Agenda PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR DOCKET TUESDAY, October 9, 2018 at 5:30 P.M. CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS I. Commission Pre-Meeting (Agenda discussion(s)) Beginning: 4:30 p.m. Location: City Hall, 2nd Floor, NDS Conference II. Commission Regular Meeting Beginning: 5:30 p.m. Location: City Hall, 2nd Floor, Council Chambers A. COMMISSIONERS' REPORTS B. UNIVERSITY REPORT C. CHAIR'S REPORT D. DEPARTMENT OF NDS E. MATTERS TO BE PRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC NOT ON THE FORMAL AGENDA F. CONSENT AGENDA (Items removed from the consent agenda will be considered at the end of the regular agenda) 1. Final Subdivision – Stonehenge PUD III. JOINT MEETING OF COMMISSION/ COUNCIL Beginning: 6:00 p.m. Continuing: until all public hearings are completed Format: (i) Staff Report, (ii) Applicant, (iii) Hearing 1. Hogwaller Farm ZM-18-00001 – (918 Nassau Street) (Hogwaller Farm Development) – Justin Shimp (Shimp Engineering) on behalf of Charles Hurt and Shirley Fisher (landowners) have submitted a rezoning petition for Tax Map 61 Parcels 79.17, 79.18, & 79.19, 918 Nassau Street, and a portion of Tax Map 61 Parcel 79 (Subject Properties). The rezoning petition proposes a change in zoning from the existing R-2 Two-family Residential to HW Highway Corridor with proffered development conditions. The proffered conditions include: (i) maximum height of buildings: Any structures(s) located on the property shall not exceed thirty-five (35) feet in height, where height is the vertical distance measured perpendicularly from grad from the highest point on such building or structure; (ii) future land uses: The land uses permitted on the Subject Properties are found in the HW Corridor Sec. 34-796 use matrix, but prohibits the following; Bed-and-breakfasts homestays, B&Bs, Inns, amusement centers, art galleries, auditoriums, automotive services, banks/financial institutions, health clinics, private clubs, data centers, dry cleaning establishments, elementary schools, high schools, hotels/motels, laundromats, libraries, movie theaters, municipal buildings, music halls, offices, outdoor storage, public recreational facilities, fast food restaurants, full service restaurants, taxi stands, transit facilities, home improvement centers, pharmacies, shopping centers, retail stores over 4,001 SF, and laboratories; (iii) affordable housing; contingent upon approval of residential density on site, 15% (fifteen percent) of the Floor Area Ratio (FAR) of the residential square footage of the project will be available for rent on-site. For-rent affordable units shall rent at a rate making the units affordable to households with incomes at not more than 80% of the area median income for a period on not more than 15 (fifteen) years. The Subject Properties are further identified on City Real Property Tax Map 61 Parcels 79, 79.17, 79.18, 79.19, & 79.201. The Subject Properties is approximately 0.8 acres. The Land Use Plan calls for Low Density Residential. The Comprehensive Plan specifies density no greater than 15 units per acre. SP18-00004 – (918 Nassau Street) (Hogwaller Farm Development) – Justin Shimp (Shimp Engineering) on behalf of Charles Hurt and Shirley Fisher (landowners) have submitted an application seeking approval of a Special Use permit (SUP) for a portion of Tax Map 61 Parcel 79, Tax Map 61 Parcels 79.16, 79.17, 79.18, & 79.19, 918 Nassau Street (Subject Properties). The SUP application proposes a density of 32 Dwelling Units Acres (DUA) per City Code Sec. 34-740. The applicant is requesting a rezoning (see petition ZM-18-00001) and a SUP for the proposed development of eighteen (18) one-bedroom and twelve (12) two-bedroom units split between two (2) three-story buildings for a total of thirty (30) dwelling units. The development is being proposed as an urban farm and will accommodate a 1,280 square foot greenhouse and a 600 square foot retail farm store. Additional parking, farm sheds (not to exceed 600 square feet), and agricultural fields supporting the development are proposed on an adjacent 7.52 acre county parcel. The Subject Properties are further identified on City Real Property Tax Map 61 Parcels 79, 79.16, 79.17, 79.18, 79.19, & 79.20. The Subject Properties are approximately 0.94 acres and has road frontage on Nassau Street. The Land Use Plan calls for Low Density Residential. The Comprehensive Plan specifies density no greater than 15 units per acre. Information pertaining to these requests may be viewed five days prior to the Public Hearing online at http://www.charlottesville.org/departments-and-services/departments-h-z/neighborhood-development-services or obtained from the Department of Neighborhood Development Services, 2nd Floor of City Hall, 610 East Main Street. Persons interested in this Rezoning and SUP petition may contact Matt Alfele by email (alfelem@charlottesville.org) or by telephone (434-970-3636). IV. COMMISSION’S ACTION ITEMS Continuing: until all action items are concluded 1. Long Range Transportation Plan Process Presentation V. FUTURE MEETING SCHEDULE/ADJOURN Tuesday, October 23, 2018 - 5:00 PM Work Comprehensive Plan Session Tuesday, November 13, 2018 – 4:30 Pre- Meeting PM Tuesday, November 13, 2018 – 5:30 Regular Public Hearing: East High Street PM Meeting Streetscape Project – Preferred concept review Minutes – September 11, 2018 – Pre­ meeting and Regular meeting Anticipated Items on Future Agendas Zoning Text Amendments –Off-street parking facilities requirements along streets designated as “framework streets” (initiated May 8, 2018) SUP –MACAA (1021 Park Street), 513 Rugby Road, 167 Chancellor PUD - ZM18-00002- 1335, 1337 Carlton Avenue (Carlton Views PUD) CIP – Work Session December 18, 2018, Public Hearing – Jan 8, 2019 Persons with Disabilities may request reasonable accommodations by contacting ada@charlottesville.org or (434)970-3182 PLEASE NOTE: THIS AGENDA IS SUBJECT TO CHANGE PRIOR TO THE MEETING. PLEASE NOTE: We are including suggested time frames on Agenda items. These times are subject to change at any time during the meeting. LIST OF SITE PLANS AND SUBDIVISIONS APPROVED ADMINISTRATIVELY 9/1/2018 TO 9/30/2018 1. Preliminary Site Plans 2. Final Site Plans 3. Site Plan Amendments a. 522 2nd Street SE – North American Sake – Sept 7, 2018 b. 1154 5th Street SW (Tiger Fuel) – Sept 18, 2018 4. Subdivision a. BLA - 1027 Locust Avenue & 1024 St. Charles Ave (TMP 48 – 57 & 57.1) – Sept 25, 2018 CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE DEPARTMENT OF NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT SERVICES STAFF REPORT APPLICATION FOR APPROVAL OF A SUBDIVISION PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING DATE OF MEETING: October 9, 2018 Project Planner: Brian Haluska Date of Staff Report: September 24, 2018 Development: Belmont Point (Tax Map 60 Parcels 81.8, 91, 120, 120A, 120B, 120C, 122, 122.4, 122.5, 122.6, and 122.7) Applicant: Justin Shimp of Shimp Engineering Current Property Owner: Stonehenge Park LLC Applicable City Code Provisions: 29-1 through 29-126 (Subdivision) Zoning District: Planned Unit Development (“PUD”) Reason for Planning Commission Review: The Planning Commission shall review major subdivisions per Section 29-76(a). Vicinity Map 1 Standard of Review Approval of a subdivision is a ministerial function, as to which the Planning Commission has little or no discretion. When an applicant has submitted a subdivision that complies with the requirements of the City’s Subdivision Ordinance, then approval of the plat must be granted. In the event the Planning Commission determines there are grounds upon which to deny approval of a subdivision, the motion must clearly identify the deficiencies in the subdivision, that are the basis for the denial, by reference to specific City Code sections and requirements. Further, upon disapproval of a subdivision, the Planning Commission must identify the modifications or corrections that would permit approval of the subdivision. Summary Justin Shimp of Shimp Engineering, acting as agent for Stonehenge Park LLC, is requesting approval of a major subdivision to create 25 single-family residential lots, an extension of a public street, (1) new public street, and reserved open space. This subdivision is considered major because it includes more than six (6) lots, the creation of a new public street, and the extension of public facilities. The properties are further identified on City Real Property Tax Map 60 Parcels 81.8, 91, 120, 120A, 120B, 120C, 122, 122.4, 122.5, 122.6, and 122.7 having frontage on Stonehenge Avenue and Quarry Road. The site is approximately 6.23 acres. The subdivision has undergone one (1) review by staff, with twenty-two (22) comments remaining to be addressed that were primarily formatting and drawing concerns. Those comments are attached. Subdivision Compliance Subdivisions are reviewed for compliance with City codes and standards. An overview of subdivision requirements and the location of those items on the subdivision plat are outlined below. Subdivision Requirements A. Compliance with design standards and improvements (per Sections 29-160 - 29-163) 1. Blocks: One (1) new block will be created as a result of this subdivision. 2. Lots: The applicant is proposing to create 25 residential lots. 3. Parks, Schools, and other Public Land: No new public spaces will be created with this subdivision. 4. Preservation of natural features and amenities: Critical slopes as defined by Section 34-1120(b)(2) are found on the site. The applicant previously received a critical slope waiver. 2 5. Soil Erosion and Sediment Control: The applicant has an approved erosion and sediment control plan. 6. Monuments: Monuments will be used in the subdivision as needed. B. Compliance with the Street Standards for Subdivisions (Section 29-180 – 29-183) The proposed subdivision includes one (1) new public street. The design of the public street was previously reviewed and approved by the Engineering and Traffic Divisions as part of the site plan review process. C. Compliance with Utility Standards for Subdivisions (Sections 29-200 – 29-204) The utility layout and configurations were approved by Public Utilities as a part of the site plan review process. D. Compliance with applicable zoning district regulations (Sections 34-350 – 34-420) All lots shown on the subdivision plat are legal and buildable single-family residential lots that conform to the standards previously approved by City Council in the Planned Unit Development concept plan. E. Compliance with the Erosion and Sediment Control Ordinance (Chapter 10) As noted before, the applicant has an approved erosion and sediment control. Public Comments Received No comments received. Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the subdivision Attachments 1. Final Subdivision Plat Dated September 25, 2018 2. Final Plat Comments dated September 14, 2018 3. Final Plat Comments response dated September 26, 2018 3 THE PLATTING OR DEDICATION OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED LAND [LOTS 1 THRU 25. BELMONT POINT] IS WITH THE FREE CONSENT AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE DESIRE OF THE UNDERSIGNED OWNERS. PROPRIETORS AND TRUSTEES. IF ANY. FOR: STONEHENGE PARK. LLC CITY /COUNTY OF _ _ _ _ __ STATE OF _ _ _ _ _ _ __ THE FOREGOING INSTRUMENT WAS ACKNOWLEDGED BEFORE ME THIS DAY OF _ _ _ __ _ _ ,BY _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ FOR: STONEHENGE PARK, LLC NOTARY PUBLIC _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ REGISTRATION# -----------­ MY COMMISSION EXPIRES : _ _ _ _ _ _ __ NOTARY SEAL ' APPROVED FOR RECORDATION: )(,,, ROCKLAND AVENUE UNOPENED SECRETARY OF PLANNING COMMISSION DATE QUARRY ROAD CHAIRMAN OF PLANNING COMMISSION DATE KEY MAP SCALE : 1 "= 200' SHEET LAYOUT 3 4 5 SUBDIVISION PLAT LOTS 1 THROUGH 25 BELMONT POINT THE PROPERTY OF STONEHENGE PARK,LLC LOCATED ON STONEHENGE AVENUE, CASTALIA STREET, ROCKLAND AVENUE & QUARRY ROAD CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE, VIRGINIA SCALE: 1"= 30' DATE: OCTOBER 31, 2014 REVISED: JANUARY 26, 201B REVISED: JUNE 15, 201B REVISED: SEPTEMBER 25, 2018 FOR SIMEON INVESTMENTS LLC ROGER W. RAY I> ASSOC., INC. 663 BERKMAR COURT CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA 22901 434-293-3195 SHEET 1 OF 5 WWW.RAYSURVEYING.COM 10928L LINE DELTA RADIUS ARC TANGENT CHORD CHORD BEARING LINE BEARING DISTANCE Ci 79 "ii' 36" 20.00 27.64 i6.54 25.50 SB5 "2i '54"W L1 S70"03'i6"E 32.B6 C2 i3"i4'40" i75.00 40.45 20.32 40.36 S37 "44' i3"W L2 SB5 "24' i5"E i.99 C3 ii "30 '34" i75.00 35. i5 i7.64 35.09 S25 "2i '36"W L3 S06 ·22' 29 "w 0.54 C4 5 ·22 '46" i75.00 i6.43 B.22 i6.42 Ni6"54'56"E L4 NB5 "24' i4 "W i 7 i. 99 C5 7"43'45" 225.00 30.35 i5.20 30.33 S2i"40'22"W L5 NB5 "24' i4 "W i3.46 C6 ii "2B '50" 225.00 45.0B 22.62 45.0i S3i"i6'40"W L6 NB5 "24' i4 "W 0. i4 Cl 79 "ii' 36" 20.00 27.64 i6.54 25.50 S06"iO'i9"W L7 N30"09'00"E i7.95 CB B"2B '32" 220.00 32.54 i6.30 32.5i S29 "i i ' i 2 "E LB Ni4"5i'OO"W 7.07 C9 7"06'18" 220.00 27.2B i3.66 27.26 S2i "23 '47"E L9 S30"09'00"W 22.00 C10 0"46'53" 110. 00 i.50 0.75 i.50 SiB"i4'05"E L10 S75 "09' 00 "w 7.07 Cii 25 "18 '5B" 110. 00 4B.60 24.7i 4B.2i S3 i "i 7 '0 i "E Ci2 26"06'46" 110. 00 50. i3 25.5i 49.70 S56 "59 '53 "E Ci3 75 "3i '27" i00.00 i3 i. B2 77.46 i22.4B S32 "43 '45 "E PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENTS Ci4 76 "23 '52" 50.0i 66.6B 39.35 6i. B5 N32 "43 '45 "W LINE BEARING DISTANCE Ci5 2i"59'i3" i60.00 6i. 40 3i. OB 6i. 02 N59"03'39"W Si S59 "5 i '00" E B.96 Ci6 i6"i5'32" i60.00 45.40 22.B6 45.25 N39 "56' i6"W S2 Si5"i5'35"W 5i. i5 Ci7 i3 •57 '52" i60.00 39.00 i9.60 3B.90 N24 "49 '34 "W S3 S79"07'29"W 49. i4 C18 5"i4'03" i70.00 i5.53 7.77 i5.25 S20 "27 '40 "E S4 S59"50'56"E 6.05 Ci9 30 "44 '43" i70.00 9i. 22 46.74 90. i3 S3B "27 '03 "E S5 N29 "47' i6"E 3.00 C20 5 ·o i · 35 . i70.00 i7.BB B.95 i7.B7 N56 "50' i2"W S6 N46 "5i' iO"E 5.02 C2i i 7 "i 7 '2B" 255.00 76.96 3B.77 76.66 S26 "29 '22 "E S7 N44"30'49"E 6. i6 C22 B"29 '2 i" 255.00 37.7B 18. 93 37.75 N30 "53 '25 "W SB N79"03'47"W B.67 C23 B"4B'06" 255.00 39. i7 i9.63 39. i3 N22 "i 4 ' 4 i "W S9 SiO "56' i3"W 18.99 C24 35 "5B '47" 75.00 47. 10 24.35 46.33 S35 "50 'Oi "E S10 NB4 "54' i2"W i5B.Oi C25 ii "56 '0 i" 75.00 i5.62 7.B4 i5.93 N23 "4B '39 "W Sii S05"05'4B"W 26.39 C26 24"02'45" 75.00 3i. 4B i5.92 3i. 24 N4i "4B'02"W Si2 NB5 "24' i4"W 3.40 C27 i "24 '34" i75.00 4.30 2. i5 4.30 S45"03'50"W Si3 Si9"33'44"E i59.79 C2B 4"4B'42" 220.00 18. 4B 9.24 iB.47 N57 "26 '39 "W Si4 S70 "26' i6"W 23.7B C29 B"45'02" 225.00 34.36 i7.22 34.33 S4 i "23 '36 "w Si5 S70 "26' i6"W B.37 Si6 Ni9"33'44"W i60.00 Si7 N70 "4B '46"E i3.03 S18 N70 "4B '46"E i9. i2 Si9 Si7"50'3B"E 20.07 BIOFILTER EASEMENT PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT LINE BEARING DISTANCE ILINEI BEARING IDISTANCE I ACCESS EASEMENT Bi N36 "10 '35"E 27.B2 I Wi I N3B "i5 '05"WI 10. 391 LINE BEARING DISTANCE B2 S32"36'30"E 40.74 Ai S60"06'24"E 6.9B B3 SiO "24 '36"E i3.37 A2 N74"09'54"E 49. i2 B4 S07"33'32"W 39.30 A3 Si5"29'i9"E 9.B6 A4 N74"5i'53"E 55.06 A5 N72"09'22"E B.56 A6 Ni7"50'3B"W 5.00 [g] [g] [g] [g] LEGEND PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENTS I. S. DENOTES IRON SET LINE BEARING DISTANCE I. F. DENOTES IRON FOUND Ni Si2 "04' i3"W 30. i9 · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · DENOTES EXISTING BOUNDARY LINE N2 N72 "27 '25 "W 5.B6 HEREBY EXTINGUISHED N3 N05 "4i '37"W ii3.52 <: > IDENOTES STORMWATER N4 N07 "32 '36 "W S69"i7'33"W B7.0i I :.:.:.:.:>:::::<: MAINTENANCE EASEMENT N5 N6 Ni9 "22 '07"W 2.7B 2i7.44 N7 N36 "25 '23 "W 6B.25 NB N55 "59 '44 "E i50.23 NOTES: N9 N64 "2i '33"W ii9.55 i. THE BOUNDARY DATA SHOWN HEREON IS BASED ON A FIELD SURVEY PERFORMED IN 20i4. 2. NO TITLE REPORT FURNISHED. ALL EASEMENT KNOWN TO ME ARE SHOWN HEREON. THIS PROPERTY IS SUBJECT TO ANY EASEMENTS, UTILITIES, CONDITIONS, AND/OR COVENANTS THAT MAY EXIST. 3. PROPERTY ZONED PUD PER ZM-i2-04-06. TABULATION LOTS = i2B, 027 SF 4. OWNER : ROAD = 53, 237 SF STONEHENGE PARK, LLC OPEN SPACE= 9i, 764 SF i95 RIVERBEND DRIVE, SUITE i TOTAL= 273, 02B SF CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA 229ii 5. LEGAL REFERENCES: ALL LOTS: INSTRUMENT #20i7-0000467i T. M. 60-i20, i20A, i20B, i20C: D.B.906-506 PLAT & R.C.S.BOOK 2-23 T.M.60-Bi.B, 9i, i22, i22.4, i22.5, i22.6 & i22. 7: A.C.D.B.96-72 THRU 75 PLAT 5. SETBACK REQUIREMENTS: LOTS i-4, FRONT=25', SIDE=3' & REAR=25' LOTS 5-26, FRONT=20 ', SIDE=3' & REAR=20' 6. HORIZONTAL COORDINATES SHOWN HEREON WERE RELATED TO VA-SOUTH, SPC, NADB3. REVIEW COPY 7. T.M.60-Bi.B, 90, -i20, i20A, i20B, i20C, i2i, i22.4, i22.5, i22.6 & i22.7 ARE SUBJECT TO A STORMWATER MANAGEMENT/BMP FACILITIES MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT(INSTRUMENT# 20i5-00003033). SCALE: 1 "= 30' DATE: OCTOBER 31, 2014 B. A CRITICAL SLOPES WAIVER HAS BEEN SUBMITTED AND APPROVED PER ZM-i2-04-06. REVISED: JANUARY 26, 2018 REVISED: JUNE 15, 2018 9. LOTS i THRU 25 EACH CONTAIN A BUILDING SITE THAT COMPLIES REVISED: SEPTEMBER 25, 2018 WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE'S ZONING, WATER PROTECTION AND SUBDIVISION ORDINANCES. ROGER W. RAY & ASSOC .. INC. 10. THE PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENTS SHOWN HEREON ARE TO BE DEDICATED 663 BERKMAR COURT TO THE CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE. CHARLOTTESVILLE. VA 2290i 434-293-3i95 SHEET 2 OF 5 ii. IRONS TO BE SET AT ALL LOT CORNERS BY DECEMBER 31. 20i9. WWW.RAYSURVEYING.COM i092BL ------------------- - ----~-------------- CASTALIA STREET UNOPENED I. S· 12' ALLEY . \ I. S· S60"03'36"E 50.00' (2011) S59"52'24"E I.S . . . 195.01' (2011) I. S. 46.55' I. s. 55. 90' en " ~6.32' 46.24' 31.77' I.S. 18.23' 33.28' \~. en 16'WIDE LANDSCAPE ('1 BUFFER l> I. s. )~l S59"56'52"E 81.74' I. s. lf) u 0 lf) 01 a LOT 5 (T] u LOT 1 lf) [I] 01 """ (T] 2,888 SF 6, 423 SF (T) OPEN 01 .,,... "" .. w SPACE D "'""""' I. S. N59 "1 7 ' 10 "W 84. 62 ' ....: .: "" UJ ~ 7, 591 SF I. S. SEWER EASEMENT TO EXISTING CONSTRUCTION I> SLOPE EASEMENT ~ H u ~ II w­ [I] CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE (D. B. 104-279, 280 PLAT) THIS PORTION --~--1 a _J f-­ 01 (D. B. 402-200, z (T) _J <( TO BE VACATED ru u 203 PLAT) z OH__JD a TO BE VACATED 1->o...w [/] :r: """ LOT 6 1-W CTJ Zl-QHD en W 3, 350 SF ' 5Q· ~t:;rual~ L.S.~{1; ~cr!ci;::"_ I.S. N59 "56'52"W 79.21' . u ~ ~~~~~ ~ I~. f;~ ru \ wu...O-- f-­ z en \ \ w w I. S. I. S. I. S. w w :r: :r: (2011) S59"51'00"E 180.62' I. s. C20 I [/] [/] 52. 14' w w I.S.I en z z w [\] ­ - - - 01- -i - j /50. 90 ' I I H _J :r: H _J """ - (T) lO lO . r. s. _J ~ s-@--+t-­ u f-- (T].,,... <( • (T] r. s. ,Cl ~ 01.,,... EXISTING > [1] [\] z CONSTRUCTION I> v ;n~ SLOPE EASEMENT c- w CTl :r: Ul­ (D. B. 402-200, ifi u... :::J ')-' ~ w """ lO [1] 203 PLAT) :2:DH01 _JD w >a mH TO BE VACA TED [/] >- [/] ru <( 3: <(I-~ . 1­ w HI-- IIl LJ) O 3: Uo . Wru E5a_J~ >­ a ::s::1-a:w men a w . SPACE B :r: :r: en en en en "'> So. w w w w .0 0'<9 z z H H z z o. (­ _J _J H H _J _J ././ :r: :r: :r: LOT 12 I. s. 0' . 0' u f-­ u f-­ u f-­ 6,323 SF 9'. <( ::.: <( <( "" LOT 13 ~ 6,317 SF I)." ..;:> . ­ LOT 14 ·"'1>­ 6, 140 SF '.\"' """ FILTERRA EASEMENT PUBLIC HEREBY UTILITY DEDICATED EASEMENT TD THE H.O.A. LOT 17 3,861 SF L~ C12 I. S. I. S. 1. 52' C15 OPEN SPACE E 2, 766 SF LOT 21 EASEMENT \ \ ,{... ROCKLAND AVENUE \ .,,., U> (60') SHEET 4 OF 5 (UNOPENED) 10928L ---- ­ GRAPHIC SCALE 1"=30' SCALE: 1"= 30' DATE: OCTOBER 31, 2014 REVISED: JANUARY 26, 2018 0 30 60 90 REVISED: JUNE 15, 2018 REVISED: SEPTEMBER 25, 2018 ROGER W. RAY S ASSOC., INC. 663 BERKMAR COURT CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA 22901 434-293-3195 ············· DENOTES EXISTING BOUNDARY LINE WWW.RAYSURVEYING.COM HEREBY EXTINGUISHED REVIEW I>> J DENOTES STORMWATER MAINTENANCE EASEMENT COPY DENOTES APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF AREA WITHIN ZONE AE (100 YEAR ~$///1/UffftA FLOOD PLAIN, ACCORDING TO FEMA FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAPS EFFECTIVE DATE FEBRUARY 4, 2005 (COMMUNITY PANEL 510033 0288 D) AND LOMR, EFFECTIVE: FEBRUARY 6, 2017 ------------------------1-----------, T.M.60-252 MONTICELLO OVERLOOK CONDOMINIUM PORTION STONEHENGE AVENUE UNOPENED ~ -----S : EX D.B.1008-583 D.B. 1039-199 THRU 201 PLAT MH S60"03'36"E 284.15' I.F. (20 11) 239. 21' 44.94' "'3" LD S29 "56' 24" w --- 26. 30' f­ f­ w w w w :r: :r: en en w w z z H H _J _J T.M.60-252.2 :r: :r: BELMONT VILLAGE u u OWNER ASSOCIATION, INC. f­ f­ <{ <{ INSTRUMENT ::>: ::>: #2010-446 D.B.1120-852 THRU 858 PLAT STORM SEWER EASEMENT HEREBY DEDICATED TO THE H.O.A. \__20· cn - - I " I. s.--­ L=42. 61 ' ­ .·. ''2-a..... . ···"°·. ....A '<>a~>. ·-~......~ ¥'- ..... '· :- .. 6'"· .6' ~-. 0 ,,.:>'_·· \ ~a··~ SIGHT • ...A I. S. ·,;·o .. DISTANCE EASEMENT ...A·.. 92' I. S . . ·.~ ~ .. J.35. . "·'&44. l.l.' ··.570 ·o3. l.5"E. ~ ·.. \ L2 (~oi_i)········· I.S. .·. 39 . 09' I. s . \ ..... •• ...A ..,..A·•• ·~·-.~ 4,000 B B S S S B S B B B B S 6/14 Attachment C 9/4/2018 Charlottesville, VA Code of Ordinances <4,000 B B B B B B B B B B B B B B Daycare facility B B B B B B B B B B B B B B Dry cleaning establishments B B B B B B B B B B Educational facilities (non- residential) Elementary B B B B B B B B B B B B B B High schools B B B B B B B B B B B B B B Colleges and universities B Artistic instruction, up to B B B B B B B S S B B B B B 4,000 SF, GFA Artistic instruction, up to S B B B B S S S 10,000 SF, GFA Vocational, up to 4,000 SF, B GFA Vocational, up to 10,000 B SF, GFA Electronic gaming café S Funeral home (without crematory) GFA 4,000 SF or less B B B B B B B B GFA up to 10,000 SF B S S S S S Funeral homes (with crematory) GFA 4,000 SF or less B B GFA up to 10,000 SF B Golf course 7/14 Attachment C 9/4/2018 Charlottesville, VA Code of Ordinances Golf driving range Helipad Hospital S S S S B S Hotels/motels: Up to 100 guest rooms B B B B B B B B B B B B 100+ guest rooms B B B B B B B B B S S Laundromats B B B Libraries B B B B B B B B B B B B B B Manufactured home sales Micro-producers B B B B B B B B B B B B Small Breweries S S S S Mobile food units P P P P P P P P P P P P P P Movie theaters, cineplexes S S S S S B S B S S S S S Municipal/governmental B B B B B B B B B B B B B B oÚces, buildings, courts Museums: Up to 4,000 SF, GFA B B B B B B B S S B B B B B Up to 10,000 SF, GFA S B S B B B B S B S S B Music hall B P B B B B B S B P OÚces: Business and professional B B B B B B B B B B B B B B Medical B B B B B B B B B B B B B B 8/14 Attachment C 9/4/2018 Charlottesville, VA Code of Ordinances Philanthropic B B B B B B B B B B B B B B institutions/agencies Property management A A A A A A A A A A A A A A (ancillary to MFD) Other oÚces (non- B B B B B B B B B B B B B B speciÓed) Outdoor storage, accessory S S B S Parking: Parking garage B B A/S A/S A/S A/S A/S A/S B A/S B A/S A/S Surface parking lot (19 or B B B B B B B B B B A B A less spaces) Surface parking lot (more A A A A A A A A A A A A A A than 20 spaces) Temporary parking facilities Photography studio B B B B B B B B B B B B B B Photographic processing; B B B B blueprinting Radio/television broadcast B B B B B B B B B B B B stations Recreational facilities: Indoor: health/sports B B B B B B B B B B B B B B clubs; tennis club; swimming club; yoga studios; dance studios, skating rinks, recreation centers, etc. (on City-owned, City School Board-owned, or other public property) 9/14 Attachment C 9/4/2018 Charlottesville, VA Code of Ordinances Indoor: health/sports clubs; tennis club; swimming club; yoga studios; dance studios, skating rinks, recreation centers, etc. (on private property) GFA 4,000 SF or less B B B B B B B B B B B B B B GFA (4,001—10,000 SF) B B S B B S B B B B S S GFA more than 10,000 SF B B S B B S B S B S S Outdoor: Parks, B B B B B B B B B B B B B B playgrounds, ball Óelds and ball courts, swimming pools, picnic shelters, etc. (city- owned), and related concession stands Outdoor: Parks, S S S S S B S S S S S S S S playgrounds, ball Óelds and ball courts, swimming pools, picnic shelters, etc. (private) Restaurants: All night S S S S S S S S S S Drive-through windows S S S S Fast food B B B B B B B B B B B B B B Full service B B B B B B B B B B B B B B 24-hour Towing service, automobile Technology-based B B B B B B B B B B B B B B businesses 10/14 Attachment C 9/4/2018 Charlottesville, VA Code of Ordinances Taxi stand B S S B S B B S B Transit facility B B B B B B B B B B B B B B Utility facilities S S S S S S S S S S S S S S Utility lines B B B B B B B B B B B B B B NON-RESIDENTIAL USES: RETAIL Accessory buildings, B B B B B B B B B B B B B B structures and uses Consumer service businesses: Up to 4,000 SF, GFA B B B B B B B B B B B B B B Up to 10,000 SF, GFA B B B B B S S S S B B B B S 10,001+ GFA B S S S B S B S Farmer's market S S S S S S S S S S S S Greenhouses/nurseries S B B S Grocery stores: Convenience B B B B B B B B B B B B B B General, up to 10,000 SF, S B S B B S B S B S B S S B GFA General, more than 10,000 S B S B B S B S B S S S SF, GFA Home improvement center S S B Pharmacies: 1—1,700 SF, GFA B B B B B B B B B B B B B B 1,701—4,000 SF, GFA B B S B B S S B B B B B B 11/14 Attachment C 9/4/2018 Charlottesville, VA Code of Ordinances 4,001+ SF, GFA B B S B B S S B B B B B S Shopping centers S S S S S S S B S S S S S Shopping malls S S S S S S S S S S S S Temporary sales, outdoor T T T T (Ôea markets, craft fairs, promotional sales, etc.) Other retail stores (non- speciÓed): Up to 4,000 SF, GFA B B B B B B B B B B B B B B 4,001 SF to 20,000 SF GFA S B S B B S S B S B S S S More than 20,000 SF, GFA S B S S B S B S S NON-RESIDENTIAL: INDUSTRIAL Accessory buildings, structures and uses Assembly, industrial Beverage or food processing, packaging and bottling plants Brewery and bottling facility Compounding of cosmetics, toiletries, drugs and pharmaceutical products Construction storage yard Contractor or tradesman shop (HAZMAT) Frozen food lockers 12/14 Attachment C 9/4/2018 Charlottesville, VA Code of Ordinances Greenhouse/nursery (wholesale) Industrial equipment: service and repair Janitorial service company Kennels Laboratory, medical >4,000 S B S B B B S S B S sq. ft. <4,000 sq. ft. B B B B B B B B B B B B B Laboratory, pharmaceutical S S S S S S S S >4,000 sq. ft. <4,000 sq. ft. B B B B B B B B B B B B B Landscape service company Laundries Manufactured home sales Manufacturing, light Moving companies Printing/publishing facility S B S S S S S S S S S Open storage yard Outdoor storage, accessory to industrial use Research and testing B B B B B S laboratories Self-storage companies Warehouses 13/14 Attachment C 9/4/2018 Charlottesville, VA Code of Ordinances Welding or machine shop Wholesale establishments ~ (6-6-05(2); 6-19-06; 5-19-08(4); 9-2-08(2); Ord. of 9-15-08(1); 11-17-08(1); 11-17-08(2); 3-16-09(3); 7-20-09(2); 11-16-09; 2-16-10; 7- 19-10; 10-4-10(2); 12-20-10(1); 1-18-11; 4-18-11(2); 6-20-11(2); 12-17-12(2); 5-6-13(2); 12-21-15(2); 3-21-16, § 5; 9-6-16, § 1) 14/14 Attachment C 2. STRUCTURES: Any structure(s) located on the Property shall not exceed thirty-five (35) feet in height, where height is the vertical distance measured perpendicularly from grade from the highest point on such building or structure, per Section 34-1100. 3. AFFORDABLE HOUSING: Contingent upon approval of residential density on site, the Owners shall provide on-site for rent Affordable Dwelling Units (as defined herein) equal to 15% (fifteen percent) of the Floor Area Ratio (“FAR”) of the residential square footage of the project, given the project does not exceed 1.0 Floor Area Ratio (“FAR”). If the project exceeds 1.0 FAR, the number of affordable units provided shall be determined by Section 34-12 of the City of Charlottesville Zoning Ordinance, Codified through March 5, 2018. FOR-RENT AFFORDABLE HOUSING: For-rent affordable units shall rent at a rate making the units affordable to households with incomes at not more than 80% of the area median income for a period of not more than 15 (fifteen) years. Attachment C OWNERS: Franklin St. Land Trust II (to be signed upon final submission of proffer statement) ______________________________________________ By: Charles Wm Hurt Title: Trustee Tax Map and Parcel Number: 610079000 Franklin St. Land Trust III (to be signed upon final submission of proffer statement) ______________________________________________ By: Justin M. Shimp Title: Trustee Tax Map and Parcel Number: 610079170, 610079180, 610079190 Virginia Land Trust II (to be signed upon final submission of proffer statement) ______________________________________________ By: Charles Wm Hurt Title: Trustee Tax Map and Parcel Number: 610079201 Attachment C The undersigned Owner hereby proffers that the use and development of the Property shall be in conformance with the proffers and conditions herein above. This document shall supersede all other agreements, proffers or conditions that may be found to be in conflict. The Owner agrees that all proffers shall be binding to the property, which means the proffers shall be transferred to all future property successors of the land. WITNESS the following signature: Franklin St. Land Trust II By:__________________________ Franklin St. Land Trust III By:__________________________ Virginia Land Trust By:__________________________ COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA CITY/COUNTY OF___________________, to wit: The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ____day of _______________2018 by Dr. Charles Wm Hurt, Trustee of Franklin St. Land Trust II. My Commission expires: _____________________ ___________________________ Notary Public Attachment E C I TY O F CHA R LO T TE S V I LLE “A World Class City” Neighborhood Development Services 610 East Market Street Charlottesville, VA 22902 Telephone 434-970-3182 Fax 434-970-3359 www.charlottesville.org April 18, 2018 Albemarle County Planning Commission Community Development 401 McIntire Road North Wing Charlottesville, VA 22902 RE: PROJECT: ZMA201700007 Hogwaller Farm Dear Commissioners, On !pril 10, 2018 the City of Charlottesville’s Planning Commission held a Public Hearing for the above development project, as it relates to properties located within the City. As you are aware, the proposed development would cover properties in both the City and County and would impact both communities. As presented to the City’s Planning Commission, the portion of the development within the Charlottesville would contain thirty (30) apartment units, a large greenhouse, and small retail store (“farm store”). The portion of the development in Albemarle would include farm sheds, agricultural fields, and a tree farm. It became apparent during the Public Hearing that the applicant could not proceed with the City side of the development should he not receive his rezoning request from the County. For this reason, the applicant has deferred action on the City applications for a rezoning and a SUP until after the County makes a decision related to project ZMA201700007. During the meeting on April 10th, the following concerns were raised that the City’s Planning Commission respectively asks the County to take into consideration during your deliberation for this project:  Both the City and County portion of the development will only be accessible by way of City streets. Increased traffic and the introduction of larger vehicles (large trucks and equipment for farming and tree transplanting) are a concern.  The City would like to see access for all residents to Moores Creek and Rives Parks. The opportunity for public access easements and new trails needs consideration with this application. The Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan calls for a Shard Use Path along Moores Creek at this location.  The housing component of the development is very important to the City. Unintended consequences of rezoning the City portion of the development could lead to the loss of future housing stock that the current R-2 zoning allows. A rezoning on the City side to Highway Corridor currently requires a Special Use Permit for any density. Of concern is any future development that utilizes by-right commercial or retail uses without a housing component. The City’s Planning Commission is intrigued by the idea of an Urban Farm that has a residential component and contributes to the surrounding community by providing local products and a live work environment. It is also apparent, through information gained at the April 10th meeting, this development hinges on the outcome of the County’s rezoning process. It would be premature for the City to act upon Page 1 of 2 Attachment E the applicant’s request for a rezoning and SUP before the County’s portion of the development is resolved. Thank you for taking the time to hear our thoughts and concerns as you prepare to make a recommendation on this project. Sincerely, The City of Charlottesville Planning Commission Lisa Green — Chair Taneia Dowell Genevieve Keller Kurt Keesecker Jody Lahendro John Santoski Lyle Solla-Yates Page 2 of 2 Attachment F ORDINANCE NO. 18-A(5) ZMA 2017-07 HOGWALLER FARM AN ORDINANCE TO REZONE 7.52 ACRES FROM LI LIGHT INDUSTRIAL TO RA RURAL AREAS FOR TAX MAP PARCEL NUMBER 07700-00-00-02000 WHEREAS, the application to rezone 7.52 acres from LI Light Industrial to RA Rural Areas for Tax Map Parcel Number 07700-00-00-020000 is identified as ZMA 2017-00007 Hogwaller Farm (“ZMA 2017-07”); and WHEREAS, staff recommended denial of ZMA 2017-07 for reasons set forth in the May 1, 2018 Planning Commission staff report; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing on ZMA 2017-07 on May 1, 2018 and recommended denial; and WHEREAS, subsequent to the Planning Commission meeting, the applicant submitted a revised conceptual plan and revised proffers, which staff believes address the issues of concern raised by staff and the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, on August 1 and September 12, 2018, the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors held duly noticed public hearings on ZMA 2017-07. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Albemarle, Virginia, that upon consideration of the staff report prepared for ZMA 2017-07 and its attachments, including the proffers dated August 20, 2018, which include the use restrictions and the establishment and maintenance of a riparian buffer as recommended by staff, as well as the establishment of a maximum aggregate limit of 600 square feet for any structure(s) within the Floor Hazard Overlay District as requested by the Board on August 1, and the rezoning application plan entitled “TMP 07700-00-00-02000: Hogwaller Farm, ZMA Application: 2017-00007”, prepared by Shimp Engineering, P.C., dated January 16, 2018 and last revised on June 27, 2018 (the “conceptual plan”), the information presented at the public hearing, the material and relevant factors in Virginia Code § 15.2-2284, the intent of the RA Rural Areas zoning district stated in County Code § 18-10.1, and for the purposes of public necessity, convenience, general welfare, and good zoning practices, the Board hereby approves ZMA 2017-07 with the proffers dated August 20, 2018 and the conceptual plan dated January 16, 2018 and last revised on June 27, 2018. *** I, Claudette K. Borgersen, do hereby certify that the foregoing writing is a true, correct copy of an Ordinance duly adopted by the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle County, Virginia, by a vote of _____ to _____, as recorded below, at a regular meeting held on _________________________. _________________________________________ Clerk, Board of County Supervisors Aye Nay Mr. Dill ____ ____ Mr. Gallaway ____ ____ Ms. Mallek ____ ____ Ms. McKeel ____ ____ Ms. Palmer ____ ____ Mr. Randolph ____ ____ Attachment G Attachment G Attachment G Attachment G Attachment G Attachment G ATTACHMENT C Attachment G Attachment G 012340513789NTY78D3 eepenld ne edmpimpede rene neen meeA endeemnp dddlpeddenee d neeimsd emis eddmnie dndmund es dimeddeeedend d dddmn Se1 cB12P eih m ttu e eee1 cB211 Se1 PByrmhtt1 T drll nsid d eee ll dpm dend ee imse n ndedAA neene meneicdeee ed plpne ldmund dimeddee r enee pedm 1 Ddeed edlinsdrenli dllns dennein dl dssd ieeeeesed d mddelredeedppmdnd e eimn md d edmmdun imdeddee redeend1.4neddddendldddlpeddeimnsene lldedermde eie ide dedm mdeee e e d dndnnil i idn d leeicdeeeedeend1.3 2 Sndiiiend ipldd ceeicdeeeedpmdnende redeend1.4ppmdnd e eddeneinee ndendd d pmdnd e eilnsn demdleed e e ede in deeil dpmdnd ne leeddns ed lledm und deerm deed ensdren mdimed dli li dllndedeps cdermendime eedeee d lltedm e irenli dllnsdee lldpm dendee pmdnd ddneeinee nend dd 3 Asniemn melidrmdeeimnd rnediid m eedepcdee edmnddpd e cmeeipl mdnd 4 G edpdd memddn e nllnrdedeeimdne d rnediid m ee 1 eAddl p d 111m ii. 6 W em dneddnmddmi dsneeein deende neemnindrel e nneneeddd d mrmdd111m e 2 7 Aeedeemiid ee d ilns n deneinse dl d cm ed eepe i ndeeddd mrmdd12 e Amnendm ed eeipendeedd mrmddd12 e Amnd eemsd ilns n de 8 Tdepmmiedeei meendideeeddd mrmdd111m e 8 9 Pilneid eeemrm dddded111m 2 1. Ted pmmie enllemdrmddded1111 d eicdeeepdr m me dedeed mend41m 4 11 eemdm ddeei rree ddn iemnd inded m eeddedi l 12 Asmel i emnd nieml dde eepei ndeeicdeeepm drmedde eed mend41m 4 13 Dnnnd de e rld nd eem dd e needeend1.3 14 ed d mdfreeedddmrmdd114m e 8 11 direeimd edenndnn d ilnuilnrnsi id ddmedrll ndsmdun imdeddeeemr ddmdded16m Apmpmi de dm dme d dedpd dnns mendeend pm de ddde ed nedeepled e dr i eem id ed deei pmpmin de d mdmee nen d d rillnd iee snieml meli deplidd Dideed deeimeend r pm de ddde ed ddeds mddidn e ceee Apdenm eed dneedi ndene ddddedeedcedd edd lde2 1me deeTdZdd nsAendneememe lld ie mned eneeid pdee mnend eem dd e needne ddderene mnddde d e lld ie me nd emund dim meddf dinrm d e end ne de i dded emndde ddeeminde fdns dden em dend reee""d d "" red rmdeddendd iee d 16 Ted pmmie dr i eem id ednd eem dd e needeend17 18i1.i2 Z dd nsSipp 11 .n11i8 i.1 Attachment G 012340513789NTY78D3 ).adm ides d aae1eeda ee1d. eeii eeia e eode i.e saeeeid1..12)21)21d.)22. e)2 (.o dd de1 dd pe i1deeeceeig .d d gge dgeeeeme rrrse ie o ad.)11 2e iesda . idee.d ig ee dd pe ia d. dd dea d ds depdeeerdeed. dee o .pid. e ee rei oa pdeaiid)eee drddee1..(.22 9. dreed.om e ea di.e. dii eeea)eee drddee1)..2 2.C mmee dieae ee)eee drddee1..3. 2 2.medm eedm dgemee dree ii ieeaao d d d pd p ee.rideae ieped da .ea iiidpee. 22.Tid e d.Tide pd eade ideeeaaadi eeeeree iieia)eee e drddee1..)2. 23.adm de edo ad1igCeaa )peeed eepda e d. pee aeigad eepd e eedae2)eee drddee 1..)). 2 2).C desaed1 eCeaa )eeee drdde1..1. )2 21.mm ee i.edie d da)eee drddee1..). )2 2).)Aee p ee. 121)2 2).admaeda)eee . drddee1..). )2 2(.amies.somea)eee drddee1..).12 29.adm dees d aae1eeda ee1d. eeii eeia e eodiee. saeeeid1..) 1)21)21d.)22. e)2 3.veee dad. eeii eeiae egi deeedepde e ida eodiee. sdge io de .daeeeid1..(.. 1)2 3.adm.iaeieeeds aea1eeede1a d. eeieieiea eodiee. saeeeid1..19)21)21d.)e22 )2. 32.rd pome)e dreddeee1..)2. )§21 ..12 21 1(O21)(O 1 ))(O 113 119 (O 119((O 1 12 9O1129O 13 d..9112)211 119O11§ (1 ..1 2 d..91 ( )21(111( 9O d..21())1 2 112 9 O d. )1(21 )2 131)O d..)1(21 )2 2131)O d..(1())1 2 121(O d..91() 2121 19O d. . 1(31)21111 O d.. 1())121111 O d.. 1 ()21121 O d..21(31 )2)) 112O d..31(11 )291 13O d..)1())1 2 121)O d..11() 21 29111O d..)1()211(1)O d..)1())1 2(9 11)O d..(1()211 1(2 Sp1c 2BBy 11 seeclptuepem pit1 Toeree ig d aaa e oeeepd emieee. sapeeieaepd emieideeA o .ade1 ieiea ceeeeee o pe pie ee deqiedmeeda rei oaeopeed . C mm de iseedeed)eee drddee1..). 2 2. Ce a d.e.e ga)eee drddee1..2. 2 3. ad ie d.da eeeaq .aeeida)eedeee2 d)eee drddee1..9. 2 ). m im1ger1eeda di dami i edeoeeeieree iieia)eee e drddee1..). 2 1. Pi deeeaeo e.a (1 13 Z dd igmp. p 111 1( Attachment G 012340513789NTY78D3 6. Eeh dna dieaarn deundrundan r rrndree nnunrReee e nrndee111..2. 7. D aeneeeun nrndee11 derReee ..6. 8. Reeeeei318 996 9. M drrereuni aerrier ennndrReee nrndee11. . 1.Reeeeei11911992 11.Reeeeei31 91991 12.oner r hnrip dr eadd. n eu 13.orruarerhun e rr. e 14.a anr eepedd nhaneer di ianirRnr eend eee1.11 .1 dirreceeuu enrnadeerudinirnd 4.4. 1 11.Reeeeei89997 1 16.Reeeeei1191 1991 17.o aaee nneiedde eReee nrndee111 ..1 dirrcueeeu ernn adeerudinrn i d41.4. 18.eueennn d arnnr eeeepda n e rnueReeee nrnde111 ..1 dirrcu eeeu ernn a deerudinrn i d41 .4. 19.rnneue nn npu eenur peen np urenhurnunReeee nrnde11 ..1. 2.Daea pe nnhea id Reeee nrnde11 ..1. 21.adun n aedr ineeReee nrndee111 ..4. 22.orduarn unp eoerr Reee nrndee114 ..1. 23.o aaee nnerru nn nhnnrune eer nie re enhid edr u. 24.Reeeeei1999188 21.le iedne u iardina ri eu. dadr 26.Reeeeei19 18998 27.er eurndr upueedpnr dinddru une . Leui e d ru needunnh dd rnereu urun unr nu r nnernere urun doni rune rir ene dindreend u 3.1 neeui e d ru needunnh dd rnereu urun unrneu idnrni e redunnrnhu eud nu r nneir nunnu e rirene dindreend31 u .pneii ne Rnuernereurun r nu r nneeeare ri r nr eurndpuueednn ndd n neenre ra neeirnrre ree r areenerre ean n uadiRnnnrndeu e nd nnr eunund rue nu r nnerneren urun r n ri eprre e de hrr eenr euneuernere urun rrnurreea r rrneeeuue nenuune eer e nee un rue ennir R rnurrhn ndrnedee dir eeeea nune d di ednud rreuuee n nuadiRnnnu uda iiu nndr nde rnere urunrr eerneee nreurndp uueedn d r irnh nndreenu d nundue nu r nnernere urun die rreea enunh d dDeeae e en1p421a 6n 189194 Z dd nhar .11p1198 91 Attachment G 012340513789NTY78D3 . N dedremna d ss eMeeiieeene ee s edeendn d sseeeei dene psna d eeedise eeae sdseems edna iu e eee ee ndre e eeene psna d di e si e ss e diree nnens e ne e ep dnds ree n eessm. dee 28. nnnd es s redi s eeiin ne dseeend1.... 0121 29.o eedna idsdiedeeneee. d 30.ueemneeeieenee sidness e s eeiin ne dseeend1.... 0121 31.eeeeeei1112111 32.ome eeee.d 33.oeem eenm. 34.eeeeeei32 1111 0 31.eeenn a s ssm e ed s. e 36.inreMeeredi denues s. 37.u eneaea. e 38.xpeeeedinna eeed. 39.yideeeeeeee n eead eeeendeeereeee de112 ..6. 40.o ee eeM ee nedeeemneeei dieeseeend1...8 0211. 41.odeee dM dseeedeeereeedee112 ..9. 42.hme eedeeee dss dseei deeedderneeadae n nds ne eeeeeeeieMdis eene er eeenMeeeeesMis neeneeeeereeede e 11..27. 43.naeneeeee semeeereeedee1.13 .0. 44.heeeeM ei eiem . 41.eeeeeei11112114 46.frrse 1ne eid nare neees s n eeeeees esns ee eeereeee de1..8 13 e rr1nseeem edee eid nared ndiseenesend dnis d eeneadd nais neee neeeereeee de113 ..9. 47.nndm eseeeeeeeereeeede111 ..1. 48.hneeppp eesde neeeessseeee neree nnens e eeereeedee114 ..0. 49.yneeee s n eedeeeM s neeee s n eedeeeseeneeeeeM ds neeee s n eedeeersn eeeeseeereeedee114 ..2. 10.peeneeeee dseeereeedee114 ..3. 11.aem eiee sdM naoessoem eee deed ee ds e em eee de seeendaseeeeees eeereeedee114 ..4. 1811011 Z dd nap .11 0M1110118 Attachment G 012340513789NTY78D3 59ol pg lnd d. e dp lndedudeendhne e dedb ed1 l ( d l (dpdde )6 59959 519adbhnddb 1ede1d. eenn een e de. n b eend5995e(6 (619 5)9akrae(kmarkees(ekrkc eeeee14 77).7 559adb dhdb 1ede1d. eenn een e de. n b eend599)e(6 5(619 5)9vede d. eenn een egn deledlpdend e de. n b penl pdbned.d eend 5(6 599(.9 5)9adb.nenlldb 1ede1d. eenn een e de.n b eend5995(619 e(6 5(9oldddgb beb 9 (1 1 991 1 1(O11((O 1 1 1(O)1((O1 ))(O 111111)5(O11)(O 11) (O 11((O)1 1 O 1 1 O d9. 51 (6111515O d.951 (161 1 15O d.951 (561 1515O1 (1 991 d.9(1 ((61(5 11(O d9. 1() (61)1)1 O d.9 1(()61 1(1 O d.9 1((6111 1 O d9 . 1(()1 6 1 1 O d.9)1((61511) 5 ppeene )11)O d.9)1((61 111)O d9 . 51()1 (6)(115O d9 . 51 (((61)1115O d9. )1((61 111)O d9 . (1((6 )1 1 1(O d9. 1((61155 11 O d9. 1((6)151 51 O d9 . 1((611 1 O d9 . )1()1 (6 1 1)O d9 . 51(( 61 115O d9. )1()1 (6 1)1)O d.9)1((611(1)O d9 . )1((61)1)1)O d.9)1(()61(11)O d.9(1((611 1(6 Sn3c03.Apmmoototn nltot n nnne cin rduoinfrd eom nit rdui ot3 pllhndgpdennd llpl pbe dbpdelpded. e555pb9 9 1e ede.b peeb d1 ( (dpdde )9569 (1 1 91 1 1 1(O 11 ((O1 (1 911 d9 1 1(5 . (((6 11(6 Sn3c033 .A0otnint netoto nnneeom nit3 R glend nd eend 95geddd ng.elpb debdgen llpl pbee .e nnnd p pdelne d pne (56 dphdle pl e dehde1d b ( 6ed nd d d.ee leend ppne (6 5 dphd.h llng d den d dbpdelnd cnede ee enb p.pnd e pen dn .dde (dpdde eend 96 19 ggdge ed g .ee.e e le d.elpb de lldece .ende1d b (16ed 1cepend e e h den ggdge ed g lnbneendnpdel.. b e dpdennd pen dn .dde9 ed. dede penpdennd llde pl pne leld..e.. nn eh de ppeene .e pen .dde (dpdde eend 96 dn 1 d.oeb d(1 (9 (1 1 9191 1 1(O 1(( 1 O11 O1 (1 9191 d.9(1((61(151(O d.9 1(()61)1)1 6 99 1 Id ..e nndee pdgng d1e d ll pdbnee. bdge n db.e nnnd pld.ned pdel e ph ne ll ehdb e1d ( 6ed db dnd d 9o e pdel ll ne dl..nd .edbnnge dd db d ppdelh ne b b ed e. bdge n pd dee eend 99O 1 n e(6d e .e pde..e nnnd llppeee db d ppdelh ne b b .e.. nn pd dee eend 919O(6e db b lee.deb de d d (6.h llng d dned db pdeled e.pd deeen eendO(6 e ee enb pdb e .e nnnd1e hdd pe pdel nn ll. nde .e.. g e db d ppdelne d h ne e pdel .e..b nn b pde d e..pd dee eend 919ege dhne gdge .nn g ed g lnbneend nd eed.de hne eend 919Od.(.6d e .nnnd e llne dd e db d ppdelh ne b b ed e. pd dee eend 999 1 (1 1 9911 1 1(O 11 ((O11 O1 (1 991 1 d9 1 1(5 . (((6 11(O d9 . 1()1(6 111 6 (1 1) Z dd ngop9 p 511 1( Attachment H COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE TRANSMITTAL TO THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS SUMMARY OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION AGENDA TITLE: AGENDA DATE: ZMA201700007 Hogwaller Farm September 12, 2018 SUBJECT/PROPOSAL/REQUEST: STAFF CONTACT(S): Rezone 7.52-acre parcel from Light Industrial (LI) which Kamptner, Pohl, Benish, Padalino allows industrial, office, and limited commercial uses (no residential uses), to Rural Areas (RA) which allows PRESENTER(S): agricultural, forestal, and fishery uses as well as Tim Padalino residential uses. SCHOOL DISTRICTS: Cale – Elementary; Walton – Middle; and Monticello – High BACKGROUND: At the August 1, 2018 Board meeting, a public hearing was conducted on ZMA201700007 Hogwaller Farm. The staff report for that meeting included a recommendation for approval, and the Board voted to adopt Ordinance 18-A(5) to approve ZMA201700007. However, the County Attorney’s Office has since concluded that another public hearing and Board action is required because the proffers were amended after the August 1 public hearing was closed. Due to the length of the August 1, 2018 staff report and attachments, it is not included with this Transmittal Summary, but may be found with the Board’s August 1, 2018 meeting materials. DISCUSSION: The applicant has submitted revised proffers (Attachment A), which include all of the proffers the Board previously considered during the August 1 public hearing, as well as an additional proffer (#5) to establish a maximum limit of six hundred (600) square feet (aggregate total) for any structure(s) within the Flood Hazard Overlay District. This additional proffer formalizes the verbal commitment which was discussed and found to be acceptable at the August 1 Board meeting. Please note the revised proffers do not include a commitment to specify gravel as the parking lot surface material. Although the applicant’s intent is for the parking lot to be gravel, the applicant has expressed reluctance to have this material specification become a legislative requirement established through this ZMA petition. After extensive coordination with Frank Pohl, County Engineer and Floodplain Administrator, staff is in agreement with the applicant that the appropriate method and time to address the issue of parking lot materials is during the detailed review of the Floodplain Development Permit application, which is required for improvements within the Flood Hazard Overlay District. The Floodplain Development Permit application and review process would include project-specific and property-specific details that are necessary in order for the Floodplain Administrator to make an informed decision about the design and material specification(s) of proposed improvements. RECOMMENDATIONS: Staff recommends that the Board adopt the attached Ordinance (Attachment B) to approve ZMA201700007 with proffers. ATTACHMENTS: Attach. A – Revised Proffer Statement (signed and dated 8/20/2018) with proffered Conceptual Plan (dated 6/27/2018) Attach. B – Ordinance to Approve ZMA201700007 CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE DEPARTMENT OF NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT SERVICES STAFF REPORT APPLICATION FOR A SPECIAL USE PERMIT JOINT CITY COUNCIL AND PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC HEARING DATE OF HEARING: October 9, 2018 APPLICATION NUMBER: SP18-00004 Project Planner: Matthew Alfele Date of Staff Report: March 26, 2018 (updated September 19, 2018) Applicant: Justin Shimp and Charles Hurt Applicant’s Representative: Justin Shimp with Shimp Engineering, P.C. Current Property Owner: Charles Hurt and Shirley Fisher Application Information Property Street Address: 918 Nassau Street (four unaddressed lots and a portion of one unaddressed lot) Tax Map/Parcel #: Tax Map 61, Parcels 79.16, 79.17, 79.18, 79.19, & 79.201 and a portion of Tax Map 61, Parcel 79 Total Square Footage/ Acreage Site: Approx. 0.94 acres (40,946 square feet) Comprehensive Plan (General Land Use Plan): Low Density Residential Current Zoning Classification: R-2 Tax Status: Parcel is up to date on payment of taxes Completeness: The application generally contains all of the information required by Zoning Ordinance (Z.O.) Secs. 34-41(d), and 34-158(a) and (b). !pplicant’s Request (Summary) On April 10, 2018 the Planning Commission held a joint Public Hearing for a SUP on the Subject Properties to increase density from a by-right zero (0) DUA (dwelling unit per acre) to thirty-two (32) DUA. During the Public Hearing the Planning Commission expressed concerns with the County portion of the development and did not want to take any action until Albemarle County granted or denied a rezoning petition. The applicant requested, and received, a deferral by the Planning Commission until Page 1 of 17 the County portion of the development status was resolved. The Planning Commission also requested !lbemarle County to be aware of the City’s concerns with the project; On !pril 18, 2018 the Planning Commission sent a letter to !lbemarle County’s Planning Commission (See Rezoning Application ZM18-00001 Attachment E) Below are the main points from that letter:  Both the City and County portion of the development will only be accessible by way of City streets. Increased traffic and the introduction of lager vehicles (large trucks and equipment for farming and tree transplanting) are a concern.  The City would like to see access for all residents to Moores Creek and Rives Parks. The opportunity for public access easements and new trails needs consideration with this application. The Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan calls for a Shard Use Path along Moores Creek at this location.  The housing component of the development is very important to the City. Unintended consequences of rezoning the City portion of the development could lead to the loss of future housing stock that the current R-2 zoning allows. A rezoning on the City side to Highway Corridor currently requires a Special Use Permit for any density. Of concern is any future development that utilizes by-right commercial or retail uses without a housing component. On September 12, 2018 the Albemarle Board of Supervisors approved an ordinance to rezoning 7.52 acres from LI Light Industrial to RA Rural Areas (See Rezoning Application ZM18-00001 Ordinance NO. 18-A(5) Attachment F, County Proffer Statement Attachment G, and Albemarle summary of Planning Commission Action Attachment H). Below are key portions of the approved ordinance and proffer statement:  The property will be developed in general accord with the conceptual plan titled “TMP 07700- 00-00-02000: Hogwaller Farm” dated 01-16-2018 and last revised 06-27-18 (Rezoning Application ZM18-00001 Attachment G page 5).  ! 100’ riparian buffer will be preserved from the top of Moore’s Creek bank and signed (Rezoning Application ZM18-00001 Attachment G page 6).  Uses on the site are restricted to the uses pursuant to Section 10.2 (3), (6), (7), (9), (21), (27), and (30) (Rezoning Application ZM18-00001 Attachment G page 2).  Any structure(s) within the Flood Hazard Overlay District shall not exceed six hundred (600) square feet of aggregated improved space (Rezoning Application ZM18-00001 Attachment G page 2). Justin Shimp has submitted a special use application (SUP) for 918 Nassau Street, a portion of tax map 61, parcel 79, and tax map 61 parcels 79.16, 79.17 ,79.18, 79.19, & 79.201 (Subject Properties) for residential density. The SUP application is being requested (in conjunction with rezoning application ZM18-00001) to accommodate the development of (18) one-bedroom and (12) two-bedroom units split between (2) three-story apartment buildings for a total of (30) dwelling units. The development is being proposed as an urban farm and will accommodate a 1,280 square foot greenhouse and an approximately 600 Page 2 of 17 square foot retail farm store. Additional parking, farm sheds, and agricultural fields supporting the development are proposed on an adjacent 7.52 acre county parcel. The applicant has submitted a rezoning petition (ZM1-00001) and a SUP application (SP18- 00004) in order to develop a specific project on the subject properties (Attachment C). Per the two applications the proposed development involves:  ZM18-00001 – A rezoning request of the subject properties from R-2 to HW (Highway Corridor).  SP18-00004 – A SUP request for a density of thirty-two (32) DUA. The applicant is proposing two (2) multi-family apartments on the subject properties. Vicinity Map County portion of the development site. Page 3 of 17 Zoning Map County portion of the development site. Gray: County Land, Orange: (R-2) Residential Two-family, Yellow: (R-1S) Residential Single-Family, Purple: (HW) Highway Corridor, Green Stripped: Park 2016 Aerial Page 4 of 17 2013 Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map Yellow: Low Density Residential, Purple: Mixed Use, & Green: Park or Preserved Open Space, White: County Standard of Review City Council may grant an applicant a special permit or special use permit, giving consideration to a number of factors set forth within Zoning Ordinance Sec. 34-157. If Council finds that a proposed use or development will have potentially adverse impacts, and if Council identifies development conditions that could satisfactorily mitigate such impacts, then Council may set forth reasonable conditions within its SUP approval. The role of the Planning Commission is to make an advisory recommendation to the City Council, as to (i) whether or not Council should approve a proposed SUP and if so, (ii) whether there are any reasonable development conditions that could mitigate potentially adverse impacts of the propose use or development. Section 34-157 of the City’s Zoning Ordinance lists a number of factors that Council will consider in making a decision on a proposed SUP. Following below is staff’s analysis of those factors, based on the information provided by the applicant. Page 5 of 17 34-157(1) whether the proposed use or development will be harmonious with existing patterns of use and development within the neighborhood. The properties immediately surrounding the subject property are described as: Direction Zoning District Current Use East *7.52 acres of Vacant floodplain and floodway land that county land abuts Moores Creek South HW Vacant parcel West R-1S Residential Homes and Rives Park North R-2 Residential Homes and Vacant parcels * The 7.52 acres of county land is part of the proposed development and would serve as farm land supporting the City’s portion of the development. The parcel of land was rezoned from Light Industrial to Rural Areas by the Albemarle Board of Supervisors on September 12, 2018 (See Rezoning Application ZM18-00001 Attachment F). The uses surrounding the subject property are mostly single family, two-family, and vacant parcels. In addition, multi-family and commercial/industrial uses are in close proximity to the proposed development. Most buildings surrounding the subject property are one (1) or two (2) story in height, but within close proximity (at the corner of Nassau and Linden) are three (3) story condos and apartments. The buildings adjacent to the subject properties are two (2) single family homes. Directly across the street from the subject properties is access to Rives Park. Commercial and industrial uses such as Van Yahres Tree Company, Albemarle Heating & Air, and JAUNT are all within 0.2 miles of the subject properties. Staff Analysis: The site plan (Attachment C) and application materials (Attachment A and B) propose two (2) three (3) story multi-family buildings with twelve (12) two- bedroom units in one and eighteen (18) one-bedroom units in the second for a total of thirty (30) dwelling units. The site plan also shows thirty-eight (38) parking spaces, a farm store (approximately 600 square feet), and a greenhouse (approximately 1,280 square feet). The county portion of the development shows eleven (11) additional parking spaces, sheds to house farming equipment, and over 7 acres of land for farming. The proposed uses are not consistent with the current uses along Nassau Street running north, but the proposed uses are consistent with the uses along Linden Avenue. The concept of an urban farm in this location could be harmonious with the existing patterns of uses within the neighborhood. 34-157(2) whether the proposed use or development and associated public facilities will substantially conform to the city's comprehensive plan. Page 6 of 17 The applicant’s own analysis of the development’s consistency with the Comprehensive Plan, as required by Z.O. Sec. 34-41(d)(2), is attached (Attachment B) Below are specific areas of the Comprehensive Plan for which the development may be in compliance: a. Land Use 2.2: Encourage small businesses that enhance existing neighborhoods and employment centers. 2.3: Enhance pedestrian connections between residences, commercial centers, public facilities, amenities and green spaces. 2.4: Enhance the role of schools and parks by expanding the community use of these places. 3.2: Enhance existing neighborhood commercial centers and create opportunities for other in areas where they will enhance adjacent residential areas. Provide opportunities for nodes of activity to develop, particularly along mixed-use corridors. b. Economic Sustainability 3.6: Align zoning ordinances to facilitate economic activity in new areas of commercial opportunity identified in the updated future land use map. c. Housing 1.3: Evaluate the effects new developments have on transit, the environment, density, open space configuration, commuter costs and affordable housing. 3.6: Promote housing options to accommodate both renters and owners at all price points, including workforce housing. 8.1: Encourage mixed-use and mixed-income housing developments. 8.2: Link housing options and employment opportunities in City land use decisions. 8.5: Promote redevelopment and infill development that supports bicycle and pedestrian-oriented infrastructure and robust public transportation to better connect residents to jobs and commercial activity. d. Transportation 2.1: Provide convenient and safe bicycle and pedestrian connections between new and existing residential developments, employment areas and other activity centers to promote the option of walking and biking. 2.3: Improve walking and biking conditions by discouraging and/or minimizing curb cuts for driveways, parking garages, etc. in new development and redevelopment. 2.6: Promote urban design techniques, such as placing parking behind buildings, reducing setbacks and increasing network connectivity, to create a Page 7 of 17 more pedestrian friendly streetscape and to reduce speeds on high volume roadways. e. Historic Preservation & Urban Design 1.4: Develop pedestrian-friendly environments in Charlottesville that connect neighborhoods to community facilities, to commercial areas and employment centers, and that connect neighborhood to each other, to promote a healthier community. Below are specific areas of the Comprehensive Plan for which the development may not be in compliance: f. Land Use 2.1: When considering changes to land use regulations, respect nearby residential areas. 3.1: Respect natural resources and sensitive environmental areas, including designated flood plain areas, rivers and streams. g. Environment 1.4: Ensure that planning for future land and recreational uses along the Rivanna River adequately protects water quality. Comprehensive Plan The 2013 General Land Use Plan Map calls for the subject properties to be Low Density Residential. Low Density Residential, as described within the Land Use Map, includes all land occupied by single or two-family type housing. The density in these areas by- right should be no greater than 15 dwelling units per acre. Staff Analysis: As noted in 34-157(2)(a) through 34-157(2)(e) above, many of the City’s Comprehensive Plan goals could be achieved through a residential and commercial development of this type on the subject properties. The subject properties’ location could promote more pedestrian and cycling trips to Rives Park and some of the commercial uses along Linden Avenue. Several goals in the 2013 Comprehensive Plan speak to a desire to have density, as appropriate, in locations that will foster alternative transportation options to employment and parks. The proposed development is not consistent with existing development patterns along Nassau Street, but would be consistent with the existing development patterns along Linden Avenue. The development of an urban farm with supporting infrastructure (farm store and greenhouse) along with thirty (30) dwelling units (within 2 buildings) could create a unique opportunity in this part of the City. Page 8 of 17 Streets that Work Plan The Streets that Work Plan (approved September 2016 as an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan) labels Nassau Street as Local. The full plan can be viewed at: http://www.charlottesville.org/departments-and-services/departments-h- z/neighborhood-development-services/streets-that-work/streets-that-work-plan Local Streets are characterized as the majority of the street network and have no specific associated typology due to the variation of context and available space. The Streets that Work Plan notes design elements on Local Streets should not exceed the dimensions specified for Neighborhood B streets, and that techniques such as curb extensions are appropriate. A minimum of five (5) to six (6) feet of clear zone width for sidewalks is recommended for Neighborhood B streets. Sidewalks and on-street parking are noted as the highest priority street elements. Staff Analysis: Based on the application package and supporting documents (attachments, A, B, & C), staff concludes that the pedestrian network along the subject properties’ frontage is consistent with the Streets that Work Plan. Staff is concerned that “farming” activities could include a wide range of vehicular traffic that are not suitable for a Local road, as designated by Streets that Work typology. Small low impact farming could be compatible with a Local Street Typology if it does not include large tractor trailers continuously making deliveries and pickups. Larger scale farming could produce the type of traffic more suitable for an Industrial type Street Typology. 34-157(3) whether proposed use or development of any buildings or structures will comply with all applicable building code regulations. Based on the information contained within the application (attachment A and C), the proposed development would likely comply with applicable building code regulations. However, final determinations cannot be made prior to having the details required for final site plan and building permit approvals. 34-157(4) whether the proposed use or development will have any potentially adverse impacts on the surrounding neighborhood, or the community in general; and if so, whether there are any reasonable conditions of approval that would satisfactorily mitigate such impacts. Potential adverse impacts to be considered include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: a) Traffic or parking congestion Traffic, Parking, and Other Modes of Transportation Page 9 of 17 The City Traffic Engineer has reviewed the development plan and traffic Study (Attachment D) and finds a development of this type would not adversely affect traffic on Nassau, Linden or the surrounding street network. The development proposes one (1) of the buildings will create a street wall along Nassau Street which will screen the parking lot from view. Although the proposed development is not directly on a mass transit line, bus route 3 has a stop accessible through Rives Park (a 5 minute walk away). A four (4) foot sidewalk currently runs along the west side of Nassau Street across from the subject properties. The applicant will be required to install a sidewalk on the east side of Nassau Street in front of the subject properties. This will add to the pedestrian network of the City. The development plan calls for thirty (30) dwelling units consisting of eighteen (18) one-bedroom and twelve (12) two-bedroom units in two (2) buildings and thirty- eight (38) parking spaces. This generally meets the requirements per Z.O. Sec. 34- 984 of the City Zoning Code. Parking congestion may occur if residents have more than one (1) vehicle or have guests that visit by car. On street parking is currently not prohibited on Nassau Street. Staff Analysis: The City Traffic Engineer has reviewed the development plan and traffic study and finds it will not have a major impact on the amount of traffic or parking on Nassau, Linden, or the surrounding street network. Vehicular Access One (1) point of vehicular access off a City maintained street is required for the proposed development per Z.O. Sec. 34-896(a). Current vehicular ingress and egress to the subject property includes one (1) access point on Nassau Street. Due to the location of the county parcel, it is likely ingress and egress to this parcel will also be through the subject properties. Staff Analysis: The vehicular ingress /egress and circulation pattern, as shown on the site plan (attachment C); is consistent with a residential development and will have no impact to the intersection of Nassau and Linden. Staff is concerned the site plan does not indicate a second point of ingress /egress for farm equipment. It appears that residential, commercial (farm store), and agricultural traffic will utilize one circulation pattern. Depending on the level of farming intensity or commercial activity, this could create conflict. Staff is also concerned with agricultural deliveries to the development. Depending on the level and type of farming to take place, large deliveries on tractor-trailers could be a constant activity. Page 10 of 17 b) Noise, lights, dust, odor, fumes, vibration, and other factors which adversely affect the natural environment The proposed development could result in an increase in noise, odor, and vibration as the development proposes a farm use. It should be noted the farm use is on the county portion of the development and the City portion is residential and commercial. The development will be required to plant street trees and landscaping per Z.O. Sec. 34-867. No lighting plan was provided but will be required during final site plan review. Staff Analysis: Two (2) multi-family buildings with a total of thirty (30) units at this location will have minimal impact and can be mitigated through existing site plan regulations. The farm store and greenhouse should also have minimal impact to the surrounding neighborhood and can be mitigated through existing site plan regulations. Although the “farming” portion of the development is located in the county and is not technically within the City’s jurisdiction, staff’s analysis includes the whole development as it cannot be fully reviewed without the farming aspect. Based on the application materials and narrative, the applicant is indicating the farming component (County) is directly connected to the residential and commercial aspect (City) of the development. Depending on the type of and intensity of farming, unwanted odors, noise, or vibration could affect the neighborhood. The applicant materials indicate farming activities will be small scale and directly related to products sold at the farm store. From the application materials, no large scale farming is being proposed. Prior to County approval the applicant was proposing tree farming on the county portion of the development. With the proffer (See Rezoning Application ZM18-00001 Attachment G) requiring a 100’ riparian buffer, tree farming is no longer being proposed. c) Displacement of existing residents or businesses The subject properties are currently vacant with the exception of 918 Nassau Street (single family home). No businesses will be displaced, but one (1) existing single- family home will be removed. d) Discouragement of economic development activities that may provide desirable employment or enlarge the tax base As noted above, the subject property is vacant and any use has the potential to add to the City’s tax base. e) Undue density of population or intensity of use in relation to the community facilities existing or available Page 11 of 17 The City’s Comprehensive Plan identifies community facilities as fire protection, police enforcement, and emergency response services; public utilities and infrastructure; and public parks and recreation opportunities. The applicant’s proposal narrative (Attachment B) has not adequately discussed this issue within its comprehensive plan analysis required by Z.O. Sec. 34-41(d)(3). Staff Analysis: Fire, Police, Public Utilities, and Parks have all reviewed the proposed plan and finds the development will have little impact on existing community facilities. The proposed development is on a City maintained street and can be served by existing fire, police, and emergency response services. The additional density of the site will also have limited impact on surrounding parks. In reviewing the application, Parks believes additional density at this location will enhance Rives Park by adding more activity to this location. Stormwater requirements will be reviewed with final site plan. All utilities, such as water and sewer will be reviewed with the final site plan. f) Reduction in the availability of affordable housing in the neighborhood The subject properties are currently vacant with the exception of 918 Nassau Street. One single-family home will be removed, but it is unknown if it contains an affordable unit as defined by City code. Refer to the rezoning application ZM18- 00001 and Rezoning Application ZM18-00001 Attachment F for additional information on affordable housing. g) Impact on school population and facilities The applicant’s project proposal narrative (Attachment A) does not specifically analyze this factor, as required by Z.O. Sec. 34-158(b). Staff Analysis: Because housing is open to all, there is a possibility that families with children could take residence here. Therefore, some impact could be created for school population and facilities. h) Destruction of or encroachment upon conservation or historic districts The subject property is not within or encroach upon any design control district. i) Conformity with federal, state and local laws, as demonstrated and certified by the applicant Based on the information contained within the application (Attachment A, B, and C), the proposed development would likely comply with applicable federal and state laws. As to local ordinances (zoning, water protection, etc.), it generally appears that this project, as detailed in the application, can be accommodated on this site in Page 12 of 17 compliance with applicable local ordinances; however, final determinations cannot be made prior to having the details required for final site plan and building permit approvals. Specific Z.O. requirements reviewed preliminarily at this stage include massing and scale (building height, setbacks, stepbacks, etc.) and general planned uses. In a preliminary review of the site plan, staff has found that the parking will need to conform to Z.O. Sec 34-873 for screening and interior landscaping. The site plan will also need to conform to Z.O. Sec. 34-1103 for lots with two or more principal buildings within the development unless the recommended conditions are approved. Sec. 34-1103. - Two or more principal buildings or structures on one lot. (a) No lot or parcel of land shall contain more than one (1) principal building or structure, except where such lot or parcel is used for a multifamily, mixed- use, commercial, or industrial development. (b) In circumstances where more than one (1) principal building or structure is authorized, as set forth above, all buildings and structures must conform to required yard and other lot requirements for the district in which the lot or parcel is located. This is not intended to be a full list of site plan requirements and a full review at final site plan submission will generate additional comments. From this initial review, staff believes the proposed development can be accommodated on this site with a few adjustments during the final site plan review process. j) Massing and scale of project The application materials (Attachment A, B, and C) depict two (2) new multi-family buildings that are three (3) stories above the surface of the subject properties as viewed from Nassau Street. The site plan (Attachment C) indicates the maximum height of the building will be thirty-five (35) feet. The maximum height for districts zoned HW is eighty (80) feet, but the accompanying rezoning application (ZM18- 00001) proposed a proffer statement that reduces the max height to thirty-five (35) feet. The massing of the residential units will be very similar to the existing multi- family units on Linden Avenue. No height is given for the farm store or greenhouse, but under the proffer statement they could not exceed thirty-five (35) feet. The application materials indicate the farm store will be approximately six hundred (600) square feet, but not more than a maximum of four thousand (4,000) square feet. Most commercial greenhouses are no more than twenty (20) feet tall. No architectural or elevations drawings were submitted with this application. Staff Analysis: The massing and footprint are consistent with HW requirements. Staff would recommend the height of the buildings not exceed thirty-five (35’) in order to maintain a scale that is consistent with the surrounding buildings to the Page 13 of 17 southwest of the site. This height is reflected in the rezoning application preliminary proffer statement. Staff would also recommend that the height of the farm store not exceed twenty (20) feet. Due to the residential nature of Nassau Street and the requirement that buildings in the HW Corridor create a streetwall (34-738), staff recommends modifications to the setbacks, and stepback of 10 feet after the first two stories. Three story buildings up against Nassau with a run of 180 feet could create a large streetwall in a mostly residential setting. Stepping back 10 feet after the second story (somewhere within 20 to 28 feet for a building with a max height of 35 feet) could reduce the massing along Nassau. Staff would also like to see some modulation to the front of the building along Nassau Street to better incorporate it into the surrounding neighborhood. The illustrative graphic (Attachment B) indicates some modulation, but it is not reflected on the site plan. Planning Commission might consider a condition that breakups the massing along Nassau Street. 34-157(5) whether the proposed use or development will be in harmony with the purposes of the specific zoning district in which it will be placed; In 1949 the property was zoned B-2 Business. In 1958 the property was zoned R-2 Residential and has retained that zoning calcification. (Application ZM18-00001 is requesting the zoning return to HW). According to Z.O. Sec. 34-350(b)(1), R-2, consisting of quiet, low-density residential areas in which single-family attached and two-family dwellings are encouraged. According to Z.O. Sec. 34-541(9), HW, The intent of the Highway Corridor district is to facilitate development of a commercial nature that is more auto oriented than the mixed use and neighborhood commercial corridors. This district provides for intense commercial development with very limited residential use. Staff Analysis: If the Planning Commission recommends approval of the corresponding rezoning request (ZM18-00001), staff finds the proposed development could to be harmonious with the zoning district, but is too residential in nature to comply with Sec. 34- 541(9). If Planning Commission recommends denial of the corresponding rezoning request, staff finds the proposed development not to be harmonious with the zoning district. 34-157(6) whether the proposed use or development will meet applicable general and specific standards set forth within the zoning ordinance, subdivision regulations, or other city ordinances or regulations; and Page 14 of 17 Based on the information contained within the application and site plan (Attachment A, B, and C), the proposed development would likely comply with applicable local ordinances. However, final determinations cannot be made prior to having the details required for final site plan and building permit approvals. 34-157(7) when the property that is the subject of the application for a special use permit is within a design control district, city council shall refer the application to the BAR or ERB, as may be applicable, for recommendations as to whether the proposed use will have an adverse impact on the district, and for recommendations as to reasonable conditions which, if imposed, that would mitigate any such impacts. The BAR or ERB, as applicable, shall return a written report of its recommendations to the city council. The subject property is not located in a design control district. Public Comments Received Community Meeting Required by Z.O. Sec. 34-41(c)(2) On September 11, 2017 the applicant held a community meeting at Clark Elementary. The applicant gave an overview of the project as it related to the need for a rezoning and a SUP. The community voiced the following concerns with the proposed development:  View from Linden Avenue could be blocked.  The development could have an adverse impact on Moores Creek.  What type of development could happen in the floodplain? Other comments included:  Appreciation for proposing an initiative “urban farm”.  Providing affordable units. On April 10, 2018 the Planning Commission held a joint Public Hearing with City Council. Two (2) members of the public spoke and expressed the following:  The development should provide a trail to Moores Creek.  Any development should not include bringing in fill to the floodplain.  Concerned the applicant is only looking for density and will not provide any amenities or farm. As of the date of this report, staff has received one (1) email related to the rezoning or SUP application and two (2) phone calls. The following concerns were expressed:  No access to the development from the County side  30 units at this location could have an adverse impact on Moores Creek.  One of the buildings would be too close to the road. Page 15 of 17  The building should be turned so the short end is facing the street and not the long street wall. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends the Planning Commission focus on the following items during review:  Appropriate density. The only request being made is for density. All other proposed uses on the site are by-right under HW zoning. The appropriateness of “uses” should be discussed through the Rezoning and not the SUP. Recommended Conditions Staff recommends that a request for density could be approved with the following conditions: 1. Up to 32 dwelling units per acre (DUA) are permitted on the subject properties. 2. The design, height, setbacks and other characteristics of the development shall remain essentially the same, in all material aspects, as described within the application materials (Attachment C) dated January 23, 2018. Except as the design details of the development may subsequently be modified to comply with staff comments, or by any other provision(s) of these SUP Conditions, any change of the development that is inconsistent with the application shall require a modification of this SUP. Key elements of this design are: a. Two (2) multi-family residential buildings containing eighteen (18) one- bedroom and twelve (12) two-bedroom units for a total of thirty (30) dwelling units on the subject properties. b. Thirty-five (35’) feet maximum height of the multi-family residential buildings. c. Modification of front yard setback to ten (10) minimum and no maximum to accommodate the layout of buildings as presented in the application materials. d. Parking located behind the building and not visible from the City’s right of way. 3. Twenty (20’) feet maximum height on the farm store or any nonresidential building on the subject properties. 4. The maximum height of the street wall of any building or structure with frontage along Nassau Street shall be two (2) stories. After two (2) stories there shall be a minimum stepback of ten (10) feet along at least fifty (50) percent of the length of the streetwall. 5. The greenhouse must be screened (Z.O. Sec. 34-871 S-2 Screening) from the adjacent R-2 parcels. 6. All outdoor lighting and light fixtures shall be full cut-off luminaires and shielded in a manner to direct all light down. Page 16 of 17 7. Conform to Z.O. Sec. 34-881(2)-Bicycle Storage Facilities or the most current Bicycle Storage Facilities code for multi-family dwellings at time of development. 8. Trash facility shall be provided and screened per Z.O. Sec. 34-872(b)(2). 9. An alternative ingress/egress point for farm equipment and large deliveries to the county portion of the development should be explored with direction from the City’s Traffic Engineer. If an alternative point cannot be accommodated: a. The applicant will work with the City’s Traffic Engineer during final site plan review to develop a comprehensive traffic plan that will keep residential and farm (farm equipment deliveries and pickups) traffic separated. 10. Work with the City’s Parks Department to implement any portion of the Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan (as shown in the 2015 Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan Updates, adopted September 8, 2015) that abuts the development. Suggested Motions 1. I move to recommend approval of this application for a Special Use Permit for subject properties in the R-2 (application ZM18-00001 under review to rezone from R-2 to HW) zone to permit residential development with residential density with the following listed conditions. a. ________________________________________________________________ b. ________________________________________________________________ c. ________________________________________________________________ d. ________________________________________________________________ e. ________________________________________________________________ f. ________________________________________________________________ g. ________________________________________________________________ h. ________________________________________________________________ OR, 2. I move to recommend denial of this application for a Special Use Permit for the subject properties in the R-2 zone. Attachments A. Special Use Application Dated January 22, 2018 B. Special Use Permit Narrative and supporting documents Dated January 23, 2018 and revised September 6, 2018 C. Site Plan Dated January 23, 2018 D. Traffic Study Dated January 23, 2018 Page 17 of 17 Attachment A Attachment A Attachment A Attachment A Attachment A Attachment A Attachment A Attachment B Hogwaller Farm Rezoning & Special Use Permit Narrative March 16, 2018 Revised: September 6, 2018 RE: Rezoning and Special Use Permit Narrative, TMP 61-79 (portion), 61-79.16, 61-79.17, 61-79.18, 61-79.19, and 61-79.201 Shimp Engineering is applying for a rezoning in accordance with Sec. 34-41 of the Charlottesville Zoning Ordinance, to rezone TMP 61-79.17, 61-79.18, 61-79.19, 61-79.201, and a portion of 61-79 from R-2 (Residential) to HW (Highway Corridor). Contingent upon rezoning approval, Shimp Engineering is applying concurrently for a special use permit in accordance with Sec. 34-158, to allow for residential units in a HW district on the aforementioned parcels and TMP 61- 79.16. The proposed 30 (thirty) multifamily units on the approximately .94 acre site will be part of an innovative urban farm development comprised of City and County parcels, where the residential structures will be built on City parcels adjacent to a County parcel (TMP 77-20) that is intended to be utilized for agricultural production. It is the intent for the City parcels to also accommodate a greenhouse and a retail shop for farm sales; both uses, greenhouse and retail, are allowed by-right in a HW district. The proposed development does not trigger affordable housing provisions per Sec. 34- 12, however, the applicant wishes to provide two affordable units as a condition of approval for the requested special use permit. Project Outline: Parcels: 61-79 (portion), 61-79.16, 61-79.17, 61-79.18, 61-79.19, and 61-79.201 Current Zoning: HW: 61-79.16; R-2: 61-79 (portion), 61-79.17, 61-79.18, 61-79.19, and 61-79.201 Proposed Zoning: HW on all parcels Existing Use: Vacant and Residential Proposed Use: Residential with affordable units, greenhouse for agricultural production, farm stand for potential farm sales Current Conditions: TMP 61-79.201 has an existing single family dwelling and the remaining parcels are vacant. The parcels have a clearing towards the northwest boundaries fronting on Nassau St. and are lightly wooded towards the rear of the lots. A portion of TMP 61-79.16, 61-79.17, 61-79.18, and 61-79.19 are in the floodplain. Parcels 61-79.201 and 61-79 (portion) are entirely in the floodplain. There are a few steep slopes on the property and there are no critical slopes present on the property. Proposed Use: The development proposal for this property consists of two multi-family structures: one three story structure with 18 (eighteen) one-bedroom units and one three story structure with 12 (twelve) two-bedroom units, for a total of 30 (thirty) units. This multi-family housing development will be part of an innovative urban farm that will encompass both City and County parcels, where housing, including affordable units, will be provided on the City parcels and the County parcel will be dedicated to agricultural purposes. A greenhouse, allowed by right, in a Highway zoning district will be located on the City parcels. Additionally, a farm stand of approximately 600 square feet will be located on the city portion of the Attachment B development and will house future farm sales. The farm retail building will not exceed 4000 square feet, the maximum allowable square footage for retail use in a highway district. The development proposal includes proffered conditions for use and structure height in a HW zoning district. Affordable Housing Data: There are currently no supported affordable units on the property. No units are required to be designated as affordable in the proposed development, per Sec. 34-12 of the Charlottesville City Zoning Ordinance, however, the applicant wishes to provide two affordable units as a condition of special use permit approval. The affordable units will rent at a rate affordable to those making up to 80% of the area median income (AMI). The GFA of the residential structures, as proposed, on the property does not exceed 25,000 square feet. Given the site is approximately .94 Ac (40,946 square feet), the FAR of the site is .6. Surrounding Uses: The immediate surrounding is entirely residential. R-2 parcels with single family dwellings are northeast of the development. R-1S parcels with single family dwellings are across Nassau St. opposite the proposed development. Parcels zoned HW are south of the development. Southwest of the development along Linden Ave there are existing multi-family structures and townhomes. Consistency with Comprehensive Plan: The first goal of the Land Use Chapter of the Comprehensive Plan states, “enhance the sense of place throughout Charlottesville.” A unique development like Hogwaller Farm will inherently foster a sense of place by tying into the agricultural heritage of the area along Moore’s creek as the site of the livestock exchange and by serving as a unique residential model in Charlottesville. The second goal of the land use chapter is to, “establish a mix of uses within walking distance of residential neighborhoods that will enhance opportunities for small group interaction throughout Charlottesville.” The communal spaces within the residential development will facilitate resident interaction as well as allow for interaction between and among farm visitors. Goal 3 of the Housing Chapter is to, “grow the City’s housing stock for residents of all income levels.” Hogwaller Farm aligns with this goal because the proposed development offers a variety of housing options, in the form of one and two bedroom units in two multi-family structures. These units will be more affordable than the existing predominant housing stock in Belmont, the single family dwelling. The residential units proposed at Hogwaller Farm will directly contribute to achieving the City’s goal of “15% supported affordable housing by 2025,” by providing two affordable units. Compliance with USBC Provisions The proposed development will be in compliance with all applicable USBC provisions. Impacts on Public Facilities and Public Infrastructure: The project will have a minimal environmental footprint, and seeks to mitigate any ill effects. Stormwater runoff will largely be mitigated on the site of the development (city and county parcels) through an undisturbed riparian buffer and proposed tree plantings. Attachment B Attachment C SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR Hogwaller Farm FIRE MARSHAL'S NOTES LEGEND TAX MAP 61, PARCELS 79,79.16,79.17,79.18,79.19, 79.201 EXIST NEW DESCRIPTION 16 5 16 TC 5 x x 12 TC 12 5 5 CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE, VIRGINIA 5 5 16 TW x 12 TW 5 5 VICINITY MAP SCALE: 1"=1000' 16 BW x 12 BW RD RD OWNER/DEVELOPER S S 6''W 6''W GAS GAS T OHE OHE ZONING E W UGE UGE V I OHT OHT E JUSTIN M. SHIMP R45183 LEGAL REFERENCE Lic. No. UGT UGT R F O SITE SOURCE OF BOUNDARY & TOPO BUILDING HEIGHT BUILDING SETBACKS FLOOD ZONE EXISTING USE SHEET INDEX ELECTRIC / TELEPHONE / CABLE TV SHEET C1 - COVER SHEET PROPOSED USE SHEET C2 - CONTEXT PLAN SHEET C3 - EXISTING CONDITIONS SHEET C4 - SITE PLAN PARKING SCHEDULE LAND USE SCHEDULE NOTES x x x x ITE TRIP GENERATION LAND DISTURBANCE CITY PERMITS SIGNS COMPACT PARKING CROSSWALK HANDICAP ACCESSIBLE AISLE CG-12 HANDICAP PARKING APPROVALS: DIRECTOR OF NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DATE Attachment C NASSAU STREET (45') CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE PAVED PARKING AREA SFA GREENHOUSE RESIDENTIAL FARM STORE APPROVED IN CITY OF SFA CHARLOTTESVILLE CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE RESIDENTIAL COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE APPROVED IN CITY OF CHARLOTT COUNTY OF ALBEM CITY OF WESTERN PROPERTY LINE IS TMP CHARLOTTESVILLE BOUNDARY BETWEEN CITY OF 07700-00-00-020A0 CHARLOTTESVILLE AND ALBEMARLE KEYSER, ARTHUR FARM FARM SHEDS COUNTY IN ACCORDANCE WITH B OR SUE C ENTRANCE RECORDED PLATS FOR CITY PARCELS 1.81 ACRES PARKING ZONED LI (LIGHT AREA INDUSTRY) EXISTING ESVILLE DRAINAGE DITCH ARLE TMP 07700-00-00-02000 TMP DR FRANKLIN STREET LAND TRUST II AIN 07700-00-00-021A0 AG 7.52 ACRES E F FALLS, JOHN LOW ZONED LI (LIGHT INDUSTRY) RA ZONING REQUESTED HARVEY OR VIRGINIA S 5 ACRES DRAINAGE FL FLOODWAY ZONED LI (LIGHT OW INDUSTRY) DRAINAGE FLOW EXISTING CRITICAL SLOPES ALONG WESTERN BANK OF MOORE'S CREEK TMP 07700-00-00-038B0 (UNDISTURBED) RIVANNA WATER AND SEWER AUTHORITY 51.1 ACRES ZONED LI (LIGHT INDUSTRY) TMP 07700-00-00-038B0 MOORE RIVANNA WATER AND SEWER 'S CREEK AUTHORITY 51.1 ACRES ZONED LI (LIGHT INDUSTRY) Attachment C TO BE RELOCATED TO REMAIN EXISTING STEEP SLOPES Attachment C NASSAU STREET NEW SIDEWALK 3-STORY 6 UNITS PER FLOOR 4320 SF PER FLOOR TO BE RELOCATED TO REMAIN PAVED PARKING LOT 38 SPACES @ 8.5' x 18' 20' TRAVEL WAY 1280 SF 600 SF 1-STORY GREENHOUSE 3-STORY 1-STORY 4 UNITS PER FLOOR EXISTING 3360 SF PER FLOOR STEEP SLOPES FARM STORE CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE CITY OF CHARLOTTES COUNTY OF ALBEMARL 1440 SF 1-STORY FARM SHEDS VILLE E GRAVEL SURFACE FARM PARKING 11 SPACES @ 9 x 18 Attachment D Attachment D Attachment D Attachment D Attachment D Attachment D Attachment D Attachment D Charlottesville-Albemarle Metropolitan Planning Organization POB 1505, 401 E. Water St, Charlottesville, VA 22902 www.tjpdc.org (434) 979-7310 phone ● info@tjpdc.org email Memorandum To: City of Charlottesville, Planning Commission From: Wood Hudson, Transportation Program Manager Date: September 24, 2018 Reference: Update of the 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) Purpose: The Charlottesville-Albemarle MPO (CA-MPO) is working to update of the region’s Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP), for its 5-year update. MPO staff is presenting the Planning Commission with a status update on the LRTP planning process and soliciting input. Background: The CA-MPO is the official forum for cooperative transportation decision-making for the metropolitan area. It is federally designated to consider long-range regional projects that receive federal funds. One of the core responsibilities of the MPO is developing and maintaining the LRTP. The LRTP guides the region in creating a more efficient, responsive and environmentally-sensitive transportation system over the next 20+ years. The plan examines regional transportation trends/issues and offers a list of specific projects for addressing the region’s mobility needs. The focus of the plan is on the regional transportation network, which provides connectivity through and around the for region for people goods and services. The MPO Policy Board, which includes representatives for the Charlottesville City Council and Albemarle Board of Supervisors, approved the most recent plan in May 2014. The updated plan must be completed and approved by the Policy Board by May of 2019. MPO staff are mid-way through the planning process and are working with the MPO committees to evaluate possible projects for inclusion in the final constrained project list. Projects are being evaluated using a performance-based approach as stipulated by Federal Highway Administration, and Virginia Department of transportation guidance (Attachment 1). MPO staff are employing a scenario-based approach to evaluate groups of projects. Currently, the Policy Board MPO has reviewed the first scenario (Attachment 2) and provided input on a second round of projects for consideration in scenario review round two. Summary: The five-year LRTP update process kicked off in the Spring of 2017. Since kickoff the following tasks have been completed. Developing a detailed scope of work, adopting plan goals and objectives, establishing project review criteria and scenario performance measures, completing an update of the regional travel demand model, developing a projects list, conducting a first round of scenario project planning. Next steps include further scenario planning, additional public engagement, and defining a final constrained project list. Action Items: This discussion is to inform the Planning Commission of the ongoing planning process and solicit input form the Commission. Additional opportunities for input include a public meeting scheduled for October 17th (5:30-7:30pm at the Water Street Center) and additional Planning Commission briefings. If there are any questions or comments, please contact Wood Hudson at whudson@tjpdc.org or visit the plan website at http://campo.tjpdc.org/process-documents/lrtp/. Attachment 1 Scenario Review Criteria Desired LRTP Goal LRTP Objective Aspect to Quantify Performance Measure Method Trend Improve the efficiency of the existing transportation system and Congestion Delay due to Congestion Vehicle-hours of delay Decrease Model services whenever possible. Total population within 1/4 mile of a transit stop* (multiply by 2 if peak-hour headway is 20 minutes or less, divide by 2 if peak-hour headway is 45 minutes or Improve access to transit for all users. Ensure the diverse needs more) of a changing population are met including the elderly, disabled, Population below poverty line (present-day) within 1/4 mile from transit stop GIS, using Resident access to Transit Increase limited English proficiency, and persons lacking access to private Minority population (present-day) within 1/4 mile from transit stop ACS data Accessibility vehicles. Population age 65+ (present-day) within 1/4 mile from transit stop & Mobility Limited-English proficiency (LEP) population (present-day) within 1/4 mile from transit stop SMART SCALE: Access to jobs Commute time Average commute time - driving Decrease Model Enhance connectivity among and between various modes of # of park-and-ride spaces in the region transportation through identifying and filling gaps in networks. Manual Access to mode transfers Increase Increase awareness and continue to support Rideshare and count # of bike rack spaces at transit stops in the region Travel Demand Management (TDM) services. # of transit stops* within (or immediately adjacent to) activity center TAZs, with each express bus stop* counting as 2 stops Assure activity centers are designed to accommodate a range of Access to activity centers by bus, Length of bicycle facilities within (or immediately adjacent to) activity center TAZs Increase GIS transportation modes. bike and walking Length of pedestrian facilities within (or immediately adjacent to) activity center Economic TAZs Development Target transportation improvements to support local land use Transportation projects within or and Land Use Miles of road that are within (or immediately adjacent to) activity center TAZs Increase GIS and development priorities. connected to activity centers Improve the effectiveness of the existing transportation VMT (vehicle-miles traveled) per network, recognizing internal and external future travel VMT per capita Decrease Model capita demands from tourism, freight, and commuters. Fatality crashes, multiplied by 540 Reduce the number and severity of crashes Crashes Injury crashes, multiplied by 10 Decrease Model Safety Property damage only crashes Identify key safety deficiencies in regional networks across all Length of regional shared-use paths and bike lanes Bicycle and Pedestrian network Increase GIS modes including the needs of bike and pedestrian users. Length of regional sidewalks and shared-use paths Environment Promote use of alternative transportation modes and % of trips non-motorized Non-SOV Commute Mode Share Increase Model & Community alternative fuel vehicles. % of trips transit *excludes stops that serve only peak-hour (commuter) routes Attachment 1: Project Review Criteria Project Description: includes project location and scope (roadway, transit, bike/ped), cost estimate if available, and any other essential information Congestion Transit Access Bike/Ped Projected change in Length of bicycle Change in transit # of vehicle-hours of and pedestrian access measure delay (model) improvements Project Impacts Environmental Incorporates Complete Streets elements that aren’t in measures (street trees, Design bus shelters, benches or other amenities). List potential elements included. Environmental Wetlands, floodplains, park lands, scenic rivers, conservation easements, and endangered species habitat. Quantative values presented, with qualitative Impacts description if necessary. Estimate of number of individuals who are minority, in poverty, or older than Social 65 who live within 500 feet of the project. Quantative values presented, with Impacts qualitative description if necessary. Historical Site List of sites potentially impacted by the project. Site information presented, Impacts with qualitative description if necessary. Inter-regional Impact on corridors that are identified by VDOT as part of the National corridors Highway System (NHS). Qualitative description. Inter-regional Impact on inter-regional transit. Qualitative description. transit Maintenance Qualitative description of potential impact on MAP-21 performance measures, and if applicable. Primary focus is whether project includes a deficient bridge or Safety locations with a high potential for safety improvement (PSI). Icons from flaticon.com made by Freepik, Scott de Jonge, and Google Project A Attachment 2 Scenario A - Capacity Round 1 Capacity-focused projects Current SMART SCALE US 250/US 29 Bypass widening (R1) Hydraulic and 29 Area Projects (R3) US 250 widening - Shadwell (R2) Fontaine/Bypass Interchange (R4) US 250 and Free Bridge widening (R5) West Main Street Multimodal (R6) I-64 Truck Lanes (R16) Scenario B - Connectivity Connectivity-focused projects Current SMART SCALE Berkmar Drive Extension (R11) Hydraulic and 29 Area Projects (R3) Sunset/Fontaine Connector (R12) Fontaine/Bypass Interchange (R4) Eastern Avenue - Crozet (R13) West Main Street Multimodal (R6) Hillsdale Drive to Rio Rd (R18) Pantops Bridge (R19) Scenario C - Multimodal Multimodal roadway Current SMART SCALE projects Hydraulic and 29 Area Projects (R3) Route 20 (R7) Fontaine/Bypass Interchange (R4) Rio Rd (R8) West Main Street Multimodal (R6) Fifth/Ridge/McIntire (R9) Avon Street (R10) Transit Projects Old Lynchburg (R14) Express Bus on US 29 Corridor (T1) Ivy Road - East (R15) Commuter bus to Crozet (T2) Ivy Road - West (R17) Bus route to Avon/Mill Creek (T3) Increased bus service to Pantops (T4) Fontaine Research Park bus route (T5) Attachment 2: Scenario 1 Map R11 Legend Potential Roadway Projects ± 8 R1 R3 R3 R13 R17 R8 R15 R9 R5 R6 R1 R4 R19 R9 R16 R1 R2 2 4 R1 0 R1 R7 Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, USGS, Intermap, INCREMENT P, NRCan, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), Esri Korea, Esri (Thailand), MapmyIndia, NGCC, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community Attachment 2: Scenario 1 Map (Transit) Legend Potential Transit Routes Route Avon Street (T3) Crozet Commuter (T2) ± Express Bus (T1) Fontaine Research Park (T5) Pantops (T4) Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, USGS, Intermap, INCREMENT P, NRCan, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), Esri Korea, Esri (Thailand), MapmyIndia, NGCC, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community Scenario Round 1 Results Base year 2045 'no‐ Scenario A Scenario B Scenario C Measure Metric (2015) build' Capacity Connectivity Multimodal Congestion Vehicle‐hours of delay 7065 10668 9362 9952 10491 Population near stop* with peak headway of 20 minutes of less 31267 41948 41948 41948 44218 Population near stop* with peak headway of 20‐45 minutes 23529 26625 26625 26625 29474 Population near stop* with peak headway of more than 45 min 12153 15058 15058 15058 13370 Access to Transit Poverty population living within 1/4 mile (2016) 13460 13492 13492 13492 13667 Minority population living within 1/4 mile (2016) 23734 23680 23680 23680 24076 Age 65+ population living within 1/4 mile (2016) 6221 6034 6034 6034 6252 LEP population living within 1/4 mile (2016) 595 598 598 598 606 Commute time Average commute time ‐ driving 11.6 12.9 12.5 12.8 12.8 Access to mode # of park‐and‐ride spaces 272 360 360 360 609 transfers # of bike rack spaces at transit stops 93 95 95 95 247 # of local bus transit stops* within (or immediately adjacent to) 146 148 148 148 200 activity center TAZs Bus, bike and # of express bus transit stops* within (or immediately adjacent to) 0 0 0 0 13 pedestrian activity center TAZs network within Length of bike facilities within (or immediately adjacent to) activity 29.7 38.1 39.6 42.0 41.5 activity centers center TAZs Length of pedestrian facilities within (or immediately adjacent to) 117.5 123.0 123.6 126.5 125.9 activity center TAZs Roadways within Miles of road that are within (or immediately adjacent to) activity 47.6 51.2 51.8 54.9 51.8 activity centers center TAZs VMT per capita VMT per capita 27.2 32.8 32.9 32.7 32.8 Number of Fatality crashes 15 19 19 19 19 Safety/Crashes Number of Injury crashes 1157 1433 1469 1432 1447 Number of Property damage only crashes 2625 3291 3332 3307 3343 Length of regional bicycle paths and lanes 46.7 55.4 59.5 60.2 64.5 Bike/Ped network Length of regional sidewalks and paths 106.6 113.0 115.9 117.2 121.4 Non‐SOV Mode % of trips non‐motorized 4.60 4.77 4.65 4.77 4.76 Share % of trips transit 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.41 *excludes stops that serve only peak‐hour (commuter) routes Accessibility and Mobility Economic Development and Land Use 5% 1% 5% 50% 5% 25% 5% 1% 1% Resident Access Commute Time - Access to Mode Multimodal Activity Activity Center VMT Per Capita to Transit Driving Transfers Centers Road Miles Environment and Safety Congestion Community 1% 1% 1% 5% 10% 5% 10% Transit/Non-motorized Bicycle and Pedestrian Commute Mode Share Crashes Hours of Delay Network Worsens Improves Scenario A Scenario B Scenario C