Agenda – Joint Work Session May 26, 2021 Slide Title 5 minutes 1 Existing Conditions & Schedule What do we have and what could we have? When? 5 minutes 2 Outreach & Engagement How will we involve the community? 5 minutes 3 Student Capacity How many students should we build for? 5 minutes 4 Budget & Scope How much do our construction dollars buy? 75 minutes 5 Q&A / Discussion 25 minutes 6 Public Comment Existing Conditions Schedule 1954 1869 Brown vs Board Ruling Earliest Charlottesville City School Board Records 1966 2021 Last CCS Facility Desegregated 1974 CHS Built 47 years 1969 Jackson-Via Built 52 years 1965 Buford Built “South Site Junior High School” 56 years 1965 Walker Built “North Site Junior High School” 56 years 1962 Greenbrier Built 59 years 1955 Burnley-Moran Built 66 years 1955 Johnson Built 66 years 1930 Clark Built 91 years 1925 Venable Built 96 years Walker School Entry Entrances 05.26.2021 Extremely difficult to find, and down in a pit! Joint Council / Board Work session 4 Walker School Entry Entrances 05.26.2021 Visible, Accessible + Sense of identity Joint Council / Board Work session 5 Lobby 05.26.2021 Cramped, uninspiring, dimly lit Joint Council / Board Work session 6 Lobby 05.26.2021 Visible + Accessible, Welcoming Community Joint Council / Board Work session 7 Corridors 05.26.2021 Monotonous, lack of orientation & connection to classrooms Joint Council / Board Work session 8 Corridors 05.26.2021 Make learning everywhere and part of school culture Joint Council / Board Work session 9 Classroom 05.26.2021 Dimly lit, minimal daylight & views, stationary furniture Joint Council / Board Work session 10 Walker School Entry Classroom 05.26.2021 Flexible + Adaptable Joint Council / Board Work session 11 Library 05.26.2021 Community space isolated from classrooms and corridor Joint Council / Board Work session 12 Library 05.26.2021 Media Center - Flexible, adaptable, age-appropriate scale Joint Council / Board Work session 13 Dining 05.26.2021 Traditional cafeteria-style seating, poor acoustics Joint Council / Board Work session 14 Dining 05.26.2021 Varied seating options, acoustically designed, education focus Joint Council / Board Work session 15 Gym 05.26.2021 Outdated facility – undersized, outdated Joint Council / Board Work session 16 Gym 05.26.2021 Light, spacious, playful Joint Council / Board Work session 17 Outdoor spaces 05.26.2021 Unsafe and uninviting conditions Joint Council / Board Work session 18 Outdoor spaces 05.26.2021 Outdoor Learning - Useful, Active + Inspiring Joint Council / Board Work session 19 05.26.2021 2021 update of local school construction (originally shown in 2017) Joint Council / Board Work session 20 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 discussion reconfiguration decision, 5th & 6th grades declining enrollment reconfiguration decision, 5th, 6th & PK increasing enrollment 11 years Walker & Buford are now 55 years old declining enrollment (before pandemic) Era 1: 1966 – 1988: Walker & Buford Junior Highs Era 2: 1988 – 2008: Reconfigured into Walker Upper Elementary & Buford Middle School Era 3: 2008 – 2027: Second Reconfiguration discussions / planning / construction 9 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 A/E selected pandemic assessment conceptual phase – study of multiple approaches council & board decision schematic design council & board decision Getting to YES! design development + documentation council & board approval to bid bidding council & board approval to construct construction 2021 2022 MAY JUNE JULY AUG SEPT OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR conceptual design (6 combined approaches) What are the range of possibilities and what would they each cost? schematic design (selected approach) Develop the preferred approach far enough to establish a reliable budget 05.26.2021 Joint Council / Board Work session 23 2021 2022 MAY JUNE JULY AUG SEPT OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR conceptual design (6 approaches) 7/2 receive estimates 9/1 receive estimates schematic design (selected approaches) 1/5 receive estimates 2/24 receive estimates 05.26.2021 Joint Council / Board Work session 24 2021 2022 MAY JUNE JULY AUG SEPT OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR conceptual design (6 approaches) 6/18 pricing docs 7/2 receive estimates 8/25 pricing docs 9/1 receive estimates schematic design (selected approaches) 12/15 pricing docs 1/5 receive estimates 2/16 pricing docs 2/24 receive estimates 05.26.2021 Joint Council / Board Work session 25 2021 2022 MAY JUNE JULY AUG SEPT OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR conceptual design (6 approaches) 6/18 pricing docs 7/2 receive estimates 8/25 pricing docs 9/1 receive estimates 5/21 Board retreat 9/2 info item to Board 10/4 info item to Council 10/7 action item to Board 10/18 action item to Council schematic design (selected approaches) 12/15 pricing docs 1/5 receive estimates 2/2 Board info 2/16 pricing docs 2/24 receive estimates 3/3 Board action 3/7 Council info 3/21 Council action 05.26.2021 Joint Council / Board Work session 26 Outreach & Engagement STAFF PUBLIC STAFF CCS Community Design Working Group Building Committee (Local Leaders ) Team (CDT) (Staff) (Community) Role: Design the Process Role: Inform the Process Closed discussions between Owner and Role: Execute the Process Non-public - discussions, but all information Consultant presented & collected is made public Public discussions where potential solutions are first • What are the questions we presented • Subject matter expertise should ask? How? When? • Present the issues, Ask the questions, Hear • More fine-grained than public cares • Does feedback suggest changes people’s voices. about to the approach? • Meetings are recorded and published • Design team can speak with individual members to collect info Members Members Meet once a month for an hour Meet twice a month for up to 3 hours Members (Core group that commits to attendance; additional Meet once a month for an hour, plus as attendees from general public) needed 05.26.2021 Who? Groups & Roles Joint Council / Board Work session 28 2021 2022 MAY JUNE JULY AUG SEPT OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR engagement conceptual design (6 approaches) Working Group meetings $ $ Project Group meetings 5/21 Board retreat 9/2 info item to Board 10/4 info item to Council Building Committee meetings 10/7 action item to Board 10/18 action item to Council schematic design (selected approaches) Working Group meetings 2/2 Board info $ $ Project Group meetings Building Committee meetings Public Meetings 3/3 Board action Staff Meetings 3/7 Council info 3/21 Council action $ Docs to Estimators Schedule: revised 5/19 05.26.2021 Joint Council / Board Work session 29 2021 MAY JUNE JULY AUG SEPT OCT engagement conceptual design (6 approaches) Working Group meetings $ $ Community Design Team meetings 6/2 6/15 7/6 7/20 8/3 8/17 9/21 8/25 First Day of School 5/21 Board retreat DISCOVER DEFINE What options should We have some cost TEST we be exploring and info, so what options Did we get it right? why? should we suggest? 9/2 info item to Board 10/4 info item to Council 10/7 action item to Board 10/18 Public Meetings action Staff Meetings item to Council $ Docs to Estimators Schedule: revised 5/19 05.26.2021 Joint Council / Board Work session 30 Community Vision, Priorities and Values Scope & Constraints Budget, Site, Capacity, Design Concept(s) Construction time, Existing conditions, Etc. Launched Monday, 5/24 Leverage networks to make personalized CVille Community A variety of accessible recommendations information and engagement opportunities CCS Community Short Video Buford, Walker, & Pre-K Survey Communities Working Group, School board, City Council, CCS Staff, City Staff, Forward-able email Principals, Teachers, Partner template Organizations, Local Leaders Translation text line 05.26.2021 Outreach has been launched! Joint Council / Board Work session 32 I want to be a core member of the design Community team and help guide the process! Design Team Think CCS Community Design Team, a group of community members who are passionate about Tank this vision and can commit to attending meetings for the next eight months. This team will give voice Join us when you to our dreams, offer feedback to our ideas, and I can’t commit to being at every meeting can. Your life guide our steps. experiences and but want to be involved knowledge will Meet for up to three hours every two power the weeks through September (monthly I have a specific topic that I’m interested in project design. Tell us what you after that) serve as a project or knowledge I’d like to share are specifically ambassador and encourage others to interested in and be involved in the process we will keep you informed. I’m interested and would like to stay Participate in ongoing engagement opportunities as you are interested/ informed available. Stay in the Know Receive newsletter with regular project updates City Council CCS Community Design Team (CDT) Open City Staff (Community) School Board Role: Execute the Process Parents Public discussions where potential solutions are first presented CCS Staff • Present the issues, Ask the questions, Hear people’s voices. • Meetings are recorded and published School Members –Appointed Staff/ Students Teachers/A City dmin CCS • Lisa Torres & Jennifer • Nikuyah Walker (City Council) McKeever (School Board) • Todd Brown (Parks & Recreation) • Alex Ikefuna (Neighborhood Members – Open Application • Adams Hastings (Principal, Walker) • Denise Johnson (Supervisor of Equity Development Services) & Inclusion) • Sue Moffett (Social Services) x 8 Students (students entering 7th • Kim Powell (Assistant Superintendent, • Kaki Dimock (Human Services) grade and below are encouraged Finance & Operations • Mike Goddard (Public Works) to apply as a pair with a parent) x 8 Parents x 10 Teachers/ school staff/admin x 6 Open = 11 representatives = +/-30 representatives 05.26.2021 Who? Project Group Joint Council / Board Work session 34 2021 MAY JUNE DISCOVER What options should we be exploring and why? 5/26 School Board & City Council Work session $ 6/18 pricing docs 5/24 Facilities web page launch 6/2 CDT: Get Involved! 6/15 CDT: Visioning Community Design Team -Reconfiguration History & Context -What is our collective vision for the future of -Design Process CCS, Buford & Walker? -Who should we be talking to as part of the -What values to do want to use to measure process? What should we be learning? success of the project? 5/24 - 6/7 “Get Involved” Survey Gauge interest level of participation in the process, stay informed, be in a focus group, apply for the CDT 6/15-6/25 Visioning Survey 5/24 Welcome video 6/7 Design Process video 6/22 CCS History video 6/29 Existing Conditions Brief overview of project nuts & bolts, process, and invitation to get involved 6/4 Afternoon 6/8 Evening 6/20 Afternoon 6/28 Evening Interviews 15 min slots open to all, individual, family, or small group, 2 hr. blocks at varied times and days Family Activities Community Based Pop-Up Events Dates, times, places, and partners all to vary 05.26.2021 Schedule: revised 5/25 Joint Council / Board Work session 35 Student Capacity Greenbrier ES Last time we had a public conversation about Reconfiguration, it was in the context of the 2016-17 Capacity Study. Walker UES Today it is in the context of a project CHS focused on equity and academics. While the enrollment growth trends of Venable ES the 2010s have cooled, capacity will Burnley- Moran ES remain an important topic in Reconfiguration planning. How many students to build for now? Buford MS The answer has a significant impact on Johnson ES Clark ES project cost, and how soon additional builds might be needed. Jackson-Via ES 05.26.2021 Impacts: project cost, & how soon you build again Joint Council / Board Work session 37 Study identified how Beginning of many pupils fit at each CCS facility, and where Now growth trend potential capacity AY building projects could AY 2010- 2020- 2011 be accommodated 2016-17 2021 Capacity Study With the growth trend cooling around the time the Capacity Study was completed, CCS adopted a “Watch and Wait” approach. CCS Elementary Growth Rates … now reversed 05.26.2021 Joint Council / Board Work session 38 Now: Reconfiguration & Elementary Capacity Does the Pre-K / 5th grade swap fit? goal 05.26.2021 Joint Council / Board Work session 39 Yes, for now. If Pre-K & 5th swapped today… Projections using cohort growth method If elementary students who left the system in Fall 2020 return, near-term enrollments will be higher than shown C CCS K-5th Systemwide Capacity + S Enrollments E What about the individual school level? Today’s Enrollments (virtual & in-person)… CCS PK-4th School Capacity + Enrollments 05.26.2021 Joint Council / Board Work session 41 Yes, for now. If Pre-K & 5th swapped today… CCS K-5th School Capacity + Enrollments • School capacities grow when classrooms formerly used for early childhood programs (at 1:16) become elementary classrooms • Uses a hypothetical 5th grade class size: “If all last year’s 4th graders had stayed…” 05.26.2021 Joint Council / Board Work session 42 What if grade 6-8 participation increases? 3-year cohorts from ES + HS used as a test – Max, Min, Avg 05.26.2021 Joint Council / Board Work session 43 6-8 Middle School Alternate Capacity Options 900 pupils 975 pupils 1054 pupils (2017 Capacity Study Proposal) Alternate Capacity Options Overlaid on CCS Historical Enrollment Trends Alternate capacities overlaid on the same enrollment data 05.26.2021 Joint Council / Board Work session 44 CCS Early Childhood Center: How Many Classrooms? Must Do Should Do Would Do Maintain the existing scope of Build in some growth, anticipating Increase the 3-year-old program size to services increased demand match the 4-year old program, providing a two-year sequence for all enrollees (improves outcomes) 20 classrooms 26 classrooms 32 classrooms 13 : 1 avg = 260; @ 90% utilization = 234 13 : 1 avg = 338; @ 90% utilization = 304 13 : 1 avg = 416; @ 90% utilization = 374 15 : 1 avg = 300; @ 90% utilization = 270 15 : 1 avg = 390; @ 90% utilization = 351 15 : 1 avg = 480; @ 90% utilization = 432 05.26.2021 Joint Council / Board Work session 45 Budget & Scope 05.26.2021 Shown in 2017 Joint Council / Board Work session 47 2020 construction dollars: $60.0M - $80.0M Start construction 2023 (escalate to 2024): $68.6M - $91.8M Start construction 2024 (escalate to 2025): $71.3M - $95.0M 05.26.2021 2017 cost numbers, escalated Joint Council / Board Work session 48 05.26.2021 Current City CIP Joint Council / Board Work session 49 FY 2022 Capital FY 2022-2026 Capital FY 2022 Capital Improvement Program Improvement Program Improvement Program w/o Elementary Modernization Education: 13% Education: 41% Education: 9% $3,520,000 $68,820,000 $2,270,000 Large Cap Maint: $1.96M Large Cap Maint: $11.07M Large Cap Maint: $1.96M Elem Modernization: $1.25M Elem Modernization: $3.75M Reconfiguration: $50.00M 2016 total to schools: $1.52M 2017 total to schools: $1.72M 05.26.2021 Current City CIP Joint Council / Board Work session 50 Planning assumptions in each option Cost of new construction: $320 / gsf Cost of renovation at Buford: $200 / gsf Cost of renovation at Walker: $225 / gsf Cost of demolition: $13.50 / gsf Soft costs: 27.5% * (doesn’t include relocatables) Annual inflation: 3.5% Construction start: Summer 2023 Escalate Buford to: Summer 2024 Escalate Walker to: Summer 2025 / 2026* Utilization rate: 85% * (90% at PK) Square foot per student: 150 (planned capacity) Students per teaching station: 25:1 MS / 14:1 PK 05.26.2021 Math exercise, not a design exercise Joint Council / Board Work session 51 Buford Walker Planned capacity Planned capacity 533 Legend 574 Legend CCS Existing to remain Existing to remain Admin 1 VDOE capacity Renovation - all VDOE capacity Renovation - all Renovation - partial Renovation - partial 627 Demolish 675 Demolish New New 2019-20 ` Site improvements 2019-20 ` Site improvements enrollment ` Other existing building enrollment ` Other existing building Smith A 531 Aquatic 673 Boys & Girls Club Area Area B 101,856 total C B 91,400 total C EUI A EUI Crow Pool D 50 kBTU/sf/yr 51 kBTU/sf/yr 05.26.2021 Existing Conditions Joint Council / Board Work session 52 Required Maintenance (2021-2031) $10,043,520 Walker $5,012,726 Cost to maintain Walker/Buford as-is Buford $5,030,794 Total: $10,043,520 Does not address teaching space quality, asbestos mitigation, nor seismic/accessibility/fire protection/IT improvements. Utility Costs Energy Use Est. Combined Annual Projected Annual Projected 10-year savings Intensity (EUI) Energy Cost Savings (2027-2037) Existing (Buford/Walker) 50/58 $300,000 (actual) none none Minor Renovation 44/46 $260,000 (-14%) $40,000/year $400,000 Major Renovation 28/30 $180,000 (-40%) $120,000/year $1,200,000 New Construction 16/18 $110,000 (-63%) $190,000/year $1,900,000 05.26.2021 What is the cost to do nothing? Joint Council / Board Work session 53 Buford Walker Planned capacity 900 Legend Legend Existing to remain Existing to remain VDOE capacity Renovation - all Renovation - all Renovation - partial Renovation - partial 1,059 Demolish Demolish New New Area ` Site improvements ` Site improvements 39,157 as-is ` Other existing building ` Other existing building A 51,384 reno 68,309 new 158,850 total Renovate 51,384 GSF B Cost Cost C B $0 $48.5m C A New Academics @ 68,309 GSF Big Idea Big Idea • Build just enough classrooms to accommodate 6, 7, 8 at current sizes • Leave everything as-is. • Renovate all of “A” except for new labs • Keep 5th grade by itself • More parking by demolishing “D” or • Move Pre-K into spaces not designed for them • Remaining space for Central Admin and/or wrap-around services 05.26.2021 Option A.1: $48.5m ($50.2m if Buford starts in 2024) Joint Council / Board Work session 54 Buford Walker Planned capacity Planned capacity 900 Legend 280 Legend Existing to remain Existing to remain VDOE capacity Renovation - all VDOE capacity Renovation - all Renovation - partial Renovation - partial 1,059 Demolish 311 Demolish New New Area ` Site improvements Area ` Site improvements 68,400 as-is ` Other existing building 50,400 as-is ` Other existing building A 32,600 reno 41,000 reno Renovate 57,850 new 0 new 41,000 GSF 158,850 total Renovate 91,400 total 32,600 GSFF B Cost Cost C B $37.5m $14.7m C A D New Academics @ 57,850 GSF Big Idea Big Idea • Build just enough classrooms to accommodate 6, 7, 8 at current sizes • Provide 18 Pre-K classrooms • Renovate upper level of “A” only, except for new labs • Renovate upper level of “A” only • Parking stays as-is. • Remaining space for Central Admin and/or wrap-around services • Walker starts 2 years after Buford starts 05.26.2021 Option A.2: $52.2m ($54.1m if Buford starts in 2024 & Walker in 2026) Joint Council / Board Work session 55 Buford Walker Planned capacity Planned capacity 975 Legend 280 Legend Existing to remain Existing to remain VDOE capacity Renovation - all VDOE capacity Renovation - all Renovation - partial Renovation - partial 1,147 Demolish 311 Demolish New New Area ` Site improvements Area ` Site improvements 49,616 as-is ` Other existing building 31,400 as-is ` Other existing building A 51,384 reno 60,000 reno Renovate 71,050 new 0 new 60,000 GSF 158,850 total Renovate 91,400 total 51,384 GSFF B Cost Cost C B $48.8m $21.2m C ` A D New Academics @ 71,050 GSF Big Idea Big Idea • Build more classrooms to accommodate 6, 7, 8 with some growth • Provide 20 Pre-K classrooms • Renovate all of “A”, except for new labs • Renovate all of “A” • Parking stays as-is. • Remaining space for Central Admin and/or wrap-around services • Walker starts 2 years after Buford starts 05.26.2021 Option B.1: $70.0m ($72.4m if Buford starts in 2024 & Walker in 2026) Joint Council / Board Work session 56 Buford Walker Planned capacity Planned capacity 975 Legend 280 Legend Existing to remain Existing to remain VDOE capacity Renovation - all VDOE capacity Renovation - all Renovation - partial Renovation - partial 1,147 Demolish 311 Demolish New New Area ` Site improvements Area ` Site improvements 24,916 as-is ` Other existing building 50,400 as-is ` Other existing building A 51,384 reno 41,000 reno Renovate 95,750 new 0 new 41,000 GSF 172,050 total Renovate 91,400 total 51,384 GSFF B Cost Cost B $61.8m $14.7m C A New Academics + Athletics @ 94,050 GSF Big Idea Big Idea • Build more classrooms to accommodate 6, 7, 8 with some growth • Provide 18 Pre-K classrooms • Renovate all of “A”, except for new labs • Renovate upper level of “A” only • More parking by demolishing “D” • Remaining space for Central Admin and/or wrap-around services • New Gym / multi-purpose space • Walker starts 2 years after Buford starts 05.26.2021 Option B.2: $76.6m ($79.3m if Buford starts in 2024 & Walker in 2026) Joint Council / Board Work session 57 Buford Walker Planned capacity Planned capacity 975 Legend 280 Legend Existing to remain Existing to remain VDOE capacity Renovation - all VDOE capacity Renovation - all Renovation - partial Renovation - partial 1,147 Demolish 311 Demolish New New Area ` Site improvements Area ` Site improvements 49,616 as-is ` Other existing building 78,400 as-is ` Other existing building A 51,384 reno 13,000 reno 71,050 new 46,000 new 158,850 total Renovate 137,400 total 51,384 GSFF B Cost Cost C B $48.8m $28.5m C ` A D New Pre-K @ 46,000 GSF New Academics @ 71,050 GSF Big Idea Big Idea • Build more classrooms to accommodate 6, 7, 8 with some growth • 20 classrooms in new Pre-K addition • Renovate all of “A”, except for new labs • Renovate Gym as Pre-K movement space • Parking stays as-is. • Remaining space for Central Admin and/or wrap-around services • Walker starts simultaneously with Buford • Completed project provides swing space in “A”. 05.26.2021 Option B.3 $77.3m ($80.0m if both projects start in 2024) Joint Council / Board Work session 58 Buford Walker Planned capacity Planned capacity 1,050 Legend 280 Legend Existing to remain Existing to remain VDOE capacity Renovation - all VDOE capacity Renovation - all Renovation - partial Renovation - partial 1,235 Demolish 311 Demolish New New Area ` Site improvements Area ` Site improvements 0 as-is ` Other existing building 91,400 as-is ` Other existing building A 51,384 reno 0 reno 125,250 new 49,000 new 185,250 total Renovate 140,400 total 51,384 GSF B Cost Cost $74.4m $24.2m C A New Arts/Athletics New Academics New Pre-K @ @ 50,250 GSF @ 75,000 GSF 49,000 GSF Big Idea Big Idea • Build more classrooms to accommodate 6, 7, 8 with desired capacity for growth • 20 classrooms in new Pre-K • Renovate all of “A”, except for new labs • Remaining space for Central Admin and/or wrap-around services • Major expansion of Parking. • Walker starts simultaneously with Buford • Every square foot is “new”. • Completed project provides swing space in “A”. • Loss of Crow (and operating costs) 05.26.2021 Option C.1 $98.6m ($102.1m if both projects start in 2024) Joint Council / Board Work session 59 Option A.1 - $48.5m Option A.2 - $52.2m Option B.1 - $70.0m Buford: 900 students Buford: 900 students Buford: 975 students Walker: 5th Grade remains, or sub-standard Pre-K Walker: 18 Pre-K classrooms Walker: 20 Pre-K classrooms Buford Walker Buford Walker Buford Walker Option B.2 - $76.6m Option B.3 - $77.3m Option C.1 - $98.6m Buford: 975 students Buford: 975 students Buford: 1,050 students Walker: 18 Pre-K classrooms Walker: 20 Pre-K classrooms Walker: 20 Pre-K classrooms Buford Walker Buford Walker Buford Walker 05.26.2021 Cost Summary Joint Council / Board Work session 60 Questions & Discussion Points Slide Title 1 What is the budget range we should study with the public? 2 If the construction dollars are phased, what is the range/limit for phase one? 3 Can we save money from going to inflation by starting construction funding in FY24? 4 If we price work in a phase two, when is that construction funding available? 5 If you have to prioritize starting at one campus only, is it Buford? 6 Middle School: Should we build now for anything less than 1050? If so, how low? 975? 900? 7 Confirm that a proposed 10 cent real estate tax increase is for entire CIP, not just reconfiguration. 8 What’s the best metric to discuss local funding of schools, inclusive of CIP? Adopted Capital Improvements Program FY 2022 FY 2023 FY 2024 FY 2025 FY 2026 Totals Sources of Funds: General fund transfer $ 6,880,841 $ 6,737,940 $ 7,549,378 $ 6,580,400 $ 8,580,400 $ 36,328,959 Year- End Surplus - - - - $ - Adopted Bond issues Other 19,823,072 908,000 19,235,491 380,500 12,287,907 318,000 59,885,491 318,000 9,885,491 $ 121,117,452 318,000 $ 2,242,500 FY 2022 Total sources Uses of funds: $ 27,611,913 $ 26,353,931 $ 20,155,285 $ 66,783,891 $ 18,783,891 $ 159,688,911 Education $3,520,000 $4,600,000 $3,400,000 $52,150,000 $2,150,000 $ 65,820,000 CIP Budget Economic development Facilities Capital Projects $0 $1,370,491 $150,000 $1,370,491 $150,000 $1,370,492 $150,000 $1,370,491 $150,000 $ $1,370,491 $ 600,000 6,852,456 Public safety and justice $6,634,581 $265,000 $1,417,415 $265,000 $265,000 $ 8,846,996 Transportation and access $8,462,000 $11,563,440 $4,662,378 $4,443,400 $4,443,400 $ 33,574,618 Parks and recreation $865,000 $790,000 $790,000 $790,000 $790,000 $ 4,025,000 Affordable Housing $6,469,841 $7,325,000 $8,075,000 $7,325,000 $9,325,000 $ 38,519,841 General government $290,000 $290,000 $290,000 $290,000 $290,000 $ 1,450,000 Total uses $ 27,611,913 $ 26,353,931 $ 20,155,285 $ 66,783,891 $ 18,783,891 $ 159,688,911 budget@charlottesville.gov Office of Budget and www.charlottesville.gov/budget Performance Management How are We Paying for the CIP? budget@charlottesville.gov Office of Budget and www.charlottesville.gov/budget Performance Management 2 CIP Balancing Act Debt Affordability Capacity The maximum amount of debt that could be The alignment of public issued to stay within policy and financial the parameters defined resources by the financial policy How much can we pay How much debt can we with current resources issue before reaching before having to raise the 10% max? taxes? budget@charlottesville.gov Office of Budget and www.charlottesville.gov/budget Performance Management 3 City Commitment Outlook for Schools – FY 23 and Beyond FY2023 Annual FY 2022 Debt Service Operations Operations $58.7M $63.2M $4.5M in CARES funding used to Potential for CARES funding balance increases to offset some of increase CIP Tax Rate CIP Equivalents $3.5M $4.6M 1 cent $845,026 Maintains level funding of Lump Maintains level funding of Sums and School Priority Funding 5 cents $4,225,129 Lump Sums, School Priority Funding and CHS Roof Replacement 8 cents $6,760,206 11 cents $9,295,283 budget@charlottesville.gov Office of Budget and www.charlottesville.gov/budget Performance Management 4 Option 1 ‐ $50M Reconfiguration Option 2 ‐ $75M Reconfiguration • Significant Revenue Enhancements Needed • Significant Revenue Enhancements Needed • $0.15 Tax Increase Equivalent • $0.18 Tax Increase Equivalent • $0.05 ‐ $4.5M School Operational Increase • $0.05 ‐ $4.5M School Operational Increase • $0.05 – Debt Service ‐ $50M School Project • $0.08 – Debt Service ‐ $75M School Project • $0.05 ‐ additional Debt Service remaining CIP • $0.05 ‐ additional Debt Service remaining CIP • Debt Service Doubles ‐ $12M to $23M – in 6 years • Debt Service Doubles ‐ $12M to $23M – in 5 years • Bond Capacity is Exhausted • Bond Capacity is EXCEEDED – FY 28 • 2 years+ with no new projects • 4+ years with no new projects • Debt Service Fund Balance Exhausted • Debt Service Fund Balance Exhausted Option 3 ‐ $100M Reconfiguration • Significant Revenue Enhancements Needed • $0.21 Tax Increase Equivalent • $0.05 ‐ $4.5M School Operational Increase • $0.11 – Debt Service ‐ $100M School CIP • $0.05 ‐ additional Debt Service remaining CIP • Debt Service Doubles ‐ $12M to $23M – in 4 years • Bond Capacity is EXCEEDED – FY 26 • 5 years+ with no new projects • Debt Service Fund Balance Exhausted budget@charlottesville.gov Office of Budget and www.charlottesville.gov/budget Performance Management 5 How Can We Get There? Revenues Recalibration of $$ Committed to Operations Expenses Revenue Enhancements ‐ Tax Increases Operating Budget Increases Reprioritizing CIP Spending Debt Service Increases New Initiatives Grant Funds Phasing Out Priorities and Commitments – A Delicate Balance budget@charlottesville.gov Office of Budget and www.charlottesville.gov/budget Performance Management 6