Agenda PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR DOCKET TUESDAY, April 12, 2022 at 5:30 P.M. Virtual Meeting I. Commission Pre-Meeting (Agenda discussion(s)) Beginning: 5:00 p.m. Location: (Electronic/Virtual) II. Commission Regular Meeting Beginning: 5:30 p.m. Location: (Electronic/Virtual) A. COMMISSIONERS' REPORTS B. UNIVERSITY REPORT C. CHAIR'S REPORT D. DEPARTMENT OF NDS E. MATTERS TO BE PRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC NOT ON THE FORMAL AGENDA F. CONSENT AGENDA (Items removed from the consent agenda will be considered at the end of the regular agenda) No items G. Entrance Corridor Review - Recommendation on SUP for 2005 and 2007 Jefferson Park Avenue and 104 Observatory Avenue (discussion to occur with SP22-00001) III. JOINT MEETING OF COMMISSION/ COUNCIL Beginning: 6:00 p.m. Continuing: until all public hearings are completed Format: (i) Staff Report, (ii) Applicant, (iii) Hearing 1. Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) and HOME Funding—4th Year Action Plan, FY 22-23: The Planning Commission and City Council are considering projects to be undertaken in the 4th Year Action Plan of the multi-year Consolidated Plan utilizing CDBG & HOME funds for the City of Charlottesville. In Fiscal Year 22-23 it is expected that the City of Charlottesville will receive about $433,471 in Community Development Block Grant funds and about $84,576.88 in HOME funds from the Department of Housing and Urban Development HUD. CDBG fund`s will be used in the City to address neighborhood improvements in the Ridge Street neighborhood, economic development activities, housing activities, and public service projects that benefit low and moderate income citizens. HOME funds will be used to support the housing needs of low and moderate-income citizens through homeowner rehabilitation. Report prepared by Erin Atak, Grants Coordinator 2. SP22-00001 – 2005 and 2007 Jefferson Park Avenue and 104 Observatory Avenue – Aspen Topco II Acquisitions, LLC (Contract Purchaser/Applicant) and Mitchell Matthews Architects (Applicant’s Representative) have submitted an application seeking approval of a Special Use Permit (SUP) for the following properties: Tax Map and Parcels (TMP) 170104000, 170103100, and 170103000 (owners, Norman Lamson, Trustee of the Gadient Land Trust Agreement) (Subject Properties). Pursuant to City Code Sec. 34-420, 34-353(3), and 34- 162(a) an application has been submitted requesting increased density from a By-Right 21 Dwelling Units per Acre (DUA) to 70 DUA, increased height from a By-Right 45 feet to 75 feet, reduction of rear yard setback from a required 75 feet to 36 feet, and a reduction of the onsite parking by 22% from the requirements stated in Sec. 34-984. The applicant is proposing a multifamily building with 119 units and underground parking. The Subject Properties are approximately 1.71 acres with road frontage on Jefferson Park Avenue, Observatory Avenue, and Washington Avenue and falls within the City Entrance Corridor. The properties are zoned R-3 Medium Density Residential. The Comprehensive Land Use Map for this area calls for Urban Mixed Use Corridor which recommends higher intensity mixed use developments up to 5 stories in height, up to 8 stories in height at key intersections and affordable units depending on zoning allowances. Information pertaining to this application may be viewed online at www.charlottesville.gov/agenda. Persons interested in the Special Use Permit application may contact NDS Planner Matt Alfele by e-mail (alfelem@charlottesville.gov) or by telephone (434- 970-3636). (items below will be included in part 2 of the packet) 3. SP22-00002 - 209 Maury Avenue – FMC Investments, LLC (Owner) has submitted a Special Use Permit (SUP) Application for the following properties: Tax Map and Parcels (TMP) 170018002, 170018000, 170018001, 170018600, 170018500, and 170018400 (Subject Properties). Pursuant to City Code Sec. 34-420 and 34-162(a) an application has been submitted requesting increased density from a by-right 21 Dwelling Units per Acre (DUA) to 43 DUA, modifications to yard requirements to match the layout proffered in ZM19-00002 and approved by City Council on December 2, 2019, and reduction to required onsite parking to ½ the spaces required under Sec. 34-984. The applicant is proposing to modify a site plan currently under review to allow more residential units without altering the footprint or layout of the development under review. The Subject Properties are approximately 1.60 acres with road frontage on Maury Avenue and Stadium Road. The properties are zoned R-3 Medium Density Residential. The Comprehensive Land Use Map for this area calls for Higher- Intensity Residential which recommends multi-family developments up to 5 stories in height, 13 plus units per lot, and affordable units depending on zoning allowances. Information pertaining to this application may be viewed online at www.charlottesville.gov/agenda. Persons interested in the Special Use Permit applications may contact NDS Planner Matt Alfele by e-mail (alfelem@charlottesville.gov) or by telephone (434-970-3636). 4. SP22-00003 - 207 14th Street NW -William Chapman (Contract Purchaser/Applicant) is requesting a Special Use Permit (SUP) pursuant to City Code Sec. 34-158, to authorize a specific land use (Hotel) at 207 14th Street NW (“Subject Property”) having frontage on 14th Street NW and 15th Street NW. The Subject Property is further identified on City Real Property Tax Map 9 as Parcel 701 (City Real Estate Parcel ID 090070100). The property is currently developed with a 21-unit multi-family residential building. The Subject Property is zoned Business (B- 1). The applicant proposes to redevelop the existing residential building into a 19-unit hotel with one residential apartment (4 dwelling units per acre). In the B-1 Business zoning district, hotel uses with 100 or fewer rooms are allowed with an approved Special Use Permit, while multi-family residential units are allowed by-right with residential density up to 21 dwelling units per acre (DUA). The Future Land Use Map for this area calls for Higher Intensity Residential, and no density range is specified by the Comprehensive Plan. Information pertaining to this application may be viewed online at www.charlottesville.gov/agenda. Persons interested in this Special Use Permit may contact NDS Planner Dannan O’Connell by e-mail (oconnelld@charlottesville.gov) or by telephone (434-970-3182) IV. COMMISSION’S ACTION ITEMS Continuing: until all action items are concluded. V. FUTURE MEETING SCHEDULE/ADJOURN Tuesday May 10, 2022 – 5:00 PM Pre- Meeting Tuesday May 10, 2022 – 5:30 PM Regular Minutes - July 13, 2021, August 10, 2021, Meeting August 31, 2021, September 14, 2021, October 11, 2021, October 12, 2021, October 21, 2021, November 9, 2021 Special Use Permit – 923 Harris Comprehensive Plan Amendment – Manufactured Housing Anticipated Items on Future Agendas Zoning Text Amendments –Off-street parking facilities requirements along streets designated as “framework streets” (initiated May 8, 2018), Site Plan Requirements, Accessory Dwelling Unit, Middle Density zoning and Affordable Dwelling Unit , 12th and Rosser/CH Brown Historic Conservation District (six properties) Rezoning and SUP – 0 Carlton Road Rezoning – 415 10th Street NW, Mount View PUD Preliminary Site Plan - 218 West Market Street Site Plan –Flint Hill PUD, 1223 Harris Critical Slope Waiver – Azalea Springs Special Use Permit – Fire Station on 250 Bypass, 1000 Monticello Future Entrance Corridor • 916 E High Street - Comprehensive Sign Plan Request (Sentara) • 2005 JPA – New apartment building, requires SUP (Mitchell Matthews Architects) • 1815 JPA - New apartment building (Wassenaar+Winkler Architects) • 1150 5th Street SW – new convenience store and gas canopy (Wawa, Riverbend) • 1801 Hydraulic Road – revised Comp Sign Plan, revised design review (Hillsdale Place, Riverbend) PLEASE NOTE: THIS AGENDA IS SUBJECT TO CHANGE PRIOR TO THE MEETING. PLEASE NOTE: We are including suggested time frames on Agenda items. These times are subject to change at any time during the meeting. Individuals with disabilities who require assistance or special arrangements to participate in the public meeting may call the ADA Coordinator at (434) 970-3182 or submit a request via email to ada@charlottesville.gov. The City of Charlottesville requests that you provide a 48 hour notice so that proper arrangements may be made. During the local state of emergency related to the Coronavirus (COVID19), City Hall and City Council Chambers are closed to the public and meetings are being conducted virtually via a Zoom webinar. The webinar is broadcast on Comcast Channel 10 and on all the City's streaming platforms including: Facebook, Twitter, and www.charlottesville.gov/streaming. Public hearings and other matters from the public will be heard via the Zoom webinar which requires advanced registration here: www.charlottesville.gov/zoom . You may also participate via telephone and a number is provided with the Zoom registration or by contacting staff at 434-970-3182 to ask for the dial in number for each meeting. LIST OF SITE PLANS AND SUBDIVISIONS APPROVED ADMINISTRATIVELY 3/1/2022 TO 3/31/2022 1. Preliminary Site Plans 2. Final Site Plans 3. Site Plan Amendments a. 125 Chancellor Street – February 28, 2022 b. South Street Inn – 200 South Street – February 25, 2022 4. Subdivision a. 1912-1914 Lewis Mountain Road - March 2, 2022 CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE DEPARTMENT OF NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT SERVICES STAFF REPORT ERB Review of Special Use Permit Request within the Fontaine Avenue / Jefferson Park Avenue Entrance Corridor 2005 Jefferson Park Avenue PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING DATE OF PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING: April 12, 2022 Project Planner: Matt Alfele Date of Hearing: April 12, 2022 Application Number: SP-15-00001 Zoning: R-3 Residential with Entrance Corridor Overlay (Fontaine Ave/JPA; Sub-area C.) Tax Parcels: 17-104, 17-103, 17-103.1 (Note: 17-104 is not within the EC Overlay.) Site Acreage: 1.7 acres (74,531 sq ft) ERB Staff report prepared by: Jeff Werner, AICP, Preservation and Design Planner ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Relevant Code Section Section 34-157 (a)(7). When a property that is the subject of the application for a SUP is within an Entrance Corridor (EC), City Council shall refer the application to the Entrance Corridor Review Board (ERB) for recommendations as to whether the proposed use will have an adverse impact on the district, and for recommendations as to reasonable conditions which, if imposed, that would mitigate any such impacts. The ERB shall return a written report of its recommendations to the City Council. Note: Per Code Section 34-309, regardless of the approval or denial of the requested SUP, any subsequent development of this site will require formal design review by the ERB [applying the City’s Entrance Corridor Design Guidelines (design guidelines)] and approval of a Certificate of Appropriateness (CoA). Background The 1.7-acre project site is comprised of three parcels; two (1.5 acres) are within the Fontaine Avenue/Jefferson Park Avenue Entrance Corridor, Sub-area C (Maury Avenue to Emmet Street). The site is the location currently of six (6) residential structures: a c1899 two-story house (converted to apartments), a 1948 single-story house; a 1957 two-story apartment building, a c2000 four-story apartment building, and two c2000 three-story apartment buildings. 2005 JPA SUP - ERB staff report (March 30, 2022) 1 SUP request 1 to increase residential density from 21 DUA to 70 DUA. (87 DUA is the max allowed by SUP), will require the following: • Increase building height from 45-ft to 75-ft (101-ft is the max allowed by SUP). • Reduce the rear yard setback from 75-ft (w/25-ft S-3 buffer) to 40-ft (w/25-ft S-3 buffer). • Reduce off-street parking requirements from 200 spaces to 125. Discussion (Note: See Attachments 1 and 2 re: the Entrance Corridor Design Guidelines.) Increased residential density: The design guidelines do not address how density and additional density, in and of itself, would visually impact the corridor. (Regardless if a building contains 100 small apartments or a single large one, the design review applies the same guidelines relative to scale and design.) Increased height (including massing and scale): The design guidelines were adopted on 2012. At that time, the corridor-specific recommendations for this EC--and this sub-area—suggested a maximum of 60-feet for parcels zoned University High Density. (In 2013, while parcel zoning did not change, revisions to the Land Use Map designated them University High Density.) 2021 revisions to the Land Use Map designated the parcels Urban Mixed-Use Corridor, with a recommended maximum height of five stories, with up to eight stories for properties at key intersections, such as intersections of Streets That Work, Downtown, Industrial, Mixed Use, or Neighborhood corridors. [emphasis added] While JPA is designated on the Streets That Work Plan, the project site is not at a key intersection of designated streets. As such, whether applying the EC guidelines (60-feet) or the Comprehensive Plan (five stories) a height of 75-feet exceeds the recommendation for this location and therefore results in an adverse impact. Emphasizing the word recommendation, the design guidelines are not intended to prohibit the consideration of increased height, where allowed by SUP, but to provide recommendations that, when properly applied, mitigate the adverse impacts of the increased height. Additionally, perception of a building’s height is more a response to its massing and scale than to vertical or planar dimensions. Massing refers to how one perceives a building’s shape and size, its three-dimensional form. Scale refers to the dimensional perception of building’s height and width, particularly in context of its surroundings. Our perceptions of both are affected by design, architectural elements, materials, setbacks and even landscaping. During the required EC design review, the ERB will evaluate the visual elements of this project— landscaping, lighting, design, materials, etc.—and, possibly, request modifications that mitigate 1 Mitchell Matthews SUP Application for 2005 Jefferson Park Avenue, dated January 11, 2022: Cover, pages 2 through 37. 2005 JPA SUP - ERB staff report (March 30, 2022) 2 the perceived height, mass and scale of the building. However, the design guidelines do not provide an objective checklist; therefore, the results of the design review process depend on how the ERB interprets and applies them. Staff finds the project, as presented conceptually, to be generally consistent with the EC design guidelines relative to streetscape, site design, and architectural design; however, the unbroken east and west elevations exceed what is typical within this corridor; in fact, exceed what is typical in Charlottesville. (See Appendix.) Facing Washington Avenue, the building wall is approximately 300-feet in length and seven stories high at mid-block. Facing Observatory Avenue, the building wall is approximately 250-feet long and six stories high at mid-block. Additionally, while portions of the primary façade step back, the northeast corner reads as an imposing element on JPA. The site’s topography, planned landscaping, and the conceptual design (for example, the articulated walls above a masonry foundation) somewhat mitigate the perception of height, scale, and massing; however, staff recommends this be addressed further. Much could be accomplished at the pedestrian level (where mass and scale are most experienced) with street trees and breezeways into and through a central courtyard; however, when viewed from a distance, the tall, unbroken walls read as massive and overwhelming. With that, the ERB can opt to address these elements during the design review process, in consideration of the design guidelines or, during this SUP review, recommend specific conditions that would be requirements for the design review. Reduced rear setback: The reduced rear yard setback will not be visible from JPA and will not visually impact the corridor. On-site Parking: The EC design guidelines address the visual impacts of off-street [on-site] parking. (For example, screening and reducing the scale of parking lots.) The submittal indicates all on-site parking will be concealed, below-grade, with a single entrance/egress on located at the NW corner of the site, on Washington Avenue. Reduced on-site parking therefore contributes to the viability of the concealed parking, a preferred solution for EC projects. Recommendation As stated above, insofar as the increased height exceeds what is recommended, design staff finds the requested height and related massing and scale will adversely impact Sub-Area C of the Fontaine Avenue/Jefferson Park Avenue Entrance Corridor; however, those impacts can be mitigated during the subsequent design review through application of the Entrance Corridor Design Guidelines. Should the ERB wish to apply design-related conditions to the SUP, staff recommends the following three conditions be considered: 2005 JPA SUP - ERB staff report (March 30, 2022) 3 • The building’s east and west elevations (along Washington and Observatory avenues) should incorporate pedestrian-level breaks to increase mid-block permeability and to mitigate the building’s perceived height from pedestrian level. • When the project returns to the ERB for a Certificate of Appropriateness, the proposed building’s façade along JPA shall be generally consistent with the conceptual design presented in the SUP request, relative to form, massing, step backs, and materiality. • When the project returns to the ERB for a Certificate of Appropriateness, the proposed building should be generally consistent with the conceptual design presented in the SUP request, relative to the overall organization and composition of the buildings. Note: This is not a recommendation of approval—or denial--for the necessary Certificate of Appropriateness. The project’s final design—architecture, scale and massing, site layout, landscaping, lighting, materials, etc.--are all subject to ERB review and approval. Public Comments Received See Special use permit report for comments received. Suggested Motion Finding of adverse impact with recommendation to approve the SUP: I move to find that the requested Special Use Permit for 2005 Jefferson Park Avenue relative to the increased height and related massing and scale will adversely impact the Fontaine Avenue/Jefferson Park Avenue Entrance Corridor district; however, during the subsequent design review, these impacts could be mitigated through application of the Entrance Corridor Design Guidelines[….]. Should the ERB wish to apply design-related conditions to the SUP, staff recommends the following three conditions be considered: • The building’s east and west elevations (along Washington and Observatory avenues) should incorporate pedestrian-level breaks to increase mid-block permeability and to mitigate the building’s perceived height from pedestrian level. • When the project returns to the ERB for a Certificate of Appropriateness, the proposed building’s façade along JPA shall be generally consistent with the conceptual design presented in the SUP request, relative to form, massing, step backs, and materiality. • When the project returns to the ERB for a Certificate of Appropriateness, the proposed building should be generally consistent with the conceptual design presented in the SUP request, relative to the overall organization and composition of the buildings. Alternate Motions Finding of no adverse impact with recommendation to approve the SUP: I move to find that the requested Special Use Permit for 2005 Jefferson Park Avenue relative to the increased 2005 JPA SUP - ERB staff report (March 30, 2022) 4 height and related massing and scale will not adversely impact the Fontaine Avenue/Jefferson Park Avenue Entrance Corridor district and, therefore, recommend approval of the Special Use Permit. Finding of adverse impact with recommendation to deny the SUP: I move to find that the requested Special Use Permit for 2005 Jefferson Park Avenue relative to the increased height and related massing and scale will adversely impact the Fontaine Avenue/Jefferson Park Avenue Entrance Corridor district in a manner that cannot be mitigated through application of the Entrance Corridor Design Guidelines and, therefore, recommend denial of the Special Use Permit. Attachments • Attachment 1: Charlottesville Entrance Corridor Design Guidelines Chapter V: Fontaine Avenue/Jefferson Park Avenue Entrance Corridor (pages 17-19) • Attachment 2: Relevant Entrance Corridor Design Guidelines 2005 JPA SUP - ERB staff report (March 30, 2022) 5 Appendix Suggested conditions for the Special Use Permit: • There should be pedestrian-level, permeable breaks in the east and west elevations, along Washington Avenue and Observatory Avenue. • The primary façade fronting on JPA (the street-level, two-story element and the multi-story elements) shall be generally consistent with the conceptual design relative to form, massing, height step backs, use of masonry (including hardscaping), and the variation in materiality. • The organization and composition of the buildings shall be generally consistent with the conceptual design: a two-story, masonry foundation supporting five-story, residential structures separated by a central courtyard and set back from JPA. Façade lengths, for context: • 15th Street NW façade Grand Marc Apartments (5 stories) approx. 450-feet. • Water Street façade Water Street Parking Garage (4 stories) approx. 400-feet. • West Main façade The Standard (5 stories) approx. 380-feet. • 10th Street elevation The Lark (6 stories) approx. 380-feet. • West Main façade The Flats (6 stories) approx. 370-feet. • Water Street facade City Walk Apartments (4 stories) approx. 360-feet • 2005 JPA (conceptual): Washington Avenue façade (7 stories) approx. 300-feet. • Culbreth Parking Garage (3 stories) approx. 285-feet. • 2005 JPA (conceptual): Observatory Avenue façade (7 stories) approx. 250-feet • West Main facade The Omni (6 stories) approx. 232-feet. • Maywood Lane façade of 1800 JPA (3 stories) approx. 221-feet • Downtown Mall: West Man block length 200-feet, side streets approx. 220-feet. • Water Street façade CODE Building (8 stories) approx. 215-feet. • 2111 JPA (apartments) front façade (3 stories) approx. 210-feet. • East High Street façade Queen Charlotte condos (4 stories) approx. 200-feet. • 1600 JPA west façade South Range Apartments (4 stories) approx. 188-feet • Grady Avenue façade Preston Court Apartments (4 stories) approx. 160-feet • 1815 JPA apartments façade (5 stories) approx. 160-feet • 2005 JPA (conceptual): JPA façade (seven stories) approx. 150-feet • 1600 Monticello Avenue (apartments) (5 stories) approx. 150-feet. • Stadium Road facade Woodrow Apartments (2 stories) approx. 145-feet. • 1830 JPA (apartments) Shamrock Road facade (3 stories) approx. 124-feet. • 1725 JPA (apartments) front façade (6 stories) approx. 100-feet. 2005 JPA SUP - ERB staff report (March 30, 2022) 6 Attachment 1: 2005 JPA SUP - ERB staff report (March 30, 2022) 7 2005 JPA SUP - ERB staff report (March 30, 2022) 8 2005 JPA SUP - ERB staff report (March 30, 2022) 9 Attachment 2. Entrance Corridor Design Guidelines • Chapter I: Introduction o http://weblink.charlottesville.org/public/0/edoc/793359/1_Introduction_ERB.pdf • Chapter II: Streetscape o http://weblink.charlottesville.org/public/0/edoc/793360/2_Chapter%20II%20Street scape_ERB.pdf • Chapter III: Site o http://weblink.charlottesville.org/public/0/edoc/793361/3_Chapter%20III%20Site_E RB.pdf • Chapter IV: Buildings o http://weblink.charlottesville.org/public/0/edoc/793362/4_Chapter%20IV%20Buildi ngs_ERB.pdf • Chapter V: Entrance Corridors o http://weblink.charlottesville.org/public/0/edoc/793363/5_Chapter%20V%20Maps %20of%20Corridors_ERB.pdf Design Guidelines relevant to Density n/a Design Guidelines relevant to Height (including massing and scale) Chapter I: Maintain Human Scale in Buildings and Spaces: Consider the impact of building design, especially height, mass, complexity of form, and architectural details, and the impact of spaces created, on the people who will pass by, live, work, or shop there. The size, placement and number of doors, windows, portals and openings define human scale. Chapter IV: Guidelines for Buildings C. Building Mass, Scale & Height 1. Break up the front of a large building by dividing it into individual bays of 25 to 40 feet wide. 2. Use variation in materials, textures, patterns, colors and details to break down the mass and scale of the building. a. Avoid an unmodulated mass b. Use stepped-back height c. Use varied wall surfaces d. Use varied heights with regular width 3. Use building mass appropriate to the site. Place buildings of the greatest footprint, massing, and height in the core of commercial or office developments where the impact on adjacent uses is the least. Follow setback requirements for upper story according to zoning classification of the corridor. 4. When making transitions to lower density areas, modulate the mass of the building to relate to smaller buildings. Heights can be greater if the mass is modulated and other scale techniques are adopted. Reduce height near lower density uses. 2005 JPA SUP - ERB staff report (March 30, 2022) 10 5. Use massing reduction techniques of articulated base, watertables, string courses, cornices, material changes and patterns, and fenestration to reduce the apparent height of a large building. Fake windows and similar details are not appropriate articulation. Floor-to-floor heights of a building can have an impact on the mass of a building. For instance, typical ceiling heights in a residence are 8-9 feet. First floors of office buildings or retail shops can range from 10-15 feet. Upper floors that include residential or office are generally 8-12 feet in height. When actual or implied floor-to-floor heights exceed 15-20 feet on the exterior, then a building may begin to read as more massive than human-scaled. When articulating large buildings, keep these dimensions in mind. Design Guidelines relevant to Setbacks. Chapter III: Guidelines for Sites, D. Building Placement 1. Orient the facade of new buildings to front on the corridor. 2. Limit setback of new buildings according to the zoning of the particular corridor. 3. Limit setbacks at major intersections so that the architecture can help define the area. 4. Use compact building arrangements to reduce the feeling of seas of parking, encourage pedestrian activity and define space. 5. Strive for contiguous building arrangement along the street face, and avoid large breaks between buildings in identified development sites. 6. Ensure that larger developments orient their design to any adjoining neighborhoods and to side streets. 7. Provide breaks in large developments and building masses to allow pedestrian connections between developments. 8. Orient service areas to limit their impact on the development and any neighboring areas. 9. Each side of a corner building that faces a street should be considered a facade of the building for design purposes. Design Guidelines relevant to Parking. Chapter I. Design Principles Mask the Utilitarian: Provide screening from adjacent properties and public view of parking lots, outdoor storage and loading areas, refuse areas, mechanical and communication equipment, and other uses that have adverse impacts. Where feasible, relegate parking behind buildings. Chapter III: Guidelines for Sites, E. Parking 3. Reduce the visibility of residential garages by: a. Not allowing a garage to become the primary architectural feature when a development is viewed from the street, especially for attached housing. b. Placing garages behind the building setback, preferably facing to the side or rear of attached housing. c. Placing garages and parking in the rear with alley access 2005 JPA SUP - ERB staff report (March 30, 2022) 11 Chapter IV: Guidelines for Buildings, E. Facade Organization & Storefronts 3. Secondary entries may be created to allow convenient access from adjacent buildings, sidewalks, parking, bicycle paths and transit stops. Design Guidelines specific to Fontaine Avenue/Jefferson Park Avenue Entrance Corridor (Ref. Entrance Corridor Design Guidelines, Chapter V: Corridors, pages 17-19.) Vision statement for Fontaine Avenue/Jefferson Park Avenue Entrance Corridor: This corridor transitions quickly from accommodating highway speed autos to more congested auto, transit, pedestrian and bicycle traffic. Foremost considerations are traffic calming, provisions for pedestrian safety, and pedestrian amenities such as sidewalks, landscaping and transit stops. The neighborhood center, Maury Avenue intersection, is currently a bustling, mixed use pedestrian activity area that newer developments strive to emulate. The pedestrian and mixed use characteristics of this neighborhood intersection should not be lost as redevelopment occurs. New mixed use and apartment project design should reflect the character and importance of this major entrance to the City and the University. Historic assets to be protected include the JPA median that formerly accommodated a trolley line, the Fry Spring’s Service Station, and the Oakhurst-Gildersleeve Neighborhood. This corridor is a potential location for public way-finding signage. Recommended General Guidelines for Sub-area: Maury Avenue to Emmet Street: • Put utilities underground that are now located within median • Ensure that off street parking areas are well defined and screened as needed • Design new apartment buildings to break up their large scale and use traditional materials 2005 JPA SUP - ERB staff report (March 30, 2022) 12 City of Charlottesville MEMO TO: Planning Commission FROM: Erin Atak, Grants Coordinator of Charlottesville DATE: April 12, 2022 SUBJECT: Public hearing for proposed FY 2022-2023 CDBG and HOME Budget Allocations for the Annual Plan of the Consolidated Plan As part of the CDBG public participation process, the Planning Commission must provide recommendations to City Council on all Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) and HOME Investment Partnership (HOME) funding recommendations. Attached you will find the proposed allocations for FY 22-23 CDBG and HOME programs. These recommendations are based on the CDBG Task Force recommendations for Housing, Public Service, Economic Development activities, and the Ridge Priority Neighborhood Task Force. Attached you will also find copies of meeting minutes where these recommendations were made. This includes a memo of explanation and a list of all the projects reviewed as a result of the competitive Request for Proposal (RFP) process. Following the public hearing, staff is asking for a recommendation to City Council concerning the CDBG and HOME budget allocations. The budget allocations will later be included in the FY22- 23 Annual Action Plan for HUD submittal this May. If you have any questions or concerns, please contact Erin Atak at (434) 970-3093 or email atake@charlottesville.gov. Cc: City Council Mr. Sam Sanders, Deputy City Manager Alexander Ikefuna, Interim Director of Office of Community Solutions CDBG Task Force City of Charlottesville MEMO TO: Planning Commission FROM: Erin Atak, Grants Coordinator of Charlottesville DATE: April 12, 2022 SUBJECT: Proposed FY 2022-2023 CDBG and HOME Budget Allocations CDBG and HOME Project Recommendations for FY 2022-2023: The CDBG program total has an estimated $433,471 for the 2022-2023 program year. The HOME total consists of an estimated $84,576.88 which is the City’s portion of the Consortium’s appropriation, in addition to $21,144.22 for the City’s 25% required match. Minutes from the meetings are attached which outline the recommendations made. It is important to note that all projects went through an extensive review by the CDBG/HOME Task Force as a result of a competitive RFP process. On September 21, 2021, City Council set priorities for the FY22-23 CDBG Program which included prioritizing access to affordable housing (including but not limited to low income housing redevelopment), workforce development (including but not limited to efforts to bolster Section 3 training opportunities and partnerships with the City’s GO programs), microenterprise assistance, access to quality childcare, homeowner rehabilitation, and down payment assistance. The CDBG/HOME competitive request for proposals were based off the 2022-2023 City Council’s CDBG/HOME priorities, the 2018-2022 Consolidated Plan, Charlottesville Affordable Housing Plan, and HUD’s CDBG/HOME national priorities. Priority Neighborhood – On September 21, 2021, Council approved Ridge Street to be the Priority Neighborhood. On March 15, 2021, City Council approved activities for the Ridge Street priority neighborhood to be carried out with CDBG funds. Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Ridge Street as the priority neighborhood to allow for completion of those selected activities. All chosen activities went through extensive community participation selection and engagement process through the Ridge Street priority neighborhood Taskforce that occurred between September 2020 through February 2021. Economic Development – Council set aside FY 22-23 CDBG funding for Economic Development Activities. Funds are proposed to be used to provide Community Investment Collaborative Microenterprise scholarships assistance to 10-20 entrepreneurs to develop their businesses through a 16-session workshop through technical assistance mentorship and financial management training program. The Taskforce also recommended the Local Energy Alliance Program to receive funding for the Workforce Development program. Estimated benefits include hiring 2 staff members from the Home to Hope or CRHA’s Section 3 program for their Weatherization Technician Workforce Development program. Public Service Programs – The Task Force has recommended several public service programs. Funds are proposed to assist the Literacy Volunteers of Charlottesville/Albemarle to prepare 32 illiterate City residents for the workforce through individualized instruction; and assist the Public Housing Association of Residents to fund the resident outreach and community organization of public housing redevelopment. CDBG Housing Programs – The Taskforce recommended the Local Energy Alliance Program for a solar home energy maintenance roof repair program. Estimated benefits include seven minor roof repairs and solar rooftop instillations. Administration and Planning: To pay for the costs of staff working with CDBG projects, citizen participation, environmental reviews, and other costs directly related to CDBG funds, $86,694.20 is budgeted to administer the program; capped at 20% of the CDBG entitlement funds. HOME Funds: The CDBG/HOME Task Force recommended funding the Local Energy Alliance Program that support homeowner energy maintenance rehabilitation. Estimated benefits include ten homeowner rehabilitations. Adjusting for Actual Entitlement Amount: Because actual entitlement amounts are not known at this time, it is recommended that all recommendations are increased/reduced at the same pro- rated percentage of actual entitlement to be estimated. No agency will increase more than their initial funding request. Adjusting for Timeliness: Because several subrecipients are in the process of completing their 2021-2022 CDBG/HOME contracts; 2022-2023 contract awards are subject to reprogramming if 2021-2022 CDBG/HOME subrecipients are not able to fulfill their contract obligations by June 30, 2022. Attachments: Proposed FY 22-23 CDBG and HOME budgets FY 22-23 List of RFPs received CDBG/HOME Task Force Minutes CDBG/HOME Taskforce Rubric 2022-2023 CDBG & HOME BUDGET ALLOCATIONS RECOMMENDED BY CDBG/HOME TASKFORCE: 2/16/22 & 3/21/22 RECOMMENDED BY PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL A. PRIORITY NEIGHBORHOOD A. Ridge Street Priority Neighborhood $ 186,376.16 B. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS A. Community Investment Collaborative - Micro Scholarships $ 25,000.00 B. Local Energy Alliance Program - Workforce Development $ 30,130.00 C. PUBLIC SERVICE PROJECTS (15% CAP) A. Public Housing Association of Residents $ 37,510.32 B. Literacy Volunteers of Charlottesville/Albemarle $ 27,510.32 D. HOUSING PROJECTS A. Local Energy Alliance Program - Solar Energy Maintenance $ 40,250.00 E. ADMINISTRATION/PLANNING (20% CAP) A. Admin/Planning $ 86,694.20 Grand Total $ 433,471.00 Estimated Entitlement $ 433,471.00 2022-2023 HOME BUDGET ALLOCATIONS A.Local Energy Alliance Program - Assisted HOME Performance $ 84,576.88 Total $ 84,576.88 Estimated Entitlement $ 84,576.88 Local Match $ 21,144.22 CDBG FY22-23 Submissions Organization, Program Title Project Contact Program Description Funding Requested Assisted Home Performance Worforce Local Energy Alliance Program (LEAP) Chris Meyer Development $ 30,130.00 CDBG Econ Community Investment Collaborative (CIC) Stephen Davis CIC Entrepreneur Program $ 25,000.00 Total Amount of Request $ 55,130.00 Organization, Program Title Project Contact Program Description Funding Requested Public Services (15% Cap) Public Housing Association of Residents Capacity Building, Empowerment, Protecting (PHAR) Shelby Edwards Affordable Housing $ 35,000.00 CDBG PACEM Jayson Whitehead Referrals Specialist $ 39,375.00 Literacy Volunteers Charlottesville/Albemarle Ellen Osborne Beginning Workforce Development Services $ 37,432.00 Total Amount of Request $ 111,807.00 Total Projected Budget $ 65,020.65 Request Overage $ 46,786.35 Organization, Program Title Project Contact Program Description Funding Requested Local Energy Alliance Program Chris Meyer Low-Income Roof Repairs $ 40,250.00 Housing CDBG Total Amount of Request $ 40,250.00 HOME FY22/23 RFP Submissions Organization, Program Title Project Contact Program Description Funding Requested HOME Local Energy Alliance Program (LEAP) Chris Meyer Assisted Home Performance $80,100 Friendship Court Early Learning Piedmont Housing Alliance (PHA) Sunshine Mathon Center $105,721 Total Amount of Request $185,821 Total Projected Budget $84,576.88 Request Overage $101,244 Community Development Block Grant/HOME Taskforce Wednesday, February 16th, 2022 4-5PM Virtual Meeting (Zoom) Meeting Minutes 1. Introductions/Housekeeping/Minutes Grants Coordinator, Erin Atak (EA), took Roll Call. Name Attendance Nancy Carpenter Present Helen Sporkin Present Matthew Gillikin Present Connor Brew Present James Bryant Present Kem Lea Spaulding Present Howard Evergreen Present Emily Cone Miller Absent Taneia Dowell Absent All Taskforce members introduced themselves and their neighborhood designation/role on the CDBG/HOME Taskforce 2. CDBG/HOME Background EA shared the CDBG/HOME introductory technical assistance PowerPoint for the Taskforce. The PowerPoint serves as the training slideshow that all CDBG and HOME applicants are required to sit through in a mandatory 30-45 training session with the grants coordinator prior to applying for CDBG and HOME. EA walks through the following topics with the Taskforce: a. 2022-2023 CDBG/HOME Priorities selected by City Council b. Three CDBG/HOME HUD National Objectives Staff Contact: Erin Atak, Grants Coordinator (atake@charlottesville.gov), (434) 970-3093 c. CDBG/HOME program income guidelines posted on the City of Charlottesville website that all CDBG/HOME applicants adhere to. d. The updated CDBG/HOME Priority Neighborhood Map on the City Website: https://www.charlottesville.gov/DocumentCenter/View/6760/2021-CDBG- Priority-Neighborhood-Map e. The HOME HUD Program Definition, eligible activities, and ineligible activities. f. Projected HOME allocation for FY2022-2023 g. Federal and Local requirements subrecipients are required to adhere to (submitting quarterly reports, getting environmental reviews done, spending requirements, documentation requirements for invoices, etc.) h. And submitting an internal controls checklist required by HUD as listed in the City’s CDBG Guidelines by application date: current annual audit, policies and procedures manual, financial statements, Evidence of 501(c)3, etc. EA explained to the Taskforce that there was a total of six technical assistance meetings prior to application submittal with the following organizations: i. Piedmont Housing Alliance j. Thomas Jefferson Community Land Trust k. Local Energy Alliance Program l. Literacy Volunteers of Charlottesville/Albemarle m. Virginia Supportive Housing n. Charlottesville Redevelopment and Housing Authority Two organizations submitted applications for the FY2022-2023 HOME request for proposal: - Local Energy Alliance Program (LEAP) - Piedmont Housing Alliance (PHA) EA explained to the Taskforce that HUD reviewed the applications and advised the City that the Piedmont Housing Alliance Application and a portion of the LEAP application would be better suited for other funding sources. The Taskforce would only be able to review one portion of LEAP’s application for funding consideration this afternoon. Nancy Carpenter (NC) asks about whether the HUD national objective #2 (blight/slum) wording can be updated. NC also brings up whether organizations submit policies on diversity, equity, and inclusion within the attachments that subrecipients were required to submit with applications. 3. Scores EA asks the Taskforce is there were any concerns reviewing the applications. No concerns were brought up. EA outlines LEAP’s performance history. No concerns were brought up with audit history, timeliness, and documentation requirements. Staff Contact: Erin Atak, Grants Coordinator (atake@charlottesville.gov), (434) 970-3093 Discussion with the Taskforce revolved around LEAP’s FY2021 financial and performance workload. EA explains that LEAP is currently performing 16-20 energy efficiency audits with the same amount of funding that is being requested in the current application. NC, Howard Evergreen (HE), and Connor Brew (CB) discuss the energy savings and impact on utility bills. The Taskforce unanimously voted on the following funding recommendation for the LEAP assisted home performance application. Funding TF Funding Applicant Average Score Request Recommendations Assisted Home LEAP 32.14 $80,100.00 $84,576.88 Performance (Only) Funding Available $ 84,576.88 4. Public Comment None Individuals with disabilities who require assistance or special arrangements to participate in the public meeting may call the ADA Coordinator (434)-970-3182 or submit a request via email to ada@charlottesville.gov. The City of Charlottesville requests that you provide a 48-hour notice so that proper arrangements can be made. Staff Contact: Erin Atak, Grants Coordinator (atake@charlottesville.gov), (434) 970-3093 Community Development Block Grant/HOME Taskforce Monday, March 21, 2022 4-5PM Virtual Meeting (Zoom) Meeting Minutes 1. Introductions/Housekeeping Grants Coordinator, Erin Atak (EA), took Roll Call. Name Attendance Nancy Carpenter Present Helen Sporkin Present Matthew Gillikin Present Connor Brew Present James Bryant Absent – sent in funding recommendations Kem Lea Spaulding Absent Howard Evergreen Present Emily Cone Miller Absent Taneia Dowell Absent Guests Observing review process: Shirese Franklin, TJPDC Planner III Hunter Allen Smith, City Staff, Vibrant Communities Fund EA explained to the Taskforce about how many applicants she met with during the pre-application technical assistance meetings. There was a total of eleven applicants that met with EA during the RFP process. 6 applications were received at the end of the RFP process. 1. Community Investment Collaborative 2. Local Energy Alliance Program 3. Literacy Volunteers of Charlottesville/Albemarle 4. Thomas Jefferson Area Coalition for the Homeless Staff Contact: Erin Atak, Grants Coordinator (atake@charlottesville.gov), (434) 970-3093 5. Charlottesville Redevelopment and Housing Authority 6. Piedmont Housing Authority 7. Region 10 8. Habitat for Humanity of Greater Charlottesville 9. Public Housing Association of Residents 10. People and Congregations Engaged in Ministry (PACEM) 11. The HAVEN EA explained the CDBG timeliness concerns for current applicants to the Taskforce. - 2021-2022 subrecipients with CDBG/HOME contracts were eligible to apply for new rounds of funding for CDBG as long as they are able to fully spend their 2021 contract by the end of their contract year. - EA explained that the contract year ends June 30, 2022. All funds must be spend by then in order to be eligible for their 2022 CDBG awards. If the subrecipient is not able to fulfill their end of the contract obligation, the City can reprogram the 2021 and 2022 CDBG awards for timeliness purposes. - EA explained three organizations fell into this category: LEAP, CIC, and PHAR. 2. Scores Taskforce begins to look over the economic development scores first. - EA gives an audit history for both applications in the economic development category. No concerns are listed from staff side. - Nancy Carpenter (NC) makes a motion to fully fund both Community Investment Collaborative (CIC) and the Local Energy Alliance Program (LEAP). She explains that in LEAP’s application she appreciates the initiative to re-acclimate people to the workforce with housing; and CIC’s application was good and large in scope. - Matthew Gillikin (MG) seconds the motion and wonders if CIC would be able to take on additional funding. - Howard Evergeen (HE) asks what happens to any undesignated funds at the end of the awarding process - EA explains several options to the taskforce: o There is the option to issue another RFP o There is the option to fund an unfunded project within the CDBG priority neighborhood that the City is looking for funding for o There is the option to give the extra funds to the priority neighborhood taskforce budget - NC states that the Taskforce should proceed with awarding the rest of the CDBG categories and then coming back and seeing if there are any extra funds remaining. The committee agrees. Taskforce begins to look over the housing applications. - EA gives an audit history for both applications in the economic development category. No concerns are listed from staff side. Staff Contact: Erin Atak, Grants Coordinator (atake@charlottesville.gov), (434) 970-3093 - MG and NC states that this proposal was interesting and different from the typical housing application that LEAP generally requests for funds for. NC states that the application addresses the need for families to stay in their homes and addresses financial concerns. - NC moves to fully fund the LEAP application. - Connor Brew (CB) seconds the motion. Taskforce begins to look over the public service applications. - EA reminds the committee that the public service section has a HUD cap of 15% with CDBG funds. - EA gives an audit history for applications in the public services category. No concerns are listed from staff side. EA gives several options to the Taskforce about how to fund the applications because there is a finite amount of funds to give out to the applicants. - MG makes a motion to fully fund Literacy Volunteers of Charlottesville/Albemarle (LVCA) as they ranked the highest among the public service category. - HE and NC seconds the motion. - Helen Sporkin (HP) states that LVCA had the most thorough application among all that was submitted. - NC makes the motion to fully fund Public Housing Association of Residents. - NC states that there was not anything sustainable in the PACEM application about keeping the staff position long term past the one-year contract agreement. - EA states that generally previous taskforces have also tended to stray away from funding staff positions for that reason. - CB, MG, and HS support fully funding PHAR and LVCA. - EA offers the option of adding the remaining additional $5,020.64 split between the two funded programs. The Taskforce agrees. This uses the full 15% of the funding for public services. The CDBG/HOME Taskforce unanimously votes on the following budget: Applicant Average Score Funding Request TF Recommendation CIC 37.33 $25,000.00 $25,000.00 LEAP Workforce 33.17 $30,130.00 $30,130.00 LEAP Solar Roof 33.50 $40,250.00 $40,250.00 PACEM 32.17 $39,375.00 $0.00 LVCA 39.67 $25,000.00 $27,510.32 PHAR 34.17 $35,000.00 $37,510.32 - Shirese Franklin (SF): Makes a comment to the comment about how the review process on shovel ready projects is a great idea the City does and should be implemented to the region. - Hunter Allen Smith (HAS) noted that it was great getting to shadow along the review process and the budget making process with the Taskforce. Staff Contact: Erin Atak, Grants Coordinator (atake@charlottesville.gov), (434) 970-3093 - MG stated that the process had a learning curve to it and the technical assistance trainings are always helpful. 3. Public Comment - Shelby Edwards: Shared her appreciation for the dialogue from the Taskforce and the Grants Coordinator and is looking forward to the future funding. - Joy Johnson: Shared her concerns for the review process of the applications and asked whether the Taskforce received training. Individuals with disabilities who require assistance or special arrangements to participate in the public meeting may call the ADA Coordinator (434)-970-3182 or submit a request via email to ada@charlottesville.gov. The City of Charlottesville requests that you provide a 48-hour notice so that proper arrangements can be made. Staff Contact: Erin Atak, Grants Coordinator (atake@charlottesville.gov), (434) 970-3093 SCORING RUBRIC FOR HOME PROPOSALS Name of Applicant: Name of Project: Exemplary Adequate Needs Missing Score Comments Improvement Information (3 Points) (2 Points) (1 Point) (0 Points) Program/Project Provides a clear Provides a description Program/project Proposal does not Description description and clearly that adequately description needs describe how it will explains how it will explains how it will improvement address a Council address a Council address a Council Priority Priority Priority Program/Project Provides a clear Provides an adequate Program/Project goal Goal is missing Goal explanation of the goal. explanation of the goal needs improvement. and/or not Identifies what will be Barely identifies what explained. provided to whom, how will be provided to Identification of many. Provides whom and how beneficiaries, demographic many. Barely number of information of the provides beneficiaries, beneficiaries and how demographic demographic they will meet the information and how information, and income guidelines the beneficiaries will information about meet the income how the guidelines beneficiaries will meet the income guidelines is missing Need Clearly describes how Adequately describes Description of need Does not describe the program will how the program will needs improvement. how the program directly address the directly address the Only state, regional, will directly address needs. needs using some local or national data the needs and/or 1 Provides local data to data to describe the provided, data not does not provide describe the needs of needs of the specific to clients data to describe the the community and the community and the needs of the beneficiaries beneficiaries community and the beneficiaries Outcomes Clearly explains how Adequately explains Explanation of how Does not explain proposed outcomes will how proposed proposed outcomes how proposed be meaningful, client- outcomes will be will be meaningful, outcomes will be focused and related to meaningful, client- client-focused and meaningful, client- the service focused and related to related to the service focused and/or the service needs improvement related to the service Strategies Provides evidence- Adequately describes Describes how Does not identify based strategies for how strategies address strategies address how strategies how the need using researched need without directly address program/project will best practices information about need address the need strategies at a best practices or minimum research Implementation Timeline is detailed and Timeline is adequate Timeline is limited or No timeline Timeline realistic not realistic provided and information is missing Evaluation Plan Provides a rigorous Provides a solid Evaluates some Proposal does not evaluation plan which evaluation plan elements of its work, provide an informs ongoing work, but the evaluation is evaluation plan or explains metrics and not thorough the plan is why they are used insufficient Demographic Proposal clearly Proposal adequately Proposal describes Proposal does not Verification describes how the describes how the how the agency will describe how the agency will collect and agency will collect and collect and verify agency will collect verify all required verify all required some required and verify any information information information required information 2 Financial Proposal describes how Proposal describes how Proposal describes Proposal does not Benefits the program fully the program fully how the program describe how the meets two financial meets one financial partially meets one to program will provide benefits benefit two financial benefits a financial benefit Collaboration Proposal describes how Proposal describes Proposal describes Proposal does not the program formal agreements collaboration describe collaborates with other with more than two informally with other collaboration with organizations to organizations organizations (ex. other entities achieve a common goal describing how they information sharing, using defined cooperate, but does resource sharing) deliverables and not share common metrics (ex. Clear deliverables or metrics. accountability, shared management, such as MOU’s or formal partnership agreements) Engagement/ Proposal describes Proposal describes Proposal explains Proposal does not Outreach complete outreach and some outreach and that services are provide strategies Strategy engagement strategies engagement strategies available to needy for outreach and and explains how it will and how it will serve and underserved engagement to serve needy and needy and underserved populations but needy and underserved populations program/project does underserved populations not conduct outreach populations or engagement Priority Proposal describes Proposal describes Proposal explains Proposal does not Neighborhood complete outreach some outreach and that services are provide strategies Ridge Street strategies and program/project serves available to priority for outreach to program/project serves residents in the Priority neighborhood priority residents in the Priority Neighborhood residents but neighborhood Neighborhood program/project does residents not conduct outreach 3 Organizational Organization Organization Organization capacity The organization Capacity demonstrated demonstrated needs improvement, demonstrated a lack (STAFF ONLY) sufficient capacity and adequate capacity and did not meet of a capacity fully met projected almost met projected projected outcomes outcomes in previous outcomes in previous grant year grant year Organizational Proposal provides clear Proposal provides Evidence of capacity Proposal does not Capacity evidence of the adequate evidence of and ability needs provide evidence of capacity and ability to the capacity and ability improvement. Does the capacity and ensure timely to ensure timely not address the ability performance and performance and question fully reporting reporting Budget Proposal clearly Proposal provides an Proposed budget The proposal does demonstrates: adequate budget. needs improvement not demonstrate A. How requested Adequately addresses and barely addresses how the requested funds will be A, B, and C A, B, and/or C. funds will be applied applied to Proposed budget to expense line expense line needs improvement. items, how the items amount requested is B. How the reasonable, and amount does not show a requested is direct relationship reasonable with proposed C. That the overall service items program budget shows a direct relationship with proposed service items TOTAL SCORE (MAX SCORE = 42 PTS) 4 CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE DEPARTMENT OF NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT SERVICES STAFF REPORT JOINT CITY COUNCIL AND PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC HEARING APPLICATION FOR A SPECIAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION NUMBER: SP22-00001 DATE OF HEARING: April 12, 2022 Project Planner: Matt Alfele, AICP Date of Staff Report: March 30, 2022 Applicant: Aspen Topco II Acquisitions, LLC (Contract Purchaser) Applicant’s Representative(s): Erin Hannegan with Michell/Matthews Architects & Planners Current Property Owner: Norman Lamson, Trustee of the Gadient Land Trust Agreement Application Information Property Street Address: 2005/2007 Jefferson Park Avenue and 104 Observatory Avenue (“Subject Properties”) Tax Map & Parcel/Tax Status: 170104000, 170103100, and 170103000 (real estate taxes paid current - Sec. 34-10) Total Square Footage/ Acreage Site: Approx. 1.71 acres (74,487 square feet) Comprehensive Plan (Future Land Use Map): Mixed Use Corridor Current Zoning Classification: R-3 Medium-density Residential Overlay District: Entrance Corridor for 2005/2007 Jefferson Park Avenue. No Overlay District for 104 Observatory Avenue Applicant’s Request (Summary) The applicant is requesting a Special Use Permit (SUP) pursuant to Code Sec. 34-420, 34-353(3), and Sec. 34-162(a), which allows increased residential density, additional height, and modifications to parking and setbacks. The Subject Properties have street frontage on Jefferson Park Avenue, Observatory Avenue, and Washington Avenue; and a by-right density of 21 dwelling units per acre (DUA). The applicant is looking to increase density to 70 DUA, increase height from a by-right 45 feet to 75 feet, reduce the rear yard setback from the required 75 feet to 36 feet, and reduce the onsite parking by 22% from what is required under Sec. 34-984. The SUP is required in order to accommodate the development being proposed for a 119-unit multifamily building with underground parking. Page 1 of 22 SP22-00001 2005 Jefferson Park Avenue SUP Vicinity Map Subject Properties Context Map 1 Subject Properties Page 2 of 22 SP22-00001 2005 Jefferson Park Avenue SUP Context Map 2- Zoning Classifications Subject Properties KEY - Light Orange: R-2U, Orange: R-3, Orange (lower right) UHD, Purple: NCC, Hatch: Entrance Corridor Context Map 3- Future Land Use Map, 2021 Comprehensive Plan KEY – Brown: Higher-Intensity Residential, Purple: Urban Mixed Use Corridor, Yellow: General Residential Page 3 of 22 SP22-00001 2005 Jefferson Park Avenue SUP Standard of Review City Council may grant an applicant a special permit or special use permit, giving consideration to a number of factors set forth within Zoning Ordinance Sec. 34-157. If Council finds that a proposed use or development will have potentially adverse impacts, and if Council identifies development conditions that could satisfactorily mitigate such impacts, then Council may set forth reasonable conditions within its SUP approval. The role of the Planning Commission is to make an advisory recommendation to the City Council, as to (i) whether or not Council should approve a proposed SUP and if so, (ii) whether there are any reasonable development conditions that could mitigate potentially adverse impacts of the proposed use or development. Section 34-157 of the City’s Zoning Ordinance lists a number of factors that Council will consider in making a decision on a proposed SUP. Following below is staff’s analysis of those factors, based on the information provided by the applicant. For the applicant analysis of their application per Sec. 34-157, see attachment B. (1) Whether the proposed use or development will be harmonious with existing patterns of use and development within the neighborhood. The properties immediately surrounding the Subject properties are described as: Direction Use Zoning North Single Family Detached R-2U South Multi-Family Apartments (across JPA) University High Density, EC East Single Family Detached and Multi-Family R-2U, EC Apartments West Single Family Detached and Multi-Family R-2U, EC Apartments The Subject Properties footprint takes up almost an entire city block and is surrounded by a variety of dwelling types. Directly to the south, across the seventy-foot plus (70+) right of way (ROW) of JPA, are located two multi-family apartments buildings of different sizes. The larger is approximately four (4) stories in height and sits at the highest point of the intersection. Heading northeast along JPA the grade drops and the next structures (multi- family apartments) become only two (2) stories in height. To the north of the Subject Properties (the highest point abutting the proposed development) are moderate single family detached dwellings one (1) to two (2) stories in height. On the eastern side of the Subject Properties the grade rises from JPA heading north along Washington Avenue and the surrounding dwellings are single family detached with heights of one (1) to two (2) stories. This pattern is repeated to the west of the Subject Properties along Observatory Page 4 of 22 SP22-00001 2005 Jefferson Park Avenue SUP Avenue, with the exception of the intersection of JPA and Observatory Avenue where a four (4) story multi-family apartment is located. The uses surrounding the Subject Properties consist of single family, two-family, small multi- family, and moderate multi-family residential as defined by Sec. 34-420. Although commercial and retail uses are within a ¼ mile of the Subject Properties, the overwhelming use type for this location, and surrounding neighborhood, is residential. Within the residential use, the majority of units are rentals, but owner occupied units still exist primarily to the north of the Subject Properties. It should also be noted that although a majority of the dwelling “type” is single family detached, this is only referencing the structure and not the use. Due to the proximity to UVA many of the single family detached units are functioning as small apartments or two-family dwellings. This is a product of bedroom count and allowable unrelated inhabitants per Sec. 34-420. Staff Analysis: The by-right density for the Subject Properties could create a residential development with a maximum of thirty-five (35) units. The proposed SUP would increase that density and would have a maximum unit count of one hundred and nineteen (119). This would be an increase of eight four (84) units over that of a by-right development. Under R-3 regulations, each unit within a residential development can have up to four (4) unrelated persons living in the unit (Sec. 34-420). This would mean a by-right development could have as many as one hundred and forty (140) bedrooms. Although the application materials do not indicate a final bedroom count, page two (2) of attachment B indicates the required parking for the development would be two hundred (200) spaces. This indicates the total bedroom count would be under the maximum allowable of four hundred and seventy-six (476) bedrooms under Sec. 34-420. The most likely final outcome will be a mix of one-, two-, three-, and four-bedroom units. The applicant’s Traffic Impact Analysis (attachment E) indicates the bedroom count will be around three hundred and ninety (390). This number will need to be finalized during the final site plan review. The majority of residential developments surrounding the Subject Properties have a unit count from one (1) to ten (10) with more density (over twenty units per dwelling) to the south of JPA (information provided by the City Assessor’s Office). Developing the Subject Properties to a unit count of one hundred and nineteen (119) would create one of the largest multi-family residential developments in the area. Although it is true that comparable developments are located in this area (as it relates to density and height), these developments are located farther north on JPA. For comparison, below are the dwelling unit counts for the larger multi-family residential developments in the immediate area: • 1725 JPA = nineteen (19) units and six (6) stories (DUA of 49) Page 5 of 22 SP22-00001 2005 Jefferson Park Avenue SUP • 1815 JPA = thirty (30) units and four (4) stories (DUA of 47) • 2111 JPA = thirty-four (34) units and (3) stories (DUA of 55) These counts only indicate units and not bedrooms. For a maximum bedroom count the unit count can be multiplied by four (4). Based on the surrounding uses, staff believes the “use” of multi-family residential on the Subject Properties is harmonious with the existing patterns of development. By contrast, staff believes the scale and density of the development is not harmonious with the existing patterns within the neighborhood. (2) Whether the proposed use or development and associated public facilities will substantially conform to the city's comprehensive plan. Below are specific areas of the Comprehensive Plan for which the request could be in compliance: a. Land Use, Urban Form, and Historic & Cultural Preservation Goal 2: Future Land Use Vision. Guide implementation of the Future Land Use vision contained in this Comprehensive Plan, including support for existing neighborhoods and preventing displacement. Goal 7: Entrance Corridors. Ensure that the quality of development in Charlottesville’s designated Entrance Corridor Overlay Districts is compatible with the City’s requirements and standards, and with the adjacent neighborhood’s historic, architectural, and cultural resources, while allowing for reuse of structures and evolution of uses in these areas. b. Housing Goal 2: Diverse Housing Throughout the City. Support a wide range of rental and homeownership housing choices that are integrated and balanced across the city, and that meet multiple City goals including community sustainability, walkability, bikeability, ADA accessibility, public transit use, increased support for families with children and low0income households, access to food, access to local jobs, thriving local businesses, and decreased vehicle use. c. Transportation Goal 1: Complete Streets Create and maintain a connected network of safe, convenient, and pleasant accommodations for pedestrians, bicyclists, and transit riders, including people of all ages and abilities. Goal 2: Coordination with Land Use & Community Design Page 6 of 22 SP22-00001 2005 Jefferson Park Avenue SUP Improve quality of life and promote active living by reducing automobile use and congestion and supporting multimodal options for safe and convenient travel in conjunction with implementation of the Future Land Use Vision. Goal 4: Parking Supply and Management Provide a balanced approach to parking that supports economic vitality, achieves urban form goals, minimizes environmental impacts, and accommodates pedestrians, bicycles, transit users, and disabled individuals. d. Environment, Climate, and Food Equity Goal 6: Tree Canopy Contribute to the creation, protection, and expansion of robust urban forests. Below are specific areas of the Comprehensive Plan for which the request may not be in compliance: a. Land Use, Urban Form, and Historic & Cultural Preservation Goal 3: Balance Conservation and Preservation with Change. Protect and enhance the existing distinct identities of the city’s neighborhoods and places while promoting and prioritizing infill development, housing options, a mix of uses, and sustainable reuse in our community Goal 7: Entrance Corridors. Ensure that the quality of development in Charlottesville’s designated Entrance Corridor Overlay Districts is compatible with the City’s requirements and standards, and with the adjacent neighborhood’s historic, architectural, and cultural resources, while allowing for reuse of structures and evolution of uses in these areas. b. Environment, Climate, and Food Equity Goal 6: Tree Canopy Contribute to the creation, protection, and expansion of robust urban forests. Comprehensive Plan- Staff Analysis: The Subject Properties are zoned R-3 with Entrance Corridor overlay. R-3 consists of mainly medium density residential units with small to medium apartment buildings being the most common use. In this section of the City most development on R-3 lots are by-right and have a density of twenty-one (21) DUA. Some of the larger developments in the area, ones with DUA over 21, were granted SUPs, constructed prior to the current code, or are located within the UHD zoning district. The 2021 Comprehensive Future Land Use Map indicates the Page 7 of 22 SP22-00001 2005 Jefferson Park Avenue SUP Subject Properties remain Urban Mixed Use Corridor. The land use section of the comprehensive plan states the following for Urban Mixed Use Corridor: Description: Higher intensity mixed use development arranged along corridors between employment, commercial, and civic hubs of the City. Form: Respond to existing residential, environmental, historic context. building heights according to context. Height: 5 stories, up to 8 at key intersections, such as intersections of Streets That Work Downtown, Industrial, Mixed Use, or Neighborhood corridors. Use and Affordability: Commercial, employment, residential. Include an inclusionary zoning mechanism to support housing affordability. As presented, the development will be required to provide nine (9) affordable dwelling units on or off site; or pay $435,245.76 into the City’s Affordable Housing fund per Sec. 34- 12 (attachment C). Staff finds the proposed development would conform to the Future Land Use Map as it relates to Description and Use but would not conform to Form and Height. The application, as proposed, would have seven (7) stories at the JPA and Washington/Observatory Avenue intersections. It is stated that buildings up to eight (8) stories are appropriate at “key intersections” in this district. Key intersections are not called out in any City planning documents, but it is staff’s professional opinion that Washington Avenue and Observatory Avenue would not be categorized as “key intersections” due to existing conditions and level of use. Key intersections for this area would most likely be JPA at Maury Avenue and JPA at Shamrock Road. Staff finds that design elements being incorporated into the building, such as stepping back the bulk after two (2) stories on the western frontage and additional articulation could make the building feel smaller than seven (7) stories. Staff is concerned with the eastern frontage of the building as it is the tallest portion of the structure due to grade. A five (5) story building would be more appropriate in this location, but design standards from Entrance Corridor review may be enough to mitigate the impact of a larger building at this location. In addition, staff cannot make a full determination on Affordability or Density as those aspects of the land use map are tied to a future zoning code. Streets that Work Plan The 2016 Streets that Work Plan labels Jefferson Park Avenue (JPA) as Mixed Use B typology. Mixed Use B streets are characterized as able to support high levels of walking, bicycling, and transit as they connect important destinations within the City and surrounding county. The Streets that Work Plan recommends a minimum clear zone width of seven (7) feet for sidewalks, which are noted along with a curbside buffer zone (the area Page 8 of 22 SP22-00001 2005 Jefferson Park Avenue SUP between the curb and sidewalk) as the highest priority items in the Mixed Use B typology. The next level (high) priority items for Mixed Use B typology are five (5) to seven (7) foot bike lanes, turn boxes, ten (10) foot shared use paths, and bicycle parking in curbside buffer zoned or on-street. The existing conditions for JPA include a 4.5 foot wide sidewalks with no buffer, on street parking, a marked bike lane, and crosswalk markings over Washington Avenue. As part of the development, per attachment B, the applicant will provide a larger sidewalk (no dimensions given) and additional pedestrian access next to the building. The Streets that Work Plans labels Washington Avenue and Observatory Avenue as “Local”. Local streets are found throughout the city and provide immediate access to all types of land uses. Although local streets form the majority of the street network, there is no specific typology associated with them. This is due in part to the many variations in context and right-of-way width, as well as the community’s expressed desire to replicate as nearly as possible the feel of older local streets that do not meet current engineering and fire code standards. The existing conditions for Washington Avenue are similar to many of the Local streets in the City. No sidewalk exists on the Subject Properties side and only a partial four (4) foot wide sidewalk is constructed on the opposite (eastern) side. This sidewalk starts at the intersection of JPA and runs north for about one-hundred and fifty (150) feet before ending. The conditions are the same for Observatory Avenue, but with a newer four (4.5) foot wide sidewalk on the side opposite (western) to the Subject Properties. This sidewalk also starts at the intersection of JPA and runs north for about one-hundred and fifty (150) feet. On the Subject Properties side a four (4.5) foot wide sidewalk (with no buffer) starts about two- hundred (200) feet from the intersection with JPA and continues north to the end of the Subject Properties. In relation to connectivity, Washington Avenue connects JPA to Stadium Road. Observatory Avenue terminates into a dead-end about three-hundred (300) feet north of the Subject Properties. As part of the proposed development a sidewalk (no dimensions provided) without a planting buffer will be constructed along Washington Avenue and JPA. Along Observatory Avenue a sidewalk (no dimensions provided) with a buffer is being proposed. The development also proposes on street parking for both Washington Avenue and Observatory Avenue. This would be permitted parking but not available to residents and guest of the development (see 4(a) below). Staff Analysis: Based on the application package, staff concludes that the pedestrian network along Washington and Observatory as shown on attachment B, would be Page 9 of 22 SP22-00001 2005 Jefferson Park Avenue SUP consistent with the City’s Streets that Work Plan and would be an upgrade to the existing conditions. It should be noted that any by-right development on the Subject Properties would not require the construction of sidewalks per Sec. 34-1124 as the Subject Properties are not vacant. For JPA staff believes the pedestrian network is not consistent with the City’s Streets That Work Plan. Staff would like to see a seven (7) foot sidewalk with a three (3) foot landscape buffer proposed for JPA. This would address the highest priorities of Mixed Use B Streets for this area. Bike Ped Master Plan The City’s 2015 Bike Ped Master Plan indicates JPA to have “Bike Lanes or Buffered Bike Lanes”. Bicycle lanes are one-way, on-road bike facilities that provide a dedicated space for people bicycling parallel to motor vehicle traffic. Bicycle lines are often delineated with pavement marking stripes and, in some cases, may be fully colored for higher visibility, especially at intersections. Additional striping or hatching between a bicycle lane and vehicular travel lane is recommended to provide a buffer between the person bicycling and the person driving, where roadway widths allow. Bicycle lanes without a buffer require a minimum width of 5-6 feet and bicycle lanes with a buffer require 7-8 feet. JPA currently has bike lanes and nothing in the proposed plan alters this existing feature. No improvements are recommended for Washington and Observatory Avenues within the Bike Ped Master Plan. (3) Whether proposed use or development of any buildings or structures will comply with all applicable building code regulations. Based on the information contained within the application the proposed development would likely comply with applicable building code regulations, but final determination cannot be made until final site plan review. (4) Potential adverse impacts, including, but not necessarily limited to: a) Traffic or parking congestion Traffic The City Traffic Engineer has reviewed the Traffic Impact Analysis (Attachment E) provided by the applicant. The following information is a synopsis of the information provided in the Traffic Impact Analysis. Please see Attachment E for more information. Trip generation information (VPD): The trip generation figures provided by the applicant indicate that a development of off campus student housing apartments will have 1,070 vehicular trips per day. Page 10 of 22 SP22-00001 2005 Jefferson Park Avenue SUP Peak-hour traffic: As shown in the trip generation, the morning peak hour would have 38 trips. The afternoon peak hour would have 53 trips. A mid-day peak would also occur with 84 trips. As this development is targeted toward campus housing, the newest edition of the ITE manual accounts for this different use rather than a normal apartment building as it generally has a different time of day trip generation. Traffic Counts, adjacent streets—The applicant conducted a traffic count study on August 31st, 2021 (background data included in Attachment E). The study found that the existing traffic volumes are as follows: • Jefferson Park Avenue: Approximately 12,000 vehicles per day (ADT) • Stadium Road: Approximately 3,800 vehicles per day (ADT) • Observatory Avenue: Approximately 200 vehicles per day (ADT) • Washington Avenue: Approximately 200 vehicles per day (ADT) At the direction of staff, the applicant did evaluate the intersections most effected by the development to see if the increased traffic would satisfy requirements for additional traffic signals. It was found that signalized intersections would not be warranted. Staff Analysis: The City Traffic Engineer has reviewed the provided Traffic Impact Analysis, and found the information provided to be sufficient and appropriate. The proposed development and increased residential density, while increasing traffic on the roadway, will not create an adverse effect on traffic on surrounding City streets. Much of this is due to the redistribution of trips in the “off campus student housing” and the location of the project to UVA and proximity to both CAT and UTS transit options. Vehicular Access The proposed project will only have one vehicular access point off of Washington Avenue to an underground parking facility. Staff Analysis: While in many conditions multiple access points are desirable, for this particular location the traffic engineer has agreed that a singular access point is not only acceptable, but desirable. The building will be close enough to Observatory for fire apparatus to service the building if needed. As Observatory and Washington Avenue are less than 250 feet apart, having a singular access point for the traveling public to have to anticipate vehicles turning in and out is beneficial. Observatory is also a sub-standard roadway and would have difficulty accommodating additional traffic while still maintaining the on-street parking that is currently present. Page 11 of 22 SP22-00001 2005 Jefferson Park Avenue SUP Parking As part of the applicants request to increase density, the applicant is also requesting to reduce the onsite parking by twenty-two percent (22%) of the requirements under Sec. 34-984. Under Sec. 34-984 efficiency, one-bedroom and two-bedroom units need to provide a minimum of one (1) space per unit. Three- and four-bedroom units need to provide two (2) spaces per units. The application materials do not call out a final unit count for each type, but it is indicated studio, one-, two-, three- and four-bedroom units are being considered. If built out to a max of one-hundred and nineteen (119) four- bedroom units, two-hundred and thirty-eight (238) onsite parking spots would be required. With a twenty-two percent (22%) reduction the minimum parking required, in this configuration, would be one-hundred and eighty-six (186). The application materials indicate the final space count will be one-hundred and twenty-five (125). This indicates some of the units will fall under the requirement of only needing one (1) space per unit and not two (2). Under the current plan all parking will be provided under the proposed development with one access point on Washington Avenue. Due to current regulations, the proposed development would not be eligible to obtain on street parking permits in this zone (Zone 1). This means residents and guest of the proposed development would not be allowed to park on Washington, Observatory or JPA. Other Modes of Transportation There are several mass transit stops located within a quarter (1/4) mile, including stops on JPA, Shamrock, Fontaine and Stadium that are serviced by both the UTS and the CAT’s free trolly. JPA has bike lanes in both directions that connect all the way to UVA and to West Main Street. The proposed development is also served by a complete (but mostly un-buffered) sidewalk network immediately adjacent to the Subject Properties along JPA but has limited sidewalk along Washington Avenue (see the above Streets that Work and Bike Ped Master Plan sections). The Subject Properties could be served by a system of scooter and bicycle programs due to the proximity to UVA. Staff Analysis: Staff believes a condition should be placed on the applicant to upgrade the existing pedestrian crossing at Harmon Street for residents to have a more manageable way to access all transit options that are being so heavily leveraged in the proposed development. Additional sidewalk along Washington Avenue to connect to Stadium Road, while ideal, is not practical with this project. Page 12 of 22 SP22-00001 2005 Jefferson Park Avenue SUP Staff Analysis: Based on the information provided in the application it appears an increase in density from twenty-one (21) DUA to seventy (70) DUA would not have an adverse impact related to traffic and transportation. The proposed development could have an adverse impact on the surrounding neighborhood as it relates to parking should adequate measures not be implemented. Staff recommends conditioning the applicant work with the City Traffic Engineer to develop a detailed parking plan that is kept on file with the City. Staff Analysis: Staff finds the existing pedestrian circulation plan is not adequate and the sidewalk on JPA should be updated to meet the standards described in the Streets that work Plan. Staff recommends a condition that the applicant provide seven (7) foot sidewalks with a planting buffer on JPA. b) Noise, lights, dust, odor, fumes, vibration, and other factors which adversely affect the natural environment The proposed development will not result in any additional dust, odor, fumes, vibration, or other factors that could also be present with any by-right development. It should be noted that due to the height and density, noise and lighting could be more intense than would be present in a by-right development. Any site plan submitted would need to conform to Division 3 Lighting of the Zoning Ordinance. c) Displacement of existing residents or businesses There are currently six (6) buildings on the Subject Properties totaling seventeen (17) dwelling units. These units would be removed to accommodate the proposed development. The application materials indicate construction would not begin until existing leases expire. With the replacement of the existing units the net gain for the Subject Properties will be one hundred-two (102) units. d) Discouragement of economic development activities that may provide desirable employment or enlarge the tax base No discouragement of economic development activities will be associated with the proposed development. The existing rental unit count will be multiplied by seven (7) upon completion. Prior to completion of the project, the Subject Properties would be vacant and not contributing at current levels. e) Undue density of population or intensity of use in relation to the community facilities existing or available Page 13 of 22 SP22-00001 2005 Jefferson Park Avenue SUP The City’s Comprehensive Plan identifies community facilities as fire protection, police enforcement, and emergency response services; public utilities and infrastructure; and public parks and recreation opportunities. Although final determination for capacity and code compliance will take place at Final Site Plan review, each of these departments have reviewed the SUP applicant and determined the development, as proposed, would not have an adverse impact on community facilities. f) Reduction in the availability of affordable housing in the neighborhood This application includes the Affordable Dwelling Unit (ADU) Ordinance Worksheet, which currently identifies a minimum of nine (9) ADUs required pursuant to the gross floor area proposed in excess of 1.0 FAR (per Sec. 34-12. - Affordable dwelling units.). Cash-in-Lieu Payment information is also included on the worksheet. At this time, the applicant has not identified whether ADUs or cash-in-lieu will be proposed. The Office of Community Solutions offers the following comments as to this application: • preference that on-site affordable dwelling units be provided with this project vs. cash-in-lieu payment • "affordable dwelling units" means dwelling units that are affordable to households with incomes at not more than 80% of the area median income and that are committed to remain affordable for a term of not more than thirty (30) years • A marketing plan on how to market the designated affordable units shall be provided to the City’s Office of Community Solutions • When completed and occupied, owner shall provide an annual report on affordability compliance to the City on a template provided by the City’s Office of Community Solutions The table below shows the 2022 HUD guidelines for Fair Market Rent. If this application is approved, the FMR will be based on the HUD guidelines for the year that the Certificate of Occupancy for the unit is issued. Eff 1 BR 2 BR 3 BR 4 BR 2022 HUD FMR 1,024 1,063 1,264 1,562 1,959 Monthly cost includes tenant-paid utilities g) Impact on school population and facilities Page 14 of 22 SP22-00001 2005 Jefferson Park Avenue SUP Because housing is open to all, there is a possibility that families with children could take residence here. Therefore, some impact could be created on school population and facilities. h) Destruction of or encroachment upon conservation or historic districts The subject property is not within any of these design control districts. i) Conformity with federal, state and local laws, as demonstrated and certified by the applicant Based on the information contained within the application, the proposed development would likely comply with applicable federal and state laws. As to local ordinances (zoning, water protection, etc.), it generally appears that this project, as detailed in the application, can be accommodated on this site in compliance with applicable local ordinances; however, final determinations cannot be made prior to having the details required for final site plan and building permit approvals. Specific Z.O. requirements reviewed preliminarily at this stage include massing and scale (building height, setbacks, stepbacks, etc.) and general planned uses. j) Massing and scale of project The building being proposed has a footprint of approximately fifty-one thousand two hundred (51,200) square feet and will take up the entire block between Washington Avenue and Observatory Avenue. The height of the building will be seventy-five (75) feet as measured per Sec. 34-1100 and Sec. 34-1200 but could appear taller from JPA and shorter from the back of the Subject Properties. The application materials indicate the building will be five (5) stories of apartment over two (2) stories of underground parking. This makes the building seven (7) stories as viewed from JPA and five (5) stories as viewed from the back of the Subject Properties. In the application renderings, the apartments are configured in a “U” shape above the underground parking. This configuration makes the overall development appear as two (2) buildings and breaks up the massing as viewed from JPA. The front setback will be just over twenty-six (26) feet with side setbacks of twenty (20) feet. The rear setback will be thirty-six (36) feet. The maximum height allowed in this zoning district is one-hundred and one (101) feet with a Special Use Permit and a DUA of forty-four (44) or above per Sec. 34-353(b)(3). Buildings in the R-3 zoning district are measured by feet and not stories. This conflicts with the 2021 Future Land Use Map as “Height” is measured in stories for this land use designation. Should the Subject Properties be developed by-right, the max height allowed would be forty-five (45) feet. Another characteristic of the R-3 zoning districts is Page 15 of 22 SP22-00001 2005 Jefferson Park Avenue SUP side yard setbacks are calculated based on the height and density of the building. But this is only applicable for side setbacks “not” adjacent to ROW or considered “corner lots”. For corner lot setbacks, the required distance is a set twenty (20) feet and is not altered by the height and/or density of the building per Sec. 34-343(a). The development as presented would meet side and front setback requirements. Sec. 34- 343(b)(4) requires a seventy-five (75) foot setback from any multifamily development with a DUA of forty-four (44) and above when adjacent to a low density zoned district. The proposed development is adjacent to a R-2U lot which is considered low density. As part of the SUP the applicant is requesting to modify this requirement to make the rear yard setback thirty-six (36) feet. Staff Analysis: This section reflects staff’s analysis as it relates to Massing and Scale for the SUP. For more detailed information on design and how the proposed development could impact the Entrance Corridor, see the ERB Staff Report. Also, it should be noted that the final design of the proposed development is subject to review by the Entrance Corridor Review Board and to date that application has not been submitted. According to the City’s Future Land Use Map the JPA corridor is anticipated to go through a significant change in the coming years based off the stated goals of the plan. These goals include more “intense” mixed use developments within five (5) and eight (8) story buildings. Although this is the vision for the corridor, the neighborhood directly impacted by the proposed development is still mainly a mix of one (1) and two (2) story residential dwellings. Staff is concerned with the impact such a large building could have on these properties. Staff believes some of the massing has been broken up by arranging the apartment units in a “U”. This makes the building look like two (2) smaller buildings sitting on a pedestal from a pedestrian perspective on JPA. Staff would like to see the seven (7) story section of the building that is located at the corner of JPA and Washington Avenue pushed back or articulated more in order to scale back the massing at that intersection. In general, staff does believe the massing and scale of the development as it relates to JPA will activate the street and create an inviting pedestrian experience. Staff’s biggest concern with the massing and scale relates to the portion of the building that abuts the low density residential zoned district. The application materials (attachment B) indicate the five (5) story section of the building will only be twenty (20) feet taller than the existing structure on that property to the north. There is currently one (1) two-story building and one (1) three-story building within approximately thirty- Page 16 of 22 SP22-00001 2005 Jefferson Park Avenue SUP six (36) feet of the property line. This is the same setback the application is requesting for the new development. See insert below: In addition, below is a view of the existing two-story building (far left) as seen in relation to the existing low density residential unit (far right) from Washington Avenue. As is evident, the existing two-story unit is already taller than the low density structure. Staff is concerned three (3) additional stories on the Subject Properties will create an inappropriate transition. Although the twenty-five (25) foot S-3 planting buffer will offer some protection, staff would like to see the building step-back after two-stories or see the grade lowered on the back end of the Subject Properties to ensure a better transition to the low density district. An alternative to this would be to condition the rear of the proposed development shall be no more than twenty (20) feet taller than the existing structure located at 116 Washington Avenue (TMP 170105000) as indicated in the application materials (attachment A page 26). Page 17 of 22 SP22-00001 2005 Jefferson Park Avenue SUP Staff is less concerned with the massing along Washington Avenue as an existing four and one half (4 ½) story building already sits in close proximity to the street. Although the proposed building replacing this structure will be larger, the improved streetscape, setback, and articulation will mitigate the impact. Although the existing buildings along Observatory Avenue (on the Subject Properties) are not as tall as the one on Washington Avenue, staff believes the improved streetscape, setback, and articulation will mitigate the impact of the proposed five (5) to seven (7) story building. Page 18 of 22 SP22-00001 2005 Jefferson Park Avenue SUP (5) Whether the proposed use or development will be in harmony with the purposes of the specific zoning district in which it will be placed; The Subject Properties are currently zoned R-3 with Entrance Corridor (EC) overlay. The purpose of the multifamily residential zoning district is to provide areas for medium- to high-density residential development. The basic permitted use is medium-density residential development; however, higher density residential development may be permitted where harmonious with surrounding areas. Certain additional uses may be permitted, in cases where the character of the district will not be altered by levels of traffic, parking, lighting, noise, or other impacts associated with such uses. R-3 consists of medium-density residential areas in which medium-density residential developments, including multifamily uses, are encouraged. The entrance corridor overlay district (EC) is intended to implement the comprehensive plan goal of protecting the city's historic, architectural and cultural resources, by ensuring a quality of development compatible with those resources through design control measures. The purposes of this article are to stabilize and improve property values; to protect and enhance the city's attractiveness to tourists and other visitors; to sustain and enhance the economic benefits accruing to the city from tourism; to support and stimulate development complimentary to the prominence afforded properties and districts having historic, architectural or cultural significance; all of the foregoing being deemed to advance and promote the health, safety and welfare of the general public. Staff Analysis: Staff finds that although the Zoning Ordinance does not define “medium- density, Sec. 34-420 indicates any density up to eighty-seven (87) DUA is appropriate in the R-3 districts. Nothing within the SUP application would conflict with the district regulations. Additional information on the EC is provided under the ERB Staff Report. (6) Whether the proposed use or development will meet applicable general and specific standards set forth within the zoning ordinance, subdivision regulations, or other city ordinances or regulations; and Based on the information contained within the application, the proposed development would likely comply with applicable local ordinances. However, final determinations cannot be made prior to having the details required for final site plan and building permit approvals. (7) When the property that is the subject of the application for a special use permit is within a design control district, city council shall refer the application to the BAR or ERB, as may Page 19 of 22 SP22-00001 2005 Jefferson Park Avenue SUP be applicable, for recommendations as to whether the proposed use will have an adverse impact on the district, and for recommendations as to reasonable conditions which, if imposed, that would mitigate any such impacts. The BAR or ERB, as applicable, shall return a written report of its recommendations to the city council. The Subject Property is located within an Entrance Corridor Overlay, where the final design of the proposed development is subject to review by the Entrance Corridor Review Board (ERB). Public Comments Received Community Meetings Required by Sec. 34-41(c)(2) The applicant held a community meeting on December 7, 2021 and was well attended by twelve (12) members of the public. A recording of the meeting can be found at the below link. https://transcripts.gotomeeting.com/#/s/9e98af90f4404d2dd2a2a7d7cca2cfaff77ec76ae4c36d 12fdfbebefe6788c32 Staff has received a number of emails and phone calls (attachment D) expressing concerns with the development. Below is an outline of these concerns: • Lack of on street parking: Observatory and Washington already deal with a lack of on street parking that impact everything from trash pick up to blocking driveways. • Parking will be inadequate for the development and impact the surrounding neighborhood. • The scale of the building will be much larger than any of the surrounding buildings. • The project will place too much density in one location. • The development will remove existing trees that are part of the urban forest. • Students living in the development will still have cars and not walk and take the bus everywhere. • Visitor parking is not accounted for. • The new development will create too much impervious surface and not be environmentally friendly. • The setback should not be reduced. Any comments received after the completion of this staff report will be directly sent to Planning Commission and City Council. Staff Recommendation Staff finds the applications meets general standards three (3), five (5), and six (6) and with reasonable conditions the application would meet standards two (2), four (4), and seven (7). The application does not meet standard one (1). Page 20 of 22 SP22-00001 2005 Jefferson Park Avenue SUP Recommended Conditions Should Planning Commission recommend approval to City Council, Staff recommends that following conditions be included: 1. Up to seventy (70) dwelling units per acre (DUA) are permitted on the Subject Properties. 2. Modification of rear yard setback to thirty-six (36) feet with a twenty-five (25) foot S-3 buffer. 3. A new seven (7) foot sidewalk with three (3) foot curbside buffer shall be constructed along Jefferson Park Avenue in accordance with the City’s Streets That Work Plan. 4. The applicant will work with the City’s Traffic Engineer to develop a Master Parking Plan for the site. This plan will be kept on file with the City and may be updated or altered from time to time with authorization of the City’s Traffic Engineer. The plan shall indicate how the developer will distribute available parking spots on site, how potential residents are informed of their parking opportunities, and any possible offsite parking arrangements for residents, etc.… 5. The pedestrian crossing of JPA at Harmon Street will be upgraded to provide safer access to transit options. The applicant will work with the City’s Traffic Engineer to determine appropriate improvements. 6. The rear elevation of the development shall be no more than twenty (20) feet taller than the existing structure located at 116 Washington Avenue (TMP 170105000) as indicated in the application materials labeled “205 Jefferson Park Avenue Special Use Permit Application January 11, 2022” (page 26). Suggested Motions 1. I move to recommend approval of this application for a Special Use Permit in the R-3 zone at 170104000, 170103000, and 170103100, collectively 2005/2007 Jefferson Park Avenue and 104 Observatory Avenue to permit additional density with the following listed conditions. a. The six (6) conditions recommended by staff b. [alternative conditions, or additional condition(s)….list here] Or 2. I move to recommend denial of this application for a Special Use Permit in the R-3 zone at 170104000, 170103000, and 170103100 collectively 2005/2007 Jefferson Park Avenue and 104 Observatory Avenue to permit additional density. Attachments A. Special Use Permit Application Page 21 of 22 SP22-00001 2005 Jefferson Park Avenue SUP B. Special Use Permit Narrative and supporting documents C. Affordable Dwelling Unit Ordinance Worksheet D. Public Comments E. Traffic Impact Analysis Page 22 of 22 Attachment A Attachment A Attachment A Attachment A Attachment A Attachment A Attachment A Attachment A Attachment A Attachment B 2005 JEFFERSON PARK AVENUE C H A R L O T T E S V I L L E , V A SPECIAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION M I T C H E L L M AT T H E W S A R C H I T E C T S JANUARY 11, 2022 Attachment B REQUEST FOR INFORMAL REVIEW OF SPECIAL USE PERMIT REQUESTS (LISTED BELOW) AND ENTRANCE CORRIDOR CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS INTRODUCTION: 2005 JPA is a proposed multi-family residential development on Jefferson Park Avenue. The project consists of residential units over parking and is situated in close proximity (walking distance) to the University of Virginia’s central grounds. The project is within an entrance corridor. LOCATION: 2005, 2007 Jefferson Park Avenue and 104 Observatory Avenue, an assemblage of 3 lots, with frontage on Jefferson Park Avenue between Observatory Avenue and Washington Avenue. ZONING: The property is currently zoned R-3 in the City of Charlottesville. PROPOSED USE: Multi-Family Residential SPECIAL USE PERMIT REQUEST: A Special Use Permit (SUP) is being requested for: 1) Additional Density: Allowable by right: Up to 21 DUA Allowable by SUP: Up to 87 DUA. PROPOSED: 70 DUA 2) Additional Height: Allowable by right: 45’ max Allowable by SUP: Up to 101’ (44-87 DUA) PROPOSED: 75’, from average grade plane 3) Rear yard setback reduction: Required: 75’ (for 44-87 DUA), with a 25’ S-3 buffer PROPOSED: 36’, with a 25’ S-3 buffer 4) Parking reduction: Required: Studios, One and Two Bedroom Apts: 1 space PROPOSED: 22% reduction in required spaces Three or Four Bedroom Apts: 2 spaces (125 spaces after allowable reductions) 200 spaces JUSTIFICATION FOR THE SPECIAL USE PERMIT FOLLOWS. REFER TO SECTION 1 (page 6) FOR INFORMATION ON THE SURROUNDING CONTEXT. REFER TO SECTION 2 (page 14) FOR ANALYSIS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN VISION FOR THIS AREA THROUGH THE LAST FEW DECADES. REFER TO SECTION 3 (page 24) FOR ILLUSTRATIVE INFORMATION EXPLAINING THE PROPOSED PROJECT. 2005 JPA M I T C H E L L / M AT T H E W S Charlott es v ille VA EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Architects & Planners 2 01.11.2022 All grades, counts and quantities are approximate and will change as design proceeds. 434.979.7550 © 2021 Attachment B 1. Whether the proposed use or development will be harmonious with The project allows for an amenity space at street level for potential density is desirable, promotes a more sustainable city. existing patterns of use and development within the neighborhood: conversion to future commercial use – while still fitting the definition The proposed multi-family residential project is harmonious with the of an ancillary consumer service business, allowable within R-3 Chapter 6: Transportation: existing patterns of use in this neighborhood – residential, predominately zoning. This will create a compatible condition that both meets current The proposal will allow students to live in easy walking distance to student rentals. The neighborhood is coincident with Census Tract 6.0, zoning, the 2013 comprehensive plan’s goal of a mix of uses within both UVA and nearby commercial areas (the Corner and Fontaine)— which is characterized by 93% of the current dwellings being renter- walking distance of residential that encourages small businesses, as well as in close proximity to a bus stop - helping to minimize the occupied and 79% being non-family household types. The proposed and the future vision outlined in the ongoing comprehensive plan use of private automobile transportation. project is also consistent with the goals of the current zoning ordinance, work. and recently approved projects on Jefferson Park Avenue. This project Goal #1: Complete Streets Observatory Avenue and Washington promotes a sustainable community – making efficient use of the land and Goal #7: Entrance Corridors This proposed project will be a quality Ave will both benefit from increased pedestrian infrastructure as a placing carefully designed student housing in close proximity to UVA. We development along one of the city’s most frequented entrance result of this project. Jefferson Park Avenue is already a multi-modal anticipate that the scale, material choices and detailing of this proposed corridors. Street trees and other landscape elements will enhance through corridor with sufficient pedestrian, bicycle, and vehicular residential building will strengthen the character of Jefferson Park Avenue the streetscape and contribute to the urban design. infrastructure to accommodate this project. and the whole JPA neighborhood. Chapter 5: Housing: Goal #2: Coordination with Land Use & Community Design 2. Whether the proposed use or development and associated public The proposed redevelopment of 2005 JPA will increase the The proposed development will increase pedestrian safety on all facilities will substantially conform to the city’s comprehensive neighborhood’s housing stock in a location that can both support three adjacent streets by minimizing vehicular access points – an plan: The redevelopment of 2005 JPA conforms to both the current and increased density and that has been earmarked by the City for improvement over current conditions. All parking will be on site and previous comprehensive plans in the following areas: increased residential use. Specifically, it will increase purpose-built hidden from view below grade, lessoning the existing pressure for student housing, which will decrease the pressure on single-family on street parking and assisting in the creation of a more pedestrian Chapter 4: Land Use: residential neighborhoods that are increasingly being populated by friendly environment. Ample on-site bicycle storage facilities will be This stretch of Jefferson Park Avenue is commonly considered student rentals, such as the adjacent Fry’s Spring Neighborhood, provided. a student housing corridor between UVA / UVA Hospital and the or the growth and expansion experienced on other sides of Fry’s Spring / Fontaine Ave Neighborhood Commercial area. It is the University, into the Lewis Mountain and the 10th and Page predominately vehicular oriented and classified in the Streets that neighborhoods. Displacement within established neighborhoods 3. Whether proposed use or development of any buildings or structures Work typology as Mixed Use B, the equivalent of West Main Street, and affordability issues across the city are directly related to the will comply with all applicable building code regulations: The Millmont Street, Cherry Avenue, and University Avenue. It is a multi- historical lack of student housing supply. structures and site will be designed to comply with all applicable building modal street that supports higher density development projects. The code regulations. vitality of the street comes from its intensity of use for transportation Of utmost importance is an increase in city housing stock alongside – thus its designation as an Entrance Corridor. A wide range of the equitable impact of such development. Placing increased height residential densities and diverse architectural styles currently defines and reasonable residential density in a predominately student rental its character. JPA embodies the evolution of off-campus student neighborhood, along a transit oriented corridor, supports the city’s housing around the University of Virginia. It is currently a corridor goals and vision. that is evolving, as expected. The ongoing comprehensive plan re- write currently envisions it as an urban mixed-use corridor, defined Not only will this residential project add to the city’s existing housing as higher-intensity mixed-use development linking employment, stock, it will also trigger the affordable housing ordinance, supporting commercial and civic hubs. This project bridges between the current affordable housing throughout the city. ordinance and the future vision of the corridor, by contributing to the establishment of a vibrant, engaged sense of place that can be This residential building expands the diversity of housing choices replicated along Jefferson Park Avenue - one of a walkable, people- in this area of the city, thereby balancing offerings with other areas focused, urban project that aids the city in its supply of housing such as along the West Main Street corridor, or Millmont Street. stock. Increased density in close proximity to UVA, where increased 2005 JPA M I T C H E L L / M AT T H E W S Charlott es v ille VA SUP REVIEW CRITERIA: SECTION 34-157 Architects & Planners 3 01.11.2022 All grades, counts and quantities are approximate and will change as design proceeds. 434.979.7550 © 2021 Attachment B building is a U-shape – with the open end facing JPA. This arrangement 4. Whether the proposed use or development will have any potentially e. Undue density of population or intensity of use in relation to creates two narrow residential wings projecting towards the street, one adverse impacts on the surrounding neighborhood, or the community the community facilities existing or available; The proposed extending farther than the other – reducing the massing and scale of in general; and if so, whether there are any reasonable conditions of population and intensity of use are consistent with those anticipated the project along the JPA streetscape. At the more prominent corner approval that would satisfactorily mitigate such impacts. Potential under the current zoning designation and under all previous and of the site, at Washington Avenue, a vertical expression denotes both adverse impacts to be considered include, but are not necessarily current versions of the Comprehensive Plan. No adverse effects the primary, street-level pedestrian entrance, as well as the primary limited to, the following: to the existing or available community facilities are expected. The amenity spaces within. This vertical massing is carved away at the top project will likely have a positive effect of restoring detached single- floor to create an outdoor terrace. a. Traffic or parking congestion; The project is located near the family housing units within nearby neighborhoods like Fry’s Spring, to University of Virginia’s central grounds; given this proximity, it is their intended occupancy as single-family households. The request of The scale of the project is comparable to other projects along Jefferson anticipated that residents would not commute daily by car, but would 70 DUA is below the maximum available (87 DUA) under an SUP for Park Avenue, albeit with a more engaging streetscape and a more predominately walk. The project’s parking enters from Washington this zoning district. urban or contemporary form and aesthetic. The scale of the project Avenue, which is a through street between JPA and Stadium Road, changes relative to the elevation change across the site. The scale as opposed to Observatory Avenue, which is a dead end. Similarly, f. Reduction in the availability of affordable housing in the is consistent with the Urban Mixed Use Corridor zoning description the project is near the commercial area at the intersection of JPA neighborhood; The proposed development will comply with the – calling for 5 stories up to 8 along key neighborhood corridors Extended, Fontaine Ave, and Maury Ave, providing convenient walk- affordable housing ordinance via the cash contribution option. The designated in the Streets that Work plan (such as JPA). At the western able services and dining options nearby. The site is also located site does not currently accommodate affordable housing – all units are façade, adjacent to R-2U zoning, the proposed project is 5 stories in along the free trolley line, with an existing stop approximately a block market rate; therefore no committed affordable housing units will be height – consistent with the comprehensive plan height designation away. JPA has significant bike infrastructure in place and the project lost. for the adjacent zoning designation – Higher-Intensity Residential. will provide ample on-site bicycle storage facilities. The project is asking for a parking reduction to balance market demand with actual g. Impact on school population and facilities; While the units are Overall, the proposed massing and scale of the proposed project spaces provided. All of these conditions will limit the potential traffic planned to be market rate rental units and available to the general is consistent with the current ordinance and the recently approved and parking congestion. public, given its proximity to UVA, it is anticipated that students, comprehensive plan. possibly young professionals and/or employees at the medical school b. Noise, lights, dust, odor, fumes, vibration, and other factors, and hospital will primarily occupy the units. It is expected that the 5. Whether the proposed use or development will be in harmony with which adversely affect the natural environment; No activities project will have minimal to no impact on the school population and the purposes of the specific zoning district in which it will be placed: are anticipated that will adversely affect the natural environment. All facilities. The proposed use will not change from its current use. The development exterior lighting will comply with the city’s dark sky ordinance. The is in harmony with the purposes of the zoning district, which calls for same functions currently on site will continue on site. h. Destruction of or encroachment upon conservation or historic medium-density residential, including multi-family. districts; The proposed project is not within a conservation or historic c. Displacement of existing residents or businesses; This project district. No individually protected properties exist on this site. The 6. Whether the proposed use or development will meet applicable replaces 17 current residential units with 119 units – creating an project is within an entrance corridor overlay district and ERB review general and specific standards set forth within the zoning ordinance, overall gain of 102 units. Construction will not begin until all leases will be required. subdivision regulations, or other city ordinances or regulations; and occupancies for current tenants have terminated. The proposed use is identical to the current use. This development is i. Conformity with federal, state and local laws, as demonstrated within the city’s allowable uses, density (with SUP), and height (with d. Discouragement of economic development activities that may and certified by the applicant; The proposed project will conform to SUP) provided for in this zoning district. The property is located within an provide desirable employment or enlarge the tax base; 2005 JPA all applicable federal, state, and local laws. entrance corridor overlay district and is subject to review by the Entrance will not discourage economic development, but rather will contribute Corridor Review Board. An application will be submitted to the ERB at a to the vibrancy of a mixed use area along JPA, providing patrons to j. Massing and scale of project. From the street, the building massing future date. nearby commercial establishments. It will help spur the development originates with a two-story base along Jefferson Park Avenue, which and investment in this area by providing a residential population base disappears into grade along the two side streets due to the substantial in need of additional goods and services. (37’) elevation drop across the site. Above this, the massing of the 2005 JPA M I T C H E L L / M AT T H E W S Charlott es v ille VA SUP REVIEW CRITERIA, CONTINUED Architects & Planners 4 01.11.2022 All grades, counts and quantities are approximate and will change as design proceeds. 434.979.7550 © 2021 Attachment B (1)   A site plan when required by section 34-802 of the City Code; provided as an attachment. (2)   A written disclosure of the information required by section 34-8 of the City Code and, if the applicant is not the owner of the property, written evidence of his status as (i) the authorized agent of the property owner, or (ii) a contract purchaser of the property whose application is with the permission of the property owner; provided in the application. (3)   For developments including any non-residential uses, and developments proposing the construction of three (3) or more single- or two- family dwellings, the applicant shall provide a completed low-impact development (“LID”) methods worksheet; provided in the application. (4)   For applications proposing the alteration of the footprint or height of an existing building, or the construction of one (1) or more new buildings: (i) a building massing diagram and (ii) elevations; See accompanying graphic materials. (5)   Information and data identifying how many, if any, existing dwelling units on the development site meet the city’s definition of an “affordable dwelling unit” and whether any such existing units, or equivalent affordable units, will remain following the development; Existing units on site do not meet the city’s definition of “affordable dwelling units”. Existing units will be replaced for a net gain of 102 units. (6) Other supporting data sufficient to demonstrate compliance with the purposes and standards of this Zoning Ordinance, including, without limitation, graphic materials that illustrate the context of the project as well as information and data addressing the factors set forth within section 34-157 above. See accompanying graphic materials. 2005 JPA M I T C H E L L / M AT T H E W S Charlott es v ille VA SUP APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS: SECTION 34-158 Architects & Planners 5 01.11.2022 All grades, counts and quantities are approximate and will change as design proceeds. 434.979.7550 © 2021 Attachment B EXISTING CONDITIONS SECTION 1 The project site is located on the southeastern side of the City, within blocks of the University’s Central Grounds. It is situated in the middle of the JPA neighborhood, which is predominately renter occupied according to both recent census data and GIS records. The site is one block away from a commercial node, at the intersection of Maury Avenue and Jefferson Park Avenue. The project spans between two sides streets, Observatory Avenue - a dead end, and Washington Avenue, a through street between JPA and Stadium Road. The site has only one continguous parcel or neighbor to the rear, which is renter occupied. Nearly all parcels across the bordering streets - JPA, Observatory Ave and Washington Ave, are renter occupied, less two - along Observatory Avenue. The existing zoning of R-3, approved in 2009, stretches the length of JPA, on the northwest side, while University High Density was designated for the opposite side of the street and R-2U stretches behind to Stadium Road. Existing conditions along JPA are varied. Newer projects range in scale from SECTION 1: five to nine stories facing JPA. These projects have limited engagement with the street, presumably due to topographic challenges. Similarly, the 2005 JPA TABLE OF CONTENTS & SYNOPSIS site drops 37’ across the site. VICINITY MAP NEIGHBORHOOD MAP LOCATION MAP RENTER OCCUPIED MAP ZONING SUMMARY CONTEXT PHOTOS SURVEY 2005 JPA M I T C H E L L / M AT T H E W S Charlott es v ille VA SYNOPSIS OF EXISTING CONDITIONS Architects & Planners 6 01.11.2022 All grades, counts and quantities are approximate and will change as design proceeds. 434.979.7550 © 2021 Attachment B UN IVE RS ITY AV E UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA WES TM AIN ST CITY LIMITS RA ILR OA D UE EN AV OAD RK LR RAI PA SO N E R EFF J 2005 JEFFERSON PARK AVENUE 2005 JPA M I T C H E L L / M AT T H E W S Charlott es v ille VA VICINITY MAP Architects & Planners 7 01.11.2022 All grades, counts and quantities are approximate and will change as design proceeds. 434.979.7550 © 2021 Attachment B D. T. YR ET S GB EM M RU THE CORNER 20 MIN. WALK THE ROTUNDA UVA SOURCE: https://censusreporter.org/profiles/14000US51540000600- SCOTT STADIUM CITY LIMITS census-tract-6-charlottesville-va/ 10 MIN. WALK UE EN AV RK PA N SO ER F F LR OAD JE RAI JPA NEIGHBORHOOD & CENSUS TRACT 6.0 2005 JEFFERSON PARK AVENUE FRY’S SPRING NEIGHBORHOOD 2005 JPA M I T C H E L L / M AT T H E W S Charlott es v ille VA NEIGHBORHOOD MAP Architects & Planners 8 01.11.2022 All grades, counts and quantities are approximate and will change as design proceeds. 434.979.7550 © 2021 Attachment B AD STADIUM RO FREE W T AS HI NG TO N AV EN FREE UE OB T UE SE E N RV M 2005 JPA AV AT AU RK O RY PA RY ON AV S ER AV E FF NU E E NU J E E FREE T OAD ILR RA FONTAINE AVENUE 2005 JPA M I T C H E L L / M AT T H E W S Charlott es v ille VA LOCATION MAP Architects & Planners 9 01.11.2022 All grades, counts and quantities are approximate and will change as design proceeds. 434.979.7550 © 2021 Attachment B OAD STADIUM R W AS HI NG N TO AV E N OB U E N SE U E E AV RV RK AT M A SITE P O AU ON RY RY S ER AV A FF E E NU J VE NU E E OAD ILR RA FONTAINE AVENUE RENTER OCCUPIED COMMERCIAL INSTITUTIONAL UNIVERSITY 2005 JPA M I T C H E L L / M AT T H E W S Charlott es v ille VA RENTER OCCUPIED AND OTHER USES Architects & Planners 10 01.11.2022 All grades, counts and quantities are approximate and will change as design proceeds. 434.979.7550 © 2021 Attachment B Location 2005 Jefferson Park Ave. Area 1.711 acres (74, 531.16 SF) Zone R-3 UNIVERSITY OF Residential Units up to 21 DUA (by right) VIRGINIA 22 - 87 DUA (by SUP) Parking Two bedroom apt. or smaller: 1 space Three or Four bedroom apt.: 2 spaces Height 45’ (max) (by right) 80’ (22-43 DUA, by SUP) E 101’ (44-87 DUA, by SUP) U EN AV R K Setbacks PA 26.35’ (average of neighbor- (front) ing properties) N O E RS Setbacks F A D 20’ (corner, both sides) J EF IL RO (side) RA Setbacks 25’ min. (rear) 50’ (22-43 DUA, adjacent to low density residential) 75’ (44-87 DUA, adjacent to low density residential) (25’ Type S-3 buffer, above 21 DUA) 2005 JEFFERSON PARK AVENUE Overlays Entrance Corridor 2005 JPA M I T C H E L L / M AT T H E W S Charlott es v ille VA ZONING SUMMARY Architects & Planners 11 01.11.2022 All grades, counts and quantities are approximate and will change as design proceeds. 434.979.7550 © 2021 Attachment B 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 5 2 6 7 8 SITE 3 10 9 4 1 8 9 10 2005 JPA M I T C H E L L / M AT T H E W S Charlott es v ille VA NEIGHBORHOOD CONTEXT PHOTOS - JPA CORRIDOR Architects & Planners 12 01.11.2022 All grades, counts and quantities are approximate and will change as design proceeds. 434.979.7550 © 2021 Attachment B ADE GR P IN RO ’D 37 Y:\904\48530-Aspen Heights\DWG\48530-V-XPSURV_ALTA.dwg | Plotted on 8/13/2021 1:02 PM | by Joe Medley 'ALTA / NSPS LAND TITLE SURVEY' OF THREE PARCELS OF LAND COMPRISING 1.711 ACRES FRONTING JEFFERSON PARK AVENUE, WASHINGTON AVENUE, 37’ DROP IN GRADE ACROSS SITE & OBSERVATORY AVENUE ( > 3 STORIES) 37' v1 BEING TAX MAP PARCELS 17-103, 17-103.1, & 17-104 IN THE CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE, VIRGINIA 2005 JPA M I T C H E L L / CITY M AT T H E W S VA SURVEY EXISTING CONDITIONS 13 OF CHARLOTTESVILLE, Charlott es v ille VA A r cJuly Date: h 28, i t e2021 ct s Scale: & P lASa SHOWN nners Sheet 2 of 2 J.N.: 48530 01.11.2022 All grades, counts and quantities are approximate and will change as design proceeds. 434.979.7550 Drawn by: DWJ © 2021 Checked by: JCM LAST REVISED: Aug. 13, 2021 Attachment B SECTION 2 C O M P. P L A N T R E N D S Additional justification for height and density (SUP REQUEST): Comprehensive Plan Trends 2001 - PRESENT along West Main Street, no significant, new, purpose- built student housing has been created in close proximity The comprehensive plans of the past 20 years show to Central Grounds, even as expectations for it to occur the community’s expectation for increased density along the JPA corridor have grown. and height along the JPA corridor, specifically serving the residential needs of UVA students, as The 2013 Comprehensive Plan modified the zoning in demonstrated by the exhibits in this section. the JPA neighborhood to increase its density. Rather than UHD, R-3 and R-2U spanning east to west Two decades ago, in the 2001 Comprehensive Plan, between the railroad and Stadium Road, the entire area neighborhoods identified the conversion of single-family was designated as High-Density residential. This vision owner occupied residential homes to rental units to eliminated the different designation between the 2005 accommodate the increasing demand for student rentals JPA site and the adjacent parcel to the rear. as problematic. The Neighborhoods also identified locations closest to UVA as preferable by students. The The 2018 draft land use maps continued this trend, planning commission identified higher density along treating the entire cross section of the neighborhood transit corridors as preferable. as the same residential density - east to west, north to south, less the commercial area at the intersection of The 2003 Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map shows Maury and JPA and extending west along Fontaine. SECTION 2: the same conditions as the present zoning. The recently approved comprehensive plan returns to TABLE OF CONTENTS & SYNOPSIS The 2011 Housing Survey shows a density of housing a vision of a higher density or intensity corridor - albeit 2001 COMP PLAN CONCERNS units congregated 1) in the Venable neighborhood - both with the same designation on either side of JPA and 2003 COMP PLAN LUM behind the Corner and along Madison Avenue, 2) along with the addition of a mixed-use condition rather than 2011 HOUSING SURVEY MAP JPA, and 3) at public housing sites. Additions to this map solely residential. The adjacent parcel to the rear, is 2013 COMP PLAN LUM have been made based on incomplete data of known a different designation (higher-intensity residential), 2018 COMP PLAN FLUM (DRAFT) 2021 COMP PLAN FLUM (DRAFT) built or under construction projects, showing the last with a suggested height of 5 stories. The 2005 JPA 2021 COMP PLAN INFO (DRAFT) decades’ progress of additional housing units. While site is designated as Urban Mixed-use Corridor 2016 STREETS THAT WORK projects along West Main Street have garnered lots of and suggests height may range from 5 to 8 stories. 2021 COMP PLAN INFO attention locally, multi-family residential projects have Upon implementation (via a zoning update) of these generally been dispersed across the city’s medium to anticipated changes, the heights and densities of the high intensity zoning districts. Other than the projects two designations become more similar. 2005 JPA M I T C H E L L / M AT T H E W S Charlott es v ille VA SYNOPSIS OF COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TRENDS Architects & Planners 14 01.11.2022 All grades, counts and quantities are approximate and will change as design proceeds. 434.979.7550 © 2021 Attachment B 2005 JPA M I T C H E L L / M AT T H E W S Charlott es v ille VA NEIGHBORHOOD CONCERNS FROM 2001 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Architects & Planners 15 01.11.2022 All grades, counts and quantities are approximate and will change as design proceeds. 434.979.7550 © 2021 Attachment B 2005 JEFFERSON PARK AVENUE 2005 JPA M I T C H E L L / M AT T H E W S Charlott es v ille VA 2003 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN LAND USE MAP Architects & Planners 16 01.11.2022 All grades, counts and quantities are approximate and will change as design proceeds. 434.979.7550 © 2021 Attachment B Housing Units Number of Units on Parcel £ No Units 29 KNOWN ADDITIONAL £ US PROJECTS SINCE 2011 1 Unit 2 Units 3 - 10 Units £ Route 250 £ 11 - 50 Units 51 - 240 Units £ St et m Em Rd Rio 2005 JEFFERSON PARK AVENUE Pr e sto nA 2011 Land Use and Housing Survey and the 2010 US Census ve The housing unit count from the survey and the same count from the Decennial census were within 0.66% of each other, despite the very different methodolo- West M ain S gies used. The 2011 survey counted 19,062 units and the 2010 Census counted t Dow ntow High St nM 19,189 units. Most of the variation is accounted for in neighborhoods around the all University of Virginia. ve e ry A k Av Cher ar Ma nP rke rso Number of Units per Block Je ffe tS t 0 - 10 Units Av 11 - 30 Units St on 5th t S M 31 - 60 Units o ntic ello 4 Av 61 - 100 Units e 100 - 220 Units 221 - 447 Units 64 6 64 2005 JPA M I T C H E L L / M AT T H E W S Charlott es v ille VA HOUSING UNITS, SOURCE: 2011 HOUSING SURVEY, WITH UPDATES Architects & Planners 17 01.11.2022 All grades, counts and quantities are approximate and will change as design proceeds. 434.979.7550 © 2021 Attachment B GREENFI BR PA EN RK RD TW EA W ND BROO ST COURT MYER OO LA OO BR OR E DS NO DR S DR OO PL D D KD STM FIEL GL OW RTH TT ELDS WE KMER OD R NO £ ¤ RO £ ¤ IN 85 1 BE RD 63 H WO COUR LA A GH RT D RW 4 MO KE ROSLYN E ¤ £ A IDLE A DR 743 HE IC M BIX NT FO LE RO AD ROSLYN T NG KC AR HA ON ER A 63 £ IA ¤ RE RO OAD TR D M GT M T R 1 EY ST GE CT LN RK BS FOREST LN TIN RID SP N AD DR M BE D IVY RIN REDING HU RO RIDGE DR LA R G LA TON CO KE ST UR LANE T TE FORE RO BR RA NN DR IS BIN COU IG M DR RO BL HT BRIER HIL RT E A F OOD CT CE D LA IE W GENERAL LAND USE PLAN EN M L R K PL LAMBS ROAD O LD KE ID WOODLAKE FA OO WILLIA OV A D O GREEN D PR DR VE RO BR PL IVE W TOWNW RO PL RAIN DR MSBU DR HE SLY WIL TREE £ ¤ 43 CO ROAD IG N DM SNOWD HT 7 LS EN DR MM SR W ER DOMINION DR HIL DRIVE E RG D BL PL E ON WEALTH BIR AC RIO AN FO HO RIO CO NA D LIB E P UR M GL CT KIN LN E CT O DR RO SE OA RT S A L D AS KS Y DE TT R ON CT SP AD N CT PU S LN TO RIN RIN CT K S OW D G TT DR TIN KR PL TE DR IV HE G PU OA HAD RD E N TIN RO OO RD IT HU HIL BL WES S LLIN BR RD RD WYNRIDGE DR LIC LS JPA DELLWO EA D TFIE CO RD £ G WESTF ¤ ST 65 RD OL E AU ER WYNRIDGE LN W UR 7 AK ED LD S DR LD EF T PL RD LV RID OR OD IE IELD FIE BE HY LD M CO GE MIN T E OL D MALL DR H H UR CH ROAD LT RT MINOR NS BROOK SA CIR EA ALBERT EE NO RIDGE L QU DR W WHITEWO CTOR CT KNIGH N UR N DS T CT O OD RD CT CO TO T ROAD M EY X M IER ASHL SU EXETER SA CO FORE DR EM BR CT ST TH PR AN M WEAL CIR LE DR CT TE CH CIR ON BL C HILL SDA R WALDEN CT W VD HLA CT COMM K CT ATHA ES OA ND EE SUMERSET TO TF GE W N S OAK CT NE TR CORRIDOR A LN OR M CT IE MANCHESTER CT PINE GE GREEN LA LD K PE GR OA YT E CRITT ARBOR ON EN DR BR RD FREE IE LD NDS RD CREST DR R STATE DR IE RD EF CHLA W AK BOWLES LN RD 29 ES W E E TF L R IV TE IE RT D £ ¤ DR LD 743 BRAN RD RR H TU ON LT NO RD EL RD RD N EA £ N ¤ EE RT GD L GREE GAZE L W K W RO HIL R H NBRIE RD EE BO TE N LN 65 G TIN W TO R O CT L FOUNTA E LN AD CT R CR 4 E PE M IN IDG R DR ST ROSE M N GE A NN EL E DR E CT CO CH HU CT ARBO L WAY D A E L E RTR RT R GL OLI OR R IR IV WE L CT E O TU PIN EL ST DR ST INGB AD PA GN GA WAKE GE BA RR E PL R DR CO TE FIELD EN W UE ME IV RR HAV HU MA MILL PARK AP TE LIS I U DR MOCK PS TS V AC CT CT E BIL RT HO SA CH LT NT MILLST AV VERM DR PL A PE KS PL US ONE SE TM RIVER CO IRA PL MO T ST TON R AIL RO LN IC O KERRY ED REYNARD RE CT E LN LN RIV TR DR AD MA DENIC E ER TR OLD FOR D PEBBLE CREEK CT IN RIE AS GE DIS GE RD R OA YW CH RID DR EXT BR PL K E EN PL ER RD S OL RA D DA MICH OD HILLWO LINE G BL CA AN RIV S CT AEL N GASO LO LN A K MIN U RD UR NN MON BR FF IDGE RD PL BR O N SOLO KB SE O Y DU ER ALLE SE WILSON HO DR O MIN N ING AC RIV CT OK BO URN PL LE OL BLACKB BL WO 2005 JEFFERSON ND E RD WAY Y LN OLD SALEM OD STURBR DR DR ST CT E ST WOOD DR APARTMENTS IV ER TR G INGLE DR KERR EE REE RD EA NBRI OP PK N HILL TER RD ST AY T N RD DR ES LO L DR ZA R OOD RC N COURT GREE W M N BA RD HUNTWOOD LN TO LE R N W SA CO IO DR BE RA LE INGLEW YO TO SH Y DR KIN RIE R DR L RK LO KE DRIVE ROA TAR LINE EL KS FA ES DR TOWN MO GE IV N G BY E RY H SE E DU CO IR IN NB CHAR N DR NT OR X U SO E WILLIAM CT L ER US W D RD URT NB INDIA RD WENDOV HIL KIN FO EE AN £ ¤ 6 DY ROAD G T GE DA DR DR PEND RD BA AN UR 65 G LANE TER RD SW LETO RD LIN AN M GR CO R N MEAD PARK COUR JAME TN FO DA COUR T BR RD OA UIL AN N PARK AVENUE CE G DE KS DR BUNK STOW GU KE OW WEST ST L CK AD LM DR ER T NW TON DR S O EA O E HILL BROO AD L ST R O T HY D DR DA O ME LN RD RO LN N DR D BENNING S D L DR CHARLOTTE DR O KY HIL LN ST O E R EM HIE W CIR K RD HW TE AU RIC AD MIC RT IN LD G NO O LIC IN EE ER KIN E S R GE WA MID IE AV TM RD HO HF HT OR G IST YN N AD GE L ES RO SM VIC T IT EA ID ER Y T L DL JOH ER O SM AY K VE DR UR DR AL LE R W ST RD IT R R FR AD DR C ES H PA WO CO L ED D LE AU OO FIE HOLLY VA EX DRIVE EN K N OD RIC DRIVE LE CIR KENW FD LE N H EY E AR OO £ LD E W ¤ HU H AY C K CT PA G INE CLI EEN HIG C IT R R CIR LE RID T AV K 631 TO DYW W S CT ST LE R CIR LLY W. GR HURS KE R T RD BR HO RD SU NE ES H BRAN CT E EA ST GE N CT EN CO ER DR RK RD DO RH ER N W T K DR OW RID UR BA T DR WA A A CA W BL N AS RT Y YO RU ST WOOD AR RT KE R IM S NC ER HAM AD T CROSSING RA R RN W AY T DR EN LN AT CH LA SC VIC ER W C KENW ME MO EN LN RD ER KS GRE N LO CT OOD TO RIV Y VALLITH RT EY R IO AL CO ON RIA GB CO RD DA DR PEN PARK MER BY-PASS LN G KE PETERSON UR N RD N PK X RD CE FOXB N CO FO RU T Y ROOK TO DAIR WY ¤ £ ¤ LANE EX BELFIELD LOOP £ 29 GR PL 250 PIN M EA OV TOWNE WILLO ET DO E LN WDALE RD O W RD LANE P BR EY E OO CT SP GROVER CT GEL IV K DR O NASH DR D TT O A RID RD CT R CIR CT SW D IRY R PET DA R O LE BLUE NER VE O RD ON UM D CO CT BY-PASS PE CR RD HIT AR ON NN FAULCO ST RD RD W RY LN PA TT DR T HE DS C GENT £ R ¤ SU GE EAF E KL E S OAKL NG HIR 250 SIA N AN DR T RID STONE HE AR RD ON LANE BU ES Y DR D SEYMOUR RD N UR DR RIDG EL CH CK D ID DM LIN T LISB BRUC P VEGA SQ RD IE ON G M LE R TO ER E AV G PRESCELLY PL OO S SS RE AR G CT SA UE E R D E W BY L LM TO BR EN HIL IS BL W Y MA ME RU E STON G ROSE HILL N IL CA OO LE DR RU ST G M RO AF LBO M BY £ LN DRIVE ¤ KW DR BR W LN A D LILI LN CIR ES OO 601 D AY IDG CIR UR W DR TV BL AL FIE ST PEYT E IE VD OL ON NE LD RK E W HO D PL OX RV FORD DR OOD RD HARROW RD PA RD IV DR AM FARM RD AG LM Y CO RD RD HA IVE RO P GH AD RD RD CIR ELE NE NES ES IVY W IN RO WA E PLYMO E CK FO R AD Y OX ST IV MASON UTH R BU IV ST AV UR HO DR WIL RT TE LN DR ES CO E DR PL RD O E CR DW LB W EL U T BUS WELLFORD IN PARKER IZ STONE OXFORD L E ST AB O RD AL HERNDON R SHERWOOD RD M FIELD LN OLD FE ON RUTLED ET R OD SE IVY RIE RD PL MA ND W GE AVE H FRANKLIN £ R RM D ¤ RD ST N N RD S AV DO OL RD SS AL FE RO 250 DR E E IE LA RUGBY CT PRESTON G NE RO RD BEEC R VE AN RUGBY TA Y LOCUST YD LN CT LA AVE HW AD IV FA RD NE G R AVE T E LN OO ME KENSINGTON CO N AVE ELE DR D RIED LN ED LA T SS R O RR LO LN RD LE ST EMME G O TE EW IN R T P ST LN CU E DR W ROBINSON AV CU LOCU CO W WESTWOO FERN O AY ST WOODS RD O RU D RD S OD CT ME DER S D G DE S D STILLF ID LN L LE AN ST LL DR BY CK WO RR PL VE HO E UN AR BL CIR LO LN EW CIR WIL TE Y PL HARDWOO GREENWAY ROSSER IV E AIR N E HEM CH HB RD ON AV CABELL AVE D RA AMHERST AUGUSTA PARK ST WOOD ER ER CL AL AVE AR E W NS AD SIT AVE AN ST AS ST COMMON UTH NO PL CT ND TT T D BARB M PE T RTH EX Y PL ST ID OO N EM BU VE ROSE HILL DR CO E ER DR SO LO W BLV AVE AR ER GL ED E WEST CIR A DW NLA SH RN O AV E GE AV TR AMHER RIV D E C TU O C H SM AV EE CT ¤ BYPASS ST ILL LE LL BIR £ UR S CIR BE LN N ST E RD ST X IT MEADOW S LAM TO PL CA RD Y BIR 250 AV ALL RD H LE TR CT ES RE MADISON CT BETH RD TRIPPER IS AC DW KELSEY AR RR PR AVE AVE ST LC TW KS CM CT OOD SH ST H O NS WAY IV AVE ON HIL DA C U YM M AL ST AN £ Y ST MAR GR ¤ VIS ST C DIS LIE ELL ST AN WOOD RO AD LN D M T Y LO AV TIN 20 MA LE EX SIT Y AL E CA R ROAD AD LIE AR CO B D WA L G D CA PA HO M ER RIV IN TS NW LA LN RK NE AV ST RD ES LL HE ON UN M IV H AN BO Y E NR ILL T ELK N AV BE LA ER ST IF UN RD P ST YA AN AN NA E DR RD CY AV CO SW LN TH ROSSER SA TH RO RD GO ST C VE DR H NT E NW ST R IV LN EY 16TH RM LE E DO ET MIN AVE E TH HA CO H IA E ST KENT CR N ST MIDM 10 RLT C T MA BR OR N ST NC LY GE DE ON ON AV NA N 13TH AV LEWIS RD ON ST L SPRI E AV OR E OR CU E W AV 17TH SA ER AL GG G AV CARR D L ONT KL E E EA 12TH LN VE N ST BE MT CIR HIL VE CAM ST IR LL AC ST LOUDON EV RD A ST VIRG LEWIS R RD TIN RIV CL IEW 15TH UIRE ST KE TH MTN INIA ) S LN E (unopen NEL LN 1/2 RV ST AR SE O S T AVE ST 14 ROAD AVE IL RD RO ISTA BO D S LN Y LATR BERT M G ST RE RO ST FAUQ 10 UNIV SO AV ST GB AR R HIL OBE DA NO SO LYO OT E OR ON CT N FO TE LE ST CT AN DR C RD THOM LN NS N L WE ER ST RT AV PR LE R T R RU AR SON ST CT ST DIS CELL N M HW LA ST E D RD ST LN O BYPASS LE ES ND D T M RIV AV CIR O LO A EM JO ST NORTHW UN PE MA RO BE O O ST CO EMME HN E NG IS AN TO D OOD EVER CIR NIA G IVE CHAN ST AL DE 13TH RR H GREE RR ED D SADL MO RD RS R 9T N E WOO N 11TH SO E £ ER WINE AR ¤ WB T DR £ Y AVE NW ¤ N AV HA ITY TIR DR N IN CK E RA 20 29 ST CELL PO GTO PAO DRIV YCASTL OL PARK Y ST PA ELLIE IN E PL JA ST O MB E LI LN E Mc GE CIR M ES D AV AV MINOAVE AV NC ST MO H ST RE ST ST WINE RIV XIN CO RTO HA 8T CIR R IR E Y SE ST HA N Z LE ON N ER CU Mc A EAST PA ST MALCOL EL ST W AV E RV LN LE CL R AR CO LAW DA BONN 1ST ST KW RD M NE ST O WAL ES ST VI EW EY N LO IR RM AY ST E LE M CRESCE £ DR KE ¤ ST NE WERTL H PAG E GR CT BE R LL RD RL ICK NT W NT AV AND ST E ST FARIS A 1421 10T VA DR RU IL AL DR CE PARK ALTA ST A N ST E H ST ST MO CIR LO A S CH MO AV NW HA PO E T ST RD PL AZ RE W £ NT ¤ K PLA DR 13 ST RD AV TA 2ND IC CIR HE RIC LLY Y DR Y ST E P O ST RS 250 12 ST RM DR DG AL 12 1/2 NEW LL SY AV AV D S MO ST E T Mc CO HM CA ST HO H R ST KE 10 1/2 TA HO HIG MO E 7T WA YLO TIRE HS RE H O DR E 'S AVE W M MAP R IG ND AV T ORE HO IE ST EH BROW ST MO PRESTON AIN USE ST E LE ST SP RD N ST VE ST ST NG WHITEH S JEFF ST ST T RO CIN DUKE 4TH AVE BEND EAD LE H O T ER PARK ELSO ST A JEFFERSON 8T MA EVEL SO AP AD DR LE GR OR M ST OLD ST GIL ST EAM RK N ST BLVD E ST TN E M 5TH ST ET E CIR OAKHURST 11TH O ST 7TH ST AV OE LN CR 8 TH E HIGH SP OS STEW DR LA ST D CIR NE COMMER JEFF SO 6TH R AVE £ OA M TE N CT DR ¤ CE ST ERSO RO ER UT ST RD AN ST AY R RIDG ST BROW ST ET ESTE IW T PS H 250 W S TE WAL N ST MONR ST ETH 2S AN ART PA NE S ST ST NR ST O H UG KE O GILDERSLEEVE LITT E ST MAI SNL NT IVER A ER ST R SQ N JE ELL PLZ NC 2ND N ST TO AV 9 1/ VA DR LE LI PA VA 6TH R DON PELL ST 7TH HIG LA 1ST WOOD ST P IN RO MAL MA NA DELE S LK T LL TIB CRIS ST H HS 2ND LLE 9TH ST L ST 9T VAN SO WA T EY RO CA ST 3RD C ON ST ST ST BRAN ADCT NOVA E 7TH DO UT TER ER DR E AV H 4TH M RO E ST 13TH LN ST AD KING H GROV ST ALD 5TH M T ST AR 10T RD AY CHE ST SO RM 12TH ST HS KING BO ME 10TH W T JONE SEA RRY CIR R UT N O HS FA VA 4T HIC SPRI CHEL SO LA O GA WATE HA AVE ST STADIUM U BL F F DIC H NE D CIR LL DR RR R FA ST ST KM E EA 11T ETT RM 13TH IRW EY ST KE W VE ST S ST ST ES RIVER OB ST GL ST MAURY AN NG RD AS ST /2 PANT MIMOSA T N ELM AY MA ST KING ON CA ER T OA OU 61 H 2ND A K S ST ST ST HIN PATO APPLETREE TH RK PIEDMONT AVE N CT 6T 4TH ST ER CL TE RR R ST TH ST E ST ST ET N BA ST H ER CH GT AVE A OPS R OL GROV AVON BINGL VA T PL OLM 12 M 5T R S RK EXT ST E RD PRICE ON DR KE R EY PIN GRAVES ST TE SA ON N LTON NUNL TO ON E ST PE PA MIMOSA ST VER KER KM ST ST AK VA ISH AVE D RY CT E AR LE TIC AV T ST SH OA LL SH VY HANO HIN NS ES TERR OR AV CH E EV E DAVID FIF E ON ST EY AM TO LITTL AV T1 DRIV GRAV EL E RD CIS DR UL RS FRAN NA MA E ST ROCK E 8T ST WAY GE OA RD ST S AV FE H Y VE ST K BO LO TON FONTAINE AVE HILL ST WA DR AS JEF OD BE 16TH AV OM RID E LM /2 D TH ST ST LA M ST GO PIEDMONT AVE NT ON 71 OR IR E ST MONPELIER R FOREST HILLS AVE R ST LEWIS PLATEAU FA R KE T RD CH TF AL ST UG CARL FA D HU ST RA STC LLY BA EXT TODD AVE VE ITY UR SUMM ES D T ST ST HE RS E EN DO RD CT A ST NU BROA AT IVE CENTER 1ST AV YC RR WILLIS C N CH HO UN EL LN S AVE BA ST E ¤ £ E CE 18TH UR RD O R RK YS RD E 782 AV AVE ER LIO NO RA ROBERTSON AVE AV W G WESTERLY SD T EL W O MA E F RU BO GA ST ALE IT ST NT RID MY PA RRIS RD ES LIF DR AK IDE IE LA LL SS RT UR TT ST NUT FA ST CE HIGHLAND SP IN LE OL IN R AV ERV AVE IV CIR YE RC LE BE ST TTE G ST LN LA E RS AVE AL E E RR AV MO RG ST AV C L AV DR FOREST IA RO E R U ST ST ING BL AVE ET RIV AVE MA E E RAYMOND T EXT TU DA RY E E BR C E EN IDGE BU RK RIV NG TRAILRIDGE K CH AV LA D RN HE NA BR ET IBLI ER CR BAIN ST 2N HIL EP NK RD N IM JEFFERSON ST ST B RD EE RY BU YO E AVE STR FO AV UL LIN E ET AV K MO E ST L DE ST RD CA SH RD ER M RA ST ST G ST N NT H CT RE RE RL RD E H AM N RR RO LIN CH 6T AR AV ST AV S TO PE WA ER AV KS RO EA RIB EL RD LEONARD AC ST TM RO RAND ST UTH E NA X TR LE CR E 1ST VE TU OS D ST LIO MARCHANT ST B BR N CK SO AN C S ST EST IN FT OAD VE DA RD SO PL TT ST ON TO PR AN AV MON N BA S MID WAY O MORG SUNSET N E OR M AV OLPH MON E AV H LA ST ILE GE T LT ALT S NG IL ST RL DR E E ND PA UNR E TE RA KH 5T YR ITH L ST AV RIA ST U AV RD ET RID EL R IS IAN RA ID A CT RK IN D ST IS E MA CA D ST AV HAM OR SM IN ON TA IE VIL E NO IN CLE TO LOOP AV RID EH ST DR HA R ST LA LN RL SO G AN CT EN E VELA IER ST U ICK BIN N E GE ST M EY GE ID PIR RO RD ME CA NO IA G RO VIN ND PT MASON L AV RID C EU L AVE HUNTL C E BRUNSW KLA E E O E B TA AV RD ST K DANBURY WATERBURY RO S N G AV IL GREENWICH HILL ND E RA LA RD RD RO S PA ST AD CR AVE WO MONTICELL CA T VIL ST E AV CT BL IN W LO R BAYLOR AV ETT SA RK E ST WIL E N K OD EK RD HIG LN ST DR DARIE PA RR RO ON EL IC HLA DR T DU U IN LA E RD SE LIN HARTFORD ID LA ST RLY ND CIRRK N TE LYNN ER DR RD BA WOODFOLK TO AV K IC ON PL PA RSO RD UN AV RO FL ND AVE PL YLO EH E AN MILFORD ROAD RO AN U EA S O NT CT AC R GE EN R FR TER C FE AVE DR KL O MO E ROYS PL MO GE EN RAYMOND BR DR MO SELE AN F NT PA AV OO R CE JE CLEV L DA E DR Y KW AV AT VE D K LN K E ST PAR ELAN IN CREE DE DR OO IV E ES DR D AV RD N MOOR E W EN D CLY ST MANILA E RIO LN ALL E ON E ST MA CT DR RIVES K OR ST CO R N ST ST EE TE O CIR ST LN OW NAYL ET AD O CR IN R U ST LL DR AVE LT E EN PO G O BL SA YE AV PL SLATE RIA ST IS R AV E UR E IEW ST HARR CS DG TH E S PL GR IAN ES NA X FIF K OL D HB LO CH IM PL AVE RD LINDEN WEL ID HART Y D RO OL GR RO RIST R ROAD VISTA MILL MANS U QUARRY RD NC ME GE CT CIR IS KEYS RR LE TROOST BELLEV EL E RD MO PL DR HA LID KNOLL A § IG ¦ ¨ DR DR N LY CHANDLERS NT MC H PL TO EAS CT PL AV ST 64 LLIA DR LEY D TONE ALE HIL E TOWLER ST MONTE OO SE SH T VIE PL COURT MO MTN D BR FL OO W OL V EA DR K IE IN ST LN A NG ST W W PL M MID T PE CAME LO LO DLE DR PP NE SHAS ET TO ER AZAL N TA CT FIELDING E CT LN KE RE LN E PL DRIVE £ ¤ BIL GARDEN RD ST § ¦ ¨ 780 O NE BE CE ER 64 M DR NT HARRIS LA IN CAMELLIA Y E RO CREEK RO QU IV H A D 5T DR GLEN XT AVE E DR ST SC ON £ ¤ AR 781 BO § ¦ ¨ AV UG MIC H 64 TA VE HIE WY DO RN R DR EGE D N LN CA COLL PK AVE EXT MANSFIELD RD RT ST £ ¤ LN ER 1 HA PL CT 63 OOD ON INW MOUNTA LOCKSLEY RS RO TERR FE AD COUNTRY EF SUNSET GREEN APTS J AS £ ¤ OM 780 £ ¤ CO U LD TH NTR Y STREET EXT 631 FIE CIR £ ¤ 20 µ RD GR 5TH W IN PIN E EN LE RD EH CT 53 Land Use UR VIL BROOK AD S RG RO T TS OA U STAGECOACH HB OT K C ESIDE N HIL LAK SOUTH W LY HILL AVE OO SC DRIVE Low Density Residential Park or Preserved Open Space L D DR D OL CT High Density Residential Public or Semi-Public Neighborhood Commercial ** Denotes property not subject to the City of Charlottesville's municipal authority Mixed Use Business and Technology Miles 0 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 Map adopted as part of the 2013 Comprehensive Plan by Charlottesville City Council on August 19, 2013. 2005 JPA M I T C H E L L / M AT T H E W S Charlott es v ille VA 2013 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN LAND USE MAP Architects & Planners 18 01.11.2022 All grades, counts and quantities are approximate and will change as design proceeds. 434.979.7550 © 2021 Attachment B D R A F T Stonefield FEB. 2018 Meadow Creek Valley Greenbrier NOV. 2018 Greenbrier Park R ek iv re C an ow na d ea Ri M ve r Meadowcreek Gardens & Disc Golf Walker Charlottesville High School Pen Park Greenleaf YMCA Park M McIntire ea Barracks Road ow d Shopping Center Park C re ek Northeast Park Washington Park Jackson P. Murray Burley Schenk's Greenway Venable The Rotunda and Lawn Burnley- Downtown Moran Mall Maplewood UVA Hospital Pantops Cemetery Ri va n Jefferson n School aR ive Meade r Park Buford Tonsler Oakwood Park Cemetery Forest Hills Park Riverview Downtown Belmont Park Clark Johnson Belmont Park Fry's Springs Jordan Rives Park Park Quarry Park eek sCr ore Jackson-Via Mo k ee 2005 JEFFERSON Azalea Park Mo r or es C 5th St. Station PARK AVENUE City of Charlottesville Land Use ² Comprehensive Plan 2018 2005 JEFFERSON Park and Preserved Open Space General Land Use Plan School Cemetery PARKLAND AVENUE 0 0.5 1 1 inch = 1,000 feet STW Typology 1:12,000 on 24"x36" Mile Downtown Mixed Use B NOVEMBER USE PLAN PLANNING COMMISSION PROPOSED Map By: NDS, City of Charlottesville 12/06/2017 Data Source: City of Charlottesville Planning Commission and This product is for general information only and shall not be used for design, modification, or construction. Industrial Neighborhood A City of Charlottesville SDE 12/06/2017 There is no guarantee of completeness or accuracy. Projection Information: Lambert Conformal Conic, NAD83, Virginia State Plane South The City assumes no liability arising from use of this product. Mixed Use A Neighborhood B 2005 JPA M I T C H E L L / M AT T H E W S Charlott es v ille VA 2018 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FUTURE LAND USE MAP DRAFTS Architects & Planners 19 01.11.2022 All grades, counts and quantities are approximate and will change as design proceeds. 434.979.7550 © 2021 Attachment B On the next page, you can view Future Land Use Map a version of this map with parcel RESIDENTIAL boundaries. Ri o Limited commercial uses allowed in all residential districts, to be further described in the Zoning Rd 2005 . Ordinance. Zoning tools will regulate affordability and maximum allowable development for all Click here to view . Rd G re categories and will consider demolition disincentives, as feasible. e ill precedent examples nb JEFFERSON rH rie da rD Description An Ce for residential and gu r. Hy sR r. D dr General Residential: Allow for additional housing choice within existing residential d. PARK AVE. d. ok e au mixed-use categories. hi s R ro lic ic ht b M neighborhoods throughout the city. ig ow Rd . He ead General Residential (Sensitive Community Areas): Allow for additional housing choice, M Ken woo d and tools to mitigate displacement, within existing residential neighborhoods that have Ln. high proportions of populations that may be sensitive to displacement pressures. (Note: Grove Rd. The boundaries for these areas should evolve during the zoningupdate process, as . et t St .N Ln. Me lb Gentry described on page 25 of the Comprehensive Plan.) Ba n St Em lmo r ra A . ourn Rd il rli c m Medium Intensity Residential: Increase opportunities for housing development M ks ng y to gb Rd e n including affordable housing, along neighborhoods corridors, near community amenities, Ru . Bl Rd. vd . r employment centers, and in neighborhoods that are traditionally less affordable. ne ar W Rugby Higher-Intensity Residential: Provide opportunities for higher density, multi-family d. Ave. wy W. yR Westwood Pk hn focused development. Incentivize affordability and increased intensity to meet Affordable . gb Rd. Rose Hill Dr . Ru Jo Housing Plan goals. Iv y Rd Ca MIXED USE NODES AND CORRIDORS . . Rd W lh ats ou an o n rm nA St Neighborhood Mixed Use Corridor: Neighborhood-scaled mixed use areas arranged ve . t. de . kS Al along corridors that support existing residential districts. . r St 25 Pa 0- is Pr . ve BY rr . es Rd Ha Neighborhood Mixed Use Node: Compact neighborhood centers that encompass a mix of tA e. to P W Av n r us ve U . Av t. N Rd E ni c land uses arranged in smaller scale buildings. on Ri e. N Lo ve ire Po hS gt r St. p si nt lar xin ty cI 10t St 2nd Business and Technology Mixed Use: Light industrial and production uses, with other M Av . Le Wes Hig e. tM ain S hS commercial and residential uses (where appropriate). t. Ma rke t. High St. t St Urban Mixed Use Corridor: Higher intensity mixed use development arranged along . . ve . ve Wa A ter eA k corridors between employment, commercial, and civic hubs of the city. St. r Pa ad Ch n so 9th St. SW Me er Urban Mixed Use Node: Urban mixed use districts that support community housing, er ry ff Av Je employment, and commercial development. e. e. E. Ma Av Fontaine Ave. Ext. Ch rke es Mo tS ap de Downtown Core: A primary, central mixed use activity hub for the city. y Av e. nt t. ea ke rsi rr ice Che llo St. e e. Av Riv . Av OTHER CATEGORIES St e. JPA Ca ling rlt h ib on 5t Str t. Av eS Open Spaces and Parks: Includes both public and private spaces e. Monticello Rd Ell dg Cle iot vel tA Ri a nd ve St. Cemetery: Includes both public and private cemeteries Ave . . on Av Civic: Includes governmental buildings . is Rd . Education: Charlottesville City Schools and Non-City Schools Harr Ave. Linden UVA: Properties owned by the University of Virginia October 5, 2021 Draft Map Stream Buffer: 100’ buffer With October 12 Planning City of Charlottesville Boundary and Urban Development Area Commission Text Amendments 2005 JPA M I T C H E L L / M AT T H E W S Charlott es v ille VA CURRENT 2021 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FUTURE LAND USE MAP Architects & Planners 20 01.11.2022 All grades, counts and quantities are approximate and will change as design proceeds. 434.979.7550 © 2021 Attachment B 8/24/2021 42 Mixed Use Corridors NEIGHBORHOOD MIXED USE CORRIDOR Neighborhood mixed use areas arranged along corridors that support existing residential districts. Mixed Use Corridors Mixed/ Business Use Corridors & Tech / URBAN MIXED USE CORRIDOR Higher intensity mixed use development arranged along corridors that link the employment, commercial, and civic hubs of the city. Business & Technology BUSINESS AND TECHNOLOGY MIXED USE Neighborhood Urban Neighborhood Mixed Use Corridor Mixed Mixed Use Use Corridor Corridor Light industrial and production uses as well as Commercial, employment, residential Commercial, Commercial,employment, employment,residential residential. Active Commercia Ligh (including small multi-unit and live-work unit (including small multi-unit and live-work unit USES USES additional commercial and residential uses (where ground floor uses groundbus floo buildings). Active ground floor uses. buildings). Active ground floor uses. Act appropriate). Neighborhood character. Respond to existing Neighborhood character. Respond to existing Respondenvironmental residential, to existing RespondRec to FORM FORM residential, environmental and historic residential, environmental and historic hum 2005 JEFFERSON and historic context and historic context context PARK AVENUE Up to 5 stories, general average of 3 stories. Up5to 5 stories, stories, general up to average 8 at key of 3 stories. intersections (such Upup 5 stories, HEIGHT HEIGHT Highest buildings at intersections or at sites Highest buildings at as intersections ofintersections or at sites Downtown, Industrial, as intersect with larger land areas with larger Mixed land Use, or areas Neighborhood corridors in the Mixed Use, Streets That Work plan) Streets Tha 2005 JPA M I T C H E L L / M AT T H E W S Charlott es v ille VA CURRENT 2021 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATIONS Architects & Planners 21 01.11.2022 All grades, counts and quantities are approximate and will change as design proceeds. 434.979.7550 © 2021 Attachment B JEFFERSON PARK AVENUE IS IDENTIFIED AS A MIXED USE B STREET 2005 JPA M I T C H E L L / M AT T H E W S Charlott es v ille VA 2016 STREETS THAT WORK PLAN Architects & Planners 22 01.11.2022 All grades, counts and quantities are approximate and will change as design proceeds. 434.979.7550 © 2021 Attachment B ADJACENT DESIGNATION 8/24/2021 39 Residential HIGHER-INTENSITY RESIDENTIAL Neighborhoods and sites for multi-unit housing. Incentivize affordability and increased intensity to meet Affordable Housing Plan goals. Multi-unit housing (13+). May include large USES and/or smaller-scaled buildings. Limited ground floor commercial uses encouraged. All residential categories: compatible with existing residential and historic neighborhood context. Highest FORM building heights according to context. Zoning tools will define building form and neighborhood compatibility criteria for development (e.g., lot coverage, topography, parking, etc.) HEIGHT Up to 5 stories. 2005 JEFFERSON PARK AVENUE 2005 JPA M I T C H E L L / M AT T H E W S Charlott es v ille VA CURRENT 2021 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATIONS Architects & Planners 23 01.11.2022 All grades, counts and quantities are approximate and will change as design proceeds. 434.979.7550 © 2021 Attachment B UNITS 119 units SECTION 3 DESIGN SITE AREA 1.711 Acres DUA 70 DUA (SUP REQUEST) STORIES 7 stories at JPA, 5 stories adjacent to R-2U zoning BUILDING HEIGHT 75’, from average grade plane (SUP REQUEST) PARKING 125 spaces provided Justification for rear yard setback reduction (SUP REQUEST): PROPOSED We are seeking a reduction in the rear yard setback As suggested by planning staff, the project investigated from 75 feet to 36 feet. This request is based on the the application of the West Main East zoning regulations following argument that contends a setback of 75’ on the proposed building site with regard to the rear yard is grossly excessive, disproportionate, and obsolete setback adjacent to a low-density residential district. under today’s view of (and vision for) this evolving The WME regulations require a 20’ minimum rear yard neighborhood. Strict adherence to the Ordinance in setback along with a bulk plane requirement and a 10’ this instance seems contrary to the intent originally Type S-1 buffer. Height is limited to 52’. In comparison, envisioned - to protect single-family homes, and is in the proposed design would have a 36’ setback, and be conflict with the long-held belief by City planners and approximately 56’ tall adjacent to the R-2U zoning. The others that reasonable increased density adjacent to project would be under this hypothetical bulk plane – the University is preferable and beneficial. The intent utilizing the WME zoning requirements of a 20’ setback, of the Ordinance was to separate single-family, owner- and using the adjacent R-2U height of 35’. Refer to the occupied homes from multi-family residential buildings. conceptual section provided in this section. This is no longer the case in this neighborhood where only the smallest vestiges of single-family, owner- Finally, if the city’s zoning re-write implements the SECTION 2: occupied residences remain. This is overwhelmingly a comprehensive plan work, the adjacent zoning district TABLE OF CONTENTS, PROJECT neighborhood of student rentals that continues its slow will no longer be low-density. The adjacency created will DATA & JUSTIFICATION OF REAR transition to increased density, more pedestrians, and be 5 stories maximum on the adjacent site to 5-8 stories YARD SETBACK REDUCTION more efficient land use where a 75-foot setback is not on this site – with both anticipating higher-intensity SITE PLAN necessary. residential. MASSING DIAGRAM (PERSPECTIVE) MASSING DIAGRAM (SECTION) For this project, the zoning ordinance requires a rear In conclusion, the 75-foot setback requirement is an STREETSCAPE PLAN yard setback of 75’ due to the property’s adjacency to anachronism no longer appropriate for this evolving STREETSCAPE PERSPECTIVE a low-density residential district and based upon the neighborhood. STREETSCAPE PERSPECTIVE project’s proposed density (Sec. 34-353 (b)(4)). The STREETSCAPE PERSPECTIVE adjacent property has been a student rental for decades. Given, the compatible uses, we propose height as the governing metric of the setback requirement. 2005 JPA M I T C H E L L / M AT T H E W S Charlott es v ille VA PROJECT DATA & JUSTIFICATION OF REAR YARD SETBACK REDUCTION Architects & Planners 24 01.11.2022 All grades, counts and quantities are approximate and will change as design proceeds. 434.979.7550 © 2021 Attachment B 515 520 505 525 510 WASHINGTON AVENUE PROPERTY LINE 503 510 507.66 509.5 509.66 509.5 510 JEFFERSON PARK AVENUE 529 510 20’ setback 509.66 510 509.85 525 525 530 510 505 510 36’ PROPOSED setback PROPERTY LINE 26.35’ setback PROPERTY LINE 539 75’ setback 25’ buffer 510 535 510 20’ setback 519.5 525 523 539 540 PROPERTY LINE 513 540 OBSERVATORY AVENUE 525 SCALE: 1" = 30' 2005 JPA SITE M I T C H E L L / M AT T H E W S Charlott es v ille VA 2005 JEFFERSON PARK AVENUE SITE PLAN Architects MITCHELL / MATTHEWS © 2021 & Planners 25 01.11.2022 ASPEN HEIGHT S PARTNERS All grades, counts and quantities are approximate and will change as design proceeds. 434.979.7550 ARCHITECTS & PLA NNERS © 2021 SK-153 Tuesday, December 7, 2021 CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA 434-979-7550 Attachment B & COMP PLAN HEIGHT OF 5 STORIES ALLOWABLE BUILDING HEIGHT (35’) UNDER EXISTING R-2U ZONING PROPERTY PROPERTY LINE LINE M E AL C OR 55’ +/- ZO R PLANTI PE LK THE E SETBACK BU P O NINGW Y H 75' REQUIRED REAR SETBACK MAXIMUM BUILDING ENVELOPE UNDER SUP 36' 26' PROPOSED SETBACK REQUESTED BUILDING ENVELOPE WITH SUP MAX. HEIGHT 20' JEFFERSON PARK AVENUE 101' proposed REQUESTED building 55' HEIGHT beyond 75' 35' 35' 25' ∆ GRADE TYPE S-3 AVG. GRADE 37' BUFFER PLANE 2005 JPA M I T C H E L L / M AT T H E W S Charlott es v ille VA COMPARISON TO BUILDABLE ENVELOPE UNDER A SPECIAL USE PERMIT Architects & Planners 26 01.11.2022 All grades, counts and quantities are approximate and will change as design proceeds. 434.979.7550 © 2021 Attachment B OBSERVATORY AVENUE WASHINGTON AVENUE T D RAF S N G RES ESIG GE PRO LL IN D CHAN STI T TO U B JEC S 2005 JPA M I T C H E L L / M AT T H E W S Charlott es v ille VA ELEVATION JEFFERSON PARK AVENUE Architects & Planners 27 01.11.2022 All grades, counts and quantities are approximate and will change as design proceeds. 434.979.7550 © 2021 Attachment B T D RAF S N G RES ESIG GE PRO LL IN D CHAN STI T TO U B JEC S 2005 JPA M I T C H E L L / M AT T H E W S Charlott es v ille VA ELEVATION OBSERVATORY AVENUE Architects & Planners 28 01.11.2022 All grades, counts and quantities are approximate and will change as design proceeds. 434.979.7550 © 2021 Attachment B T D RAF S N G RES ESIG GE PRO LL IN D CHAN STI T TO U B JEC S 2005 JPA M I T C H E L L / M AT T H E W S Charlott es v ille VA ELEVATION WASHINGTON AVENUE Architects & Planners 29 01.11.2022 All grades, counts and quantities are approximate and will change as design proceeds. 434.979.7550 © 2021 Attachment B OBSERVATORY AVENUE WASHINGTON AVENUE T D RAF S N G RES ESIG GE PRO LL IN D CHAN STI T TO U B JEC S 2005 JPA M I T C H E L L / M AT T H E W S Charlott es v ille VA ELEVATION REAR Architects & Planners 30 01.11.2022 All grades, counts and quantities are approximate and will change as design proceeds. 434.979.7550 © 2021 5 Attachment B 510 509.5 20’ setback 20’ setback Elevated terrace / COURTYARD 509.66 523 509.85 507.66 510 WASHINGTON AVENUE POOL OBSERVATORY AVENUE 519.5 26.35’ setback 509.66 510 513 510 PROPERTY LINE 503 JEFFERSON PARK AVENUE 2005 JPA M I T C H E L L / M AT T H E W S Charlott es v ille VA ENLARGED STREETSCAPE PLAN / ROOF PLAN Architects & Planners 31 510 505 01.11.2022 All grades, counts and quantities are approximate and will change as design proceeds. 434.979.7550 © 2021 Attachment B T D RAF S N G RES ESIG GE PRO LL IN D CHAN STI T TO U B JEC S 2005 JPA M I T C H E L L / M AT T H E W S Charlott es v ille VA PERSPECTIVE JPA & OBSERVATORY AVENUE CORNER Architects & Planners 32 01.11.2022 All grades, counts and quantities are approximate and will change as design proceeds. 434.979.7550 © 2021 Attachment B T D RAF S N G RES ESIG GE PRO LL IN D CHAN STI T TO U B JEC S 2005 JPA M I T C H E L L / M AT T H E W S Charlott es v ille VA PERSPECTIVE LOOKING ACROSS JPA Architects & Planners 33 01.11.2022 All grades, counts and quantities are approximate and will change as design proceeds. 434.979.7550 © 2021 Attachment B T D RAF S N G RES ESIG GE PRO LL IN D CHAN STI T TO U B JEC S 2005 JPA M I T C H E L L / M AT T H E W S Charlott es v ille VA PERSPECTIVE JPA & WASHINGTON AVENUE CORNER Architects & Planners 34 01.11.2022 All grades, counts and quantities are approximate and will change as design proceeds. 434.979.7550 © 2021 Attachment B T D RAF S N G RES ESIG GE PRO LL IN D CHAN STI T TO U B JEC S 2005 JPA M I T C H E L L / M AT T H E W S Charlott es v ille VA PERSPECTIVE JPA STREETSCAPE Architects & Planners 35 01.11.2022 All grades, counts and quantities are approximate and will change as design proceeds. 434.979.7550 © 2021 Attachment B T D RAF S N G RES ESIG GE PRO LL IN D CHAN STI T TO U B JEC S 2005 JPA M I T C H E L L / M AT T H E W S Charlott es v ille VA PERSPECTIVE JPA STREETSCAPE Architects & Planners 36 01.11.2022 All grades, counts and quantities are approximate and will change as design proceeds. 434.979.7550 © 2021 Attachment B T D RAF S N G RES ESIG GE PRO LL IN D CHAN STI T TO U B JEC S 2005 JPA M I T C H E L L / M AT T H E W S Charlott es v ille VA PERSPECTIVE OBSERVATORY AVENUE PARTIAL STREETSCAPE Architects & Planners 37 01.11.2022 All grades, counts and quantities are approximate and will change as design proceeds. 434.979.7550 © 2021 S:\103\48530-JPA_Aspen_Heights\DWG\Sheet\SUP\48530-103-C1.0 SITE CONTEXT PLAN.dwg | Plotted on 3/14/2022 4:10 PM | by Kim Roeser LEGEND BUS STOP FONTAINE RESEARCH PARK FONTAI NE AVE EXT SLAUGHTER REC CENTER PROJECT LOCATION AL DE RM AN RD HILL DINING ROOM UVA OBSERVATORY JEFFERSON PARK AVE MC CO RM IC K RD ST STADIUM AD I UVA SCOTT J UM E BEACH CLUB F FRY'S SPRING RD FE AQUATIC AND RS O FITNESS CENTER N P A RK AV E Attachment B .25 MI. 10 MIN. EMM E T ST S BARRACKS ROAD SHOPPING CENTER UVA LIBRARY .50 MI. 15 MIN. UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA THE LAWN .75 MI. 20 MIN. WES 0 T MA IN ST 300' NAD 83 SCALE 1"=300' HOSPITAL MALL UVA UNIVERSITY 600' DOWNTOWN THIS DRAWING PREPARED AT THE YOUR VISION ACHIEVED THROUGH OURS. CHARLOTTESVILLE OFFICE 608 Preston Avenue, Suite 200 | Charlottesville, VA 22903 TEL 434.295.5624 FAX 434.295.8317 www.timmons.com DATE REVISION DESCRIPTION ASPEN HEIGHTS (2005 JPA) DATE CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA SCALE JOB NO. C1.0 DRAWN BY SHEET NO. 1" = 300' 48530 T. BRIGHT T. BRIGHT CHECKED BY DESIGNED BY B. CICHOCKI SUP SITE CONTEXT These plans and associated documents are the exclusive property of TIMMONS GROUP and may not be reproduced in whole or in part and shall not be used for any purpose whatsoever, inclusive, but not limited to construction, bidding, and/or construction staking without the express written consent of TIMMONS GROUP. Attachment B MHS TOP=498.42 INV IN=479.67 8" PVC (SW) INV OUT=479.59 8" PVC (NE) TEL 434.295.5624 FAX 434.295.8317 www.timmons.com 608 Preston Avenue, Suite 200 | Charlottesville, VA 22903 REMOVE SD INLET/ W GRATE S THIS DRAWING PREPARED AT THE TOP=514.79 CHARLOTTESVILLE OFFICE INV IN=512.74 12" RCP (NW) INV OUT=512.69 12" RCP (SE) MHS 10" TOP=512.05 REMOVE SD INLET/ W GRATE INV IN=509.25 8" CLAY (SW) INV IN=507.50 8" PVC (NW) P TOP=516.65 OH APPROX. LOCATION OF 8" DI WATERLINE INV IN=514.60 8" PVC (SW) CL 16' (W) INV OUT=507.45 8" PVC (SE) REVISION DESCRIPTION SWL INV IN=514.55 8" PVC (DS) GARAGE DOOR SAN SWL INV OUT=514.50 12" RCP (SE) FFE=516.50 12" DI OHP DWS OHP OHP OHP EP OHP MHS W WP OH OHP OHP OHP OHP P W W W OHP OH TOP=528.49 OHP W INV IN=525.19 6" PVC (SW) W EP OH REMOVE METERS AND P WASHINGTON AVENUE W OHP W IINV OUT=523.86 8" CLAY (NW) ABANDON AT MAIN (TYP.) 35' R/W 8" DI OHP W DB. 93, PG. 60 (EXCEPTION 9) OHP REMOVE REMOVE S REMOVE AND REPLACE ADA OHP REMOVE OVERHEAD LINE CONC. STEPS CONC. STEP SAN SAN CURB RAMP W CL 16' (W) SAN OHP AND POLE SERVING 2 TREADS 1 TREAD SAN S MHS P PK NAIL (S) SAWCUT (TYP.) OHP 2 RISERS GARAGE DOOR OH EXISTING BUILDING G P OHW 3 RISERS TOP=502.01 YOUR VISION ACHIEVED THROUGH OURS. OHP FFE=515.54 EP G 2" PE ' G G G G INV IN=499.71 8" PVC (SW) OHP REMOVE AND REPLACE CURB 67.24 12" RCP 12" RCP DWS INV IN=498.71 8" PVC (NW) "E S36°15'36"E 256.13' 31'28 REMOVE IRON (F) CONC. INV OUT=496.66 10" CLAY (NE) S51° 8" W FIRE HYDRANT TO REMAIN 6" PVC APPROX. LOCATION OF 8" OUTFALL PIPE (DAYLIGHTS) SAN SAN 8" SAN S S43°26'28" E EP REMOVE INV=523.40WOOD WALL ASPH. CONC. ASPH. 8" REMOVE SD INLET/ W GRATE X 15" DEC 63.40' ASPH. EP 8" PVC IRON (F) TOP=512.57 X OHP REMOVE JEFFERSON PARK AVENUE INV=528.60 1.0' 2.0' 15" DEC U FRAME SHED 16.0' CL 16' (W) 20.0' 17.0' 1.9' INV IN=510.37 8" PVC (DS) SAN 8" HOLLY STONE WALL 18.4' X 30" RCP #110 INV IN=509.47 12" RCP (NW) X REMOVE 15.3' REMOVE GARAGE DOOR CL SINGLE 8.8' REMOVE X 8.8' IRON (F) 4" CLAY GRILL (2) FFE=518.50 DOOR (2) INV OUT=508.17 30" RCP (SW) TRENCH DRAIN CONC. STAIRS 3 STORY 31.2' INV=527.81 15.5' 14" PINE 5 RISERS / 6 TREADS REMOVE X CL SINGLE 2ND FRAME / VINYL X X DATE CONC. 32.2' 24" PINE (2) S52°24'24"W 104.10' 30" MAPLE REMOVE DOOR REMOVE FLOOR BUILDING ANDDECK 4.4' CL SINGLE 14" PINE REMOVE WOOD WALL FFE=527.00 ASSOCIATED DOOR CL SINGLE X W CONC. STEPS FFE=527.03 6" PVCSTAIRS, DOOR REMOVE SIGN AND REMOVE APPURTENANCES, OHP 6 TREADS REMOVE SHRUBS CL SINGLE INV= 30" POPLAR CONC. SWK CONC. STEPS 6" PVC REMOVE STORM PIPES AND RETURN TO OWNER (TYP.) X 7 RISERS DOOR WALLS, 522.9 ETC.9 FFE=527.03 5 TREADS / 6 RISERS FFE=527.02 INV=5 23.54 81.3' 6" PVC STRUCTURES (TYP.) X DATE CONC. SWK REMOVE C . INV=522.45 D 10/04/2021 AC EP AC CONC. SWK AC WOOD FENCE GRAVEL N 2ND FLOOR DECK 8" 30" DEC TMP 17-104 AC CONC. CO AC REMOVE APPROX. LOCATION OF 12" DI WATERLINE SAN HT=8' CONC. GRAVEL CITY PID 170104000 (6 SPACES) REMOVE 1.5' X 1.5' 14.5' CL SINGLE WOOD WALLS WOOD WALLS WOOD WALLS MHD TOP=525.02 X X NORMAN LAMSON, TRUSTEE OF THE DRAWN BY 10.0' (9 SPACES) COLUMNS 10.0' INV IN=521.27 8" PVC (DS)15" PINEGADIENT LAND TRUST AGREEMENT K. ROESER (TYP) DOOR REMOVE WOOD STEPS WOOD STEPS X FFE=541.38 8 TREADS / 9 RISERS INV OUT=509.33 30" RCP (NE) DATED JANUARY 3, 2005 OHP 8" DEC 8 TREADS / 9 RISERS DESIGNED BY REMOVE 7.9' 11.5' REMOVE DB. 1011, PG. 397 CONC. WALL X UNABLE TO WOOD STEPS ZONED: R-3 W COVERED BRICK PATIO CL SINGLE MEASURE INV. REMOVE TO 2ND FLOOR DECK K. ROESER CONC. DOOR 1.247 AC. (SURVEYED) FFE=541.38 WOOD STEPS 8 TREADS / 9 RISERS REMOVE REMOVE TO 2ND FLOOR DECK BRICK CHECKED BY 10" DEC 26.0' #2005 3'X3' 8 TREADS / 9 RISERS COLUMNS REMOVE REMOVE X CONC. STEPS 47.9' 8" DEC COLUMNS MHS 2 STORY 12" REMOVE STONE S B. CICHOCKI X EP (TYP) 3 TREADS / 4 RISERS SWL SWL CONC. STEPS COLUMN X TWIN 177.69' FRAME TOP=507.84 REMOVE MAPLE X 2 TREADS / 3 RISERS OHP CONC. SCALE TMP 17-105 CONC. STEPS XIRON (F) FLAGSTONE SWK X XX X X INV IN=503.36 8" PVC (SW) 4.5' 12.4' CL SINGLE INV OUT=503.33 8" CLAY (NE) CITY PID: 170105000 2 TREADS REMOVE DOOR BUILDING AND 1" = 20' 4' BENJAMIN T. & SENEM K. WARD IRON (F) 3 RISERS ASSOCIATED 15" DEC FLAGSTONE SWK FFE=541.83 IRON (F) SE CORNER X 22.5' INST. NO. 090002917 AT 92.13' APPURTENANCES, STAIRS, CONC. SWK OF STONE N51°22'45"E CL SINGLE REMOVE N36°40'40"W 109.89' N36°47'39"W 108.89' REMOVE WALLS, ETC. CL SINGLE CONC. STEPS W #116 WASHINGTON AVE. STONE COLUMN X X DOOR DOOR 8 TREADS REMOVE REMOVE COLUMN FFE=541.83 FFE=541.73 BRICK CONC. STEPS (COR) 12" DEC 9 RISERS COLUMNS 5 TREADS / 6 RISERS 92.10'CONC. SWK REMOVE REMOVE REMOVE 28.8' CONC. STEPS 8" SAN REMOVE WOOD STEPS 17.2' WOOD STEPS TO 4" CLAY OHP 4 TREADS TO 2ND FLOOR DECK 2ND FLOOR DECK INV=531.39 30 TREADS / 31 RISERS 13 TREADS CL SINGLE DOOR 5 RISERS REMOVE 20" (A) 31.7' REMOVE 14 RISERS (A) FFE=536.32 4" CLAY PINE BRICK WALL TMP 17-103 INV=529.22 X CL SINGLE REMOVE CITY PID 17010300 CO TMP 17-103.1 These plans and associated documents are the exclusive property of TIMMONS GROUP and may not be reproduced in whole or in part and shall not be used for any purpose whatsoever, inclusive, but not X CONC. SWK CONC. X AC 4' 4' DOOR NORMAN LAMSON, TRUSTEE OF THE 94.33' CONC. NC CL SINGLE DOOR FFE=513.01 STEPS CONC. GADIENT LAND TRUST AGREEMENT EP 5 TREADS . 34.3' 57.9' (B) CL SINGLE CL SINGLE 32.2' X REMOVE CONC. STEPS CL SINGLE TMP 17-103.1 6 RISERS DATED JANUARY 3, 2005, AS AMENDED W FFE= FFE= DOOR REMOVE (9 SPACES) RS CL SINGLE DB. 1011, PG. 397 BRICK PATIO 24.1' DOOR 10" DEC 2 TREADS / 3 RISE OHP S52°41'07"W DOOR 538.73 538.71 S50°39'44"W FFE=528.99 #2007 HAND 24.3' 4' DOOR CL 16' (W) FFE=540.28 #104 RAILS ZONED: R-3 60.0' 60.1' ASPEN HEIGHTS (2005 JPA) SUP EXISTING CONDITION & DEMO PLAN CL SINGLE 2 STORY 29.1' #108 CL SINGLEDOOR FFE=521.53 0.236 AC. (SURVEYED) SAN GARAGE DOOR REMOVE BUILDING REMOVE BUILDING CONC. 1 STORY X 4' DOOR AC BRICK AND ASSOCIATED 3 STORY CL SINGLE AND ASSOCIATED 39.3' REMOVE CURB (TYP.) APPURTENANCES, FRAME / VINYL 40" MAPLE #106 AC BRICK DOOR 16.5' APPURTENANCES, REMOVE BUILDING FFE=536.35 40.3' 3 STORY CL SINGLE (B) 39.3' X 5.0' STAIRS, WALLS, ETC. 41.4' STAIRS, WALLS, ETC. AND ASSOCIATED CL SINGLE REMOVE P 8.0' CONC. SWK DOOR TMP 17-103.1 OH CL 16' (W) CL SINGLE FRAME / VINYL REMOVE FFE=521.54 DOOR APPURTENANCES, CONC. FFE=521.57 CITY PID 170103100 EP STEPS 16.0' GARAGE DOOR DOOR CONC. CONC. STAIRS, WALLS, OHP REMOVE P 6 TREADS NORMAN LAMSON, TRUSTEE OF THE FFE=537.16 FLAGSTONE REMOVE OH ETC. 2' 7 RISERS X 26.4' 32.4' CONC. HAND REMOVE GADIENT LAND TRUST AGREEMENT REMOVE LIGHT POLE (TYP.) 10" BIRCH (2) REMOVE SIDEWALK W STEPS RAIL GRAVEL WOOD FENCE 4.4' DATED JANUARY 3, 2005, AS AMENDED X X CL 7' (W) REMOVE 2 TREADS BRICK 31.7' CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA HT=6' AC AC INST. NO. 202200000918 AC (TRASH ENCLOSURE) CONC. STEPS 3 RISERS STEPS GARAGE 5 TREADS / 6 RISERS 8" DEC REMOVE SAN X WOOD FENCE 4' REMOVE 6 TREADS CONC. ZONED: R-3 EP 8" P 10" BIRCH (4) DOOR GRAVEL P WOOD FENCE X OH HT=8' 7 RISERS OH 0.228 AC. (SURVEYED) X HT=8' X 165.32' X XS37°19'40"E X X CL 7' (W) GARAGE DOOR X IRON (F) CATALPA N37°18'15"W 110.04' IRON (F) N37°18'15"W 105.40' PK NAIL (S) OHP OHP GRAVEL IRON (F) UG P OHP OHP OHP OHP OHP OHP OHP OHP OHP OHP OHP OHP OHP OHP OHP OHP OHP OHP EP S:\103\48530-JPA_Aspen_Heights\DWG\Sheet\SUP\48530-103-C2.0-EXIST.dwg | Plotted on 3/14/2022 4:11 PM | by Kim Roeser EP REMOVE REMOVE AND REPLACE REMOVE SIGN AND BLOCK WALL G G G EP G G 2" PE G G W SAN SIDEWALK AND SAN CURB RETURN TO OWNER (TYP.) W SAN SAN REMOVE OVERHEAD G SAN HP SAN S SAWCUT (TYP.) SAN SAN LINES SERVING EXISTING SAN OHP O PARCELS TO BE CONSOLIDATED. SAN OHP P SAN limited to construction, bidding, and/or construction staking without the express written consent of TIMMONS GROUP. OHP BUILDINGS SAN OH SAN S INTERNAL PROPERTY LINES TO P OH OHP BE REMOVED. W W RWSA 16" W W '16" CVL' W W W W W W EP RWSA 16"W W W W EXISTING OHP TO REMAIN (TYP.) HP EP CVL O MHS TOP=535.76 EXISTING OHP TO REMAIN (TYP.) INV IN=531.81 8" CLAY (NW) INV OUT=531.66 8" CLAY (SE) OBSERVATORY AVENUE MHS TOP=513.69 40' & VAR. WIDTH R/W INV IN=508.39 8" PVC (SW) EXISTING POLES TO REMAIN. INV IN=508.49 8" CLAY (NW) SWL CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT INV OUT=508.34 8" PVC (NE) EP THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION. SWL LEGEND: X REMOVE TREES/SHRUBS REMOVE ASPHALT REMOVE CONCRETE 83 REMOVE HARDSCAPING D NA JOB NO. REMOVE BUILDING SCALE 1"=20' 48530 SHEET NO. SAWCUT 0 20' 40' C2.0 Attachment B MHS TOP=498.42 INV IN=479.67 8" PVC (SW) INV OUT=479.59 8" PVC (NE) TEL 434.295.5624 FAX 434.295.8317 www.timmons.com 608 Preston Avenue, Suite 200 | Charlottesville, VA 22903 S THIS DRAWING PREPARED AT THE CHARLOTTESVILLE OFFICE MHS 10" PROPOSED WATERLINE TOP=512.05 CONNECTION INV IN=509.25 8" CLAY (SW) INV IN=507.50 8" PVC (NW) P OH APPROX. LOCATION OF 8" DI WATERLINE INV OUT=507.45 8" PVC (SE) REVISION DESCRIPTION SWL SAN 20' SIDE SETBACK (CORNER) SWL 12" DI OHP DWS OHP OHP OHP EP OHP MHS W WP OH OHP OHP OHP OHP P W W W OHP OH TOP=528.49 OHP W INV IN=525.19 6" PVC (SW) W EP OHP WASHINGTON AVENUE W OHP W IINV OUT=523.86 8" CLAY (NW) 35' R/W 8" DI OHP W DB. 93, PG. 60 (EXCEPTION 9) OHP S SAN W OHP SAN SAN OHP SAN S MHS OHP G P OHW TOP=502.01 YOUR VISION ACHIEVED THROUGH OURS. 2" PE W OHP G ' G G G G INV IN=499.71 8" PVC (SW) OHP 67.24 INV IN=498.71 8" PVC (NW) "E S36°15'36"E 256.13' 31'28 INV OUT=496.66 10" CLAY (NE) S51° W SAN SAN E 8" SAN S S43°26'28" 8" PVC 63.40' OHP 4' JEFFERSON PARK AVENUE INV=528.60 SAN STONE WALL 24' D DATE 104.10' RETAINING WALL (TYP.) W OHP DATE S52°24'24"W 10/04/2021 EP APPROX. LOCATION OF 12" DI WATERLINE SAN DRAWN BY 26.35' FRONT SETBACK K. ROESER OHP DESIGNED BY W K. ROESER 25' PLANTING BUFFER CHECKED BY SAN S MHS B. CICHOCKI SWL SWL 177.69' TOP=507.84 OHP SCALE TMP 17-105 119-UNIT APARTMENT BUILDING. INV IN=503.36 8" PVC (SW) CITY PID: 170105000 DOG PARK 5-STORY APARTMENT OVER 2-STORY UNDERGROUND GARAGE. INV OUT=503.33 8" CLAY (NE) 1" = 20' 9' BENJAMIN T. & SENEM K. WARD SEE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR DETAILS. PROPOSED SANITARY INST. NO. 090002917 N51°22'45"E SEWER CONNECTION W #116 WASHINGTON AVE. SAN OHP 8" These plans and associated documents are the exclusive property of TIMMONS GROUP and may not be reproduced in whole or in part and shall not be used for any purpose whatsoever, inclusive, but not 92.10' 36' REAR SETBACK (SUP) SITE DATA: W OHP S52°41'07"W TAX MAP PARCEL AND OWNER INFO:PARCEL(S) 170104000, 170103000, 170103100 ASPEN HEIGHTS (2005 JPA) NORMAN LAMSON, TRUSTEE OF THE GADIENT LAND SAN TRUST AGREEMENT 25 WHITE PINE STREET SCOTTSVILLE, VA 24590 12' TOTAL SITE AREA: 1.71 ACRES (COMBINED PARCELS) 5' OHP PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS AREA: 1.24 ACRES LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE: 1.84 ACRES W SUP CONCEPT PLAN 6' CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA SOURCE OF SURVEY, BOUNDARY, AND TOPOGRAPHY: TIMMONS GROUP 13' 28 IMPERIAL DRIVE SAN STAUNTON, VA 24401 (540) 885-0920 S37°19'40"E 165.32' N37°18'15"W 110.04' N37°18'15"W 105.40' OHP GRAVEL OHP OHP VERTICAL DATUM REFERENCE: NAVD 88 S:\103\48530-JPA_Aspen_Heights\DWG\Sheet\SUP\48530-103-C3.0-CONCEPT.dwg | Plotted on 3/14/2022 4:11 PM | by Kim Roeser OHP OHP OHP OHP OHP OHP OHP OHP OHP OHP OHP OHP OHP OHP OHP OHP OHP CURRENT USE: RESIDENTIAL G G G G G G G 2" PE PROPOSED USE:MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL W SAN W SAN SAN G SAN SAN SAN HP S SAN SAN SAN MAXIMUM DENSITY ALLOWED WITH SPECIAL USE PERMIT: 87 DUA; 70 DUA PROPOSED OHP O SAN OHP P SAN limited to construction, bidding, and/or construction staking without the express written consent of TIMMONS GROUP. OHP SAN OH SAN S P OH ALL PARKING IS PROVIDED BELOW GRADE ACCESS FROM ENTRANCE ON WASHINGTON AVENUE. OHP W W RWSA 16" W W '16" CVL' W W W W W W EP RWSA 16"W W W W RECREATION AREA: PROPOSED STREETSCAPE AND ROOF TOP AMENITY SPACE HP EP CVL O MHS ZONED: R-3 TOP=535.76 INV IN=531.81 8" CLAY (NW) INV OUT=531.66 8" CLAY (SE) OBSERVATORY AVENUE 20' SIDE SETBACK (CORNER) MHS TOP=513.69 SETBACKS: PRIMARY STREET FRONTAGE (JPA): 26.35' SIDES: 20' 40' & VAR. WIDTH R/W INV IN=508.39 8" PVC (SW) REAR: 75'; REQUESTED REDUCTION TO 36' INV IN=508.49 8" CLAY (NW) SWL INV OUT=508.34 8" PVC (NE) ADJACENT AREAS: NORTH - WASHINGTON AVENUE EP EAST - JEFFERSON PARK AVENUE SOUTH - OBSERVATORY AVENUE SWL WEST - PARCEL 170105000 (116 WASHINGTON AVE) MAXIMUM HEIGHT ALLOWED WITH SPECIAL USE PERMIT: 101'; 75' PROPOSED (AVERAGE GRADE) LEGEND: UTILITIES: CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE PUBLIC WATER, SEWER CONCRETE SIDEWALK NOTES: 1. FOR ALL PROPOSED RETAINING WALLS AND BUILDING FOUNDATIONS, NO TIEBACKS, GEOGRID, OR OTHER STRUCTURAL COMPONENT CAN HEAVY DUTY CONCRETE EXTEND INTO CITY ROW (INCLUDING TEMPORARY SHEETING AND SHORING) WITHOUT EXPRESS WRITTEN APPROVAL OF CITY COUNCIL. 2. A BACKFLOW PREVENTER MUST BE PROVIDED FOR THE PROPOSED HEAVY DUTY ASPHALT 83 DOMESTIC CONNECTION, IN ADDITION TO THE FIRE SERVICE LINE. D NA 3. ALL WATER LINE SHUT DOWNS MUST BE COORDINATED WITH AND PERFORMED BY THE CITY. THE DEVELOPER MUST HAND OUT NOTICES HARDSCAPE (SEE LANDSCAPE PLAN) TO AFFECTED CUSTOMERS AT LEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE. JOB NO. 4. ALL PERIMETER SIDEWALK ALONG OBSERVATORY AVENUE, SCALE 1"=20' JEFFERSON PARK AVENUE, AND WASHINGTON AVENUE WILL BE 48530 MILL AND OVERLAY PLACED WITHIN AN ACCESS EASEMENT AND MAINTAINED BY THE SHEET NO. 0 20' 40' PROPERTY OWNER. C3.0 Attachment B WATER QUALITY ANALYSIS (PRELIMINARY): WATER QUANTITY ANALYSIS (PRELIMINARY): STORMWATER MANAGEMENT NARRATIVE SITE DATA DRAINAGE AREA ANALYSIS THE SITE TOPOGRAPHY AND BELOW GRADE PARKING GARAGE PODIUM WILL BE USED TO PRE DEVELOPED AREA PRE DEVELOPED POST DEVELOPED PROMOTE DISCONNECTION OF IMPERVIOUS AREA DIRECTED TO RUNOFF REDUCTION MANAGED TURF = 0.82 AC AREA = 1.84 AC STORMWATER PRACTICES. THE INTENT IS TO DRAIN ALL OF THE ROOF AREAS TO URBAN AREA = 1.84 AC MHS IMPERVIOUS = 0.75 AC CN = 79 CN= 91 BIORETENTION PRACTICES STRATEGICALLY DISTRIBUTED AROUND THE PERIMETER OF THE TOP=498.42 TC = 6 MIN TC = 6 MIN BUILDING. THE UNDERGROUND PARKING GARAGE PODIUM ALLOWS GREAT FLEXIBILITY IN INV IN=479.67 8" PVC (SW) PRE DEVELOPMENT LOAD (TP) (LB/YR) = 2.04 LB/YR DISTRIBUTING THE ROOF DRAINAGE AS NEEDED BECAUSE THE ROOF DRAINS CAN BE TAKEN INV OUT=479.59 8" PVC (NE) Q (CFS) V (AC-FT) Q (CFS) V (AC-FT) DOWN INTO THE GARAGE PER USUAL AND THEN ROUTED AS NEEDED FOR TREATMENT. THE POST DEVELOPED AREA 1 YEAR 3.93 0.190 1 YEAR 1.78 0.292 URBAN BIORETENTION PRACTICES ALONG THE OBSERVATORY AVE ARE PLANNED TO PROVIDE MANAGED TURF= 0.33 AC 10 YEAR 10.34 10 YEAR 8.07 THE MAJORITY OF THE TREATMENT WITH OVERFLOWS CONNECTING TO THE DETENTION PIPE IMPERVIOUS = 1.24 AC POST Q ABOVE ARE THE DETAINED RATES DIRECTLY BELOW (WHICH UNDERDRAINS WILL TIE TO ALSO). THE WATER QUALITY TEL 434.295.5624 FAX 434.295.8317 www.timmons.com 608 Preston Avenue, Suite 200 | Charlottesville, VA 22903 CHANNEL PROTECTION (ENERGY BALANCE): REQUIREMENTS AS SHOWN ON THIS SHEET ARE EXPECTED TO BE ACHIEVED ON SITE. WATER TOTAL POST DEVELOPMENT LOAD (TP) (LB/YR) = 3.36 LB/YR QUANTITY IS MET THROUGH THE RUNOFF REDUCTION PRACTICES AND SUPPLEMENTED BY THE QDEVELOPED ≤ 0.90*(QPRE-DEVELOPED*RVPRE-DEVELOPED)/RVDEVELOPED UNDERGROUND STORAGE PIPE. ALL RUNOFF FROM THE SITE LEAVES IN THE FORM OF SHEET TOTAL LOAD REDUCTION REQUIRED (LB/YR) = 1.48 LB/YR FLOW TO CURB LINES AND ULTIMATELY DRAINS TO THE NORTH EAST DOWN JEFFERSON PARK OK 1.78 CFS ≤ 0.80*(3.93 CFS*0.190AC-FT)/(0.292AC-FT)= 2.05 CFS AVENUE. OUR INTENT IS TO MEET THE ENERGY BALANCE AND FLOOD PROTECTION ONSITE LOAD REDUCTION PROPOSED: ALLOWABLE RELEASE RATES FOR THE SITE. FURTHER, OUR INTENT IS TO DISPERSE THE URBAN BIORETENTION PHOSPHORUS REMOVAL (LB/YR) = 1.31 LB/YR RELEASE POINTS OF FLOW FROM THE SITE INTO THE SITE PERIMETER CURB LINES IN SUCH S THIS DRAWING PREPARED AT THE FLOOD PROTECTION: DOWNSTREAM HYDRODYNAMIC PHOSPHORUS REMOVAL (LB/YR) = 0.21 LB/YR WAY AS TO MIMIC THE EXISTING HYDROLOGY OF THE SITE TO THE EXTENT PRACTICAL. CHARLOTTESVILLE OFFICE TOTAL PHOSPHORUS REMOVED ON SITE = 1.52 LB/YR POST-DEVELOPED Q10 ≤ PRE-DEVELOPED Q10 MHS 10" THIS CONCEPTUAL EVALUATION DEMONSTRATES HOW AT SITE PLAN THE VIRGINIAOK 8.07 CFS (POST-DEVELOPED Q ) ≤ 10.34 CFS (PRE-DEVELOPED Q ) TOP=512.05 10 10 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS FOR WATER QUALITY WILL BE MET. INV IN=509.25 8" CLAY (SW) INV IN=507.50 8" PVC (NW) P OH APPROX. LOCATION OF 8" DI WATERLINE INV OUT=507.45 8" PVC (SE) REVISION DESCRIPTION SWL 500 SAN SWL 12" DI OHP DWS OHP OHP OHP EP OHP MHS W WP OH OHP OHP OHP OHP P W W OHP 512 W OH TOP=528.49 OHP 508 W WASHINGTON AVENUE 515 INV IN=525.19 6" PVC (SW) OHP W W EP 518 505 OHP W IINV OUT=523.86 8" CLAY (NW) 35' R/W 8" DI 520 APPROX. AREA OF DEPRESSED URBAN 523 OHP 50 W 503 OHP BIORETENTION PLANTER (TYP.) DB. 93, PG. 60 (EXCEPTION 9) 1 S SAN W OHP SAN SAN 510 527 OHP CURB DRAIN (TYP.) SAN S MHS OHP 507 G P OHW TOP=502.01 YOUR VISION ACHIEVED THROUGH OURS. 525 2" PE W OHP G 8 ' G G G G INV IN=499.71 8" PVC (SW) OHP 52 67.24 521 515 520 512 S36°15'36"E INV IN=498.71 8" PVC (NW) "E 510 510 507 256.13' 50 5 31'28 508 506 50055 INV OUT=496.66 10" CLAY (NE) S51° 9 W SAN 514 503 SAN E 516 SAN S S43°26'28" 516 8" 530 51 50 8" PVC 63.40' 52 8 9 525 5 515 OHP JEFFERSON PARK AVENUE INV=528.60 505 SAN 528 STONE WALL 534 517 D FFE=510.00' FFE=510.00' 529 528 6' VORTECH STRUCTURE 527 519 FFE=510.00' 505 DATE 53 104.10' 1 0 5353 TRENCH DRAINS TO URBAN 53 0 51 4 BIORETENTION PLANTER 520 505 53 W 532 5 FFE=525.00' 6" TRENCH DRAIN 5 524 OHP 506 DATE 533 525 FFE=510.00' 51 53 S52°24'24"W 7 10/04/2021 0 EP 531 4 APPROX. LOCATION OF 12" DI WATERLINE 53 SAN 526 DRAWN BY 530 528 529 507 K. ROESER 53 OHP 8 DESIGNED BY 533 532 507 W 527 53 K. ROESER 0 535 52 508 APPROX. AREA OF DEPRESSED URBAN CHECKED BY 5 BIORETENTION PLANTER (TYP.) SAN S MHS B. CICHOCKI SWL SWL 177.69' TOP=507.84 517 OHP 535 SCALE INV IN=503.36 8" PVC (SW) 530 TMP 17-105 535 529 CITY PID: 170105000 509 INV OUT=503.33 8" CLAY (NE) 1" = 20' 519 53 513 BENJAMIN T. & SENEM K. WARD 3 52 INST. NO. 090002917 0 N51°22'45"E 509 9 W #116 WASHINGTON AVE. 53 51 53 5 5 53 2 SAN 536 510 OHP 8" 538 510 540 514 These plans and associated documents are the exclusive property of TIMMONS GROUP and may not be reproduced in whole or in part and shall not be used for any purpose whatsoever, inclusive, but not 92.10' 534 517 52 1 535 511 537 530 W 9 53 OHP S52°41'07"W 528 540 ASPEN HEIGHTS (2005 JPA) 511 SAN 53 7 2 53 51 7 514 SUP CONCEPT SWM & GRADING 538 ROOF DRAINS 512 CONTRIBUTING TO URBAN OHP 250 LF OF 72" CMP. SIZE OF DETENTION BIORETENTION (TYP.) 535 527 FFE=525.00' FFE=525.00' FFE=523.00' SYSTEM SUBJECT TO CHANGE BASED ON W 51 9 BUILDING/ROOF DRAIN UPDATES. 2 53 CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA 537 515 52 2 SAN 513 536 530 526 527 531 529 528 530 525 S37°19'40"E 165.32' N37°18'15"W 110.04' 533 N37°18'15"W 105.40' 535 524 4 537 536 2 8 OHP 9 S:\103\48530-JPA_Aspen_Heights\DWG\Sheet\SUP\48530-103-C4.0-GRAD-SWM.dwg | Plotted on 3/14/2022 4:11 PM | by Kim Roeser 53 OHP 523 53 53 53 GRAVEL OHP 521 515 516 517 519 518 520 522 OHP OHP OHP OHP OHP OHP OHP OHP OHP OHP OHP OHP OHP OHP OHP OHP OHP G G G G G 2" PE 53 G G W W 515 520 530 SAN 525 5 518 SAN SAN G SAN SAN SAN HP S SAN SAN APPROX. AREA OF URBAN SAN CURB DRAIN (TYP.) OHP O SAN OHP P SAN limited to construction, bidding, and/or construction staking without the express written consent of TIMMONS GROUP. OHP SAN 540 OH SAN S BIORETENTION CELLS TO TREAT 38 P CURB DRAIN (TYP.) OH 5 OHP ROOF DRAINAGE (TYP.) 2 W W 53 7 RWSA 16" W W '16" CVL' 52 W W W W W W EP RWSA 16"W W W W HP EP CVL O MHS TOP=535.76 INV IN=531.81 8" CLAY (NW) INV OUT=531.66 8" CLAY (SE) OBSERVATORY AVENUE MHS TOP=513.69 40' & VAR. WIDTH R/W INV IN=508.39 8" PVC (SW) INV IN=508.49 8" CLAY (NW) SWL INV OUT=508.34 8" PVC (NE) EP SWL 83 D 36" NA LEGEND: SCALE 1"=20' URBAN BIORETENTION 0 20' 40' PLANTER AREA JOB NO. ROOF AREA TO URBAN BIORETENTION PLANTER 48530 SHEET NO. C4.0 Attachment C Affordable Dwelling Unit Ordinance Worksheet Step 1: Total Floor Area Ratio (FAR) of Site A. Total size of development site: 1.71 acres B. Total square footage of site: 1.71 x 43,560.00 = 74,531.16 square feet (sf) (# of acres) C. 1.0 Floor Area Ratio (FAR): 74,531.16 (total sf of site) D. Gross Floor Area (GFA) of ALL buildings/uses: 183,648.00 sf E. Total site FAR: 183,648.00 ÷ 74,531.16 = 2.46 (total GFA of site) (1.0 FAR) F. Is E greater than or equal to 1.0 FAR? NO: Your proposed development does not trigger the ADU ordinance. YES: Proceed to Step 2 or Step 3. Step 2: Number of ADUs Required G. GFA in excess of 1.0 FAR: 183,648.00 - 74,531.16 = 109,116.84 (D: total site GFA) (B: total SF of site) H. Total GFA of ADUs required: 109,116.84 x 0.05 = 5,455.84 (G: GFA in excess of 1.0 FAR) I. Equivalent density based on Units Per Acre: i. Dwelling Units per Acre (DUA) approved by SUP: 70.00 ii. SF needed for ADUs: 5,455.84 ÷ 43,560.00 = 0.1252489 acres (H: Total GFA of ADUs) iii. Total number of ADUs required: 0.1252489 x 70.00 = 8.77 (ii: ADU acreage) (i: DUA approved) Step 3: Cash-in-Lieu Payment J. Cash-in-Lieu Amount Residential: 183,648.00 x $2.370 = $435,245.76 K. Cash-in-Lieu Amount Mixed-Use: Total GFA of development site: 183,648.00 GFA Occupied Commercial Space: 0.00 GFA Occupied Residential Space: 183,648.00 Total GFA Occupied Space: 183,648.00 % Residential: 1.00 Propotionate amount of non-occupied GFA Non-Occupied Space*: 0.00 space GFA for residential use: 0.00 Amount of Payment: 183,648.00 x $2.370 = $435,245.76 *GFA of non-occupied space shall include: (i) basements, elevator shafts and stairwells at each story, (ii) spaces used or occupied for mechanical equipment and having a structural head room of six (6) feet six (6) inches or more, (iii) penthouses, (iv) attic space, whether or not a floor has been laid, having a structural head room of six (6) feet six (6) inches or more, (v) interior balconies, and (vi) mezzanines. GFA shall not include outside balconies that do not exceed a projection of six (6) feet beyond the exterior walls of the building; parking structures below or above grade; or and roof top mechanical structures. Attachment C Step 4: Minimum Term of Affordability L. Residential Project i. Households earning up to 80% AMI: Unit Type Eff. 1BR 2BR 3BR 4BR 5BR 6BR Number of Units Market Rent HUD Fair Market Rents $752.00 $1,027.00 $1,179.00 $1,478.00 $1,772.00 $2,037.00 $2,303.00 HUD Utility Allowance Difference per Month $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Annual Cost of ADU $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Total Annual Cost of ADUs: 0.00 (Sum of Annual Cost of ADU) Minimum Term of Affordability*: #DIV/0! (Cash-in-lieu payment / Total annual cost of ADUs) *If answer is less than 5, then minimum term of affordability will be 5 years. M. Mixed-Use Project i. Households earning up to 80% AMI: Unit Type Eff. 1BR 2BR 3BR 4BR 5BR 6BR Number of Units Market Rent HUD Fair Market Rents $752.00 $1,027.00 $1,179.00 $1,478.00 $1,772.00 $2,037.00 $2,303.00 HUD Utility Allowance Difference per Month $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Annual Cost of ADU $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Total Annual Cost of ADUs: 0.00 (Sum of Annual Cost of ADU) Minimum Term of Affordability: #DIV/0! (Cash-in-lieu payment / Total annual cost of ADUs) *If answer is less than 5, then minimum term of affordability will be 5 years. Attachment D From: Karimi, Hamid Jim (hk6ty) hk6ty@virginia.edu Subject: Aspen Heights Building Plan Date: November 30, 2021 at 1:31 PM To: eh@mitchellmatthews.com Cc: alfelem@charlottesville.gov Dear Erin Hannegan, Thank you for your recent le6er regarding your upcoming request for a Special Use Permit for 104 Observatory Avenue. I am the resident and owner of 113 Observatory Avenue. Reading your project proposal, I am primarily concerned about on-street parking. Occasionally, cars parked on the road block my way out of my driveway. On-street parking has also presented a problem for the trash-pickup services, as their trucks are someMmes unable to navigate through Observatory Avenue. You are proposing a 10% reducMon in required parking spaces for your planned units. I would like to know what you anMcipate as an effect of this on on-street parking. With so many new units being proposed, what recommendaMons do you have, if any, to regulate parking? I very much appreciate any informaMon and recommendaMons you may have to help alleviate this problem. Thank you for your Mme and consideraMon. Regards, Hamid Karimi Attachment D From: Bill Schaaf billschaafsr@gmail.com Subject: 2005 JPA Project Date: December 15, 2021 at 2:35 PM To: eh@mitchellmatthews.com Good Afternoon Erin, The attached letter expressed my concerns with the proposed development. Please review and comment if you like . I was unable to view the virtual presentation. Thank you, Bill Schaaf 814-882-769 Washington AVe 2005 p…ect.odt Attachment D December 15, 2021 Mitchell / Matthews Architects Erin Ferguson, Project manager PO Box 5603 Chancellorsville, VA 22905 Good Morning Erin, Thank you for the information on the 2005 JPA proposed development. I was unable to attend the virtual meeting. I own the property at 113 Washington Ave. If I understand the plans correctly the proposed ingress and egress for the parking garage would be very close to the front door of my property I am most concerned that the proposed plan and related appeal would put an unreasonable amount of traffic on Washington Avenue. This street has a downward slope to the south from your parking entrance towards JPA and a rising slope approaching the garage entrance from the stadium. The result, in my opinion, would be creating a potential hazard for vehicles entering and exiting your garage. They would not see approaching vehicles on Washington Ave when turning into or leaving the garage. If everybody followed the speed limit it would be less of a problem, but they do not. This residential street was not designed to handle high density development. Ingress and egress would be more properly facing JPA. It solves the safety of visibility and the wider street would permit the higher density traffic. The second concern is the request for a decrease in the total parking by 10 % The reality is that it should be increased. My 4 bedroom dwelling has 5 occupants and 5 cars. There is not adequate parking for them on the street and includes using the existing driveway. The typical college student comes to the University with a vehicle. The plan as presented does not address where the others will park. The plan does not recite the number of parking spaces that will be in the garage. The minimum requirement should be one parking space per bedroom. I don't want to be a property owner that says “NIMBY” – Not in My Back Yard. However, the request for variances serve the best interest of the developers and not the interest of the neighborhood. Perhaps you are asking for the moon and will settle for something reasonable and acceptable to both. I ask you to look very closely at the impact of traffic and parking as you finalize your design. Sincerely William E. Schaaf 5017 Westbury Farms Drive Attachment D Erie, PA 16506 814-882-7696 cc: Mat Alfele Attachment D From: Kenneth Hill micasabe@gmail.com Subject: Fwd: 2005 JPA Project Date: January 6, 2022 at 5:02 PM To: eh@mitchellmatthews.com Hi Erin: I received notice from Mr. Shaaf about the 2005 JPA project, the next-door owner. My property is at 111 Washington Ave. According to the project plan video, the vehicle exit and entryway are right across from my property, as well as the trash pickup area. I have serious concerns re 390 tenants and 125 and only parking spaces. I have 8 tenants in my duplex and each has their own car. Five of them park on the street. It is hard enough to find a parking space on Washington Avenue now and little enforcement, so I can really see this by the numbers for what it is. I would like to know when the public was first made aware of this project. I was not informed of such and believe a number of my non- resident neighbor owners were not as well. I would like to know who to contact (emails preferably) in the transportation department and the planning commission to find out more information and to provide feedback accordingly. Please put my email on a list of any information on the 2005 JPA project moving forward. V/R Kenneth Hill 111 Washington Ave owner 703-280-1742 ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: Bill Schaaf Date: Sat, Dec 18, 2021 at 10:58 AM Subject: Fwd: 2005 JPA Project To: ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: Bill Schaaf Date: Wed, Dec 15, 2021 at 3:48 PM Subject: Re: 2005 JPA Project To: Erin Hannegan Thank you. I reviewed the video. The parking and traffic seem to be identified by multiple viewers as being of concern. I would like the name and address of the planning commission that asked for a reduction in parking spaces so I can have dialogue with them. It is somewhat naive that students that can pay the rental prices of you building will not have cars available to them. One participant brought up the challenge of visitors and their parking. Really concerned about those two issues. Bill Schaaf 814-882-7696 On Wed, Dec 15, 2021 at 2:55 PM Erin Hannegan wrote: Bill, Thanks for you interest in our project and for your letter. Did you happen to leave me a voicemail just a little while ago? Your partial number below appears to match the voicemail, albeit, no name was left in the VM. If so, follow the below link to access the archived video of Tuesday, Dec. 7th's Neighborhood meeting for our proposed project titled "2005 JPA”. This will remain accessible throughout the review process. Please feel free to forward this email to neighbors who could not attend. https://transcripts.gotomeeting.com/#/s/9e98af90f4404d2dd2a2a7d7cca2cfaff77ec76ae4c36d12fdfbebefe6788c32 Additionally, as one slide (#14) had an incorrect title, (explained during the meeting), here is a link to a pdf of the slides, with that title corrected: https://mitchellmatthewsarchitects.sharefile.com/d-se9d73fea857143d28596cd8eed6847d3 A pdf of the original slides (used for the meeting) is also available for download from the video archive link (the first link) above. Attachment D I will forward your letter on to our civil & traffic engineer. Please continue to reach out with additional questions or comments. Thank you for your time. Sincerely, Erin Erin Hannegan, LEED AP Project Manager Mitchell/Matthews Architects & Planners a | P.O. Box 5603, Charlottesville, VA 22905 e | eh@mitchellmatthews.com p | 434.979.7550 x 208 c | 215.266.6943 f | 434.979.5220 On Dec 15, 2021, at 2:35 PM, Bill Schaaf wrote: Good Afternoon Erin, The attached letter expressed my concerns with the proposed development. Please review and comment if you like . I was unable to view the virtual presentation. Thank you, Bill Schaaf 814-882-769 Attachment D Attachment D Attachment D Alfele, Matthew From: Anne Benham Sent: Thursday, February 10, 2022 5:39 PM To: Alfele, Matthew; Anne Benham Subject: ASPEN TOPCO II Special Use Permit (SUP) application / JPA and Observatory Ave Attachments: TRAFFIC_Parking_Observatory (2)_jpg; TREES_3STORYBLDGS_104_OBSERVATORY_jpg; TREES_JPA_SUP_jpg Follow Up Flag: FollowUp Flag Status: Flagged ** WARNING: This email has originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.** Dear Mr. Alfele Re: ASPEN TOPCO II Special Use Permit (SUP) application / JPA and Observatory Ave It's important to me that the City Department members who will review the above referenced SUP will read and acknowledge receipt of my comments on this application. Please confirm that you have received and read my message in an email to me. I thank you in advance for this. As a long‐time resident homeowner of Observatory Avenue, I’m writing to urge that you reject the Special Use Permit application by Aspen Topco II to build a large student complex on 2005‐2007JPA /104 Observatory, for reasons of safety, building scale, density, and the required parking reduction inappropriate for our street. I also have concerns about the destruction of green space and about the reputation of the developer. Parking, Traffic, Safety Issues Observatory Avenue is a narrow dead end street, with only one lane of traffic available when there are vehicles parked on the street, which is most of the time. It’s very difficult to back out of a driveway when there are cars parked on the street, especially in the snow. Last week I saw my neighbor struggle to avoid hitting a car parked across from her driveway as she backed out. Large vehicles such as garbage or UPS trucks block traffic when they’re on the street. They must back down the street to exit, because there is no space for them to turn around at the end of the street. A fire truck or ambulance would be unable to drive down Observatory if there were other large vehicles on the street or many parked cars. The proposed new complex calls for 390 students, with underground parking provided for only 125. This leaves scores of students without spaces, many of whom (and their visitors) will want to park on our street. Observatory Avenue can’t possibly handle much more parking. SEE ATTACHED PHOTO, taken from my driveway last week, of traffic and parking conditions on Observatory. Scale, Height, Density, Duration of Construction The five to seven story building of the proposed project is much larger than and way out of proportion with the existing structures on Observatory, none of which is currently higher than three stories. PLEASE SEE 1 Attachment D ATTACHED PHOTO OF 3‐STORY BUILDINGS CURRENTLY ON PROPOSED BUILDING SITE on Observatory. The proposed five to seven story building, at certain times of the day, will cast big shadows on adjacent properties, eliminating or reducing sunlight necessary for established plantings or growing flowers and vegetables in the summer on these properties, mine included. The proposed density of 390 occupants will bring more artificial light at night, more noise and more parked cars to the street, not to mention the destruction of a significant green space (see next item below). The construction is estimated to take two years – a very long time for Observatory and Washington residents to have to bear the (unhealthy) dust, loud noise, additional parking by employees working on the building, and treeless, bleak, unsightly views of the construction process. The process and completion of the proposed complex will dramatically alter the character of Observatory and reduce quality of life for its residents, in terms of traffic, safety, health, the environment and aesthetics. Destruction of Tree Canopy and Increased Heat Island Effect Currently, there are over two dozen trees on the SUP property. They form part of Charlottesville’s urban forest, which continues to decline. These trees provide carbon sequestration, shade, cooling, air purification, and stormwater management. They mitigate the urban heat island effect in our neighborhood. If the SUP goes forward, 27 mature trees will be cut down. In their place small, young trees will be planted. However, it takes decades for young trees to provide the same cover as mature trees, as City Planning Commissioner Stolzenberg says in a Charlottesville Tomorrow 2020 article. According to a Charlottesville Tomorrow 8/30/21 article on heat islands, the JPA neighborhood is already one of the hottest parts of the city. This is corroborated by a January 2021 article, in which Tree Commission Chair Brian Menard is quoted: Simply put, less shade equals higher levels of heat, negative health outcomes, and higher energy costs …Neighborhoods with tree canopy below 40 percent are effectively unhealthy neighborhoods. In the January 2021 article graphic the tree canopy percentage listed for the JPA area is 36.6%. Removal of over two dozen shade‐providing trees and the increase of impermeable surfaces, which will occur if this SUP is approved and the complex is built, can only increase the heat island effect in our neighborhood PLEASE SEE ATTACHED PHOTOS for examples of the trees that would be removed if the proposed project is approved. Concerns about Aspen Heights History I’m concerned about a company with major problems in its track record coming to build a complex in my neighborhood. Some reports on problems with their projects: 2020 Baltimore Sun article on Towson students who filed lawsuit against Aspen Heights 2020 Texas law firm reports on a multimillion dollar lawsuit won against a company controlled by the Aspen Heights group of companies. 2014 Columbia Missourian article on high student housing utility bills and connection to Aspen Heights construction of student housing building. 2013 KOMU article reports on unpaid workers controversy concerning Columbia Mo. student housing built by Aspen Heights 2 Attachment D Please Note: Aspen Topco II, LLC is registered to Aspen Heights Partners CEO Greg Henry. Sincerely, Anne Benham 116 Observatory Ave apbe4n@gmail.com 3 Attachment D Attachment D Attachment D Attachment D Alfele, Matthew From: Bill Schaaf Sent: Tuesday, February 15, 2022 12:21 PM To: Alfele, Matthew Cc: Kenneth Hill Subject: JPA 2005 project Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged ** WARNING: This email has originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.** Good afternoon Matt. Let me begin by stating that Iam not in opposition to this development as I have been a real estate investor for years. I own a property at 113 Washington Avenue that will be impacted by the proposed construction. I am confidentthat the project will move forward and neighbors' reasonable concerns will be responded to. My big concern is that the parking is very inadequate. I base this on the fact that at my property I have 6 tenants and six cars attributed to them. My neighbor to the south has a similar situation . For the developers and planners to ignore this statistic is not a good answer to a significant concern . Of course, related to the vehicles is the single exit and ingress off Washington. WAshington AVe is not designed to handle this traffic flow and the related impact on JPA. The garbage collection site is nearly opposite my property. I believe this will be an ongoing problem with smell, trash flying etc if it is not completely enclosed . Is there any chance that I could appear virtually? I don't live in Charlottesville. You can reach me at 814‐882‐7696 to discuss these concerns. Bill Schaaf 1 Attachment D Alfele, Matthew From: Erin Hannegan Sent: Friday, December 3, 2021 12:36 PM To: Karimi, Hamid Jim (hk6ty) Cc: Alfele, Matthew; Matthews, John Subject: Re: Aspen Heights Building Plan Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged ** WARNING: This email has originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.** Dear Hamid, Thank you for your inquiry into our proposed project and your recent follow up phone call. As a team, we are aware that Observatory Avenue has owner occupied residences, (as opposed to Washington Avenue) and is a narrower street. I am sorry to hear that you are currently experiencing some parking problems on your street. After further review of the existing conditions, we understand that Observatory Avenue is a permit parking only street already. It appears that the existing street width is typically not wide enough to support on‐street parking, which explains your concerns about navigation for trash trucks, etc. It is our opinion that parking is a problem virtually everywhere in close proximity to the University and the Hospital, and is not specific to newer residential projects. New purpose‐built student residences generally do a better job at providing adequate parking and other amenities for their residents when compared to the condition created by conversion of older homes to student residences. As I expect you realize, this project cannot stop illegal or nuisance parking issues, but we expect it will house all its parking needs on site, below grade and out of view, with no vehicular access to/from Observatory Avenue. This should be a major improvement over the current condition. In addition, trash services for our proposed project are also located off of Washington Avenue. The request for a 10% reduction in parking is based on a few factors: 1) Planning Commission suggested we build less parking during our recent informal discussion, 2) calculation of existing on‐street parking at the perimeter of the site, suggests there are at least 16 spaces ‐ 8 available spaces on JPA, 4 spaces on Washington Avenue, and 4 spaces on Observatory Avenue. (Refer to attached image). Observatory Avenue does not appear wide enough to accommodate on‐street parking for much of its length, however the city has not restricted the on street parking. The proposed design will eliminate many of the existing access points / driveways, and therefore potentially increase the available spaces on‐ street, if the city does not enforce its street width requirements. 3) the University has parking available to students at Scott Stadium, within easy walking distance of this project (and the neighborhood at large) as well as at other locations around Grounds accessible via the University Transit System and 4) finally, for your specific benefit as a resident of Observatory Ave, the main entrances to the building are on the corner of JPA and Washington ‐ thus parking on Observatory will be the least convenient location compared to other available on‐street parking on JPA and Washington Ave. After we (the neighborhood and our team) jointly understand the city’s current monitoring of the area, potential solutions could be improved 'permit parking only' signage and increased frequency of monitoring for non‐compliant parking, by city parking enforcement. I would appreciate knowing if you felt these suggestions would be helpful to you and your neighbors. 1 Attachment D As requested over the phone, here’s a link to our preliminary packet, used during our informal discussion with planning commission. I look forward to meeting you (virtually) on Tuesday. Get in touch if you have further questions. https://mitchellmatthewsarchitects.sharefile.com/d‐s722f7162427c441bad7fccd3d407ba83 Sincerely, Erin Erin Hannegan, LEED AP Project Manager Mitchell/Matthews Architects & Planners a | P.O. Box 5603, Charlottesville, VA 22905 e | eh@mitchellmatthews.com p | 434.979.7550 x 208 c | 215.266.6943 f | 434.979.5220 2 Attachment D 3 Attachment D On Nov 30, 2021, at 1:31 PM, Karimi, Hamid Jim (hk6ty) wrote: Dear Erin Hannegan, Thank you for your recent letter regarding your upcoming request for a Special Use Permit for 104 Observatory Avenue. I am the resident and owner of 113 Observatory Avenue. Reading your project proposal, I am primarily concerned about on‐street parking. Occasionally, cars parked on the road block my way out of my driveway. On‐street parking has also presented a problem for the trash‐pickup services, as their trucks are sometimes unable to navigate through Observatory Avenue. You are proposing a 10% reduction in required parking spaces for your planned units. I would like to know what you anticipate as an effect of this on on‐street parking. With so many new units being proposed, what recommendations do you have, if any, to regulate parking? I very much appreciate any information and recommendations you may have to help alleviate this problem. Thank you for your time and consideration. Regards, Hamid Karimi 4 Attachment D Dear Matt Alfere and City Regulators, I am writing because I am concerned about Aspen Heights Partners’ application for a more than threefold increase in by-right density and a reduction in required parking spaces for their proposed construction of new student housing on Observatory Avenue and the adjacent streets. I am the resident and owner of 113 Observatory Avenue. I have lived on this address for nearly 10 years. Occasionally, cars parked on the road block my way out of my driveway. There is a telephone post right at the corner of my driveway. Whenever a car is parked on the other side of the road across from my driveway, there is no way I can navigate my vehicle out and turn onto the road without hitting the car behind or the telephone post. On several occasions I have had to knock on my neighbor’s door in the early hours of the morning to ask them to move their cars, so I could get out. It is never a pleasant experience to wake a neighbor early in the morning. On-street parking has also presented a problem for the trash-pickup services, as their trucks are sometimes unable to pass through Observatory Avenue. Last year I took the issue up with the local traffic authorities and Neighborhood Development, but I never heard back. The suggestion, presented by Aspen Heights Partners and their architects, that many students do not own cars and commute on the buses is not at all what we are seeing in this neighborhood. Has their suggestion been independently verified? Our experience is that for every 3 or 4 students, there are 4 or 5 cars parked at and around their residencies. The extra cars belong to their visitors. The proposed 119 new units means many weekly student parties and overnight visitors, who will squeeze their cars into any space available on Observatory and Washington Avenue without worrying about the disruption this may cause for other residents. I bought this house because Observatory Avenue is a nice and quiet neighborhood, conveniently located within walking distance of where I currently work. Aspen Heights Partners and their architects claim that building a giant edifice in this neighborhood will be nothing more than simply following a trend already happening in this area: homeownership being turned into rentals. Contrary to their claim, the percentage of owner-occupancy has increased on our street over the last few years (111 and 125 Observatory Ave were both rentals, now owner-occupied. I believe 113 was also a rental at some point in the past). This is roughly a 15% increase in owner-occupancy on Observatory Avenue. The proposed construction will not simply follow a trend. It may dictate a new trend: it may force out the existing homeowners, in particular professionals working at UVA and those seeking a retirement in peace, in favor of investors who themselves live outside of this community. I hope that the city officials will protect the interests of the residents in this neighborhood. Attachment D I am not opposed to any project that improves student accommodation in our community. In my opinion, students add so much value to our city. I have a job because of them. I want our students to live well and have a good, vibrant time during their tenure at the university. I am only objecting to building a high-density-low-parking edifice that does not adequately address the concerns and the welfare of the existing residents. For this reason, I request that Aspen Heights Partners’ application for Special Use Permits for increased density and reduced parking be denied in its current form. More density will bring more vehicles. Any student housing built on this site should provide for more parking spaces. There needs to be more regulations as conditions for any such project. In my view, the parking provisions should sufficiently accommodate not only the need for parking spaces for the residents of the units, but also take into account their guests and overnight visitors. Thank you for your time and consideration. Regards, Hamid Karimi Attachment D Alfele, Matthew From: Jennifer King Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2022 9:45 AM To: Dowell, Taneia; Habbab, Karim; Lahendro, Jody; hosealmitchells@gmail.com; Palmer, William Charles; Russell, Liz; Solla-Yates, Lyle; Stolzenberg, Rory Cc: Alfele, Matthew Subject: SUP 2005-2007 JPA/104 Observatory Ave Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged ** WARNING: This email has originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.** To the Planning Commission: The Jefferson Park Avenue Neighborhood Association Board respectfully requests that the Planning Commission and City Council REJECT the application of Aspen Topco II for Special Use Permits to construct a residential building aimed at student renters at 2005‐2007 JPA/104 Observatory Ave. The developer requests a height of 75 feet, almost twice the height permitted by the current R‐3 zoning of this location, and a density of 119 units, more than three times the density of 36 units permitted by zoning. They also request a reduction of rear setback from 75 feet to 36 feet and a 22% reduction in required parking. This application, made soon after City Council approved the FLUM, anticipates a rezoning of the JPA neighborhood as “higher intensity residential” and a redesignation of Jefferson Park Avenue as an “urban mixed use corridor.” But this rezoning has not yet happened and it is not a given that it will happen precisely as the FLUM proposes. The 2021 Draft Comprehensive Plan projects rezoning to take 1‐3 years, using a deliberative, community‐collaborative, step‐by‐step rezoning process. Moreover, the rezoning proposed in the FLUM is highly controversial; it has already provoked a lawsuit. Aspen Topco II Acquisitions’ application not only jumps the gun on the City’s collaborative rezoning process, but even requests a radical increase in height (7 stories) compared to that envisaged by the FLUM for “higher intensity residential” (5 stories). According to the City Code guidelines for Special Use Permits (Section 34‐157, item 1) the Planning Commission must consider "whether the proposed use or development will be harmonious with existing patterns of use and development within the neighborhood". The SUP guidelines also specify that the Planning Commission must consider "whether the proposed use or development will have any potentially adverse impacts on the surrounding neighborhood, or the community in general", including traffic or parking congestion (item 4a), undue density of population or intensity of use (item 4e), and massing and scale of project (item 4j). This project has adverse effects in all these ways. 1. Parking and Safety. Observatory Ave. is a narrow, dead‐end street that already has more cars than it can tolerate. The developer proposes to provide only 125 parking spaces for a population of 390 students, on the grounds of proximity to U.Va. and to a bus stop. However, it is well known that students prefer to have cars for purposes other than going to school. Even if the developer increased the number of on‐site parking spaces, the addition of hundreds of cars of both residents and their guests would add to the already hazardous traffic conditions on both Observatory Ave. and Washington Ave. 2. Massing and scale. The developer proposes to place a 5‐7 story building directly across from one‐story houses on Observatory and two‐ story houses on Observatory and Washington, and in front of a one‐story house on Washington. It would be grossly out 1 Attachment D of scale in relation to the surrounding neighborhood, and its shadow would deprive nearby homes of sunlight. Note that on p. 6 of their application the developer misleadingly states that "newer projects range in scale from five to nine stories facing JPA," and they include a photo of the 9‐story building in the "neighborhood context photos" on p. 12. In fact that building, 1800 JPA, is located on the side of JPA that is in a higher density zone (University High Density) than the side where the proposed building would be located. 1800 JPA is also set considerably back from the street, unlike the proposed building. Furthermore, the developer also misleadingly claims that "the 2013 Comprehensive Plan modified the zoning in the JPA neighborhood … Rather than UHD, R‐3 and R‐2U spanning east to west between the railroad and Stadium Road, the entire area was designated as High‐Density residential" (p. 14). In fact, there has been no rezoning of the neighborhood, as shown by the developer's own zoning map on p. 11 of their application. 3. This project will not increase the City's inventory of badly‐needed affordable housing. On the contrary, it will replace current units on the site that are relatively affordable with luxury units targeting U.Va. students. As stated in their December 7 presentation to the neighborhood, the developer plans to charge rents at "market rate". 4. Environmental concerns. Considering that six buildings will be removed to make way for one large U‐shaped building with underground parking, there are several environmental concerns. The impervious surface will be greatly enlarged, so the ground water absorption will be greatly reduced with increased water into city drainage systems and the local creek for the surface water runoff. The removal of 27 trees will reduce the canopy cover that the city aims to enhance. The addition of 390 students will increase litter, noise, lights and fumes from car uses and personal gatherings. 5. Entrance corridor concerns. The City's Entrance Corridor Design Guidelines specify that "[n]ew building design should be compatible (in massing, scale, materials, colors) with those structures that contribute to the overall character and quality of the corridor" and that they "should complement the City’s character and respect those qualities that distinguish the City’s built environment." The proposed structure is hugely disproportionate in massing and scale with nearby buildings in the JPA corridor, and also starkly contrasts with them in materials and color. 6. Aspen Heights Partners, the Texas‐based developer behind this project, has a problematic history. For example, according to a 2020 article in the Baltimore Sun, a group of Towson University students sued Aspen Heights for charging them rent despite not having completed construction of the units they had leased. A 2014 article in the Columbia Missourian describes extraordinarily high electricity bills in another Aspen Heights student building, possibly due to under‐sized heating units. Other recent news stories mention multi‐million dollar lawsuits against subcontractors controlled by this company. In summary, this project will not benefit the City. Instead it will create hazardous parking and traffic conditions, will mar the environment, and will do serious harm to the quality of life of residents of the neighborhood. Please do not approve the Special Use Permits for this project. Sincerely, Nina Barnes, President Bobbie Williams, Vice President Bonnie Reilly, Treasurer Jennifer King, Secretary Ellen Contini‐Morava, At‐Large Member Nancy Haynes, At‐Large Member Jennifer King Interim Secretary, JPANA Board Phone: (434) 293‐9104, option 4 or ext. 103 2 Attachment D Fax: (434) 293‐9002 jenniferking@chaseinv.com ------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Electronic Privacy Notice. This e-mail, and any attachments, contains information that is, or may be, covered by electronic communications privacy laws, and is also confidential and proprietary in nature. If you are not the intended recipient, please be advised that you are legally prohibited from retaining, using, copying, distributing, or otherwise disclosing this information in any manner. Instead, please reply to the sender that you have received this communication in error,and then immediately delete it. Thank you in advance for your cooperation. Mutual fund investing involves risk. Principal loss is possible. Quasar Distributors, LLC, Distributor ===================================================================== 3 Attachment D Dear Planning Commissioners and City Councilors I am writing to express my concern about the proposed apartment building at 2005 Jefferson Park Avenue and 104 Observatory ,I reside at 125 Observatory Avenue. On the front end the project is asking for a special use permit, the developer want to exceed the by-right height for R-3 zoning by 30 feet, which is a seven stories on the JPA front going above and beyond , to triple the by-right density to accommodate close to 400 tenants . This towering structure will certainly impact the quality of life of residents negatively in parking alone the streets around here already maxed and the side entrances on the 5-7floor structure will only invite more side street parking. The road especially Observatory is narrow to begin with my neighbors and I already are constantly making many too adjustments in turning just to get out of the driveway! With the intended setbacks and reduce parking plans its a no brainer this is going to be ugly for us. I know there is some underground parking but there’s no doubt with this dense high population apartment complex will bring agony for us residents on already crowded streets. I respectfully ask you to deny Aspen Llc request for the special use permits. I bought my house four years ago and I completely renovated the entire house from the 1928 days of the past all brick and tile block and stucco, I love this home the structure and style and plan on living here for a long time. Its great to be within walking distance to so many places the church ,the school the restaurants , coffee shops etc . We like our calm and comfort here now and see that is going to change on the downside from this towering imposing structure. The word harmonious will transpire and will be sore ears, eyes and headaches for many many months, our living here will be rough then the other problems will begin ,The car Parking Mostly. I would also would venture to say the old waste lines on our street ,are terra cotta and there are 100 years old ,just believe they will rattle apart along with the shabby power lines when all this digging will start .(The city utility folks already know many of these waste lines are compromised already in these old neighborhoods.) as The rumbling will be going on for a good while I suppose. It is going to be noisy for sure. We my neighbors and I urge the planning commissioners and city councilors to please give us some thought and ask yourself how would I like this if it were me living next to this expansive construction site for months and months on end . Please think about how this will affect the residents, thank you . We ask for your help Sincerely John Ashworth Attachment D Attachment D Attachment D Date: January 20, 2022 Subject: Aspen Topco II Acquisitions and Mitchell/Matthews’s SUP application for 2005 Jefferson Park Avenue To: Matt Alfele and the City departments contributing to the analysis From: Lorna Martens, resident homeowner at 128 Observatory Avenue Attachment: Photo of Observatory Avenue plat of 1928 Dear Matt and Reviewing Departments: Aspen Topco II Acquisitions and Mitchell/Matthews have applied for four special use permits in order to construct an apartment building on the site they call 2005 Jefferson Park Avenue. This 1.71 acre site also includes a number of addresses on Observatory Avenue and Washington Avenue. Precisely the special use permits, if granted, would cause trouble if the developer were to build the proposed building. The developer is requesting close to double the by-right height (75’ at average grade plane instead of 45’) and more than three times the by-right density (119 units instead of 36 units). Nothing would mitigate the problems caused by this height and this density. 1. Height. The 1.7 acre lot is on an eminence. If you drive south from the university along Jefferson Park Avenue and pass Carrolton Terrace, the current buildings on the 2005 Jefferson Park Avenue site, i.e., the mansion and a side building, loom into view. They define the skyline. They are taller than anything else around. Imagine adding two stories to their height at the crest of the hill and four stories to their height where Observatory Avenue and Washington Avenue meet Jefferson Park Avenue. The result would be by far the tallest building in the neighborhood. It would not only block the light for houses on Observatory and Washington, but block afternoon light for houses on Harmon Street and Shamrock Road to the east and morning light for a stretch of residences to the west. On Observatory Avenue and Washington Avenue, the effect of the height on the light as well as the view would be disastrous. The building would dwarf every structure on both streets. The property, which is currently zoned R-3, is adjacent to R-2 zoning. The developer proposes to erect a 5-7 story edifice directly across from one-story houses on Observatory and two-story houses on Observatory and Washington and in front of a one-story house on Washington. The disproportion is grotesque. The 45’ by-right R-3 height is enough; 75’ from average grade plane is far too much. The 2021 draft Comprehensive Plan emphasizes context-sensitivity in new development: “forms and scales that are respectful of the surrounding Attachment D 2 neighborhood,” “adequate transitions such as step downs in scale and intensity to mitigate impacts on adjacent residential and historical areas,” and “viewsheds.” The entrance corridor guidelines likewise state: “When making transitions to lower density areas, modulate the mass of the building to relate to smaller buildings. Heights can be greater if the mass is modulated and other scale techniques are adopted. Reduce height near lower density uses (p. 52).” 2. Density. The main problem with increased density is cars. Seemingly every student who lives off grounds wants to have a car. There are no rules against this. For a student, it’s one of the perks of coming to UVA. You’ve noticed the difference in traffic in Charlottesville generally, and the difference in parking along JPA, during term and during vacations? When classes are in session and students are here, Charlottesville is overwhelmed by student traffic. The students don’t want cars in order to drive to classes; in the daytime, there is no place to park on Central Grounds. To get on-grounds parking you have to join a waiting list longer than any student’s stay at the university. Students want cars for the many other reasons it’s convenient to have a car: to get groceries, to drive to “places like Wal-Mart” (to quote what they’ve said in the past), to visit their friends, to drive to their local jobs, to drive home during vacations, to drive out of town. In any case, it’s not an exaggeration to plan for one car (thus, one parking space) per off-grounds student. 125 parking spots for 390 residents, which is what the developer requests, is a totally inadequate number. Yet even if the developer were to add additional spots, that would not solve the parking problem (see below on “Traffic” and “Safety”). Traffic on Observatory Avenue: Observatory Avenue is a 1-block long dead end on a steep upgrade from Jefferson Park Avenue that narrows halfway up. There is no turnaround. There is at most one sidewalk, and for stretches no sidewalk at all. On Washington Avenue, too, there is at most one sidewalk. City records show that in 1924 H. Gary Clarke acquired a tract of land whose description corresponds to the location of present- day Observatory Avenue and Washington Avenue (DB 46, pg 29). According to 1925 land records for Charlottesville’s “District #1,” lot sales on Observatory Avenue took place in that year, and the first houses were built. The “new street” Observatory Avenue, built by H.G. Clarke, is shown together with its numbered lots on a plat of September 1928 (DB 62, pg 362). Please refer to the attached photo of this plat. The size of the road shown on this plat of 1928 has not changed. It is a narrow, hilly little road. Nevertheless, it sees a remarkable amount of traffic for a one-block-long dead end. We homeowners on Observatory Ave. have long been plagued by people driving up our street by mistake and using our driveways to turn around. During the university terms, Observatory Ave. swells with student traffic— not just the cars owned by the student renters, but those brought by their many guests, who come for parties and other get-togethers particularly in the evenings. Attachment D 3 Observatory Avenue is also targeted by football game goers looking for parking. Observatory and Washington were not built for such traffic. Safety on Observatory Avenue: Observatory Avenue narrows upwards of the large parking lot behind 108 Observatory. Observatory Avenue is 27” wide at the level of 108 Observatory, but only 21.5” wide at the telephone pole in front of 113 Observatory. Currently, if cars park on both sides of the street on the narrow stretch and stay on the asphalt, i.e., do not drive up onto somebody’s grass, large vehicles like garbage trucks, fire trucks, and snow plows cannot squeeze through between two cars parked on opposite sides of the street. This has been an ongoing problem for decades and already constitutes a hazard. I’ve had to call garbage collection many times: why hasn’t my trash been picked up? The answer is, the driver couldn’t get up the road. Mail vehicles, delivery and other trucks, etc. routinely use the 108 Observatory parking lot (this is the parking lot that the proposed project wants to get rid of) to turn around so as to descend back onto JPA. In short, we have a problem with traffic and parking as it is. Observatory Avenue absolutely cannot support any more traffic of any kind. The 390 residents of 2005 JPA and their guests will exacerbate the traffic and parking problem, because they will park wherever they find space, regardless of the proposed underground parking spots. Additionally, the exit from Observatory Avenue onto JPA is almost blind and therefore dangerous. If cars park in the legal parking spaces on JPA to the left of Observatory Avenue, then it is difficult to impossible to see traffic coming from the left when exiting Observatory Avenue. The taller the vehicles parked on JPA, and the smaller the vehicle coming from Observatory, the less visibility the driver has. (If you send somebody to check this out, please do not send a 6’ 4” guy in a pickup truck! Such a person might actually be able to see over the parked cars. Instead, send somebody who can duplicate the residents’ experience, such as a 5’5” woman in a Honda Civic.) The existence of the proposed building fronting on Jefferson Park Avenue as shown in the architect’s diagrams would make the exit from Observatory Avenue more blind and more dangerous. Traffic on Jefferson Park Avenue and Emmett Street: During the university terms, traffic between Observatory Avenue and Grounds and Route 29 North (BUS), and between Observatory Avenue and UVA Hospital, is heavy and often backed up. Imagine adding several hundred cars (390 cars?) to that traffic. It is worth noting that the traffic analysis that Aspen commissioned is based on traffic observation on a Saturday, and hence not representative of the weekday traffic flow. Other: Aesthetic considerations: The buildings along the JPA entrance corridor, as well as on Observatory Avenue and Washington Avenue are largely made of brick, stucco, Attachment D 4 and wood. The proposed building does not use these materials. It does not fit in with its surroundings, but—in its context—creates an eyesore. It looks as if it were designed for Stonefield Plaza. Trees: “Keep Charlottesville green” is a priority in the new draft Comprehensive Plan. Currently, the property has many old trees and some newer flowering trees along Observatory Avenue. The 2005 Jefferson Park Avenue project proposes to get rid of all of them. Affordable Housing: No affordable housing is envisaged at 2005 Jefferson Park Avenue. Meanwhile, a component of the “affordable housing” concept is “aging in place” (2021 draft Comprehensive Plan, pp. 18, 33). Observatory Avenue has six residents, five of them resident homeowners, over the age of 65. We all hope to be able to “age in place.” For all these reasons, it is not advisable to grant the special use permits. Sincerely, Lorna Martens Attachment D Attachment D Aspen-Topco IIʼs Application for Special Use Permits I am a resident homeowner at 123 Observatory Ave., and I have objections to the proposed Special Use Permit requests of Aspen-Topco II for the 2005 Jefferson Park Avenue project. My first objection is to the permit to increase the allowable residential density and to the permit to reduce the parking requirement. Both of these SUPʼs would impact safety, related to parking congestion and traffic. (City Code Standard for Special Use Permits, Sec. 34-157: (4)a) Parking: Aspen-Topco II plans to house 390 students in 119 units, and provide 125 underground parking spots. This would leave 265 residents with no on-site parking. Observatory Ave is a narrow, one-block-long dead end. If cars are parked all along both sides of the street, Fire Trucks, Rescue Squad Vehicles, Garbage Trucks, Repair Trucks, and Delivery Trucks couldnʼt travel in the narrow space between the cars. As it is, delivery trucks need to back down the street after making their deliveries, until they find a place to partly back into a driveway to turn around. If cars are parked on the street too close to a driveway, itʼs very hard to enter or exit the driveway. If one driver is entering Observatory Ave. from JPA while another is driving on Observatory Ave. toward JPA, itʼs now possible for one driver to find a place to pull to one side so the other driver can continue in the single lane in the middle. If cars were parked all along both sides of the street, this would be impossible. Add snow/ice to all of this, and each of these problems would be worse. There are city and university bus stops nearby, and a few places to eat or buy basics like bread and milk. There are no complete grocery stores or general all- purpose stores close by. Students would need/want to go to places not on the bus lines and not in walking distance, or at times that donʼt match a bus schedule. Attachment D Would 265 residents be able or willing to park their cars in areas not adjacent to their building, or do without cars entirely? The proposed buildingʼs residents would also have guests who would need to park. Traffic: Visibility to the left when entering JPA from Observatory Ave. is minimal to non-existent due to cars parked all along JPA between Washington Ave. and Observatory Ave. Iʼve turned right onto JPA from Observatory Ave. to see a car, which I was unable to see from Observatory Ave., frighteningly close behind my car once on JPA. Traffic will increase on JPA due to cars from the proposed buildingʼs underground parking area turning from Washington Ave. onto JPA. Some of the increased traffic will turn right and pass Observatory Ave., increasing the possibility of an accident when exiting Observatory Ave. onto JPA. My second objection is to the permit to increase height. This SUP is related to massing and scale of the project. (City Code Standard for Special Use Permits, Sec. 34-157: (4)j) A building of such height and mass would cast a very large shadow over the smaller houses on Observatory Ave., and would affect the amount of sunlight available for grass, gardens, shrubs, and smaller trees. Some homeowners would live in almost continuous shadow. Attachment D Alfele, Matthew From: Marilyn Poling Sent: Tuesday, December 7, 2021 8:48 PM To: Alfele, Matthew Subject: Re: 2005 JPA ** WARNING: This email has originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.** I listened to the Dec. 7 meeting on my phone, and didn’t have a way to “sign in.” I do have some comments. A house across the street from me has been rented to students since before I moved here, over 30 years ago. There has always been one car per student, and most students have used their cars almost daily. I don’t think it’ll be any different for 2005 JPA. If 390 people live in the building, there will be 390 cars. The presence of bus stops is irrelevant. As several people said, students will go places other than the university, that are not on the university or city bus lines, and are not in convenient walking or biking distance. To think otherwise is to indulge a fantasy. If the city were to issue parking permits for Observatory or Washington, I can foresee being unable to enter my own driveway, and trying to find a place to park on another street, for which I would have neither a parking permit nor a driveway. I’m 67 years old, and would find this a hardship. I believe there are people in their 70s who live on this street, and one in her 80s, who would find the situation even more difficult. At one point, the presenter seemed to imply that because there were parking issues here 10 and 20 years ago, it’s fine that there will be more parking issues now. Expecting side streets that could barely deal with parking for 50 units/70 students to now deal with 119 units/390 students is unrealistic. What is possible in the comprehensive plan may have no correlation to what’s possible on the ground. > On Dec 6, 2021, at 8:53 AM, Alfele, Matthew wrote: > > Marilyn, > Thank you for the comments. I will make sure to include them in any report that goes to Planning Commission and City Council. > > ‐‐‐‐‐Original Message‐‐‐‐‐ > From: Marilyn Poling > Sent: Sunday, December 5, 2021 7:32 PM > To: Alfele, Matthew > Subject: 2005 JPA > 1 Attachment D > ** WARNING: This email has originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.** > > > I live at 123 Observatory Ave., and have concerns about the 2005 JPA project: > > 1) Parking—If the current buildings have the by‐right maximum density now, it’s 21 units/acre. The special use permit requests 70 units/acre, and, since its request is not final, it could change the request to 87 units/acre. Another special use permit requests 10% decrease in parking. The density would more than triple at 70 units/acre, and parking would decrease by 10%? Observatory Ave. is a narrow, one block long dead end. Residents have stickers for parking during weekdays, but one or two rented houses have their driveways filled and a car parked across on the street in front of their driveways when everyone is at home with current parking conditions. Currently, on home football game days, only one side of the street is allowed parked cars; cars on the other side of the street are ticketed/towed, because if cars are parked in available spaces on both sides of the street, no fire truck would be able to go up the street. If cars from the proposed 2005 JPA project are allowed to park along Observatory Ave., this inability of a fire truck (or garbage truck, or snow plow, or utility truck, or some trucks from private companies that need to do work at houses on the street) to go up the street would be a permanent condition. One day while I was in my yard, the driver of a truck that needed to get to a house beyond mine to work on the house was unable to pass my house because a car (not mine) was parked in front of my house and another car was parked directly across the street from it. The driver had to take all his equipment by hand from the truck to the house. A fire truck would not have been able to get as far up the street as my house. When cars are parked on both sides of the street, the middle is wide enough for one car, barely wide enough for an SUV, and two cars, one going up the street and one going down the street, could not pass each other. When cars are parked on both sides of the street with some distance between them, one car can pull between two cars to let the other pass— impossible if maximum cars are parked along the street. Also, cars would park very close to driveways, making it difficult/impossible to enter/exit driveways due to the narrowness of the street. > > 2) Entering JPA from Observatory Ave.—Visibility to the left when trying to pull into JPA currently is minimal to non‐existent now, when cars are parked all along JPA to the left, as occurs whenever UVA is in session and businesses are open, particularly when it’s a high‐traffic time of day. Sometimes a minimal amount of visibility is possible if you look further down the street. If the planned building setback is very close to JPA and Observatory Ave., instead of the current building’s further setback, even this occasional minimal visibility would not exist. > > 3) Height/bulk of proposed building—The “Perspective Rendering” of the proposed building in the information package from Mitchell/Matthews says the proposed building could be 5‐8 2 Attachment D stories high. A building of that height and bulk would put quite a bit of Observatory Ave. into shadow, not just the houses directly across from or behind the building. I live on 123 Observatory Ave., three houses up from the back of the site. From the angles that sunlight comes into my windows, it seems that the building would cut off light to my house for part of the year. Would this be enough shadow in some places to interfere with growing lawns, flower/vegetable gardens, shrubs, trees? Could the architects calculate the area of shadow though the day and through the year, and present the results to the neighborhood association? > > > Marilyn Poling > > 3 Attachment D Megan Buschi & Family 126 Observatory Ave Charlottesville, VA 22903 megantbuschi@gmail.com 434.466.2632 March 5, 2022 Dear Planning Commissioners, I’m writing to you to protest any special use permits (SUP) that have been presented to the City from Aspen Topco II Acquisitions, LLC and architects and planners Mitchell Matthews for the property 2005 Jefferson Park Ave. My family and I are residents of Observatory Ave and have lived here for over 15 years. We didn’t buy the property as an investment, it was a decision made in good conscience to live close to where we work and recreate. I work for UVA (therefore walk to work) and my husband works for Blue Wheel Bicycle downtown (rides his bike to work), where we are part owners. We are a family of four, sometimes five when a parent stays for an extended visit. My husband and I have two elementary-age active boys that play in our yard and along the entire street. Our community on Observatory Ave is unique…we have 15 houses, 9 are occupied by the homeowners. (This does not include the homes on 2005 Jefferson Park Ave). This is a much higher owner-occupied street than any other in the JPA neighborhood. When you’re here you can feel the difference. We are active in our yards/gardens and use our surrounding amenities to the fullest. Many of our residents have lived here for over 25 years…one even 40 years. We love our neighborhood and how close we are to the students and academic energy that the University provides. I have always enjoyed getting to know the students living in the rental properties and showing/teaching them what it means to be part of our Observatory community. We have had many students come back to visit after graduation. We oppose the SUP (special use permit) for increased density to 70 dwellings per acre and this amounts to 119 units total. That equals 390 occupants. This increase in dwellings will increase traffic on an already narrow street. The City of Charlottesville rescue vehicles and the City’s garbage facilities have a difficult time getting to our street now…an increase in population (cars) will be unsafe! We oppose the SUP for increasing the height to 75 feet. This increased height is a direct reflection in the number of units needed. With the increase of units, is an increase in the population. The City of Charlottesville rescue vehicles and the City’s garbage vehicles have a difficult time getting to our street now…an increase in population (vehicles) will be unsafe! Attachment D We oppose the SUP to reduce the rear setback. I believe the setback should not be reduced to shield the remaining parts of the street from the building. We would love to maintain the charm and character of our hundred-year-old homes. We oppose the SUP for reducing onsite parking by 22%. Our street is already at capacity with cars parking on both sides of our narrow road..reducing parking provided by the apartment complex would increase traffic to Observatory Ave.. Increased traffic will cause more issues for the emergency vehicles, snowplows, garbage trucks, delivery services. Thank you for your communication and participation with the community of Observatory Ave and the JPA neighborhood. Sincerely, Megan Buschi, Paul Buschi, Sam Buschi and Jack Buschi. Attachment D Alfele, Matthew From: Megan Buschi Sent: Monday, January 31, 2022 6:53 PM To: Alfele, Matthew Subject: Fwd: SUP for 2005 Jefferson Park Ave. Follow Up Flag: FollowUp Flag Status: Flagged ** WARNING: This email has originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.** Matt, I'm not sure where this letter goes after I send it to you but I would love to make sure it gets to the City Council. What's the best action from here...mailing an actual letter? Best, Megan Buschi ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Forwarded message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ From: Megan Buschi Date: Mon, Jan 31, 2022 at 3:58 PM Subject: SUP for 2005 Jefferson Park Ave. To: Megan Buschi January 30, 2022 Dear members of the Charlottesville City Council, I’m writing to you to protest any special use permits (SUP) that have been presented to the City from Aspen Topco II Acquisitions, LLC and architects and planners Mitchell Matthews for the property 2005 Jefferson Park Ave. My family and I are residents of Observatory Ave and have lived here over 15 years. We didn’t buy the property as an investment, it was a decision made in good conscience to live close to where we work and recreate. I work for UVA (therefore walk to work) and my husband works for Blue Wheel Bicycle downtown (rides his bike to work), where we are part owners. We are a family of four, sometimes five when a parent stays for an extended visit. My husband and I have two elementary age active boys that play in our yard and along the entire street. Our community on Observatory Ave is unique…we have 15 houses, 8 are occupied by the homeowners. (This does not include the homes on 2005 Jefferson Park Ave). This is a much higher owner occupied street than any other in the JPA neighborhood. When you’re here you can feel the difference. We are active in our yards/gardens and use our surrounding amenities to the fullest. Many of our residents have lived here for over 25 years…one even 40 years. We love our neighborhood and how close we are with the students and academic energy that the University provides. I have always enjoyed getting to know the students living in the rental properties and showing/teaching them what it means to be part of our Observatory community. We have had many students come back to visit after graduation. 1 Attachment D We oppose the SUP (special use permit) for increased density to 70 dwellings. This increase in dwellings will increase traffic on an already narrow street. The City of Charlottesville rescue vehicles and the City’s garbage facilities have a difficult time getting to our street now…an increase in population (cars) will be unsafe! We oppose the SUP for increasing the height to 75 feet. This increased height is a direct reflection in the number of units needed. With the increase of units, is an increase in the population. The City of Charlottesville rescue vehicles and the City’s garbage vehicles have a difficult time getting to our street now…an increase in population (vehicles) will be unsafe! Also, the height will severely and negativity alter the appearance of the neighborhood and reduce visibility to the sky. We oppose the SUP to reduce the rear set back. I believe the setback should not be reduced to shield the remaining parts of the street from the building. We would love to maintain the charm and character of our hundred year old homes. We oppose the SUP for reducing onsite parking by 22%. Our street is already at capacity with cars parking on both sides of our narrow road..reducing parking provided by the apartment complex would increase traffic to Observatory Ave.. Increased traffic will cause more issues for the emergency vehicles, snow plows, garbage trucks, delivery services. Special notes and requests: I believe that the apartment complex will have all of it’s utilities placed underground in duct banks with conduit. Mitchell Matthews as architects and planners should offer this service to all the residents on Observatory Ave for no charge. Any ingress and egress should remain on Washington Ave with no exceptions. All landscaping plants should be native and any in need of replacement should be replaced with native plantings. Underground parking should take into consideration exterior lighting. The exterior lighting should consider the residents of Observatory Ave and how the lights will flood their homes. The dumpsters should be maintained from the garage level or well hidden behind a barrier. Thank you for your communication and participation with the community of Observatory Ave. Sincerely, Megan Buschi, Paul Buschi, Sam Buschi and Jack Buschi. 2 Attachment E ASPEN HEIGHTS CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE, VIRGINIA Traffic Impact Analysis December 23, 2021 Prepared For: Aspen Topco II Acquisitions, LLC Contact: Thomas Ruff, PE, PTOE 1001 Boulders Parkway, Suite 300 • Richmond, VA 23225 (804) 200-6500 phone www.timmons.com Attachment E December 2021 Aspen Heights TIA – City of Charlottesville PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK Attachment E December 2021 Aspen Heights TIA – City of Charlottesville TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ........................................................................................................................................................... I APPENDICES .......................................................................................................................................................................... II LIST OF TABLES .................................................................................................................................................................. III LIST OF FIGURES ............................................................................................................................................................... IV 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................................1-1 2 BACKGROUND INFORMATION .............................................................................................................................2-1 2.1 DESCRIPTION OF ON-SITE DEVELOPMENT ................................................................................................................2-1 2.2 STUDY LIMITS .........................................................................................................................................................2-1 2.3 EXISTING ROADWAYS NETWORK ..............................................................................................................................2-1 2.4 FUTURE IMPROVEMENTS...........................................................................................................................................2-2 2.5 OTHER MODES OF TRANSPORTATION .......................................................................................................................2-2 3 2021 EXISTING CONDITIONS .............................................................................................................................3-1 3.1 EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES ....................................................................................................................................3-1 3.2 CAPACITY ANALYSIS.................................................................................................................................................3-1 3.3 EXISTING CONDITIONS CAPACITY ANALYSIS RESULTS ...............................................................................................3-4 4 2023 BACKGROUND CONDITIONS .....................................................................................................................4-1 4.1 2023 BACKGROUND TRAFFIC VOLUMES....................................................................................................................4-1 4.2 APPROVED BACKGROUND 2023 DEVELOPMENTS .......................................................................................................4-1 4.3 BACKGROUND 2023 CAPACITY ANALYSIS RESULTS ...................................................................................................4-1 5 2028 BACKGROUND CONDITIONS .....................................................................................................................5-1 5.1 2028 BACKGROUND TRAFFIC VOLUMES....................................................................................................................5-1 5.2 BACKGROUND 2028 CAPACITY ANALYSIS RESULTS ...................................................................................................5-1 6 TRIP GENERATION ..................................................................................................................................................6-1 6.1 SITE TRIP GENERATION ...........................................................................................................................................6-1 6.2 EXTERNAL TRIP DISTRIBUTIONS...............................................................................................................................6-2 6.3 TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENT ..............................................................................................................................................6-2 7 2023 TOTAL FUTURE CONDITIONS ...................................................................................................................7-1 7.1 TOTAL FUTURE TRAFFIC VOLUMES ...........................................................................................................................7-1 7.2 2023 FUTURE CONDITIONS ANALYSIS RESULTS .......................................................................................................7-1 8 2028 TOTAL FUTURE CONDITIONS ...................................................................................................................8-1 8.1 TOTAL FUTURE TRAFFIC VOLUMES ...........................................................................................................................8-1 8.2 2028 TOTAL FUTURE CONDITIONS ANALYSIS RESULTS ............................................................................................8-1 9 TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANT ANALYSIS ...........................................................................................................9-1 9.1 WARRANT 1 (EIGHT-HOUR VEHICULAR VOLUME) .....................................................................................................9-1 9.2 WARRANT 2 (FOUR-HOUR VEHICULAR VOLUME) ......................................................................................................9-2 9.3 WARRANT 3 (PEAK-HOUR VEHICULAR VOLUME) .......................................................................................................9-3 9.4 SIGNAL WARRANT ANALYSIS SUMMARY ....................................................................................................................9-3 10 CONCLUSIONS .........................................................................................................................................................10-1 i Attachment E December 2021 Aspen Heights TIA – City of Charlottesville APPENDICES Appendix A – Traffic Counts Appendix B – Existing Traffic Signal Timings Appendix C – Synchro/SimTraffic Outputs for 2021 Existing Conditions Appendix D – Synchro/SimTraffic Outputs for 2023/2028 Background Conditions Appendix E – Synchro/SimTraffic Outputs for 2023/2028 Total Future Conditions ii Attachment E December 2021 Aspen Heights TIA – City of Charlottesville LIST OF TABLES TABLE 3-1: LEVEL OF SERVICE DEFINITIONS .............................................................................................. 3-2 TABLE 3-2: SIGNALIZED AND UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE CRITERIA ....................................... 3-3 TABLE 3-3: INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE AND DELAY SUMMARY 2021 EXISTING PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC ................. 3-7 TABLE 4-1: INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE AND DELAY SUMMARY 2023 TOTAL BACKGROUND PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC ... 4-3 TABLE 5-1: INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE AND DELAY SUMMARY 2028 TOTAL BACKGROUND PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC ... 5-3 TABLE 6-1: ASPEN HEIGHTS TRIP GENERATION SUMMARY ............................................................................. 6-1 TABLE 7-1: INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE AND DELAY SUMMARY 2023 TOTAL FUTURE TRAFFIC.......................... 7-3 TABLE 8-1: INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE AND DELAY SUMMARY 2028 TOTAL FUTURE TRAFFIC.......................... 8-3 TABLE 9-1– TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANT ANALYSIS JEFFERSON PARK AVENUE/WASHINGTON AVENUE INTERSECTION ..... 9-4 iii Attachment E December 2021 Aspen Heights TIA – City of Charlottesville LIST OF FIGURES FIGURE 1-1: SURROUNDING ROADWAY NETWORK & SITE LOCATION FIGURE 1-2 CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN FIGURE 2-1: EXISTING INTERSECTION GEOMETRY FIGURE 2-2: CHARLOTTESVILLE TRAILS AND BIKE LANES FIGURE 2-3: CHARLOTTESVILLE AREA TRANSIT (CAT) SERVICE MAP FIGURE 2-4: UVA TRANSIT SERVICE MAP FIGURE 3-1: 2021 EXISTING PEAK HOUR VOLUMES FIGURE 3-2: 2021 EXISTING BICYCLE VOLUMES FIGURE 3-3: 2021 EXISTING PEDESTRIAN VOLUMES FIGURE 4-1: 2023 BACKGROUND PEAK HOUR VOLUMES FIGURE 4-2: 2023 BACKGROUND BICYCLE VOLUMES FIGURE 4-3: 2023 BACKGROUND PEDESTRIAN VOLUMES FIGURE 5-1: 2028 BACKGROUND PEAK HOUR VOLUMES FIGURE 5-2: 2028 BACKGROUND BICYCLE VOLUMES FIGURE 5-3: 2028 BACKGROUND PEDESTRIAN VOLUMES FIGURE 6-1: SITE PEAK HOUR TRIP DISTRIBUTIONS FIGURE 6-2: TOTAL EXTERNAL SITE PEAK HOUR TRIPS FIGURE 7-1: 2023 TOTAL FUTURE PEAK HOUR VOLUMES FIGURE 8-1: 2028 TOTAL FUTURE PEAK HOUR VOLUMES iv Attachment E December 2021 Aspen Heights TIA – City of Charlottesville 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report presents the findings of the traffic impact analysis prepared for the proposed Aspen Heights off-campus student housing development in the City of Charlottesville, Virginia. The proposed development is located between Observatory Avenue and Washington Avenue to the east and west and Jefferson Park Avenue to the south as shown in Figure 1-1 (all figures are located at the end of their respective chapter). The site is currently zoned R3. The proposed development will consist of 390 beds (119 units) of off- campus student housing apartments. The applicant is submitting this traffic impact analysis in support of a Special Use Permit (SUP). Access to the site will be provided via one (1) full movement entrance on Washington Avenue. A conceptual plan is shown on Figure 1-2. For the purposes of this analysis, the development was assumed to be complete and occupied by 2023. When complete, the proposed development will generate a total of 38 trips (16 in and 22 out) during the AM peak, 55 trips (26 in and 29 out) during the Midday peak, 84 trips (42 in and 42 out) during the PM peak, and 1,070 average weekday daily trips. The purpose of this analysis is to determine the impact of the proposed development on the surrounding roadway network. The scope of this study was developed in conjunction with the City of Charlottesville staff at a scoping meeting held (virtually) on August 23, 2021. As agreed upon in the scoping meeting, the study limits include the following seven (7) existing intersections: 1. Jefferson Park Avenue and Shamrock Road (signalized); 2. Jefferson Park Avenue and Harmon Street (unsignalized); 3. Jefferson Park Avenue and Washington Street (unsignalized); 4. Jefferson Park Avenue and Observatory Avenue (unsignalized); 5. Jefferson Park Avenue and Fontaine Avenue/Maury Avenue (Signalized); 6. Maury Avenue/Alderman Road and Stadium Road (unsignalized); and 7. Stadium Road and Washington Avenue (unsignalized) In addition, the site entrance will be analyzed in future conditions (2023 and 2028). In accordance with the scoping agreement, analyses were completed for the following scenarios: 1. 2021 Existing Traffic Conditions; 2. 2023 Background Traffic Conditions (without development of the site); 3. 2028 Background Conditions (without development of the site); 4. 2023 Future Traffic Conditions (with development of the site); and 5. 2028 Future Traffic Conditions (with development of the site). 1-1 Attachment E December 2021 Aspen Heights TIA – City of Charlottesville The following steps were taken to determine the potential traffic impacts associated with this project: 1. Data Collection – Existing AM, Midday, and PM peak hour traffic counts were collected at the existing study intersections on August 28, 2021. A 12-hour turning movement count was also conducted at Jefferson Park Avenue/Washington Avenue on the same date. 2. Traffic Growth – In order to be conservative and account for development outside the study area, a 0.2% annual growth rate was applied to the existing vehicle traffic counts and 1.0% annual growth rate was applied to the existing bike and pedestrian volumes at all study intersections for the 2023 and 2028 analysis scenarios. 3. Trip Generation – Traffic generated by the proposed development was estimated using the 10th edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineers’ Trip Generation Manual. 4. Traffic Distributions – The distribution of trips generated by the proposed developed was based on the existing traffic volumes, the nature of the use, and local knowledge. 5. Site Traffic Projections – Future traffic volumes were determined by combining the 2023 and 2028 background traffic volumes with proposed new trips generated by the site to create the 2023 and 2028 total traffic volumes used in the analysis. 6. Traffic Capacity Analysis – Level of service calculations for existing, background, and future conditions were performed using SYNCHRO Version 10 with SimTraffic for signalized and unsignalized intersections. 7. Queuing Analysis – The 95th percentile queue lengths (Synchro) and maximum queues (SimTraffic) were reviewed at the intersections listed above. 1-2 Attachment E December 2021 Aspen Heights TIA – City of Charlottesville Based on the operational analyses the following is offered: • Across 2023 and 2028 background conditions during the PM peak, the westbound approach to the intersection of Jefferson Park Avenue/Maury Avenue experiences operational issues with congestion on the westbound approach and the queue extends through Observatory Avenue, Washington Avenue, and Harmon Street intersections. Under 2023 and 2028 total volume conditions, with the addition of the proposed Aspen Heights development site traffic, the westbound approach is expected to experience minimal increases with the proposed development over the 2023 and 2028 background conditions. • The results of the signal warrant analysis at Jefferson Park Avenue/Washington Avenue under 2028 total build conditions indicate that none of the traffic volume thresholds in Warrants 1 through 3 were met. None of the other warrants were considered at this time. • Under 2021 existing conditions: o All movements at unsignalized intersections within the study area on Jefferson Park Avenue and Stadium Road operate at level of service (LOS) C or better during the AM, Midday, and PM peak hours. All approaches have adequate distance to accommodate 95th percentile and maximum queue lengths. o At the signalized intersection of Jefferson Park Avenue and Shamrock Road, the overall intersection operates at a level of service (LOS) B during the AM/Midday/PM peak hours. All turning movements and approaches operate at a LOS C or better during the AM/Midday/PM peaks. All turn bays have adequate storage to accommodate 95th percentile and maximum queue lengths. o At the signalized intersection of Jefferson Park Avenue and Maury Avenue/Fontaine Avenue, the overall intersection operates at a LOS C during the AM/PM peaks and a LOS B during the Midday peak. All turning movements and approaches generally operate at a LOS C or better during the AM/Midday/PM peaks. The westbound left queue fills the available storage (AM/Midday) and backs up into the through lane (PM). During the PM peak, the westbound approach queues through the adjacent intersection with Observatory Avenue. During the PM peak, the southbound through queue backs up through the adjacent intersection with Clark Court. • Under 2023 and 2028 background conditions (without the proposed development): o Levels of service at the study intersections do not change significantly from 2021 existing to 2023 or 2028 background conditions. All unsignalized intersections continue to operate at LOS C or better during all peak hours. All signalized intersections continue to operate with LOS B or C during all peak hours. o There are no queuing concerns within the study area, with the exception of the westbound approach of Jefferson Park Avenue at Maury Avenue during the PM peak hour. The queues extend to intermittently block the intersections of Observatory Avenue, Washington Avenue, and Harmon Street. 1-3 Attachment E December 2021 Aspen Heights TIA – City of Charlottesville • Under 2023 and 2028 total future conditions (with the proposed development): o Levels of service at the study intersections do not change significantly from background to total future conditions in 2023 or 2028. o All movements at unsignalized intersections within the study area on Jefferson Park Avenue and Stadium Road operate at level of service (LOS) C or better during the AM, Midday, and PM peak hours. All approaches have adequate distance to accommodate 95th percentile and maximum queue lengths. o At the signalized intersection of Jefferson Park Avenue and Shamrock Road, the overall intersection operates at a level of service (LOS) B during the AM/Midday/PM peak hours. All turning movements and approaches operate at a LOS C or better during the AM/Midday/PM peaks. During the PM peak, the westbound left fills the available storage. All other approaches have adequate distance to accommodate 95th percentile and maximum queue lengths. o At the signalized intersection of Jefferson Park Avenue and Maury Avenue/Fontaine Avenue, the overall intersection operates at a LOS C during the AM/PM peaks and a LOS B during the Midday peak. All turning movements and approaches generally operate at a LOS C or better during the AM/Midday/PM peaks. The westbound left queue fills the available storage (AM/Midday) and backs up into the through lane (PM). During the PM peak, the westbound approach queue backs up through the adjacent intersection with Observatory Avenue. During the PM peak, the southbound through queue backs up through the adjacent intersection with Clark Court. Based on the results of the operational analysis, there are no vehicular and roadway network improvements required based on the additional development traffic volumes. The site will increase the residential density in the area and add to the pedestrian, bicycle, and transit volumes. To address the additional pedestrian, bicycle, and transit volumes, the applicant plans to install sidewalks along the entire frontage of the property. 1-4 Attachment E 6 7 Stadium Road Washington Ave Observatory Ave Harmon Street 8 BUS 5 29 Jefferson Park Avenue NOT TO SCALE 4 3 2 1 LEGEND: Existing Road Shamrock Proposed Road Proposed Site Road Study Intersection Future Intersection Surrounding Roadway Network and Site Location Figure Aspen Heights TIA City of Charlottesville, Virginia 1-1 Attachment E Shamrock Road NOT TO SCALE Conceptual Site Plan Figure Aspen Heights TIA City of Charlottesville, Virginia 1-2 Attachment E December 2021 Aspen Heights TIA – City of Charlottesville 2 BACKGROUND INFORMATION This report presents the findings of the traffic impact analysis prepared for the proposed Aspen Heights residential development in the City of Charlottesville, Virginia. 2.1 DESCRIPTION OF ON-SITE DEVELOPMENT The proposed development is located north of Jefferson Park Avenue, between Observatory Avenue and Washington Avenue. The proposed development will consist of 388 bedrooms of off-campus student housing apartments (119 units). Access to the site is proposed via one (1) full movement entrance on Washington Avenue. A conceptual plan is shown on Figure 1-2. For purposes of this analysis, the development was assumed to be complete and occupied by 2023. 2.2 STUDY LIMITS As agreed upon in the scoping agreement, the study limits include the following seven (7) existing intersections: 1. Jefferson Park Avenue and Shamrock Road (signalized); 2. Jefferson Park Avenue and Harmon Street (unsignalized); 3. Jefferson Park Avenue and Washington Street (unsignalized); 4. Jefferson Park Avenue and Observatory Avenue (unsignalized); 5. Jefferson Park Avenue and Fontaine Avenue/Maury Avenue (Signalized); 6. Maury Avenue/Alderman Road and Stadium Road (unsignalized); and 7. Stadium Road and Washington Avenue (unsignalized) In addition, the proposed site entrance will be analyzed in future conditions (2023 and 2028) 2.3 EXISTING ROADWAYS NETWORK Jefferson Park Avenue between Maury Avenue and Emmett Street is a two-lane divided principal arterial with a posted speed limit of 35 mph. According to the 2019 VDOT traffic counts, Jefferson Park Avenue services 12,000 vehicles per day. The roadway has one bike lane in each direction with on-street parking and sidewalks on both sides through the study area. Jefferson Park Avenue south of Fontaine Avenue is a two-lane divided minor arterial with a posted speed limit of 30 mph. According to the 2019 VDOT traffic counts, Jefferson Park Avenue services 11,000 vehicles per day. The roadway has one bike lane in each direction with on-street parking and sidewalks on both sides through the study area. Fontaine Avenue is a two-lane undivided principal arterial with a posted speed limit of 35 mph. According to the 2019 VDOT traffic counts, Fontaine Avenue services 13,000 vehicles per day. The roadway has sidewalks on both sides through the study area. Maury Avenue is a two-lane undivided minor arterial with a posted speed limit of 25 mph. According to the 2019 VDOT traffic counts, Fontaine Avenue services 6,200 vehicles per day. The roadway has sidewalks on one side through the study area. Alderman Road is a two-lane undivided minor arterial with a posted speed limit of 25 mph. According to the 2019 VDOT traffic counts, Alderman Road services 6,200 vehicles per day. The roadway has sidewalks on one side through the study area. 2-1 Attachment E December 2021 Aspen Heights TIA – City of Charlottesville Stadium Road is a two-lane undivided major collector with a posted speed limit of 25 mph. According to the 2019 VDOT traffic counts, Stadium Road services 3,800 vehicles per day. The roadway has sidewalks on one side through the study area. Shamrock Road is a two-lane undivided major collector with a posted speed limit of 25 mph. According to the 2019 VDOT traffic counts, Shamrock Road services 3,500 vehicles per day. The roadway has sidewalks on one side through the study area. Observatory Avenue is a two-lane undivided local road with a posted speed limit of 25 mph. The roadway has sidewalks on one side in some locations through the study area. Washington Avenue is a two-lane undivided local road with a posted speed limit of 25 mph. The roadway has sidewalks on one side in some locations through the study area. Currently, it is not possible to walk from Jefferson Park Avenue to Stadium Road using a sidewalk. Harmon Street is a two-lane undivided local road with a posted speed limit of 25 mph. The roadway has sidewalks on one side through the study area. The 2021 existing lane use and traffic control at the study intersections is shown on Figure 2-1. 2.4 FUTURE IMPROVEMENTS Fontaine Avenue from the west city limits to Jefferson Park Avenue is proposed to have streetscape improvements. The proposed typical section is expected to consist of two travel and two bike lanes (one in each direction) and sidewalks on both sides. The project is not expected to change the existing lane configuration of the eastbound approach to the Fontaine Avenue/Jefferson Park Avenue intersection. Construction is tentatively scheduled to start in Fall 2023. The applicant has committed to install new sidewalks along the frontage of the property on Observatory Avenue and Washington Avenue. In addition, a new north-south marked pedestrian crossing will be installed at the intersection of Observatory Avenue and Jefferson Park Avenue. This will provide access to the UVA Transit bus stop at the SE corner of the intersection. 2.5 OTHER MODES OF TRANSPORTATION Currently, there are sidewalks and bike lanes throughout the study area that connect the proposed Aspen Heights development to the UVA campus and greater Charlottesville. The applicant is proposing to maintain the existing pedestrian facilities with the construction of the site and to add sidewalks along the frontage of the property on Washington and Observatory Avenues. A map showing the proposed development and City trails and bike lanes is included on Figure 2-2. It is anticipated that some site trips may be made via walking/biking/transit, however, a reduction from the vehicular trip generation rates provided by the ITE Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition. The Charlottesville Area Transit (CAT) Route T runs along Jefferson Park Avenue with a bus stop approximately 500 feet away from the proposed development at Jefferson Park Avenue/Maury Avenue. The UVA Transit Orange Line runs along Jefferson Park Avenue, with bus stops approximately 200 feet (Jefferson Park Avenue/Observatory Avenue) and 500 feet (Jefferson Park Avenue/Maury Avenue) away from the proposed development. Transit routes in the vicinity of the site are shown for CAT and UVA Transit on Figures 2-3 and 2-4, respectively. 2-2 Alderman Road Attachment E 6 7 NOT TO SCALE Stadium Road LEGEND: Existing Road Proposed Road Signalized Intersection Stop Controlled Intersection Stop Sign Location Washington Avenue 8 Maury Avenue Lane Configuration Shamrock Site Entrance Channelization Road Yield * Per TOSAM Guidelines, effective storage (S’) equals the full width Observatory Avenue storage length plus ½ the taper length Harmon Street 5 4 3 2 1 125’ S’ 117’ S’ Jefferson Park Avenue Fontaine Avenue 88’ S’ 75’ S’ 152’ S’ 120’ S’ 355’ S’ 225’ S’ Jefferson Park Avenue Private Entrance Private Entrance Private Entrance Shamrock Road Existing Intersection Geometry Figure Aspen Heights TIA City of Charlottesville, Virginia 2-1 Source: Attachment E City of Charlottesville N Project Site Existing Bike Lanes Charlottesville Trails and Bike Lanes Figure Aspen Heights TIA City of Charlottesville, Virginia 2-2 Attachment E N Bus Stops Project Site Source: Charlottesville Area Transit Charlottesville Area Transit (CAT) Service Map Figure Aspen Heights TIA City of Charlottesville, Virginia 2-3 Attachment E N Bus Stops Source: UVA Transit Service Project Site UVA University Transit Service Map Figure Aspen Heights TIA City of Charlottesville, Virginia 2-4 Attachment E December 2021 Aspen Heights TIA – City of Charlottesville 3 2021 EXISTING CONDITIONS 3.1 EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES Existing peak hour turning movement counts were conducted at each of the study intersections during the AM (7:00-9:00), Midday (11:00-1:00), and PM (4:00-6:00) peak hour timeframes. The counts were conducted on August 28, 2021 on a typical weekday when public schools and the University of Virginia were in session. The counts included heavy vehicles by movement, pedestrians, and bikes. The common peak hours across all study intersections were found to be 7:30–8:30 AM, 12:00–1:00 PM, and 4:45–5:45 PM. The existing vehicle traffic counts are shown on Figure 3-1; existing bike and pedestrian volumes are shown on Figures 3-2 and 3-3, respectively. In addition, a 12-hour count at the intersection of Jefferson Park Avenue and Washington Avenue was conducted to support a traffic signal warrant analysis. The complete traffic data is included in Appendix A. Existing signal timings for all intersections were provided by the City of Charlottesville and are included in Appendix B. 3.2 CAPACITY ANALYSIS Capacity analysis allows traffic engineers to determine the impacts of traffic on the surrounding roadway network. The Transportation Research Board’s (TRB) Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) methodologies govern how the capacity analyses are conducted and how the results are interpreted. There are six letter grades of Levels of Service (LOS) from A to F, with LOS A representing the best operating conditions and LOS F the worst operating conditions. Table 3-1 shows in detail how each of these levels of service are interpreted. 3-1 Attachment E December 2021 Aspen Heights TIA – City of Charlottesville Table 3-1: Level of Service Definitions Level of Roadway Segments or Service Controlled Access Highways Intersections A Free flow, low traffic No vehicle waits longer than density. one signal indication. B Delay is not unreasonable, On a rare occasion motorists stable traffic flow. wait through more than one signal indication. C Stable condition, Intermittently drivers wait movements somewhat through more than one signal restricted due to higher indication, and occasionally volumes, but not backups may develop behind objectionable for motorists. left turning vehicles, traffic flow still stable and acceptable. D Movements more restricted, Delays at intersections may queues and delays may become extensive with some, occur during short peaks, especially left-turning but lower demands occur vehicles waiting two or more often enough to permit signal indications, but clearing, thus preventing enough cycles with lower excessive backups. demand occur to permit periodic clearance, thus preventing excessive backups. E Actual capacity of the Very long queues may create roadway invloves delay to lengthly delays, especially for all motorists due to left-turning vehicles. congestion. F Forced flow with demand Backups from locations volumes greater than downstream restrict or capacity resulting in prevent movement of vehicles complete congestion. out of approach creating a Volumes drop to zero in storage ares during part or extreme cases. all of an hour. SOURCE: "A Policy on Design of Design of Urban Highways and Arterial Streets" - AASHTO, 1973 based upon material published in "Highway Capacity Manual" , National Academy of Sciences, 1965. 3-2 Attachment E December 2021 Aspen Heights TIA – City of Charlottesville For signalized and unsignalized intersections, level of service is defined in terms of delay, a measure of driver discomfort, frustration, fuel consumption and lost travel time. Table 3-2 summarizes the delay associated with each LOS category: Table 3-2: Signalized and Unsignalized Intersection Level of Service Criteria Signalized Intersections Unsignalized Intersections Level of Control Delay per Level of Average Control Service Vehicle (sec/veh) Service Delay (sec/veh) A ≤ 10 A 0 to 10 B > 10 to ≤ 20 B > 10 to ≤ 15 C > 20 to ≤ 35 C > 15 to ≤ 25 D > 35 to ≤ 55 D > 25 to ≤ 35 E > 55 to ≤ 80 E > 35 to ≤ 50 F > 80 F > 50 Source: Exhibit 16-2 and Exhibit 17-2 from TRB's "Highway Capacity Manual 2000" Capacity analyses were performed to assess existing (2021), background (2025), and future (2031) operational conditions. The signalized and unsignalized intersections were analyzed using SYNCHRO Version 10 based on HCM 2000 methodologies with the following assumptions: • Level terrain; • 12-foot lane widths; • Existing peak hour factor as determined by the traffic counts (by intersection) for existing scenario; • The higher of the existing peak hour factor as determined by traffic counts (by intersection) or a peak hour factor of 0.92 for the background and total future scenarios. • Heavy vehicle percentage as determined by the traffic counts (by movement); and • Traffic signals timing data provided by the City of Charlottesville. 3-3 Attachment E December 2021 Aspen Heights TIA – City of Charlottesville 3.3 EXISTING CONDITIONS CAPACITY ANALYSIS RESULTS Table 3-3 summarizes the 2021 existing intersection LOS, delay, 95th percentile queue lengths (Synchro), and longest queue lengths (SimTraffic) based on the 2021 existing intersection geometry (Figure 2-1) and peak hour traffic volumes shown on Figures 3-1, 3-2, and 3-3. The corresponding SYNCHRO and SimTraffic reports are included in Appendix C. Note that the intersection numbers shown on the LOS, delay, and queue length summary tables correspond with the intersection numbers used in the SYNCHRO models and report figures. As shown in Table 3-1, under 2021 existing conditions: • At the signalized intersection of Jefferson Park Avenue and Shamrock Road, the overall intersection operates at a LOS B during the AM/Midday/PM peak hours. During the AM/Midday/PM peaks, the mainline (east-west) approaches and movements operate at a LOS B or better; the side street (north-south) approaches operate at a LOS C. All turn bays have adequate storage to accommodate 95th percentile and maximum queue lengths. • At the unsignalized intersection of Jefferson Park Avenue and Harmon Street, the mainline (east-west) approaches operate at a LOS A during the AM/Midday/PM peaks. The side street (north-south) approaches operate at a LOS C or better during the AM/Midday/PM peaks. All approaches have adequate distance to accommodate 95th percentile and maximum queue lengths. • At the unsignalized intersection of Jefferson Park Avenue and Washington Avenue, the mainline (east-west) approaches operate at a LOS A during the AM/Midday/PM peaks. The side street (north-south) approaches operate at a LOS C or better during the AM/Midday/PM peaks. During the PM peak, the westbound approach maximum queue length (79 feet) fills the distance to the adjacent intersection with Harmon Street (77 feet away). All other approaches have adequate distance to accommodate 95th percentile and maximum queue lengths. • At the unsignalized intersection of Jefferson Park Avenue and Observatory Avenue, the mainline (east-west) approaches operate at a LOS A during the AM/Midday/PM peaks. The side street (north-south) approaches operate at a LOS B during the AM/Midday peaks and a LOS C during the PM peak. During the PM peak, the westbound maximum queue (157 feet) fills the distance to the adjacent intersection with Washington Avenue (174 feet away). All other approaches have adequate distance to accommodate 95th percentile and maximum queue lengths. • At the signalized intersection of Jefferson Park Avenue and Maury Avenue/Fontaine Avenue, the overall intersection operates at a LOS C during the AM/PM peaks and a LOS B during the Midday peak. The north- and southbound approaches and movements generally operate at a LOS C during the AM/Midday/PM peaks. The east- and westbound approaches and movements generally operate at a LOS C or better during the AM/PM peaks and LOS B during the Midday peak. 3-4 Attachment E December 2021 Aspen Heights TIA – City of Charlottesville o During the AM/Midday peaks, the westbound left maximum queue (87 feet) fills the available storage (88 feet), spilling back into the through lane sometimes. During the PM peak, the 95th percentile queue (178 feet) exceeds the available storage (88 feet), spilling back into the through lane 20% of the time. During the PM peak, the westbound approach maximum queue (445 feet) backs up through the adjacent intersection with Observatory Avenue (432 feet away). Factoring in space for the intersection width, the queue continues past Observatory Avenue a further 157 feet. During the PM peak, the southbound through maximum queue (339 feet) effectively blocks the left and right turn lanes (125 feet max. storage) and backs up through the adjacent intersection with Clark Court (275 feet away). All other turn bays have adequate distance to accommodate 95th percentile and maximum queue lengths. • At the unsignalized intersection of Maury Avenue/Alderman Road and Stadium Road, all approaches operate at a LOS B or better during the AM/Midday peaks. During the PM peak, the east- west- and northbound approaches operate at a LOS C or better. The southbound approach operates at a LOS D. All approaches have adequate distance to accommodate 95th percentile and maximum queue lengths. • At the unsignalized intersection of Stadium Road and Washington Avenue, all approaches operate at a LOS A during the AM/Midday/PM peaks. All approaches have adequate distance to accommodate 95th percentile and maximum queue lengths. 3-5 Attachment E December 2021 Aspen Heights TIA – City of Charlottesville PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK 3-6 Attachment E December 2021 Aspen Heights TIA – City of Charlottesville Table 3-3: Intersection Level of Service and Delay Summary 2021 Existing Peak Hour Traffic AM PEAK HOUR MIDDAY PEAK HOUR PM PEAK HOUR Effective Synchro Turn Synchro Synchro SimTraffic Intersection and Movement and 95th Lane 1 95th SimTraffic 1 95th SimTraffic Max Type of Control Approach Delay 1 Delay 1 Delay 1 1 Percentile Storage (sec/veh) LOS Percentile Max Queue (sec/veh) LOS Percentile Max Queue (sec/veh) LOS Queue Queue (ft) Queue Length (ft) Queue Length (ft) Length Length Length (ft) Length (ft) (ft) (ft) 1. Shamrock Road (N-S) and EB Approach 13.8 B 320 299 11.8 B 272 248 14.4 B 212 253 Jefferson Park Avenue (E-W) WB Left 75 6.4 A 18 66 6.6 A 25 74 8.7 A 47 74 Signalized WB Thru - Right 5.9 A 46 140 6.8 A 147 199 10.5 B 296 354 WB Approach 6.0 A -- -- 6.8 A -- -- 10.2 B -- -- NB Approach 31.4 C 157 197 28.8 C 93 146 28.0 C 113 152 SB Approach 27.1 C 31 63 27.0 C 32 65 26.4 C 63 96 Overall 15.2 B -- -- 11.9 B -- -- 14.2 B -- -- 2. Harmon Street (N-S) and EB Approach 8.2 A 0 68 8.2 A 0 67 9.1 A 0 52 Jefferson Park Avenue (E-W) WB Approach 8.5 A 0 56 8.4 A 0 78 8.2 A 0 159 Unsignalized NB Approach 15.4 C 0 27 15.4 C 0 27 11.1 B 0 33 SB Approach 15.8 C 0 31 12.6 B 2 33 18.7 C 6 66 3. Washington Avenue (N-S) and EB Approach 8.4 A 0 65 8.7 A 0 68 9.2 A 0 80 Jefferson Park Avenue (E-W) WB Approach 8.6 A 0 38 8.4 A 0 14 8.3 A 0 79 Unsignalized NB Approach 12 B 0 22 16.9 C 2 62 11 B 0 25 SB Approach 0 A 0 0 14.3 B 2 35 19.8 C 4 42 4. Observatory Avenue (N-S) and EB Approach 8.2 A 0 55 8.2 A 0 11 9.3 A 0 91 Jefferson Park Avenue (E-W) WB Approach 9.2 A 0 61 8.3 A 0 46 8.5 A 0 157 Unsignalized NB Approach 14.3 B 0 31 14.4 B 0 35 19.1 C 2 41 SB Approach 14.9 B 0 29 10.8 B 0 14 21.3 C 4 46 5. Maury Avenue/Jefferson Park Ave (N-S) EB Left 152 20.2 C 77 133 16.3 B 53 117 27.7 C 35 90 and Fontaine Avenue (E-W) EB Thru 25.2 C 275 292 19.9 B 226 237 24.5 C 58 210 Signalized EB Right 120 9.2 A 19 120 11.3 B 20 120 16.8 B 48 120 EB Approach 20.1 C -- -- 16.8 B -- -- 18.8 B -- -- WB Left 88 16.7 B 52 87 15.2 B 97 87 29.8 C 178 87 WB Thru - Right 15.7 B 186 211 11.7 B 178 241 23.9 C 294 445 WB Approach 15.9 B -- -- 12.9 B -- -- 26.1 C -- -- NB Left 355 34.1 C #319 269 29.5 C 126 153 32.9 C 174 187 NB Thru 27.5 C 215 221 28.0 C 86 113 30.8 C 101 133 NB Right 200 0.0 A 53 111 0.0 A 32 0 0.0 A 15 0 NB Approach 31.2 C -- -- 28.9 C -- -- 32.2 C -- -- SB Left 117 31.7 C 31 67 27.6 C 40 86 27.8 C 57 117 SB Thru 32.3 C 59 93 29.4 C 111 157 36.9 D 284 339 SB Right 125 31.6 C 0 66 27.9 C 0 107 28.1 C 0 125 SB Approach 32.1 C -- -- 28.7 C -- -- 34.7 C -- -- Overall 24.2 C -- -- 19.6 B -- -- 27.8 C -- -- 6. Maury Avenue/Alderman Road (N-S) and EB Approach 11.7 B 31 101 8.5 A 4 42 10.4 B 6 63 Stadium Road (E-W) WB Approach 9.8 A 8 73 9.0 A 10 72 15.1 C 55 127 Unsignalized NB Approach 14.6 B 74 224 9.1 A 20 103 11.4 B 25 122 SB Approach 11.4 B 20 101 9.4 A 23 88 30.4 D 168 310 7. Washington Avenue (N-S) and EB Approach † † -- 3 † † -- 6 † † -- -- Stadium Road (E-W) WB Approach 7.6 A 0 -- 7.5 A 0 12 7.6 A 0 28 Unsignalized NB Approach 9.5 A 0 30 9.8 A 0 39 9.5 A 0 33 1 Overall intersection LOS and delay cannot be reported for unsignalized intersections. † SYNCHRO does not provide level of service or delay for unsignalized movements with no conflicting volumes. # - 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. SimTraffic queues are average maximum queues after 10 runs of 60 minutes each. 3-7 Attachment E December 2021 Aspen Heights TIA – City of Charlottesville PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK 3-8 71 (328) {150} Alderman Road 29 (94) {40} 26 (61) {17} Attachment E 6 7 31 (20) {21} 9 (129) {22} 50 (259) {93} 6 18 (128) {53} 1 (5) {7} Stadium Road {20} (20) 111 {47} (80) 143 7 Stadium Drive {12} (16) 70 Washington Ave Observatory Ave {2} (3) 6 {9} (2) 3 Harmon Street {3} (5) 1 {2} (10) 4 {5} (6) 2 {26} (16) 49 {157} (154) 304 NOT TO SCALE 4 (7) {16} LEGEND: Washington Avenue 00 AM Peak Hour 8 5 Maury Avenue (00) PM Peak Hour Site Entrance 4 3 2 1 {00} Midday Peak Hour Jefferson Shamrock Park Avenue Existing Road Road Proposed Road {8} (10) 8 AM Peak: 7:30-8:30 AM Observatory Avenue Harmon Street Midday Peak: 12-1 PM PM Peak: 4:45-5:45 PM 49 (305) {116} 19 (52) {21} 2 2 (15) {8} 3 (7) {1} 0 (1) {0} 2 (6) {0} 0 (1) {0} 2 (6) {2} 14 (49) {42} 20 (49) {31} 0 (7) {7} 0 (0) {1} 0 (7) {4} 5 4 3 3 (7) {5} 4 (9) {2} 1 Jefferson Park Avenue 2 (2) {5} 1 (5) {6} Fontaine Avenue 22 (33) {24} 291 (590) {360} 3 (4) {1} 3 (12) {6} 214 (327) {216} 278 (609) {377} 287 (571) {351} 243 (549) {342} 2 (2) {1} 53 (222) {125} 4 (8) {3} 4 (13) {8} 31 (104) {54} {46} (25) 68 {3} (9) 6 {6} (7) 9 {5} (21) 8 {257} (150) 293 {426} (311) 502 {3} (8) 5 {419} (314) 479 {406} (275) 451 {144} (255) 136 {3} (3) 0 {425} (317) 483 {3} (1) 1 {33} (55) 32 {38} (43) 65 {22} (25) 45 {38} (56) 73 {132} (183) 309 {85} (101) 232 {129} (105) 177 {1} (1) 2 {2} (4) 1 {0} (0) 0 {3} (6) 3 {1} (0) 1 {0} (0) 0 {1} (8) 1 {2} (0) 0 {0} (0) 0 {3} (1) 1 Jefferson Park Avenue Private Entrance Private Entrance Private Entrance Shamrock Road 2021 Existing Peak Hour Volumes Figure Aspen Heights TIA City of Charlottesville, Virginia 3-1 Alderman Road Attachment E 0 (22) {6} 2 (9) {5} 1 (0) {1} 6 7 1 (0) {0} 1 (3) {1} 1 (6) {2} 6 0 (1) {1} 1 (0) {2} Stadium Road {2} (7) 11 {3} (2) 2 7 Stadium Drive {1} (1) 2 Washington Ave Observatory Ave {0} (0) 0 {0} (0) 0 Harmon Street {0} (0) 0 {3} (3) 0 {1} (0) 0 {13} (6) 13 {1} (1) 0 NOT TO SCALE LEGEND: Washington Avenue 00 AM Peak Hour 8 5 Maury Avenue (00) PM Peak Hour Site Entrance 4 3 2 1 {00} Midday Peak Hour Jefferson Shamrock Park Avenue Existing Road Road Proposed Road AM Peak: 7:30-8:30 AM Observatory Avenue Harmon Street Midday Peak: 12-1 PM PM Peak: 4:45-5:45 PM 1 (2) {0} 0 (0) {0} 0 (0) {0} 0 (0) {0} 0 (0) {0} 0 (0) {0} 0 (0) {0} 0 (0) {0} 0 (0) {0} 0 (10) {3} 5 4 3 0 (2) {0} 0 (2) {2} 2 1 Jefferson Park Avenue 0 (1) {1} 3 (9) {2} 0 (0) {0} 0 (1) {1} 0 (1) {1} Fontaine Avenue 0 (0) {0} 0 (0) {0} 3 (2) {0} 3 (2) {0} 4 (21) {6} 4 (25) {7} 2 (21) {6} 3 (21) {11} 1 (15) {5} 0 (2) {0} 0 (0) {0} 0 (0) {0} 0 (6) {0} {0} (0) 0 {0} (0) 0 {0} (1) 0 {0} (1) 0 {6} (7) 17 {0} (1) 0 {1} (3) 2 {5} (6) 18 {5} (4) 20 {0} (1) 0 {5} (6) 17 {1} (1) 0 {0} (0) 0 {0} (1) 0 {0} (0) 0 {3} (3) 4 {1} (0) 2 {0} (0) 0 {1} (1) 0 {9} (2) 12 {4} (1) 9 {0} (0) 0 {0} (0) 0 {0} (0) 1 {0} (1) 0 {0} (0) 0 {0} (0) 0 {0} (0) 0 {1} (0) 0 {0} (0) 0 Jefferson Park Avenue Private Entrance Private Entrance Private Entrance Shamrock Road 2021 Existing Bicycle Volumes Figure Aspen Heights TIA City of Charlottesville, Virginia 3-2 Alderman Road Attachment E 47 (46) {39} {34} (30) 22 6 7 1 (1) {1} 6 Stadium Road 7 Stadium Drive {13} (9) 4 {17} (17) 15 Washington Ave Observatory Ave Harmon Street NOT TO SCALE 8 (11) {19} 13 (42) {38} LEGEND: Washington Avenue 00 AM Peak Hour (00) PM Peak Hour 8 5 Maury Avenue {00} Midday Peak Hour Site Entrance 4 3 2 1 Jefferson Existing Road Shamrock Park Avenue Proposed Road Road Marked Crosswalk AM Peak: 7:30-8:30 AM Observatory Avenue Harmon Street Midday Peak: 12-1 PM PM Peak: 4:45-5:45 PM 18 (58) {47} 5 4 3 2 1 16 (21) {22} Jefferson Park Avenue 23 (69) {14} {5} (3) 3 {30} (50) 43 {22} (42) 57 {52} (73) 61 2 (2) {1} {23} (45) 56 2 (2) {1} Fontaine Avenue {0} (4) 2 {2} (1) 1 {9} (9) 16 {0} (0) 0 {0} (4) 2 11 (18) {7} 32 (89) {21} 26 (66) {24} 19 (43) {24} 26 (81) {35} Jefferson Park Avenue Private Entrance Private Entrance Private Entrance Shamrock Road 2021 Existing Pedestrian Volumes Figure Aspen Heights TIA City of Charlottesville, Virginia 3-3 Attachment E December 2021 Aspen Heights TIA – City of Charlottesville PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK 3-12 Attachment E December 2021 Aspen Heights TIA – City of Charlottesville 4 2023 BACKGROUND CONDITIONS The background 2023 volumes were analyzed assuming existing intersection geometry in conjunction with projected background traffic volumes. The background vehicle volumes were developed based on a 0.2% annual growth rate. The background bike and pedestrian volumes were developed based on a 1% annual growth rate. 4.1 2023 BACKGROUND TRAFFIC VOLUMES The 0.2% and 1% annual growth rates discussed above were compounded annually for the two-year period from 2021 to 2023 and was applied to all movements at the study intersections. The resulting 2023 vehicle background (existing + growth) volumes are shown on Figure 4-1; the 2023 bike and pedestrian background (existing + growth) volumes are shown on Figures 4-2 and 4-3, respectively. 4.2 APPROVED BACKGROUND 2023 DEVELOPMENTS Per coordination with the City of Charlottesville, no background developments are expected to be completed within the vicinity of the proposed development. 4.3 BACKGROUND 2023 CAPACITY ANALYSIS RESULTS Table 4-1 summarizes the 2023 background intersection LOS, delay, 95th percentile queue lengths (Synchro), and maximum queue lengths (SimTraffic) based on the intersection geometry (Figure 2-1) and 2023 background peak hour traffic volumes shown on Figures 4-1, 4-2, and 4-3. The corresponding SYNCHRO and SimTraffic reports are included in Appendix D. Note that the intersection numbers shown on the LOS, delay, and queue length summary tables correspond with the intersection numbers used in the SYNCHRO models and report figures. As shown in Table 4-1 under 2023 background conditions: • Levels of service at the study intersections are not expected to change significantly from 2021 existing to 2023 background conditions. • At the signalized intersection of Jefferson Park Avenue and Shamrock Avenue, the overall intersection continues to operate at a LOS B during the AM/Midday/PM peak hours. During the AM/Midday/PM peaks, the mainline (east-west) approaches and movements continue to operate at a LOS B or better; the side street (north-south) approaches continue to operate at a LOS C. During the PM peak, the westbound left maximum queue (74 feet) fills the available storage (75 feet). All other approaches have adequate distance to accommodate 95th percentile and maximum queue lengths. • At the unsignalized intersection of Jefferson Park Avenue and Harmon Street, the mainline (east-west) approaches continue to operate at a LOS A during the AM/Midday/PM peaks. The side street (north-south) approaches continue to operate at a LOS C or better during the AM/Midday/PM peaks. All approaches have adequate distance to accommodate 95th percentile and maximum queue lengths. • At the unsignalized intersection of Jefferson Park Avenue and Washington Avenue, the mainline (east-west) approaches continue to operate at a LOS A during the AM/Midday/PM peaks. The side street (north-south) approaches continue to operate at a LOS C or better during the AM/Midday/PM peaks. During the PM peak, the westbound approach maximum queue length 4-1 Attachment E December 2021 Aspen Heights TIA – City of Charlottesville (78 feet) fills the distance to the adjacent intersection with Harmon Street (77 feet away). All other approaches have adequate distance to accommodate 95th percentile and maximum queue lengths. • At the unsignalized intersection of Jefferson Park Avenue and Observatory Avenue, the mainline (east-west) approaches continue to operate at a LOS A during the AM/Midday/PM peaks. The side street (north-south) approaches continue to operate at a LOS B during the AM/Midday peaks and a LOS C during the PM peak. All approaches have adequate distance to accommodate 95th percentile and maximum queue lengths. • At the signalized intersection of Jefferson Park Avenue and Maury Avenue/Fontaine Avenue, the overall intersection continues to operate at a LOS C during the AM/PM peaks and a LOS B during the Midday peak. The north- and southbound approaches and movements continue to generally operate at a LOS C during the AM/Midday/PM peaks. The east- and westbound approaches and movements continue to generally operate at a LOS C or better during the AM/PM peaks and LOS B during the Midday peak. o During the AM/Midday peaks, the westbound left maximum queue (87 feet) fills the available storage (88 feet), spilling back into the through lane sometimes. During the PM peak, the 95th percentile queue (179 feet) exceeds the available storage (88 feet), spilling back into the through lane 20% of the time. During the PM peak, the westbound approach maximum queue (442 feet) backs up through the adjacent intersection with Observatory Avenue (432 feet away). Factoring in space for the intersection width, the queue continues past Observatory Avenue a further 166 feet. During the PM peak, the southbound through maximum queue (350 feet) effectively blocks the left and right turn lanes (125 feet max. storage) and backs up through the adjacent intersection with Clark Court (275 feet away). All other turn bays have adequate distance to accommodate 95th percentile and maximum queue lengths. • At the unsignalized intersection of Maury Avenue/Alderman Road and Stadium Road, all approaches continue to operate at a LOS B or better during the AM/Midday peaks. During the PM peak, the east- west- and northbound approaches continue to operate at a LOS C or better. The southbound approach operates at a LOS D. All approaches have adequate distance to accommodate 95th percentile and maximum queue lengths. • At the unsignalized intersection of Stadium Road and Washington Avenue, all approaches continue operate at a LOS A during the AM/Midday/PM peaks. All approaches have adequate distance to accommodate 95th percentile and maximum queue lengths. 4-2 Attachment E December 2021 Aspen Heights TIA – City of Charlottesville Table 4-1: Intersection Level of Service and Delay Summary 2023 Total Background Peak Hour Traffic AM PEAK HOUR MIDDAY PEAK HOUR PM PEAK HOUR Effective Synchro Turn Synchro Synchro SimTraffic Intersection and Movement and 95th Lane 1 95th SimTraffic 1 95th SimTraffic Max Type of Control Approach Delay 1 Delay 1 Delay 1 1 Percentile Storage (sec/veh) LOS Percentile Max Queue LOS Percentile Max Queue LOS Queue (sec/veh) (sec/veh) Queue (ft) Queue Length (ft) Queue Length (ft) Length Length Length (ft) Length (ft) (ft) (ft) 1. Shamrock Road (N-S) and EB Approach 13.9 B 321 293 11.9 B 274 284 14.5 B 212 261 Jefferson Park Avenue (E-W) WB Left 75 6.5 A 18 61 6.6 A 25 68 8.7 A 47 74 Signalized WB Thru - Right 5.9 A 105 144 6.9 A 147 207 10.6 B 298 326 WB Approach 6.0 A -- -- 6.9 A -- -- 10.3 B -- -- NB Approach 31.4 C 157 200 28.8 C 93 133 28.0 C 114 159 SB Approach 27.1 C 31 63 27.0 C 32 53 26.4 C 63 111 Overall 15.3 B -- -- 11.9 B -- -- 14.2 B -- -- 2. Harmon Street (N-S) and EB Approach 8.2 A 0 73 8.2 A 0 63 9.1 A 0 62 Jefferson Park Avenue (E-W) WB Approach 8.5 A 0 37 8.4 A 0 82 8.2 A 0 199 Unsignalized NB Approach 15.4 C 0 21 15.5 C 0 21 11 B 0 33 SB Approach 15.9 C 0 33 12.6 B 2 35 18.1 C 6 55 3. Washington Avenue (N-S) and EB Approach 8.4 A 0 93 8.7 A 0 32 9.2 A 0 119 Jefferson Park Avenue (E-W) WB Approach 8.6 A 0 35 8.4 A 0 11 8.3 A 0 78 Unsignalized NB Approach 12 B 0 22 16.9 C 2 55 11 B 0 19 SB Approach 0 A 0 0 14.4 B 2 38 19.6 C 4 44 4. Observatory Avenue (N-S) and EB Approach 8.2 A 0 37 8.2 A 0 29 9.3 A 0 77 Jefferson Park Avenue (E-W) WB Approach 9.2 A 0 26 8.4 A 0 51 8.5 A 0 166 Unsignalized NB Approach 14.1 B 0 30 14.4 B 0 33 18.6 C 2 46 SB Approach 14.7 B 0 31 10.8 B 0 9 20.7 C 4 42 5. Maury Avenue/Jefferson Park Ave (N-S) EB Left 152 20.8 C 77 143 16.3 B 53 141 27.9 C 35 80 and Fontaine Avenue (E-W) EB Thru 26.1 C 276 306 20.0 B 227 282 27.2 C 143 198 Signalized EB Right 120 9.6 A 19 120 11.3 B 20 120 16.9 B 50 120 EB Approach 20.9 C -- -- 16.8 B -- -- 21.2 C -- -- WB Left 88 17.2 B 52 87 15.2 B 98 87 36.6 D 179 88 WB Thru - Right 16.4 B 187 203 11.7 B 178 256 24.0 C 295 442 WB Approach 16.5 B -- -- 12.9 B -- -- 28.8 C -- -- NB Left 355 35.1 D #320 269 29.5 C 127 145 32.9 C 175 190 NB Thru 28.0 C 216 225 28.0 C 86 105 30.8 C 101 129 NB Right 200 0.0 A 53 156 0.0 A 33 0 0.0 A 15 0 NB Approach 32.1 C -- -- 28.9 C -- -- 32.2 C -- -- SB Left 117 31.4 C 31 65 27.6 C 40 95 27.8 C 57 117 SB Thru 32.0 C 59 96 29.4 C 111 174 37.0 D 285 350 SB Right 125 31.3 C 0 67 28.0 C 0 92 28.2 C 0 125 SB Approach 31.7 C -- -- 28.8 C -- -- 34.8 C -- -- Overall 24.9 C -- -- 19.6 B -- -- 28.9 C -- -- 6. Maury Avenue/Alderman Road (N-S) and EB Approach 11.0 B 25 97 8.4 A 4 49 10.5 B 6 59 Stadium Road (E-W) WB Approach 9.4 A 6 78 8.9 A 10 7 15.2 C 55 133 Unsignalized NB Approach 13 B 59 222 9 A 20 120 11.4 B 23 135 SB Approach 10.8 B 18 105 9.3 A 23 119 30.8 D 170 294 7. Washington Avenue (N-S) and EB Approach † † -- 3 † † -- 6 † † -- 11 Stadium Road (E-W) WB Approach 7.6 A 0 8 7.5 A 0 15 7.6 A 0 20 Unsignalized NB Approach 9.3 A 0 30 9.8 A 0 46 10.0 A 2 40 1 Overall intersection LOS and delay cannot be reported for unsignalized intersections. † SYNCHRO does not provide level of service or delay for unsignalized movements with no conflicting volumes. # - 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. SimTraffic queues are average maximum queues after 10 runs of 60 minutes each. 4-3 Attachment E December 2021 Aspen Heights TIA – City of Charlottesville PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK 4-4 71 (329) {151} Alderman Road 29 (94) {40} 26 (61) {17} Attachment E 6 7 31 (20) {21} 9 (130) {22} 50 (260) {93} 6 18 (129) {53} 1 (5) {7} Stadium Road {20} (20) 111 {47} (80) 144 7 Stadium Drive {12} (16) 70 Washington Ave Observatory Ave {3} (3) 6 {9} (2) 3 Harmon Street {3} (5) 1 {2} (10) 4 {5} (6) 2 {26} (16) 49 {158} (156) 305 NOT TO SCALE 4 (7) {16} LEGEND: Washington Avenue 00 AM Peak Hour 8 5 Maury Avenue (00) PM Peak Hour Site Entrance 4 3 2 1 {00} Midday Peak Hour Jefferson Shamrock Park Avenue Existing Road Road Proposed Road {8} (10) 8 AM Peak: 7:30-8:30 AM Observatory Avenue Harmon Street Midday Peak: 12-1 PM PM Peak: 4:45-5:45 PM 49 (306) {116} 19 (52) {21} 2 2 (15) {8} 3 (7) {1} 0 (1) {0} 2 (6) {0} 0 (1) {0} 2 (6) {2} 14 (49) {42} 20 (49) {31} 0 (7) {7} 0 (0) {1} 0 (7) {4} 5 4 3 3 (7) {5} 4 (9) {2} 1 Jefferson Park Avenue 2 (2) {5} 1 (5) {6} Fontaine Avenue 22 (33) {24} 292 (592) {361} 3 (4) {1} 3 (12) {6} 215 (328) {217} 279 (611) {379} 288 (573) {352} 244 (551) {343} 2 (2) {1} 53 (223) {126} 4 (8) {3} 4 (13) {8} 31 (104) {54} {46} (25) 68 {3} (9) 6 {6} (7) 9 {5} (21) 8 {258} (151) 294 {428} (312) 504 {3} (8) 5 {421} (315) 481 {408} (276) 453 {145} (256) 137 {3} (3) 0 {427} (318) 485 {3} (1) 1 {33} (55) 32 {38} (43) 65 {22} (25) 45 {38} (56) 73 {133} (184) 310 {85} (101) 233 {130} (105) 178 {1} (1) 2 {2} (4) 1 {0} (0) 0 {3} (6) 3 {1} (0) 1 {0} (0) 0 {1} (8) 1 {2} (0) 0 {0} (0) 0 {3} (1) 1 Jefferson Park Avenue Private Entrance Private Entrance Private Entrance Shamrock Road 2023 Background Peak Hour Volumes Figure Aspen Heights TIA City of Charlottesville, Virginia 4-1 Alderman Road Attachment E 0 (22) {6} 2 (9) {5} 1 (0) {1} 6 7 1 (0) {0} 1 (3) {1} 1 (6) {2} 6 0 (1) {1} 1 (0) {2} Stadium Road {2} (7) 11 {3} (2) 2 7 Stadium Drive {1} (1) 2 Washington Ave Observatory Ave {0} (0) 0 {0} (0) 0 Harmon Street {0} (0) 0 {3} (3) 0 {1} (0) 0 {13} (6) 13 {1} (1) 0 NOT TO SCALE LEGEND: Washington Avenue 00 AM Peak Hour 8 5 Maury Avenue (00) PM Peak Hour Site Entrance 4 3 2 1 {00} Midday Peak Hour Jefferson Shamrock Park Avenue Existing Road Road Proposed Road AM Peak: 7:30-8:30 AM Observatory Avenue Harmon Street Midday Peak: 12-1 PM PM Peak: 4:45-5:45 PM 1 (2) {0} 0 (0) {0} 0 (0) {0} 0 (0) {0} 0 (0) {0} 0 (0) {0} 0 (0) {0} 0 (0) {0} 0 (0) {0} 0 (10) {3} 5 4 3 0 (2) {0} 0 (2) {2} 2 1 Jefferson Park Avenue 0 (1) {1} 3 (9) {2} 0 (0) {0} 0 (1) {1} 0 (1) {1} Fontaine Avenue 0 (0) {0} 0 (0) {0} 3 (2) {0} 3 (2) {0} 4 (21) {6} 4 (26) {7} 2 (21) {6} 3 (21) {11} 1 (15) {5} 0 (2) {0} 0 (0) {0} 0 (0) {0} 0 (6) {0} {0} (0) 0 {0} (0) 0 {0} (1) 0 {0} (1) 0 {6} (7) 17 {0} (1) 0 {1} (3) 2 {5} (6) 18 {5} (4) 20 {0} (1) 0 {5} (6) 17 {1} (1) 0 {0} (0) 0 {0} (1) 0 {0} (0) 0 {3} (3) 4 {1} (0) 2 {0} (0) 0 {1} (1) 0 {9} (2) 12 {4} (1) 9 {0} (0) 0 {0} (0) 0 {0} (0) 1 {0} (1) 0 {0} (0) 0 {0} (0) 0 {0} (0) 0 {1} (0) 0 {0} (0) 0 Jefferson Park Avenue Private Entrance Private Entrance Private Entrance Shamrock Road 2023 Background Bicycle Volumes Figure Aspen Heights TIA City of Charlottesville, Virginia 4-2 Alderman Road Attachment E 48 (47) {40} {35} (31) 22 6 7 1 (1) {1} 6 Stadium Road 7 Stadium Drive {13} (9) 4 {17} (17) 15 Washington Ave Observatory Ave Harmon Street NOT TO SCALE 8 (11) {19} 13 (42) {39} LEGEND: Washington Avenue 00 AM Peak Hour (00) PM Peak Hour 8 5 Maury Avenue {00} Midday Peak Hour Site Entrance 4 3 2 1 Jefferson Existing Road Shamrock Park Avenue Proposed Road Road Marked Crosswalk AM Peak: 7:30-8:30 AM Observatory Avenue Harmon Street Midday Peak: 12-1 PM PM Peak: 4:45-5:45 PM 18 (59) {48} 5 4 3 2 1 16 (21) {22} Jefferson Park Avenue 23 (70) {14} {5} (3) 3 {31} (51) 44 {22} (43) 58 {53} (74) 62 2 (2) {1} {23} (46) 57 2 (2) {1} Fontaine Avenue {0} (4) 2 {2} (1) 1 {9} (9) 16 {0} (0) 0 {0} (4) 2 11 (18) {7} 32 (91) {21} 27 (67) {25} 19 (44) {25} 27 (83) {36} Jefferson Park Avenue Private Entrance Private Entrance Private Entrance Shamrock Road 2023 Background Pedestrian Volumes Figure Aspen Heights TIA City of Charlottesville, Virginia 4-3 Attachment E December 2021 Aspen Heights TIA – City of Charlottesville PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK 4-8 Attachment E December 2021 Aspen Heights TIA – City of Charlottesville 5 2028 BACKGROUND CONDITIONS The background 2028 volumes were analyzed assuming existing intersection geometry in conjunction with projected background traffic volumes. The background vehicle volumes were developed based on a 0.2% annual growth rate. The background bike and pedestrian volumes were developed based on a 1% annual growth rate. 5.1 2028 BACKGROUND TRAFFIC VOLUMES The 0.2% and 1% annual growth rates discussed above were compounded annually for the 7-year period from 2021 to 2028 and was applied to all movements at the study intersections. The resulting 2028 vehicle background (existing + growth) volumes are shown on Figure 5-1; the 2028 bike and pedestrian background (existing + growth) volumes are shown on Figures 5-2 and 5-3, respectively. 5.2 BACKGROUND 2028 CAPACITY ANALYSIS RESULTS Table 5-1 summarizes the 2028 background intersection LOS, delay, 95th percentile queue lengths (Synchro), and maximum queue lengths (SimTraffic) based on the intersection geometry (Figure 2-1) and 2028 background peak hour traffic volumes shown on Figures 5-1, 5-2, and 5-3. The corresponding SYNCHRO and SimTraffic reports are included in Appendix D. Note that the intersection numbers shown on the LOS, delay, and queue length summary tables correspond with the intersection numbers used in the SYNCHRO models and report figures. As shown in Table 5-1 under 2028 background conditions: • Levels of service at the study intersections are not expected to change significantly from 2021 existing to 2028 background conditions. • At the signalized intersection of Jefferson Park Avenue and Shamrock Avenue, the overall intersection continues to operate at a LOS B during the AM/Midday/PM peak hours. During the AM/Midday/PM peaks, the mainline (east-west) approaches and movements continue to operate at a LOS B or better; the side street (north-south) approaches continue to operate at a LOS C. During the PM peak, the westbound left maximum queue (74 feet) fills the available storage (75 feet). All other approaches have adequate distance to accommodate 95th percentile and maximum queue lengths. • At the unsignalized intersection of Jefferson Park Avenue and Harmon Street, the mainline (east-west) approaches continue to operate at a LOS A during the AM/Midday/PM peaks. The side street (north-south) approaches continue to operate at a LOS C or better during the AM/Midday/PM peaks. All approaches have adequate distance to accommodate 95th percentile and maximum queue lengths. • At the unsignalized intersection of Jefferson Park Avenue and Washington Avenue, the mainline (east-west) approaches continue to operate at a LOS A during the AM/Midday/PM peaks. The side street (north-south) approaches continue to operate at a LOS C or better during the AM/Midday/PM peaks. During the PM peak, the westbound approach maximum queue length (82 feet) backs up through the adjacent intersection with Harmon Street (77 feet away). This queue is most often caused by the westbound approach queue at Jefferson Park Avenue/Maury Avenue. All other approaches have adequate distance to accommodate 95th percentile and maximum queue lengths. 5-1 Attachment E December 2021 Aspen Heights TIA – City of Charlottesville • At the unsignalized intersection of Jefferson Park Avenue and Observatory Avenue, the mainline (east-west) approaches continue to operate at a LOS A during the AM/Midday/PM peaks. The side street (north-south) approaches continue to operate at a LOS B during the AM/Midday peaks and a LOS C during the PM peak. During the PM peak, the westbound approach maximum queue (184 feet) backs up through the adjacent intersection with Washington Avenue (174 feet away). This queue is most often caused by the westbound approach queue at Jefferson Park Avenue/Maury Avenue. All other approaches have adequate distance to accommodate 95th percentile and maximum queue lengths. • At the signalized intersection of Jefferson Park Avenue and Maury Avenue/Fontaine Avenue, the overall intersection continues to operate at a LOS C during the AM/PM peaks and a LOS B during the Midday peak. The north- and southbound approaches and movements continue to generally operate at a LOS C during the AM/Midday/PM peaks. The east- and westbound approaches and movements continue to generally operate at a LOS C or better during the AM/PM peaks and LOS B during the Midday peak. o During the AM/Midday peaks, the westbound left maximum queue (87 feet) fills the available storage (88 feet), spilling back into the through lane sometimes. During the PM peak, the 95th percentile queue (182 feet) exceeds the available storage (88 feet), spilling back into the through lane 24% of the time. During the PM peak, the westbound approach maximum queue (446 feet) backs up through the roadway network at Observatory Avenue (432 feet away), Washington Avenue (606 feet away) and Harmon Street (683 feet away). During the PM peak, the southbound through maximum queue (384 feet) effectively blocks the left and right turn lanes (125 feet max. storage) and backs up through the adjacent intersection with Clark Court (275 feet away). All other turn bays have adequate distance to accommodate 95th percentile and maximum queue lengths. • At the unsignalized intersection of Maury Avenue/Alderman Road and Stadium Road, all approaches continue to operate at a LOS B or better during the AM/Midday peaks. During the PM peak, the east- west- and northbound approaches continue to operate at a LOS C or better. The southbound approach operates at a LOS D. All approaches have adequate distance to accommodate 95th percentile and maximum queue lengths. • At the unsignalized intersection of Stadium Road and Washington Avenue, all approaches continue operate at a LOS A during the AM/Midday/PM peaks. All approaches have adequate distance to accommodate 95th percentile and maximum queue lengths. 5-2 Attachment E December 2021 Aspen Heights TIA – City of Charlottesville Table 5-1: Intersection Level of Service and Delay Summary 2028 Total Background Peak Hour Traffic AM PEAK HOUR MIDDAY PEAK HOUR PM PEAK HOUR Effective Synchro Turn Synchro Synchro SimTraffic Intersection and Movement and 95th Lane 1 95th SimTraffic 1 95th SimTraffic Max Type of Control Approach Delay 1 Delay 1 Delay 1 1 Percentile Storage (sec/veh) LOS Percentile Max Queue (sec/veh) LOS Percentile Max Queue (sec/veh) LOS Queue Queue (ft) Queue Length (ft) Queue Length (ft) Length Length Length (ft) Length (ft) (ft) (ft) 1. Shamrock Road (N-S) and EB Approach 14.1 B 325 298 12.1 B 278 283 14.7 B 216 262 Jefferson Park Avenue (E-W) WB Left 75 6.5 A 18 58 6.7 A 26 73 8.9 A 47 74 Signalized WB Thru - Right 6.0 A 106 146 7.1 A 149 188 10.8 B 303 326 WB Approach 6.0 A -- -- 7.0 A -- -- 10.5 B -- -- NB Approach 31.5 C 160 187 28.7 C 95 138 28.0 C 115 162 SB Approach 27.1 C 31 59 26.9 C 32 63 26.3 C 64 97 Overall 15.4 B -- -- 12.1 B -- -- 14.4 B -- -- 2. Harmon Street (N-S) and EB Approach 8.2 A 0 64 8.2 A 0 69 9.1 A 0 61 Jefferson Park Avenue (E-W) WB Approach 8.6 A 0 44 8.4 A 0 82 8.2 A 0 201 Unsignalized NB Approach 15.6 C 0 27 15.8 C 0 21 11.1 B 0 31 SB Approach 16.1 C 0 33 12.8 B 2 31 18.4 C 6 61 3. Washington Avenue (N-S) and EB Approach 8.4 A 0 48 8.8 A 0 39 9.2 A 0 97 Jefferson Park Avenue (E-W) WB Approach 8.6 A 0 17 8.4 A 0 3 8.4 A 0 82 Unsignalized NB Approach 12 B 0 21 17.2 C 2 60 11.1 B 0 21 SB Approach 0 A 0 0 14.5 B 2 31 19.9 C 4 42 4. Observatory Avenue (N-S) and EB Approach 8.2 A 0 58 8.3 A 0 28 9.3 A 0 97 Jefferson Park Avenue (E-W) WB Approach 9.2 A 0 39 8.4 A 0 52 8.5 A 0 184 Unsignalized NB Approach 14.3 B 0 31 14.6 B 0 31 18.9 C 2 54 SB Approach 14.9 B 0 33 10.9 B 0 20 21 C 4 55 5. Maury Avenue/Jefferson Park Ave (N-S) EB Left 152 21.1 C 78 141 16.5 B 55 132 28.3 C 35 68 and Fontaine Avenue (E-W) EB Thru 26.7 C 280 358 20.3 C 230 295 27.5 C 144 195 Signalized EB Right 120 9.8 A 19 120 11.4 B 20 120 16.9 B 52 119 EB Approach 21.3 C -- -- 17.0 B -- -- 21.3 C -- -- WB Left 88 17.5 B 52 87 15.5 B 98 87 37.6 D 181 87 WB Thru - Right 16.7 B 188 219 11.9 B 180 237 24.4 C 299 446 WB Approach 16.9 B -- -- 13.1 B -- -- 29.4 C -- -- NB Left 355 35.7 D #326 312 29.5 C 129 145 33.0 C 176 206 NB Thru 28.1 C 218 293 27.9 C 86 102 30.8 C 102 144 NB Right 200 0.0 A 54 133 0.0 A 34 0 0.0 A 15 0 NB Approach 32.4 C -- -- 28.9 C -- -- 32.2 C -- -- SB Left 117 31.4 C 31 75 27.6 C 40 98 27.9 C 59 117 SB Thru 32.0 C 60 118 29.5 C 113 174 37.5 D #289 384 SB Right 125 31.4 C 0 65 28.0 C 0 99 28.2 C 0 125 SB Approach 31.8 C -- -- 28.9 C -- -- 35.2 D -- -- Overall 25.3 C -- -- 19.8 B -- -- 29.2 C -- -- 6. Maury Avenue/Alderman Road (N-S) and EB Approach 11.1 B 27 87 8.4 A 4 41 10.5 B 6 60 Stadium Road (E-W) WB Approach 9.5 A 6 78 8.9 A 10 81 15.4 C 57 161 Unsignalized NB Approach 13.2 B 60 225 9 A 20 100 11.5 B 25 150 SB Approach 10.9 B 18 102 9.3 A 23 94 32.2 D 178 422 7. Washington Avenue (N-S) and EB Approach † † -- 3 † † -- 6 † † -- 12 Stadium Road (E-W) WB Approach 7.6 A 0 6 7.5 A 0 20 7.6 A 0 18 Unsignalized NB Approach 9.3 A 0 30 9.8 A 0 46 10.0 A 2 35 1 Overall intersection LOS and delay cannot be reported for unsignalized intersections. † SYNCHRO does not provide level of service or delay for unsignalized movements with no conflicting volumes. # - 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. SimTraffic queues are average maximum queues after 10 runs of 60 minutes each. 5-3 Attachment E December 2021 Aspen Heights TIA – City of Charlottesville PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK 5-4 72 (333) {152} Alderman Road 29 (95) {41} 26 (62) {17} Attachment E 6 7 31 (20) {21} 9 (131) {22} 51 (263) {94} 6 18 (130) {54} 1 (5) {7} Stadium Road {20} (20) 113 {48} (81) 145 7 Stadium Drive {12} (16) 71 Washington Ave Observatory Ave {2} (3) 6 {9} (2) 3 Harmon Street {3} (5) 1 {2} (10) 4 {5} (6) 2 {26} (16) 50 {159} (156) 308 NOT TO SCALE 4 (7) {16} LEGEND: Washington Avenue 00 AM Peak Hour 8 5 Maury Avenue (00) PM Peak Hour Site Entrance 4 3 2 1 {00} Midday Peak Hour Jefferson Shamrock Park Avenue Existing Road Road Proposed Road {8} (10) 8 AM Peak: 7:30-8:30 AM Observatory Avenue Harmon Street Midday Peak: 12-1 PM PM Peak: 4:45-5:45 PM 50 (309) {118} 19 (53) {21} 2 2 (15) {8} 3 (7) {1} 0 (1) {0} 2 (6) {0} 0 (1) {0} 2 (6) {2} 14 (50) {43} 20 (50) {31} 0 (7) {7} 0 (0) {1} 0 (7) {4} 5 4 3 3 (7) {5} 4 (9) {2} 1 Jefferson Park Avenue 2 (2) {5} 1 (5) {6} Fontaine Avenue 22 (33) {24} 295 (598) {365} 3 (4) {1} 3 (12) {6} 217 (332) {219} 282 (618) {382} 291 (579) {362} 246 (557) {347} 2 (2) {1} 54 (225) {127} 4 (8) {3} 4 (13) {8} 31 (105) {55} {47} (25) 69 {3} (9) 6 {6} (7) 9 {5} (21) 8 {261} (152) 297 {432} (315) 509 {3} (8) 5 {425} (318) 486 {412} (279) 457 {146} (259) 138 {3} (3) 0 {431} (321) 490 {3} (1) 1 {33} (56) 32 {39} (44) 66 {22} (25) 46 {39} (57) 74 {134} (186) 313 {86} (102) 235 {131} (106) 179 {1} (1) 2 {2} (4) 1 {0} (0) 0 {3} (6) 3 {1} (0) 1 {0} (0) 0 {1} (8) 1 {2} (0) 0 {0} (0) 0 {3} (1) 1 Jefferson Park Avenue Private Entrance Private Entrance Private Entrance Shamrock Road 2028 Background Peak Hour Volumes Figure Aspen Heights TIA City of Charlottesville, Virginia 5-1 Alderman Road Attachment E 2 (10) {5} 0 (24) {6} 1 (0) {1} 6 7 1 (0) {0} 1 (3) {1} 1 (6) {2} 6 0 (1) {1} 1 (0) {2} Stadium Road {2} (8) 12 {3} (2) 2 7 Stadium Drive {1} (1) 2 Washington Ave Observatory Ave {0} (0) 0 {0} (0) 0 Harmon Street {0} (0) 0 {3} (3) 0 {1} (0) 0 {14} (6) 14 {1} (1) 0 NOT TO SCALE LEGEND: Washington Avenue 00 AM Peak Hour 8 5 Maury Avenue (00) PM Peak Hour Site Entrance 4 3 2 1 {00} Midday Peak Hour Jefferson Shamrock Park Avenue Existing Road Road Proposed Road AM Peak: 7:30-8:30 AM Observatory Avenue Harmon Street Midday Peak: 12-1 PM PM Peak: 4:45-5:45 PM 1 (2) {0} 0 (0) {0} 0 (0) {0} 0 (0) {0} 0 (0) {0} 0 (0) {0} 0 (0) {0} 0 (0) {0} 0 (0) {0} 0 (11) {3} 5 4 3 0 (2) {0} 0 (2) {2} 2 1 Jefferson Park Avenue 3 (10) {2} 0 (1) {1} 0 (0) {0} 0 (1) {1} 0 (1) {1} Fontaine Avenue 0 (0) {0} 0 (0) {0} 3 (2) {0} 3 (2) {0} 4 (23) {6} 4 (27) {8} 2 (23) {7} 3 (23) {12} 1 (16) {5} 0 (2) {0} 0 (0) {0} 0 (0) {0} 0 (6) {0} {0} (0) 0 {0} (0) 0 {0} (1) 0 {0} (1) 0 {6} (8) 18 {0} (1) 0 {1} (3) 2 {5} (6) 19 {5} (4) 21 {0} (1) 0 {5} (7) 18 {1} (1) 0 {0} (0) 0 {0} (1) 0 {0} (0) 0 {3} (3) 4 {1} (0) 2 {0} (0) 0 {1} (1) 0 {10} (2) 13 {4} (1) 10 {0} (0) 0 {0} (0) 0 {0} (0) 1 {0} (1) 0 {0} (0) 0 {0} (0) 0 {0} (0) 0 {1} (0) 0 {0} (0) 0 Jefferson Park Avenue Private Entrance Private Entrance Private Entrance Shamrock Road 2028 Background Bicycle Volumes Figure Aspen Heights TIA City of Charlottesville, Virginia 5-2 Alderman Road Attachment E 50 (49) {42} {36} (32) 24 6 7 1 (1) {1} 6 Stadium Road 7 Stadium Drive {14} (10) 4 {18} (18) 16 Washington Ave Observatory Ave Harmon Street NOT TO SCALE 9 (12) {20} 14 (45) {41} LEGEND: Washington Avenue 00 AM Peak Hour (00) PM Peak Hour 8 5 Maury Avenue {00} Midday Peak Hour Site Entrance 4 3 2 1 Jefferson Existing Road Shamrock Park Avenue Proposed Road Road Marked Crosswalk AM Peak: 7:30-8:30 AM Observatory Avenue Harmon Street Midday Peak: 12-1 PM PM Peak: 4:45-5:45 PM 18 (62) {51} 5 4 3 2 1 17 (23) {24} Jefferson Park Avenue 25 (74) {15} {5} (3) 3 {32} (54) 46 {24} (45) 61 {56} (78) 65 2 (2) {1} {25} (48) 60 2 (2) {1} Fontaine Avenue {10} (10) 17 {0} (4) 2 {2} (1) 1 {0} (0) 0 {0} (4) 2 12 (19) {8} 34 (95) {23} 27 (71) {26} 20 (46) {26} 28 (87) {38} Jefferson Park Avenue Private Entrance Private Entrance Private Entrance Shamrock Road 2028 Background Pedestrian Volumes Figure Aspen Heights TIA City of Charlottesville, Virginia 5-3 Attachment E December 2021 Aspen Heights TIA – City of Charlottesville PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK 5-8 Attachment E December 2021 Aspen Heights TIA – City of Charlottesville 6 TRIP GENERATION Site traffic for the proposed development was estimated based on the site characteristics and subsequently distributed to the surrounding roadway network. The site is currently zoned R3. The proposed development will consist of 388 beds (119 units) of off- campus student housing apartments. The applicant is submitting this traffic impact analysis in support of a Special Use Permit (SUP) to allow for the additional density beyond the existing zoning. Access to the site is proposed via one (1) full movement entrance on Washington Avenue. 6.1 SITE TRIP GENERATION The site-generated traffic volumes shown in Table 6-1 were estimated using the 10th Edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineers’ (ITE) Trip Generation Manual and were calculated using the number of beds as the independent variable and with “adjacent to campus” subcategory. A reduction of 13% was applied for external trips, corresponding with the 13% reduction for parking spaces allowed under City of Charlottesville code for this land use and location. The midday peak hour trips were calculated using Appendix A of the ITE Trip Generation Manual, time of day distributions for the midday peak hour (12:00 – 1:00 PM). Table 6-1: Aspen Heights Trip Generation Summary WEEKDAY VEHICULAR TRIPS AMOUNT ADT AM PEAK HOUR MIDDAY PEAK HOUR(1) PM PEAK HOUR LAND USE ITE CODE UNITS (X) IN OUT IN OUT IN OUT TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL (41%) (59%) (48%) (52%) (50%) (50%) Proposed Development Off Campus Student Apartment 225 388 Beds 1,230 18 26 44 30 33 63 48 48 96 Trip Reduction 13% (160) (2) (4) (6) (4) (4) (8) (6) (6) (12) Total External Primary Trips 1,070 16 22 38 26 29 55 42 42 84 SOURCE: Institute of Transportation Engineers' Trip Generation Manual 10th Edition (2017) (1) Midday peak hour based on the ITE Trip Generation Manual 10th Edition, Appendix A time of day distributions for the hour beginning at 12:00 PM (2) Trip Reduction based on the same percentage used for the parking reduction and approved by the City. As shown in Table 6-1, the proposed development will generate a total of 38 trips (16 in and 22 out) during the AM peak, 55 trips (26 in and 29 out) during the Midday peak, 84 trips (42 in and 42 out) during the PM peak, and 1,070 average weekday daily trips. 6-1 Attachment E December 2021 Aspen Heights TIA – City of Charlottesville 6.2 EXTERNAL TRIP DISTRIBUTIONS The distribution of external trips generated by the development was based on the existing travel patterns, the nature of the use, the 2021 existing traffic volumes, and local knowledge. The following directional distributions were assumed for the site and are shown on Figure 6-1: • 40% to/from the east on Jefferson Park Avenue; • 30% to/from the east on Stadium Road; • 10% to/from the west on Fontaine Avenue; • 10% to/from the north on Alderman Road; and • 10% to/from the south on Jefferson Park Avenue. 6.3 TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENT The trip distribution percentages for the external trips from Figure 6-1 were applied to the trip generation table (Table 6-1) to distribute the external trips to the surrounding roadway network. The resulting site generated external trips are shown on Figure 6-2. 6-2 Alderman Road Attachment E 6 7 10% 6 10% 30% Stadium Road 10% 7 Stadium Drive Washington Ave Observatory Ave Harmon Street 10% 30% Washington Avenue 40% 8 5 Maury Avenue LEGEND: Site Entrance 4 3 2 1 xx% Volume Distribution Jefferson Shamrock 40% Park Avenue Existing Road Road 60% Proposed Road 60% NOT TO SCALE Observatory Avenue Harmon Street 5 4 3 2 1 Jefferson Park Avenue 20% 40% Fontaine Avenue 10% 10% 20% 40% 40% 40% 10% 20% 20% 40% 40% 10% Jefferson Park Avenue Private Entrance Private Entrance Private Entrance Shamrock Road Site Peak Hour Trip Distributions Figure Aspen Heights TIA City of Charlottesville, Virginia 6-1 Alderman Road Attachment E 2 (4) {3} 6 7 6 2 (4) {3} 5 (13) {8} Stadium Road {3} (4) 2 7 Stadium Drive Washington Ave Observatory Ave Harmon Street {3} (4) 2 {9} (13) 7 6 (17) {10} LEGEND: Washington Avenue 00 AM Peak Hour 8 5 Maury Avenue (00) PM Peak Hour Site Entrance 4 3 2 1 {00} Midday Peak Hour Jefferson Shamrock Park Avenue Existing Road {12} (17) 9 Road {17} (25) 13 Proposed Road {16} (25) 10 NOT TO SCALE Observatory Avenue Harmon Street 9 (17) {12} 4 (8) {6} 5 4 3 2 1 Jefferson Park Avenue Fontaine Avenue 2 (4) {3} 2 (4) {3} 4 (8) {6} 6 (17) {10} 6 (17) {10} 6 (17) {10} {3} (4) 2 {5} (8) 3 {5} (8) 3 {12} (17) 9 {12} (17) 9 {3} (4) 2 Jefferson Park Avenue Private Entrance Private Entrance Private Entrance Shamrock Road Total External Site Peak Hour Trips Figure Aspen Heights TIA City of Charlottesville, Virginia 6-2 Attachment E December 2021 Aspen Heights TIA – City of Charlottesville 7 2023 TOTAL FUTURE CONDITIONS To complete the analysis of 2023 total conditions (with the proposed development), the estimated site trips were added to the background 2023 traffic volumes. The projected volumes were then used to complete the capacity analysis. 7.1 TOTAL FUTURE TRAFFIC VOLUMES To generate the 2023 total future traffic volumes, the external site trips shown on Figure 6-2 and the background 2023 vehicle volumes shown in Figure 4-1 were summed. The resulting 2023 total future traffic volumes are shown on Figure 7-1. 7.2 2023 FUTURE CONDITIONS ANALYSIS RESULTS Table 7-1 summarizes the 2023 total future intersection LOS, delay, 95th percentile queue lengths (Synchro), and maximum queue lengths (SimTraffic) based on the intersection geometry and 2023 total future peak hour traffic volumes shown on Figures 2-1 and 7-1, respectively. The corresponding SYNCHRO and SimTraffic reports are included in Appendix E. Note that the intersection numbers shown on the LOS, delay, and queue length summary tables correspond with the intersection numbers used in the SYNCHRO models and report figures. As shown in Table 7-1, under 2023 total future conditions with development of the site: • Levels of service at the study intersections are not expected to change significantly from 2023 background to 2023 total future conditions. • At the signalized intersection of Jefferson Park Avenue and Shamrock Avenue, the overall intersection continues to operate at a LOS B during the AM/Midday/PM peak hours. During the AM/Midday/PM peaks, the mainline (east-west) approaches and movements continue to operate at a LOS B or better; the side street (north-south) approaches continue to operate at a LOS C. During the Midday/PM peaks, the westbound left maximum queue (75 feet) fills the available storage (75 feet). All other approaches have adequate distance to accommodate 95th percentile and maximum queue lengths. • At the unsignalized intersection of Jefferson Park Avenue and Harmon Street, the mainline (east-west) approaches continue to operate at a LOS A during the AM/Midday/PM peaks. The side street (north-south) approaches continue to operate at a LOS C or better during the AM/Midday/PM peaks. During the PM peak, the eastbound approach maximum queue (75 feet) fills the distance to the adjacent intersection with Washington Avenue (77 feet away). All approaches have adequate distance to accommodate 95th percentile and maximum queue lengths. • At the unsignalized intersection of Jefferson Park Avenue and Washington Avenue, the mainline (east-west) approaches continue to operate at a LOS A during the AM/Midday/PM peaks. The side street (north-south) approaches continue to operate at a LOS C or better during the AM/Midday/PM peaks. During the PM peak, the westbound approach maximum queue length (85 feet) backs up through the adjacent intersection with Harmon Street (77 feet away). This queue is most often caused by the westbound approach queue at Jefferson Park Avenue/Maury Avenue. All other approaches have adequate distance to accommodate 95th percentile and maximum queue lengths. 7-1 Attachment E December 2021 Aspen Heights TIA – City of Charlottesville • At the unsignalized intersection of Jefferson Park Avenue and Observatory Avenue, the mainline (east-west) approaches continue to operate at a LOS A during the AM/Midday/PM peaks. The side street (north-south) approaches continue to operate at a LOS B during the AM/Midday peaks and a LOS C during the PM peak. During the PM peak, the westbound approach maximum queue (184 feet) backs up through the adjacent intersection with Washington Avenue (174 feet away). This queue is most often caused by the westbound approach queue at Jefferson Park Avenue/Maury Avenue. All other approaches have adequate distance to accommodate 95th percentile and maximum queue lengths. • At the signalized intersection of Jefferson Park Avenue and Maury Avenue/Fontaine Avenue, the overall intersection continues to operate at a LOS C during the AM/PM peaks and a LOS B during the Midday peak. The north- and southbound approaches and movements continue to generally operate at a LOS C during the AM/Midday/PM peaks. The east- and westbound approaches and movements continue to generally operate at a LOS C or better during the AM/PM peaks and LOS B during the Midday peak. o During the AM/Midday peaks, the westbound left maximum queue (87 feet) fills the available storage (88 feet), spilling back into the through lane sometimes. During the PM peak, the 95th percentile queue (182 feet) exceeds the available storage (88 feet), spilling back into the through lane 24% of the time. During the PM peak, the westbound approach maximum queue (447 feet) backs up through the roadway network at Observatory Avenue (432 feet away), Washington Avenue (606 feet away) and Harmon Street (683 feet away). During the PM peak, the southbound through maximum queue (326 feet) effectively blocks the left and right turn lanes (125 feet max. storage) and backs up through the adjacent intersection with Clark Court (275 feet away). All other turn bays have adequate distance to accommodate 95th percentile and maximum queue lengths. • At the unsignalized intersection of Maury Avenue/Alderman Road and Stadium Road, all approaches continue to operate at a LOS B or better during the AM/Midday peaks. During the PM peak, the east- west- and northbound approaches continue to operate at a LOS C or better. The southbound approach operates at a LOS D. All approaches have adequate distance to accommodate 95th percentile and maximum queue lengths. • At the unsignalized intersection of Stadium Road and Washington Avenue, all approaches continue operate at a LOS A during the AM/Midday/PM peaks, the exception being the northbound approach changing from a LOS A (10.0 seconds) to LOS B (10.1 seconds) during the PM peak. All approaches have adequate distance to accommodate 95th percentile and maximum queue lengths. • At the unsignalized intersection of the Site Entrance and Washington Avenue, all approaches will operate at a LOS A during the AM/Midday/PM peaks. All approaches have adequate distance to accommodate 95th percentile and maximum queue lengths. 7-2 Attachment E December 2021 Aspen Heights TIA – City of Charlottesville Table 7-1: Intersection Level of Service and Delay Summary 2023 Total Future Traffic AM PEAK HOUR MIDDAY PEAK HOUR PM PEAK HOUR Effective Synchro Turn Synchro Synchro SimTraffic Intersection and Movement and 95th Lane 1 95th SimTraffic 1 95th SimTraffic Max Type of Control Approach Delay 1 Delay 1 Delay 1 1 Percentile Storage (sec/veh) LOS Percentile Max Queue (sec/veh) LOS Percentile Max Queue (sec/veh) LOS Queue Queue (ft) Queue Length (ft) Queue Length (ft) Length Length Length (ft) Length (ft) (ft) (ft) 1. Shamrock Road (N-S) and EB Approach 14.1 B 330 297 12.0 B 285 268 14.8 B 226 265 Jefferson Park Avenue (E-W) WB Left 75 6.5 A 18 63 6.6 A 25 75 8.8 A 47 74 Signalized WB Thru - Right 6.0 A 108 142 7.0 A 152 213 10.8 B 312 402 WB Approach 6.0 A -- -- 6.9 A -- -- 10.5 B -- -- NB Approach 31.4 C 157 189 28.7 C 93 124 28.0 C 114 151 SB Approach 27.1 C 31 64 27.0 C 32 58 26.4 C 63 90 Overall 15.3 B -- -- 12.0 B -- -- 14.4 B -- -- 2. Harmon Street (N-S) and EB Approach 8.2 A 0 60 8.2 A 0 64 9.1 A 0 75 Jefferson Park Avenue (E-W) WB Approach 8.6 A 0 62 8.4 A 0 89 8.3 A 0 225 Unsignalized NB Approach 15.7 C 0 31 15.8 C 0 26 11.2 B 0 35 SB Approach 16.1 C 0 31 12.8 B 2 35 18.7 C 6 61 3. Washington Avenue (N-S) and EB Approach 8.5 A 0 72 8.8 A 0 73 9.3 A 0 139 Jefferson Park Avenue (E-W) WB Approach 8.6 A 0 31 8.4 A 0 11 8.3 A 0 85 Unsignalized NB Approach 12 B 0 12 17.3 C 2 58 11 B 0 22 SB Approach 17.7 C 2 38 16.6 C 6 51 24.2 C 14 92 4. Observatory Avenue (N-S) and EB Approach 8.2 A 0 34 8.2 A 0 15 9.3 A 0 114 Jefferson Park Avenue (E-W) WB Approach 9.2 A 0 52 8.4 A 0 59 8.5 A 0 184 Unsignalized NB Approach 14.2 B 0 31 14.5 B 0 31 19 C 2 53 SB Approach 14.8 B 0 29 10.9 B 0 14 20.9 C 4 84 5. Maury Avenue/Jefferson Park Ave (N-S) EB Left 152 20.8 C 77 149 16.3 B 53 133 28.0 C 35 73 and Fontaine Avenue (E-W) EB Thru 26.3 C 279 289 20.1 C 230 268 27.3 C 146 201 Signalized EB Right 120 9.7 A 19 120 11.3 B 20 120 16.9 B 50 120 EB Approach 21.0 C -- -- 16.9 B -- -- 21.3 C -- -- WB Left 88 17.3 B 53 87 15.4 B 99 87 37.6 D 182 87 WB Thru - Right 16.4 B 188 211 11.8 B 180 246 24.2 C 298 447 WB Approach 16.6 B -- -- 13.0 B -- -- 29.3 C -- -- NB Left 355 35.1 D #320 289 29.5 C 127 160 32.9 C 175 208 NB Thru 28.0 C 216 221 28.0 C 86 109 30.8 C 101 129 NB Right 200 0.0 A 53 111 0.0 A 35 0 0.0 A 18 0 NB Approach 32.1 C -- -- 28.9 C -- -- 32.2 C -- -- SB Left 117 31.4 C 31 71 27.6 C 40 92 27.8 C 57 117 SB Thru 32.0 C 59 96 29.4 C 111 146 37.0 D 285 326 SB Right 125 31.4 C 0 61 28.0 C 0 108 28.2 C 0 125 SB Approach 31.7 C -- -- 28.8 C -- -- 34.8 C -- -- Overall 24.9 C -- -- 19.6 B -- -- 29.0 C -- -- 6. Maury Avenue/Alderman Road (N-S) and EB Approach 11.0 B 25 102 8.4 A 4 40 10.5 B 6 51 Stadium Road (E-W) WB Approach 9.5 A 6 75 8.9 A 10 80 15.4 C 57 160 Unsignalized NB Approach 13 B 60 208 9 A 20 106 11.5 B 25 135 SB Approach 10.9 B 18 106 9.3 A 23 101 31.9 D 176 290 7. Washington Avenue (N-S) and EB Approach † † -- 3 † † -- 6 † † -- 10 Stadium Road (E-W) WB Approach 7.6 A 0 24 7.5 A 0 24 7.6 A 0 35 Unsignalized NB Approach 9.4 A 2 30 9.8 A 2 64 10.1 B 2 44 8. Washington Avenue (N-S) and EB Approach 8.6 A 2 35 8.7 A 2 40 8.8 A 2 52 Site Entrance (E-W) NB Approach 7.2 A 0 -- 4.9 A 0 12 7.3 A 2 25 Unsignalized SB Approach † † -- -- † † -- -- † † -- -- 1 Overall intersection LOS and delay cannot be reported for unsignalized intersections. † SYNCHRO does not provide level of service or delay for unsignalized movements with no conflicting volumes. # - 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. SimTraffic queues are average maximum queues after 10 runs of 60 minutes each. 7-3 Attachment E December 2021 Aspen Heights TIA – City of Charlottesville PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK 7-4 71 (329) {151} Alderman Road 29 (94) {40} 28 (65) {20} Attachment E 6 7 33 (24) {24} 9 (130) {22} 50 (260) {93} 6 18 (129) {53} 6 (18) {15} Stadium Road {20} (20) 111 {47} (80) 144 7 Stadium Drive {12} (16) 70 Washington Ave Observatory Ave {3} (3) 6 {12} (6) 5 Harmon Street {6} (9) 3 {11} (23) 11 {5} (6) 2 {26} (16) 49 {158} (156) 305 NOT TO SCALE 6 (17) {10} 4 (7) {16} LEGEND: Washington Avenue 00 AM Peak Hour 8 5 Maury Avenue (00) PM Peak Hour Site Entrance 4 3 2 1 {00} Midday Peak Hour Jefferson Shamrock Park Avenue Existing Road {12} (17) 9 Road {17} (25) 13 Proposed Road {16} (25) 10 {8} (10) 8 AM Peak: 7:30-8:30 AM Observatory Avenue Harmon Street Midday Peak: 12-1 PM PM Peak: 4:45-5:45 PM 49 (306) {116} 19 (52) {21} 2 4 (15) {13} 9 (24) {16} 2 (15) {8} 3 (7) {1} 0 (1) {0} 2 (6) {0} 0 (1) {0} 2 (6) {2} 14 (49) {42} 20 (49) {31} 0 (0) {1} 5 4 3 3 (7) {5} 4 (9) {2} 1 Jefferson Park Avenue 8 (19) {15} 1 (5) {6} Fontaine Avenue 22 (33) {24} 292 (592) {361} 3 (4) {1} 3 (12) {6} 217 (332) {220} 283 (619) {385} 294 (590) {362} 250 (568) {353} 2 (2) {1} 55 (227) {129} 4 (8) {3} 4 (13) {8} 31 (104) {54} {46} (25) 68 {3} (9) 6 {6} (7) 9 {5} (21) 8 {261} (155) 296 {433} (320) 507 {8} (16) 8 {433} (332) 490 {420} (293) 462 {145} (256) 137 {3} (3) 0 {427} (318) 485 {3} (1) 1 {33} (55) 32 {38} (43) 65 {22} (25) 45 {38} (56) 73 {133} (184) 310 {85} (101) 233 {133} (109) 180 {1} (1) 2 {2} (4) 1 {0} (0) 0 {3} (6) 3 {1} (0) 1 {0} (0) 0 {1} (8) 1 {2} (0) 0 {0} (0) 0 {3} (1) 1 Jefferson Park Avenue Private Entrance Private Entrance Private Entrance Shamrock Road 2023 Total Future Peak Hour Volumes Figure Aspen Heights TIA City of Charlottesville, Virginia 7-1 Attachment E December 2021 Aspen Heights TIA – City of Charlottesville PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK 7-6 Attachment E December 2021 Aspen Heights TIA – City of Charlottesville 8 2028 TOTAL FUTURE CONDITIONS To complete the analysis of 2028 total conditions (with the proposed development), the estimated site trips were added to the background 2028 traffic volumes. The projected volumes were then used to complete the capacity analysis. 8.1 TOTAL FUTURE TRAFFIC VOLUMES To generate the 2028 total future traffic volumes, the external site trips shown on Figure 6-2 and the background 2028 vehicle volumes shown in Figure 5-1 were summed. The resulting 2028 total future traffic volumes are shown on Figure 8-1. 8.2 2028 TOTAL FUTURE CONDITIONS ANALYSIS RESULTS Table 8-1 summarizes the 2028 future intersection LOS, delay, 95th percentile queue lengths (Synchro), and maximum queue lengths (SimTraffic) based on the intersection geometry and 2028 future peak hour traffic volumes shown on Figures 2-1 and 8-1, respectively. The corresponding SYNCHRO and SimTraffic reports are included in Appendix E. Note that the intersection numbers shown on the LOS, delay, and queue length summary tables correspond with the intersection numbers used in the SYNCHRO models and report figures. As shown in Table 8-1, under 2028 future conditions with development of the site: • Levels of service at the study intersections are not expected to change significantly from 2028 background to 2028 total future conditions. • At the signalized intersection of Jefferson Park Avenue and Shamrock Avenue, the overall intersection continues to operate at a LOS B during the AM/Midday/PM peak hours. During the AM/Midday/PM peaks, the mainline (east-west) approaches and movements continue to operate at a LOS B or better; the side street (north-south) approaches continue to operate at a LOS C. During the PM peaks, the westbound left maximum queue (74 feet) fills the available storage (75 feet). All other approaches have adequate distance to accommodate 95th percentile and maximum queue lengths. • At the unsignalized intersection of Jefferson Park Avenue and Harmon Street, the mainline (east-west) approaches continue to operate at a LOS A during the AM/Midday/PM peaks. The side street (north-south) approaches continue to operate at a LOS C or better during the AM/Midday/PM peaks. All approaches have adequate distance to accommodate 95th percentile and maximum queue lengths. • At the unsignalized intersection of Jefferson Park Avenue and Washington Avenue, the mainline (east-west) approaches continue to operate at a LOS A during the AM/Midday/PM peaks. The side street (north-south) approaches continue to operate at a LOS C or better during the AM/Midday/PM peaks. During the PM peak, the westbound approach maximum queue length (82 feet) backs up through the adjacent intersection with Harmon Street (77 feet away). This queue is most often caused by the westbound approach queue at Jefferson Park Avenue/Maury Avenue. All other approaches have adequate distance to accommodate 95th percentile and maximum queue lengths. 8-1 Attachment E December 2021 Aspen Heights TIA – City of Charlottesville • At the unsignalized intersection of Jefferson Park Avenue and Observatory Avenue, the mainline (east-west) approaches continue to operate at a LOS A during the AM/Midday/PM peaks. The side street (north-south) approaches continue to operate at a LOS B during the AM/Midday peaks and a LOS C during the PM peak. During the PM peak, the westbound approach maximum queue (160 feet) fills the distance to the adjacent intersection with Washington Avenue (174 feet away). This queue is most often caused by the westbound approach queue at Jefferson Park Avenue/Maury Avenue. All other approaches have adequate distance to accommodate 95th percentile and maximum queue lengths. • At the signalized intersection of Jefferson Park Avenue and Maury Avenue/Fontaine Avenue, the overall intersection continues to operate at a LOS C during the AM/PM peaks and a LOS B during the Midday peak. The north- and southbound approaches and movements continue to generally operate at a LOS C during the AM/Midday/PM peaks. The east- and westbound approaches and movements continue to generally operate at a LOS C or better during the AM/PM peaks and LOS B during the Midday peak. o During the AM/Midday peaks, the westbound left maximum queue (87 feet) fills the available storage (88 feet), spilling back into the through lane sometimes. During the PM peak, the 95th percentile queue (184 feet) exceeds the available storage (88 feet), spilling back into the through lane 22% of the time. During the PM peak, the westbound approach maximum queue (444 feet) backs up through the adjacent intersection with Observatory Avenue (432 feet away). During the PM peak, the southbound through maximum queue (402 feet) effectively blocks the left and right turn lanes (125 feet max. storage) and backs up through the adjacent intersection with Clark Court (275 feet away). All other turn bays have adequate distance to accommodate 95th percentile and maximum queue lengths. • At the unsignalized intersection of Maury Avenue/Alderman Road and Stadium Road, all approaches continue to operate at a LOS B or better during the AM/Midday peaks. During the PM peak, the east- west- and northbound approaches continue to operate at a LOS C or better. The southbound approach operates at a LOS D. All approaches have adequate distance to accommodate 95th percentile and maximum queue lengths. • At the unsignalized intersection of Stadium Road and Washington Avenue, all approaches continue operate at a LOS A during the AM/Midday/PM peaks, the exception being the northbound approach changing from a LOS A (10.0 seconds) to LOS B (10.1 seconds) during the PM peak. All approaches have adequate distance to accommodate 95th percentile and maximum queue lengths. • At the unsignalized intersection of the Site Entrance and Washington Avenue, all approaches will operate at a LOS A during the AM/Midday/PM peaks. All approaches have adequate distance to accommodate 95th percentile and maximum queue lengths. 8-2 Attachment E December 2021 Aspen Heights TIA – City of Charlottesville Table 8-1: Intersection Level of Service and Delay Summary 2028 Total Future Traffic AM PEAK HOUR MIDDAY PEAK HOUR PM PEAK HOUR Effective Synchro Turn Synchro Synchro SimTraffic Intersection and Movement and 95th Lane 1 95th SimTraffic 1 95th SimTraffic Max Type of Control Approach Delay 1 Delay 1 Delay 1 1 Percentile Storage (sec/veh) LOS Percentile Max Queue (sec/veh) LOS Percentile Max Queue (sec/veh) LOS Queue Queue (ft) Queue Length (ft) Queue Length (ft) Length Length Length (ft) Length (ft) (ft) (ft) 1. Shamrock Road (N-S) and EB Approach 14.2 B 335 293 12.3 B 288 275 15.0 B 230 294 Jefferson Park Avenue (E-W) WB Left 75 6.5 A 18 56 6.7 A 26 72 8.9 A 47 74 Signalized WB Thru - Right 6.0 A 109 150 7.2 A 154 215 11.1 B 318 356 WB Approach 6.1 A -- -- 7.1 A -- -- 10.7 B -- -- NB Approach 31.5 C 160 193 28.7 C 95 118 28.0 C 115 154 SB Approach 27.1 C 31 59 26.9 C 32 57 26.3 C 64 87 Overall 15.4 B -- -- 12.1 B -- -- 14.6 B -- -- 2. Harmon Street (N-S) and EB Approach 8.2 A 0 68 8.2 A 0 68 9.2 A 0 69 Jefferson Park Avenue (E-W) WB Approach 8.6 A 0 52 8.5 A 0 31 8.3 A 0 149 Unsignalized NB Approach 15.8 C 0 24 16 C 0 27 11.2 B 0 37 SB Approach 16.3 C 0 31 12.9 B 2 31 19 C 6 56 3. Washington Avenue (N-S) and EB Approach 8.5 A 0 58 8.8 A 0 76 9.4 A 2 130 Jefferson Park Avenue (E-W) WB Approach 8.6 A 0 38 8.4 A 0 22 8.4 A 0 88 Unsignalized NB Approach 12 B 0 22 17.6 C 2 57 11.1 B 0 18 SB Approach 18 C 4 40 16.8 C 6 49 24.7 C 14 67 4. Observatory Avenue (N-S) and EB Approach 8.2 A 0 29 8.3 A 0 19 9.3 A 0 110 Jefferson Park Avenue (E-W) WB Approach 9.2 A 0 71 8.4 A 0 35 8.6 A 0 160 Unsignalized NB Approach 14.4 B 0 31 14.7 B 0 31 19.3 C 2 33 SB Approach 15 B 0 26 10.9 B 0 20 21.4 C 4 48 5. Maury Avenue/Jefferson Park Ave (N-S) EB Left 152 21.2 C 78 143 16.5 B 55 129 28.6 C 35 76 and Fontaine Avenue (E-W) EB Thru 26.8 C 281 302 20.3 C 233 292 27.6 C 147 240 Signalized EB Right 120 9.8 A 19 120 11.4 B 20 120 17.1 B 53 120 EB Approach 21.4 C -- -- 17.1 B -- -- 21.4 C -- -- WB Left 88 17.6 B 53 87 15.7 B 100 87 38.6 D 184 87 WB Thru - Right 16.7 B 190 234 12.0 B 182 259 24.6 C 304 444 WB Approach 16.9 B -- -- 13.2 B -- -- 30.0 C -- -- NB Left 355 35.7 D #326 259 29.5 C 129 148 33.0 C 176 188 NB Thru 28.1 C 218 211 27.9 C 86 110 30.8 C 102 125 NB Right 200 0.0 A 54 110 0.0 A 37 0 0.0 A 15 0 NB Approach 32.4 C -- -- 28.9 C -- -- 32.2 C -- -- SB Left 117 31.4 C 31 74 27.6 C 40 93 27.9 C 59 117 SB Thru 32.0 C 60 101 29.5 C 113 156 37.5 D #289 402 SB Right 125 31.4 C 0 55 28.0 C 0 101 28.3 C 0 125 SB Approach 31.8 C -- -- 28.9 C -- -- 35.2 D -- -- Overall 25.3 C -- -- 19.8 B -- -- 29.4 C -- -- 6. Maury Avenue/Alderman Road (N-S) and EB Approach 11.1 B 27 90 8.5 A 4 47 10.6 B 6 59 Stadium Road (E-W) WB Approach 9.5 A 8 74 8.9 A 10 84 15.6 C 57 163 Unsignalized NB Approach 13.2 B 60 210 9 A 20 111 11.6 B 25 143 SB Approach 11 B 18 106 9.4 A 23 101 33.4 D 176 366 7. Washington Avenue (N-S) and EB Approach † † -- 6 † † -- 1 † † -- 14 Stadium Road (E-W) WB Approach 7.6 A 0 21 7.5 A 0 25 7.6 A 0 37 Unsignalized NB Approach 9.4 A 2 35 9.8 A 2 67 10.1 B 2 47 8. Washington Avenue (N-S) and EB Approach 8.6 A 2 38 8.7 A 2 44 8.8 A 2 47 Site Entrance (E-W) NB Approach 7.2 A 0 -- 7.3 A 0 9 7.3 A 2 19 Unsignalized SB Approach † † -- -- † † -- -- † † -- -- 1 Overall intersection LOS and delay cannot be reported for unsignalized intersections. † SYNCHRO does not provide level of service or delay for unsignalized movements with no conflicting volumes. # - 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. SimTraffic queues are average maximum queues after 10 runs of 60 minutes each. 8-3 Attachment E December 2021 Aspen Heights TIA – City of Charlottesville PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK 8-4 72 (333) {152} Alderman Road 29 (95) {41} 28 (66) {20} Attachment E 6 7 33 (24) {24} 9 (131) {22} 51 (263) {94} 6 18 (130) {54} 6 (18) {15} Stadium Road {20} (20) 113 {48} (81) 145 7 Stadium Drive {12} (16) 71 Washington Ave Observatory Ave {2} (3) 6 {12} (6) 5 Harmon Street {6} (9) 3 {11} (23) 11 {5} (6) 2 {26} (16) 50 {159} (156) 308 NOT TO SCALE 6 (17) {10} 4 (7) {16} LEGEND: Washington Avenue 00 AM Peak Hour 8 5 Maury Avenue (00) PM Peak Hour Site Entrance 4 3 2 1 {00} Midday Peak Hour Jefferson Shamrock Park Avenue Existing Road {12} (17) 9 Road {17} (25) 13 Proposed Road {16} (25) 10 {8} (10) 8 AM Peak: 7:30-8:30 AM Observatory Avenue Harmon Street Midday Peak: 12-1 PM PM Peak: 4:45-5:45 PM 50 (309) {118} 19 (53) {21} 2 4 (15) {13} 9 (24) {16} 2 (15) {8} 3 (7) {1} 0 (1) {0} 2 (6) {0} 0 (1) {0} 2 (6) {2} 14 (50) {43} 20 (50) {31} 0 (0) {1} 5 4 3 3 (7) {5} 4 (9) {2} 1 Jefferson Park Avenue 8 (19) {15} 1 (5) {6} Fontaine Avenue 22 (33) {24} 295 (598) {365} 3 (4) {1} 3 (12) {6} 219 (336) {222} 286 (626) {388} 297 (596) {366} 252 (574) {357} 2 (2) {1} 56 (229) {130} 4 (8) {3} 4 (13) {8} 31 (105) {55} {47} (25) 69 {3} (9) 6 {6} (7) 9 {5} (21) 8 {264} (156) 299 {437} (323) 512 {8} (16) 8 {437} (335) 495 {424} (296) 466 {146} (259) 138 {3} (3) 0 {431} (321) 490 {3} (1) 1 {33} (56) 32 {39} (44) 66 {22} (25) 46 {39} (57) 74 {134} (186) 313 {86} (102) 235 {134} (106) 181 {1} (1) 2 {2} (4) 1 {0} (0) 0 {3} (6) 3 {1} (0) 1 {0} (0) 0 {1} (8) 1 {2} (0) 0 {0} (0) 0 {3} (1) 1 Jefferson Park Avenue Private Entrance Private Entrance Private Entrance Shamrock Road 2028 Total Future Peak Hour Volumes Figure Aspen Heights TIA City of Charlottesville, Virginia 8-1 Attachment E December 2021 Aspen Heights TIA – City of Charlottesville PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK 8-6 Attachment E December 2021 Aspen Heights TIA – City of Charlottesville 9 TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANT ANALYSIS Signal warrant analyses were completed at the intersection of Jefferson Park Avenue and Washington Avenue using the 2028 total volumes from Figure 8-1. The warrant analyses were conducted following procedures from the 2009 edition of the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) and the hourly volumes from 7:00 AM to 7:00 PM. In accordance with VDOT standards, Warrant 1 (Eight-Hour), Warrant 2 (Four-Hour), and Warrant 3 (Peak Hour) outlined in the 2009 MUTCD was considered for the analyses and are described in detail below. The MUTCD contains both 100% and 70% volume thresholds that can be used in the signal warrant analysis. The 100% volume thresholds were used to complete the analyses as the conditions for using the 70% volumes are not met in this case. As noted above, this section of Jefferson Park Avenue has one (1) through travel lane in each direction. The lane geometry used in the traffic signal warrant analysis for the major street is assumed to be one (1) lane and the minor street as one (1) lane. It is specifically noted in all hours of the warrant analysis that the higher minor street volume is on Washington Avenue. At no time does the traffic from the northbound approach from the private entrance oppositive Washington Avenue have higher hourly volumes than the southbound approach from Washington Avenue. 9.1 WARRANT 1 (EIGHT-HOUR VEHICULAR VOLUME) According to the MUTCD, “the need for a traffic control signal shall be considered if an engineering study finds that one of the following conditions exist for each of any 8 hours of an average day”: Condition A: This warrant is intended for application at locations where a large volume of intersecting traffic is the principal reason to consider installing a traffic control signal. The need for a traffic control signal is considered when, for each of any eight (8) hours of an average day, a minimum of 500 vehicles per hour exist on the major street approaches and 150 vehicles per hour are present on the higher-volume minor street approach. These are the 100% volume thresholds for a one-lane major street approach and a one-lane minor street approach from the 2009 MUTCD Table 4C-1. The analysis results indicate the required vehicle volume on the minor street approach was present for zero (0) of the eight (8) required hours under the 100% volume thresholds for the one-lane minor street approach. Therefore, this warrant is not considered met. Condition B: This warrant is intended for application at locations where the traffic volume on a major street is so heavy that traffic on a minor intersecting street suffers excessive delay or conflict in entering or crossing the major street. The need for a traffic control signal is considered when for each of any eight (8) hours of an average day, a minimum of 750 vehicles per hour exist on the major street approaches and 75 vehicles are present on the higher-volume minor street approach. These are the 100% volume thresholds for a two- lane major street approach and a two-lane minor street approach from the 2009 MUTCD Table 4C-1. 9-1 Attachment E December 2021 Aspen Heights TIA – City of Charlottesville The analysis results indicate the required vehicle volume on the minor street approach was present for zero (0) of the eight (8) required hours under the 100% volume thresholds. Therefore, this warrant is considered not considered met under the 100% volume thresholds. Combination of Conditions A and B This warrant reduces the volume thresholds found in Conditions A and B by 20% and considers both conditions simultaneously. The need for a traffic control signal is considered when for each of any eight (8) hours of an average day, a minimum of 400 vehicles are present on the major street approaches and 120 vehicles are present on the higher volumes minor street approach (Condition A) and a minimum of 600 vehicles are present on the major street approaches and 60 vehicles are present on the higher volumes minor street approach (Condition B). These are the 100% volume thresholds for a one-lane major street approach and a one-lane minor street approach from the 2009 MUTCD Table 4C-1. The analysis results indicate the required vehicle volume on the minor street approach was present for zero (0) of the eight (8) required hours for Condition A and zero (0) of the eight (8) required hours for Condition B under the 100% volume thresholds. Therefore, this warrant is not considered met. 9.2 WARRANT 2 (FOUR-HOUR VEHICULAR VOLUME) This warrant is intended to be applied where the volume of intersecting traffic is the principal reason to consider installing a traffic signal. The need for a traffic control signal can be considered when, for each of any four (4) hours of an average day, the plotted points representing the vehicles per hour on the major street (total of both approaches) and the corresponding vehicles per hour on the minor street approach all fall above the applicable curve (on MUTCD Figures 4C-1 and 4C-2) for the existing combination of all approach lanes. The analysis results indicate the required vehicle volumes were present for zero (0) of the four (4) required hours under the 100% volume thresholds. Therefore, this warrant is not considered met. 9-2 Attachment E December 2021 Aspen Heights TIA – City of Charlottesville 9.3 WARRANT 3 (PEAK-HOUR VEHICULAR VOLUME) This warrant is intended to be applied at a location where traffic conditions are such that for a minimum of one hour of an average day, the minor-street traffic suffers due to undue delay when entering or crossing the major street. The need for a traffic control signal can be considered when, the following two categories are met: Condition A: For the same one hour (any four consecutive 15-minute periods) of an average day, the following conditions exist: 1. The total stopped time delay experienced by the traffic on one minor-street approach (one direction only) controlled by a STOP sign equals or exceeds: four vehicle-hours for a one lane approach of five vehicle hours for a two-lane approach; and 2. The volume on the same minor-street approach (one direction only) equals or exceeds 100 vehicles per hour for one moving lane of traffic or 150 vehicles per hour for two moving lanes; and 3. The total entering volume serviced during the hour equals or exceeds 650 vehicles per hour for intersections with three approaches or 800 vehicles per hour for intersections with four or more approaches. Condition B: The plotted points representing the vehicles per hour on the major street (total of both approaches) and the corresponding vehicles per hour on the higher-volume minor-street approach (one direction only) for 1 hour (any four consecutive 15-minute periods) of an average day falls above the applicable curve in the 2009 MUTCD Figure 4C-3 for the existing combination of approach lanes. The analysis results indicate the required volumes were present for zero (0) of the one (1) required peak hour under the 100% volume thresholds. Therefore, this warrant is not considered met. 9.4 SIGNAL WARRANT ANALYSIS SUMMARY The total volumes used in the traffic signal warrant analyses, along with the results, are summarized in Table 9-1. The analysis indicates a traffic signal is not warranted using Warrant 1 (8-hour), Warrant 2 (4-hour), or Warrant 3 (peak hour) for any of the 12 hours analyzed between 7 AM and 7 PM. The proposed Aspen Heights development does not warrant a traffic signal at the intersection of Jefferson Park Avenue and Washington Avenue. 9-3 Attachment E December 2021 Aspen Heights TIA – City of Charlottesville Table 9-1– Traffic Signal Warrant Analysis Jefferson Park Avenue/Washington Avenue Intersection 100% WARRANTS Minor Street Major #1 (8-hour) Volume #3 Time Period Street Combination #2 (Highest Condition Condition (Peak Volume Condition Condition (4-hour) Approach) A B Hour) A B 07:00 - 08:00 674 13 08:00 - 09:00 772 15 09:00 - 10:00 735 22 10:00 - 11:00 721 20 11:00 - 12:00 669 19 12:00 - 13:00 800 29 13:00 - 14:00 754 24 14:00 - 15:00 774 27 15:00 - 16:00 856 29 16:00 - 17:00 901 29 17:00 - 18:00 926 39 18:00 - 19:00 799 35 # of Hours Warrant is Met 0 0 0 0 0 0 # of Hours Warrant is Required to be Met 8 8 8 8 4 1 Is Warrant Satisfied? No No No No No 9-4 Attachment E December 2021 Aspen Heights TIA – City of Charlottesville 10 CONCLUSIONS Based on the operational analyses the following is offered: • Across 2023 and 2028 background conditions during the PM peak, the westbound approach to the intersection of Jefferson Park Avenue/Maury Avenue experiences operational issues with congestion on the westbound approach and the queue extends through Observatory Avenue, Washington Avenue, and Harmon Street intersections. Under 2023 and 2028 total volume conditions, with the addition of the proposed Aspen Heights development site traffic, the westbound approach is expected to experience minimal increases with the proposed development over the 2023 and 2028 background conditions. • The results of the signal warrant analysis at Jefferson Park Avenue/Washington Avenue under 2028 total build conditions indicate that none of the traffic volume thresholds in Warrants 1 through 3 were met. None of the other warrants were considered at this time. • Under 2021 existing conditions: o All movements at unsignalized intersections within the study area on Jefferson Park Avenue and Stadium Road operate at level of service (LOS) C or better during the AM, Midday, and PM peak hours. All approaches have adequate distance to accommodate 95th percentile and maximum queue lengths. o At the signalized intersection of Jefferson Park Avenue and Shamrock Road, the overall intersection operates at a level of service (LOS) B during the AM/Midday/PM peak hours. All turning movements and approaches operate at a LOS C or better during the AM/Midday/PM peaks. All turn bays have adequate storage to accommodate 95th percentile and maximum queue lengths. o At the signalized intersection of Jefferson Park Avenue and Maury Avenue/Fontaine Avenue, the overall intersection operates at a LOS C during the AM/PM peaks and a LOS B during the Midday peak. All turning movements and approaches generally operate at a LOS C or better during the AM/Midday/PM peaks. The westbound left queue fills the available storage (AM/Midday) and backs up into the through lane (PM). During the PM peak, the westbound approach queues through the adjacent intersection with Observatory Avenue. During the PM peak, the southbound through queue backs up through the adjacent intersection with Clark Court. • Under 2023 and 2028 background conditions (without the proposed development): o Levels of service at the study intersections do not change significantly from 2021 existing to 2023 or 2028 background conditions. All unsignalized intersections continue to operate at LOS C or better during all peak hours. All signalized intersections continue to operate with LOS B or C during all peak hours. o There are no queuing concerns within the study area, with the exception of the westbound approach of Jefferson Park Avenue at Maury Avenue during the PM peak hour. The queues extend to intermittently block the intersections of Observatory Avenue, Washington Avenue, and Harmon Street. 10-1 Attachment E December 2021 Aspen Heights TIA – City of Charlottesville • Under 2023 and 2028 total future conditions (with the proposed development): o Levels of service at the study intersections do not change significantly from background to total future conditions in 2023 or 2028. o All movements at unsignalized intersections within the study area on Jefferson Park Avenue and Stadium Road operate at level of service (LOS) C or better during the AM, Midday, and PM peak hours. All approaches have adequate distance to accommodate 95th percentile and maximum queue lengths. o At the signalized intersection of Jefferson Park Avenue and Shamrock Road, the overall intersection operates at a level of service (LOS) B during the AM/Midday/PM peak hours. All turning movements and approaches operate at a LOS C or better during the AM/Midday/PM peaks. During the PM peak, the westbound left fills the available storage. All other approaches have adequate distance to accommodate 95 th percentile and maximum queue lengths. o At the signalized intersection of Jefferson Park Avenue and Maury Avenue/Fontaine Avenue, the overall intersection operates at a LOS C during the AM/PM peaks and a LOS B during the Midday peak. All turning movements and approaches generally operate at a LOS C or better during the AM/Midday/PM peaks. The westbound left queue fills the available storage (AM/Midday) and backs up into the through lane (PM). During the PM peak, the westbound approach queue backs up through the adjacent intersection with Observatory Avenue. During the PM peak, the southbound through queue backs up through the adjacent intersection with Clark Court. Based on the results of the operational analysis, there are no vehicular and roadway network improvements required based on the additional development traffic volumes. The site will increase the residential density in the area and add to the pedestrian, bicycle, and transit volumes. To address the additional pedestrian, bicycle, and transit volumes, the applicant plans to install sidewalks along the entire frontage of the property. 10-2 Attachment E December 2021 Aspen Heights TIA – City of Charlottesville Appendix A Traffic Counts Attachment E December 2021 Aspen Heights TIA – City of Charlottesville Attachment E Data Collection Group LSmith@DataCollectionGroup.net File Name : JPA and Shamrock Site Code : Start Date : 8/31/2021 Page No :1 Groups Printed- Passenger Veh - Trucks Shamrock Rd JPA Shamrock Rd JPA From North From East From South From West Start Time Right Thru Left U-Turn App. Total Right Thru Left U-Turn App. Total Right Thru Left U-Turn App. Total Right Thru Left U-Turn App. Total Int. Total 07:00 AM 1 1 0 0 2 0 33 2 0 35 3 4 6 0 13 4 73 1 0 78 128 07:15 AM 0 1 0 0 1 2 39 9 1 51 10 11 12 0 33 4 100 1 1 106 191 07:30 AM 0 4 1 0 5 1 64 4 1 70 24 11 16 0 51 6 115 2 0 123 249 07:45 AM 1 6 1 0 8 0 67 6 0 73 15 13 19 0 47 6 103 3 1 113 241 Total 2 12 2 0 16 3 203 21 2 229 52 39 53 0 144 20 391 7 2 420 809 08:00 AM 2 3 1 0 6 1 54 14 0 69 15 11 12 0 38 13 113 0 1 127 240 08:15 AM 0 6 1 0 7 1 44 5 0 50 19 10 17 0 46 5 109 0 0 114 217 08:30 AM 0 1 1 0 2 1 42 8 1 52 13 11 17 0 41 4 132 1 0 137 232 08:45 AM 2 4 2 0 8 0 49 13 0 62 11 5 5 0 21 5 116 3 0 124 215 Total 4 14 5 0 23 3 189 40 1 233 58 37 51 0 146 27 470 4 1 502 904 11:00 AM 0 2 1 0 3 0 86 12 0 98 7 4 6 0 17 6 83 0 0 89 207 11:15 AM 0 3 0 0 3 0 56 8 0 64 6 4 5 0 15 9 62 1 1 73 155 11:30 AM 0 5 0 0 5 0 72 11 1 84 7 4 13 0 24 8 72 0 0 80 193 11:45 AM 1 3 2 0 6 2 63 7 0 72 16 6 12 0 34 10 92 4 0 106 218 Total 1 13 3 0 17 2 277 38 1 318 36 18 36 0 90 33 309 5 1 348 773 12:00 PM 1 5 0 0 6 2 82 13 0 97 8 6 9 0 23 9 88 1 0 98 224 12:15 PM 1 6 1 0 8 1 85 13 0 99 7 5 12 0 24 6 111 2 0 119 250 12:30 PM 1 5 1 0 7 0 70 13 1 84 4 6 11 0 21 9 81 2 0 92 204 12:45 PM 2 5 0 0 7 3 86 12 0 101 19 5 4 0 28 8 108 0 0 116 252 Total 5 21 2 0 28 6 323 51 1 381 38 22 36 0 96 32 388 5 0 425 930 04:00 PM 3 5 0 0 8 3 97 12 0 112 13 12 14 0 39 11 61 0 0 72 231 04:15 PM 0 10 1 0 11 3 121 20 0 144 16 7 13 0 36 13 82 1 0 96 287 04:30 PM 2 6 1 0 9 2 109 19 0 130 11 4 17 0 32 18 66 1 0 85 256 04:45 PM 1 20 3 0 24 2 135 20 0 157 19 8 12 0 39 10 67 0 1 78 298 Total 6 41 5 0 52 10 462 71 0 543 59 31 56 0 146 52 276 2 1 331 1072 05:00 PM 2 11 3 0 16 3 145 24 0 172 13 7 7 0 27 17 76 2 4 99 314 05:15 PM 2 12 1 0 15 2 140 24 0 166 11 7 11 0 29 13 63 3 0 79 289 05:30 PM 2 9 2 0 13 4 118 35 0 157 11 3 12 0 26 15 63 2 3 83 279 05:45 PM 2 19 0 0 21 3 113 10 2 128 14 5 9 0 28 8 63 0 1 72 249 Total 8 51 6 0 65 12 516 93 2 623 49 22 39 0 110 53 265 7 8 333 1131 Grand Total 26 152 23 0 201 36 1970 314 7 2327 292 169 271 0 732 217 2099 30 13 2359 5619 Apprch % 12.9 75.6 11.4 0 1.5 84.7 13.5 0.3 39.9 23.1 37 0 9.2 89 1.3 0.6 Total % 0.5 2.7 0.4 0 3.6 0.6 35.1 5.6 0.1 41.4 5.2 3 4.8 0 13 3.9 37.4 0.5 0.2 42 Attachment E Data Collection Group LSmith@DataCollectionGroup.net File Name : JPA and Shamrock Site Code : Start Date : 8/31/2021 Page No :2 Groups Printed- Passenger Veh - Trucks Shamrock Rd JPA Shamrock Rd JPA From North From East From South From West Right Thru Left U-Turn App. Total Right Thru Left U-Turn App. Total Right Thru Left U-Turn App. Total Right Thru Left U-Turn App. Total Int. Total Passenger Veh 26 152 22 0 200 33 1893 308 7 2241 287 168 265 0 720 212 2024 29 13 2278 5439 % Passenger Veh 100 100 95.7 0 99.5 91.7 96.1 98.1 100 96.3 98.3 99.4 97.8 0 98.4 97.7 96.4 96.7 100 96.6 96.8 Trucks 0 0 1 0 1 3 77 6 0 86 5 1 6 0 12 5 75 1 0 81 180 % Trucks 0 0 4.3 0 0.5 8.3 3.9 1.9 0 3.7 1.7 0.6 2.2 0 1.6 2.3 3.6 3.3 0 3.4 3.2 Attachment E Data Collection Group LSmith@DataCollectionGroup.net File Name : JPA and Shamrock Site Code : Start Date : 8/31/2021 Page No :3 Shamrock Rd JPA Shamrock Rd JPA From North From East From South From West Start Time Right Thru Left U-Turn App. Total Right Thru Left U-Turn App. Total Right Thru Left U-Turn App. Total Right Thru Left U-Turn App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 09:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:30 AM 07:30 AM 0 4 1 0 5 1 64 4 1 70 24 11 16 0 51 6 115 2 0 123 249 07:45 AM 1 6 1 0 8 0 67 6 0 73 15 13 19 0 47 6 103 3 1 113 241 08:00 AM 2 3 1 0 6 1 54 14 0 69 15 11 12 0 38 13 113 0 1 127 240 08:15 AM 0 6 1 0 7 1 44 5 0 50 19 10 17 0 46 5 109 0 0 114 217 Total Volume 3 19 4 0 26 3 229 29 1 262 73 45 64 0 182 30 440 5 2 477 947 % App. Total 11.5 73.1 15.4 0 1.1 87.4 11.1 0.4 40.1 24.7 35.2 0 6.3 92.2 1 0.4 PHF .375 .792 1.00 .000 .813 .750 .854 .518 .250 .897 .760 .865 .842 .000 .892 .577 .957 .417 .500 .939 .951 Passenger Veh 3 19 4 0 26 3 215 28 1 247 73 45 63 0 181 28 429 4 2 463 917 % Passenger Veh 100 100 100 0 100 100 93.9 96.6 100 94.3 100 100 98.4 0 99.5 93.3 97.5 80.0 100 97.1 96.8 Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 1 0 15 0 0 1 0 1 2 11 1 0 14 30 % Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 0 6.1 3.4 0 5.7 0 0 1.6 0 0.5 6.7 2.5 20.0 0 2.9 3.2 Attachment E Data Collection Group LSmith@DataCollectionGroup.net File Name : JPA and Shamrock Site Code : Start Date : 8/31/2021 Page No :4 Shamrock Rd Out In Total 52 26 78 1 0 1 53 26 79 3 19 4 0 0 0 0 0 3 19 4 0 Right Thru Left U-Turn Peak Hour Data 29 744 773 4 1 5 Right Thru Total Left Out 517 506 3 0 3 11 North 11 429 440 U-Turn Right Thru 229 215 14 463 477 14 Peak Hour Begins at 07:30 AM In JPA JPA In 262 247 15 2 28 30 Left U-Turn Passenger Veh 29 28 Trucks 1 15 281 296 Out Total 2 0 2 779 753 26 1 0 1 Left Thru Right U-Turn 63 45 73 0 1 0 0 0 64 45 73 0 75 181 256 3 1 4 78 182 260 Out In Total Shamrock Rd Attachment E Data Collection Group LSmith@DataCollectionGroup.net File Name : JPA and Shamrock Site Code : Start Date : 8/31/2021 Page No :5 Shamrock Rd JPA Shamrock Rd JPA From North From East From South From West Start Time Right Thru Left U-Turn App. Total Right Thru Left U-Turn App. Total Right Thru Left U-Turn App. Total Right Thru Left U-Turn App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 10:00 AM to 01:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 12:00 PM 12:00 PM 1 5 0 0 6 2 82 13 0 97 8 6 9 0 23 9 88 1 0 98 224 12:15 PM 1 6 1 0 8 1 85 13 0 99 7 5 12 0 24 6 111 2 0 119 250 12:30 PM 1 5 1 0 7 0 70 13 1 84 4 6 11 0 21 9 81 2 0 92 204 12:45 PM 2 5 0 0 7 3 86 12 0 101 19 5 4 0 28 8 108 0 0 116 252 Total Volume 5 21 2 0 28 6 323 51 1 381 38 22 36 0 96 32 388 5 0 425 930 % App. Total 17.9 75 7.1 0 1.6 84.8 13.4 0.3 39.6 22.9 37.5 0 7.5 91.3 1.2 0 PHF .625 .875 .500 .000 .875 .500 .939 .981 .250 .943 .500 .917 .750 .000 .857 .889 .874 .625 .000 .893 .923 Passenger Veh 5 21 2 0 28 6 304 49 1 360 38 22 34 0 94 31 370 5 0 406 888 % Passenger Veh 100 100 100 0 100 100 94.1 96.1 100 94.5 100 100 94.4 0 97.9 96.9 95.4 100 0 95.5 95.5 Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 2 0 21 0 0 2 0 2 1 18 0 0 19 42 % Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 0 5.9 3.9 0 5.5 0 0 5.6 0 2.1 3.1 4.6 0 0 4.5 4.5 Attachment E Data Collection Group LSmith@DataCollectionGroup.net File Name : JPA and Shamrock Site Code : Start Date : 8/31/2021 Page No :6 Shamrock Rd Out In Total 33 28 61 0 0 0 33 28 61 5 21 2 0 0 0 0 0 5 21 2 0 Right Thru Left U-Turn Peak Hour Data 40 749 789 5 0 5 Right Thru Total Left Out 428 410 6 0 6 18 North 18 370 388 U-Turn Right Thru 323 304 19 406 425 19 Peak Hour Begins at 12:00 PM In JPA JPA In 381 360 21 1 31 32 Left U-Turn Passenger Veh 51 49 Trucks 2 21 343 364 Out Total 0 0 0 809 770 39 1 0 1 Left Thru Right U-Turn 34 22 38 0 2 0 0 0 36 22 38 0 101 94 195 3 2 5 104 96 200 Out In Total Shamrock Rd Attachment E Data Collection Group LSmith@DataCollectionGroup.net File Name : JPA and Shamrock Site Code : Start Date : 8/31/2021 Page No :7 Shamrock Rd JPA Shamrock Rd JPA From North From East From South From West Start Time Right Thru Left U-Turn App. Total Right Thru Left U-Turn App. Total Right Thru Left U-Turn App. Total Right Thru Left U-Turn App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 02:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 04:45 PM 04:45 PM 1 20 3 0 24 2 135 20 0 157 19 8 12 0 39 10 67 0 1 78 298 05:00 PM 2 11 3 0 16 3 145 24 0 172 13 7 7 0 27 17 76 2 4 99 314 05:15 PM 2 12 1 0 15 2 140 24 0 166 11 7 11 0 29 13 63 3 0 79 289 05:30 PM 2 9 2 0 13 4 118 35 0 157 11 3 12 0 26 15 63 2 3 83 279 Total Volume 7 52 9 0 68 11 538 103 0 652 54 25 42 0 121 55 269 7 8 339 1180 % App. Total 10.3 76.5 13.2 0 1.7 82.5 15.8 0 44.6 20.7 34.7 0 16.2 79.4 2.1 2.4 PHF .875 .650 .750 .000 .708 .688 .928 .736 .000 .948 .711 .781 .875 .000 .776 .809 .885 .583 .500 .856 .939 Passenger Veh 7 52 9 0 68 10 527 102 0 639 52 25 41 0 118 55 263 7 8 333 1158 % Passenger Veh 100 100 100 0 100 90.9 98.0 99.0 0 98.0 96.3 100 97.6 0 97.5 100 97.8 100 100 98.2 98.1 Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 1 11 1 0 13 2 0 1 0 3 0 6 0 0 6 22 % Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 9.1 2.0 1.0 0 2.0 3.7 0 2.4 0 2.5 0 2.2 0 0 1.8 1.9 Attachment E Data Collection Group LSmith@DataCollectionGroup.net File Name : JPA and Shamrock Site Code : Start Date : 8/31/2021 Page No :8 Shamrock Rd Out In Total 42 68 110 1 0 1 43 68 111 7 52 9 0 0 0 0 0 7 52 9 0 Right Thru Left U-Turn Peak Hour Data 18 908 926 7 0 7 Right Thru Total Left Out 11 10 332 324 1 8 North 6 263 269 U-Turn Right Thru 538 527 6 333 339 11 Peak Hour Begins at 04:45 PM In JPA JPA In 652 639 13 0 55 55 Left U-Turn Passenger Veh 103 102 Trucks 1 12 575 587 Out Total 8 0 8 984 963 21 0 0 0 Left Thru Right U-Turn 41 25 52 0 1 0 2 0 42 25 54 0 209 118 327 1 3 4 210 121 331 Out In Total Shamrock Rd Attachment E Data Collection Group LSmith@DataCollectionGroup.net File Name : JPA and Shamrock Site Code : Start Date : 8/31/2021 Page No :1 Groups Printed- Bikes - Peds Shamrock Rd JPA Shamrock Rd JPA From North From East From South From West Start Time Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Int. Total 07:00 AM 0 0 0 3 3 0 0 0 2 2 1 0 0 8 9 0 0 0 0 0 14 07:15 AM 0 0 0 3 3 0 1 0 4 5 0 0 0 8 8 0 3 0 0 3 19 07:30 AM 0 0 0 10 10 0 1 0 3 4 0 0 0 24 24 0 0 0 0 0 38 07:45 AM 0 0 0 4 4 1 2 0 7 10 2 0 0 24 26 0 9 0 0 9 49 Total 0 0 0 20 20 1 4 0 16 21 3 0 0 64 67 0 12 0 0 12 120 08:00 AM 0 0 0 4 4 1 0 0 4 5 0 2 0 7 9 0 5 0 1 6 24 08:15 AM 0 0 0 8 8 1 0 0 4 5 0 2 0 6 8 0 0 0 0 0 21 08:30 AM 0 0 0 4 4 0 1 0 5 6 1 1 0 13 15 0 6 0 1 7 32 08:45 AM 0 0 0 8 8 0 1 0 10 11 0 3 0 13 16 0 5 0 0 5 40 Total 0 0 0 24 24 2 2 0 23 27 1 8 0 39 48 0 16 0 2 18 117 11:00 AM 0 0 0 6 6 0 1 0 6 7 1 1 0 15 17 0 2 1 0 3 33 11:15 AM 0 0 0 6 6 0 0 0 6 6 0 2 0 9 11 0 1 0 0 1 24 11:30 AM 0 0 0 3 3 0 1 1 2 4 0 0 0 8 8 0 1 0 0 1 16 11:45 AM 0 0 0 5 5 0 1 0 5 6 0 0 0 6 6 0 0 0 0 0 17 Total 0 0 0 20 20 0 3 1 19 23 1 3 0 38 42 0 4 1 0 5 90 12:00 PM 0 2 2 5 9 0 3 0 15 18 0 2 0 16 18 0 0 0 0 0 45 12:15 PM 0 0 0 14 14 0 7 0 16 23 1 1 0 13 15 0 3 0 1 4 56 12:30 PM 0 0 0 10 10 0 0 0 10 10 0 0 0 15 15 0 0 0 1 1 36 12:45 PM 0 1 0 6 7 0 1 0 6 7 0 0 0 8 8 0 2 0 0 2 24 Total 0 3 2 35 40 0 11 0 47 58 1 3 0 52 56 0 5 0 2 7 161 04:00 PM 0 0 0 8 8 0 0 0 6 6 0 0 0 10 10 0 0 0 1 1 25 04:15 PM 0 0 0 5 5 0 6 0 7 13 1 0 0 11 12 0 0 0 1 1 31 04:30 PM 0 2 0 3 5 0 7 1 8 16 0 0 0 10 10 0 1 0 1 2 33 04:45 PM 1 7 2 8 18 1 9 2 19 31 0 2 0 10 12 0 0 1 1 2 63 Total 1 9 2 24 36 1 22 3 40 66 1 2 0 41 44 0 1 1 4 6 152 05:00 PM 1 1 0 21 23 0 8 0 22 30 0 0 0 34 34 1 0 0 0 1 88 05:15 PM 0 0 0 41 41 0 2 2 10 14 0 1 0 17 18 0 1 0 0 1 74 05:30 PM 1 2 0 11 14 1 2 2 7 12 0 0 0 12 12 0 3 0 0 3 41 05:45 PM 0 2 0 33 35 0 5 2 6 13 0 0 0 19 19 0 0 0 0 0 67 Total 2 5 0 106 113 1 17 6 45 69 0 1 0 82 83 1 4 0 0 5 270 Grand Total 3 17 4 229 253 5 59 10 190 264 7 17 0 316 340 1 42 2 8 53 910 Apprch % 1.2 6.7 1.6 90.5 1.9 22.3 3.8 72 2.1 5 0 92.9 1.9 79.2 3.8 15.1 Total % 0.3 1.9 0.4 25.2 27.8 0.5 6.5 1.1 20.9 29 0.8 1.9 0 34.7 37.4 0.1 4.6 0.2 0.9 5.8 Attachment E Data Collection Group LSmith@DataCollectionGroup.net File Name : JPA and Shamrock Site Code : Start Date : 8/31/2021 Page No :2 Groups Printed- Bikes - Peds Shamrock Rd JPA Shamrock Rd JPA From North From East From South From West Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Int. Total Bikes 3 17 4 0 24 5 59 10 0 74 7 17 0 0 24 1 42 2 0 45 167 % Bikes 100 100 100 0 9.5 100 100 100 0 28 100 100 0 0 7.1 100 100 100 0 84.9 18.4 Peds 0 0 0 229 229 0 0 0 190 190 0 0 0 316 316 0 0 0 8 8 743 % Peds 0 0 0 100 90.5 0 0 0 100 72 0 0 0 100 92.9 0 0 0 100 15.1 81.6 Attachment E Data Collection Group LSmith@DataCollectionGroup.net File Name : JPA and Harmon Site Code : 00000115 Start Date : 8/31/2021 Page No :1 Groups Printed- Passenger Veh - Trucks Harmon JPA Driveway JPA From North From East From South From West Start Time Right Thru Left Uturns App. Total Right Thru Left Uturns App. Total Right Thru Left Uturns App. Total Right Thru Left Uturns App. Total Int. Total 07:00 AM 0 0 1 0 1 0 43 1 0 44 1 0 0 0 1 0 76 0 0 76 122 07:15 AM 1 0 0 0 1 1 49 0 0 50 1 0 0 0 1 0 102 0 0 102 154 07:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 2 74 0 1 77 0 0 0 0 0 1 122 3 0 126 203 07:45 AM 0 0 2 0 2 0 86 0 1 87 1 0 1 0 2 0 117 4 1 122 213 Total 1 0 3 0 4 3 252 1 2 258 3 0 1 0 4 1 417 7 1 426 692 08:00 AM 1 0 0 0 1 0 68 0 0 68 0 0 0 0 0 0 124 0 0 124 193 08:15 AM 1 0 0 0 1 1 59 0 2 62 0 0 0 0 0 0 116 1 0 117 180 08:30 AM 2 0 0 1 3 0 59 0 0 59 0 0 0 0 0 0 135 1 0 136 198 08:45 AM 1 0 2 0 3 1 49 0 2 52 0 0 1 0 1 0 128 3 2 133 189 Total 5 0 2 1 8 2 235 0 4 241 0 0 1 0 1 0 503 5 2 510 760 *** BREAK *** 11:00 AM 1 0 0 0 1 2 89 1 0 92 1 0 0 0 1 1 83 1 0 85 179 11:15 AM 0 0 1 0 1 0 62 0 2 64 0 0 1 0 1 1 70 0 0 71 137 11:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 79 0 3 82 0 0 0 0 0 0 73 2 0 75 157 11:45 AM 2 0 0 0 2 1 75 0 0 76 1 0 0 0 1 0 101 2 0 103 182 Total 3 0 1 0 4 3 305 1 5 314 2 0 1 0 3 2 327 5 0 334 655 12:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 86 0 1 87 0 0 0 0 0 1 106 0 0 107 194 12:15 PM 3 0 1 0 4 0 98 0 1 99 1 0 0 0 1 1 108 3 0 112 216 12:30 PM 3 0 0 0 3 0 81 2 1 84 0 0 0 0 0 0 92 2 0 94 181 12:45 PM 2 0 1 0 3 1 86 0 3 90 0 0 1 0 1 1 113 1 0 115 209 Total 8 0 2 0 10 1 351 2 6 360 1 0 1 0 2 3 419 6 0 428 800 *** BREAK *** 04:00 PM 2 0 1 0 3 2 116 0 1 119 2 0 0 0 2 0 75 1 0 76 200 04:15 PM 1 0 0 0 1 0 130 1 0 131 2 0 0 0 2 0 92 0 0 92 226 04:30 PM 4 0 0 0 4 0 128 0 1 129 1 0 1 0 2 2 80 1 0 83 218 04:45 PM 3 0 1 0 4 1 146 0 1 148 2 0 0 0 2 1 74 3 1 79 233 Total 10 0 2 0 12 3 520 1 3 527 7 0 1 0 8 3 321 5 1 330 877 05:00 PM 7 1 2 0 10 1 151 3 3 158 1 0 0 0 1 0 93 1 0 94 263 05:15 PM 2 0 1 0 3 1 142 0 3 146 1 0 0 0 1 0 76 0 0 76 226 05:30 PM 3 0 2 0 5 1 132 0 3 136 4 0 0 0 4 0 71 2 0 73 218 05:45 PM 3 0 1 0 4 1 117 2 0 120 1 0 0 0 1 0 67 1 1 69 194 Total 15 1 6 0 22 4 542 5 9 560 7 0 0 0 7 0 307 4 1 312 901 Grand Total 42 1 16 1 60 16 2205 10 29 2260 20 0 5 0 25 9 2294 32 5 2340 4685 Apprch % 70 1.7 26.7 1.7 0.7 97.6 0.4 1.3 80 0 20 0 0.4 98 1.4 0.2 Total % 0.9 0 0.3 0 1.3 0.3 47.1 0.2 0.6 48.2 0.4 0 0.1 0 0.5 0.2 49 0.7 0.1 49.9 Attachment E Data Collection Group LSmith@DataCollectionGroup.net File Name : JPA and Harmon Site Code : 00000115 Start Date : 8/31/2021 Page No :2 Groups Printed- Passenger Veh - Trucks Harmon JPA Driveway JPA From North From East From South From West Uturn Right Thru Left App. Total Right Thru Left Uturns App. Total Right Thru Left Uturns App. Total Right Thru Left Uturns App. Total Int. Total s Passenger Veh 40 1 16 1 58 16 2117 10 29 2172 20 0 5 0 25 9 2219 32 5 2265 4520 % Passenger Veh 95.2 100 100 100 96.7 100 96 100 100 96.1 100 0 100 0 100 100 96.7 100 100 96.8 96.5 Trucks 2 0 0 0 2 0 88 0 0 88 0 0 0 0 0 0 75 0 0 75 165 % Trucks 4.8 0 0 0 3.3 0 4 0 0 3.9 0 0 0 0 0 0 3.3 0 0 3.2 3.5 Attachment E Data Collection Group LSmith@DataCollectionGroup.net File Name : JPA and Harmon Site Code : 00000115 Start Date : 8/31/2021 Page No :3 Harmon JPA Driveway JPA From North From East From South From West Uturn Start Time Right Thru Left App. Total Right Thru Left Uturns App. Total Right Thru Left Uturns App. Total Right Thru Left Uturns App. Total Int. Total s Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 09:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:30 AM 07:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 2 74 0 1 77 0 0 0 0 0 1 122 3 0 126 203 07:45 AM 0 0 2 0 2 0 86 0 1 87 1 0 1 0 2 0 117 4 1 122 213 08:00 AM 1 0 0 0 1 0 68 0 0 68 0 0 0 0 0 0 124 0 0 124 193 08:15 AM 1 0 0 0 1 1 59 0 2 62 0 0 0 0 0 0 116 1 0 117 180 Total Volume 2 0 2 0 4 3 287 0 4 294 1 0 1 0 2 1 479 8 1 489 789 % App. Total 50 0 50 0 1 97.6 0 1.4 50 0 50 0 0.2 98 1.6 0.2 PHF .500 .000 .250 .000 .500 .375 .834 .000 .500 .845 .250 .000 .250 .000 .250 .250 .966 .500 .250 .970 .926 Passenger Veh 2 0 2 0 4 3 272 0 4 279 1 0 1 0 2 1 465 8 1 475 760 % Passenger Veh 100 0 100 0 100 100 94.8 0 100 94.9 100 0 100 0 100 100 97.1 100 100 97.1 96.3 Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 0 0 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 0 0 14 29 % Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 0 5.2 0 0 5.1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2.9 0 0 2.9 3.7 Attachment E Data Collection Group LSmith@DataCollectionGroup.net File Name : JPA and Harmon Site Code : 00000115 Start Date : 8/31/2021 Page No :4 Harmon Out In Total 11 4 15 0 0 0 11 4 15 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 Right Thru Left Uturns Peak Hour Data 29 750 779 8 0 8 Right Thru Total Left Out 482 468 3 0 3 14 North 14 465 479 Uturns Right Thru 287 272 14 475 489 15 Peak Hour Begins at 07:30 AM In JPA JPA In 294 279 15 1 0 1 Left Passenger Veh Trucks 0 0 0 15 275 290 Out Total Uturns 1 0 1 776 747 29 4 0 4 Left Thru Right Uturns 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 2 3 0 0 0 1 2 3 Out In Total Driveway Attachment E Data Collection Group LSmith@DataCollectionGroup.net File Name : JPA and Harmon Site Code : 00000115 Start Date : 8/31/2021 Page No :5 Harmon JPA Driveway JPA From North From East From South From West Start Time Right Thru Left Uturns App. Total Right Thru Left Uturns App. Total Right Thru Left Uturns App. Total Right Thru Left Uturns App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 10:00 AM to 01:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 12:00 PM 12:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 86 0 1 87 0 0 0 0 0 1 106 0 0 107 194 12:15 PM 3 0 1 0 4 0 98 0 1 99 1 0 0 0 1 1 108 3 0 112 216 12:30 PM 3 0 0 0 3 0 81 2 1 84 0 0 0 0 0 0 92 2 0 94 181 12:45 PM 2 0 1 0 3 1 86 0 3 90 0 0 1 0 1 1 113 1 0 115 209 Total Volume 8 0 2 0 10 1 351 2 6 360 1 0 1 0 2 3 419 6 0 428 800 % App. Total 80 0 20 0 0.3 97.5 0.6 1.7 50 0 50 0 0.7 97.9 1.4 0 PHF .667 .000 .500 .000 .625 .250 .895 .250 .500 .909 .250 .000 .250 .000 .500 .750 .927 .500 .000 .930 .926 Passenger Veh 8 0 2 0 10 1 329 2 6 338 1 0 1 0 2 3 400 6 0 409 759 % Passenger Veh 100 0 100 0 100 100 93.7 100 100 93.9 100 0 100 0 100 100 95.5 100 0 95.6 94.9 Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 0 0 22 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 0 0 19 41 % Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 0 6.3 0 0 6.1 0 0 0 0 0 0 4.5 0 0 4.4 5.1 Attachment E Data Collection Group LSmith@DataCollectionGroup.net File Name : JPA and Harmon Site Code : 00000115 Start Date : 8/31/2021 Page No :6 Harmon Out In Total 7 10 17 0 0 0 7 10 17 8 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 2 0 Right Thru Left Uturns Peak Hour Data 41 747 788 6 0 6 Right Thru Total Left Out 422 403 1 0 1 19 North 19 400 419 Uturns Right Thru 351 329 19 409 428 22 Peak Hour Begins at 12:00 PM In JPA JPA In 360 338 22 3 0 3 Left Passenger Veh Trucks 2 0 2 22 338 360 Out Total Uturns 0 0 0 782 741 41 6 0 6 Left Thru Right Uturns 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 5 2 7 0 0 0 5 2 7 Out In Total Driveway Attachment E Data Collection Group LSmith@DataCollectionGroup.net File Name : JPA and Harmon Site Code : 00000115 Start Date : 8/31/2021 Page No :7 Harmon JPA Driveway JPA From North From East From South From West Start Time Right Thru Left Uturns App. Total Right Thru Left Uturns App. Total Right Thru Left Uturns App. Total Right Thru Left Uturns App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 02:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 04:15 PM 04:15 PM 1 0 0 0 1 0 130 1 0 131 2 0 0 0 2 0 92 0 0 92 226 04:30 PM 4 0 0 0 4 0 128 0 1 129 1 0 1 0 2 2 80 1 0 83 218 04:45 PM 3 0 1 0 4 1 146 0 1 148 2 0 0 0 2 1 74 3 1 79 233 05:00 PM 7 1 2 0 10 1 151 3 3 158 1 0 0 0 1 0 93 1 0 94 263 Total Volume 15 1 3 0 19 2 555 4 5 566 6 0 1 0 7 3 339 5 1 348 940 % App. Total 78.9 5.3 15.8 0 0.4 98.1 0.7 0.9 85.7 0 14.3 0 0.9 97.4 1.4 0.3 PHF .536 .250 .375 .000 .475 .500 .919 .333 .417 .896 .750 .000 .250 .000 .875 .375 .911 .417 .250 .926 .894 Passenger Veh 14 1 3 0 18 2 542 4 5 553 6 0 1 0 7 3 330 5 1 339 917 % Passenger Veh 93.3 100 100 0 94.7 100 97.7 100 100 97.7 100 0 100 0 100 100 97.3 100 100 97.4 97.6 Trucks 1 0 0 0 1 0 13 0 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 9 23 % Trucks 6.7 0 0 0 5.3 0 2.3 0 0 2.3 0 0 0 0 0 0 2.7 0 0 2.6 2.4 Attachment E Data Collection Group LSmith@DataCollectionGroup.net File Name : JPA and Harmon Site Code : 00000115 Start Date : 8/31/2021 Page No :8 Harmon Out In Total 7 18 25 0 1 1 7 19 26 14 1 3 0 1 0 0 0 15 1 3 0 Right Thru Left Uturns Peak Hour Data 23 896 919 5 0 5 Right Thru Total Left Out 348 339 2 0 2 9 North 9 330 339 Uturns Right Thru 555 542 9 339 348 13 Peak Hour Begins at 04:15 PM In JPA JPA In 566 553 13 3 0 3 Left Passenger Veh Trucks 4 0 4 14 557 571 Out Total Uturns 1 0 1 914 892 22 5 0 5 Left Thru Right Uturns 1 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 6 0 8 7 15 0 0 0 8 7 15 Out In Total Driveway Attachment E Data Collection Group LSmith@DataCollectionGroup.net File Name : JPA and Harmon Site Code : 00000115 Start Date : 8/31/2021 Page No :1 Groups Printed- Bikes - Peds Harmon JPA Driveway JPA From North From East From South From West Start Time Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Int. Total 07:00 AM 0 0 0 5 5 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 4 4 0 2 0 0 2 12 07:15 AM 0 0 0 2 2 0 1 0 1 2 0 0 0 11 11 0 3 0 0 3 18 07:30 AM 0 0 0 8 8 0 1 0 6 7 0 0 0 26 26 0 0 0 0 0 41 07:45 AM 1 0 0 3 4 0 1 0 4 5 0 0 0 15 15 0 8 0 0 8 32 Total 1 0 0 18 19 0 3 0 12 15 0 0 0 56 56 0 13 0 0 13 103 08:00 AM 0 0 0 3 3 0 0 0 3 3 1 0 0 4 5 0 7 0 0 7 18 08:15 AM 0 0 0 5 5 0 0 0 3 3 0 0 0 12 12 0 2 0 0 2 22 08:30 AM 0 0 0 4 4 0 1 0 3 4 0 0 0 14 14 0 5 0 0 5 27 08:45 AM 0 0 0 7 7 0 1 0 3 4 0 0 0 12 12 0 9 0 0 9 32 Total 0 0 0 19 19 0 2 0 12 14 1 0 0 42 43 0 23 0 0 23 99 *** BREAK *** 11:00 AM 0 0 0 3 3 0 1 0 3 4 0 0 0 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 10 11:15 AM 0 0 0 5 5 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 1 1 0 2 0 0 2 10 11:30 AM 0 0 0 2 2 0 1 0 3 4 0 0 0 6 6 0 1 0 0 1 13 11:45 AM 0 0 0 2 2 0 1 0 3 4 0 0 0 4 4 0 1 0 0 1 11 Total 0 0 0 12 12 0 3 0 11 14 0 0 0 14 14 0 4 0 0 4 44 12:00 PM 0 0 0 3 3 0 2 0 3 5 0 0 0 8 8 0 1 0 0 1 17 12:15 PM 0 0 0 3 3 1 3 0 7 11 0 0 0 1 1 0 2 0 0 2 17 12:30 PM 0 0 0 4 4 0 0 0 9 9 0 0 0 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 17 12:45 PM 0 0 0 4 4 0 1 0 3 4 0 0 0 1 1 0 2 0 0 2 11 Total 0 0 0 14 14 1 6 0 22 29 0 0 0 14 14 0 5 0 0 5 62 *** BREAK *** 04:00 PM 0 0 0 4 4 0 0 0 6 6 0 0 0 7 7 0 0 0 0 0 17 04:15 PM 0 0 0 3 3 0 5 0 2 7 0 0 0 3 3 0 1 0 0 1 14 04:30 PM 0 0 0 4 4 0 8 0 9 17 0 0 0 5 5 0 1 0 0 1 27 04:45 PM 1 0 0 1 2 0 7 0 5 12 0 0 0 3 3 0 0 1 0 1 18 Total 1 0 0 12 13 0 20 0 22 42 0 0 0 18 18 0 2 1 0 3 76 05:00 PM 0 0 0 2 2 1 7 0 10 18 0 0 0 19 19 0 2 0 0 2 41 05:15 PM 1 0 0 34 35 0 4 0 6 10 0 0 0 13 13 0 1 0 0 1 59 05:30 PM 0 0 0 6 6 0 3 0 0 3 0 0 0 7 7 0 3 0 0 3 19 05:45 PM 1 0 0 26 27 0 6 0 2 8 0 0 0 6 6 0 0 0 0 0 41 Total 2 0 0 68 70 1 20 0 18 39 0 0 0 45 45 0 6 0 0 6 160 Grand Total 4 0 0 143 147 2 54 0 97 153 1 0 0 189 190 0 53 1 0 54 544 Apprch % 2.7 0 0 97.3 1.3 35.3 0 63.4 0.5 0 0 99.5 0 98.1 1.9 0 Total % 0.7 0 0 26.3 27 0.4 9.9 0 17.8 28.1 0.2 0 0 34.7 34.9 0 9.7 0.2 0 9.9 Attachment E Data Collection Group LSmith@DataCollectionGroup.net File Name : JPA and Harmon Site Code : 00000115 Start Date : 8/31/2021 Page No :2 Groups Printed- Bikes - Peds Harmon JPA Driveway JPA From North From East From South From West Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Int. Total Bikes 4 0 0 0 4 2 54 0 0 56 1 0 0 0 1 0 53 1 0 54 115 % Bikes 100 0 0 0 2.7 100 100 0 0 36.6 100 0 0 0 0.5 0 100 100 0 100 21.1 Peds 0 0 0 143 143 0 0 0 97 97 0 0 0 189 189 0 0 0 0 0 429 % Peds 0 0 0 100 97.3 0 0 0 100 63.4 0 0 0 100 99.5 0 0 0 0 0 78.9 Attachment E Data Collection Group LSmith@DataCollectionGroup.net File Name : JPA and Washington Site Code : Start Date : 8/31/2021 Page No :1 Groups Printed- Passenger Veh - Trucks Washington Ave JPA Driveway JPA From North From East From South From West Start Time Right Thru Left U-Turn App. Total Right Thru Left U-Turn App. Total Right Thru Left U-Turn App. Total Right Thru Left U-Turn App. Total Int. Total 07:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 41 0 0 41 1 0 0 0 1 0 72 0 0 72 114 07:15 AM 1 0 1 0 2 0 50 0 0 50 0 0 0 0 0 0 107 1 0 108 160 07:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 1 76 0 0 77 0 0 0 0 0 0 120 1 0 121 198 07:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 1 89 0 0 90 0 0 0 0 0 0 126 0 1 127 217 Total 1 0 1 0 2 2 256 0 0 258 1 0 0 0 1 0 425 2 1 428 689 08:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 69 0 0 69 1 0 0 0 1 0 118 1 0 119 189 08:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 57 2 0 59 0 0 0 0 0 0 119 1 0 120 179 08:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 1 59 1 0 61 1 0 1 0 2 1 136 0 1 138 201 08:45 AM 2 0 0 0 2 0 55 0 0 55 0 0 0 0 0 0 131 0 0 131 188 Total 2 0 0 0 2 1 240 3 0 244 2 0 1 0 3 1 504 2 1 508 757 09:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 56 0 0 56 1 0 0 0 1 0 133 2 0 135 192 09:15 AM 1 0 2 0 3 1 59 1 0 61 2 0 0 0 2 0 119 2 0 121 187 09:30 AM 3 0 0 0 3 0 53 0 1 54 0 0 0 0 0 0 111 3 0 114 171 09:45 AM 2 0 0 0 2 2 58 0 0 60 1 0 0 0 1 0 109 2 0 111 174 Total 6 0 2 0 8 3 226 1 1 231 4 0 0 0 4 0 472 9 0 481 724 10:00 AM 1 0 1 0 2 1 76 0 0 77 1 0 1 0 2 0 98 1 0 99 180 10:15 AM 1 0 1 0 2 1 57 0 0 58 1 0 0 0 1 1 120 1 0 122 183 10:30 AM 1 0 1 0 2 0 59 1 1 61 0 0 0 0 0 0 104 0 0 104 167 10:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 64 0 0 64 0 0 0 0 0 2 112 1 0 115 179 Total 3 0 3 0 6 2 256 1 1 260 2 0 1 0 3 3 434 3 0 440 709 11:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 90 0 0 90 3 0 0 0 3 0 81 2 0 83 176 11:15 AM 2 0 0 0 2 0 61 0 0 61 0 0 0 0 0 0 72 0 0 72 135 11:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 1 82 0 0 83 0 0 0 0 0 0 78 0 0 78 161 11:45 AM 1 1 0 0 2 0 77 0 0 77 1 0 0 0 1 0 103 1 0 104 184 Total 3 1 0 0 4 1 310 0 0 311 4 0 0 0 4 0 334 3 0 337 656 12:00 PM 3 0 1 0 4 1 90 0 0 91 0 0 0 0 0 0 110 1 0 111 206 12:15 PM 1 1 1 0 3 3 97 0 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 108 0 2 110 213 12:30 PM 2 0 1 0 3 0 82 0 0 82 1 0 0 0 1 0 92 0 0 92 178 12:45 PM 1 0 1 0 2 1 91 1 0 93 2 0 0 0 2 0 115 0 0 115 212 Total 7 1 4 0 12 5 360 1 0 366 3 0 0 0 3 0 425 1 2 428 809 01:00 PM 1 0 2 0 3 0 82 1 0 83 0 0 0 0 0 0 96 1 0 97 183 01:15 PM 1 0 0 0 1 2 82 0 0 84 0 0 0 0 0 0 93 1 0 94 179 01:30 PM 1 0 0 0 1 0 95 1 0 96 0 0 1 0 1 0 82 2 0 84 182 Attachment E Data Collection Group LSmith@DataCollectionGroup.net File Name : JPA and Washington Site Code : Start Date : 8/31/2021 Page No :2 Groups Printed- Passenger Veh - Trucks Washington Ave JPA Driveway JPA From North From East From South From West Start Time Right Thru Left U-Turn App. Total Right Thru Left U-Turn App. Total Right Thru Left U-Turn App. Total Right Thru Left U-Turn App. Total Int. Total 01:45 PM 0 0 1 0 1 0 91 1 0 92 0 0 0 0 0 0 99 1 0 100 193 Total 3 0 3 0 6 2 350 3 0 355 0 0 1 0 1 0 370 5 0 375 737 02:00 PM 0 0 1 0 1 1 110 0 1 112 1 0 0 0 1 0 86 0 0 86 200 02:15 PM 2 0 3 0 5 3 96 0 0 99 0 0 0 0 0 0 72 1 0 73 177 02:30 PM 0 0 1 0 1 1 92 2 0 95 0 0 1 0 1 0 88 0 0 88 185 02:45 PM 1 0 1 0 2 1 92 0 1 94 3 0 0 0 3 0 101 0 0 101 200 Total 3 0 6 0 9 6 390 2 2 400 4 0 1 0 5 0 347 1 0 348 762 03:00 PM 1 0 0 0 1 0 91 0 1 92 1 0 0 0 1 0 103 0 0 103 197 03:15 PM 0 0 1 0 1 1 112 0 1 114 1 0 0 0 1 1 88 0 0 89 205 03:30 PM 4 0 1 0 5 1 150 0 2 153 1 0 0 0 1 0 80 1 0 81 240 03:45 PM 0 1 2 0 3 1 111 0 2 114 0 0 0 0 0 0 79 1 0 80 197 Total 5 1 4 0 10 3 464 0 6 473 3 0 0 0 3 1 350 2 0 353 839 04:00 PM 2 0 0 0 2 2 112 0 0 114 0 0 0 0 0 0 79 0 0 79 195 04:15 PM 1 0 1 0 2 1 132 0 0 133 1 0 0 0 1 1 93 1 1 96 232 04:30 PM 3 0 0 0 3 0 132 0 0 132 1 0 0 0 1 0 82 2 1 85 221 04:45 PM 1 0 0 0 1 1 152 1 0 154 0 0 0 0 0 0 76 0 0 76 231 Total 7 0 1 0 8 4 528 1 0 533 2 0 0 0 2 1 330 3 2 336 879 05:00 PM 2 0 4 0 6 0 157 0 0 157 0 0 0 0 0 1 92 0 1 94 257 05:15 PM 2 0 0 0 2 1 140 1 0 142 1 0 0 0 1 0 81 0 0 81 226 05:30 PM 2 0 3 0 5 0 141 0 0 141 0 0 0 0 0 0 68 7 0 75 221 05:45 PM 2 0 0 0 2 1 124 0 0 125 0 0 1 0 1 1 69 2 3 75 203 Total 8 0 7 0 15 2 562 1 0 565 1 0 1 0 2 2 310 9 4 325 907 06:00 PM 0 0 1 0 1 1 96 0 0 97 0 0 0 0 0 0 84 2 2 88 186 06:15 PM 2 0 0 0 2 1 124 2 0 127 1 0 1 0 2 0 90 1 1 92 223 06:30 PM 1 0 1 0 2 0 95 0 1 96 0 0 0 0 0 0 109 0 1 110 208 06:45 PM 4 0 2 0 6 1 79 0 0 80 2 1 0 0 3 0 72 1 2 75 164 Total 7 0 4 0 11 3 394 2 1 400 3 1 1 0 5 0 355 4 6 365 781 Grand Total 55 3 35 0 93 34 4336 15 11 4396 29 1 6 0 36 8 4656 44 16 4724 9249 Apprch % 59.1 3.2 37.6 0 0.8 98.6 0.3 0.3 80.6 2.8 16.7 0 0.2 98.6 0.9 0.3 Total % 0.6 0 0.4 0 1 0.4 46.9 0.2 0.1 47.5 0.3 0 0.1 0 0.4 0.1 50.3 0.5 0.2 51.1 Passenger Veh 53 3 35 0 91 30 4171 15 10 4226 27 1 6 0 34 7 4487 43 15 4552 8903 % Passenger Veh 96.4 100 100 0 97.8 88.2 96.2 100 90.9 96.1 93.1 100 100 0 94.4 87.5 96.4 97.7 93.8 96.4 96.3 Trucks 2 0 0 0 2 4 165 0 1 170 2 0 0 0 2 1 169 1 1 172 346 % Trucks 3.6 0 0 0 2.2 11.8 3.8 0 9.1 3.9 6.9 0 0 0 5.6 12.5 3.6 2.3 6.2 3.6 3.7 Attachment E Data Collection Group LSmith@DataCollectionGroup.net File Name : JPA and Washington Site Code : Start Date : 8/31/2021 Page No :3 Washington Ave JPA Driveway JPA From North From East From South From West Start Time Right Thru Left U-Turn App. Total Right Thru Left U-Turn App. Total Right Thru Left U-Turn App. Total Right Thru Left U-Turn App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 09:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:45 AM 07:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 1 89 0 0 90 0 0 0 0 0 0 126 0 1 127 217 08:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 69 0 0 69 1 0 0 0 1 0 118 1 0 119 189 08:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 57 2 0 59 0 0 0 0 0 0 119 1 0 120 179 08:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 1 59 1 0 61 1 0 1 0 2 1 136 0 1 138 201 Total Volume 0 0 0 0 0 2 274 3 0 279 2 0 1 0 3 1 499 2 2 504 786 % App. Total 0 0 0 0 0.7 98.2 1.1 0 66.7 0 33.3 0 0.2 99 0.4 0.4 PHF .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .500 .770 .375 .000 .775 .500 .000 .250 .000 .375 .250 .917 .500 .500 .913 .906 Passenger Veh 0 0 0 0 0 1 259 3 0 263 2 0 1 0 3 1 485 2 1 489 755 % Passenger Veh 0 0 0 0 0 50.0 94.5 100 0 94.3 100 0 100 0 100 100 97.2 100 50.0 97.0 96.1 Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 1 15 0 0 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 0 1 15 31 % Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 50.0 5.5 0 0 5.7 0 0 0 0 0 0 2.8 0 50.0 3.0 3.9 Attachment E Data Collection Group LSmith@DataCollectionGroup.net File Name : JPA and Washington Site Code : Start Date : 8/31/2021 Page No :4 Washington Ave Out In Total 3 0 3 1 0 1 4 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Right Thru Left U-Turn Peak Hour Data 30 749 779 2 0 2 Right Thru Total Left Out 501 487 2 1 1 14 North 14 485 499 U-Turn Right Thru 274 259 15 489 504 15 Peak Hour Begins at 07:45 AM In JPA JPA In 279 263 16 1 0 1 Left U-Turn Passenger Veh Trucks 3 0 3 15 260 275 Out Total 1 1 2 780 750 30 0 0 0 Left Thru Right U-Turn 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 4 3 7 0 0 0 4 3 7 Out In Total Driveway Attachment E Data Collection Group LSmith@DataCollectionGroup.net File Name : JPA and Washington Site Code : Start Date : 8/31/2021 Page No :5 Washington Ave JPA Driveway JPA From North From East From South From West Start Time Right Thru Left U-Turn App. Total Right Thru Left U-Turn App. Total Right Thru Left U-Turn App. Total Right Thru Left U-Turn App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 10:00 AM to 01:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 12:00 PM 12:00 PM 3 0 1 0 4 1 90 0 0 91 0 0 0 0 0 0 110 1 0 111 206 12:15 PM 1 1 1 0 3 3 97 0 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 108 0 2 110 213 12:30 PM 2 0 1 0 3 0 82 0 0 82 1 0 0 0 1 0 92 0 0 92 178 12:45 PM 1 0 1 0 2 1 91 1 0 93 2 0 0 0 2 0 115 0 0 115 212 Total Volume 7 1 4 0 12 5 360 1 0 366 3 0 0 0 3 0 425 1 2 428 809 % App. Total 58.3 8.3 33.3 0 1.4 98.4 0.3 0 100 0 0 0 0 99.3 0.2 0.5 PHF .583 .250 1.00 .000 .750 .417 .928 .250 .000 .915 .375 .000 .000 .000 .375 .000 .924 .250 .250 .930 .950 Passenger Veh 7 1 4 0 12 5 338 1 0 344 3 0 0 0 3 0 406 0 2 408 767 % Passenger Veh 100 100 100 0 100 100 93.9 100 0 94.0 100 0 0 0 100 0 95.5 0 100 95.3 94.8 Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 0 0 22 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 1 0 20 42 % Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 0 6.1 0 0 6.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4.5 100 0 4.7 5.2 Attachment E Data Collection Group LSmith@DataCollectionGroup.net File Name : JPA and Washington Site Code : Start Date : 8/31/2021 Page No :6 Washington Ave Out In Total 5 12 17 1 0 1 6 12 18 7 1 4 0 0 0 0 0 7 1 4 0 Right Thru Left U-Turn Peak Hour Data 42 753 795 0 1 1 Right Thru Total Left Out 432 413 5 0 5 19 North 19 406 425 U-Turn Right Thru 360 338 20 408 428 22 Peak Hour Begins at 12:00 PM In JPA JPA In 366 344 22 0 0 0 Left U-Turn Passenger Veh Trucks 1 0 1 22 345 367 Out Total 2 0 2 798 757 41 0 0 0 Left Thru Right U-Turn 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 2 3 5 0 0 0 2 3 5 Out In Total Driveway Attachment E Data Collection Group LSmith@DataCollectionGroup.net File Name : JPA and Washington Site Code : Start Date : 8/31/2021 Page No :7 Washington Ave JPA Driveway JPA From North From East From South From West Start Time Right Thru Left U-Turn App. Total Right Thru Left U-Turn App. Total Right Thru Left U-Turn App. Total Right Thru Left U-Turn App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 02:00 PM to 06:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 04:15 PM 04:15 PM 1 0 1 0 2 1 132 0 0 133 1 0 0 0 1 1 93 1 1 96 232 04:30 PM 3 0 0 0 3 0 132 0 0 132 1 0 0 0 1 0 82 2 1 85 221 04:45 PM 1 0 0 0 1 1 152 1 0 154 0 0 0 0 0 0 76 0 0 76 231 05:00 PM 2 0 4 0 6 0 157 0 0 157 0 0 0 0 0 1 92 0 1 94 257 Total Volume 7 0 5 0 12 2 573 1 0 576 2 0 0 0 2 2 343 3 3 351 941 % App. Total 58.3 0 41.7 0 0.3 99.5 0.2 0 100 0 0 0 0.6 97.7 0.9 0.9 PHF .583 .000 .313 .000 .500 .500 .912 .250 .000 .917 .500 .000 .000 .000 .500 .500 .922 .375 .750 .914 .915 Passenger Veh 7 0 5 0 12 2 560 1 0 563 2 0 0 0 2 2 333 3 3 341 918 % Passenger Veh 100 0 100 0 100 100 97.7 100 0 97.7 100 0 0 0 100 100 97.1 100 100 97.2 97.6 Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 0 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 10 23 % Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 0 2.3 0 0 2.3 0 0 0 0 0 0 2.9 0 0 2.8 2.4 Attachment E Data Collection Group LSmith@DataCollectionGroup.net File Name : JPA and Washington Site Code : Start Date : 8/31/2021 Page No :8 Washington Ave Out In Total 5 12 17 0 0 0 5 12 17 7 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 5 0 Right Thru Left U-Turn Peak Hour Data 23 908 931 3 0 3 Right Thru Total Left Out 350 340 2 0 2 10 North 10 333 343 U-Turn Right Thru 573 560 10 341 351 13 Peak Hour Begins at 04:15 PM In JPA JPA In 576 563 13 2 0 2 Left U-Turn Passenger Veh Trucks 1 0 1 13 567 580 Out Total 3 0 3 926 903 23 0 0 0 Left Thru Right U-Turn 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 3 2 5 0 0 0 3 2 5 Out In Total Driveway Attachment E Data Collection Group LSmith@DataCollectionGroup.net File Name : JPA and Washington Site Code : Start Date : 8/31/2021 Page No :1 Groups Printed- Bikes - Peds Washington Ave JPA Driveway JPA From North From East From South From West Start Time Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Int. Total 07:00 AM 0 0 0 5 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 2 0 0 2 8 07:15 AM 0 0 0 2 2 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 7 7 0 3 0 0 3 13 07:30 AM 0 0 0 9 9 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 18 18 0 0 0 0 0 29 07:45 AM 0 0 0 4 4 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 10 10 0 9 0 0 9 25 Total 0 0 0 20 20 0 5 0 0 5 0 0 0 36 36 0 14 0 0 14 75 08:00 AM 0 0 0 9 9 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 3 3 0 7 0 1 8 21 08:15 AM 0 0 0 4 4 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 12 12 0 2 0 1 3 20 08:30 AM 0 0 0 4 4 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 7 7 0 6 0 2 8 21 08:45 AM 0 0 0 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 9 0 8 0 0 8 20 Total 0 0 0 20 20 0 0 0 4 4 0 0 0 31 31 0 23 0 4 27 82 09:00 AM 0 0 0 16 16 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 32 32 0 8 1 0 9 58 09:15 AM 0 0 0 10 10 0 2 0 0 2 0 1 0 11 12 0 11 0 0 11 35 09:30 AM 0 0 0 5 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 1 1 8 09:45 AM 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 4 0 4 0 0 4 9 Total 0 0 0 32 32 0 2 0 1 3 0 1 0 49 50 0 23 1 1 25 110 10:00 AM 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 6 0 3 0 0 3 10 10:15 AM 0 0 0 3 3 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 9 9 0 4 0 0 4 17 10:30 AM 0 0 0 9 9 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 12 12 0 4 0 0 4 26 10:45 AM 0 0 2 5 7 0 3 0 0 3 0 0 0 6 6 0 8 0 0 8 24 Total 0 0 2 18 20 0 4 0 1 5 0 0 0 33 33 0 19 0 0 19 77 11:00 AM 0 0 0 3 3 0 1 0 1 2 0 0 0 3 3 0 2 0 0 2 10 11:15 AM 0 0 0 5 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 4 5 0 2 0 0 2 12 11:30 AM 0 0 0 3 3 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 4 4 0 1 0 0 1 9 11:45 AM 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 2 0 0 0 2 2 0 1 0 0 1 6 Total 0 0 0 12 12 0 3 0 2 5 0 1 0 13 14 0 6 0 0 6 37 12:00 PM 0 0 0 6 6 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 10 10 0 1 0 0 1 19 12:15 PM 0 0 0 6 6 0 4 0 0 4 0 0 0 9 9 0 2 0 0 2 21 12:30 PM 0 0 0 6 6 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 8 8 0 0 0 0 0 15 12:45 PM 0 0 0 6 6 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 3 4 0 2 0 0 2 13 Total 0 0 0 24 24 0 7 0 1 8 0 1 0 30 31 0 5 0 0 5 68 01:00 PM 0 0 0 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 3 0 1 0 0 1 7 01:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 9 0 0 0 0 0 9 01:30 PM 0 0 0 3 3 0 2 0 2 4 0 0 0 11 11 0 2 0 0 2 20 Attachment E Data Collection Group LSmith@DataCollectionGroup.net File Name : JPA and Washington Site Code : Start Date : 8/31/2021 Page No :2 Groups Printed- Bikes - Peds Washington Ave JPA Driveway JPA From North From East From South From West Start Time Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Int. Total 01:45 PM 0 0 1 6 7 0 6 0 0 6 0 0 0 4 4 0 3 0 0 3 20 Total 0 0 1 12 13 0 8 0 2 10 0 0 0 27 27 0 6 0 0 6 56 02:00 PM 0 0 0 8 8 0 5 0 0 5 0 0 0 5 5 0 0 0 0 0 18 02:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 5 0 0 0 0 0 5 02:30 PM 0 0 0 3 3 0 3 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 3 0 0 0 1 1 10 02:45 PM 0 1 0 2 3 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 6 6 0 2 0 0 2 13 Total 0 1 0 13 14 0 10 0 0 10 0 0 0 19 19 0 2 0 1 3 46 03:00 PM 0 0 0 5 5 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 9 9 0 1 0 1 2 18 03:15 PM 0 0 0 6 6 0 3 1 2 6 0 0 0 18 18 0 2 0 0 2 32 03:30 PM 0 0 0 8 8 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 11 11 0 0 0 1 1 22 03:45 PM 0 0 0 6 6 0 2 0 1 3 0 0 0 5 5 0 0 0 3 3 17 Total 0 0 0 25 25 0 9 1 3 13 0 0 0 43 43 0 3 0 5 8 89 04:00 PM 0 0 0 6 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 8 04:15 PM 0 0 0 5 5 0 7 0 0 7 0 0 0 12 12 1 1 0 0 2 26 04:30 PM 0 0 0 9 9 0 7 0 0 7 0 0 0 9 9 0 1 0 0 1 26 04:45 PM 0 0 0 5 5 0 9 0 2 11 0 0 0 12 12 0 0 0 2 2 30 Total 0 0 0 25 25 0 23 0 2 25 0 0 0 34 34 1 2 0 3 6 90 05:00 PM 0 0 0 14 14 0 8 0 0 8 0 0 0 21 21 0 2 0 1 3 46 05:15 PM 0 0 0 38 38 0 5 0 0 5 0 0 0 20 20 0 1 0 0 1 64 05:30 PM 0 0 0 9 9 0 3 0 0 3 0 0 0 9 9 0 3 1 1 5 26 05:45 PM 0 0 0 31 31 0 6 0 0 6 0 0 0 14 14 0 0 1 0 1 52 Total 0 0 0 92 92 0 22 0 0 22 0 0 0 64 64 0 6 2 2 10 188 06:00 PM 0 0 0 4 4 0 4 0 0 4 0 0 0 11 11 0 0 0 0 0 19 06:15 PM 0 1 0 11 12 0 3 0 0 3 0 0 0 17 17 0 1 0 1 2 34 06:30 PM 0 0 0 11 11 1 5 0 0 6 0 0 0 8 8 0 2 0 0 2 27 06:45 PM 0 0 0 11 11 0 3 0 2 5 0 0 0 7 7 0 1 0 1 2 25 Total 0 1 0 37 38 1 15 0 2 18 0 0 0 43 43 0 4 0 2 6 105 Grand Total 0 2 3 330 335 1 108 1 18 128 0 3 0 422 425 1 113 3 18 135 1023 Apprch % 0 0.6 0.9 98.5 0.8 84.4 0.8 14.1 0 0.7 0 99.3 0.7 83.7 2.2 13.3 Total % 0 0.2 0.3 32.3 32.7 0.1 10.6 0.1 1.8 12.5 0 0.3 0 41.3 41.5 0.1 11 0.3 1.8 13.2 Bikes 0 2 3 0 5 1 108 1 0 110 0 3 0 0 3 1 113 3 0 117 235 % Bikes 0 100 100 0 1.5 100 100 100 0 85.9 0 100 0 0 0.7 100 100 100 0 86.7 23 Peds 0 0 0 330 330 0 0 0 18 18 0 0 0 422 422 0 0 0 18 18 788 % Peds 0 0 0 100 98.5 0 0 0 100 14.1 0 0 0 100 99.3 0 0 0 100 13.3 77 Attachment E Data Collection Group LSmith@DataCollectionGroup.net File Name : JPA and Observatory Site Code : 12222222 Start Date : 8/31/2021 Page No :1 Groups Printed- Passenger Veh - Trucks Observatory JPA Driveway JPA From North From East From South From West Start Time Right Thru Left Uturns App. Total Right Thru Left Uturns App. Total Right Thru Left Uturns App. Total Right Thru Left Uturns App. Total Int. Total 07:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 42 0 0 42 0 0 0 0 0 0 86 0 0 86 128 07:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 59 0 0 59 1 0 0 0 1 1 102 0 0 103 163 07:30 AM 1 0 0 0 1 0 81 0 0 81 0 0 1 0 1 0 131 0 4 135 218 07:45 AM 0 0 0 2 2 0 80 1 0 81 0 0 0 0 0 0 140 0 0 140 223 Total 1 0 0 2 3 0 262 1 0 263 1 0 1 0 2 1 459 0 4 464 732 08:00 AM 1 0 0 0 1 1 66 1 0 68 1 0 0 0 1 0 117 0 0 117 187 08:15 AM 1 0 0 0 1 0 51 0 2 53 3 0 0 0 3 0 114 0 2 116 173 08:30 AM 3 0 0 0 3 0 55 0 0 55 1 0 0 0 1 0 132 0 0 132 191 08:45 AM 2 0 0 0 2 2 52 1 1 56 0 0 0 0 0 2 131 2 2 137 195 Total 7 0 0 0 7 3 224 2 3 232 5 0 0 0 5 2 494 2 4 502 746 *** BREAK *** 11:00 AM 0 0 1 0 1 1 92 0 0 93 4 0 0 0 4 1 76 1 0 78 176 11:15 AM 0 0 1 0 1 1 64 0 0 65 2 0 0 0 2 0 74 0 0 74 142 11:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 85 0 0 85 3 0 1 0 4 2 77 0 0 79 168 11:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 79 1 0 80 1 0 0 0 1 1 115 0 1 117 198 Total 0 0 2 0 2 2 320 1 0 323 10 0 1 0 11 4 342 1 1 348 684 12:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 3 102 0 1 106 1 0 0 0 1 0 104 1 0 105 212 12:15 PM 1 0 0 0 1 3 98 0 0 101 0 0 0 0 0 1 107 0 1 109 211 12:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 81 0 0 81 1 0 0 0 1 1 101 0 0 102 184 12:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 96 2 0 98 1 0 2 0 3 1 114 0 1 116 217 Total 1 0 0 0 1 6 377 2 1 386 3 0 2 0 5 3 426 1 2 432 824 *** BREAK *** 04:00 PM 1 0 0 0 1 1 119 0 1 121 0 0 0 0 0 0 73 2 0 75 197 04:15 PM 2 0 1 0 3 1 139 0 0 140 1 0 2 0 3 0 89 1 0 90 236 04:30 PM 1 0 0 0 1 1 132 1 1 135 0 0 0 0 0 0 91 0 0 91 227 04:45 PM 3 0 3 0 6 1 147 0 0 148 1 0 0 0 1 1 70 0 1 72 227 Total 7 0 4 0 11 4 537 1 2 544 2 0 2 0 4 1 323 3 1 328 887 05:00 PM 3 0 0 0 3 1 175 1 1 178 1 0 0 0 1 0 90 0 1 91 273 05:15 PM 1 0 2 0 3 1 133 2 0 136 2 0 1 0 3 1 84 1 2 88 230 05:30 PM 0 1 1 0 2 2 154 1 0 157 2 0 3 0 5 1 67 1 3 72 236 05:45 PM 2 0 2 0 4 4 127 0 1 132 0 0 0 0 0 0 72 3 1 76 212 Total 6 1 5 0 12 8 589 4 2 603 5 0 4 0 9 2 313 5 7 327 951 Grand Total 22 1 11 2 36 23 2309 11 8 2351 26 0 10 0 36 13 2357 12 19 2401 4824 Apprch % 61.1 2.8 30.6 5.6 1 98.2 0.5 0.3 72.2 0 27.8 0 0.5 98.2 0.5 0.8 Total % 0.5 0 0.2 0 0.7 0.5 47.9 0.2 0.2 48.7 0.5 0 0.2 0 0.7 0.3 48.9 0.2 0.4 49.8 Attachment E Data Collection Group LSmith@DataCollectionGroup.net File Name : JPA and Observatory Site Code : 12222222 Start Date : 8/31/2021 Page No :2 Groups Printed- Passenger Veh - Trucks Observatory JPA Driveway JPA From North From East From South From West Uturn Right Thru Left App. Total Right Thru Left Uturns App. Total Right Thru Left Uturns App. Total Right Thru Left Uturns App. Total Int. Total s Passenger Veh 21 1 11 2 35 22 2250 10 8 2290 25 0 10 0 35 13 2295 12 19 2339 4699 % Passenger Veh 95.5 100 100 100 97.2 95.7 97.4 90.9 100 97.4 96.2 0 100 0 97.2 100 97.4 100 100 97.4 97.4 Trucks 1 0 0 0 1 1 59 1 0 61 1 0 0 0 1 0 62 0 0 62 125 % Trucks 4.5 0 0 0 2.8 4.3 2.6 9.1 0 2.6 3.8 0 0 0 2.8 0 2.6 0 0 2.6 2.6 Attachment E Data Collection Group LSmith@DataCollectionGroup.net File Name : JPA and Observatory Site Code : 12222222 Start Date : 8/31/2021 Page No :3 Observatory JPA Driveway JPA From North From East From South From West Uturn Start Time Right Thru Left App. Total Right Thru Left Uturns App. Total Right Thru Left Uturns App. Total Right Thru Left Uturns App. Total Int. Total s Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 09:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:30 AM 07:30 AM 1 0 0 0 1 0 81 0 0 81 0 0 1 0 1 0 131 0 4 135 218 07:45 AM 0 0 0 2 2 0 80 1 0 81 0 0 0 0 0 0 140 0 0 140 223 08:00 AM 1 0 0 0 1 1 66 1 0 68 1 0 0 0 1 0 117 0 0 117 187 08:15 AM 1 0 0 0 1 0 51 0 2 53 3 0 0 0 3 0 114 0 2 116 173 Total Volume 3 0 0 2 5 1 278 2 2 283 4 0 1 0 5 0 502 0 6 508 801 % App. Total 60 0 0 40 0.4 98.2 0.7 0.7 80 0 20 0 0 98.8 0 1.2 PHF .750 .000 .000 .250 .625 .250 .858 .500 .250 .873 .333 .000 .250 .000 .417 .000 .896 .000 .375 .907 .898 Passenger Veh 3 0 0 2 5 1 268 1 2 272 3 0 1 0 4 0 491 0 6 497 778 % Passenger Veh 100 0 0 100 100 100 96.4 50.0 100 96.1 75.0 0 100 0 80.0 0 97.8 0 100 97.8 97.1 Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 1 0 11 1 0 0 0 1 0 11 0 0 11 23 % Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 0 3.6 50.0 0 3.9 25.0 0 0 0 20.0 0 2.2 0 0 2.2 2.9 Attachment E Data Collection Group LSmith@DataCollectionGroup.net File Name : JPA and Observatory Site Code : 12222222 Start Date : 8/31/2021 Page No :4 Observatory Out In Total 1 5 6 0 0 0 1 5 6 3 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 2 Right Thru Left Uturns Peak Hour Data 21 769 790 0 0 0 Right Thru Total Left Out 506 494 1 0 1 12 North 11 491 502 Uturns Right Thru 278 268 11 497 508 10 Peak Hour Begins at 07:30 AM In JPA JPA In 283 272 11 0 0 0 Left Passenger Veh Trucks 2 1 1 10 272 282 Out Total Uturns 6 0 6 789 766 23 2 0 2 Left Thru Right Uturns 1 0 3 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 4 0 1 4 5 1 1 2 2 5 7 Out In Total Driveway Attachment E Data Collection Group LSmith@DataCollectionGroup.net File Name : JPA and Observatory Site Code : 12222222 Start Date : 8/31/2021 Page No :5 Observatory JPA Driveway JPA From North From East From South From West Start Time Right Thru Left Uturns App. Total Right Thru Left Uturns App. Total Right Thru Left Uturns App. Total Right Thru Left Uturns App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 10:00 AM to 01:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 12:00 PM 12:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 3 102 0 1 106 1 0 0 0 1 0 104 1 0 105 212 12:15 PM 1 0 0 0 1 3 98 0 0 101 0 0 0 0 0 1 107 0 1 109 211 12:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 81 0 0 81 1 0 0 0 1 1 101 0 0 102 184 12:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 96 2 0 98 1 0 2 0 3 1 114 0 1 116 217 Total Volume 1 0 0 0 1 6 377 2 1 386 3 0 2 0 5 3 426 1 2 432 824 % App. Total 100 0 0 0 1.6 97.7 0.5 0.3 60 0 40 0 0.7 98.6 0.2 0.5 PHF .250 .000 .000 .000 .250 .500 .924 .250 .250 .910 .750 .000 .250 .000 .417 .750 .934 .250 .500 .931 .949 Passenger Veh 1 0 0 0 1 6 363 2 1 372 3 0 2 0 5 3 411 1 2 417 795 % Passenger Veh 100 0 0 0 100 100 96.3 100 100 96.4 100 0 100 0 100 100 96.5 100 100 96.5 96.5 Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 0 0 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 0 0 15 29 % Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 0 3.7 0 0 3.6 0 0 0 0 0 0 3.5 0 0 3.5 3.5 Attachment E Data Collection Group LSmith@DataCollectionGroup.net File Name : JPA and Observatory Site Code : 12222222 Start Date : 8/31/2021 Page No :6 Observatory Out In Total 7 1 8 0 0 0 7 1 8 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 Right Thru Left Uturns Peak Hour Data 29 783 812 1 0 1 Right Thru Total Left Out 429 414 6 0 6 15 North 15 411 426 Uturns Right Thru 377 363 15 417 432 14 Peak Hour Begins at 12:00 PM In JPA JPA In 386 372 14 3 0 3 Left Passenger Veh Trucks 2 0 2 14 366 380 Out Total Uturns 2 0 2 815 786 29 1 0 1 Left Thru Right Uturns 2 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 3 0 5 5 10 0 0 0 5 5 10 Out In Total Driveway Attachment E Data Collection Group LSmith@DataCollectionGroup.net File Name : JPA and Observatory Site Code : 12222222 Start Date : 8/31/2021 Page No :7 Observatory JPA Driveway JPA From North From East From South From West Start Time Right Thru Left Uturns App. Total Right Thru Left Uturns App. Total Right Thru Left Uturns App. Total Right Thru Left Uturns App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 02:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 04:45 PM 04:45 PM 3 0 3 0 6 1 147 0 0 148 1 0 0 0 1 1 70 0 1 72 227 05:00 PM 3 0 0 0 3 1 175 1 1 178 1 0 0 0 1 0 90 0 1 91 273 05:15 PM 1 0 2 0 3 1 133 2 0 136 2 0 1 0 3 1 84 1 2 88 230 05:30 PM 0 1 1 0 2 2 154 1 0 157 2 0 3 0 5 1 67 1 3 72 236 Total Volume 7 1 6 0 14 5 609 4 1 619 6 0 4 0 10 3 311 2 7 323 966 % App. Total 50 7.1 42.9 0 0.8 98.4 0.6 0.2 60 0 40 0 0.9 96.3 0.6 2.2 PHF .583 .250 .500 .000 .583 .625 .870 .500 .250 .869 .750 .000 .333 .000 .500 .750 .864 .500 .583 .887 .885 Passenger Veh 7 1 6 0 14 5 599 4 1 609 6 0 4 0 10 3 307 2 7 319 952 % Passenger Veh 100 100 100 0 100 100 98.4 100 100 98.4 100 0 100 0 100 100 98.7 100 100 98.8 98.6 Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 4 14 % Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.6 0 0 1.6 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.3 0 0 1.2 1.4 Attachment E Data Collection Group LSmith@DataCollectionGroup.net File Name : JPA and Observatory Site Code : 12222222 Start Date : 8/31/2021 Page No :8 Observatory Out In Total 7 14 21 0 0 0 7 14 21 7 1 6 0 0 0 0 0 7 1 6 0 Right Thru Left Uturns Peak Hour Data 14 929 943 2 0 2 Right Thru Total Left Out 323 319 5 0 5 4 North 4 307 311 Uturns Right Thru 609 599 4 319 323 10 Peak Hour Begins at 04:45 PM In JPA JPA In 619 609 10 3 0 3 Left Passenger Veh Trucks 4 0 4 10 610 620 Out Total Uturns 7 0 7 942 928 14 1 0 1 Left Thru Right Uturns 4 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 6 0 8 10 18 0 0 0 8 10 18 Out In Total Driveway Attachment E Data Collection Group LSmith@DataCollectionGroup.net File Name : JPA and Observatory Site Code : 12222222 Start Date : 8/31/2021 Page No :1 Groups Printed- Bikes - Peds Observatory JPA Driveway JPA From North From East From South From West Start Time Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Int. Total 07:00 AM 0 0 0 5 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 7 0 3 0 0 3 15 07:15 AM 0 0 0 2 2 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 12 12 0 3 1 0 4 19 07:30 AM 0 0 0 12 12 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 22 22 0 3 0 0 3 39 07:45 AM 0 0 0 2 2 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 11 11 0 7 0 0 7 22 Total 0 0 0 21 21 0 5 0 0 5 0 0 0 52 52 0 16 1 0 17 95 08:00 AM 0 0 0 11 11 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 5 5 0 6 0 0 6 23 08:15 AM 0 0 0 7 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 18 0 1 0 1 2 27 08:30 AM 0 0 0 6 6 0 1 0 1 2 0 0 0 12 12 0 5 0 0 5 25 08:45 AM 0 0 0 6 6 0 0 0 3 3 0 0 0 11 11 0 9 0 1 10 30 Total 0 0 0 30 30 0 1 0 5 6 0 0 0 46 46 0 21 0 2 23 105 *** BREAK *** 11:00 AM 0 0 0 2 2 0 1 0 3 4 0 0 0 2 2 0 1 0 0 1 9 11:15 AM 0 0 0 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 5 0 1 0 0 1 10 11:30 AM 0 0 0 2 2 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 2 0 1 0 0 1 6 11:45 AM 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 3 0 0 3 7 Total 0 0 0 10 10 0 2 0 3 5 0 0 0 11 11 0 6 0 0 6 32 12:00 PM 0 0 0 6 6 0 2 0 2 4 0 0 0 8 8 0 0 0 1 1 19 12:15 PM 0 0 0 6 6 0 4 0 0 4 0 0 0 7 7 0 3 0 0 3 20 12:30 PM 0 0 0 5 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 6 0 0 0 5 5 16 12:45 PM 0 0 0 4 4 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 2 0 3 0 0 3 10 Total 0 0 0 21 21 1 6 0 2 9 0 0 0 23 23 0 6 0 6 12 65 *** BREAK *** 04:00 PM 0 0 0 8 8 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 8 8 0 1 0 1 2 20 04:15 PM 0 0 0 5 5 0 5 0 0 5 0 0 0 8 8 0 1 0 0 1 19 04:30 PM 0 0 1 10 11 0 8 0 2 10 0 0 0 7 7 0 1 0 1 2 30 04:45 PM 0 0 0 11 11 0 9 1 0 10 0 0 0 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 24 Total 0 0 1 34 35 0 24 1 2 27 0 0 0 26 26 0 3 0 2 5 93 05:00 PM 0 0 0 11 11 1 5 1 3 10 0 0 0 17 17 0 2 0 0 2 40 05:15 PM 0 0 0 55 55 0 4 0 2 6 0 0 1 15 16 1 2 0 0 3 80 05:30 PM 0 0 0 12 12 0 3 0 0 3 0 0 0 10 10 0 3 0 1 4 29 05:45 PM 0 0 0 38 38 0 5 0 1 6 0 0 0 16 16 0 1 0 0 1 61 Total 0 0 0 116 116 1 17 1 6 25 0 0 1 58 59 1 8 0 1 10 210 Grand Total 0 0 1 232 233 2 55 2 18 77 0 0 1 216 217 1 60 1 11 73 600 Apprch % 0 0 0.4 99.6 2.6 71.4 2.6 23.4 0 0 0.5 99.5 1.4 82.2 1.4 15.1 Total % 0 0 0.2 38.7 38.8 0.3 9.2 0.3 3 12.8 0 0 0.2 36 36.2 0.2 10 0.2 1.8 12.2 Attachment E Data Collection Group LSmith@DataCollectionGroup.net File Name : JPA and Observatory Site Code : 12222222 Start Date : 8/31/2021 Page No :2 Groups Printed- Bikes - Peds Observatory JPA Driveway JPA From North From East From South From West Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Int. Total Bikes 0 0 1 0 1 2 55 2 0 59 0 0 1 0 1 1 60 1 0 62 123 % Bikes 0 0 100 0 0.4 100 100 100 0 76.6 0 0 100 0 0.5 100 100 100 0 84.9 20.5 Peds 0 0 0 232 232 0 0 0 18 18 0 0 0 216 216 0 0 0 11 11 477 % Peds 0 0 0 100 99.6 0 0 0 100 23.4 0 0 0 100 99.5 0 0 0 100 15.1 79.5 Attachment E Data Collection Group LSmith@DataCollectionGroup.net File Name : JPA and Maury Site Code : Start Date : 8/31/2021 Page No :1 Groups Printed- Passenger Veh - Trucks Maury JPA JPA Fontaine From North From East From South From West Start Time Right Thru Left U-Turn App. Total Right Thru Left U-Turn App. Total Right Thru Left U-Turn App. Total Right Thru Left U-Turn App. Total Int. Total 07:00 AM 3 5 2 0 10 4 28 11 0 43 17 34 30 0 81 18 56 23 0 97 231 07:15 AM 1 11 3 0 15 4 34 12 0 50 39 35 40 0 114 30 62 20 0 112 291 07:30 AM 4 9 2 0 15 3 69 8 0 80 39 68 66 0 173 25 86 23 0 134 402 07:45 AM 2 10 7 0 19 4 62 16 0 82 50 62 98 0 210 31 73 14 0 118 429 Total 10 35 14 0 59 15 193 47 0 255 145 199 234 0 578 104 277 80 0 461 1353 08:00 AM 5 14 8 0 27 11 39 18 0 68 38 55 77 0 170 45 72 18 0 135 400 08:15 AM 3 16 3 0 22 4 44 11 0 59 50 47 68 0 165 35 62 13 0 110 356 08:30 AM 8 19 7 0 34 3 44 15 0 62 54 44 70 0 168 31 70 14 0 115 379 08:45 AM 6 14 4 0 24 3 30 17 0 50 51 47 61 0 159 36 79 10 0 125 358 Total 22 63 22 0 107 21 157 61 0 239 193 193 276 0 662 147 283 55 0 485 1493 11:00 AM 4 23 3 0 30 6 44 39 0 89 24 15 28 0 67 30 54 10 0 94 280 11:15 AM 9 18 3 0 30 6 32 22 0 60 21 23 26 0 70 35 41 6 0 82 242 11:30 AM 8 24 7 0 39 4 51 25 0 80 24 23 32 0 79 33 48 9 0 90 288 11:45 AM 13 28 6 0 47 5 44 24 0 73 33 15 42 0 90 35 74 11 0 120 330 Total 34 93 19 0 146 21 171 110 0 302 102 76 128 0 306 133 217 36 0 386 1140 12:00 PM 6 36 4 0 46 4 58 35 0 97 19 22 30 1 72 31 68 13 0 112 327 12:15 PM 14 29 7 0 50 9 54 34 0 97 43 21 27 0 91 47 58 16 0 121 359 12:30 PM 10 30 11 0 51 8 46 29 0 83 34 19 30 0 83 34 52 9 0 95 312 12:45 PM 12 21 9 0 42 3 58 27 0 88 33 23 44 0 100 32 79 8 0 119 349 Total 42 116 31 0 189 24 216 125 0 365 129 85 131 1 346 144 257 46 0 447 1347 04:00 PM 14 49 8 0 71 7 75 28 0 110 15 20 53 0 88 51 44 5 0 100 369 04:15 PM 12 41 8 0 61 10 81 48 0 139 32 17 37 0 86 65 57 5 0 127 413 04:30 PM 16 64 13 0 93 6 81 51 0 138 30 11 45 0 86 67 43 4 0 114 431 04:45 PM 14 69 11 0 94 5 80 54 0 139 26 29 41 0 96 59 33 9 0 101 430 Total 56 223 40 0 319 28 317 181 0 526 103 77 176 0 356 242 177 23 0 442 1643 05:00 PM 15 74 20 0 109 7 91 62 0 160 26 28 40 0 94 70 38 4 0 112 475 05:15 PM 10 84 11 0 105 13 79 48 0 140 30 25 52 0 107 68 42 6 0 116 468 05:30 PM 10 78 7 0 95 8 77 58 0 143 23 19 50 0 92 58 37 6 0 101 431 05:45 PM 10 59 12 0 81 13 69 57 0 139 27 25 50 0 102 45 42 15 0 102 424 Total 45 295 50 0 390 41 316 225 0 582 106 97 192 0 395 241 159 31 0 431 1798 Grand Total 209 825 176 0 1210 150 1370 749 0 2269 778 727 1137 1 2643 1011 1370 271 0 2652 8774 Apprch % 17.3 68.2 14.5 0 6.6 60.4 33 0 29.4 27.5 43 0 38.1 51.7 10.2 0 Total % 2.4 9.4 2 0 13.8 1.7 15.6 8.5 0 25.9 8.9 8.3 13 0 30.1 11.5 15.6 3.1 0 30.2 Attachment E Data Collection Group LSmith@DataCollectionGroup.net File Name : JPA and Maury Site Code : Start Date : 8/31/2021 Page No :2 Groups Printed- Passenger Veh - Trucks Maury JPA JPA Fontaine From North From East From South From West Right Thru Left U-Turn App. Total Right Thru Left U-Turn App. Total Right Thru Left U-Turn App. Total Right Thru Left U-Turn App. Total Int. Total Passenger Veh 197 814 155 0 1166 119 1331 735 0 2185 766 705 1110 1 2582 985 1325 258 0 2568 8501 % Passenger Veh 94.3 98.7 88.1 0 96.4 79.3 97.2 98.1 0 96.3 98.5 97 97.6 100 97.7 97.4 96.7 95.2 0 96.8 96.9 Trucks 12 11 21 0 44 31 39 14 0 84 12 22 27 0 61 26 45 13 0 84 273 % Trucks 5.7 1.3 11.9 0 3.6 20.7 2.8 1.9 0 3.7 1.5 3 2.4 0 2.3 2.6 3.3 4.8 0 3.2 3.1 Attachment E Data Collection Group LSmith@DataCollectionGroup.net File Name : JPA and Maury Site Code : Start Date : 8/31/2021 Page No :3 Maury JPA JPA Fontaine From North From East From South From West Start Time Right Thru Left U-Turn App. Total Right Thru Left U-Turn App. Total Right Thru Left U-Turn App. Total Right Thru Left U-Turn App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 09:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:30 AM 07:30 AM 4 9 2 0 15 3 69 8 0 80 39 68 66 0 173 25 86 23 0 134 402 07:45 AM 2 10 7 0 19 4 62 16 0 82 50 62 98 0 210 31 73 14 0 118 429 08:00 AM 5 14 8 0 27 11 39 18 0 68 38 55 77 0 170 45 72 18 0 135 400 08:15 AM 3 16 3 0 22 4 44 11 0 59 50 47 68 0 165 35 62 13 0 110 356 Total Volume 14 49 20 0 83 22 214 53 0 289 177 232 309 0 718 136 293 68 0 497 1587 % App. Total 16.9 59 24.1 0 7.6 74 18.3 0 24.7 32.3 43 0 27.4 59 13.7 0 PHF .700 .766 .625 .000 .769 .500 .775 .736 .000 .881 .885 .853 .788 .000 .855 .756 .852 .739 .000 .920 .925 Passenger Veh 12 47 17 0 76 17 206 52 0 275 176 228 305 0 709 134 284 66 0 484 1544 % Passenger Veh 85.7 95.9 85.0 0 91.6 77.3 96.3 98.1 0 95.2 99.4 98.3 98.7 0 98.7 98.5 96.9 97.1 0 97.4 97.3 Trucks 2 2 3 0 7 5 8 1 0 14 1 4 4 0 9 2 9 2 0 13 43 % Trucks 14.3 4.1 15.0 0 8.4 22.7 3.7 1.9 0 4.8 0.6 1.7 1.3 0 1.3 1.5 3.1 2.9 0 2.6 2.7 Attachment E Data Collection Group LSmith@DataCollectionGroup.net File Name : JPA and Maury Site Code : Start Date : 8/31/2021 Page No :4 Maury Out In Total 311 76 387 11 7 18 322 83 405 12 47 17 0 2 2 3 0 14 49 20 0 Right Thru Left U-Turn Peak Hour Data 27 1007 1034 2 66 68 Right Thru Total Left Out 22 17 490 477 5 13 North 9 284 293 U-Turn Right Thru 214 206 13 484 497 Fontaine Peak Hour Begins at 07:30 AM In JPA 8 In 289 275 14 2 134 136 Left U-Turn Passenger Veh 53 52 Trucks 1 14 523 537 Out Total 0 0 0 779 752 27 0 0 0 Left Thru Right U-Turn 305 228 176 0 4 4 1 0 309 232 177 0 233 709 942 5 9 14 238 718 956 Out In Total JPA Attachment E Data Collection Group LSmith@DataCollectionGroup.net File Name : JPA and Maury Site Code : Start Date : 8/31/2021 Page No :5 Maury JPA JPA Fontaine From North From East From South From West Start Time Right Thru Left U-Turn App. Total Right Thru Left U-Turn App. Total Right Thru Left U-Turn App. Total Right Thru Left U-Turn App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 10:00 AM to 01:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 12:00 PM 12:00 PM 6 36 4 0 46 4 58 35 0 97 19 22 30 1 72 31 68 13 0 112 327 12:15 PM 14 29 7 0 50 9 54 34 0 97 43 21 27 0 91 47 58 16 0 121 359 12:30 PM 10 30 11 0 51 8 46 29 0 83 34 19 30 0 83 34 52 9 0 95 312 12:45 PM 12 21 9 0 42 3 58 27 0 88 33 23 44 0 100 32 79 8 0 119 349 Total Volume 42 116 31 0 189 24 216 125 0 365 129 85 131 1 346 144 257 46 0 447 1347 % App. Total 22.2 61.4 16.4 0 6.6 59.2 34.2 0 37.3 24.6 37.9 0.3 32.2 57.5 10.3 0 PHF .750 .806 .705 .000 .926 .667 .931 .893 .000 .941 .750 .924 .744 .250 .865 .766 .813 .719 .000 .924 .938 Passenger Veh 38 116 26 0 180 19 204 121 0 344 126 82 127 1 336 140 248 43 0 431 1291 % Passenger Veh 90.5 100 83.9 0 95.2 79.2 94.4 96.8 0 94.2 97.7 96.5 96.9 100 97.1 97.2 96.5 93.5 0 96.4 95.8 Trucks 4 0 5 0 9 5 12 4 0 21 3 3 4 0 10 4 9 3 0 16 56 % Trucks 9.5 0 16.1 0 4.8 20.8 5.6 3.2 0 5.8 2.3 3.5 3.1 0 2.9 2.8 3.5 6.5 0 3.6 4.2 Attachment E Data Collection Group LSmith@DataCollectionGroup.net File Name : JPA and Maury Site Code : Start Date : 8/31/2021 Page No :6 Maury Out In Total 144 180 324 11 9 20 155 189 344 38 116 26 0 4 0 5 0 42 116 31 0 Right Thru Left U-Turn Peak Hour Data 36 800 836 3 43 46 Right Thru Total Left Out 24 19 417 400 5 17 North 9 248 257 U-Turn Right Thru 216 204 16 431 447 Fontaine 12 Peak Hour Begins at 12:00 PM In JPA In 365 344 21 4 140 144 Left U-Turn Passenger Veh 125 121 Trucks 4 20 369 389 Out Total 0 0 0 782 744 38 0 0 0 Left Thru Right U-Turn 127 82 126 1 4 3 3 0 131 85 129 1 377 336 713 8 10 18 385 346 731 Out In Total JPA Attachment E Data Collection Group LSmith@DataCollectionGroup.net File Name : JPA and Maury Site Code : Start Date : 8/31/2021 Page No :7 Maury JPA JPA Fontaine From North From East From South From West Start Time Right Thru Left U-Turn App. Total Right Thru Left U-Turn App. Total Right Thru Left U-Turn App. Total Right Thru Left U-Turn App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 02:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 04:30 PM 04:30 PM 16 64 13 0 93 6 81 51 0 138 30 11 45 0 86 67 43 4 0 114 431 04:45 PM 14 69 11 0 94 5 80 54 0 139 26 29 41 0 96 59 33 9 0 101 430 05:00 PM 15 74 20 0 109 7 91 62 0 160 26 28 40 0 94 70 38 4 0 112 475 05:15 PM 10 84 11 0 105 13 79 48 0 140 30 25 52 0 107 68 42 6 0 116 468 Total Volume 55 291 55 0 401 31 331 215 0 577 112 93 178 0 383 264 156 23 0 443 1804 % App. Total 13.7 72.6 13.7 0 5.4 57.4 37.3 0 29.2 24.3 46.5 0 59.6 35.2 5.2 0 PHF .859 .866 .688 .000 .920 .596 .909 .867 .000 .902 .933 .802 .856 .000 .895 .943 .907 .639 .000 .955 .949 Passenger Veh 54 289 52 0 395 25 325 213 0 563 112 89 172 0 373 259 153 23 0 435 1766 % Passenger Veh 98.2 99.3 94.5 0 98.5 80.6 98.2 99.1 0 97.6 100 95.7 96.6 0 97.4 98.1 98.1 100 0 98.2 97.9 Trucks 1 2 3 0 6 6 6 2 0 14 0 4 6 0 10 5 3 0 0 8 38 % Trucks 1.8 0.7 5.5 0 1.5 19.4 1.8 0.9 0 2.4 0 4.3 3.4 0 2.6 1.9 1.9 0 0 1.8 2.1 Attachment E Data Collection Group LSmith@DataCollectionGroup.net File Name : JPA and Maury Site Code : Start Date : 8/31/2021 Page No :8 Maury Out In Total 137 395 532 10 6 16 147 401 548 54 289 52 0 1 2 3 0 55 291 55 0 Right Thru Left U-Turn Peak Hour Data 21 986 1007 0 23 23 Right Thru Total Left Out 31 25 323 317 6 6 North 3 153 156 U-Turn Right Thru 331 325 8 435 443 Fontaine Peak Hour Begins at 04:30 PM In JPA 6 In 577 563 14 5 259 264 Left U-Turn Passenger Veh 215 213 Trucks 2 13 551 564 Out Total 0 0 0 900 880 20 0 0 0 Left Thru Right U-Turn 172 89 112 0 6 4 0 0 178 93 112 0 761 373 1134 9 10 19 770 383 1153 Out In Total JPA Attachment E Data Collection Group LSmith@DataCollectionGroup.net File Name : JPA and Maury Site Code : Start Date : 8/31/2021 Page No :1 Groups Printed- Bikes - Peds Maury JPA JPA Fontaine From North From East From South From West Start Time Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Int. Total 07:00 AM 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 9 9 1 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 12 07:15 AM 0 1 0 2 3 0 1 0 6 7 1 1 0 3 5 0 0 0 2 2 17 07:30 AM 0 0 0 3 3 0 2 0 3 5 0 3 0 3 6 0 0 0 1 1 15 07:45 AM 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 3 3 2 0 6 11 0 0 0 6 6 21 Total 0 1 0 7 8 0 4 1 19 24 5 7 0 12 24 0 0 0 9 9 65 08:00 AM 0 2 0 2 4 0 0 0 8 8 6 3 0 2 11 0 1 0 3 4 27 08:15 AM 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 11 11 0 4 0 0 4 0 1 0 6 7 23 08:30 AM 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 5 5 1 0 0 2 3 1 1 0 5 7 16 08:45 AM 0 0 0 2 2 0 1 0 13 14 4 0 1 8 13 1 1 0 1 3 32 Total 0 4 0 4 8 0 1 0 37 38 11 7 1 12 31 2 4 0 15 21 98 11:00 AM 0 1 0 1 2 0 0 1 2 3 1 2 0 3 6 1 1 0 1 3 14 11:15 AM 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 5 5 0 1 0 2 3 1 1 0 2 4 13 11:30 AM 0 2 0 1 3 0 0 1 1 2 1 1 0 3 5 0 0 0 0 0 10 11:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 3 1 2 0 0 3 1 0 0 1 2 8 Total 0 3 0 3 6 0 0 4 9 13 3 6 0 8 17 3 2 0 4 9 45 12:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 4 5 0 1 0 5 6 1 1 0 2 4 15 12:15 PM 1 1 0 1 3 0 0 4 5 9 2 6 0 1 9 0 0 0 2 2 23 12:30 PM 0 1 0 2 3 0 0 0 3 3 0 0 1 1 2 0 0 0 3 3 11 12:45 PM 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 2 2 2 2 0 0 4 0 0 0 2 2 10 Total 1 2 0 5 8 0 0 5 14 19 4 9 1 7 21 1 1 0 9 11 59 04:00 PM 0 2 0 4 6 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 3 3 0 0 0 6 6 17 04:15 PM 0 1 0 1 2 1 2 2 8 13 0 0 0 4 4 0 2 0 2 4 23 04:30 PM 0 6 1 0 7 0 0 6 7 13 0 0 1 6 7 0 0 0 2 2 29 04:45 PM 0 2 0 2 4 0 1 6 9 16 0 2 0 6 8 0 0 0 1 1 29 Total 0 11 1 7 19 1 3 14 26 44 0 2 1 19 22 0 2 0 11 13 98 05:00 PM 0 1 1 1 3 0 1 4 7 12 0 0 0 6 6 0 1 0 3 4 25 05:15 PM 0 4 0 0 4 0 0 2 39 41 0 0 1 5 6 0 0 0 5 5 56 05:30 PM 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 3 14 17 1 0 0 1 2 1 2 0 0 3 24 05:45 PM 0 0 0 3 3 0 0 4 31 35 2 1 0 0 3 0 0 0 1 1 42 Total 0 7 1 4 12 0 1 13 91 105 3 1 1 12 17 1 3 0 9 13 147 Grand Total 1 28 2 30 61 1 9 37 196 243 26 32 4 70 132 7 12 0 57 76 512 Apprch % 1.6 45.9 3.3 49.2 0.4 3.7 15.2 80.7 19.7 24.2 3 53 9.2 15.8 0 75 Total % 0.2 5.5 0.4 5.9 11.9 0.2 1.8 7.2 38.3 47.5 5.1 6.2 0.8 13.7 25.8 1.4 2.3 0 11.1 14.8 Attachment E Data Collection Group LSmith@DataCollectionGroup.net File Name : JPA and Maury Site Code : Start Date : 8/31/2021 Page No :2 Groups Printed- Bikes - Peds Maury JPA JPA Fontaine From North From East From South From West Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Int. Total Bikes 1 28 2 0 31 1 9 37 0 47 26 32 4 0 62 7 12 0 0 19 159 % Bikes 100 100 100 0 50.8 100 100 100 0 19.3 100 100 100 0 47 100 100 0 0 25 31.1 Peds 0 0 0 30 30 0 0 0 196 196 0 0 0 70 70 0 0 0 57 57 353 % Peds 0 0 0 100 49.2 0 0 0 100 80.7 0 0 0 100 53 0 0 0 100 75 68.9 Attachment E Data Collection Group LSmith@DataCollectionGroup.net File Name : Maury and Stadium Site Code : 23333333 Start Date : 8/31/2021 Page No :1 Groups Printed- Passenger Veh - Trucks Alderman Stadium Maury Stadium From North From East From South From West Start Time Right Thru Left Uturns App. Total Right Thru Left Uturns App. Total Right Thru Left Uturns App. Total Right Thru Left Uturns App. Total Int. Total 07:00 AM 3 12 7 0 22 3 3 2 0 8 9 65 1 0 75 1 17 31 0 49 154 07:15 AM 8 9 9 0 26 4 1 1 0 6 12 72 1 0 85 1 16 32 0 49 166 07:30 AM 4 10 9 0 23 6 3 5 0 14 16 96 1 0 113 1 20 45 0 66 216 07:45 AM 10 16 6 0 32 9 2 4 0 15 10 84 0 0 94 3 21 45 0 69 210 Total 25 47 31 0 103 22 9 12 0 43 47 317 3 0 367 6 74 153 0 233 746 08:00 AM 6 24 8 0 38 8 2 7 0 17 14 70 1 0 85 1 19 11 0 31 171 08:15 AM 9 21 3 0 33 8 2 2 0 12 9 54 0 0 63 1 10 10 0 21 129 08:30 AM 6 31 4 0 41 5 5 3 0 13 9 58 0 0 67 1 13 15 0 29 150 08:45 AM 7 23 2 0 32 3 2 2 0 7 10 51 2 0 63 0 10 11 0 21 123 Total 28 99 17 0 144 24 11 14 0 49 42 233 3 0 278 3 52 47 0 102 573 *** BREAK *** 11:00 AM 4 32 6 0 42 2 4 6 0 12 4 27 1 0 32 1 6 6 0 13 99 11:15 AM 6 23 2 0 31 5 6 6 0 17 9 24 0 0 33 1 7 5 0 13 94 11:30 AM 13 29 1 0 43 3 8 9 0 20 11 30 1 0 42 1 4 7 0 12 117 11:45 AM 5 44 2 0 51 4 3 8 0 15 2 28 3 0 33 1 6 5 0 12 111 Total 28 128 11 0 167 14 21 29 0 64 26 109 5 0 140 4 23 23 0 50 421 12:00 PM 3 45 4 0 52 6 7 8 0 21 7 44 1 0 52 0 0 4 0 4 129 12:15 PM 11 34 4 0 49 9 3 11 0 23 7 49 0 0 56 0 6 7 0 13 141 12:30 PM 10 38 5 0 53 4 6 16 0 26 4 27 2 0 33 0 3 6 0 9 121 12:45 PM 10 30 3 0 43 2 6 15 0 23 8 27 2 0 37 2 3 3 0 8 111 Total 34 147 16 0 197 21 22 50 0 93 26 147 5 0 178 2 12 20 0 34 502 *** BREAK *** 04:00 PM 16 64 13 0 93 10 14 18 0 42 4 26 1 0 31 0 3 4 0 7 173 04:15 PM 20 59 11 0 90 6 23 24 0 53 2 32 3 0 37 2 3 3 0 8 188 04:30 PM 21 74 8 0 103 2 21 38 0 61 2 15 1 0 18 2 5 7 0 14 196 04:45 PM 23 84 12 0 119 9 30 32 0 71 4 41 1 0 46 1 5 5 0 11 247 Total 80 281 44 0 405 27 88 112 0 227 12 114 6 0 132 5 16 19 0 40 804 05:00 PM 25 76 10 0 111 1 35 34 0 70 6 36 0 0 42 2 2 3 0 7 230 05:15 PM 19 78 12 0 109 5 40 30 0 75 2 38 3 0 43 0 6 3 0 9 236 05:30 PM 20 87 6 0 113 5 24 29 0 58 4 30 2 0 36 0 3 8 0 11 218 05:45 PM 8 70 10 0 88 6 16 15 0 37 6 31 1 0 38 3 4 8 0 15 178 Total 72 311 38 0 421 17 115 108 0 240 18 135 6 0 159 5 15 22 0 42 862 Grand Total 267 1013 157 0 1437 125 266 325 0 716 171 1055 28 0 1254 25 192 284 0 501 3908 Apprch % 18.6 70.5 10.9 0 17.5 37.2 45.4 0 13.6 84.1 2.2 0 5 38.3 56.7 0 Total % 6.8 25.9 4 0 36.8 3.2 6.8 8.3 0 18.3 4.4 27 0.7 0 32.1 0.6 4.9 7.3 0 12.8 Attachment E Data Collection Group LSmith@DataCollectionGroup.net File Name : Maury and Stadium Site Code : 23333333 Start Date : 8/31/2021 Page No :2 Groups Printed- Passenger Veh - Trucks Alderman Stadium Maury Stadium From North From East From South From West Uturn Right Thru Left App. Total Right Thru Left Uturns App. Total Right Thru Left Uturns App. Total Right Thru Left Uturns App. Total Int. Total s Passenger Veh 232 999 86 0 1317 124 263 306 0 693 171 994 27 0 1192 25 192 282 0 499 3701 % Passenger Veh 86.9 98.6 54.8 0 91.6 99.2 98.9 94.2 0 96.8 100 94.2 96.4 0 95.1 100 100 99.3 0 99.6 94.7 Trucks 35 14 71 0 120 1 3 19 0 23 0 61 1 0 62 0 0 2 0 2 207 % Trucks 13.1 1.4 45.2 0 8.4 0.8 1.1 5.8 0 3.2 0 5.8 3.6 0 4.9 0 0 0.7 0 0.4 5.3 Attachment E Data Collection Group LSmith@DataCollectionGroup.net File Name : Maury and Stadium Site Code : 23333333 Start Date : 8/31/2021 Page No :3 Alderman Stadium Maury Stadium From North From East From South From West Uturn Start Time Right Thru Left App. Total Right Thru Left Uturns App. Total Right Thru Left Uturns App. Total Right Thru Left Uturns App. Total Int. Total s Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 09:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:15 AM 07:15 AM 8 9 9 0 26 4 1 1 0 6 12 72 1 0 85 1 16 32 0 49 166 07:30 AM 4 10 9 0 23 6 3 5 0 14 16 96 1 0 113 1 20 45 0 66 216 07:45 AM 10 16 6 0 32 9 2 4 0 15 10 84 0 0 94 3 21 45 0 69 210 08:00 AM 6 24 8 0 38 8 2 7 0 17 14 70 1 0 85 1 19 11 0 31 171 Total Volume 28 59 32 0 119 27 8 17 0 52 52 322 3 0 377 6 76 133 0 215 763 % App. Total 23.5 49.6 26.9 0 51.9 15.4 32.7 0 13.8 85.4 0.8 0 2.8 35.3 61.9 0 PHF .700 .615 .889 .000 .783 .750 .667 .607 .000 .765 .813 .839 .750 .000 .834 .500 .905 .739 .000 .779 .883 Passenger Veh 24 57 12 0 93 27 7 13 0 47 52 311 3 0 366 6 76 133 0 215 721 % Passenger Veh 85.7 96.6 37.5 0 78.2 100 87.5 76.5 0 90.4 100 96.6 100 0 97.1 100 100 100 0 100 94.5 Trucks 4 2 20 0 26 0 1 4 0 5 0 11 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 42 % Trucks 14.3 3.4 62.5 0 21.8 0 12.5 23.5 0 9.6 0 3.4 0 0 2.9 0 0 0 0 0 5.5 Attachment E Data Collection Group LSmith@DataCollectionGroup.net File Name : Maury and Stadium Site Code : 23333333 Start Date : 8/31/2021 Page No :4 Alderman Out In Total 471 93 564 11 26 37 482 119 601 24 57 12 0 4 2 20 0 28 59 32 0 Right Thru Left Uturns Peak Hour Data 5 249 254 0 133 133 Right Thru Total Left Out 27 27 160 140 0 20 North 0 76 76 Uturns Right Thru 0 215 215 Stadium Stadium Peak Hour Begins at 07:15 AM In 8 1 7 In 52 47 6 0 6 Left Uturns 5 Passenger Veh 17 13 Trucks 4 5 34 39 Out Total 0 0 0 212 187 25 0 0 0 Left Thru Right Uturns 3 311 52 0 0 11 0 0 3 322 52 0 76 366 442 6 11 17 82 377 459 Out In Total Maury Attachment E Data Collection Group LSmith@DataCollectionGroup.net File Name : Maury and Stadium Site Code : 23333333 Start Date : 8/31/2021 Page No :5 Alderman Stadium Maury Stadium From North From East From South From West Start Time Right Thru Left Uturns App. Total Right Thru Left Uturns App. Total Right Thru Left Uturns App. Total Right Thru Left Uturns App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 10:00 AM to 01:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 11:45 AM 11:45 AM 5 44 2 0 51 4 3 8 0 15 2 28 3 0 33 1 6 5 0 12 111 12:00 PM 3 45 4 0 52 6 7 8 0 21 7 44 1 0 52 0 0 4 0 4 129 12:15 PM 11 34 4 0 49 9 3 11 0 23 7 49 0 0 56 0 6 7 0 13 141 12:30 PM 10 38 5 0 53 4 6 16 0 26 4 27 2 0 33 0 3 6 0 9 121 Total Volume 29 161 15 0 205 23 19 43 0 85 20 148 6 0 174 1 15 22 0 38 502 % App. Total 14.1 78.5 7.3 0 27.1 22.4 50.6 0 11.5 85.1 3.4 0 2.6 39.5 57.9 0 PHF .659 .894 .750 .000 .967 .639 .679 .672 .000 .817 .714 .755 .500 .000 .777 .250 .625 .786 .000 .731 .890 Passenger Veh 22 159 15 0 196 23 19 40 0 82 20 139 6 0 165 1 15 22 0 38 481 % Passenger Veh 75.9 98.8 100 0 95.6 100 100 93.0 0 96.5 100 93.9 100 0 94.8 100 100 100 0 100 95.8 Trucks 7 2 0 0 9 0 0 3 0 3 0 9 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 21 % Trucks 24.1 1.2 0 0 4.4 0 0 7.0 0 3.5 0 6.1 0 0 5.2 0 0 0 0 0 4.2 Attachment E Data Collection Group LSmith@DataCollectionGroup.net File Name : Maury and Stadium Site Code : 23333333 Start Date : 8/31/2021 Page No :6 Alderman Out In Total 184 196 380 9 9 18 193 205 398 22 159 15 0 7 2 0 0 29 161 15 0 Right Thru Left Uturns Peak Hour Data 7 85 92 0 22 22 Right Thru Total Left Out 23 23 0 50 50 0 North 0 15 15 Uturns Right Thru 0 38 38 Stadium Stadium 19 19 Peak Hour Begins at 11:45 AM In 0 In 85 82 1 0 1 Left Uturns 3 Passenger Veh 43 40 Trucks 3 7 47 54 Out Total 0 0 0 135 132 3 0 0 0 Left Thru Right Uturns 6 139 20 0 0 9 0 0 6 148 20 0 200 165 365 5 9 14 205 174 379 Out In Total Maury Attachment E Data Collection Group LSmith@DataCollectionGroup.net File Name : Maury and Stadium Site Code : 23333333 Start Date : 8/31/2021 Page No :7 Alderman Stadium Maury Stadium From North From East From South From West Start Time Right Thru Left Uturns App. Total Right Thru Left Uturns App. Total Right Thru Left Uturns App. Total Right Thru Left Uturns App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 02:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 04:45 PM 04:45 PM 23 84 12 0 119 9 30 32 0 71 4 41 1 0 46 1 5 5 0 11 247 05:00 PM 25 76 10 0 111 1 35 34 0 70 6 36 0 0 42 2 2 3 0 7 230 05:15 PM 19 78 12 0 109 5 40 30 0 75 2 38 3 0 43 0 6 3 0 9 236 05:30 PM 20 87 6 0 113 5 24 29 0 58 4 30 2 0 36 0 3 8 0 11 218 Total Volume 87 325 40 0 452 20 129 125 0 274 16 145 6 0 167 3 16 19 0 38 931 % App. Total 19.2 71.9 8.8 0 7.3 47.1 45.6 0 9.6 86.8 3.6 0 7.9 42.1 50 0 PHF .870 .934 .833 .000 .950 .556 .806 .919 .000 .913 .667 .884 .500 .000 .908 .375 .667 .594 .000 .864 .942 Passenger Veh 80 322 19 0 421 20 129 122 0 271 16 136 6 0 158 3 16 18 0 37 887 % Passenger Veh 92.0 99.1 47.5 0 93.1 100 100 97.6 0 98.9 100 93.8 100 0 94.6 100 100 94.7 0 97.4 95.3 Trucks 7 3 21 0 31 0 0 3 0 3 0 9 0 0 9 0 0 1 0 1 44 % Trucks 8.0 0.9 52.5 0 6.9 0 0 2.4 0 1.1 0 6.2 0 0 5.4 0 0 5.3 0 2.6 4.7 Attachment E Data Collection Group LSmith@DataCollectionGroup.net File Name : Maury and Stadium Site Code : 23333333 Start Date : 8/31/2021 Page No :8 Alderman Out In Total 174 421 595 10 31 41 184 452 636 80 322 19 0 7 3 21 0 87 325 40 0 Right Thru Left Uturns Peak Hour Data 8 252 260 1 18 19 Right Thru Total Left Out 20 20 0 72 21 51 North 0 16 16 Uturns Right Thru 129 129 1 37 38 Stadium Stadium Peak Hour Begins at 04:45 PM In 0 In 274 271 3 0 3 Left Uturns 3 Passenger Veh 125 122 Trucks 3 7 215 222 Out Total 0 0 0 346 322 24 0 0 0 Left Thru Right Uturns 6 136 16 0 0 9 0 0 6 145 16 0 447 158 605 6 9 15 453 167 620 Out In Total Maury Attachment E Data Collection Group LSmith@DataCollectionGroup.net File Name : Maury and Stadium Site Code : 23333333 Start Date : 8/31/2021 Page No :1 Groups Printed- Bikes - Peds Alderman Stadium Maury Stadium From North From East From South From West Start Time Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Int. Total 07:00 AM 0 2 0 2 4 0 0 0 9 9 2 5 0 0 7 0 0 0 1 1 21 07:15 AM 0 1 0 6 7 0 0 0 7 7 0 2 0 1 3 0 1 1 3 5 22 07:30 AM 0 0 0 2 2 1 0 0 10 11 0 1 0 3 4 0 0 3 2 5 22 07:45 AM 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 6 6 0 5 0 0 5 0 0 1 5 6 18 Total 0 3 0 11 14 1 0 0 32 33 2 13 0 4 19 0 1 5 11 17 83 08:00 AM 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 16 16 0 2 0 2 4 0 1 3 1 5 27 08:15 AM 2 0 1 12 15 0 1 0 15 16 0 5 0 3 8 0 1 4 7 12 51 08:30 AM 0 1 0 12 13 0 0 0 16 16 0 1 0 2 3 0 0 1 7 8 40 08:45 AM 0 0 0 12 12 0 0 0 19 19 0 4 0 0 4 0 0 4 5 9 44 Total 2 1 1 38 42 0 1 0 66 67 0 12 0 7 19 0 2 12 20 34 162 *** BREAK *** 11:00 AM 1 2 0 5 8 1 1 0 11 13 0 3 0 4 7 0 0 1 3 4 32 11:15 AM 0 1 0 2 3 0 0 0 4 4 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 3 3 11 11:30 AM 1 1 0 5 7 1 0 0 2 3 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 2 3 5 16 11:45 AM 0 2 0 7 9 0 0 0 8 8 0 2 0 1 3 0 0 0 1 1 21 Total 2 6 0 19 27 2 1 0 25 28 0 6 0 6 12 0 0 3 10 13 80 12:00 PM 0 0 1 12 13 0 0 1 8 9 0 3 1 5 9 0 0 1 2 3 34 12:15 PM 2 3 0 9 14 0 1 0 15 16 1 8 0 3 12 0 1 1 6 8 50 12:30 PM 1 2 0 8 11 0 0 0 12 12 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 8 8 33 12:45 PM 2 1 0 5 8 0 0 0 4 4 0 2 0 1 3 0 0 0 1 1 16 Total 5 6 1 34 46 0 1 1 39 41 1 13 1 11 26 0 1 2 17 20 133 *** BREAK *** 04:00 PM 1 1 0 6 8 0 1 0 6 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 04:15 PM 1 3 0 3 7 0 0 0 12 12 0 1 1 3 5 0 0 1 9 10 34 04:30 PM 0 7 0 12 19 1 0 0 13 14 0 0 0 3 3 0 0 0 2 2 38 04:45 PM 3 6 0 5 14 0 1 1 13 15 1 0 0 3 4 0 0 3 6 9 42 Total 5 17 0 26 48 1 2 1 44 48 1 1 1 9 12 0 0 4 17 21 129 05:00 PM 3 2 0 14 19 0 0 0 16 16 0 1 0 2 3 0 1 1 4 6 44 05:15 PM 1 9 0 7 17 0 2 0 6 8 0 4 0 10 14 0 0 1 5 6 45 05:30 PM 2 5 0 4 11 0 0 0 11 11 0 1 0 4 5 0 0 2 2 4 31 05:45 PM 1 0 0 12 13 0 1 0 12 13 0 3 0 5 8 0 0 0 5 5 39 Total 7 16 0 37 60 0 3 0 45 48 0 9 0 21 30 0 1 4 16 21 159 Grand Total 21 49 2 165 237 4 8 2 251 265 4 54 2 58 118 0 5 30 91 126 746 Apprch % 8.9 20.7 0.8 69.6 1.5 3 0.8 94.7 3.4 45.8 1.7 49.2 0 4 23.8 72.2 Total % 2.8 6.6 0.3 22.1 31.8 0.5 1.1 0.3 33.6 35.5 0.5 7.2 0.3 7.8 15.8 0 0.7 4 12.2 16.9 Attachment E Data Collection Group LSmith@DataCollectionGroup.net File Name : Maury and Stadium Site Code : 23333333 Start Date : 8/31/2021 Page No :2 Groups Printed- Bikes - Peds Alderman Stadium Maury Stadium From North From East From South From West Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Int. Total Bikes 21 49 2 0 72 4 8 2 0 14 4 54 2 0 60 0 5 30 0 35 181 % Bikes 100 100 100 0 30.4 100 100 100 0 5.3 100 100 100 0 50.8 0 100 100 0 27.8 24.3 Peds 0 0 0 165 165 0 0 0 251 251 0 0 0 58 58 0 0 0 91 91 565 % Peds 0 0 0 100 69.6 0 0 0 100 94.7 0 0 0 100 49.2 0 0 0 100 72.2 75.7 Attachment E Data Collection Group LSmith@DataCollectionGroup.net File Name : Stadium and Washington Site Code : 11111111 Start Date : 8/31/2021 Page No :1 Groups Printed- Passenger Veh - Trucks Stadium Washington Stadium From North From East From South From West Start Time Right Thru Left Uturns App. Total Right Thru Left Uturns App. Total Right Thru Left Uturns App. Total Right Thru Left Uturns App. Total Int. Total 07:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 34 0 0 34 40 07:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 8 0 0 1 0 1 1 34 0 0 35 44 07:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 1 46 0 0 47 56 07:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 0 0 14 1 0 1 0 2 0 35 0 0 35 51 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 37 0 0 37 1 0 2 0 3 2 149 0 0 151 191 08:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 1 0 17 2 0 0 0 2 1 42 0 0 43 62 08:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 11 1 0 0 0 1 1 20 0 0 21 33 08:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 0 0 14 1 0 1 0 2 0 24 0 0 24 40 08:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 4 0 11 0 0 1 0 1 1 17 0 0 18 30 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 48 5 0 53 4 0 2 0 6 3 103 0 0 106 165 *** BREAK *** 11:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 1 0 17 1 0 1 0 2 1 15 0 0 16 35 11:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 1 0 15 0 0 2 0 2 3 14 0 0 17 34 11:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 0 0 15 0 0 1 0 1 2 16 0 0 18 34 11:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 2 0 18 2 0 1 0 3 1 11 0 0 12 33 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 61 4 0 65 3 0 5 0 8 7 56 0 0 63 136 12:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 1 0 23 1 0 1 0 2 2 9 0 0 11 36 12:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 3 0 23 0 0 2 0 2 2 13 0 0 15 40 12:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 1 0 28 1 0 0 0 1 4 11 0 0 15 44 12:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 2 0 26 0 0 0 0 0 1 14 0 0 15 41 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 93 7 0 100 2 0 3 0 5 9 47 0 0 56 161 *** BREAK *** 04:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 37 0 0 37 2 0 0 0 2 2 17 0 0 19 58 04:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 57 1 0 58 1 0 1 0 2 0 13 0 0 13 73 04:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 63 0 0 63 2 0 0 0 2 0 16 0 0 16 81 04:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 70 3 0 73 1 0 2 0 3 1 23 0 0 24 100 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 227 4 0 231 6 0 3 0 9 3 69 0 0 72 312 05:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 71 1 0 72 1 0 2 0 3 0 20 0 0 20 95 05:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 61 1 0 62 5 0 0 0 5 1 22 0 0 23 90 05:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 57 0 0 57 3 0 1 0 4 0 15 0 0 15 76 05:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 39 2 0 41 1 0 2 0 3 5 15 0 0 20 64 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 228 4 0 232 10 0 5 0 15 6 72 0 0 78 325 Grand Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 694 24 0 718 26 0 20 0 46 30 496 0 0 526 1290 Apprch % 0 0 0 0 0 96.7 3.3 0 56.5 0 43.5 0 5.7 94.3 0 0 Total % 0 0 0 0 0 0 53.8 1.9 0 55.7 2 0 1.6 0 3.6 2.3 38.4 0 0 40.8 Attachment E Data Collection Group LSmith@DataCollectionGroup.net File Name : Stadium and Washington Site Code : 11111111 Start Date : 8/31/2021 Page No :2 Groups Printed- Passenger Veh - Trucks Stadium Washington Stadium From North From East From South From West Uturn Right Thru Left App. Total Right Thru Left Uturns App. Total Right Thru Left Uturns App. Total Right Thru Left Uturns App. Total Int. Total s Passenger Veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 673 23 0 696 25 0 19 0 44 30 425 0 0 455 1195 % Passenger Veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 97 95.8 0 96.9 96.2 0 95 0 95.7 100 85.7 0 0 86.5 92.6 Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 1 0 22 1 0 1 0 2 0 71 0 0 71 95 % Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 4.2 0 3.1 3.8 0 5 0 4.3 0 14.3 0 0 13.5 7.4 Attachment E Data Collection Group LSmith@DataCollectionGroup.net File Name : Stadium and Washington Site Code : 11111111 Start Date : 8/31/2021 Page No :3 Stadium Washington Stadium From North From East From South From West Uturn Start Time Right Thru Left App. Total Right Thru Left Uturns App. Total Right Thru Left Uturns App. Total Right Thru Left Uturns App. Total Int. Total s Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 09:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:15 AM 07:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 8 0 0 1 0 1 1 34 0 0 35 44 07:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 1 46 0 0 47 56 07:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 0 0 14 1 0 1 0 2 0 35 0 0 35 51 08:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 1 0 17 2 0 0 0 2 1 42 0 0 43 62 Total Volume 0 0 0 0 0 0 47 1 0 48 3 0 2 0 5 3 157 0 0 160 213 % App. Total 0 0 0 0 0 97.9 2.1 0 60 0 40 0 1.9 98.1 0 0 PHF .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .734 .250 .000 .706 .375 .000 .500 .000 .625 .750 .853 .000 .000 .851 .859 Passenger Veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 42 1 0 43 3 0 2 0 5 3 138 0 0 141 189 % Passenger Veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 89.4 100 0 89.6 100 0 100 0 100 100 87.9 0 0 88.1 88.7 Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 0 0 19 24 % Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 0 10.6 0 0 10.4 0 0 0 0 0 0 12.1 0 0 11.9 11.3 Attachment E Data Collection Group LSmith@DataCollectionGroup.net File Name : Stadium and Washington Site Code : 11111111 Start Date : 8/31/2021 Page No :4 Out In Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Right Thru Left Uturns Peak Hour Data 24 185 209 0 0 0 Right Thru Total Left Out 160 141 0 0 0 19 North 19 138 157 Uturns Right Thru 19 141 160 Stadium Stadium 47 42 Peak Hour Begins at 07:15 AM In 5 In 48 43 3 0 3 Left 5 Passenger Veh Trucks 1 0 1 5 44 49 Out Total Uturns 0 0 0 208 184 24 0 0 0 Left Thru Right Uturns 2 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 3 0 4 5 9 0 0 0 4 5 9 Out In Total Washington Attachment E Data Collection Group LSmith@DataCollectionGroup.net File Name : Stadium and Washington Site Code : 11111111 Start Date : 8/31/2021 Page No :5 Stadium Washington Stadium From North From East From South From West Start Time Right Thru Left Uturns App. Total Right Thru Left Uturns App. Total Right Thru Left Uturns App. Total Right Thru Left Uturns App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 10:00 AM to 01:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 12:00 PM 12:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 1 0 23 1 0 1 0 2 2 9 0 0 11 36 12:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 3 0 23 0 0 2 0 2 2 13 0 0 15 40 12:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 1 0 28 1 0 0 0 1 4 11 0 0 15 44 12:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 2 0 26 0 0 0 0 0 1 14 0 0 15 41 Total Volume 0 0 0 0 0 0 93 7 0 100 2 0 3 0 5 9 47 0 0 56 161 % App. Total 0 0 0 0 0 93 7 0 40 0 60 0 16.1 83.9 0 0 PHF .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .861 .583 .000 .893 .500 .000 .375 .000 .625 .563 .839 .000 .000 .933 .915 Passenger Veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 90 7 0 97 1 0 3 0 4 9 46 0 0 55 156 % Passenger Veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 96.8 100 0 97.0 50.0 0 100 0 80.0 100 97.9 0 0 98.2 96.9 Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 3 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 5 % Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 0 3.2 0 0 3.0 50.0 0 0 0 20.0 0 2.1 0 0 1.8 3.1 Attachment E Data Collection Group LSmith@DataCollectionGroup.net File Name : Stadium and Washington Site Code : 11111111 Start Date : 8/31/2021 Page No :6 Out In Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Right Thru Left Uturns Peak Hour Data 4 148 152 0 0 0 Right Thru Total Left Out 0 0 0 49 47 2 North 1 46 47 Uturns Right Thru 1 55 56 Stadium Stadium 93 90 Peak Hour Begins at 12:00 PM In 3 In 100 97 9 0 9 Left 3 Passenger Veh Trucks 7 0 7 3 93 96 Out Total Uturns 0 0 0 149 144 5 0 0 0 Left Thru Right Uturns 3 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 3 0 2 0 16 4 20 0 1 1 16 5 21 Out In Total Washington Attachment E Data Collection Group LSmith@DataCollectionGroup.net File Name : Stadium and Washington Site Code : 11111111 Start Date : 8/31/2021 Page No :7 Stadium Washington Stadium From North From East From South From West Start Time Right Thru Left Uturns App. Total Right Thru Left Uturns App. Total Right Thru Left Uturns App. Total Right Thru Left Uturns App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 02:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 04:30 PM 04:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 63 0 0 63 2 0 0 0 2 0 16 0 0 16 81 04:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 70 3 0 73 1 0 2 0 3 1 23 0 0 24 100 05:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 71 1 0 72 1 0 2 0 3 0 20 0 0 20 95 05:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 61 1 0 62 5 0 0 0 5 1 22 0 0 23 90 Total Volume 0 0 0 0 0 0 265 5 0 270 9 0 4 0 13 2 81 0 0 83 366 % App. Total 0 0 0 0 0 98.1 1.9 0 69.2 0 30.8 0 2.4 97.6 0 0 PHF .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .933 .417 .000 .925 .450 .000 .500 .000 .650 .500 .880 .000 .000 .865 .915 Passenger Veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 263 5 0 268 9 0 4 0 13 2 57 0 0 59 340 % Passenger Veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 99.2 100 0 99.3 100 0 100 0 100 100 70.4 0 0 71.1 92.9 Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 0 0 24 26 % Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.8 0 0 0.7 0 0 0 0 0 0 29.6 0 0 28.9 7.1 Attachment E Data Collection Group LSmith@DataCollectionGroup.net File Name : Stadium and Washington Site Code : 11111111 Start Date : 8/31/2021 Page No :8 Out In Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Right Thru Left Uturns Peak Hour Data 26 326 352 0 0 0 Right Thru Total Left Out 0 0 0 90 24 66 North 57 24 81 Uturns Right Thru 265 263 59 24 83 Stadium Stadium Peak Hour Begins at 04:30 PM In 2 In 270 268 2 0 2 Left 2 Passenger Veh Trucks 5 0 5 2 267 269 Out Total Uturns 0 0 0 360 334 26 0 0 0 Left Thru Right Uturns 4 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 9 0 7 13 20 0 0 0 7 13 20 Out In Total Washington Attachment E Data Collection Group LSmith@DataCollectionGroup.net File Name : Stadium and Washington Site Code : 11111111 Start Date : 8/31/2021 Page No :1 Groups Printed- Bikes - Peds Stadium Washington Stadium From North From East From South From West Start Time Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Int. Total 07:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 2 0 0 2 4 07:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 3 3 0 1 0 0 1 5 07:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 3 07:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 3 0 0 0 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 6 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 3 4 0 0 0 11 11 0 3 0 0 3 18 08:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 2 0 0 0 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 5 08:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 4 4 0 2 0 1 3 8 08:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 2 2 08:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 2 2 0 1 0 0 1 4 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 2 4 0 0 0 9 9 0 4 0 2 6 19 *** BREAK *** 11:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 2 1 0 0 5 6 0 0 0 0 0 8 11:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 1 4 5 0 0 0 0 0 7 11:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 5 5 0 1 0 1 2 8 11:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 5 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 4 6 1 0 1 18 20 0 1 0 1 2 28 12:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 5 3 0 0 12 15 0 1 0 0 1 21 12:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 6 10 0 0 0 14 14 0 2 0 0 2 26 12:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 8 8 0 0 0 0 0 10 12:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 4 0 0 0 1 1 5 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 13 17 3 0 0 38 41 0 3 0 1 4 62 *** BREAK *** 04:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 2 4 0 0 0 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 7 04:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 3 0 0 0 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 7 04:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 8 8 0 0 0 0 0 9 04:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 3 5 2 0 0 8 10 0 0 0 0 0 15 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 3 6 13 2 0 0 23 25 0 0 0 0 0 38 05:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 4 6 0 0 0 6 6 0 2 0 0 2 14 05:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 3 0 0 0 21 21 0 0 0 0 0 24 05:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 7 8 0 0 0 1 1 10 05:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 4 5 2 0 0 8 10 0 0 0 0 0 15 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 1 10 15 3 0 0 42 45 0 2 0 1 3 63 Grand Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 8 38 59 9 0 1 141 151 0 13 0 5 18 228 Apprch % 0 0 0 0 0 22 13.6 64.4 6 0 0.7 93.4 0 72.2 0 27.8 Total % 0 0 0 0 0 0 5.7 3.5 16.7 25.9 3.9 0 0.4 61.8 66.2 0 5.7 0 2.2 7.9 Attachment E Data Collection Group LSmith@DataCollectionGroup.net File Name : Stadium and Washington Site Code : 11111111 Start Date : 8/31/2021 Page No :2 Groups Printed- Bikes - Peds Stadium Washington Stadium From North From East From South From West Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Int. Total Bikes 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 8 0 21 9 0 1 0 10 0 13 0 1 14 45 % Bikes 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 100 0 35.6 100 0 100 0 6.6 0 100 0 20 77.8 19.7 Peds 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 38 38 0 0 0 141 141 0 0 0 4 4 183 % Peds 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 64.4 0 0 0 100 93.4 0 0 0 80 22.2 80.3 Attachment E December 2021 Aspen Heights TIA – City of Charlottesville Appendix B Traffic Signal Timings Attachment E December 2021 Aspen Heights TIA – City of Charlottesville Attachment E Attachment E Attachment E Attachment E Attachment E Attachment E Attachment E Attachment E Attachment E December 2021 Aspen Heights TIA – City of Charlottesville Appendix C Synchro/SimTraffic Outputs for 2021 Existing Conditions Attachment E December 2021 Aspen Heights TIA – City of Charlottesville Attachment E JPA Aspen Heights 2021 Existing AM 1: Shamrock Rd & Jefferson Park Ave Queues Lane Group EBT WBL WBT NBT SBT Lane Group Flow (vph) 517 33 259 192 27 v/c Ratio 0.59 0.06 0.24 0.66 0.09 Control Delay 17.0 6.4 7.1 41.9 24.6 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 17.0 6.4 7.1 41.9 24.6 Queue Length 50th (ft) 162 5 46 92 10 Queue Length 95th (ft) 320 18 104 157 31 Internal Link Dist (ft) 301 481 515 490 Turn Bay Length (ft) 75 Base Capacity (vph) 883 516 1065 447 469 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.59 0.06 0.24 0.43 0.06 Intersection Summary JPA Aspen Heights Existing - AM.syn Synchro 10 Report - 10/11/2021 TG Page 1 Attachment E JPA Aspen Heights 2021 Existing AM 1: Shamrock Rd & Jefferson Park Ave HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 8 451 32 31 243 3 65 45 73 4 19 3 Future Volume (veh/h) 8 451 32 31 243 3 65 45 73 4 19 3 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 0.96 0.91 1.00 0.93 0.96 0.95 0.97 0.95 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1707 1870 1811 1856 1811 1900 1870 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 8 475 34 33 256 3 68 47 77 4 20 3 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 13 2 6 3 6 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 Cap, veh/h 49 916 65 575 1180 14 143 97 121 74 283 38 Arrive On Green 0.54 0.54 0.54 0.05 0.66 0.66 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 Sat Flow, veh/h 8 1701 120 1767 1784 21 436 505 630 122 1475 200 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 517 0 0 33 0 259 192 0 0 27 0 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1829 0 0 1767 0 1805 1571 0 0 1797 0 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.0 4.6 5.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 14.8 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.0 4.6 9.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 Prop In Lane 0.02 0.07 1.00 0.01 0.35 0.40 0.15 0.11 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 1030 0 0 575 0 1194 361 0 0 396 0 0 V/C Ratio(X) 0.50 0.00 0.00 0.06 0.00 0.22 0.53 0.00 0.00 0.07 0.00 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 1030 0 0 575 0 1194 517 0 0 571 0 0 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 12.1 0.0 0.0 6.3 0.0 5.5 30.2 0.0 0.0 27.1 0.0 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 1.7 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.4 1.2 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 5.8 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 1.5 3.5 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 13.8 0.0 0.0 6.4 0.0 5.9 31.4 0.0 0.0 27.1 0.0 0.0 LnGrp LOS B A A A A A C A A C A A Approach Vol, veh/h 517 292 192 27 Approach Delay, s/veh 13.8 6.0 31.4 27.1 Approach LOS B A C C Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 10.0 50.0 21.7 60.0 21.7 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 4.0 44.0 24.0 54.0 24.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 2.6 16.8 3.0 6.6 11.0 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 3.5 0.0 1.6 0.5 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 15.2 HCM 6th LOS B JPA Aspen Heights Existing - AM.syn Synchro 10 Report - 10/11/2021 TG Page 2 Attachment E JPA Aspen Heights 2021 Existing AM 2: Private Entrance/Harmon St & Jefferson Park Ave HCM 6th TWSC Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.3 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 9 479 1 4 287 3 1 0 1 2 0 2 Future Vol, veh/h 9 479 1 4 287 3 1 0 1 2 0 2 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 57 0 19 19 0 57 0 0 16 16 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 3 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Mvmt Flow 10 515 1 4 309 3 1 0 1 2 0 2 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 369 0 0 535 0 0 875 932 551 928 931 368 Stage 1 - - - - - - 555 555 - 376 376 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 320 377 - 552 555 - Critical Hdwy 4.1 - - 4.1 - - 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 - - 2.2 - - 3.5 4 3.3 3.5 4 3.3 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1201 - - 1043 - - 272 269 538 250 269 682 Stage 1 - - - - - - 520 516 - 649 620 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 696 619 - 522 516 - Platoon blocked, % - - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1136 - - 1024 - - 263 246 520 229 246 645 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 263 246 - 229 246 - Stage 1 - - - - - - 504 501 - 606 583 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 690 582 - 507 501 - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0.2 0.1 15.4 15.8 HCM LOS C C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 349 1136 - - 1024 - - 338 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.006 0.009 - - 0.004 - - 0.013 HCM Control Delay (s) 15.4 8.2 0 - 8.5 0 - 15.8 HCM Lane LOS C A A - A A - C HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 0 - - 0 - - 0 JPA Aspen Heights Existing - AM.syn Synchro 10 Report - 10/11/2021 TG Page 3 Attachment E JPA Aspen Heights 2021 Existing AM 3: Private Entrance/Washington Ave & Jefferson Park Ave HCM 6th TWSC Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.1 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 5 483 2 2 291 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 Future Vol, veh/h 5 483 2 2 291 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 43 0 26 26 0 43 2 0 2 2 0 2 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 Heavy Vehicles, % 20 3 100 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Mvmt Flow 6 537 2 2 323 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 368 0 0 565 0 0 906 948 566 924 948 369 Stage 1 - - - - - - 576 576 - 371 371 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 330 372 - 553 577 - Critical Hdwy 4.3 - - 4.1 - - 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.38 - - 2.2 - - 3.5 4 3.3 3.5 4 3.3 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1098 - - 1017 - - 259 263 528 252 263 681 Stage 1 - - - - - - 506 505 - 653 623 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 687 622 - 521 505 - Platoon blocked, % - - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1053 - - 992 - - 250 244 514 239 244 652 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 250 244 - 239 244 - Stage 1 - - - - - - 489 488 - 621 596 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 684 595 - 515 488 - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0.1 0.1 12 0 HCM LOS B A Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 514 1053 - - 992 - - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.002 0.005 - - 0.002 - - - HCM Control Delay (s) 12 8.4 0 - 8.6 0 - 0 HCM Lane LOS B A A - A A - A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 0 - - 0 - - - JPA Aspen Heights Existing - AM.syn Synchro 10 Report - 10/11/2021 TG Page 4 Attachment E JPA Aspen Heights 2021 Existing AM 4: Private Entrance/Observatory Ave & Jefferson Park Ave HCM 6th TWSC Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.3 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 6 502 0 4 278 1 1 0 3 2 0 3 Future Vol, veh/h 6 502 0 4 278 1 1 0 3 2 0 3 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 56 0 32 32 0 56 2 0 1 1 0 2 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 2 0 25 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Mvmt Flow 7 558 0 4 309 1 1 0 3 2 0 3 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 366 0 0 590 0 0 925 978 591 949 978 368 Stage 1 - - - - - - 604 604 - 374 374 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 321 374 - 575 604 - Critical Hdwy 4.1 - - 4.35 - - 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 - - 2.425 - - 3.5 4 3.3 3.5 4 3.3 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1204 - - 882 - - 252 252 511 242 252 682 Stage 1 - - - - - - 489 491 - 651 621 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 695 621 - 507 491 - Platoon blocked, % - - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1140 - - 855 - - 240 228 495 225 228 644 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 240 228 - 225 228 - Stage 1 - - - - - - 470 472 - 611 584 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 686 584 - 499 472 - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0.1 0.1 14.3 14.9 HCM LOS B B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 391 1140 - - 855 - - 369 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.011 0.006 - - 0.005 - - 0.015 HCM Control Delay (s) 14.3 8.2 0 - 9.2 0 - 14.9 HCM Lane LOS B A A - A A - B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 0 - - 0 - - 0 JPA Aspen Heights Existing - AM.syn Synchro 10 Report - 10/11/2021 TG Page 5 Attachment E JPA Aspen Heights 2021 Existing AM 5: Jefferson Park Ave & Fontaine Ave & Maury Ave Queues Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Group Flow (vph) 74 318 148 58 257 336 252 192 22 53 15 v/c Ratio 0.19 0.50 0.15 0.16 0.33 0.77 0.55 0.38 0.12 0.24 0.05 Control Delay 26.8 28.9 1.6 18.4 18.9 41.8 32.4 6.8 34.0 36.0 0.3 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 26.8 28.9 1.6 18.4 18.9 41.8 32.4 6.8 34.0 36.0 0.3 Queue Length 50th (ft) 28 135 0 17 82 152 107 0 10 26 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) 77 275 19 52 186 #319 215 53 31 59 0 Internal Link Dist (ft) 751 428 732 533 Turn Bay Length (ft) 150 120 88 355 225 117 125 Base Capacity (vph) 382 641 1048 359 786 559 582 595 491 571 530 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.19 0.50 0.14 0.16 0.33 0.60 0.43 0.32 0.04 0.09 0.03 Intersection Summary # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. JPA Aspen Heights Existing - AM.syn Synchro 10 Report - 10/11/2021 TG Page 6 Attachment E JPA Aspen Heights 2021 Existing AM 5: Jefferson Park Ave & Fontaine Ave & Maury Ave HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 68 293 136 53 214 22 309 232 177 20 49 14 Future Volume (veh/h) 68 293 136 53 214 22 309 232 177 20 49 14 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 0.99 0.98 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.93 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1856 1856 1885 1870 1841 1559 1885 1870 1885 1678 1841 1693 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 74 318 148 58 233 24 336 252 0 22 53 15 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 3 3 1 2 4 23 1 2 1 15 4 14 Cap, veh/h 445 596 868 324 712 73 409 427 172 199 143 Arrive On Green 0.32 0.32 0.32 0.04 0.43 0.43 0.23 0.23 0.00 0.11 0.11 0.11 Sat Flow, veh/h 1100 1856 1570 1781 1639 169 1795 1870 1598 1598 1841 1328 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 74 318 148 58 0 257 336 252 0 22 53 15 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1100 1856 1570 1781 0 1808 1795 1870 1598 1598 1841 1328 Q Serve(g_s), s 3.8 11.0 3.7 1.6 0.0 7.3 13.9 9.4 0.0 1.0 2.1 0.8 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 3.8 11.0 3.7 1.6 0.0 7.3 13.9 9.4 0.0 1.0 2.1 0.8 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.09 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 445 596 868 324 0 785 409 427 172 199 143 V/C Ratio(X) 0.17 0.53 0.17 0.18 0.00 0.33 0.82 0.59 0.13 0.27 0.10 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 445 596 868 349 0 785 550 573 490 564 407 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 19.4 21.8 8.8 16.6 0.0 14.6 28.7 27.0 0.0 31.6 32.1 31.5 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.8 3.4 0.4 0.1 0.0 1.1 5.3 0.5 0.0 0.1 0.3 0.1 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 1.0 5.0 2.0 0.6 0.0 3.0 6.4 4.1 0.0 0.4 0.9 0.3 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 20.2 25.2 9.2 16.7 0.0 15.7 34.1 27.5 0.0 31.7 32.3 31.6 LnGrp LOS C C A B A B C C C C C Approach Vol, veh/h 540 315 588 A 90 Approach Delay, s/veh 20.1 15.9 31.2 32.1 Approach LOS C B C C Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 8.9 31.1 14.4 40.0 23.9 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 4.0 24.0 24.0 34.0 24.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 3.6 13.0 4.1 9.3 15.9 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 2.0 0.2 1.4 1.0 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 24.2 HCM 6th LOS C Notes Unsignalized Delay for [NBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay. JPA Aspen Heights Existing - AM.syn Synchro 10 Report - 10/11/2021 TG Page 7 Attachment E JPA Aspen Heights 2021 Existing AM 6: Maury Ave/Alderman Road & Stadium Drive HCM 6th AWSC Intersection Intersection Delay, s/veh12.9 Intersection LOS B Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 111 70 6 18 9 31 2 304 49 26 71 29 Future Vol, veh/h 111 70 6 18 9 31 2 304 49 26 71 29 Peak Hour Factor 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 0 0 22 11 0 0 3 0 54 4 21 Mvmt Flow 132 83 7 21 11 37 2 362 58 31 85 35 Number of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 Approach EB WB NB SB Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB Opposing Lanes 1 1 1 1 Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB Conflicting Lanes Left 1 1 1 1 Conflicting Approach RightNB SB WB EB Conflicting Lanes Right 1 1 1 1 HCM Control Delay 11.7 9.8 14.6 11.4 HCM LOS B A B B Lane NBLn1 EBLn1WBLn1 SBLn1 Vol Left, % 1% 59% 31% 21% Vol Thru, % 86% 37% 16% 56% Vol Right, % 14% 3% 53% 23% Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Traffic Vol by Lane 355 187 58 126 LT Vol 2 111 18 26 Through Vol 304 70 9 71 RT Vol 49 6 31 29 Lane Flow Rate 423 223 69 150 Geometry Grp 1 1 1 1 Degree of Util (X) 0.581 0.35 0.115 0.258 Departure Headway (Hd) 4.948 5.659 5.982 6.202 Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Cap 731 634 598 579 Service Time 2.978 3.696 4.028 4.241 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.579 0.352 0.115 0.259 HCM Control Delay 14.6 11.7 9.8 11.4 HCM Lane LOS B B A B HCM 95th-tile Q 3.8 1.6 0.4 1 JPA Aspen Heights Existing - AM.syn Synchro 10 Report - 10/11/2021 TG Page 8 Attachment E JPA Aspen Heights 2021 Existing AM 7: Washington Ave & Stadium Drive HCM 6th TWSC Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.3 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 143 3 1 50 1 4 Future Vol, veh/h 143 3 1 50 1 4 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 13 13 0 4 1 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - - - - 0 - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 81 81 81 81 81 81 Heavy Vehicles, % 10 0 0 8 0 0 Mvmt Flow 177 4 1 62 1 5 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 194 0 260 193 Stage 1 - - - - 192 - Stage 2 - - - - 68 - Critical Hdwy - - 4.1 - 6.4 6.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.4 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.4 - Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.2 - 3.5 3.3 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1391 - 733 854 Stage 1 - - - - 845 - Stage 2 - - - - 960 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1374 - 721 843 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 721 - Stage 1 - - - - 835 - Stage 2 - - - - 955 - Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 0.1 9.5 HCM LOS A Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity (veh/h) 815 - - 1374 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.008 - - 0.001 - HCM Control Delay (s) 9.5 - - 7.6 0 HCM Lane LOS A - - A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - 0 - JPA Aspen Heights Existing - AM.syn Synchro 10 Report - 10/11/2021 TG Page 9 Attachment E JPA Aspen Heights 2021 Existing AM 8: Washington Ave & Site Entrance HCM 6th TWSC Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 8 4 0 Future Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 8 4 0 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 0 - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 0 0 0 0 0 Mvmt Flow 0 0 0 9 4 0 Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 13 4 4 0 - 0 Stage 1 4 - - - - - Stage 2 9 - - - - - Critical Hdwy 6.4 6.2 4.1 - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.4 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.4 - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.5 3.3 2.2 - - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1011 1085 1631 - - - Stage 1 1024 - - - - - Stage 2 1019 - - - - - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1011 1085 1631 - - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 1011 - - - - - Stage 1 1024 - - - - - Stage 2 1019 - - - - - Approach EB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0 0 0 HCM LOS A Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1631 - - - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - - - - HCM Control Delay (s) 0 - 0 - - HCM Lane LOS A - A - - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - - - JPA Aspen Heights Existing - AM.syn Synchro 10 Report - 10/11/2021 TG Page 10 Attachment E JPA Aspen Heights 2021 Existing AM Queuing and Blocking Report Intersection: 1: Shamrock Rd & Jefferson Park Ave Movement EB WB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR L TR LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 299 66 140 197 63 Average Queue (ft) 143 16 54 103 18 95th Queue (ft) 260 45 112 169 51 Link Distance (ft) 304 532 559 534 Upstream Blk Time (%) 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 1 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 75 Storage Blk Time (%) 0 3 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 1 Intersection: 2: Private Entrance/Harmon St & Jefferson Park Ave Movement EB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 68 56 27 31 Average Queue (ft) 7 4 2 4 95th Queue (ft) 37 25 12 20 Link Distance (ft) 77 304 320 536 Upstream Blk Time (%) 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 1 Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 3: Private Entrance/Washington Ave & Jefferson Park Ave Movement EB WB NB Directions Served LTR LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 65 38 22 Average Queue (ft) 5 2 1 95th Queue (ft) 35 20 9 Link Distance (ft) 174 77 261 Upstream Blk Time (%) 0 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) JPA Aspen Heights Existing - AM.syn SimTraffic Report - 10/11/2021 TG Page 1 Attachment E JPA Aspen Heights 2021 Existing AM Queuing and Blocking Report Intersection: 4: Private Entrance/Observatory Ave & Jefferson Park Ave Movement EB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 55 61 31 29 Average Queue (ft) 3 4 4 5 95th Queue (ft) 24 30 20 22 Link Distance (ft) 432 174 314 534 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 5: Jefferson Park Ave & Fontaine Ave & Maury Ave Movement EB EB EB WB WB NB NB NB SB SB SB Directions Served L T R L TR L T R L T R Maximum Queue (ft) 133 292 120 87 211 269 221 111 67 93 66 Average Queue (ft) 38 117 39 36 93 152 112 6 14 32 14 95th Queue (ft) 92 223 113 82 178 237 188 63 47 72 45 Link Distance (ft) 774 432 770 538 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 150 120 88 355 225 117 125 Storage Blk Time (%) 0 7 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 14 1 0 5 0 1 0 0 0 Intersection: 6: Maury Ave/Alderman Road & Stadium Drive Movement EB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 101 73 224 101 Average Queue (ft) 49 33 106 47 95th Queue (ft) 79 64 183 83 Link Distance (ft) 544 504 452 665 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) JPA Aspen Heights Existing - AM.syn SimTraffic Report - 10/11/2021 TG Page 2 Attachment E JPA Aspen Heights 2021 Existing AM Queuing and Blocking Report Intersection: 7: Washington Ave & Stadium Drive Movement EB WB NB Directions Served TR LT LR Maximum Queue (ft) 3 6 30 Average Queue (ft) 0 0 4 95th Queue (ft) 3 4 22 Link Distance (ft) 504 658 455 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 8: Washington Ave & Site Entrance Movement Directions Served Maximum Queue (ft) Average Queue (ft) 95th Queue (ft) Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Network Summary Network wide Queuing Penalty: 24 JPA Aspen Heights Existing - AM.syn SimTraffic Report - 10/11/2021 TG Page 3 Attachment E JPA Aspen Heights 2021 Existing Midday 1: Shamrock Rd & Jefferson Park Ave Queues Lane Group EBT WBL WBT NBT SBT Lane Group Flow (vph) 482 59 379 106 30 v/c Ratio 0.44 0.10 0.32 0.49 0.12 Control Delay 11.6 5.2 6.1 37.6 25.1 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 11.6 5.2 6.1 37.6 25.1 Queue Length 50th (ft) 126 7 57 48 11 Queue Length 95th (ft) 272 25 147 93 32 Internal Link Dist (ft) 301 481 515 490 Turn Bay Length (ft) 75 Base Capacity (vph) 1084 612 1198 444 499 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.44 0.10 0.32 0.24 0.06 Intersection Summary JPA Aspen Heights Existing - MID.syn Synchro 10 Report - 10/11/2021 TG Page 1 Attachment E JPA Aspen Heights 2021 Existing Midday 1: Shamrock Rd & Jefferson Park Ave HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 5 406 33 54 342 6 38 22 38 2 21 5 Future Volume (veh/h) 5 406 33 54 342 6 38 22 38 2 21 5 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 0.97 0.92 0.99 0.93 0.89 0.88 0.91 0.88 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1900 1841 1856 1841 1811 1900 1826 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 5 441 36 59 372 7 41 24 41 2 23 5 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 0 4 3 4 6 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 Cap, veh/h 47 910 74 576 1162 22 149 90 112 53 287 59 Arrive On Green 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.04 0.66 0.66 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 Sat Flow, veh/h 4 1660 134 1753 1769 33 445 458 570 30 1455 297 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 482 0 0 59 0 379 106 0 0 30 0 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1799 0 0 1753 0 1802 1474 0 0 1783 0 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.1 0.0 7.5 1.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 13.6 0.0 0.0 1.1 0.0 7.5 4.7 0.0 0.0 1.1 0.0 0.0 Prop In Lane 0.01 0.07 1.00 0.02 0.39 0.39 0.07 0.17 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 1030 0 0 576 0 1184 351 0 0 398 0 0 V/C Ratio(X) 0.47 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.00 0.32 0.30 0.00 0.00 0.08 0.00 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 1030 0 0 598 0 1184 486 0 0 563 0 0 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 11.5 0.0 0.0 6.5 0.0 6.1 28.3 0.0 0.0 26.9 0.0 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.7 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 4.8 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.0 2.5 1.8 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 11.8 0.0 0.0 6.6 0.0 6.8 28.8 0.0 0.0 27.0 0.0 0.0 LnGrp LOS B A A A A A C A A C A A Approach Vol, veh/h 482 438 106 30 Approach Delay, s/veh 11.8 6.8 28.8 27.0 Approach LOS B A C C Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 9.0 51.0 22.2 60.0 22.2 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 4.0 44.0 24.0 54.0 24.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 3.1 15.6 3.1 9.5 6.7 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 3.2 0.0 2.5 0.3 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 11.9 HCM 6th LOS B JPA Aspen Heights Existing - MID.syn Synchro 10 Report - 10/11/2021 TG Page 2 Attachment E JPA Aspen Heights 2021 Existing Midday 2: Private Entrance/Harmon St & Jefferson Park Ave HCM 6th TWSC Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.3 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 6 419 3 8 351 1 1 0 1 2 0 8 Future Vol, veh/h 6 419 3 8 351 1 1 0 1 2 0 8 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 22 0 24 24 0 22 0 0 22 22 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 5 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Mvmt Flow 6 451 3 9 377 1 1 0 1 2 0 9 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 400 0 0 478 0 0 889 907 499 905 908 400 Stage 1 - - - - - - 489 489 - 418 418 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 400 418 - 487 490 - Critical Hdwy 4.1 - - 4.1 - - 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 - - 2.2 - - 3.5 4 3.3 3.5 4 3.3 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1170 - - 1095 - - 266 278 576 260 277 654 Stage 1 - - - - - - 564 553 - 616 594 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 630 594 - 566 552 - Platoon blocked, % - - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1145 - - 1070 - - 253 261 551 245 260 640 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 253 261 - 245 260 - Stage 1 - - - - - - 547 536 - 599 575 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 615 575 - 549 535 - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0.1 0.2 15.4 12.6 HCM LOS C B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 347 1145 - - 1070 - - 484 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.006 0.006 - - 0.008 - - 0.022 HCM Control Delay (s) 15.4 8.2 0 - 8.4 0 - 12.6 HCM Lane LOS C A A - A A - B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 0 - - 0 - - 0.1 JPA Aspen Heights Existing - MID.syn Synchro 10 Report - 10/11/2021 TG Page 3 Attachment E JPA Aspen Heights 2021 Existing Midday 3: Private Entrance/Washington Ave & Jefferson Park Ave HCM 6th TWSC Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.4 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 3 425 1 1 360 5 2 0 3 4 1 7 Future Vol, veh/h 3 425 1 1 360 5 2 0 3 4 1 7 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 30 0 24 24 0 30 0 0 1 1 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 33 4 100 0 6 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 Mvmt Flow 3 447 1 1 379 5 2 0 3 4 1 7 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 414 0 0 472 0 0 866 894 473 870 892 412 Stage 1 - - - - - - 478 478 - 414 414 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 388 416 - 456 478 - Critical Hdwy 4.43 - - 4.1 - - 8.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 7.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 7.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.497 - - 2.2 - - 4.4 4 3.3 3.5 4 3.3 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 997 - - 1100 - - 189 283 595 274 283 644 Stage 1 - - - - - - 421 559 - 620 597 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 478 595 - 588 559 - Platoon blocked, % - - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 969 - - 1075 - - 181 267 581 264 267 626 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 181 267 - 264 267 - Stage 1 - - - - - - 410 544 - 600 579 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 471 577 - 582 544 - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0.1 0 16.9 14.3 HCM LOS C B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 308 969 - - 1075 - - 399 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.017 0.003 - - 0.001 - - 0.032 HCM Control Delay (s) 16.9 8.7 0 - 8.4 0 - 14.3 HCM Lane LOS C A A - A A - B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 0 - - 0 - - 0.1 JPA Aspen Heights Existing - MID.syn Synchro 10 Report - 10/11/2021 TG Page 4 Attachment E JPA Aspen Heights 2021 Existing Midday 4: Private Entrance/Observatory Ave & Jefferson Park Ave HCM 6th TWSC Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.2 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 3 426 3 3 377 6 2 0 3 0 0 1 Future Vol, veh/h 3 426 3 3 377 6 2 0 3 0 0 1 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 23 0 21 21 0 23 0 0 1 1 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 4 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Mvmt Flow 3 448 3 3 397 6 2 0 3 0 0 1 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 426 0 0 472 0 0 884 909 472 887 907 423 Stage 1 - - - - - - 477 477 - 429 429 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 407 432 - 458 478 - Critical Hdwy 4.1 - - 4.1 - - 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 - - 2.2 - - 3.5 4 3.3 3.5 4 3.3 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1144 - - 1100 - - 268 277 596 267 278 635 Stage 1 - - - - - - 573 559 - 608 587 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 625 586 - 587 559 - Platoon blocked, % - - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1119 - - 1078 - - 260 263 584 258 264 621 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 260 263 - 258 264 - Stage 1 - - - - - - 559 546 - 592 572 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 621 571 - 581 546 - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0.1 0.1 14.4 10.8 HCM LOS B B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 390 1119 - - 1078 - - 621 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.013 0.003 - - 0.003 - - 0.002 HCM Control Delay (s) 14.4 8.2 0 - 8.3 0 - 10.8 HCM Lane LOS B A A - A A - B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 0 - - 0 - - 0 JPA Aspen Heights Existing - MID.syn Synchro 10 Report - 10/11/2021 TG Page 5 Attachment E JPA Aspen Heights 2021 Existing Midday 5: Jefferson Park Ave & Fontaine Ave & Maury Ave Queues Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Group Flow (vph) 49 273 153 133 256 140 90 137 33 123 45 v/c Ratio 0.13 0.44 0.18 0.31 0.30 0.51 0.31 0.36 0.14 0.44 0.12 Control Delay 23.0 24.9 1.8 17.1 15.8 36.3 31.5 6.3 30.3 35.2 0.7 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 23.0 24.9 1.8 17.1 15.8 36.3 31.5 6.3 30.3 35.2 0.7 Queue Length 50th (ft) 15 92 0 31 63 58 36 0 13 51 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) 53 226 20 97 178 126 86 32 40 111 0 Internal Link Dist (ft) 751 428 732 533 Turn Bay Length (ft) 150 120 88 355 225 117 125 Base Capacity (vph) 363 627 1100 436 846 601 639 627 534 652 639 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.13 0.44 0.14 0.31 0.30 0.23 0.14 0.22 0.06 0.19 0.07 Intersection Summary JPA Aspen Heights Existing - MID.syn Synchro 10 Report - 10/11/2021 TG Page 6 Attachment E JPA Aspen Heights 2021 Existing Midday 5: Jefferson Park Ave & Fontaine Ave & Maury Ave HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 46 257 144 125 216 24 132 85 129 31 116 42 Future Volume (veh/h) 46 257 144 125 216 24 132 85 129 31 116 42 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 0.99 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.94 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1796 1841 1856 1856 1811 1589 1856 1870 1885 1663 1900 1900 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 49 273 153 133 230 26 140 90 0 33 123 45 Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Percent Heavy Veh, % 7 4 3 3 6 21 3 2 1 16 0 0 Cap, veh/h 470 631 743 421 775 88 235 249 197 236 189 Arrive On Green 0.34 0.34 0.34 0.06 0.49 0.49 0.13 0.13 0.00 0.12 0.12 0.12 Sat Flow, veh/h 1071 1841 1556 1767 1597 180 1767 1870 1598 1584 1900 1519 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 49 273 153 133 0 256 140 90 0 33 123 45 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1071 1841 1556 1767 0 1777 1767 1870 1598 1584 1900 1519 Q Serve(g_s), s 2.2 8.0 4.0 3.3 0.0 6.1 5.2 3.1 0.0 1.3 4.2 1.9 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 2.2 8.0 4.0 3.3 0.0 6.1 5.2 3.1 0.0 1.3 4.2 1.9 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.10 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 470 631 743 421 0 863 235 249 197 236 189 V/C Ratio(X) 0.10 0.43 0.21 0.32 0.00 0.30 0.60 0.36 0.17 0.52 0.24 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 470 631 743 421 0 863 606 641 543 651 521 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 15.8 17.7 10.7 13.2 0.0 10.8 28.6 27.6 0.0 27.4 28.7 27.7 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.4 2.2 0.6 2.0 0.0 0.9 0.9 0.3 0.0 0.1 0.7 0.2 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.6 3.5 1.8 1.4 0.0 2.3 2.2 1.3 0.0 0.5 1.9 0.7 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 16.3 19.9 11.3 15.2 0.0 11.7 29.5 28.0 0.0 27.6 29.4 27.9 LnGrp LOS B B B B A B C C C C C Approach Vol, veh/h 475 389 230 A 201 Approach Delay, s/veh 16.8 12.9 28.9 28.7 Approach LOS B B C C Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 10.0 30.0 14.7 40.0 15.3 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 4.0 24.0 24.0 34.0 24.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 5.3 10.0 6.2 8.1 7.2 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 1.9 0.5 1.5 0.4 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 19.6 HCM 6th LOS B Notes Unsignalized Delay for [NBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay. JPA Aspen Heights Existing - MID.syn Synchro 10 Report - 10/11/2021 TG Page 7 Attachment E JPA Aspen Heights 2021 Existing Midday 6: Maury Ave/Alderman Road & Stadium Drive HCM 6th AWSC Intersection Intersection Delay, s/veh 9.2 Intersection LOS A Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 20 12 2 53 22 21 5 157 26 17 150 40 Future Vol, veh/h 20 12 2 53 22 21 5 157 26 17 150 40 Peak Hour Factor 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 6 0 6 2 15 Mvmt Flow 22 13 2 60 25 24 6 176 29 19 169 45 Number of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 Approach EB WB NB SB Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB Opposing Lanes 1 1 1 1 Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB Conflicting Lanes Left 1 1 1 1 Conflicting Approach RightNB SB WB EB Conflicting Lanes Right 1 1 1 1 HCM Control Delay 8.5 9 9.1 9.4 HCM LOS A A A A Lane NBLn1 EBLn1WBLn1 SBLn1 Vol Left, % 3% 59% 55% 8% Vol Thru, % 84% 35% 23% 72% Vol Right, % 14% 6% 22% 19% Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Traffic Vol by Lane 188 34 96 207 LT Vol 5 20 53 17 Through Vol 157 12 22 150 RT Vol 26 2 21 40 Lane Flow Rate 211 38 108 233 Geometry Grp 1 1 1 1 Degree of Util (X) 0.261 0.054 0.151 0.291 Departure Headway (Hd) 4.455 5.134 5.028 4.509 Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Cap 805 695 711 795 Service Time 2.489 3.186 3.073 2.541 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.262 0.055 0.152 0.293 HCM Control Delay 9.1 8.5 9 9.4 HCM Lane LOS A A A A HCM 95th-tile Q 1 0.2 0.5 1.2 JPA Aspen Heights Existing - MID.syn Synchro 10 Report - 10/11/2021 TG Page 8 Attachment E JPA Aspen Heights 2021 Existing Midday 7: Washington Ave & Stadium Drive HCM 6th TWSC Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.6 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 47 9 7 93 3 2 Future Vol, veh/h 47 9 7 93 3 2 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 38 38 0 13 1 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - - - - 0 - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 91 91 91 91 91 91 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 0 0 3 0 50 Mvmt Flow 52 10 8 102 3 2 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 100 0 226 96 Stage 1 - - - - 95 - Stage 2 - - - - 131 - Critical Hdwy - - 4.1 - 6.4 6.7 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.4 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.4 - Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.2 - 3.5 3.75 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1505 - 767 844 Stage 1 - - - - 934 - Stage 2 - - - - 900 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1451 - 726 813 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 726 - Stage 1 - - - - 900 - Stage 2 - - - - 884 - Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 0.5 9.8 HCM LOS A Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity (veh/h) 758 - - 1451 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.007 - - 0.005 - HCM Control Delay (s) 9.8 - - 7.5 0 HCM Lane LOS A - - A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - 0 - JPA Aspen Heights Existing - MID.syn Synchro 10 Report - 10/11/2021 TG Page 9 Attachment E JPA Aspen Heights 2021 Existing Midday 8: Washington Ave & Site Entrance HCM 6th TWSC Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 8 16 0 Future Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 8 16 0 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 0 - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 0 0 0 0 0 Mvmt Flow 0 0 0 9 17 0 Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 26 17 17 0 - 0 Stage 1 17 - - - - - Stage 2 9 - - - - - Critical Hdwy 6.4 6.2 4.1 - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.4 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.4 - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.5 3.3 2.2 - - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 995 1068 1613 - - - Stage 1 1011 - - - - - Stage 2 1019 - - - - - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 995 1068 1613 - - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 995 - - - - - Stage 1 1011 - - - - - Stage 2 1019 - - - - - Approach EB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0 0 0 HCM LOS A Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1613 - - - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - - - - HCM Control Delay (s) 0 - 0 - - HCM Lane LOS A - A - - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - - - JPA Aspen Heights Existing - MID.syn Synchro 10 Report - 10/11/2021 TG Page 10 Attachment E JPA Aspen Heights 2021 Existing Midday Queuing and Blocking Report Intersection: 1: Shamrock Rd & Jefferson Park Ave Movement EB WB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR L TR LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 248 74 199 146 65 Average Queue (ft) 113 28 78 60 18 95th Queue (ft) 218 64 156 112 50 Link Distance (ft) 304 532 559 534 Upstream Blk Time (%) 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 75 Storage Blk Time (%) 0 6 Queuing Penalty (veh) 1 3 Intersection: 2: Private Entrance/Harmon St & Jefferson Park Ave Movement EB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 67 78 27 33 Average Queue (ft) 7 9 2 9 95th Queue (ft) 36 45 14 32 Link Distance (ft) 77 304 320 536 Upstream Blk Time (%) 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 3: Private Entrance/Washington Ave & Jefferson Park Ave Movement EB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 68 14 62 35 Average Queue (ft) 3 0 8 12 95th Queue (ft) 32 8 37 36 Link Distance (ft) 174 77 261 281 Upstream Blk Time (%) 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) JPA Aspen Heights Existing - MID.syn SimTraffic Report - 10/11/2021 TG Page 1 Attachment E JPA Aspen Heights 2021 Existing Midday Queuing and Blocking Report Intersection: 4: Private Entrance/Observatory Ave & Jefferson Park Ave Movement EB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 11 46 35 14 Average Queue (ft) 1 3 4 1 95th Queue (ft) 7 22 22 10 Link Distance (ft) 432 174 314 534 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 5: Jefferson Park Ave & Fontaine Ave & Maury Ave Movement EB EB EB WB WB NB NB SB SB SB Directions Served L T R L TR L T L T R Maximum Queue (ft) 117 237 120 87 241 153 113 86 157 107 Average Queue (ft) 28 105 45 57 93 72 44 23 68 25 95th Queue (ft) 77 195 118 96 184 127 90 62 121 69 Link Distance (ft) 774 432 770 538 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 150 120 88 355 117 125 Storage Blk Time (%) 0 5 0 2 7 0 2 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 9 1 5 9 0 1 0 Intersection: 6: Maury Ave/Alderman Road & Stadium Drive Movement EB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 42 72 103 88 Average Queue (ft) 21 37 54 49 95th Queue (ft) 47 61 85 76 Link Distance (ft) 544 504 452 665 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) JPA Aspen Heights Existing - MID.syn SimTraffic Report - 10/11/2021 TG Page 2 Attachment E JPA Aspen Heights 2021 Existing Midday Queuing and Blocking Report Intersection: 7: Washington Ave & Stadium Drive Movement EB WB NB Directions Served TR LT LR Maximum Queue (ft) 6 12 39 Average Queue (ft) 0 1 4 95th Queue (ft) 5 10 24 Link Distance (ft) 504 658 455 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 8: Washington Ave & Site Entrance Movement Directions Served Maximum Queue (ft) Average Queue (ft) 95th Queue (ft) Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Network Summary Network wide Queuing Penalty: 30 JPA Aspen Heights Existing - MID.syn SimTraffic Report - 10/11/2021 TG Page 3 Attachment E JPA Aspen Heights 2021 Existing - PM 1: Shamrock Rd & Jefferson Park Ave Queues Lane Group EBT WBL WBT NBT SBT Lane Group Flow (vph) 374 111 597 133 72 v/c Ratio 0.44 0.18 0.53 0.56 0.27 Control Delay 13.3 6.2 9.6 39.4 28.5 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 13.3 6.2 9.6 39.4 28.5 Queue Length 50th (ft) 93 15 119 61 29 Queue Length 95th (ft) 212 47 296 113 63 Internal Link Dist (ft) 301 481 515 490 Turn Bay Length (ft) 75 Base Capacity (vph) 841 606 1130 424 479 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.44 0.18 0.53 0.31 0.15 Intersection Summary JPA Aspen Heights Existing - PM.syn Synchro 10 Report - 10/11/2021 TG Page 1 Attachment E JPA Aspen Heights 2021 Existing - PM 1: Shamrock Rd & Jefferson Park Ave HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 21 275 55 104 549 12 43 25 56 9 52 7 Future Volume (veh/h) 21 275 55 104 549 12 43 25 56 9 52 7 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 0.98 0.89 0.99 0.91 0.89 0.88 0.91 0.88 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1900 1870 1900 1885 1870 1781 1870 1900 1841 1900 1900 1900 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 22 293 59 111 584 13 46 27 60 10 55 7 Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Percent Heavy Veh, % 0 2 0 1 2 8 2 0 4 0 0 0 Cap, veh/h 68 715 138 642 1138 25 149 94 154 77 346 40 Arrive On Green 0.51 0.51 0.51 0.05 0.63 0.63 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.23 Sat Flow, veh/h 47 1402 271 1795 1818 40 397 399 654 124 1474 172 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 374 0 0 111 0 597 133 0 0 72 0 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1720 0 0 1795 0 1858 1451 0 0 1769 0 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.4 0.0 15.3 2.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 11.2 0.0 0.0 2.4 0.0 15.3 6.2 0.0 0.0 2.7 0.0 0.0 Prop In Lane 0.06 0.16 1.00 0.02 0.35 0.45 0.14 0.10 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 922 0 0 642 0 1164 397 0 0 463 0 0 V/C Ratio(X) 0.41 0.00 0.00 0.17 0.00 0.51 0.34 0.00 0.00 0.16 0.00 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 922 0 0 642 0 1164 458 0 0 537 0 0 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 13.1 0.0 0.0 8.1 0.0 8.9 27.5 0.0 0.0 26.3 0.0 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 1.3 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.0 1.6 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 4.4 0.0 0.0 0.9 0.0 5.7 2.3 0.0 0.0 1.2 0.0 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 14.4 0.0 0.0 8.7 0.0 10.5 28.0 0.0 0.0 26.4 0.0 0.0 LnGrp LOS B A A A A B C A A C A A Approach Vol, veh/h 374 708 133 72 Approach Delay, s/veh 14.4 10.2 28.0 26.4 Approach LOS B B C C Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 10.0 50.0 26.2 60.0 26.2 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 4.0 44.0 24.0 54.0 24.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 4.4 13.2 4.7 17.3 8.2 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 2.5 0.1 4.4 0.3 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 14.2 HCM 6th LOS B JPA Aspen Heights Existing - PM.syn Synchro 10 Report - 10/11/2021 TG Page 2 Attachment E JPA Aspen Heights 2021 Existing - PM 2: Private Entrance/Harmon St & Jefferson Park Ave HCM 6th TWSC Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.7 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 7 314 1 13 571 4 0 0 8 6 1 15 Future Vol, veh/h 7 314 1 13 571 4 0 0 8 6 1 15 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 42 0 43 43 0 42 0 0 21 21 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 Mvmt Flow 8 353 1 15 642 4 0 0 9 7 1 17 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 688 0 0 397 0 0 1096 1131 418 1111 1129 686 Stage 1 - - - - - - 413 413 - 716 716 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 683 718 - 395 413 - Critical Hdwy 4.1 - - 4.1 - - 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.27 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 - - 2.2 - - 3.5 4 3.3 3.5 4 3.363 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 916 - - 1173 - - 193 205 639 188 206 439 Stage 1 - - - - - - 620 597 - 424 437 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 442 436 - 634 597 - Platoon blocked, % - - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 879 - - 1125 - - 173 183 601 170 184 421 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 173 183 - 170 184 - Stage 1 - - - - - - 588 566 - 402 411 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 414 410 - 605 566 - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0.2 0.2 11.1 18.7 HCM LOS B C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 601 879 - - 1125 - - 288 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.015 0.009 - - 0.013 - - 0.086 HCM Control Delay (s) 11.1 9.1 0 - 8.2 0 - 18.7 HCM Lane LOS B A A - A A - C HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 0 - - 0 - - 0.3 JPA Aspen Heights Existing - PM.syn Synchro 10 Report - 10/11/2021 TG Page 3 Attachment E JPA Aspen Heights 2021 Existing - PM 3: Private Entrance/Washington Ave & Jefferson Park Ave HCM 6th TWSC Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.4 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 8 317 1 2 590 2 0 0 1 7 0 7 Future Vol, veh/h 8 317 1 2 590 2 0 0 1 7 0 7 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 50 0 66 66 0 50 4 0 2 2 0 4 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Mvmt Flow 9 348 1 2 648 2 0 0 1 8 0 8 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 700 0 0 415 0 0 1094 1137 417 1072 1136 703 Stage 1 - - - - - - 433 433 - 703 703 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 661 704 - 369 433 - Critical Hdwy 4.1 - - 4.1 - - 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 - - 2.2 - - 3.5 4 3.3 3.5 4 3.3 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 906 - - 1155 - - 193 203 640 200 204 441 Stage 1 - - - - - - 605 585 - 431 443 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 455 443 - 655 585 - Platoon blocked, % - - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 863 - - 1082 - - 175 178 599 187 179 418 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 175 178 - 187 179 - Stage 1 - - - - - - 560 541 - 405 420 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 444 420 - 644 541 - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0.2 0 11 19.8 HCM LOS B C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 599 863 - - 1082 - - 258 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.002 0.01 - - 0.002 - - 0.06 HCM Control Delay (s) 11 9.2 0 - 8.3 0 - 19.8 HCM Lane LOS B A A - A A - C HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 0 - - 0 - - 0.2 JPA Aspen Heights Existing - PM.syn Synchro 10 Report - 10/11/2021 TG Page 4 Attachment E JPA Aspen Heights 2021 Existing - PM 4: Private Entrance/Observatory Ave & Jefferson Park Ave HCM 6th TWSC Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.7 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 9 311 3 8 609 5 4 0 6 6 1 7 Future Vol, veh/h 9 311 3 8 609 5 4 0 6 6 1 7 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 45 0 89 89 0 45 4 0 2 2 0 4 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Mvmt Flow 10 349 3 9 684 6 4 0 7 7 1 8 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 735 0 0 441 0 0 1174 1213 442 1126 1211 736 Stage 1 - - - - - - 460 460 - 750 750 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 714 753 - 376 461 - Critical Hdwy 4.1 - - 4.1 - - 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 - - 2.2 - - 3.5 4 3.3 3.5 4 3.3 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 879 - - 1130 - - 170 183 620 184 184 422 Stage 1 - - - - - - 585 569 - 407 422 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 425 420 - 649 569 - Platoon blocked, % - - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 841 - - 1034 - - 148 156 566 170 156 402 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 148 156 - 170 156 - Stage 1 - - - - - - 528 513 - 384 398 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 408 396 - 630 513 - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0.3 0.1 19.1 21.3 HCM LOS C C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 266 841 - - 1034 - - 237 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.042 0.012 - - 0.009 - - 0.066 HCM Control Delay (s) 19.1 9.3 0 - 8.5 0 - 21.3 HCM Lane LOS C A A - A A - C HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 0 - - 0 - - 0.2 JPA Aspen Heights Existing - PM.syn Synchro 10 Report - 10/11/2021 TG Page 5 Attachment E JPA Aspen Heights 2021 Existing - PM 5: Jefferson Park Ave & Fontaine Ave & Maury Ave Queues Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Group Flow (vph) 26 158 268 234 379 193 106 111 52 321 52 v/c Ratio 0.09 0.30 0.33 0.55 0.52 0.63 0.34 0.31 0.14 0.80 0.12 Control Delay 28.0 28.8 4.2 27.4 24.5 43.3 34.5 3.7 29.4 48.7 0.5 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 28.0 28.8 4.2 27.4 24.5 43.3 34.5 3.7 29.4 48.7 0.5 Queue Length 50th (ft) 10 67 16 85 149 98 51 0 23 163 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) 35 142 50 178 294 174 101 15 57 284 0 Internal Link Dist (ft) 751 428 732 533 Turn Bay Length (ft) 150 120 88 355 225 117 125 Base Capacity (vph) 288 529 966 426 732 502 524 493 483 534 540 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.09 0.30 0.28 0.55 0.52 0.38 0.20 0.23 0.11 0.60 0.10 Intersection Summary JPA Aspen Heights Existing - PM.syn Synchro 10 Report - 10/11/2021 TG Page 6 Attachment E JPA Aspen Heights 2021 Existing - PM 5: Jefferson Park Ave & Fontaine Ave & Maury Ave HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 25 150 255 222 327 33 183 101 105 49 305 49 Future Volume (veh/h) 25 150 255 222 327 33 183 101 105 49 305 49 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 0.98 0.97 0.99 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.84 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1900 1870 1900 1885 1870 1678 1870 1856 1900 1811 1885 1841 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 26 158 268 234 344 35 193 106 0 52 321 52 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 0 2 0 1 2 15 2 3 0 6 1 4 Cap, veh/h 308 509 731 359 642 65 340 355 379 414 289 Arrive On Green 0.27 0.27 0.27 0.05 0.39 0.39 0.19 0.19 0.00 0.22 0.22 0.22 Sat Flow, veh/h 1002 1870 1557 1795 1666 169 1781 1856 1610 1725 1885 1315 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 26 158 268 234 0 379 193 106 0 52 321 52 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1002 1870 1557 1795 0 1835 1781 1856 1610 1725 1885 1315 Q Serve(g_s), s 1.8 5.9 9.8 4.0 0.0 14.1 8.7 4.3 0.0 2.1 14.1 2.8 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 5.9 5.9 9.8 4.0 0.0 14.1 8.7 4.3 0.0 2.1 14.1 2.8 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.09 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 308 509 731 359 0 707 340 355 379 414 289 V/C Ratio(X) 0.08 0.31 0.37 0.65 0.00 0.54 0.57 0.30 0.14 0.78 0.18 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 308 509 731 359 0 707 485 505 469 513 358 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 27.2 25.5 15.4 27.3 0.0 21.0 32.4 30.6 0.0 27.7 32.4 28.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.5 1.6 1.4 8.9 0.0 2.9 0.6 0.2 0.0 0.1 4.5 0.1 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.5 2.8 5.1 3.3 0.0 6.3 3.7 1.9 0.0 0.9 6.9 0.9 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 27.7 27.1 16.8 36.2 0.0 23.9 32.9 30.8 0.0 27.8 36.9 28.1 LnGrp LOS C C B D A C C C C D C Approach Vol, veh/h 452 613 299 A 425 Approach Delay, s/veh 21.0 28.6 32.2 34.7 Approach LOS C C C C Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 10.0 30.0 25.4 40.0 22.9 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 4.0 24.0 24.0 34.0 24.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 6.0 11.8 16.1 16.1 10.7 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 1.6 1.0 2.1 0.5 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 28.7 HCM 6th LOS C Notes Unsignalized Delay for [NBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay. JPA Aspen Heights Existing - PM.syn Synchro 10 Report - 10/11/2021 TG Page 7 Attachment E JPA Aspen Heights 2021 Existing - PM 6: Maury Ave/Alderman Road & Stadium Drive HCM 6th AWSC Intersection Intersection Delay, s/veh21.8 Intersection LOS C Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 20 16 3 128 129 20 6 154 16 61 328 94 Future Vol, veh/h 20 16 3 128 129 20 6 154 16 61 328 94 Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Heavy Vehicles, % 5 0 0 2 0 0 0 6 0 34 1 7 Mvmt Flow 21 17 3 136 137 21 6 164 17 65 349 100 Number of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 Approach EB WB NB SB Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB Opposing Lanes 1 1 1 1 Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB Conflicting Lanes Left 1 1 1 1 Conflicting Approach RightNB SB WB EB Conflicting Lanes Right 1 1 1 1 HCM Control Delay 10.4 15.1 11.4 30.4 HCM LOS B C B D Lane NBLn1 EBLn1WBLn1 SBLn1 Vol Left, % 3% 51% 46% 13% Vol Thru, % 88% 41% 47% 68% Vol Right, % 9% 8% 7% 19% Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Traffic Vol by Lane 176 39 277 483 LT Vol 6 20 128 61 Through Vol 154 16 129 328 RT Vol 16 3 20 94 Lane Flow Rate 187 41 295 514 Geometry Grp 1 1 1 1 Degree of Util (X) 0.302 0.079 0.497 0.825 Departure Headway (Hd) 5.802 6.859 6.074 5.778 Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Cap 616 526 589 627 Service Time 3.879 4.859 4.145 3.834 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.304 0.078 0.501 0.82 HCM Control Delay 11.4 10.4 15.1 30.4 HCM Lane LOS B B C D HCM 95th-tile Q 1.3 0.3 2.8 8.6 JPA Aspen Heights Existing - PM.syn Synchro 10 Report - 10/11/2021 TG Page 8 Attachment E JPA Aspen Heights 2021 Existing - PM 7: Washington Ave & Stadium Drive HCM 6th TWSC Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.5 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 80 2 5 259 5 10 Future Vol, veh/h 80 2 5 259 5 10 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 42 42 0 9 1 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - - - - 0 - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 81 81 81 81 81 81 Heavy Vehicles, % 26 0 0 1 0 0 Mvmt Flow 99 2 6 320 6 12 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 143 0 483 143 Stage 1 - - - - 142 - Stage 2 - - - - 341 - Critical Hdwy - - 4.1 - 6.4 6.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.4 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.4 - Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.2 - 3.5 3.3 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1452 - 546 910 Stage 1 - - - - 890 - Stage 2 - - - - 725 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1394 - 517 873 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 517 - Stage 1 - - - - 854 - Stage 2 - - - - 715 - Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 0.1 10.2 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity (veh/h) 710 - - 1394 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.026 - - 0.004 - HCM Control Delay (s) 10.2 - - 7.6 0 HCM Lane LOS B - - A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 - - 0 - JPA Aspen Heights Existing - PM.syn Synchro 10 Report - 10/11/2021 TG Page 9 Attachment E JPA Aspen Heights 2021 Existing - PM 8: Washington Ave & Site Entrance HCM 6th TWSC Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 10 7 0 Future Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 10 7 0 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 0 - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 0 0 0 0 0 Mvmt Flow 0 0 0 11 8 0 Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 19 8 8 0 - 0 Stage 1 8 - - - - - Stage 2 11 - - - - - Critical Hdwy 6.4 6.2 4.1 - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.4 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.4 - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.5 3.3 2.2 - - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1004 1080 1625 - - - Stage 1 1020 - - - - - Stage 2 1017 - - - - - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1004 1080 1625 - - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 1004 - - - - - Stage 1 1020 - - - - - Stage 2 1017 - - - - - Approach EB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0 0 0 HCM LOS A Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1625 - - - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - - - - HCM Control Delay (s) 0 - 0 - - HCM Lane LOS A - A - - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - - - JPA Aspen Heights Existing - PM.syn Synchro 10 Report - 10/11/2021 TG Page 10 Attachment E JPA Aspen Heights 2021 Existing - PM Queuing and Blocking Report Intersection: 1: Shamrock Rd & Jefferson Park Ave Movement EB WB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR L TR LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 253 74 354 152 96 Average Queue (ft) 125 41 154 73 40 95th Queue (ft) 225 78 288 128 80 Link Distance (ft) 304 532 559 534 Upstream Blk Time (%) 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 75 Storage Blk Time (%) 1 17 Queuing Penalty (veh) 5 18 Intersection: 2: Private Entrance/Harmon St & Jefferson Park Ave Movement EB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 52 159 33 66 Average Queue (ft) 6 34 8 19 95th Queue (ft) 31 161 31 49 Link Distance (ft) 77 304 320 536 Upstream Blk Time (%) 0 1 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 3 Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 3: Private Entrance/Washington Ave & Jefferson Park Ave Movement EB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 80 79 25 42 Average Queue (ft) 7 14 1 14 95th Queue (ft) 40 65 12 41 Link Distance (ft) 174 77 261 281 Upstream Blk Time (%) 4 Queuing Penalty (veh) 22 Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) JPA Aspen Heights Existing - PM.syn SimTraffic Report - 10/11/2021 TG Page 1 Attachment E JPA Aspen Heights 2021 Existing - PM Queuing and Blocking Report Intersection: 4: Private Entrance/Observatory Ave & Jefferson Park Ave Movement EB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 91 157 41 46 Average Queue (ft) 6 41 9 13 95th Queue (ft) 39 149 33 42 Link Distance (ft) 432 174 314 534 Upstream Blk Time (%) 4 Queuing Penalty (veh) 25 Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 5: Jefferson Park Ave & Fontaine Ave & Maury Ave Movement EB EB EB WB WB NB NB SB SB SB Directions Served L T R L TR L T L T R Maximum Queue (ft) 90 210 120 87 445 187 133 117 339 125 Average Queue (ft) 18 78 62 83 296 96 58 42 184 46 95th Queue (ft) 56 156 122 99 489 163 112 112 295 125 Link Distance (ft) 774 432 770 538 Upstream Blk Time (%) 7 Queuing Penalty (veh) 43 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 150 120 88 355 117 125 Storage Blk Time (%) 0 2 0 21 38 0 27 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 5 1 76 85 0 26 1 Intersection: 6: Maury Ave/Alderman Road & Stadium Drive Movement EB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 60 165 124 271 Average Queue (ft) 25 67 65 117 95th Queue (ft) 53 121 105 213 Link Distance (ft) 544 504 452 665 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) JPA Aspen Heights Existing - PM.syn SimTraffic Report - 10/11/2021 TG Page 2 Attachment E JPA Aspen Heights 2021 Existing - PM Queuing and Blocking Report Intersection: 7: Washington Ave & Stadium Drive Movement WB NB Directions Served LT LR Maximum Queue (ft) 18 35 Average Queue (ft) 1 13 95th Queue (ft) 9 37 Link Distance (ft) 658 455 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 8: Washington Ave & Site Entrance Movement Directions Served Maximum Queue (ft) Average Queue (ft) 95th Queue (ft) Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Network Summary Network wide Queuing Penalty: 311 JPA Aspen Heights Existing - PM.syn SimTraffic Report - 10/11/2021 TG Page 3 Attachment E Attachment E December 2021 Aspen Heights TIA – City of Charlottesville Appendix D Synchro/SimTraffic Outputs for 2023/2028 Background Conditions Attachment E December 2021 Aspen Heights TIA – City of Charlottesville Attachment E JPA Aspen Heights 2023 Background AM 1: Shamrock Rd & Jefferson Park Ave Queues Lane Group EBT WBL WBT NBT SBT Lane Group Flow (vph) 519 33 260 192 27 v/c Ratio 0.59 0.06 0.24 0.66 0.09 Control Delay 17.1 6.4 7.1 41.9 24.6 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 17.1 6.4 7.1 41.9 24.6 Queue Length 50th (ft) 164 5 46 92 10 Queue Length 95th (ft) 321 18 105 157 31 Internal Link Dist (ft) 301 481 515 490 Turn Bay Length (ft) 75 Base Capacity (vph) 882 515 1064 447 469 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.59 0.06 0.24 0.43 0.06 Intersection Summary JPA Aspen Heights 2023 Background - AM.syn Synchro 10 Report - 10/12/2021 TG Page 1 Attachment E JPA Aspen Heights 2023 Background AM 1: Shamrock Rd & Jefferson Park Ave HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 8 453 32 31 244 3 65 45 73 4 19 3 Future Volume (veh/h) 8 453 32 31 244 3 65 45 73 4 19 3 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 0.96 0.91 1.00 0.93 0.96 0.93 0.97 0.95 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1707 1870 1811 1856 1811 1900 1870 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 8 477 34 33 257 3 68 47 77 4 20 3 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 13 2 6 3 6 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 Cap, veh/h 49 915 64 572 1179 14 143 96 120 74 284 39 Arrive On Green 0.54 0.54 0.54 0.05 0.66 0.66 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 Sat Flow, veh/h 8 1700 120 1767 1785 21 431 499 623 123 1476 200 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 519 0 0 33 0 260 192 0 0 27 0 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1829 0 0 1767 0 1806 1554 0 0 1798 0 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.0 4.7 6.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 14.9 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.0 4.7 9.1 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 Prop In Lane 0.02 0.07 1.00 0.01 0.35 0.40 0.15 0.11 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 1029 0 0 572 0 1192 359 0 0 397 0 0 V/C Ratio(X) 0.50 0.00 0.00 0.06 0.00 0.22 0.53 0.00 0.00 0.07 0.00 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 1029 0 0 572 0 1192 512 0 0 571 0 0 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 12.2 0.0 0.0 6.3 0.0 5.5 30.2 0.0 0.0 27.0 0.0 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 1.8 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.4 1.2 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 5.8 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 1.5 3.5 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 13.9 0.0 0.0 6.5 0.0 5.9 31.4 0.0 0.0 27.1 0.0 0.0 LnGrp LOS B A A A A A C A A C A A Approach Vol, veh/h 519 293 192 27 Approach Delay, s/veh 13.9 6.0 31.4 27.1 Approach LOS B A C C Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 10.0 50.0 21.8 60.0 21.8 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 4.0 44.0 24.0 54.0 24.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 2.6 16.9 3.0 6.7 11.1 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 3.5 0.0 1.6 0.5 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 15.3 HCM 6th LOS B JPA Aspen Heights 2023 Background - AM.syn Synchro 10 Report - 10/12/2021 TG Page 2 Attachment E JPA Aspen Heights 2023 Background AM 2: Private Entrance/Harmon St & Jefferson Park Ave HCM 6th TWSC Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.3 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 9 481 1 4 288 3 1 0 1 2 0 2 Future Vol, veh/h 9 481 1 4 288 3 1 0 1 2 0 2 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 58 0 19 19 0 58 0 0 16 16 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 3 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Mvmt Flow 10 517 1 4 310 3 1 0 1 2 0 2 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 371 0 0 537 0 0 878 936 553 932 935 370 Stage 1 - - - - - - 557 557 - 378 378 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 321 379 - 554 557 - Critical Hdwy 4.1 - - 4.1 - - 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 - - 2.2 - - 3.5 4 3.3 3.5 4 3.3 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1199 - - 1041 - - 271 267 537 249 267 680 Stage 1 - - - - - - 518 515 - 648 619 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 695 618 - 520 515 - Platoon blocked, % - - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1133 - - 1022 - - 262 244 519 228 244 642 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 262 244 - 228 244 - Stage 1 - - - - - - 502 500 - 605 582 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 689 581 - 505 500 - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0.2 0.1 15.4 15.9 HCM LOS C C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 348 1133 - - 1022 - - 336 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.006 0.009 - - 0.004 - - 0.013 HCM Control Delay (s) 15.4 8.2 0 - 8.5 0 - 15.9 HCM Lane LOS C A A - A A - C HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 0 - - 0 - - 0 JPA Aspen Heights 2023 Background - AM.syn Synchro 10 Report - 10/12/2021 TG Page 3 Attachment E JPA Aspen Heights 2023 Background AM 3: Private Entrance/Washington Ave & Jefferson Park Ave HCM 6th TWSC Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.1 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 5 485 2 2 292 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 Future Vol, veh/h 5 485 2 2 292 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 44 0 27 27 0 44 2 0 2 2 0 2 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 20 3 100 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Mvmt Flow 5 527 2 2 317 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 363 0 0 556 0 0 889 932 557 907 932 364 Stage 1 - - - - - - 565 565 - 366 366 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 324 367 - 541 566 - Critical Hdwy 4.3 - - 4.1 - - 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.38 - - 2.2 - - 3.5 4 3.3 3.5 4 3.3 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1103 - - 1025 - - 266 269 534 259 269 685 Stage 1 - - - - - - 513 511 - 657 626 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 692 626 - 529 511 - Platoon blocked, % - - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1057 - - 999 - - 257 249 519 246 249 655 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 257 249 - 246 249 - Stage 1 - - - - - - 496 494 - 625 598 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 689 598 - 523 494 - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0.1 0.1 12 0 HCM LOS B A Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 519 1057 - - 999 - - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.002 0.005 - - 0.002 - - - HCM Control Delay (s) 12 8.4 0 - 8.6 0 - 0 HCM Lane LOS B A A - A A - A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 0 - - 0 - - - JPA Aspen Heights 2023 Background - AM.syn Synchro 10 Report - 10/12/2021 TG Page 4 Attachment E JPA Aspen Heights 2023 Background AM 4: Private Entrance/Observatory Ave & Jefferson Park Ave HCM 6th TWSC Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.3 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 6 504 0 4 279 1 1 0 3 2 0 3 Future Vol, veh/h 6 504 0 4 279 1 1 0 3 2 0 3 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 57 0 32 32 0 57 2 0 1 1 0 2 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 2 0 25 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Mvmt Flow 7 548 0 4 303 1 1 0 3 2 0 3 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 361 0 0 580 0 0 909 963 581 934 963 363 Stage 1 - - - - - - 594 594 - 369 369 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 315 369 - 565 594 - Critical Hdwy 4.1 - - 4.35 - - 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 - - 2.425 - - 3.5 4 3.3 3.5 4 3.3 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1209 - - 890 - - 258 258 517 248 258 686 Stage 1 - - - - - - 495 496 - 655 624 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 700 624 - 513 496 - Platoon blocked, % - - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1143 - - 863 - - 246 233 501 230 233 648 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 246 233 - 230 233 - Stage 1 - - - - - - 476 477 - 614 587 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 691 587 - 505 477 - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0.1 0.1 14.1 14.7 HCM LOS B B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 398 1143 - - 863 - - 375 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.011 0.006 - - 0.005 - - 0.014 HCM Control Delay (s) 14.1 8.2 0 - 9.2 0 - 14.7 HCM Lane LOS B A A - A A - B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 0 - - 0 - - 0 JPA Aspen Heights 2023 Background - AM.syn Synchro 10 Report - 10/12/2021 TG Page 5 Attachment E JPA Aspen Heights 2023 Background AM 5: Jefferson Park Ave & Fontaine Ave & Maury Ave Queues Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Group Flow (vph) 74 320 149 58 258 337 253 193 22 53 15 v/c Ratio 0.19 0.50 0.15 0.16 0.33 0.77 0.55 0.38 0.12 0.24 0.05 Control Delay 26.8 29.1 1.5 18.4 19.0 41.9 32.5 6.9 34.0 36.0 0.3 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 26.8 29.1 1.5 18.4 19.0 41.9 32.5 6.9 34.0 36.0 0.3 Queue Length 50th (ft) 28 136 0 17 83 153 108 0 10 26 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) 77 276 19 52 187 #320 216 53 31 59 0 Internal Link Dist (ft) 751 428 732 533 Turn Bay Length (ft) 150 120 88 355 225 117 125 Base Capacity (vph) 382 641 1047 358 785 559 582 587 491 571 528 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.19 0.50 0.14 0.16 0.33 0.60 0.43 0.33 0.04 0.09 0.03 Intersection Summary # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. JPA Aspen Heights 2023 Background - AM.syn Synchro 10 Report - 10/12/2021 TG Page 6 Attachment E JPA Aspen Heights 2023 Background AM 5: Jefferson Park Ave & Fontaine Ave & Maury Ave HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 68 294 137 53 215 22 310 233 178 20 49 14 Future Volume (veh/h) 68 294 137 53 215 22 310 233 178 20 49 14 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 0.99 0.96 1.00 0.96 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.88 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1856 1856 1885 1870 1841 1559 1885 1870 1885 1678 1841 1693 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 74 320 149 58 234 24 337 253 0 22 53 15 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 3 3 1 2 4 23 1 2 1 15 4 14 Cap, veh/h 438 586 848 315 699 72 408 425 190 219 150 Arrive On Green 0.32 0.32 0.32 0.04 0.43 0.43 0.23 0.23 0.00 0.12 0.12 0.12 Sat Flow, veh/h 1099 1856 1535 1781 1636 168 1795 1870 1598 1598 1841 1258 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 74 320 149 58 0 258 337 253 0 22 53 15 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1099 1856 1535 1781 0 1803 1795 1870 1598 1598 1841 1258 Q Serve(g_s), s 3.9 11.3 3.9 1.7 0.0 7.6 14.2 9.6 0.0 1.0 2.1 0.8 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 3.9 11.3 3.9 1.7 0.0 7.6 14.2 9.6 0.0 1.0 2.1 0.8 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.09 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 438 586 848 315 0 771 408 425 190 219 150 V/C Ratio(X) 0.17 0.55 0.18 0.18 0.00 0.33 0.83 0.60 0.12 0.24 0.10 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 438 586 848 339 0 771 542 564 482 555 379 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 20.0 22.5 9.2 17.1 0.0 15.2 29.2 27.5 0.0 31.3 31.8 31.2 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.8 3.6 0.5 0.1 0.0 1.2 5.9 0.5 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.1 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 1.1 5.2 2.1 0.6 0.0 3.1 6.6 4.2 0.0 0.4 0.9 0.3 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 20.8 26.1 9.6 17.2 0.0 16.4 35.1 28.0 0.0 31.4 32.0 31.4 LnGrp LOS C C A B A B D C C C C Approach Vol, veh/h 543 316 590 A 90 Approach Delay, s/veh 20.9 16.5 32.1 31.7 Approach LOS C B C C Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 8.9 31.1 15.5 40.0 24.1 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 4.0 24.0 24.0 34.0 24.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 3.7 13.3 4.1 9.6 16.2 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 2.0 0.2 1.4 1.0 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 24.9 HCM 6th LOS C Notes Unsignalized Delay for [NBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay. JPA Aspen Heights 2023 Background - AM.syn Synchro 10 Report - 10/12/2021 TG Page 7 Attachment E JPA Aspen Heights 2023 Background AM 6: Maury Ave/Alderman Road & Stadium Drive HCM 6th AWSC Intersection Intersection Delay, s/veh11.8 Intersection LOS B Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 111 70 6 18 9 31 2 305 49 26 71 29 Future Vol, veh/h 111 70 6 18 9 31 2 305 49 26 71 29 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 0 0 22 11 0 0 3 0 54 4 21 Mvmt Flow 121 76 7 20 10 34 2 332 53 28 77 32 Number of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 Approach EB WB NB SB Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB Opposing Lanes 1 1 1 1 Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB Conflicting Lanes Left 1 1 1 1 Conflicting Approach RightNB SB WB EB Conflicting Lanes Right 1 1 1 1 HCM Control Delay 11 9.4 13 10.8 HCM LOS B A B B Lane NBLn1 EBLn1WBLn1 SBLn1 Vol Left, % 1% 59% 31% 21% Vol Thru, % 86% 37% 16% 56% Vol Right, % 14% 3% 53% 23% Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Traffic Vol by Lane 356 187 58 126 LT Vol 2 111 18 26 Through Vol 305 70 9 71 RT Vol 49 6 31 29 Lane Flow Rate 387 203 63 137 Geometry Grp 1 1 1 1 Degree of Util (X) 0.52 0.31 0.101 0.229 Departure Headway (Hd) 4.84 5.485 5.761 6.029 Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Cap 751 657 622 596 Service Time 2.84 3.515 3.798 4.058 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.515 0.309 0.101 0.23 HCM Control Delay 13 11 9.4 10.8 HCM Lane LOS B B A B HCM 95th-tile Q 3 1.3 0.3 0.9 JPA Aspen Heights 2023 Background - AM.syn Synchro 10 Report - 10/12/2021 TG Page 8 Attachment E JPA Aspen Heights 2023 Background AM 7: Washington Ave & Stadium Drive HCM 6th TWSC Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.3 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 144 3 1 50 1 4 Future Vol, veh/h 144 3 1 50 1 4 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 13 13 0 4 1 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - - - - 0 - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 10 0 0 8 0 0 Mvmt Flow 157 3 1 54 1 4 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 173 0 232 173 Stage 1 - - - - 172 - Stage 2 - - - - 60 - Critical Hdwy - - 4.1 - 6.4 6.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.4 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.4 - Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.2 - 3.5 3.3 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1416 - 761 876 Stage 1 - - - - 863 - Stage 2 - - - - 968 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1398 - 748 864 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 748 - Stage 1 - - - - 853 - Stage 2 - - - - 963 - Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 0.1 9.3 HCM LOS A Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity (veh/h) 838 - - 1398 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.006 - - 0.001 - HCM Control Delay (s) 9.3 - - 7.6 0 HCM Lane LOS A - - A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - 0 - JPA Aspen Heights 2023 Background - AM.syn Synchro 10 Report - 10/12/2021 TG Page 9 Attachment E JPA Aspen Heights 2023 Background AM 8: Washington Ave & Site Entrance HCM 6th TWSC Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 8 4 0 Future Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 8 4 0 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 0 - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 0 0 0 0 0 Mvmt Flow 0 0 0 9 4 0 Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 13 4 4 0 - 0 Stage 1 4 - - - - - Stage 2 9 - - - - - Critical Hdwy 6.4 6.2 4.1 - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.4 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.4 - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.5 3.3 2.2 - - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1011 1085 1631 - - - Stage 1 1024 - - - - - Stage 2 1019 - - - - - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1011 1085 1631 - - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 1011 - - - - - Stage 1 1024 - - - - - Stage 2 1019 - - - - - Approach EB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0 0 0 HCM LOS A Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1631 - - - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - - - - HCM Control Delay (s) 0 - 0 - - HCM Lane LOS A - A - - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - - - JPA Aspen Heights 2023 Background - AM.syn Synchro 10 Report - 10/12/2021 TG Page 10 Attachment E JPA Aspen Heights 2023 Background AM Queuing and Blocking Report Intersection: 1: Shamrock Rd & Jefferson Park Ave Movement EB WB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR L TR LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 293 61 144 200 63 Average Queue (ft) 142 15 54 98 19 95th Queue (ft) 264 44 113 169 51 Link Distance (ft) 304 532 559 534 Upstream Blk Time (%) 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 1 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 75 Storage Blk Time (%) 0 4 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 1 Intersection: 2: Private Entrance/Harmon St & Jefferson Park Ave Movement EB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 73 37 21 33 Average Queue (ft) 9 3 2 3 95th Queue (ft) 41 25 15 19 Link Distance (ft) 77 304 320 536 Upstream Blk Time (%) 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 1 Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 3: Private Entrance/Washington Ave & Jefferson Park Ave Movement EB WB NB Directions Served LTR LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 93 35 22 Average Queue (ft) 7 2 2 95th Queue (ft) 50 15 12 Link Distance (ft) 174 77 261 Upstream Blk Time (%) 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) JPA Aspen Heights 2023 Background - AM.syn SimTraffic Report - 10/12/2021 TG Page 1 Attachment E JPA Aspen Heights 2023 Background AM Queuing and Blocking Report Intersection: 4: Private Entrance/Observatory Ave & Jefferson Park Ave Movement EB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 37 26 30 31 Average Queue (ft) 3 2 4 5 95th Queue (ft) 18 15 20 23 Link Distance (ft) 432 174 314 534 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 5: Jefferson Park Ave & Fontaine Ave & Maury Ave Movement EB EB EB WB WB NB NB NB SB SB SB Directions Served L T R L TR L T R L T R Maximum Queue (ft) 143 306 120 87 203 269 225 156 65 96 67 Average Queue (ft) 43 128 42 40 93 147 114 8 15 37 13 95th Queue (ft) 105 256 117 86 170 230 192 76 45 79 45 Link Distance (ft) 774 432 770 538 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 150 120 88 355 225 117 125 Storage Blk Time (%) 0 9 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 18 1 0 4 2 0 0 0 Intersection: 6: Maury Ave/Alderman Road & Stadium Drive Movement EB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 97 78 222 105 Average Queue (ft) 48 33 108 48 95th Queue (ft) 78 63 186 86 Link Distance (ft) 544 504 452 665 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) JPA Aspen Heights 2023 Background - AM.syn SimTraffic Report - 10/12/2021 TG Page 2 Attachment E JPA Aspen Heights 2023 Background AM Queuing and Blocking Report Intersection: 7: Washington Ave & Stadium Drive Movement EB WB NB Directions Served TR LT LR Maximum Queue (ft) 3 8 30 Average Queue (ft) 0 0 4 95th Queue (ft) 3 6 20 Link Distance (ft) 504 658 455 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 8: Washington Ave & Site Entrance Movement Directions Served Maximum Queue (ft) Average Queue (ft) 95th Queue (ft) Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Network Summary Network wide Queuing Penalty: 30 JPA Aspen Heights 2023 Background - AM.syn SimTraffic Report - 10/12/2021 TG Page 3 Attachment E JPA Aspen Heights 2023 Background Midday 1: Shamrock Rd & Jefferson Park Ave Queues Lane Group EBT WBL WBT NBT SBT Lane Group Flow (vph) 484 59 380 106 30 v/c Ratio 0.45 0.10 0.32 0.49 0.12 Control Delay 11.6 5.2 6.1 37.7 25.1 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 11.6 5.2 6.1 37.7 25.1 Queue Length 50th (ft) 127 7 58 48 11 Queue Length 95th (ft) 274 25 147 93 32 Internal Link Dist (ft) 301 481 515 490 Turn Bay Length (ft) 75 Base Capacity (vph) 1084 610 1198 443 498 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.45 0.10 0.32 0.24 0.06 Intersection Summary JPA Aspen Heights 2023 Background - MID.syn Synchro 10 Report - 10/12/2021 TG Page 1 Attachment E JPA Aspen Heights 2023 Background Midday 1: Shamrock Rd & Jefferson Park Ave HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 5 408 33 54 343 6 38 22 38 2 21 5 Future Volume (veh/h) 5 408 33 54 343 6 38 22 38 2 21 5 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 0.97 0.93 0.99 0.93 0.89 0.86 0.91 0.86 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1900 1841 1856 1841 1811 1900 1826 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 5 443 36 59 373 7 41 24 41 2 23 5 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 0 4 3 4 6 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 Cap, veh/h 47 909 73 573 1160 22 148 90 112 53 287 59 Arrive On Green 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.04 0.66 0.66 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 Sat Flow, veh/h 4 1662 134 1753 1769 33 441 452 563 30 1447 295 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 484 0 0 59 0 380 106 0 0 30 0 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1800 0 0 1753 0 1802 1456 0 0 1772 0 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.1 0.0 7.6 1.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 13.7 0.0 0.0 1.1 0.0 7.6 4.8 0.0 0.0 1.1 0.0 0.0 Prop In Lane 0.01 0.07 1.00 0.02 0.39 0.39 0.07 0.17 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 1029 0 0 573 0 1182 350 0 0 398 0 0 V/C Ratio(X) 0.47 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.00 0.32 0.30 0.00 0.00 0.08 0.00 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 1029 0 0 595 0 1182 481 0 0 559 0 0 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 11.5 0.0 0.0 6.6 0.0 6.2 28.3 0.0 0.0 26.9 0.0 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.7 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 4.9 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.0 2.5 1.8 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 11.9 0.0 0.0 6.6 0.0 6.9 28.8 0.0 0.0 27.0 0.0 0.0 LnGrp LOS B A A A A A C A A C A A Approach Vol, veh/h 484 439 106 30 Approach Delay, s/veh 11.9 6.9 28.8 27.0 Approach LOS B A C C Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 9.0 51.0 22.3 60.0 22.3 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 4.0 44.0 24.0 54.0 24.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 3.1 15.7 3.1 9.6 6.8 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 3.2 0.0 2.5 0.3 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 11.9 HCM 6th LOS B JPA Aspen Heights 2023 Background - MID.syn Synchro 10 Report - 10/12/2021 TG Page 2 Attachment E JPA Aspen Heights 2023 Background Midday 2: Private Entrance/Harmon St & Jefferson Park Ave HCM 6th TWSC Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.3 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 6 421 3 8 352 1 1 0 1 2 0 8 Future Vol, veh/h 6 421 3 8 352 1 1 0 1 2 0 8 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 22 0 25 25 0 22 0 0 22 22 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 5 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Mvmt Flow 6 453 3 9 378 1 1 0 1 2 0 9 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 401 0 0 481 0 0 893 911 502 908 912 401 Stage 1 - - - - - - 492 492 - 419 419 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 401 419 - 489 493 - Critical Hdwy 4.1 - - 4.1 - - 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 - - 2.2 - - 3.5 4 3.3 3.5 4 3.3 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1169 - - 1092 - - 264 276 573 258 276 653 Stage 1 - - - - - - 562 551 - 616 593 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 630 593 - 564 550 - Platoon blocked, % - - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1145 - - 1066 - - 251 259 548 244 259 639 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 251 259 - 244 259 - Stage 1 - - - - - - 545 534 - 599 574 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 615 574 - 547 533 - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0.1 0.2 15.5 12.6 HCM LOS C B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 344 1145 - - 1066 - - 483 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.006 0.006 - - 0.008 - - 0.022 HCM Control Delay (s) 15.5 8.2 0 - 8.4 0 - 12.6 HCM Lane LOS C A A - A A - B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 0 - - 0 - - 0.1 JPA Aspen Heights 2023 Background - MID.syn Synchro 10 Report - 10/12/2021 TG Page 3 Attachment E JPA Aspen Heights 2023 Background Midday 3: Private Entrance/Washington Ave & Jefferson Park Ave HCM 6th TWSC Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.4 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 3 427 1 1 361 5 2 0 3 4 1 7 Future Vol, veh/h 3 427 1 1 361 5 2 0 3 4 1 7 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 31 0 25 25 0 31 0 0 1 1 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 33 4 100 0 6 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 Mvmt Flow 3 449 1 1 380 5 2 0 3 4 1 7 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 416 0 0 475 0 0 870 899 476 874 897 414 Stage 1 - - - - - - 481 481 - 416 416 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 389 418 - 458 481 - Critical Hdwy 4.43 - - 4.1 - - 8.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 7.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 7.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.497 - - 2.2 - - 4.4 4 3.3 3.5 4 3.3 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 995 - - 1098 - - 188 281 593 272 281 643 Stage 1 - - - - - - 419 557 - 618 595 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 477 594 - 587 557 - Platoon blocked, % - - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 966 - - 1072 - - 180 265 578 261 265 624 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 180 265 - 261 265 - Stage 1 - - - - - - 407 541 - 598 577 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 470 576 - 581 541 - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0.1 0 16.9 14.4 HCM LOS C B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 307 966 - - 1072 - - 396 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.017 0.003 - - 0.001 - - 0.032 HCM Control Delay (s) 16.9 8.7 0 - 8.4 0 - 14.4 HCM Lane LOS C A A - A A - B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 0 - - 0 - - 0.1 JPA Aspen Heights 2023 Background - MID.syn Synchro 10 Report - 10/12/2021 TG Page 4 Attachment E JPA Aspen Heights 2023 Background Midday 4: Private Entrance/Observatory Ave & Jefferson Park Ave HCM 6th TWSC Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.2 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 3 428 3 3 379 6 2 0 3 0 0 1 Future Vol, veh/h 3 428 3 3 379 6 2 0 3 0 0 1 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 23 0 21 21 0 23 0 0 1 1 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 4 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Mvmt Flow 3 451 3 3 399 6 2 0 3 0 0 1 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 428 0 0 475 0 0 889 914 475 892 912 425 Stage 1 - - - - - - 480 480 - 431 431 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 409 434 - 461 481 - Critical Hdwy 4.1 - - 4.1 - - 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 - - 2.2 - - 3.5 4 3.3 3.5 4 3.3 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1142 - - 1098 - - 266 275 594 265 276 634 Stage 1 - - - - - - 571 558 - 607 586 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 623 585 - 584 557 - Platoon blocked, % - - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1117 - - 1076 - - 259 262 582 256 262 620 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 259 262 - 256 262 - Stage 1 - - - - - - 557 545 - 591 571 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 619 570 - 578 544 - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0.1 0.1 14.4 10.8 HCM LOS B B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 388 1117 - - 1076 - - 620 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.014 0.003 - - 0.003 - - 0.002 HCM Control Delay (s) 14.4 8.2 0 - 8.4 0 - 10.8 HCM Lane LOS B A A - A A - B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 0 - - 0 - - 0 JPA Aspen Heights 2023 Background - MID.syn Synchro 10 Report - 10/12/2021 TG Page 5 Attachment E JPA Aspen Heights 2023 Background Midday 5: Jefferson Park Ave & Fontaine Ave & Maury Ave Queues Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Group Flow (vph) 49 274 154 134 257 141 90 138 33 123 45 v/c Ratio 0.14 0.44 0.18 0.31 0.30 0.51 0.31 0.37 0.14 0.44 0.12 Control Delay 23.0 24.9 1.8 17.2 15.8 36.3 31.5 6.5 30.3 35.2 0.7 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 23.0 24.9 1.8 17.2 15.8 36.3 31.5 6.5 30.3 35.2 0.7 Queue Length 50th (ft) 15 92 0 31 64 59 36 0 13 51 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) 53 227 20 98 178 127 86 33 40 111 0 Internal Link Dist (ft) 751 428 732 533 Turn Bay Length (ft) 150 120 88 355 225 117 125 Base Capacity (vph) 362 627 1099 434 846 601 639 620 534 652 637 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.14 0.44 0.14 0.31 0.30 0.23 0.14 0.22 0.06 0.19 0.07 Intersection Summary JPA Aspen Heights 2023 Background - MID.syn Synchro 10 Report - 10/12/2021 TG Page 6 Attachment E JPA Aspen Heights 2023 Background Midday 5: Jefferson Park Ave & Fontaine Ave & Maury Ave HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 46 258 145 126 217 24 133 85 130 31 116 42 Future Volume (veh/h) 46 258 145 126 217 24 133 85 130 31 116 42 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 0.99 0.97 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.92 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1796 1841 1856 1856 1811 1589 1856 1870 1885 1663 1900 1900 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 49 274 154 134 231 26 141 90 0 33 123 45 Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Percent Heavy Veh, % 7 4 3 3 6 21 3 2 1 16 0 0 Cap, veh/h 470 631 732 420 775 87 236 250 197 236 184 Arrive On Green 0.34 0.34 0.34 0.06 0.49 0.49 0.13 0.13 0.00 0.12 0.12 0.12 Sat Flow, veh/h 1070 1841 1524 1767 1597 180 1767 1870 1598 1584 1900 1480 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 49 274 154 134 0 257 141 90 0 33 123 45 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1070 1841 1524 1767 0 1777 1767 1870 1598 1584 1900 1480 Q Serve(g_s), s 2.2 8.1 4.1 3.3 0.0 6.1 5.3 3.1 0.0 1.3 4.2 1.9 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 2.2 8.1 4.1 3.3 0.0 6.1 5.3 3.1 0.0 1.3 4.2 1.9 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.10 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 470 631 732 420 0 863 236 250 197 236 184 V/C Ratio(X) 0.10 0.43 0.21 0.32 0.00 0.30 0.60 0.36 0.17 0.52 0.24 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 470 631 732 420 0 863 606 641 543 651 507 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 15.9 17.8 10.7 13.2 0.0 10.8 28.6 27.6 0.0 27.4 28.7 27.7 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.4 2.2 0.7 2.0 0.0 0.9 0.9 0.3 0.0 0.1 0.7 0.3 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.6 3.5 1.8 1.4 0.0 2.3 2.2 1.3 0.0 0.5 1.9 0.7 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 16.3 20.0 11.3 15.2 0.0 11.7 29.5 28.0 0.0 27.6 29.4 28.0 LnGrp LOS B B B B A B C C C C C Approach Vol, veh/h 477 391 231 A 201 Approach Delay, s/veh 16.8 12.9 28.9 28.8 Approach LOS B B C C Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 10.0 30.0 14.7 40.0 15.3 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 4.0 24.0 24.0 34.0 24.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 5.3 10.1 6.2 8.1 7.3 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 2.0 0.5 1.5 0.4 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 19.6 HCM 6th LOS B Notes Unsignalized Delay for [NBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay. JPA Aspen Heights 2023 Background - MID.syn Synchro 10 Report - 10/12/2021 TG Page 7 Attachment E JPA Aspen Heights 2023 Background Midday 6: Maury Ave/Alderman Road & Stadium Drive HCM 6th AWSC Intersection Intersection Delay, s/veh 9.1 Intersection LOS A Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 20 12 2 53 22 21 5 158 26 17 151 40 Future Vol, veh/h 20 12 2 53 22 21 5 158 26 17 151 40 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 6 0 6 2 15 Mvmt Flow 22 13 2 58 24 23 5 172 28 18 164 43 Number of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 Approach EB WB NB SB Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB Opposing Lanes 1 1 1 1 Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB Conflicting Lanes Left 1 1 1 1 Conflicting Approach RightNB SB WB EB Conflicting Lanes Right 1 1 1 1 HCM Control Delay 8.4 8.9 9 9.3 HCM LOS A A A A Lane NBLn1 EBLn1WBLn1 SBLn1 Vol Left, % 3% 59% 55% 8% Vol Thru, % 84% 35% 23% 73% Vol Right, % 14% 6% 22% 19% Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Traffic Vol by Lane 189 34 96 208 LT Vol 5 20 53 17 Through Vol 158 12 22 151 RT Vol 26 2 21 40 Lane Flow Rate 205 37 104 226 Geometry Grp 1 1 1 1 Degree of Util (X) 0.253 0.052 0.145 0.282 Departure Headway (Hd) 4.432 5.097 4.997 4.486 Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Cap 809 700 716 800 Service Time 2.464 3.147 3.04 2.518 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.253 0.053 0.145 0.282 HCM Control Delay 9 8.4 8.9 9.3 HCM Lane LOS A A A A HCM 95th-tile Q 1 0.2 0.5 1.2 JPA Aspen Heights 2023 Background - MID.syn Synchro 10 Report - 10/12/2021 TG Page 8 Attachment E JPA Aspen Heights 2023 Background Midday 7: Washington Ave & Stadium Drive HCM 6th TWSC Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.6 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 47 9 7 93 3 2 Future Vol, veh/h 47 9 7 93 3 2 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 39 39 0 13 1 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - - - - 0 - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 91 91 91 91 91 91 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 0 0 3 0 50 Mvmt Flow 52 10 8 102 3 2 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 101 0 227 97 Stage 1 - - - - 96 - Stage 2 - - - - 131 - Critical Hdwy - - 4.1 - 6.4 6.7 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.4 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.4 - Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.2 - 3.5 3.75 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1504 - 766 843 Stage 1 - - - - 933 - Stage 2 - - - - 900 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1448 - 725 811 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 725 - Stage 1 - - - - 898 - Stage 2 - - - - 884 - Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 0.5 9.8 HCM LOS A Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity (veh/h) 757 - - 1448 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.007 - - 0.005 - HCM Control Delay (s) 9.8 - - 7.5 0 HCM Lane LOS A - - A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - 0 - JPA Aspen Heights 2023 Background - MID.syn Synchro 10 Report - 10/12/2021 TG Page 9 Attachment E JPA Aspen Heights 2023 Background Midday 8: Washington Ave & Site Entrance HCM 6th TWSC Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 8 16 0 Future Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 8 16 0 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 0 - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 0 0 0 0 0 Mvmt Flow 0 0 0 9 17 0 Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 26 17 17 0 - 0 Stage 1 17 - - - - - Stage 2 9 - - - - - Critical Hdwy 6.4 6.2 4.1 - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.4 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.4 - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.5 3.3 2.2 - - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 995 1068 1613 - - - Stage 1 1011 - - - - - Stage 2 1019 - - - - - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 995 1068 1613 - - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 995 - - - - - Stage 1 1011 - - - - - Stage 2 1019 - - - - - Approach EB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0 0 0 HCM LOS A Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1613 - - - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - - - - HCM Control Delay (s) 0 - 0 - - HCM Lane LOS A - A - - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - - - JPA Aspen Heights 2023 Background - MID.syn Synchro 10 Report - 10/12/2021 TG Page 10 Attachment E JPA Aspen Heights 2023 Background Midday Queuing and Blocking Report Intersection: 1: Shamrock Rd & Jefferson Park Ave Movement EB WB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR L TR LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 284 68 207 133 53 Average Queue (ft) 121 25 76 61 18 95th Queue (ft) 243 59 153 112 48 Link Distance (ft) 304 532 559 534 Upstream Blk Time (%) 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 1 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 75 Storage Blk Time (%) 0 7 Queuing Penalty (veh) 1 4 Intersection: 2: Private Entrance/Harmon St & Jefferson Park Ave Movement EB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 63 82 21 35 Average Queue (ft) 8 6 2 8 95th Queue (ft) 39 36 14 31 Link Distance (ft) 77 304 320 536 Upstream Blk Time (%) 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 1 Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 3: Private Entrance/Washington Ave & Jefferson Park Ave Movement EB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 32 11 55 38 Average Queue (ft) 2 1 7 10 95th Queue (ft) 15 9 34 34 Link Distance (ft) 174 77 261 281 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) JPA Aspen Heights 2023 Background - MID.syn SimTraffic Report - 10/12/2021 TG Page 1 Attachment E JPA Aspen Heights 2023 Background Midday Queuing and Blocking Report Intersection: 4: Private Entrance/Observatory Ave & Jefferson Park Ave Movement EB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 29 51 33 9 Average Queue (ft) 1 2 5 0 95th Queue (ft) 19 24 24 6 Link Distance (ft) 432 174 314 534 Upstream Blk Time (%) 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 5: Jefferson Park Ave & Fontaine Ave & Maury Ave Movement EB EB EB WB WB NB NB SB SB SB Directions Served L T R L TR L T L T R Maximum Queue (ft) 141 282 120 87 256 145 105 95 174 92 Average Queue (ft) 34 114 48 58 102 71 47 26 70 28 95th Queue (ft) 93 218 122 99 209 122 90 71 133 71 Link Distance (ft) 774 432 770 538 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 150 120 88 355 117 125 Storage Blk Time (%) 0 6 0 2 7 0 2 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 11 1 5 9 0 1 0 Intersection: 6: Maury Ave/Alderman Road & Stadium Drive Movement EB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 49 73 120 119 Average Queue (ft) 22 38 57 54 95th Queue (ft) 46 63 93 93 Link Distance (ft) 544 504 452 665 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) JPA Aspen Heights 2023 Background - MID.syn SimTraffic Report - 10/12/2021 TG Page 2 Attachment E JPA Aspen Heights 2023 Background Midday Queuing and Blocking Report Intersection: 7: Washington Ave & Stadium Drive Movement EB WB NB Directions Served TR LT LR Maximum Queue (ft) 6 15 46 Average Queue (ft) 0 0 6 95th Queue (ft) 5 6 29 Link Distance (ft) 504 658 455 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 8: Washington Ave & Site Entrance Movement Directions Served Maximum Queue (ft) Average Queue (ft) 95th Queue (ft) Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Network Summary Network wide Queuing Penalty: 35 JPA Aspen Heights 2023 Background - MID.syn SimTraffic Report - 10/12/2021 TG Page 3 Attachment E JPA Aspen Heights 2023 Background PM 1: Shamrock Rd & Jefferson Park Ave Queues Lane Group EBT WBL WBT NBT SBT Lane Group Flow (vph) 375 111 599 133 72 v/c Ratio 0.45 0.18 0.53 0.56 0.27 Control Delay 13.3 6.2 9.6 39.5 28.5 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 13.3 6.2 9.6 39.5 28.5 Queue Length 50th (ft) 94 15 119 61 29 Queue Length 95th (ft) 212 47 298 114 63 Internal Link Dist (ft) 301 481 515 490 Turn Bay Length (ft) 75 Base Capacity (vph) 841 604 1130 423 478 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.45 0.18 0.53 0.31 0.15 Intersection Summary JPA Aspen Heights 2023 Background - PM.syn Synchro 10 Report - 10/12/2021 TG Page 1 Attachment E JPA Aspen Heights 2023 Background PM 1: Shamrock Rd & Jefferson Park Ave HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 21 276 55 104 551 12 43 25 56 9 52 7 Future Volume (veh/h) 21 276 55 104 551 12 43 25 56 9 52 7 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 0.98 0.90 0.99 0.90 0.89 0.85 0.91 0.84 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1900 1870 1900 1885 1870 1781 1870 1900 1841 1900 1900 1900 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 22 294 59 111 586 13 46 27 60 10 55 7 Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Percent Heavy Veh, % 0 2 0 1 2 8 2 0 4 0 0 0 Cap, veh/h 68 715 138 640 1137 25 149 93 152 77 346 40 Arrive On Green 0.51 0.51 0.51 0.05 0.63 0.63 0.24 0.24 0.24 0.24 0.24 0.24 Sat Flow, veh/h 47 1404 271 1795 1818 40 392 393 646 124 1466 171 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 375 0 0 111 0 599 133 0 0 72 0 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1722 0 0 1795 0 1858 1432 0 0 1761 0 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.4 0.0 15.4 2.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 11.3 0.0 0.0 2.4 0.0 15.4 6.3 0.0 0.0 2.7 0.0 0.0 Prop In Lane 0.06 0.16 1.00 0.02 0.35 0.45 0.14 0.10 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 922 0 0 640 0 1162 394 0 0 463 0 0 V/C Ratio(X) 0.41 0.00 0.00 0.17 0.00 0.52 0.34 0.00 0.00 0.16 0.00 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 922 0 0 640 0 1162 452 0 0 534 0 0 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 13.2 0.0 0.0 8.2 0.0 8.9 27.5 0.0 0.0 26.3 0.0 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 1.3 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.0 1.6 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 4.5 0.0 0.0 0.9 0.0 5.7 2.3 0.0 0.0 1.2 0.0 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 14.5 0.0 0.0 8.7 0.0 10.6 28.0 0.0 0.0 26.4 0.0 0.0 LnGrp LOS B A A A A B C A A C A A Approach Vol, veh/h 375 710 133 72 Approach Delay, s/veh 14.5 10.3 28.0 26.4 Approach LOS B B C C Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 10.0 50.0 26.4 60.0 26.4 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 4.0 44.0 24.0 54.0 24.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 4.4 13.3 4.7 17.4 8.3 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 2.5 0.1 4.4 0.4 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 14.2 HCM 6th LOS B JPA Aspen Heights 2023 Background - PM.syn Synchro 10 Report - 10/12/2021 TG Page 2 Attachment E JPA Aspen Heights 2023 Background PM 2: Private Entrance/Harmon St & Jefferson Park Ave HCM 6th TWSC Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.7 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 7 315 1 13 573 4 0 0 8 6 1 15 Future Vol, veh/h 7 315 1 13 573 4 0 0 8 6 1 15 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 43 0 44 44 0 43 0 0 21 21 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 Mvmt Flow 8 342 1 14 623 4 0 0 9 7 1 16 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 670 0 0 387 0 0 1065 1101 408 1080 1099 668 Stage 1 - - - - - - 403 403 - 696 696 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 662 698 - 384 403 - Critical Hdwy 4.1 - - 4.1 - - 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.27 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 - - 2.2 - - 3.5 4 3.3 3.5 4 3.363 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 930 - - 1183 - - 202 214 648 197 214 450 Stage 1 - - - - - - 628 603 - 435 446 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 454 445 - 643 603 - Platoon blocked, % - - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 892 - - 1133 - - 181 191 608 178 191 432 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 181 191 - 178 191 - Stage 1 - - - - - - 595 571 - 412 420 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 427 419 - 614 571 - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0.2 0.2 11 18.1 HCM LOS B C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 608 892 - - 1133 - - 299 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.014 0.009 - - 0.012 - - 0.08 HCM Control Delay (s) 11 9.1 0 - 8.2 0 - 18.1 HCM Lane LOS B A A - A A - C HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 0 - - 0 - - 0.3 JPA Aspen Heights 2023 Background - PM.syn Synchro 10 Report - 10/12/2021 TG Page 3 Attachment E JPA Aspen Heights 2023 Background PM 3: Private Entrance/Washington Ave & Jefferson Park Ave HCM 6th TWSC Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.4 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 8 318 1 2 592 2 0 0 1 7 0 7 Future Vol, veh/h 8 318 1 2 592 2 0 0 1 7 0 7 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 51 0 67 67 0 51 4 0 2 2 0 4 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Mvmt Flow 9 346 1 2 643 2 0 0 1 8 0 8 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 696 0 0 414 0 0 1088 1132 416 1066 1131 699 Stage 1 - - - - - - 432 432 - 699 699 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 656 700 - 367 432 - Critical Hdwy 4.1 - - 4.1 - - 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 - - 2.2 - - 3.5 4 3.3 3.5 4 3.3 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 909 - - 1156 - - 195 205 641 202 205 443 Stage 1 - - - - - - 606 586 - 434 445 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 458 444 - 657 586 - Platoon blocked, % - - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 865 - - 1082 - - 176 180 599 189 180 420 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 176 180 - 189 180 - Stage 1 - - - - - - 560 541 - 408 422 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 447 421 - 646 541 - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0.2 0 11 19.6 HCM LOS B C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 599 865 - - 1082 - - 261 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.002 0.01 - - 0.002 - - 0.058 HCM Control Delay (s) 11 9.2 0 - 8.3 0 - 19.6 HCM Lane LOS B A A - A A - C HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 0 - - 0 - - 0.2 JPA Aspen Heights 2023 Background - PM.syn Synchro 10 Report - 10/12/2021 TG Page 4 Attachment E JPA Aspen Heights 2023 Background PM 4: Private Entrance/Observatory Ave & Jefferson Park Ave HCM 6th TWSC Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.7 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 9 312 3 8 611 5 4 0 6 6 1 7 Future Vol, veh/h 9 312 3 8 611 5 4 0 6 6 1 7 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 46 0 91 91 0 46 4 0 2 2 0 4 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Mvmt Flow 10 339 3 9 664 5 4 0 7 7 1 8 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 715 0 0 433 0 0 1145 1185 434 1097 1184 717 Stage 1 - - - - - - 452 452 - 731 731 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 693 733 - 366 453 - Critical Hdwy 4.1 - - 4.1 - - 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 - - 2.2 - - 3.5 4 3.3 3.5 4 3.3 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 895 - - 1137 - - 178 191 626 192 191 433 Stage 1 - - - - - - 591 574 - 416 430 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 437 429 - 657 573 - Platoon blocked, % - - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 856 - - 1038 - - 155 162 571 177 162 412 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 155 162 - 177 162 - Stage 1 - - - - - - 532 517 - 392 405 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 420 405 - 639 516 - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0.3 0.1 18.6 20.7 HCM LOS C C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 275 856 - - 1038 - - 245 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.04 0.011 - - 0.008 - - 0.062 HCM Control Delay (s) 18.6 9.3 0 - 8.5 0 - 20.7 HCM Lane LOS C A A - A A - C HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 0 - - 0 - - 0.2 JPA Aspen Heights 2023 Background - PM.syn Synchro 10 Report - 10/12/2021 TG Page 5 Attachment E JPA Aspen Heights 2023 Background PM 5: Jefferson Park Ave & Fontaine Ave & Maury Ave Queues Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Group Flow (vph) 26 159 269 235 380 194 106 111 52 322 52 v/c Ratio 0.09 0.30 0.34 0.55 0.52 0.64 0.34 0.31 0.14 0.80 0.12 Control Delay 28.2 29.0 4.3 27.7 24.7 43.7 34.7 3.8 29.3 48.1 0.5 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 28.2 29.0 4.3 27.7 24.7 43.7 34.7 3.8 29.3 48.1 0.5 Queue Length 50th (ft) 10 67 17 86 150 98 51 0 23 164 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) 35 143 50 179 295 175 101 15 57 285 0 Internal Link Dist (ft) 751 428 732 533 Turn Bay Length (ft) 150 120 88 355 225 117 125 Base Capacity (vph) 287 528 963 425 730 501 523 490 482 533 533 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.09 0.30 0.28 0.55 0.52 0.39 0.20 0.23 0.11 0.60 0.10 Intersection Summary JPA Aspen Heights 2023 Background - PM.syn Synchro 10 Report - 10/12/2021 TG Page 6 Attachment E JPA Aspen Heights 2023 Background PM 5: Jefferson Park Ave & Fontaine Ave & Maury Ave HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 25 151 256 223 328 33 184 101 105 49 306 49 Future Volume (veh/h) 25 151 256 223 328 33 184 101 105 49 306 49 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 0.98 0.94 0.99 0.96 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.81 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1900 1870 1900 1885 1870 1678 1870 1856 1900 1811 1885 1841 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 26 159 269 235 345 35 194 106 0 52 322 52 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 0 2 0 1 2 15 2 3 0 6 1 4 Cap, veh/h 305 508 721 358 640 65 342 356 379 414 278 Arrive On Green 0.27 0.27 0.27 0.05 0.38 0.38 0.19 0.19 0.00 0.22 0.22 0.22 Sat Flow, veh/h 1002 1870 1519 1795 1662 169 1781 1856 1610 1725 1885 1265 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 26 159 269 235 0 380 194 106 0 52 322 52 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1002 1870 1519 1795 0 1831 1781 1856 1610 1725 1885 1265 Q Serve(g_s), s 1.8 6.0 10.2 4.0 0.0 14.2 8.7 4.3 0.0 2.1 14.2 3.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 6.1 6.0 10.2 4.0 0.0 14.2 8.7 4.3 0.0 2.1 14.2 3.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.09 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 305 508 721 358 0 704 342 356 379 414 278 V/C Ratio(X) 0.09 0.31 0.37 0.66 0.00 0.54 0.57 0.30 0.14 0.78 0.19 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 305 508 721 358 0 704 484 504 469 512 344 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 27.3 25.6 15.5 27.5 0.0 21.1 32.4 30.6 0.0 27.7 32.4 28.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.5 1.6 1.5 9.1 0.0 3.0 0.6 0.2 0.0 0.1 4.6 0.1 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.5 2.8 5.1 3.4 0.0 6.3 3.7 1.9 0.0 0.9 6.9 0.9 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 27.9 27.2 16.9 36.6 0.0 24.0 32.9 30.8 0.0 27.8 37.0 28.2 LnGrp LOS C C B D A C C C C D C Approach Vol, veh/h 454 615 300 A 426 Approach Delay, s/veh 21.2 28.8 32.2 34.8 Approach LOS C C C C Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 10.0 30.0 25.4 40.0 22.9 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 4.0 24.0 24.0 34.0 24.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 6.0 12.2 16.2 16.2 10.7 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 1.6 1.0 2.1 0.5 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 28.9 HCM 6th LOS C Notes Unsignalized Delay for [NBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay. JPA Aspen Heights 2023 Background - PM.syn Synchro 10 Report - 10/12/2021 TG Page 7 Attachment E JPA Aspen Heights 2023 Background PM 6: Maury Ave/Alderman Road & Stadium Drive HCM 6th AWSC Intersection Intersection Delay, s/veh 22 Intersection LOS C Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 20 16 3 129 130 20 6 155 16 61 329 94 Future Vol, veh/h 20 16 3 129 130 20 6 155 16 61 329 94 Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Heavy Vehicles, % 5 0 0 2 0 0 0 6 0 34 1 7 Mvmt Flow 21 17 3 137 138 21 6 165 17 65 350 100 Number of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 Approach EB WB NB SB Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB Opposing Lanes 1 1 1 1 Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB Conflicting Lanes Left 1 1 1 1 Conflicting Approach RightNB SB WB EB Conflicting Lanes Right 1 1 1 1 HCM Control Delay 10.5 15.2 11.4 30.8 HCM LOS B C B D Lane NBLn1 EBLn1WBLn1 SBLn1 Vol Left, % 3% 51% 46% 13% Vol Thru, % 88% 41% 47% 68% Vol Right, % 9% 8% 7% 19% Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Traffic Vol by Lane 177 39 279 484 LT Vol 6 20 129 61 Through Vol 155 16 130 329 RT Vol 16 3 20 94 Lane Flow Rate 188 41 297 515 Geometry Grp 1 1 1 1 Degree of Util (X) 0.304 0.079 0.502 0.828 Departure Headway (Hd) 5.817 6.877 6.085 5.79 Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Cap 614 524 591 623 Service Time 3.894 4.877 4.154 3.847 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.306 0.078 0.503 0.827 HCM Control Delay 11.4 10.5 15.2 30.8 HCM Lane LOS B B C D HCM 95th-tile Q 1.3 0.3 2.8 8.7 JPA Aspen Heights 2023 Background - PM.syn Synchro 10 Report - 10/12/2021 TG Page 8 Attachment E JPA Aspen Heights 2023 Background PM 7: Washington Ave & Stadium Drive HCM 6th TWSC Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.5 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 80 2 5 260 5 10 Future Vol, veh/h 80 2 5 260 5 10 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 42 42 0 9 1 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - - - - 0 - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 26 0 0 1 0 0 Mvmt Flow 87 2 5 283 5 11 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 131 0 432 131 Stage 1 - - - - 130 - Stage 2 - - - - 302 - Critical Hdwy - - 4.1 - 6.4 6.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.4 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.4 - Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.2 - 3.5 3.3 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1467 - 584 924 Stage 1 - - - - 901 - Stage 2 - - - - 755 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1408 - 554 886 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 554 - Stage 1 - - - - 865 - Stage 2 - - - - 745 - Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 0.1 10 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity (veh/h) 738 - - 1408 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.022 - - 0.004 - HCM Control Delay (s) 10 - - 7.6 0 HCM Lane LOS B - - A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 - - 0 - JPA Aspen Heights 2023 Background - PM.syn Synchro 10 Report - 10/12/2021 TG Page 9 Attachment E JPA Aspen Heights 2023 Background PM 8: Washington Ave & Site Entrance HCM 6th TWSC Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 10 7 0 Future Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 10 7 0 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 0 - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 0 0 0 0 0 Mvmt Flow 0 0 0 11 8 0 Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 19 8 8 0 - 0 Stage 1 8 - - - - - Stage 2 11 - - - - - Critical Hdwy 6.4 6.2 4.1 - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.4 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.4 - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.5 3.3 2.2 - - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1004 1080 1625 - - - Stage 1 1020 - - - - - Stage 2 1017 - - - - - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1004 1080 1625 - - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 1004 - - - - - Stage 1 1020 - - - - - Stage 2 1017 - - - - - Approach EB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0 0 0 HCM LOS A Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1625 - - - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - - - - HCM Control Delay (s) 0 - 0 - - HCM Lane LOS A - A - - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - - - JPA Aspen Heights 2023 Background - PM.syn Synchro 10 Report - 10/12/2021 TG Page 10 Attachment E JPA Aspen Heights 2023 Background PM Queuing and Blocking Report Intersection: 1: Shamrock Rd & Jefferson Park Ave Movement EB WB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR L TR LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 261 74 326 159 111 Average Queue (ft) 123 45 154 75 40 95th Queue (ft) 228 80 273 133 84 Link Distance (ft) 304 532 559 534 Upstream Blk Time (%) 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 75 Storage Blk Time (%) 1 18 Queuing Penalty (veh) 6 19 Intersection: 2: Private Entrance/Harmon St & Jefferson Park Ave Movement EB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 62 199 33 55 Average Queue (ft) 8 29 7 19 95th Queue (ft) 39 130 28 47 Link Distance (ft) 77 304 320 536 Upstream Blk Time (%) 0 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 1 1 Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 3: Private Entrance/Washington Ave & Jefferson Park Ave Movement EB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 119 78 19 44 Average Queue (ft) 12 13 1 12 95th Queue (ft) 59 60 10 38 Link Distance (ft) 174 77 261 281 Upstream Blk Time (%) 0 2 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 13 Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) JPA Aspen Heights 2023 Background - PM.syn SimTraffic Report - 10/12/2021 TG Page 1 Attachment E JPA Aspen Heights 2023 Background PM Queuing and Blocking Report Intersection: 4: Private Entrance/Observatory Ave & Jefferson Park Ave Movement EB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 77 166 46 42 Average Queue (ft) 7 41 11 11 95th Queue (ft) 38 152 47 35 Link Distance (ft) 432 174 314 534 Upstream Blk Time (%) 3 Queuing Penalty (veh) 19 Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 5: Jefferson Park Ave & Fontaine Ave & Maury Ave Movement EB EB EB WB WB NB NB SB SB SB Directions Served L T R L TR L T L T R Maximum Queue (ft) 80 198 120 88 442 190 129 117 350 125 Average Queue (ft) 19 76 59 81 298 98 58 44 191 54 95th Queue (ft) 52 155 116 102 491 164 110 115 305 139 Link Distance (ft) 774 432 770 538 Upstream Blk Time (%) 6 Queuing Penalty (veh) 40 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 150 120 88 355 117 125 Storage Blk Time (%) 0 2 0 20 37 0 28 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 6 1 72 82 1 28 1 Intersection: 6: Maury Ave/Alderman Road & Stadium Drive Movement EB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 59 133 135 294 Average Queue (ft) 25 70 66 131 95th Queue (ft) 52 113 109 245 Link Distance (ft) 544 504 452 665 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) JPA Aspen Heights 2023 Background - PM.syn SimTraffic Report - 10/12/2021 TG Page 2 Attachment E JPA Aspen Heights 2023 Background PM Queuing and Blocking Report Intersection: 7: Washington Ave & Stadium Drive Movement EB WB NB Directions Served TR LT LR Maximum Queue (ft) 11 20 40 Average Queue (ft) 0 1 13 95th Queue (ft) 6 13 38 Link Distance (ft) 504 658 455 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 8: Washington Ave & Site Entrance Movement Directions Served Maximum Queue (ft) Average Queue (ft) 95th Queue (ft) Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Network Summary Network wide Queuing Penalty: 288 JPA Aspen Heights 2023 Background - PM.syn SimTraffic Report - 10/12/2021 TG Page 3 Attachment E JPA Aspen Heights 2028 Background AM 1: Shamrock Rd & Jefferson Park Ave Queues Lane Group EBT WBL WBT NBT SBT Lane Group Flow (vph) 523 33 262 195 27 v/c Ratio 0.59 0.06 0.25 0.67 0.09 Control Delay 17.3 6.4 7.2 42.2 24.5 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 17.3 6.4 7.2 42.2 24.5 Queue Length 50th (ft) 167 5 47 93 10 Queue Length 95th (ft) 325 18 106 160 31 Internal Link Dist (ft) 301 481 515 490 Turn Bay Length (ft) 75 Base Capacity (vph) 881 512 1063 446 469 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.59 0.06 0.25 0.44 0.06 Intersection Summary JPA Aspen Heights 2028 Background - AM.syn Synchro 10 Report - 10/12/2021 TG Page 1 Attachment E JPA Aspen Heights 2028 Background AM 1: Shamrock Rd & Jefferson Park Ave HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 8 457 32 31 246 3 66 46 74 4 19 3 Future Volume (veh/h) 8 457 32 31 246 3 66 46 74 4 19 3 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 0.96 0.91 1.00 0.93 0.96 0.93 0.97 0.95 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1707 1870 1811 1856 1811 1900 1870 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 8 481 34 33 259 3 69 48 78 4 20 3 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 13 2 6 3 6 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 Cap, veh/h 49 914 64 568 1177 14 143 97 121 74 286 39 Arrive On Green 0.54 0.54 0.54 0.05 0.66 0.66 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 Sat Flow, veh/h 8 1701 119 1767 1785 21 433 500 622 124 1476 200 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 523 0 0 33 0 262 195 0 0 27 0 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1828 0 0 1767 0 1806 1554 0 0 1799 0 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.0 4.7 6.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 15.1 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.0 4.7 9.3 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 Prop In Lane 0.02 0.07 1.00 0.01 0.35 0.40 0.15 0.11 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 1027 0 0 568 0 1191 361 0 0 399 0 0 V/C Ratio(X) 0.51 0.00 0.00 0.06 0.00 0.22 0.54 0.00 0.00 0.07 0.00 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 1027 0 0 568 0 1191 511 0 0 570 0 0 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 12.3 0.0 0.0 6.3 0.0 5.6 30.2 0.0 0.0 27.0 0.0 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 1.8 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.4 1.3 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 5.9 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 1.6 3.6 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 14.1 0.0 0.0 6.5 0.0 6.0 31.5 0.0 0.0 27.1 0.0 0.0 LnGrp LOS B A A A A A C A A C A A Approach Vol, veh/h 523 295 195 27 Approach Delay, s/veh 14.1 6.0 31.5 27.1 Approach LOS B A C C Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 10.0 50.0 21.9 60.0 21.9 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 4.0 44.0 24.0 54.0 24.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 2.6 17.1 3.0 6.7 11.3 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 3.5 0.0 1.6 0.5 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 15.4 HCM 6th LOS B JPA Aspen Heights 2028 Background - AM.syn Synchro 10 Report - 10/12/2021 TG Page 2 Attachment E JPA Aspen Heights 2028 Background AM 2: Private Entrance/Harmon St & Jefferson Park Ave HCM 6th TWSC Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.2 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 9 486 1 4 291 3 1 0 1 2 0 2 Future Vol, veh/h 9 486 1 4 291 3 1 0 1 2 0 2 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 61 0 20 20 0 61 0 0 17 17 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 3 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Mvmt Flow 10 523 1 4 313 3 1 0 1 2 0 2 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 377 0 0 544 0 0 888 949 561 945 948 376 Stage 1 - - - - - - 564 564 - 384 384 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 324 385 - 561 564 - Critical Hdwy 4.1 - - 4.1 - - 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 - - 2.2 - - 3.5 4 3.3 3.5 4 3.3 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1193 - - 1035 - - 267 262 531 244 263 675 Stage 1 - - - - - - 514 512 - 643 615 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 692 614 - 516 512 - Platoon blocked, % - - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1124 - - 1015 - - 257 238 512 223 239 636 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 257 238 - 223 239 - Stage 1 - - - - - - 498 496 - 598 576 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 686 575 - 500 496 - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0.1 0.1 15.6 16.1 HCM LOS C C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 342 1124 - - 1015 - - 330 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.006 0.009 - - 0.004 - - 0.013 HCM Control Delay (s) 15.6 8.2 0 - 8.6 0 - 16.1 HCM Lane LOS C A A - A A - C HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 0 - - 0 - - 0 JPA Aspen Heights 2028 Background - AM.syn Synchro 10 Report - 10/12/2021 TG Page 3 Attachment E JPA Aspen Heights 2028 Background AM 3: Private Entrance/Washington Ave & Jefferson Park Ave HCM 6th TWSC Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.1 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 5 490 2 2 295 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 Future Vol, veh/h 5 490 2 2 295 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 46 0 27 27 0 46 2 0 2 2 0 2 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 20 3 100 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Mvmt Flow 5 533 2 2 321 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 369 0 0 562 0 0 899 944 563 919 944 370 Stage 1 - - - - - - 571 571 - 372 372 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 328 373 - 547 572 - Critical Hdwy 4.3 - - 4.1 - - 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.38 - - 2.2 - - 3.5 4 3.3 3.5 4 3.3 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1097 - - 1019 - - 262 264 530 254 264 680 Stage 1 - - - - - - 509 508 - 653 622 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 689 622 - 525 508 - Platoon blocked, % - - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1049 - - 993 - - 253 244 515 240 244 649 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 253 244 - 240 244 - Stage 1 - - - - - - 492 491 - 620 593 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 686 593 - 519 491 - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0.1 0.1 12 0 HCM LOS B A Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 515 1049 - - 993 - - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.002 0.005 - - 0.002 - - - HCM Control Delay (s) 12 8.4 0 - 8.6 0 - 0 HCM Lane LOS B A A - A A - A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 0 - - 0 - - - JPA Aspen Heights 2028 Background - AM.syn Synchro 10 Report - 10/12/2021 TG Page 4 Attachment E JPA Aspen Heights 2028 Background AM 4: Private Entrance/Observatory Ave & Jefferson Park Ave HCM 6th TWSC Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.3 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 6 509 0 4 282 1 1 0 3 2 0 3 Future Vol, veh/h 6 509 0 4 282 1 1 0 3 2 0 3 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 60 0 34 34 0 60 2 0 1 1 0 2 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 2 0 25 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Mvmt Flow 7 553 0 4 307 1 1 0 3 2 0 3 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 368 0 0 587 0 0 920 977 588 946 977 370 Stage 1 - - - - - - 601 601 - 376 376 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 319 376 - 570 601 - Critical Hdwy 4.1 - - 4.35 - - 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 - - 2.425 - - 3.5 4 3.3 3.5 4 3.3 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1202 - - 884 - - 254 253 513 243 253 680 Stage 1 - - - - - - 491 493 - 649 620 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 697 620 - 510 493 - Platoon blocked, % - - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1133 - - 855 - - 241 227 496 225 227 640 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 241 227 - 225 227 - Stage 1 - - - - - - 471 473 - 606 581 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 688 581 - 502 473 - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0.1 0.1 14.3 14.9 HCM LOS B B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 392 1133 - - 855 - - 368 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.011 0.006 - - 0.005 - - 0.015 HCM Control Delay (s) 14.3 8.2 0 - 9.2 0 - 14.9 HCM Lane LOS B A A - A A - B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 0 - - 0 - - 0 JPA Aspen Heights 2028 Background - AM.syn Synchro 10 Report - 10/12/2021 TG Page 5 Attachment E JPA Aspen Heights 2028 Background AM 5: Jefferson Park Ave & Fontaine Ave & Maury Ave Queues Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Group Flow (vph) 75 323 150 59 260 340 255 195 22 54 15 v/c Ratio 0.20 0.50 0.15 0.17 0.33 0.77 0.56 0.39 0.12 0.24 0.05 Control Delay 26.9 29.2 1.6 18.5 19.1 42.1 32.5 6.9 34.1 36.1 0.3 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 26.9 29.2 1.6 18.5 19.1 42.1 32.5 6.9 34.1 36.1 0.3 Queue Length 50th (ft) 28 138 0 17 84 155 109 0 11 26 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) 78 280 19 52 188 #326 218 54 31 60 0 Internal Link Dist (ft) 751 428 732 533 Turn Bay Length (ft) 150 120 88 355 225 117 125 Base Capacity (vph) 381 640 1046 354 785 558 581 585 490 570 526 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.20 0.50 0.14 0.17 0.33 0.61 0.44 0.33 0.04 0.09 0.03 Intersection Summary # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. JPA Aspen Heights 2028 Background - AM.syn Synchro 10 Report - 10/12/2021 TG Page 6 Attachment E JPA Aspen Heights 2028 Background AM 5: Jefferson Park Ave & Fontaine Ave & Maury Ave HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 69 297 138 54 217 22 313 235 179 20 50 14 Future Volume (veh/h) 69 297 138 54 217 22 313 235 179 20 50 14 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 0.99 0.96 1.00 0.96 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.87 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1856 1856 1885 1870 1841 1559 1885 1870 1885 1678 1841 1693 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 75 323 150 59 236 24 340 255 0 22 54 15 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 3 3 1 2 4 23 1 2 1 15 4 14 Cap, veh/h 433 581 845 309 695 71 411 428 195 224 152 Arrive On Green 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.04 0.42 0.42 0.23 0.23 0.00 0.12 0.12 0.12 Sat Flow, veh/h 1096 1856 1532 1781 1637 166 1795 1870 1598 1598 1841 1250 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 75 323 150 59 0 260 340 255 0 22 54 15 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1096 1856 1532 1781 0 1803 1795 1870 1598 1598 1841 1250 Q Serve(g_s), s 4.0 11.6 4.0 1.7 0.0 7.8 14.4 9.7 0.0 1.0 2.1 0.9 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 4.0 11.6 4.0 1.7 0.0 7.8 14.4 9.7 0.0 1.0 2.1 0.9 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.09 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 433 581 845 309 0 766 411 428 195 224 152 V/C Ratio(X) 0.17 0.56 0.18 0.19 0.00 0.34 0.83 0.60 0.11 0.24 0.10 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 433 581 845 333 0 766 538 561 479 552 375 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 20.3 22.9 9.3 17.4 0.0 15.5 29.4 27.6 0.0 31.3 31.8 31.2 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.9 3.8 0.5 0.1 0.0 1.2 6.3 0.5 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.1 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 1.1 5.4 2.1 0.7 0.0 3.2 6.7 4.3 0.0 0.4 1.0 0.3 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 21.1 26.7 9.8 17.5 0.0 16.7 35.7 28.1 0.0 31.4 32.0 31.4 LnGrp LOS C C A B A B D C C C C Approach Vol, veh/h 548 319 595 A 91 Approach Delay, s/veh 21.3 16.9 32.4 31.8 Approach LOS C B C C Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 8.9 31.1 15.8 40.0 24.3 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 4.0 24.0 24.0 34.0 24.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 3.7 13.6 4.1 9.8 16.4 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 2.0 0.2 1.5 1.0 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 25.3 HCM 6th LOS C Notes Unsignalized Delay for [NBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay. JPA Aspen Heights 2028 Background - AM.syn Synchro 10 Report - 10/12/2021 TG Page 7 Attachment E JPA Aspen Heights 2028 Background AM 6: Maury Ave/Alderman Road & Stadium Drive HCM 6th AWSC Intersection Intersection Delay, s/veh 12 Intersection LOS B Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 113 71 6 18 9 31 2 308 50 26 72 29 Future Vol, veh/h 113 71 6 18 9 31 2 308 50 26 72 29 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 0 0 22 11 0 0 3 0 54 4 21 Mvmt Flow 123 77 7 20 10 34 2 335 54 28 78 32 Number of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 Approach EB WB NB SB Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB Opposing Lanes 1 1 1 1 Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB Conflicting Lanes Left 1 1 1 1 Conflicting Approach RightNB SB WB EB Conflicting Lanes Right 1 1 1 1 HCM Control Delay 11.1 9.5 13.2 10.9 HCM LOS B A B B Lane NBLn1 EBLn1WBLn1 SBLn1 Vol Left, % 1% 59% 31% 20% Vol Thru, % 86% 37% 16% 57% Vol Right, % 14% 3% 53% 23% Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Traffic Vol by Lane 360 190 58 127 LT Vol 2 113 18 26 Through Vol 308 71 9 72 RT Vol 50 6 31 29 Lane Flow Rate 391 207 63 138 Geometry Grp 1 1 1 1 Degree of Util (X) 0.528 0.316 0.101 0.232 Departure Headway (Hd) 4.855 5.504 5.787 6.048 Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Cap 747 653 618 594 Service Time 2.855 3.536 3.827 4.08 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.523 0.317 0.102 0.232 HCM Control Delay 13.2 11.1 9.5 10.9 HCM Lane LOS B B A B HCM 95th-tile Q 3.1 1.4 0.3 0.9 JPA Aspen Heights 2028 Background - AM.syn Synchro 10 Report - 10/12/2021 TG Page 8 Attachment E JPA Aspen Heights 2028 Background AM 7: Washington Ave & Stadium Drive HCM 6th TWSC Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.3 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 145 3 1 51 1 4 Future Vol, veh/h 145 3 1 51 1 4 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 14 14 0 4 1 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - - - - 0 - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 10 0 0 8 0 0 Mvmt Flow 158 3 1 55 1 4 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 175 0 235 175 Stage 1 - - - - 174 - Stage 2 - - - - 61 - Critical Hdwy - - 4.1 - 6.4 6.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.4 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.4 - Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.2 - 3.5 3.3 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1414 - 758 874 Stage 1 - - - - 861 - Stage 2 - - - - 967 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1395 - 744 862 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 744 - Stage 1 - - - - 850 - Stage 2 - - - - 962 - Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 0.1 9.3 HCM LOS A Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity (veh/h) 835 - - 1395 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.007 - - 0.001 - HCM Control Delay (s) 9.3 - - 7.6 0 HCM Lane LOS A - - A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - 0 - JPA Aspen Heights 2028 Background - AM.syn Synchro 10 Report - 10/12/2021 TG Page 9 Attachment E JPA Aspen Heights 2028 Background AM 8: Washington Ave & Site Entrance HCM 6th TWSC Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 8 4 0 Future Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 8 4 0 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 0 - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 0 0 0 0 0 Mvmt Flow 0 0 0 9 4 0 Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 13 4 4 0 - 0 Stage 1 4 - - - - - Stage 2 9 - - - - - Critical Hdwy 6.4 6.2 4.1 - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.4 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.4 - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.5 3.3 2.2 - - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1011 1085 1631 - - - Stage 1 1024 - - - - - Stage 2 1019 - - - - - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1011 1085 1631 - - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 1011 - - - - - Stage 1 1024 - - - - - Stage 2 1019 - - - - - Approach EB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0 0 0 HCM LOS A Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1631 - - - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - - - - HCM Control Delay (s) 0 - 0 - - HCM Lane LOS A - A - - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - - - JPA Aspen Heights 2028 Background - AM.syn Synchro 10 Report - 10/12/2021 TG Page 10 Attachment E JPA Aspen Heights 2028 Background AM Queuing and Blocking Report Intersection: 1: Shamrock Rd & Jefferson Park Ave Movement EB WB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR L TR LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 298 58 146 187 59 Average Queue (ft) 149 16 51 100 19 95th Queue (ft) 270 45 110 163 50 Link Distance (ft) 304 532 559 534 Upstream Blk Time (%) 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 1 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 75 Storage Blk Time (%) 0 3 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 1 Intersection: 2: Private Entrance/Harmon St & Jefferson Park Ave Movement EB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 64 44 27 33 Average Queue (ft) 9 4 2 5 95th Queue (ft) 41 24 15 24 Link Distance (ft) 77 304 320 536 Upstream Blk Time (%) 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 1 Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 3: Private Entrance/Washington Ave & Jefferson Park Ave Movement EB WB NB Directions Served LTR LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 48 17 21 Average Queue (ft) 4 1 1 95th Queue (ft) 24 10 9 Link Distance (ft) 174 77 261 Upstream Blk Time (%) 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) JPA Aspen Heights 2028 Background - AM.syn SimTraffic Report - 10/12/2021 TG Page 1 Attachment E JPA Aspen Heights 2028 Background AM Queuing and Blocking Report Intersection: 4: Private Entrance/Observatory Ave & Jefferson Park Ave Movement EB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 58 39 31 33 Average Queue (ft) 3 3 4 5 95th Queue (ft) 25 26 20 22 Link Distance (ft) 432 174 314 534 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 5: Jefferson Park Ave & Fontaine Ave & Maury Ave Movement EB EB EB WB WB NB NB NB SB SB SB Directions Served L T R L TR L T R L T R Maximum Queue (ft) 141 358 120 87 219 312 293 133 75 118 65 Average Queue (ft) 43 123 45 37 96 164 117 8 14 35 13 95th Queue (ft) 100 252 123 83 182 265 215 75 47 82 43 Link Distance (ft) 774 432 770 538 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 150 120 88 355 225 117 125 Storage Blk Time (%) 0 8 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 16 1 1 5 1 1 0 0 0 Intersection: 6: Maury Ave/Alderman Road & Stadium Drive Movement EB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 87 78 225 102 Average Queue (ft) 47 32 107 48 95th Queue (ft) 74 64 183 81 Link Distance (ft) 544 504 452 665 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) JPA Aspen Heights 2028 Background - AM.syn SimTraffic Report - 10/12/2021 TG Page 2 Attachment E JPA Aspen Heights 2028 Background AM Queuing and Blocking Report Intersection: 7: Washington Ave & Stadium Drive Movement EB WB NB Directions Served TR LT LR Maximum Queue (ft) 3 6 30 Average Queue (ft) 0 0 6 95th Queue (ft) 3 6 25 Link Distance (ft) 504 658 455 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 8: Washington Ave & Site Entrance Movement Directions Served Maximum Queue (ft) Average Queue (ft) 95th Queue (ft) Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Network Summary Network wide Queuing Penalty: 28 JPA Aspen Heights 2028 Background - AM.syn SimTraffic Report - 10/12/2021 TG Page 3 Attachment E JPA Aspen Heights 2028 Background Midday 1: Shamrock Rd & Jefferson Park Ave Queues Lane Group EBT WBL WBT NBT SBT Lane Group Flow (vph) 489 60 384 108 30 v/c Ratio 0.45 0.10 0.32 0.50 0.12 Control Delay 11.7 5.3 6.2 37.9 25.0 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 11.7 5.3 6.2 37.9 25.0 Queue Length 50th (ft) 129 7 59 49 11 Queue Length 95th (ft) 278 26 149 95 32 Internal Link Dist (ft) 301 481 515 490 Turn Bay Length (ft) 75 Base Capacity (vph) 1083 605 1197 440 497 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.45 0.10 0.32 0.25 0.06 Intersection Summary JPA Aspen Heights 2028 Background - MID.syn Synchro 10 Report - 10/12/2021 TG Page 1 Attachment E JPA Aspen Heights 2028 Background Midday 1: Shamrock Rd & Jefferson Park Ave HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 5 412 33 55 347 6 39 22 39 2 21 5 Future Volume (veh/h) 5 412 33 55 347 6 39 22 39 2 21 5 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 0.97 0.93 0.99 0.93 0.88 0.85 0.90 0.85 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1900 1841 1856 1841 1811 1900 1826 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 5 448 36 60 377 7 42 24 42 2 23 5 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 0 4 3 4 6 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 Cap, veh/h 46 905 72 566 1155 21 150 89 114 53 292 60 Arrive On Green 0.54 0.54 0.54 0.04 0.65 0.65 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 Sat Flow, veh/h 4 1663 133 1753 1769 33 444 440 563 31 1444 295 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 489 0 0 60 0 384 108 0 0 30 0 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1800 0 0 1753 0 1802 1447 0 0 1769 0 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.2 0.0 7.8 1.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 14.0 0.0 0.0 1.2 0.0 7.8 4.9 0.0 0.0 1.1 0.0 0.0 Prop In Lane 0.01 0.07 1.00 0.02 0.39 0.39 0.07 0.17 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 1023 0 0 566 0 1176 353 0 0 404 0 0 V/C Ratio(X) 0.48 0.00 0.00 0.11 0.00 0.33 0.31 0.00 0.00 0.07 0.00 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 1023 0 0 587 0 1176 476 0 0 556 0 0 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 11.8 0.0 0.0 6.7 0.0 6.3 28.2 0.0 0.0 26.8 0.0 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.7 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 5.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.0 2.6 1.9 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 12.1 0.0 0.0 6.7 0.0 7.1 28.7 0.0 0.0 26.9 0.0 0.0 LnGrp LOS B A A A A A C A A C A A Approach Vol, veh/h 489 444 108 30 Approach Delay, s/veh 12.1 7.0 28.7 26.9 Approach LOS B A C C Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 9.0 51.0 22.7 60.0 22.7 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 4.0 44.0 24.0 54.0 24.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 3.2 16.0 3.1 9.8 6.9 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 3.3 0.0 2.5 0.3 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 12.1 HCM 6th LOS B JPA Aspen Heights 2028 Background - MID.syn Synchro 10 Report - 10/12/2021 TG Page 2 Attachment E JPA Aspen Heights 2028 Background Midday 2: Private Entrance/Harmon St & Jefferson Park Ave HCM 6th TWSC Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.3 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 6 425 3 8 362 1 1 0 1 2 0 8 Future Vol, veh/h 6 425 3 8 362 1 1 0 1 2 0 8 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 24 0 26 26 0 24 0 0 24 24 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 5 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Mvmt Flow 6 457 3 9 389 1 1 0 1 2 0 9 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 414 0 0 486 0 0 909 929 509 927 930 414 Stage 1 - - - - - - 497 497 - 432 432 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 412 432 - 495 498 - Critical Hdwy 4.1 - - 4.1 - - 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 - - 2.2 - - 3.5 4 3.3 3.5 4 3.3 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1156 - - 1087 - - 258 270 568 251 269 643 Stage 1 - - - - - - 559 548 - 606 586 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 621 586 - 560 548 - Platoon blocked, % - - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1130 - - 1060 - - 245 253 541 236 252 628 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 245 253 - 236 252 - Stage 1 - - - - - - 541 530 - 588 566 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 606 566 - 542 530 - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0.1 0.2 15.8 12.8 HCM LOS C B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 337 1130 - - 1060 - - 471 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.006 0.006 - - 0.008 - - 0.023 HCM Control Delay (s) 15.8 8.2 0 - 8.4 0 - 12.8 HCM Lane LOS C A A - A A - B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 0 - - 0 - - 0.1 JPA Aspen Heights 2028 Background - MID.syn Synchro 10 Report - 10/12/2021 TG Page 3 Attachment E JPA Aspen Heights 2028 Background Midday 3: Private Entrance/Washington Ave & Jefferson Park Ave HCM 6th TWSC Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.4 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 3 431 1 1 365 5 2 0 3 4 1 7 Future Vol, veh/h 3 431 1 1 365 5 2 0 3 4 1 7 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 32 0 26 26 0 32 0 0 1 1 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 33 4 100 0 6 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 Mvmt Flow 3 454 1 1 384 5 2 0 3 4 1 7 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 421 0 0 481 0 0 880 910 482 884 908 419 Stage 1 - - - - - - 487 487 - 421 421 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 393 423 - 463 487 - Critical Hdwy 4.43 - - 4.1 - - 8.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 7.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 7.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.497 - - 2.2 - - 4.4 4 3.3 3.5 4 3.3 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 990 - - 1092 - - 184 277 588 268 277 638 Stage 1 - - - - - - 416 554 - 614 592 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 475 591 - 583 554 - Platoon blocked, % - - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 960 - - 1065 - - 176 261 573 257 261 619 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 176 261 - 257 261 - Stage 1 - - - - - - 404 538 - 593 574 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 468 573 - 577 538 - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0.1 0 17.2 14.5 HCM LOS C B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 301 960 - - 1065 - - 391 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.017 0.003 - - 0.001 - - 0.032 HCM Control Delay (s) 17.2 8.8 0 - 8.4 0 - 14.5 HCM Lane LOS C A A - A A - B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 0 - - 0 - - 0.1 JPA Aspen Heights 2028 Background - MID.syn Synchro 10 Report - 10/12/2021 TG Page 4 Attachment E JPA Aspen Heights 2028 Background Midday 4: Private Entrance/Observatory Ave & Jefferson Park Ave HCM 6th TWSC Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.2 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 3 432 3 3 382 6 2 0 3 0 0 1 Future Vol, veh/h 3 432 3 3 382 6 2 0 3 0 0 1 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 25 0 23 23 0 25 0 0 1 1 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 4 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Mvmt Flow 3 455 3 3 402 6 2 0 3 0 0 1 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 433 0 0 481 0 0 898 925 481 901 923 430 Stage 1 - - - - - - 486 486 - 436 436 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 412 439 - 465 487 - Critical Hdwy 4.1 - - 4.1 - - 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 - - 2.2 - - 3.5 4 3.3 3.5 4 3.3 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1137 - - 1092 - - 262 271 589 261 272 629 Stage 1 - - - - - - 566 554 - 603 583 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 621 582 - 581 554 - Platoon blocked, % - - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1110 - - 1068 - - 254 257 576 252 258 614 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 254 257 - 252 258 - Stage 1 - - - - - - 551 540 - 586 567 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 617 566 - 575 540 - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0.1 0.1 14.6 10.9 HCM LOS B B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 382 1110 - - 1068 - - 614 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.014 0.003 - - 0.003 - - 0.002 HCM Control Delay (s) 14.6 8.3 0 - 8.4 0 - 10.9 HCM Lane LOS B A A - A A - B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 0 - - 0 - - 0 JPA Aspen Heights 2028 Background - MID.syn Synchro 10 Report - 10/12/2021 TG Page 5 Attachment E JPA Aspen Heights 2028 Background Midday 5: Jefferson Park Ave & Fontaine Ave & Maury Ave Queues Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Group Flow (vph) 50 278 155 135 259 143 91 139 33 126 46 v/c Ratio 0.14 0.44 0.18 0.31 0.31 0.51 0.31 0.37 0.14 0.45 0.13 Control Delay 23.1 25.1 1.8 17.4 15.9 36.4 31.6 6.6 30.3 35.4 0.7 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 23.1 25.1 1.8 17.4 15.9 36.4 31.6 6.6 30.3 35.4 0.7 Queue Length 50th (ft) 15 94 0 32 64 60 37 0 13 53 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) 55 230 20 98 180 129 86 34 40 113 0 Internal Link Dist (ft) 751 428 732 533 Turn Bay Length (ft) 150 120 88 355 225 117 125 Base Capacity (vph) 361 625 1096 429 845 600 638 617 533 650 635 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.14 0.44 0.14 0.31 0.31 0.24 0.14 0.23 0.06 0.19 0.07 Intersection Summary JPA Aspen Heights 2028 Background - MID.syn Synchro 10 Report - 10/12/2021 TG Page 6 Attachment E JPA Aspen Heights 2028 Background Midday 5: Jefferson Park Ave & Fontaine Ave & Maury Ave HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 47 261 146 127 219 24 134 86 131 31 118 43 Future Volume (veh/h) 47 261 146 127 219 24 134 86 131 31 118 43 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 0.99 0.97 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.92 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1796 1841 1856 1856 1811 1589 1856 1870 1885 1663 1900 1900 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 50 278 155 135 233 26 143 91 0 33 126 46 Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Percent Heavy Veh, % 7 4 3 3 6 21 3 2 1 16 0 0 Cap, veh/h 466 628 732 414 772 86 240 254 199 238 185 Arrive On Green 0.34 0.34 0.34 0.06 0.48 0.48 0.14 0.14 0.00 0.13 0.13 0.13 Sat Flow, veh/h 1067 1841 1521 1767 1599 178 1767 1870 1598 1584 1900 1475 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 50 278 155 135 0 259 143 91 0 33 126 46 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1067 1841 1521 1767 0 1777 1767 1870 1598 1584 1900 1475 Q Serve(g_s), s 2.3 8.3 4.2 3.3 0.0 6.2 5.4 3.1 0.0 1.3 4.4 2.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 2.3 8.3 4.2 3.3 0.0 6.2 5.4 3.1 0.0 1.3 4.4 2.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.10 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 466 628 732 414 0 858 240 254 199 238 185 V/C Ratio(X) 0.11 0.44 0.21 0.33 0.00 0.30 0.60 0.36 0.17 0.53 0.25 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 466 628 732 414 0 858 602 638 540 648 503 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 16.0 18.0 10.7 13.4 0.0 11.0 28.6 27.6 0.0 27.5 28.8 27.8 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.5 2.3 0.7 2.1 0.0 0.9 0.9 0.3 0.0 0.1 0.7 0.3 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.6 3.6 1.8 1.4 0.0 2.3 2.2 1.4 0.0 0.5 2.0 0.7 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 16.5 20.3 11.4 15.5 0.0 11.9 29.5 27.9 0.0 27.6 29.5 28.0 LnGrp LOS B C B B A B C C C C C Approach Vol, veh/h 483 394 234 A 205 Approach Delay, s/veh 17.0 13.1 28.9 28.9 Approach LOS B B C C Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 10.0 30.0 14.8 40.0 15.6 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 4.0 24.0 24.0 34.0 24.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 5.3 10.3 6.4 8.2 7.4 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 2.0 0.5 1.5 0.4 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 19.8 HCM 6th LOS B Notes Unsignalized Delay for [NBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay. JPA Aspen Heights 2028 Background - MID.syn Synchro 10 Report - 10/12/2021 TG Page 7 Attachment E JPA Aspen Heights 2028 Background Midday 6: Maury Ave/Alderman Road & Stadium Drive HCM 6th AWSC Intersection Intersection Delay, s/veh 9.1 Intersection LOS A Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 20 12 2 54 22 21 5 159 26 17 152 41 Future Vol, veh/h 20 12 2 54 22 21 5 159 26 17 152 41 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 6 0 6 2 15 Mvmt Flow 22 13 2 59 24 23 5 173 28 18 165 45 Number of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 Approach EB WB NB SB Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB Opposing Lanes 1 1 1 1 Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB Conflicting Lanes Left 1 1 1 1 Conflicting Approach RightNB SB WB EB Conflicting Lanes Right 1 1 1 1 HCM Control Delay 8.4 8.9 9 9.3 HCM LOS A A A A Lane NBLn1 EBLn1WBLn1 SBLn1 Vol Left, % 3% 59% 56% 8% Vol Thru, % 84% 35% 23% 72% Vol Right, % 14% 6% 22% 20% Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Traffic Vol by Lane 190 34 97 210 LT Vol 5 20 54 17 Through Vol 159 12 22 152 RT Vol 26 2 21 41 Lane Flow Rate 207 37 105 228 Geometry Grp 1 1 1 1 Degree of Util (X) 0.255 0.052 0.147 0.285 Departure Headway (Hd) 4.438 5.107 5.007 4.49 Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Cap 808 698 714 799 Service Time 2.472 3.159 3.052 2.522 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.256 0.053 0.147 0.285 HCM Control Delay 9 8.4 8.9 9.3 HCM Lane LOS A A A A HCM 95th-tile Q 1 0.2 0.5 1.2 JPA Aspen Heights 2028 Background - MID.syn Synchro 10 Report - 10/12/2021 TG Page 8 Attachment E JPA Aspen Heights 2028 Background Midday 7: Washington Ave & Stadium Drive HCM 6th TWSC Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.6 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 48 9 7 94 3 2 Future Vol, veh/h 48 9 7 94 3 2 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 41 41 0 14 1 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - - - - 0 - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 0 0 3 0 50 Mvmt Flow 52 10 8 102 3 2 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 103 0 230 99 Stage 1 - - - - 98 - Stage 2 - - - - 132 - Critical Hdwy - - 4.1 - 6.4 6.7 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.4 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.4 - Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.2 - 3.5 3.75 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1502 - 763 840 Stage 1 - - - - 931 - Stage 2 - - - - 899 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1443 - 720 806 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 720 - Stage 1 - - - - 895 - Stage 2 - - - - 882 - Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 0.5 9.8 HCM LOS A Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity (veh/h) 752 - - 1443 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.007 - - 0.005 - HCM Control Delay (s) 9.8 - - 7.5 0 HCM Lane LOS A - - A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - 0 - JPA Aspen Heights 2028 Background - MID.syn Synchro 10 Report - 10/12/2021 TG Page 9 Attachment E JPA Aspen Heights 2028 Background Midday 8: Washington Ave & Site Entrance HCM 6th TWSC Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 8 16 0 Future Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 8 16 0 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 0 - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 0 0 0 0 0 Mvmt Flow 0 0 0 9 17 0 Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 26 17 17 0 - 0 Stage 1 17 - - - - - Stage 2 9 - - - - - Critical Hdwy 6.4 6.2 4.1 - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.4 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.4 - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.5 3.3 2.2 - - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 995 1068 1613 - - - Stage 1 1011 - - - - - Stage 2 1019 - - - - - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 995 1068 1613 - - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 995 - - - - - Stage 1 1011 - - - - - Stage 2 1019 - - - - - Approach EB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0 0 0 HCM LOS A Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1613 - - - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - - - - HCM Control Delay (s) 0 - 0 - - HCM Lane LOS A - A - - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - - - JPA Aspen Heights 2028 Background - MID.syn Synchro 10 Report - 10/12/2021 TG Page 10 Attachment E JPA Aspen Heights 2028 Background Midday Queuing and Blocking Report Intersection: 1: Shamrock Rd & Jefferson Park Ave Movement EB WB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR L TR LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 283 73 188 138 63 Average Queue (ft) 126 27 80 62 19 95th Queue (ft) 247 63 155 111 52 Link Distance (ft) 304 532 559 534 Upstream Blk Time (%) 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 75 Storage Blk Time (%) 0 7 Queuing Penalty (veh) 1 4 Intersection: 2: Private Entrance/Harmon St & Jefferson Park Ave Movement EB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 69 82 21 31 Average Queue (ft) 8 9 1 9 95th Queue (ft) 39 42 10 31 Link Distance (ft) 77 304 320 536 Upstream Blk Time (%) 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 1 Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 3: Private Entrance/Washington Ave & Jefferson Park Ave Movement EB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 39 3 60 31 Average Queue (ft) 2 0 7 9 95th Queue (ft) 21 3 33 31 Link Distance (ft) 174 77 261 281 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) JPA Aspen Heights 2028 Background - MID.syn SimTraffic Report - 10/12/2021 TG Page 1 Attachment E JPA Aspen Heights 2028 Background Midday Queuing and Blocking Report Intersection: 4: Private Entrance/Observatory Ave & Jefferson Park Ave Movement EB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 28 52 31 20 Average Queue (ft) 1 3 5 2 95th Queue (ft) 15 24 22 12 Link Distance (ft) 432 174 314 534 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 5: Jefferson Park Ave & Fontaine Ave & Maury Ave Movement EB EB EB WB WB NB NB SB SB SB Directions Served L T R L TR L T L T R Maximum Queue (ft) 132 295 120 87 237 145 102 98 174 99 Average Queue (ft) 31 118 51 58 99 70 44 24 68 26 95th Queue (ft) 82 226 125 96 198 124 85 68 128 67 Link Distance (ft) 774 432 770 538 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 150 120 88 355 117 125 Storage Blk Time (%) 0 7 0 2 9 0 2 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 13 1 4 11 0 1 0 Intersection: 6: Maury Ave/Alderman Road & Stadium Drive Movement EB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 41 81 100 94 Average Queue (ft) 22 39 55 52 95th Queue (ft) 46 65 86 83 Link Distance (ft) 544 504 452 665 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) JPA Aspen Heights 2028 Background - MID.syn SimTraffic Report - 10/12/2021 TG Page 2 Attachment E JPA Aspen Heights 2028 Background Midday Queuing and Blocking Report Intersection: 7: Washington Ave & Stadium Drive Movement EB WB NB Directions Served TR LT LR Maximum Queue (ft) 6 20 46 Average Queue (ft) 0 1 4 95th Queue (ft) 6 12 24 Link Distance (ft) 504 658 455 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 8: Washington Ave & Site Entrance Movement Directions Served Maximum Queue (ft) Average Queue (ft) 95th Queue (ft) Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Network Summary Network wide Queuing Penalty: 36 JPA Aspen Heights 2028 Background - MID.syn SimTraffic Report - 10/12/2021 TG Page 3 Attachment E JPA Aspen Heights 2028 Background PM 1: Shamrock Rd & Jefferson Park Ave Queues Lane Group EBT WBL WBT NBT SBT Lane Group Flow (vph) 379 112 606 135 73 v/c Ratio 0.45 0.19 0.54 0.57 0.27 Control Delay 13.5 6.3 9.8 39.7 28.4 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 13.5 6.3 9.8 39.7 28.4 Queue Length 50th (ft) 96 15 123 62 29 Queue Length 95th (ft) 216 47 303 115 64 Internal Link Dist (ft) 301 481 515 490 Turn Bay Length (ft) 75 Base Capacity (vph) 837 597 1128 421 479 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.45 0.19 0.54 0.32 0.15 Intersection Summary JPA Aspen Heights 2028 Background - PM.syn Synchro 10 Report - 10/12/2021 TG Page 1 Attachment E JPA Aspen Heights 2028 Background PM 1: Shamrock Rd & Jefferson Park Ave HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 21 279 56 105 557 12 44 25 57 9 53 7 Future Volume (veh/h) 21 279 56 105 557 12 44 25 57 9 53 7 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 0.98 0.89 0.99 0.90 0.89 0.87 0.90 0.87 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1900 1870 1900 1885 1870 1781 1870 1900 1841 1900 1900 1900 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 22 297 60 112 593 13 47 27 61 10 56 7 Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Percent Heavy Veh, % 0 2 0 1 2 8 2 0 4 0 0 0 Cap, veh/h 68 710 138 633 1133 25 151 93 155 76 352 40 Arrive On Green 0.51 0.51 0.51 0.05 0.62 0.62 0.24 0.24 0.24 0.24 0.24 0.24 Sat Flow, veh/h 46 1399 272 1795 1818 40 399 390 651 122 1477 170 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 379 0 0 112 0 606 135 0 0 73 0 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1717 0 0 1795 0 1858 1440 0 0 1768 0 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.4 0.0 15.8 2.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 11.6 0.0 0.0 2.4 0.0 15.8 6.4 0.0 0.0 2.7 0.0 0.0 Prop In Lane 0.06 0.16 1.00 0.02 0.35 0.45 0.14 0.10 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 916 0 0 633 0 1158 399 0 0 469 0 0 V/C Ratio(X) 0.41 0.00 0.00 0.18 0.00 0.52 0.34 0.00 0.00 0.16 0.00 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 916 0 0 633 0 1158 453 0 0 535 0 0 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 13.3 0.0 0.0 8.3 0.0 9.1 27.5 0.0 0.0 26.2 0.0 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 1.4 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.0 1.7 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 4.6 0.0 0.0 0.9 0.0 5.9 2.4 0.0 0.0 1.2 0.0 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 14.7 0.0 0.0 8.9 0.0 10.8 28.0 0.0 0.0 26.3 0.0 0.0 LnGrp LOS B A A A A B C A A C A A Approach Vol, veh/h 379 718 135 73 Approach Delay, s/veh 14.7 10.5 28.0 26.3 Approach LOS B B C C Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 10.0 50.0 26.7 60.0 26.7 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 4.0 44.0 24.0 54.0 24.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 4.4 13.6 4.7 17.8 8.4 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 2.6 0.1 4.4 0.4 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 14.4 HCM 6th LOS B JPA Aspen Heights 2028 Background - PM.syn Synchro 10 Report - 10/12/2021 TG Page 2 Attachment E JPA Aspen Heights 2028 Background PM 2: Private Entrance/Harmon St & Jefferson Park Ave HCM 6th TWSC Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.7 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 7 318 1 13 579 4 0 0 8 6 1 15 Future Vol, veh/h 7 318 1 13 579 4 0 0 8 6 1 15 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 45 0 46 46 0 45 0 0 23 23 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 Mvmt Flow 8 346 1 14 629 4 0 0 9 7 1 16 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 678 0 0 393 0 0 1077 1115 416 1094 1113 676 Stage 1 - - - - - - 409 409 - 704 704 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 668 706 - 390 409 - Critical Hdwy 4.1 - - 4.1 - - 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.27 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 - - 2.2 - - 3.5 4 3.3 3.5 4 3.363 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 923 - - 1177 - - 198 210 641 193 210 445 Stage 1 - - - - - - 623 600 - 431 443 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 451 442 - 638 600 - Platoon blocked, % - - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 883 - - 1125 - - 177 186 599 174 186 426 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 177 186 - 174 186 - Stage 1 - - - - - - 589 567 - 408 416 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 424 415 - 608 567 - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0.2 0.2 11.1 18.4 HCM LOS B C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 599 883 - - 1125 - - 293 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.015 0.009 - - 0.013 - - 0.082 HCM Control Delay (s) 11.1 9.1 0 - 8.2 0 - 18.4 HCM Lane LOS B A A - A A - C HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 0 - - 0 - - 0.3 JPA Aspen Heights 2028 Background - PM.syn Synchro 10 Report - 10/12/2021 TG Page 3 Attachment E JPA Aspen Heights 2028 Background PM 3: Private Entrance/Washington Ave & Jefferson Park Ave HCM 6th TWSC Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.4 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 8 321 1 2 598 2 0 0 1 7 0 7 Future Vol, veh/h 8 321 1 2 598 2 0 0 1 7 0 7 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 54 0 71 71 0 54 4 0 2 2 0 4 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Mvmt Flow 9 349 1 2 650 2 0 0 1 8 0 8 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 706 0 0 421 0 0 1102 1149 423 1079 1148 709 Stage 1 - - - - - - 439 439 - 709 709 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 663 710 - 370 439 - Critical Hdwy 4.1 - - 4.1 - - 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 - - 2.2 - - 3.5 4 3.3 3.5 4 3.3 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 902 - - 1149 - - 191 200 635 198 200 438 Stage 1 - - - - - - 601 582 - 428 440 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 454 440 - 654 582 - Platoon blocked, % - - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 856 - - 1071 - - 172 174 591 185 174 414 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 172 174 - 185 174 - Stage 1 - - - - - - 553 535 - 401 416 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 443 416 - 643 535 - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0.2 0 11.1 19.9 HCM LOS B C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 591 856 - - 1071 - - 256 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.002 0.01 - - 0.002 - - 0.059 HCM Control Delay (s) 11.1 9.2 0 - 8.4 0 - 19.9 HCM Lane LOS B A A - A A - C HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 0 - - 0 - - 0.2 JPA Aspen Heights 2028 Background - PM.syn Synchro 10 Report - 10/12/2021 TG Page 4 Attachment E JPA Aspen Heights 2028 Background PM 4: Private Entrance/Observatory Ave & Jefferson Park Ave HCM 6th TWSC Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.7 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 9 315 3 8 618 5 4 0 6 6 1 7 Future Vol, veh/h 9 315 3 8 618 5 4 0 6 6 1 7 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 48 0 95 95 0 48 4 0 2 2 0 4 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Mvmt Flow 10 342 3 9 672 5 4 0 7 7 1 8 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 725 0 0 440 0 0 1160 1202 441 1110 1201 727 Stage 1 - - - - - - 459 459 - 741 741 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 701 743 - 369 460 - Critical Hdwy 4.1 - - 4.1 - - 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 - - 2.2 - - 3.5 4 3.3 3.5 4 3.3 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 887 - - 1131 - - 174 186 621 188 186 427 Stage 1 - - - - - - 586 570 - 411 426 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 433 425 - 655 569 - Platoon blocked, % - - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 846 - - 1029 - - 151 157 564 173 157 406 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 151 157 - 173 157 - Stage 1 - - - - - - 525 511 - 386 401 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 416 400 - 636 510 - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0.3 0.1 18.9 21 HCM LOS C C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 269 846 - - 1029 - - 240 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.04 0.012 - - 0.008 - - 0.063 HCM Control Delay (s) 18.9 9.3 0 - 8.5 0 - 21 HCM Lane LOS C A A - A A - C HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 0 - - 0 - - 0.2 JPA Aspen Heights 2028 Background - PM.syn Synchro 10 Report - 10/12/2021 TG Page 5 Attachment E JPA Aspen Heights 2028 Background PM 5: Jefferson Park Ave & Fontaine Ave & Maury Ave Queues Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Group Flow (vph) 26 160 273 237 384 196 107 112 53 325 53 v/c Ratio 0.09 0.30 0.34 0.56 0.53 0.64 0.34 0.31 0.14 0.80 0.12 Control Delay 28.3 29.1 4.5 28.1 25.1 43.7 34.7 3.9 29.4 48.5 0.5 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 28.3 29.1 4.5 28.1 25.1 43.7 34.7 3.9 29.4 48.5 0.5 Queue Length 50th (ft) 10 68 18 87 154 100 51 0 23 166 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) 35 144 52 181 299 176 102 15 59 #289 0 Internal Link Dist (ft) 751 428 732 533 Turn Bay Length (ft) 150 120 88 355 225 117 125 Base Capacity (vph) 285 526 958 423 727 500 521 485 480 531 537 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.09 0.30 0.28 0.56 0.53 0.39 0.21 0.23 0.11 0.61 0.10 Intersection Summary # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. JPA Aspen Heights 2028 Background - PM.syn Synchro 10 Report - 10/12/2021 TG Page 6 Attachment E JPA Aspen Heights 2028 Background PM 5: Jefferson Park Ave & Fontaine Ave & Maury Ave HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 25 152 259 225 332 33 186 102 106 50 309 50 Future Volume (veh/h) 25 152 259 225 332 33 186 102 106 50 309 50 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 0.98 0.96 0.99 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.83 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1900 1870 1900 1885 1870 1678 1870 1856 1900 1811 1885 1841 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 26 160 273 237 349 35 196 107 0 53 325 53 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 0 2 0 1 2 15 2 3 0 6 1 4 Cap, veh/h 300 506 732 354 639 64 345 360 380 416 286 Arrive On Green 0.27 0.27 0.27 0.05 0.38 0.38 0.19 0.19 0.00 0.22 0.22 0.22 Sat Flow, veh/h 997 1870 1554 1795 1668 167 1781 1856 1610 1725 1885 1298 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 26 160 273 237 0 384 196 107 0 53 325 53 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 997 1870 1554 1795 0 1835 1781 1856 1610 1725 1885 1298 Q Serve(g_s), s 1.9 6.1 10.1 4.0 0.0 14.5 8.8 4.4 0.0 2.2 14.4 2.9 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 6.4 6.1 10.1 4.0 0.0 14.5 8.8 4.4 0.0 2.2 14.4 2.9 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.09 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 300 506 732 354 0 703 345 360 380 416 286 V/C Ratio(X) 0.09 0.32 0.37 0.67 0.00 0.55 0.57 0.30 0.14 0.78 0.19 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 300 506 732 354 0 703 482 502 466 510 351 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 27.8 25.8 15.5 27.9 0.0 21.4 32.4 30.6 0.0 27.8 32.6 28.1 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.6 1.6 1.5 9.7 0.0 3.0 0.5 0.2 0.0 0.1 4.9 0.1 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.5 2.8 5.2 3.5 0.0 6.5 3.8 1.9 0.0 0.9 7.1 0.9 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 28.3 27.5 16.9 37.6 0.0 24.4 33.0 30.8 0.0 27.9 37.5 28.2 LnGrp LOS C C B D A C C C C D C Approach Vol, veh/h 459 621 303 A 431 Approach Delay, s/veh 21.3 29.4 32.2 35.2 Approach LOS C C C D Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 10.0 30.0 25.6 40.0 23.2 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 4.0 24.0 24.0 34.0 24.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 6.0 12.1 16.4 16.5 10.8 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 1.6 1.0 2.1 0.5 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 29.2 HCM 6th LOS C Notes Unsignalized Delay for [NBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay. JPA Aspen Heights 2028 Background - PM.syn Synchro 10 Report - 10/12/2021 TG Page 7 Attachment E JPA Aspen Heights 2028 Background PM 6: Maury Ave/Alderman Road & Stadium Drive HCM 6th AWSC Intersection Intersection Delay, s/veh22.8 Intersection LOS C Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 20 16 3 130 131 20 6 156 16 62 333 95 Future Vol, veh/h 20 16 3 130 131 20 6 156 16 62 333 95 Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Heavy Vehicles, % 5 0 0 2 0 0 0 6 0 34 1 7 Mvmt Flow 21 17 3 138 139 21 6 166 17 66 354 101 Number of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 Approach EB WB NB SB Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB Opposing Lanes 1 1 1 1 Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB Conflicting Lanes Left 1 1 1 1 Conflicting Approach RightNB SB WB EB Conflicting Lanes Right 1 1 1 1 HCM Control Delay 10.5 15.4 11.5 32.2 HCM LOS B C B D Lane NBLn1 EBLn1WBLn1 SBLn1 Vol Left, % 3% 51% 46% 13% Vol Thru, % 88% 41% 47% 68% Vol Right, % 9% 8% 7% 19% Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Traffic Vol by Lane 178 39 281 490 LT Vol 6 20 130 62 Through Vol 156 16 131 333 RT Vol 16 3 20 95 Lane Flow Rate 189 41 299 521 Geometry Grp 1 1 1 1 Degree of Util (X) 0.307 0.08 0.507 0.841 Departure Headway (Hd) 5.844 6.919 6.109 5.806 Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Cap 610 521 586 620 Service Time 3.923 4.919 4.184 3.863 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.31 0.079 0.51 0.84 HCM Control Delay 11.5 10.5 15.4 32.2 HCM Lane LOS B B C D HCM 95th-tile Q 1.3 0.3 2.9 9.1 JPA Aspen Heights 2028 Background - PM.syn Synchro 10 Report - 10/12/2021 TG Page 8 Attachment E JPA Aspen Heights 2028 Background PM 7: Washington Ave & Stadium Drive HCM 6th TWSC Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.5 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 81 2 5 263 5 10 Future Vol, veh/h 81 2 5 263 5 10 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 45 45 0 10 1 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - - - - 0 - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 26 0 0 1 0 0 Mvmt Flow 88 2 5 286 5 11 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 135 0 440 135 Stage 1 - - - - 134 - Stage 2 - - - - 306 - Critical Hdwy - - 4.1 - 6.4 6.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.4 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.4 - Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.2 - 3.5 3.3 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1462 - 578 919 Stage 1 - - - - 897 - Stage 2 - - - - 751 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1399 - 546 879 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 546 - Stage 1 - - - - 858 - Stage 2 - - - - 741 - Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 0.1 10 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity (veh/h) 730 - - 1399 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.022 - - 0.004 - HCM Control Delay (s) 10 - - 7.6 0 HCM Lane LOS B - - A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 - - 0 - JPA Aspen Heights 2028 Background - PM.syn Synchro 10 Report - 10/12/2021 TG Page 9 Attachment E JPA Aspen Heights 2028 Background PM 8: Washington Ave & Site Entrance HCM 6th TWSC Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 10 7 0 Future Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 10 7 0 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 0 - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 0 0 0 0 0 Mvmt Flow 0 0 0 11 8 0 Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 19 8 8 0 - 0 Stage 1 8 - - - - - Stage 2 11 - - - - - Critical Hdwy 6.4 6.2 4.1 - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.4 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.4 - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.5 3.3 2.2 - - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1004 1080 1625 - - - Stage 1 1020 - - - - - Stage 2 1017 - - - - - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1004 1080 1625 - - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 1004 - - - - - Stage 1 1020 - - - - - Stage 2 1017 - - - - - Approach EB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0 0 0 HCM LOS A Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1625 - - - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - - - - HCM Control Delay (s) 0 - 0 - - HCM Lane LOS A - A - - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - - - JPA Aspen Heights 2028 Background - PM.syn Synchro 10 Report - 10/12/2021 TG Page 10 Attachment E JPA Aspen Heights 2028 Background PM Queuing and Blocking Report Intersection: 1: Shamrock Rd & Jefferson Park Ave Movement EB WB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR L TR LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 262 74 326 162 97 Average Queue (ft) 117 42 154 77 40 95th Queue (ft) 215 78 284 135 82 Link Distance (ft) 304 532 559 534 Upstream Blk Time (%) 0 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 75 Storage Blk Time (%) 1 18 Queuing Penalty (veh) 6 19 Intersection: 2: Private Entrance/Harmon St & Jefferson Park Ave Movement EB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 61 201 31 61 Average Queue (ft) 7 39 7 20 95th Queue (ft) 36 162 28 55 Link Distance (ft) 77 304 320 536 Upstream Blk Time (%) 0 1 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 5 Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 3: Private Entrance/Washington Ave & Jefferson Park Ave Movement EB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 97 82 21 42 Average Queue (ft) 8 18 1 11 95th Queue (ft) 46 72 10 37 Link Distance (ft) 174 77 261 281 Upstream Blk Time (%) 0 4 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 25 Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) JPA Aspen Heights 2028 Background - PM.syn SimTraffic Report - 10/12/2021 TG Page 1 Attachment E JPA Aspen Heights 2028 Background PM Queuing and Blocking Report Intersection: 4: Private Entrance/Observatory Ave & Jefferson Park Ave Movement EB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 97 184 54 55 Average Queue (ft) 7 59 13 13 95th Queue (ft) 45 183 47 46 Link Distance (ft) 432 174 314 534 Upstream Blk Time (%) 6 Queuing Penalty (veh) 34 Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 5: Jefferson Park Ave & Fontaine Ave & Maury Ave Movement EB EB EB WB WB NB NB SB SB SB Directions Served L T R L TR L T L T R Maximum Queue (ft) 68 195 119 87 446 206 144 117 384 125 Average Queue (ft) 19 78 62 83 329 105 60 42 203 55 95th Queue (ft) 51 156 124 100 512 175 117 111 330 138 Link Distance (ft) 774 432 770 538 Upstream Blk Time (%) 10 Queuing Penalty (veh) 66 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 150 120 88 355 117 125 Storage Blk Time (%) 2 1 24 41 0 30 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 5 1 87 92 1 30 1 Intersection: 6: Maury Ave/Alderman Road & Stadium Drive Movement EB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 60 161 150 422 Average Queue (ft) 24 73 67 148 95th Queue (ft) 52 126 117 313 Link Distance (ft) 544 504 452 665 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) JPA Aspen Heights 2028 Background - PM.syn SimTraffic Report - 10/12/2021 TG Page 2 Attachment E JPA Aspen Heights 2028 Background PM Queuing and Blocking Report Intersection: 7: Washington Ave & Stadium Drive Movement EB WB NB Directions Served TR LT LR Maximum Queue (ft) 12 18 35 Average Queue (ft) 0 1 13 95th Queue (ft) 9 8 37 Link Distance (ft) 504 658 455 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 8: Washington Ave & Site Entrance Movement Directions Served Maximum Queue (ft) Average Queue (ft) 95th Queue (ft) Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Network Summary Network wide Queuing Penalty: 373 JPA Aspen Heights 2028 Background - PM.syn SimTraffic Report - 10/12/2021 TG Page 3 Attachment E December 2021 Aspen Heights TIA – City of Charlottesville Appendix E Synchro/SimTraffic Outputs for 2023/2028 Total Future Conditions Attachment E December 2021 Aspen Heights TIA – City of Charlottesville Attachment E JPA Aspen Heights 2023 Total AM 1: Shamrock Rd & Jefferson Park Ave Queues Lane Group EBT WBL WBT NBT SBT Lane Group Flow (vph) 528 33 266 192 27 v/c Ratio 0.60 0.06 0.25 0.66 0.09 Control Delay 17.4 6.4 7.2 41.9 24.6 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 17.4 6.4 7.2 41.9 24.6 Queue Length 50th (ft) 168 5 47 92 10 Queue Length 95th (ft) 330 18 108 157 31 Internal Link Dist (ft) 301 481 515 490 Turn Bay Length (ft) 75 Base Capacity (vph) 882 511 1064 447 469 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.60 0.06 0.25 0.43 0.06 Intersection Summary JPA Aspen Heights 2023 Total - AM.syn Synchro 10 Report - 10/12/2021 TG Page 1 Attachment E JPA Aspen Heights 2023 Total AM 1: Shamrock Rd & Jefferson Park Ave HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 8 462 32 31 250 3 65 45 73 4 19 3 Future Volume (veh/h) 8 462 32 31 250 3 65 45 73 4 19 3 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 0.96 0.91 1.00 0.93 0.96 0.93 0.97 0.95 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1707 1870 1811 1856 1811 1900 1870 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 8 486 34 33 263 3 68 47 77 4 20 3 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 13 2 6 3 6 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 Cap, veh/h 49 917 63 566 1179 13 143 96 120 74 284 39 Arrive On Green 0.54 0.54 0.54 0.05 0.66 0.66 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 Sat Flow, veh/h 8 1703 118 1767 1785 20 431 499 623 123 1476 200 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 528 0 0 33 0 266 192 0 0 27 0 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1829 0 0 1767 0 1806 1554 0 0 1798 0 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.0 4.8 6.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 15.3 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.0 4.8 9.1 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 Prop In Lane 0.02 0.06 1.00 0.01 0.35 0.40 0.15 0.11 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 1029 0 0 566 0 1193 359 0 0 397 0 0 V/C Ratio(X) 0.51 0.00 0.00 0.06 0.00 0.22 0.53 0.00 0.00 0.07 0.00 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 1029 0 0 566 0 1193 512 0 0 571 0 0 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 12.2 0.0 0.0 6.3 0.0 5.5 30.2 0.0 0.0 27.0 0.0 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 1.8 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.4 1.2 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 6.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 1.6 3.5 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 14.1 0.0 0.0 6.5 0.0 6.0 31.4 0.0 0.0 27.1 0.0 0.0 LnGrp LOS B A A A A A C A A C A A Approach Vol, veh/h 528 299 192 27 Approach Delay, s/veh 14.1 6.0 31.4 27.1 Approach LOS B A C C Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 10.0 50.0 21.8 60.0 21.8 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 4.0 44.0 24.0 54.0 24.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 2.6 17.3 3.0 6.8 11.1 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 3.6 0.0 1.6 0.5 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 15.3 HCM 6th LOS B JPA Aspen Heights 2023 Total - AM.syn Synchro 10 Report - 10/12/2021 TG Page 2 Attachment E JPA Aspen Heights 2023 Total AM 2: Private Entrance/Harmon St & Jefferson Park Ave HCM 6th TWSC Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.2 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 9 490 1 4 294 3 1 0 1 2 0 2 Future Vol, veh/h 9 490 1 4 294 3 1 0 1 2 0 2 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 58 0 19 19 0 58 0 0 16 16 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 3 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Mvmt Flow 10 527 1 4 316 3 1 0 1 2 0 2 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 377 0 0 547 0 0 894 952 563 948 951 376 Stage 1 - - - - - - 567 567 - 384 384 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 327 385 - 564 567 - Critical Hdwy 4.1 - - 4.1 - - 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 - - 2.2 - - 3.5 4 3.3 3.5 4 3.3 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1193 - - 1033 - - 264 261 530 243 262 675 Stage 1 - - - - - - 512 510 - 643 615 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 690 614 - 514 510 - Platoon blocked, % - - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1127 - - 1014 - - 255 238 512 223 239 638 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 255 238 - 223 239 - Stage 1 - - - - - - 496 494 - 599 578 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 684 577 - 499 494 - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0.1 0.1 15.7 16.1 HCM LOS C C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 340 1127 - - 1014 - - 330 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.006 0.009 - - 0.004 - - 0.013 HCM Control Delay (s) 15.7 8.2 0 - 8.6 0 - 16.1 HCM Lane LOS C A A - A A - C HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 0 - - 0 - - 0 JPA Aspen Heights 2023 Total - AM.syn Synchro 10 Report - 10/12/2021 TG Page 3 Attachment E JPA Aspen Heights 2023 Total AM 3: Private Entrance/Washington Ave & Jefferson Park Ave HCM 6th TWSC Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.4 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 8 485 2 2 292 8 0 0 1 9 0 4 Future Vol, veh/h 8 485 2 2 292 8 0 0 1 9 0 4 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 44 0 27 27 0 44 2 0 2 2 0 2 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 20 3 100 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Mvmt Flow 9 527 2 2 317 9 0 0 1 10 0 4 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 370 0 0 556 0 0 903 947 557 919 944 368 Stage 1 - - - - - - 573 573 - 370 370 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 330 374 - 549 574 - Critical Hdwy 4.3 - - 4.1 - - 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.38 - - 2.2 - - 3.5 4 3.3 3.5 4 3.3 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1096 - - 1025 - - 260 263 534 254 264 682 Stage 1 - - - - - - 508 507 - 654 624 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 687 621 - 524 506 - Platoon blocked, % - - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1050 - - 999 - - 249 242 519 240 243 652 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 249 242 - 240 243 - Stage 1 - - - - - - 489 488 - 619 597 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 680 594 - 516 487 - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0.1 0.1 12 17.7 HCM LOS B C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 519 1050 - - 999 - - 298 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.002 0.008 - - 0.002 - - 0.047 HCM Control Delay (s) 12 8.5 0 - 8.6 0 - 17.7 HCM Lane LOS B A A - A A - C HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 0 - - 0 - - 0.1 JPA Aspen Heights 2023 Total - AM.syn Synchro 10 Report - 10/12/2021 TG Page 4 Attachment E JPA Aspen Heights 2023 Total AM 4: Private Entrance/Observatory Ave & Jefferson Park Ave HCM 6th TWSC Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.3 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 6 507 0 4 283 1 1 0 3 2 0 3 Future Vol, veh/h 6 507 0 4 283 1 1 0 3 2 0 3 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 57 0 32 32 0 57 2 0 1 1 0 2 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 2 0 25 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Mvmt Flow 7 551 0 4 308 1 1 0 3 2 0 3 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 366 0 0 583 0 0 917 971 584 942 971 368 Stage 1 - - - - - - 597 597 - 374 374 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 320 374 - 568 597 - Critical Hdwy 4.1 - - 4.35 - - 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 - - 2.425 - - 3.5 4 3.3 3.5 4 3.3 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1204 - - 887 - - 255 255 515 245 255 682 Stage 1 - - - - - - 493 495 - 651 621 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 696 621 - 511 495 - Platoon blocked, % - - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1139 - - 860 - - 243 231 499 227 231 644 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 243 231 - 227 231 - Stage 1 - - - - - - 474 476 - 610 584 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 687 584 - 503 476 - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0.1 0.1 14.2 14.8 HCM LOS B B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 395 1139 - - 860 - - 371 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.011 0.006 - - 0.005 - - 0.015 HCM Control Delay (s) 14.2 8.2 0 - 9.2 0 - 14.8 HCM Lane LOS B A A - A A - B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 0 - - 0 - - 0 JPA Aspen Heights 2023 Total - AM.syn Synchro 10 Report - 10/12/2021 TG Page 5 Attachment E JPA Aspen Heights 2023 Total AM 5: Jefferson Park Ave & Fontaine Ave & Maury Ave Queues Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Group Flow (vph) 74 322 149 60 260 337 253 196 22 53 15 v/c Ratio 0.19 0.50 0.15 0.17 0.33 0.77 0.55 0.39 0.12 0.24 0.05 Control Delay 26.8 29.1 1.5 18.5 19.0 41.9 32.5 6.8 34.0 36.0 0.3 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 26.8 29.1 1.5 18.5 19.0 41.9 32.5 6.8 34.0 36.0 0.3 Queue Length 50th (ft) 28 137 0 18 84 153 108 0 10 26 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) 77 279 19 53 188 #320 216 53 31 59 0 Internal Link Dist (ft) 751 428 732 533 Turn Bay Length (ft) 150 120 88 355 225 117 125 Base Capacity (vph) 382 641 1047 356 786 559 582 589 491 571 528 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.19 0.50 0.14 0.17 0.33 0.60 0.43 0.33 0.04 0.09 0.03 Intersection Summary # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. JPA Aspen Heights 2023 Total - AM.syn Synchro 10 Report - 10/12/2021 TG Page 6 Attachment E JPA Aspen Heights 2023 Total AM 5: Jefferson Park Ave & Fontaine Ave & Maury Ave HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 68 296 137 55 217 22 310 233 180 20 49 14 Future Volume (veh/h) 68 296 137 55 217 22 310 233 180 20 49 14 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 0.99 0.96 1.00 0.96 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.88 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1856 1856 1885 1870 1841 1559 1885 1870 1885 1678 1841 1693 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 74 322 149 60 236 24 337 253 0 22 53 15 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 3 3 1 2 4 23 1 2 1 15 4 14 Cap, veh/h 436 585 847 314 700 71 408 425 190 219 150 Arrive On Green 0.32 0.32 0.32 0.04 0.43 0.43 0.23 0.23 0.00 0.12 0.12 0.12 Sat Flow, veh/h 1097 1856 1535 1781 1637 166 1795 1870 1598 1598 1841 1258 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 74 322 149 60 0 260 337 253 0 22 53 15 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1097 1856 1535 1781 0 1804 1795 1870 1598 1598 1841 1258 Q Serve(g_s), s 3.9 11.4 3.9 1.7 0.0 7.7 14.2 9.6 0.0 1.0 2.1 0.8 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 3.9 11.4 3.9 1.7 0.0 7.7 14.2 9.6 0.0 1.0 2.1 0.8 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.09 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 436 585 847 314 0 771 408 425 190 219 150 V/C Ratio(X) 0.17 0.55 0.18 0.19 0.00 0.34 0.83 0.60 0.12 0.24 0.10 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 436 585 847 337 0 771 542 564 482 555 379 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 20.0 22.6 9.2 17.2 0.0 15.2 29.2 27.5 0.0 31.3 31.8 31.2 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.8 3.7 0.5 0.1 0.0 1.2 5.9 0.5 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.1 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 1.1 5.3 2.1 0.7 0.0 3.1 6.6 4.2 0.0 0.4 0.9 0.3 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 20.8 26.3 9.7 17.3 0.0 16.4 35.1 28.0 0.0 31.4 32.0 31.4 LnGrp LOS C C A B A B D C C C C Approach Vol, veh/h 545 320 590 A 90 Approach Delay, s/veh 21.0 16.6 32.1 31.7 Approach LOS C B C C Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 8.9 31.1 15.5 40.0 24.1 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 4.0 24.0 24.0 34.0 24.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 3.7 13.4 4.1 9.7 16.2 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 2.0 0.2 1.5 1.0 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 24.9 HCM 6th LOS C Notes Unsignalized Delay for [NBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay. JPA Aspen Heights 2023 Total - AM.syn Synchro 10 Report - 10/12/2021 TG Page 7 Attachment E JPA Aspen Heights 2023 Total AM 6: Maury Ave/Alderman Road & Stadium Drive HCM 6th AWSC Intersection Intersection Delay, s/veh11.8 Intersection LOS B Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 111 70 6 18 9 33 2 305 49 28 71 29 Future Vol, veh/h 111 70 6 18 9 33 2 305 49 28 71 29 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 0 0 22 11 0 0 3 0 54 4 21 Mvmt Flow 121 76 7 20 10 36 2 332 53 30 77 32 Number of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 Approach EB WB NB SB Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB Opposing Lanes 1 1 1 1 Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB Conflicting Lanes Left 1 1 1 1 Conflicting Approach RightNB SB WB EB Conflicting Lanes Right 1 1 1 1 HCM Control Delay 11 9.5 13 10.9 HCM LOS B A B B Lane NBLn1 EBLn1WBLn1 SBLn1 Vol Left, % 1% 59% 30% 22% Vol Thru, % 86% 37% 15% 55% Vol Right, % 14% 3% 55% 23% Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Traffic Vol by Lane 356 187 60 128 LT Vol 2 111 18 28 Through Vol 305 70 9 71 RT Vol 49 6 33 29 Lane Flow Rate 387 203 65 139 Geometry Grp 1 1 1 1 Degree of Util (X) 0.521 0.31 0.104 0.233 Departure Headway (Hd) 4.85 5.498 5.759 6.041 Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Cap 747 654 622 595 Service Time 2.85 3.528 3.796 4.07 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.518 0.31 0.105 0.234 HCM Control Delay 13 11 9.5 10.9 HCM Lane LOS B B A B HCM 95th-tile Q 3.1 1.3 0.3 0.9 JPA Aspen Heights 2023 Total - AM.syn Synchro 10 Report - 10/12/2021 TG Page 8 Attachment E JPA Aspen Heights 2023 Total AM 7: Washington Ave & Stadium Drive HCM 6th TWSC Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.8 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 144 5 6 50 3 11 Future Vol, veh/h 144 5 6 50 3 11 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 13 13 0 4 1 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - - - - 0 - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 10 0 0 8 0 0 Mvmt Flow 157 5 7 54 3 12 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 175 0 245 174 Stage 1 - - - - 173 - Stage 2 - - - - 72 - Critical Hdwy - - 4.1 - 6.4 6.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.4 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.4 - Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.2 - 3.5 3.3 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1414 - 748 875 Stage 1 - - - - 862 - Stage 2 - - - - 956 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1396 - 732 863 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 732 - Stage 1 - - - - 852 - Stage 2 - - - - 947 - Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 0.8 9.4 HCM LOS A Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity (veh/h) 831 - - 1396 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.018 - - 0.005 - HCM Control Delay (s) 9.4 - - 7.6 0 HCM Lane LOS A - - A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 - - 0 - JPA Aspen Heights 2023 Total - AM.syn Synchro 10 Report - 10/12/2021 TG Page 9 Attachment E JPA Aspen Heights 2023 Total AM 8: Washington Ave & Site Entrance HCM 6th TWSC Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 5.2 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 9 13 10 8 4 6 Future Vol, veh/h 9 13 10 8 4 6 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 0 - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 0 0 0 0 0 Mvmt Flow 10 14 11 9 4 7 Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 39 8 11 0 - 0 Stage 1 8 - - - - - Stage 2 31 - - - - - Critical Hdwy 6.4 6.2 4.1 - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.4 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.4 - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.5 3.3 2.2 - - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 978 1080 1621 - - - Stage 1 1020 - - - - - Stage 2 997 - - - - - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 971 1080 1621 - - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 971 - - - - - Stage 1 1013 - - - - - Stage 2 997 - - - - - Approach EB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 8.6 4 0 HCM LOS A Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1621 - 1033 - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.007 - 0.023 - - HCM Control Delay (s) 7.2 0 8.6 - - HCM Lane LOS A A A - - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - 0.1 - - JPA Aspen Heights 2023 Total - AM.syn Synchro 10 Report - 10/12/2021 TG Page 10 Attachment E JPA Aspen Heights 2023 Total AM Queuing and Blocking Report Intersection: 1: Shamrock Rd & Jefferson Park Ave Movement EB WB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR L TR LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 297 63 142 189 64 Average Queue (ft) 151 16 50 98 19 95th Queue (ft) 268 46 107 166 50 Link Distance (ft) 304 532 559 534 Upstream Blk Time (%) 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 1 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 75 Storage Blk Time (%) 0 3 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 1 Intersection: 2: Private Entrance/Harmon St & Jefferson Park Ave Movement EB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 60 62 31 31 Average Queue (ft) 7 4 3 5 95th Queue (ft) 33 30 17 24 Link Distance (ft) 77 304 320 536 Upstream Blk Time (%) 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 1 Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 3: Private Entrance/Washington Ave & Jefferson Park Ave Movement EB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 72 31 12 38 Average Queue (ft) 7 2 0 11 95th Queue (ft) 39 17 6 35 Link Distance (ft) 174 77 261 281 Upstream Blk Time (%) 0 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) JPA Aspen Heights 2023 Total - AM.syn SimTraffic Report - 10/12/2021 TG Page 1 Attachment E JPA Aspen Heights 2023 Total AM Queuing and Blocking Report Intersection: 4: Private Entrance/Observatory Ave & Jefferson Park Ave Movement EB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 34 52 31 29 Average Queue (ft) 2 3 5 4 95th Queue (ft) 16 27 24 19 Link Distance (ft) 432 174 314 534 Upstream Blk Time (%) 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 5: Jefferson Park Ave & Fontaine Ave & Maury Ave Movement EB EB EB WB WB NB NB NB SB SB SB Directions Served L T R L TR L T R L T R Maximum Queue (ft) 149 289 120 87 211 289 221 111 71 96 61 Average Queue (ft) 42 114 41 38 94 154 117 4 13 33 12 95th Queue (ft) 102 220 116 83 178 247 191 52 44 74 41 Link Distance (ft) 774 432 770 538 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 150 120 88 355 225 117 125 Storage Blk Time (%) 0 6 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 12 1 1 5 0 1 0 0 Intersection: 6: Maury Ave/Alderman Road & Stadium Drive Movement EB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 102 75 208 106 Average Queue (ft) 50 33 109 51 95th Queue (ft) 81 61 183 89 Link Distance (ft) 544 504 452 665 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) JPA Aspen Heights 2023 Total - AM.syn SimTraffic Report - 10/12/2021 TG Page 2 Attachment E JPA Aspen Heights 2023 Total AM Queuing and Blocking Report Intersection: 7: Washington Ave & Stadium Drive Movement EB WB NB Directions Served TR LT LR Maximum Queue (ft) 3 24 30 Average Queue (ft) 0 1 11 95th Queue (ft) 3 10 35 Link Distance (ft) 504 658 455 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 8: Washington Ave & Site Entrance Movement EB Directions Served LR Maximum Queue (ft) 35 Average Queue (ft) 17 95th Queue (ft) 42 Link Distance (ft) 156 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Network Summary Network wide Queuing Penalty: 24 JPA Aspen Heights 2023 Total - AM.syn SimTraffic Report - 10/12/2021 TG Page 3 Attachment E JPA Aspen Heights 2023 Total Midday 1: Shamrock Rd & Jefferson Park Ave Queues Lane Group EBT WBL WBT NBT SBT Lane Group Flow (vph) 498 59 391 106 30 v/c Ratio 0.46 0.10 0.33 0.49 0.12 Control Delay 11.8 5.2 6.2 37.7 25.1 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 11.8 5.2 6.2 37.7 25.1 Queue Length 50th (ft) 132 7 60 48 11 Queue Length 95th (ft) 285 25 152 93 32 Internal Link Dist (ft) 301 481 515 490 Turn Bay Length (ft) 75 Base Capacity (vph) 1084 602 1198 443 499 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.46 0.10 0.33 0.24 0.06 Intersection Summary JPA Aspen Heights 2023 Total - MID.syn Synchro 10 Report - 10/12/2021 TG Page 1 Attachment E JPA Aspen Heights 2023 Total Midday 1: Shamrock Rd & Jefferson Park Ave HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 5 420 33 54 353 6 38 22 38 2 21 5 Future Volume (veh/h) 5 420 33 54 353 6 38 22 38 2 21 5 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 0.97 0.92 1.00 0.93 0.89 0.88 0.91 0.88 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1900 1841 1856 1841 1811 1900 1826 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 5 457 36 59 384 7 41 24 41 2 23 5 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 0 4 3 4 6 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 Cap, veh/h 47 911 71 563 1161 21 149 91 113 53 288 59 Arrive On Green 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.04 0.66 0.66 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 Sat Flow, veh/h 4 1666 130 1753 1770 32 445 457 569 30 1455 297 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 498 0 0 59 0 391 106 0 0 30 0 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1800 0 0 1753 0 1803 1471 0 0 1782 0 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.1 0.0 7.8 1.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 14.2 0.0 0.0 1.1 0.0 7.8 4.7 0.0 0.0 1.1 0.0 0.0 Prop In Lane 0.01 0.07 1.00 0.02 0.39 0.39 0.07 0.17 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 1029 0 0 563 0 1182 352 0 0 400 0 0 V/C Ratio(X) 0.48 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.00 0.33 0.30 0.00 0.00 0.07 0.00 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 1029 0 0 586 0 1182 485 0 0 562 0 0 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 11.7 0.0 0.0 6.6 0.0 6.2 28.3 0.0 0.0 26.9 0.0 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.8 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 5.1 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.0 2.6 1.8 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 12.0 0.0 0.0 6.6 0.0 7.0 28.7 0.0 0.0 27.0 0.0 0.0 LnGrp LOS B A A A A A C A A C A A Approach Vol, veh/h 498 450 106 30 Approach Delay, s/veh 12.0 6.9 28.7 27.0 Approach LOS B A C C Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 9.0 51.0 22.3 60.0 22.3 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 4.0 44.0 24.0 54.0 24.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 3.1 16.2 3.1 9.8 6.7 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 3.3 0.0 2.6 0.3 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 12.0 HCM 6th LOS B JPA Aspen Heights 2023 Total - MID.syn Synchro 10 Report - 10/12/2021 TG Page 2 Attachment E JPA Aspen Heights 2023 Total Midday 2: Private Entrance/Harmon St & Jefferson Park Ave HCM 6th TWSC Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.3 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 6 433 3 8 362 1 1 0 1 2 0 8 Future Vol, veh/h 6 433 3 8 362 1 1 0 1 2 0 8 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 22 0 25 25 0 22 0 0 22 22 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 5 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Mvmt Flow 6 466 3 9 389 1 1 0 1 2 0 9 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 412 0 0 494 0 0 917 935 515 932 936 412 Stage 1 - - - - - - 505 505 - 430 430 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 412 430 - 502 506 - Critical Hdwy 4.1 - - 4.1 - - 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 - - 2.2 - - 3.5 4 3.3 3.5 4 3.3 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1158 - - 1080 - - 255 267 564 249 267 644 Stage 1 - - - - - - 553 544 - 607 587 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 621 587 - 555 543 - Platoon blocked, % - - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1134 - - 1054 - - 242 250 539 235 250 631 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 242 250 - 235 250 - Stage 1 - - - - - - 536 527 - 590 568 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 606 568 - 538 526 - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0.1 0.2 15.8 12.8 HCM LOS C B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 334 1134 - - 1054 - - 472 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.006 0.006 - - 0.008 - - 0.023 HCM Control Delay (s) 15.8 8.2 0 - 8.4 0 - 12.8 HCM Lane LOS C A A - A A - B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 0 - - 0 - - 0.1 JPA Aspen Heights 2023 Total - MID.syn Synchro 10 Report - 10/12/2021 TG Page 3 Attachment E JPA Aspen Heights 2023 Total Midday 3: Private Entrance/Washington Ave & Jefferson Park Ave HCM 6th TWSC Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.8 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 8 427 1 1 361 15 2 0 3 16 1 13 Future Vol, veh/h 8 427 1 1 361 15 2 0 3 16 1 13 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 31 0 25 25 0 31 0 0 1 1 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 33 4 100 0 6 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 Mvmt Flow 8 449 1 1 380 16 2 0 3 17 1 14 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 427 0 0 475 0 0 889 920 476 889 912 419 Stage 1 - - - - - - 491 491 - 421 421 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 398 429 - 468 491 - Critical Hdwy 4.43 - - 4.1 - - 8.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 7.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 7.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.497 - - 2.2 - - 4.4 4 3.3 3.5 4 3.3 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 985 - - 1098 - - 182 273 593 266 276 638 Stage 1 - - - - - - 413 552 - 614 592 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 471 587 - 579 552 - Platoon blocked, % - - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 956 - - 1072 - - 172 255 578 254 258 619 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 172 255 - 254 258 - Stage 1 - - - - - - 399 533 - 589 574 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 459 569 - 569 533 - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0.2 0 17.3 16.6 HCM LOS C C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 297 956 - - 1072 - - 341 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.018 0.009 - - 0.001 - - 0.093 HCM Control Delay (s) 17.3 8.8 0 - 8.4 0 - 16.6 HCM Lane LOS C A A - A A - C HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 0 - - 0 - - 0.3 JPA Aspen Heights 2023 Total - MID.syn Synchro 10 Report - 10/12/2021 TG Page 4 Attachment E JPA Aspen Heights 2023 Total Midday 4: Private Entrance/Observatory Ave & Jefferson Park Ave HCM 6th TWSC Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.2 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 3 433 3 3 385 6 2 0 3 0 0 1 Future Vol, veh/h 3 433 3 3 385 6 2 0 3 0 0 1 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 23 0 21 21 0 23 0 0 1 1 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 4 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Mvmt Flow 3 456 3 3 405 6 2 0 3 0 0 1 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 434 0 0 480 0 0 900 925 480 903 923 431 Stage 1 - - - - - - 485 485 - 437 437 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 415 440 - 466 486 - Critical Hdwy 4.1 - - 4.1 - - 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 - - 2.2 - - 3.5 4 3.3 3.5 4 3.3 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1136 - - 1093 - - 262 271 590 260 272 629 Stage 1 - - - - - - 567 555 - 602 583 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 619 581 - 581 554 - Platoon blocked, % - - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1111 - - 1071 - - 255 258 578 251 259 615 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 255 258 - 251 259 - Stage 1 - - - - - - 553 542 - 586 568 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 615 566 - 575 541 - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0.1 0.1 14.5 10.9 HCM LOS B B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 384 1111 - - 1071 - - 615 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.014 0.003 - - 0.003 - - 0.002 HCM Control Delay (s) 14.5 8.2 0 - 8.4 0 - 10.9 HCM Lane LOS B A A - A A - B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 0 - - 0 - - 0 JPA Aspen Heights 2023 Total - MID.syn Synchro 10 Report - 10/12/2021 TG Page 5 Attachment E JPA Aspen Heights 2023 Total Midday 5: Jefferson Park Ave & Fontaine Ave & Maury Ave Queues Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Group Flow (vph) 49 278 154 137 260 141 90 141 33 123 45 v/c Ratio 0.14 0.44 0.18 0.32 0.31 0.51 0.31 0.38 0.14 0.44 0.12 Control Delay 23.0 25.0 1.8 17.3 15.9 36.3 31.5 6.8 30.3 35.2 0.7 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 23.0 25.0 1.8 17.3 15.9 36.3 31.5 6.8 30.3 35.2 0.7 Queue Length 50th (ft) 15 94 0 32 64 59 36 0 13 51 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) 53 230 20 99 180 127 86 35 40 111 0 Internal Link Dist (ft) 751 428 732 533 Turn Bay Length (ft) 150 120 88 355 225 117 125 Base Capacity (vph) 362 627 1099 431 846 601 639 620 534 652 637 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.14 0.44 0.14 0.32 0.31 0.23 0.14 0.23 0.06 0.19 0.07 Intersection Summary JPA Aspen Heights 2023 Total - MID.syn Synchro 10 Report - 10/12/2021 TG Page 6 Attachment E JPA Aspen Heights 2023 Total Midday 5: Jefferson Park Ave & Fontaine Ave & Maury Ave HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 46 261 145 129 220 24 133 85 133 31 116 42 Future Volume (veh/h) 46 261 145 129 220 24 133 85 133 31 116 42 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 0.99 0.97 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.92 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1796 1841 1856 1856 1811 1589 1856 1870 1885 1663 1900 1900 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 49 278 154 137 234 26 141 90 0 33 123 45 Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Percent Heavy Veh, % 7 4 3 3 6 21 3 2 1 16 0 0 Cap, veh/h 469 631 732 417 777 86 236 250 197 236 184 Arrive On Green 0.34 0.34 0.34 0.06 0.49 0.49 0.13 0.13 0.00 0.12 0.12 0.12 Sat Flow, veh/h 1067 1841 1524 1767 1600 178 1767 1870 1598 1584 1900 1480 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 49 278 154 137 0 260 141 90 0 33 123 45 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1067 1841 1524 1767 0 1778 1767 1870 1598 1584 1900 1480 Q Serve(g_s), s 2.2 8.2 4.1 3.4 0.0 6.2 5.3 3.1 0.0 1.3 4.2 1.9 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 2.2 8.2 4.1 3.4 0.0 6.2 5.3 3.1 0.0 1.3 4.2 1.9 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.10 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 469 631 732 417 0 863 236 250 197 236 184 V/C Ratio(X) 0.10 0.44 0.21 0.33 0.00 0.30 0.60 0.36 0.17 0.52 0.24 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 469 631 732 417 0 863 606 641 543 651 507 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 15.9 17.8 10.7 13.3 0.0 10.9 28.6 27.6 0.0 27.4 28.7 27.7 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.4 2.2 0.7 2.1 0.0 0.9 0.9 0.3 0.0 0.1 0.7 0.3 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.6 3.6 1.8 1.4 0.0 2.3 2.2 1.3 0.0 0.5 1.9 0.7 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 16.3 20.1 11.3 15.4 0.0 11.8 29.5 28.0 0.0 27.6 29.4 28.0 LnGrp LOS B C B B A B C C C C C Approach Vol, veh/h 481 397 231 A 201 Approach Delay, s/veh 16.9 13.0 28.9 28.8 Approach LOS B B C C Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 10.0 30.0 14.7 40.0 15.3 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 4.0 24.0 24.0 34.0 24.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 5.4 10.2 6.2 8.2 7.3 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 2.0 0.5 1.5 0.4 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 19.6 HCM 6th LOS B Notes Unsignalized Delay for [NBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay. JPA Aspen Heights 2023 Total - MID.syn Synchro 10 Report - 10/12/2021 TG Page 7 Attachment E JPA Aspen Heights 2023 Total Midday 6: Maury Ave/Alderman Road & Stadium Drive HCM 6th AWSC Intersection Intersection Delay, s/veh 9.1 Intersection LOS A Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 20 12 2 53 22 24 5 158 26 20 151 40 Future Vol, veh/h 20 12 2 53 22 24 5 158 26 20 151 40 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 6 0 6 2 15 Mvmt Flow 22 13 2 58 24 26 5 172 28 22 164 43 Number of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 Approach EB WB NB SB Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB Opposing Lanes 1 1 1 1 Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB Conflicting Lanes Left 1 1 1 1 Conflicting Approach RightNB SB WB EB Conflicting Lanes Right 1 1 1 1 HCM Control Delay 8.4 8.9 9 9.3 HCM LOS A A A A Lane NBLn1 EBLn1WBLn1 SBLn1 Vol Left, % 3% 59% 54% 9% Vol Thru, % 84% 35% 22% 72% Vol Right, % 14% 6% 24% 19% Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Traffic Vol by Lane 189 34 99 211 LT Vol 5 20 53 20 Through Vol 158 12 22 151 RT Vol 26 2 24 40 Lane Flow Rate 205 37 108 229 Geometry Grp 1 1 1 1 Degree of Util (X) 0.254 0.052 0.149 0.287 Departure Headway (Hd) 4.443 5.111 4.988 4.499 Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Cap 807 698 717 798 Service Time 2.477 3.163 3.033 2.531 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.254 0.053 0.151 0.287 HCM Control Delay 9 8.4 8.9 9.3 HCM Lane LOS A A A A HCM 95th-tile Q 1 0.2 0.5 1.2 JPA Aspen Heights 2023 Total - MID.syn Synchro 10 Report - 10/12/2021 TG Page 8 Attachment E JPA Aspen Heights 2023 Total Midday 7: Washington Ave & Stadium Drive HCM 6th TWSC Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 1.5 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 47 12 15 93 6 11 Future Vol, veh/h 47 12 15 93 6 11 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 39 39 0 13 1 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - - - - 0 - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 91 91 91 91 91 91 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 0 0 3 0 50 Mvmt Flow 52 13 16 102 7 12 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 104 0 245 99 Stage 1 - - - - 98 - Stage 2 - - - - 147 - Critical Hdwy - - 4.1 - 6.4 6.7 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.4 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.4 - Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.2 - 3.5 3.75 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1500 - 748 840 Stage 1 - - - - 931 - Stage 2 - - - - 885 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1444 - 703 808 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 703 - Stage 1 - - - - 897 - Stage 2 - - - - 864 - Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 1 9.8 HCM LOS A Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity (veh/h) 768 - - 1444 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.024 - - 0.011 - HCM Control Delay (s) 9.8 - - 7.5 0 HCM Lane LOS A - - A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 - - 0 - JPA Aspen Heights 2023 Total - MID.syn Synchro 10 Report - 10/12/2021 TG Page 9 Attachment E JPA Aspen Heights 2023 Total Midday 8: Washington Ave & Site Entrance HCM 6th TWSC Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 4.7 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 12 17 16 8 16 10 Future Vol, veh/h 12 17 16 8 16 10 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 0 - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 0 0 0 0 0 Mvmt Flow 13 18 17 9 17 11 Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 66 23 28 0 - 0 Stage 1 23 - - - - - Stage 2 43 - - - - - Critical Hdwy 6.4 6.2 4.1 - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.4 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.4 - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.5 3.3 2.2 - - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 944 1060 1599 - - - Stage 1 1005 - - - - - Stage 2 985 - - - - - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 934 1060 1599 - - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 934 - - - - - Stage 1 994 - - - - - Stage 2 985 - - - - - Approach EB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 8.7 4.9 0 HCM LOS A Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1599 - 1004 - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.011 - 0.031 - - HCM Control Delay (s) 7.3 0 8.7 - - HCM Lane LOS A A A - - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - 0.1 - - JPA Aspen Heights 2023 Total - MID.syn Synchro 10 Report - 10/12/2021 TG Page 10 Attachment E JPA Aspen Heights 2023 Total Midday Queuing and Blocking Report Intersection: 1: Shamrock Rd & Jefferson Park Ave Movement EB WB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR L TR LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 268 75 213 124 58 Average Queue (ft) 119 29 83 58 20 95th Queue (ft) 236 64 169 108 51 Link Distance (ft) 304 532 559 534 Upstream Blk Time (%) 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 75 Storage Blk Time (%) 0 7 Queuing Penalty (veh) 1 4 Intersection: 2: Private Entrance/Harmon St & Jefferson Park Ave Movement EB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 64 89 26 35 Average Queue (ft) 8 8 2 10 95th Queue (ft) 36 46 13 34 Link Distance (ft) 77 304 320 536 Upstream Blk Time (%) 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 3: Private Entrance/Washington Ave & Jefferson Park Ave Movement EB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 73 11 58 51 Average Queue (ft) 7 0 7 22 95th Queue (ft) 44 8 34 49 Link Distance (ft) 174 77 261 281 Upstream Blk Time (%) 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) JPA Aspen Heights 2023 Total - MID.syn SimTraffic Report - 10/12/2021 TG Page 1 Attachment E JPA Aspen Heights 2023 Total Midday Queuing and Blocking Report Intersection: 4: Private Entrance/Observatory Ave & Jefferson Park Ave Movement EB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 15 59 31 14 Average Queue (ft) 1 4 5 1 95th Queue (ft) 9 32 22 8 Link Distance (ft) 432 174 314 534 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 5: Jefferson Park Ave & Fontaine Ave & Maury Ave Movement EB EB EB WB WB NB NB SB SB SB Directions Served L T R L TR L T L T R Maximum Queue (ft) 133 268 120 87 246 160 109 92 146 108 Average Queue (ft) 30 108 43 59 94 69 49 23 64 27 95th Queue (ft) 82 206 113 100 184 128 92 63 118 69 Link Distance (ft) 774 432 770 538 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 150 120 88 355 117 125 Storage Blk Time (%) 0 6 0 2 6 0 1 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 12 1 5 8 0 1 0 Intersection: 6: Maury Ave/Alderman Road & Stadium Drive Movement EB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 40 80 106 101 Average Queue (ft) 21 39 56 50 95th Queue (ft) 46 64 89 80 Link Distance (ft) 544 504 452 665 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) JPA Aspen Heights 2023 Total - MID.syn SimTraffic Report - 10/12/2021 TG Page 2 Attachment E JPA Aspen Heights 2023 Total Midday Queuing and Blocking Report Intersection: 7: Washington Ave & Stadium Drive Movement EB WB NB Directions Served TR LT LR Maximum Queue (ft) 6 24 64 Average Queue (ft) 0 2 19 95th Queue (ft) 4 13 55 Link Distance (ft) 504 658 455 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 8: Washington Ave & Site Entrance Movement EB NB Directions Served LR LT Maximum Queue (ft) 40 12 Average Queue (ft) 19 0 95th Queue (ft) 44 6 Link Distance (ft) 156 281 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Network Summary Network wide Queuing Penalty: 31 JPA Aspen Heights 2023 Total - MID.syn SimTraffic Report - 10/12/2021 TG Page 3 Attachment E JPA Aspen Heights 2023 Total PM 1: Shamrock Rd & Jefferson Park Ave Queues Lane Group EBT WBL WBT NBT SBT Lane Group Flow (vph) 393 111 617 133 72 v/c Ratio 0.47 0.19 0.55 0.56 0.27 Control Delay 13.7 6.3 9.9 39.5 28.5 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 13.7 6.3 9.9 39.5 28.5 Queue Length 50th (ft) 100 15 125 61 29 Queue Length 95th (ft) 226 47 312 114 63 Internal Link Dist (ft) 301 481 515 490 Turn Bay Length (ft) 75 Base Capacity (vph) 843 593 1131 423 478 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.47 0.19 0.55 0.31 0.15 Intersection Summary JPA Aspen Heights 2023 Total - PM.syn Synchro 10 Report - 10/12/2021 TG Page 1 Attachment E JPA Aspen Heights 2023 Total PM 1: Shamrock Rd & Jefferson Park Ave HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 21 293 55 104 568 12 43 25 56 9 52 7 Future Volume (veh/h) 21 293 55 104 568 12 43 25 56 9 52 7 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 0.98 0.89 0.99 0.90 0.89 0.85 0.91 0.84 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1900 1870 1900 1885 1870 1781 1870 1900 1841 1900 1900 1900 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 22 312 59 111 604 13 46 27 60 10 55 7 Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Percent Heavy Veh, % 0 2 0 1 2 8 2 0 4 0 0 0 Cap, veh/h 67 723 132 626 1137 24 149 93 152 77 346 40 Arrive On Green 0.51 0.51 0.51 0.05 0.63 0.63 0.24 0.24 0.24 0.24 0.24 0.24 Sat Flow, veh/h 45 1420 259 1795 1819 39 392 393 646 124 1466 171 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 393 0 0 111 0 617 133 0 0 72 0 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1723 0 0 1795 0 1858 1432 0 0 1761 0 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.4 0.0 16.1 2.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 12.0 0.0 0.0 2.4 0.0 16.1 6.3 0.0 0.0 2.7 0.0 0.0 Prop In Lane 0.06 0.15 1.00 0.02 0.35 0.45 0.14 0.10 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 922 0 0 626 0 1162 394 0 0 463 0 0 V/C Ratio(X) 0.43 0.00 0.00 0.18 0.00 0.53 0.34 0.00 0.00 0.16 0.00 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 922 0 0 626 0 1162 452 0 0 534 0 0 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 13.3 0.0 0.0 8.2 0.0 9.1 27.5 0.0 0.0 26.3 0.0 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 1.4 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.0 1.7 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 4.7 0.0 0.0 0.9 0.0 6.0 2.3 0.0 0.0 1.2 0.0 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 14.8 0.0 0.0 8.8 0.0 10.8 28.0 0.0 0.0 26.4 0.0 0.0 LnGrp LOS B A A A A B C A A C A A Approach Vol, veh/h 393 728 133 72 Approach Delay, s/veh 14.8 10.5 28.0 26.4 Approach LOS B B C C Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 10.0 50.0 26.4 60.0 26.4 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 4.0 44.0 24.0 54.0 24.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 4.4 14.0 4.7 18.1 8.3 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 2.7 0.1 4.6 0.4 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 14.4 HCM 6th LOS B JPA Aspen Heights 2023 Total - PM.syn Synchro 10 Report - 10/12/2021 TG Page 2 Attachment E JPA Aspen Heights 2023 Total PM 2: Private Entrance/Harmon St & Jefferson Park Ave HCM 6th TWSC Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.7 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 7 332 1 13 590 4 0 0 8 6 1 15 Future Vol, veh/h 7 332 1 13 590 4 0 0 8 6 1 15 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 43 0 44 44 0 43 0 0 21 21 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 Mvmt Flow 8 361 1 14 641 4 0 0 9 7 1 16 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 688 0 0 406 0 0 1102 1138 427 1117 1136 686 Stage 1 - - - - - - 422 422 - 714 714 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 680 716 - 403 422 - Critical Hdwy 4.1 - - 4.1 - - 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.27 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 - - 2.2 - - 3.5 4 3.3 3.5 4 3.363 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 916 - - 1164 - - 191 203 632 186 204 439 Stage 1 - - - - - - 613 592 - 425 438 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 444 437 - 628 592 - Platoon blocked, % - - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 878 - - 1115 - - 171 181 593 168 182 421 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 171 181 - 168 182 - Stage 1 - - - - - - 581 561 - 403 412 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 417 411 - 600 561 - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0.2 0.2 11.2 18.7 HCM LOS B C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 593 878 - - 1115 - - 286 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.015 0.009 - - 0.013 - - 0.084 HCM Control Delay (s) 11.2 9.1 0 - 8.3 0 - 18.7 HCM Lane LOS B A A - A A - C HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 0 - - 0 - - 0.3 JPA Aspen Heights 2023 Total - PM.syn Synchro 10 Report - 10/12/2021 TG Page 3 Attachment E JPA Aspen Heights 2023 Total PM 3: Private Entrance/Washington Ave & Jefferson Park Ave HCM 6th TWSC Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 1.1 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 16 318 1 2 592 19 0 0 1 24 0 15 Future Vol, veh/h 16 318 1 2 592 19 0 0 1 24 0 15 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 51 0 67 67 0 51 4 0 2 2 0 4 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Mvmt Flow 17 346 1 2 643 21 0 0 1 26 0 16 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 715 0 0 414 0 0 1118 1167 416 1092 1157 709 Stage 1 - - - - - - 448 448 - 709 709 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 670 719 - 383 448 - Critical Hdwy 4.1 - - 4.1 - - 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 - - 2.2 - - 3.5 4 3.3 3.5 4 3.3 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 895 - - 1156 - - 186 195 641 194 198 438 Stage 1 - - - - - - 594 576 - 428 440 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 450 436 - 644 576 - Platoon blocked, % - - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 852 - - 1082 - - 163 169 599 180 171 415 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 163 169 - 180 171 - Stage 1 - - - - - - 542 526 - 397 417 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 429 413 - 626 526 - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0.4 0 11 24.2 HCM LOS B C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 599 852 - - 1082 - - 230 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.002 0.02 - - 0.002 - - 0.184 HCM Control Delay (s) 11 9.3 0 - 8.3 0 - 24.2 HCM Lane LOS B A A - A A - C HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 0.1 - - 0 - - 0.7 JPA Aspen Heights 2023 Total - PM.syn Synchro 10 Report - 10/12/2021 TG Page 4 Attachment E JPA Aspen Heights 2023 Total PM 4: Private Entrance/Observatory Ave & Jefferson Park Ave HCM 6th TWSC Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.7 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 9 320 3 8 619 5 4 0 6 6 1 7 Future Vol, veh/h 9 320 3 8 619 5 4 0 6 6 1 7 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 46 0 91 91 0 46 4 0 2 2 0 4 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Mvmt Flow 10 348 3 9 673 5 4 0 7 7 1 8 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 724 0 0 442 0 0 1163 1203 443 1115 1202 726 Stage 1 - - - - - - 461 461 - 740 740 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 702 742 - 375 462 - Critical Hdwy 4.1 - - 4.1 - - 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 - - 2.2 - - 3.5 4 3.3 3.5 4 3.3 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 888 - - 1129 - - 173 186 619 187 186 428 Stage 1 - - - - - - 584 569 - 412 426 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 432 425 - 650 568 - Platoon blocked, % - - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 849 - - 1031 - - 150 158 564 173 158 408 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 150 158 - 173 158 - Stage 1 - - - - - - 526 512 - 388 402 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 415 401 - 632 511 - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0.3 0.1 19 20.9 HCM LOS C C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 268 849 - - 1031 - - 241 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.041 0.012 - - 0.008 - - 0.063 HCM Control Delay (s) 19 9.3 0 - 8.5 0 - 20.9 HCM Lane LOS C A A - A A - C HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 0 - - 0 - - 0.2 JPA Aspen Heights 2023 Total - PM.syn Synchro 10 Report - 10/12/2021 TG Page 5 Attachment E JPA Aspen Heights 2023 Total PM 5: Jefferson Park Ave & Fontaine Ave & Maury Ave Queues Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Group Flow (vph) 26 163 269 239 384 194 106 115 52 322 52 v/c Ratio 0.09 0.31 0.34 0.57 0.53 0.64 0.34 0.32 0.14 0.80 0.12 Control Delay 28.2 29.0 4.3 28.1 24.9 43.7 34.7 4.1 29.3 48.1 0.5 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 28.2 29.0 4.3 28.1 24.9 43.7 34.7 4.1 29.3 48.1 0.5 Queue Length 50th (ft) 10 69 17 88 153 98 51 0 23 164 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) 35 146 50 182 298 175 101 18 57 285 0 Internal Link Dist (ft) 751 428 732 533 Turn Bay Length (ft) 150 120 88 355 225 117 125 Base Capacity (vph) 286 528 962 423 730 501 523 490 482 533 533 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.09 0.31 0.28 0.57 0.53 0.39 0.20 0.23 0.11 0.60 0.10 Intersection Summary JPA Aspen Heights 2023 Total - PM.syn Synchro 10 Report - 10/12/2021 TG Page 6 Attachment E JPA Aspen Heights 2023 Total PM 5: Jefferson Park Ave & Fontaine Ave & Maury Ave HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 25 155 256 227 332 33 184 101 109 49 306 49 Future Volume (veh/h) 25 155 256 227 332 33 184 101 109 49 306 49 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 0.98 0.94 0.99 0.96 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.81 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1900 1870 1900 1885 1870 1678 1870 1856 1900 1811 1885 1841 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 26 163 269 239 349 35 194 106 0 52 322 52 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 0 2 0 1 2 15 2 3 0 6 1 4 Cap, veh/h 303 508 721 355 640 64 342 356 379 414 278 Arrive On Green 0.27 0.27 0.27 0.05 0.38 0.38 0.19 0.19 0.00 0.22 0.22 0.22 Sat Flow, veh/h 998 1870 1519 1795 1664 167 1781 1856 1610 1725 1885 1265 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 26 163 269 239 0 384 194 106 0 52 322 52 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 998 1870 1519 1795 0 1831 1781 1856 1610 1725 1885 1265 Q Serve(g_s), s 1.8 6.1 10.2 4.0 0.0 14.4 8.7 4.3 0.0 2.1 14.2 3.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 6.3 6.1 10.2 4.0 0.0 14.4 8.7 4.3 0.0 2.1 14.2 3.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.09 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 303 508 721 355 0 705 342 356 379 414 278 V/C Ratio(X) 0.09 0.32 0.37 0.67 0.00 0.54 0.57 0.30 0.14 0.78 0.19 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 303 508 721 355 0 705 484 504 469 512 344 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 27.5 25.7 15.5 27.8 0.0 21.2 32.4 30.6 0.0 27.7 32.4 28.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.6 1.7 1.5 9.8 0.0 3.0 0.6 0.2 0.0 0.1 4.6 0.1 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.5 2.9 5.1 3.6 0.0 6.4 3.7 1.9 0.0 0.9 6.9 0.9 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 28.0 27.3 16.9 37.6 0.0 24.2 32.9 30.8 0.0 27.8 37.0 28.2 LnGrp LOS C C B D A C C C C D C Approach Vol, veh/h 458 623 300 A 426 Approach Delay, s/veh 21.3 29.3 32.2 34.8 Approach LOS C C C C Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 10.0 30.0 25.4 40.0 22.9 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 4.0 24.0 24.0 34.0 24.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 6.0 12.2 16.2 16.4 10.7 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 1.6 1.0 2.1 0.5 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 29.0 HCM 6th LOS C Notes Unsignalized Delay for [NBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay. JPA Aspen Heights 2023 Total - PM.syn Synchro 10 Report - 10/12/2021 TG Page 7 Attachment E JPA Aspen Heights 2023 Total PM 6: Maury Ave/Alderman Road & Stadium Drive HCM 6th AWSC Intersection Intersection Delay, s/veh22.7 Intersection LOS C Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 20 16 3 129 130 24 6 155 16 65 329 94 Future Vol, veh/h 20 16 3 129 130 24 6 155 16 65 329 94 Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Heavy Vehicles, % 5 0 0 2 0 0 0 6 0 34 1 7 Mvmt Flow 21 17 3 137 138 26 6 165 17 69 350 100 Number of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 Approach EB WB NB SB Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB Opposing Lanes 1 1 1 1 Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB Conflicting Lanes Left 1 1 1 1 Conflicting Approach RightNB SB WB EB Conflicting Lanes Right 1 1 1 1 HCM Control Delay 10.5 15.4 11.5 31.9 HCM LOS B C B D Lane NBLn1 EBLn1WBLn1 SBLn1 Vol Left, % 3% 51% 46% 13% Vol Thru, % 88% 41% 46% 67% Vol Right, % 9% 8% 8% 19% Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Traffic Vol by Lane 177 39 283 488 LT Vol 6 20 129 65 Through Vol 155 16 130 329 RT Vol 16 3 24 94 Lane Flow Rate 188 41 301 519 Geometry Grp 1 1 1 1 Degree of Util (X) 0.306 0.08 0.51 0.838 Departure Headway (Hd) 5.846 6.915 6.093 5.81 Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Cap 610 521 587 623 Service Time 3.926 4.915 4.167 3.87 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.308 0.079 0.513 0.833 HCM Control Delay 11.5 10.5 15.4 31.9 HCM Lane LOS B B C D HCM 95th-tile Q 1.3 0.3 2.9 9 JPA Aspen Heights 2023 Total - PM.syn Synchro 10 Report - 10/12/2021 TG Page 8 Attachment E JPA Aspen Heights 2023 Total PM 7: Washington Ave & Stadium Drive HCM 6th TWSC Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 1.2 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 80 6 18 260 9 23 Future Vol, veh/h 80 6 18 260 9 23 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 42 42 0 9 1 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - - - - 0 - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 26 0 0 1 0 0 Mvmt Flow 87 7 20 283 10 25 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 136 0 465 134 Stage 1 - - - - 133 - Stage 2 - - - - 332 - Critical Hdwy - - 4.1 - 6.4 6.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.4 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.4 - Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.2 - 3.5 3.3 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1461 - 559 920 Stage 1 - - - - 898 - Stage 2 - - - - 731 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1403 - 523 882 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 523 - Stage 1 - - - - 862 - Stage 2 - - - - 713 - Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 0.5 10.1 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity (veh/h) 739 - - 1403 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.047 - - 0.014 - HCM Control Delay (s) 10.1 - - 7.6 0 HCM Lane LOS B - - A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 - - 0 - JPA Aspen Heights 2023 Total - PM.syn Synchro 10 Report - 10/12/2021 TG Page 9 Attachment E JPA Aspen Heights 2023 Total PM 8: Washington Ave & Site Entrance HCM 6th TWSC Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 5.5 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 17 25 25 10 7 17 Future Vol, veh/h 17 25 25 10 7 17 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 0 - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 0 0 0 0 0 Mvmt Flow 18 27 27 11 8 18 Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 82 17 26 0 - 0 Stage 1 17 - - - - - Stage 2 65 - - - - - Critical Hdwy 6.4 6.2 4.1 - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.4 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.4 - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.5 3.3 2.2 - - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 925 1068 1601 - - - Stage 1 1011 - - - - - Stage 2 963 - - - - - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 909 1068 1601 - - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 909 - - - - - Stage 1 994 - - - - - Stage 2 963 - - - - - Approach EB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 8.8 5.2 0 HCM LOS A Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1601 - 997 - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.017 - 0.046 - - HCM Control Delay (s) 7.3 0 8.8 - - HCM Lane LOS A A A - - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 - 0.1 - - JPA Aspen Heights 2023 Total - PM.syn Synchro 10 Report - 10/12/2021 TG Page 10 Attachment E JPA Aspen Heights 2023 Total PM Queuing and Blocking Report Intersection: 1: Shamrock Rd & Jefferson Park Ave Movement EB WB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR L TR LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 265 74 402 151 90 Average Queue (ft) 130 42 171 76 40 95th Queue (ft) 233 79 335 133 74 Link Distance (ft) 304 532 559 534 Upstream Blk Time (%) 0 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 1 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 75 Storage Blk Time (%) 1 20 Queuing Penalty (veh) 6 20 Intersection: 2: Private Entrance/Harmon St & Jefferson Park Ave Movement EB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 75 225 35 61 Average Queue (ft) 10 45 6 20 95th Queue (ft) 47 188 26 51 Link Distance (ft) 77 304 320 536 Upstream Blk Time (%) 1 1 Queuing Penalty (veh) 2 4 Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 3: Private Entrance/Washington Ave & Jefferson Park Ave Movement EB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 139 85 22 92 Average Queue (ft) 24 20 1 34 95th Queue (ft) 96 75 11 79 Link Distance (ft) 174 77 261 281 Upstream Blk Time (%) 0 5 Queuing Penalty (veh) 1 28 Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) JPA Aspen Heights 2023 Total - PM.syn SimTraffic Report - 10/12/2021 TG Page 1 Attachment E JPA Aspen Heights 2023 Total PM Queuing and Blocking Report Intersection: 4: Private Entrance/Observatory Ave & Jefferson Park Ave Movement EB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 114 184 53 84 Average Queue (ft) 11 62 16 25 95th Queue (ft) 59 189 69 99 Link Distance (ft) 432 174 314 534 Upstream Blk Time (%) 6 Queuing Penalty (veh) 38 Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 5: Jefferson Park Ave & Fontaine Ave & Maury Ave Movement EB EB EB WB WB NB NB SB SB SB Directions Served L T R L TR L T L T R Maximum Queue (ft) 73 201 120 87 447 208 129 117 326 125 Average Queue (ft) 19 79 60 83 330 105 56 47 192 52 95th Queue (ft) 51 163 118 101 525 174 107 118 301 133 Link Distance (ft) 774 432 770 538 Upstream Blk Time (%) 11 Queuing Penalty (veh) 69 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 150 120 88 355 117 125 Storage Blk Time (%) 0 2 1 24 42 0 29 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 5 1 88 96 1 28 1 Intersection: 6: Maury Ave/Alderman Road & Stadium Drive Movement EB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 51 160 135 290 Average Queue (ft) 24 75 64 138 95th Queue (ft) 49 125 109 248 Link Distance (ft) 544 504 452 665 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) JPA Aspen Heights 2023 Total - PM.syn SimTraffic Report - 10/12/2021 TG Page 2 Attachment E JPA Aspen Heights 2023 Total PM Queuing and Blocking Report Intersection: 7: Washington Ave & Stadium Drive Movement EB WB NB Directions Served TR LT LR Maximum Queue (ft) 10 35 44 Average Queue (ft) 0 3 21 95th Queue (ft) 7 19 44 Link Distance (ft) 504 658 455 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 8: Washington Ave & Site Entrance Movement EB NB Directions Served LR LT Maximum Queue (ft) 52 25 Average Queue (ft) 25 1 95th Queue (ft) 48 9 Link Distance (ft) 156 281 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Network Summary Network wide Queuing Penalty: 389 JPA Aspen Heights 2023 Total - PM.syn SimTraffic Report - 10/12/2021 TG Page 3 Attachment E JPA Aspen Heights 2028 Total AM 1: Shamrock Rd & Jefferson Park Ave Queues Lane Group EBT WBL WBT NBT SBT Lane Group Flow (vph) 533 33 268 195 27 v/c Ratio 0.60 0.07 0.25 0.67 0.09 Control Delay 17.6 6.4 7.2 42.2 24.5 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 17.6 6.4 7.2 42.2 24.5 Queue Length 50th (ft) 171 5 48 93 10 Queue Length 95th (ft) 335 18 109 160 31 Internal Link Dist (ft) 301 481 515 490 Turn Bay Length (ft) 75 Base Capacity (vph) 881 507 1063 446 469 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.60 0.07 0.25 0.44 0.06 Intersection Summary JPA Aspen Heights 2028 Total- AM.syn Synchro 10 Report - 10/12/2021 TG Page 1 Attachment E JPA Aspen Heights 2028 Total AM 1: Shamrock Rd & Jefferson Park Ave HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 8 466 32 31 252 3 66 46 74 4 19 3 Future Volume (veh/h) 8 466 32 31 252 3 66 46 74 4 19 3 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 0.96 0.91 1.00 0.93 0.96 0.93 0.97 0.95 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1707 1870 1811 1856 1811 1900 1870 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 8 491 34 33 265 3 69 48 78 4 20 3 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 13 2 6 3 6 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 Cap, veh/h 49 916 63 561 1177 13 143 97 121 74 286 39 Arrive On Green 0.54 0.54 0.54 0.05 0.66 0.66 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 Sat Flow, veh/h 8 1704 117 1767 1785 20 433 500 622 124 1476 200 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 533 0 0 33 0 268 195 0 0 27 0 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1829 0 0 1767 0 1806 1554 0 0 1799 0 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.0 4.9 6.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 15.5 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.0 4.9 9.3 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 Prop In Lane 0.02 0.06 1.00 0.01 0.35 0.40 0.15 0.11 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 1027 0 0 561 0 1191 361 0 0 399 0 0 V/C Ratio(X) 0.52 0.00 0.00 0.06 0.00 0.23 0.54 0.00 0.00 0.07 0.00 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 1027 0 0 561 0 1191 511 0 0 570 0 0 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 12.4 0.0 0.0 6.3 0.0 5.6 30.2 0.0 0.0 27.0 0.0 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 1.9 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.4 1.3 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 6.1 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 1.6 3.6 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 14.2 0.0 0.0 6.5 0.0 6.0 31.5 0.0 0.0 27.1 0.0 0.0 LnGrp LOS B A A A A A C A A C A A Approach Vol, veh/h 533 301 195 27 Approach Delay, s/veh 14.2 6.1 31.5 27.1 Approach LOS B A C C Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 10.0 50.0 21.9 60.0 21.9 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 4.0 44.0 24.0 54.0 24.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 2.6 17.5 3.0 6.9 11.3 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 3.6 0.0 1.7 0.5 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 15.4 HCM 6th LOS B JPA Aspen Heights 2028 Total- AM.syn Synchro 10 Report - 10/12/2021 TG Page 3 Attachment E JPA Aspen Heights 2028 Total AM 2: Private Entrance/Harmon St & Jefferson Park Ave HCM 6th TWSC Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.2 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 9 495 1 4 297 3 1 0 1 2 0 2 Future Vol, veh/h 9 495 1 4 297 3 1 0 1 2 0 2 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 61 0 20 20 0 61 0 0 17 17 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 3 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Mvmt Flow 10 532 1 4 319 3 1 0 1 2 0 2 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 383 0 0 553 0 0 903 964 570 960 963 382 Stage 1 - - - - - - 573 573 - 390 390 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 330 391 - 570 573 - Critical Hdwy 4.1 - - 4.1 - - 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 - - 2.2 - - 3.5 4 3.3 3.5 4 3.3 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1187 - - 1027 - - 260 257 525 238 258 670 Stage 1 - - - - - - 508 507 - 638 611 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 687 611 - 510 507 - Platoon blocked, % - - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1118 - - 1007 - - 251 233 507 217 234 631 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 251 233 - 217 234 - Stage 1 - - - - - - 492 491 - 593 573 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 681 573 - 494 491 - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0.1 0.1 15.8 16.3 HCM LOS C C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 336 1118 - - 1007 - - 323 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.006 0.009 - - 0.004 - - 0.013 HCM Control Delay (s) 15.8 8.2 0 - 8.6 0 - 16.3 HCM Lane LOS C A A - A A - C HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 0 - - 0 - - 0 JPA Aspen Heights 2028 Total- AM.syn Synchro 10 Report - 10/12/2021 TG Page 4 Attachment E JPA Aspen Heights 2028 Total AM 3: Private Entrance/Washington Ave & Jefferson Park Ave HCM 6th TWSC Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.4 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 8 490 2 2 295 8 0 0 1 9 0 4 Future Vol, veh/h 8 490 2 2 295 8 0 0 1 9 0 4 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 46 0 27 27 0 46 2 0 2 2 0 2 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 20 3 100 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Mvmt Flow 9 533 2 2 321 9 0 0 1 10 0 4 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 376 0 0 562 0 0 913 959 563 931 956 374 Stage 1 - - - - - - 579 579 - 376 376 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 334 380 - 555 580 - Critical Hdwy 4.3 - - 4.1 - - 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.38 - - 2.2 - - 3.5 4 3.3 3.5 4 3.3 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1090 - - 1019 - - 256 259 530 249 260 677 Stage 1 - - - - - - 504 504 - 649 620 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 684 617 - 520 503 - Platoon blocked, % - - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1042 - - 993 - - 245 238 515 235 239 646 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 245 238 - 235 239 - Stage 1 - - - - - - 485 485 - 613 591 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 677 589 - 512 484 - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0.1 0.1 12 18 HCM LOS B C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 515 1042 - - 993 - - 292 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.002 0.008 - - 0.002 - - 0.048 HCM Control Delay (s) 12 8.5 0 - 8.6 0 - 18 HCM Lane LOS B A A - A A - C HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 0 - - 0 - - 0.2 JPA Aspen Heights 2028 Total- AM.syn Synchro 10 Report - 10/12/2021 TG Page 5 Attachment E JPA Aspen Heights 2028 Total AM 4: Private Entrance/Observatory Ave & Jefferson Park Ave HCM 6th TWSC Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.3 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 6 512 0 4 286 1 1 0 3 2 0 3 Future Vol, veh/h 6 512 0 4 286 1 1 0 3 2 0 3 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 60 0 34 34 0 60 2 0 1 1 0 2 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 2 0 25 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Mvmt Flow 7 557 0 4 311 1 1 0 3 2 0 3 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 372 0 0 591 0 0 928 985 592 954 985 374 Stage 1 - - - - - - 605 605 - 380 380 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 323 380 - 574 605 - Critical Hdwy 4.1 - - 4.35 - - 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 - - 2.425 - - 3.5 4 3.3 3.5 4 3.3 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1198 - - 881 - - 250 250 510 240 250 677 Stage 1 - - - - - - 488 491 - 646 617 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 693 617 - 507 491 - Platoon blocked, % - - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1130 - - 852 - - 238 225 493 222 225 637 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 238 225 - 222 225 - Stage 1 - - - - - - 468 471 - 603 578 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 684 578 - 499 471 - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0.1 0.1 14.4 15 HCM LOS B C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 389 1130 - - 852 - - 364 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.011 0.006 - - 0.005 - - 0.015 HCM Control Delay (s) 14.4 8.2 0 - 9.2 0 - 15 HCM Lane LOS B A A - A A - C HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 0 - - 0 - - 0 JPA Aspen Heights 2028 Total- AM.syn Synchro 10 Report - 10/12/2021 TG Page 6 Attachment E JPA Aspen Heights 2028 Total AM 5: Jefferson Park Ave & Fontaine Ave & Maury Ave Queues Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Group Flow (vph) 75 325 150 61 262 340 255 197 22 54 15 v/c Ratio 0.20 0.51 0.15 0.17 0.33 0.77 0.56 0.39 0.12 0.24 0.05 Control Delay 26.9 29.3 1.6 18.6 19.1 42.1 32.5 6.9 34.1 36.1 0.3 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 26.9 29.3 1.6 18.6 19.1 42.1 32.5 6.9 34.1 36.1 0.3 Queue Length 50th (ft) 28 139 0 18 85 155 109 0 11 26 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) 78 281 19 53 190 #326 218 54 31 60 0 Internal Link Dist (ft) 751 428 732 533 Turn Bay Length (ft) 150 120 88 355 225 117 125 Base Capacity (vph) 380 640 1046 353 785 558 581 586 490 570 526 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.20 0.51 0.14 0.17 0.33 0.61 0.44 0.34 0.04 0.09 0.03 Intersection Summary # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. JPA Aspen Heights 2028 Total- AM.syn Synchro 10 Report - 10/12/2021 TG Page 7 Attachment E JPA Aspen Heights 2028 Total AM 5: Jefferson Park Ave & Fontaine Ave & Maury Ave HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 69 299 138 56 219 22 313 235 181 20 50 14 Future Volume (veh/h) 69 299 138 56 219 22 313 235 181 20 50 14 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 0.99 0.96 1.00 0.96 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.87 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1856 1856 1885 1870 1841 1559 1885 1870 1885 1678 1841 1693 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 75 325 150 61 238 24 340 255 0 22 54 15 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 3 3 1 2 4 23 1 2 1 15 4 14 Cap, veh/h 432 580 844 308 696 70 411 428 195 224 152 Arrive On Green 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.04 0.42 0.42 0.23 0.23 0.00 0.12 0.12 0.12 Sat Flow, veh/h 1094 1856 1532 1781 1638 165 1795 1870 1598 1598 1841 1250 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 75 325 150 61 0 262 340 255 0 22 54 15 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1094 1856 1532 1781 0 1804 1795 1870 1598 1598 1841 1250 Q Serve(g_s), s 4.1 11.7 4.0 1.8 0.0 7.8 14.4 9.7 0.0 1.0 2.1 0.9 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 4.1 11.7 4.0 1.8 0.0 7.8 14.4 9.7 0.0 1.0 2.1 0.9 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.09 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 432 580 844 308 0 766 411 428 195 224 152 V/C Ratio(X) 0.17 0.56 0.18 0.20 0.00 0.34 0.83 0.60 0.11 0.24 0.10 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 432 580 844 331 0 766 538 561 479 552 375 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 20.3 22.9 9.3 17.5 0.0 15.5 29.4 27.6 0.0 31.3 31.8 31.2 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.9 3.9 0.5 0.1 0.0 1.2 6.3 0.5 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.1 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 1.1 5.4 2.1 0.7 0.0 3.2 6.7 4.3 0.0 0.4 1.0 0.3 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 21.2 26.8 9.8 17.6 0.0 16.7 35.7 28.1 0.0 31.4 32.0 31.4 LnGrp LOS C C A B A B D C C C C Approach Vol, veh/h 550 323 595 A 91 Approach Delay, s/veh 21.4 16.9 32.4 31.8 Approach LOS C B C C Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 9.0 31.0 15.8 40.0 24.3 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 4.0 24.0 24.0 34.0 24.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 3.8 13.7 4.1 9.8 16.4 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 2.0 0.2 1.5 1.0 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 25.3 HCM 6th LOS C Notes Unsignalized Delay for [NBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay. JPA Aspen Heights 2028 Total- AM.syn Synchro 10 Report - 10/12/2021 TG Page 9 Attachment E JPA Aspen Heights 2028 Total AM 6: Maury Ave/Alderman Road & Stadium Drive HCM 6th AWSC Intersection Intersection Delay, s/veh 12 Intersection LOS B Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 113 71 6 18 9 33 2 308 50 28 72 29 Future Vol, veh/h 113 71 6 18 9 33 2 308 50 28 72 29 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 0 0 22 11 0 0 3 0 54 4 21 Mvmt Flow 123 77 7 20 10 36 2 335 54 30 78 32 Number of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 Approach EB WB NB SB Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB Opposing Lanes 1 1 1 1 Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB Conflicting Lanes Left 1 1 1 1 Conflicting Approach RightNB SB WB EB Conflicting Lanes Right 1 1 1 1 HCM Control Delay 11.1 9.5 13.2 11 HCM LOS B A B B Lane NBLn1 EBLn1WBLn1 SBLn1 Vol Left, % 1% 59% 30% 22% Vol Thru, % 86% 37% 15% 56% Vol Right, % 14% 3% 55% 22% Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Traffic Vol by Lane 360 190 60 129 LT Vol 2 113 18 28 Through Vol 308 71 9 72 RT Vol 50 6 33 29 Lane Flow Rate 391 207 65 140 Geometry Grp 1 1 1 1 Degree of Util (X) 0.529 0.316 0.105 0.236 Departure Headway (Hd) 4.867 5.517 5.786 6.062 Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Cap 747 653 619 593 Service Time 2.867 3.55 3.825 4.094 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.523 0.317 0.105 0.236 HCM Control Delay 13.2 11.1 9.5 11 HCM Lane LOS B B A B HCM 95th-tile Q 3.1 1.4 0.4 0.9 JPA Aspen Heights 2028 Total- AM.syn Synchro 10 Report - 10/12/2021 TG Page 10 Attachment E JPA Aspen Heights 2028 Total AM 7: Washington Ave & Stadium Drive HCM 6th TWSC Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.8 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 145 5 6 51 3 11 Future Vol, veh/h 145 5 6 51 3 11 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 14 14 0 4 1 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - - - - 0 - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 10 0 0 8 0 0 Mvmt Flow 158 5 7 55 3 12 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 177 0 248 176 Stage 1 - - - - 175 - Stage 2 - - - - 73 - Critical Hdwy - - 4.1 - 6.4 6.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.4 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.4 - Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.2 - 3.5 3.3 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1411 - 745 872 Stage 1 - - - - 860 - Stage 2 - - - - 955 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1392 - 729 860 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 729 - Stage 1 - - - - 849 - Stage 2 - - - - 946 - Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 0.8 9.4 HCM LOS A Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity (veh/h) 828 - - 1392 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.018 - - 0.005 - HCM Control Delay (s) 9.4 - - 7.6 0 HCM Lane LOS A - - A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 - - 0 - JPA Aspen Heights 2028 Total- AM.syn Synchro 10 Report - 10/12/2021 TG Page 11 Attachment E JPA Aspen Heights 2028 Total AM 8: Washington Ave & Site Entrance HCM 6th TWSC Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 5.2 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 9 13 10 8 4 6 Future Vol, veh/h 9 13 10 8 4 6 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 0 - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 0 0 0 0 0 Mvmt Flow 10 14 11 9 4 7 Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 39 8 11 0 - 0 Stage 1 8 - - - - - Stage 2 31 - - - - - Critical Hdwy 6.4 6.2 4.1 - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.4 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.4 - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.5 3.3 2.2 - - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 978 1080 1621 - - - Stage 1 1020 - - - - - Stage 2 997 - - - - - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 971 1080 1621 - - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 971 - - - - - Stage 1 1013 - - - - - Stage 2 997 - - - - - Approach EB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 8.6 4 0 HCM LOS A Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1621 - 1033 - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.007 - 0.023 - - HCM Control Delay (s) 7.2 0 8.6 - - HCM Lane LOS A A A - - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - 0.1 - - JPA Aspen Heights 2028 Total- AM.syn Synchro 10 Report - 10/12/2021 TG Page 12 Attachment E JPA Aspen Heights 2028 Total AM Queuing and Blocking Report Intersection: 1: Shamrock Rd & Jefferson Park Ave Movement EB WB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR L TR LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 293 56 150 193 59 Average Queue (ft) 153 15 58 104 20 95th Queue (ft) 274 44 121 169 51 Link Distance (ft) 304 532 559 534 Upstream Blk Time (%) 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 1 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 75 Storage Blk Time (%) 0 4 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 1 Intersection: 2: Private Entrance/Harmon St & Jefferson Park Ave Movement EB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 68 52 24 31 Average Queue (ft) 7 5 2 4 95th Queue (ft) 35 26 13 20 Link Distance (ft) 77 304 320 536 Upstream Blk Time (%) 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 1 Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 3: Private Entrance/Washington Ave & Jefferson Park Ave Movement EB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 58 38 22 40 Average Queue (ft) 6 2 1 10 95th Queue (ft) 32 17 12 34 Link Distance (ft) 174 77 261 281 Upstream Blk Time (%) 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) JPA Aspen Heights 2028 Total- AM.syn SimTraffic Report - 10/12/2021 TG Page 1 Attachment E JPA Aspen Heights 2028 Total AM Queuing and Blocking Report Intersection: 4: Private Entrance/Observatory Ave & Jefferson Park Ave Movement EB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 29 71 31 26 Average Queue (ft) 1 5 4 3 95th Queue (ft) 12 34 21 16 Link Distance (ft) 432 174 314 534 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 5: Jefferson Park Ave & Fontaine Ave & Maury Ave Movement EB EB EB WB WB NB NB NB SB SB SB Directions Served L T R L TR L T R L T R Maximum Queue (ft) 143 302 120 87 234 259 211 110 74 101 55 Average Queue (ft) 42 125 44 39 101 147 107 6 15 37 11 95th Queue (ft) 101 243 123 85 195 233 181 62 48 79 40 Link Distance (ft) 774 432 770 538 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 150 120 88 355 225 117 125 Storage Blk Time (%) 0 8 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 16 1 0 6 1 0 0 0 Intersection: 6: Maury Ave/Alderman Road & Stadium Drive Movement EB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 90 74 210 106 Average Queue (ft) 48 32 104 51 95th Queue (ft) 76 59 177 87 Link Distance (ft) 544 504 452 665 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) JPA Aspen Heights 2028 Total- AM.syn SimTraffic Report - 10/12/2021 TG Page 2 Attachment E JPA Aspen Heights 2028 Total AM Queuing and Blocking Report Intersection: 7: Washington Ave & Stadium Drive Movement EB WB NB Directions Served TR LT LR Maximum Queue (ft) 6 21 35 Average Queue (ft) 0 1 13 95th Queue (ft) 5 11 37 Link Distance (ft) 504 658 455 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 8: Washington Ave & Site Entrance Movement EB Directions Served LR Maximum Queue (ft) 38 Average Queue (ft) 15 95th Queue (ft) 40 Link Distance (ft) 156 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Network Summary Network wide Queuing Penalty: 28 JPA Aspen Heights 2028 Total- AM.syn SimTraffic Report - 10/12/2021 TG Page 3 Attachment E JPA Aspen Heights 2028 Total Midday 1: Shamrock Rd & Jefferson Park Ave Queues Lane Group EBT WBL WBT NBT SBT Lane Group Flow (vph) 502 60 395 108 30 v/c Ratio 0.46 0.10 0.33 0.50 0.12 Control Delay 11.9 5.3 6.3 37.9 25.0 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 11.9 5.3 6.3 37.9 25.0 Queue Length 50th (ft) 134 7 61 49 11 Queue Length 95th (ft) 288 26 154 95 32 Internal Link Dist (ft) 301 481 515 490 Turn Bay Length (ft) 75 Base Capacity (vph) 1083 599 1197 440 498 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.46 0.10 0.33 0.25 0.06 Intersection Summary JPA Aspen Heights 2028 Total- MID.syn Synchro 10 Report - 10/12/2021 TG Page 1 Attachment E JPA Aspen Heights 2028 Total Midday 1: Shamrock Rd & Jefferson Park Ave HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 5 424 33 55 357 6 39 22 39 2 21 5 Future Volume (veh/h) 5 424 33 55 357 6 39 22 39 2 21 5 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 0.97 0.93 1.00 0.93 0.88 0.85 0.90 0.87 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1900 1841 1856 1841 1811 1900 1826 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 5 461 36 60 388 7 42 24 42 2 23 5 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 0 4 3 4 6 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 Cap, veh/h 46 907 70 556 1156 21 150 89 114 53 294 60 Arrive On Green 0.54 0.54 0.54 0.04 0.65 0.65 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 Sat Flow, veh/h 4 1668 129 1753 1771 32 444 440 563 31 1452 297 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 502 0 0 60 0 395 108 0 0 30 0 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1801 0 0 1753 0 1803 1447 0 0 1779 0 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.2 0.0 8.1 1.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 14.5 0.0 0.0 1.2 0.0 8.1 4.9 0.0 0.0 1.1 0.0 0.0 Prop In Lane 0.01 0.07 1.00 0.02 0.39 0.39 0.07 0.17 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 1024 0 0 556 0 1177 353 0 0 406 0 0 V/C Ratio(X) 0.49 0.00 0.00 0.11 0.00 0.34 0.31 0.00 0.00 0.07 0.00 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 1024 0 0 578 0 1177 476 0 0 559 0 0 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 11.9 0.0 0.0 6.7 0.0 6.4 28.2 0.0 0.0 26.8 0.0 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.8 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 5.2 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.0 2.7 1.9 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 12.3 0.0 0.0 6.7 0.0 7.2 28.7 0.0 0.0 26.9 0.0 0.0 LnGrp LOS B A A A A A C A A C A A Approach Vol, veh/h 502 455 108 30 Approach Delay, s/veh 12.3 7.1 28.7 26.9 Approach LOS B A C C Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 9.0 51.0 22.7 60.0 22.7 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 4.0 44.0 24.0 54.0 24.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 3.2 16.5 3.1 10.1 6.9 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 3.4 0.0 2.6 0.3 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 12.1 HCM 6th LOS B JPA Aspen Heights 2028 Total- MID.syn Synchro 10 Report - 10/12/2021 TG Page 3 Attachment E JPA Aspen Heights 2028 Total Midday 2: Private Entrance/Harmon St & Jefferson Park Ave HCM 6th TWSC Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.3 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 6 437 3 8 366 1 1 0 1 2 0 8 Future Vol, veh/h 6 437 3 8 366 1 1 0 1 2 0 8 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 24 0 26 26 0 24 0 0 24 24 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 5 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Mvmt Flow 6 470 3 9 394 1 1 0 1 2 0 9 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 419 0 0 499 0 0 927 947 522 945 948 419 Stage 1 - - - - - - 510 510 - 437 437 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 417 437 - 508 511 - Critical Hdwy 4.1 - - 4.1 - - 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 - - 2.2 - - 3.5 4 3.3 3.5 4 3.3 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1151 - - 1075 - - 251 263 559 244 263 638 Stage 1 - - - - - - 550 541 - 602 583 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 617 583 - 551 540 - Platoon blocked, % - - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1125 - - 1048 - - 238 246 533 229 246 623 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 238 246 - 229 246 - Stage 1 - - - - - - 532 524 - 584 563 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 602 563 - 534 523 - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0.1 0.2 16 12.9 HCM LOS C B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 329 1125 - - 1048 - - 464 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.007 0.006 - - 0.008 - - 0.023 HCM Control Delay (s) 16 8.2 0 - 8.5 0 - 12.9 HCM Lane LOS C A A - A A - B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 0 - - 0 - - 0.1 JPA Aspen Heights 2028 Total- MID.syn Synchro 10 Report - 10/12/2021 TG Page 4 Attachment E JPA Aspen Heights 2028 Total Midday 3: Private Entrance/Washington Ave & Jefferson Park Ave HCM 6th TWSC Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.8 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 8 431 1 1 365 15 2 0 3 16 1 13 Future Vol, veh/h 8 431 1 1 365 15 2 0 3 16 1 13 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 32 0 26 26 0 32 0 0 1 1 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 33 4 100 0 6 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 Mvmt Flow 8 454 1 1 384 16 2 0 3 17 1 14 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 432 0 0 481 0 0 899 931 482 899 923 424 Stage 1 - - - - - - 497 497 - 426 426 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 402 434 - 473 497 - Critical Hdwy 4.43 - - 4.1 - - 8.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 7.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 7.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.497 - - 2.2 - - 4.4 4 3.3 3.5 4 3.3 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 981 - - 1092 - - 178 269 588 262 272 634 Stage 1 - - - - - - 410 548 - 610 589 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 469 585 - 576 548 - Platoon blocked, % - - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 951 - - 1065 - - 168 251 573 250 254 615 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 168 251 - 250 254 - Stage 1 - - - - - - 396 528 - 585 571 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 457 567 - 566 528 - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0.2 0 17.6 16.8 HCM LOS C C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 292 951 - - 1065 - - 337 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.018 0.009 - - 0.001 - - 0.094 HCM Control Delay (s) 17.6 8.8 0 - 8.4 0 - 16.8 HCM Lane LOS C A A - A A - C HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 0 - - 0 - - 0.3 JPA Aspen Heights 2028 Total- MID.syn Synchro 10 Report - 10/12/2021 TG Page 5 Attachment E JPA Aspen Heights 2028 Total Midday 4: Private Entrance/Observatory Ave & Jefferson Park Ave HCM 6th TWSC Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.2 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 3 437 3 3 388 6 2 0 3 0 0 1 Future Vol, veh/h 3 437 3 3 388 6 2 0 3 0 0 1 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 25 0 23 23 0 25 0 0 1 1 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 4 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Mvmt Flow 3 460 3 3 408 6 2 0 3 0 0 1 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 439 0 0 486 0 0 909 936 486 912 934 436 Stage 1 - - - - - - 491 491 - 442 442 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 418 445 - 470 492 - Critical Hdwy 4.1 - - 4.1 - - 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 - - 2.2 - - 3.5 4 3.3 3.5 4 3.3 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1132 - - 1087 - - 258 267 585 257 268 625 Stage 1 - - - - - - 563 552 - 598 580 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 616 578 - 578 551 - Platoon blocked, % - - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1105 - - 1063 - - 250 253 572 248 254 610 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 250 253 - 248 254 - Stage 1 - - - - - - 548 538 - 581 564 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 612 562 - 572 537 - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0.1 0.1 14.7 10.9 HCM LOS B B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 378 1105 - - 1063 - - 610 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.014 0.003 - - 0.003 - - 0.002 HCM Control Delay (s) 14.7 8.3 0 - 8.4 0 - 10.9 HCM Lane LOS B A A - A A - B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 0 - - 0 - - 0 JPA Aspen Heights 2028 Total- MID.syn Synchro 10 Report - 10/12/2021 TG Page 6 Attachment E JPA Aspen Heights 2028 Total Midday 5: Jefferson Park Ave & Fontaine Ave & Maury Ave Queues Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Group Flow (vph) 50 281 155 138 262 143 91 143 33 126 46 v/c Ratio 0.14 0.45 0.18 0.32 0.31 0.51 0.31 0.38 0.14 0.45 0.13 Control Delay 23.1 25.2 1.8 17.5 16.0 36.4 31.6 7.1 30.3 35.4 0.7 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 23.1 25.2 1.8 17.5 16.0 36.4 31.6 7.1 30.3 35.4 0.7 Queue Length 50th (ft) 15 95 0 33 65 60 37 0 13 53 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) 55 233 20 100 182 129 86 37 40 113 0 Internal Link Dist (ft) 751 428 732 533 Turn Bay Length (ft) 150 120 88 355 225 117 125 Base Capacity (vph) 359 625 1096 427 845 600 638 617 533 650 635 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.14 0.45 0.14 0.32 0.31 0.24 0.14 0.23 0.06 0.19 0.07 Intersection Summary JPA Aspen Heights 2028 Total- MID.syn Synchro 10 Report - 10/12/2021 TG Page 7 Attachment E JPA Aspen Heights 2028 Total Midday 5: Jefferson Park Ave & Fontaine Ave & Maury Ave HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 47 264 146 130 222 24 134 86 134 31 118 43 Future Volume (veh/h) 47 264 146 130 222 24 134 86 134 31 118 43 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 0.99 0.97 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.92 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1796 1841 1856 1856 1811 1589 1856 1870 1885 1663 1900 1900 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 50 281 155 138 236 26 143 91 0 33 126 46 Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Percent Heavy Veh, % 7 4 3 3 6 21 3 2 1 16 0 0 Cap, veh/h 465 628 732 412 773 85 240 254 199 238 185 Arrive On Green 0.34 0.34 0.34 0.06 0.48 0.48 0.14 0.14 0.00 0.13 0.13 0.13 Sat Flow, veh/h 1064 1841 1521 1767 1601 176 1767 1870 1598 1584 1900 1475 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 50 281 155 138 0 262 143 91 0 33 126 46 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1064 1841 1521 1767 0 1778 1767 1870 1598 1584 1900 1475 Q Serve(g_s), s 2.3 8.4 4.2 3.4 0.0 6.3 5.4 3.1 0.0 1.3 4.4 2.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 2.3 8.4 4.2 3.4 0.0 6.3 5.4 3.1 0.0 1.3 4.4 2.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.10 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 465 628 732 412 0 859 240 254 199 238 185 V/C Ratio(X) 0.11 0.45 0.21 0.34 0.00 0.31 0.60 0.36 0.17 0.53 0.25 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 465 628 732 412 0 859 602 638 540 648 503 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 16.0 18.0 10.7 13.5 0.0 11.0 28.6 27.6 0.0 27.5 28.8 27.8 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.5 2.3 0.7 2.2 0.0 0.9 0.9 0.3 0.0 0.1 0.7 0.3 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.6 3.6 1.8 1.5 0.0 2.4 2.2 1.4 0.0 0.5 2.0 0.7 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 16.5 20.3 11.4 15.7 0.0 12.0 29.5 27.9 0.0 27.6 29.5 28.0 LnGrp LOS B C B B A B C C C C C Approach Vol, veh/h 486 400 234 A 205 Approach Delay, s/veh 17.1 13.2 28.9 28.9 Approach LOS B B C C Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 10.0 30.0 14.8 40.0 15.6 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 4.0 24.0 24.0 34.0 24.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 5.4 10.4 6.4 8.3 7.4 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 2.0 0.5 1.5 0.4 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 19.8 HCM 6th LOS B Notes Unsignalized Delay for [NBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay. JPA Aspen Heights 2028 Total- MID.syn Synchro 10 Report - 10/12/2021 TG Page 9 Attachment E JPA Aspen Heights 2028 Total Midday 6: Maury Ave/Alderman Road & Stadium Drive HCM 6th AWSC Intersection Intersection Delay, s/veh 9.1 Intersection LOS A Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 20 12 2 54 22 24 5 159 26 20 152 41 Future Vol, veh/h 20 12 2 54 22 24 5 159 26 20 152 41 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 6 0 6 2 15 Mvmt Flow 22 13 2 59 24 26 5 173 28 22 165 45 Number of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 Approach EB WB NB SB Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB Opposing Lanes 1 1 1 1 Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB Conflicting Lanes Left 1 1 1 1 Conflicting Approach RightNB SB WB EB Conflicting Lanes Right 1 1 1 1 HCM Control Delay 8.5 8.9 9 9.4 HCM LOS A A A A Lane NBLn1 EBLn1WBLn1 SBLn1 Vol Left, % 3% 59% 54% 9% Vol Thru, % 84% 35% 22% 71% Vol Right, % 14% 6% 24% 19% Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Traffic Vol by Lane 190 34 100 213 LT Vol 5 20 54 20 Through Vol 159 12 22 152 RT Vol 26 2 24 41 Lane Flow Rate 207 37 109 232 Geometry Grp 1 1 1 1 Degree of Util (X) 0.255 0.053 0.151 0.29 Departure Headway (Hd) 4.453 5.12 4.999 4.504 Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Cap 805 697 715 796 Service Time 2.486 3.173 3.044 2.537 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.257 0.053 0.152 0.291 HCM Control Delay 9 8.5 8.9 9.4 HCM Lane LOS A A A A HCM 95th-tile Q 1 0.2 0.5 1.2 JPA Aspen Heights 2028 Total- MID.syn Synchro 10 Report - 10/12/2021 TG Page 10 Attachment E JPA Aspen Heights 2028 Total Midday 7: Washington Ave & Stadium Drive HCM 6th TWSC Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 1.5 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 48 12 15 94 6 11 Future Vol, veh/h 48 12 15 94 6 11 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 41 41 0 14 1 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - - - - 0 - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 0 0 3 0 50 Mvmt Flow 52 13 16 102 7 12 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 106 0 248 101 Stage 1 - - - - 100 - Stage 2 - - - - 148 - Critical Hdwy - - 4.1 - 6.4 6.7 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.4 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.4 - Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.2 - 3.5 3.75 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1498 - 745 838 Stage 1 - - - - 929 - Stage 2 - - - - 884 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1440 - 698 805 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 698 - Stage 1 - - - - 893 - Stage 2 - - - - 862 - Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 1 9.8 HCM LOS A Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity (veh/h) 764 - - 1440 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.024 - - 0.011 - HCM Control Delay (s) 9.8 - - 7.5 0 HCM Lane LOS A - - A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 - - 0 - JPA Aspen Heights 2028 Total- MID.syn Synchro 10 Report - 10/12/2021 TG Page 11 Attachment E JPA Aspen Heights 2028 Total Midday 8: Washington Ave & Site Entrance HCM 6th TWSC Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 4.7 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 12 17 16 8 16 10 Future Vol, veh/h 12 17 16 8 16 10 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 0 - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 0 0 0 0 0 Mvmt Flow 13 18 17 9 17 11 Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 66 23 28 0 - 0 Stage 1 23 - - - - - Stage 2 43 - - - - - Critical Hdwy 6.4 6.2 4.1 - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.4 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.4 - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.5 3.3 2.2 - - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 944 1060 1599 - - - Stage 1 1005 - - - - - Stage 2 985 - - - - - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 934 1060 1599 - - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 934 - - - - - Stage 1 994 - - - - - Stage 2 985 - - - - - Approach EB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 8.7 4.9 0 HCM LOS A Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1599 - 1004 - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.011 - 0.031 - - HCM Control Delay (s) 7.3 0 8.7 - - HCM Lane LOS A A A - - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - 0.1 - - JPA Aspen Heights 2028 Total- MID.syn Synchro 10 Report - 10/12/2021 TG Page 12 Attachment E JPA Aspen Heights 2028 Total Midday Queuing and Blocking Report Intersection: 1: Shamrock Rd & Jefferson Park Ave Movement EB WB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR L TR LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 275 72 215 118 57 Average Queue (ft) 111 28 81 59 18 95th Queue (ft) 220 63 163 104 49 Link Distance (ft) 304 532 559 534 Upstream Blk Time (%) 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 75 Storage Blk Time (%) 0 7 Queuing Penalty (veh) 1 4 Intersection: 2: Private Entrance/Harmon St & Jefferson Park Ave Movement EB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 68 91 27 31 Average Queue (ft) 6 8 2 11 95th Queue (ft) 34 44 14 34 Link Distance (ft) 77 304 320 536 Upstream Blk Time (%) 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 3: Private Entrance/Washington Ave & Jefferson Park Ave Movement EB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 76 22 57 49 Average Queue (ft) 8 1 6 21 95th Queue (ft) 43 11 32 48 Link Distance (ft) 174 77 261 281 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) JPA Aspen Heights 2028 Total- MID.syn SimTraffic Report - 10/12/2021 TG Page 1 Attachment E JPA Aspen Heights 2028 Total Midday Queuing and Blocking Report Intersection: 4: Private Entrance/Observatory Ave & Jefferson Park Ave Movement EB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 19 35 31 20 Average Queue (ft) 1 2 5 1 95th Queue (ft) 18 15 23 9 Link Distance (ft) 432 174 314 534 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 5: Jefferson Park Ave & Fontaine Ave & Maury Ave Movement EB EB EB WB WB NB NB SB SB SB Directions Served L T R L TR L T L T R Maximum Queue (ft) 129 292 120 87 259 148 110 93 156 101 Average Queue (ft) 35 117 51 61 103 76 48 24 68 26 95th Queue (ft) 89 226 127 101 203 135 93 67 122 71 Link Distance (ft) 774 432 770 538 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 150 120 88 355 117 125 Storage Blk Time (%) 0 6 0 2 8 0 1 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 13 1 6 10 0 1 0 Intersection: 6: Maury Ave/Alderman Road & Stadium Drive Movement EB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 47 84 111 101 Average Queue (ft) 20 38 57 52 95th Queue (ft) 46 65 90 84 Link Distance (ft) 544 504 452 665 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) JPA Aspen Heights 2028 Total- MID.syn SimTraffic Report - 10/12/2021 TG Page 2 Attachment E JPA Aspen Heights 2028 Total Midday Queuing and Blocking Report Intersection: 7: Washington Ave & Stadium Drive Movement EB WB NB Directions Served TR LT LR Maximum Queue (ft) 3 25 67 Average Queue (ft) 0 1 18 95th Queue (ft) 5 10 54 Link Distance (ft) 504 658 455 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 8: Washington Ave & Site Entrance Movement EB NB Directions Served LR LT Maximum Queue (ft) 44 9 Average Queue (ft) 21 0 95th Queue (ft) 45 4 Link Distance (ft) 156 281 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Network Summary Network wide Queuing Penalty: 37 JPA Aspen Heights 2028 Total- MID.syn SimTraffic Report - 10/12/2021 TG Page 3 Attachment E JPA Aspen Heights 2028 Total PM 1: Shamrock Rd & Jefferson Park Ave Queues Lane Group EBT WBL WBT NBT SBT Lane Group Flow (vph) 397 112 624 135 73 v/c Ratio 0.47 0.19 0.55 0.57 0.27 Control Delay 13.9 6.3 10.1 39.7 28.4 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 13.9 6.3 10.1 39.7 28.4 Queue Length 50th (ft) 103 15 129 62 29 Queue Length 95th (ft) 230 47 318 115 64 Internal Link Dist (ft) 301 481 515 490 Turn Bay Length (ft) 75 Base Capacity (vph) 841 587 1128 421 478 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.47 0.19 0.55 0.32 0.15 Intersection Summary JPA Aspen Heights 2028 Total - PM.syn Synchro 10 Report - 10/12/2021 TG Page 1 Attachment E JPA Aspen Heights 2028 Total PM 1: Shamrock Rd & Jefferson Park Ave HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 21 296 56 105 574 12 44 25 57 9 53 7 Future Volume (veh/h) 21 296 56 105 574 12 44 25 57 9 53 7 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 0.98 0.89 0.99 0.90 0.89 0.85 0.90 0.84 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1900 1870 1900 1885 1870 1781 1870 1900 1841 1900 1900 1900 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 22 315 60 112 611 13 47 27 61 10 56 7 Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Percent Heavy Veh, % 0 2 0 1 2 8 2 0 4 0 0 0 Cap, veh/h 66 721 132 620 1134 24 150 92 153 76 351 40 Arrive On Green 0.51 0.51 0.51 0.05 0.62 0.62 0.24 0.24 0.24 0.24 0.24 0.24 Sat Flow, veh/h 45 1420 261 1795 1820 39 395 385 643 122 1470 169 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 397 0 0 112 0 624 135 0 0 73 0 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1725 0 0 1795 0 1858 1423 0 0 1760 0 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.4 0.0 16.5 2.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 12.2 0.0 0.0 2.4 0.0 16.5 6.5 0.0 0.0 2.7 0.0 0.0 Prop In Lane 0.06 0.15 1.00 0.02 0.35 0.45 0.14 0.10 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 920 0 0 620 0 1158 395 0 0 467 0 0 V/C Ratio(X) 0.43 0.00 0.00 0.18 0.00 0.54 0.34 0.00 0.00 0.16 0.00 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 920 0 0 620 0 1158 448 0 0 532 0 0 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 13.5 0.0 0.0 8.3 0.0 9.3 27.5 0.0 0.0 26.2 0.0 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 1.5 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.0 1.8 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 4.8 0.0 0.0 0.9 0.0 6.2 2.4 0.0 0.0 1.2 0.0 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 15.0 0.0 0.0 8.9 0.0 11.1 28.0 0.0 0.0 26.3 0.0 0.0 LnGrp LOS B A A A A B C A A C A A Approach Vol, veh/h 397 736 135 73 Approach Delay, s/veh 15.0 10.7 28.0 26.3 Approach LOS B B C C Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 10.0 50.0 26.7 60.0 26.7 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 4.0 44.0 24.0 54.0 24.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 4.4 14.2 4.7 18.5 8.5 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 2.7 0.1 4.6 0.4 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 14.6 HCM 6th LOS B JPA Aspen Heights 2028 Total - PM.syn Synchro 10 Report - 10/12/2021 TG Page 3 Attachment E JPA Aspen Heights 2028 Total PM 2: Private Entrance/Harmon St & Jefferson Park Ave HCM 6th TWSC Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.7 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 7 335 1 13 596 4 0 0 8 6 1 15 Future Vol, veh/h 7 335 1 13 596 4 0 0 8 6 1 15 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 45 0 46 46 0 45 0 0 23 23 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 Mvmt Flow 8 364 1 14 648 4 0 0 9 7 1 16 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 697 0 0 411 0 0 1114 1152 434 1131 1150 695 Stage 1 - - - - - - 427 427 - 723 723 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 687 725 - 408 427 - Critical Hdwy 4.1 - - 4.1 - - 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.27 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 - - 2.2 - - 3.5 4 3.3 3.5 4 3.363 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 909 - - 1159 - - 187 199 626 182 200 434 Stage 1 - - - - - - 610 589 - 421 434 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 440 433 - 624 589 - Platoon blocked, % - - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 870 - - 1108 - - 167 176 585 164 177 415 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 167 176 - 164 177 - Stage 1 - - - - - - 576 557 - 398 407 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 413 406 - 594 557 - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0.2 0.2 11.2 19 HCM LOS B C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 585 870 - - 1108 - - 281 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.015 0.009 - - 0.013 - - 0.085 HCM Control Delay (s) 11.2 9.2 0 - 8.3 0 - 19 HCM Lane LOS B A A - A A - C HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 0 - - 0 - - 0.3 JPA Aspen Heights 2028 Total - PM.syn Synchro 10 Report - 10/12/2021 TG Page 4 Attachment E JPA Aspen Heights 2028 Total PM 3: Private Entrance/Washington Ave & Jefferson Park Ave HCM 6th TWSC Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 1.1 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 16 321 1 2 598 19 0 0 1 24 0 15 Future Vol, veh/h 16 321 1 2 598 19 0 0 1 24 0 15 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 54 0 71 71 0 54 4 0 2 2 0 4 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Mvmt Flow 17 349 1 2 650 21 0 0 1 26 0 16 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 725 0 0 421 0 0 1132 1184 423 1105 1174 719 Stage 1 - - - - - - 455 455 - 719 719 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 677 729 - 386 455 - Critical Hdwy 4.1 - - 4.1 - - 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 - - 2.2 - - 3.5 4 3.3 3.5 4 3.3 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 887 - - 1149 - - 182 191 635 190 193 432 Stage 1 - - - - - - 589 572 - 423 436 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 446 431 - 641 572 - Platoon blocked, % - - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 841 - - 1071 - - 159 164 591 176 166 408 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 159 164 - 176 166 - Stage 1 - - - - - - 535 520 - 391 412 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 425 408 - 623 520 - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0.4 0 11.1 24.7 HCM LOS B C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 591 841 - - 1071 - - 225 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.002 0.021 - - 0.002 - - 0.188 HCM Control Delay (s) 11.1 9.4 0 - 8.4 0 - 24.7 HCM Lane LOS B A A - A A - C HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 0.1 - - 0 - - 0.7 JPA Aspen Heights 2028 Total - PM.syn Synchro 10 Report - 10/12/2021 TG Page 5 Attachment E JPA Aspen Heights 2028 Total PM 4: Private Entrance/Observatory Ave & Jefferson Park Ave HCM 6th TWSC Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.7 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 9 323 3 8 626 5 4 0 6 6 1 7 Future Vol, veh/h 9 323 3 8 626 5 4 0 6 6 1 7 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 48 0 95 95 0 48 4 0 2 2 0 4 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Mvmt Flow 10 351 3 9 680 5 4 0 7 7 1 8 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 733 0 0 449 0 0 1177 1219 450 1127 1218 735 Stage 1 - - - - - - 468 468 - 749 749 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 709 751 - 378 469 - Critical Hdwy 4.1 - - 4.1 - - 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 - - 2.2 - - 3.5 4 3.3 3.5 4 3.3 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 881 - - 1122 - - 169 182 613 183 182 423 Stage 1 - - - - - - 579 565 - 407 422 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 428 421 - 648 564 - Platoon blocked, % - - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 841 - - 1020 - - 146 153 556 169 153 402 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 146 153 - 169 153 - Stage 1 - - - - - - 519 506 - 383 397 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 411 396 - 630 505 - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0.3 0.1 19.3 21.4 HCM LOS C C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 262 841 - - 1020 - - 235 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.041 0.012 - - 0.009 - - 0.065 HCM Control Delay (s) 19.3 9.3 0 - 8.6 0 - 21.4 HCM Lane LOS C A A - A A - C HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 0 - - 0 - - 0.2 JPA Aspen Heights 2028 Total - PM.syn Synchro 10 Report - 10/12/2021 TG Page 6 Attachment E JPA Aspen Heights 2028 Total PM 5: Jefferson Park Ave & Fontaine Ave & Maury Ave Queues Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Group Flow (vph) 26 164 273 241 389 196 107 112 53 325 53 v/c Ratio 0.09 0.31 0.34 0.58 0.53 0.64 0.34 0.31 0.14 0.80 0.12 Control Delay 28.3 29.2 4.6 28.6 25.2 43.7 34.7 3.9 29.4 48.5 0.6 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 28.3 29.2 4.6 28.6 25.2 43.7 34.7 3.9 29.4 48.5 0.6 Queue Length 50th (ft) 10 70 19 89 156 100 51 0 23 166 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) 35 147 53 184 304 176 102 15 59 #289 0 Internal Link Dist (ft) 751 428 732 533 Turn Bay Length (ft) 150 120 88 355 225 117 125 Base Capacity (vph) 284 526 957 419 728 500 521 484 480 531 530 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.09 0.31 0.29 0.58 0.53 0.39 0.21 0.23 0.11 0.61 0.10 Intersection Summary # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. JPA Aspen Heights 2028 Total - PM.syn Synchro 10 Report - 10/12/2021 TG Page 7 Attachment E JPA Aspen Heights 2028 Total PM 5: Jefferson Park Ave & Fontaine Ave & Maury Ave HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 25 156 259 229 336 33 186 102 106 50 309 50 Future Volume (veh/h) 25 156 259 229 336 33 186 102 106 50 309 50 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 0.98 0.94 0.99 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.80 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1900 1870 1900 1885 1870 1678 1870 1856 1900 1811 1885 1841 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 26 164 273 241 354 35 196 107 0 53 325 53 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 0 2 0 1 2 15 2 3 0 6 1 4 Cap, veh/h 296 506 722 352 638 63 345 360 380 416 276 Arrive On Green 0.27 0.27 0.27 0.05 0.38 0.38 0.19 0.19 0.00 0.22 0.22 0.22 Sat Flow, veh/h 993 1870 1516 1795 1667 165 1781 1856 1610 1725 1885 1250 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 26 164 273 241 0 389 196 107 0 53 325 53 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 993 1870 1516 1795 0 1831 1781 1856 1610 1725 1885 1250 Q Serve(g_s), s 1.9 6.2 10.4 4.0 0.0 14.8 8.9 4.4 0.0 2.2 14.4 3.1 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 6.6 6.2 10.4 4.0 0.0 14.8 8.9 4.4 0.0 2.2 14.4 3.1 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.09 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 296 506 722 352 0 701 345 360 380 416 276 V/C Ratio(X) 0.09 0.32 0.38 0.69 0.00 0.55 0.57 0.30 0.14 0.78 0.19 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 296 506 722 352 0 701 481 502 466 510 338 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 28.0 25.9 15.6 28.2 0.0 21.5 32.4 30.6 0.0 27.8 32.6 28.2 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.6 1.7 1.5 10.4 0.0 3.1 0.5 0.2 0.0 0.1 4.9 0.1 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.5 2.9 5.3 3.7 0.0 6.6 3.8 1.9 0.0 0.9 7.1 0.9 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 28.6 27.6 17.1 38.6 0.0 24.6 33.0 30.8 0.0 27.9 37.5 28.3 LnGrp LOS C C B D A C C C C D C Approach Vol, veh/h 463 630 303 A 431 Approach Delay, s/veh 21.4 30.0 32.2 35.2 Approach LOS C C C D Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 10.0 30.0 25.6 40.0 23.2 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 4.0 24.0 24.0 34.0 24.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 6.0 12.4 16.4 16.8 10.9 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 1.6 1.0 2.1 0.5 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 29.4 HCM 6th LOS C Notes Unsignalized Delay for [NBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay. JPA Aspen Heights 2028 Total - PM.syn Synchro 10 Report - 10/12/2021 TG Page 9 Attachment E JPA Aspen Heights 2028 Total PM 6: Maury Ave/Alderman Road & Stadium Drive HCM 6th AWSC Intersection Intersection Delay, s/veh23.5 Intersection LOS C Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 20 16 3 130 131 24 6 156 16 66 333 95 Future Vol, veh/h 20 16 3 130 131 24 6 156 16 66 333 95 Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Heavy Vehicles, % 5 0 0 2 0 0 0 6 0 34 1 7 Mvmt Flow 21 17 3 138 139 26 6 166 17 70 354 101 Number of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 Approach EB WB NB SB Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB Opposing Lanes 1 1 1 1 Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB Conflicting Lanes Left 1 1 1 1 Conflicting Approach RightNB SB WB EB Conflicting Lanes Right 1 1 1 1 HCM Control Delay 10.6 15.6 11.6 33.4 HCM LOS B C B D Lane NBLn1 EBLn1WBLn1 SBLn1 Vol Left, % 3% 51% 46% 13% Vol Thru, % 88% 41% 46% 67% Vol Right, % 9% 8% 8% 19% Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Traffic Vol by Lane 178 39 285 494 LT Vol 6 20 130 66 Through Vol 156 16 131 333 RT Vol 16 3 24 95 Lane Flow Rate 189 41 303 526 Geometry Grp 1 1 1 1 Degree of Util (X) 0.309 0.08 0.515 0.85 Departure Headway (Hd) 5.87 6.955 6.118 5.824 Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Cap 608 518 585 620 Service Time 3.952 4.955 4.194 3.884 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.311 0.079 0.518 0.848 HCM Control Delay 11.6 10.6 15.6 33.4 HCM Lane LOS B B C D HCM 95th-tile Q 1.3 0.3 2.9 9.4 JPA Aspen Heights 2028 Total - PM.syn Synchro 10 Report - 10/12/2021 TG Page 10 Attachment E JPA Aspen Heights 2028 Total PM 7: Washington Ave & Stadium Drive HCM 6th TWSC Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 1.2 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 81 6 18 263 9 23 Future Vol, veh/h 81 6 18 263 9 23 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 45 45 0 10 1 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - - - - 0 - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 26 0 0 1 0 0 Mvmt Flow 88 7 20 286 10 25 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 140 0 473 138 Stage 1 - - - - 137 - Stage 2 - - - - 336 - Critical Hdwy - - 4.1 - 6.4 6.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.4 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.4 - Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.2 - 3.5 3.3 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1456 - 553 916 Stage 1 - - - - 895 - Stage 2 - - - - 728 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1394 - 515 876 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 515 - Stage 1 - - - - 857 - Stage 2 - - - - 709 - Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 0.5 10.2 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity (veh/h) 732 - - 1394 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.048 - - 0.014 - HCM Control Delay (s) 10.2 - - 7.6 0 HCM Lane LOS B - - A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 - - 0 - JPA Aspen Heights 2028 Total - PM.syn Synchro 10 Report - 10/12/2021 TG Page 11 Attachment E JPA Aspen Heights 2028 Total PM 8: Washington Ave & Site Entrance HCM 6th TWSC Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 5.5 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 17 25 25 10 7 17 Future Vol, veh/h 17 25 25 10 7 17 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 0 - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 0 0 0 0 0 Mvmt Flow 18 27 27 11 8 18 Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 82 17 26 0 - 0 Stage 1 17 - - - - - Stage 2 65 - - - - - Critical Hdwy 6.4 6.2 4.1 - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.4 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.4 - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.5 3.3 2.2 - - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 925 1068 1601 - - - Stage 1 1011 - - - - - Stage 2 963 - - - - - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 909 1068 1601 - - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 909 - - - - - Stage 1 994 - - - - - Stage 2 963 - - - - - Approach EB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 8.8 5.2 0 HCM LOS A Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1601 - 997 - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.017 - 0.046 - - HCM Control Delay (s) 7.3 0 8.8 - - HCM Lane LOS A A A - - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 - 0.1 - - JPA Aspen Heights 2028 Total - PM.syn Synchro 10 Report - 10/12/2021 TG Page 12 Attachment E JPA Aspen Heights 2028 Total PM Queuing and Blocking Report Intersection: 1: Shamrock Rd & Jefferson Park Ave Movement EB WB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR L TR LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 294 74 356 154 87 Average Queue (ft) 141 43 159 75 42 95th Queue (ft) 245 81 289 135 82 Link Distance (ft) 304 532 559 534 Upstream Blk Time (%) 0 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 75 Storage Blk Time (%) 1 18 Queuing Penalty (veh) 7 19 Intersection: 2: Private Entrance/Harmon St & Jefferson Park Ave Movement EB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 69 149 37 56 Average Queue (ft) 8 25 9 18 95th Queue (ft) 39 105 32 47 Link Distance (ft) 77 304 320 536 Upstream Blk Time (%) 0 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 1 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 3: Private Entrance/Washington Ave & Jefferson Park Ave Movement EB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 130 88 18 67 Average Queue (ft) 17 12 1 28 95th Queue (ft) 71 57 9 58 Link Distance (ft) 174 77 261 281 Upstream Blk Time (%) 0 2 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 11 Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) JPA Aspen Heights 2028 Total - PM.syn SimTraffic Report - 10/12/2021 TG Page 1 Attachment E JPA Aspen Heights 2028 Total PM Queuing and Blocking Report Intersection: 4: Private Entrance/Observatory Ave & Jefferson Park Ave Movement EB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 110 160 33 48 Average Queue (ft) 12 35 7 13 95th Queue (ft) 59 138 28 40 Link Distance (ft) 432 174 314 534 Upstream Blk Time (%) 3 Queuing Penalty (veh) 15 Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 5: Jefferson Park Ave & Fontaine Ave & Maury Ave Movement EB EB EB WB WB NB NB SB SB SB B22 Directions Served L T R L TR L T L T R T Maximum Queue (ft) 76 240 120 87 444 188 125 117 402 125 4 Average Queue (ft) 19 88 66 82 285 101 57 49 205 50 0 95th Queue (ft) 52 182 127 101 474 169 108 123 344 130 4 Link Distance (ft) 774 432 770 538 452 Upstream Blk Time (%) 6 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 39 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 150 120 88 355 117 125 Storage Blk Time (%) 3 1 22 36 0 29 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 8 1 82 83 1 29 1 Intersection: 6: Maury Ave/Alderman Road & Stadium Drive Movement EB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 59 163 143 366 Average Queue (ft) 25 73 65 147 95th Queue (ft) 53 127 110 296 Link Distance (ft) 544 504 452 665 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) JPA Aspen Heights 2028 Total - PM.syn SimTraffic Report - 10/12/2021 TG Page 2 Attachment E JPA Aspen Heights 2028 Total PM Queuing and Blocking Report Intersection: 7: Washington Ave & Stadium Drive Movement EB WB NB Directions Served TR LT LR Maximum Queue (ft) 14 37 47 Average Queue (ft) 1 4 21 95th Queue (ft) 8 22 47 Link Distance (ft) 504 658 455 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 8: Washington Ave & Site Entrance Movement EB NB Directions Served LR LT Maximum Queue (ft) 47 19 Average Queue (ft) 24 1 95th Queue (ft) 46 10 Link Distance (ft) 156 281 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Network Summary Network wide Queuing Penalty: 298 JPA Aspen Heights 2028 Total - PM.syn SimTraffic Report - 10/12/2021 TG Page 3