City of Charlottesville Board of Architectural Review Regular Meeting April 19, 2022, 5:30 p.m. Remote meeting via Zoom Packet Guide This is not the agenda. Please click each agenda item below to link directly to the corresponding documents Pre-Meeting Discussion Regular Meeting A. Matters from the public not on the agenda [or on the Consent Agenda] (please limit to 3 minutes per speaker) B. Consent Agenda (Note: Any consent agenda item may be pulled and moved to the regular agenda if a BAR member wishes to discuss it, or if any member of the public is present to comment on it. Pulled applications will be discussed at the beginning of the meeting.) 1. Certificate of Appropriateness BAR 22-04-01 864 Locust Avenue, Tax Parcel 510093000 Martha Jefferson Historic Conservation District Owner/Applicant: Elvira Hoskins Project: New accessory structure C. New Items 5:40 2. Certificate of Appropriateness BAR 22-04-02 500 Court Square, TMP 530096000 North Downtown ADC District Owner: 500 Court Square Applicant: Brannan Boze, Smartlink (for T-Mobile) Project: Install gas pipe for roof-top generator 6:15 3. Certificate of Appropriateness BAR 22-04-03 707 West Main Street, TMP 320156000 West Main ADC District Owner: Starr Hill Properties, LLC Applicant: Orhun Bartu Dikmen Project: Storefront window replacement April 19, 2022 BAR Packet Guide 1 7:00 4. Certificate of Appropriateness (HC District) BAR 22-04-04 313 Steephill Street, TMP 55A135000 Woolen Mills Village HC District (contributing) Owner: Sara and Brian Shullaw Applicant: Robert Nichols, Formworks Project: Porch rehab and side addition 7:45 5. Certificate of Appropriateness BAR 22-04-05 1901 East Market Street, TMP 55A149000 and 55A150000 IPP and Woolen Mills Village HC District (contributing) Owner/Applicant: Jon Fink Project: Rear addition E. Other Business 8:00 7. Staff questions/discussion Courts Expansion – Levy site: Demo CoA extension F. Adjourn April 19, 2022 BAR Packet Guide 2 Certificate of Appropriateness BAR 22-04-01 864 Locust Avenue, Tax Parcel 510093000 Martha Jefferson Historic Conservation District Owner/Applicant: Elvira Hoskins Project: New accessory structure Application components (please click each link to go directly to PDF page): • Staff Report • Historic Survey • Application Submittal April 19, 2022 BAR Packet Guide 3 City of Charlottesville Board of Architectural Review Staff Report April 19, 2022 Certificate of Appropriateness Application (Historic Conservation District) BAR 22-04-01 864 Locust Avenue, Tax Parcel 510093000 Martha Jefferson HC District Owner/Applicant: Elvira Hoskins Project: Studio Background Year Built: 1906 District: Martha Jefferson HC District Status: Contributing 864 Locust Avenue is a 1½ brick house. It has a gable roof with its gable oriented towards Locust Avenue. A veranda shades the façade. T.M. Hill constructed the house in 1905 and it was divided into four apartments in the first half of the twentieth century. Prior BAR Review n/a Application • Applicant submittal: Drawings, dated March 28, 2022, by Point Office Architecture & Design; site plan; floor plans of proposed studio; elevation drawings; renderings; material samples Request CoA for construction of a studio accessory structure to the east (rear) of primary house. Materials • Roof: Standing-seam metal. • Walls (West elevation, visible from Locust Avenue): Dark gray brick lower walls with stucco- clad upper-story walls. Corten (weathering steel) cladding on side elevations not visible from Locust Avenue. • Windows (West elevation, visible from Locust Ave): None. Marvin Ultimate windows with undivided glazing on side elevations not visible from Locust Avenue. 864 Locust Ave (April 7, 2022) 1 • Entry Doors (West elevation, visible from Locust Ave): None. Marvin Ultimate sliding glass doors on side elevations not visible from Locust Avenue. • Garage Doors: Full View aluminum-frame glazed garage doors. Discussion and Recommendations Note: The regulations and guidelines for projects within a Historic Conservation District (HCD) are, by design, less rigid than those for an ADC District or an IPP. The HCD designations are intended to preserve the character-defining elements of the neighborhoods and to assure that new construction is not inappropriate to that character, while minimally imposing on current residents who may want to upgrade their homes. Within the existing HCDs are buildings and/or areas that might easily qualify for an ADC District or as an IPP; however, in evaluating proposals within HCDs, the BAR may apply only the HCD requirements and guidelines. Within an HCD, the design review prioritizes what is visible from the public right of way. New structures concealed by the principal structure from all abutting streets are exempt from BAR review. With that, the four sides of the proposed garage are of the same design and materials, staff will focus on the front elevation. Staff recommends approval. (See comments below under Pertinent Design Review Guidelines for New Construction and Additions.) 864 Locust Ave (April 7, 2022) 2 Suggested Motions Approval: Having considered the standards set forth within the City Code, including City Design Guidelines for Historic Conservation Districts, I move to find that the proposed auxiliary dwelling unit at 864 Locust Avenue satisfies the BAR’s criteria and is compatible with this property and other properties in the Martha Jefferson Neighborhood Historic Conservation District, and that the BAR approves the application [as submitted.] […as submitted with the following conditions: …] Criteria, Standards, and Guidelines Review Criteria Generally Sec. 34-341 of the City Code. Criteria for approval a) In considering a particular application the BAR shall approve the application unless it finds: 1) That the proposal does not meet specific standards set forth within this division or applicable provisions of the conservation district design guidelines; and 2) The proposal is incompatible with the historic, cultural or architectural character of the conservation district in which the property is located. b) The BAR's review of the proposed new construction or addition to a building or structure shall be limited to factors specified in section 34-342. The BAR's review of the proposed demolition, razing or moving of any contributing structure shall be limited to the factors specified in section 34-343. c) The BAR, or city council on appeal, may require conditions of approval as are necessary or desirable to ensure that any new construction or addition would be compatible with the scale and character of the historic conservation district. Prior to attaching conditions to an approval, due consideration shall be given to the cost of compliance with the proposed conditions. Sec. 34-342 of the City Code. Standards for review of new construction and additions. The following features and factors shall be considered in determining the appropriateness of proposed new construction and additions to buildings or structures: 1) Whether the form, height, scale, mass and placement of the proposed construction are visually and architecturally compatible with the site and the applicable conservation district; 2) The harmony of the proposed changes in terms of overall proportion and the size and placement of entrances and windows; 3) The impact of the proposed change on the essential architectural form and integrity of the existing building; 4) The effect, with respect to architectural considerations, of the proposed change on the conservation district neighborhood; 5) Any applicable provisions of the city's conservation district design guidelines. Pertinent Guidelines for New Construction and Additions (Historic Conservation Districts) Building Location – setback and spacing 1. Align a new building close to the average building setback line on the same street, if established, or consistent with the surrounding area. 2. Maintain average spacing between buildings on the same street. 864 Locust Ave (April 7, 2022) 3 Staff Comment: Garages generally located along the parcel line and either to the side or behind a house are common within the district, especially at the northern end of Locust Avenue; with most listed as contributing structures. The 1920 Sanborn Map indicates a garage located to the rear of this property. (See image and map in the Appendix.) Building Scale – height and massing … 4. An accessory building should appear secondary to the main building in scale and design. Staff Comment: The proposed structure complies with this recommendation. Building Form – roofs and porches 1. Roof forms should reference contributing buildings on the same street or surrounding area. Other roof forms may be approved by the BAR when contextually appropriate. 2. If many of the contributing buildings on the same street have porches, then it is strongly recommended that the design of a new residence includes a porch or similar form of similar width and depth. Staff Comment: The roof material and form are contemporary, but the guidelines for Martha Jefferson encourage well-designed, contemporary architecture. Building Openings – orientation, doors and windows 1. A single entrance door (or main entrance of a multifamily dwelling) facing the street is recommended. 2. Window and door patterns and the ratio of solids (wall area) to voids (window and door area) of new buildings should be compatible with contributing buildings in the surrounding area. 3. Windows should be simple shapes compatible with those on contributing buildings, which are generally vertically oriented in residential areas. Staff Comment: Like many historic garage buildings in the Martha Jefferson neighborhood, the elevation facing the street contains a single garage door opening. Building Materials and Textures 1. The selection of materials and textures for a new building should relate architecturally to the district, and should be compatible with and complementary to neighboring buildings. 2. Long-lasting, durable and natural materials are preferred, including brick, wood, stucco, and cementitious siding and standing seam metal roofs. Clear glass windows (VLT of 70% or more) are preferred. Staff Comment: The proposed materials are compatible with the HCD. Per the HCD regs, the replacement of windows and doors does not require a CoA. For additions and the construction of small, auxiliary buildings, it is staff’s interpretation that window and door specifications are not required for CoA approval. Relative to the provision for 70% VLT glass, the BAR has established that this is not necessary or appropriate for residential projects. (The glass for most residential doors and windows typically has a VLT in the low 60s.) Building Paint 864 Locust Ave (April 7, 2022) 4 1. Painting unpainted brick or other masonry is discouraged because it is irreversible and may cause moisture problems. Staff Comment: Not applicable. Site 1. Fences or walls that abut a City street (or fences located in a side yard between a street and the front of the principal structure on a lot) should not exceed three and one-half feet in height. Staff Comment: Not applicable. Martha Jefferson Historic Conservation District Architectural character-defining features: 1. Encourage one-story front porches; 2. Encourage garages to be located in the rear yards; 3. The levels of a building’s stories should be consistent with those on surrounding structures with respect to the natural grade [for example, a first floor should not be raised so that it is higher than most surrounding first floors]; 4. Do not exclude well-designed, new contemporary architecture [there may be a misconception that only historic-looking new buildings are permitted]; 5. Encourage standing seam metal roofs; 6. Maintain and encourage tree canopy [Maintain the existing tree canopy and encourage new large shade trees]; 7. The following Historic Conservation Overlay District Design Guidelines are especially pertinent: a. Maintain neighborhood massing and form; b. Encourage the use of sustainable materials; c. Limit the height of fences in front yards to 3 ½ feet in height. 8. Regarding the future development of the hospital properties, the neighborhood’s focus has been: a. not to tear down the old houses; to encourage low density residential development north of Taylor Walk (with the suggestion that Taylor Street be reinstated); b. to expect the High Street area to develop as a sensitively designed, high-quality, mixed use development; 9. Encourage good stewardship of Maplewood Cemetery. Staff Comment: Proposed structure is located in the rear yard and features a standing-seam metal roof. 864 Locust Ave (April 7, 2022) 5 Appendix 864 Locust Ave (April 7, 2022) 6 Photo of existing at 864 Locust Avenue 25 'F 1 RO NT 864 LOCUST AVENUE, CHARLOTTESVILLE VA 22902 SE TB LOT SIZE: 3 31 SF AC E K NU EXISTING HOUSE FOOTPRINT: 2923 SF E ALLOWABLE ADU FOOTPRINT: 11 9 SF AV %%198 RECORD MERIDIAN ST PROPOSED ADU FOOTPRINT: 107 SF D.B.202 Pg.179 CU .1 8 ' AREA OF REAR YARD: 18905 SF LO 11 5 MAX. AREA OF ACCESSORY STRUCTURES: 5 71 SF HOSKINS STUDIO "E '00 49 PROPOSED AREA OF ACCESORY STRUCTURES: 107 SF 17 % % N4 ∀ ∀ ∀ 111 E (M XIS S5 5% PROJEC : AI TIN % N 17 ST G H 31 '25 RU OU "E 32 CT SE 2.7 2' UR E) 11 2 900 DEKALB AVE, SUITE E WWW.POINT-OFFICE.COM OFFICE: 404.500.9913 ATLANTA, GA 30307 SETBACK LINE 25 PROPERTY LINE 'R EA 11 1 RS ET BA CK .99 nard .1 80 D.B "Bar 51-94 4P " g.2 P TM NE ARCHITECTURE & DESIGN W 2' TALL RETAINING ST AC IF RU CE WALL AND FENCE CT SSO POINT OFFICE 110 ALONG DRIVEWAY UR R E Y TO GARAGE N5 7% ' .40 % 17 101 24 '3 3"W "W 35 '39 9.5 1' 41 n 113 iso 7 t.# l M .1 %1 4 Ins Isabe 51-93 20 orr 7% S2 Ne TMP 5 10 il 100 IF 1 ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN O 10 20 40 1 1/32" = 1'-0" SCALE IN FEET TMP 51-91 "Everett" D.B.597 Pg.273 2 864 LOCUST AVENUE, CHARLOTTESVILLE VA 22902 3 1 3 1 3 4 2 1 3 4 2 1 3' - 4" 7' - 10 1/4" HOSKINS STUDIO 17' - 0 1/2" F F DN 9' - 7 1/2" OFFICE BEDROOM BATHROOM 17' - 5 3/8" PROJEC : CLOSET 2 2 2 DN 2 3 4 3 4 LIVING 15' - 7 3/4" 3' - 8" ROOM CLOSET 900 DEKALB AVE, SUITE E WWW.POINT-OFFICE.COM KITCHEN 3' - 8 3/4" OFFICE: 404.500.9913 ENTRY ATLANTA, GA 30307 UP 0' - 9 3/8" 1 ' - 7" B 3' - 10 3/4" B 3' - 11 1/2" ROOF BELOW 21' - 4 1/2" ARCHITECTURE & DESIGN WORKSPACE POINT OFFICE |1A| 96 X 96 A A DN 4 1 4 1 1 FLOOR PLAN - GROUND FLOOR 2 FLOOR PLAN - SECOND FLOOR 2 1/8" = 1'-0" 2 1/8" = 1'-0" 1 2 4 3 3 864 LOCUST AVENUE, CHARLOTTESVILLE VA 22902 ROOF #2 BEARING 20' - 8" HOSKINS STUDIO PLASTER CORTEN ROOF #1 BEARING 12' - " SECOND FLOOR 10' - " PROJEC : BRICK FIRST FLOOR 1 ELEVATION - EAST 0' - 0" 3 1/8" = 1'-0" AVG. GRADE 900 DEKALB AVE, SUITE E WWW.POINT-OFFICE.COM -1' - " OFFICE: 404.500.9913 ATLANTA, GA 30307 F B A ARCHITECTURE & DESIGN CORTEN POINT OFFICE ROOF #2 BEARING 20' - 8" WOOD ROOF #1 BEARING HARDIE PANEL 12' - " SECOND FLOOR 10' - " BRICK CORTEN FIRST FLOOR 2 ELEVATION - NORTH 0' - 0" 3 1/8" = 1'-0" AVG. GRADE -1' - " 3 4 2 1 4 864 LOCUST AVENUE, CHARLOTTESVILLE VA 22902 ROOF #2 BEARING 20' - 8" HOSKINS STUDIO PLASTER ROOF #1 BEARING 12' - " SECOND FLOOR 10' - " PROJEC : BRICK FIRST FLOOR 0' - 0" 1 ELEVATION - WEST AVG. GRADE 900 DEKALB AVE, SUITE E WWW.POINT-OFFICE.COM 4 1/8" = 1'-0" -1' - " OFFICE: 404.500.9913 ATLANTA, GA 30307 A B F ARCHITECTURE & DESIGN ROOF #2 BEARING POINT OFFICE 20' - 8" STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF PLASTER ROOF #1 BEARING 25' - 3 5/8" PLASTER 12' - " SECOND FLOOR 10' - " METAL CORTEN CLADDING FIRST FLOOR 0' - 0" 2 ELEVATION - SOUTH 4 1/8" = 1'-0" AVG. GRADE -1' - " PROJEC : OFFICE: 404.500.9913 5 POINT OFFICE WWW.POINT-OFFICE.COM 900 DEKALB AVE, SUITE E HOSKINS STUDIO ARCHITECTURE & DESIGN ATLANTA, GA 30307 864 LOCUST AVENUE, CHARLOTTESVILLE VA 22902 PROJEC : OFFICE: 404.500.9913 POINT OFFICE WWW.POINT-OFFICE.COM 900 DEKALB AVE, SUITE E HOSKINS STUDIO ARCHITECTURE & DESIGN ATLANTA, GA 30307 864 LOCUST AVENUE, CHARLOTTESVILLE VA 22902 PROJEC : OFFICE: 404.500.9913 7 POINT OFFICE WWW.POINT-OFFICE.COM 900 DEKALB AVE, SUITE E HOSKINS STUDIO ARCHITECTURE & DESIGN ATLANTA, GA 30307 864 LOCUST AVENUE, CHARLOTTESVILLE VA 22902 Certificate of Appropriateness BAR 22-04-02 500 Court Square, TMP 530096000 North Downtown ADC District Owner: 500 Court Square Applicant: Brannan Boze, Smartlink (for T-Mobile) Project: Install gas pipe for roof-top generator Application components (please click each link to go directly to PDF page): • Staff Report • Historic Survey • Application Submittal April 19, 2022 BAR Packet Guide 4 City of Charlottesville Board of Architectural Review Staff Report April 19, 2022 Certificate of Appropriateness Application BAR 22-04-02 500 Court Square, TMP 530096000 North Downtown ADC District Owner: 500 Court Square Applicant: Brannan Boze, Smartlink (for T-Mobile) Project: Install gas pipe for roof-top generator Background: Year Built: 1906, renovated 1936 (Originally the City’s U.S. Post Office) District: North Downtown ADC District Status: Contributing Prior BAR Reviews (See Appendix 2 for complete list.) November 29, 2021 - Admin approval of rooftop generators for telecom equipment, gas pipe to be run inside the building. Attachments • Submittal: T-Mobile drawings for Generator Add at wireless site VA32349A, 500 Court Square. Sheets T-1, N-1, A-1, A-2, A-2.1, A-3, A-4, S-1, E-1, G-1 (dated 8/06/21) and Sheets P-1. P-2, and P-3 (dated 12/02/21). Also, photo in Appendix 1 showing the proposed routing. CoA to install exterior gas pipe to rooftop generators. (The November 2021 CoA approved the generators administratively, with gas service to be run inside the building. However, installing the gas pipe on the exterior requires BAR review.) In Appendix 1 are additional photographs of the building, which may be helpful. In the attachment are images of similar conditions elsewhere in the City. 500 Court Square – (April 14, 2022) 1 Discussion The Design Guidelines do not specifically address conduits and piping; however, the guidance is generally to consolidate and screen equipment and utilities and to locate them where least likely to detract from the character of the site. At the ground level, the service is in the rear parking area, where other mechanical equipment is located. Screening is not necessary. Where installed vertically on the building—a span ten stories plus the parapet—screening or fully concealing the assembly would likely be more visible than a painted pipe installed at an appropriate location. Staff suggests two options: • Mounting the pipe as close as possible adjacent to a downspout; specifying which, if not as proposed by the applicant, and on which side of the downspout, if there is a preference. (below, left) • Mounting the pipe as close as possible into the vertical corner between the first and second downspouts. (below, right) The rooftop and the generators are concealed behind the parapet. Anchor details from P-3 of submittal. 500 Court Square – (April 14, 2022) 2 Photo showing conduits with similar installation brackets at the Main Library. The intent is to paint the pipe and anchor brackets. The BAR should approve or recommend an appropriate color allow for staff to make a determination. (For the Main Library, the CoA included a condition that the conduits be painted a color close to the existing brick, to be approved by staff. For that, staff circulated color samples with a recommended selection, which the BAR informally expressed support for.) Suggested Motions Approval: Having considered the standards set forth within the City Code, including the City’s ADC Design Guidelines, I move to find that the proposed gas pipe at 500 Court Square satisfies the BAR’s criteria and is compatible with this property and other properties in the North Downtown ADC District, and that the BAR approves the application as submitted. […as submitted with the following conditions:…] Denial: Having considered the standards set forth within the City Code, including the City’s ADC Design Guidelines, I move to find that the proposed gas pipe at 500 Court Square does not satisfy the BAR’s criteria and is not compatible with this property and other properties in the North Downtown ADC District, and that for the following reasons the BAR denies the application as submitted. Criteria, Standards, and Guidelines Review Criteria Generally Sec. 34-284(b) of the City Code states that, in considering a particular application the BAR shall approve the application unless it finds: (1) That the proposal does not meet specific standards set forth within this division or applicable provisions of the Design Guidelines established by the board pursuant to Sec. 34-288(6); and (2) The proposal is incompatible with the historic, cultural or architectural character of the district in which the property is located or the protected property that is the subject of the application. 500 Court Square – (April 14, 2022) 3 Pertinent Standards for Review of Construction and Alterations include: (1) Whether the material, texture, color, height, scale, mass and placement of the proposed addition, modification or construction are visually and architecturally compatible with the site and the applicable design control district; (2) The harmony of the proposed change in terms of overall proportion and the size and placement of entrances, windows, awnings, exterior stairs and signs; (3) The Secretary of the Interior Standards for Rehabilitation set forth within the Code of Federal Regulations (36 C.F.R. §67.7(b)), as may be relevant; (4) The effect of the proposed change on the historic district neighborhood; (5) The impact of the proposed change on other protected features on the property, such as gardens, landscaping, fences, walls and walks; (6) Whether the proposed method of construction, renovation or restoration could have an adverse impact on the structure or site, or adjacent buildings or structures; (7) Any applicable provisions of the City’s Design Guidelines. Pertinent ADC District Design Guidelines Chapter II – Site Design and Elements H. Utilities and Other Site Appurtenances Site appurtenances, such as overhead utilities, fuel tanks, utility poles and meters, antennae, exterior mechanical units, and trash containers, are a necessary part of contemporary life. However, their placement may detract from the character of the site and building. 1. Plan the location of overhead wires, utility poles and meters, electrical panels, antennae, trash containers, and exterior mechanical units where they are least likely to detract from the character of the site. 2. Screen utilities and other site elements with fences, walls, or plantings. 3. Encourage the installation of utility services underground. 4. Antennae and communication dishes should be placed in inconspicuous rooftop locations, not in a front yard. 5. Screen all rooftop mechanical equipment with a wall of material harmonious with the building or structure. Chapter IV – Rehabilitation L. Rear of Buildings … 2. Consolidate and screen mechanical and utility equipment in one location when possible. 500 Court Square – (April 14, 2022) 4 Appendix 1 Top image is from applicant, showing the preferred routing. Additional images by staff 500 Court Square – (April 14, 2022) 5 500 Court Square – (April 14, 2022) 6 500 Court Square – (April 14, 2022) 7 500 Court Square – (April 14, 2022) 8 Appendix 2 Previous BAR Reviews February 28, 1989 - New windows in south wall façade and two to three outdoor mechanical units on fire stair June 27, 1989 - Install railings on towers and two sets of stairs on roof January 23, 1990 - Install six windows; close two fire door entrances; install vent; add two heat pump units on fire stairs April 24, 1990 - Screening for rear heat pumps June 21, 1994 - Replace new sliding doors February 2001 – Admin approval: co-locate antenna on roof April 2001 – Admin approval: replace two rooftop cabinets and upgrade telecom equipment. July 2001- Admin approval: locate six to nine rooftop antennas with accessory telecom cabinets October 2001 – Administrative approval: Remove three rooftop antennas and replace six. June 17, 2003 – Approve Add two new rectangular windows in south elevation. September 21, 2004 – Approve revolving door June 21, 2011 – Approve replacement the balustrade with a painted terne-coated stainless-steel replica. July 19, 2011 – Approve replacement of nine existing wood windows in a 6th floor unit facing Market Street with aluminum clad wood window sash kits with exterior applied 7/8” putty profile muntins. (This is the only approved window replacement at this time for the entire structure.) March 19, 2013 – Approve re-roofing and replacement of painted galvanized steel balustrade with painted copper balustrade. March 18, 2014 - Approve change in baluster material from painted copper to fiberglass as submitted. August 19, 2014 – Admin approval to replace three antennas with three similar sized antennas. April 21, 2015 - Approve replacement of six rooftop antennas and add one new cabinet on roof. June 16, 2015 – BAR accepted applicant’s request for deferral re: proposed rooftop communications equipment. BAR recommended a master plan be developed that might include options for: locating the antennas behind the baluster; locating the antennas to the sides of the penthouse, and painting the antennas to match the penthouse; or adding screening to the penthouse area resulting in a wider penthouse. January 2019 – Approve installation of two metal security gates, with the following conditions: o Drawing #1 for the Porte Cochere (without the ovals) o Drawing #3 for the Court Square Tavern (without the ovals) o Request to look at the proportions for the Porte Cochere [height of gate relative to fixed panel above] o Request the gates be set back and swing inward o Submit the updated final drawings for the BAR Archive July 22, 2020 – Admin approval of additional communications equipment. 500 Court Square – (April 14, 2022) 9 Main Library, Market Street BAR discussion: April 19, 2022 (1 of 7) 2205-09 Fontaine Avenue. (Entrance Corridor.) BAR discussion: April 19, 2022 (2 of 7) Exterior ductwork and conduits enclosed with prefinished metal panels. Main Street Market (West Main) BAR discussion: April 19, 2022 (3 of 7) City Courthouse BAR discussion: April 19, 2022 (4 of 7) City Courthouse BAR discussion: April 19, 2022 (5 of 7) 609 East Market Street BAR discussion: April 19, 2022 (6 of 7) Number Nothing, Court Square BAR discussion: April 19, 2022 (7 of 7) -----,--------------------------.--.-----; -- LANDMARK SURVEY IDENTIFICATION BASE DATA Street Address: 516 East Jefferson Street Historic Name: The Monticello Hotel Map and Parcel: 53-96 Date/Period: 1924-26 Census Track & Block: 1-112 Style: Neo-Classical Revival Present Owner: Monticello Plaza Condominiums Height to Cornice: 103.28 Address: Box 591, City Height in Stories: 9 Present Use: Hotel Present Zoning: B-3 Original Owner: Jackson Park Hotel Company land Area (sq. ft.): Land: 24,600 Original Use: Hotel Assessed Value (land + imp.): Building: 55,450 ARCHITECTURAL DESCRIPTION The Monticello Hotel illustrates the return to classical architecture in the first part of this century. The architect, Stanhope Johnson of Lynchburg, was a leader in the Roman & neo-Classical revivals. The first two levels of this massive facade is treated with Doric pilasters supporting a horizontal entablature with triglyphs. Between the range of pilasters the architect placed tri-part windows with thermal windows above. The tope of the hotel is capped by a hugh cornice and balustrade. The public dining room is designed with graceful Adamesque details including slender engaged columns, finely carved entabla- - tures, and delicate carvings. The room is one of the finest revival spaces in the city. HISTORICAL DESCRIPTION In 1924 the Jackson Park Hotel Company purchased a row of Nineteenth century merchantile structures, from R. E. Yowell and razed them. The cornerstone was laid in 1925 and the building was opened to the public in 1929. In 1957, the Jackson Park Hotel Company sold the property to the Monticello Hotel Company for $925,000. In 1973, the owners began to convert the hotel into condominiums. Deed references: (see Farish House for pre-1924 references) City DB 48-199, 340-360, 352-455. GRAPHICS / CONDtTl0NS SOURCES Good City Records LANDMARK CO.MMISSION-DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ---'----[,L--.-. ~ JW - March 28, 2022 PROPOSED GAS PIPING ALONG ROOF AND UP TO PROPOSED T-MOBILE GENERATOR. Generator +/- PROPOSED GAS PIPING UP ALONG EXTERIOR OF BUILDING ADJACENT TO EXISTING RAIN LEADER. PAINTED TO MATCH ADJACENT SURFACE Indicate routing of gas pipe. PROPOSED GAS PIPING ALONG LOWER ROOF PROPOSED GAS PIPING UP ALONG EXTERIOR OF BUILDING. PAINTED TO MATCH ADJACENT SURFACES. Meter +/- For: Mobile Mobile R R VICINITY MAP PROJECT: PROJECT TEAM GENERATOR ADD APPLICANT: T-MOBILE 1825 W. WALNUT HILL LANE, SUITE 120 IRVING, TEXAS 75038 12050 BALTIMORE AVE 1-855-669-5421 BELTSVILLE, MD 20705 SITE NAME: SITE ACQUISITION: COMPANY: SMARTLINK GROUP ADDRESS: 1362 MELLON RD HANOVER, MD 21076 CONTACT: HINSON WHITE EMAIL: HINSON.WHITE@SMARTLINKGROUP.COM ARCHITECTURAL & ENGINEERING: SITE ID: COMPANY: ADDRESS: TRYLON TSF 1825 W. WALNUT HILL LANE, SUITE 120 IRVING, TX 75038 ENGINEER: KATYA SERAVALLE PHONE: 1 (855) 669-5421 EMAIL: KATYA.SERAVALLE@TRYLON.COM SITE ADDRESS: AERIAL MAP SUBMITTALS REV DATE DESCRIPTION BY 0 03/01/21 FINAL MKJ CODE COMPLIANCE 1 08/06/21 CLIENT COMMENTS MKJ PROJECT DESCRIPTION ALL WORK & MATERIALS SHALL BE PERFORMED & INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CURRENT EDITIONS OF THE FOLLOWING CODES AS ADOPTED BY THE LOCAL GOVERNING AUTHORITIES. NOTHING IN THESE PLANS IS TO BE CONSTRUED TO PERMIT WORK NOT CONFORMING TO THESE CODES: THE PROJECT CONSISTS OF MODIFICATIONS TO AN EXISTING APPROVED WIRELESS FACILITY WITH FOLLOWING: 1. 2015 INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODE 2. 2015 INTERNATIONAL RESIDENTIAL CODE • EXISTING (1) 11'-0" x 13'-6" EQUIPMENT PLATFORM 3. 2015 INTERNATIONAL FIRE CODE • INSTALL (1) 25KW GENERAC NATURAL GAS GENERATOR (GENERAC RG025 AC) • INSTALL (1) AUTOMATIC TRANSFER SWITCH 4. 2015 INTERNATIONAL PLUMBING CODE SITE INFORMATION 5. 2015 INTERNATIONAL MECHANICAL CODE 6. 2015 INTERNATIONAL FUEL GAS CODE 7. 2017 NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE SITE ID: VA32349A SHEET INDEX SITE NAME: SHEET # DESCRIPTION RIDGE STREET PROJECT INFORMATION T-1 TITLE SHEET SITE NAME: RIDGE STREET DRIVING DIRECTIONS N-1 GENERAL NOTES SITE ADDRESS: SITE ID: VA32349A 500 COURT SQUARE FROM: 12050 BALTIMORE AVE, BELTSVILLE, MD 20705 A-1 EXISTING COMPOUND LAYOUT COUNTY: ALBEMARLE TO: 500 COURT SQUARE , CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA 22902 CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA 22902 JURISDICTION: CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE A-2 PROPOSED COMPOUND LAYOUT APN: 53009600 START HEAD SOUTHEAST TOWARD US-1 S. FOLLOW I-495 W, I-66 W AND US-29 S TO PARK ST IN CHARLOTTESVILLE. TAKE THE PARK ST EXIT LATITUDE: 38.031159° FROM US-250 E/US-250 BYP E, TURN RIGHT ONTO US-1 S, TURN RIGHT ONTO AMMENDALE RD. TURN LEFT ONTO MD-212 W/AMMENDALE RD, USE A-2.1 ENLARGED PROPOSED COMPOUND LAYOUT THE RIGHT LANE TO MERGE WITH I-95 S VIA THE RAMP TO WASHINGTONI, USE THE RIGHT 2 LANES TO TAKE EXIT 27 W FOR I-95/I-495 W LONGITUDE: -78.47759° TOWARD SILVER SPRING/BETHESDAI KEEP RIGHT AT THE Y JUNCTION AND MERGE WITH I-495 W, KEEP RIGHT TO CONTINUE ON I-495 S, KEEP A-3 GENERATOR SPECIFICATIONS RIGHT TO STAY ON I-495 S, USE THE RIGHT 2 LANES TO TAKE EXIT 49 TO MERGE WITH I-66 W TOWARD MANASSAS/FRONT ROYAL, USE THE GROUND ELEVATION: ±501' (AMSL) RIGHT 2 LANES TO TAKE EXIT 43A TO MERGE WITH US-29 S/LEE HWY. TOWARD GAINESVILLE/WARRENTON, KEEP LEFT TO CONTINUE ON US-15 S/US-29 S, FOLLOW SIGNS FOR US-17 S/CULPEPER/FREDERICKSBURG, KEEP RIGHT TO STAY ON US-29 S, KEEP LEFT TO STAY ON US-29 S USE THE A-4 EQUIPMENT AND MOUNTING DETAILS SITE ADDRESS: 500 COURT SQUARE LEFT 2 LANES TO TURN LEFT ONTO HYDRAULIC RD USE THE LEFT 2 LANES TO TURN LEFT ONTO US-250 E/US-250 BYP E, TAKE THE PARK ST EXIT. FOLLOW PARK ST TO E JEFFERSON ST, TURN RIGHT ONTO PARK ST, TURN RIGHT ONTO E JEFFERSON ST, DESTINATION WILL BE ON THE LEFT S-1 ATTACHMENT DETAILS SHEET DESCRIPTION CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA 22902 E-1 PANEL SCHEDULE & WIRING DETAILS PROPERTY OWNER: BROADCAST SERVICES INC. TO OBTAIN LOCATION OF PARTICIPANTS UNDERGROUND FACILITIES BEFORE TITLE SHEET YOU DIG IN VIRGINIA, CALL VIRGINIA 811 G-1 GROUNDING DETAILS 4801 INDUSTRIAL PARKWAY INDIANAPOLIS, IL 46226 R TOLL FREE: 1-800-552-7001 OR P-1 GAS PIPE ROUTING PLANS, AND NOTES SHEET NO. www.va811.com P-2 GAS RISER DIAGRAM, SYMBOLS LIST, AND NOTES VIRGINIA STATUTE TOWER OWNER: UNKNOWN Know what's below. REQUIRES MIN OF 2 P-3 DETAILS Call before you dig. T-1 WORKING DAYS NOTICE BEFORE YOU EXCAVATE TOWER OWNER SITE ID: UNKNOWN GENERAL NOTES Mobile R 1. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS L. SITE CONTROL E. STRIPPING 4. GENERAL NOTES 1. THE CONTRACTOR IS COMPLETELY RESPONSIBLE FOR CONTAINMENT OF 1. STRIP NOT LESS 3 INCHES OF SOD AND TOPSOIL FROM AREAS THAT WILL A. PURPOSE AND INTENT SEDIMENT AND CONTROL OF EROSION AT THE SITE. ANY DAMAGE TO UNDERLAY GRAVEL, PAVEMENT, NEW STRUCTURES OR EMBANKMENTS. 1. IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO EXAMINE ALL PLAN 1. THE DRAWING AND SPECIFICATION ARE INTENDED TO BE FULLY ADJACENT OR DOWNSTREAM PROPERTIES WILL BE CORRECTED BY THE STOCKPILE STRIPPING ON-SITE FOR RE-USE AND FINAL LANDSCAPING. SHEETS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND COORDINATE HIS WORK WITH THE EXPLANATORY AND SUPPLEMENTARY, HOWEVER, SHOULD ANYTHING BE CONTRACTOR AT NO EXPENSE TO T-MOBILE. WORK OF ALL OTHER CONTRACTORS TO ENSURE THAT WORK SHOWN, INDICATED, OR SPECIFIED ON ONE AND NOT THE OTHER, IT SHALL 2. THE CONTRACTOR IS TO MAINTAIN ADEQUATE DRAINAGE AT ALL TIMES. F. EMBANKMENT PROGRESSION IS NOT INTERRUPTED. BE DONE THE SAME AS IF DISCREPANCIES BETWEEN REQUIREMENTS SHOWN DO NOT ALLOW WATER TO STAND OR POND. ANY DAMAGE TO 1. CONSTRUCT EMBANKMENT TO THE LINES AND GRADES SHOWN ON THE 2. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTAINING A NEAT AND IN BOTH, THE MORE STRINGENT REQUIREMENTS SHALL APPLY. STRUCTURES OR WORK ON THE SITE CAUSED BY INADEQUATE DRAWING. ORDERLY SITE, YARD AND GROUNDS. CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE AND 2. THE INTENTION OF THE DOCUMENT IS TO INCLUDE ALL LABOR AND MAINTENANCE OF DRAINAGE PROVISIONS WILL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF 2. CONSTRUCT EMBANKMENT FROM ON-SITE EXCAVATION MATERIAL WHEN DISPOSE OFF SITE ALL RUBBISH, WASTE MATERIAL, LITTER AND ALL MATERIALS REASONABLY NECESSARY FOR THE PROPER EXECUTION AND THE CONTRACTOR AND ANY COST ASSOCIATED WITH REPAIRS FOR SUCH SUITABLE. USE IMPORTED BACKFILL ONLY AFTER AVAILABLE ON-SITE FOREIGN SUBSTANCES. REMOVE PETROCHEMICAL SPILLS, STAINS AND COMPLETION OF THE WORK AS STIPULATED IN THE CONTRACT. DAMAGE WILL BE AT THE CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE. EXCAVATION MATERIAL HAS BEEN USED. OTHER FOREIGN DEPOSITS. RAKE GROUND TO A SMOOTH 3. ALL WASTE MATERIAL SHALL BE PROPERLY DISPOSED OF OFF-SITE OR AS 3. CONSTRUCT IN LIFTS OF NOT MORE THAN 12 INCHES IN LOOSE DEPTH. THE EVEN-TEXTURED SURFACE. B. CONFLICTS DIRECTED BY CONSTRUCTION MANAGER AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH FULL WIDTH OF THE CROSS SECTION SHALL BE BROUGHT UP UNIFORMLY. 3. THE PLANS SHOW SOME KNOWN SUBSURFACE STRUCTURE ABOVE 1. VERIFY ALL MEASUREMENTS AT THE SITE BEFORE ORDERING MATERIAL OR JURISDICTIONAL AUTHORITIES. 4. MATERIAL SHALL BE PLACED IN LAYERS AND SHALL BE NEAR OPTIMUM GROUND STRUCTURES AND/OR UTILITIES BELIEVED TO EXIST IN THE DOING ANY WORK, NO EXTRA CHARGE OR COMPENSATION WILL BE ALLOWED M. LIVESTOCK PROTECTION MOISTURE CONTENT BEFORE ROLLING TO OBTAIN THE PRESCRIBED WORKING AREA, EXACT LOCATION OF WHICH MAY VARY FROM THE DUE TO DIFFERENCES BETWEEN ACTUAL DIMENSIONS OR DIMENSIONS 1. PROTECT AND SECURE LIVESTOCK. MAINTAIN AND SECURE EXISTING COMPACTION. WETTING OR DRYING OF THE MATERIAL AND MANIPULATION LOCATION INDICATED. IN PARTICULAR THE CONTRACTOR IS WARNED SHOWN ON PLANS SUBMIT NOTICE OF ANY DISCREPANCY IN DIMENSIONS OR PERIMETER FENCE AND/OR GATE ENCLOSURES. TO SECURE A UNIFORM MOISTURE CONTENT THROUGHOUT THE LAYERS MAY THAT THE EXACT OR EVEN APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF SUCH OTHERWISE TO T-MOBILE FOR RESOLUTION BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH THE BE REQUIRED. SUCH OPERATIONS SHALL BE INCLUDED IN THE APPROPRIATE PIPELINES, SUBSURFACE STRUCTURES AND/OR UTILITIES IN THE AREA WORK. 2. SITE PREPARATION BID ITEM. SHOULD THE MATERIAL BE TOO WET TO PERMIT PROPER MAY BE SHOWN OR MAY NOT BE SHOWN AND IT SHALL BE HIS 2. NO PLEA OF IGNORANCE OF CONDITIONS THAT EXIST, OR OF COMPACTION, IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO UTILIZE RESPONSIBILITY TO PROCEED WITH GREAT CARE IN 48 HOURS BEFORE DIFFICULTIES OR CONDITIONS THAT MAY BE ENCOUNTERED, OR OF ANY A. SCOPE OF WORK INCLUDES MATERIAL WITH AN ACCEPTABLE MOISTURE CONTENT. YOU DIG, DRILL OR BLAST CALL LOCAL UTILITIES LOCATOR COMPANY. OTHER RELEVANT MATTER CONCERNING THE EXECUTION OF THE WORK WILL 1. PROTECTION OF EXISTING TREES, VEGETATION AND LANDSCAPING 5. DO NOT PLACE FROZEN MATERIAL IN THE EMBANKMENT AND DO NOT PLACE 4. THE OWNER OR OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE SHALL BE NOTIFIED IN 1825 W. WALNUT HILL LANE, SUITE 120 BE ACCEPTED AS AN EXCUSE FOR ANY FAILURE OR OMISSION ON THE PART MATERIALS WHICH MIGHT BE DAMAGED BY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. EMBANKMENT MATERIAL UPON FROZEN MATERIAL. WRITING OF ANY CONDITIONS THAT VARY FROM THOSE SHOWN ON IRVING, TEXAS 75038 OF THE CONTRACTOR TO FULFILL EVERY DETAIL OF ALL THE REQUIREMENTS 2. TRIMMING OF EXISTING TREES AND VEGETATION AS REQUIRED FOR 6. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE STABILITY OF EMBANKMENTS 1-855-669-5421 THE PLANS. THE CONTRACTOR'S WORK SHALL NOT VARY FROM THE OF THE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS GOVERNING THE WORK. AND THE REPLACEMENT OF ANY PORTION WHICH HAS BECOME DISPLACED PROTECTION DURING CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. PLANS WITHOUT THE EXPRESSED APPROVAL OF THE OWNER OR THE DUE TO CONTRACTOR'S OPERATIONS. 3. CLEANING AND GRUBBING OF STUMPS, VEGETATION, DEBRIS, RUBBISH, OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE. C. CLEANING 7. START LAYERS IN THE DEEPEST PORTION OF THE FILL AND AS PLACEMENT DESIGNATED TREES AND SITE IMPROVEMENTS. 5. THE CONTRACTOR IS INSTRUCTED TO COOPERATE WITH ANY AND ALL 1. KEEP THE SITE FREE FROM ACCUMULATION OF WASTE AND RUBBISH CAUSED PROGRESSES, CONSTRUCT LAYERS APPROXIMATELY PARALLEL TO THE FINISH 4. TOPSOIL STRIPPING AND STOCKPILING. OTHER CONTRACTORS PERFORMING WORK ON THE SITE DURING THE BY EMPLOYEES AT THE COMPLETION OF THE WORK, REMOVE ALL WASTE AND GRADE LINE. 5. TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL, SILTATION CONTROL, AND DUST PERFORMANCE OF THIS CONTRACT. NON-CONSTRUCTION MATERIAL INCLUDING ALL CONTRACT TOOLS, 8. ROUTE EQUIPMENT BOTH LOADED AND EMPTY, OVER THE FULL WIDTH OF CONTROL CONFORMING TO LOCAL REQUIREMENTS AS APPLICABLE. 6. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL RESTORE ALL DAMAGED, PUBLIC OR PRIVATE SCAFFOLDING, AND SURPLUS MATERIAL AND LEAVE SITE CLEAN AND READY THE EMBANKMENT TO ENSURE UNIFORMITY OF MATERIAL PLACEMENT. 6. TEMPORARY PROTECTION OF ADJACENT PROPERTY, STRUCTURES, PROPERTY TO AT LEAST AS GOOD OF CONDITION AS BEFORE FOR USE. 9. COMPACT EMBANKMENT UNDERLYING NEW GRAVEL PAVING, FLOOR SLABS BENCHMARKS, AND MONUMENTS. DISTURBED AS DETERMINED BY THE OWNER OR OWNER'S AND STRUCTURES TO BE 95% COMPACTION AT A MINIMUM DRY DENSITY AS 7. PROTECTION AND TEMPORARY RELOCATION, STORAGE AND REPRESENTATIVE. D. CODES DETERMINED BY ASTM 0-1557 OR WITHIN PLUS OR MINUS 3% OF OPTIMUM 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR FOLLOWING ALL LAWS, RE-INSTALLATION OF EXISTING FENCE AND OTHER SITE IMPROVEMENTS 7. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL REQUIRED PERMITS. MOISTURE CONTENT. COMPACT NON-STRUCTURAL AREA EMBANKMENTS TO A REGULATIONS, AND RULES PROMULGATED BY FEDERAL STATE AND LOCAL SCHEDULED FOR RE-USE. MINIMUM OF 90% OF ASTM 0-1557. 8. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT EXISTING PROPERTY LINE AUTHORITIES WITH JURISDICTION OVER THE SALTIER. THIS RESPONSIBILITY 8. REMOVAL AND DISPOSAL OF CLEARED MATERIALS. MONUMENTATION. ANY MONUMENTATION DISTURBED OR DESTROYED, IS IN EFFECT REGARDLESS OF WEATHER THE LAW, ORDINANCE, REGULATION G. SITE GRADING AS JUDGED BY THE OWNER OR OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE, SHALL BE OR RULE IS MENTIONED IN THESE SPECIFICATIONS. B. PRODUCTS AND MATERIALS (AS APPROVED BY CONSTRUCTION MANAGER OR AS 1. USING ON-SITE EXCAVATION MATERIAL, SHAPE, TRIM, FINISH AND COMPACT REPLACED. NOTED IN CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS) SURFACE AREAS TO CONFORM TO THE LINES. GRADES AND CROSS SECTIONS 9. ALL TRENCH EXCAVATION AND ANY REQUIRED SHEETING AND SHORING E. LICENSING 1. MATERIALS USED FOR TREE PROTECTION, EROSION CONTROL, SILTATION SHOWN ON THE DRAWING OR AS DESIGNATED BY THE CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE DONE IN ACCORDANCE WITH OSHA REGULATIONS FOR 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL HAVE AND MAINTAIN A VALID CONTRACTOR'S LICENSE CONTROL, AND DUST CONTROL. MANAGER. CONSTRUCTION. FOR THE LOCATION IN WHICH THE WORK IS TO BE PERFORMED. FOR 2. GRADE SURFACES TO DRAIN AND ELIMINATE ANY PONDING OR EROSION. 10. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR DEWATERING AND THE JURISDICTIONS THAT LICENSE INDIVIDUAL TRADES, THE TRADESMAN OR 3. EARTHWORK 3. ELIMINATE WHEEL RUTS BY REGRADING. MAINTENANCE OF SURFACE DRAINAGE DURING THE COURSE OF WORK. SUBCONTRACTOR PERFORMING THOSE SHALL BE LICENSED, RESEARCHED 4. COMPACT AREAS OF UNDERLYING NEW GRAVEL, PAVING, FLOOR SLABS AND 11. ALL UTILITY WORK INVOLVING CONNECTIONS TO EXISTING SYSTEMS AND COMPLY WITH THE LICENSING LAWS, PAY LICENSE FEES, AND SELECT A. SCOPE OF WORK INCLUDES STRUCTURES TO BE AT 95% COMPACTION AT A MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY AS SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH THE OWNER OR OWNER'S AND INFORM SUBCONTRACTORS REGARDING THESE LAWS. 1. EXCAVATION, TRENCHING, FILLING, COMPACTION, AND GRADING FOR DETERMINED BY THE ASTM 0-1557 OR WITHIN PLUS OR MINUS 3% OF REPRESENTATIVE BEFORE EACH AND EVERY CONNECTION TO EXISTING SUBMITTALS STRUCTURES, SITE IMPROVEMENTS AND UTILITIES. OPTIMUM MOISTURE CONTENT. SYSTEMS IS MADE. F. OSHA 2. MATERIALS FOR SUB-BASE, DRAINAGE, BACKFILL AND GRAVEL FOR SLABS, 5. CONSTRUCT FINISH SURFACE OF SITE GRADING AREAS WITHIN 1 INCH FROM 12. MAINTAIN FLOW FOR ALL EXISTING UTILITIES REV DATE DESCRIPTION BY 1. FOLLOW ALL APPLICABLE RULES AND REGULATIONS OF THE OCCUPATIONAL PAVEMENT AND IMPROVEMENTS. SPECIFIED GRADE. 13. ALL SITE FILL SHALL MEET SELECTED FILL STANDARDS AS DEFINED BY 0 03/01/21 FINAL MKJ SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATIONS AND STATE LAWS BASED IN THE 3. ROCK EXCAVATION WITHOUT BLASTING. THE OWNER OF OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE ON THE DRAWINGS OR FEDERAL OCCUPATION SAFETY AND HEALTH ACT. THESE REGULATIONS 4. SUPPLY OF ADDITIONAL MATERIALS FOR OFFSITE AS REQUIRED. H. SUBGRADE PREPARATION GEOTECHNICAL REPORT RECOMMENDATIONS. 1 08/06/21 CLIENT COMMENTS MKJ INCLUDE, BUT ARE NOT LIMITED TO, REGULATIONS DEALING WITH TOWER 5. REMOVAL AND LEGDK DISPOSAL OF EXCAVATED MATERIAL AS REQUIRED. 1. SHAPE TOP OF SUBGRADE TO THE LINES AND GRADES SHOWN ON THE 14. CONTRACTOR TO GRADE ALL AREAS OF THE SITE TO PROVIDE POSITIVE CONSTRUCTION AND SAFETY, EXCAVATION AND TRENCHING, AND WORK IN DRAWINGS. DRAINAGE AWAY FROM THE BUILDING OR EQUIPMENT PAD AND THE CONFINED SPACES. ENSURE THAT EMPLOYEES AND SUBCONTRACTORS WEAR B. QUALITY ASSURANCE 2. MAINTAIN TOP OF SUBGRADE IN A FREE-DRAINING CONDITION. TOWER. HARD HATS AT ALL TIMES DURING CONSTRUCTION. 1. COMPACTION 3. DO NOT STOCK PILE MATERIAL ON TOP OF SUBGRADE UNLESS AUTHORIZED 15. IF NECESSARY, THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR REPAIRING AND G. PHOTOS A. UNDER STRUCTURES, BUILDING SLABS, PAVEMENTS AND BY CONSTRUCTION MANAGER. REGRADING ROADWAY AND ANY DISTURBED AREAS FOLLOWING 1. PROVIDE PHOTOGRAPHIC EVIDENCE OF ALL FOUNDATION INSTALLATIONS, WALKWAYS WILL OBTAIN A 95% COMPACTION AT A MINIMUM DRY DENSITY 4. COMPACT THE TOP 12 INCHES OF SUBGRADE TO A 95% COMPACTION AT A INSTALLATION OF UTILITIES. GROUNDING, AND TRENCHING AFTER PLACEMENT OF UTILITIES PRIOR TO AS DETERMINED BY ASTM 0-1557 OR WITH PLUS OR MINUS 3% OF THE MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY AS DETERMINED BY ASTM 0-1557 OR WITHIN PLUS 16. NO COMMERCIAL MESSAGES TO BE DISPLAYED ON TOWER BACKFILL. MOISTURE CONTENT. OR MINUS 3% OF THE OPTIMUM MOISTURE CONTENT. 17. WATER AND SEWER SERVICES ARE NOT REQUIRED FOR THE 2. GRADING TOLERANCES OUTSIDE BUILDING LINES 5. CONSTRUCT TOP OF SUBGRADE WITHIN 1 INCH OF ESTABLISHED GRADE AND DEVELOPMENT SITE INFORMATION H. BUILDING PERMITS A. LAWNS, UNPAVED AREAS AND WALKS PLUS OR MINUS 1 INCH. CROSS SECTION. 18. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FURNISH AND INSTALL ALL MATERIAL UNLESS 1. CONTRACTOR WILL SUBMIT CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS TO THE B. UNDER PAVEMENTS PLUS OR MINUS 12 INCH. OTHERWISE NOTED. JURISDICTIONAL AUTHORITY FOR PLAN CHECK AND REVIEW. CONTRACTOR I. GEOTEXTILE FABRIC SITE ID: 3. GRADING TOLERANCES FOR FILL UNDER CONCRETE APPLICATIONS 19. ELECTRICAL DRAWINGS HAVE BEEN REVIEWED AND SEALED FOR WILL SUBMIT LICENSING AND WORKMAN'S COMPENSATION INFORMATION TO A. PLUS OR MINUS 12 INCH MEASURED WITH 10 FOOT STRAIGHT EDGE. 1. LAY GEOTEXTILE FABRIC OVER COMPACTED SUBGRADE IN THE COMPOUND STRUCTURAL PURPOSES ONLY. VA32349A THE JURISDICTION AS REQUIRED TO OBTAIN THE BUILDING PERMIT, AREA AND UNDER LENGTH OF ROAD (WHEN REQUIRED). LAP ALL JOINTS TO A CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE AND SCHEDULE REQUIRED INSPECTIONS MINIMUM OF 36 INCHES. SITE LEGENDS C. PRODUCTS AND MATERIALS (AS APPROVED BY CONSTRUCTION MANAGER OR AS AND POST REQUIRED PERMITS AT THE JOB SITE COMPLY WITH SPECIFIC NOTED IN CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS) PROJECT RELATED REQUESTS AND SUGGESTIONS MADE BY BUILDING 1. SUB-BASE MATERIAL: GRADED MIXTURE OF NATURAL OR CRUSHED J. GRAVEL SURFACING CENTERLINE SITE NAME: INSPECTOR, AND INFORM CONSTRUCTION MANAGER OF ANY SUCH WORK 1. CONSTRUCT GRAVEL SURFACING AREAS USING CRUSHED AGGREGATE BASE THAT MAY BE BEYOND THE SCOPE OF THE CONTRACT OR DEVIATE FROM THE GRAVEL, CRUSHED STONE OR SLAG, AND NATURAL SAND. AND FINISH COURSES AS SPECIFIED BY CONSTRUCTION MANAGER. SPREAD PROPERTY/LEASE LINE RIDGE STREET CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENT. T-MOBILE WILL REIMBURSE THE CONTRACTOR 2. WASHED MATERIAL, EVENLY GRADED MIXTURE OF CRUSHED STONE OR GROUND CONDUCTOR GRAVEL AND RAKE TO OBTAIN A UNIFORM SURFACE AREA. FEES FOR PLAN REVIEW, BUILDING PERMIT, CONNECTIONS, AND GRAVEL WITH 95% PASSING A 1-1/2 INCH SIEVE. COAXIAL CABLE INSPECTIONS. (INCLUDED IN THE BASE PROPOSAL). 3. GRADING MATERIAL WILL CONSIST OF SATISFACTORY NATIVE OR K. LANDSCAPING CHAIN LINK FENCING SITE ADDRESS: IMPORTED SOIL MATERIALS FREE OF CLAY, ROCK OR GRAVEL NOT LARGER THAN 2 INCHES IN ANY DIMENSION, DEBRIS, WASTE, FROZEN MATERIALS 1. FURNISH, INSTALL AND MAINTAIN LANDSCAPE WORK AS SHOWN AND/OR OVERHEAD TELEPHONE LINE 500 COURT SQUARE I. ZONING REGULATIONS AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS REQUIRED WITHIN THE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS OR AS SPECIFIED IN OVERHEAD POWER LINE 1. CONTRACTOR WILL SUBMIT ALL ZONING AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS. AND OTHER UNSUITABLE MATERIALS WILL NOT BE ALLOWED FOR USE. THE CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATIONS. POWER RUN CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA 22902 SOME USE PERMITS MAY HAVE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS FOR THE SITE IMPORTED MATERIALS SHALL HAVE A CLAY CONTENT OF NO MORE THAN FIBER/POWER RUN RELATED TO CONSTRUCTION, SUCH AS NOISE REGULATIONS, HOURS OF 5%. L. CONCRETE FORM WORK 4. GRAVEL MATERIAL: EVENLY GRADED MIXTURE OF CRUSHED STONE OR TELCO RUN WORK, ACCESS LIMITATIONS, ETC. THE CONSTRUCTION MANAGER WILL 1. FORMS: SMOOTH AND FREE OF SURFACE IRREGULARITIES. UTILIZE FORM GRAVEL WITH 95% PASSING A 1-1/2 INCH SIEVE. POWER/TELCO RUN INFORM THE CONTRACTOR OF THESE REQUIREMENTS AT THE PRE-BID RELEASE AGENTS. MEETING OR AS SHOWN IN THE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS. 5. GEOTEXTILE FABRIC: AS PER CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS. 2. CHAMFER EXPOSED EDGES OF ALL TOWER FOUNDATION SHALL RECEIVE A 34 GROUNDING CONDUCTOR INCH BY 34 INCH 45 DEGREE CHAMFER. OTHER EXPOSED EDGES SHALL SPARK ZONE AND WORKING J. FAA PERMIT AND TOWER LIGHTING D. CLEARING AND GRUBBING 1. REFER TO CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS AND CONSTRUCTION MANAGER FOR FAA 1. REMOVE ALL VEGETATION AND MATERIALS AS REQUIRED. REMOVE STUMPS RECEIVE A TOOLED RADIUS FINISH. CLEARANCE SHEET DESCRIPTION AND STATE LIGHTING REQUIREMENTS. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE TEMPORARY 3. UPON COMPLETION, REMOVE ALL FORMS INCLUDING THOSE CONCEALED OR COMPLETELY UNDER FOUNDATIONS AND ROADWAYS. DISPOSE OF SYMBOLS & MATERIAL FM APPROVED LIGHTING UNTIL PERMANENT LIGHTING IS OPERATIONAL. BURIED. CLEARING AND GRUBBING OFF-SITE OR IN AN ON-SITE LOCATION 4. REFER TO STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS FOR ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS. K. TOWER SECURITY APPROVED BY CONSTRUCTION MANAGER. DETAIL REFERENCE GENERAL NOTES 1. IF REQUIRED, TOWER MUST BE FENCED, TEMPORARILY OR PERMANENTLY WITHIN 24 HOURS OF ERECTION. DO NOT ALLOW THE GATE ACCESSING THE TOWER AREA TO REMAIN OPEN OR UNATTENDED ANY TIME FOR ANY REASON. KEEP THE GATE CLOSED AND LOCKED WHEN NOT IN USE. ELEVATION REFERENCE SHEET NO. SECTION REFERENCE N-1 Mobile R 1825 W. WALNUT HILL LANE, SUITE 120 IRVING, TEXAS 75038 1-855-669-5421 SUBMITTALS REV DATE DESCRIPTION BY 0 03/01/21 FINAL MKJ 1 08/06/21 CLIENT COMMENTS MKJ SITE INFORMATION SITE ID: VA32349A SITE NAME: RIDGE STREET SITE ADDRESS: 500 COURT SQUARE CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA 22902 SHEET DESCRIPTION EXISTING COMPOUND LAYOUT SHEET NO. A-1 EXISTING COMPOUND LAYOUT 0 5' 10' 1 Mobile R 1825 W. WALNUT HILL LANE, SUITE 120 IRVING, TEXAS 75038 1-855-669-5421 SUBMITTALS REV DATE DESCRIPTION BY 0 03/01/21 FINAL MKJ 1 08/06/21 CLIENT COMMENTS MKJ SITE INFORMATION SITE ID: VA32349A SITE NAME: RIDGE STREET SITE ADDRESS: 500 COURT SQUARE CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA 22902 SHEET DESCRIPTION PROPOSED COMPOUND LAYOUT SHEET NO. A-2 PROPOSED COMPOUND LAYOUT 0 5' 10' 1 Mobile R 1825 W. WALNUT HILL LANE, SUITE 120 IRVING, TEXAS 75038 1-855-669-5421 SUBMITTALS REV DATE DESCRIPTION BY 0 03/01/21 FINAL MKJ 1 08/06/21 CLIENT COMMENTS MKJ SITE INFORMATION SITE ID: VA32349A SITE NAME: RIDGE STREET SITE ADDRESS: 500 COURT SQUARE CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA 22902 SHEET DESCRIPTION ENLARGED PROPOSED COMPOUND LAYOUT SHEET NO. A-2.1 ENLARGED PROPOSED COMPOUND LAYOUT 0 1' 2' 1 Mobile R 1825 W. WALNUT HILL LANE, SUITE 120 IRVING, TEXAS 75038 1-855-669-5421 SUBMITTALS REV DATE DESCRIPTION BY 0 03/01/21 FINAL MKJ 1 08/06/21 CLIENT COMMENTS MKJ SITE INFORMATION SITE ID: VA32349A SITE NAME: RIDGE STREET SITE ADDRESS: 500 COURT SQUARE CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA 22902 SHEET DESCRIPTION GENERATOR SPECIFICATIONS SHEET NO. A-3 GENERATOR SPECIFICATION Mobile R GENERAC 1825 W. WALNUT HILL LANE, SUITE 120 IRVING, TEXAS 75038 1-855-669-5421 SUBMITTALS REV DATE DESCRIPTION BY ATS CABINET SPECIFICATION 1 NOT USED 2 NOT USED 3 0 03/01/21 FINAL MKJ 1 08/06/21 CLIENT COMMENTS MKJ SITE INFORMATION SITE ID: VA32349A SITE NAME: RIDGE STREET SITE ADDRESS: 500 COURT SQUARE CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA 22902 SHEET DESCRIPTION EQUIPMENT AND MOUNTING DETAILS SHEET NO. A-4 GROUND ROD DETAIL 4 NOT USED 5 Mobile R 1825 W. WALNUT HILL LANE, SUITE 120 IRVING, TEXAS 75038 1-855-669-5421 SUBMITTALS REV DATE DESCRIPTION BY 0 03/01/21 FINAL MKJ 1 08/06/21 CLIENT COMMENTS MKJ SITE INFORMATION SITE ID: VA32349A SITE NAME: RIDGE STREET SITE ADDRESS: 500 COURT SQUARE CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA 22902 SHEET DESCRIPTION ATTACHMENT DETAILS SHEET NO. S-1 ANCHOR BOLT DETAIL 1 Mobile R 1825 W. WALNUT HILL LANE, SUITE 120 IRVING, TEXAS 75038 1-855-669-5421 SUBMITTALS REV DATE DESCRIPTION BY CIRCUIT DETAIL 1 ALARM WIRING IDENTIFICATION CHART 2 0 03/01/21 FINAL MKJ 1 08/06/21 CLIENT COMMENTS MKJ SITE INFORMATION SITE ID: VA32349A SITE NAME: RIDGE STREET SITE ADDRESS: 500 COURT SQUARE CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA 22902 SHEET DESCRIPTION PANEL SCHEDULE &WIRING DETAILS SHEET NO. E-1 NOT USED 3 SINGLE-LINE WIRING DIAGRAM 4 Mobile R 1825 W. WALNUT HILL LANE, SUITE 120 IRVING, TEXAS 75038 1-855-669-5421 CADWELD GROUNDING CONNECTIONS 1 EXTERIOR GROUND BAR LUG 2 GENERAL GROUNDING NOTES 3 SUBMITTALS REV DATE DESCRIPTION BY 0 03/01/21 FINAL MKJ 1 08/06/21 CLIENT COMMENTS MKJ 1 SITE INFORMATION SITE ID: VA32349A 2 SITE NAME: RIDGE STREET 4 • • SITE ADDRESS: 3 500 COURT SQUARE CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA 22902 5 SHEET DESCRIPTION GROUNDING DETAILS SHEET NO. G-1 GENERATOR GROUNDING DETAIL 4 T-MOBILE NORTHEAST LLC 12050 BALTIMORE AVENUE BELTSVILLE, MD 20705 PHONE: (240) 264-8600 1362 Mellon Road Suite 140 Hanover, MD 21075 TE I TELEGENT ENGINEERING I NC. 2216 Commerce Road, Suite 1 Forest Hill, MD 21050 410-692-5816 www.tel-eng.com VA32349A RIDGE STREET 500 COURT SQUARE CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA 22902 SUBMITTALS GAS PIPE ROUTING PLANS, AND NOTES P-1 T-MOBILE NORTHEAST LLC 12050 BALTIMORE AVENUE BELTSVILLE, MD 20705 PHONE: (240) 264-8600 1362 Mellon Road Suite 140 Hanover, MD 21075 TE I TELEGENT ENGINEERING I NC. 2216 Commerce Road, Suite 1 Forest Hill, MD 21050 410-692-5816 www.tel-eng.com VA32349A RIDGE STREET 500 COURT SQUARE CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA 22902 SUBMITTALS GAS RISER DIAGRAM, SYMBOLS LIST, AND NOTES P-2 T-MOBILE NORTHEAST LLC 12050 BALTIMORE AVENUE BELTSVILLE, MD 20705 PHONE: (240) 264-8600 1362 Mellon Road Suite 140 Hanover, MD 21075 TE I TELEGENT ENGINEERING I NC. 2216 Commerce Road, Suite 1 Forest Hill, MD 21050 410-692-5816 www.tel-eng.com VA32349A RIDGE STREET 500 COURT SQUARE CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA 22902 SUBMITTALS DETAILS P-3 Certificate of Appropriateness BAR 22-04-03 707 West Main Street, TMP 320156000 West Main ADC District Owner: Starr Hill Properties, LLC Applicant: Orhun Bartu Dikmen Project: Storefront window replacement Application components (please click each link to go directly to PDF page): • Staff Report • Historic Survey • Application Submittal April 19, 2022 BAR Packet Guide 5 City of Charlottesville Board of Architectural Review Staff Report April 19, 2022 Certificate of Appropriateness BAR 22-04-03 707 West Main Street, TMP 320156000 West Main ADC District Owner: Starr Hill Properties, LLC Applicant: Orhun Bartu Dikmen Project: Storefront window replacement Background Year Built: c. 1925 District: West Main ADC District Status: Contributing 707-709 West Main Street is a 6-bay, 2-story duplex commercial building constructed in 1925. A wide cornice runs across the top of the storefront and divides the building’s two stories; six compass-headed metal sash windows overlook West Main Street on the second floor. A.G. Carter purchased and developed the building in 1925 on what had previously been a residential site. Carter also developed the neighboring building, 701-705 West Main Street. The subject building housed furniture stores for much of the twentieth century. Prior BAR Reviews None at this address. October 4, 2013: Staff grants administrative approval for the installation of an air intake vent and exhaust fan in the rear elevation of the neighboring commercial unit in the building, 709 West Main Street. Application • CoA submittal dated March 29, 2022. Elevation and plan drawings for new storefront window. Detail drawings of window sill, jamb, and head. Photos of existing storefront. Material sample for metal window frame. CoA request to replace storefront glazing with operable, 5-leaf metal-framed folding windows and install a metal-framed, fixed, single-lite panel in the opening adjacent to the entry. 707 West Main Street (April 15, 2022) 1 Discussion Staff identified two properties in ADC districts with retractable storefront windows, both are roll-up windows: 1397 West Main Street (Boylan Heights; no record of BAR review) and 109-111 West Water Street (Otto Turkish Street Food; CoA approved October 2021). Historic survey forms identify this property and the neighboring building at 701-705 West Main Street as the best-preserved stretch of historic commercial buildings on West Main Street. At the subject building, the storefront glazing itself is modern, but other elements that encompass the storefront retain good integrity; including the prism-glass transom and pressed-metal cornice above the transom; the entry recess, doors, and door trim; and the low stone-faced walls below the glazing. The Design Guidelines offer clear guidance for alterations and rehabilitation of storefronts. See staff responses to each guideline below under Pertinent ADC District Design Guidelines: B. Facades & Storefronts. The BAR should consider if the proposed 5-leaf glazing pattern and the added visual thickness from the inserted frame will impact the building’s historic character. As designed, the frame of the operable window is wider than the frame of the fixed window—see below. The windows are not on the same plane; however, the BAR should discuss if this an issue or not. Head Sill 707 West Main Street (April 15, 2022) 2 The submittal does not indicate if the bronze corner post will be retained or replaced. (See component #3 in the photographs below, under Facades & Storefronts, item 4.) BAR should discuss this detail. For example, if replaced, with what and what are the dimensions. Note: It is uncertain if this a structural component—supporting the transom above—or only a glazing component. Innovation and flexibility allow the City’s downtown corridors to compete with suburban strip malls. At times, the City’s preservation goals might seem at odds with efforts to maintain and increase commercial activity. In evaluating this request, while we cannot conclude the existing storefront is too deteriorated to save, staff suggests the following might be helpful (from NPS Preservation Brief 11: Rehabilitating Historic Storefronts, see the Appendix): Where original or early storefronts no longer exist or are too deteriorated to save, the commercial character of the building should nonetheless be preserved—either through an accurate restoration based on historic research and physical evidence or a contemporary design which is compatible with the scale, design, materials, color and texture of the historic building. The sensitive rehabilitation of historic storefronts will not only enhance the architectural character of the overall building but will contribute to rejuvenating neighborhoods or business districts as well. If approved, staff recommends the following conditions: • Glass have VLT of not less than 70%. • Any original, metal components that are removed will be retained on-site and labeled, should a future restoration be considered. (Refer to comments under Facades & Storefronts, item 4.) Suggested motion Approval: Having considered the standards set forth within the City Code, including City’s ADC District Design Guidelines, I move to find that the proposed storefront alterations at 707 West Main Street satisfy the BAR’s criteria and are compatible with this property and other properties in the West Main ADC District, and that the BAR approves the application as submitted, with the following conditions: the glass have VLT of not less than 70%, and any original, metal components that are removed will be retained on-site and labeled, should a future restoration be considered. Denial: Having considered the standards set forth within the City Code, including the ADC District Design Guidelines, I move to find that the proposed storefront alterations at 707 West Main Street do not satisfy the BAR’s criteria and are not compatible with this property and other properties in the West Main ADC District, and that for the following reasons the BAR denies the application as submitted… Criteria, Standards, and Guidelines Review Criteria Generally Sec. 34-284(b) of the City Code states that, In considering a particular application the BAR shall approve the application unless it finds: 1) That the proposal does not meet specific standards set forth within this division or applicable provisions of the Design Guidelines established by the board pursuant to Sec.34-288(6); and 2) The proposal is incompatible with the historic, cultural or architectural character of the district in which the property is located or the protected property that is the subject of the application. 707 West Main Street (April 15, 2022) 3 Pertinent Standards for Review of Construction and Alterations include: 1) Whether the material, texture, color, height, scale, mass and placement of the proposed addition, modification or construction are visually and architecturally compatible with the site and the applicable design control district; 2) The harmony of the proposed change in terms of overall proportion and the size and placement of entrances, windows, awnings, exterior stairs and signs; 3) The Secretary of the Interior Standards for Rehabilitation set forth within the Code of Federal Regulations (36 C.F.R. §67.7(b)), as may be relevant; 4) The effect of the proposed change on the historic district neighborhood; 5) The impact of the proposed change on other protected features on the property, such as gardens, landscaping, fences, walls and walks; 6) Whether the proposed method of construction, renovation or restoration could have an adverse impact on the structure or site, or adjacent buildings or structures; 7) Any applicable provisions of the City’s Design Guidelines. Pertinent ADC District Design Guidelines Chapter III: New Construction & Additions I. Windows & Doors … 8) Glass shall be clear. Opaque spandrel glass or translucent glass may be approved by the BAR for specific applications. [Note: See below re: clear glass.] BAR discussion on July 17, 2018 regarding the definition of clear glass and the corresponding 70 % Visible Light Transmission (VLT) that has become the City’s standard: BAR concluded that VLT 70 should remain the preference relative to clear glass. However, they acknowledged the case-by-case flexibility offered in the Design Guidelines; specifically, though not exclusively, that this allows for the consideration of alternatives—e.g. VLTs below 70--and that subsequent BAR decisions regarding glass should be guided by the project’s location (e.g. on the Downtown Mall versus a side street), the type of windows and location on the building (e.g. a street level storefront versus the upper floors of an office building), the fenestration design (e.g. continuous glass walls versus punched windows), energy conservation goals, the intent of the architectural design, matching historical glass, and so on. Chapter IV: Rehabilitation B. Facades & Storefronts 1) Conduct pictorial research to determine the design of the original building or early changes. Staff comment: Photographs of the building from historic surveys confirm that many elements in the storefront, like the prism-glass transom and storefront cornice are historic. 3) Conduct exploratory demolition to determine what original fabric remains and its condition. Staff comment: Not applicable to the proposed project. 3) Remove any inappropriate materials, signs, or canopies covering the façade. 707 West Main Street (April 15, 2022) 4 Staff comment: The storefront does not have materials covering [concealing] historic elements. 4) Retain all elements, materials, and features that are original to the building or are contextual remodelings, and repair as necessary. Staff comment: A historic survey confirms that the glazing itself is not historic. Refer to images below: o The transom and bulkhead will not be altered. o #1. Bronze trim will be retained. o #2. Bronze glazing strips (top and bottom) will be removed. o #3. Bronze corner post. Unclear if this will be retained or replaced. o Vertical mull in center will be removed. (Uncertain if this is original to bronze components; however, it matches similar mull in adjacent storefront.) o Glass is not historic 707 West Main Street (April 15, 2022) 5 5) Restore as many original elements as possible, particularly the materials, windows, decorative details, and cornice. Staff comment: The proposed project will remove the bronze does not include the removal of surviving historic elements. 6) When designing new building elements, base the design on the “Typical elements of a commercial façade and storefront” (see drawing next page). Staff comment: This project will insert a new window between the existing historic elements of the storefront (transom and bulkhead). The five-leaf window is not a historic design. 7) Reconstruct missing or original elements, such as cornices, windows, and storefronts, if documentation is available. Staff comment: Not applicable to the proposed project. 9) Design new elements that respect the character, materials, and design of the building, yet are distinguished from the original building. Staff comment: The proposed window will be a clearly modern addition and does not mimic historic elements. 10) Depending on the existing building’s age, originality of the design and architectural significance, in some cases there may be an opportunity to create a more contemporary façade design when undertaking a renovation project. Staff comment: Not applicable to the proposed project. 11) Avoid using materials that are incompatible with the building or within the specific districts, including textured wood siding, vinyl or aluminum siding, and pressure-treated wood. Staff comment: The proposed window will have a black, aluminum frame. 12) Avoid introducing inappropriate architectural elements where they never previously existed. Staff comment: The proposed window will alter the appearance of the historic storefront by adding new five-leaf glazing and thicker trim necessary to insert the folding window into the existing storefront. C. Windows … 15) Do not use tinted or mirrored glass on major facades of the building. Translucent or low glass may be strategies to keep heat gain down. 707 West Main Street (April 15, 2022) 6 Appendix: From NPS Preservation Brief 11: Rehabilitating Historic Storefronts https://www.nps.gov/tps/how-to-preserve/briefs/11-storefronts.htm Designing Replacement Storefronts Where an architecturally or historically significant storefront no longer exists or is too deteriorated to save, a new front should be designed which is compatible with the size, scale, color, material, and character of the building. Such a design should be undertaken based on a thorough understanding of the building's architecture and, where appropriate, the surrounding streetscape. For example, just because upper floor windows are arched is not sufficient justification for designing arched openings for the new storefront. The new design should "read" as a storefront; filling in the space with brick or similar solid material is inappropriate for historic buildings. Similarly the creation of an arcade or other new design element, which alters the architectural and historic character of the building and its relationship with the street, should be avoided. Guidelines for Designing Replacement Storefronts • Scale: Respect the scale and proportion of the existing building in the new storefront design. • Materials: Select construction materials that are appropriate to the storefronts; wood, cast iron, and glass are usually more appropriate replacement materials than masonry which tends to give a massive appearance. • Cornice: Respect the horizontal separation between the storefront and the upper stories. A cornice or fascia board traditionally helped contain the store's sign. • Frame: Maintain the historic planar relationship of the storefront to the facade of the building and the streetscape (if appropriate). Most storefront frames are generally composed of horizontal and vertical elements. • Entrances: Differentiate the primary retail entrance from the secondary access to upper floors. In order to meet current code requirements, out-swinging doors generally must be recessed. Entrances should be placed where there were entrances historically, especially when echoed by architectural detailing (a pediment or projecting bay) on the upper stories. • Windows: The storefront generally should be as transparent as possible. Use of glass in doors, transoms, and display areas allows for visibility into and out of the store. • Secondary Design Elements: Keep the treatment of secondary design elements such as graphics and awnings as simple as possible in order to avoid visual clutter to the building and its streetscape. A key to the successful rehabilitation of historic commercial buildings is the sensitive treatment of the first floor itself. Wherever possible, significant storefronts (be they original or later alterations), including windows, sash, doors, transoms, signs and decorative features, should be repaired in order to retain the historic character of the building. Where original or early storefronts no longer exist or are too deteriorated to save, the commercial character of the building should nonetheless be preserved— either through an accurate restoration based on historic research and physical evidence or a contemporary design which is compatible with the scale, design, materials, color and texture of the historic building. The sensitive rehabilitation of historic storefronts will not only enhance the architectural character of the overall building but will contribute to rejuvenating neighborhoods or business districts as well. 707 West Main Street (April 15, 2022) 7 707 West Main Street 707 West Main Street 707 West Main - storefront alterations. April 2022. Color sample for metal frame In sun In shade\ Existing storefront 707 West Main Street 707 West Main Street 707 West Main Street 707 West Main Street — Google Street View 2019 707 West Main Street — Google Street View 2008 707 West Main Street — Google Street View 2012 Certificate of Appropriateness (HC District) BAR 22-04-04 313 Steephill Street, TMP 55A135000 Woolen Mills Village HC District (contributing) Owner: Sara and Brian Shullaw Applicant: Robert Nichols, Formworks Project: Porch rehab and side addition Application components (please click each link to go directly to PDF page): • Staff Report • Historic Survey • Application Submittal April 19, 2022 BAR Packet Guide 6 City of Charlottesville Board of Architectural Review Staff Report April 19, 2022 Certificate of Appropriateness (HC District) BAR 22-04-04 313 Steephill Street, TMP 55A135000 Woolen Mills Village HC District (contributing) Owner: Sara and Brian Shullaw Applicant: Robert Nichols, Formworks Project: Porch rehab and side addition Background 313 Steephill Street Year Built: 1897 Status: Contributing Two-story, three-bay, framed dwelling, hipped-roof and two prominent cross gables. Façade features boxed cornices and returns on each of the cross-gabled side bays. Front entrance is in the middle bay. House has an altered, two-bay, shed-roofed front porch, with one remaining, original, squared column with inset panels and a molded base and cap. Front door is located under this original portion of the porch, surmounted by a pointed arch and framed on each side by three sidelights. Each of the façade’s other bays has a 1/1 double-hung replacement window with pointed arch trim. The house is weatherboard on a brick foundation. The roof is asphalt shingles. Prior BAR Review N/A Request • Submittal: Formworks plans and renderings, three sheets, dated March 12, 2022 and sheet A6.1, dated Feb 8, 2022. CoA for alterations to enclosed front porch. Extend on the north side with the rear portion being an enclosed addition. (Note: The 1920 Sanborn Map shows the open porch. If not original to the 1897 house, we know it dates to before 1920.) Discussion and Recommendations Note: The regulations and guidelines for projects within a Historic Conservation District (HCD) are, by design, less rigid than those for an ADC District or an IPP. The HCD designations are intended to 333 Steephill Street (April 14, 2022) 1 preserve the character-defining elements of the neighborhoods and to assure that new construction is not inappropriate to that character, while minimally imposing on current residents who may want to upgrade their homes. Within the existing HCDs are buildings and/or areas that might easily qualify for an ADC District or as an IPP; however, in evaluating proposals within HCDs, the BAR may apply only the HCD requirements and guidelines. The design review should focus on the components of the project that will be visible from the streets. Referring to the staff comments (below, under Building Scale), the BAR should discuss the extent to which the porch extension and enclosed addition are perceived as additions. With that, if necessary, the BAR should discuss if the design should be differentiated further or, possibly, less so, should that differentiation result in additions that appear incompatible with this house and the character of the HC District. For example, (see below) is it more important the box cornice have two profiles, thus distinguishing new from original or be continuous, thus appearing visually and architecturally compatible? The goal is to differentiate old and new, and the modified siding contributes to that expression; however, for a porch expansion within a Historic Conservation District, staff suggests the result of continuity with certain elements (roof material, roof line, cornice, screen framing) is preferable to a subtle—or not so subtle--attempt to distinguish the old from new. Re: the original exterior walls and porch ceiling enclosed by the front addition. The window siding, trim, railing, etc. were removed with the prior alteration and no longer exist. Re: the porch entablature on the north side (see below), which will be enclosed by the expansion, the applicant noted it will be removed, that the within the screened enclosure there ceiling rafter will be exposed rafters and painted white, in order to create some height. 333 Steephill Street (April 14, 2022) 2 Suggested Motions Approval: Having considered the standards set forth within the City Code, including City Design Guidelines for Historic Conservation Districts, I move to find that the proposed alterations and addition at 313 Steephill Street satisfy the BAR’s criteria and are compatible with this property and other properties in the Woolen Mills Village Historic Conservation District, and that the BAR approves the application [as submitted.] […as submitted with the following conditions: …] Denial: Having considered the standards set forth within the City Code, including City Design Guidelines for Historic Conservation Districts, I move to find that the proposed alterations and addition at 313 Steephill Street do not satisfy the BAR’s criteria and are not compatible with this property and other properties in the Woolen Mills Village Historic Conservation District, and that for the following reasons the BAR denies the application as submitted: Criteria, Standards, and Guidelines Review Criteria Generally Sec. 34-341 - Criteria for approval a. In considering a particular application the BAR shall approve the application unless it finds: 1. That the proposal does not meet specific standards set forth within this division or applicable provisions of the conservation district design guidelines; and 2. The proposal is incompatible with the historic, cultural or architectural character of the conservation district in which the property is located. b. The BAR's review of the proposed new construction or addition to a building or structure shall be limited to factors specified in section 34-342. The BAR's review of the proposed demolition, razing or moving of any contributing structure shall be limited to the factors specified in section 34-343. c. The BAR, or city council on appeal, may require conditions of approval as are necessary or desirable to ensure that any new construction or addition would be compatible with the scale and character of the historic conservation district. Prior to attaching conditions to an approval, due consideration shall be given to the cost of compliance with the proposed conditions. Sec. 34-342 - Standards for review of new construction and additions. The following features and factors shall be considered in determining the appropriateness of proposed new construction and additions to buildings or structures: 1) Whether the form, height, scale, mass and placement of the proposed construction are visually and architecturally compatible with the site and the applicable conservation district; 2) The harmony of the proposed changes in terms of overall proportion and the size and placement of entrances and windows; 3) The impact of the proposed change on the essential architectural form and integrity of the existing building; 4) The effect, with respect to architectural considerations, of the proposed change on the conservation district neighborhood; 5) Any applicable provisions of the city's conservation district design guidelines. HC District Design Guidelines for New Construction and Additions Building Scale – height and massing 3. An addition needs to be perceived as an addition and therefore should not visually overpower the existing building in scale and design. 333 Steephill Street (April 14, 2022) 3 Staff Comment: Re-opening the original porch is appropriate--and a welcome alteration. The porch extension/side addition could be read as the enclosure of an existing [possibly original] porch that wrapped the corner, suggesting a different form for the original house. However, relative to scale, from the street the addition is single-story and approximately 10-feet wide, which does not overpower the original two-story, 44-foot wide, primary facade. Building Openings – orientation, doors and windows 1. A single entrance door (or main entrance of a multifamily dwelling) facing the street is recommended. 2. Window and door patterns and the ratio of solids (wall area) to voids (window and door area) of new buildings should be compatible with contributing buildings in the surrounding area. 3. Windows should be simple shapes compatible with those on contributing buildings, which are generally vertically oriented in residential areas. Staff Comment: The openings are appropriate. Building Materials and Textures 1. The selection of materials and textures for a new building should relate architecturally to the district, and should be compatible with and complementary to neighboring buildings. 2. Long-lasting, durable and natural materials are preferred, including brick, wood, stucco, and cementitious siding and standing seam metal roofs. Clear glass windows (VLT of 70% or more) are preferred. Staff Comment: The proposed materials and textures are appropriate. Woolen Mills Village Historic Conservation District Architectural character-defining features: 1. Encourage one-story front porches; 2. Encourage garages to be located in the rear yards 3. The levels of a building’s stories should be consistent with those on surrounding structures with respect to the natural grade [for example, a first floor should not be raised so that it is higher than most surrounding first floors] 4. Do not exclude well-designed, new contemporary architecture [there may be a misconception that only historic-looking new buildings are permitted] 5. Encourage standing seam metal roofs 6. Maintain and encourage tree canopy [Maintain the existing tree canopy and encourage new large shade trees] 7. Maintain neighborhood massing and form; encourage the use of sustainable materials 8. Encourage existing site features (wrought iron fencing, stone walls, shared streets) 9. Encourage good stewardship of Riverview Cemetery. Staff Comment: Except for the staff comments re: item 7 (form and massing), the alterations are appropriate. 333 Steephill Street (April 14, 2022) 4 Historic Conservation District (Martha Jefferson, Woolen Mills, Rugby Road) NOTE: For IPPs within HC Districts usetheADC District/IPP CoA application. Board of Architectural Review (BAR) OTTESP Conservation District Certificate of Appropriateness ithil Piease Return To: City of Charlottesville Department of Neighborhood Development Services P.O. Box 911, City Hall Staff email: wernerjb@charlottesville.gov Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 GINIA Telephone (434) 970-3130 watkinsro@charlottesville.gov Please submit the signed application form and a digital copy of submittal and attachments (via email or thumb drive). Please include application fee as follows: New construction project $375; Demolition of a contributing structure $375; Appeal of BAR decision regarding new construction or demolition $125. Make checks payable to the City of Charlottesville. No fee reguredfor: Additionsand othe projects requiring BAR approvaland not listedabove;Administrativeapprovals Appeals of BAR decisions if the originalapplication Wae not subject toan applicationfee. The BAR meets the third Tuesday of the month. Deadline for submittals is Tuesday 3 weeks prior to next BAR meeting by 3:30 p.m. Project Name/Description Porch rehab and sideaddition Parcel Number 55A135000 Project Address/Location 313 Steephill Street Owner Name Sara and Brian Shullaw Applicant Name_ Robert Nichols, Formwork Design Applicant Information Signature of Applicant hereby attest that the information I have provided is, to the Address 619 E High St best of my knowledge. correct. robert@formworkusa.com 434-296-2223 Email: Phone: (W (H) Signature Date Robert Nichols March 31, 2022 Print Name Date PropertyOwner Information(if not applicant) Address 313 Steephill Street Property I have Owner Permission lif not applicant) read thisplication andbereby give my consent to Charlottesville. VA 22902 itssubgis_ion. Email Phone:(VW). (H) Signature Date Brian Sara S 3Date 3 22 Print Name Description of Proposed Work (attach separate narrative if necessary): Porch rehab and side addition List All Attachments (see reverse side for submittal Design Documentation requirements): For Office Use Only Approved Disapproved by:. Received by Date: Fee paid: Cash/Ck.# Conditions of approval Date Received: Revised Apil 2017 HISTORIC CONSERVATION DISTRICT COMPLIANCE NOTES - 313 STEEPHILL STREET IS A CONTRIBUTING STRUCTURE - EXISTING STRUCTURE IS 2-STORY WOOD-FRAME DWELLING - CHANGES TO FOOTPRINT OF EXISTING STRUCTURE CONSIST OF 1-STORY "WRAP-AROUND" PORCH, 60% OF WHICH IS SCREENED, 40% ENCLOSED - PREVIOUSLY ENCLOSED FRONT PORCH TO BE OPENED AND RESTORED OPEN PORCH CONDITION PROPOSED ADDITION TAX MAP: 55A PARCEL: 136 SCREEN PORCH 1719 E. MARKET ST 313 STEEPHILL ST TAX MAP: 55A TAX MAP: 55A EXISTING PARCEL: 136 PARCEL: 135 ENCLOSED SPACE PROPERTY LINE STEEPHILL STREET NORTH PLAN SHULLAW 313 STEEPHILL RESIDENCE STREETCONSTRUCTION CONSTRUCTION DIAGRAM DIAGRAM MAR 12 2022 FORMWORK DESIGN, llc 619A EAST HIGH ST CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA 22902 434.296.2223 80'S ERA ENCLOSURE TO BE REPLACED WITH SCREENED PORCH EXISTING ASPHALT SHINGLE ROOF ORIGINAL CORNICE STANDING-SEAM METAL ROOF TRANSITION BLOCK ORIGINAL NEW CORNICE ("BOXIER" PROFILE) COLUMN FOOTPRINT OF ORIGINAL PORCH ADDITION NEW COLUMNN TYPE (DISTINGUISHED BY SCALE) SCREENED PANELS TO REPLACE 80'S ERA WEATHER ENCLOSURE SHULLAW 313 STEEPHILL RESIDENCE STREETEXTERIOR EXTERIOR EXISTING EXISTING VS. VS. PROPOSED PROPOSED MAR 12 2022 FORMWORK DESIGN, llc 619A EAST HIGH ST CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA 22902 434.296.2223 ORIGINAL NEW CORNICE CORNICE ("BOXIER" PROFILE) WOOD SIDING W/ DISTINCT PROFILE (PERIODIC PROJECTIONS/SHADOWS) TRANSITION BLOCK 313 STEEPHILL SHULLAW STREETLayout RESIDENCE ORIGINAL VS NEW PORCH RELATIONSHIPS Layout MAR 12 2022 FORMWORK DESIGN, llc 619A EAST HIGH ST CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA 22902 434.296.2223 THE CONCEPTS AND DESIGNS CONTAINED IN THESE DRAWINGS ARE THE PROPERTY OF THE ARCHITECT AND SHALL NOT BE USED FOR ANY PURPOSE OTHER THAN THAT SPECIFICALLY DETAILED HEREIN. UNAUTHORIZED USE OR REPRODUCTION SHALL BE PROSECUTED TO THE FULLEST EXTENT OF THE LAW. 1" 7 1/2" 5 1/2" 1" FORMWORK FORMWORK DESIGN LLC 619 E. HIGH ST, UNIT A CHARLOTTESVILLE, VIRGINIA 22902 TEL – 434.296.2223 1" 5 1/2" 7 1/2" SCREEN PANEL 0 3/4" 1" 5 1/2" W EA LT H OF V IR ON TYP. COLUMN DETAIL 3 M GI COM NIA SCALE: 6" = 1'-0" CECILIA H. NICHOLS No. 011708 ARC 0 1/2" H ITEC T SHULLAW 1" RESIDENCE 313 STEEPHILL STREET 1'-4 1/2" CHARLOTTESVILLE, VIRGINIA 4" +/- OWNER: SARA & BRIAN SHULLAW REVISION HISTORY RAIL STOCK: 1/2" X 2" ARCHITECTURAL BRONZE; Rev ID Transmittal Set Name Date COUNTERSINK FOR #14 BRONZE "BOAT SCREWS" 01 RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION 2/8/22 5" 8" VERT. TABS (TYP) 1 1/2" 3 1/2" 1 1/2" HORIZ. OFFSET 11" +/- (V.I.F.) PERIODIC "SILL" PROFILE 3D DRAINAGE MATRIX D EY ON NB LUM 2'-6" CO CHANGES THIS REVISION SQ. WOOD SIDING DETAIL CONCEALED END SIMILAR 2 SCALE: 3" = 1'-0" Chg ID Change Name Date 2/8/22 1/4" X 1/4" RABBETS (4) 1 1/2" 1 1/2" 1 1/2" C.M.U. STEM WALL W/ JAMB @ #4 VERT. REBAR @ 24" O.C.; INTERMEDIATE BOND BEAM W/ (2) #4 HORIZ AT TOP COURSE POST PROJ. NO: 2009 5" DAMPPROOF TO FINISHED GRADE DRAWN BY: CHK'D BY: P.T. LEDGER TOP-MOUNT HANGER NOM. 2X8 WOOD JOIST BRONZE WIRE MESH OPEN CELL SPRAY-FOAM REVISION DATE REVISION ID INSULATION FEB 08 2022 01 CLASS I VAPOR 4" PERF PIPE BARRIER COURSE STONE FILTER FABRIC SHEET TITLE #10 BRASS COUNTERSUNK WASHERS (LEE VALLEY: 01K70.03) DETAILS #10X2" BOAT SCREW, SILICON BRONZE, FLAT 8" 2 1/2" HORIZ. TABS (TYP) HEAD, SQUARE DRIVE (MCFEELYS: 1020-SFC-C) 1'-4" C.I.P. CONC. FOOTING W/ (3) #4 REBAR 3" FROM BTM SHEET NUMBER 7 STAIR RAILS - 3D VIEW SCALE: 1:300 4 DETAILS @ SCREEN PORCH SCALE: 3" = 1'-0" 1 FOUNDATION DETAIL SCALE: 1 1/2"= 1'-0" A6.1 1970s? June 2009 Certificate of Appropriateness BAR 22-04-05 1901 East Market Street, TMP 55A149000 and 55A150000 IPP and Woolen Mills Village HC District (contributing) Owner/Applicant: Jon Fink Project: Rear addition Application components (please click each link to go directly to PDF page): • Staff Report • Historic Survey • Application Submittal April 19, 2022 BAR Packet Guide 7 City of Charlottesville Board of Architectural Review Staff Report April 19, 2022 Certificate of Appropriateness BAR 22-04-05 1901 East Market Street, TMP 55A149000 and 55A150000 IPP and Woolen Mills Village HC District (contributing) Owner/Applicant: Jon Fink Project: Rear addition Background Year Built: c1835, Pireus Store District: Individually Protected Property within the Woolen Mills HC District Status: Contributing to the HC District (Note: While within a HC District, IPPs are reviewed using the ADC District Design Guidelines.) The Pireus Store building is a two-story brick structure with a gable front and a Victorian porch. The building was constructed by 1840 to house a store for workers at the nearby textile mills. The store was converted to a house after 1875. Prior BAR Actions March 15, 2022 – BAR held informal discussion with staff, applicant was not available, Application • Submittal, dated March 3, 2022: Project narrative from applicant; photographs of house and site; parcel plats; elevation drawings, site plans, floor plans, and section drawings of house with proposed addition CoA for a rear addition, extending a prior addition on the original, c1835 structure. Discussion The BAR offered comment on the submitted materials at the March 15 BAR meeting. A summary of the discussion is provided here: • BAR members are concerned about too many competing design languages and competing forms that take away from the historic structure o A joint, break, or hyphen between the earlier (2000s) addition and proposed addition might be a better transition • Because of the proposed addition’s site at the end of the house, new construction will create a long plane. The addition should manipulate the roofline and wall material to break up this long plane. 1901 E. Market Street (April 7, 2022) 1 • BAR members ask purpose of dormer without window Criteria for Additions in Chapter III: • Function and Size • Location • Design • Replication of Style • Materials and Features • Attachment to Existing Building The BAR should also consider the building elements and details necessary to evaluate the project. Renderings and schematics communicates mass, scale, design and composition; however a complete application should include details and specific information about the projects materials and components. For example: • Measured drawings: Elevations, wall details, etc. • Roofing: Flat, hipped, etc. Metal, slate, asphalt. Flashing details. • Gutters/downspouts: Types, color, locations, etc. • Foundation. • Walls: Masonry, siding, stucco, etc. • Soffit, cornice, siding, and trim. • Color palette. • Doors and windows: Type, lite arrangement, glass spec, trim details, etc. • Porches and decks: Materials, railing and stair design, etc. • Landscaping/hardscaping: Grading, trees, low plants, paving materials, etc. • Lighting. Fixture cut sheets, lamping, etc. At the time that this staff report was written, the applicant has reviewed the March BAR meeting video but has not submitted additional drawings. Given that the applicant was not present in March, staff recommends that the BAR use this time to clarify any concerns or recommendations regarding the project. Criteria, Standards, and Guidelines Review Criteria Generally Sec. 34-284(b) of the City Code states that, in considering a particular application the BAR shall approve the application unless it finds: 1901 E. Market Street (April 7, 2022) 2 (1) That the proposal does not meet specific standards set forth within this division or applicable provisions of the Design Guidelines established by the board pursuant to Sec.34-288(6); and (2) The proposal is incompatible with the historic, cultural or architectural character of the district in which the property is located or the protected property that is the subject of the application. Pertinent Standards for Review of Construction and Alterations include: (1) Whether the material, texture, color, height, scale, mass and placement of the proposed addition, modification or construction are visually and architecturally compatible with the site and the applicable design control district; (2) The harmony of the proposed change in terms of overall proportion and the size and placement of entrances, windows, awnings, exterior stairs and signs; (3) The Secretary of the Interior Standards for Rehabilitation set forth within the Code of Federal Regulations (36 C.F.R. §67.7(b)), as may be relevant; (4) The effect of the proposed change on the historic district neighborhood; (5) The impact of the proposed change on other protected features on the property, such as gardens, landscaping, fences, walls and walks; (6) Whether the proposed method of construction, renovation or restoration could have an adverse impact on the structure or site, or adjacent buildings or structures; (7) Any applicable provisions of the City’s Design Guidelines. Pertinent ADC District Design Guidelines Chapter II – Site Design and Elements Chapter 2 Site Design and Elements B. Plantings C. Walls and Fences D. Lighting E. Walkways and Driveways F. Parking Areas and Lots G. Garages, Sheds, and Other Structures H. Utilities and Other Site Appurtenances Chapter III – New Construction and Additions Chapter 3 New Construction and Additions Checklist from section P. Additions 1) Function and Size a. Attempt to accommodate needed functions within the existing structure without building an addition. b. Limit the size of the addition so that it does not visually overpower the existing building. 2) Location a. Attempt to locate the addition on rear or side elevations that are not visible from the street. b. If additional floors are constructed on top of a building, set the addition back from the main façade so that its visual impact is minimized. c. If the addition is located on a primary elevation facing the street or if a rear addition faces a street, parking area, or an important pedestrian route, the façade of the addition should be treated under the new construction guidelines. 3) Design a. New additions should not destroy historic materials that characterize the property. 1901 E. Market Street (April 7, 2022) 3 b. The new work should be differentiated from the old and should be compatible with the massing, size, scale, and architectural features to protect the historic integrity of the property and its environment. 4) Replication of Style a. A new addition should not be an exact copy of the design of the existing historic building. The design of new additions can be compatible with and respectful of existing buildings without being a mimicry of their original design. b. If the new addition appears to be part of the existing building, the integrity of the original historic design is compromised and the viewer is confused over what is historic and what is new. 5) Materials and Features a. Use materials, windows, doors, architectural detailing, roofs, and colors that are compatible with historic buildings in the district. 6) Attachment to Existing Building a. Wherever possible, new additions or alterations to existing buildings should be done in such a manner that, if such additions or alterations were to be removed in the future, the essential form and integrity of the buildings would be unimpaired. b. The new design should not use the same wall plane, roof line, or cornice line of the existing structure. 1901 E. Market Street (April 7, 2022) 4 Board of Architectural Review (BAR) Certificate of Appropriateness Please Retum To: City of Charlottesville Department of Neighborhood Development Services P.O. Box 911, City Hall Char1ottesv1Ue, Virginia 22902 Telephone (434) 970-3130 PINH submit ten (10) hard copies and one (1) dlgltal copy of application form and an attachments. Please lncluct. appllcdon fH •• follows: New construction project $375; Demolltlon of a contributing structure $375; App.al of BAR decision $125: Additions and other projects requiring BAR approval $125; Administrative approval $100. Make checks payabS. to the City of Charlottesville. The BAR meets the third Tuesday of the month. Deadline for submittal• Is Tuesday 3 weeks prior to next BAR meeting by 3:30 p.m. �L �,,,,> Owner Name__..,,,______....._______....-Appllcant Name \ Project Name/Description \\ �- �\\I� f\ Parcel Number 55'\V\\ \\� SS(\ i,,�� ���\����::..__i\'\\_"� Project Property Address��.:...: 1� .,;._;::.;.;;..;:--=:.;_ "bJl.....;.\l. \ �-� ....:.." __...::.::...; __________ Signature of Applicant Applicant Information Address:f\�\ '€.. �"\\� §. .. I hereby attest that the information I have provided is, to the best of m�n1DW1Aooe, correct. Email: $f\;l\( a :S-3 \ • Qiffi \\, 2 S:\;�C"\ Phone: (W) ______ (C) S_� .l. __1 I_ ll. Property Owner Information (ff not appllcantt Print Name Address:._______________ Property Owner Permission (If not applicant) I have read this application and hereby give my consent to its submission. EmaU:.__,,..,.,.,...---------;;:;.------ Phone: (W) ______ (C) ______ Signature Date Do you intend to apply for Federal or State Tax Credits for this project? __ _ _____ ___ Print Name Date Description of Proposed Work (attach uparate narrative If necessary): _____________ Ust All Attachments (see reverse side for submittal requirements): For Office Use Only Approved/Disapproved by: ________ Received by: __________ Date: _______________ Fee paid: ____Cash/Ck. # _ __ Conditions of approval: _________ Date Received: _________ Revised 2016 Pireus Store, ca. 1821 In the late 18th Century, William Hunter Merriwether, nephew to Merriweather Lewis, inherited with his wife 168 acres of bottom land along the Rivanna River. Mr. Merriwether, along with Thomas Jefferson, was a founding member of the Rivanna Company, whose main aims were commercial in nature. In 1809 The Rivanna Company begun construction on a damn across the Rivanna just above it's confluence with Moores Creek. Once the damn was completed with its accompanying lock on river left, Bateaus were able to unload their cargo. This area because known as "Pireus", Greek for port, and the dirt trail on River right leading into Charlottesville was renamed Market Street. Pireus Store was built sometime late in the first quarter of the 19th century. The structure was built with a Tavern on the ground floor, a General store and the 2 nd floor, and storage with a tiny living space on the top floor. Historic preservationists have identified building elements such as brick mouse tooth dentil work as historically indicative of that time period. Pireus Store, remained a tavern and general store into the early 20th century. I purchased this home in 1990 and begun an intensive interior renovation. Early in the process I was visited by a neighbor, Mr. Taylor, who at that point was well into his nineties. He informed me in 1906 he was a delivery boy for the store and occasionally for the tavern as well. The renovation included a full excavation of the tavern floor, where various pieces of pipes, gaming balls, and other period artifacts were identified, catalogues, and then donated. The structure had a slate roof returned as originally built. We were fortunate that nearly every element original to the interior of the structure has been covered over instead of being removed. In 2002, I applied for and received permission from the BAR to construct an addition. This was a tricky application because there was an understandable concern to ensure that the new construction respected the original structure. In the end we completed a very respectful and sensitive addition. That addition though did constrain space on the top floor due to the roof pitch matching the original structure. In our new addition we have designed more living space. Our current application reflects the needs of our growing family and our desire to create more livable space. We purposely differentiated this design in both form and material pallet. We did not illustrate but plan to have voltaics installed on the southern roof face. Our plan will be to build in maximum energy efficiency while still respecting existing roof peaks. We have very large boxwoods and dogwoods that already visually shield the 1st addition and will also shield a good part of the proposed addition. We appreciate your attention to this application and please direct any questions you might have to me, Jon Fink. jfink@jvi.com, or to Mr. Andres Pacheco, architect, apachecomail@gmail.com. See you in April. Thank you very much, Southwest Face South Face c�>0 \\� \'\ct_ Street view 2012 Street view 2019 c1835 structure Existing addition Proposed addition c1960s Sanborn Map City GIS Original Existing addition Proposed - .: .,... ' .� •«- ... 1 l -- ,., \.A ... , �" ?-"'"� t., ,r , I' - .• # • .A tr-·· ., ,-� � -.... ,.�. t ,> •• ' '• -• . _,.. < r ... po- • I •, ' .,. • .T " II, .� .... I= 'J I , :::l ',' ..-,.. --. r .( � , - r1 � ' ' ' t I J I 1 1' 10" 5' ? 11 9' 3" >H---t------18'--------� 11' � 5' 10' 9' 1O" '----1---10'6'---- " 6' 26' 2" 12' 13'4" 9' 4' 7'1 ---- / ----,-- 6' 811 - 12' 14 1 2" 3'4" 00 0 000 t ,r---, 6' 8" 1' 1' 5' 4-----t'-=-,o;'=--__c::======-t-, ; ,• • • • • • •�.A:-- ..... .... .- . � ... - - 1 ' -, L •• ,. , •• ,. ,,... ' '!;!. •• ..... -, ' • - ·- • . -. ·,.......• <-. '\ ',.,... �- ... \ � :, • • • ... 1."' L ,. .. It": .. • .> .. --- • J .- ., / ,, _, • " ., : -� � ' '­ {4'- t- 4 .. • •• ; ,• • • • -- �.A: ..... ..... - . � ... - - 1 .•,.-,• L •• , ' ,. ,,... ,.• '!;!. •• ..... -, ' • - ·- • . -. ·,.......• <-. '\ ',.,... �- ... \ � :, • • ... 1."' • .... .: � J • • ., , I ,• .. - - .' I I _, ' ....,_.".. 4 \ .i, , ,, ►- ... -�,-\ .. .. 1 �� ;. J r< 1' 1" " 6' 8'3'°4 ·­·•- ' • , L ♦ - ,.. _.,, _,,; \ .. - .. ,� ' ,. , .·•-. ( .. .,. ' < r ( .. - - .. .. ..-,• • .- '· ' ,.. ··\ , ..• ·,r _.,- , .�-,. . I'!' • • � I > ....••,. < ' \ I ' I I I I ' • ' •• r Al.f·---- _. ..... ". -- . .. ...,.\ .... ', ,• ' ••.•�......;,- ..,' -.',... 1 - l -· ( ...•- � .. .-.. � • • • ,• -'. •,.A 1• / ,...... ' ' ' • .... ' •• r ..... ". --. .. ...,.\ .... ', Al.f·---- _. ,• ' ... _..., , -.' l • ... ;,- .. ' ,... 1 - -· .. .. � ( ...•- � .-..� • • • ,• -'. •,.A 1• / ,...... ' ' .... "- r • r• ... .. .:'• ,i � , • •� r I , ( l 1' 10'' Jr 1'1" . " ·--·. •- r .. ,,. - _... � 2'3" .,. ... " ,J ' . 't -, 1' "- .-_... ...... ..... I .. :- ., I .f -,' )' ), , 1 .t •' •. ; • .. - . - ..1. • . _, I , ,. ', I • _, . �- ' 9' -, • ' - .. \ , 6' ,. 1' 1' 9" 9' 6' • .-... ' .- - 1' 3" I l 1' 10'' Jr' .. 1' 1" . 6' 8'3" 2'3" •\ ' �-· , ; I -' r I 9' 6' I 1' 3 11 I' 1011 1'1" 6' 8'3" • "" . •• ►• .. • •• 2' 3" ..• • • 1' ..,,. ., .. • • >�· t • ,• 1' • • • •• • ' 9' • , '!• • . /'- 1' 1' ,J • .. . ► - .• ,.•' � ' ,. > ". 1. 9' \ i ,. .... .,..,..., . .,,. r �.. '1 \: ---- .. t.., =· . .,.. • .. .'\..;"�....' ',• . .1. ... .. ,. ." ,rJ . 'J' ..... • . \ 1' 3 11