Stribling Avenue Cost Estimate Analysis Jack Dawson, PE City of Charlottesville Public Works Engineering Typical Planning/ Design/Estimate Process: Identification ->Prioritization ->Planning Study ->Cost Estimate #1 w/Heavy Contingencies ->30% Design with Alternates ->60% Design & New Cost Estimates ->90% Design and New Cost Estimates -> Construction/Bid Phase Cost Established This Exercise Is an Expedited “Over/Under” more so than an Estimate. -This is not an existing priority project so background info is minimal -Includes 20% Contingency -Has not gone through community engagement/stakeholder meetings -Projects of this type are not insignificant undertakings nor are they “cookie-cutter” in design typology or execution. -The revised layout is preliminary, the estimate should not be considered final. Considerations for Designing Streetscapes in Developed Corridors 1- ROW takes 2-Driveway tie in costs/temporary easements 3-Drainage requirements 4-SWM impacts 5-Utility Relocation 6-Roadway improvements Other non-priced impacts: 7-Existing Parking Reductions 8-Tree canopy removal Steps Taken: 1. Analyze existing corridor for physical constraints (width, retaining walls, challenging driveway tie ins, etc) as well as safe crossing zones to revise layout to sidewalk on one side 2. Review estimate in comparison with revised concept layout for areas where costs are likely to escalate and qualify non-cost related impacts. 3. Revise estimate for likely escalations found above Provided Concept: Existing Corridor Analysis • Physical Constraints -utility poles -grading challenges -trees -driveway/parking conflicts Revised Sidewalk Layout Cost Escalations 1- ROW takes 2-Driveway tie in costs/temporary easements 3-Drainage requirements 4-SWM impacts 5-Utility Relocation 6-Roadway improvements Other non-priced impacts: Existing Parking and Tree removal 1-ROW TAKES Represents permanent ROW takes necessary for 33’ ROW. Approximate cost= $42,000 Cost Escalations • Driveway tie in costs/temporary easements Example Address: 109 EXISTING FLOW PATH Adress: 109 Existing Driveway Width= 31' Existing Driveway Slope= 5.80% Vertical Delta Ex/Pr at ROW= 1.5 "Grade Chase"= 33' CF FILL= 670 CY FILL= 24.81481481 37 dollar/CY (import) Driveway= 1280 SF Unit Price= 7.34 dollar/SF Temp easement= 2400 SF Unit Price= 2 dollar/SF Drainage Considerations= assume d/w culvert Total price= 2500 dollars Total= $17,613.35 Other Driveway Examples: Cost Escalations 3-Basic Drainage Requirements Drainage impacts as a result of grading: (121 Stribling, Sag/ Outfall #1, Upstream inlet) On Road Drainage as a Result Spread Requirements: Cost Escalations • SWM impacts: Quality/Quantity/permanent Easements Quality: Quantity: Proposed SWM Quality Outfall 1: Outfall 2: Outfall 3: Outfall 4: Revised Conceptual Outfalls: Outfall #1 Outfall #2 Outfall #2 Outfall #2 Outfall #2 Outfall #3 Outfall #3 Outfall #3 Outfall #3 Outfall #4 Outfall 1 Outfall Costs 130 lf 18" Pipe 94 12220 2600 SF Easement 8 20800 Cons/E&S-Outfall prot./channel improvements 20000 53020 Outfall 2 140 lf 18" Pipe 94 13160 2800 SF Easement 8 22400 Cons/E&S-Outfall prot./channel improvements 40000 75560 Outfall 3 200 lf 18" Pipe 94 18800 4000 SF Easement 8 32000 Cons/E&S-Outfall prot./channel improvements 50000 100800 Outfall 4 Further investigation required. 80000 TOTAL OUTFALL 309380 Utility Relocation Utility Relocation Roadway Improvement Costs • Reduced for S/W on one side Other Considerations Existing Parking Removed • Minimally, 21 Spaces (4 on-street, 17 Private)-Eliminated: Tree Removal • 19 Trees Removed ? ? Cost Summary: Original: Revised Per Analysis: Total= $1,231,722+(25% Contingency)=$1,539,653 Total= $2,394,385+(20% Contingency)=$2,873,262 Questions ?