Agenda PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR DOCKET TUESDAY, March 13, 2018 at 5:30 P.M. and WEDNESDAY, March 14 at 5:30 P.M. CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS ** Items I, II & III to occur on March 13, 2018 **Items IV to occur on March 14, 2018 I. Commission Pre-Meeting (Agenda discussion(s)) Beginning: 4:30 p.m. Location: City Hall, 2nd Floor, NDS Conference II. Commission Regular Meeting Beginning: 5:30 p.m. Location: City Hall, 2nd Floor, Council Chambers A. COMMISSIONERS' REPORTS B. UNIVERSITY REPORT C. CHAIR'S REPORT D. DEPARTMENT OF NDS E. MATTERS TO BE PRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC NOT ON THE FORMAL AGENDA F. CONSENT AGENDA (Items removed from the consent agenda will be considered at the end of the regular agenda) 1. Minutes – January 9, 2018 – Pre- meeting and Regular meeting 2. Minutes – November 28, 2017 - Work Session 3. Minutes – January 3, 2018 - Work Session 4. Minutes – January 23, 2018 - Work Session III. JOINT MEETING OF COMMISSION/ COUNCIL Beginning: 6:00 p.m. Continuing: until all public hearings are completed Format: (i) Staff Report, (ii) Applicant, (iii) Hearing 1. Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) and HOME Funding— 1st Year Action Plan, FY 18- 19: The Planning Commission and City Council are considering projects to be undertaken in the 1st Year Action Plan of the multi-year Consolidated Plan utilizing CDBG & HOME funds for the City of Charlottesville. In Fiscal Year 18-19 it is expected that the City of Charlottesville will receive about $388,000 in Community Development Block Grant funds and about $57,100 in HOME funds from the Department of Housing and Urban Development HUD. CDBG funds will be used in the City to address neighborhood improvements in Belmont and Ridge Street, economic development activities, housing activities, and public service projects that benefit low and moderate income citizens. HOME funds will be used to support the housing needs of low and moderate income citizens through down payment assistance and homeowner rehabilitation. Report prepared by Tierra Howard, Grants Coordinator. 2. SP18-00001 - 901 River Road SUP Request - Robert High Development, LLC, contract purchaser, and landowner River Road Plaza, LLC, have submitted an application seeking approval of a Special Use Permit (SUP) request for the property located at 901 River Road with road frontage on River Road and Belleview Avenue. The proposal requests to allow for a self-storage company, pursuant to City Code Section 34-480. The property is further identified on City Real Property Tax Map 49 Parcel 98 (“Subject Property”). The Subject Property is zoned IC (Industrial Corridor District). The site is approximately 2.203 acres or 95,963 square feet. The Comprehensive Plan designates the land use of the Subject Property as Business and Technology. Information pertaining to request may be viewed online at http://www.charlottesville.org/departments-and- services/departments-h-z/neighborhood-development-services or obtained from the Department of Neighborhood Development Services, 2nd Floor of City Hall, 610 East Main Street. Persons interested in this SUP application may contact NDS Planner Heather Newmyer by e-mail (newmyerh@charlottesville.org) or by telephone (434-970-3968). 3. ZM17-00003 – 0 Monticello Road- Henningsen Kestner Architects, on behalf of Richard Spurzem, the owner of the property, has submitted a rezoning petition for 0 Monticello Road, also identified on City Real Property Tax Map 61 as Parcel 265.A (“Subject Property”). The petition proposes a change in zoning from M-I Industrial (current zoning) to R1-S Low-Density Residential (proposed zoning). The Subject Property has frontage on Monticello Road, and contains approximately 0.0895 acres or 3,899 square feet. The general usage of the proposed R-1S zoning classification is low-density residential areas characterized by small-lot development. The general usage specified in the Comprehensive Plan for the Subject Property is High-Density Residential. The Comprehensive Plan specifies density greater than 15 units per acre. Information pertaining to request may be viewed online at http://www.charlottesville.org/departments-and-services/departments-h-z/neighborhood-development-services or obtained from the Department of Neighborhood Development Services, 2nd Floor of City Hall, 610 East Main Street. Persons interested in this rezoning petition may contact Carrie Rainey by email (raineyc@charlottesville.org) of by telephone (434-970-3453). 4. SP17-00003 – 0 Carlton Road – Stony Point Design/Build, LLC, as the owner of the Subject Property, has submitted an application seeking approval of a Special Use Permit (SUP) request to allow for multi-family residential use up to 21 dwelling units per acre per City Code Section 34-480 and a reduction of the minimum required front yard setback from 20-feet to 0-feet per City Code Section 34-162(a) at 0 Carlton Road, also identified on City Real Property Tax Map 57 Parcels 123.69, 123.701, 123.71 and Tax Map 61 Parcel 2.2 (“Subject Property”). The Subject Property has frontage on Carlton Road and Monticello Road. The site is zoned M-I Industrial. The property is approximately 0.623 acres or 27,138 square feet. A residential density of 19.26 units per acre is proposed (up to 21 DUA by SUP can be requested) for a total of 12 units. The Land Use Plan calls for High-Density Residential. The Comprehensive Plan specifies density greater than 15 units per acre. Information pertaining to request may be viewed online at http://www.charlottesville.org/departments-and-services/departments-h- z/neighborhood-development-services or obtained from the Department of Neighborhood Development Services, 2nd Floor of City Hall, 610 East Main Street. Persons interested in this rezoning petition may contact Carrie Rainey by email (raineyc@charlottesville.org) of by telephone (434-970-3453). 5. 1206 Carlton Avenue a. ZM-17-00004 - 1206 Carlton Avenue – Justin Shimp (Shimp Engineering) on behalf of Chris Hulett (owners of 1206 Carlton Ave) has submitted a rezoning petition for 1206 Carlton Avenue (Subject Property). The rezoning petition proposes a change in zoning from the existing R-2 Two- family Residential to R-3 Multi-family with no proffered development conditions. The Subject Property is further identified on City Real Property Tax Map 57 Parcels 127. The Subject Property is approximately 0.26 acres. The Land Use Plan calls for Low Density Residential. The Comprehensive Plan specifies density no greater than 15 units per acre. Information pertaining to request may be viewed online at http://www.charlottesville.org/departments-and-services/departments-h-z/neighborhood- development-services or obtained from the Department of Neighborhood Development Services, 2nd Floor of City Hall, 610 East Main Street. Persons interested in this rezoning petition my contact Matt Alfele, City Planner by email at (alfelem@charlottesville.org) or by telephone (434-970-3636). b. SP17-00008 - 1206 Carlton Avenue – Justin Shimp (Shimp Engineering) on behalf of Chris Hulett (owners of 1206 Carlton Ave) has submitted an application seeking approval of a Special Use permit (SUP) for 1206 Carlton Avenue (Subject Property). The SUP application proposes increasing the density from a By-Right 21 Dwelling Units per Acres (DUA) to 24 DUA (per City Code Section 34- 420) and adjusting the southeastern side setback from 10’ to 8’ (per City Code Section 34-162(a)). The applicant is requesting a rezoning (see petition ZM-17-00004) and a SUP to build a 6 unit apartment. The Subject Properties are further identified on City Real Property Tax Map 57 Parcels 127. The Subject Property is further identified on City Real Property Tax Map 57 Parcels 127. The Subject Property is approximately 0.26 acres. The Land Use Plan calls for Low Density Residential. The Comprehensive Plan specifies density no greater than 15 units per acre. Information pertaining to request may be viewed online at http://www.charlottesville.org/departments-and-services/departments-h- z/neighborhood-development-services or obtained from the Department of Neighborhood Development Services, 2nd Floor of City Hall, 610 East Main Street. Persons interested in this rezoning petition my contact Matt Alfele, City Planner by email at (alfelem@charlottesville.org) or by telephone (434-970- 3636). 6. Hogwaller Farm DEFERRED BY APPLICANT ON MARCH, 6, 2018 a. ZM-18-00001 – Hogwaller Farm – Justin Shimp (Shimp Engineering) on behalf of Charles Hurt and Shirley Fisher (owners) has submitted a rezoning petition for Tax Map 61 Parcels 79.17, 79.18, & 79.19, 918 Nassau Street, and a portion of Tax Map 61 Parcel 79 (Subject Properties). The rezoning petition proposes a change in zoning from the existing R-2 Two-family Residential to HW Highway Corridor with no proffered development conditions. The Subject Property is further identified on City Real Property Tax Map 61 Parcels 79, 79.17, 79.18, 79.19, & 79.201. The Subject Properties is approximately 1.16 acres. The Land Use Plan calls for Low Density Residential. The Comprehensive Plan specifies density no greater than 15 units per acre. Information pertaining to request may be viewed online at http://www.charlottesville.org/departments-and-services/departments-h-z/neighborhood-development- services or obtained from the Department of Neighborhood Development Services, 2nd Floor of City Hall, 610 East Main Street. Persons interested in this rezoning petition my contact Matt Alfele, City Planner by email at (alfelem@charlottesville.org) or by telephone (434-970-3636). b. SP18-00004 – Hogwaller Farm – Justin Shimp (Shimp Engineering) on behalf of Charles Hurt and Shirley Fisher (owners) has submitted an application seeking approval of a Special Use permit (SUP) for Tax Map 61 Parcels 79, 79.16, 79.17, 79.18, & 79.19, 918 Nassau Street (Subject Properties). The SUP application proposes a density of 24 Dwelling Units Acres (DUA) per City Code Section 34-740. The applicant is requesting a rezoning (see petition ZM-18-00001) and a SUP for the proposed development of (18) one-bedroom and (12) two-bedroom units split between (2) three-story buildings for a total of (30) dwelling units. The development is being proposed as an urban farm and will accommodate a 1,280 square foot greenhouse and a 600 square foot retail farm store. Additional parking, farm sheds, and agricultural fields supporting the development are proposed on an adjacent 7.52 acre county parcel. The Subject Properties are further identified on City Real Property Tax Map 61 Parcels 79, 79.16, 79.17, 79.18, 79.19, & 79.20. The Subject Properties are approximately 1.26 acres and has road frontage on Nassau Street. The Land Use Plan calls for Low Density Residential. The Comprehensive Plan specifies density no greater than 15 units per acre. Information pertaining to request may be viewed online at http://www.charlottesville.org/departments-and-services/departments-h-z/neighborhood-development- services or obtained from the Department of Neighborhood Development Services, 2nd Floor of City Hall, 610 East Main Street. Persons interested in this rezoning petition my contact Matt Alfele, City Planner by email at (alfelem@charlottesville.org) or by telephone (434-970-3636). PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR DOCKET Continued WEDNESDAY, March 14 at 5:30 P.M. CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS Commission Pre-Meeting (Agenda discussion(s)) Beginning: 5:00 p.m. Location: City Hall, 2nd Floor, NDS Conference IV. COMMISSION’S ACTION ITEMS Continuing: until all action items are concluded – beginning at 5:30 P.M. 1. Site Plan – 1011 East Jefferson Street Site Plan 2 Entrance Corridor Review Board (ERB) – 912 East High Street 3. Dairy Central - 946 Grady Avenue a. Preliminary Discussion b. ERB – Recommendation on SUP request 4. Preliminary Discussion - 140 Emmet Street North 5. Hydraulic/29 Transportation Plan Presentation V. FUTURE MEETING SCHEDULE/ADJOURN Thursday , March 22, 2018 – 5:00 PM Work Session Joint Work Session with City Council on Hydraulic 29 Transportation Plan Tuesday, March 27, 2018 – 5:00 PM Work Session Comprehensive Plan Tuesday, April 10, 2018 – 4:30 PM Pre- Meeting Tuesday, April 10, 2018 – 5:30 PM Regular Comprehensive Plan Amendment – Meeting Hydraulic/29 – Land Use and Transportation Plans and inclusion as Urban Development Area Presentation - Ivy Corridor Preliminary Development Plan Rezoning and SUP – Hogwaller Farm Anticipated Items on Future Agendas Site Plan - Sunrise Park PUD Phase IV Subdivision - Paynes Mill Entrance Corridor - 916, 920 East High Street, 325 10th Street NE (10th & High), Seminole Square shopping center Zoning Text Amendments – Mixed Use definition (initiation), Parking Exempt zone revisions. SUP –MACAA (1021 Park Street), 1233 Cedars Court, Cleveland Avenue, 1817 Nassau, Brookwood SUP Persons with Disabilities may request reasonable accommodations by contacting ada@charlottesville.org or (434)970-3182 PLEASE NOTE: THIS AGENDA IS SUBJECT TO CHANGE PRIOR TO THE MEETING. PLEASE NOTE: We are including suggested time frames on Agenda items. These times are subject to change at any time during the meeting. CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE DEPARTMENT OF NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT SERVICES STAFF REPORT APPLICATION FOR APPROVAL OF A PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING DATE OF MEETING: March 14, 2018 Project Planner: Carrie Rainey Date of Staff Report: March 1, 2018 Development: 1011 E Jefferson Street (Tax Map 54 Parcel 127) Applicant: David Mitchell, Great Eastern Management Applicant’s Representative(s): Scott Collins, Collins Engineering Current Property Owner: Jefferson Medical Building Limited Partnership Applicable City Code Provisions: 34‐800 – 34‐827 (Site Plans) Zoning District: B‐1 Commercial Reason for Planning Commission Review: Preliminary site plans associated with a property which has a Special Use Permit (SUP) are subject to review by the Planning Commission. Vicinity Map Applicant Property 1 Context Map 1 Context Map 2‐ Zoning Classifications Applicant Property KEY ‐ Yellow: R1‐S, Light Orange: R‐2, Orange: R‐3, Pink: B‐1, Red: B‐2, Purple: DN or HS, Grey: M‐I 2 Standard of Review Approval of a site plan is a ministerial function, as to which the Planning Commission has little or no discretion. When an applicant has submitted a site plan that complies with the requirements of the City’s Site Plan Ordinance, then approval of the plan must be granted. In the event the Planning Commission determines there are grounds upon which to deny approval of a site plan, the motion must clearly identify the deficiencies in the plan, that are the basis for the denial, by reference to specific City Code sections and requirements. Further, upon disapproval of a site plan, the Planning Commission must identify the modifications or corrections that would permit approval of the plan. Summary Scott Collins of Collins Engineering, LLC, acting as agent for Jefferson Medical Building Limited Partnership and Great Eastern Management, is requesting approval of a preliminary site plan to construct a mixed‐use building with up to 127 residential units at 1011 E Jefferson (TMP 54‐ 127). City Council approved a Special Use Permit (SP16‐00001) with conditions for additional residential density on July 5, 2017. The preliminary site plan (Attachment 1) shows a deviation from driveway layout shown in the conceptual plan presented in conjunction with the Special Use Permit (Attachment 4). The previously shown modification to the building has been removed. The preliminary site plan proposes a driveway that is set further back from the northern property line than the driveway proposed in the conceptual plan associated with the Special Use Permit. The driveway entrance locations on 10th Street NE and 11th Street NE proposed on the preliminary site plan are in the same location as those proposed on the conceptual plan associated with the Special Use Permit. However, the majority of proposed driveway on the preliminary site plan is located further south (farther from the property line). Site Plan Compliance Site plans are reviewed for compliance with City codes and standards. An overview of site plan requirements and the location of those items on the site plan are outlined below. Site Plan Requirements A. Compliance with applicable zoning district regulation B‐1 Commercial District (“B‐1”) (per Sections 34‐440 ‐ 34‐480) The property is zoned B‐1 Commercial District. The project complies with all requirements of the B‐1 Commercial District. 3 B. Compliance with the City’s Erosion and Sediment Control ordinance, Chapter 10 The applicant’s erosion and sediment control plan will be submitted and reviewed during final site plan submission. The applicant will be required to comply with staff comments. C. Compliance with General Standard for site plans (Sections 34‐800 ‐ 34‐827) 1. General site plan information, including but not limited to project, property, zoning, site, and traffic information: Found on Sheet 1. 2. Existing condition and adjacent property information: Found on Sheet 2. 3. Phasing plan: The project will be constructed in one phase per Sheet 1. 4. Topography and grading: Found on Sheet 3. 5. Existing landscape and trees: Found on Sheet 2. 6. The name and location of all water features: N/A. 7. One hundred‐year flood plain limits: N/A. 8. Existing and proposed streets and associated traffic information: Reference to Traffic Impact Analysis noted on Sheet 1 (see Attachment 3). No new roads are proposed. 9. Location and size of existing water and sewer infrastructure: Found on Sheet 2. 10. Proposed layout for water and sanitary sewer facilities and storm drain facilities: Found of Sheets 3 and 5. 11. Location of other existing and proposed utilities and utility easements: Found on Sheet 3. 12. Location of existing and proposed ingress to and egress from the property, showing the distance to the centerline of the nearest existing street intersection: Found on Sheet 3. 13. Location and dimensions of all existing and proposed improvements: Found on Sheets 3, 4, 5, 6. 14. All areas intended to be dedicated or reserved for public use: Found on Sheet 3 (right‐of‐way to be dedicated behind the sidewalk on 10th Street NE and E Jefferson Street). 15. Landscape plan: Found on Sheet 3. 16. Where deemed appropriate by the director due to intensity of development: a. Estimated traffic generation figures for the site based upon current ITE rates: Found in the Traffic Impact Analysis. b. Estimated vehicles per day: Found in the Traffic Impact Analysis. 4 D. Additional information to be shown on the site plan as deemed necessary by the director or Commission in order to provide sufficient information for the director or Commission to adequately review the site plan. The Special Use Permit granted by City Council on July 5, 2017 includes the following conditions, which are provided on Sheet 1 of the preliminary site plan. 1. A maximum of 180 bedrooms shall be allowed on the subject property. No owner or operator of the multifamily dwelling shall enter into lease agreements with tenants on a bedroom‐by‐bedroom basis. Up to 50% of the residential units may be two‐ bedroom units. All residential units will be either one or two‐bedroom units. Found on Sheet 1. 2. The applicant has notified the City that it has elected to provide affordable housing units to satisfy the requirements of City Code Sec. 34‐12. Each of the required affordable housing units shall be provided either on‐site or off‐site, on land within the adjacent Downtown or Downtown North Mixed Use Corridor zoning Districts. Condition to be resolved at final site plan approval. 3. No demolition of existing building(s) or improvements shall be commenced prior to the approval of a final site plan and approval of a permit authorizing land‐disturbing activities pursuant to City Code Sec. 10‐9. Land disturbance associated with demolition shall be planned and taken into account within the stormwater management plan for the development, as part of a common plan of development for the Subject Property. Condition to be resolved at final site plan approval. 4. The design, height, and other characteristics of the development shall remain, in all material aspects, as described within the Application Materials. Any change in use of the proposed building, and any substantial change of the proposed development, shall require a modification of this SUP—specifically including, but without limitation, any change to the following matters depicted and/or represented within the Application Materials, as supplemented through June 12, 2017: a) The provision of two (2) open air courtyards in the front and rear of the building, with the front courtyard visible from E Jefferson Street; Found on Sheets 1 and 3. b) The provision of three (3) plazas: one along the entire 10th Street NE frontage; one, at the corner of 10th Street NE and E Jefferson Streets; and one, at the corner of 11th Street NE and East Jefferson Streets; Found on Sheets 1 and 3. c) The provision of direct pedestrian access from East Jefferson Street to the on‐site means of access to the building; Found on Sheet 3. 5 d) The entire eastern half of the building, as measured along the E Jefferson Street frontage, shall be a maximum of three (3) stories in height; Found on Sheets 1, 3, and 4. e) A building setback of at least 30 feet, along no less than 30% of the building’s 10th Street NE and 11th Street NE frontages. Found on Sheets 3 and 4. f) A building setback at least 30 feet along no less than 25% of the site’s E Jefferson Street frontage, and a setback of at least 20 feet along the building’s remaining frontage along E Jefferson Street. Found on Sheets 3 and 4. g) Stepbacks: i. A stepback at least 10 feet from the required minimum 20 foot setback above the second (2nd) story of the building, along 100% of the building’s 11th Street N.E. frontage, Found on Sheets 1 and 4. ii. A stepback of at least 25 feet from the required minimum five (5) foot setback above the second story of the building, along 100% of the eastern half of the building’s E Jefferson Street frontage. Found on Sheets 1 and 4. h) No more than 15,000 square feet of commercial space shall be allowed on the Subject Property. Found on Sheet 1. 5. All street trees shall be a minimum of three (3) inch caliper at planting. Regardless of canopy size, street trees shall be spaced no more than 25 feet apart on the 10th Street NE and 11th Street NE frontages, and no more than 35 feet apart on the E Jefferson Street frontage. Found on Sheets 1 and 3. 6. The landowner shall provide the following pedestrian facilities, along with a dedication of land or suitable permanent easements: a) Construction of sidewalk on 10th Street NE along the entire frontage of the Subject Property, minimum seven (7) feet in width. If the sidewalk cannot be constructed within existing public right‐of‐way, then a reduction of two (2) feet shall be applied to the building setbacks and stepbacks required for 10th Street NE by Z.O. Sec. 34‐457 and condition (4), above. Found on Sheet 3. b) Construction of curb extensions into (i) the intersection of 10th Street NE and E Jefferson Street adjacent to the Subject Property on both sides of the staggered intersection, and (ii) the intersection of 11th Street NE and E Jefferson Streets adjacent to the Subject Property, all as shown in the site plan dated June 9, 2017. Curb extensions shall include ADA‐compliant perpendicular curb ramps aligned with each pedestrian crosswalk. A receiving ADA‐compliant curb ramp shall be installed as necessary on the opposite end of each pedestrian crosswalk. Found on Sheet 3. c) Install high visibility crosswalks at all pedestrian crossings at both the 10th Street NE and E Jefferson Street and 11th Street NE and E Jefferson Street intersections, as shown in the provided site plan dated June 9, 2017. Found on Sheet 3. 6 d) Extend concrete sidewalk across all driveway/alley entrances in full width and at a maximum two (2) percent cross slope, as shown in the site plan dated June 9, 2017. Found on Sheet 3. e) If such is approved by the City, relocation of the existing two way stop located at the intersection of 11th Street NE and Little High Street, in order to stop traffic traveling on Little High Street, to an alternate location designated by the City Traffic Engineer. Condition to be resolved at final site plan approval per Condition 6g below. f) Construction of curb extensions and high visibility crosswalks at the intersection of 11th Street NE and Little High Street. Curb extensions shall include ADA‐compliant perpendicular curb ramps aligned with each pedestrian crosswalk. An ADA‐compliant receiving curb ramp shall be installed as necessary on the opposite end of each pedestrian crosswalk. Condition to be resolved at final site plan approval per Condition 6g below. g) All of the items referenced in (a)‐(f) above shall be shown on the final site plan for the development, and any dedications of land or conveyances of public easements shall be provided prior to final site plan approval. The Traffic Engineer is authorized to modify the dimensions of the facilities referenced in (a) through (f), above, as necessary to leave adequate right‐of‐ way available for future construction of bicycle lanes on 10th Street NE. Any such modification shall be shown within the final site plan for the development. Final construction plans for the public facilities referenced in (a)‐(f), above will be submitted to the City’s Traffic Engineer for approval, prior to commencement of construction. 7. All outdoor lighting and light fixtures shall be full cut‐off luminaires. Spillover light from luminaires onto public roads and onto property adjacent property shall not exceed one‐half (½) foot candle. A spillover shall be measured horizontally and vertically at the property line or edge of right‐of‐way or easement, whichever is closer to the light source. Found on Sheet 6. 8. There shall be no vehicular access to the Subject Property from the existing alley connecting the rear of the Subject Property to Little High Street. No more than one (1) vehicular access point (“curb cut”) shall be allowed on 11th Street NE, unless additional any access point(s) on 11th Street NE are determined by the City Traffic Engineer to be necessary for the public safety. Found on Sheet 3. 9. Bicycle storage will be provided on‐site, to the standards set forth within City Code Sec. 34‐881(2) of the Charlottesville City Code (Bicycle Storage Facilities), or the most current Bicycle Storage Facilities code applicable to this multifamily dwelling at time of development. Found on Sheets 1, 3, and 4. 10. Low impact development techniques such as rain gardens and permeable pavers shall be constructed/ installed as part of the development, and the nature, location 7 and specifications for all such LID techniques shall be shown on the final site plan. Found on Sheet 3. 11. The redevelopment of the subject property shall include the installation of solar energy systems sufficient, at a minimum, to offset the electrical usage in the common areas of the development. Condition to be resolved at final site plan approval. 12. For every 1,500 square feet of commercial space, there shall be a reduction of one (1) dwelling unit from the maximum number of dwelling units (127) allowed under this special use permit. Found on Sheet 1. E. Compliance with Additional Standards for Specific Uses (Sections 34‐930 ‐ 34‐938) No improvements regulated by these sections are proposed. Public Comments Received Staff has received correspondence from members of the public concerned with the modification to the rear of the building (northern side of the property) and maintenance of the maximum three story height set for the eastern half of the building. Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the preliminary site plan. Attachments 1. Preliminary Site Plan dated January 11, 2018 2. Special Use Permit Resolution dated July 5, 2017 3. Traffic Impact Analysis dated May 22, 2017 4. Conceptual Site Plan Associated with SUP dated June 9, 2017 8 RESOLUTION APPROVING A SPECIAL USE PERMIT TO AUTHORIZE A MULTIFAMILY DWELLING AT 1101 EAST JEFFERSON STREET CONTAINING UP TO 87 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE WHEREAS, Jefferson Medical Building Limited Partnership (“Applicant”), is the owner of certain property located at 1101 East Jefferson Street, identified on City Tax Map 54 as Parcel 127 (Tax Map Parcel Id. # 540127000) and containing approximately 1.46 acres (“Subject Property”), pursuant to City Code Sec. 34-480, has requested City Council to approve a special use permit to authorize the development of the Subject Property as a multifamily dwelling containing up to 87 dwelling units per acre (the proposed “Special Use”). The Subject Property is within the City’s B-1 (Commercial) zoning district, with frontage on 10th Street, N.E., East Jefferson Street and 11th Street, N.E.; and WHEREAS, the requested Special Use is generally described within the Applicant’s application materials submitted in connection with SP16-00001, including: (i) the original application materials dated September 16 and 19, 2016; (ii) a supplemental narrative dated June 12, 2017, and (iii) a revised proposed site plan dated June 9, 2017, submitted to NDS on June 12, 2017 (collectively, the “Application Materials”); and WHEREAS, the existing building at the Subject Property is proposed to be demolished and removed to allow for establishment of the Special Use and related buildings and improvements; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission reviewed the original application materials dated September 16 and 19, 2016, and the City’s Staff Report pertaining thereto, and following a joint public hearing, duly advertised and conducted by the Planning Commission and City Council on October 11, 2016, the Commission voted to recommend that City Council should deny the requested Special Use; and WHEREAS, upon consideration of: the comments received during the joint public hearing, the Planning Commission’s recommendation, the Staff Report, updated through July 5, 2017, and supplemental materials provided by the Applicant (dated June 9 and 12, 2017) as well as the factors set forth within Sec. 34-157 of the City’s Zoning Ordinance, this Council finds and determines that granting the requested special use permit subject to suitable conditions would serve the public necessity, convenience, general welfare or good zoning practice; now, therefore, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Charlottesville, Virginia that, pursuant to City Code Sec. 34-480, a special use permit is hereby approved and granted to authorize a multifamily dwelling containing not more than 87 dwelling units per acre (approximately 127.02 units, maximum), subject to the following conditions: 1. A maximum of 180 bedrooms shall be allowed on the subject property. No owner or operator of the multifamily dwelling shall enter into lease agreements with tenants on a bedroom-by-bedroom basis. Up to 50% of the residential units may be two-bedroom units. All residential units will be either one or two-bedroom units. 2. The applicant has notified the City that it has elected to provide affordable housing units to satisfy the requirements of City Code Sec. 34-12. Each of the required affordable housing units shall be provided either on-site or off-site, on land within the adjacent Downtown or Downtown North Mixed Use Corridor zoning Districts. 3. No demolition of existing building(s) or improvements shall be commenced prior to the approval of a final site plan and approval of a permit authorizing land-disturbing activities pursuant to City Code Sec. 10-9. Land disturbance associated with demolition shall be planned and taken into account within the stormwater management plan for the development, as part of a common plan of development for the Subject Property. 4. The design, height, and other characteristics of the development shall remain, in all material aspects, as described within the Application Materials. Any change in use of the proposed building, and any substantial change of the proposed development, shall require a modification of this SUP—specifically including, but without limitation, any change to the following matters depicted and/or represented within the Application Materials, as supplemented through June 12, 2017: a. The provision of two (2) open air courtyards in the front and rear of the building, with the front courtyard visible from E Jefferson Street; b. The provision of three (3) plazas: one along the entire 10th Street NE frontage; one, at the corner of 10th Street NE and E Jefferson Streets; and one, at the corner of 11th Street NE and East Jefferson Streets; c. The provision of direct pedestrian access from East Jefferson Street to the on-site means of access to the building; d. The entire eastern half of the building, as measured along the E Jefferson Street frontage, shall be a maximum of three (3) stories in height; e. A building setback of at least 30 feet, along no less than 30% of the building’s 10th Street NE and 11th Street NE frontages. f. A building setback at least 30 feet along no less than 25% of the site’s E Jefferson Street frontage, and a setback of at least 20 feet along the building’s remaining frontage along E Jefferson Street. g. Stepbacks: (i) A stepback at least 10 feet from the required minimum 20 foot setback above the second (2nd) story of the building, along 100% of the building’s 11th Street N.E. frontage, and (ii) A stepback of at least 25 feet from the required minimum five (5) foot setback above the second story of the building, along 100% of the eastern half of the building’s E Jefferson Street frontage. h. No more than 15,000 square feet of commercial space shall be allowed on the Subject Property. 5. All street trees shall be a minimum of three (3) inch caliper at planting. Regardless of canopy size, street trees shall be spaced no more than 25 feet apart on the 10th Street NE and 11th Street NE frontages, and no more than 35 feet apart on the E Jefferson Street frontage. 6. The landowner shall provide the following pedestrian facilities, along with a dedication of land or suitable permanent easements: a. Construction of sidewalk on 10th Street NE along the entire frontage of the Subject Property, minimum seven (7) feet in width. If the sidewalk cannot be constructed within existing public right-of-way, then a reduction of two (2) feet shall be applied to the building setbacks and stepbacks required for 10th Street NE by Z.O. Sec. 34-457 and condition (4), above. b. Construction of curb extensions into (i) the intersection of 10th Street NE and E Jefferson Street adjacent to the Subject Property on both sides of the staggered intersection, and (ii) the intersection of 11th Street NE and E Jefferson Streets adjacent to the Subject Property, all as shown in the site plan dated June 9, 2017. Curb extensions shall include ADA-compliant perpendicular curb ramps aligned with each pedestrian crosswalk. A receiving ADA-compliant curb ramp shall be installed as necessary on the opposite end of each pedestrian crosswalk. c. Install high visibility crosswalks at all pedestrian crossings at both the 10th Street NE and E Jefferson Street and 11th Street NE and E Jefferson Street intersections, as shown in the provided site plan dated June 9, 2017. d. Extend concrete sidewalk across all driveway/alley entrances in full width and at a maximum two (2) percent cross slope, as shown in the site plan dated June 9, 2017. e. If such is approved by the City, relocation of the existing two way stop located at the intersection of 11th Street NE and Little High Street, in order to stop traffic traveling on Little High Street, to an alternate location designated by the City Traffic Engineer. f. Construction of curb extensions and high visibility crosswalks at the intersection of 11th Street NE and Little High Street. Curb extensions shall include ADA-compliant perpendicular curb ramps aligned with each pedestrian crosswalk. An ADA-compliant receiving curb ramp shall be installed as necessary on the opposite end of each pedestrian crosswalk. g. All of the items referenced in (a)-(f) above shall be shown on the final site plan for the development, and any dedications of land or conveyances of public easements shall be provided prior to final site plan approval. The Traffic Engineer is authorized to modify the dimensions of the facilities referenced in (a) through (f), above, as necessary to leave adequate right-of-way available for future construction of bicycle lanes on 10th Street NE. Any such modification shall be shown within the final site plan for the development. Final construction plans for the public facilities referenced in (a)-(f), above will be submitted to the City’s Traffic Engineer for approval, prior to commencement of construction. 7. All outdoor lighting and light fixtures shall be full cut-off luminaires. Spillover light from luminaires onto public roads and onto property adjacent property shall not exceed one-half (½) foot candle. A spillover shall be measured horizontally and vertically at the property line or edge of right-of-way or easement, whichever is closer to the light source. 8. There shall be no vehicular access to the Subject Property from the existing alley connecting the rear of the Subject Property to Little High Street. No more than one (1) vehicular access point (“curb cut”) shall be allowed on 11th Street NE, unless additional any access point(s) on 11th Street NE are determined by the City Traffic Engineer to be necessary for the public safety. 9. Bicycle storage will be provided on-site, to the standards set forth within City Code Sec. 34-881(2) of the Charlottesville City Code (Bicycle Storage Facilities), or the most current Bicycle Storage Facilities code applicable to this multifamily dwelling at time of development. 10. Low impact development techniques such as rain gardens and permeable pavers shall be constructed/ installed as part of the development, and the nature, location and specifications for all such LID techniques shall be shown on the final site plan. 11. The redevelopment of the subject property shall include the installation of solar energy systems sufficient, at a minimum, to offset the electrical usage in the common areas of the development. 12. For every 1,500 square feet of commercial space, there shall be a reduction of one (1) dwelling unit from the maximum number of dwelling units (127) allowed under this special use permit. Approved by Council July 5, 2017 Clerk of Council May 22, 2017 Mr. Brennen Duncan, P.E. City of Charlottesville 610 East Market Street Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 Phone: (434) 970-3182 Reference: East Jefferson Street Apartments – Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) Charlottesville, Virginia Dear Mr. Duncan, Ramey Kemp & Associates, Inc. (RKA) has performed a Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) to support the proposed redevelopment of the property on the north side of East Jefferson Street between 10th Street NE and 11th Street NE. The property currently has a 20,300 square foot (s.f.) medical office building, with two full-movement driveways on East Jefferson Street, and one full-movement driveway on 10th Street NE. The proposed redevelopment includes replacing the medical office building with 126 apartment units, up to 8,000 s.f. of specialty retail space, and a 2,000 s.f. coffee / donut shop without a drive-through window. The proposed access plan includes removing both driveways on East Jefferson Street, and adding one new full- movement driveway on 11th Street NE. The plan includes constructing a two-level below-grade parking deck with 246 spaces. If approved, the redevelopment is expected to be complete in 2019. Figure 1 shows the site location and study intersections. The purpose of this letter report is to provide the following:  Trip generation calculations  Trip generation study at City Walk Apartments  Trip generation study at two local coffee shops  Capacity analysis of study intersections  Multi-way stop analysis for the intersection of Little High Street at 11th Street Existing Roadway Conditions 10th Street NE is a two-lane local collector with an average daily traffic (ADT) volume of approximately 4,000 vehicles per day, and a posted speed limit of 25 mph across the property frontage. East Jefferson Street is a two-lane local collector with an ADT volume of approximately 1,700 vehicles per day, and a posted speed limit of 25 mph across the property frontage. Mr. Brennen Duncan, P.E. Page 2 of 12 11th Street NE is a two-lane local collector with an ADT volume of approximately 1,500 vehicles per day, and a posted speed limit of 25 mph across the property frontage. Existing Traffic Volumes The existing 2016 AM peak hour (7:00 to 9:00 AM) and PM peak hour (4:00 to 6:00 PM) turning movement counts were conducted by RKA and Burns Service, Inc. at the following intersections during the week of September 12, 2016:  10th Street NE at East Jefferson Street  11th Street NE at East Jefferson Street  East Jefferson Street at three existing medical office driveways Burns Service, Inc. also performed a 14-hour (6:00 AM to 8:00 PM) turning movement count at the following intersection during the week of May 8, 2017:  Little High Street at 11th Street NE The existing peak hour volumes were increased and balanced between the study intersections, and are shown in Figure 2. All of the traffic count data is enclosed for reference. Background Traffic Growth The existing medical office trips were removed from the existing driveways, but those trips were not subtracted from the main intersections. Additionally, based on a review of the 2012 and 2015 ADT’s, the existing 2016 peak hour traffic volumes were grown by an annual rate of 3.0% for three years to estimate the 2019 no-build traffic volumes, which are shown in Figure 3. Based on discussion with the City, we understand there are no approved developments near this site. Mr. Brennen Duncan, P.E. Page 3 of 12 Trip Generation The trip generation potential of the proposed redevelopment during a typical weekday, AM peak hour and PM peak hour was estimated using the methodologies published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual – 9th Edition. Table 1 shows the trip generation potential of the proposed redevelopment. Table 1 ITE Trip Generation – 9th Edition – Weekday Average Daily Traffic AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Land Use (vph) (vph) Size (vpd) (ITE Land Use Code) Enter Exit Enter Exit Enter Exit Proposed Uses Apartments 126 units 419 419 13 51 51 28 (220) Specialty Retail Center 8,000 s.f. 190 190 4 2 18 23 (826) Coffee / Donut Shop without Drive–Through Window 2,000 s.f. 748 748 111 106 41 41 (936) Subtotal 1,357 1,357 128 159 110 92 ITE Internal Capture – 8% AM / 37% PM -305 -305 -11 -11 -37 -37 Driveway Volumes 1,052 1,052 117 148 73 55 ITE Pass-By Trips: Specialty Retail – 34% -50 -50 -0 -0 -4 -4 Coffee / Donut Shop – 49% AM / 50% PM* -287 -287 -48 -48 -12 -12 33% Adjustment for -347 -347 -38 -48 -24 -18 Pedestrian, Bicycle, and Transit Trips Net New External Trips 368 368 31 52 33 21 Existing Use Medical Office 20,300 s.f. 366 366 39 10 20 52 (720) Net Change in External Trips +2 +2 -8 +42 +13 -31 * ITE does not publish pass-by rates for coffee / donut shops. In this case, the pass-by rates for a fast-food restaurant were applied. It is reasonable to assume that the actual pass-by rates for coffee / donut shops are significantly higher, which would result in fewer new trips. Mr. Brennen Duncan, P.E. Page 4 of 12 Note that the existing medical office trips were not subtracted out of the background traffic volumes at the study intersections. Specialty retail space and coffee / donut shops attract pass-by trips, which are made by drivers who are already driving by the site today, and will visit these uses in the future because they are convenient. Table 1 shows the ITE pass-by trip adjustments that could be applied. In this case, the pass-by adjustments were not applied, which results in more new trips in the traffic projections. Note that the trip generation of the coffee / donut shop is based on the ITE trip rates, which are significantly higher than expected with the proposed coffee shop because most of the shops surveyed by ITE are part of large chains, and located on major thoroughfares. The proposed shop will likely be locally-owned and focused on serving the neighborhood. To confirm, RKA counted two local coffee shops, and those results are presented later in this report. Trip Generation Study at City Walk Apartments A traffic count was conducted by Burns Service, Inc. at the intersection of Water Street at City Walk Way during the week of September 12, 2016. The purpose of the count was to determine an appropriate pedestrian reduction by comparing similar apartments in Charlottesville. Table 2 shows a comparison of the trip generation potential of City Walk Apartments based on the ITE trip rates, and the actual traffic counts. Table 2 City Walk Apartments Trip Generation Comparison – 9th Edition – Weekday Average Daily Traffic AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Land Use (vph) (vph) Size (vpd) (ITE Land Use Code) Enter Exit Enter Exit Enter Exit Apartments 301 units 974 974 30 121 119 64 (220) Actual Counts 301 units - - 10 88 69 30 - - -67% -27% -42% -53% Compared to ITE - - -35% -46% The number of vehicle trips entering and exiting City Walk Apartments is approximately 35% lower than what ITE predicts during the AM peak hour, and approximately 46% lower during the PM peak hour. Therefore, the 33% adjustment shown in Table 1 for the proposed East Jefferson Street apartments is reasonable. However, in this case, the reduction was not applied, which results in more new trips in the traffic projections. Mr. Brennen Duncan, P.E. Page 5 of 12 Trip Generation Study at Local Coffee Shops An AM peak hour (7:00 to 9:00 AM) pedestrian count was conducted by Burns Service, Inc. at two local coffee shops during the week of April 24 to determine an appropriate trip generation rate for the proposed coffee shop. Shenandoah Joe’s is a 3,200 s.f. coffee shop on Preston Avenue at 10th Street NW, and Milli Coffee Roasters is a 1,800 s.f. coffee shop located on Preston Avenue at McIntire Road. Table 3 shows a comparison of the trip generation potential of the local coffee / donut shops based on the ITE trip rates, and the actual traffic counts. Table 3 Local Coffee Shops Trip Generation Comparison – 9th Edition – Weekday AM Peak Hour Location Size (vph) Enter Exit ITE Trip Generation for Coffee / Donut Shop 3,200 s.f. 177 170 without Drive-Through Window (936) Shenandoah Joe’s – Preston Avenue 3,200 s.f. 76 70 ITE Trip Generation for 3,200 s.f. 19 16 High-Turnover Sit-Down Restaurant (932) ITE Trip Generation for Coffee / Donut Shop 2,000 s.f. 111 106 without Drive-Through Window (936) Proposed East Jefferson Coffee Shop 2,000 s.f. 41 39 ITE Trip Generation for 2,000 s.f. 12 10 High-Turnover Sit-Down Restaurant (932) ITE Trip Generation for Coffee / Donut Shop 1,800 s.f. 100 96 without Drive-Through Window (936) Milli Coffee Roasters – Preston Avenue 1,800 s.f. 31 22 ITE Trip Generation for 1,800 s.f. 11 9 High-Turnover Sit-Down Restaurant (932) Based on the Shenandoah Joe and Milli Coffee Roasters data, the proposed coffee shop is expected to generate only 80 trips during the AM peak hour, which is approximately 63% lower than the 217 AM peak hour trips predicted by ITE. This analysis is based on the ITE trip rates, which result in significantly more trips than other local coffee shops. Mr. Brennen Duncan, P.E. Page 6 of 12 Site Traffic Distribution The following site traffic distribution was assumed for vehicle trips based on a review of the existing traffic volumes, the adjacent roadway network, and engineering judgement:  30% to / from the north on 10th Street  30% to / from the south on 10th Street  15% to / from the west on East Jefferson Street  15% to / from the north on 11th Street  5% to / from the south on 11th Street  5% to / from the east on East Jefferson Street The following site traffic distribution was assumed for the pedestrian and bicycle trips:  55% to / from the west on East Jefferson Street  20% to / from the south on 10th Street  10% to / from the north on 10th Street  10% to / from the north on 11th Street  5% to / from the south on 11th Street The vehicle trips are assumed to be medium and long-range trips, so a significant percentage of those trips are assigned to / from the US 250 Bypass. The pedestrian and bicycle trips are assumed to be short-range trips, which will be oriented toward the downtown area. Figures 4 and 5 show the site trip distribution for vehicles and pedestrian / bicycles. Figure 6 shows the vehicle site trip assignment, and the build 2019 traffic volumes are shown in Figure 6. Mr. Brennen Duncan, P.E. Page 7 of 12 Traffic Capacity Analysis Traffic capacity analysis for the study intersections was performed using Synchro 9.1, which is a comprehensive software package that allows the user to model signalized and unsignalized intersections to determine levels-of-service based on the thresholds specified in the 2010 Highway Capacity Manual (HCM). Table 4 summarizes the capacity analysis results for the unsignalized intersection of 10th Street NE at East Jefferson Street, and all of the Synchro output is enclosed for reference. Table 4 Level-of-Service Summary for 10th Street NE at East Jefferson Street AM PEAK HOUR PM PEAK HOUR LANE CONDITION GROUP Overall Overall Lane Queue Lane Queue LOS LOS LOS (ft) LOS (ft) (Delay) (Delay) EBL/T/R1 B 10 C 35 Existing 2016 WBL/T/R1 B 13 B 8 Traffic Conditions NBL/T/R2 A 0 N/A3 A 0 N/A3 SBL/T/R2 A 3 A 3 EBL/T/R1 B 10 C 48 No-Build 2019 WBL/T/R1 B 15 3 B 10 Traffic Conditions NBL/T/R2 A 0 N/A A 0 N/A3 SBL/T/R2 A 3 A 3 EBL/T/R1 C 20 C 60 Build 2019 WBL/T/R1 B 13 3 B 10 Traffic Conditions NBL/T/R2 A 0 N/A A 0 N/A3 SBL/T/R2 A 3 A 3 1. Level of service for minor approach 2. Level of service for major street left-turn movement 3. HCM methodology does not provide lane group or overall LOS, delay, and queue lengths for major street through movements or right turns at unsignalized intersections. Capacity analysis indicates that all movements at this intersection are projected to operate with short delays (less than 25 seconds) during the AM and PM peak hours under all scenarios, with a queue length of three vehicles or less. Note that the eastbound and westbound approaches are offset by 90 feet, and function as two three-leg intersections. Note that this intersection was modeled as one four-leg intersection, which results in longer delays and queues because a four-leg intersection has 32 traffic conflict points, but a three-leg intersection has only 9 traffic conflict points. No improvements are warranted or recommended at this intersection. Mr. Brennen Duncan, P.E. Page 8 of 12 Table 5 summarizes the capacity analysis results for the unsignalized intersection of 11th Street NE at East Jefferson Street, and all of the Synchro output is enclosed for reference. Table 5 Level-of-Service Summary for 11th Street NE at East Jefferson Street AM PEAK HOUR PM PEAK HOUR LANE CONDITION GROUP Overall Overall Lane Queue Lane Queue LOS LOS LOS (ft) LOS (ft) (Delay) (Delay) EBL/T/R1 A 5 B 10 Existing 2016 WBL/T/R1 B 5 3 B 5 Traffic Conditions NBL/T/R2 A 3 N/A A 0 N/A3 SBL/T/R2 A 0 A 0 EBL/T/R1 A 8 B 13 No-Build 2019 WBL/T/R1 B 5 3 B 8 Traffic Conditions NBL/T/R2 A 3 N/A A 0 N/A3 SBL/T/R2 A 0 A 0 EBL/T/R1 B 8 B 13 Build 2019 WBL/T/R1 B 8 3 B 8 Traffic Conditions NBL/T/R2 A 3 N/A A 0 N/A3 SBL/T/R2 A 3 A 0 1. Level of service for minor approach 2. Level of service for major street left-turn movement 3. HCM methodology does not provide lane group or overall LOS, delay, and queue lengths for major street through movements or right turns at unsignalized intersections. Capacity analysis indicates that all movements at this intersection are projected to operate with short delays (less than 25 seconds) during the AM and PM peak hours under all scenarios, with a queue length of one vehicle or less. No improvements are warranted or recommended at this intersection. Mr. Brennen Duncan, P.E. Page 9 of 12 Table 6 summarizes the capacity analysis results for the unsignalized intersection of Little High Street at 11th Street NE, and all of the Synchro output is enclosed for reference. Table 6 Level-of-Service Summary for Little High Street at 11th Street NE AM PEAK HOUR PM PEAK HOUR LANE CONDITION GROUP Overall Overall Lane Queue Lane Queue LOS LOS LOS (ft) LOS (ft) (Delay) (Delay) EBL/T/R2 A 0 A 0 Existing 2016 WBL/T/R2 A 0 3 A 0 Traffic Conditions NBL/T/R1 B 5 N/A B 10 N/A3 SBL/T/R1 B 15 B 8 EBL/T/R2 A 0 A 0 No-Build 2019 WBL/T/R2 A 0 3 A 0 Traffic Conditions NBL/T/R1 B 5 N/A B 10 N/A3 SBL/T/R1 B 18 B 10 Build 2019 EBL/T/R1 B 15 B 10 Traffic Conditions WBL/T/R1 B 13 3 B 8 with Stop control on NBL/T/R2 A 0 N/A A 0 N/A3 Little High Street SBL/T/R2 A 0 A 0 1. Level of service for minor approach 2. Level of service for major street left-turn movement 3. HCM methodology does not provide lane group or overall LOS, delay, and queue lengths for major street through movements or right turns at unsignalized intersections. Capacity analysis indicates that all movements at this intersection are projected to operate with short delays (less than 25 seconds) during the AM and PM peak hours under all scenarios, with a queue length of one vehicle or less. As described later in this report, we recommend switching the Stop control at this intersection to designate 11th Street as the major street, and Little High Street as the minor street. We also recommend installing bulbouts on the west side of the intersection to aid in traffic calming, and the shorten the crossing distance for pedestrians. Mr. Brennen Duncan, P.E. Page 10 of 12 Table 7 summarizes the capacity analysis results for the unsignalized intersection of 10th Street NE at Site Driveway 1, and all of the Synchro output is enclosed for reference. Table 7 Level-of-Service Summary for 10th Street NE at Site Driveway 1 AM PEAK HOUR PM PEAK HOUR LANE CONDITION GROUP Overall Overall Lane Queue Lane Queue LOS LOS LOS (ft) LOS (ft) (Delay) (Delay) WBL/R1 B 25 B 8 Build 2019 Traffic Conditions NBT/R - - N/A3 - - N/A3 SBL/T2 A 3 A 3 1. Level of service for minor approach 2. Level of service for major street left-turn movement 3. HCM methodology does not provide lane group or overall LOS, delay, and queue lengths for major street through movements or right turns at unsignalized intersections. Capacity analysis indicates that all movements at this intersection are projected to operate with short delays (less than 25 seconds) during the AM and PM peak hours at build-out of the site, with a queue length of one vehicle or less. No improvements are warranted or recommended at this intersection. Table 8 summarizes the capacity analysis results for the unsignalized intersection of 11th Street NE at Site Driveway 2, and all of the Synchro output is enclosed for reference. Table 8 Level-of-Service Summary for 11th Street NE at Site Driveway 2 AM PEAK HOUR PM PEAK HOUR LANE CONDITION GROUP Overall Overall Lane Queue Lane Queue LOS LOS LOS (ft) LOS (ft) (Delay) (Delay) EBL/R1 A 3 A 3 Build 2019 Traffic Conditions NBL/T2 A 0 N/A3 A 0 N/A3 SBT/R - - - - 1. Level of service for minor approach 2. Level of service for major street left-turn movement 3. HCM methodology does not provide lane group or overall LOS, delay, and queue lengths for major street through movements or right turns at unsignalized intersections. Capacity analysis indicates that all movements at this intersection are projected to operate with short delays (less than 25 seconds) during the AM and PM peak hours at build-out of the site, with a queue length of one vehicle or less. No improvements are warranted or recommended at this intersection. Mr. Brennen Duncan, P.E. Page 11 of 12 Multi-Way Stop Warrant Analysis A multi-way stop warrant analysis was performed for the intersection of Little High Street at 11th Street NE. Multi-way stop warrants are evaluated using the thresholds for intersection volume and collision history as outlined in the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD). The following traffic volume thresholds must be met for at least 8 hours to warrant multi-way stop control:  The approach volumes on the major street approaches must exceed 300 vehicles per hour, and  The approach volumes on the minor street approaches must exceed 200 vehicles per hour During the traffic count, the 8:00 to 9:00 AM hour was the busiest, and the total approach volume at the intersection was only 254 vehicles. This is just over half the threshold needed to meet one hour of the warrant, so the traffic volumes are well below the thresholds for multi-way stop control. In order to meet the collision warrant for a multi-way stop, there must be five or more correctable collisions in a 12 month period at the intersection. Based on the data provided by the Virginia Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV), there were no reported collisions at the intersection between January 2013 and December 2015, so that warrant is not met either. We understand that there is concern about the speed of traffic on eastbound Little High Street. Based on the 14 hour volume data, 11th Street had a total approach volume of 966 vehicles, and Little High Street had a total approach volume of 882 vehicles. The proposed redevelopment is projected to add approximately 315 vehicles per day to this segment of 11th Street. Therefore, we recommend switching the Stop control at this intersection to designate 11th Street as the major street, and Little High Street as the minor street. We also recommend installing bulbouts on the west side of the intersection to aid in traffic calming, and the shorten the crossing distance for pedestrians. Note that this analysis includes several assumptions that overestimate the impact of the proposed redevelopment:  The capacity analysis in this TIA assumes no reduction for the pedestrian, bicycle, and transit trips, even though a comparison of City Walk Apartments shows a 33% adjustment would be appropriate  The existing medical office trips were not subtracted from the study intersections  The trip generation of the coffee / donut shop results in a significantly higher number of trips because most of the shops surveyed by ITE are part of large chains, and located on major thoroughfares. The proposed shop will likely be locally-owned and focused on serving the neighborhood.  The proposed specialty retail space and coffee / donut shop will attract pass-by trips, but no adjustment for pass-by trips was made in this analysis  The intersection of 10th Street NE at East Jefferson Street was modeled as four-leg intersection instead of two three-leg intersections Mr. Brennen Duncan, P.E. Page 12of12 Figure 8 shows the recommended lane configuration. We appreciate your attention to this matter. Please contact me at (804) 217-8560 if you have any questions about this report. Sincerely yours, Ramey Kemp & Associates, Inc. Carl Hultgren, P.E., PTOE Regional Manager Enclosures: Figures, Synchro output, Traffic count data, Multi-Way Stop warrant Copy to: Mr. David Mitchell, Southern Classic, Inc. Ms. Valerie Long, Williams Mullen Ms. Ashley Davies, Williams Mullen Mr. Scott Collins, P.E., Collins Engineering ------------------------- ~RAMEY KEMP """ASSOCIATES Inset Inset LEGEND N Study Intersection Site Boundary Overview East Jefferson Street Site Location and Study Apartments Intersections Charlottesville, Virginia Scale: Not to Scale Figure 1 10th Street NE 11th Street NE N 70 (40) 11 (11) 3 (13) 5 (9) 36 (39) 11 (3) Little High Street (10) 15 (42) 15 (9) 3 (54) 26 (3) 3 292 (245) (3) 58 16 (13) 8 (22) 1 (4) Medical Driveway #1 (315) 193 (4) 6 Medical Medical Driveway #2 Driveway #3 236 (208) 32 (30) 25 (11) 45 (32) 47 (37) 30 (5) 3 (8) 5 (9) 4 (11) 21 (27) 3 (7) 3 (2) 0 (1) 19 (7) 10 (8) 2 (1) 4 (3) 8 (5) 73 (50) 72 (44) E Jefferson Street (1) 5 (6) 9 (49) 19 (13) 5 (72) 47 (67) 38 (35) 12 (33) 11 (10) 11 (233) 133 (8) 8 (15) 25 (45) 24 (60) 13 (32) 26 (4) 0 10th Street NE 11th Street NE LEGEND X (Y) AM (PM) Peak Hour East Jefferson Street Existing (2016) Apartments Peak Hour Traffic Volumes Charlottesville, Virginia Scale: Not to Scale Figure 2 10th Street NE 11th Street NE N 74 (43) 12 (12) 3 (14) 5 (10) 38 (41) 12 (3) Little High Street (11) 16 (45) 16 (10) 3 (57) 29 (3) 3 320 (272) (3) 62 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) Medical Driveway #1 (349) 217 (0) 0 Medical Medical Driveway #2 Driveway #3 258 (227) 27 (12) 35 (33) 51 (40) 49 (34) 33 (5) 3 (9) 5 (10) 21 (8) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 23 (36) 11 (9) 0 (0) 0 (0) 9 (5) 83 (57) 83 (57) E Jefferson Street (54) 21 (0) 0 (0) 0 (14) 5 (43) 13 (85) 57 (85) 57 (11) 12 (255) 145 (9) 9 (36) 16 (16) 27 (47) 27 (66) 14 (35) 36 (4) 0 10th Street NE 11th Street NE LEGEND X (Y) AM (PM) Peak Hour East Jefferson Street No Build (2019) Peak Hour Apartments Traffic Volumes Charlottesville, Virginia Scale: Not to Scale Figure 3 10th Street NE 11th Street NE N 30% 15% 15% Little High Street (15%) 30% 15% (30%) (45%) Site Driveway (15%) 10% 45% (10%) Site (5%) (5%) (15%) (30%) 5% E Jefferson 15% Street 15% 5% 30% 5% 30% 5% 10th Street NE 11th Street NE LEGEND X% (Y%) Entering (Exiting) Trip Distribution XX% Regional Trip Distribution East Jefferson Street Site Trip Distribution Apartments for Vehicles Charlottesville, Virginia Scale: Not to Scale Figure 4 10th Street NE 11th Street NE N 10% 10% 10% Little High Street (10%) 10% 10% (10%) (75%) Site Driveway (10%) 5% 75% (5%) Site (55%) (20%) (5%) E Jefferson 55% Street 55% 20% 5% 20% 5% 10th Street NE 11th Street NE LEGEND X% (Y%) Entering (Exiting) Trip Distribution XX% Regional Trip Distribution East Jefferson Street Site Trip Distribution Apartments for Peds / Bikes Charlottesville, Virginia Scale: Not to Scale Figure 5 10th Street NE 11th Street NE N 17 (11) Little High Street (8) 22 35 (22) 17 (11) 44 (16) 67 (25) Site Driveway (8) 22 (33) 53 (7) 12 (6) 15 Site 45 (17) 8 (3) 7 (3) 22 (8) 6 (3) E Jefferson Street (11) 18 (22) 35 (4) 6 10th Street NE 11th Street NE LEGEND X (Y) AM (PM) Peak Hour East Jefferson Street Site Trip Assignment for Vehicles Apartments Charlottesville, Virginia Scale: Not to Scale Figure 6 10th Street NE 11th Street NE N 91 (54) 12 (12) 3 (14) 5 (10) 38 (41) 12 (3) Little High Street (11) 16 (45) 16 (10) 3 (65) 51 (3) 3 (3) 62 320 (272) 94 (49) 17 (11) 35 (22) 44 (16) 67 (25) Site Driveway (8) 22 (7) 12 (70) 35 (349) 217 (33) 53 (6) 15 Site 303 (244) 57 (37) 19 (13) 49 (20) 35 (33) 51 (40) 33 (5) 9 (12) 21 (8) 23 (36) 11 (9) 9 (5) E Jefferson Street (65) 39 (14) 5 (43) 13 (36) 16 (16) 27 (51) 33 (4) 0 (11) 12 (277) 180 (9) 9 (66) 14 (35) 36 10th Street NE 11th Street NE LEGEND X (Y) AM (PM) Peak Hour East Jefferson Street Build (2019) Peak Hour Apartments Traffic Volumes Charlottesville, Virginia Scale: Not to Scale Figure 7 Remove Stop Control 10th Street NE 11th Street NE N Install Stop Control Little High Street Install Stop Control and Curb Bulbouts Remove Stop Control Site Driveway Existing Driveway Site Existing Driveway (To Be Removed) (To Be Removed) E Jefferson Street LEGEND 10th Street NE X' Storage (In Feet) 11th Street NE Existing Lane Proposed Lane Configuration Proposed Curb Bulbout East Jefferson Street Recommended Lane Configuration Apartments Charlottesville, Virginia Scale: Not to Scale Figure 8 East Jefferson Street Apartments - Charlottesville, VA Existing (2016) Conditions 1: 10th Street NE & E Jefferson Street Timing Plan: AM Peak Hour Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 3.2 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 19 12 13 10 19 47 11 133 8 32 236 25 Future Vol, veh/h 19 12 13 10 19 47 11 133 8 32 236 25 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 21 13 15 11 21 53 12 149 9 36 265 28 Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 567 534 279 544 544 154 293 0 0 158 0 0 Stage 1 351 351 - 179 179 - - - - - - - Stage 2 216 183 - 365 365 - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 4.12 - - 4.12 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 2.218 - - 2.218 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 434 452 760 450 446 892 1269 - - 1422 - - Stage 1 666 632 - 823 751 - - - - - - - Stage 2 786 748 - 654 623 - - - - - - - Platoon blocked, % - - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 381 434 760 418 428 892 1269 - - 1422 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 381 434 - 418 428 - - - - - - - Stage 1 659 613 - 815 743 - - - - - - - Stage 2 711 741 - 609 604 - - - - - - - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 13.7 11.6 0.6 0.8 HCM LOS B B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1269 - - 465 628 1422 - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.01 - - 0.106 0.136 0.025 - - HCM Control Delay (s) 7.9 0 - 13.7 11.6 7.6 0 - HCM Lane LOS A A - B B A A - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - 0.4 0.5 0.1 - - Synchro 9 Report RKA Page 1 East Jefferson Street Apartments - Charlottesville, VA Existing (2016) Conditions 2: 11th Street NE & E Jefferson Street Timing Plan: AM Peak Hour Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 4.7 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 5 11 26 8 21 3 25 24 1 5 45 30 Future Vol, veh/h 5 11 26 8 21 3 25 24 1 5 45 30 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 7 15 36 11 29 4 34 33 1 7 62 41 Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 214 199 82 223 218 34 103 0 0 34 0 0 Stage 1 96 96 - 102 102 - - - - - - - Stage 2 118 103 - 121 116 - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 4.12 - - 4.12 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 2.218 - - 2.218 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 743 697 978 733 680 1039 1489 - - 1578 - - Stage 1 911 815 - 904 811 - - - - - - - Stage 2 887 810 - 883 800 - - - - - - - Platoon blocked, % - - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 700 678 978 680 661 1039 1489 - - 1578 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 700 678 - 680 661 - - - - - - - Stage 1 890 811 - 883 792 - - - - - - - Stage 2 832 791 - 831 796 - - - - - - - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 9.6 10.6 3.7 0.5 HCM LOS A B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1489 - - 841 689 1578 - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.023 - - 0.068 0.064 0.004 - - HCM Control Delay (s) 7.5 0 - 9.6 10.6 7.3 0 - HCM Lane LOS A A - A B A A - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 - - 0.2 0.2 0 - - Synchro 9 Report RKA Page 2 East Jefferson Street Apartments - Charlottesville, VA Existing (2016) Conditions 3: 11th Street NE & Little High Street Timing Plan: AM Peak Hour Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 5.7 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 15 15 58 11 36 11 3 26 3 6 70 3 Future Vol, veh/h 15 15 58 11 36 11 3 26 3 6 70 3 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 22 22 84 16 52 16 4 38 4 9 101 4 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 68 0 0 106 0 0 252 207 64 220 241 60 Stage 1 - - - - - - 107 107 - 92 92 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 145 100 - 128 149 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 4.12 - - 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 2.218 - - 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1533 - - 1485 - - 701 690 1000 736 660 1005 Stage 1 - - - - - - 898 807 - 915 819 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 858 812 - 876 774 - Platoon blocked, % - - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1533 - - 1485 - - 602 672 1000 688 643 1005 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 602 672 - 688 643 - Stage 1 - - - - - - 885 795 - 901 810 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 739 803 - 818 762 - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 1.3 1.4 10.6 11.7 HCM LOS B B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 686 1533 - - 1485 - - 655 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.068 0.014 - - 0.011 - - 0.175 HCM Control Delay (s) 10.6 7.4 0 - 7.5 0 - 11.7 HCM Lane LOS B A A - A A - B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.2 0 - - 0 - - 0.6 Synchro 9 Report RKA Page 3 East Jefferson Street Apartments - Charlottesville, VA Existing (2016) Conditions 1: 10th Street NE & E Jefferson Street Timing Plan: PM Peak Hour Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 4.6 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 49 35 60 8 7 37 10 233 8 30 208 11 Future Vol, veh/h 49 35 60 8 7 37 10 233 8 30 208 11 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 54 38 66 9 8 41 11 256 9 33 229 12 Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 608 588 235 635 589 260 241 0 0 265 0 0 Stage 1 301 301 - 282 282 - - - - - - - Stage 2 307 287 - 353 307 - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 4.12 - - 4.12 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 2.218 - - 2.218 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 408 421 804 391 421 779 1326 - - 1299 - - Stage 1 708 665 - 725 678 - - - - - - - Stage 2 703 674 - 664 661 - - - - - - - Platoon blocked, % - - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 370 405 804 323 405 779 1326 - - 1299 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 370 405 - 323 405 - - - - - - - Stage 1 701 646 - 718 671 - - - - - - - Stage 2 652 667 - 557 642 - - - - - - - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 15.8 11.9 0.3 0.9 HCM LOS C B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1326 - - 491 581 1299 - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.008 - - 0.322 0.098 0.025 - - HCM Control Delay (s) 7.7 0 - 15.8 11.9 7.8 0 - HCM Lane LOS A A - C B A A - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - 1.4 0.3 0.1 - - Synchro 9 Report RKA Page 1 East Jefferson Street Apartments - Charlottesville, VA Existing (2016) Conditions 2: 11th Street NE & E Jefferson Street Timing Plan: PM Peak Hour Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 6 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 13 33 32 5 27 8 15 45 4 9 32 5 Future Vol, veh/h 13 33 32 5 27 8 15 45 4 9 32 5 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 16 41 40 6 34 10 19 56 5 11 40 6 Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 184 165 43 202 165 59 46 0 0 61 0 0 Stage 1 66 66 - 96 96 - - - - - - - Stage 2 118 99 - 106 69 - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 4.12 - - 4.12 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 2.218 - - 2.218 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 777 728 1027 756 728 1007 1562 - - 1542 - - Stage 1 945 840 - 911 815 - - - - - - - Stage 2 887 813 - 900 837 - - - - - - - Platoon blocked, % - - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 730 714 1027 684 714 1007 1562 - - 1542 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 730 714 - 684 714 - - - - - - - Stage 1 933 834 - 899 804 - - - - - - - Stage 2 830 802 - 816 831 - - - - - - - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 10 10.1 1.7 1.4 HCM LOS B B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1562 - - 819 754 1542 - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.012 - - 0.119 0.066 0.007 - - HCM Control Delay (s) 7.3 0 - 10 10.1 7.4 0 - HCM Lane LOS A A - B B A A - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - 0.4 0.2 0 - - Synchro 9 Report RKA Page 2 East Jefferson Street Apartments - Charlottesville, VA Existing (2016) Conditions 3: 11th Street NE & Little High Street Timing Plan: PM Peak Hour Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 6 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 10 42 3 3 39 11 9 54 3 9 40 13 Future Vol, veh/h 10 42 3 3 39 11 9 54 3 9 40 13 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 13 53 4 4 49 14 11 68 4 11 50 16 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 63 0 0 56 0 0 175 149 54 178 144 56 Stage 1 - - - - - - 79 79 - 63 63 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 96 70 - 115 81 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 4.12 - - 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 2.218 - - 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1540 - - 1549 - - 788 743 1013 784 747 1011 Stage 1 - - - - - - 930 829 - 948 842 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 911 837 - 890 828 - Platoon blocked, % - - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1540 - - 1549 - - 729 734 1013 720 738 1011 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 729 734 - 720 738 - Stage 1 - - - - - - 922 822 - 939 839 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 840 834 - 807 821 - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 1.3 0.4 10.5 10.1 HCM LOS B B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 743 1540 - - 1549 - - 779 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.111 0.008 - - 0.002 - - 0.099 HCM Control Delay (s) 10.5 7.4 0 - 7.3 0 - 10.1 HCM Lane LOS B A A - A A - B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.4 0 - - 0 - - 0.3 Synchro 9 Report RKA Page 3 East Jefferson Street Apartments - Charlottesville, VA No-Build (2019) Conditions 1: 10th Street NE & E Jefferson Street Timing Plan: AM Peak Hour Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 3.4 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 21 13 14 11 21 51 12 145 9 35 258 27 Future Vol, veh/h 21 13 14 11 21 51 12 145 9 35 258 27 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 24 15 16 12 24 57 13 163 10 39 290 30 Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 619 584 305 594 594 168 320 0 0 173 0 0 Stage 1 384 384 - 195 195 - - - - - - - Stage 2 235 200 - 399 399 - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 4.12 - - 4.12 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 2.218 - - 2.218 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 401 423 735 417 418 876 1240 - - 1404 - - Stage 1 639 611 - 807 739 - - - - - - - Stage 2 768 736 - 627 602 - - - - - - - Platoon blocked, % - - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 345 404 735 383 399 876 1240 - - 1404 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 345 404 - 383 399 - - - - - - - Stage 1 631 590 - 797 730 - - - - - - - Stage 2 686 727 - 578 582 - - - - - - - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 14.6 12.2 0.6 0.8 HCM LOS B B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1240 - - 428 595 1404 - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.011 - - 0.126 0.157 0.028 - - HCM Control Delay (s) 7.9 0 - 14.6 12.2 7.6 0 - HCM Lane LOS A A - B B A A - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - 0.4 0.6 0.1 - - Synchro 9 Report RKA Page 1 East Jefferson Street Apartments - Charlottesville, VA No-Build (2019) Conditions 2: 11th Street NE & E Jefferson Street Timing Plan: AM Peak Hour Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 5 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 5 16 36 9 23 3 27 27 1 5 49 33 Future Vol, veh/h 5 16 36 9 23 3 27 27 1 5 49 33 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 7 22 49 12 32 4 37 37 1 7 67 45 Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 232 215 90 251 238 38 112 0 0 38 0 0 Stage 1 103 103 - 112 112 - - - - - - - Stage 2 129 112 - 139 126 - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 4.12 - - 4.12 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 2.218 - - 2.218 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 723 683 968 702 663 1034 1478 - - 1572 - - Stage 1 903 810 - 893 803 - - - - - - - Stage 2 875 803 - 864 792 - - - - - - - Platoon blocked, % - - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 677 662 968 634 643 1034 1478 - - 1572 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 677 662 - 634 643 - - - - - - - Stage 1 880 806 - 870 782 - - - - - - - Stage 2 815 782 - 794 788 - - - - - - - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 9.8 10.9 3.7 0.4 HCM LOS A B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1478 - - 829 662 1572 - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.025 - - 0.094 0.072 0.004 - - HCM Control Delay (s) 7.5 0 - 9.8 10.9 7.3 0 - HCM Lane LOS A A - A B A A - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 - - 0.3 0.2 0 - - Synchro 9 Report RKA Page 2 East Jefferson Street Apartments - Charlottesville, VA No-Build (2019) Conditions 3: 11th Street NE & Little High Street Timing Plan: AM Peak Hour Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 5.7 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 16 16 62 12 38 12 3 29 3 5 74 3 Future Vol, veh/h 16 16 62 12 38 12 3 29 3 5 74 3 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 23 23 90 17 55 17 4 42 4 7 107 4 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 72 0 0 113 0 0 268 221 68 237 258 64 Stage 1 - - - - - - 114 114 - 99 99 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 154 107 - 138 159 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 4.12 - - 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 2.218 - - 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1528 - - 1476 - - 685 678 995 717 646 1000 Stage 1 - - - - - - 891 801 - 907 813 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 848 807 - 865 766 - Platoon blocked, % - - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1528 - - 1476 - - 580 659 995 665 628 1000 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 580 659 - 665 628 - Stage 1 - - - - - - 877 788 - 892 803 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 723 797 - 802 754 - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 1.3 1.4 10.8 11.9 HCM LOS B B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 671 1528 - - 1476 - - 639 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.076 0.015 - - 0.012 - - 0.186 HCM Control Delay (s) 10.8 7.4 0 - 7.5 0 - 11.9 HCM Lane LOS B A A - A A - B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.2 0 - - 0 - - 0.7 Synchro 9 Report RKA Page 3 East Jefferson Street Apartments - Charlottesville, VA No-Build (2019) Conditions 1: 10th Street NE & E Jefferson Street Timing Plan: PM Peak Hour Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 5.2 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 54 43 66 9 8 40 11 255 9 33 227 12 Future Vol, veh/h 54 43 66 9 8 40 11 255 9 33 227 12 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 59 47 73 10 9 44 12 280 10 36 249 13 Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 665 643 256 697 644 285 263 0 0 290 0 0 Stage 1 329 329 - 309 309 - - - - - - - Stage 2 336 314 - 388 335 - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 4.12 - - 4.12 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 2.218 - - 2.218 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 374 392 783 356 391 754 1301 - - 1272 - - Stage 1 684 646 - 701 660 - - - - - - - Stage 2 678 656 - 636 643 - - - - - - - Platoon blocked, % - - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 334 375 783 282 374 754 1301 - - 1272 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 334 375 - 282 374 - - - - - - - Stage 1 676 625 - 693 653 - - - - - - - Stage 2 623 649 - 516 622 - - - - - - - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 18.1 12.6 0.3 1 HCM LOS C B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1301 - - 452 536 1272 - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.009 - - 0.396 0.117 0.029 - - HCM Control Delay (s) 7.8 0 - 18.1 12.6 7.9 0 - HCM Lane LOS A A - C B A A - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - 1.9 0.4 0.1 - - Synchro 9 Report RKA Page 1 East Jefferson Street Apartments - Charlottesville, VA No-Build (2019) Conditions 2: 11th Street NE & E Jefferson Street Timing Plan: PM Peak Hour Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 6.2 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 14 36 35 5 36 9 16 47 4 10 34 5 Future Vol, veh/h 14 36 35 5 36 9 16 47 4 10 34 5 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 18 45 44 6 45 11 20 59 5 13 43 6 Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 200 175 46 216 175 61 49 0 0 64 0 0 Stage 1 71 71 - 101 101 - - - - - - - Stage 2 129 104 - 115 74 - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 4.12 - - 4.12 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 2.218 - - 2.218 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 759 718 1023 740 718 1004 1558 - - 1538 - - Stage 1 939 836 - 905 811 - - - - - - - Stage 2 875 809 - 890 833 - - - - - - - Platoon blocked, % - - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 702 702 1023 663 702 1004 1558 - - 1538 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 702 702 - 663 702 - - - - - - - Stage 1 927 828 - 893 800 - - - - - - - Stage 2 806 798 - 798 826 - - - - - - - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 10.1 10.3 1.8 1.5 HCM LOS B B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1558 - - 806 738 1538 - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.013 - - 0.132 0.085 0.008 - - HCM Control Delay (s) 7.3 0 - 10.1 10.3 7.4 0 - HCM Lane LOS A A - B B A A - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - 0.5 0.3 0 - - Synchro 9 Report RKA Page 2 East Jefferson Street Apartments - Charlottesville, VA No-Build (2019) Conditions 3: 11th Street NE & Little High Steet Timing Plan: PM Peak Hour Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 6.1 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 11 45 3 3 41 12 10 57 3 10 43 14 Future Vol, veh/h 11 45 3 3 41 12 10 57 3 10 43 14 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 14 56 4 4 51 15 13 71 4 13 54 18 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 66 0 0 60 0 0 188 160 58 189 154 59 Stage 1 - - - - - - 86 86 - 66 66 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 102 74 - 123 88 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 4.12 - - 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 2.218 - - 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1536 - - 1544 - - 772 732 1008 771 738 1007 Stage 1 - - - - - - 922 824 - 945 840 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 904 833 - 881 822 - Platoon blocked, % - - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1536 - - 1544 - - 709 723 1008 704 729 1007 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 709 723 - 704 729 - Stage 1 - - - - - - 914 817 - 936 837 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 829 831 - 794 815 - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 1.4 0.4 10.6 10.3 HCM LOS B B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 730 1536 - - 1544 - - 769 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.12 0.009 - - 0.002 - - 0.109 HCM Control Delay (s) 10.6 7.4 0 - 7.3 0 - 10.3 HCM Lane LOS B A A - A A - B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.4 0 - - 0 - - 0.4 Synchro 9 Report RKA Page 3 East Jefferson Street Apartments - Charlottesville, VA Build (2019) Conditions 1: 10th Street NE & E Jefferson Street Timing Plan: AM Peak Hour Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 3.6 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 39 13 14 11 21 51 12 180 9 35 303 49 Future Vol, veh/h 39 13 14 11 21 51 12 180 9 35 303 49 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 44 15 16 12 24 57 13 202 10 39 340 55 Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 722 686 368 696 708 207 396 0 0 212 0 0 Stage 1 447 447 - 234 234 - - - - - - - Stage 2 275 239 - 462 474 - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 4.12 - - 4.12 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 2.218 - - 2.218 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 342 370 677 356 360 833 1163 - - 1358 - - Stage 1 591 573 - 769 711 - - - - - - - Stage 2 731 708 - 580 558 - - - - - - - Platoon blocked, % - - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 290 352 677 324 342 833 1163 - - 1358 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 290 352 - 324 342 - - - - - - - Stage 1 583 552 - 759 702 - - - - - - - Stage 2 649 699 - 531 537 - - - - - - - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 18.3 13.2 0.5 0.7 HCM LOS C B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1163 - - 344 530 1358 - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.012 - - 0.216 0.176 0.029 - - HCM Control Delay (s) 8.1 0 - 18.3 13.2 7.7 0 - HCM Lane LOS A A - C B A A - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - 0.8 0.6 0.1 - - Synchro 9 Report RKA Page 1 East Jefferson Street Apartments - Charlottesville, VA Build (2019) Conditions 2: 11th Street NE & E Jefferson Street Timing Plan: AM Peak Hour Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 5.1 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 5 16 36 9 23 9 27 33 1 19 57 33 Future Vol, veh/h 5 16 36 9 23 9 27 33 1 19 57 33 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 7 22 49 12 32 12 37 45 1 26 78 45 Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 295 274 101 308 295 46 123 0 0 47 0 0 Stage 1 153 153 - 120 120 - - - - - - - Stage 2 142 121 - 188 175 - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 4.12 - - 4.12 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 2.218 - - 2.218 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 657 633 954 644 616 1023 1464 - - 1560 - - Stage 1 849 771 - 884 796 - - - - - - - Stage 2 861 796 - 814 754 - - - - - - - Platoon blocked, % - - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 602 605 954 574 589 1023 1464 - - 1560 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 602 605 - 574 589 - - - - - - - Stage 1 827 757 - 861 775 - - - - - - - Stage 2 795 775 - 736 740 - - - - - - - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 10.1 11.1 3.3 1.3 HCM LOS B B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1464 - - 786 645 1560 - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.025 - - 0.099 0.087 0.017 - - HCM Control Delay (s) 7.5 0 - 10.1 11.1 7.3 0 - HCM Lane LOS A A - B B A A - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 - - 0.3 0.3 0.1 - - Synchro 9 Report RKA Page 2 East Jefferson Street Apartments - Charlottesville, VA Build (2019) Conditions 3: 11th Street NE & Little High Steet Timing Plan: AM Peak Hour Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 5.5 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 16 16 62 12 38 12 3 51 3 5 91 3 Future Vol, veh/h 16 16 62 12 38 12 3 51 3 5 91 3 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 23 23 90 17 55 17 4 74 4 7 132 4 Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 270 236 134 290 236 76 136 0 0 78 0 0 Stage 1 149 149 - 85 85 - - - - - - - Stage 2 121 87 - 205 151 - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 4.12 - - 4.12 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 2.218 - - 2.218 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 683 665 915 662 665 985 1448 - - 1520 - - Stage 1 854 774 - 923 824 - - - - - - - Stage 2 883 823 - 797 772 - - - - - - - Platoon blocked, % - - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 624 660 915 577 660 985 1448 - - 1520 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 624 660 - 577 660 - - - - - - - Stage 1 851 770 - 920 822 - - - - - - - Stage 2 807 821 - 694 768 - - - - - - - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 10.4 11 0.4 0.4 HCM LOS B B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1448 - - 799 685 1520 - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.003 - - 0.171 0.131 0.005 - - HCM Control Delay (s) 7.5 0 - 10.4 11 7.4 0 - HCM Lane LOS A A - B B A A - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - 0.6 0.5 0 - - Synchro 9 Report RKA Page 3 East Jefferson Street Apartments - Charlottesville, VA Build (2019) Conditions 4: 10th Street NE & Access Road Timing Plan: AM Peak Hour Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 2.6 Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 67 44 217 53 35 320 Future Vol, veh/h 67 44 217 53 35 320 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 0 - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0 Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 73 48 236 58 38 348 Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 689 265 0 0 293 0 Stage 1 265 - - - - - Stage 2 424 - - - - - Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 - - 4.12 - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 - - 2.218 - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 412 774 - - 1269 - Stage 1 779 - - - - - Stage 2 660 - - - - - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 397 774 - - 1269 - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 397 - - - - - Stage 1 779 - - - - - Stage 2 636 - - - - - Approach WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 14.7 0 0.8 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1 SBL SBT Capacity (veh/h) - - 492 1269 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.245 0.03 - HCM Control Delay (s) - - 14.7 7.9 0 HCM Lane LOS - - B A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - - 1 0.1 - Synchro 9 Report RKA Page 4 East Jefferson Street Apartments - Charlottesville, VA Build (2019) Conditions 5: 11th Street NE & Access Road Timing Plan: AM Peak Hour Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 2.2 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 22 15 12 35 94 17 Future Vol, veh/h 22 15 12 35 94 17 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 0 - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 24 16 13 38 102 18 Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 175 111 121 0 - 0 Stage 1 111 - - - - - Stage 2 64 - - - - - Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 4.12 - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 2.218 - - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 815 942 1467 - - - Stage 1 914 - - - - - Stage 2 959 - - - - - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 808 942 1467 - - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 808 - - - - - Stage 1 914 - - - - - Stage 2 950 - - - - - Approach EB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 9.4 1.9 0 HCM LOS A Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1467 - 857 - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.009 - 0.047 - - HCM Control Delay (s) 7.5 0 9.4 - - HCM Lane LOS A A A - - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - 0.1 - - Synchro 9 Report RKA Page 5 East Jefferson Street Apartments - Charlottesville, VA Build (2019) Conditions 1: 10th Street NE & E Jefferson Street Timing Plan: PM Peak Hour Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 5.7 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 65 43 66 9 8 40 11 277 9 33 244 20 Future Vol, veh/h 65 43 66 9 8 40 11 277 9 33 244 20 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 71 47 73 10 9 44 12 304 10 36 268 22 Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 712 690 279 746 697 309 290 0 0 314 0 0 Stage 1 352 352 - 334 334 - - - - - - - Stage 2 360 338 - 412 363 - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 4.12 - - 4.12 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 2.218 - - 2.218 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 347 368 760 330 365 731 1272 - - 1246 - - Stage 1 665 632 - 680 643 - - - - - - - Stage 2 658 641 - 617 625 - - - - - - - Platoon blocked, % - - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 309 351 760 259 348 731 1272 - - 1246 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 309 351 - 259 348 - - - - - - - Stage 1 658 610 - 673 636 - - - - - - - Stage 2 603 634 - 497 603 - - - - - - - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 20.9 13.1 0.3 0.9 HCM LOS C B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1272 - - 415 507 1246 - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.01 - - 0.461 0.124 0.029 - - HCM Control Delay (s) 7.9 0 - 20.9 13.1 8 0 - HCM Lane LOS A A - C B A A - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - 2.4 0.4 0.1 - - Synchro 9 Report RKA Page 1 East Jefferson Street Apartments - Charlottesville, VA Build (2019) Conditions 2: 11th Street NE & E Jefferson Street Timing Plan: PM Peak Hour Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 6.2 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 14 36 35 5 36 12 16 51 4 13 37 5 Future Vol, veh/h 14 36 35 5 36 12 16 51 4 13 37 5 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 18 45 44 6 45 15 20 64 5 16 46 6 Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 218 191 49 232 191 66 53 0 0 69 0 0 Stage 1 82 82 - 106 106 - - - - - - - Stage 2 136 109 - 126 85 - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 4.12 - - 4.12 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 2.218 - - 2.218 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 738 704 1020 723 704 998 1553 - - 1532 - - Stage 1 926 827 - 900 807 - - - - - - - Stage 2 867 805 - 878 824 - - - - - - - Platoon blocked, % - - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 678 687 1020 646 687 998 1553 - - 1532 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 678 687 - 646 687 - - - - - - - Stage 1 914 818 - 888 797 - - - - - - - Stage 2 795 795 - 785 815 - - - - - - - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 10.2 10.4 1.7 1.7 HCM LOS B B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1553 - - 792 734 1532 - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.013 - - 0.134 0.09 0.011 - - HCM Control Delay (s) 7.3 0 - 10.2 10.4 7.4 0 - HCM Lane LOS A A - B B A A - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - 0.5 0.3 0 - - Synchro 9 Report RKA Page 2 East Jefferson Street Apartments - Charlottesville, VA Build (2019) Conditions 3: 11th Street NE & Little High Street Timing Plan: PM Peak Hour Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 5.1 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 11 45 3 3 41 12 10 65 3 10 54 14 Future Vol, veh/h 11 45 3 3 41 12 10 65 3 10 54 14 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 14 56 4 4 51 15 13 81 4 13 68 18 Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 242 211 76 239 218 83 85 0 0 85 0 0 Stage 1 101 101 - 108 108 - - - - - - - Stage 2 141 110 - 131 110 - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 4.12 - - 4.12 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 2.218 - - 2.218 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 712 686 985 715 680 976 1512 - - 1512 - - Stage 1 905 811 - 897 806 - - - - - - - Stage 2 862 804 - 873 804 - - - - - - - Platoon blocked, % - - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 651 674 985 658 668 976 1512 - - 1512 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 651 674 - 658 668 - - - - - - - Stage 1 897 804 - 889 799 - - - - - - - Stage 2 787 797 - 802 797 - - - - - - - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 10.9 10.6 0.9 0.9 HCM LOS B B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1512 - - 680 716 1512 - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.008 - - 0.108 0.098 0.008 - - HCM Control Delay (s) 7.4 0 - 10.9 10.6 7.4 0 - HCM Lane LOS A A - B B A A - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - 0.4 0.3 0 - - Synchro 9 Report RKA Page 3 East Jefferson Street Apartments - Charlottesville, VA Build (2019) Conditions 4: 10th Street NE & Access Road Timing Plan: PM Peak Hour Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 1 Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 25 16 349 33 22 272 Future Vol, veh/h 25 16 349 33 22 272 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 0 - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0 Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 27 17 379 36 24 296 Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 740 397 0 0 415 0 Stage 1 397 - - - - - Stage 2 343 - - - - - Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 - - 4.12 - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 - - 2.218 - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 384 652 - - 1144 - Stage 1 679 - - - - - Stage 2 719 - - - - - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 374 652 - - 1144 - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 374 - - - - - Stage 1 679 - - - - - Stage 2 701 - - - - - Approach WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 13.9 0 0.6 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1 SBL SBT Capacity (veh/h) - - 449 1144 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.099 0.021 - HCM Control Delay (s) - - 13.9 8.2 0 HCM Lane LOS - - B A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - - 0.3 0.1 - Synchro 9 Report RKA Page 4 East Jefferson Street Apartments - Charlottesville, VA Build (2019) Conditions 5: 11th Street NE & Access Road Timing Plan: PM Peak Hour Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 1.2 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 8 6 7 70 49 11 Future Vol, veh/h 8 6 7 70 49 11 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 0 - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 9 7 8 76 53 12 Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 150 59 65 0 - 0 Stage 1 59 - - - - - Stage 2 91 - - - - - Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 4.12 - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 2.218 - - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 842 1007 1537 - - - Stage 1 964 - - - - - Stage 2 933 - - - - - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 838 1007 1537 - - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 838 - - - - - Stage 1 964 - - - - - Stage 2 928 - - - - - Approach EB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 9.1 0.7 0 HCM LOS A Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1537 - 903 - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.005 - 0.017 - - HCM Control Delay (s) 7.4 0 9.1 - - HCM Lane LOS A A A - - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - 0.1 - - Synchro 9 Report RKA Page 5 Ramey Kemp & Associates 4343 Cox Road Glen Allen, Virginia 23060 File Name : Jefferson at 10th - AM Counted By: Lee Site Code : 00000002 Weather: Clear Start Date : 9/14/2016 Equipment ID: 4792 Page No :1 Groups Printed- Cars + Trucks 10 th Street E Jefferson Street 10 th Street E Jefferson Street Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound Start Time Right Thru Left U-Turns App. Total Right Thru Left U-Turns App. Total Right Thru Left U-Turns App. Total Right Thru Left U-Turns App. Total Int. Total 07:00 AM 0 20 2 0 22 1 1 0 0 2 0 12 2 0 14 0 0 4 0 4 42 07:15 AM 3 28 2 0 33 3 1 2 0 6 4 19 1 0 24 0 0 1 0 1 64 07:30 AM 4 27 5 0 36 3 1 2 0 6 1 30 1 0 32 1 4 1 0 6 80 07:45 AM 11 57 6 0 74 2 1 1 0 4 1 23 1 0 25 2 4 2 0 8 111 Total 18 132 15 0 165 9 4 5 0 18 6 84 5 0 95 3 8 8 0 19 297 08:00 AM 5 51 6 0 62 8 2 2 0 12 1 34 3 0 38 0 3 2 0 5 117 08:15 AM 7 52 9 0 68 21 6 2 0 29 4 39 0 0 43 5 4 8 0 17 157 08:30 AM 8 58 9 0 75 9 6 4 0 19 1 31 6 0 38 4 1 3 0 8 140 08:45 AM 5 75 8 0 88 2 5 2 0 9 2 29 2 0 33 4 4 6 0 14 144 Total 25 236 32 0 293 40 19 10 0 69 8 133 11 0 152 13 12 19 0 44 558 Grand Total 43 368 47 0 458 49 23 15 0 87 14 217 16 0 247 16 20 27 0 63 855 Apprch % 9.4 80.3 10.3 0 56.3 26.4 17.2 0 5.7 87.9 6.5 0 25.4 31.7 42.9 0 Total % 5 43 5.5 0 53.6 5.7 2.7 1.8 0 10.2 1.6 25.4 1.9 0 28.9 1.9 2.3 3.2 0 7.4 10 th Street Out In Total 293 458 751 43 368 47 0 Right Thru Left U-Turns 145 27 Right Thru Total Left Out 49 81 E Jefferson Street E Jefferson Street North 20 U-Turns Right Thru 63 23 In In 9/14/2016 07:00 AM 87 16 Left U-Turns 9/14/2016 08:45 AM 15 82 Cars + Trucks Out Total 0 168 0 Left Thru Right U-Turns 16 217 14 0 399 247 646 Out In Total 10 th Street Ramey Kemp & Associates 4343 Cox Road Glen Allen, Virginia 23060 File Name : Jefferson at 10th - PM Counted By: Lee Site Code : 00000001 Weather: Clear Start Date : 9/13/2016 Equipment ID: 4791 Page No :1 Groups Printed- Cars + Trucks 10 th Street E Jefferson Street 10th Street E Jefferson Street Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound Start Time Right Thru Left U-Turns App. Total Right Thru Left U-Turns App. Total Right Thru Left U-Turns App. Total Right Thru Left U-Turns App. Total Int. Total 04:00 PM 5 32 2 0 39 7 4 3 0 14 0 40 3 0 43 16 8 5 0 29 125 04:15 PM 5 45 3 0 53 3 3 3 0 9 1 43 1 0 45 6 2 8 0 16 123 04:30 PM 3 33 8 0 44 10 6 7 0 23 2 44 0 0 46 13 8 12 0 33 146 04:45 PM 6 41 4 0 51 9 2 3 0 14 3 47 5 0 55 10 6 9 0 25 145 Total 19 151 17 0 187 29 15 16 0 60 6 174 9 0 189 45 24 34 0 103 539 05:00 PM 2 47 6 0 55 14 3 3 0 20 2 63 3 0 68 21 10 15 0 46 189 05:15 PM 2 60 7 0 69 5 1 2 0 8 0 66 0 0 66 11 6 12 0 29 172 05:30 PM 1 60 8 0 69 9 1 0 0 10 2 57 2 0 61 18 7 13 0 38 178 05:45 PM 1 47 4 0 52 6 3 2 0 11 5 56 0 0 61 7 5 4 0 16 140 Total 6 214 25 0 245 34 8 7 0 49 9 242 5 0 256 57 28 44 0 129 679 Grand Total 25 365 42 0 432 63 23 23 0 109 15 416 14 0 445 102 52 78 0 232 1218 Apprch % 5.8 84.5 9.7 0 57.8 21.1 21.1 0 3.4 93.5 3.1 0 44 22.4 33.6 0 Total % 2.1 30 3.4 0 35.5 5.2 1.9 1.9 0 8.9 1.2 34.2 1.1 0 36.5 8.4 4.3 6.4 0 19 10 th Street Out In Total 557 432 989 25 365 42 0 Right Thru Left U-Turns 294 78 Right Thru Total Left Out 63 109 E Jefferson Street E Jefferson Street North 52 U-Turns Right Thru 232 23 In In 109 9/13/2016 04:00 PM 102 Left U-Turns 9/13/2016 05:45 PM 23 62 Cars + Trucks Out Total 0 218 0 Left Thru Right U-Turns 14 416 15 0 490 445 935 Out In Total 10th Street Ramey Kemp & Associates 4343 Cox Road Glen Allen, Virginia 23060 File Name : Charlottesville(Jefferson and 11th) AM Peak Counted By: Site Code : Burns Service, Inc. Start Date : 9/14/2016 Page No :1 Groups Printed- Cars + 11th Street Jefferson Street 11th Street Jefferson Street Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound Start Time Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Int. Total 07:00 AM 3 4 0 0 7 0 1 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 2 1 0 1 0 2 12 07:15 AM 2 5 0 0 7 1 2 0 0 3 2 1 3 0 6 2 1 1 1 5 21 07:30 AM 1 5 1 1 8 1 2 1 0 4 0 3 4 0 7 3 5 0 0 8 27 07:45 AM 1 4 0 1 6 4 5 1 0 10 0 3 0 0 3 8 1 1 0 10 29 Total 7 18 1 2 28 6 10 2 0 18 4 7 7 0 18 14 7 3 1 25 89 08:00 AM 6 3 2 0 11 1 4 3 0 8 0 5 6 3 14 3 4 3 3 13 46 08:15 AM 12 25 0 1 38 1 6 3 3 13 0 3 11 2 16 6 1 1 1 9 76 08:30 AM 12 11 1 1 25 0 7 2 0 9 0 6 3 3 12 5 2 0 0 7 53 08:45 AM 0 6 2 4 12 1 4 0 0 5 0 10 5 1 16 10 4 1 0 15 48 Total 30 45 5 6 86 3 21 8 3 35 0 24 25 9 58 24 11 5 4 44 223 Grand Total 37 63 6 8 114 9 31 10 3 53 4 31 32 9 76 38 18 8 5 69 312 Apprch % 32.5 55.3 5.3 7 17 58.5 18.9 5.7 5.3 40.8 42.1 11.8 55.1 26.1 11.6 7.2 Total % 11.9 20.2 1.9 2.6 36.5 2.9 9.9 3.2 1 17 1.3 9.9 10.3 2.9 24.4 12.2 5.8 2.6 1.6 22.1 11th Street Out In Total 48 114 162 37 63 6 8 Right Thru Left Peds 169 8 Right Thru Total Left Out 9 28 Jefferson Street Jefferson Street North 18 Peds Right Thru 69 31 In In 9/14/2016 07:00 AM 53 38 Left Peds 9/14/2016 08:45 AM 10 100 Cars + Out Total 5 81 3 Left Thru Right Peds 32 31 4 9 111 76 187 Out In Total 11th Street Ramey Kemp & Associates 4343 Cox Road Glen Allen, Virginia 23060 File Name : Charlottesville(Jefferson and 11th) PM Peak Counted By: Site Code : Burns Service, Inc. Start Date : 9/14/2016 Page No :1 Groups Printed- Cars + 11th Street Jefferson Street 11th Street Jefferson Street Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound Start Time Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Int. Total 04:00 PM 2 2 1 0 5 3 7 0 0 10 1 3 2 1 7 3 6 1 1 11 33 04:15 PM 2 7 2 1 12 3 5 0 0 8 2 2 1 1 6 3 4 3 0 10 36 04:30 PM 0 7 1 1 9 2 8 1 0 11 1 10 2 0 13 6 9 2 0 17 50 04:45 PM 1 7 2 1 11 3 8 1 0 12 0 8 2 1 11 8 7 4 1 20 54 Total 5 23 6 3 37 11 28 2 0 41 4 23 7 3 37 20 26 10 2 58 173 05:00 PM 3 10 1 1 15 3 6 3 0 12 3 9 6 2 20 11 8 5 1 25 72 05:15 PM 1 8 5 0 14 0 4 0 0 4 0 12 5 1 18 7 9 2 0 18 54 05:30 PM 2 8 0 0 10 1 6 3 0 10 1 5 6 0 12 3 13 0 0 16 48 05:45 PM 1 6 1 2 10 1 4 2 0 7 0 5 2 0 7 3 7 2 0 12 36 Total 7 32 7 3 49 5 20 8 0 33 4 31 19 3 57 24 37 9 1 71 210 Grand Total 12 55 13 6 86 16 48 10 0 74 8 54 26 6 94 44 63 19 3 129 383 Apprch % 14 64 15.1 7 21.6 64.9 13.5 0 8.5 57.4 27.7 6.4 34.1 48.8 14.7 2.3 Total % 3.1 14.4 3.4 1.6 22.5 4.2 12.5 2.6 0 19.3 2.1 14.1 6.8 1.6 24.5 11.5 16.4 5 0.8 33.7 11th Street Out In Total 89 86 175 12 55 13 6 Right Thru Left Peds 215 19 Right Thru Total Left Out 16 84 Jefferson Street Jefferson Street North 63 Peds Right Thru 129 48 In In 9/14/2016 04:00 PM 74 44 Left Peds 9/14/2016 05:45 PM 10 86 Cars + Out Total 3 158 0 Left Thru Right Peds 26 54 8 6 109 94 203 Out In Total 11th Street Burns Service Inc. 1202 Langdon Terrace Drive Raleigh, NC, 27615 File Name : charlottesville(little high and 11th) 14 hour count Site Code : Start Date : 5/10/2017 Page No :1 Groups Printed- Cars + - Trucks 11th Street Little High Street 11th Street Little High Street Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound Start Time Right Thru Left App. Total Right Thru Left App. Total Right Thru Left App. Total Right Thru Left App. Total Int. Total 06:00 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 06:15 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 06:30 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 06:45 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 4 Total 0 1 0 1 0 3 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 0 0 0 8 07:00 0 4 0 4 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 2 0 1 0 1 8 07:15 1 8 0 9 2 5 0 7 0 4 0 4 1 1 0 2 22 07:30 2 10 0 12 2 6 0 8 0 5 0 5 1 3 0 4 29 07:45 0 8 3 11 5 7 1 13 1 1 1 3 6 5 0 11 38 Total 3 30 3 36 9 19 1 29 2 11 1 14 8 10 0 18 97 08:00 0 11 3 14 1 8 3 12 0 5 1 6 16 3 5 24 56 08:15 2 27 0 29 4 10 3 17 0 7 1 8 28 5 5 38 92 08:30 0 24 3 27 2 4 2 8 2 6 0 8 9 5 4 18 61 08:45 1 8 0 9 4 14 3 21 1 5 1 7 5 2 1 8 45 Total 3 70 6 79 11 36 11 58 3 23 3 29 58 15 15 88 254 09:00 2 5 3 10 0 4 1 5 1 7 1 9 0 5 1 6 30 09:15 1 8 1 10 0 5 0 5 0 9 2 11 2 3 1 6 32 09:30 0 8 0 8 1 4 1 6 0 2 1 3 1 3 1 5 22 09:45 2 10 1 13 2 7 0 9 0 9 0 9 3 4 4 11 42 Total 5 31 5 41 3 20 2 25 1 27 4 32 6 15 7 28 126 10:00 1 6 0 7 1 5 2 8 0 4 1 5 1 3 2 6 26 10:15 0 6 1 7 1 4 0 5 1 7 2 10 0 2 3 5 27 10:30 2 8 0 10 2 3 0 5 0 9 1 10 1 2 1 4 29 10:45 1 4 1 6 2 8 0 10 1 7 1 9 0 4 0 4 29 Total 4 24 2 30 6 20 2 28 2 27 5 34 2 11 6 19 111 11:00 2 6 0 8 2 2 0 4 2 7 1 10 0 4 0 4 26 11:15 1 6 0 7 0 4 0 4 2 4 3 9 2 1 2 5 25 11:30 0 5 0 5 0 2 0 2 1 10 1 12 1 2 1 4 23 11:45 1 7 2 10 1 3 0 4 1 5 1 7 2 5 1 8 29 Total 4 24 2 30 3 11 0 14 6 26 6 38 5 12 4 21 103 12:00 1 6 2 9 4 6 0 10 1 8 1 10 2 12 4 18 47 12:15 3 4 1 8 1 6 0 7 0 17 3 20 3 5 2 10 45 12:30 1 11 1 13 2 8 0 10 0 12 0 12 1 5 1 7 42 12:45 3 5 0 8 0 3 2 5 1 10 1 12 2 6 3 11 36 Total 8 26 4 38 7 23 2 32 2 47 5 54 8 28 10 46 170 13:00 0 10 0 10 2 3 0 5 1 8 0 9 2 3 0 5 29 13:15 2 24 3 29 2 5 0 7 3 10 1 14 11 9 2 22 72 13:30 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 2 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 5 13:45 2 11 0 13 2 7 0 9 1 8 0 9 3 5 1 9 40 Total 4 46 3 53 6 17 0 23 5 27 1 33 16 18 3 37 146 14:00 2 7 3 12 2 3 1 6 1 5 0 6 0 4 0 4 28 14:15 1 6 0 7 0 2 1 3 1 10 0 11 4 7 1 12 33 14:30 2 7 2 11 0 1 0 1 0 4 4 8 2 4 1 7 27 14:45 3 6 0 9 3 1 0 4 0 8 1 9 0 3 1 4 26 Total 8 26 5 39 5 7 2 14 2 27 5 34 6 18 3 27 114 15:00 0 9 3 12 2 5 1 8 1 6 2 9 2 9 1 12 41 15:15 3 7 3 13 1 5 3 9 0 5 0 5 1 4 1 6 33 15:30 1 8 1 10 1 11 0 12 0 10 3 13 8 8 7 23 58 15:45 0 8 2 10 2 8 3 13 1 9 1 11 1 3 2 6 40 Total 4 32 9 45 6 29 7 42 2 30 6 38 12 24 11 47 172 16:00 2 7 3 12 1 6 0 7 0 10 2 12 1 5 1 7 38 16:15 2 4 3 9 1 5 1 7 0 6 2 8 2 4 5 11 35 16:30 2 2 1 5 1 6 1 8 1 5 2 8 1 8 1 10 31 16:45 1 12 1 14 2 6 0 8 1 16 1 18 0 5 2 7 47 Total 7 25 8 40 5 23 2 30 2 37 7 46 4 22 9 35 151 17:00 4 10 2 16 0 6 1 7 1 12 2 15 0 7 4 11 49 Burns Service Inc. 1202 Langdon Terrace Drive Raleigh, NC, 27615 File Name : charlottesville(little high and 11th) 14 hour count Site Code : Start Date : 5/10/2017 Page No :2 Groups Printed- Cars + - Trucks 11th Street Little High Street 11th Street Little High Street Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound Start Time Right Thru Left App. Total Right Thru Left App. Total Right Thru Left App. Total Right Thru Left App. Total Int. Total 17:15 4 7 2 13 6 20 2 28 1 15 4 20 2 8 2 12 73 17:30 4 8 4 16 3 7 0 10 0 11 2 13 1 22 2 25 64 17:45 1 10 4 15 1 4 1 6 0 11 0 11 1 9 0 10 42 Total 13 35 12 60 10 37 4 51 2 49 8 59 4 46 8 58 228 18:00 0 5 0 5 1 5 0 6 1 6 0 7 1 12 0 13 31 18:15 0 2 0 2 1 3 1 5 0 7 3 10 1 6 0 7 24 18:30 0 3 1 4 0 4 1 5 0 2 0 2 0 13 1 14 25 18:45 0 2 2 4 1 1 0 2 1 1 1 3 0 5 0 5 14 Total 0 12 3 15 3 13 2 18 2 16 4 22 2 36 1 39 94 19:00 0 1 1 2 3 4 1 8 0 6 0 6 0 7 1 8 24 19:15 0 0 1 1 0 8 0 8 0 1 0 1 0 3 0 3 13 19:30 0 2 0 2 1 1 1 3 0 3 0 3 0 10 1 11 19 19:45 1 2 0 3 2 6 0 8 0 2 2 4 0 2 1 3 18 Total 1 5 2 8 6 19 2 27 0 12 2 14 0 22 3 25 74 ***BREAK*** Grand Total 64 387 64 515 80 277 37 394 31 363 57 451 131 277 80 488 1848 Apprch % 12.4 75.1 12.4 20.3 70.3 9.4 6.9 80.5 12.6 26.8 56.8 16.4 Total % 3.5 20.9 3.5 27.9 4.3 15 2 21.3 1.7 19.6 3.1 24.4 7.1 15 4.3 26.4 Cars + 64 386 64 514 80 277 37 394 31 363 57 451 131 277 80 488 1847 % Cars + 100 99.7 100 99.8 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 99.9 Trucks 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 % Trucks 0 0.3 0 0.2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.1 Ramey Kemp & Associates 4343 Cox Road Glen Allen, Virginia 23060 File Name : Driveways - AM Counted By: Dean Site Code : 00000000 Weather: Clear Start Date : 9/14/2016 Equipment ID: 4233 Page No :1 Groups Printed- Unshifted East Jefferson St EXIT 10th Street EXIT East Jefferson St ENTER 10th Street ENTER Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound Start Time Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Int. Total *** BREAK *** 07:15 AM 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 2 07:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 07:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 4 0 4 0 8 10 Total 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 5 0 5 0 10 13 08:00 AM 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 2 0 3 0 0 4 0 4 9 08:15 AM 1 0 0 0 1 4 0 0 0 4 1 0 3 0 4 1 0 8 0 9 18 08:30 AM 1 0 0 0 1 2 0 1 0 3 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 2 0 3 8 08:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 3 6 Total 3 0 0 0 3 9 0 2 0 11 2 0 6 0 8 2 0 17 0 19 41 Grand Total 4 0 0 0 4 10 0 2 0 12 2 0 7 0 9 7 0 22 0 29 54 Apprch % 100 0 0 0 83.3 0 16.7 0 22.2 0 77.8 0 24.1 0 75.9 0 Total % 7.4 0 0 0 7.4 18.5 0 3.7 0 22.2 3.7 0 13 0 16.7 13 0 40.7 0 53.7 East Jefferson St EXIT Out In Total 32 4 36 4 0 0 0 Right Thru Left Peds 40 22 Right Thru Total Left Out 10 10th Street ENTER 10th Street EXIT 2 North 0 Peds Right Thru 29 In 0 In 9/14/2016 07:00 AM 12 7 Left 9/14/2016 08:45 AM 2 11 Unshifted Out Total 0 Peds 14 0 Left Thru Right Peds 7 0 2 0 9 9 18 Out In Total East Jefferson St ENTER Ramey Kemp & Associates 4343 Cox Road Glen Allen, Virginia 23060 File Name : Driveways - PM Counted By: Dean Site Code : 00000000 Weather: Clear Start Date : 9/13/2016 Equipment ID: 4233 Page No :1 Groups Printed- Unshifted East Jefferson St EXIT 10th Street EXIT East Jefferson ENTER 10th Street ENTER Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound Start Time Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Int. Total 04:00 PM 1 0 0 0 1 6 0 3 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 3 13 04:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 2 0 7 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 9 04:30 PM 1 0 0 0 1 3 0 1 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 2 7 04:45 PM 1 0 0 0 1 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 6 0 8 12 Total 3 0 0 0 3 17 0 6 0 23 1 0 0 0 1 4 0 10 0 14 41 05:00 PM 0 0 1 0 1 11 0 1 0 12 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 5 0 6 20 05:15 PM 0 0 1 0 1 2 0 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 5 05:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 3 0 5 8 05:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 Total 0 0 2 0 2 19 0 2 0 21 0 0 1 0 1 3 0 9 0 12 36 Grand Total 3 0 2 0 5 36 0 8 0 44 1 0 1 0 2 7 0 19 0 26 77 Apprch % 60 0 40 0 81.8 0 18.2 0 50 0 50 0 26.9 0 73.1 0 Total % 3.9 0 2.6 0 6.5 46.8 0 10.4 0 57.1 1.3 0 1.3 0 2.6 9.1 0 24.7 0 33.8 East Jefferson St EXIT Out In Total 55 5 60 3 0 2 0 Right Thru Left Peds 30 19 Right Thru Total Left Out 36 10th Street ENTER 10th Street EXIT 3 North 0 Peds Right Thru 26 In 0 In 9/13/2016 04:00 PM 44 7 Left 9/13/2016 05:45 PM 8 4 Unshifted Out Total 0 Peds 47 0 Left Thru Right Peds 1 0 1 0 15 2 17 Out In Total East Jefferson ENTER Ramey Kemp & Associates 4343 Cox Road Glen Allen, Virginia 23060 File Name : Charlottesville(Jefferson and Driveway#3) PM Peak Counted By: Site Code : Burns Service, Inc. Start Date : 9/14/2016 Page No :1 Groups Printed- Cars + Driveway #3 Jefferson Street Jefferson Street Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound Start Time Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Int. Total 04:00 PM 1 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 04:15 PM 4 0 2 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 8 04:30 PM 2 0 2 0 4 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 7 04:45 PM 1 0 4 0 5 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 Total 8 0 8 0 16 5 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 4 25 05:00 PM 0 0 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 5 05:15 PM 2 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 5 05:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 2 05:45 PM 3 0 2 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 Total 5 0 5 0 10 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 4 17 Grand Total 13 0 13 0 26 8 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 8 42 Apprch % 50 0 50 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 Total % 31 0 31 0 61.9 19 0 0 0 19 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 0 19 Driveway #3 Out In Total 16 26 42 13 0 13 0 Right Thru Left Peds 21 8 Right Thru Total Left Out 8 13 Jefferson Street Jefferson Street North 0 Peds Right Thru 8 In 0 In 9/14/2016 04:00 PM 0 Left 9/14/2016 05:45 PM 8 0 13 Cars + Out Total 0 Peds 21 0 Left Thru Right Peds 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Out In Total Ramey Kemp & Associates 4343 Cox Road Glen Allen, Virginia 23060 File Name : Charlottesville(Water and City Walk) AM Peak Counted By: Site Code : Burns Service, Inc. Start Date : 9/14/2016 Page No :1 Groups Printed- Cars + - Bikes City Walk Way Water Street Water Street Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound Start Time Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Int. Total 07:00 AM 5 0 6 4 15 0 10 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 2 0 7 32 07:15 AM 9 0 4 4 17 0 11 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 3 0 9 37 07:30 AM 11 0 5 1 17 5 9 0 1 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 2 0 6 38 07:45 AM 8 0 6 1 15 1 17 0 1 19 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 1 0 7 41 Total 33 0 21 10 64 6 47 0 2 55 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 8 0 29 148 08:00 AM 19 0 10 1 30 2 19 0 0 21 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 2 0 6 57 08:15 AM 11 0 9 4 24 1 16 0 0 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 7 48 08:30 AM 12 0 4 2 18 3 19 0 0 22 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 1 0 10 50 08:45 AM 17 0 6 7 30 1 26 0 0 27 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 0 0 14 71 Total 59 0 29 14 102 7 80 0 0 87 0 0 0 0 0 0 34 3 0 37 226 Grand Total 92 0 50 24 166 13 127 0 2 142 0 0 0 0 0 0 55 11 0 66 374 Apprch % 55.4 0 30.1 14.5 9.2 89.4 0 1.4 0 0 0 0 0 83.3 16.7 0 Total % 24.6 0 13.4 6.4 44.4 3.5 34 0 0.5 38 0 0 0 0 0 0 14.7 2.9 0 17.6 Cars + 92 0 50 16 158 13 127 0 2 142 0 0 0 0 0 0 54 11 0 65 365 % Cars + 100 0 100 66.7 95.2 100 100 0 100 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 98.2 100 0 98.5 97.6 Bikes 0 0 0 8 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 9 % Bikes 0 0 0 33.3 4.8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.8 0 0 1.5 2.4 City Walk Way Out In Total 24 158 182 0 8 8 24 166 190 92 0 50 16 0 0 0 8 92 0 50 24 Right Thru Left Peds 284 285 1 11 11 0 Right Thru Total Left Out 13 13 105 104 0 1 North 54 55 1 Water Street Water Street Peds Right Thru 127 127 65 66 1 9/14/2016 07:00 AM In 0 In 9/14/2016 08:45 AM 142 142 0 0 0 Left Peds 0 Cars + 0 0 0 219 219 0 Bikes Out Total 0 0 0 247 246 1 2 0 2 Left Thru Right Peds 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Out In Total Ramey Kemp & Associates 4343 Cox Road Glen Allen, Virginia 23060 File Name : Charlottesville(Water and City Walk) PM Peak Counted By: Site Code : Burns Service, Inc. Start Date : 9/14/2016 Page No :1 Groups Printed- Cars + - Bikes City Walk Way Water Street Water Street Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound Start Time Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Int. Total 04:00 PM 3 0 3 2 8 10 7 0 0 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 5 0 15 40 04:15 PM 0 0 1 2 3 9 5 0 0 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 2 0 17 34 04:30 PM 0 0 2 7 9 3 7 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 5 0 19 38 04:45 PM 3 0 3 4 10 4 9 0 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 10 2 34 57 Total 6 0 9 15 30 26 28 0 0 54 0 0 0 0 0 0 61 22 2 85 169 05:00 PM 5 0 1 1 7 7 8 0 0 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 9 0 36 58 05:15 PM 6 1 2 8 17 9 12 0 0 21 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 11 0 31 69 05:30 PM 4 0 5 6 15 11 13 0 0 24 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 8 4 34 73 05:45 PM 8 0 6 1 15 6 4 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 4 0 29 54 Total 23 1 14 16 54 33 37 0 0 70 0 0 0 0 0 0 94 32 4 130 254 Grand Total 29 1 23 31 84 59 65 0 0 124 0 0 0 0 0 0 155 54 6 215 423 Apprch % 34.5 1.2 27.4 36.9 47.6 52.4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 72.1 25.1 2.8 Total % 6.9 0.2 5.4 7.3 19.9 13.9 15.4 0 0 29.3 0 0 0 0 0 0 36.6 12.8 1.4 50.8 Cars + 29 1 23 17 70 59 65 0 0 124 0 0 0 0 0 0 155 54 4 213 407 % Cars + 100 100 100 54.8 83.3 100 100 0 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 100 66.7 99.1 96.2 Bikes 0 0 0 14 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 16 % Bikes 0 0 0 45.2 16.7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 33.3 0.9 3.8 City Walk Way Out In Total 113 70 183 0 14 14 113 84 197 29 1 23 17 0 0 0 14 29 1 23 31 Right Thru Left Peds 307 309 2 54 54 0 Right Thru Total Left Out 59 59 178 178 0 0 North 155 0 155 Water Street Water Street Peds Right Thru 213 215 2 65 65 9/14/2016 04:00 PM In 0 In 9/14/2016 05:45 PM 124 124 0 0 0 Left Peds 0 Cars + 0 0 0 94 94 0 Bikes Out Total 4 2 6 302 302 0 0 0 0 Left Thru Right Peds 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 Out In Total Burns Service Inc. 1202 Langdon Terrace Drive Raleigh, NC, 27615 File Name : Shenandoah Joe Ped Count Site Code : Start Date : 4/26/2017 Page No :1 Groups Printed- Cars + - Trucks Into Shenandoah Joe Out of Shenandoah Joe Into Shenandoah Joe Westbound Northbound Eastbound Start Time Thru Left App. Total Right Left App. Total Right Thru App. Total Int. Total 07:00 0 4 4 4 0 4 2 0 2 10 07:15 0 6 6 6 4 10 1 0 1 17 07:30 0 7 7 5 1 6 1 0 1 14 07:45 0 5 5 9 0 9 1 0 1 15 Total 0 22 22 24 5 29 5 0 5 56 08:00 0 8 8 3 0 3 0 0 0 11 08:15 0 10 10 8 2 10 3 0 3 23 08:30 0 14 14 10 1 11 3 1 4 29 08:45 0 5 5 8 4 12 2 0 2 19 Total 0 37 37 29 7 36 8 1 9 82 Grand Total 0 59 59 53 12 65 13 1 14 138 Apprch % 0 100 81.5 18.5 92.9 7.1 Total % 0 42.8 42.8 38.4 8.7 47.1 9.4 0.7 10.1 Cars + 0 59 59 53 12 65 13 1 14 138 % Cars + 0 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 % Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Burns Service Inc. 1202 Langdon Terrace Drive Raleigh, NC, 27615 File Name : Shenandoah Joe Ped Count Door #2 Site Code : Start Date : 4/26/2017 Page No :1 Groups Printed- Cars + - Trucks Into Shenandoah Joe Out of Shenandoah Joe Into Shenandoah Joe Southbound Westbound Northbound Start Time Thru Left App. Total Right Left App. Total Right Thru App. Total Int. Total 07:00 0 2 2 0 2 2 4 0 4 8 07:15 0 3 3 6 4 10 3 0 3 16 07:30 0 3 3 4 0 4 4 0 4 11 07:45 0 2 2 5 3 8 5 0 5 15 Total 0 10 10 15 9 24 16 0 16 50 08:00 0 2 2 2 6 8 6 0 6 16 08:15 0 4 4 3 1 4 2 0 2 10 08:30 0 4 4 7 4 11 6 0 6 21 08:45 0 1 1 7 4 11 5 0 5 17 Total 0 11 11 19 15 34 19 0 19 64 Grand Total 0 21 21 34 24 58 35 0 35 114 Apprch % 0 100 58.6 41.4 100 0 Total % 0 18.4 18.4 29.8 21.1 50.9 30.7 0 30.7 Cars + 0 21 21 34 24 58 35 0 35 114 % Cars + 0 100 100 100 100 100 100 0 100 100 Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 % Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Burns Service Inc. 1202 Langdon Terrace Drive Raleigh, NC, 27615 File Name : Milli Coffee Roasters Ped Count Site Code : Start Date : 4/26/2017 Page No :1 Groups Printed- Cars + Into Milli Coffee Into Milli Coffee Out of Milli Coffee Southbound Northbound Eastbound Start Time Right Thru App. Total Thru Left App. Total Right Left App. Total Int. Total 07:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 07:15 0 0 0 0 7 7 3 0 3 10 07:30 0 0 0 0 4 4 3 0 3 7 07:45 1 0 1 0 7 7 3 0 3 11 Total 1 0 1 0 18 18 9 0 9 28 08:00 1 0 1 0 7 7 1 0 1 9 08:15 3 0 3 0 4 4 6 0 6 13 08:30 2 0 2 0 10 10 4 0 4 16 08:45 0 0 0 0 4 4 11 0 11 15 Total 6 0 6 0 25 25 22 0 22 53 Grand Total 7 0 7 0 43 43 31 0 31 81 Apprch % 100 0 0 100 100 0 Total % 8.6 0 8.6 0 53.1 53.1 38.3 0 38.3 Traffic Signal Warrant Analysis Multi‐Way Stop Warrants Project Name East Jefferson Street Apartments Project/File # 16147 Scenario Existing 2017 Intersection Information Major Street (E/W Road) Little High Street Minor Street (N/S Road) 11th Street Analyzed with 1 approach lane Analyzed with 1 Approach Lane Total Approach Volume 966 vehicles Total Approach Volume 884 vehicles Total Ped/Bike Volume 0 crossings Total Ped/Bike Volume 0 crossings Right turn reduction of 0 percent applied Right turn reduction of 0 percent applied No high speed or isolated community reduction applied to the Multi‐Way Stop Warrant thresholds. Condition A ‐ Traffic Signal Warrant Condition Satisfied? Not Satisfied Criteria* Traffic Signal Warranted & Justified * Multi‐way stop control may be used as an interim measure that can be installed quickly to control traffic while arrangements are being made for the installation of the traffic control signal. Condition B ‐ Crash Experience Condition Satisfied? Not satisfied Required values reached for less than 4 correctable crashes Criteria ‐ Crash Experience 5 or more correctable crashes in 12‐month period Condition C ‐ Intersection Volume & Delay Condition Satisfied? Not Satisfied Required values reached for 0 hours & sec. average delay/veh Criteria ‐ Major Street (veh/hr) 300 for any 8 hours of an average day Criteria ‐ Minor Street (total vol‐veh, ped, & bikes/hr) 200 for the same 8 hours of an average day Criteria ‐ Delay (average sec/veh) 30 during the highest hour Condition D ‐ Combination Volume, Crash Experience, & Delay Condition Satisfied? Not Satisfied Required values reached for 0 hours, less than 4 crashes, & sec. average delay/veh Criteria ‐ Major Street (veh/hr) 240 for any 8 hours of an average day Criteria ‐ Minor Street (total vol‐veh, ped, & bikes/hr) 160 for the same 8 hours of an average day Criteria ‐ Crash Experience 4 or more correctable crashes in 12‐month period Criteria ‐ Delay (average sec/veh) 24 during the highest hour CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE DEPARTMENT OF NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT SERVICES STAFF REPORT TO THE ENTRANCE CORRIDOR REVIEW BOARD (ERB) ENTRANCE CORRIDOR CERTIFICATE OF APPROPROPRIATENESS DATE OF PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING: March 13, 2018 Project Name: 912 East High Street Planner: Jeff Werner, AICP Applicant: Justin Shimp Applicant’s Representative: Justin Shimp Applicant’s Relation to Owner: Engineer Application Information Property Street Address: 912 East High Street Property Owner: Nine Twelve Land Company Tax Map/Parcel #: 530271000 Total Square Footage/Acreage Site: 0.218 acres Comprehensive Plan (Land Use Plan) Designation: Mixed Use Current Zoning Classification: Downtown North Corridor with Entrance Corridor (EC) Overlay Entrance Corridor Overlay District: §34-307(a)(10) (East High Street) Current Usage: Office Building Background Because the proposed renovations will significantly change the appearance of the building, staff determined that the ERB should review the application. The building is currently red brick, with GAF slateline shingles, and a standing seam metal roof canopy. The building is visible from East High Street. Applicant’s Request The applicant is requesting approval of a certificate of appropriateness to renovate the existing building. The general proposal is to: • Paint the building white (Sherwin-Williams SW 7012 Creamy) • Remove the existing canopy 1 • Add an awning over the entrance • Screen the ground mechanical units Standard of Review The Planning Commission serves as the entrance corridor review board (ERB) responsible for administering the design review process in entrance corridor overlay districts. This development project requires a site plan, and therefore also requires a certificate of appropriateness from the ERB, pursuant to the provisions of §34-309(a)(3) of the City’s Zoning Ordinance. The ERB shall act on an application within 60 days of the submittal date, and shall either approve, approve with conditions, or deny the application. Appeal would be to City Council. Standards for considering certificates of appropriateness: In conducting review of an application, the ERB must consider certain features and factors in determining the appropriateness of proposed construction, alteration, etc. of buildings or structures located within an entrance corridor overlay district. Following is a list of the standards set forth within §34-310 of the City Code: §34-310(1): Overall architectural design, form, and style of the subject building or structure, including, but not limited to: the height, mass and scale; Staff Analysis: The height, mass and scale of the building are not changing. §34-310(2): Exterior architectural details and features of the subject building or structure; The existing canopy on the east elevation of the building will be demolished, and an awning will be added above the existing door. Staff Analysis: The demolition of the canopy is appropriate. §34-310(3): Texture, materials and color of materials proposed for use on the subject building or structure; The proposed materials/colors consist of: • Paint the building white (Sherwin-Williams SW 7012 Creamy) • Screen the ground mechanical units Staff Analysis: The proposed materials are within the guidelines. It is important to look if the building color is harmonious among the rest of the structures in the entrance corridor. §34-310(4): Design and arrangement of buildings and structures on the subject site; The footprint is unchanged. Staff Analysis: The design is straightforward. 2 §34-310(5): The extent to which the features and characteristics described within paragraphs (1)-(4),above, are architecturally compatible (or incompatible) with similar features and characteristics of other buildings and structures having frontage on the same EC street(s) as the subject property. Staff Analysis: The height, mass and scale as viewed from the corridor are appropriate for an urban structure in this location. §34-310(6): Provisions of the Entrance Corridor Design Guidelines. Relevant sections of the guidelines include: Section 1 (Introduction) The Entrance Corridor design principles are expanded below: • Design For a Corridor Vision New building design should be compatible (in massing, scale, materials, colors) with those structures that contribute to the overall character and quality of the corridor. Existing developments should be encouraged to make upgrades consistent with the corridor vision. Site designs should contain some common elements to provide continuity along the corridor. New development, including franchise development, should complement the City’s character and respect those qualities that distinguish the City’s built environment. • Preserve History Preserve significant historic buildings as well as distinctive architecture from more recent periods. Encourage new contemporary design that integrates well with existing historic buildings to enhance the overall character and quality of the corridor. • Facilitate Pedestrian Access Encourage compact, walkable developments. Design pedestrian connections from sidewalk and car to buildings, between buildings, and between corridor properties and adjacent residential areas. • Maintain Human Scale in Buildings and Spaces Consider the building scale, especially height, mass, complexity of form, and architectural details, and the impact of spaces created, as it will be experienced by the people who will pass by, live, work, or shop there. The size, placement and number of doors, windows, portals and openings define human scale, as does the degree of ground-floor pedestrian access. • Preserve and Enhance Natural Character Daylight and improve streams, and retain mature trees and natural buffers. Work with topography to minimize grading and limit the introduction of impervious surfaces. Encourage plantings of diverse native species. •. Create a Sense of Place In corridors where substantial pedestrian activity occurs or is encouraged, or where mixed use and multi- building projects are proposed, one goal will be creating a sense of place. Building arrangements, uses, natural features, and landscaping should contribute, where feasible, to create exterior space where people 3 can interact. •. Create an Inviting Public Realm Design inviting streetscapes and public spaces. Redevelopment of properties should enhance the existing streetscapes and create an engaging public realm. • Create Restrained Communications Private signage and advertising should be harmonious and in scale with building elements and landscaping features. • Screen Incompatible Uses and Appurtenances: Screen from adjacent properties and public view those uses and appurtenances whose visibility may be incompatible with the overall character and quality of the corridor, such as: parking lots, outdoor storage and loading areas, refuse areas, mechanical and communication equipment, Where feasible, relegate parking behind buildings. It is not the intent to require screening for utilitarian designs that are attractive, and/or purposeful. • Respect and Enhance Charlottesville’s Character Charlottesville seeks new construction that reflects the unique character, history, and cultural diversity of this place. Architectural transplants from other locales, or shallow imitations of historic architectural styles, for example, are neither appropriate nor desirable. Incompatible aspects of franchise design or corporate signature buildings must be modified to fit the character of this community. Section 2 (Streetscape) No changes are proposed to existing street landscaping. Staff Analysis: The streetscape design is appropriate. Section 3 (Site): There are three site changes that are proposed, the demolition of the canopy, the addition of an awning above the entrance, and the screening of the ground mechanical units. Staff Analysis: The proposed site changes are appropriate. Section 4 (Buildings): Pertinent Guidelines are: • In Charlottesville, common building materials are brick, wood or stucco siding, and standing-seam metal roofs. Stone is more commonly used for site walls than building walls. Staff Analysis: While the applicant is not rebuilding anything, it should be noted that in Charlottesville brick is a common building material, but painted brick is not. Section 5 (Individual Corridors): 4 East High Street Vision The southeast side of High Street from Long Street to the light at Meade Avenue shares similar characteristics with the Long Street corridor. Properties here have potential to be redeveloped at an urban scale with shallow setbacks, higher density, and mixed uses. The natural character of the river should be preserved, and riverfront properties may incorporate the river as a site amenity. Future infill and redevelopment on the northwest side of High Street from Riverdale Drive to Locust Avenue and on the southeast side of High Street from Meade Avenue to 10th Street should complement the smaller scale of the abutting residential neighborhoods on either side. The retail areas of this part of the corridor will continue to provide basic service-business functions until redeveloped into a mix of uses including residential. This area may be considered for nearby offsite or shared parking in the future, due to the small parcel sizes and convenience to transit and the downtown area. From Locust Avenue to Market Street there will be opportunities for denser development. The area surrounding Martha Jefferson Hospital is a potential historic district. A pedestrian environment should be encouraged along the entire corridor with sidewalks, landscaping and transit stops. SUB-AREA C 9th Street from High to Market Street: Ninth Street between High and Market Streets delineates the northern edge of the central downtown area. Gas stations are located at both ends of the corridor. Early-twentieth-century residences converted to professional use for either the adjacent court complex or Martha Jefferson Hospital are intermingled with offices and banks of more recent construction. Streetscape: Mixed-use, mixed-scale, mixed setback, concrete median, 4 lanes, overhead utilities, cobra- head lights, concrete sidewalks. Site: Parking in front of several structures, large trees on private sites, some edge landscaping, mixed private site lighting. Tree planting and consistent sidewalks in this area have started to create a more pedestrian-oriented environment. Public Comments Received No public comments have been received regarding the Entrance Corridor application. Staff Recommendations Staff recommends that the ERB discuss the changes to the building and whether the painted brick is appropriate within the guidelines and this specific entrance corridor. Suggested Motion I move to approve the Entrance Corridor Certificate of Appropriateness application for the 912 East High Street with the following modifications: 1. Do not paint the brick 2. …. 5 Entrance Corridor Review Application (E Certificate of Appropriateness ECEIVED Please Return To: City of Charlottesville FE8 20 2018 Department of Neighborhood Development Services P.O. Box 911, City Hall NBGffBORtJOOD DEVEl.OPMENT SERVICES Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 Teleohone {434) 970-3130 Please submit one (1) hard copy and one (1) digital copy of application form and all attachments. Please include appllcation fee as follows : New construction project $375; Additions and other projects requiring ERB approval $125; Administrative approval $100. Make checks payable to the City of Charlottesville. The Entrance Corridor Review Board (ERB) meets the second Tuesday of the month . Deadline for submittals is Tuesday 3 weeks prior to next ERB meeting by 3:30 p.m. Owner Name Ni''f\O ui lo.\~ Parcel Number_ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ ProjectStreetAddress 012 e. Hrjh St~d- Date Date Property Owner (if not applicant) Property Owner Permission (if not applicant) I have read this application and hereby give my consent to Address: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ its submission. Email :_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ Phone: (W) - - - - - - - (C) _ _ _ _ __ Signature Date Print Name Date Description of Proposed Work (attach separate narrative if necessary): Q..,; fJ} 6?>vl}~111t3 W1'J1 4Xlol ~r£n'lCNrt ~·->\.;tlb Canvv~· For Office Use Only _,il- . . . ) Received by: _CYf. ......_.~/.J -1at..r){.gLL/ ________~_ Approved/Disapproved b y : - - - - - - - - - Fee paid: f ./25 ~ Cash/Ck.# Vt sA Date:_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ Date Received: ~ / .:>,o / .)o I 8 Conditions of approval: - - - - - - - - - - - Revlsed2016 PJS- 003~ CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE DEPARTMENT OF NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT SERVICES PLANNING COMMISSION PRELIMINARY DISCUSSION: SPECIAL USE PERMIT Author of Memo: Brian Haluska, Principal Planner Date of Meeting: March 13, 2018 RE: Dairy Central (946 Grady Avenue) Background Ashley Davies of Williams Mullen; acting as agent for Dairy Holdings, LLC has submitted a special use permit for a mixed-use development at 946 Grady Avenue. The request is for additional height and residential density. The site plan proposes multiple new buildings with 260 residential units and 11,358 square feet of commercial retail space. The project also shows 471 parking spaces. The property is further identified on City Real Property Tax Map 31 Parcel 60. The site is zoned CC (Central City District Corridor) with an Entrance Corridor Overlay Zone. The property is approximately 4.35 acres. Vicinity Map Preliminary Analysis Reason for Special Use Permit The applicant is requesting a special use permit for additional height and density. The maximum height permitted by right in the Central City zoning district is 55 feet, with an additional 25 feet permitted by special use permit. The applicant shows a maximum building height of 65 feet. The maximum by-right residential density in the Central City corridor for a mixed-use project is 43 dwelling units per acre, with 120 units per acre permitted by special use permit. The applicant is requesting density of 60 dwelling units an acre. Questions for Discussion • Would the massing and scale of the project create a negative impact to the surrounding area as a result of the additional height requested? The proposed buildings would be a maximum 65 feet tall, and would be adjacent to low-density residential structures along West Street that are typically two stories tall. • Would the increase in density result in a negative impact to the surrounding area as a result of an increased demand on services? The proposed project would have a maximum density of 60 dwelling units an acre. The by-right limit along Preston Avenue is 43 dwelling units per acre. The site abuts a residential area with a typical density of between 5 and 10 dwelling units per acre. Attachments Applicant Submission Packet CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE ENTRANCE CORRIDOR REVIEW BOARD STAFF REPORT Special Use Permit Recommendation Property Street Address: 946 Grady Avenue Zoning: Central City Corridor with Entrance Corridor Overlay Tax Parcel: 310060000 Site Acreage: 4.35 acres Date of Hearing: March 13, 2018 Application Number: SP18-00002 Staff report prepared by: Brian Haluska, Principal Planner ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Relevant Code Section: Sec. 34-157(7) When the property that is the subject of the application for a special use permit (SUP) is within a design control district, city council shall refer the application to the Board of Architectural Review (BAR) or Entrance Corridor Review Board (ERB), as may be applicable, for recommendations as to whether the proposed use will have an adverse impact on the district, and for recommendations as to reasonable conditions which, if imposed, that would mitigate any such impacts. The BAR or ERB, as applicable, shall return a written report of its recommendations to the city council. Background: This site is currently occupied by the historically designated Monticello Dairy Building. The applicant is requesting a SUP to increase the residential density of the subject property, from its current (187) units maximum (43 DUA) to a (260) units maximum (60 DUA), although the corresponding site plan only calls for (245) units. The proposed development would increase the maximum permitted height on the site from the current by-right maximum (50’) to a proposed (65’) maximum. The site has been divided into four proposed phases. The historically designated dairy building is contained in Phase 1, and is subject to BAR review. The applicant presented Phase 1 to the BAR for preliminary discussion in November, in conjunction with a final site plan submission on that portion of the property. The remaining three phases are outside the bounds of the Individually Protect Property designation, and are thus subject to Entrance Corridor Review. Discussion and Recommendations: Before City Council takes action to permit the proposed use, they must consider the ERB’s opinion whether there are any adverse impacts to the entrance corridor (EC) district that could be mitigated with conditions. A special use permit is an important zoning tool that allows City Council to impose reasonable conditions to make a use more acceptable in a specific location, and to “protect the welfare, safety and convenience of the public.” In staff opinion, the proposed SUP request for additional density and height will not have an adverse impact on the EC district. The added density does not impact the building visually; and the additional height will comply with the Entrance Corridor guidelines for Building Mass, Scale and Height; especially in light of the width of the adjacent public right-of-way. 1 The required entrance corridor review will address visually important elements, including the landscape plan, building materials and type of windows. Suggested Motions: I move to find that the proposed special use permit to allow additional density and height at 946 Grady Avenue will not have an adverse impact on the Preston Park Avenue Entrance Corridor district. 2 CIT Y O F CH ARLOT T E SVILLE SPECIA L U SE PER MIT JA N UA RY 23, 2018 DAIRY CE NT RAL – PH AS E 2, 3 , AND 4 C H ARLOT T E SV I L L E , VA S U B MI T T E D JANUARY 2 3 , 2 018 L I ST OF D RAW I N G S ARC HI TEC TURE Cover...............................................................................1 Zoning Map........................................................................2 Existing Site + Context....................................................3-4 Context Photos...............................................................5-7 Phasing Diagrams.......................................................8-10 Building Bird’s Eye Perspectives..............................11-13 Building Perspectives...............................................14-15 Proposed Plans .........................................................16-19 Proposed Elevations.................................................20-24 L A N DSC A PE Landscape Site Plan.........................................................1 CI VI L SUP Conceptual Plan Phase Two....................................1 SUP Conceptual Plan Phase Three/Four........................2 STONY POINT DESIGN/BUILD, LLC | CUNNINGHAM | QUILL ARCHITECTS | TIMMONS GROUP | WATERSTREET STUDIO PHASE 2, 3 AND 4 SUP SUBMISSION ZO NING MAP MONTICELLO DAIRY – PHASE 2, 3 AND 4 | 946 GRADY AVENUE | CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA S ITE ZO NE : CE NTRAL C I T Y CO R R I DO R “CC ” S I TE AR E A: 4 . 35 AC R E S AL LOW E D B U I L DI NG H E I GH T: BY- R I G HT: 35 ’ - 5 0 ’ S U P : 8 0’ STR E E TWAL L : 4 5 ’ M AX. WI T H 1 0 ’ S E T BAC K ALO NG 70 % O F T H E L E NGT H O F STR E E T WAL L O F FAC ADE S E TB ACKS : P R I M ARY ST R E E T: 0 ’ - 1 5 ’ L I NK I NG ST R E E T: 5 ’ - 20 ’ D E NS I TY: M I X E D U S E : 25 % GFA NO N- R E S I D E NT I AL BY-R I G H T: 43 DUA S U P : 1 2 0 DUA K E Y: CE NTR AL C I T Y CO R R I DO R “CC ” R -1 S : LOW-DE NS I T Y R E S I DE NT I AL B-3: NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL STONY POINT DESIGN/BUILD, LLC | CUNNINGHAM | QUILL ARCHITECTS | TIMMONS GROUP | WATERSTREET STUDIO 01.23.2018 2 EXIST ING SITE & CONT EX T KEY LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL PRESTON PLAZA NEIGHBORHOOD SHOPPING CENTER COMMERCIAL BUSINESS AND TECHNOLOGY MIXED USE NW ET PR TRE ES TO HS N 10T AV ENU E WE ST S TRE ET MONTICELLO DAIRY SITE 01.23.2018 CURRENT LAND STONY POINT DESIGN/BUILD, LLC | USE CUNNINGHAM | QUILL ARCHITECTS | TIMMONS GROUP | WATERSTREET STUDIO 3 EXIST ING SITE & CONT EX T 1 2 3 7 4 6 5 8 9 10 17 11 12 16 18 15 14 13 STONY POINT DESIGN/BUILD, LLC | CUNNINGHAM | QUILL ARCHITECTS | TIMMONS GROUP | WATERSTREET STUDIO 01.23.2018 4 G R ADY + P RESTON AV EN UE CON T EX T 1. A E RI A L V I E W O F T H E S I T E F R O M T HE NO RT H -WE ST 2 . AER IAL VIEW OF THE SITE FR OM THE NORTH 3 . A ERI A L V I E W O F T H E S I T E F R O M TH E NO RT H -E AST 4. DAIRY BUILDING FR OM GR ADY AVENUE + WOOD STR EET STONY POINT DESIGN/BUILD, LLC | CUNNINGHAM | QUILL ARCHITECTS | TIMMONS GROUP | WATERSTREET STUDIO 01.23.2018 5 1 0 T H STREET CONTEX T P HOTOS 5 . PA RKI N G LOT AT R E AR O F DAI RY 6 . LO O KING S O UT H ALO NG 10 TH STR EET 7. HOUSES ALONG 10 TH STR EET 8. HOUSE A LO NG 1 0 T H ST R E E T 9. H O US E ALO NG 1 0T H ST R EET 10. HOUSE ALONG 10 TH STR EET 11. 1 0T H ST RE E T + W E ST ST R E E T LO OKING NO RT H 1 2. 1 0T H ST RE E T + WE ST STR EET LOOKING W EST STONY POINT DESIGN/BUILD, LLC | CUNNINGHAM | QUILL ARCHITECTS | TIMMONS GROUP | WATERSTREET STUDIO 01.23.2018 6 W E ST STREET CON TE X T P HOTOS 15. LOOKING W EST TOWAR D 10 TH 13 . LO OKI N G W E ST AT F U T U R E WO O D ST. 1 4 . WE ST ST RE E T S IDEWALK STR EET 16. WA REHO US E A N D E X I ST I NG R E A R O F DAIRY 1 7. WE ST ST RE E T AT 10 TH STR EET 18 . EXISTING R EAR W ING OF DAIRY STONY POINT DESIGN/BUILD, LLC | CUNNINGHAM | QUILL ARCHITECTS | TIMMONS GROUP | WATERSTREET STUDIO 01.23.2018 7 PH AS ING DIAGRAMS: P HASE ON E (A P P R OV ED BY B . A . R . O N 01 .1 7.1 8) PRIMARY STREET 0' - 15' setback PRE 15.00' MAX. GRADY AVENUE 50% S-1 buffer SETBACK STO N AVE NUE PROPERTY LINE EXISTING DAIRY - 2ND FLOOR 1 STORY OFFICE ADDITION (ABOVE EXISTING DAIRY BUILDING) PHASE 4 SITE 3 STORY OFFICE (+ GARAGE BELOW) ADDITION LOADING 10TH STREET NW LINKING STREET 20.00' MAX. SETBACK 5.00' MIN. SETBACK PHASE 2 SITE PHASE 3 SITE KEY PROPERTY LINE E EXISTING IN TY L PER 20.00' MAX. SETBACK OFFICE SETBACK 5.00' MIN. PRO WEST STREET PROPERTY LINE LINKING STREET 5' - 20' setback 50% S-1 buffer PH AS E O NE PLAN 1 SCA LE: 1 /32” = 1 ’ –0” STONY POINT DESIGN/BUILD, LLC | CUNNINGHAM | QUILL ARCHITECTS | TIMMONS GROUP | WATERSTREET STUDIO 01.23.2018 8 PH AS ING DIAGRAMS: P R OP OSED P HASE T WO PRIMARY STREET 0' - 15' setback PRE 15.00' MAX. GRADY AVENUE 50% S-1 buffer SETBACK STO N AVE NUE PROPERTY LINE D Phase 2 Unit Mix D Level Total Units Level 1 33 Level 2 44 PHASE 1 Level 3 44 Level 4 44 PHASE 4 SITE Level 5 10 Total Units* 171-176 *Note: Range of units because types may T LOADING T vary. T T Totals 10TH STREET NW LINKING STREET Total GSF 202,305 Bldg. Height 60'-0" - 65'-0" 20.00' MAX. SETBACK PHASE 2 5.00' MIN. SETBACK PHASE 3 SITE KEY PROPERTY LINE E RESIDENTIAL IN TY L PER PRO 20.00' MAX. SETBACK SETBACK 5.00' MIN. WEST STREET PROPERTY LINE LINKING STREET 5' - 20' setback 50% S-1 buffer P HASE T WO P L A N 1 S C A L E : 1 /3 2 ” = 1’–0 ” STONY POINT DESIGN/BUILD, LLC | CUNNINGHAM | QUILL ARCHITECTS | TIMMONS GROUP | WATERSTREET STUDIO 01.23.2018 9 PH AS ING DIAGRAMS: P HASES T HR EE + FOUR PRIMARY STREET 0' - 15' setback GRADY AVENUE 50% S-1 buffer PRE STO 15.00' MAX. N SETBACK AVE NUE PROPERTY LINE D D Phase 3 Residential Phase 4 Garage + Retail Total GSF 61,000 Retail GSF 8,000-10,000 Bldg. Height 60'-0" - 65'-0" Parking GSF 104,000 Total Units 60-75 Total GSF 114,000 PHASE 1 PHASE 4 BUILDABLE AREA *See building elevation sheets for building heights Phase 3 Residential Phase 4 Gar Total GSF 61,000 Retail GSF Bldg. Height 60'-0" - 65'-0" Parking GSF Total Units 60-75 Total GSF T T T T *See building elevation sheets for building heights 10TH STREET NW LINKING STREET PHASE 3 20.00' MAX. RESIDENTIAL SETBACK PHASE 2 5.00' MIN. SETBACK KEY PROPERTY LINE RESIDENTIAL E IN TY L PER PR O PROPERTY LINE 20.00' MAX. WEST STREET SETBACK SETBACK 5.00' MIN. LINKING STREET 5' - 20' setback 50% S-1 buffer P HASE S T H R E E + FO U R P L AN 1 S C A L E : 1 /3 2 ” = 1’–0 ” STONY POINT DESIGN/BUILD, LLC | CUNNINGHAM | QUILL ARCHITECTS | TIMMONS GROUP | WATERSTREET STUDIO 01.23.2018 10 B U IL DING BIRD’S EY E P ER SP EC T I V E (LOOKI N G N O RTH -W E ST) VE. P R E S TO N A T R EE ST T ES 10 W TH ST RE ET T R EE ST T PHASE 1 ES W 10 TH ALLEY ST RE ET WOOD STREET 10TH STREET PHASE 2 PHASE 3 WEST STREET 1 STONY POINT DESIGN/BUILD, LLC | CUNNINGHAM | QUILL ARCHITECTS | TIMMONS GROUP | WATERSTREET STUDIO 01.23.2018 11 B U IL DING BIRD’S EY E P ER SP EC T I V E (LOOKI N G N O RTH - E AST) PR ES TO GRA N DY A AV VE. E. W ES T ST RE ET PHASE 1 ALLEY WOOD STREET 10TH STREET PHASE 2 PHASE 3 WEST STREET 1 STONY POINT DESIGN/BUILD, LLC | CUNNINGHAM | QUILL ARCHITECTS | TIMMONS GROUP | WATERSTREET STUDIO 01.23.2018 12 B U IL DING BIRD’S EY E P ER SP EC T I V E (LOOKI N G N O RTH - E AST) PR ES TO GRA N DY A AV VE. E. W ES T ST RE ET PHASE 1 ALLEY WOOD STREET 10TH STREET PHASE 2 PHASE 3 WEST STREET 1 STONY POINT DESIGN/BUILD, LLC | CUNNINGHAM | QUILL ARCHITECTS | TIMMONS GROUP | WATERSTREET STUDIO 01.23.2018 13 B U IL DING P ERSP ECTI V E AT W EST ST R EET PHASE 1 ALLEY WOOD STREET 10TH STREET PHASE 2 PHASE 3 WEST STREET 1 STONY POINT DESIGN/BUILD, LLC | CUNNINGHAM | QUILL ARCHITECTS | TIMMONS GROUP | WATERSTREET STUDIO 01.23.2018 14 B U IL DING P ERSP ECTI V E ON 10 T H ST R EET AT W E ST STR E E T PHASE 1 ALLEY WOOD STREET 10TH STREET PHASE 2 PHASE 3 1 WEST STREET STONY POINT DESIGN/BUILD, LLC | CUNNINGHAM | QUILL ARCHITECTS | TIMMONS GROUP | WATERSTREET STUDIO 01.23.2018 15 L E VEL 1 P LA N T T T T 1 PROP. LINE 23 ALLEY PHASE ONE 5' - 0" PHASE TWO 19' - 0" 501.00' RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL COMMON AREA COMMON AREA LOBBY 1 1 22 24 LINKING STREET 5' - 20' setback 50% S-1 buffer PHASE 3 RESIDENTIAL 157' - 0" WOOD STREET 501.00' 501.00' 10TH STREET NW 95' - 0" NEIGHBORHOOD RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL OR 15' - 0" RESIDENTIAL PROP. LINE 60' - 0" 54' - 0" 55' - 0" 54' - 0" 60' - 0" 15' - 10" WEST STREET 283' - 0" LINKING STREET 5' - 20' setback 50% S-1 buffer 1 1 21 20 P RO P OSE D L E V E L 1 P L AN 1 S C A L E : 1 ” = 4 0 ’–0 ” STONY POINT DESIGN/BUILD, LLC | CUNNINGHAM | QUILL ARCHITECTS | TIMMONS GROUP | WATERSTREET STUDIO 01.23.2018 16 L E VEL S 2- 4 TY P ICA L P L A N T T T T PROP. LINE ALLEY PHASE ONE PHASE TWO RESIDENTIAL 1 22 PHASE 3 RESIDENTIAL 165' - 0" WOOD STREET 10TH STREET NW RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL PROP. LINE 69' - 0" 44' - 0" 65' - 0" 44' - 0" 69' - 0" WEST STREET 291' - 0" 1 1 21 20 P RO P OSE D L E V E L S 2 - 4 T Y P I C AL PLAN 1 S C A L E : 1 ” = 4 0 ’–0 ” STONY POINT DESIGN/BUILD, LLC | CUNNINGHAM | QUILL ARCHITECTS | TIMMONS GROUP | WATERSTREET STUDIO 01.23.2018 17 L E VEL 5 P LAN T T T T 1 PROP. LINE 23 ALLEY PHASE ONE 270' - 0" 21' - 0" 21' - 0" PHASE TWO TERRACE TERRACE TERRACE TERRACE TERRACE TERRACE PHASE 3 RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL 49' - 0" 1 1 22 24 RESIDENTIAL TERRACE TERRACE TERRACE TERRACE TERRACE 165' - 0" WOOD STREET TERRACE 10TH STREET NW 92' - 0" 92' - 0" 107' - 6" . 107'-6" . PROP. LINE 69' - 0" 40' - 0" 69' - 0" 44' - 0" 69' - 0" WEST STREET 291' - 0" 1 1 21 20 P RO P OSE D L E V E L 5 P L A N 1 S C A L E : 1 ” = 4 0 ’–0 ” STONY POINT DESIGN/BUILD, LLC | CUNNINGHAM | QUILL ARCHITECTS | TIMMONS GROUP | WATERSTREET STUDIO 01.23.2018 18 PAR K ING P LA N PHASE ONE 1 PROP. LINE 23 ALLEY GARAGE ENTRY 20' - 0" 18' - 0" ELEC RM WTR PHASE TWO RM SEE 1ST 489.00' FLOOR PLAN 18' X 30' FOR LOWER LOADING LOBBY ABOVE 1 36' - 0" 24 491.00' PHASE 3 RESIDENTIAL WOOD STREET ABOVE 170' - 0" 20' - 0" 36' - 0" 489.00' 20' - 0" 20' - 0" 18' - 0" 20' - 0" ROOM PROP. LINE 287' - 0" P RO P OSE D PA R K I N G P L AN 1 S C A L E : 1 ” = 40 ’–0 ” STONY POINT DESIGN/BUILD, LLC | CUNNINGHAM | QUILL ARCHITECTS | TIMMONS GROUP | WATERSTREET STUDIO 01.23.2018 19 OVER ALL SOUTH ELEVAT I ON 1 21 P ROP OSE D OV E R AL L S O U T H E L E VAT IO N @ WE ST ST RE E T 1 SC A L E : 1 ” = 40 ’–0 ” PHASE 1 N OT E : - P HASE T WO ME AS U R I N G P O INT IS B AS E D O N AV E RAG E C U R B H E I GH T ALO NG 1 0T H ST RE E T, NW. ALLEY -1 0T H ST R E E T, N W I S T H E P R IMARY ST RE E T FO R WOOD STREET 10TH STREET PHASE 2 PHASE 3 P HASE T WO. - P HASE T H R E E ME AS U R I NG P O INT IS B AS E D O N AV E RAG E C U R B H E I GH T ALO NG WE ST ST RE E T, NW. WEST STREET -WEST ST R E E T, NW I S T H E P R IMARY ST RE E T FO R P HASE T H R E E . 1 STONY POINT DESIGN/BUILD, LLC | CUNNINGHAM | QUILL ARCHITECTS | TIMMONS GROUP | WATERSTREET STUDIO 01.23.2018 20 S O U T H ELEVATION **NOTE: G ROUN D - L E V E L F LO O R -TO - F LO O R MAY VARY F ROM 11 ’ - 0” TO 1 4 ’ - 0 ” , AF F E C T I NG B U I L DI N G H E IG H T F ROM 60 ’ - 0” TO 6 5 ’- 0 ” . P RO P OSE D S O U T H E L E VAT I O N 1 S C A L E : 1 ” = 20 ’–0 ” PHASE 1 N OT E : - P HASE T WO ME AS U R I N G P O INT IS B AS E D O N AV E RAG E C U R B H E I GH T ALO NG 1 0T H ST RE E T, NW. ALLEY -1 0T H ST R E E T, N W I S T H E P R IMARY ST RE E T FO R WOOD STREET 10TH STREET PHASE 2 PHASE 3 P HASE T WO. WEST STREET 1 STONY POINT DESIGN/BUILD, LLC | CUNNINGHAM | QUILL ARCHITECTS | TIMMONS GROUP | WATERSTREET STUDIO 01.23.2018 21 W E ST ELEVATION **NOTE: GR OUND-LEVEL FLOOR -TO-FLOOR MAY VA RY FR OM 11’-0 ” TO 14’-0 ”, AFFECTING BUILDING HEIGH T FR OM 60 ’-0 ” TO 65’-0 ”. P ROP OSE D W E ST E L E VAT I O N @ 1 0T H ST RE E T NW 1 SC A L E : 1 ” = 20 ’–0 ” PHASE 1 N OT E : - P HASE T WO ME AS U R I N G P O INT IS B AS E D O N AV E RAG E C U R B H E I GH T ALO NG 1 0T H ST RE E T, NW. ALLEY -1 0T H ST R E E T, N W I S T H E P R IMARY ST RE E T FO R WOOD STREET 10TH STREET PHASE 2 PHASE 3 P HASE T WO. 1 WEST STREET STONY POINT DESIGN/BUILD, LLC | CUNNINGHAM | QUILL ARCHITECTS | TIMMONS GROUP | WATERSTREET STUDIO 01.23.2018 22 NO RT H ELEVATION **NOTE: GR OUND-LEVEL FLOOR -TO-F LOOR M AY VA RY FR OM 11’-0 ” TO 14’-0 ”, AFFECTING BU I L D I N G H E I GH T FR OM 60 ’-0 ” TO 65’-0 ”. PHASE 1 P RO P OSE D NO RT H E L E VAT I O N 1 S C A L E : 1 ” = 20 ’–0 ” 1 N OT E : - P HASE T WO ME AS U R I N G P O INT IS B AS E D O N AV E RAG E C U R B H E I GH T ALO NG 1 0T H ST RE E T, NW. ALLEY -1 0T H ST R E E T, N W I S T H E P R IMARY ST RE E T FO R WOOD STREET 10TH STREET PHASE 2 PHASE 3 P HASE T WO. WEST STREET STONY POINT DESIGN/BUILD, LLC | CUNNINGHAM | QUILL ARCHITECTS | TIMMONS GROUP | WATERSTREET STUDIO 01.23.2018 23 EAST ELEVATION **N OT E: G RO U ND- L E V E L F LO O R -TO -FLO O R MAY VARY F RO M 1 1 ’ - 0” TO 14 ’- 0 ” , AF F E C T I NG B UILDING H E IG H T F RO M 6 0’ - 0” TO 6 5’- 0 ” . P RO P OSE D E AST E L E VAT I O N 1 S C A L E : 1 ” = 20 ’–0 ” PHASE 1 N OT E : - P HASE T WO ME AS U R I N G P O INT IS B AS E D O N AV E RAG E C U R B H E I GH T ALO NG 1 0T H ST RE E T, NW. ALLEY -1 0T H ST R E E T, N W I S T H E P R IMARY ST RE E T FO R WOOD STREET 10TH STREET PHASE 2 PHASE 3 P HASE T WO. 1 WEST STREET STONY POINT DESIGN/BUILD, LLC | CUNNINGHAM | QUILL ARCHITECTS | TIMMONS GROUP | WATERSTREET STUDIO 01.23.2018 24 waterstreetstudio waterstreetstudio waterstreetstudio feet 0 15 30 waterstreet studio LANDSCAPE ARCHITEC TS PLANNERS PHASE 2 SUP SITE PLAN DAIRY CENTRAL - OLD MONTICELLO DAIRY DESIGN DEVELOPMENT CIVIL ENGINEERS 23 | JANUARY | 2018 Sheet List Table VICINITY MAP DAIRY CENTRAL - PHASE 2, 3, AND 4 SCALE: 1'' = 2000' Sheet Number Sheet Title C1.0 SPECIAL USE PERMIT CONCEPTUAL PLAN - PHASE 2 C2.0 SPECIAL USE PERMIT CONCEPTUAL PLAN - PHASE 3/4 # OF SHEETS = 2 SITE DATA: TAX MAP PARCEL AND OWNER INFO:PARCEL 310060000 DAIRY HOLDINGS, LLC 200 GARRETT ST, STE 0 CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA 22902 SPECIAL USE PERMIT CONCEPTUAL PLAN PROJECT LOCATION ENGINEER: TIMMONS GROUP 608 PRESTON AVENUE SUITE 200 CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA 22903 CONTACT: CLINT SHIFFLETT, P.E. TELEPHONE: 434-327-1690 TOP=496.39' CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE, VIRGINIA EP INV. IN=490.94' 8" TC (NW) TEL 434.295.5624 FAX 434.295.8317 www.timmons.com 608 Preston Avenue, Suite 200 | Charlottesville, VA 22903 ARCHITECT: CUNNINGHAM QUILL ARCHITECTS SIGN ON INV. IN=490.78' 8" STEEL (SW) 1054 31 STREET NW SUITE 315 2 CONC. BASE INV. OUT=490.65'' 8" 3 49 WASHINGTON DC 20007 49 1 W 49 (CHURCH) SIGNAL CONTACT: LEE QUILL, AIA S SAN SAN 8" TELEPHONE: 202-337-0090 EXCEPTION 14 SAN 0 SAN 49 OHP TRAFFIC SAN SAN D ARM VDOT SIGNAL VAULT 4 94 SAN S S SITE AREA: TOTAL AREA = 4.35 ACRES EASEMENT SWL DWL 8 PHASE 2 AREA = 1.42 ACRES (APPROXIMATE) 'VDH' 48 DB. 360 PG. 492 PHASE 3 AREA = 0.54 ACRES (APPROXIMATE) THIS DRAWING PREPARED AT THE 496 (SEE SHEET C1.0) S PHASE 4 AREA = 0.63 ACRES (APPROXIMATE) D 497 490 CHARLOTTESVILLE OFFICE IRON (F) C4 D 91.23' PK NAIL (F) CROSS-WALK 8"E S71°02'11"E SOURCE OF SURVEY, BOUNDARY, AND TOPOGRAPHY: TIMMONS GROUP CONC. SWOHP S76°41'2 PK NAIL (F) VDH VDH W OHP 2815 N. AUGUSTA ST, SUITE C MON MON (F) OHP STAUNTON, VA 24401 C3 71.51' C7 W IRON (F) D JOE MEDLEY, L.S. N67°37'23"W 101.86' (540) 885-0920 (S) IRON (F) IRON (F) CONC. CONDUCTED: 12/7/2016 WOOD VDH C2 S SW C8 5 SAN 44.8' RAMP L4 MONs HORIZONTAL DATUM REFERENCE: NAD83 (F) L1 ENTRA L3 NCE 3 1.1' 49 MISS UTILITY TICKET NUMBER: A631200369-00A FRAME CHURCH 0 REVISION DESCRIPTION 25.0' 60.5' U 1.2' W/ BASEMENTBSMT. OHP CURRENT USE: COMMERCIAL BUILDING, AUTO MECHANIC AND PARKING SD INLET 52.0' HATCH 49.9' 2.0' 1.3' 60.6' 6.0' IRON TRENCH CORNICE W PROPOSED USE: PHASE 1 - OFFICE, RETAIL, BREWERY, RESTAURANT (CURRENTLY UNDER DRAIN; L=57' REVIEW AS A BY-RIGHT DEVELOPMENT) 16.6' CONC. (S) 62.3' W 88.01' PHASE 2 - APT. BUILDING, RETAIL, AND PARKING GARAGE (SP REQUIRED) STEPS TOP=496.0' UNK. UTILITY CONC. 1.9' PHASE 3 - APT. BUILDING (SP REQUIRED) (CONC. COVER) 489 WOOD SAN PHASE 4 - PARKING GARAGE AND RETAIL (BY RIGHT) SAN STEPS 9 L5 SPECIAL USE PERMIT: A SPECIAL USE PERMIT IS BEING APPLIED FOR TO INCREASE THE 26.2' 48 "E OHP SWL DYL ALLOWABLE DENSITY UP TO 60 DUA AND HEIGHT FOR PROPOSED N28°36'29 BUILDINGS TO 65 FT. CONC. CONC. PP A2776791 24.1' WALL 15991 P STEPS YOUR VISION ACHIEVED THROUGH OURS. RECREATION AREA: NONE OH O 10NW419 CHAIN-LINK 489 HP 8 48 FENCE 'POB D' 496 8 OPEN SPACE: NONE 218.36' CONC. W 48 ZONED: CENTRAL CITY CORRIDOR, ENTRANCE CORRIDOR 26.2' 7 9 OHP 48 OHP 6''W AFFORDABLE UNITS:20 AFFORDABLE DWELLING UNITS ARE PROPOSED AS A PART OF THIS O HP 12 SAN PROJECT, ON SITE. N26°40'21"E N67°37'23"W 110.57' OH P 9 TMP 31-57 ALLOWABLE DENSITY: 43 DUA (MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT WITH AT LEAST 25% GFA IRON (F) MULTI-LEVEL RENNICK PROPERTIES, LLC SAN NON-RESIDENTIAL) AT 2.98' BRICK BUILDING DB. 932, PG. 246 PPSD A2776797 PP A2776596 OHP PROPOSED DENSITY:245 UNITS / 4.35 ACRES = 56.3 DUA INLET ADDRESS: 946 G0025 TRENCH GRADY AVENUE SETBACKS: PRIMARY STREET FRONTAGE (10TH ST, PRESTON AVE): 0' MIN; 15' MAX DRAIN;EM55 L=23' W (MULTIPLE SUITES) LINKING STREET FRONTAGE (WEST ST, GRADY AVE): 5' MIN; 20' MAX TOP=496.0' PK EP W SIDE/REAR, ADJACENT TO ANY NON-RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICT: 0' NAIL (F) STEPBACK: STREETWALL MAXIMUM 45' DATE 488 488 SAN STEPBACK AT HEIGHT OF STREET WALL 10' CURB 6''W OHP ADJACENT AREAS: NORTH - COMMERCIAL CONC. SW EAST - COMMERCIAL/RETAIL TMP 4-52 D 4''W SOUTH - RESIDENTIAL/COMMERCIAL SILK PURSE PROPERTIES, LLC WEST - RESIDENTIAL/CHURCH DB. 1117 PG. 149 PP 2776597 DATE SAN PP A2776798 FL88 MAX ALLOWABLE HEIGHT: 50' G0025 01/23/2018 W ALLOWABLE HEIGHT WITH SUP: 80' EM54 8 9 48 48 6''W DRAWN BY MAXIMUM HEIGHT REQUESTED: 65' 11 SAN 48 22 7 A.ALLISON GROSS FLOOR AREA:PHASE 2 - 202,305 GSF PHASE 3 - 61,000 GSF PP A2776599 PP A2776598 PHASE 4 - 114,000 GSF FM21 DESIGNED BY FM11 OHP SITE PHASING: OVERALL SITE TO BE DEVELOPED IN UP TO FOUR PHASES. 1 LEVEL 13 MOBILE C.SHIFFLETT 8" TMP 4-53 PARKING REQUIRED: LYNWOOD DALE WOOD BUILDING PARKING REQUIRED TMP 31-60 (OFFICE) CHECKED BY DB. 952, PG. 473 W PHASE 2 SAN PARKING REQUIRED FROM PHASE 1: 155 DAIRY HOLDINGS, LLC PARCEL A BOOK 1 488 MARKET RATE 1&2 BEDROOM UNITS : 155 X 1 SPACE/UNIT 155 SPACES 489 C.KOTARSKI AFFORDABLE HOUSING 1&2 BEDROOM UNITS: 20 X 0 SPACE/UNIT 0 SPACES TIE PHASE 2 DRAINS TO PHASE 1 SAN COMMERCIAL RETAIL SPACE: 1,358 SF X 3.5 SPACES/1,000 SF 5 SPACES OHP 496 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM SCALE PARKING REDUCTION (VICINITY TO BUS STOP, CC DISTRICT) (4) SPACES PP TOTAL PARKING REQUIRED: 311 SPACES G0025 1"=20' FM32 489 PARKING PROVIDED:PARKING GARAGE BENEATH PHASE 2 BUILDING: 143 SPACES SURFACE LOT FROM PHASE 1: 168 SPACES W S64°37'49"E DAIRY CENTRAL - PHASE 2, 3, AND 4 SPECIAL USE PERMIT TOTAL PARKING PROVIDED: 311 SPACES ACCESS TO S SAN SAN SAN S 24.64' OHP CG-12 PARKING DECK PHASE 3 AND 4 SAN PARKING REQUIRED FROM PHASE 1 AND 2 : 311 SPACES 497 489 PP D MARKET RATE 1&2 BEDROOM UNITS : 75 X 1 SPACE/UNIT 75 SPACES 10-156 FENCE COMMERCIAL RETAIL SPACE: 10,000 SF X 3.5 SPACES/1,000 SF 35 SPACES POST (F) FENCE 288.37' 49 PARKING REDUCTION (VICINITY TO BUS STOP, CC DISTRICT) (4) SPACES POST (F) 6 ACCESS TO PARKING DECK BELOW These plans and associated documents are the exclusive property of TIMMONS GROUP and may not be reproduced in whole or in part and shall not be used for any purpose whatsoever, inclusive, but not TOTAL PARKING REQUIRED: 417 SPACES PARKING GARAGE 1 SPECIAL USE PERMIT CONCEPTUAL PLAN - PHASE 2 49 OHP 10TH STREET, NW VAR. WIDTH R/W N22°28'31"E PARKING PROVIDED:PARKING GARAGE IN PHASE 1 BUILDING: 28 SPACES W 490 49 PARKING GARAGE BENEATH PHASE 2 BUILDING: 143 SPACES 2 PARKING GARAGE FROM PHASE 3/4: 300 SPACES LOBBY 1 AMENITY SPACE 49 49 SAN AMENITY SPACE ENTRANCE 0 TOTAL PARKING PROVIDED: 471 SPACES 49 3 PP A2776600 6' SITE TRIP GENERATION: SEE TRAFFIC IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT TMP 4-55 TIE TO EXISTING PIPE AND WATER QUALITY DOGWOOD PROPERTIES OF TREATMENT VOLUME OHP 0 UTILITIES: THE SITE WILL BE SERVED BY PUBLIC WATER AND SEWER. REMOVE PIPE AND INLET STUB 49 49 CHARLOTTESVILLE, LLC FOR 50% OF SITE AREA LANDSCAPE AREA FROM PHASE 1 4 DB. 1165, PG. 269 DYL STORMWATER: STORMWATER QUALITY WILL BE MET BY A COMBINATION OF S-2 SCREENING 491 FILTRATION CARTRIDGES AND OFF SITE WATER QUALITY 490 WATER QUALITY 49 CREDITS. STORMWATER QUANTITY HAS BEEN ACCOUNTED FOR IN THE W 7 PHASE 1 SITE PLAN TO MEET ENERGY BALANCE REQUIREMENTS. FILTRATION 49 14 13 7 8 PHASE 2 5 LID CHECKLIST SUMMARY: PROJECT MEETS THE LID CHECKLIST REQUIREMENT BY REDUCING THE CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE, VIRGINIA SAN FOOTPRINT OF PARKING BY PLACING 91.6% OF REQUIRED PARKING UNDER THE BUILDING 491 498 OHP FOOTPRINT OF PHASE 2 IN A PARKING GARAGE FOR 5 POINTS (WITH ALL OF THE PARKING IN A 49 PARKING GARAGE AFTER DEVELOPMENT OF PHASE 3 AND 4). ADDITIONALLY, A FILTER VAULT IS 492 6 492 PROPOSED (EXACT LOCATION NOT YET DETERMINED) TO ACCOMMODATE TREATMENT OF 50% OF PP THE PHASE 2 SITE (0.71 ACRES). A FILTER VAULT IS ALSO PROPOSED FOR PHASES 3 AND 4 G0025 6' (EXACT LOCATION NOT YET DETERMINED) TO ACCOMMODATE TREATMENT OF 50% OF THE PHASE 3 EM41 LANDSCAPE 49 SITE (0.27 ACRES). AREA (TYP) 7 49 CRITICAL SLOPES: NONE 3 W ' 49 23 PP A2776789 8 492 OHP 197. PUBLIC USE AREAS: NONE EM51 492 SAN INGRESS/EGRESS: ACCESS TO BUILDING PARKING GARAGES SHALL BE FROM PROPOSED 15' MAXIMUM SETBACK 49 ROADS THAT ARE ACCESSED FROM 10TH STREET, WEST STREET, AND 29"W 0' MINIMUM SETBACK 8 GRADY AVE. TMP 4-59 493 49 R:\103\40421-Dairy_Central_Phase2\DWG\Sheet\CD\C1.0 - Dairy Central PH2 Special Use.dwg | Plotted on 1/23/2018 10:48 AM | by Jeremy Sanders OHP LYNWOOD DALE WOOD 5 FLOOD PLAIN: THERE ARE NO FLOODPLAIN LIMITS WITHIN THE PROPERTY LIMITS PER DB. 860, PG. 156 °04' FEMAMAP #51003C0286D, PANEL 286 OF 575 DATED 02/04/2005. limited to construction, bidding, and/or construction staking without the express written consent of TIMMONS GROUP. 499 S39 493 OH OHP P STREAM BUFFERS: THIS PROPERTY DOES NOT IMPACT A STREAM BUFFER OR A FLOOD PLAIN. (ASPHALT) W AMENITY SPACE AMENITY SPACE LIGHTING PLAN: ALL LIGHTING SHALL BE FULL OBLIQUE SHIELDING OUTDOOR MHS SOH LIGHTING, WHICH SHALL NOT EMIT LIGHT ABOVE THE LINE OF SIGHT TOP=499.56' P 10 TO THE LIGHT SOURCES WHEN VIEWED FROM THE PROTECTED INV. OUT=493.39' 8" STEEL OHP PROPERTIES. THE SHIELD SHALL BLOCK DIRECT ILLUMINATION OF PROTECTED PROPERTIES AND THE FIXTURE SHALL COMPLETELY 3 CONCEAL AND RECESS THE LIGHT SOURCE FROM ALL VIEWING 494 49 POSITIONS EXCEPT THOSE POSITIONS PERMITTED TO RECEIVE TMP 31-57 499 RENNICK PROPERTIES, LLC OHP ILLUMINATION. SPILL OVER LIGHT FROM LUMINARIES ONTO PUBLIC IRON (F) ROADS AND ONTO ADJACENT PROPERTY SHALL NOT EXCEED (1/2) FOOT DB. 932, PG. 246 CURB CANDLES. LOCATION TO FIRE HYDRANTS: THERE ARE TWO EXISTING FIRE HYDRANTS THAT SERVE THIS EPW BUILDING. THEY ARE LOCATED AS FOLLOWS: LANDSCAPE AREA OHP PARKING DECK 495 RISER AND 1. ON THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE INTERSECTION OF 10TH ST & GRADY AVE. 70.86' RISER AND S-2 SCREENING CONC. SW HANDRAILS (TYP) PP A2776601 2. ON SOUTH SIDE OF WEST ST, ADJACENT TO THE PROPERTY. (PARCEL C) HANDRAILS (TYP) BELOW ADDITIONAL HYDRANTS WILL BE ADDED AS NECESSARY. TMP 4-60 IRON (F) OHP H & W DAIRY, LLC 20' MAXIMUM SETBACK 5 CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY LOCATION AND ELEVATION OF ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES INST. SHOWN NO. 2011003518 S22°42'16"W ON PLANS IN AREAS OF CONSTRUCTION PRIOR TO STARTING WORK. CONTACT ENGINEER IMMEDIATELY IF LOCATION OR ELEVATION IS DIFFERENT FROM THAT SHOWN ON THE PLANS, IF THERE APPEARS TO BE A CONFLICT, AND UPON DISCOVERY OF ANY UTILITY NOT SHOWN ON THE 500 PLANS. C1 OHP IRON (F) 5' MINIMUM SETBACK ANY SIDEWALKS AND/OR CURB DAMAGE IDENTIFIED IN THE SITE VICINITY DUE TO PROJECT PP CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES, AS DETERMINED BY THE CITY INSPECTOR, SHALL BE REPAIRED AT OHP OHP OHP OHP OHP 6' OHP OHP OHP OHP OHP OHP OHP OHP G0025 THE CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE. OHP OHP OHP OHP CROSS-WAL CG-12 MAG MHS 'POB A' PP A2776786 N68°06'19"W 402.28' ALL SIGNING AND PAVEMENT MARKINGS SHALL BE CONSISTENT WITH THE MUTCD. G0025 NAIL (F) OHP PP A2776593 PP A2776594 49 TOP=493.07' PK OHP PP A2776591 CG-12 G0025 3 INV. IN=487.77' 8" STEEL 495 49 EL38 PP WEST STREET G0025 SITE AND BUILDING CONSTRUCTION SHALL MEET 2006 IBC SECTION 3409 FOR ACCESSIBILITY. P 9 NAIL FL06 OH OHP G0025 EL77 8" INV. OUT=487.69' 8" STEEL OH 40' R/W S 8" OHP SAN SAN SAN PROJECT TIMING: THE ANTICIPATED START DATE FOR FOR PHASE 2 CONSTRUCTION IS SUMMER OHP (S) SAN SAN S OHP SAN OHP SAN P EL58 SAN SAN 83 O 2019, WHILE PHASE 3 AND 4 IS ANTICIPATED TO START DURING THE SUMMER OF OHP 2021 SW OR 2022. S68°11'17"E PP A2776592 HP OHP CONC. K (TYP.) CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES ARE ANTICIPATED TO LAST APPROXIMATELY 12-18 MONTHS. HEADER SW 7 D W 174.59' 49 'POB F' NA W W CURB EP W W W 494 PP A2776602 OHP W W 'POB C' 'POB B' EP W PP W A2776595 S68°00'37"E EP G G G G G WEST STREET PK NAIL (S) CONC. SW25.03' CURB OHP OHP OHP OHP OHP JOB NO. APPROVALS 40' R/W IRON X MHS TOP=493.78' EP CONC. SW (PARCEL B) 60.3' SW DRAIN IRON (S) TMP 31-73 S67°44'01"E IRON (S)IRON (S) SCALE 1"=20' 40421 OHP TMP 31-70 CONC. 1 LEVEL FRAME INV.=496.94' (S) INV. OUT= 487.89' 8" STEEL JANICE R. TMP 31-74 TMP 31-75 TMP 31-76 32.27' TMP 31-78 DIRECTOR OF NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT SERVICES H & W DAIRY, LLC & METAL PP FELTON JACOB E. ROTH AND SARAH E. ROTH SILK PURSE PROPERTIES, LLC FLORENCE C. BRYANT, TRUSTEE MARIA G. ARIAS SHEET NO. 20" INST. NO. 2011003518 CONC. P (PARCEL F) 0 20' 40' BUILDING OH EL86 DB. 1160, PG. 135 INST. NO. 2013001076 DB. 747, PG. 422 DB. 1066 PG. 309 EP P DB. 786, PG. 11 TMP 31-77 X DEC OH C1.0 OHP OH P (W/ RAISED WOOD H & W DAIRY, LLC CURB CLEARANCE) FENCE INST. NO. 2011003518 X EP TEL 434.295.5624 FAX 434.295.8317 www.timmons.com 608 Preston Avenue, Suite 200 | Charlottesville, VA 22903 SIGN ON 2 CONC. BASE 3 49 1 49 W 49 LANDSCAPE AREA LEGEND (CHURCH) SIGNAL S SAN SAN EXCEPTION 14 SAN SAN 90 OHP TRAFFIC SAN SAN 4 D ARM PROPERTY LINE GAS METER VDOT SIGNAL VAULT 49 4 SAN S S EASEMENT SWL DWL 8 'VDH' 11 48 POST/BOLLARD GAS VENT DB. 360 PG. 492 THIS DRAWING PREPARED AT THE 496 (SEE SHEET C1.0) S D 497 SIGN GAS MARKER 490 CHARLOTTESVILLE OFFICE D CROSS-WALK BUMPER BLOCK UGT TELECOM LINE CONC. SWOHP W OHP 0' MINIMU OHP SATELLITE DISH TELECOM MANHOLE M SETBA T CK W D TC TRAFFIC CONTROL BOX T TELEPHONE PEDESTAL CONC. WOOD S 6.5' 15' MAXIM UM SETB SW SAN U UNKNOWN MANHOLE COMMUNICATIONS VAULT RAMP ACK ENTRA NCE STORM SEWER ELECTRIC LINE 1.1' UGP 49 FRAME CHURCH 0 REVISION DESCRIPTION U D STORM SEWER MANHOLE E ELECTRIC MANHOLE W/ BASEMENTBSMT. OHP SD INLET CATCH BASIN ELECTRIC PULLBOX HATCH TRENCH CORNICE W CONC. DRAIN; L=57' W CATCH BASIN WITH DOME GRATE ELECTRIC METER TOP=496.0' UNK. UTILITY CONC. STEPS (CONC. COVER) 489 TRENCH DRAIN UTILITY POLE WOOD SAN SAN STEPS SAN SANITARY SEWER DECIDUOUS TREE 9 48 OHP SWL DYL S SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE GUARDRAIL CONC. CONC. WALL P STEPS YOUR VISION ACHIEVED THROUGH OURS. WATER LINE FENCE OH W X O CHAIN-LINK 489 HP 8 48 FENCE 496 W WATER MANHOLE XXX MAJOR CONTOUR CONC. W 48 WATER VALVE XXX MINOR CONTOUR 7 9 OHP 48 OHP 6''W WATER LINE MARKER SOIL BORING O HP SAN OH FIRE HYDRANT SURVEY CONTROL MONUMENT P MULTI-LEVEL TMP 31-57 RENNICK PROPERTIES, LLC SAN G MONITORING WELL GAS LINE SURVEY CONTROL POINT SD INLET TRENCH OHP W BRICK BUILDING ADDRESS: 946 GRADY AVENUE PHASE 4 DB. 932, PG. 246 DRAIN; L=23' (MULTIPLE SUITES) 0' SETBACK TOP=496.0' EP W DATE 488 488 SAN CURB 6''W OHP CONC. SW TMP 4-52 D 4''W SILK PURSE PROPERTIES, LLC DB. 1117 PG. 149 DATE SAN 01/23/2018 W 8 9 48 48 6''W DRAWN BY SAN 48 7 A.ALLISON DESIGNED BY OHP 1 LEVEL 6' LANDSCAPE AREA ACCESS TO MOBILE C.SHIFFLETT TMP 4-53 TIE TO EXISTING PIPE AND BUILDING LYNWOOD DALE WOOD PARKING GARAGE REMOVE PIPE AND INLET STUB (OFFICE) DB. 952, PG. 473 CHECKED BY W FROM PHASE 1 SAN 488 16' 489 C.KOTARSKI SAN OHP 496 SCALE 1"=20' 489 LANDSCAPE AREA W DAIRY CENTRAL - PHASE 2, 3, AND 4 SPECIAL USE PERMIT S SAN SAN SAN S OHP SAN 497 489 D 49 6 SPECIAL USE PERMIT CONCEPTUAL PLAN - PHASE 3/4 These plans and associated documents are the exclusive property of TIMMONS GROUP and may not be reproduced in whole or in part and shall not be used for any purpose whatsoever, inclusive, but not 1 49 OHP 10TH STREET, NW VAR. WIDTH R/W W 490 49 6' WATER QUALITY 2 PARKING GARAGE TREATMENT VOLUME 1 49 49 SAN 49 ENTRANCE 0 FOR 50% OF SITE AREA 3 TMP 4-55 DOGWOOD PROPERTIES OF OHP 0 WATER QUALITY 49 49 CHARLOTTESVILLE, LLC FILTRATION 4 DB. 1165, PG. 269 DYL 491 490 49 W 7 49 PHASE 2 5 PHASE 3 LANDSCAPE AREA CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE, VIRGINIA SAN 491 498 OHP 49 492 6 492 49 7 49 3 W 49 8 492 OHP 492 SAN R:\103\40421-Dairy_Central_Phase2\DWG\Sheet\CD\C2.0 - Dairy Central PH3 AND 4 Special Use.dwg | Plotted on 1/23/2018 10:49 AM | by Jeremy Sanders 49 8 TMP 4-59 493 49 OHP LYNWOOD DALE WOOD 5 DB. 860, PG. 156 limited to construction, bidding, and/or construction staking without the express written consent of TIMMONS GROUP. 499 493 OH OHP P (ASPHALT) W SOH P OHP 3 494 49 TMP 31-57 499 RENNICK PROPERTIES, LLC OHP 6' DB. 932, PG. 246 CURB EPW OHP 495 CONC. SW 20' MAXIMUM SETBACK OHP LANDSCAPE AREA 500 5' MINIMUM SETBACK S-2 SCREENING OHP OHP OHP OHP OHP OHP OHP 5.28' 5' OHP OHP OHP OHP OHP OHP OHP OHP OHP OHP OHP CROSS-WAL OHP 49 OHP 3 495 49 WEST STREET P 9 OH OHP OH 40' R/W S OHP SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN S OHP SAN OHP SAN P OHP SAN SAN 83 O OHP HP OHP CONC. SW K (TYP.) HEADER SW 7 D W 49 NA W W CURB EP W W W 494 OHP W W W EP W EP G G G G G WEST STREET CONC. SW CURB OHP OHP OHP OHP OHP JOB NO. 40' R/W X EP CONC. SW SW DRAIN SCALE 1"=20' 40421 OHP 1 LEVEL FRAME INV.=496.94' TMP 31-73 CONC. JANICE R. TMP 31-74 TMP 31-75 TMP 31-76 TMP 31-78 & METAL FELTON JACOB E. ROTH AND SARAH E. ROTH SILK PURSE PROPERTIES, LLC FLORENCE C. BRYANT, TRUSTEE MARIA G. ARIAS 0 20' 40' SHEET NO. 20" BUILDING CONC. OH P DB. 1160, PG. 135 INST. NO. 2013001076 DB. 747, PG. 422 DB. 1066 PG. 309 EP P DB. 786, PG. 11 X DEC OH C2.0 OHP OH P (W/ RAISED WOOD CURB CLEARANCE) FENCE X CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE DEPARTMENT OF NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT SERVICES STAFF REPORT PRELIMINARY DISCUSSION: SPECIAL USE PERMIT & ENTRANCE CORRIDOR DATE OF PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING: March 14, 2018 Project Planner: Heather Newmyer, AICP Date of Staff Report: March 1, 2018 Project Name: Gallery Court Hotel Property Street Address: 140 Emmet St N Tax Map/Parcel #: Tax Map 8, Parcel 4 Current Zoning Classification: Urban Corridor Mixed Use (URB), Entrance Corridor Overlay Comprehensive Plan (Land Use Plan): Public or Semi-Public Property Owner: Vipul Patel (Incaam Hotels) Applicant’s Representative: Daniel Hyer, P.E. (Line + Grade Civil Engineering) RE: Gallery Court Hotel – Redevelopment of lot 140 Emmet St (former Excel Inn & Suites) Background Vipul Patel, owner of property addressed 140 Emmet St North (“Subject Property”), is seeking to redevelop the Subject Property with a new boutique hotel to replace the longstanding hotel (Excel Inn &Suites) that was lost to a fire on May 4, 2017. Originally named the Gallery Court Motor Hotel, the former hotel dates back to the 1950’s. The hotel hosted Dr. Marin Luther King Jr in 1963 when the Civil Rights leader was invited by Robert F. Kennedy to Charlottesville for a lecture at the University. For more background information, please see the applicant’s preliminary project proposal narrative (Attachment 1). The applicant has also included a Preliminary Site Exhibit (Attachment 2), Preliminary Gallery Court Hotel Rendering and Preliminary Floor Layout (Attachments 3 & 4). It is the applicant’s desire to discuss with the Planning Commission the proposed preliminary plans and to obtain feedback that will inform their planning process prior to moving forward with formal submittals. The preliminary proposal calls for a boutique hotel comprised of: • Building Size: 74,605 gross square feet (GSF) • Height: Seven (7) Stories • Rooms: 72 • Parking: Structured containing 92 spaces 1 The Subject Property has road frontage on Emmet St North, is surrounded by the University to the west and south, and is bordered by the CSX Railroad to the north. The Subject Property is zoned Urban Corridor Mixed Use District (URB) and falls within an Entrance Corridor Overlay. Vicinity Map 2016 Aerial 2 Zoning Map Magenta: URB, Light Yellow: R-1, Light Blue Cross-Hatch: Entrance Corridor Overlay 2013 Comp Plan Yellow: Low Density Residential, Purple: Mixed Use, Light Blue: Public or Semi-Public, Hatched Area: University (Not Subject to City of Charlottesville municipal authority) 3 Preliminary Analysis The Subject Property is located within one of the City’s Entrance Corridors, is in close proximity to the University of Virginia as well as the 14 acre-site that will house the future redevelopment by UVA once their Ivy Corridor planning process is complete, and is an area that experiences high volumes of vehicular and pedestrian traffic. Because of the factors mentioned, how the Subject Property’s redevelopment creates a sense of place and tailors its design to the pedestrian experience is important. In addition, the Subject Property’s location is of importance in the City’s Smart Scale Emmet Streetscape Project, a planning process that kicked off in February 2018. The Emmet Streetscape Project is for the design of streetscape improvements along Emmet Street from the intersection of University Avenue and Ivy Road to Arlington Boulevard. The streetscape improvements include: landscaping with street trees, intersection improvements for better ADA and pedestrian access, bike lanes and a shared use path, consolidated bus stops/optimized bus shelters, and a shared use path connection under the CSX railroad tracks. The shared use path connection under the CSX railroad tracks will be determined through City- CSX railroad coordination and will either be on the east (Subject Property’s side) or west side of Emmet St N. Should the connection run along the east side of Emmet St N (the Subject Property’s side), the City will need to coordinate with the Subject Property as the shared use path will run adjacent to the Subject Property. City staff has met with the owner/applicant and applicant’s representative to have preliminary discussions regarding the project. City staff has made the owner aware of the Emmet Streetscape Project, its scope and the future coordination efforts. (Please note: Regardless of if the path will run along the west or east side of Emmet St N, the owner will be involved in the Emmet Streetscape Project’s ongoing public process and has been invited to sit on the Steering Committee). Staff wants to highlight the Gallery Court Hotel Design Team is aware of the Emmet Streetscape Project potentially locating the shared use path along the east side of Emmet Street and has expressed it is their intent to cooperate with the City and make reasonable accommodations for the path. In addition, City staff has passed along the Streets That Work Plan and the Entrance Corridor Guidelines to inform their planning process should they move forward with the formal special use permit request. It should be noted the Preliminary Site Exhibit (Attachment 2) depicts a seven (7) foot sidewalk and four (4) foot curbside buffer with future street trees; both street elements conform to the Mixed Use A Street Typology design parameters found in Streets That Work (Emmet St N is categorized as Mixed Use A). 4 Based off of the Subject Property’s current zoning (URB, Entrance Corridor Overlay), the Gallery Court Hotel preliminary proposal will require: 1) Special Use Permit – The preliminary proposal calls for a 7-story building that will exceed the maximum height allowed by-right in the URB Zoning District. The maximum height allowed in the URB District is sixty (60) feet; however, per Sec. 34-757, up to eighty (80) feet is allowed in this zoning district via a special use permit. a. Per Sec. 34-157(7), the Entrance Corridor Review Board (ERB) is to provide a recommendation to City Council regarding if the SUP request would have an adverse impact to the district, and for recommendations as to reasonable conditions which, if imposed, that would mitigate such impacts. 2) Entrance Corridor Review – The Subject Property falls within the Corridor 1 (Route 29 North from the Corporate Limits to Ivy Road); Sub Area C (Barracks Rd to Ivy Rd). Staff highlights a few items taken directly from the Vision Statement for Planning Commission’s discussion including: this area has the potential to become more of an urban boulevard with greater pedestrian activity, mixed use projects are to front on Emmet St N and the magnolia street trees along Emmet should be retained. See Attachment 7 for more detail on the description and vision of this area found within the Entrance Corridor Guidelines. To access the full Entrance Corridor Guidelines, see Attachment 8. a. Should the SUP be approved - Per Sec. 34-309(c), development requiring a site plan within an Entrance Corridor requires that a Certificate of Appropriateness (COA) be obtained. See the Preliminary Site Exhibit (Attachment 2) and Preliminary Gallery Court Hotel Rendering (Attachment 3).When meeting with the applicant, Preservation and Design planning staff made the following suggestion to the applicant specific to their preliminary rendering: Consider enhancing the pedestrian experience along the structure parking portion of the front building wall. This can be done by adding additional plantings at ground level or looking into potential green wall for that side of the building. Lastly, one of the preliminary meetings held with the applicant was considered a formal pre- application meeting for the special use permit request complying with Sec. 34-41(b)(1). The meeting was held on January 8, 2018 (See Pre-Application Verification Form (Attachment 5)). Should the applicant formally submit a special use permit request application, staff has requested in addition to general application requirements, per Sec. 34-41(d): • Project Proposal Narrative (Sec. 34-41(d)(1)) • Comprehensive Plan Analysis (Sec. 34-41(d)(2)) • Other Information – Traffic Analysis/Streets That Work Narrative (Sec. 34-41(d)(9)) 5 Questions/Topics for Discussion • Given the Subject Property’s prominent location in a City Entrance Corridor and in a high traffic volume area, discuss the pedestrian experience providing feedback on what is proposed. Concerns? Suggestions? • What is some initial feedback the Planning Commission can provide on the preliminary hotel rendering, site exhibit, and floor layout (Attachments 2-4) in light of Entrance Corridor guidelines (Attachments 7-8) specific to this area? o What is the initial reaction to the applicant’s proposed massing and scale? Suggestions? Concerns? • Discuss the proposed special use permit request in light of the following: o Upon initial review, do any of the Planning Commissioners foresee adverse impacts including but not limited to: traffic or parking congestion, noise, massing and scale of project. o Does the Planning Commission recommend any mitigations to the proposed building mass due to the requested increase in building height? o Is this project harmonious with surrounding area? o Does this use conform to the Land Use Map and future vision for this area? Attachments 1. Applicant Preliminary Project Proposal Narrative dated February 20, 2018 2. Preliminary Site Exhibit dated February 20, 2018 3. Preliminary Gallery Court Hotel Rendering received February 20, 2018 4. Preliminary Floor Layout dated February 20, 2018 5. Pre-Application Verification Form January 10, 2018 6. Corridor 1 (Route 29 North from the Corporate Limits to Ivy Road); Sub Area C (Barracks Rd to Ivy Rd) Entrance Corridor Excerpt 7. Entrance Corridor Guidelines: http://www.charlottesville.org/departments-and- services/departments-h-z/neighborhood-development-services/development-ordinances/entrance- corridor-review-board-erb 8. Sec. 34-157 – Special Use Permit General Standards of Issuance 6 Attachment 1 THE GALLERY COURT HOTEL 140 Emmet Street North, Charlottesville, VA 22903 TO: Heather Newmyer, City Planner – City of Charlottesville Neighborhood Development Services 610 East Market Street, Charlottesville, VA 22902 FROM: Vipul Patel Incaam Hotels 140 Emmet Street North, Charlottesville, VA 22903 DATE: February 20, 2018 RE: The Gallery Court Hotel - A boutique hotel redevelopment at the site of Excel Inn & Suites Planning Commission Workshop on March 13, 2018 Parcel ID: 080004000 THE GALLERY COURT HOTEL General Description: This project is best described as a redevelopment of an existing hotel which was lost to fire on May 04, 2017. The hotel property has deep and longstanding roots in Charlottesville dating back to 1950’s: originally named the Gallery Court Motor Hotel with an adjoining Howard Johnson’s Restaurant. The hotel has had a long and successful life due to the convenient location adjacent to the intersection of Emmet St & Ivy Rd (State Routes 29 & 250) as well as the University of Virginia Grounds. As an interesting historic insight: the hotel in 1963 was the host to Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. when the Civil Rights leader was invited by Robert F. Kennedy to Charlottesville for a lecture at the University. In short: this redevelopment project seeks to replace the lost building with a new boutique hotel comprised of 74,605 Square Feet, a 7-story structure that will house 72 standard and suite rooms and 92 effective parking spaces in structured parking. The parcel is bound by Emmet Street (East), C&O RR (North) and the University of Virginia (West and South). The total parcel area is 0.574 acres. Design for a Corridor Vision: The building is designed in an architectural language consistent with recent buildings built on the University of Virginia Grounds including the materials, scale, mass and color. The exterior building facades are predominately stone, brick, stucco and painted aluminum windows and shall be broken down into a scale compatible with buildings in the nearby vicinity. To maintain a human scale to the development the overall mass of the building has been broken into smaller blocks. The corner tower feature and the first three floors in a façade of stone recall the historic buildings of Charlottesville. The window features of the first three floors visually conceal the parking structure. The upper three floors have a native brick veneer. A tall frieze in light stucco color provide a cap to the building as a recollection of traditional buildings. The hotel is consistent with the City’s architectural character and respect of the qualities that have made Charlottesville a world class city. Preserve History: The original hotel, now left in ruins, shall not to be restored as a result of this redevelopment project. However, the name of the hotel shall create the verbal connection to the original hotel. 1 Facilitate Pedestrian Access: The site design shall facilitate pedestrian access to the building by virtue of the compactness and simplicity of accessing the hotel from the enclosed parking structure. Patrons will not need to leave the parking structure to enter the hotel. The wayfinding from parking space to hotel will be apparent and clearly indicated for those who have entered the hotel site. Maintain Human Scale in Buildings and Spaces: A low-rise mass in the front of the building and the entry Porte-cochere makes the building scale appropriate at the pedestrian level. Walkway along with the property facilitates the proposed pedestrian walkways concept by the city. The open area on the site will be landscaped to enhance the natural character of the site, and to facilitate human interaction. The façade treatment to the parking floors and the windows will conceal unwanted views of the parking deck. Preserve and Enhance Natural Character: The existing site is 99% impervious cover. The proposed redevelopment plan anticipates reducing the impervious cover close to 93% impervious cover. And, of this reduced impervious cover, much of it will be devoted to urban stormwater practices and landscaping adjacent to the Emmet Street – thus contributing to a sense of place (see below). In addition to the reduction in runoff associated with impervious areas and associated runoff reduction strategies, the proposed work shall provide street trees to provide shade for pedestrians as well as to promote the stormwater benefits such as tree canopy interception. Create a Sense of Place: The portion of the Emmet Street Corridor where this project is located experiences a high volume of pedestrian traffic – specifically UVA students walking between Grounds and their dorms/residences (Lambeth Field Apartments). The proposed work seeks to enhance the pedestrian experience in several ways. First, the portion of the site fronting on Emmet Street shall be designed in general conformance with the City’s Streets that Work Design Guide. According to this guiding document this portion of Emmet Street falls into the Category of Mixed Use A. Though, it is noteworthy to express that in most areas Mixed Use A street typologies contain a raised, landscaped center median and this portion of Emmet Street does not. That said, according to guidance this street frontage shall provide a 7-foot pedestrian sidewalk and a 4’ planted verge (curbside buffer). Both elements shall be provided in conformance with this published guidance. It is noteworthy to express that the Gallery Court Hotel Design Team is aware of the City of Charlottesville’s Plans to provide a shared use path along this portion of the Emmet Street corridor. As such, we would like to express that we intend to cooperate with the City to the greatest extent practicable and will make reasonable accommodations for this path. 2 Furthermore, this project shall devote a pedestrian access easement to the City as a result of the 7’ wide sidewalk which falls within the parcel boundary. Finally, the sense of place will be enhanced by the incorporation of an urban stormwater system which shall be introduced along the sidewalk within a trapezoidal buffer space between the sidewalk and the building façade. The design intent of this stormwater system shall be aesthetically attractive and well planted with a diverse, yet intentional, palate of native species. The intent is to create a stormwater management experience that visually connects the passer-by with an opportunity to interact with the engineered and visually designed stormwater feature. Create an Inviting Public Realm: For the reasons described above (Create a Sense of Place) we anticipate the public realm will feel inviting. Create Restrained Communication: The signage associated with the hotel will be of appropriate scale and in aesthetic harmony with the building itself. Screen Incompatible Uses and Appurtenances: As described previously, the parking garage shall be concealed by means of the provided landscape elements and the selected building materials which shall make the parking deck visually unobtrusive. Based on the unique nature of this site, the refuse storage will be contained within the building envelope and rolling trash containers will be wheeled nearer to the street edge for pickup. The design intent is such that even in their street-side position, the containers will be screened from view for the people who pass the site. Respect and Enhance Charlottesville’s Character: What started as a mere pass-through of Charlottesville in 1981 ended with a conversation between my father and the good-hearted owners George & Nell Eby and Herbert Monte Jr. of the University Lodge Motel (formerly Gallery Court Motor Hotel). Negotiations were completed on April 14, 1981, and as the saying goes: the rest is history. In retrospect, the University Lodge Motel was much more than livelihood for my family. The ownership and operation of this family business was our real-life American Dream. And despite inevitable hardships, owning and operating a mom-and-pop motel gave us purpose and vision for the future—the motel was our silver lining (not to mention the added bonus of being next door to Thomas Jefferson’s University didn’t hurt). 3 Though the name has changed throughout the years (University Lodge Motel, Budget Inn, and finally Excel Inn & Suites), the motel has been my lifelong passion. My parents quickly put down roots in Charlottesville, and chose it as the place to raise their family. While attending Charlottesville High, class of ‘84—sharing a lunch table with Boyd Tinsley and all—I became fully involved in the day-to-day operations of the motel After completing my degrees at Roanoke College and the VCU Medical College of Virginia, followed by a brief career in pharmacy, my wife and I made a conscious decision to commit to the hotel/motel business full time. In 1996, we took full control of operations from my parents, since then expanding to properties in Staunton, VA, Orange, VA and Belle Vernon, PA. The fire of May 4th was devastating beyond words. Though we are profoundly grateful that there was no harm done to our staff or guests, we never imagined losing Excel Inn & Suites entirely. We are thankful to the City Fire, City Police and others for their valiant efforts. Our hearts were shattered, and this continues to be a difficult time for my family. However, we find comfort in knowing that this is not the end, but the opportunity for a new beginning. Though rumors persisted that we plan to sell or have sold the property to UVA and/or other developers, I can unequivocally state that that new beginning is the redevelopment of our boutique hotel: The Gallery Court Hotel. Towards this endeavor, I am proud to have on my team Neil Bhatt and Asim Kumar of Nbj Architecture and Daniel Hyer of Line + Grade with others to follow. Charlottesville has meant the world to my family and me—not only for its rich history, strong sense of community, incredible restaurants, and natural beauty—but for the opportunities it has provided us. Charlottesville has given my children a world-class education in the halls of Albemarle High, and later at the University of Virginia. And, it’s offered my wife and me the ability to create the career we’ve always dreamed of. We continue to love and cherish this town and all it has to offer and promise that we are here to stay. 4 © 2018 - LINE+GRADE, LLC CURB CITY STANDARD ENTRANCE 7' SIDEWALK 4' BUFFER STRIP 5' BIKE LANE STREET LIGHT 17 N 15° 6.09' 43'41 "E STREET TREE URBAN BIORETENTION SYSTEM CURB RAMP HARDSCAPE S 60°47'18" E 162.59' RAMP N 55°59'35" 122.37' W CURB CONCRETE S 29°05'00" W181.47' GALLERY COURT HOTEL CONCEPT SITE LAYOUT CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA DATE 02/20/2018 PROJECT 1801200 Attachment 5 Attachment 6 Corridors V B. Corridor 1: Route 29 North from the corporate limits to Ivy Road Recommended General Guidelines • Buffer regulations: and University offices in former • Mid Scale Adjacent to any low-density commercial buildings. Heights vary residential district, side and rear from 1 to 4 stories, and there is a • Mixed-use buffers (S-2 type) shall be required, variety of architectural scales, forms • On site/shared parking 5 feet, minimum. and materials. • Consolidation of smaller parcels Sub-Area C: Barracks Road to Recent past: bank buildings on the Ivy Road northwest corner of Emmet Street • Upgrade existing building and site Description and Arlington Boulevard and on the elements southwest corner of Emmet Street and Guidelines Specific to the Zoning North of Arlington Boulevard, this Barracks Road. sub-area is dominated by the very (URB) Urban Corridor: The intent Vision successful Barracks Road Shopping of the Urban Corridor district is Center on the west side and University Emmet Street has the potential to to continue the close-in urban offices on the east. Between Arlington become more of an urban boulevard, commercial activity that has been Boulevard and Ivy Road, two with lively pedestrian activity and the traditional development patterns motels, a hotel, two restaurants, and a greater mix and integration of in these areas. Development in this other University related structures uses. Both Barracks Road Shopping district is both pedestrian and auto- predominate. The University has a Center and Meadowbrook Shopping oriented, but is evolving to more of new sports arena on Massie Road and Center may redevelop with retail, a pedestrian center development plans to develop a new arts center office, hotels, housing, and structured pattern. The regulations provide for on the northwest corner of Emmet parking. The attractive magnolia street both a mixture of uses or single use Street at Ivy Road. A new pedestrian trees along Emmet Street should be commercial activities. It encourages bridge over Emmet Street, between retained and new landscaping added parking located behind the structure the existing CSX railroad bridge to the streetscape as redevelopment and development of a scale and and Massie Road, has also been occurs. There are opportunities character that is respectful to the constructed to connect the Central for unified landscaping along the neighborhoods and University uses Grounds to the North Grounds. corridor that would help enhance the adjacent. Streetscape: Overhead utilities, 4 lanes, pedestrian connection. If possible, • Height regulation: character-defining architecture should grass median, cobra-head lights, row 1 to 5 stories; recommend 2 to 4 be incorporated into redevelopment of magnolia street trees along shopping stories. plans. As the University redevelops its center, heavily landscaped wooded • Setbacks: edge, pedestrian and railroad bridges, property on the southern end of the Primary street frontage: 5 feet University planted street trees at sub-area, including the University Arts minimum; 30 feet maximum, southern end, creek bed plantings. Center, there may be opportunities recommend 5 to 10 feet. to include student housing and Site: Parcels dominated by front community-related facilities in mixed- Linking street frontage: 5 feet site parking with buildings to rear, use projects that front on Emmet minimum; 20 feet maximum. monument signs, concrete and brick Street. Side and Rear, adjacent to any low- retaining walls. density residential district: 10 feet, Buildings: Franchise retail buildings, minimum. shopping center, landscaped slope Side and Rear, adjacent to any other to east with elevated University- zoning district: none required. related office structures, multi-family residential, restaurants, motels, 8 CHARLOTTESVILLE ENTRANCE CORRIDOR DESIGN GUIDELINES Attachment 8 Sec. 34-157. - General standards for issuance. (a) In considering an application for a special use permit, the city council shall consider the following factors: (1) Whether the proposed use or development will be harmonious with existing patterns of use and development within the neighborhood; (2) Whether the proposed use or development and associated public facilities will substantially conform to the city's comprehensive plan; (3) Whether proposed use or development of any buildings or structures will comply with all applicable building code regulations; (4) Whether the proposed use or development will have any potentially adverse impacts on the surrounding neighborhood, or the community in general; and if so, whether there are any reasonable conditions of approval that would satisfactorily mitigate such impacts. Potential adverse impacts to be considered include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: a. Traffic or parking congestion; b. Noise, lights, dust, odor, fumes, vibration, and other factors which adversely affect the natural environment; c. Displacement of existing residents or businesses; d. Discouragement of economic development activities that may provide desirable employment or enlarge the tax base; e. Undue density of population or intensity of use in relation to the community facilities existing or available; f. Reduction in the availability of affordable housing in the neighborhood; g. Impact on school population and facilities; h. Destruction of or encroachment upon conservation or historic districts; i. Conformity with federal, state and local laws, as demonstrated and certified by the applicant; and, j. Massing and scale of project. (5) Whether the proposed use or development will be in harmony with the purposes of the specific zoning district in which it will be placed; (6) Whether the proposed use or development will meet applicable general and specific standards set forth within the zoning ordinance, subdivision regulations, or other city ordinances or regulations; and (7) When the property that is the subject of the application for a special use permit is within a design control district, city council shall refer the application to the BAR or ERB, as may be applicable, for recommendations as to whether the proposed use will have an adverse impact on the district, and for recommendations as to reasonable conditions which, if imposed, that would mitigate any such impacts. The BAR or ERB, as applicable, shall return a written report of its recommendations to the city council. (b) Any resolution adopted by city council to grant a special use permit shall set forth any reasonable conditions which apply to the approval. (9-15-03(3); 11-21-05; 2-21-06) City of Charlottesville Neighborhood Development Services MEMORANDUM “A World Class City” www.charlottesville.org TO: Planning Commission FROM: Alex Ikefuna, NDS Director DATE: March 6, 2018 SUBJECT: Hydraulic-29 Small Area Plan – Transportation Phase Update Background The City of Charlottesville and Albemarle County expressed interest in a joint Small Area Plan to address land use and transportation issues in the Hydraulic-Route 29 Intersection Area. Because of the inter-jurisdictional interests, the City, County and the Charlottesville-Albemarle Metropolitan Planning Organization (TJMPO) in partnership with the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT), expressed a mutual interest in establishing an agreeable framework for coordinating and providing planning and engineering studies necessary to provide a Transportation and Land Use Development Plan for this geographic area. The main area of study includes the Route 29 Hydraulic, Route 250 By- pass and Hillsdale highway intersections and surrounding that directly influence current and future traffic, bicycle and pedestrian travel patterns within this portion of the Route 29 Solutions Program encompassing approximately 600 acres; 300 acres in the City and 300 acres in the County. The area is bounded by Greenbrier Drive/Whitewood Road in the North, US Highway 250 in the South, Meadow Creek in the East and North Berkshire Road in the West. The project has two phases. The first phase of the project is the land use element which was completed last fall and has already been presented to the Planning Commission. The second phase of the Small Area Plan is the preliminary engineering that addresses transportation needs for the project area. The land use element was prepared by Kimley-Horn consulting firm and the transportation and engineering component by Baker International. Land Use Element – Key Vision Statements • Strong Sense of Place (Create great streets and connected public spaces; establish an authentic urban form) • Vibrant, Dynamic Economy (A vibrant mixed-use destination for business; integrate a variety of housing and affordability options) • Equitable. Environmentally Sustainable Community (Promote housing within the core area; Create a multi-modal development system; Plan for environmentally sustainable stormwater management practices) Hydraulic-29 SAP Transportation Phase Update Page 1 • Connected by an Efficient, Multi-Modal Transportation Network, enhanced transit service; safe options for crossing Route 29; (Improved pedestrian and bicycle facilities; better neighborhood connectivity to the core area.) Transportation Elements • US 29 and Hydraulic Road Intersection Improvement (3 potential scenarios) • Hydraulic Road and District Avenue Roundabout • Hydraulic Road and Hillsdale Drive Roundabout • Zan Road Grade Separation-Connection over Route 29. • Angus Road Grade Separated Intersection with right turn only access and signalized US 29 South Bound U-Turn. • Hillsdale Drive Connection to Holiday Drive • Relocation of West Bound US 250 Ramps to Hillsdale Drive Extension. • Extend East Bound US 250 left-turn lane at Hydraulic There are three potential scenarios proposed for the US 29 and Hydraulic Intersection improvement; one of which will be selected. Scenario 1: This scenario has three options: a) pedestrian crossing over US Route 29, unsignalized pedestrian crossing, barrier at pedestrian crossing and shared-use path/sidewalk; b) pedestrian tunnels under Right-Turn Ramps, pedestrian crossing under US Route 29, and shared-use path/sidewalk; and c) pedestrian ramp system, unsignalized pedestrian crossing, barrier at pedestrian crossing and shared- use path/sidewalk. Estimated Cost: $29 - $35 million (does not include Right of Way acquisition) . Scenario 2: At-grade pedestrian crossing, signalized pedestrian crossing, dedicated bike lanes and shared-use path/sidewalk. Estimated cost: $9.5 - $12 million (does not include Right of Way acquisition) Scenario 3: Grade-separated roundabout, bike/pedestrian accommodations, roundabout approach and shared-use path/sidewalk. Estimated cost: $40 - $48 million (does not include Right of Way acquisition). Community Engagement Process: Several Advisory Panel and community meetings have been held to present information and solicit input that guide the development of the resulting plans. Next Steps: The transportation plan will be presented to the Planning Commission in April, at its regular monthly meeting and will include a request to formally endorse the land use and transportation plans. This will subsequently go to the City Council for consideration. The City intends to partner with the Thomas Jefferson Metropolitan Planning Organization and Albemarle County in submitting application for Smart Scale funding to implement the intersection improvement this summer. All related information on the process can be accessed at: www.route 29 solutions.org. Hydraulic-29 SAP Transportation Phase Update Page 2