City of Charlottesville Board of Architectural Review Regular Meeting July 20, 2021, 5:30 p.m. Remote meeting via Zoom Packet Guide This is not the agenda. Please click each agenda item below to link directly to the corresponding documents. 5:00 Pre-Meeting Discussion 5:30 Regular Meeting A. Matters from the public not on the agenda (please limit to 3 minutes per speaker) B. Consent Agenda (Note: Any consent agenda item may be pulled and moved to the regular agenda if a BAR member wishes to discuss it, or if any member of the public is present to comment on it. Pulled applications will be discussed at the beginning of the meeting.) 1. Certificate of Appropriateness BAR 21-07-01 854 Locust Avenue, Tax Parcel 510092000 Martha Jefferson Historic Conservation District Owner: Kaitlyn and Alan Taylor Applicant: Ashley Davies Project: Garage construction 2. Certificate of Appropriateness BAR 21-07-02 734 Locust Avenue, Tax Parcel 510073000 Martha Jefferson Historic Conservation District Owner: Kathleen D. Free Applicant: Barbara Gehrung Project: Carriage house alterations C. New Items 5:40 3. Certificate of Appropriateness BAR 21-07-03 743 Park Street, TMP 520052000 North Downtown ADC District Owner: Amita Sudhir and Aaron M. Freilich Applicant: Zach Snider, Alloy Architecture & Construction Project: Remove metal siding and repair/replace original wood siding; storm window replacements July 20, 2021 BAR Packet 1 6:20 4. Certificate of Appropriateness BAR 21-07-05 350 Park Street, TMP 530109000 and 530108000 North Downtown ADC District Owner: City of Charlottesville and County of Albemarle Applicant: Eric Amtmann, Dalgliesh-Gilpin-Paxton Architects [on behalf of Albemarle County] Project: New courthouse building (at Levy Building) D. Discussion Items 7:00 5. BAR 16-11-01 401 Cherry Avenue, TMP 290150000 Owner: Gateway Terrace Partners, LLC Representative: Doug Stafford, Griffin-Stafford Hospitality Project: Repairs to stucco 6. Dead trees on Downtown Mall E. Other Business 7. Staff questions/discussion 8. PLACE update F. Adjourn July 20, 2021 BAR Packet 2 Certificate of Appropriateness BAR 21-07-01 854 Locust Avenue, Tax Parcel 510092000 Martha Jefferson Historic Conservation District Owner: Kaitlyn and Alan Taylor Applicant: Ashley Davies Project: Garage construction Application components (please click each link to go directly to PDF page): • Staff Report • Historic Survey • Application Submittal July 20, 2021 BAR Packet 3 City of Charlottesville Board of Architectural Review Staff Report July 20, 2021 Certificate of Appropriateness Application (Historic Conservation District) BAR 21-07-01 854 Locust Avenue, Tax Parcel 510092000 Martha Jefferson Historic Conservation District Owner: Kaitlyn and Alan Taylor Applicant: Ashley Davies Project: Garage construction Background Year Built: 1903 District: Martha Jefferson HC District Status: Contributing The property contains an imposing two-story painted-brick dwelling, constructed in 1903 for John S. White, a real estate lawyer. (Historic survey in applicant’s submittal.) Prior BAR Review September 2011 - BAR approved demolition of small cinder block addition (c1960) on the guest house, cinder block garage (c1960) attached to the barn, and open frame shed (c1970’s). August 18, 2020 – BAR approved demolition of the guest house and cinder block garage. Note: This had been on the June 15,2021 agenda, but was deferred by the applicant prior to the meeting. Application • Applicant submittal: Bracey Designs drawings 854 Locust Avenue, dated June 17, 2021: Site Plan; Plans; Elevations (two sheets); and Renderings. Request CoA for construction of a two-story, detached garage. Materials • Roof: Standing-seam metal. Painted to match the house roof. 854 Locust Ave (July 11, 2021) 1 • Walls: Brick lower walls (painted t0 match house) with painted (white) shiplap siding on the upper, shed dormers. • Windows (West elevation, visible from Locust Ave): Single-lite, casement windows. • Entry Doors: Full-lite. (Not visible from Locust Ave.) • Garage Doors: Paneled. • Light Fixtures: o Wall sconces at garage doors. Fixtures not specified. o Low wall lights at south elevation: (Not visible from Locust Ave.) • Balcony and rail: Not specified. (Not visible from Locust Ave.) • Fence: Wood painted. (Not visible from Locust Ave.) Discussion and Recommendations Note: The regulations and guidelines for projects within a Historic Conservation District (HCD) are, by design, less rigid than those for an ADC District or an IPP. The HCD designations are intended to preserve the character-defining elements of the neighborhoods and to assure that new construction is not inappropriate to that character, while minimally imposing on current residents who may want to upgrade their homes. Within the existing HCDs are buildings and/or areas that might easily qualify for an ADC District or as an IPP; however, in evaluating proposals within HCDs, the BAR may apply only the HCD requirements and guidelines. Within an HCD, the design review prioritizes what is visible from the public right of way. New structures concealed by the principal structure from all abutting streets are exempt from BAR review. With that, the four sides of the proposed garage are of the same design and materials, staff will focus on the front elevation. Staff recommends approval. (See comments below under Pertinent Design Review Guidelines for New Construction and Additions.) Suggested Motions Approval: Having considered the standards set forth within the City Code, including City Design Guidelines for Historic Conservation Districts, I move to find that the proposed garage at 854 Locust Avenue satisfies the BAR’s criteria and is compatible with this property and other properties in the Martha Jefferson Neighborhood Historic Conservation District, and that the BAR approves the application [as submitted.] […as submitted with the following conditions: …] Criteria, Standards, and Guidelines Review Criteria Generally Sec. 34-341 of the City Code. Criteria for approval a) In considering a particular application the BAR shall approve the application unless it finds: 1) That the proposal does not meet specific standards set forth within this division or applicable provisions of the conservation district design guidelines; and 2) The proposal is incompatible with the historic, cultural or architectural character of the conservation district in which the property is located. b) The BAR's review of the proposed new construction or addition to a building or structure shall be limited to factors specified in section 34-342. The BAR's review of the proposed demolition, 854 Locust Ave (July 11, 2021) 2 razing or moving of any contributing structure shall be limited to the factors specified in section 34-343. c) The BAR, or city council on appeal, may require conditions of approval as are necessary or desirable to ensure that any new construction or addition would be compatible with the scale and character of the historic conservation district. Prior to attaching conditions to an approval, due consideration shall be given to the cost of compliance with the proposed conditions. Sec. 34-342 of the City Code. Standards for review of new construction and additions. The following features and factors shall be considered in determining the appropriateness of proposed new construction and additions to buildings or structures: 1) Whether the form, height, scale, mass and placement of the proposed construction are visually and architecturally compatible with the site and the applicable conservation district; 2) The harmony of the proposed changes in terms of overall proportion and the size and placement of entrances and windows; 3) The impact of the proposed change on the essential architectural form and integrity of the existing building; 4) The effect, with respect to architectural considerations, of the proposed change on the conservation district neighborhood; 5) Any applicable provisions of the city's conservation district design guidelines. Pertinent Guidelines for New Construction and Additions (Historic Conservation Districts) Building Location – setback and spacing 1. Align a new building close to the average building setback line on the same street, if established, or consistent with the surrounding area. 2. Maintain average spacing between buildings on the same street. Staff Comment: Garages generally located along the parcel line and either to the side or behind a house are common within the district, especially at the northern end of Locust Avenue; with most listed as contributing structures. The 1920 Sanborn Map indicates a garage located to the rear of this property. (See image and map in the Appendix.) Building Scale – height and massing 1. Keep the footprint, and massing of new buildings consistent with the neighborhood characteristics and compatible with the character of buildings on the same street. 2. Keep the height and width of new buildings within the prevailing average height and width. Exceptions up to 200% of the prevailing height and width may be approved by the BAR when contextually appropriate. 3. An addition needs to be perceived as an addition and therefore should not visually overpower the existing building in scale and design. 4. An accessory building should appear secondary to the main building in scale and design. 5. Larger buildings (commercial or multi-family) otherwise permitted by zoning should be designed and articulated to be compatible with the scale of the majority of adjacent buildings on the same street or block. Staff Comment: The proposed garage complies with these conditions. 854 Locust Ave (July 11, 2021) 3 Building Form – roofs and porches 1. Roof forms should reference contributing buildings on the same street or surrounding area. Other roof forms may be approved by the BAR when contextually appropriate. 2. If many of the contributing buildings on the same street have porches, then it is strongly recommended that the design of a new residence includes a porch or similar form of similar width and depth. Staff Comment: The garage roof material and form are compatible with the HCD. Building Openings – orientation, doors and windows 1. A single entrance door (or main entrance of a multifamily dwelling) facing the street is recommended. 2. Window and door patterns and the ratio of solids (wall area) to voids (window and door area) of new buildings should be compatible with contributing buildings in the surrounding area. 3. Windows should be simple shapes compatible with those on contributing buildings, which are generally vertically oriented in residential areas. Staff Comment: The garage is oriented towards the street. The arrangement and style of the doors and windows are compatible with the HCD. Building Materials and Textures 1. The selection of materials and textures for a new building should relate architecturally to the district, and should be compatible with and complementary to neighboring buildings. 2. Long-lasting, durable and natural materials are preferred, including brick, wood, stucco, and cementitious siding and standing seam metal roofs. Clear glass windows (VLT of 70% or more) are preferred. Staff Comment: The proposed materials are compatible with the HCD. Per the HCD regs, the replacement of windows and doors does not require a CoA. For additions and the construction of small, auxiliary buildings, it is staff’s interpretation that window and door specifications are not required for CoA approval. Relative to the provision for 70% VLT glass, in prior discussion the BAR established that this not be necessary or appropriate for residential projects. (The glass for most residential doors and windows typically has a VLT in the low 60s.) The proposed garage doors are compatible with the HCD, which features an eclectic range of styles and designs. Building Paint 1. Painting unpainted brick or other masonry is discouraged because it is irreversible and may cause moisture problems. Staff Comment: Painted brick, siding and trim is compatible with the HCD. Concerns related to the painting of unpainted masonry are primarily due to its irreversibility and potential to damage historic masonry, particularly of brick and mortar construction prior to early part of the 20 th century. This garage is new construction and the proposed painting is intended to compliment the painted brick of the existing house. 854 Locust Ave (July 11, 2021) 4 Site 1. Fences or walls that abut a City street (or fences located in a side yard between a street and the front of the principal structure on a lot) should not exceed three and one-half feet in height. Staff Comment: Not applicable. Proposed fence is behind the primary structure and not visible from Locust Ave. A CoA—and only an administrative CoA--is required only for fences located in the front and/or side yards and between the street and the front of the principle structure. (Ref. 34-346(1) and 34-340(a)(2)) Martha Jefferson Historic Conservation District Architectural character-defining features: 1. Encourage one-story front porches; 2. Encourage garages to be located in the rear yards; 3. The levels of a building’s stories should be consistent with those on surrounding structures with respect to the natural grade [for example, a first floor should not be raised so that it is higher than most surrounding first floors]; 4. Do not exclude well-designed, new contemporary architecture [there may be a misconception that only historic-looking new buildings are permitted]; 5. Encourage standing seam metal roofs; 6. Maintain and encourage tree canopy [Maintain the existing tree canopy and encourage new large shade trees]; 7. The following Historic Conservation Overlay District Design Guidelines are especially pertinent: a. Maintain neighborhood massing and form; b. Encourage the use of sustainable materials; c. Limit the height of fences in front yards to 3 ½ feet in height. 8. Regarding the future development of the hospital properties, the neighborhood’s focus has been: a. not to tear down the old houses; to encourage low density residential development north of Taylor Walk (with the suggestion that Taylor Street be reinstated); b. to expect the High Street area to develop as a sensitively designed, high-quality, mixed use development; 9. Encourage good stewardship of Maplewood Cemetery. Staff Comment: Proposed garage is located in the rear yard and features a standing-seam metal roof. 854 Locust Ave (July 11, 2021) 5 Appendix 854 Locust Ave (July 11, 2021) 6 --------------------- Garage- new construction BAR Packets PER ZONING SECT 34-1105 10' - 0" SIDE SETBACK 5' - 0" CLEAR PROPERTY LINE SETBACK LINE DRIVEWAY LOC NEW GARAGE U EXISTING HOUSE (ACCESSORY STRUCTURE) S (MAIN STRUCTURE) T NEW PRIVACY FENCE AV E PER ZONING SECT 34-1105 10' - 0" SIDE SETBACK 25' - 0" REAR SETBACK 5' - 0" CLEAR 25' - 0" F RONT SE TBACK 854 LOCUST AVE - Site Plan Scale: 1" = 30'-0" 6/17/2021 4:32:36 PM 12' - 0" 5' - 9 1/4" 4' - 0" 2 2 004 004 UP STAIR LANDING 4' - 1 1/4" 4' - 1 1/4" 7' - 4 1/2" BALCONY ABOVE 20' - 9" 1' - 7 1/2" 3' - 10 3/4" GARAGE 101 556 SF 1 1 1 1 BALCONY 004 STUDIO 004 15' - 2" 15' - 2" 8' - 0" 003 003 201 426 SF BATHROOM 10' - 1" 202 2' - 3 1/2" CL 59 SF 6' - 4" EQ 2' - 9" 2 2 003 003 2' - 5 1/2" 9' - 0" 2' - 0" 9' - 0" 1 Garage - Level 01 2 Garage - Level 02 3/16" = 1'-0" 3/16" = 1'-0" 854 LOCUST AVE - Plans Scale: 3/16" = 1'-0" 6/17/2021 4:32:37 PM 2' - 6" TYP STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF, COLOR AND TYPE TO MATCH EXISTING HOUSE Garage - Level 2 TP WHITE SHIPLAP SIDING 14' - 3 3/4" WHITE SHIPLAP SIDING 4' - 6" TYP 22' - 10 1/4" Garage - Level 2 FF 5' - 5 1/2" WALL SCONCE MASONRY, COLOR TO 8' - 0" MATCH EXISTING HOUSE MASONRY, COLOR TO MATCH EXISTING HOUSE Garage - Level 1 FF -5' - 4" 1 Elev - Garage - Left 2 Elev - Garage - Front 3/16" = 1'-0" 3/16" = 1'-0" 854 LOCUST AVE - Elevations Scale: 3/16" = 1'-0" 6/17/2021 4:32:39 PM STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF, COLOR AND TYPE TO MATCH EXISTING HOUSE Garage - Level 2 TP WHITE SHIPLAP SIDING 14' - 3 3/4" WHITE SHIPLAP SIDING 22' - 10 1/4" Garage - Level 2 FF 5' - 5 1/2" BLACK STEEL & IPE TREAD STAIR (NOT VISIBLE FROM STREET) MASONRY, COLOR TO MASONRY, COLOR TO MATCH EXISTING HOUSE MATCH EXISTING HOUSE Garage - Level 1 FF -5' - 4" 1 Elev - Garage - Right 2 Elev - Garage - Rear 3/16" = 1'-0" 3/16" = 1'-0" 854 LOCUST AVE - Elevations Scale: 3/16" = 1'-0" 6/17/2021 4:32:41 PM EXISTING HOUSE 854 LOCUST AVE - Renderings Scale: 12" = 1'-0" 6/17/2021 4:32:41 PM Certificate of Appropriateness BAR 21-07-02 734 Locust Avenue, Tax Parcel 510073000 Martha Jefferson Historic Conservation District Owner: Kathleen D. Free Applicant: Barbara Gehrung Project: Carriage house alterations Application components (please click each link to go directly to PDF page): • Staff Report • Historic Survey • Application Submittal July 20, 2021 BAR Packet 4 City of Charlottesville Board of Architectural Review Staff Report July 20, 2021 Certificate of Appropriateness Application Historic Conservation District BAR 21-07-02 734 Locust Avenue, Tax Parcel 510073000 Martha Jefferson Historic Conservation District Owner: Kathleen D. Free Applicant: Barbara Gehrung Project: Carriage house alterations Background House: Stable/Garage: Year Built: c1901 Year Built: c1901 District: Martha Jefferson HC District District: Martha Jefferson HC District Status: Contributing Status: Contributing The Eddins-Tilden House represents a Victorian Gothic-cottage style popular in the late 19th century. The brick stable/garage is similar in materiality and scale, but reflects a vernacular, use- oriented design. S.A. Eddins acquired the parcel in 1901, with no structures reported. In 1902, the sale of the property to B.R. Lester referred to the buildings on the site. Tax records also suggest the house and stable/garage were constructed at the time. (Curiously, Eddins owned the house only briefly and the City’s historic survey does not explain the Tilden name associated with it.) Prior BAR Review December 2019 - Exterior modifications and rehabilitation. Administratively approved. (See appendix.) Application • Applicant Submitted: Gehrung + Graham, LLC et al drawings 734 Locust Ave Carriage House Renovation: o Dated July 7, 2021: Sheets A0.1, A0.2, A1.0, A2.2, A2.3, and A2.4, o Dated July 16, 2021: Sheet A4.0. 734 Locust Ave (July 11, 2021) 1 Request for CoA to complete alterations to the former stable/garage. North Elevation: • Remove contemporary garage door; install entry door with side-lites. • Remove plywood at upper opening; install wood casement windows. • Repair masonry as needed. West Elevation • Remove contemporary windows, doors, and plywood; install wood casement windows, entry door, and twin French doors. • Repair masonry as needed. South Elevation • Remove lower, double-hung window; install entry door. • Repair or remove and replace (with new) the upper double-hung window. • Repair masonry as needed. East Elevation • Repair existing windows. • Repair masonry as needed. Discussion Note: The regulations and guidelines for projects within a Historic Conservation District (HCD) are, by design, less rigid than those for an ADC District or an IPP. The HCD designations are intended to preserve the character-defining elements of the neighborhoods and to assure that new construction is not inappropriate to that character, while minimally imposing on current residents who may want to upgrade their homes. Within the existing HCDs are buildings and/or areas that might easily qualify for an ADC District or as an IPP; however, in evaluating proposals within HCDs, the BAR may apply only the HCD requirements and guidelines. Within an HCD, the design review prioritizes what is visible from the public right of way. New structures concealed by the principal structure from all abutting streets are exempt from BAR review. With that, the four sides of the proposed garage are of the same design and materials, staff will focus on the front elevation. This is an existing structure that the physical evidence suggests was constructed at one time. While the openings have been altered over time, the form, footprint, and materials (brick, metal roof) appear to be unchanged. If the c1901 date is correct, this was most likely built as a stable. (Even a decade later, automobile ownership remained extremely, locally and Virginia. 1) Per the 1920 Sanborn Maps—see the Appendix—it can be assumed that between its construction and 1920, the stable was modified to accommodate an automobile garage at the north end. While there are visible alterations to the west elevation (also evident from the 1970s photos), we do not know when or in what sequence these occurred. 1 “By 1910, Virginians owned 2,705 motor vehicles.” https://www.virginiadot.org/about/resources/historyofrds.pdf and “J.P. ‘Dry Goods’ Ellington purchased the first automobile in Albemarle County in 1906, triggering the automobile craze. With his purchase, Ellington became the proud owner of number 494 of the first 500 automobiles in Virginia.” https://www.charlottesville.gov/673/History 734 Locust Ave (July 11, 2021) 2 This proposal retains and extends the life of a historic structure. The proposed alterations do not significantly alter the building’s character or materiality; in fact, they will rehabilitate and extend the life of this historic structure. Staff recommends approval. Suggested Motion Approval: Having considered the standards set forth within the City Code, including the HC District Design Guidelines, I move to find that the alterations to and rehabilitation of the stable/garage at 734 Locust Avenue satisfy the BAR’s criteria and are compatible with this property and other properties in the Martha Jefferson Historic Conservation District, and that the BAR approves the application as submitted. Criteria, Standards, and Guidelines Review Criteria Generally Sec. 34-341 of the City Code. Criteria for approval a) In considering a particular application the BAR shall approve the application unless it finds: 1) That the proposal does not meet specific standards set forth within this division or applicable provisions of the conservation district design guidelines; and 2) The proposal is incompatible with the historic, cultural or architectural character of the conservation district in which the property is located. b) The BAR's review of the proposed new construction or addition to a building or structure shall be limited to factors specified in section 34-342. The BAR's review of the proposed demolition, razing or moving of any contributing structure shall be limited to the factors specified in section 34-343. c) The BAR, or city council on appeal, may require conditions of approval as are necessary or desirable to ensure that any new construction or addition would be compatible with the scale and character of the historic conservation district. Prior to attaching conditions to an approval, due consideration shall be given to the cost of compliance with the proposed conditions. Sec. 34-342 of the City Code. Standards for review of new construction and additions. The following features and factors shall be considered in determining the appropriateness of proposed new construction and additions to buildings or structures: 1) Whether the form, height, scale, mass and placement of the proposed construction are visually and architecturally compatible with the site and the applicable conservation district; 2) The harmony of the proposed changes in terms of overall proportion and the size and placement of entrances and windows; 3) The impact of the proposed change on the essential architectural form and integrity of the existing building; 4) The effect, with respect to architectural considerations, of the proposed change on the conservation district neighborhood; 5) Any applicable provisions of the city's conservation district design guidelines. Pertinent Guidelines for the Martha Jefferson Historic Conservation District Architectural character-defining features: 1. Encourage one-story front porches; 2. Encourage garages to be located in the rear yards; 734 Locust Ave (July 11, 2021) 3 3. The levels of a building’s stories should be consistent with those on surrounding structures with respect to the natural grade [for example, a first floor should not be raised so that it is higher than most surrounding first floors]; 4. Do not exclude well-designed, new contemporary architecture [there may be a misconception that only historic-looking new buildings are permitted]; 5. Encourage standing seam metal roofs; 6. Maintain and encourage tree canopy [Maintain the existing tree canopy and encourage new large shade trees]; 7. The following Historic Conservation Overlay District Design Guidelines are especially pertinent: a. maintain neighborhood massing and form; b. encourage the use of sustainable materials; and c. limit the height of fences in front yards to 3 ½ feet in height. 8. Regarding the future development of the hospital properties, the neighborhood’s focus has been: a. Not to tear down the old houses; to encourage low density residential development north of Taylor Walk (with the suggestion that Taylor Street be reinstated); and b. to expect the High Street area to develop as a sensitively designed, high-quality, mixed use development; 9. Encourage good stewardship of Maplewood Cemetery. 734 Locust Ave (July 11, 2021) 4 Appendix December 2019, Admin Approval: Exterior repairs, including repointing crumbling brick, repainting trim, selective repair/replacement of decaying porch flooring, replacing windows in existing openings, and possibly uncovering covered-up rafter tails. All other work will be interior. After review of the project scope and drawings, staff grants administrative approval for the proposed project, with the following recommendations: 1. Staff recommends adherence to the pertinent Design Guidelines for Rehabilitation regarding masonry: a. When repointing masonry, duplicate mortar strength, composition, color, and texture. b. Repoint to match original joints and retain the original joint width. 2. Staff recommends new windows have similar light configurations and muntins of similar dimensions to the existing windows. 1920 Sanborn Map and Current Aerial Photo 734 Locust Ave (July 11, 2021) 5 Board of Architectural Review (BAR) Conservation District - CerUficate of Appropriateness Please Return To: City of Charlottesville Department of Neighborhood Development Services P.O. Box 911, City Hall Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 Telephone (434) 970-3130 Please submit ten (10) hard copies and one (1) digital copy of application form and all attachments. Please include application fee as follows: New construction project $375; Demolition of a contributing structure $375; Appeal of BAR decision regarding new construction or demolition $125. Make checks payable to the City of Charlottesville. No fee required for: Additions and other projects requiring BAR approval and not listed above; Administrative approvals; Appeals of BAR decisions if the original application was not subject to an application tee. The BAR meets the third Tuesday of the month. Deadline for submittals is Tuesday _3weeks prior to next BAR meeting by 3:30 p.m. ProjectName/Description(A&RIAGeHouSE, /:2£No:,JA:t10N Parcel Number fl 007 3 000 Project Address/Location 1 ,3Y: LOC.iJ S:T A-U~V 6 1 C H/((2.LQ1[t $ lJ{ I J ;t::.,,VA Z..2 CfO 2- Owner Name 1<.kfH(..a,..tJ Pk-,f.---e, Applicant Name ($8(~U N b L?JA:P-.,bA::M Applicant Information g A-R Signature of A ·· nt I · · n I have provided is, to the Address: 2. fP ,:; 'if' tJ A, i.- /,..A 1'-1e,. ~ ca rt1·:,5I.?11 I -t t:.,'-H . VA -:Z.::2-'1 o I Email:13A-t2.l3M,A:@(~&-lt. EA· 1,{S Phone: (W) 't!lf t.{e Z..'.b} "1'.Z..(H)_____ _ Property Owner Information (if not applicant) I(:.A T1-t1..-e:. e:.N F fl..=f:-E­ PropertyOwner Permission{if notapplicant} Address: 11 L.f tao 0,.1 sr d:UJ::-1',ruE.., I have read this appflcation and hereby give my consent to Ct1 ft~~ V l ~e.., f;" 2- 7- q o Z.. its submission. Signature Date Print Name List All Attachments (see reverse side for submittal requirements): 0 1 ~~DI l"N'P:5'!:E&:sc,IURUUIEHCE MG ""'""~°"''"''" 7/16/2021 _,_ REV1: addrtJonal pag,u. SH lndltx 7/16/2021 BARREVIEW SET on covw page A/J.1,UOdetednumbeffn9, upd.'ltod 1ext VIEW FROM HAZEL ST PHOTOGRAPH FROM THE 1950s REAR POST RENOVATION, VIEW FROM HAZEL STREET REAR POST RENOVATION, VIEW FROM CARRIAGE HOUSE (SOURCE HISTORICSURVEY) (SOURCE:G+G) (SOURCE:G+G) 734 LOCUST AVE, CHARLOTTESVILLE CARRIAGE HOUSE RENOVATION BAR REVIEW SET SITE CONTEXT VIEW FROM LOCUST AVE TO CARRIAGE HOUSE VIEW FROM ALLEY TO HOUSE & CARRIAGE HOUSE VIEW FROM MAIN HOUSE EAST PORCH TO CARRIAGE HOUSE A 0.3 (SOURCEG+G) (SOURCEG+G) (SOURCEG+G) BONCRAFT BUILDERS LLC EXISTING STRUCTURE 705 GRAVES STREET CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA 22902 EXTERIOR WALLS 1ST FLOOR: 2-WIDE CLAY BRICK WYTHE , 434-987-2549 ATTIC: WOOD FRAME OVER 2' BRICK KNEE WALLS STEEL TIE AT SOUTH GABLE T1-11 PLYWOOD PANEL SIDING (NOT ORGINAL) AND GEHRUNG + GRAHAM llC j_______.tIT onergy positive architecture EMBOSSED METAL PANELING :«,S"FOlli.--,Cl'i:iirkld~I/A~lj-~~.ton FOUNDATION: NOT DOCUMENTED ii ROOF: TRUE 2X4, 24" O.C.+/-, RAFTERS I ORIGINAL STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF, PAINTED, PITCH 45DEG, EXPOSED RAFTER TAILS CURRY & ASSOCIATES 120 RIVERBLUFF CIRCLE DOORS: MIXED, NOT ORGINAL CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA 22902 WINDOWS: RANDOM SIZES, MIXTURE OF ORGINIAL I 434-361-0180 AND VINYL REPLACEMENT WINDOWS info@curryandassociates.com SLABS: CONCRETE ON GRADE AND CONCRETE ON HAZEL ST (NORTH) ELEVATION BACKYARD (WES1) ELEVATION CLAY BRICK DR. KATHLEEN FREE 734 LOCUST AVE, CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA 22902 CONDITION OF BUILDING EXTERIOR: DRAIW9Y flEYIEWEO'll't PN'ER6'ZEA$CAl.£11UOIEHCE bg CCK 10 be p,iri.ed on 1h.17 - BRICK STRUCTURE IN NEED OF REPAIR AND _.., 7f7/21Yl17/2021 1917 REPOINTING, DISLODGED BRICKS AT OPENINGS AND CORNERS,, STRUCTURAL REPAIRS NEEDED REV1: additlonel pages. SH lndttll 7/1612021 BARREVIEWSET on cowr page NJ.1, UPdated numbemst,. - BROKEN OR INSUFFICIENT LINTELS OR JAMBS Ul)datitdt.xt. - AUTOMATIC GARAGE DOOR TO HAZEL STREET HAS NO PROPER LINTEL OR HEADER - EMBOSSED METAL FACADE PANELS AT GABLES IS HEAVILY CORRODED AND FALLING APART - STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF IS IN GOOD CONDITION, WAS RECENTLY PAINTED BY NEW OWNER - ROOF IS PARTIALLY BUCKLING BECAUSE OF INSUFFICIENT STRUCTURAL SUPPORT. NEEDS TO BE LOCALLY REINFORCED. ALLEY (EAST) ELEVATION SIDE YARD (SOUTH) ELEVATION 734 LOCUST AVE, CHARLOTTESVILLE CARRIAGE HOUSE RENOVATION BAR REVIEW SET EXISTING EXTERIOR CONDITIONS HAZEL ST (NORTH) FACADE A 1.0 BACKYARD & HAZEL ST FACADE SIDE YARD AND ALLEY FACADE BONCRAFT BUILDERS LLC 705 GRAVES STREET CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA 22902 434-987-2549 GEHRUNG + GRAHAM LLC energy positive architecture 2(6.SFOll!i..r..~.VA129:JIJWWN.~ '-r----r-- - - -=----- • -""T'" - ~ ffl _fflJilff 1 1 II If CURRY & ASSOCIATES 120 RIVERBLUFF CIRCLE CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA 22902 434-361-0180 info@curryandassociates.com ~ DR. KA TH LEEN FREE 734 LOCUST AVE, CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA 22902 BACKYARD (WESl) ELEVATION, EXISTING BACKYARD (WESl) ELEVATION, REMODEL 717/2021 _.. OAA,,.,,_8Y bg 1917 REIIIEWEOS>I l"N'P:5'!:f&:sc,IURUUIEHCE CCK 10 be pnnted on , h.17 REV1: addrtJonal pag,u. SH lndltx 7/16/2021 BARREVIEWSET on covw page A/J.1,UOdetedl'\Ufflbeffflg. upo&,tedtext. WORK TO BE PERFORMED 1) STRUCTURE OVER WOOD FRAMED EXTERIOR WALL NEEDS TO BE REINFORCED: - STEEL HEADER AND INTERIOR POSTS TO BE INSERTED - BRICK KNEE WALL TO BE PARTIALLY DEMOLISHED AND SUBSEQUENTLY REBUILT - T1 -11 SIDING, DOORS AND VINYL WINDOW TO BE REPLACED WITH ANTIQUE, RESTORED CASEMENT WINDOWS & DOORS 2) EXISTING HISTORIC WINDOW OPENINGS TO BE REPAIRED - INSERT NEW LINTELS/HEADERS, AS NEEDED 734 LOCUST AVE, - RETAIN BRICK OPENING WIDTH CHARLOTTESVILLE - LOWER SILL HEIGHT CARRIAGE HOUSE - REPLACE VINYL WINDOWS WITH RESTORED ANTIQUE CASEMENT WINDOWS - REPAIR FALLEN-IN BRICK OPENINGS WITH SOLDIER COURSE, MATCHING TO EXISTING RENOVATION 3) REPLACE NON-HISTORIC WINDOW WITH ANTIQUE, RESTORED CASEMENT, IDENTICAL BAR REVIEW SET TO WINDOWS OUTLINED IN 2), OPENING SIZE TO BE REDUCED, FILLED IN WITH MATCHING ANTIQUE BRICKS 4) REPLACE EXISTING NON-HISTORIC DOOR WITH GLASS PANEL DOOR FOUND ON SITE. BEFORE-AFTER - OPENING WIDTH TO BE REDUCED. FILLED IN WITH MATCHING ANTIQUE BRICK YARD (WEST) ELEVATION NEW WINDOWS TO BE PELLA ARCHITECT SERIES OR SIMILAR, WOOD OR WOOD-CLAD WITH TRUE OR SIMULATED DIVIDED LIGHTS WITH SPACERS .. CASEMENTS 1) DOOR 4) CASEMENTS 2) AND DOORS 1) A2.2 BONCRAFT BUILDERS LLC 705 GRAVES STREET CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA 22902 434-987-2549 GEHRUNG + GRAHAM LLC energy positi1Je architecture 20!6 FOlllano, Olarloct~. VA22901 I www.g(lfln.l'WanllTl.()Om CURRY & ASSOCIATES 120 RIVERBLUFF CIRCLE CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA 22902 434-361-0180 info@curryandassociates.com DR. KATHLEEN FREE 734 LOCUST AVE, CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA 22902 --. PM0,11:CJIMNA(;(lt 7/7/2021 _.. OR/1,,-&Y bg 1917 REVlfWEOftt CCK PN"EII SRE&SCAI.E RffUlfNCE ...... 10 be p,lnled on lh.17 ?::?~.:..,lo.---,,,. 7/1612021 _,_ REV1: addltlonal pages. ... lftdltll 7 /1612021 BARREVIEWSET on cover page NJ.1, updated~ updated text. 734 LOCUST AVE, CHARLOTTESVILLE CARRIAGE HOUSE RENOVATION BAR REVIEW SET YARD (WEST) ELEVATION PROPOSED SCALE: 1/4" = 1 '-0" YARD ELEVATION REMODEL A 2.3 ov.l!UtCQtmU.ClOlt BONCRAFT BUILDERS LLC 705 GRAVES STREET CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA 22902 434-987-2549 GEHR UNG+ GRAHAM LLC energy positive architecture 20':a$Follt..no, CNnclao,,tit, VA220011-~ CURRY & ASSOCIATES 120 RIVERBLUFF CIRCLE CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA 22902 434-361-0180 info@curryandassociates.com DR. KATHLEEN FREE 734 LOCUST AVE, CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA 22902 DM.wtfBY JIEVIEW£09Y ,,_ MU.&SCAU PDUIENCE bg ~ 10Dep,ln1edon1b17 HAZEL ST (NORTH)) ELEVATION, REMODEL .._,. HAZEL STREET (NORTH) ELEVATION, EXISTING 7{7/2021 1917 ~,o. 7/16/2021 ~:;ic- REV1: edditlonal pages._. hdex 7/16/2021 BARREVIEWSET on cove,-page N>.1, uodated nwnberlng. ~tedtext. WORK TO BE PERFORMED 1) REMODEL DOOR OPEN ING TO HAZEL STREET - HEADER NOT STRUCTURALLY SOUND, NEW STRUCTURAL LINTEL TO BE INSERTED - BRICK WALL ABOVE NEEDS TO BE PARTIALLY DEMOLISHED AND REBUILT WITH 734 LOCUST AVE, RECLAIMED AND MATCHING ANTIQUE BRICKS CHARLOTTESVILLE - VINYL ROLLING GARAGE DOOR TO BE REPLACED WITH FRONT DOOR AND SIDELIGHTS CARRIAGE HOUSE - BRICK OPENING WIDTH TO BE REDUCED FROM 1O' TO 4' (HISTORIC PHOTOGRAPHS RENOVATION SHOWS 2 DOORS WITH CENTER POST} - OPENING HEIGHT TO BE RETAINED BAR REVIEW SET 2) REPLACE HATCH DOOR WITH CASEMENT WINDOWS - OPENING WIDTH TO BE RETAINED, OPENING HEIGHT TO BE ENLARGED TO PROVIDE INCREASED DAYLIGHT IN ATTIC BEFORE AFTER HAZEL ST ELEVATION 3) CORRODED AND BROKEN STAMPED METAL SIDING TO BE REPLACED WITH BOARD AND BATTEN (WOOD OR FIBER-CEMENT) SIDING PHOTOGRAPH JELD-WEN WOOD-CLADD FRONT DOOR A2.4 BONCRAFT BUILDERS LLC 705 GRAVES STREET CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA 22902 434-987-2549 GEHRUNG + GRAHAM LLC energy positi1Je architecture 20!6 FOlllano, Olarloct~. VA22901 I www.g(lfln.l'WanllTl.()Om CURRY & ASSOCIATES 120 RIVERBLUFF CIRCLE CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA 22902 434-361-0180 info@curryandassociates.com DR. KATHLEEN FREE 734 LOCUST AVE, CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA 22902 _....._____.___-+----=J_ _.. OR/1,,-&Y REVlfWEOftt PN"EII SRE&SCAI.E RffUlfNCE 7/7/2021 bg 1917 CCK ...... 10 be p,lnled on lh.17 ?::?~.:..,lo.---,,,. SIDE YARD (SOUTH) ELEVATION, EXISTING SIDE YARD (SOUTH) ELEVATION, REMODEL REV1: addltlonal pages. ... lftdltll 7 /1612021 BARREVIEWSET on cover page NJ.1, updated~ updated text. 1) REPLACE WINDOW ON GROUND FLOOR WITH DOOR (GLAZED PANEL DOOR OR SIMILAR) - HEADER, LINTEL AND BRICK OPENING TO BE REPAIRED - OPENING WIDTH TO BE RETAINED 2) RESTORE EXISTING 2ND FLOOR DOUBLE HUNG WINDOW, AS POSSIBE, ALTERNATIVELY, REPLACE WITH WOOD OR WOOD-CLAD WINDOW IN KIND 734 LOCUST AVE, CHARLOTTESVILLE 3) BROKEN STAMPED METAL SIDING TO BE REPLACED WITH BOARD AND BATTEN WOOD OR FIBER-CEMENT SIDING CARRIAGE HOUSE RENOVATION BAR REVIEW SET BEFORE AFTER SIDE YARD ELEVATION A 2.5 BONCRAFT BUILDERS LLC 705 GRAVES STREET CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA 22902 434-987-2549 GEHRUNG + GRAHAM LLC energy positi1Je architecture 20!6 FOlllano, Olarloct~. VA22901 I www.g(lfln.l'WanllTl.()Om CURRY & ASSOCIATES 120 RIVERBLUFF CIRCLE CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA 22902 434-361-0180 info@curryandassociates.com DR. KATHLEEN FREE 734 LOCUST AVE, CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA 22902 7/7/20'Z17/2021 1917 _.. OR/1,,-&Y bg REVlfWEOftt CCK PN"EII SRE&SCAI.E RffUlfNCE ...... 10 be p,lnled on lh.17 ?::?~.:..,lo.---,,,. 7/1612021 _,_ REV1: addltlonal pages. ... lftdltll 7/16/2021 BARREVIEWSET on cover page NJ.1, updated~ updated text. 734 LOCUST AVE, CHARLOTTESVILLE CARRIAGE HOUSE RENOVATION BAR REVIEW SET HAZEL STREET (NORTH) ELEVATION PROPOSED SIDE YARD (SOUTH) ELEVATION PROPOSED SCALE: 1/4" = 1 '-0" SCALE: 1/4" = 1 '-0" GABLE ELEVATIONS REMODEL A 2.6 BONCRAFT BUILDERS LLC 705 GRAVES STREET CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA 22902 434-987-2549 GEHRUNG + GRAHAM LLC energy positi1Je architecture 20!6 FOlllano, Olarloct~. VA22901 I www.g(lfln.l'WanllTl.()Om f r ·, .I CURRY & ASSOCIATES I 120 RIVERBLUFF CIRCLE CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA 22902 l 434-361-0180 info@curryandassociates.com DR. KATHLEEN FREE 734 LOCUST AVE, CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA 22902 7/7/2021 _.. OR/1,,-&Y bg 1917 REVlfWEOftt CCK PN"EII SRE&SCAI.E RffUlfNCE ...... 10 be p,lnled on lh.17 ?::?~.:..,lo.---,,,. 7/1612021 _,_ REV1: addltlonal pages. ... lftdltll 7 /1612021 BARREVIEWSET on cover page NJ.1, updated~ updated text. JFFRi Jr-~ Im I • 734 LOCUST AVE, CHARLOTTESVILLE CARRIAGE HOUSE RENOVATION BAR REVIEW SET ALLEY {EAS1) ELEVATION AS-BUILT & PROPOSED SCALE: 1/4" = 1 '-0" ALLEY ELEVATION REMODEL ELEVATION TO REMAIN AS-IS. EXISTING WINDOWS TO BE RESTORED. A 2.7 Certificate of Appropriateness BAR 21-07-03 743 Park Street, TMP 520052000 North Downtown ADC District Owner: Amita Sudhir and Aaron M. Freilich Applicant: Zach Snider, Alloy Architecture & Construction Project: Remove metal siding and repair/replace original wood siding; storm window replacements Application components (please click each link to go directly to PDF page): • Staff Report • Historic Survey • Application Submittal July 20, 2021 BAR Packet 5 City of Charlottesville Board of Architectural Review Staff Report July 20, 2021 Certificate of Appropriateness Application BAR 21-07-03 743 Park Street, TMP 520052000 North Downtown ADC District Owner: Amita Sudhir and Aaron M. Freilich Applicant: Zach Snider, Alloy Architecture & Construction Project: Remove metal siding and repair/replace original wood siding; replace storm windows Background Year Built: c1892 District: North Downtown ADC District Status: Contributing R.H. Wood House, constructed in the Victorian vernacular style. The City’s 1970s survey describes this house as an outstanding example of the Shingle Style popular in the 1880s and 1890s and one of the most distinctive structures on Park Street. (It also refers to the exterior clapboard siding that is now concealed by aluminum siding.) Prior BAR Review (see the Appendix) Application • Applicant submittal: Alloy Workshop narrative and photos, dated June 24, 2021 (five pages). Request CoA to remove the existing aluminum siding and trim to expose original wood below. Then, as needed, repair existing or replace with cement board material. (This work excludes the 2014 addition.) Additionally, the storm windows on the original house are to be removed and replaced. Discussion and Recommendations Staff recommends approval of the requested CoA, but only after a discussion of the anticipated unknowns and establishing reasonable parameters for addressing them. 743 Park Street (July 13, 2021) 1 The goal of this project is to expose and rehabilitate the original trim and siding on this house. Should the condition of those materials limit or even preclude that goal, the intent is to replicate the existing (install new) to an extent that is reasonably possible. However, the condition and even the dimensional details of the historic siding and trim and to what extent those components even remain cannot be known until the aluminum siding and misc. flashing are removed. Staff recommends the BAR allow the applicant to move forward with removing the metal and allowing an evaluation of the underlying materials, and with that to apply reasonable conditions that allow the rehabilitation and/or replacement of those materials. For example, that the salvageable wood siding be retained and used to the extent possible. In the event that only a portion of the siding can be salvaged— and in lieu of having walls with a mix of new cement board and salvaged wood siding--the BAR recommends the salvaged material be re-used on complete walls, prioritizing the front elevation. Once the aluminum is removed and the underlying conditions assessed, the applicant will consult with staff about the extent of old and new material to be used and where, with the understanding that staff may request guidance from the BAR. For any new siding, the applicant proposes a cement board product, which the BAR has approved for other applications, with the condition that the smooth side will be exposed, no faux grain. Should the existing trim not be salvageable, particularly any profiled components, the applicant will consult with staff regarding the new material to be used and to assure that the new matches or is appropriately similar to the existing, relative to dimension and profile. Again, with the understanding that staff may request guidance from the BAR. More specifically, the BAR should discuss whether any replacement materials should replicate the existing (custom material, if necessary) or if it is acceptable to use available materials that have similar dimensions and profiles. For any replacement trim, the applicant proposes a product from Boral (www.boralamerica.com), which produces several lines of synthetic materials. (Staff requested that the applicant provide information regarding a specific product.) The proposed storm windows are not specified, but they will be powder coated (white) aluminum, which is consistent with the guidelines. In approving the CoA, relative to the storm windows the BAR may apply the following conditions (from the design guidelines): o Storm windows should match the size and shape of the existing windows and the original sash configuration. Special shapes, such as arched top storms, are available. o Storm windows should not damage or obscure the windows and frames. Suggested Motion Approval: Having considered the standards set forth within the City Code, including City Design Guidelines for ADC Districts, I move to find that the proposed exterior alterations at 743 Park Street satisfy the BAR’s criteria and are compatible with this property and other properties in the Downtown ADC District, and that the BAR approves the application [as submitted.] or [as summited, with the following modifications and/or conditions:…] Denial: Having considered the standards set forth within the City Code, including City Design Guidelines for ADC Districts, I move to find that the proposed exterior alterations at 743 Park Street do not satisfy the BAR’s criteria and are not compatible with this property and other properties in the Downtown ADC District, and for the following reasons the BAR denies the application … 743 Park Street (July 13, 2021) 2 Criteria, Standards and Guidelines Review Criteria Generally Sec. 34-284(b) of the City Code states that, in considering a particular application the BAR shall approve the application unless it finds: (1) That the proposal does not meet specific standards set forth within this division or applicable provisions of the Design Guidelines established by the board pursuant to Sec.34-288(6); and (2) The proposal is incompatible with the historic, cultural or architectural character of the district in which the property is located or the protected property that is the subject of the application. Pertinent Standards for Review of Construction and Alterations include: (1) Whether the material, texture, color, height, scale, mass and placement of the proposed addition, modification or construction are visually and architecturally compatible with the site and the applicable design control district; (2) The harmony of the proposed change in terms of overall proportion and the size and placement of entrances, windows, awnings, exterior stairs and signs; (3) The Secretary of the Interior Standards for Rehabilitation set forth within the Code of Federal Regulations (36 C.F.R. §67.7(b)), as may be relevant; (4) The effect of the proposed change on the historic district neighborhood; (5) The impact of the proposed change on other protected features on the property, such as gardens, landscaping, fences, walls and walks; (6) Whether the proposed method of construction, renovation or restoration could have an adverse impact on the structure or site, or adjacent buildings or structures; (7) Any applicable provisions of the City’s Design Guidelines. Pertinent Guidelines for Rehabilitation include: http://weblink.charlottesville.org/public/0/edoc/793066/5_Chapter%20IV%20Rehabilitation_BAR.pdf C. Windows 16) Storm windows should match the size and shape of the existing windows and the original sash configuration. Special shapes, such as arched top storms, are available. 17) Storm windows should not damage or obscure the windows and frames. 18) Avoid aluminum-colored storm sash. It can be painted an appropriate color if it is first primed with a zinc chromate primer. E. Cornice 1) Keep the cornice well sealed and anchored, and maintain the gutter system and flashing. 2) Repair rather than replace the cornice. 3) Do not remove elements of the original composition, such as brackets or blocks, without replacing them with new ones of a like design. 4) Match materials, decorative details, and profiles of the existing original cornice design when making repairs. 5) Do not replace an original cornice with a new one that conveys a different period, style, or theme from that of the building. 6) If the cornice is missing, the replacement should be based on physical or documented evidence, or barring that, be compatible with the original building. 7) Do not wrap or cover a cornice with vinyl or aluminum; these substitute materials may cover up original details and also may hide underlying moisture problems. 743 Park Street (July 13, 2021) 3 I. Wood 1. Repair rotted or missing sections rather than replace the entire element. a. Use epoxies to patch, piece, or consolidate parts. b. Match existing materials and details. 2. Replace wood elements only when they are rotted beyond repair. a. Match the original in material and design by substituting materials that convey the same visual appearance or by using surviving material. b. Base the design of reconstructed elements on pictorial or physical evidence from the actual building rather than from similar buildings in the area. c. Complement the existing details, size, scale, and material. 3. Do not substitute vinyl for wood railing and trim. Some composites, including fiberglass reinforced composite, may be found acceptable as a substitute material for a specific application, but must be painted. J. Synthetic Siding 1. Avoid applying synthetic siding. 2. Remove synthetic siding and restore original building material, if possible. Appendix Prior BAR Reviews January 21, 2014 - BAR approved (7-0) the request to demolish an outbuilding and to demolish the early 20th century, rear addition, subject to documentation. BAR accepted (7-0) the applicant’s request to defer action on the proposed addition. February 18, 2014 – BAR approved CoA for proposed addition (7-0-2 with Hogg and Graves abstaining), with the window color to be bronze, and the Hardie color to be submitted to staff for approval. May 20, 2014 - BAR approved CoA to replace existing slate roof with standing-seam metal. BAR accepted (7-0) the applicant’s request to defer. July 15, 2014 – BAR approved CoA to replace existing slate roof with standing-seam metal, with turret roof to have flat seams. 743 Park Street (July 13, 2021) 4 Staff:wernerjb@charlottesville.gov Amita Freilich and Aaron M Zach Snider/Alloy Siding replacement 520052000 743 Park Street 1109 Rose Hill Dr, Charlottesville, VA 22903 zach@alloyworkshop.com 6/25/2021 434-882-1968 743 Park Street Charlottesville, VA 22902 6/24/21 Aaron Freilch 6/24/21 no Removal of aluminum siding and restoration of the original existing wood siding and trim 24 June 2021 Alloy Architecture & Construction LLC 1109 Rose Hill Drive Charlottesville Va 22903 Board of Architectural Review CIty of Charlottesville NDS P.O. Box 911, CIty Hall Charlottesville VA 22902 Explanation of Proposed Work. The intent is to remove the existing Aluminum siding and trim. Depending on the condition of the existing we will repair the existing or replace with new cement board siding. No repair work will be done on the 2014 addition. If existing wood siding under aluminum is deteriorated to a point that it can not be repaired, we will replace all of the siding and trim with new cement board siding. and Boral trim. New siding and trim will match original wood siding and trim to the extent possible with currently available materials. All storm windows on the original house will be replaced with new similar aluminum white powder coated storm windows. Add new Ogee Style gutter Repaint existing Remove aluminum and repair existing wood siding and trim Expose and evaluate existing trim details and materials. Restore and repaint to the extent possible. Repaint addition Replace all existing storm windows Repaint existing shingle details Expose and evaluate existing trim details and materials. Restore and repaint to the extent possible. Replace all existing storm windows Expose and evaluate existing trim details and materials. Restore and repaint to the extent possible. Replace all existing storm windows Certificate of Appropriateness BAR 21-07-05 350 Park Street, TMP 530109000 and 530108000 North Downtown ADC District Owner: City of Charlottesville and County of Albemarle Applicant: Eric Amtmann, Dalgliesh-Gilpin-Paxton Architects [on behalf of Albemarle County] Project: New courthouse building (at Levy Building) Application components (please click each link to go directly to PDF page): • Staff Report • Historic Survey • Application Submittal July 20, 2021 BAR Packet 6 City of Charlottesville Board of Architectural Review Staff Report July 20, 2021 Certificate of Appropriateness Application BAR 21-07-05 350 Park Street, TMP 530109000 and 530108000 North Downtown ADC District Owner: City of Charlottesville and County of Albemarle Applicant: Eric Amtmann, Dalgliesh-Gilpin-Paxton Architects [on behalf of Albemarle County] Project: New courthouse building (at Levy Building) Background 350 Park Street 0 Park Street Year Built: Levy Building 1852, Annex c1980 Year Built: N/A, parking lot District: North Downtown ADC District District: North Downtown ADC District Status: Contributing Status: N/A The Levy Building is Greek Revival, constructed with brick laid in American bond with a Flemish bond variant. Three stories with a hipped roof, three-bay front, heavy entablature supported by monumental stuccoed pilasters on brick pedestals, crosette architraves, and brick water table. Prior BAR Reviews (See Appendix for all) October 20, 2020 – Pre-application discussion re: planned City-County Courts Complex, including necessary selective demolition of the Levy Building’s hyphen and annex. No action taken. December 15, 2020 – BAR approved CoA for selective demolition of the Levy Building hype and east annex. (See Appendix for approved motion.) Application • Applicant submitted: Fentress Architects drawing and presentation Albemarle County & Charlottesville City General District Courts Complex, dated Jun 29, 2021 (40 pages). CoA request for construction of addition to the Levy Building and new construction related to the new City-County Courts Complex. Courts Expansion/Levy Building (July 11, 2021) 1 Discussion While this is a formal CoA request, the applicant has acknowledged that this meeting—and, possibly, subsequent meetings—will be treated as an intermediate review and that no formal BAR action will be taken. However, by consensus the BAR may express an opinion about the project as presented. (For example, the BAR may take a non-binding vote to express support, opposition, or even questions and concerns regarding the project’s likelihood for an approved CoA. These will not represent approval or even endorsement of the CoA, but will represent the BAR’s opinion on the project, relative to preparing the project for final submittal. While such votes carry no legal bearing and are not binding, BAR members are expected to express their opinions—both individually and collectively--in good faith as a project advances towards an approved CoA.) This is an iterative process and these discussions should be thorough and productive. The goal is to establish what is necessary for a final submittal that provides the information necessary for the BAR to evaluate the project and to then approve or deny the requested CoA. In response to any questions from the applicant and/or for any recommendations to the applicant, the BAR should rely on the germane sections of the ADC District Design Guidelines and related review criteria. While elements of other chapters may be relevant, staff recommends that the BAR refer to the criteria in Chapter II--Site Design and Elements, Chapter III--New Construction and Additions, and Chapter VI – Public Design and Improvements. Of particular assistance for this discussion are the criteria in Chapter III: • Setback, including landscaping and site • Windows and Doors improvements • Street-Level Design • Spacing • Foundation and Cornice • Massing and Footprint • Materials and Textures • Height and Width • Paint [Color palette] • Scale • Details and Decoration, including lighting • Roof and signage • Orientation Also, the criteria under Public Buildings and Structures, in Chapter VI • Public buildings should follow design guidelines for new construction. • New structures, including bridges, should reflect contemporary design principles. Suggested Motions Staff recommends no formal action, except to defer this matter. (With an applicant’s request for deferral, there is no calendar requirement for when the application returns to the BAR. In the absence of an applicant requested deferral and the BAR defers it, the application must be presented at the next meeting.) Criteria, Standards, and Guidelines Review Criteria Generally Sec. 34-284(b) of the City Code states that, in considering a particular application the BAR shall approve the application unless it finds: Courts Expansion/Levy Building (July 11, 2021) 2 (1) That the proposal does not meet specific standards set forth within this division or applicable provisions of the Design Guidelines established by the board pursuant to Sec.34-288(6); and (2) The proposal is incompatible with the historic, cultural or architectural character of the district in which the property is located or the protected property that is the subject of the application. Pertinent Standards for Review of Construction and Alterations include: (1) Whether the material, texture, color, height, scale, mass and placement of the proposed addition, modification or construction are visually and architecturally compatible with the site and the applicable design control district; (2) The harmony of the proposed change in terms of overall proportion and the size and placement of entrances, windows, awnings, exterior stairs and signs; (3) The Secretary of the Interior Standards for Rehabilitation set forth within the Code of Federal Regulations (36 C.F.R. §67.7(b)), as may be relevant; (4) The effect of the proposed change on the historic district neighborhood; (5) The impact of the proposed change on other protected features on the property, such as gardens, landscaping, fences, walls and walks; (6) Whether the proposed method of construction, renovation or restoration could have an adverse impact on the structure or site, or adjacent buildings or structures; (7) Any applicable provisions of the City’s Design Guidelines. Pertinent ADC District Design Guidelines Links to the guidelines I: Introduction (Part 1) II: Introduction (Part 2) III: Site Design and Elements IV: New Construction and Additions V: Rehabilitation VI: Signs, Awnings, Vending, and Cafes VII: Public Improvements VIII: Moving and Demolition IX: Index Chapter II – Site Design and Elements A. Introduction The relationship between a historic building and its site, landscape features, outbuildings, and other elements within the property boundary all contribute to a historic district’s overall image. Site features should be considered an important part of any project to be reviewed by the Board of Architectural Review. There is much variety in site design and elements between and within the various historic districts in Charlottesville. The commercial areas of the downtown mall, West Main Street Corridor and the Corner, generally have few site features since the buildings usually cover much of the lot and have very limited setbacks. The early nineteenth century rowhouses near the courthouse are similar to commercial lot coverage with the exception that some may have a very small front yard with limited foundation or ground cover plantings. Many of the nineteenth century dwellings in the North Downtown area and along parts of Ridge and Wertland streets also have limited setbacks and are spaced closely together. In these cases there are small front yards composed of grass or ground cover and often containing large canopy trees. The Courts Expansion/Levy Building (July 11, 2021) 3 edges of these areas often are planted with low shrubs or flower beds, and the houses are surrounded by foundation plantings. Iron fences, hedges or low stone walls may separate the homeowner’s property from the public sidewalk. In other parts of the North Downtown area, particularly along Park Street, many of the dwellings are sited on larger lots and are placed further back on the lot. In these cases the front yard is a large lawn defined by border plantings and usually a low stone retaining wall or iron fence. Some have larger boxwood hedges and rows of box defining the entrance walkway. Large canopy trees, smaller ornamental trees and flower beds are additional elements often found within these spaces. The resulting character of many of the residential streets in the historic districts is one of lush plantings and mature shade trees. While there may be much variety within the house types and styles along a particular street, the landscape character ties together the setting and plays an important role in defining the distinctiveness of the districts. When making changes to a property within one of the historic districts, the entire site should be studied to better understand its original design and its context within its sub-area. When planning changes to a site in a historic district, create a new plan that reflects the site traditions of the area and that fits the scale of the lot. Consider using different types and scales of plantings that will create scale, define edges and enclose outdoor spaces of the site. The following sections provide more specific guidance. The elements of urban landscapes, parks, and other open spaces in public ownership, including sidewalks, streets, plantings, street furniture, and street lighting also contribute to the character of the district and are discussed in Chapter 6: Public Improvements. B. Plantings 1) Encourage the maintenance and planting of large trees on private property along the streetfronts, which contribute to the “avenue” effect. 2) Generally, use trees and plants that are compatible with the existing plantings in the neighborhood. 3) Use trees and plants that are indigenous to the area. 4) Retain existing trees and plants that help define the character of the district, especially street trees and hedges. 5) Replace diseased or dead plants with like or similar species if appropriate. 6) When constructing new buildings, identify and take care to protect significant existing trees and other plantings. 7) Choose ground cover plantings that are compatible with adjacent sites, existing site conditions, and the character of the building. 8) Select mulching and edging materials carefully and do not use plastic edgings, lava, crushed rock, unnaturally colored mulch or other historically unsuitable materials. C. Walls and Fences 1) Maintain existing materials such as stone walls, hedges, wooden picket fences, and wrought-iron fences. 2) When a portion of a fence needs replacing, salvage original parts for a prominent location. 3) Match old fencing in material, height, and detail. 4) If it is not possible to match old fencing, use a simplified design of similar materials and height. 5) For new fences, use materials that relate to materials in the neighborhood. 6) Take design cues from nearby historic fences and walls. 7) Chain-link fencing, split rail fences, and vinyl plastic fences should not be used. Courts Expansion/Levy Building (July 11, 2021) 4 8) Traditional concrete block walls may be appropriate. 9) Modular block wall systems or modular concrete block retaining walls are strongly discouraged but may be appropriate in areas not visible from the public right-of-way. 10) If street-front fences or walls are necessary or desirable, they should not exceed four (4) feet in height from the sidewalk or public right-of-way and should use traditional materials and design. 11) Residential privacy fences may be appropriate in side or rear yards where not visible from the primary street. 12) Fences should not exceed six (6) feet in height in the side and rear yards. 13) Fence structures should face the inside of the fenced property. 14) Relate commercial privacy fences to the materials of the building. If the commercial property adjoins a residential neighborhood, use a brick or painted wood fence or heavily planted screen as a buffer. 15) Avoid the installation of new fences or walls if possible in areas where there are no are no fences or walls and yards are open. 16) Retaining walls should respect the scale, materials and context of the site and adjacent properties. 17) Respect the existing conditions of the majority of the lots on the street in planning new construction or a rehabilitation of an existing site. D. Lighting 1) In residential areas, use fixtures that are understated and compatible with the residential quality of the surrounding area and the building while providing subdued illumination. 2) Choose light levels that provide for adequate safety yet do not overly emphasize the site or building. Often, existing porch lights are sufficient. 3) In commercial areas, avoid lights that create a glare. High intensity commercial lighting fixtures must provide full cutoff. 4) Do not use numerous “crime” lights or bright floodlights to illuminate a building or site when surrounding lighting is subdued. 5) In the downtown and along West Main Street, consider special lighting of key landmarks and facades to provide a focal point in evening hours. 6) Encourage merchants to leave their display window lights on in the evening to provide extra illumination at the sidewalk level. 7) Consider motion-activated lighting for security. E. Walkways and Driveways 1) Use appropriate traditional paving materials like brick, stone, and scored concrete. 2) Concrete pavers are appropriate in new construction, and may be appropriate in site renovations, depending on the context of adjacent building materials, and continuity with the surrounding site and district. 3) Gravel or stone dust may be appropriate, but must be contained. 4) Stamped concrete and stamped asphalt are not appropriate paving materials. 5) Limit asphalt use to driveways and parking areas. 6) Place driveways through the front yard only when no rear access to parking is available. 7) Do not demolish historic structures to provide areas for parking. 8) Add separate pedestrian pathways within larger parking lots, and provide crosswalks at vehicular lanes within a site. F. Parking Areas and Lots 1) If new parking areas are necessary, construct them so that they reinforce the street wall of buildings and the grid system of rectangular blocks in commercial areas. Courts Expansion/Levy Building (July 11, 2021) 5 2) Locate parking lots behind buildings. 3) Screen parking lots from streets, sidewalks, and neighboring sites through the use of walls, trees, and plantings of a height and type appropriate to reduce the visual impact year-round. 4) Avoid creating parking areas in the front yards of historic building sites. 5) Avoid excessive curb cuts to gain entry to parking areas. 6) Avoid large expanses of asphalt. 7) On large lots, provide interior plantings and pedestrian walkways. 8) Provide screening from adjacent land uses as needed. 9) Install adequate lighting in parking areas to provide security in evening hours. 10) Select lighting fixtures that are appropriate to a historic setting. H. Utilities and Other Site Appurtenances 1. Plan the location of overhead wires, utility poles and meters, electrical panels, antennae, trash containers, and exterior mechanical units where they are least likely to detract from the character of the site. 2. Screen utilities and other site elements with fences, walls, or plantings. 3. Encourage the installation of utility services underground. 4. Antennae and communication dishes should be placed in inconspicuous rooftop locations, not in a front yard. 5. Screen all rooftop mechanical equipment with a wall of material harmonious with the building or structure. Chapter III – New Construction and Additions A. Introduction The following guidelines offer general recommendations on the design for all new buildings and additions in Charlottesville’s historic districts. The guidelines are flexible enough to both respect the historic past and to embrace the future. The intent of these guidelines is not to be overly specific or to dictate certain designs to owners and designers. The intent is also not to encourage copying or mimicking particular historic styles. These guidelines are intended to provide a general design framework for new construction. Designers can take cues from the traditional architecture of the area, and have the freedom to design appropriate new architecture for Charlottesville’s historic districts. These criteria are all important when considering whether proposed new buildings are appropriate and compatible; however, the degree of importance of each criterion varies within each area as conditions vary. For instance, setback and spacing between buildings may be more important than roof forms or materials since there is more variety of the last two criteria on most residential streets. All criteria need not be met in every example of new construction although all criteria should be taken into consideration in the design process. When studying the character of a district, examine the forms of historic contributing buildings and avoid taking design cues from non-contributing structures. There may be the opportunity for more flexibility in designing new buildings or making an addition depending on the level of historic integrity of a particular area. Some parts of the historic districts retain a high degree of their original historic character. In these areas care should be taken to ensure that the new design does not visually overpower its historic neighboring buildings. In other areas where there are more non-contributing structures or more commercial utilitarian buildings, new designs could be more contemporary and the Board of Architectural Review (BAR) may be more flexible in applying these guidelines. Thus, the overall context of historic integrity of an area needs to Courts Expansion/Levy Building (July 11, 2021) 6 be understood and considered on an individual basis and what may be appropriate in some areas may not be appropriate in others. According to the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation: • New additions, exterior alterations, or related new construction shall not destroy historic materials that characterize the property. The new work shall be differentiated from the old and shall be compatible with the massing, size, scale, and architectural features to protect the historic integrity of the property and its environment. • New additions and adjacent or related new construction shall be undertaken in such a manner that, if removed in the future, the essential form and integrity of the historic property and its environment would be unimpaired. 1. Sustainability Sustainability means meeting the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs. Green building means building practices that use energy, water, and other resources wisely. The City of Charlottesville and the Board of Architectural Review support the principles of green building and sustainable design in order to create a community that is healthy, livable, and affordable: • Preservation is the most sustainable choice. Adaptive reuse of a historic building or living in a pre- owned home reduces consumption of land and materials for new construction, and may reduce housing costs. • Durable building materials such as brick, wood, cementitious siding, and metal roofs are economical and more compatible with the character of the community. • Mixed-use development provides an alternative to sprawl that allows residents to live within walking distance of activities, thereby reducing time spent in the car. • Infill development is an efficient use of land that can provide diversity in housing sizes and types, and can revitalize neighborhoods. • Options for walking, bicycling, and transit promote healthy living and reduce dependence on automobiles and energy use. • Designing buildings for the local climate helps conserve energy. • Locally obtained building materials, rapidly renewable or recycled materials, non-toxic materials and finishes, and wood certified by the Forest Stewardship Council provide sustainable choices. • Alternative construction techniques, such as structural insulated panels (SIPS), are energy efficient. • Low impact development methods (porous pavement, rain gardens, vegetated buffers, green roofs) retain storm water on site and protect street water quality by filtering runoff. • Use of rating systems such as LEED, Energy Star, and EarthCraft House are encouraged. Sustainability and preservation are complementary concepts, and both goals should be pursued. Nothing in these guidelines should be construed to discourage green building or sustainable design. If such a design is found to conflict with a specific guideline, the BAR shall work with the applicant to devise a creative design solution that meets the applicant’s goals for sustainability, and that is compatible with the character of the district and the property. 2. Flexibility The following guidelines offer general recommendations on the design for all new buildings and additions in Charlottesville’s historic districts. The guidelines are flexible enough to both respect the historic past and to embrace the future. The intent of these guidelines is not to be overly specific or to dictate certain designs to owners and designers. The intent is also not to encourage copying or Courts Expansion/Levy Building (July 11, 2021) 7 mimicking particular historic styles. These guidelines are intended to provide a general design framework for new construction. Designers can take cues from the traditional architecture of the area and have the freedom to design appropriate new architecture for Charlottesville’s historic districts. 3. Building Types within the Historic Districts When designing new buildings in the historic districts, one needs to recognize that while there is an overall distinctive district character, there is, nevertheless, a great variety of historic building types, styles, and scales throughout the districts and sub-areas that are described in Chapter 1: Introduction. Likewise, there are several types of new construction that might be constructed within the districts the design parameters of these new buildings will differ depending on the following types: d. Institutional: Government buildings, churches, schools, and libraries are all structures that represent a unique aspect of community life and frequently have special requirements that relate to their distinct uses. For these reasons, these buildings usually are freestanding and their scale and architectural arrangements may be of a different nature than their residential and historic neighbors, but their materials should blend with the character of the districts. e. Multi-lot Often new commercial, office, or multiuse buildings will be constructed on sites much larger than the traditionally sized lots 25 to 40 feet wide. Many sites for such structures are located on West Main Street and in the 14th and 15th Street area of Venable Neighborhood. These assembled parcels can translate into new structures whose scale and mass may overwhelm neighboring existing structures. Therefore, while this building type may need to respond to the various building conditions of the site, it also should employ design techniques to reduce its visual presence. These could include varying facade wall planes, differing materials, stepped-back upper levels, and irregular massing. B. Setback 1) Construct new commercial buildings with a minimal or no setback in order to reinforce the traditional street wall. 2) Use a minimal setback if the desire is to create a strong street wall or setback consistent with the surrounding area. 3) Modify setback as necessary for sub-areas that do not have well-defined street walls. 4) Avoid deep setbacks or open corner plazas on corner buildings in the downtown in order to maintain the traditional grid of the commercial district. 5) In the West Main Street corridor, construct new buildings with a minimal (up to 15 feet according to the zoning ordinance) or no setback in order to reinforce the street wall. If the site adjoins historic buildings, consider a setback consistent with these buildings. 6) On corners of the West Main Street corridor, avoid deep setbacks or open corner plazas unless the design contributes to the pedestrian experience or improves the transition to an adjacent residential area. 7) New buildings, particularly in the West Main Street corridor, should relate to any neighborhoods adjoining them. Buffer areas should be considered to include any screening and landscaping requirements of the zoning ordinance. 8) At transitional sites between two distinctive areas of setback, for instance between new commercial and historic commercial, consider using setbacks in the new construction that reinforce and relate to setbacks of the historic buildings. Courts Expansion/Levy Building (July 11, 2021) 8 9) For new governmental or institutional buildings, either reinforce the street wall through a minimal setback, or use a deep setback within a landscaped area to emphasize the civic function of the structure. 10) Keep residential setbacks within 20 percent of the setbacks of a majority of neighborhood dwellings. C. Spacing 1) Maintain existing consistency of spacing in the area. New residences should be spaced within 20 percent of the average spacing between houses on the block. 2) Commercial and office buildings in the areas that have a well-defined street wall should have minimal spacing between them. 3) In areas that do not have consistent spacing, consider limiting or creating a more uniform spacing in order to establish an overall rhythm. 4) Multi-lot buildings should be designed using techniques to incorporate and respect the existing spacing on a residential street. D. Massing and Footprint 1) New commercial infill buildings’ footprints will be limited by the size of the existing lot in the downtown or along the West Main Street corridor. Their massing in most cases should be simple rectangles like neighboring buildings. 2) New infill construction in residential sub-areas should relate in footprint and massing to the majority of surrounding historic dwellings. 3) Neighborhood transitional buildings should have small building footprints similar to nearby dwellings. a. If the footprint is larger, their massing should be reduced to relate to the smaller-scaled forms of residential structures. b. Techniques to reduce massing could include stepping back upper levels, adding residential roof and porch forms, and using sympathetic materials. 4) Institutional and multi-lot buildings by their nature will have large footprints, particularly along the West Main Street corridor and in the 14th and 15th Street area of the Venable neighborhood. a. The massing of such a large scale structure should not overpower the traditional scale of the majority of nearby buildings in the district in which it is located. b. Techniques could include varying the surface planes of the buildings, stepping back the buildings as the structure increases in height, and breaking up the roof line with different elements to create smaller compositions. E. Height and Width 1) Respect the directional expression of the majority of surrounding buildings. In commercial areas, respect the expression of any adjacent historic buildings, which generally will have a more vertical expression. 2) Attempt to keep the height and width of new buildings within a maximum of 200 percent of the prevailing height and width in the surrounding sub-area. 3) In commercial areas at street front, the height should be within 130 percent of the prevailing average of both sides of the block. Along West Main Street, heights should relate to any adjacent contributing buildings. Additional stories should be stepped back so that the additional height is not readily visible from the street. 4) When the primary façade of a new building in a commercial area, such as downtown, West Main Street, or the Corner, is wider than the surrounding historic buildings or the traditional lot size, consider modulating it with bays or varying planes. Courts Expansion/Levy Building (July 11, 2021) 9 5) Reinforce the human scale of the historic districts by including elements such as porches, entrances, storefronts, and decorative features depending on the character of the particular sub-area. F. Scale 1) Provide features on new construction that reinforce the scale and character of the surrounding area, whether human or monumental. Include elements such as storefronts, vertical and horizontal divisions, upper story windows, and decorative features. 2) As an exception, new institutional or governmental buildings may be more appropriate on a monumental scale depending on their function and their site conditions. G. Roof 1) Roof Forms and Pitches a. The roof design of new downtown or West Main Street commercial infill buildings generally should be flat or sloped behind a parapet wall. b. Neighborhood transitional buildings should use roof forms that relate to the neighboring residential forms instead of the flat or sloping commercial form. c. Institutional buildings that are freestanding may have a gable or hipped roof with variations. d. Large-scale, multi-lot buildings should have a varied roof line to break up the mass of the design using gable and/or hipped forms. e. Shallow pitched roofs and flat roofs may be appropriate in historic residential areas on a contemporary designed building. f. Do not use mansard-type roofs on commercial buildings; they were not used historically in Charlottesville’s downtown area, nor are they appropriate on West Main Street. 2) Roof Materials: Common roof materials in the historic districts include metal, slate, and composition shingles. a. For new construction in the historic districts, use traditional roofing materials such as standing-seam metal or slate. b. In some cases, shingles that mimic the appearance of slate may be acceptable. c. Pre-painted standing-seam metal roof material is permitted, but commercial-looking ridge caps or ridge vents are not appropriate on residential structures. d. Avoid using thick wood cedar shakes if using wood shingles; instead, use more historically appropriate wood shingles that are thinner and have a smoother finish. e. If using composition asphalt shingles, do not use light colors. Consider using neutral- colored or darker, plain or textured-type shingles. f. The width of the pan and the seam height on a standing-seam metal roof should be consistent with the size of pan and seam height usually found on a building of a similar period. 3) Rooftop Screening a. If roof-mounted mechanical equipment is used, it should be screened from public view on all sides. b. The screening material and design should be consistent with the design, textures, materials, and colors of the building. c. The screening should not appear as an afterthought or addition the building. H. Orientation 1) New commercial construction should orient its façade in the same direction as adjacent historic buildings, that is, to the street. 2) Front elevations oriented to side streets or to the interior of lots should be discouraged. Courts Expansion/Levy Building (July 11, 2021) 10 I. Windows and Doors 1) The rhythm, patterns, and ratio of solids (walls) and voids (windows and doors) of new buildings should relate to and be compatible with adjacent historic facades. a. The majority of existing buildings in Charlottesville’s historic districts have a higher proportion of wall area than void area except at the storefront level. b. In the West Main Street corridor in particular, new buildings should reinforce this traditional proportion. 2) The size and proportion, or the ratio of width to height, of window and door openings on new buildings’ primary facades should be similar and compatible with those on surrounding historic facades. a. The proportions of the upper floor windows of most of Charlottesville’s historic buildings are more vertical than horizontal. b. Glass storefronts would generally have more horizontal proportions than upper floor openings. 3) Traditionally designed openings generally are recessed on masonry buildings and have a raised surround on frame buildings. New construction should follow these methods in the historic districts as opposed to designing openings that are flush with the rest of the wall. 4) Many entrances of Charlottesville’s historic buildings have special features such as transoms, sidelights, and decorative elements framing the openings. Consideration should be given to incorporating such elements in new construction. 5) Darkly tinted mirrored glass is not an appropriate material for windows in new buildings within the historic districts. 6) If small-paned windows are used, they should have true divided lights or simulated divided lights with permanently affixed interior and exterior muntin bars and integral spacer bars between the panes of glass. 7) Avoid designing false windows in new construction. 8) Appropriate material for new windows depends upon the context of the building within a historic district, and the design of the proposed building. Sustainable materials such as wood, aluminum- clad wood, solid fiberglass, and metal windows are preferred for new construction. Vinyl windows are discouraged. 9) Glass shall be clear. Opaque spandrel glass or translucent glass may be approved by the BAR for specific applications. K. Street-Level Design 1) Street level facades of all building types, whether commercial, office, or institutional, should not have blank walls; they should provide visual interest to the passing pedestrian. 2) When designing new storefronts or elements for storefronts, conform to the general configuration of traditional storefronts depending on the context of the sub-area. New structures do offer the opportunity for more contemporary storefront designs. 3) Keep the ground level facades(s) of new retail commercial buildings at least eighty percent transparent up to a level of ten feet. 4) Include doors in all storefronts to reinforce street level vitality. 5) Articulate the bays of institutional or office buildings to provide visual interest. 6) Institutional buildings, such as city halls, libraries, and post offices, generally do not have storefronts, but their street levels should provide visual interest and display space or first floor windows should be integrated into the design. 7) Office buildings should provide windows or other visual interest at street level. 8) Neighborhood transitional buildings in general should not have transparent first floors, and the design and size of their façade openings should relate more to neighboring residential structures. Courts Expansion/Levy Building (July 11, 2021) 11 9) Along West Main Street, secondary (rear) facades should also include features to relate appropriately to any adjacent residential areas. 10) Any parking structures facing on important streets or on pedestrian routes must have storefronts, display windows, or other forms of visual relief on the first floors of these elevations. 11) A parking garage vehicular entrance/exit opening should be diminished in scale, and located off to the side to the degree possible. L. Foundation and Cornice 1) Distinguish the foundation from the rest of the structure through the use of different materials, patterns, or textures. 2) Respect the height, contrast of materials, and textures of foundations on surrounding historic buildings. 3) If used, cornices should be in proportion to the rest of the building. 4) Wood or metal cornices are preferred. The use of fypon may be appropriate where the location is not immediately adjacent to pedestrians. M. Materials and Textures 1) The selection of materials and textures for a new building should be compatible with and complementary to neighboring buildings. 2) In order to strengthen the traditional image of the residential areas of the historic districts, brick, stucco, and wood siding are the most appropriate materials for new buildings. 3) In commercial/office areas, brick is generally the most appropriate material for new structures. “Thin set” brick is not permitted. Stone is more commonly used for site walls than buildings. 4) Large-scale, multi-lot buildings, whose primary facades have been divided into different bays and planes to relate to existing neighboring buildings, can have varied materials, shades, and textures. 5) Synthetic siding and trim, including, vinyl and aluminum, are not historic cladding materials in the historic districts, and their use should be avoided. 6) Cementitious siding, such as HardiPlank boards and panels, are appropriate. 7) Concrete or metal panels may be appropriate. 8) Metal storefronts in clear or bronze are appropriate. 9) The use of Exterior Insulation and Finish Systems (EIFS) is discouraged but may be approved on items such as gables where it cannot be seen or damaged. It requires careful design of the location of control joints. 10) The use of fiberglass-reinforced plastic is discouraged. If used, it must be painted. 11) All exterior trim woodwork, decking and flooring must be painted, or may be stained solid if not visible from public right-of-way. N. Paint 1) The selection and use of colors for a new building should be coordinated and compatible with adjacent buildings, not intrusive. 2) In Charlottesville’s historic districts, various traditional shaded of brick red, white, yellow, tan, green, or gray are appropriate. For more information on colors traditionally used on historic structures and the placement of color on a building, see Chapter 4: Rehabilitation. 3) Do not paint unpainted masonry surfaces. 4) It is proper to paint individual details different colors. 5) More lively color schemes may be appropriate in certain sub-areas dependent on the context of the sub-areas and the design of the building. O. Details and Decoration Courts Expansion/Levy Building (July 11, 2021) 12 1) Building detail and ornamentation should be consistent with and related to the architecture of the surrounding context and district. 2) The mass of larger buildings may be reduced using articulated design details. 3) Pedestrian scale may be reinforced with details. P. Additions Many of the smaller commercial and other business buildings may be enlarged as development pressure increases in downtown Charlottesville and along West Main Street. These existing structures may be increased in size by constructing new additions on the rear or side or in some cases by carefully adding on extra levels above the current roof. The design of new additions on all elevations that are prominently visible should follow the guidelines for new construction as described earlier in this section. Several other considerations that are specific to new additions in the historic districts are listed below: 1) Function and Size a. Attempt to accommodate needed functions within the existing structure without building an addition. b. Limit the size of the addition so that it does not visually overpower the existing building. 2) Location a. Attempt to locate the addition on rear or side elevations that are not visible from the street. b. If additional floors are constructed on top of a building, set the addition back from the main façade so that its visual impact is minimized. c. If the addition is located on a primary elevation facing the street or if a rear addition faces a street, parking area, or an important pedestrian route, the façade of the addition should be treated under the new construction guidelines. 3) Design a. New additions should not destroy historic materials that characterize the property. b. The new work should be differentiated from the old and should be compatible with the massing, size, scale, and architectural features to protect the historic integrity of the property and its environment. 4) Replication of Style a. A new addition should not be an exact copy of the design of the existing historic building. The design of new additions can be compatible with and respectful of existing buildings without being a mimicry of their original design. b. If the new addition appears to be part of the existing building, the integrity of the original historic design is compromised and the viewer is confused over what is historic and what is new. 5) Materials and Features a. Use materials, windows, doors, architectural detailing, roofs, and colors that are compatible with historic buildings in the district. 6) Attachment to Existing Building a. Wherever possible, new additions or alterations to existing buildings should be done in such a manner that, if such additions or alterations were to be removed in the future, the essential form and integrity of the buildings would be unimpaired. b. The new design should not use the same wall plane, roof line, or cornice line of the existing structure. Chapter VI – Public Design and Improvements A. Introduction Courts Expansion/Levy Building (July 11, 2021) 13 Public spaces define the spatial organization of the City, forming the basis for social, cultural, and economic interaction. The Downtown Pedestrian Mall is the centerpiece of the community. Charlottesville’s historic parks, trails, boulevards, cemeteries, playgrounds, and other open spaces help balance the desired urban density and promote healthy living and quality of life. Public spaces accommodate multiple functions and provide social venues. The historic uses and organization of public spaces represent a timeline of cultural practices and values of the community. Significant features should be identified and respected when changes are proposed. New public spaces and improvements should reflect contemporary design principles and values. Charlottesville has a rich history of public improvements, which include public buildings, bridges, streetscape landscaping and lighting, street furniture, monuments, public art, fountains, and signage. Many of these improvements have been made within the historic districts, and there will be the opportunity to create additional such amenities in future years. All changes or improvements require BAR review and approval, and should be compatible with the general architectural features and character of an area or district. Repairs and maintenance should match original materials and design, and should be accomplished in a historically appropriate manner. All public improvements should reflect the quality and attention to detail and craftsmanship of the overall historic districts’ character. B. Plazas, Parks & Open Spaces 1. Maintain existing spaces and important site features for continued public use.consistent with the original design intent, 2. Maintain significant elements in a historic landscape: grave markers, structures, landforms, landscaping, circulation patterns, boundaries, and site walls. 3. Design new spaces to reinforce streetscape and pedestrian goals for the district. These areas offer the opportunity to provide visual focal points and public gathering spaces for the districts. 4. New landscaping should be historically and regionally appropriate, indigenous when possible, and scaled for the proposed location and intended use. 5. Exterior furniture and site accessories should be compatible with the overall character of the park or open space. 6. Repairs and maintenance work should match original materials and design, and should be accomplished in a historically appropriate manner. 7. Avoid demolishing historic buildings to create open spaces and parks. C. Public Buildings and Structures 1. Public buildings should follow design guidelines for new construction. 2. New structures, including bridges, should reflect contemporary design principles. D. Streets, Walks, & Curbs 1. Retain historic paving or curbing. 2. If any historic paving or curbing is uncovered in future public projects, consider reusing it or parts of it in the new project. 3. Make street paving consistent throughout districts. 4. When widening existing streets provide sidewalks, street trees, and other elements that maintain the street wall and emphasize the human scale. 5. Limit paved areas to streets, driveways and pedestrian areas. 6. Consider using some type of distinctive crosswalks at key intersections or crossings. 7. Avoid faux techniques or appearances in materials, such as stamped asphalt or concrete. Courts Expansion/Levy Building (July 11, 2021) 14 8. When sidewalks must be repaired, match adjacent materials in design, color, texture, and tooling. 9. Avoid variation in sidewalk and curb materials. 10. When sidewalks need replacement, use a paving unit, such as brick or concrete with a tooled or saw cut joint that relates to the scale of the districts. 11. Avoid excessive curb cuts for vehicular access across pedestrian ways. 12. Where curb cuts are necessary, they should be consistent with other curb cuts in the area 13. Do not block sidewalks with street furniture elements. 14. Remove obsolete signs and poles. E. Street Trees & Plantings 1. Maintain existing plantings in public rights of way. 2. Replace damaged or missing street trees with appropriate species. New street trees should be planted in appropriate locations. Consult the City-approved plant list. 3. Install plantings in areas like medians, divider strips, and traffic islands. 4. Locate planters so that they do not block sidewalks. F. Lighting 1. In pedestrian areas, use smaller-scaled light fixtures that do not create a glare. 2. Light fixtures can vary according to district or sub-area and can be in traditional or contemporary styles. 3. Provide adequate lighting at critical areas of pedestrian/vehicular conflict, such as parking lots, alleys, and crosswalks. 4. Limit the number of styles of light fixtures and light sources used in each district except in cases of varying sub-areas or distinctive areas, such as bridges. 5. Light color and intensity should be consistent throughout a general area or subarea of a 6. historic district. Use similar lamping (bulb type) and/or wattage to maintain a consistent quality of light. 7. Provide street lighting fixtures with flat lenses that are shielded and directed down to the site in order to reduce glare and prevent uplighting. I. Public Signs 1. Maintain the coordinated design for a citywide gateway, directional, and informational public sign system. 2. Add a distinctive street sign system for historic districts. 3. Continue to install plaques or signs commemorating significant events, buildings, and individuals in the districts. 4. Avoid placing sign posts in locations where they can interfere with the opening of vehicle doors. 5. Preserve existing historic plaques located in the district. 6. New plaques should be discreetly located and should not obscure architectural elements. K. Parking Facilities 1. Ensure that the design of any new parking structure follows the design guidelines in Chapter 3 for new multi-lot buildings and street-level design. 2. The street-level design of parking garage facilities should engage pedestrians through the use of storefronts, display windows or other visual features. 3. Avoid demolishing historic buildings to construct new parking facilities. 4. Locate vehicular exits and entrances to minimize their impact on the primary street on which they are located. 5. Parking at the ground level should not be visible from the street. Courts Expansion/Levy Building (July 11, 2021) 15 6. Reduce the scale of the openings by providing separate entrances and exits. 7. Consider the impact of interior and roof lighting. APPENDIX Prior BAR Reviews 350 Park Street February 2003 – Prelim discussion. Temporary sally port and ADA ramp. March 2003 - Prelim discussion. Permanent ADA ramp. December 15, 2020 – BAR approved CoA for selective demolition of the Levy Building hype and east annex Having considered the standards set forth within the City Code, including City Design Guidelines for Demolitions, I move to find that the proposed demolition satisfies the BAR’s criteria and is compatible with this property and other properties in the North Downtown ADC District, and that the BAR approves the application as submitted, with the following conditions: • that the east wall of the Levy Building is substantially protected from damage; • that the BAR recommends archaeological work within the footprint of the proposed demolition area of the hyphen and annex; • that the BAR encourages and supports archaeological planning as part of the schematic design development for the larger project site; • that the demolition includes the concrete steps (formerly to a house) along High Street. (Zehmer, Lewis second. Motion passed 8-0.) Courts Expansion/Levy Building (July 11, 2021) 16 Albemarle County & Charlottesville City General District Courts Complex Albemarle County & Charlottesville City General District Courts Complex BAR Review, 40 pages, dated 2021.06.29 Albemarle County & Charlottesville City General District Courts Complex City of Charlottesville Board of Architectural Review June 29, 2021 June 29, 2021 SITE PLAN Albemarle County & Charlottesville City General District Courts Complex Charlottesville, VA HISTORY & CONTEXT June 29, 2021 Albemarle County & Charlottesville City General District Courts Complex Charlottesville, VA June 29, 2021 HISTORY & CONTEXT Albemarle County & Charlottesville City General District Courts Complex Charlottesville, VA June 29, 2021 HISTORY & CONTEXT Albemarle County & Charlottesville City General District Courts Complex Charlottesville, VA June 29, 2021 HISTORY & CONTEXT Albemarle County & Charlottesville City General District Courts Complex Charlottesville, VA SITE CONTEXT June 29, 2021 Albemarle County & Charlottesville City General District Courts Complex Charlottesville, VA June 29, 2021 SITE AERIAL Albemarle County & Charlottesville City General District Courts Complex Charlottesville, VA June 29, 2021 SITE AERIAL Albemarle County & Charlottesville City General District Courts Complex Charlottesville, VA 1935 CIRCUIT COURT BUILDING ANNEX 1803 HISTORIC CIRCUIT COURT BUILDING 1851 LEVY BUILDING June 29, 2021 EXISTING BUILDINGS Albemarle County & Charlottesville City General District Courts Complex Charlottesville, VA 1 3 3 2 1 2 June 29, 2021 WEST SITE IMAGES Albemarle County & Charlottesville City General District Courts Complex Charlottesville, VA 4 6 4 5 6 5 June 29, 2021 EAST SITE IMAGES Albemarle County & Charlottesville City General District Courts Complex Charlottesville, VA SITE ANALYSIS June 29, 2021 Albemarle County & Charlottesville City General District Courts Complex Charlottesville, VA URBAN EDGE VIEWS TO SITE SOLAR ORIENTATION SITE TOPOGRAPHY June 29, 2021 SITE DIAGRAMS Albemarle County & Charlottesville City General District Courts Complex Charlottesville, VA EAST SITE- BUILDING DESIGN June 29, 2021 Albemarle County & Charlottesville City EAST SITE General District Courts Complex Charlottesville, VA EAST HIGH STREET STAIRS, WALL, AND PLANTING AT LEVY GARAGE RAMP FRONTAGE TO REMAIN, STAIRS TO BE REPAIRED AND REPOINTED. LEVY BUILDING PLANTING/ BIORETENTION AREA JESSUP 7TH STREET NE HOUSE PLANTING AREA PARK STREET CRUSHED GRAVEL TREE PIT NEW WEST SITE BUILDING REDLANDS CLUB BRICK PAVING EAST JEFFERSON STREET 0' 5' 10' 15' 20' Scale: 3/32"=1' TH NOR Thornless Honeylocust_Cohen Partners THORNLESS HONEY LOCUST PAVING AT SITE, PARK ST 0' 20' 40' 60' Scale: 1/32"=1' June 29, June 29, 2021 June 29,20212021 SITE SITE PLAN MATERIALS PALETTE PLAN Albemarle County & Charlottesville City Albemarle County Courts Complex Albemarle County Courts Complex EAST EASTSITE SITE General District Courts Complex T H Charlottesville, VA Charlottesville, NOR VA Charlottesville, VA EAST HIGH STREET OUTGOING SEWER INCOMING WATER INCOMING ELECTRICAL SHAFT JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE UP GARAGE RAMP BELOW VEST. LEVY BUILDING EXECUTIVE RA MP EXECUTIVE PARKING UP EXECUTIVE JESSUP HOUSE INCOMING DATA SERVICE CENTRAL UTILITY PLANT PARK STREET SALLYPORT SERVICE/HC SHERIFF MAINTENANCE LOBBY STORAGE 7TH ST NE HOLDING CELL STORAGE SHAFT UP HOLDING CELL HOLDING CELL SHERIFF PARKING AREA MODIFIED (BY OTHERS) REDLANDS CLUB E. JEFFERSON STREET PLAN TRUE 0 10 20 PLAN TRUE 0 June 10 29,20 2021 FIRST FLOOR Albemarle County & Charlottesville City EAST SITE General District Courts Complex Charlottesville, VA EAST HIGH STREET 4'-0" 10'-5" OUTGOING INCOMING 11'-10" SEWER WATER INCOMING ELECTRICAL GARAGE RAMP SHAFT JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE BELOW UP 6'-2" LEVY BUILDING VEST. EXECUTIVE RA MP EXECUTIVE PARKING UP EXECUTIVE JESSUP HOUSE INCOMING DATA SERVICE CENTRAL UTILITY PLANT PARK STREET 52'-9" SALLYPORT SERVICE/HC SHERIFF LOBBY 7TH ST NE MAINTENANCE STORAGE 47'-1" HOLDING CELL STORAGE SHAFT UP HOLDING CELL HOLDING CELL SHERIFF 3'-9" PARKING AREA MODIFIED (BY OTHERS) 7'-5" REDLANDS CLUB 7'-7" 1'-6" 5'-11" 11'-1" CURB PROPERTY LINE E. JEFFERSON STREET PLAN TRUE 0 10 20 July 20, 2021 PLAN TRUE 0 10 20 FIRST FLOOR (UPDATED) Albemarle County & Charlottesville City EAST SITE General District Courts Complex Charlottesville, VA EAST HIGH STREET OUTGOING SEWER INCOMING WATER INCOMING ELECTRICAL SHAFT JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE UP LEVY BUILDING VEST. EXECUTIVE RA MP RAMP EXECUTIVE PARKING UP UP EXECUTIVE JESSUP HOUSE INCOMING DATA SERVICE CENTRAL UTILITY PLANT PARK STREET SALLYPORT SERVICE/HC SHERIFF MAINTENANCE LOBBY STORAGE 7TH ST NE HOLDING CELL STORAGE SHAFT UP HOLDING CELL HOLDING CELL SHERIFF RAMP UP REDLANDS CLUB E. JEFFERSON STREET PLAN TRUE 0 10 20 June 29, 2021 PLAN TRUE 0 10 20 SECOND FLOOR Albemarle County & Charlottesville City EAST SITE General District Courts Complex Charlottesville, VA EAST HIGH STREET OUTGOING SEWER INCOMING WATER INCOMING ELECTRICAL SHAFT JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE UP VEST. LEVY BUILDING EXECUTIVE RA MP EXECUTIVE PARKING UP RAMP UP EXECUTIVE JESSUP HOUSE INCOMING DATA SERVICE CENTRAL UTILITY PLANT SALLYPORT PARK STREET SERVICE/HC SHERIFF MAINTENANCE LOBBY STORAGE 7TH ST NE HOLDING CELL STORAGE SHAFT UP HOLDING CELL HOLDING CELL SHERIFF RAMP UP REDLANDS CLUB E. JEFFERSON STREET PLAN TRUE 0 10 20 July 20, 2021 PLAN TRUE 0 10 20 SECOND FLOOR (UPDATED) Albemarle County & Charlottesville City EAST SITE General District Courts Complex Charlottesville, VA EAST HIGH STREET OUTGOING SEWER INCOMING WATER INCOMING ELECTRICAL SHAFT JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE UP VEST. LEVY BUILDING EXECUTIVE RA MP EXECUTIVE PARKING UP EXECUTIVE JESSUP HOUSE INCOMING DATA SERVICE CENTRAL UTILITY PLANT PARK STREET SALLYPORT SERVICE/HC SHERIFF MAINTENANCE LOBBY STORAGE 7TH ST NE HOLDING CELL STORAGE SHAFT UP HOLDING CELL HOLDING CELL SHERIFF MECHANICAL PENTHOUSE SCREEN WALL REDLANDS CLUB E. JEFFERSON STREET PLAN TRUE 0 10 20 June 29, 2021 PLAN TRUE 0 10 20 ROOF Albemarle County & Charlottesville City EAST SITE General District Courts Complex Charlottesville, VA THE ROTUNDA - CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA STATE CAPITOL - RICHMOND, VA US COURTHOUSE - HUNTSVILLE, AL CARRE D’ART - NIMES, FRANCE US COURTHOUSE - SPRINGFIELD, MA US COURTHOUSE - BAKERSFIELD, CA June 29, 2021 PORTICO ARCHITECTURE Albemarle County & Charlottesville City EAST SITE General District Courts Complex Charlottesville, VA June 29, 2021 COLONNADE PORTICO DIAGRAM Albemarle County & Charlottesville City EAST SITE General District Courts Complex Charlottesville, VA June 29, 2021 PERSPECTIVE - AERIAL Albemarle County & Charlottesville City EAST SITE General District Courts Complex Charlottesville, VA July 20, 2021 PERSPECTIVE - AERIAL (UPDATED) Albemarle County & Charlottesville City EAST SITE General District Courts Complex Charlottesville, VA PEDESTRIAN SCALE FEATURE BENCH BLUESTONE SUPPORTS BLUESTONE STEPS LIGHT POLE WOOD SEAT RECESSED LIGHTING STRIP BOLLARDS BLUESTONE ACCENT BAND PLANTING AREA LOW TO MEDIUM SHRUBS CANOPY PARK STREET OVERHEAD BRICK SEAT WALL COLUMN WITH BLUESTONE PAVING SURROUND BLUESTONE ELLIPSE WEATHERLOCK CRUSHED GRAVEL TREE PIT BLUESTONE WALL 0' 5' 10' 15' 20' BLUESTONE ACCENT BAND Scale: 3/32"=1' NEW BUILDING BLUESTONE ACCENT BAND TH NOR BOLLARDS BRICK PAVING 0' 20' 40' 60' THORNLESS HONEY Scale: 1/32"=1' LOCUSTS TH NOR Thornless Honeylocust_Cohen Partners THORNLESS HONEY LOCUST PAVING AT SITE, PARK ST BRICK SEAT WALL 0" 4' 8' 12' 16' EXISTING PARKING AND CURB TREE OPENING AND SOIL CELLS BENEATH PAVING Scale: 1/8"=1' June 29, June 29, 2021 2021 SITE SITE PLAN PLAN -- PLAZA MATERIALS ENLARGEMENT PLAZA PALETTE ENLARGEMENT Albemarle County & Charlottesville City Albemarle County Courts Complex EAST SITE General District Courts Complex Charlottesville, VA Charlottesville, VA CRUSHED GRAVEL TREE PIT 0' 5' 10' 15' 20' Scale: 3/32"=1' LEGEND BUILDING ENTRANCE TH NOR ROAD Thornless Honeylocust_Cohen Partners THORNLESS HONEY LOCUST PAVING AT SITE,EXISTING PARK ST SIDEWALK NON-ADA ACCESSIBLE WALKWAY 0' 20' 40' 60' PRIMARY ADA ACCESSIBLE WALKWAY Scale: 1/32"=1' June 29, 2021 June 29, 2021 CIRCULATION CIRCULATION PLAN MATERIALS PLAN -- SITE PALETTE SITE Albemarle County & Charlottesville City Albemarle County Courts Complex EAST SITE General District CourtsORComplex TH Charlottesville, N VA Charlottesville, VA CRUSHED GRAVEL TREE PIT 0' 5' 10' 15' 20' Scale: 3/32"=1' TH NOR 0' 20' 40' 60' Scale: 1/32"=1' LEGEND BUILDING ENTRANCE ROAD TH NOR EXISTING SIDEWALK PAVING AT SITE, NON-ADA PARK ST ACCESSIBLE WALKWAY Thornless Honeylocust_Cohen Partners THORNLESS HONEY LOCUST PRIMARY ADA ACCESSIBLE WALKWAY 0" 4' 8' 12' 16' SECONDARY ADA ACCESSIBLE WALKWAY Scale: 1/8"=1' June 29, June 29, 2021 2021 CIRCULATION MATERIALSPLAN CIRCULATION -- PLAZA PALETTE PLAN PLAZA Albemarle County & Charlottesville City Albemarle County Courts Complex EAST SITE General District Courts Complex Charlottesville, VA Charlottesville, VA LEVY BUILDING REDLANDS CLUB BRICK PAVERS BENCH BLUESTONE BRICK ELLIPSE WALL PLAZA SECTION: NORTH-SOUTH A-A' CRUSHED GRAVEL TREE PIT NEW BUILDING TW 502.88+ 500.77 + + 501.39 + FFE 502.5' BLUESTONE THORNLESS BENCH ROADWAY SIDEWALK WALL HONEYLOCUST Thornless Honeylocust_Cohen Partners THORNLESS HONEY LOCUST PAVING AT SITE, PARK ST PLAZA SECTION: WEST-EAST B-B' June 29, 2021 June 29, 2021 SITE SECTIONS SECTIONS MATERIALS SITE PALETTE Albemarle County & Charlottesville City Albemarle County Courts Complex EAST SITE General District Courts Complex Charlottesville, VA Charlottesville, VA June 29, 2021 VIEW ON PARK STREET LOOKING NORTH AND EAST Albemarle County & Charlottesville City EAST SITE General District Courts Complex Charlottesville, VA June 29, 2021 SITE PERSPECTIVE - WEST ELEVATION OF ANNEX & PLAZA Albemarle County & Charlottesville City EAST SITE General District Courts Complex Charlottesville, VA July 20, 2021 SITE PERSPECTIVE - WEST ELEVATION OF ANNEX & PLAZA (UPDATED) Albemarle County & Charlottesville City EAST SITE General District Courts Complex Charlottesville, VA June 29, 2021 SITE PERSPECTIVE - WEST ELEVATION OF ANNEX Albemarle County & Charlottesville City EAST SITE General District Courts Complex Charlottesville, VA July 20, 2021 SITE PERSPECTIVE - WEST ELEVATION OF ANNEX (UPDATED) Albemarle County & Charlottesville City EAST SITE General District Courts Complex Charlottesville, VA June 29, 2021 PHYSICAL MODEL - WEST ELEVATION & PLAZA Albemarle County & Charlottesville City EAST SITE General District Courts Complex Charlottesville, VA June 29, 2021 PHYSICAL MODEL - WEST ELEVATION & PLAZA Albemarle County & Charlottesville City EAST SITE General District Courts Complex Charlottesville, VA June 29, 2021 ELEVATION - WEST Albemarle County & Charlottesville City EAST SITE General District Courts Complex Charlottesville, VA June 29, 2021 VIEW ON HIGH STREET LOOKING WEST Albemarle County & Charlottesville City EAST SITE General District Courts Complex Charlottesville, VA June 29, 2021 PERSPECTIVE - VIEW FROM NORTHEAST Albemarle County & Charlottesville City EAST SITE General District Courts Complex Charlottesville, VA June 29, 2021 ELEVATION - EAST Albemarle County & Charlottesville City EAST SITE General District Courts Complex Charlottesville, VA June 29, 2021 ELEVATION - NORTH Albemarle County & Charlottesville City EAST SITE General District Courts Complex Charlottesville, VA June 29, 2021 ELEVATION - SOUTH Albemarle County & Charlottesville City EAST SITE General District Courts Complex Charlottesville, VA June 29, 2021 PERSPECTIVE - VIEW FROM SOUTHEAST Albemarle County & Charlottesville City EAST SITE General District Courts Complex Charlottesville, VA Commodore Smooth Medium Red Smooth Modular 503-505 Colony Red Range LIMESTONE BLUESTONE CRUSHED GRAVEL TREE PIT Rubigo Red Smooth Light Red Smooth BRICK- EXTRUDED Thornless Honeylocust_Cohen Partners THORNLESS HONEY LOCUST PAVING AT SITE, PARK ST BRONZE WINDOW FRAME CONTEMPORARY CONTEMPORARY NORMAN BRICK WITH LIGHT FIXTURE UNLIT BOLLARD 1/3 RUNNING BOND PATTERN June 29, June 29, 2021 2021 EXTERIOR FINISHES MATERIALS PALETTE Albemarle County & Charlottesville City Albemarle County Courts Complex EAST SITE General District Courts Complex Charlottesville, VA Charlottesville, VA LIMESTONE BLUESTONE CRUSHED GRAVEL TREE PIT BRICK- EXTRUDED Thornless Honeylocust_Cohen Partners THORNLESS HONEY LOCUST PAVING AT SITE, PARK ST BRONZE WINDOW FRAME CONTEMPORARY CONTEMPORARY NORMAN BRICK WITH LIGHT FIXTURE UNLIT BOLLARD 1/3 RUNNING BOND PATTERN July 29, June 20, 2021 2021 EXTERIOR FINISHES MATERIALS PALETTE (UPDATED) Albemarle County & Charlottesville City Albemarle County Courts Complex EAST SITE General District Courts Complex Charlottesville, VA Charlottesville, VA WOOD TOPPED BLUESTONE BENCH UNDERLIT BENCH BLUESTONE PAVING BLUESTONE PAVING AT COLUMN June 29, 2021 EXTERIOR MATERIALS PALETTE June 29, 2021 MATERIALS PALETTE Albemarle County & Charlottesville City EAST SITE Albemarle County Courts Complex EAST SITE General District Courts Complex Charlottesville, VA Charlottesville, VA BAR 16-11-01 401 Cherry Avenue, TMP 290150000 Owner: Gateway Terrace Partners, LLC Representative: Doug Stafford, Griffin-Stafford Hospitality Project: Repairs to stucco Application components (please click each link to go directly to PDF page): • Staff Report • 2016 Staff Report for William Taylor Plaza CoA • Conditions Photos • Documentation and Specs July 20, 2021 BAR Packet 7 City of Charlottesville Board of Architectural Review Staff Summary July 20, 2021 Discussion of proposed stucco repairs William Taylor Plaza – Phase I (Currently the Fairfield Inn & Suites by Marriott Charlottesville Downtown/University Area) 401 Cherry Avenue Background In December 2015, the BAR approved the final CoA for Phase I of the William Taylor Plaza. (See the attached March 2016 staff report for a summary of the BAR’s actions.) That project, a proposed hotel, was completed in 2018. The project/hotel was sold in 2018 and again in 2019. Currently is it operated as The Fairfield Inn & Suites by Marriott, owned by Gateway Terrace Partners, LLC of Charlotte, NC, and managed by Griffin-Stafford Hospitality of Charlotte, NC. In early 2020, staff was contacted by Doug Stafford (Griffin-Stafford Hospitality) regarding delaminating and otherwise failing stucco on the building and requested guidance on how to proceed with repairs, such that the work would be acceptable to the BAR. After some initial correspondence, the circumstances of 2020 prevailed, and the matter placed on hold. In March 2021, discussions with Mr. Stafford resumed and he presented a repair option, which staff circulated to the BAR. The following summarizing the BAR’s comments and questions, which I shared with Mr. Stafford: • Have they established where the moisture is coming from? o What exactly is the existing condition? o They refer to a vapor barrier. That does not appear to be indicated in the drawing. o What is the spec for that vapor barrier? Is it a vapor retarder (i.e. is somewhat permeable) or is it in fact a vapor barrier (i.e. impermeable)? o Is there a drainage plane associated with the vapor barrier? • Request the manufacturer’s specs & drawings for the proposed system – details as drawn are too generic. In following up on the above with, it was agreed that the best path forward would be to present this BAR directly. WTP – Phase I, BAR discussion July 20, 2021 1 Discussion The areas to be repaired are all stucco walls shown on the elevations on sheets A-200 and A-201-- see the key in the lower, righthand corner. (Note: the clouded area on these sheets are not relevant. They are from modifications made in 2017, and not related to the stucco repair.) Photographs show the existing conditions. The proposed repairs will apply a Parex EIFS system over the existing hard coat stucco. The primary details are shown on sheet A-455, which references to the existing hard coat stucco system (Decoplast Decowall FRS) and details how the Parex EIFS system will be installed (the water resistive and air barrier coating installed over the existing stucco). A-455 also illustrates the details at the various components—door and window trim and sills, roof parapet, etc. Also provided for reference: • Information on the existing Decoplast Decowall FRS system. This includes the warranty document from the original developer (affirming that the Decowall FRS was used), and four spec sheets showing how the Decowall FRS is installed, including a water resistive barrier. • Spec sheets for installing the Parex EIFS. (As noted in the spec sheets and Sheet A-455, the EIFS system will be drainable). Aside from the material and methods proposed for the repairs, the repairs will result in a slight reveal at the perimeter of the existing windows, doors, and vents. As built, the stucco is flush with these components—see the images below. This modification is detailed on Sheet A-455. This n4ew detail will be consistent on the building—and, in fact, be similar to the reveal condition at the brick wall segments. Staff suggests this is an acceptable detail modification. The roof coping—at the stucco sections and where they intersect with the other finishes—will be modified to accommodate the additional layer of stucco. At the interior corners where stucco abuts either brick or siding, appropriate expansion joints and materials will be used to waterproof those locations. WTP – Phase I, BAR discussion July 20, 2021 2 The existing horizontal and vertical joints in the stucco will be replicated with the new surface; however, the new material will cover the existing joints, with the new joints only in that new layer of stucco, and not extending into the old. The Design Guidelines recommend against the use of EIFS; however, its use has been approved for recent projects. (1532–1536 Virginia Avenue, for example.) The BAR should discuss if the proposed Parex EIFS system is acceptable and, if necessary, request additional information about it. Suggested Action This is a discussion only, with the owners and property manager seeking BAR guidance on repairing the existing stucco. This is not a CoA request and no formal action is required. The BAR may express that guidance by consensus, straw poll or even by motion and vote; however, such action will not constitute a CoA, nor modify a prior CoA, as defined by the City Code under Historical Preservation and Architectural Design Control Overlay Districts. Staff suggests that the proposed repairs, if acceptable to the BAR, fall generally within routine repair and maintenance, which does not require a CoA and provides some flexibility for repairs that do not significantly alter a structure. Given the age and contemporary design od this building, staff suggest the resulting physical changes are minor, consistent with the design guidelines, and can be allowed without formal action. (For example, the BAR did not require formal approval for the modified LED lamping at The Standard.) However, If the BAR feels a formal approval is necessary, staff can work with the owners and property manager to prepare a CoA application and submittal; however, staff recommends that the BAR first indicate they are amenable to the proposed repairs and offer clear guidance on any additional information that should be provided. Criteria, Standards, and Guidelines Note: This is not a CoA request; however, guidance from the BAR must still be consistent with the review standards and design guidelines applicable to any project within an ADC District. Review Criteria Generally Sec. 34-284(b) of the City Code states that, in considering a particular application the BAR shall approve the application unless it finds: 1) That the proposal does not meet specific standards set forth within this division or applicable provisions of the Design Guidelines established by the board pursuant to Sec. 34-288(6); and 2) The proposal is incompatible with the historic, cultural or architectural character of the district in which the property is located or the protected property that is the subject of the application. Pertinent Standards for Review of Construction and Alterations include: 1) Whether the material, texture, color, height, scale, mass and placement of the proposed addition, modification or construction are visually and architecturally compatible with the site and the applicable design control district; 2) The harmony of the proposed change in terms of overall proportion and the size and placement of entrances, windows, awnings, exterior stairs and signs; 3) The Secretary of the Interior Standards for Rehabilitation set forth within the Code of Federal Regulations (36 C.F.R. §67.7(b)), as may be relevant; 4) The effect of the proposed change on the historic district neighborhood; WTP – Phase I, BAR discussion July 20, 2021 3 5) The impact of the proposed change on other protected features on the property, such as gardens, landscaping, fences, walls and walks; 6) Whether the proposed method of construction, renovation or restoration could have an adverse impact on the structure or site, or adjacent buildings or structures; 7) Any applicable provisions of the City’s Design Guidelines. Pertinent Design Guidelines for New Construction Note: While this is an existing building, the guidelines Rehabilitation are not applicable to this condition, nor helpful under the circumstances. L. Foundation and Cornice 1. Distinguish the foundation from the rest of the structure through the use of different materials, patterns, or textures. 2. Respect the height, contrast of materials, and textures of foundations on surrounding historic buildings. 3. If used, cornices should be in proportion to the rest of the building. 4. Wood or metal cornices are preferred. The use of fypon may be appropriate where the location is not immediately adjacent to pedestrians. M. Materials & Textures 1. The selection of materials and textures for a new building should be compatible with and complementary to neighboring buildings. 2. In order to strengthen the traditional image of the residential areas of the historic districts, brick, stucco, and wood siding are the most appropriate materials for new buildings. 3. In commercial/office areas, brick is generally the most appropriate material for new structures. “Thin set” brick is not permitted. Stone is more commonly used for site walls than buildings. 4. Large-scale, multi-lot buildings, whose primary facades have been divided into different bays and planes to relate to existing neighboring buildings, can have varied materials, shades, and textures. 5. Synthetic siding and trim, including, vinyl and aluminum, are not historic cladding materials in the historic districts, and their use should be avoided. 6. Cementitious siding, such as HardiPlank boards and panels, are appropriate. 7. Concrete or metal panels may be appropriate. 8. Metal storefronts in clear or bronze are appropriate. 9. The use of Exterior Insulation and Finish Systems (EIFS) is discouraged but may be approved on items such as gables where it cannot be seen or damaged. It requires careful design of the location of control joints. 10. The use of fiberglass-reinforced plastic is discouraged. If used, it must be painted. 11. All exterior trim woodwork, decking and flooring must be painted, or may be stained solid if not visible from public right-of-way. WTP – Phase I, BAR discussion July 20, 2021 4 City of Charlottesville Board of Architectural Review Staff Report April 19, 2016 (excerpts for July 20, 2021 discussion) Certificate of Appropriateness Application BAR 15-08-04 NW Corner of Ridge St. and Cherry Ave. Tax Parcel 290145000-147000, 290149000-151000, 290157000 Charlie Armstrong, Owner/ Cherry Avenue Investments LLC, Applicant Proposed new construction of a Marriot Hotel on the NW corner intersection of Cherry Avenue and Ridge Street – plaza facade design Background All the parcels fronting on Ridge Street are located within the Ridge Street ADC district. The parcels fronting on Cherry Avenue are not in a design control district. However, the recently approved Planned Unit Development included a requirement that “The entire William Taylor Plaza Planned Unit Development (PUD), all phases, shall be subject to the Board of Architectural Review (BAR) as it applies all pertinent design standards and guidelines to this project in keeping with the Ridge Street Architectural Design Control (ADC) District.” May 18, 2004 – On the same parcels but different applicant: Preliminary Discussion with the BAR on “Cherry Ridge Commons,” William Atwood, architect. July 20, 2004 – Preliminary discussion with the BAR on “Cherry Ridge Commons,” William Atwood, architect. -------------------- October 6, 2008 - City Council agreed to convey two parcels of City-owned land to the developer. January 20, 2009 – Preliminary discussion with BAR and current applicant. July 21, 2009 Preliminary – Preliminary discussion with the BAR. The Chair requested that staff summarize the BAR’s discussion. September 9, 2009 – The Planning Commission recommended approval of the PUD with proffers. The proffers will be revised prior to City Council’s consideration. Please note that the landscaped pedestrian median that is shown on the plan in Ridge Street is not required by the proffers. September 15, 2009 - The BAR accepted (5-0-1 with Adams recusing) applicant’s deferral. The application was not properly before the BAR since the rezoning is still pending. November 2, 2009 – City Council approved the rezoning to Planned Unit Development (PUD) with proffers. November 17, 2009 - The BAR approved the application (6-1-1 with Brennan against and Adams recused) in concept, with the stipulation that detailed architectural designs, building WTP – Phase I, BAR Staff Report from April 19, 2016 (for July 20, 2021 discussion) 1 materials, colors, and detailed site/landscaping design shall come back to the BAR for approval, also the BAR voiced strong support for a landscaped median on Ridge Street. ------------------------ July 20, 2015 – City Council approved amendments to the 2009 William Taylor Plaza PUD. August 19, 2015 – The BAR had a preliminary discussion. Consensus was the proposal was too suburban; lacked pedestrian engagement along Ridge and Cherry; lacked inviting design at plaza/ important intersection corner and at rear retaining wall; lacked quality building materials; the design of the Ridge Street entrance was incompatible; and the building needs to relate in massing and scale to context of neighborhood and surrounding buildings in historic district. September 14, 2015 – The BAR held a work session on a revised design. Consensus was the design was moving in a better direction; need larger spatial break at Cherry Avenue entrance; modulate fenestration; resolve corner space to engage Ridge Street; need a good landscape design; re-design the rear retaining wall; large, shared vehicle entrance on Ridge is problematic; historicist design less important than quality materials, details, and construction. October 20, 2015- Schwarz moved to find that the proposed new construction, including massing, and general site layout generally satisfies the BAR’s criteria and is compatible with this property and other properties in the Ridge Street ADC district, and that the BAR approves only the massing and general site layout, with the following modifications: that the applicant look at the lobby entryway and the corner at Ridge and Cherry, and continue to explore color. Mohr seconded. (8-0). November 17, 2015- Miller moved to find that the proposed new construction satisfies the BAR’s criteria and is compatible with this property and other properties in the Ridge Street ADC district, and that the BAR approves (6-0) the proposed new building [including building materials] with the following items and details to come back to the BAR for approval: • Ridge Street corner [including glass canopies] and plaza; • Further site plan and planting plan development; • Exploration of a livelier color at the Cherry edge and entry [Cherry Avenue pedestrian entrance and lower garage entry] • Exterior lighting plan and signage. Additional work was recommended on the rear retaining wall, such as more terracing or landscaping. December 15, 2015 - Miller moved to find that the BAR approves the proposed new building and site design details as submitted with the following modifications: • eliminate the sidewalk colored pavers and floating seat wall from the plaza; • change Redbuds on plaza back to Red Maples; • raise the canopy on the plaza side, and continue to refine, submitting any changes via email; • institute lighting controls; • replace upright shrubs on retaining walls with leafing or draping ones; and • replace the Japanese Beauty Berry with the American Beauty Berry. WTP – Phase I, BAR Staff Report from April 19, 2016 (for July 20, 2021 discussion) 2 Seconded by Schwartz. Motion passes (8-0). [ Final elevations, site plan and landscape plan drawings with the requested changes to be submitted in digital form for circulation to the BAR.] March 15, 2016 – The BAR affirmed that all the remaining conditions of approval had been satisfied except two: The corner plaza brick façade and the related signage. Application Background: The current owner is requesting a certificate of appropriateness for Phase One of a new mixed-use Planned Unit Development on the corner of Ridge Street and Cherry Avenue. The proposed project will be built on a total of 2.9 acres. The BAR previously received a correct and updated copy of the PUD approval from July 20, 2015, “Approved Plan.” That packet includes the ordinance, amended proffers, and drawings such as Existing Conditions, Land Use Plan, Phasing Plan, and Matrix of permitted Use Types. Two phases are proposed, the 2.4 acre Cherry Avenue Phase (Phase One) and the 0.4 acre Ridge Street Phase (Phase Two). Since the developer is choosing to develop the Cherry Avenue Phase first, the plan stipulates that existing trees in the Ridge Street phase shall remain undisturbed until site plan approval has been granted for the Ridge Street phase, except invasive species may be removed. Phase One includes a proposed hotel, retail space, parking, and the arboretum area. No residential units are proposed in Phase One. Phase Two may be residential or mixed use. The new hotel is designed with 4 levels, with 2 levels of parking under the building. On the main level there is a rear drive-up entrance with a porte cochere that provides access to a lobby, and a pedestrian entrance from Cherry Avenue that leads into a corridor to the same lobby. On the second level at the Ridge Street end there is a commercial space and a secondary entrance to hotel, both accessed from a small plaza on Ridge Street. There is also a meeting room that has only an interior access. The third and fourth levels are all guest rooms. There are two levels of parking under the building. The lower level has a vehicular entrance on the west side, visible from Cherry Avenue, and a bike room with outside bike racks at the SW corner of the building. The second level has a vehicular entrance on the north (rear) side, and a pedestrian entrance from Cherry Avenue. • In addition to the garage parking, there is a surface parking lot below the level of the future Ridge Street buildings. The proffers state that a minimum of 60% of the total project parking will be accommodated in structured parking under the buildings. Parked cars will not be visible from Ridge Street. • The arboretum must occupy at least 25% of the site, with public access during daylight hours. • The Phase Two area must provide an effective buffer from the surface parking lot. The building re-design shows three layers with different materials. • Layer 1: Brick running bond, Cushwa Redland (corbl every other course below water table) Storefronts and windows are Milk White aluminum. WTP – Phase I, BAR Staff Report from April 19, 2016 (for July 20, 2021 discussion) 3 • Layer 2: Fine texture stucco in Sherwin Williams Anonymous or Camelback. Storefronts and windows are Night Hawk Gray. • Layer 3: Hardie fibercement clapboard (smooth face with bead) in color Cobblestone. Windows are color Sea Wolf Gray. Other elements • Precast stone watertables, lintels – Arctic White (smooth) • Perforated decorative metal panels on garage openings – Grecian pattern, color- Milk White • Porous concrete pavers- Umbriano style, color Winter Marvel • PTAC exterior grilles – linear louvres, color to match window frame • Marquee canopy/porte cochere cladding - beige • Cherry Avenue areaway railings – agate gray with stainless steel cable • Retaining wall guardrail – matte black aluminum • Picket fence and vehicle guardrail – dark walnut stain • Segmental retaining wall system – AB Fieldstone Europa – Abbey blend • Light fixtures – matte black • Awnings – Sunbrella Sapphire (stripe) Current application: The building design has been approved by the BAR except for the unresolved condition: “raise the canopy on the plaza side, and continue to refine.” The BAR has not been able to come to consensus via email, so staff suggested to the applicant that they submit a wrapped balcony version per Mohr’s suggestion, then the BAR could discuss both options at the April 19 BAR meeting and decide on one or the other. Mohr suggested extending the balconies around the corner to the first row of windows. Some members preferred to have balconies only on the Ridge Street façade. Criteria, Standards and Guidelines (Note: Same as current BAR staff reports.) Pertinent Design Guidelines for New Construction (Note: Guidelines related to the July 20, 2021 discussion only.) L. FOUNDATION and CORNICE 1. Distinguish the foundation from the rest of the structure through the use of different materials, patterns, or textures. 2. Respect the height, contrast of materials, and textures of foundations on surrounding historic buildings. 3. If used, cornices should be in proportion to the rest of the building. 4. Wood or metal cornices are preferred. The use of fypon may be appropriate where the location is not immediately adjacent to pedestrians. M. MATERIALS & TEXTURES 1. The selection of materials and textures for a new building should be compatible with and complementary to neighboring buildings. 2. In order to strengthen the traditional image of the residential areas of the historic districts, brick, stucco, and wood siding are the most appropriate materials for new buildings. WTP – Phase I, BAR Staff Report from April 19, 2016 (for July 20, 2021 discussion) 4 3. In commercial/office areas, brick is generally the most appropriate material for new structures. “Thin set” brick is not permitted. Stone is more commonly used for site walls than buildings. 4. Large-scale, multi-lot buildings, whose primary facades have been divided into different bays and planes to relate to existing neighboring buildings, can have varied materials, shades, and textures. 5. Synthetic siding and trim, including, vinyl and aluminum, are not historic cladding materials in the historic districts, and their use should be avoided. 6. Cementitious siding, such as HardiPlank boards and panels, are appropriate. 7. Concrete or metal panels may be appropriate. 8. Metal storefronts in clear or bronze are appropriate. 9. The use of Exterior Insulation and Finish Systems (EIFS) is discouraged but may be approved on items such as gables where it cannot be seen or damaged. It requires careful design of the location of control joints. 10. The use of fiberglass-reinforced plastic is discouraged. If used, it must be painted. 11. All exterior trim woodwork, decking and flooring must be painted, or may be stained solid if not visible from public right-of-way. Discussion and Recommendations The BAR should focus their review on this site as a major gateway to the City, in addition to the neighborhood context, and whether the design meets the pertinent design guidelines and is compatible with the Ridge Street ADC historic district. Regarding the signage, permitted signage on Ridge Street is limited to 12 sq feet, since it is in the Ridge Street ADC district. The two signs proposed on Cherry Avenue would meet the maximum 100 square foot aggregate area on that street. The applicant had originally proposed a projecting sign, but the sign ordinance allows only 3’-6’ for projecting sign, so that was not acceptable to them. Staff then suggested a monument sign of maximum 24 sq feet, which was selected. The porte cochere sign at the rear is not counted because it cannot be seen from the public road. Therefore, the only remaining condition is the resolution of the Ridge Street façade building design. The BAR was not in agreement on the idea of wrapping balconies around to Ridge Street. Everyone did seem to agree that the balcony brackets were oversized. The BAR needs to resolve this issue, understanding that the remainder of the building and site design have already received approval from the BAR. Suggested Motion Having considered the standards set forth within the City Code, including City Design Guidelines for New Construction, I move to find that the proposed Ridge Street plaza façade design satisfies the BAR’s criteria and is compatible with this property and other properties in the Ridge Street ADC district, and that the BAR approves the building details of option ---as submitted (or with the following modifications…). WTP – Phase I, BAR Staff Report from April 19, 2016 (for July 20, 2021 discussion) 5 BCA ARCHITECTS & ENGINEERS COPYRIGHT 2016 - BCA ARCHITECTS & ENGINEERS, ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. REUSE OF THESE DOCUMENTS WITHOUT THE EXPRESS 1 2 4 6 3 11 5 A-300 A-300 A-300 A-301 A-300 A-303 A-301 22 21 20 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0.5 2 3 MTL2 MTL1 A-202 A-203 MTL2 MTL1 MTL3 MTL2 MTL1 ROOF 507' - 6 1/4" WRITTEN PERMISSION OF BCA ARCHITECTS & ENGINEERS IS PROHIBITED. MTL1 CLBD W W W W W W W W W W W W W 3B 3B 3B 3B 3B 3B 3B 3B 3B 3B 3B 3B 3B 102 102 C.J. C.J. C.J. C.J. C.J. C.J. C.J. C.J. C.J. C.J. HOTEL LEVEL 4 CLBD STC1 497' - 7" C.J. C.J. C.J. C.J. W W W W W W W W W W W W 3B 3B 3B 3B 3B 3B 3B W W W W W STC1 W BRCK 102 5 2A 1A 1A 1A 2A 2A 2A 1A 1A 2A 2A 102 A-203 C.J. HOTEL LEVEL 3 C.J. C.J. C.J. C.J. C.J. C.J. C.J. BRCK 487' - 7" 2' - 2 11/16" BRCK 1 A-202 W W W W W W W W W W W W S4b W W W W W W W BEHIND ELEVATION CUT 1A 1A 2A 2A 1A 1A 2A 3A 2A 1A 1A 1A 2A 1A 1A 2A 2A 1A 1A HOTEL LEVEL 2 H 477' - 7" 2' - 2 11/16" BRCK STC1 BRCK STC1 A-305 10' - 0" W W W W W W W W W S4a 100 S7 S7 S7 S10 S7 S7 1A 1A 2A 2A 1A 1A 2A 3A 2A HOTEL LEVEL 1 465' - 7" 2' - 2 11/16" STC3 W W W STC3 W 100 4 4 4 4 S3 3' - 0" MTL2 A GARAGE LEVEL 2 456' - 1" S1 CONTINUOUS BRICK SUPPORT 2 ANGLE, SEE STRUCTURAL A-203 GARAGE LEVEL 1 447' - 1" SOUTHWEST ELEVATION 1 SCALE: 3/32" = 1'-0" 9 12 8 A-302 A-303 A-302 BACKUP WALL, CONSTRUCTION A B C D E F G H J VARIES, SEE WALL SECTIONS 1/2" PRECAST STONE WATERTABLE COLOR: 6 EXTERIOR BUILDING ARTIC WHITE, PROVIDE MTL1 4 CHAMFER ON TOP EDGE CORNER OF RIDGE STREET AND CHERRY AVENUE A-203 A-203 MOUNTED LIGHT MTL3 FIXTURE, TYPE 'B' SEE ELEVATIONS C.J. C.J. C.J. C.J. C.J. C.J. COURSES 2 BRICK ROOF CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE, VIRGINIA MARRIOTT FAIRFIELD INN & SUITES 507' - 6 1/4" WILLIAM TAYLOR PLAZA PUD (PH 1) BUILDING ELEVATIONS 10 MTL2 A-203 BRCK STC2 A 102 102 102 HOTEL LEVEL 4 497' - 7" A 1/2" W W 102 1D 1D STC1 AT ALL BRICK LOCATIONS BELOW HOTEL LEVEL 3 PRECAST STONE WATERTABLE, 2' - 2 11/16" BRCK 487' - 7" RECESS EVERY THIRD COURSE BACK 1/2", PROVIDE SAME BRICK S9 DETAIL @ ALL BRICK VENEER 103 W W S8 PLANTER BED WALLS, TYP 101 2B 2B HOTEL LEVEL 2 477' - 7" PRECAST STONE WATERTABLE 3 SCALE: 1 1/2" = 1'-0" HOTEL LEVEL 1 465' - 7" GARAGE LEVEL 2 456' - 1" REVISIONS A 06/20/17 GARAGE LEVEL 1 447' - 1" EXTERIOR FINISH KEY THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS AT THE SITE & STC1 STUCCO - COLOR SW 7046 ANONYMOUS NOTIFY THE ENGINEER IN WRITING OF ANY DISCREPANCIES. STC2 STUCCO - COLOR SW 6122 CAMELBACK Drawn By Checked By STC3 STUCCO - COLOR SW 6349 PENNYWISE TJW ATG SOUTHEAST ELEVATION 2 Scale Date BRCK CUSHWA BRICK - COLOR #103 GEORGIAN As indicated 11/14/2016 SCALE: 3/32" = 1'-0" CLBD CLAPBOARD - COLOR COBBLESTONE File No. 2015-016 MTL1 METAL - COLOR MILK WHITE (MATCH) Sheet No. MTL2 MTL3 METAL - COLOR NIGHT HAWK GRAY (MATCH) A-200 METAL - COLOR SEA WOLF (MATCH) FOR CONSTRUCTION BCA ARCHITECTS & ENGINEERS COPYRIGHT 2016 - BCA ARCHITECTS & ENGINEERS, ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. REUSE OF THESE DOCUMENTS WITHOUT THE EXPRESS 5 11 3 6 4 2 1 A-301 A-303 A-300 A-301 A-300 A-300 A-300 EXTERIOR BUILDING 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 MOUNTED LIGHT FIXTURE, TYPE 'B' 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 EXTERIOR BUILDING MOUNTED LIGHT MTL2 MTL3 MTL3 EXTERIOR BUILDING FIXTURE, TYPE 'B' STC1 MOUNTED LIGHT FIXTURES, TYPE 'B' ROOF 507' - 6 1/4" WRITTEN PERMISSION OF BCA ARCHITECTS & ENGINEERS IS PROHIBITED. CLBD W W W W W W W W W MTL2 3B 3B 3B 3B W W 2A 2A 2A 2A 2A STC2 3A CLBD 3A HOTEL LEVEL 4 497' - 7" STC2 W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W 3B 3B 3B 2A 2A 2A 3A 2A 2A 2A 2A 2A 2A 2A 2A 2A HOTEL LEVEL 3 487' - 7" W W W W W W W W 2A 2A W W W W W W W W 2A 2A 3B 3B STC1 2A 2A 2A 2A 2A 2A 2A 2A 2A 2A HOTEL LEVEL 2 477' - 7" W W W W 105 S5 W W STC1 W W W W W W 2A 2A 2A 2A S6 S10 2A 2A 2A 2A 2A 2A 2A 2A HOTEL LEVEL 1 465' - 7" STC3 3 A-201 STC3 GARAGE LEVEL 2 456' - 1" GARAGE LEVEL 1 447' - 1" NORTHEAST ELEVATION 1 SCALE: 3/32" = 1'-0" J H G F E D C B A ROOF 507' - 6 1/4" 8 3 12 9 MTL2 A-302 A-201 A-303 A-302 7' - 0" HOTEL LEVEL 4 497' - 7" 5' - 11" CORNER OF RIDGE STREET AND CHERRY AVENUE CLBD W W MTL1 2B 2B CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE, VIRGINIA MARRIOTT FAIRFIELD INN & SUITES WILLIAM TAYLOR PLAZA PUD (PH 1) HOTEL LEVEL 3 C.J. C.J. C.J. C.J. 487' - 7" BUILDING ELEVATIONS W W W W 2B 2B 1B 1B HOTEL LEVEL 2 EXTERIOR BUILDING 477' - 7" MOUNTED LIGHT BRCK FIXTURE, TYPE 'B' 1' - 0" 1' - 6" W W W W 2B 2B 1B 1B 1 A-203 HOTEL LEVEL 1 465' - 7" W W W 4 4 4 CONTINUOUS BRICK SUPPORT ANGLE, SEE STRUCTURAL 3' - 0" STEEL PLATE LETTERING, +/-1/8" FLAT METAL PANEL, GARAGE LEVEL 2 456' - 1" THICK, PAINTED BLACK, PAINTED LIGHT GRAY SECURED TO FLAT PANEL, TYP. 100 S2 51 GARAGE LEVEL 1 PARKING GARAGE SIGNAGE 447' - 1" 3 SCALE: 1" = 1'-0" REVISIONS A 06/20/17 NORTHWEST ELEVATION 2 SCALE: 3/32" = 1'-0" EXTERIOR FINISH KEY THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS AT THE SITE & STC1 STUCCO - COLOR SW 7046 ANONYMOUS NOTIFY THE ENGINEER IN WRITING OF ANY DISCREPANCIES. STC2 STUCCO - COLOR SW 6122 CAMELBACK Drawn By Checked By STC3 STUCCO - COLOR SW 6349 PENNYWISE ATG ATG Scale Date BRCK CUSHWA BRICK - COLOR #103 GEORGIAN As indicated 11/14/2016 CLBD CLAPBOARD - COLOR COBBLESTONE File No. 2015-016 MTL1 METAL - COLOR MILK WHITE (MATCH) Sheet No. MTL2 MTL3 METAL - COLOR NIGHT HAWK GRAY (MATCH) A-201 METAL - COLOR SEA WOLF (MATCH) FOR CONSTRUCTION GENERAL NOTES: NOTE: EXISTING HARD COAT STUCCO TO REMAIN. REPAIR AS NOTE: EXISTING HARD COAT STUCCO TO REMAIN. REPAIR AS NOTE: EXISTING HARD COAT STUCCO TO REMAIN. REPAIR AS Project: PLEASE SEE SUPPLEMENTAL PACKAGE FOR REQUIRED TO ADEQUATELY INSTALL NEW EIFS SYSTEM PER MANUFACTURERS WRITTEN INSTRUCTIONS. REQUIRED TO ADEQUATELY INSTALL NEW EIFS SYSTEM PER MANUFACTURERS WRITTEN INSTRUCTIONS. REQUIRED TO ADEQUATELY INSTALL NEW EIFS SYSTEM PER MANUFACTURERS WRITTEN INSTRUCTIONS. Fairfield Inn & Suites COPYRIGHT 2011 INFORMATION REGARDING THE PAREX EXISTING WALL CONSTRUCTION / STOREFRONT / DOORS TO REMAIN UNDISTURBED - TYP. EXISTING WALL CONSTRUCTION / STOREFRONT / DOORS TO REMAIN UNDISTURBED - TYP. EXISTING WALL CONSTRUCTION / STOREFRONT / DOORS TO REMAIN UNDISTURBED - TYP. 401 Cherry Ave., OPTIMUM WATERMASTER CI EIFS SYSTEM INSTALLATION AND DETAILS. Charlottesville, VA 22903 1 1/2" MIN. FULLY DRAINIBLE EIFS SYSTEM (PAREX OPTIMUM WATERMASTER CI) INSTALLED PER ALL EXHAUST VENTS / LOUVERS TO BE MANUFACTURERS WRITTEN INSTRUCTIONS -TYP. Owner: REMOVED AND RE-ATTACHED ONCE NEW NEW WATER-RESISTIVE & AIR BARRIER COATING Gateway Terrace Partners, POSSESSION IN ANY FORM CONSTITUTES ACCEPTANCE OF THESE CONDITIONS. EIFS SYSTEM IS INSTALLED - THUS PER MANUFACTURE - TO BE INSTALLED PER PREVENTING ANY CRACKING OR OTHER MANUFACTURERS WRITTEN INSTRUCTIONS - TYP. LLC DAMAGE - TYP. EXISTING DECOWALL FRS SYSTEM W/ LIQUID OR SPEEDCOAT WATER-RESISTIVE & AIR NEW EIFS SYSTEM BEYOND EXISTING WINDOW WITH INTEGRAL 124 Floyd Smith Office BARRIER COATING - TYP. CONT. FULL WIDTH ALUMINUM CAP EXISTING SHEATHING - TYP. FLASHING/ COPING AT PARAPET TOP- FLASHING. Park Drive, Suite 150 TO PROVIDE A MIN. 1/4" SLOPE BACK NEW CONTINUOUS ALUMINUM SILL SEE EIFS MANUFACTURING DETAILS TO ROOF- TYP. ALL SEAMS AND FLASHING AND COUNTER FLASHING Charlotte, NC 28262 FOR CORNER PROTECTION - AS JOINTS TO BE CAULKED, WATER AND SET IN FULL BED OF SEALANT - COLOR REQUIRED - TYP. WEATHER TIGHT- TYP. TO MATCH STOREFRONT - TYP. G.C. TO ADD LARGE FILET BEAD OF NEW CONTINUOUS CAULK AND BACKER COMPATIBLE SEALANT TO COVER THE ROD AT WINDOW SILL TO REPLACE CONNECTION JOINT FROM THE HARD CONT. COMPATIBLE SEALANT EXISTING - TYP. COAT STUCCO AND NEW EIFS SYSTEM. BOTH SIDES - TYP. PROVIDE A MIN. OF A 30 DEGREE SLOPE EXISTING SEALANT AND BACKER ROD NEW WATER-RESISTIVE & AIR BARRIER ON HORZ. EIFS PROJECTIONS AS PER BOTH SIDES OF WINDOW / STOREFRONT COATING PER MANUFACTURE - TO BE MANUFACTURER'S WRITTEN SYSTEM - TYP - REPAIR REPLACE AS INSTALLED PER MANUFACTURERS INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS- TYP. REQUIRED - TYP. WRITTEN INSTRUCTIONS - TYP. 1 1/2" MIN. FULLY DRAINIBLE EIFS SYSTEM EXISTING STOREFRONT SYSTEM / DOOR - EXISTING SHEATHING TYP. (PAREX OPTIMUM WATERMASTER CI) TYP. INSTALLED PER MANUFACTURERS 1 1/2" MIN. FULLY DRAINIBLE EIFS WRITTEN INSTRUCTIONS -TYP. SYSTEM (PAREX OPTIMUM WATERMASTER CI) INSTALLED PER EXISTING DECOWALL FRS SYSTEM W/ MANUFACTURERS WRITTEN LIQUID OR SPEEDCOAT WATER-RESISTIVE INSTRUCTIONS -TYP. & AIR BARRIER COATING - TYP. EXISTING DECOWALL FRS SYSTEM NEW WATER-RESISTIVE & AIR BARRIER W/ LIQUID OR SPEEDCOAT COATING PER MANUFACTURE - TO BE WATER-RESISTIVE & AIR BARRIER INSTALLED PER MANUFACTURERS COATING - TYP. WRITTEN INSTRUCTIONS - TYP. EXISTING SHEATHING TYP. HATCHED AREA IS EXISTING TO REMAIN - TYP. ALL DESIGNS, DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS DEPICTED ON THIS SHEET ARE THE PROPERTY OF R IV ARCHITECTURE, P.A.. ANY UNAUTHORIZED USE OR REPRODUCTION IS SUBJECT TO LEGAL PROSECUTION. EXISTING SEALANT AND BACKER ROD BOTH SIDES OF WINDOW / STOREFRONT SYSTEM - TYP. EXISTING GYPSUM WALL BOARD - TYP. EXISTING WD STUD WALL @ 16" O.C. WITH R-19 BATT INSULATION - TYP. 8 Not Used 6 Plan Detail @ Window / Storefront Jamb 4 Section Detail @ Parapet 2 Section Detail @ Window Sill 3" = 1'-0" 3" = 1'-0" 3" = 1'-0" 3" = 1'-0" 124 Floyd Smith Dr NOTE: NOTE: NOTE: NOTE: Suite 375 EXISTING HARD COAT STUCCO TO REMAIN. REPAIR AS REQUIRED TO ADEQUATELY INSTALL NEW EIFS SYSTEM EXISTING HARD COAT STUCCO TO REMAIN. REPAIR AS REQUIRED TO ADEQUATELY INSTALL NEW EIFS SYSTEM EXISTING HARD COAT STUCCO TO REMAIN. REPAIR AS REQUIRED TO ADEQUATELY INSTALL NEW EIFS SYSTEM EXISTING HARD COAT STUCCO TO REMAIN. REPAIR AS REQUIRED TO ADEQUATELY INSTALL NEW EIFS SYSTEM Charlotte, NC 28262 PER MANUFACTURERS WRITTEN INSTRUCTIONS. PER MANUFACTURERS WRITTEN INSTRUCTIONS. PER MANUFACTURERS WRITTEN INSTRUCTIONS. PER MANUFACTURERS WRITTEN INSTRUCTIONS. Tel - 704 - 688-7500 EXISTING WALL CONSTRUCTION / STOREFRONT / DOORS EXISTING WALL CONSTRUCTION / STOREFRONT / DOORS EXISTING WALL CONSTRUCTION / STOREFRONT / DOORS EXISTING WALL CONSTRUCTION / STOREFRONT / DOORS TO REMAIN UNDISTURBED - TYP. TO REMAIN UNDISTURBED - TYP. TO REMAIN UNDISTURBED - TYP. TO REMAIN UNDISTURBED - TYP. 513A Savannah Hwy 1 1/2" MIN. FULLY DRAINIBLE EIFS SYSTEM (PAREX Charleston, SC 29407 OPTIMUM WATERMASTER CI) INSTALLED PER Tel - 843 - 531-6848 MANUFACTURERS WRITTEN INSTRUCTIONS -TYP. NEW WATER-RESISTIVE & AIR BARRIER COATING PER MANUFACTURE - TO BE INSTALLED PER EXISTING WD STUD WALL @ 16" O.C. WITH EXISTING SHEATHING TYP. EXISTING SHEATHING TYP. R-19 BATT INSULATION - TYP. MANUFACTURERS WRITTEN INSTRUCTIONS - TYP. EXISTING DECOWALL FRS SYSTEM W/ LIQUID EXISTING GYPSUM WALL BOARD - TYP. EXISTING DECOWALL FRS SYSTEM W/ EXISTING DECOWALL FRS SYSTEM W/ LIQUID OR SPEEDCOAT www.R4architecture.com LIQUID OR SPEEDCOAT OR SPEEDCOAT WATER-RESISTIVE & AIR WATER-RESISTIVE & AIR BARRIER WATER-RESISTIVE & AIR BARRIER BARRIER COATING - TYP. EXISTING CONTINUOUS SEALANT AND COATING - TYP. EXISTING SHEATHING - TYP. BACKER ROD BOTH SIDES OF STOREFRONT DOOR SYSTEM - TYP. COATING - TYP. 1 1/2" MIN. FULLY DRAINIBLE EIFS 1 1/2" MIN. FULLY DRAINIBLE EIFS Revision Date SYSTEM (PAREX OPTIMUM SYSTEM (PAREX OPTIMUM SEE EIFS MANUFACTURING DETAILS G.C. TO ADD LARGE FILET BEAD OF WATERMASTER CI) INSTALLED PER WATERMASTER CI) INSTALLED PER FOR CORNER PROTECTION - AS COMPATIBLE SEALANT TO COVER THE MANUFACTURERS WRITTEN MANUFACTURERS WRITTEN REQUIRED - TYP. CONNECTION JOINT FROM THE HARD INSTRUCTIONS -TYP. INSTRUCTIONS -TYP. COAT STUCCO AND NEW EIFS SYSTEM. G.C. TO ADD LARGE FILET BEAD OF NEW WATER-RESISTIVE & AIR BARRIER COMPATIBLE SEALANT TO COVER THE NEW WATER-RESISTIVE & AIR BARRIER COATING PER COATING PER MANUFACTURE - TO BE CONNECTION JOINT FROM THE HARD INSTALLED PER MANUFACTURERS COAT STUCCO AND NEW EIFS SYSTEM. MANUFACTURE - TO BE INSTALLED PER MANUFACTURERS WRITTEN WRITTEN INSTRUCTIONS - TYP. EXISTING SEALANT AND BACKER ROD INSTRUCTIONS - TYP. BOTH SIDES OF WINDOW / STOREFRONT NEW CONT. FULL HEAD FLASHING SYSTEM - TYP - REPAIR REPLACE AS NEW EIFS STARTER TRACK WITH AND COUNTER FLASHING TO REQUIRED - TYP. THRU-WALL FLASHING AND EXTEND 4" MIN. BEHIND EPS VAPOR CONTINUOUS MTL. DRIP EDGE - TYP. BARRIER TO LAP OVER FLASHING- EXISTING DOOR - TYP. TYP. NEW EIFS STARTER TRACK WITH NEW CONT. FULL HEAD FLASHING THRU-WALL FLASHING AND AND COUNTER FLASHING TO CONTINUOUS MTL. DRIP EDGE - TYP. EXTEND 4" MIN. BEHIND EPS VAPOR BARRIER TO LAP OVER FLASHING- TYP. NEW CONTINUOUS CAULK AND Drawn By JAM NEW CONTINUOUS CAULK AND BACKER ROD AT WINDOW SILL TO BACKER ROD AS REQUIRED AT DOOR REPLACE EXISTING - TYP. Checked By MJR HEADER TO REPLACE EXISTING - TYP. EXISTING WINDOW WITH INTEGRAL EXISTING STOREFRONT SYSTEM / DOOR - TYP. EXISTING DOOR WITH INTEGRAL FLASHING. Issue Date 4/19/2021 FLASHING. SEE EIFS MANUFACTURING DETAILS FOR CORNER PROTECTION - AS HATCHED AREA IS EXISTING TO REMAIN - TYP. HATCHED AREA IS EXISTING TO REMAIN - TYP. Project No REQUIRED - TYP. EXISTING SHEATHING - TYP. EXISTING GYPSUM WALL BOARD - TYP. EXISTING VAPOR BARRIER - TYP. NEW EIFS SYSTEM BEYOND NEW EIFS SYSTEM BEYOND Sheet Title EXISTING DECOWALL FRS SYSTEM W/ LIQUID OR SPEEDCOAT WATER-RESISTIVE & AIR BARRIER COATING - TYP. Section Details NEW WATER-RESISTIVE & AIR BARRIER COATING PER MANUFACTURE - TO BE INSTALLED PER MANUFACTURERS WRITTEN INSTRUCTIONS - TYP. 1 1/2" MIN. FULLY DRAINIBLE EIFS SYSTEM (PAREX OPTIMUM WATERMASTER CI) INSTALLED PER MANUFACTURERS WRITTEN INSTRUCTIONS -TYP. Sheet Number 7 Plan Detail @ Door Jamb 3" = 1'-0" 5 Plan Detail @ Door Jamb 3" = 1'-0" 3 Section Detail @ Door Header 3" = 1'-0" 1 Section Detail @ Window Head 3" = 1'-0" A-455 rorALWALI. PRODUCT DATA [?[p� PREMIUM FIBERED STUCCO =�!�t:r:�: Concentrate Premium Fibered Stucco AMERICA'S EIFS AND STUCCO COMPANY/ TOTAL WALL Premium Fibered Stucco Concentrate is a dry mix containing Portland cement, chopped strand fiberglass rein­ forcement, micro-fibers for added strength and crack resistance, graded aggregates, and specialty modifiers designed to enhance workability and cure. TOTAL WALL Premium Fibered Stucco Concentrate requires sand to be added in addition to water. TOTAL WALL Premium Fibered Stucco Concentrate: -�;SIii - Can be used as standard stucco or as one-coat, hi-lift stucco. - Is available in 50# bags in stan­ dard gray or in a white finish grade without the w• larger fibers. - May be top-coated with TOTAL WALL Premium Fibered Stucco White Finish (Tintable), T-Wall ,LIi,,, �· . Lastic Elastomeric Coating, or any -.,:,,. TOTAL WALL Synthetic Textured 'i Finish Coat. ,eatures Coverage---· 0 Standard, One-Coat or Hi-Lift Estimated Coverage Per SO LB Bag Of Mix: 55-65 square feet at 1/4" 0 High Impact Resistance 35-40 square feet at 3/8" 0 Extremely High Impact Resistance 25-30 square feet at 1/2" 20-25 square feet at 5/8" 0 Fireproof and Mildew Res;istant 18-20 square feet at 3/4" 0 Pre-Sanded, Just Add Water 15-18 square feet at 7/8" ._,, •A•A• ..... .... ■•1•• • .,., AMERICA'S EIFS AND STUCCO COMPANY/ Description r2roauct aata sheathing followed by mechani­ above 40F for 24 hours. Shelf life Mixing Instructions cally fastened lath reinforcement in unopened bags is 12-18 months Add up to 120 punds of clean silica with joint and trim accessories. when stored in dry conditions. Store sand per 50 pound bag of Total All lathing must be galvanized under cover. Wall Premium Fibered Stucco and self-furring. Trim accessories Maintenance Concentrate. Add approximately must be galvanized, solid zinc or If damage occurs to an installed 2-3/4 gallons of clean water per custom PVC components. Apply system, please contact Total Wall batch (50-pound bag of TOTAL TOTAL WALL Premium Fibered for information on repair. WALL Premium Fibered Stucco Stucco using a trowel in one or and 10 punds of sand). Use low­ more passes or lifts to achieve Precautions speed mixing. After initial mix- the prescribed thickness. When This product is a Portland cement ing, allow the mix to stand for 2-5 useful, employ tools such as a bas�d material. Do not ingest. minutes then remix, adding a small darby or slicker to assist in level­ Avoid contact with skin and eyes. a�e;>u�t of water to adjust work­ ing the coating. If TOTAL WALL In case of contact with product or ab1hty 1f necessary. Mix pot-life will Liquid Acrylic Additive or Acrylic mix, flush with water. For contact vary depending on temperature Tint has been added to the mix with eyes, get immediate medical and bat?h size. An average pot-life do not moist cure the coating a� attention in addition to flushing. of 40 minutes can be anticipated. the acrylic assists in the proper Wear safety glasses and protec­ TOTAL WALL Premium Fibered cure process. Coating thickness tive clothing. Keep out of reach of �tuc�o n:iay be re-tempered one may range from a minimum of 1/4" children and pets.eyes, get immedi­ time 1f mix becomes too stiff. Final and a maximum of 1 1/2". TOTAL ate medical attention in addition to �onsistency �hould be a creamy WALL Premium Fibered Stucco flushing. Wear safety glasses and hght and easily trowelable mixture. Finish Coat may be applied once protective clothing. Options the combination brown and scratch Limitations 1. TOTAL WALL Liquid acrylic Ad­ coat base is firm and dry. TOTAL Apply in accordance with standard ditive may be used to replace up �ALL �y�thetic Finish may be ap­ lath and plastering practices. Do to 20% of the mix water during job plied within 18 hours. It is advis­ not apply to frozen walls or in tem­ site mixing. TOTAL WALL Liquid able to allow the TOTAL WALL peratures below freezing. Use only acryl!c Additive will improve the Premium Fibered Stucco to cure clean potable mix water. When physical strength characteristics of at least 48 hours before applying possible, schedule work to avoid ·�·· .........· ...,..•.. the product and reduce the inci­ T-Wall Lastic Coating. application in direct sun. Moist cur­ ..... dence of cracking. Handling and Storage ing of product is acceptable unless Do not apply to frozen or saturated TOTAL WALL Liquid acrylic Additive 2. TOTAL WALL Tinted-Liquid has been added. Acrylic Additive may be added to �urf�ces. Do not apply if precipita­ TOTAL WALL Premium Fibered tion Is forecast within 8 hours of Stucco White Finish to achieve a application. Do not apply if the limited range of pastel colors at the temperature cannot be maintained AMERICA'S EIFS AND STUCCO COMPANY! job site. chnical Data 3. TOTAL WALL Synthetic Finishes or T-Wall Lastic may be used for an attractive and durable finish C?�ting. TOTAL WALL Synthetic Finishes and T-Wall Lastic are Meets ASTM C595 s pecifications for Blended Hydraulic Cement available in several textures and unlimited colors. Chemistry- Portland cement meets standard ASTM Cl SO Application Aggre�ates - meet standards ASTM C33, ASTM Cl 44 and ASTM C778 TOTAL WALL Premium Fibered Stucco may be applied directly Hydration Control - balanced lime blend meets standard ASTM C207 to sound raw masonry without Modifiers - s pecialty hydrating agents and wetting agents the use of netting or lath or other reinforcement. If desired or speci­ fied, a ,:--wall Bonding Agent may Reinforcement - natural mineral fibers plus chopped strand fiberglass be apph�d to the substrate prior to Appearance: Dry, gray powder apphcat1on. If application is over painted masonry, mechanically pH (wet): Approx. 10.5 ta�tened l�th reinforcement plus 888.702.991 S Phone 10Int and tnm accessories are re­ 888.702.9916 Fax quired. For wood or gypsum-based Density {wet): 1.6-1.8 grams/cc sheathing, a moisture barrier is w ww.totalwall.com required as the first layer over the Chemistry: Portia nd cement DECOWALL FRS SHEATHING (BY OTHERS) DECOPLAST LIQUID OR SPEEDCOAT WATER-RESISTIVE & AIR BARRIER COATING (OPTIONAL: GRADE D BUILDING PAPER) CODE COMPLIANT PAPER OR FELT WATER-RESISTIVE BARRIER DECO-LATH PER ASTM C1063 ***FASTEN WITH TAPCON LEGLESS 1-3/4" PLASTER WASHER (OPTIONAL - EXPANDED METAL LATH) DECOWALL FIBER REINFORCED SANDED STUCCO (OPTIONAL - DECOPLAST MESH EMBEDDED IN DECOPLAST BASECOAT. SEE NOTES) DECOPLAST PRIMER (OPTIONAL) DECOPLAST TEXTURED FINISH (ALTERNATIVE FINISH OPTIONS SEE NOTES) DG1.01 DECOWALL FRS STUCCO ASSEMBLY / WOOD FRAME DECOPLAST DECOWALL FRS - 6/1/2016 NOTE: 1. Stucco Claddings and any cladding using a mortar bed requires the use of a slipsheet installed over the Water-Resistive & Air Barrier Coating to prevent adhesion of the stucco. 2. Refer to Decoplast specifications specified basecoat product & thickness 3. Optional Decoplast Mesh embedded in Decoplast Basecoat may be applied over DECOWALL Fiber Reinforced Sanded Stucco to help bridge spidering. 4. Optional textured finishes: Decolastic, Deco250 and DecoSil. Disclaimer: The design, specifications, and construction shall comply with all local building codes and standards. Decoplast installation guidelines are for general information and guidance only and Decoplast specifically disclaims any liability for the use of this design, and for design, engineering, or workmanship of any project. The assembly shall be designed to prevent condensation within the assembly. The designer and the user shall provide final drawings and specifications. Products shown other than those manufactured by Decoplast are shown for clarity of the Decoplast product only. Contact the manufacturer of such other products for installation instructions. DECOWALL FRS SHEATHING (BY OTHERS) DECOPLAST LIQUID OR SPEEDCOAT WATER-RESISTIVE & AIR BARRIER COATING CODE COMPLIANT PAPER OR FELT WATER-RESISTIVE BARRIER DECO-LATH PER ASTM C1063 (OPTIONAL - EXPANDED METAL LATH) DECOWALL FIBER REINFORCED SANDED STUCCO (OPTIONAL - DECOPLAST MESH EMBEDDED IN DECOPLAST BASECOAT. SEE NOTES) DECOPLAST PRIMER (OPTIONAL) DECOPLAST TEXTURED FINISH (ALTERNATIVE FINISH OPTIONS SEE NOTES) METAL WEEP SCREED OR FLASHING WATERPROOF MEMBRANE SEALED WATERTIGHT TO FOUNDATION (BY OTHERS) MEMBRANE PRIMER (BY OTHERS) DT1.01 DECOWALL FRS TERMINATION AT GRADE DECOPLAST DECOWALL FRS - 6/1/2016 NOTE: 1. To ensure a continuous air barrier across the building envelope, a continuous air seal should be made at each substrate change, joints/gaps, penetrations and dissimilar material terminations. There must be consideration of the Designer in the overall wall assembly design. 2. Stucco Claddings and any cladding using a mortar bed requires the use of a slipsheet installed over the Water-Resistive & Air Barrier Coating to prevent adhesion of the stucco. 3. Refer to Decoplast specifications specified basecoat product & thickness 4. Optional Decoplast Mesh embedded in Decoplast Basecoat may be applied over DECOWALL Fiber Reinforced Sanded Stucco to help bridge spidering. 5. Optional textured finishes: Decolastic, Deco250 and DecoSil. Disclaimer: The design, specifications, and construction shall comply with all local building codes and standards. Decoplast installation guidelines are for general information and guidance only and Decoplast specifically disclaims any liability for the use of this design, and for design, engineering, or workmanship of any project. The assembly shall be designed to prevent condensation within the assembly. The designer and the user shall provide final drawings and specifications. Products shown other than those manufactured by Decoplast are shown for clarity of the Decoplast product only. Contact the manufacturer of such other products for installation instructions. DECOWALL FRS SHEATHING (BY OTHERS) DECOPLAST SHEATHING JOINT TAPE EMBEDDED IN DECOPLAST WATER-RESISTIVE & AIR BARRIER COATING DECOPLAST LIQUID OR SPEEDCOAT WATER-RESISTIVE & AIR BARRIER COATING CODE COMPLIANT PAPER OR FELT WATER-RESISTIVE BARRIER CLOSED CELL BACKER ROD & ELASTOMERIC SEALANT CASING BEAD WITH OPTIONAL WEEP HOLES DECO-LATH PER ASTM C1063 (OPTIONAL - EXPANDED METAL LATH) WINDOW FRAME JAMB (BY OTHERS) DECOPLAST TEXTURED FINISH (ALTERNATIVE FINISH OPTIONS SEE NOTES) DECOPLAST PRIMER (OPTIONAL) DECOWALL FIBER REINFORCED SANDED STUCCO (OPTIONAL - DECOPLAST MESH EMBEDDED IN DECOPLAST BASECOAT SEE NOTES) DW1.01 DECOWALL FRS TERMINATION AT WINDOW JAMB DECOPLAST DECOWALL FRS - 6/1/2016 NOTE: 1. To ensure a continuous air barrier across the building envelope, a continuous air seal should be made at each substrate change, joints/gaps, penetrations and dissimilar material terminations. There must be consideration of the Designer in the overall wall assembly design. 2. Stucco Claddings and any cladding using a mortar bed requires the use of a slipsheet installed over the Water-Resistive & Air Barrier Coating to prevent adhesion of the stucco. 3. Refer to Decoplast specifications specified basecoat product & thickness 4. Optional Decoplast Mesh embedded in Decoplast Basecoat may be applied over DECOWALL Fiber Reinforced Sanded Stucco to help bridge spidering. 5. Optional textured finishes: Decolastic, Deco250 and DecoSil. Disclaimer: The design, specifications, and construction shall comply with all local building codes and standards. Decoplast installation guidelines are for general information and guidance only and Decoplast specifically disclaims any liability for the use of this design, and for design, engineering, or workmanship of any project. The assembly shall be designed to prevent condensation within the assembly. The designer and the user shall provide final drawings and specifications. Products shown other than those manufactured by Decoplast are shown for clarity of the Decoplast product only. Contact the manufacturer of such other products for installation instructions. DECOWALL FRS DECOWALL FIBER REINFORCED SANDED STUCCO (OPTIONAL - DECOPLAST MESH EMBEDDED IN DECOPLAST BASECOAT SEE NOTES) DECOPLAST PRIMER (OPTIONAL) DECOPLAST TEXTURED FINISH (ALTERNATIVE FINISH OPTIONS SEE NOTES) DECO-LATH PER ASTM C1063 (OPTIONAL - EXPANDED METAL LATH) CODE COMPLIANT PAPER OR FELT WATER-RESISTIVE BARRIER CASING BEAD WITH OPTIONAL WEEP HOLES CLOSED CELL BACKER ROD & ELASTOMERIC SEALANT DECOPLAST LIQUID OR SPEEDCOAT WATER-RESISTIVE & AIR BARRIER COATING FLASHING W/ WATER TIGHT, UP-TURNED ENDS SET IN SEALANT. SLOPE FLASHING FOR DRAINAGE. SEAL BETWEEN FLASHING & FRAME. DECOPLAST SHEATHING JOINT TAPE EMBEDDED IN DECOPLAST WATER-RESISTIVE & AIR BARRIER COATING WINDOW FRAME (BY OTHERS) SHEATHING (BY OTHERS) DW1.02 DECOWALL FRS TERMINATION AT WINDOW HEAD DECOPLAST DECOWALL FRS - 6/1/2016 NOTE: 1. To ensure a continuous air barrier across the building envelope, a continuous air seal should be made at each substrate change, joints/gaps, penetrations and dissimilar material terminations. There must be consideration of the Designer in the overall wall assembly design. 2. Stucco Claddings and any cladding using a mortar bed requires the use of a slipsheet installed over the Water-Resistive & Air Barrier Coating to prevent adhesion of the stucco. 3. Refer to Decoplast specifications specified basecoat product & thickness 4. Optional Decoplast Mesh embedded in Decoplast Basecoat may be applied over DECOWALL Fiber Reinforced Sanded Stucco to help bridge spidering. 5. Optional textured finishes: Decolastic, Deco250 and DecoSil. Disclaimer: The design, specifications, and construction shall comply with all local building codes and standards. Decoplast installation guidelines are for general information and guidance only and Decoplast specifically disclaims any liability for the use of this design, and for design, engineering, or workmanship of any project. The assembly shall be designed to prevent condensation within the assembly. The designer and the user shall provide final drawings and specifications. Products shown other than those manufactured by Decoplast are shown for clarity of the Decoplast product only. Contact the manufacturer of such other products for installation instructions. DECOWALL FRS WINDOW FRAME SILL FLASHING WITH END DAMS 2" MIN. SEALANT (BY OTHERS) DECOPLAST TEXTURED FINISH (ALTERNATIVE FINISH OPTIONS SEE NOTES) DECOPLAST PRIMER (OPTIONAL) DECOWALL FIBER REINFORCED SANDED STUCCO (OPTIONAL - DECOPLAST MESH EMBEDDED IN DECOPLAST BASECOAT SEE NOTES) CASING BEAD WITH OPTIONAL WEEP HOLES DECO-LATH PER ASTM C1063 (OPTIONAL - EXPANDED METAL LATH) CODE COMPLIANT PAPER OR FELT WATER-RESISTIVE BARRIER DECOPLAST LIQUID OR SPEEDCOAT WATER-RESISTIVE & AIR BARRIER COATING DECOPLAST SHEATHING JOINT TAPE EMBEDDED IN DECOPLAST WATER-RESISTIVE & AIR BARRIER COATING SHEATHING (BY OTHERS) DW1.03 DECOWALL FRS TERMINATION AT WINDOW SILL DECOPLAST DECOWALL FRS - 6/1/2016 NOTE: 1. To ensure a continuous air barrier across the building envelope, a continuous air seal should be made at each substrate change, joints/gaps, penetrations and dissimilar material terminations. There must be consideration of the Designer in the overall wall assembly design. 2. Stucco Claddings and any cladding using a mortar bed requires the use of a slipsheet installed over the Water-Resistive & Air Barrier Coating to prevent adhesion of the stucco. 3. Refer to Decoplast specifications specified basecoat product & thickness 4. Optional Decoplast Mesh embedded in Decoplast Basecoat may be applied over DECOWALL Fiber Reinforced Sanded Stucco to help bridge spidering. 5. Optional textured finishes: Decolastic, Deco250 and DecoSil. Disclaimer: The design, specifications, and construction shall comply with all local building codes and standards. Decoplast installation guidelines are for general information and guidance only and Decoplast specifically disclaims any liability for the use of this design, and for design, engineering, or workmanship of any project. The assembly shall be designed to prevent condensation within the assembly. The designer and the user shall provide final drawings and specifications. Products shown other than those manufactured by Decoplast are shown for clarity of the Decoplast product only. Contact the manufacturer of such other products for installation instructions. WATERMASTER CI SUBSTRATE. PAREX USA WATER-RESISTIVE & AIR BARRIER COATING. PAREX USA ADHESIVE. PAREX USA REINFORCING MESH EMBEDDED IN PAREX USA BASECOAT. 12 6 PAREX USA ADHESIVE. EXPANDED POLYSTYRENE BAND FEATURE. PAREX USA FINISH. LAP EMBEDDED PAREX USA REINFORCING MESH ONTO ADJACENT. EXPANDED POLYSTYRENE INSULATION BOARD. REINFORCING MESH EMBEDDED IN PAREX USA BASECOAT AND OVERLAPPING THE REINFORCING MESH A MINIMUM OF 2½" (63 MM). SUBSTRATE. PAREX USA WATER-RESISTIVE & AIR BARRIER COATING. PAREX USA ADHESIVE. REINFORCING MESH EMBEDDED IN 3/4” (19MM) PAREX USA BASECOAT AND MIN. OVERLAPPING THE REINFORCING MESH A MINIMUM OF 2½" (63 MM). REINFORCING MESH EMBEDDED IN BASECOAT. PAREX USA FINISH. SWM PA1.01 AESTHETIC BAND AND REVEAL REV. DATE: 05/04/18 SWM W1.07 TERMINATION AT FINNED WINDOW JAMB NOTES: 1. To ensure a continuous air barrier across the building envelope, a continuous air seal should be made at each substrate change, joints/gaps, penetrations and dissimilar material terminations. These must be a consideration of the designer in the overall wall assembly design. Disclaimer: The design specifications and construction shall comply with all local building codes and standards. Parex USA installation guidelines are for general information and guidance only and Parex USA specifically disclaims any liability for the use of this design and for design engineering or workmanship of any project. The assembly shall be designed to prevent condensation within the assembly. The designer and the user shall provide final drawings and specifications. Products shown other than those manufactured by Parex USA are shown for clarity of the Parex USA product only. Contact the manufacturer of such other products for installation instructions. WATERMASTER CI END STUD ANCHOR 48" ON CENTER MAXIMUM SPACING TO LIMIT MOVEMENT BETWEEN WATER RESISTIVE & AIR BARRIER AND SEALANT. SUBSTRATE. PAREX USA SHEATHING JOINT TAPE EMBEDDED IN PAREX USA WATER-RESISTIVE & AIR BARRIER COATING. PAREX USA WATER-RESISTIVE & AIR BARRIER COATING. CLOSED CELL BACKER ROD & ELASTOMERIC SEALANT (BY OTHERS). PAREX USA MESH BACKWRAP. PAREX USA ADHESIVE. EXPANDED POLYSTYRENE INSULATION BOARD. PAREX USA REINFORCING MESH EMBEDDED IN PAREX USA BASE COAT. PAREX USA BASECOAT. PAREX USA PRIMER (OPTIONAL) PAREX USA FINISH. SWM E1.01 INSIDE CORNER TERMINATION REV. DATE: 05/04/18 NOTES: 1. To ensure a continuous air barrier across the building envelope, a continuous air seal should be made at each substrate change, joints/gaps, penetrations and dissimilar material terminations. These must be a consideration of the designer in the overall wall assembly design. Disclaimer: The design specifications and construction shall comply with all local building codes and standards. Parex USA installation guidelines are for general information and guidance only and Parex USA specifically disclaims any liability for the use of this design and for design engineering or workmanship of any project. The assembly shall be designed to prevent condensation within the assembly. The designer and the user shall provide final drawings and specifications. Products shown other than those manufactured by Parex USA are shown for clarity of the Parex USA product only. Contact the manufacturer of such other products for installation instructions. WATERMASTER CI SUBSTRATE. PAREX USA WATER-RESISTIVE & AIR BARRIER COATING . PAREX USA ADHESIVE. EXPANDED POLYSTYRENE INSULATION BOARD. PAREX USA REINFORCING MESH EMBEDDED IN PAREX USA BASECOAT. PAREX USA FINISH. PAREX USA MESH BACKWRAP. PAREX USA DRAINEDGE™ PAREX USA SHEATHING JOINT TAPE EMBEDDED IN PAREX USA WATER-RESISTIVE & AIR BARRIER COATING. METAL FLASHING (BY OTHERS). CLOSED CELL BACKER ROD & ELASTOMERIC SEALANT W/ WEEPS@ 16" O.C. (BY OTHERS). ELASTOMERIC SEALANT. SWM E1.02 THRU-SYSTEM FLASHING W/ WEEPS REV. DATE: 05/04/18 NOTES: 1. To ensure a continuous air barrier across the building envelope, a continuous air seal should be made at each substrate change, joints/gaps, penetrations and dissimilar material terminations. These must be a consideration of the designer in the overall wall assembly design. Disclaimer: The design specifications and construction shall comply with all local building codes and standards. Parex USA installation guidelines are for general information and guidance only and Parex USA specifically disclaims any liability for the use of this design and for design engineering or workmanship of any project. The assembly shall be designed to prevent condensation within the assembly. The designer and the user shall provide final drawings and specifications. Products shown other than those manufactured by Parex USA are shown for clarity of the Parex USA product only. Contact the manufacturer of such other products for installation instructions. WATERMASTER CI SUBSTRATE. PAREX USA SHEATHING JOINT TAPE EMBEDDED IN PAREX USA WATER-RESISTIVE & AIR BARRIER COATING. PAREX USA WATER-RESISTIVE & AIR BARRIER COATING. CLOSED CELL BACKER ROD & ELASTOMERIC SEALANT (BY OTHERS). PAREX USA MESH BACKWRAP. PAREX USA ADHESIVE. EXPANDED POLYSTYRENE INSULATION BOARD. PAREX USA REINFORCING MESH EMBEDDED IN PAREX USA BASECOAT. PAREX USA BASECOAT. PAREX USA PRIMER (OPTIONAL). PAREX USA FINISH. SWM E1.03 EXPANSION JOINT AT DISSIMILAR SUBSTRATE REV. DATE: 05/04/18 NOTES: 1. To ensure a continuous air barrier across the building envelope, a continuous air seal should be made at each substrate change, joints/gaps, penetrations and dissimilar material terminations. These must be a consideration of the designer in the overall wall assembly design. Disclaimer: The design specifications and construction shall comply with all local building codes and standards. Parex USA installation guidelines are for general information and guidance only and Parex USA specifically disclaims any liability for the use of this design and for design engineering or workmanship of any project. The assembly shall be designed to prevent condensation within the assembly. The designer and the user shall provide final drawings and specifications. Products shown other than those manufactured by Parex USA are shown for clarity of the Parex USA product only. Contact the manufacturer of such other products for installation instructions. WATERMASTER CI SUBSTRATE. PAREX USA WATER-RESISTIVE & AIR BARRIER COATING. PAREX USA ADHESIVE. EXPANDED POLYSTYRENE INSULATION BOARD. PAREX USA REINFORCING MESH EMBEDDED IN PAREX USA BASECOAT. PAREX USA FINISH. PAREX USA SHEATHING JOINT TAPE EMBEDDED IN PAREX USA WATER-RESISTIVE & AIR BARRIER COATING. METAL FLASHING (BY OTHERS). PAREX USA DRAINEDGE™. PAREX USA MESH BACKWRAP. CLOSED CELL BACKER ROD & ELASTOMERIC SEALANT W/ WEEPS@ 16" O.C. (BY OTHERS). SHEATHING SCREWS (BEYOND) FOR UPPER ELASTOMERIC SEALANT (BY OTHERS). FLOOR SHEATHING ARE TO BE FASTENED INTO GAP FOR DEFLECTION. TRACK AT UNDER SIDE OF SLAB. DO NOT FASTEN SCREWS FOR UPPER PAREX USA SHEATHING JOINT TAPE SHEATHING INTO STUDS EMBEDDED IN PAREX USA OF LOWER STORY. WATER-RESISTIVE & AIR BARRIER COATING. SLIDING STUD CONNECTION SLOTTED TRACK TYPICAL. SWM E1.04A FLOOR LINE DEFLECTION SLIP JOINT (2D) REV. DATE: 05/04/18 NOTES: 1. To ensure a continuous air barrier across the building envelope, a continuous air seal should be made at each substrate change, joints/gaps, penetrations and dissimilar material terminations. These must be a consideration of the designer in the overall wall assembly design. Disclaimer: The design specifications and construction shall comply with all local building codes and standards. Parex USA installation guidelines are for general information and guidance only and Parex USA specifically disclaims any liability for the use of this design and for design engineering or workmanship of any project. The assembly shall be designed to prevent condensation within the assembly. The designer and the user shall provide final drawings and specifications. Products shown other than those manufactured by Parex USA are shown for clarity of the Parex USA product only. Contact the manufacturer of such other products for installation instructions. WATERMASTER CI SUBSTRATE. PAREX USA WATER-RESISTIVE & AIR BARRIER COATING. PAREX USA ADHESIVE. EXPANDED POLYSTYRENE INSULATION BOARD. PAREX USA SHEATHING JOINT TAPE EMBEDDED IN PAREX USA WATER-RESISTIVE & AIR BARRIER COATING. PAREX USA DRAINEDGE™. METAL FLASHING (BY OTHERS). CLOSED CELL BACKER ROD & ELASTOMERIC SEALANT W/ WEEPS@ 16" O.C. (BY OTHERS) . ELASTOMERIC SEALANT (BY OTHERS). PAREX USA FINISH. NOTE 1. NOTE 2. PAREX USA PRIMER (OPTIONAL). PAREX USA BASECOAT. PAREX USA REINFORCING MESH EMBEDDED IN PAREX USA BASECOAT. PAREX USA MESH BACKWRAP. PAREX USA SHEATHING JOINT TAPE EMBEDDED IN PAREX USA WATER-RESISTIVE & AIR BARRIER COATING . SWM E1.04B FLOOR LINE DEFLECTION SLIP JOINT (ISO) REV. DATE: 05/04/18 NOTES: 1. To ensure a continuous air barrier across the building envelope, a continuous air seal should be made at each substrate change, joints/gaps, penetrations and dissimilar material terminations. These must be a consideration of the designer in the overall wall assembly design. 2. Sliding stud connection. Slotted track typical. 3. Sheathing screws for upper floor sheathing are to be fastened into track at under side of slab. Do not fasten screws for upper sheathing into studs of lower story. 4. CAUTION: If nested double tracks are used for deflection, sheathing screws must not interfere with track sliding Disclaimer: The design specifications and construction shall comply with all local building codes and standards. Parex USA installation guidelines are for general information and guidance only and Parex USA specifically disclaims any liability for the use of this design and for design engineering or workmanship of any project. The assembly shall be designed to prevent condensation within the assembly. The designer and the user shall provide final drawings and specifications. Products shown other than those manufactured by Parex USA are shown for clarity of the Parex USA product only. Contact the manufacturer of such other products for installation instructions. WATERMASTER CI SUBSTRATE. PAREX USA WATER-RESISTIVE & AIR BARRIER COATING. PAREX USA ADHESIVE. EXPANDED POLYSTYRENE INSULATION BOARD. PAREX USA REINFORCING MESH EMBEDDED IN PAREX USA BASECOAT. PAREX USA FINISH. PAREX USA SHEATHING JOINT TAPE EMBEDDED IN PAREX USA WATER-RESISTIVE & AIR BARRIER COATING. METAL FLASHING (BY OTHERS). PAREX USA DRAINEDGE™. PAREX USA MESH BACKWRAP. CLOSED CELL BACKER ROD & ELASTOMERIC SEALANT W/ WEEPS@ 16" O.C. (BY OTHERS). ELASTOMERIC SEALANT (BY OTHERS). GAP FOR DEFLECTION. PAREX USA SHEATHING JOINT TAPE EMBEDDED IN PAREX USA WATER-RESISTIVE & AIR BARRIER COATING. SWM E1.05A EXPANSION JOINT WITH FLASHING AT FLOOR (2D) REV. DATE: 05/04/18 NOTES: 1. To ensure a continuous air barrier across the building envelope, a continuous air seal should be made at each substrate change, joints/gaps, penetrations and dissimilar material terminations. These must be a consideration of the designer in the overall wall assembly design. 2. Framing shown in this drawing is only conceptual and is not for construction. Follow framing designer's requirements. Disclaimer: The design specifications and construction shall comply with all local building codes and standards. Parex USA installation guidelines are for general information and guidance only and Parex USA specifically disclaims any liability for the use of this design and for design engineering or workmanship of any project. The assembly shall be designed to prevent condensation within the assembly. The designer and the user shall provide final drawings and specifications. Products shown other than those manufactured by Parex USA are shown for clarity of the Parex USA product only. Contact the manufacturer of such other products for installation instructions. WATERMASTER CI SUBSTRATE. PAREX USA WATER-RESISTIVE & AIR BARRIER COATING. PAREX USA ADHESIVE. EXPANDED POLYSTYRENE INSULATION BOARD. PAREX USA SHEATHING JOINT TAPE EMBEDDED IN PAREX USA WATER-RESISTIVE & AIR BARRIER COATING. PAREX USA DRAINEDGE™. METAL FLASHING (BY OTHERS). CLOSED CELL BACKER ROD & ELASTOMERIC SEALANT W/ WEEPS@ 16" O.C. (BY OTHERS) . ELASTOMERIC SEALANT (BY OTHERS). PAREX USA FINISH. PAREX USA PRIMER (OPTIONAL). PAREX USA BASECOAT. PAREX USA REINFORCING MESH EMBEDDED IN PAREX USA BASECOAT. PAREX USA MESH BACKWRAP. PAREX USA SHEATHING JOINT TAPE EMBEDDED IN PAREX USA WATER-RESISTIVE & AIR BARRIER COATING . SWM E1.05B EXPANSION JOINT WITH FLASHING AT FLOOR (ISO) REV. DATE: 05/04/18 NOTES: 1. To ensure a continuous air barrier across the building envelope, a continuous air seal should be made at each substrate change, joints/gaps, penetrations and dissimilar material terminations. These must be a consideration of the designer in the overall wall assembly design. Disclaimer: The design specifications and construction shall comply with all local building codes and standards. Parex USA installation guidelines are for general information and guidance only and Parex USA specifically disclaims any liability for the use of this design and for design engineering or workmanship of any project. The assembly shall be designed to prevent condensation within the assembly. The designer and the user shall provide final drawings and specifications. Products shown other than those manufactured by Parex USA are shown for clarity of the Parex USA product only. Contact the manufacturer of such other products for installation instructions. WATERMASTER CI EXPANDED POLYSTYRENE 3/4” MIN. SUBSTRATE. INSULATION BOARD. PAREX USA ADHESIVE. PAREX USA MESH BACKWRAP. PAREX USA WATER-RESISTIVE & AIR BARRIER COATING. PAREX USA REINFORCING MESH PAREX USA SHEATHING EMBEDDED IN PAREX JOINT TAPE EMBEDDED IN USA BASECOAT. PAREX USA WATER-RESISTIVE & AIR PAREX USA FINISH BARRIER COATING CLOSED CELL BACKER ROD & ELASTOMERIC SEALANT (BY OTHERS). SWM E1.06A VERTICAL EXPANSION JOINT REV. DATE: 05/04/18 NOTES: 1. To ensure a continuous air barrier across the building envelope, a continuous air seal should be made at each substrate change, joints/gaps, penetrations and dissimilar material terminations. These must be a consideration of the designer in the overall wall assembly design. Disclaimer: The design specifications and construction shall comply with all local building codes and standards. Parex USA installation guidelines are for general information and guidance only and Parex USA specifically disclaims any liability for the use of this design and for design engineering or workmanship of any project. The assembly shall be designed to prevent condensation within the assembly. The designer and the user shall provide final drawings and specifications. Products shown other than those manufactured by Parex USA are shown for clarity of the Parex USA product only. Contact the manufacturer of such other products for installation instructions. WATERMASTER CI SUBSTRATE. PAREX USA SHEATHING JOINT TAPE EMBEDDED IN PAREX USA WATER-RESISTIVE & AIR BARRIER COATING. PAREX USA WATER-RESISTIVE & AIR BARRIER COATING. PAREX USA ADHESIVE. EXPANDED POLYSTYRENE INSULATION BOARD. PAREX USA MESH BACKWRAP. CLOSED CELL BACKER ROD & ELASTOMERIC SEALANT (BY OTHERS). PAREX USA BASECOAT. PAREX USA REINFORCING MESH EMBEDDED IN PAREX USA BASECOAT. PAREX USA PRIMER (OPTIONAL). PAREX USA FINISH. SWM E1.06B VERTICAL EXPANSION JOINT REV. DATE: 05/04/18 NOTES: 1. To ensure a continuous air barrier across the building envelope, a continuous air seal should be made at each substrate change, joints/gaps, penetrations and dissimilar material terminations. These must be a consideration of the designer in the overall wall assembly design. Disclaimer: The design specifications and construction shall comply with all local building codes and standards. Parex USA installation guidelines are for general information and guidance only and Parex USA specifically disclaims any liability for the use of this design and for design engineering or workmanship of any project. The assembly shall be designed to prevent condensation within the assembly. The designer and the user shall provide final drawings and specifications. Products shown other than those manufactured by Parex USA are shown for clarity of the Parex USA product only. Contact the manufacturer of such other products for installation instructions. WATERMASTER CI SUBSTRATE. PAREX USA WATER-RESISTIVE & AIR BARRIER COATING. PAREX USA ADHESIVE. EXPANDED POLYSTYRENE INSULATION BOARD. PAREX USA REINFORCING MESH EMBEDDED IN PAREX USA BASECOAT. PAREX USA FINISH. PAREX USA MESH BACKWRAP. PAREX USA DRAINEDGE™. CLOSED CELL BACKER ROD & ELASTOMERIC SEALANT (BY OTHERS). PAREX USA SHEATHING JOINT TAPE EMBEDDED IN PAREX USA WATER-RESISTIVE & AIR BARRIER COATING. SWM E1.07 HORIZONTAL EXPANSION JOINT REV. DATE: 05/04/18 NOTES: 1. To ensure a continuous air barrier across the building envelope, a continuous air seal should be made at each substrate change, joints/gaps, penetrations and dissimilar material terminations. These must be a consideration of the designer in the overall wall assembly design. Disclaimer: The design specifications and construction shall comply with all local building codes and standards. Parex USA installation guidelines are for general information and guidance only and Parex USA specifically disclaims any liability for the use of this design and for design engineering or workmanship of any project. The assembly shall be designed to prevent condensation within the assembly. The designer and the user shall provide final drawings and specifications. Products shown other than those manufactured by Parex USA are shown for clarity of the Parex USA product only. Contact the manufacturer of such other products for installation instructions. WATERMASTER CI SUBSTRATE. REFERENCE NOTE 1. PAREX USA WATER-RESISTIVE & AIR BARRIER COATING. REFERENCE NOTE 2. PAREX USA SHEATHING JOINT TAPE EMBEDDED IN PAREX USA WATER-RESISTIVE & AIR BARRIER COATING @ SHEATHING JOINTS. PAREX USA ADHESIVE. EXPANDED POLYSTYRENE INSULATION BOARD. PAREX USA BASECOAT. PAREX USA REINFORCING MESH EMBEDDED IN PAREX USA BASECOAT. PAREX USA PRIMER ( OPTIONAL ). PAREX USA FINISH. SWM G1.01 PAREX USA WATERMASTER CI SYSTEM COMPONENTS REV. DATE: 06/08/18 NOTES: 1. Applicable for wood framing, masonry and concrete. 2. See WeatherTech details for further information. Disclaimer: The design specifications and construction shall comply with all local building codes and standards. Parex USA installation guidelines are for general information and guidance only and Parex USA specifically disclaims any liability for the use of this design and for design engineering or workmanship of any project. The assembly shall be designed to prevent condensation within the assembly. The designer and the user shall provide final drawings and specifications. Products shown other than those manufactured by Parex USA are shown for clarity of the Parex USA product only. Contact the manufacturer of such other products for installation instructions. STANDARD WATERMASTER PAREX PAREX USA SHEATHING JOINT TAPE STEP 1 STEP 2 STEP 3 CUT FOLD PAREX USA SHEATHING PAREX USA SHEATHING PAREX USA SHEATHING JOINT TAPE EMBEDDED JOINT TAPE EMBEDDED JOINT TAPE EMBEDDED IN PAREX USA IN PAREX USA IN PAREX USA WATER -RESISTIVE & WATER -RESISTIVE & WATER- RESISTIVE & AIR BARRIER COATING AIR BARRIER COATING AIR BARRIER COATING STEP 4 STEP 5 A J y V, PAREX USA SHEATHING JOINT PAREX USA TAPE COATED OVER WITH WATER - RESISTIVE & PAREX USA WATER - RESISTIVE AIR BARRIER COATING & AIR BARRIER COATING SWM G 1.03 A ROUGH OPENING FLASHING PROCEDURE ( HEAD IS SIMILAR) STANDARD WATERMASTER SYSTEM OPTIMUM WATERMASTER SYSTEM NOTE: . 1 Head flashing procedure similar . . 2 To ensure a continuous air barrier across the building envelope, a continuous air seal should be made at each . substrate change, joints/ gaps, penetrations and dissimilar material terminations These must be a consideration of the designer in the overall wall assembly design . Disclaimer: The design, specifications, and construction shall comply with all local building codes and standards. Parex USA installation guidelines are for general information and guidance only and Parex USA specifically disclaims any liability for the use of this design, and for design, engineering, or workmanship of any project. The assembly shall be designed to prevent condensation within the assembly. The designer and the user shall provide final drawings and specifications. Products shown other than those manufactured by Parex USA are shown for clarity of the Parex USA product only. Contact the manufacturer of such other products for installation instructions. STANDARD WATERMASTER PAREX THICKNESS OF WATER TIGHT SEAMS INSULATION BOARD 4" PITCH FOR DRAINAGE HEM ( PROFILE) ( PICTORAL) METAL HEAD FLASHING PROFILE HEAD FLASHING SHOULD BE FABRICATED IN THE PROFILE SHOWN . LENGTH OF FLASHING IS 1" LONGER THAN THE WIDTH OF THE WINDOW . FRAME END DAMS SHOULD BE TURNED UPWARD 5 / 8 " AS SHOWN . PAREX USA WATER - RESISTIVE & AIR BARRIER COATING LAPPED OVER BACK FLANGE OF WINDOW HEAD FLASHING BACK FLANGE OF WINDOW HEAD FLASHING WINDOW HEAD FLASHING ( BY OTHERS ) PAREX USA SHEATHING JOINT TAPE BUTTERFLY PAREX USA SHEATHING JOINT TAPE EMBEDDED IN PAREX USA WATER - RESISTIVE & AIR BARRIER COATING RETURN PAREX USA SHEATHING - JOINT TAPE & WATER RESISTIVE & AIR BARRIER COATING INTO THE WINDOW HEAD PRIOR TO INSTALLING THE WINDOW HEAD FLASHING SWM G 1.03 B ROUGH OPENING FLASHING PROCEDURE CONTINUED STANDARD WATERMASTER SYSTEM OPTIMUM WATERMASTER SYSTEM NOTE: . 1 To ensure a continuous air barrier across the building envelope, a continuous air seal should be made at each . substrate change, joints/ gaps, penetrations and dissimilar material terminations These must be a consideration of the designer in the overall wall assembly design . . 2 Finned window frames are installed before head flashing . . 3 Do not use plastic track at window heads . Disclaimer: The design, specifications, and construction shall comply with all local building codes and standards. Parex USA installation guidelines are for general information and guidance only and Parex USA specifically disclaims any liability for the use of this design, and for design, engineering, or workmanship of any project. The assembly shall be designed to prevent condensation within the assembly. The designer and the user shall provide final drawings and specifications. Products shown other than those manufactured by Parex USA are shown for clarity of the Parex USA product only. Contact the manufacturer of such other products for installation instructions. WATERMASTER CI SEE ALSO CORNER DETAIL G1.05 PAREX USA MESH BACKWRAP AT HEAD APPLICABLE. SEE ALSO DETAIL W1.01 & W1.03 INTERLOCK CORNERS OF EXPANDED POLYSTRENE INSULATION BOARD. SEE ALSO OUTSIDE CORNER DETAIL G1.05 9" X 12" (222MM X 300MM) PAREX USA REINFORCING MESH EMBEDDED SEE DETAILS T1.01 AND T1.02 DIAGONALLY IN PAREX USA BASECOAT FORFOUNDATION AT CORNERS. TERMINATION. SWM G1.04 PRELIMINARY NESH APPLICATION REV. DATE: 05/04/18 NOTES: 1. Expanded polystrene insulation board joints are offset from with corners of openings. Disclaimer: The design specifications and construction shall comply with all local building codes and standards. Parex USA installation guidelines are for general information and guidance only and Parex USA specifically disclaims any liability for the use of this design and for design engineering or workmanship of any project. The assembly shall be designed to prevent condensation within the assembly. The designer and the user shall provide final drawings and specifications. Products shown other than those manufactured by Parex USA are shown for clarity of the Parex USA product only. Contact the manufacturer of such other products for installation instructions. WATERMASTER CI PAREX USA WATER-RESISTIVE & AIR BARRIER COATING PAREX USA ADHESIVE EXPANDED POLYSTRENE INSULATION BOARD DOUBLE WRAP W ITH REINFORCING MESH EM BEDDED BASECOAT PAREX USA FINISH INSIDE CORNER PAREX USA WATER-RESISTIVE & AIR BARRIER COATING PAREX USA ADHESIVE EXPANDED POLYSTRENE INSULATION BOARD DOUBLE WRAP W ITH REINFORCING MESH EM BEDDED BASECOAT PAREX USA FINISH COAT OUTSIDE CORNER SWM G1.05 INSIDE AND OUTSIDE CORNERS REV. DATE: 05/04/18 NOTES: 1. To ensure a continuous air barrier across the building envelope, a continuous air seal should be made at each substrate change, joints/gaps, penetrations and dissimilar material terminations. These must be a consideration of the designer in the overall wall assembly design. Disclaimer: The design specifications and construction shall comply with all local building codes and standards. Parex USA installation guidelines are for general information and guidance only and Parex USA specifically disclaims any liability for the use of this design and for design engineering or workmanship of any project. The assembly shall be designed to prevent condensation within the assembly. The designer and the user shall provide final drawings and specifications. Products shown other than those manufactured by Parex USA are shown for clarity of the Parex USA product only. Contact the manufacturer of such other products for installation instructions. WATERMASTER CI SUBSTRATE. PAREX USA WATER-RESISTIVE & AIR BARRIER COATING.. PAREX USA ADHESIVE. EXPANDED POLYSTYRENE INSULATION BOARD. FIXTURE OR SIGNAGE (BY OTHERS ELASTOMERIC SEALANT (BY OTHERS). P.V.C. PIPE SLEEVE FILLED W/ ELASTOMERIC SEALANT (BY OTHERS). CORROSION RESISTANT FASTENER (BY OTHERS). CORROSION RESISTANT . WASHER (BY OTHERS) SEE NOTE 2. PAREX USA FINISH. PAREX USA PRIMER (OPTIONAL). PAREX USA REINFORCING MESH EMBEDDED IN PAREX USA BASECOAT. PAREX USA BASECOAT. SWM P1.01 FIXTURE ATTACHMENT (BY OTHERS) REV. DATE: 05/04/18 SWM W1.07 TERMINATION AT FINNED WINDOW JAMB NOTES: 1. To ensure a continuous air barrier across the building envelope, a continuous air seal should be made at each substrate change, joints/gaps, penetrations and dissimilar material terminations. These must be a consideration of the designer in the overall wall assembly design. Disclaimer: The design specifications and construction shall comply with all local building codes and standards. Parex USA installation guidelines are for general information and guidance only and Parex USA specifically disclaims any liability for the use of this design and for design engineering or workmanship of any project. The assembly shall be designed to prevent condensation within the assembly. The designer and the user shall provide final drawings and specifications. Products shown other than those manufactured by Parex USA are shown for clarity of the Parex USA product only. Contact the manufacturer of such other products for installation instructions. WATERMASTER CI SUBSTRATE. PAREX USA WATER-RESISTIVE & AIR BARRIER COATING. PAREX USA ADHESIVE. EXPANDED POLYSTYRENE INSULATION BOARD. FLANGE SET IN SEALANT (BY OTHERS). ELASTOMERIC SEALANT (BY OTHERS). PAREX USA REINFORCING MESH EMBEDDED IN PAREX USA BASECOAT. PAREX USA FINISH. SWM P1.02 TERMINATION AT HOSE BIB (BY OTHERS) REV. DATE: 05/04/18 SWM W1.07 TERMINATION AT FINNED WINDOW JAMB NOTES: 1. To ensure a continuous air barrier across the building envelope, a continuous air seal should be made at each substrate change, joints/gaps, penetrations and dissimilar material terminations. These must be a consideration of the designer in the overall wall assembly design. Disclaimer: The design specifications and construction shall comply with all local building codes and standards. Parex USA installation guidelines are for general information and guidance only and Parex USA specifically disclaims any liability for the use of this design and for design engineering or workmanship of any project. The assembly shall be designed to prevent condensation within the assembly. The designer and the user shall provide final drawings and specifications. Products shown other than those manufactured by Parex USA are shown for clarity of the Parex USA product only. Contact the manufacturer of such other products for installation instructions. WATERMASTER CI PVC OR OTHER CORROSION RESISTANT PIPE SLEEVE FILLED WITH SEALANT(BY OTHERS). CORROSION RESISTANT SCREW (BY OTHERS). ELASTOMERIC SEALANT (BY OTHERS). PAREX USA REINFORCING MESH EMBEDDED IN PAREX USA BASECOAT. DOWNSPOUT SUBSTRATE. PAREX USA FINISH. PAREX USA WATER-RESISTIVE & BARRIER COATING. EXPANDED POLYSTYRENE PAREX USA ADHESIVE. INSULATION BOARD. DOWNSPOUT STRAPPING (BY OTHERS). CORROSION RESTRAINT SCREW OR STRAPPING (BY OTHERS). SWM P1.03 DOWNSPOUT ATTACHMENT (BY OTHERS) REV. DATE: 05/04/18 SWM W1.07 TERMINATION AT FINNED WINDOW JAMB NOTES: 1. To ensure a continuous air barrier across the building envelope, a continuous air seal should be made at each substrate change, joints/gaps, penetrations and dissimilar material terminations. These must be a consideration of the designer in the overall wall assembly design. Disclaimer: The design specifications and construction shall comply with all local building codes and standards. Parex USA installation guidelines are for general information and guidance only and Parex USA specifically disclaims any liability for the use of this design and for design engineering or workmanship of any project. The assembly shall be designed to prevent condensation within the assembly. The designer and the user shall provide final drawings and specifications. Products shown other than those manufactured by Parex USA are shown for clarity of the Parex USA product only. Contact the manufacturer of such other products for installation instructions. WATERMASTER CI SUBSTRATE. PAREX USA WATER-RESISTIVE & AIR BARRIER COATING. EXPANDED POLYSTYRENE INSULATION BOARD. PAREX USA REINFORCING MESH EMBEDDED IN PAREX USA BASECOAT. PAREX USA FINISH. PAREX USA MESH BACKWRAP. PAREX USA DRAINEDGE™. PAREX USA SHEATHING JOINT TAPE EMBEDDED IN PAREX USA WATER-RESISTIVE & AIR BARRIER 4” COATING. METAL FLASHING (BY OTHERS). CLOSED CELL BACKER ROD & ELASTOMERIC SEALANT (BY OTHERS) W/ WEEPS @ 16" O.C. ELASTOMERIC SEALANT (BY OTHERS). SLEEVE (BY OTHERS). CLOSED CELL BACKER ROD & ELASTOMERIC SEALANT (BY OTHERS). PAREX USA SHEATHING JOINT TAPE EMBEDDED IN PAREX USA WATER-RESISTIVE & AIR BARRIER COATING. PAREX USA MESH BACKWRAP. PAREX USA ADHESIVE. SWM P1.04 TERMINATION AT APPLIANCE SLEEVE (BY OTHERS) REV. DATE: 05/04/18 SWM W1.07 TERMINATION AT FINNED WINDOW JAMB NOTES: 1. To ensure a continuous air barrier across the building envelope, a continuous air seal should be made at each substrate change, joints/gaps, penetrations and dissimilar material terminations. These must be a consideration of the designer in the overall wall assembly design. Disclaimer: The design specifications and construction shall comply with all local building codes and standards. Parex USA installation guidelines are for general information and guidance only and Parex USA specifically disclaims any liability for the use of this design and for design engineering or workmanship of any project. The assembly shall be designed to prevent condensation within the assembly. The designer and the user shall provide final drawings and specifications. Products shown other than those manufactured by Parex USA are shown for clarity of the Parex USA product only. Contact the manufacturer of such other products for installation instructions. WATERMASTER CI SUBSTRATE. PAREX USA WATER-RESISTIVE & AIR BARRIER COATING. PAREX USA ADHESIVE. EXPANDED POLYSTYRENE INSULATION BOARD. PAREX USA REINFORCING MESH EMBEDDED IN PAREX USA BASECOAT. PAREX USA BASECOAT. PAREX USA PRIMER (OPTIONAL). PAREX USA FINISH. PAREX USA MESH BACKWRAP. ELECTRICAL FIXTURE HOUSING (BY OTHERS). PAREX USA BASECOAT. SET ELECTRICAL FIXTURE IN ELASTOMERIC SEALANT (BY OTHERS). ELECTRICAL FIXTURE (BY OTHERS). SWM P1.05 TERMINATION @ ELECTRICAL FIXTURE (BY OTHERS) REV. DATE: 05/04/18 SWM W1.07 TERMINATION AT FINNED WINDOW JAMB NOTES: 1. To ensure a continuous air barrier across the building envelope, a continuous air seal should be made at each substrate change, joints/gaps, penetrations and dissimilar material terminations. These must be a consideration of the designer in the overall wall assembly design. Disclaimer: The design specifications and construction shall comply with all local building codes and standards. Parex USA installation guidelines are for general information and guidance only and Parex USA specifically disclaims any liability for the use of this design and for design engineering or workmanship of any project. The assembly shall be designed to prevent condensation within the assembly. The designer and the user shall provide final drawings and specifications. Products shown other than those manufactured by Parex USA are shown for clarity of the Parex USA product only. Contact the manufacturer of such other products for installation instructions. WATERMASTER CI EXPANDED POLYSTYRENE INSULATION BOARD. PAREX USA DRAINEDGE™. PAREX USA SHEATHING JOINT TAPE EMBEDDED IN PAREX USA WATER-RESISTIVE & AIR BARRIER COATING. METAL FLASHING (BY OTHERS). 3/4” MIN. METAL FLASHING (BY OTHERS). PAREX USA SHEATHING JOINT TAPE EMBEDDED IN PAREX USA WATER-RESISTIVE & AIR BARRIER COATING. PAREX USA FINISH. PAREX USA PRIMER (OPTIONAL). OAREX USA BASEBOAT. PAREX USA REINFORCING MESH EMBEDDED IN PAREX USA BASECOAT. PAREX USA MESH BACKWRAP. PAREX USA WATER-RESISTIVE & AIR BARRIER COATING. SWM P1.06 DECK ATTACHMENT (BY OTHERS) REV. DATE: 05/04/18 SWM W1.07 TERMINATION AT FINNED WINDOW JAMB NOTES: 1. To ensure a continuous air barrier across the building envelope, a continuous air seal should be made at each substrate change, joints/gaps, penetrations and dissimilar material terminations. These must be a consideration of the designer in the overall wall assembly design. Disclaimer: The design specifications and construction shall comply with all local building codes and standards. Parex USA installation guidelines are for general information and guidance only and Parex USA specifically disclaims any liability for the use of this design and for design engineering or workmanship of any project. The assembly shall be designed to prevent condensation within the assembly. The designer and the user shall provide final drawings and specifications. Products shown other than those manufactured by Parex USA are shown for clarity of the Parex USA product only. Contact the manufacturer of such other products for installation instructions. WATERMASTER CI PAREX USA WATER-RESISTIVE & AIR BARRIER COATING. PAREX USA ADHESIVE. EXPANDED POLYSTYRENE INSULATION BOARD. PAREX USA BASECOAT. PAREX USA REINFORCING MESH EMBEDDED IN PAREX USA BASECOAT. PRE-DRILLED HOLES. PVC PIPE SLEEVE INSERTED INTO PRE-DRILLED HOLES, SET IN SEALANT (BY OTHERS) (SEE NOTE 2). FASTENER. HANDRAIL POST. PAREX USA FINISH. PAREX USA PRIMER (OPTIONS) PAREX USA MESH BACKWRAP. PAREX USA SHEATHING JOINT TAPE EMBEDDED I N PAREX USA WATER-RESISTIVE & AIR BARRIER COATING. PAREX USA DRAINEDGE™. DECK. DECK FRAME. SWM P1.07 HANDRAIL ATTACHMENT (BY OTHERS) REV. DATE: 05/04/18 SWM W1.07 TERMINATION AT FINNED WINDOW JAMB NOTES: 1. To ensure a continuous air barrier across the building envelope, a continuous air seal should be made at each substrate change, joints/gaps, penetrations and dissimilar material terminations. These must be a consideration of the designer in the overall wall assembly design. Disclaimer: The design specifications and construction shall comply with all local building codes and standards. Parex USA installation guidelines are for general information and guidance only and Parex USA specifically disclaims any liability for the use of this design and for design engineering or workmanship of any project. The assembly shall be designed to prevent condensation within the assembly. The designer and the user shall provide final drawings and specifications. Products shown other than those manufactured by Parex USA are shown for clarity of the Parex USA product only. Contact the manufacturer of such other products for installation instructions. WATERMASTER CI PAREX USA WATER-RESISTIVE & AIR 1-1/2” MIN. BARRIER COATING.| ADHESIVELY ATTACHED EXPANDED POLYSTYRENE INSULATION BOARD PAREX USA REINFORCING MESH EMBEDDED IN PAREX USA BASECOAT PAREX USA FINISH . SWM R1.01A TERMINATION AT BOX CORNICE (2D) REV. DATE: 05/04/18 SWM W1.07 TERMINATION AT FINNED WINDOW JAMB NOTES: 1. To ensure a continuous air barrier across the building envelope, a continuous air seal should be made at each substrate change, joints/gaps, penetrations and dissimilar material terminations. These must be a consideration of the designer in the overall wall assembly design. Disclaimer: The design specifications and construction shall comply with all local building codes and standards. Parex USA installation guidelines are for general information and guidance only and Parex USA specifically disclaims any liability for the use of this design and for design engineering or workmanship of any project. The assembly shall be designed to prevent condensation within the assembly. The designer and the user shall provide final drawings and specifications. Products shown other than those manufactured by Parex USA are shown for clarity of the Parex USA product only. Contact the manufacturer of such other products for installation instructions. WATERMASTER CI METAL CAP FLASHING (BY OTHERS) . ELASTOMERIC SEALANT (BY OTHERS). PAREX USA FINISH. PAREX USA PRIMER (OPTIONAL). PAREX USA REINFORCING MESH EMBEDDED IN PAREX USA BASECOAT. PAREX USA BASECOAT. EXPANDED POLYSTYRENE INSULATION BOARD ATTACHED WITH VERTICAL RIBBONS OF ADHESIVE. PAREX USA WATER-RESISTIVE & AIR BARRIER COATING. PAREX USA SHEATHING JOINT TAPE EMBEDDED IN PAREX USA WATER-RESISTIVE & AIR BARRIER COATING. SUBSTRATE. SWM R1.01B TERMINATION AT CORNICE (ISO) REV. DATE: 05/04/18 SWM W1.07 TERMINATION AT FINNED WINDOW JAMB NOTES: 1. To ensure a continuous air barrier across the building envelope, a continuous air seal should be made at each substrate change, joints/gaps, penetrations and dissimilar material terminations. These must be a consideration of the designer in the overall wall assembly design. Disclaimer: The design specifications and construction shall comply with all local building codes and standards. Parex USA installation guidelines are for general information and guidance only and Parex USA specifically disclaims any liability for the use of this design and for design engineering or workmanship of any project. The assembly shall be designed to prevent condensation within the assembly. The designer and the user shall provide final drawings and specifications. Products shown other than those manufactured by Parex USA are shown for clarity of the Parex USA product only. Contact the manufacturer of such other products for installation instructions. WATERMASTER CI SUBSTRATE. PAREX USA WATER-RESISTIVE & AIR BARRIER COATING. PAREX USA ADHESIVE. EXPANDED POLYSTRENE INSULATION BOARD. PAREX USA BASECOAT. PAREX USA REINFORCING MESH EMBEDDED IN PAREX USA BASECOAT. PAREX USA PRIMER. PAREX USA FINISH. PAREX USA MESH BACKWRAP. PAREX USA DRAINEDGE @ DRAINAGE ™ TERMINATIONS. PAREX USA SHEATHING JOINT TAPE EMBEDDED IN PAREX USA WATER-RESISTIVE & AIR BARRIER COATING . PAREX USA MESH BACKWRAP . EXPANDED POLYSTYRENE INSULATION BOARD. PAREX USA ADHESIVE. SWM R1.02A SECTION AT FASCIA/SOFFIT WITH INSULATION REV. DATE: 05/04/18 SWM W1.07 TERMINATION AT FINNED WINDOW JAMB NOTES: 1. To ensure a continuous air barrier across the building envelope, a continuous air seal should be made at each substrate change, joints/gaps, penetrations and dissimilar material terminations. These must be a consideration of the designer in the overall wall assembly design. Disclaimer: The design specifications and construction shall comply with all local building codes and standards. Parex USA installation guidelines are for general information and guidance only and Parex USA specifically disclaims any liability for the use of this design and for design engineering or workmanship of any project. The assembly shall be designed to prevent condensation within the assembly. The designer and the user shall provide final drawings and specifications. Products shown other than those manufactured by Parex USA are shown for clarity of the Parex USA product only. Contact the manufacturer of such other products for installation instructions. WATERMASTER CI SUBSTRATE. PAREX USA WATER-RESISTIVE & AIR BARRIER COATING. PAREX USA ADHESIVE. EXPANDED POLYSTRENE INSULATION BOARD. PAREX USA BASECOAT. PAREX USA REINFORCING MESH EMBEDDED IN PAREX USA BASECOAT. PAREX USA PRIMER. PAREX USA FINISH. PAREX USA MESH BACKWRAP. PAREX USA DRAINEDGE @ DRAINAGE ™. PAREX USA SHEATHING JOINT TAPE EMBEDDED IN PAREX USA WATER-RESISTIVE & AIR BARRIER COATING . PAREX USA BASECOAT. PAREX USA REINFORCING MESH EMBEDDED IN PAREX USA BASECOAT. PAREX USA PRIMER. PAREX USA FINISH. SWM R1.02B SECTION AT FASCIA/SOFFIT WITHOUT INSULATION REV. DATE: 05/04/18 SWM W1.07 TERMINATION AT FINNED WINDOW JAMB NOTES: 1. To ensure a continuous air barrier across the building envelope, a continuous air seal should be made at each substrate change, joints/gaps, penetrations and dissimilar material terminations. These must be a consideration of the designer in the overall wall assembly design. Disclaimer: The design specifications and construction shall comply with all local building codes and standards. Parex USA installation guidelines are for general information and guidance only and Parex USA specifically disclaims any liability for the use of this design and for design engineering or workmanship of any project. The assembly shall be designed to prevent condensation within the assembly. The designer and the user shall provide final drawings and specifications. Products shown other than those manufactured by Parex USA are shown for clarity of the Parex USA product only. Contact the manufacturer of such other products for installation instructions. WATERMASTER CI METAL COPING/ FLASHING (BY OTHERS). FLASHING MEMBRANE EXTENDING OVER THE HORIZONTAL SURFACE AND PAREX USA WATER-RESISTIVE & AIR BARRIER COATING. 1 1/2” (38 SUBSTRATE. MM) MIN. ELASTOMERIC SEALANT (BY OTHERS) SEE NOTE 2. PAREX USA WATER-RESISTIVE & AIR BARRIER COATING . EXPANDED POLYSTYRENE INSULATION BOARD. PAREX USA REINFORCED MESH EMBEDDED IN PAREX USA BASECOAT. PAREX USA FINISH . SWM R1.03 PARAPET WALL TERMINATION AT CAP FLASHING REV. DATE: 05/04/18 SWM W1.07 TERMINATION AT FINNED WINDOW JAMB NOTES: 1. To ensure a continuous air barrier across the building envelope, a continuous air seal should be made at each substrate change, joints/gaps, penetrations and dissimilar material terminations. These must be a consideration of the designer in the overall wall assembly design. 2. Some coping systems have an inner membrane that drains behind the metal flashing. Do not block drainage of these membranes with sealant. Disclaimer: The design specifications and construction shall comply with all local building codes and standards. Parex USA installation guidelines are for general information and guidance only and Parex USA specifically disclaims any liability for the use of this design and for design engineering or workmanship of any project. The assembly shall be designed to prevent condensation within the assembly. The designer and the user shall provide final drawings and specifications. Products shown other than those manufactured by Parex USA are shown for clarity of the Parex USA product only. Contact the manufacturer of such other products for installation instructions. WATERMASTER CI GRAVEL STOP. 1 1/1” (38 MM) MIN. BACKWRAP MESH. SUBSTRATE. PAREX USA WATER-RESISTIVE & AIR BARRIER COATING. EXPANDED POLYSTYRENE INSULATION BOARD. PAREX USA REINFORCED MESH EMBEDDED IN PAREX USA BASECOAT. PAREX USA FINISH. SWM R1.04 TERMINATION AT GRAVEL STOP REV. DATE: 05/04/18 SWM W1.07 TERMINATION AT FINNED WINDOW JAMB NOTES: 1. To ensure a continuous air barrier across the building envelope, a continuous air seal should be made at each substrate change, joints/gaps, penetrations and dissimilar material terminations. These must be a consideration of the designer in the overall wall assembly design. Disclaimer: The design specifications and construction shall comply with all local building codes and standards. Parex USA installation guidelines are for general information and guidance only and Parex USA specifically disclaims any liability for the use of this design and for design engineering or workmanship of any project. The assembly shall be designed to prevent condensation within the assembly. The designer and the user shall provide final drawings and specifications. Products shown other than those manufactured by Parex USA are shown for clarity of the Parex USA product only. Contact the manufacturer of such other products for installation instructions. WATERMASTER CI 100° min. 6” (152 mm) PAREX USA DRAINEDGE™ 100° min. 12” (305 mm) 6” (152 mm) TERMINATE l" MIN. ABOVE FINISHED ROOF. . ROOF FINISH (BY OTHERS). PAREX USA FINISH. PAREX USA PRIMER (OPTIONAL). PAREX USA BASECOAT WITH EMBEDDED PAREX USA REINFORCING MESH. PAREX USA BACKWRAP MESH. PAREX USA DRAINEDGE™ . PAREX USA WATER-RESISTIVE & AIR BARRIER COATING. PAREX USA SHEATHING JOINT TAPE EMBEDDED IN PAREX USA WATER-RESISTIVE & AIR BARRIER COATING. STEP FLASHING (BY OTHERS). CLOSED CELL BACKER ROD & ELASTOMERIC SEALANT (BY OTHERS). DIVERTER FLASHING (BY OTHERS). EDGE FLASHING (BY OTHERS). GUTTER (BY OTHERS). SWM R1.05 INTERSECTION OF ROOF CORNICE AT SYSTEM REV. DATE: 05/04/18 SWM W1.07 TERMINATION AT FINNED WINDOW JAMB NOTES: 1. To ensure a continuous air barrier across the building envelope, a continuous air seal should be made at each substrate change, joints/gaps, penetrations and dissimilar material terminations. These must be a consideration of the designer in the overall wall assembly design. Disclaimer: The design specifications and construction shall comply with all local building codes and standards. Parex USA installation guidelines are for general information and guidance only and Parex USA specifically disclaims any liability for the use of this design and for design engineering or workmanship of any project. The assembly shall be designed to prevent condensation within the assembly. The designer and the user shall provide final drawings and specifications. Products shown other than those manufactured by Parex USA are shown for clarity of the Parex USA product only. Contact the manufacturer of such other products for installation instructions. WATERMASTER CI SUBSTRATE. PAREX USA WATER-RESISTIVE & AIR BARRIER COATING . PAREX USA ADHESIVE . EXPANDED POLYSTYRENE INSULATION BOARD. PAREX USA REINFORCING MESH EMBEDDED IN PAREX USA BASECOAT. PAREX USA FINISH. PAREX USA MESH BACKWRAP. PAREX USA DRAINEDGE™. PAREX USA SHEATHING JOINT TAPE EMBEDDED IN PAREX USA WATER-RESISTIVE & AIR BARRIER COATING . 4” MIN (100 MM) METAL STEP FLASHING (BY OTHERS). 2” MIN (50 mm) ROOF SHINGLE. SWM R1.06 TERMINATION AT ROOF REV. DATE: 05/04/18 SWM W1.07 TERMINATION AT FINNED WINDOW JAMB NOTES: 1. To ensure a continuous air barrier across the building envelope, a continuous air seal should be made at each substrate change, joints/gaps, penetrations and dissimilar material terminations. These must be a consideration of the designer in the overall wall assembly design. Disclaimer: The design specifications and construction shall comply with all local building codes and standards. Parex USA installation guidelines are for general information and guidance only and Parex USA specifically disclaims any liability for the use of this design and for design engineering or workmanship of any project. The assembly shall be designed to prevent condensation within the assembly. The designer and the user shall provide final drawings and specifications. Products shown other than those manufactured by Parex USA are shown for clarity of the Parex USA product only. Contact the manufacturer of such other products for installation instructions. STANDARD WATERMASTER PAREX SUBSTRATE PAREX USA WATER - RESISTIVE & AIR BARRIER COATING PAREX USA SHEATHING JOINT TAPE EMBEDDED IN PAREX USA WATER - RESISTIVE & AIR BARRIER COATING @ SHEATHING JOINTS PAREX USA ADHESIVE EXPANDED POLYSTYRENE INSULATION BOARD A A PAREX USA BASECOAT PAREX USA REINFORCING MESH / y 1 EMBEDDED IN PAREX USA BASECOAT PAREX USA PRIMER ( OPTIONAL) / 7 PAREX USA FINISH / y y / < <7 A V >< / 4 <7 O 4 A A ^ 4fpSI <7 4 PAREX USA SHEATHING JOINT <7 TAPE EMBEDDED IN PAREX USA l§koS <7 4 <7 2§ 4 * WATER - RESISTIVE & AIR BARRIER 4 4 COATING VENTED TRACK ( BY OTHERS) FOUNDATION SWM T1.01A TERMINATION AT FOUNDATION WITH VENTED TRACK STANDARD WATERMASTER SYSTEM OPTIMUM WATERMASTER SYSTEM NOTE: To ensure a continuous air barrier across the building envelope, a continuous air seal should be made at each . substrate change, joints/ gaps, penetrations and dissimilar material terminations These must be a consideration of the designer in the overall wall assembly design . Disclaimer: The design, specifications, and construction shall comply with all local building codes and standards. Parex USA installation guidelines are for general information and guidance only and Parex USA specifically disclaims any liability for the use of this design, and for design, engineering, or workmanship of any project. The assembly shall be designed to prevent condensation within the assembly. The designer and the user shall provide final drawings and specifications. Products shown other than those manufactured by Parex USA are shown for clarity of the Parex USA product only. Contact the manufacturer of such other products for installation instructions.. STANDARD WATERMASTER PAREX SUBSTRATE PAREX USA WATER -RESISTIVE & AIR BARRIER COATING PAREX USA SHEATHING JOINT TAPE EMBEDDED IN PAREX USA WATER-RESISTIVE & AIR BARRIER COATING @ SHEATHING JOINTS PAREX USA ADHESIVE EXPANDED POLYSTYRENE INSULATION BOARD A PAREX USA BASECOAT PAREX USA REINFORCING MESH / 1 EMBEDDED IN PAREX USA Vi BASECOAT PAREX USA PRIMER ( OPTIONAL) / PAREX USA FINISH / / c o <7 o c o o 4 o 0 o o <7 o <. PAREX USA MESH BACKWRAP o o o <7 o o. 4 o. <7 <7 4 PAREX USA DRAINEDGE TM 4 <7 4 <7 PAREX USA SHEATHING JOINT 4 4 TAPE EMBEDDED IN PAREX USA - WATER RESISTIVE & AIR BARRIER COATING FOUNDATION SWM T1.01B TERMINATION AT FOUNDATION WITH BACKWRAPPING STANDARD WATERMASTER SYSTEM OPTIMUM WATERMASTER SYSTEM NOTE: To ensure a continuous air barrier across the building envelope, a continuous air seal should be made at each . substrate change, joints/ gaps, penetrations and dissimilar material terminations These must be a consideration of the designer in the overall wall assembly design . Disclaimer: The design, specifications, and construction shall comply with all local building codes and standards. Parex USA installation guidelines are for general information and guidance only and Parex USA specifically disclaims any liability for the use of this design, and for design, engineering, or workmanship of any project. The assembly shall be designed to prevent condensation within the assembly. The designer and the user shall provide final drawings and specifications. Products shown other than those manufactured by Parex USA are shown for clarity of the Parex USA product only. Contact the manufacturer of such other products for installation instructions. WATERMASTER CI SUBSTRATE. PAREX USA WATER-RESISTIVE & AIR BARRIER COATING. PAREX USA SHEATHING JOINT TAPE EMBEDDED IN PAREX USA WATER-RESISTIVE & AIR BARRIER COATING @ SHEATHING JOINTS. PAREX USA ADHESIVE. EXPANDED POLYSTYRENE INSULATION BOARD. PAREX USA BASECOAT. PAREX USA REINFORCING MESH EMBEDDED IN PAREX USA BASECOAT. PAREX USA PRIMER (OPTIONAL). PAREX USA FINISH. PAREX USA MESH BACKWRAP. PAREX USA DRAINEDGE™. PAREX USA SHEATHING JOINT TAPE MIN. DISTANCE PER EMBEDDED IN PAREX USA APPLICABLE BUILDING CODE. WATER-RESISTIVE & AIR BARRIER COATING. FOUNDATION. SWM T1.02 TERMINATION AT GRADE REV. DATE: 05/04/18 NOTES: 1. To ensure a continuous air barrier across the building envelope, a continuous air seal should be made at each substrate change, joints/gaps, penetrations and dissimilar material terminations. These must be a consideration of the designer in the overall wall assembly design. 2. Sawn dimension lumber floor joists may require an expansion joint at the dissimilar substrate transition. Disclaimer: The design specifications and construction shall comply with all local building codes and standards. Parex USA installation guidelines are for general information and guidance only and Parex USA specifically disclaims any liability for the use of this design and for design engineering or workmanship of any project. The assembly shall be designed to prevent condensation within the assembly. The designer and the user shall provide final drawings and specifications. Products shown other than those manufactured by Parex USA are shown for clarity of the Parex USA product only. Contact the manufacturer of such other products for installation instructions. WATERMASTER CI SUBSTRATE. PAREX USA WATER-RESISTIVE & AIR BARRIER COATING. PAREX USA ADHESIVE. EXPANDED POLYSTYRENE INSULATION BOARD. PAREX USA REINFORCING MESH EMBEDDED IN PAREX USA BASECOAT. PAREX USA FINISH. PAREX USA MESH BACKWRAP. PAREX USA DRAINEDGE™. METAL FLASHING (BY OTHERS). CLOSED CELL BACKER ROD & ELASTOMERIC SEALANT (BY OTHERS) W/ WEEPS @ 16" O.C . METAL FLASHING EMBEDDED IN ELASTOMERIC SEALANT (BY OTHERS). SWM T1.03A CLADDING TRANSITION (2D) REV. DATE: 05/04/18 NOTES: 1. To ensure a continuous air barrier across the building envelope, a continuous air seal should be made at each substrate change, joints/gaps, penetrations and dissimilar material terminations. These must be a consideration of the designer in the overall wall assembly design. Disclaimer: The design specifications and construction shall comply with all local building codes and standards. Parex USA installation guidelines are for general information and guidance only and Parex USA specifically disclaims any liability for the use of this design and for design engineering or workmanship of any project. The assembly shall be designed to prevent condensation within the assembly. The designer and the user shall provide final drawings and specifications. Products shown other than those manufactured by Parex USA are shown for clarity of the Parex USA product only. Contact the manufacturer of such other products for installation instructions. WATERMASTER CI SUBSTRATE. PAREX USA SHEATHING JOINT TAPE EMBEDDED IN PAREX USA WATER-RESISTIVE & AIR BARRIER COATING @ SHEATHING JOINTS. PAREX USA WATER-RESISTIVE & AIR BARRIER COATING. PAREX USA ADHESIVE. EXPANDED POLYSTYRENE INSULATION BOARD. PAREX USA BASECOAT. PAREX USA REINFORCING MESH EMBEDDED IN PAREX USA BASECOAT. PAREX USA PRIMER (OPTIONAL). PAREX USA FINISH. PAREX USA DRAINEDGE™. PAREX USA MESH BACKWRAP. LAP PAREX USA SHEATHING JOINT TAPE OVER FLASHING EMBEDDED IN PAREX USA WATER-RESISTIVE & AIR BARRIER COATING. CLOSED CELL BACKER ROD & ELASTOMERIC SEALANT (BY OTHERS) W/ WEEPS @ 16" O.C. METAL FLASHING EMBEDDED IN ELASTOMERIC SEALANT (BY OTHERS). BRICK OR OTHER CLADDING . SWM T1.03B CLADDING TRANSITION (ISO) REV. DATE: 05/04/18 NOTES: 1. To ensure a continuous air barrier across the building envelope, a continuous air seal should be made at each substrate change, joints/gaps, penetrations and dissimilar material terminations. These must be a consideration of the designer in the overall wall assembly design. Disclaimer: The design specifications and construction shall comply with all local building codes and standards. Parex USA installation guidelines are for general information and guidance only and Parex USA specifically disclaims any liability for the use of this design and for design engineering or workmanship of any project. The assembly shall be designed to prevent condensation within the assembly. The designer and the user shall provide final drawings and specifications. Products shown other than those manufactured by Parex USA are shown for clarity of the Parex USA product only. Contact the manufacturer of such other products for installation instructions. WATERMASTER CI SUBSTRATE. PAREX USA WATER-RESISTIVE & AIR BARRIER COATING. PAREX USA SHEATHING JOINT TAPE EMBEDDED IN PAREX USA WATER-RESISTIVE & AIR BARRIER COATING @ SHEATHING JOINTS. PAREX USA ADHESIVE. EXPANDED POLYSTYRENE INSULATION BOARD. PAREX USA REINFORCING MESH EMBEDDED IN PAREX USA BASECOAT. PAREX USA BASECOAT. PAREX USA PRIMER (OPTIONAL). PAREX USA FINISH. PAREX USA SHEATHING JOINT TAPE EMBEDDED IN PAREX USA WATER-RESISTIVE & AIR BARRIER COATING. SIDEWALK @ FLOOR LINE ELEVATION FOR ADA COMPLIANCE. VENTED TRACK (BY OTHERS). METAL FLASHING (BY OTHERS). FIBER PAVEMENT STRIP BOND BREAKER. WATERPROOF MEMBRANE SEALED WATERTIGHT TO FOUNDATION (BY OTHERS). WATER BASED MEMBRANE PRIMER (BY OTHERS) SWM T1.04 TERMINATION AT ADA SIDEWALK REV. DATE: 05/04/18 NOTES: 1. To ensure a continuous air barrier across the building envelope, a continuous air seal should be made at each substrate change, joints/gaps, penetrations and dissimilar material terminations. These must be a consideration of the designer in the overall wall assembly design. Disclaimer: The design specifications and construction shall comply with all local building codes and standards. Parex USA installation guidelines are for general information and guidance only and Parex USA specifically disclaims any liability for the use of this design and for design engineering or workmanship of any project. The assembly shall be designed to prevent condensation within the assembly. The designer and the user shall provide final drawings and specifications. Products shown other than those manufactured by Parex USA are shown for clarity of the Parex USA product only. Contact the manufacturer of such other products for installation instructions. WATERMASTER CI SUBSTRATE. PAREX USA WATER-RESISTIVE & AIR BARRIER COATING. PAREX USA SHEATHING JOINT TAPE EMBEDDED IN PAREX USA WATER-RESISTIVE & AIR BARRIER COATING @ SHEATHING JOINTS. PAREX USA ADHESIVE. EXPANDED POLYSTYRENE INSULATION BOARD. PAREX USA BASECOAT. PAREX USA REINFORCING MESH EMBEDDED IN PAREX USA BASE . COAT. PAREX USA PRIMER (OPTIONAL). PAREX USA FINISH. PAREX USA SHEATHING JOINT . TAPE EMBEDDED IN PAREX USA WATER-RESISTIVE & AIR BARRIER COATING. PAREX USA DRAINEDGE™. BALCONY SLAB WATERPROOFING EXTENDING BEHIND EIFS 4" (BY OTHERS). BALCONY SLAB. SWM T1.05 TERMINATION AT BALCONY SLAB REV. DATE: 05/04/18 NOTES: 1. To ensure a continuous air barrier across the building envelope, a continuous air seal should be made at each substrate change, joints/gaps, penetrations and dissimilar material terminations. These must be a consideration of the designer in the overall wall assembly design. Disclaimer: The design specifications and construction shall comply with all local building codes and standards. Parex USA installation guidelines are for general information and guidance only and Parex USA specifically disclaims any liability for the use of this design and for design engineering or workmanship of any project. The assembly shall be designed to prevent condensation within the assembly. The designer and the user shall provide final drawings and specifications. Products shown other than those manufactured by Parex USA are shown for clarity of the Parex USA product only. Contact the manufacturer of such other products for installation instructions. WATERMASTER CI WINDOW FRAME SILL. FLASHING W/ END DAMS (BY OTHERS). 2” MIN. SEALANT (BY OTHERS). PAREX USA FINISH. PAREX USA PRIMER (OPTIONAL). PAREX USA BASECOAT. PAREX USA REINFORCING MESH EMBEDDED IN PAREX USA BASECOAT. PAREX USA MESH BACKWRAP. XPANDED POLYSTYRENE INSULATION BOARD. PAREX USA WATER-RESISTIVE & AIR BARRIER COATING. PAREX USA SHEATHING JOINT TAPE EMBEDDED IN PAREX USA WATER-RESISTIVE & AIR BARRIER COATING . SUBSTRATE. SWM W1.03B TERMINATION AT METAL FLASHED WINDOW SILL REV. DATE: 05/04/18 NOTES: 1. To ensure a continuous air barrier across the building envelope, a continuous air seal should be made at each substrate change, joints/gaps, penetrations and dissimilar material terminations. These must be a consideration of the designer in the overall wall assembly design. 2. For more information, see Parex USA Water Resistive Barrier Details. Disclaimer: The design specifications and construction shall comply with all local building codes and standards. Parex USA installation guidelines are for general information and guidance only and Parex USA specifically disclaims any liability for the use of this design and for design engineering or workmanship of any project. The assembly shall be designed to prevent condensation within the assembly. The designer and the user shall provide final drawings and specifications. Products shown other than those manufactured by Parex USA are shown for clarity of the Parex USA product only. Contact the manufacturer of such other products for installation instructions. WATERMASTER CI JAMB. CLOSED CELL BACKER ROD & ELASTOMERIC SEALANT (BY OTHERS). PAREX USA SHEATHING JOINT TAPE EMBEDDED IN PAREX USA WATER-RESISTIVE & AIR BARRIER COATING. PAREX USA MESH BACKWRAP. PAREX USA FINISH. PAREX USA REINFORCING MESH EMBEDDED IN PAREX USA BASECOAT. EXPANDED POLYSTYRENE INSULATION BOARD. PAREX USA ADHESIVE. PAREX USA WATER-RESISTIVE & AIR BARRIER COATING. SUBSTRATE. SWM W1.04 TERMINATION AT WINDOW JAMB REV. DATE: 05/04/18 NOTES: 1. To ensure a continuous air barrier across the building envelope, a continuous air seal should be made at each substrate change, joints/gaps, penetrations and dissimilar material terminations. These must be a consideration of the designer in the overall wall assembly design. Disclaimer: The design specifications and construction shall comply with all local building codes and standards. Parex USA installation guidelines are for general information and guidance only and Parex USA specifically disclaims any liability for the use of this design and for design engineering or workmanship of any project. The assembly shall be designed to prevent condensation within the assembly. The designer and the user shall provide final drawings and specifications. Products shown other than those manufactured by Parex USA are shown for clarity of the Parex USA product only. Contact the manufacturer of such other products for installation instructions. WATERMASTER CI SUBSTRATE. PAREX USA WATER-RESISTIVE & AIR BARRIER COATING. EXPANDED POLYSTYRENE INSULATION BOARD. PAREX USA REINFORCING MESH EMBEDDED IN PAREX USA BASECOAT. PAREX USA FINISH. PAREX USA MESH BACKWRAP. PAREX USA DRAINEDGE™. PAREX USA SHEATHING JOINT TAPE EMBEDDED IN PAREX USA WATER-RESISTIVE & AIR BARRIER 4” COATING. METAL FLASHING (BY OTHERS). CLOSED CELL BACKER ROD & ELASTOMERIC SEALANT (BY OTHERS) W/ WEEPS @ 16" O.C. HEAD. SWM W1.05 TERMINATION WITH FINNED WINDOW HEAD REV. DATE: 05/04/18 NOTES: 1. To ensure a continuous air barrier across the building envelope, a continuous air seal should be made at each substrate change, joints/gaps, penetrations and dissimilar material terminations. These must be a consideration of the designer in the overall wall assembly design. 2. Do not use plastic track at window head. Disclaimer: The design specifications and construction shall comply with all local building codes and standards. Parex USA installation guidelines are for general information and guidance only and Parex USA specifically disclaims any liability for the use of this design and for design engineering or workmanship of any project. The assembly shall be designed to prevent condensation within the assembly. The designer and the user shall provide final drawings and specifications. Products shown other than those manufactured by Parex USA are shown for clarity of the Parex USA product only. Contact the manufacturer of such other products for installation instructions. WATERMASTER CI CLOSED CELL BACKER ROD & ELASTOMERIC SEALANT (BY OTHERS). PAREX USA MESH BACKWRAP. PAREX USA FINISH. EXPANDED POLYSTYRENE INSULATION BOARD. PAREX USA REINFORCING MESH EMBEDDED IN PAREX USA BASECOAT. PAREX USA WATER-RESISTIVE & AIR BARRIER COATING. SUBSTRATE. SWM Wl.06 TERMINATION WITH FINNED WINDOW SILL REV. DATE: 05/04/18 NOTES: 1. To ensure a continuous air barrier across the building envelope, a continuous air seal should be made at each substrate change, joints/gaps, penetrations and dissimilar material terminations. These must be a consideration of the designer in the overall wall assembly design. Disclaimer: The design specifications and construction shall comply with all local building codes and standards. Parex USA installation guidelines are for general information and guidance only and Parex USA specifically disclaims any liability for the use of this design and for design engineering or workmanship of any project. The assembly shall be designed to prevent condensation within the assembly. The designer and the user shall provide final drawings and specifications. Products shown other than those manufactured by Parex USA are shown for clarity of the Parex USA product only. Contact the manufacturer of such other products for installation instructions. WATERMASTER CI SUBSTRATE. PAREX USA SHEATHING JOINT TAPE EMBEDDED IN PAREX USA WATER-RESISTIVE & AIR BARRIER COATING. PAREX USA WATER-RESISTIVE & AIR BARRIER COATING. PAREX USA SHEATHING JOINT TAPE EMBEDDED IN PAREX USA WATER-RESISTIVE & AIR BARRIER COATING. PAREX USA WATER-RESISTIVE & AIR BARRIER COATING LAPPED OVER FIN OF WINDOW JAMB. CLOSED CELL BACKER ROD & ELASTOMERIC SEALANT (BY OTHERS). PAREX USA BASECOAT. PAREX USA MESH BACKWRAP. PAREX USA ADHESIVE. EXPANDED POLYSTYRENE INSULATION BOARD. PAREX USA REINFORCING MESH EMBEDDED IN PAREX USA BASECOAT. PAREX USA BASECOAT. PAREX USA PRIMER (OPTIONAL) PAREX USA FINISH. WINDOW FRAME JAMB. SWM W1.07 TERMINATION AT FINNED WINDOW JAMB REV. DATE: 05/04/18 SWM W1.07 TERMINATION AT FINNED WINDOW JAMB NOTES: 1. To ensure a continuous air barrier across the building envelope, a continuous air seal should be made at each substrate change, joints/gaps, penetrations and dissimilar material terminations. These must be a consideration of the designer in the overall wall assembly design. Disclaimer: The design specifications and construction shall comply with all local building codes and standards. Parex USA installation guidelines are for general information and guidance only and Parex USA specifically disclaims any liability for the use of this design and for design engineering or workmanship of any project. The assembly shall be designed to prevent condensation within the assembly. The designer and the user shall provide final drawings and specifications. Products shown other than those manufactured by Parex USA are shown for clarity of the Parex USA product only. Contact the manufacturer of such other products for installation instructions.