Agenda PLANNING COMMISSION SPECIAL MEETING THURSDAY, October 21, 2021 at 5:30 P.M. Virtual Meeting I. Commission Pre-Meeting (Agenda discussion(s)) Beginning: 5:00 p.m. Location: (Electronic/Virtual) II. Commission Regular Meeting Beginning: 5:30 p.m. Location: (Electronic/Virtual) A. MATTERS TO BE PRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC NOT ON THE FORMAL AGENDA B. CONSENT AGENDA (Items removed from the consent agenda will be considered at the end of the regular agenda) i. Site Plan & Subdivision – Grove Street PUD III. JOINT MEETING OF COMMISSION/ COUNCIL Beginning: 6:00 p.m. Continuing: until all public hearings are completed Format: (i) Staff Report, (ii) Applicant, (iii) Hearing 1. ZM20-00003, SP21-00002, & P21-0023 - 1613 Grove Street – Landowner Lorven Investments, LLC has submitted applications seeking a Rezoning, a Special Use Permit, and a Critical Slope Waiver for approximately 0.652 acres of land, including multiple lots identified within 2021 City real estate records by Real Estate Parcel Identification Numbers 23013000, 230134000, and 230135000 (collectively, “Subject Property”). The Subject Property has frontage on Valley Road Extended and the unimproved section of Grove Street Extended. The applications propose to change the zoning district classification of the Subject Property from R-2 (Residential Two-Family) to R-3 (Residential Multifamily Medium Density) subject to certain proffered development conditions (“Proffers”) and development plan. The Proffers include: (1) prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the seventh (7th) dwelling on the Subject Property, the Owner shall contribute Forty-Eight Thousand Dollars ($48,000.00) to the City as a cash contribution to support the City’s construction of pedestrian improvements within the Fifeville Neighborhood, and (2) twenty-eight percent (28%) of all dwellings constructed onsite shall be affordable units (AUs), as follows: 14% will be for-rent such that the monthly cost of rent, including tenant paid utilities, does not exceed 125% of the Fair Market Rent (FMR) established by HUD by unit bedrooms for the Charlottesville MSA ,and 14% will be for rent AUs such that the monthly cost of rent, including any tenant paid utilities, does not exceed the FMR by unit bedrooms for the Charlottesville MSA. All of the required AUs shall be reserved as such throughout a period of at least 10 years from the date on which the unit receives a certificate of occupancy. The proposed development plan indicates restoration of a portion of Rock Creek that runs through the Subject Property. The Special Use Permit application seeks to increase allowed density from 21 Dwelling Units per Acre (DUA), or 13.692 units within the Subject Property, up to 43 DUA, or 28.026 units, per, City Code Sec. 34-420 (Use Matrix, R-3 District). The proposed development consists of four apartment (multifamily dwelling) buildings with (4) one- bedroom units and (24) two-bedroom units. The total number of units would not exceed (28) units. The Comprehensive Land Use Map for this area calls for Low Density Residential. The proposed development calls for disturbance of land within a Critical Slopes area, so a waiver is requested per City Code Sec. 34- 1120(b)(6). Information pertaining to this application may be viewed online at www.charlottesville.gov/agenda. Persons interested in the Rezoning, Special Use Permit or Critical Slopes applications may contact NDS Planner Matt Alfele by e-mail (alfelem@charlottesville.gov) or by telephone (434-970-3636). IV. COMMISSION’S ACTION ITEMS Continuing: until all action items are concluded. 1. Critical Slope Waiver & Site Plan – Lyman Street 2. Preliminary Discussion – 2005 Jefferson Park Avenue V. FUTURE MEETING SCHEDULE/ADJOURN Tuesday November 9, 2021 – 5:00 PM Pre- Meeting Tuesday November 9, 2021 – 5:30 PM Regular Minutes - May 11, 2021, June 8, 2021, Meeting July 13, 2021 Anticipated Items on Future Agendas Zoning Text Amendments –Off-street parking facilities requirements along streets designated as “framework streets” (initiated May 8, 2018), Site Plan Requirements, Accessory Dwelling Unit, Middle Density zoning and Affordable Dwelling Unit , 12th and Rosser/CH Brown Historic Conservation District (six properties) Rezoning – 0 Nassau Rezoning, Critical Slope Waiver, Sidewalk Waiver - Park Street Christian Church Rezoning – MAACA site Site Plan – Flint Hill PUD Critical Slope Waiver – Coleman Court Site Plan, Critical Slope Waiver - 1223 Harris Special Use Permit – Fire Station on 250 Bypass Future Entrance Corridor • 916 E High Street - Comprehensive Sign Plan Request (Sentara) • 2005 JPA – New apartment building, requires SUP (Mitchell Matthews Architects) • 1252 N Emmet – New medical office building (Aspen Dental) • 1815 JPA - New apartment building (Wassenaar+Winkler Architects) • 1150 5th Street SW – new convenience store and gas canopy (Wawa, Riverbend) • 1801 Hydraulic Road – revised Comp Sign Plan, revised design review (Hillsdale Place, Riverbend) PLEASE NOTE: THIS AGENDA IS SUBJECT TO CHANGE PRIOR TO THE MEETING. PLEASE NOTE: We are including suggested time frames on Agenda items. These times are subject to change at any time during the meeting. Individuals with disabilities who require assistance or special arrangements to participate in the public meeting may call the ADA Coordinator at (434) 970-3182 or submit a request via email to ada@charlottesville.gov. The City of Charlottesville requests that you provide a 48 hour notice so that proper arrangements may be made. During the local state of emergency related to the Coronavirus (COVID19), City Hall and City Council Chambers are closed to the public and meetings are being conducted virtually via a Zoom webinar. The webinar is broadcast on Comcast Channel 10 and on all the City's streaming platforms including: Facebook, Twitter, and www.charlottesville.gov/streaming. Public hearings and other matters from the public will be heard via the Zoom webinar which requires advanced registration here: www.charlottesville.gov/zoom . You may also participate via telephone and a number is provided with the Zoom registration or by contacting staff at 434-970-3182 to ask for the dial in number for each meeting. CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE DEPARTMENT OF NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT SERVICES STAFF REPORT PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING APPLICATION FOR APPROVAL OF A FINAL SITE PLAN APPLICATION NUMBER: SP20-0037 DATE OF MEETING: October 21, 2021 Project Planner: Matt Alfele Date of Staff Report: October 6, 2021 Applicant: A Joseph Homes, LLC Applicant’s Representative(s): Dustin Greene, PE of Roudabush, Gale & Assoc., Inc. Current Property Owner: A Joseph Homes, LLC Property Street Address: 1000 and 1002 Grove Street (“Subject Properties”) Tax Map & Parcel: 230051000 and 230052000 Current Zoning Classification: Planned Unit Development (PUD) Overlay District: None Reason for Planning Commission Review: Final site plans within a PUD shall be reviewed by the Planning Commission per Sections 34-820(d)(1) and 34-822. Vicinity Map Applicant Property Standard of Review Page 1 of 4 SP16-000001 200 Carlton Final Site Plan Site plan approval is a ministerial function of Planning Commission in which no discretion is involved. If this final site plan contains all required information, then it must be granted approval. If Planning Commission disapproves this plan, it shall set forth in writing the specific reasons therefor. As per Section 34-823(c), the reasons for disapproval shall identify deficiencies in this plan which cause the disapproval, by reference to specific ordinances, laws, or regulations. If this plan is disapproved, Planning Commission must also generally identify modifications or corrections that will permit approval of this plan. Applicant’s Request (Summary) Mr. Dustin Greene of Roudabush, Gale & Assoc., Inc. Engineering, on behalf of A Joseph Homes, LLC, is seeking Planning Commission approval for the Grove Street PUD Final Site Plan. This final site plan proposes four (4) single family detached units and two (2) single family attached units for a total of six (6) residential units. On October 2, 2006 City Council approved the rezoning of the Subject Properties from R-1S to PUD with the following proffers: 1. To offer, through a PHA or similar program, one or more of the six units represented in the site plan to a buyer whose family gross income represents 80% or less of the gross median income in the city of Charlottesville for the most recent calendar year for which the figure is available; 2. To install environmental features shown on the site plan designed to retain as much storm water as possible, including but not limited to rain gardens, rain barrels, and green roofs on the one-story section of the buildings; 3. To achieve Energy Star or higher efficiency ratings for all units including insulation, appliances, hot water heaters, and HVAC systems; 4. To make every possible effort to save existing trees shown on the site plan, and replace any significant trees lost with native species such as white ash, Appalachian serviceberry, American dogwood, or similar. As per the City’s Zoning Ordinance, Planning Commission shall review this final site plan because it reflects the proposed development of property that is within a PUD. Site Plan Requirements A. Compliance with the City’s Erosion and Sediment Control ordinance (Chapter 10) Staff has determined that this final site plan complies with the City’s Erosion and Sediment Control ordinance. Erosion and Sediment Control plans are included as site plan Sheets 12 through 15, and Stormwater Management Plans are included as site plan Sheets 16 through 20. B. Compliance with applicable Zoning District Regulations (PUD) Page 2 of 4 SP16-000001 200 Carlton Final Site Plan The Subject Properties are zoned PUD. The project complies with the PUD development plan and applicable proffers. It should be noted that some proffers (1 and 3) cannot be fulfilled during site plan review. C. Compliance with general standards for site plans (Sections 34-827 - 34-828) Staff has determined that this site plan contains the following information as required: 1. General site plan information, including but not limited to project, property, zoning, site, and traffic information: Found on Sheet 1. 2. Existing condition and adjacent property information: Found on Sheet 2. 3. Phasing plan: The project will be constructed in one phase per Sheet 1. 4. Topography and grading: Found on Sheet 5. 5. Existing landscape and trees: Found on Sheet 2. 6. The name and location of all water features: N/A. 7. One hundred-year flood plain limits: N/A. 8. Existing and proposed streets and associated traffic information: No new streets are being proposed. 9. Location and size of existing water and sewer infrastructure: Found on Sheet 2. 10. Proposed layout for water and sanitary sewer facilities and storm drain facilities: Found of Sheets 4. 11. Location of other existing and proposed utilities and utility easements: Found on Sheet 4. 12. Location of existing and proposed ingress to and egress from the property, showing the distance to the centerline of the nearest existing street intersection: Found on Sheet 3. 13. Location and dimensions of all existing and proposed improvements: Found on Sheets 3, 4, 5, and 6. 14. All areas intended to be dedicated or reserved for public use: Found on Sheet 3 and attachment A 15. Landscape plan: Found on Sheet 6. D. Additional information to be shown on the site plan as deemed necessary by the director or Commission in order to provide sufficient information for the director or Commission to adequately review the site plan. The PUD Development Plan and proffers calls for additional information. 1. To offer, through a PHA or similar program, one or more of the six units represented in the site plan to a buyer whose family gross income represents 80% or less of the gross median income in the city of Charlottesville for the most recent calendar year for which the figure is Page 3 of 4 SP16-000001 200 Carlton Final Site Plan available; The applicant is currently working with the City’s Housing Department to fulfill this requirement and it shall be met prior to issuance of certificates of occupancy (COs). 2. To install environmental features shown on the site plan designed to retain as much storm water as possible, including but not limited to rain gardens, rain barrels, and green roofs on the one-story section of the buildings; Sheet 3 and 6. 3. To achieve Energy Star or higher efficiency ratings for all units including insulation, appliances, hot water heaters, and HVAC systems; Cannot be addressed until building permit application. 4. To make every possible effort to save existing trees shown on the site plan, and replace any significant trees lost with native species such as white ash, Appalachian serviceberry, American dogwood, or similar. Sheet 2, 6, and attachment A. 5. The layout and architectural style: Sheet 3 and attachment D. E. Compliance with Additional Standards for Specific Uses (Sections 34-930 - 34- 938) No improvements regulated by these sections are proposed. Public Comments Received No comments received. Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the final site plan. Attachments A. Final Subdivision Plat dated February 12, 2021 B. Final Site Plan dated September 10, 2021 C. Development Plan D. Conceptual home layout plans Page 4 of 4 CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE DEPARTMENT OF NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT SERVICES STAFF REPORT PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING APPLICATION FOR APPROVAL OF A SUBDIVISION APPLICATION NUMBER: P20-0097 DATE OF MEETING: October 21, 2021 Project Planner: Matt Alfele Date of Staff Report: October 6, 2021 Applicant: A Joseph Homes, LLC Applicant’s Representative(s): Dustin Greene, PE of Roudabush, Gale & Assoc., Inc. Current Property Owner: A Joseph Homes, LLC Property Street Address: 1000 and 1002 Grove Street (“Subject Properties”) Tax Map & Parcel: 230051000 and 230052000 Current Zoning Classification: Planned Unit Development (PUD) Overlay District: None Vicinity Map Applicant Property Page 1 of 4 P16-000001 CRHA South First Major Subdivision Standard of Review Subdivisions are reviewed for compliance with City codes and standards, in accordance with procedures prescribed by Virginia Code 15.2-2259 and standards and design requirements specified within the City’s subdivision, zoning, and water protection ordinances and the City’s Standards and Design Manual. The Planning Commission is the “subdivision agent” for the purpose of reviewing and approving a proposed final subdivision plat for a major subdivision. As “subdivision agent” the Planning Commission is performing an administrative function, and there are only two possible actions: (1) Approval--if the proposed subdivision meets all applicable requirements, the Planning Commission must approve it, or (2) if the Planning Commission determines that the proposed subdivision does not meet all applicable requirements, then the Planning Commission must disapprove the plat, and must articulate specific reasons why the subdivision does not meet the requirements—with reference to specific laws, ordinances and regulations. Summary Mr. Dustin Greene of Roudabush, Gale & Assoc., Inc. Engineering, on behalf of A Joseph Homes, LLC, is seeking Planning Commission approval of a major subdivision to construct a new seven (7) lot subdivision as part of the Grove Street PUD site plan (application SP20-0037). Per Section 29-3, this subdivision is considered major because it involves the creation of six (6) or more new lots. The land within the proposed major subdivision is identified on City Real Estate Tax Map Parcels 230051000 and 230052000. The Subject Properties have frontage on Grove Street, King Street, and 10th Street SW. The site contains approximately 0.171 acres. Staff has made a good faith effort to identify all deficiencies (if any) so that the applicant could be in a position to submit an approvable final plat to you for consideration and approval. Subdivision Requirements A. Section 29-140 requires all subdivision plats and supporting materials to be in accordance with: 1. Applicable provisions of the Virginia Code 2. The Water Protection Ordinance, Chapter 10 City Code 3. The Fire Prevention Code, Chapter 12 City Code 4. Utilities Ordinance, Chapter 31 City Code 5. Zoning Ordinance, Chapter 34 City Code 6. Charlottesville’s Standards and Design Manual Page 2 of 4 P16-000001 CRHA South First Major Subdivision 7. Subdivision Ordinance, Chapter 29 City Code, and other applicable City ordinances B. Compliance with design standards and improvements (per Sections 29-160 - 29-163) 1. Blocks: No new blocks will be created as a result of this subdivision. 2. Lots: The applicant is proposing to create seven (7) lots. 3. Parks, Schools, and other Public Land: No new parks or schools will be created with this subdivision. 4. Preservation of natural features and amenities: No Critical Slopes are located on the Subject Properties. 5. Items Listed in Section 29-111(b): The applicant has submitted a proposed final site plan for Planning Commission’s approval. The documents and information referenced in Section 29-111(b) are included in the site plan (attachment A & B). 6. Monuments: The subdivision plat demonstrates that the following requirements of Section 29-160 have been satisfied: a. All boundaries (exterior and interior) of the original survey for the subdivision have monuments in accordance with the Standards & Design Manual (see Sheet 3). b. The applicant has verified that these monuments will be set prior to recordation of the subdivision plat, or prior to conveyance of lots with reference to this plat. C. Compliance with the Street Standards for Subdivisions (Section 29-180 – 29-183) The proposed subdivision does not include any new public street. D. Compliance with Utility Standards for Subdivisions (Sections 29-200 – 29-204) The specific utility configurations and design details were reviewed by the Utilities Department with the Final Site Plan and can be found on attachment B. The utility easements as shown on this final subdivision plat have been approved by the Utilities Department. E. Compliance with applicable zoning district regulations (Sections 34-350 – 34-420) Staff believes the lot configuration conforms to the design and development standards within the Grove Street PUD plan. F. Compliance with the Water Protection Ordinance (City Code Chapter 10). Per Section 29-202 every development must be designed to achieve state and local requirements for post-development stormwater management, including measures addressing both the quantity and quality of stormwater, as set forth within Chapter 10 of the City Code (Water Protection). 1. Stormwater Management Plan: a stormwater management concept has been submitted in the final site plan along with the final plat materials, as required by Section 29-111(a)(2). The applicant has also submitted a proposed final Stormwater Page 3 of 4 P16-000001 CRHA South First Major Subdivision Management Plan for consideration by the City’s VESMP Agent. Such improvements, facilities and treatments are identified within the final site plan. 2. Erosion & Sediment Control: the applicant will submit an erosion and sediment control plan as part of the construction plans that are part of the final site plan. Public Comments Received No comments received. Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the major Subdivision. Attachments A. Final Subdivision Plat dated February 12, 2021 B. Final Site Plan dated September 10, 2021 C. Development Plan Page 4 of 4 Attachment A Attachment A Attachment A Attachment A Attachment A Attachment A Attachment A Attachment B 435 MERCHANT WALK SQ., SUITE 300-159 CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA 22902 MAILING A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION WWW.ROUDABUSH.COM SERVING VIRGINIA SINCE 1956 PHONE 434-977-0205 CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA 22902 PHYSICAL 999 SECOND ST. SE. DESCRIPTION DATE NO. DESCRIPTION DATE NO. DESIGNED BY: LO, DG DRAWN BY: LO CHECKED BY: JT CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE APPROVAL “ ” NAME DATE DATE: 02-20-2020 “ ” JOB: 8555 ” “ CONTOUR INTERVAL: 2 FT SHEET: 1 OF 20 Q:\RGA\TMPROJ\8555-Grove Street\NEW SITE PLAN - 20191104\DWG\SITE PLAN\FOURTH SUBMITTAL\GROVE STREET PUD-FSP_VSMP-REVISION4_CITY_COMMENTS-W-3 [PU UPDATE].dwg, 10/1/2021 11:21:42 AM, AutoCAD PDF (General Documentation).pc3 Attachment B 435 MERCHANT WALK SQ., SUITE 300-159 CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA 22902 MAILING A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION WWW.ROUDABUSH.COM SERVING VIRGINIA SINCE 1956 10TH STREET SW PHONE 434-977-0205 CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA 22902 PHYSICAL 999 SECOND ST. SE. GROVE STREET One Way DESCRIPTION KING STREET DATE One Way NO. DESCRIPTION DATE NO. DESIGNED BY: LO, DG DRAWN BY: LO CHECKED BY: JT 10TH STREET SW “ ” DATE: 02-20-2020 JOB: 8555 CONTOUR INTERVAL: 2 FT SHEET: 2 OF 20 \\RGA2019\Data\RGA\TMPROJ\8555-Grove Street\NEW SITE PLAN - 20191104\DWG\SITE PLAN\FOURTH SUBMITTAL\GROVE STREET PUD-FSP_VSMP-REVISION4_CITY_COMMENTS-W-3 [PU UPDATE].dwg, 9/30/2021 9:07:54 AM, AutoCAD PDF (General Documentation).pc3 Attachment B 435 MERCHANT WALK SQ., SUITE 300-159 CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA 22902 MAILING A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION WWW.ROUDABUSH.COM SERVING VIRGINIA SINCE 1956 PHONE 434-977-0205 CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA 22902 10TH STREET SW PHYSICAL 999 SECOND ST. SE. 2- Story On Crawl 2- Story FFE=380.3 1005A KING ST On Crawl 2- Story FFE=380.3 Basement 1005B KING ST FFE=382 1002 GROVE ST DESCRIPTION GROVE STREET One Way DATE NO. KING STREET DESCRIPTION One Way DATE 3- Story 3- Story 3- Story Brick Front On Crawl NO. On Crawl On Crawl FFE=376.1 FFE=378.0 FFE=376.2 209 10TH ST SW 205 10TH ST SW 207 10TH ST SW DESIGNED BY: LO, DG DRAWN BY: LO CHECKED BY: JT 10TH STREET SW DATE: 02-20-2020 JOB: 8555 CONTOUR INTERVAL: 2 FT SHEET: 3 OF 20 Attachment B 435 MERCHANT WALK SQ., SUITE 300-159 CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA 22902 MAILING A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION WWW.ROUDABUSH.COM SERVING VIRGINIA SINCE 1956 PHONE 434-977-0205 CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA 22902 PHYSICAL 999 SECOND ST. SE. 10TH STREET SW 2- Story On Crawl 2- Story FFE=380.3 1005A KING ST On Crawl 2- Story FFE=380.3 Basement DESCRIPTION 1005B KING ST FFE=382 1002 GROVE ST GROVE STREET One Way DATE NO. DESCRIPTION KING STREET One Way DATE NO. 3- Story 3- Story 3- Story Brick Front On Crawl On Crawl On Crawl FFE=376.1 DESIGNED BY: LO, DG FFE=378.0 FFE=376.2 209 10TH ST SW DRAWN BY: LO 205 10TH ST SW 207 10TH ST SW CHECKED BY: JT 10TH STREET SW DATE: 02-20-2020 JOB: 8555 CONTOUR INTERVAL: 2 FT SHEET: OF 20 \\RGA2019\Data\RGA\TMPROJ\8555-Grove Street\NEW SITE PLAN - 20191104\DWG\SITE PLAN\FOURTH SUBMITTAL\GROVE STREET PUD-FSP_VSMP-REVISION4_CITY_COMMENTS-W-3 [PU UPDATE].dwg, 9/29/2021 1:59:52 PM, AutoCAD PDF (General Documentation).pc3 Attachment B 435 MERCHANT WALK SQ., SUITE 300-159 CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA 22902 MAILING A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION WWW.ROUDABUSH.COM SERVING VIRGINIA SINCE 1956 PHONE 434-977-0205 CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA 22902 PHYSICAL 999 SECOND ST. SE. 10TH STREET SW DESCRIPTION 2- Story On Crawl 2- Story FFE=380.3 1005A KING ST On Crawl DATE 2- Story FFE=380.3 Basement 1005B KING ST FFE=382 1002 GROVE ST NO. GROVE STREET DESCRIPTION One Way DATE KING STREET NO. DESIGNED BY: LO, DG DRAWN BY: LO One Way CHECKED BY: JT 3- Story 3- Story 3- Story Brick Front On Crawl On Crawl On Crawl FFE=376.1 FFE=378.0 FFE=376.2 209 10TH ST SW 205 10TH ST SW 207 10TH ST SW 10TH STREET SW DATE: 02-20-2020 JOB: 8555 CONTOUR INTERVAL: 2 FT SHEET: 5 OF 20 Attachment B TREE COVERAGE CALCULATIONS 435 MERCHANT WALK SQ., SUITE 300-159 PLANT LIST GROSS SITE AREA 12,880 SF TREE COVERAGE REQUIRED 1,288 SF (10%) CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA 22902 TOTAL TREE COVERAGE PROVIDED 1,532 SF (11.9%) MAILING A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION WWW.ROUDABUSH.COM SERVING VIRGINIA SINCE 1956 Ulmus americana UA Princeton American Elm “Princeton” AG Amelanchier x Autumn Brilliance grandiflora “Autumn Serviceberry Brilliance" CO 8 Cephalanthus occidentalis Sugar Shack Buttonbush 18-24" Ht. 5' O.C. SPACING "Sugar Shack" IV 10 Ilex verticillata "Red Sprite" Red Sprite Winterberry 18-24" Ht. 5' O.C. SPACING PHONE 434-977-0205 IV 2 Ilex verticillata "Jim Dandy" Jim Dandy Winterberry 18-24" Ht. 5' O.C. SPACING CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA 22902 20 Aster laevis Smooth Aster 1 Gal. Cont. 24" O.C. SPACING PHYSICAL 999 SECOND ST. SE. 21 Chasmanthium latifolium Wild Oats 1 Gal. Cont. 24" O.C. SPACING 20 Coreopsis verticillata Threadleaf Coreopsis 1 Gal. Cont. 24" O.C. SPACING MIX 20 Iris versicolor Northern Blue Flag 1 Gal. Cont. 24" O.C. SPACING 21 Monarda didyma Coral Reef Beebalm 1 Gal. Cont. 24" O.C. SPACING "Coral Reef" 21 Panicum virgatum Shenandoah Switchgrass 1 Gal. Cont. 24" O.C. SPACING "Shenandoah" 21 Penstemon digitalis Beardtongue 1 Gal. Cont. DESCRIPTION 24" O.C. SPACING 21 Rudbeckia hirta 'Goldsturm' Goldsturm Black-Eyed Susan 1 Gal. Cont. 24" O.C. SPACING MIX AREA TO BE SEEDED WITH ERNST RAIN GARDEN SEED MIX (ERNMX-180) OR EQUIVALENT AT A RATE SPECIFIED BY THE MANUFACTURER. DATE 293 SF (0.007 ACRES) REQUIRES 0.14 LBS OF SEED WITH 0.21 LBS OF COVER CROP. NO. ERNST RAIN GARDEN (ERNMX-180) MIX COMPOSITION 33.4% Schizachyrium scoparium, 'Itasca', MN Ecotype (Little Bluestem, ‘Itasca’, MN Ecotype) 20.0% Elymus virginicus, PA Ecotype (Virginia Wildrye, PA Ecotype) 7.0% Carex vulpinoidea, PA Ecotype (Fox Sedge, PA Ecotype) 5.6% Chasmanthium latifolium, WV Ecotype (River Oats, WV Ecotype) DESCRIPTION 5.5% Echinacea purpurea (Purple Coneflower) 3.0% Chamaecrista fasciculata, PA Ecotype (Partridge Pea, PA Ecotype) 3.0% Coreopsis lanceolata (Lanceleaf Coreopsis) 3.0% Panicum clandestinum, Tioga (Deertongue, Tioga) 2- Story 3.0% Panicum rigidulum, PA Ecotype (Redtop Panicgrass, PA Ecotype) 3.0% Rudbeckia hirta, Coastal Plain NC Ecotype (Blackeyed Susan, Coastal Plain NC Ecotype) On Crawl 2- Story 3.0% Verbena hastata, PA Ecotype (Blue Vervain, PA Ecotype) FFE=380.3 2.0% Heliopsis helianthoides, PA Ecotype (Oxeye Sunflower, PA Ecotype) On Crawl 2- Story 1.8% Asclepias incarnata, PA Ecotype (Swamp Milkweed, PA Ecotype) FFE=380.3 PERMANENT SEEDING 1.0% Carex scoparia, PA Ecotype (Blunt Broom Sedge, PA Ecotype) Basement DATE 1.0% Senna hebecarpa, VA & WV Ecotype (Wild Senna, VA & WV Ecotype) FFE=382 0.5% Aster novae-angliae, PA Ecotype (New England Aster, PA Ecotype) 7-IV 0.5% Aster prenanthoides, PA Ecotype (Zigzag Aster, PA Ecotype) NO. 0.5% Baptisia australis, Southern WV Ecotype (Blue False Indigo, Southern WV Ecotype) 0.5% Pycnanthemum tenuifolium (Narrowleaf Mountainmint) 0.5% Zizia aurea (Golden Alexanders) GROVE STREET 3-CO One Way 0.4% Monarda fistulosa, Fort Indiantown Gap-PA Ecotype (Wild Bergamot, Fort Indiantown Gap-PA Ecotype) DESIGNED BY: LO, DG 0.3% Eupatorium coelestinum, VA Ecotype (Mistflower, VA Ecotype) DRAWN BY: LO 0.3% Eupatorium perfoliatum, PA Ecotype (Boneset, PA Ecotype) CHECKED BY: JT 0.3% Helenium autumnale, PA Ecotype (Common Sneezeweed, PA Ecotype) 0.3% Juncus tenuis, PA Ecotype (Path Rush, PA Ecotype) 0.2% Juncus effusus (Soft Rush) 0.2% Solidago nemoralis, PA Ecotype (Gray Goldenrod, PA Ecotype) 0.2% Solidago rugosa, PA Ecotype (Wrinkleleaf Goldenrod, PA Ecotype) 2-UA PERMANENT SEEDING IN THE PIEDMONT REGION KING STREET VESCH TABLE 25 TOTAL LBS. PER ACRE MINIMUM CARE LAWN - COMMERCIAL OR RESIDENTIAL 175-200 LBS. - KENTUCKY 31 OR TURF-TYPE TALL FESCUE 95-100% 5-CO One Way - IMPROVED PERENNIAL RYE GRASS 0-5% - KENTUCKY BLUEGRASS 0-5% 5-IV HIGH MAINTENANCE LAWN 200-250 LBS. - KENTUCKY 31 OR TURF-TYPE TALL FESCUE 100% 84-MIX 3-AG W/ SEEDING GENERAL SLOPE (3:1 OR LESS) 3- Story 3- Story - KENTUCKY 31 FESCUE 128 LBS. 3- Story - RED TOP GRASS 2 LBS. Brick Front On Crawl On Crawl On Crawl FFE=376.1 - SEASONAL NURSE CROP* 20 LBS. FFE=378.0 FFE=376.2 LOW-MAINTENANCE SLOPE (STEEPER THAN 3:1) - KENTUCKY 31 FESCUE 108 LBS. - RED TOP GRASS 2 LBS. - SEASONAL NURSE CROP* 20 LBS. - CROWN VETCH** 20 LBS. TOTAL 150 LBS. *USE SEASONAL NURSE CROP IN ACCORDANCE WITH SEEDING DATES AS STATED BELOW: FEBRUARY 16TH THROUGH APRIL 30TH. . . . . . . . . . . . ANNUAL RYE MAY 1ST THROUGH AUGUST 15TH . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . FOXTAIL MILLET AUGUST 16TH THROUGH OCTOBER 31ST. . . . . . . . . . .ANNUAL RYE NOVEMBER 1ST THROUGH FEBRUARY 15TH . . . . . . . .ANNUAL RYE *** SUBSTITUTE SERICEA LESPEDEZA FOR CROWNVETCH EAST OF FARMVILLE, VA (MAY THROUGH SEPTEMBER USE HULLED SERICEA, ALL OTHER PERIODS, USE UNHULLED SERICEA.) IF FLATPEA IS USED IN LIEU OF CROWNVETCH, INCREASE RATE TO 30 LBS./ACRE. ALL LEGUME SEED MUST BE PROPERLY INNOCULATED. WEEPING LOVEGRASS MAY BE ADDED TO ANY SLOPE OR LOW MAINTENANCE MIX DURING WARMER SEEDING PERIODS; ADD 10- 20 LBS./ACRE IN MIXES. 10TH STREET SW DATE: 02-20-2020 JOB: 8555 CONTOUR INTERVAL: 2 FT SHEET: 6 OF 20 \\RGA2019\Data\RGA\TMPROJ\8555-Grove Street\NEW SITE PLAN - 20191104\DWG\SITE PLAN\FOURTH SUBMITTAL\GROVE STREET PUD-FSP_VSMP-REVISION4_CITY_COMMENTS-W-3 [PU UPDATE].dwg, 9/29/2021 2:00:20 PM, AutoCAD PDF (General Documentation).pc3 Attachment B 435 MERCHANT WALK SQ., SUITE 300-159 PROPOSEDSANITARY PROPOSED SANITARYSEWER SEWERB13-165B TO EX PROFILE TO EX. 13-165 13-165 CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA 22902 HORIZ. SCALE HORIZONTAL = 1" = 10'1" SCALE:1'= MAILING A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION VERT. SCALE 1" =1'=0" VERTICAL SCALE: 5' WWW.ROUDABUSH.COM SERVING VIRGINIA SINCE 1956 PROPOSED PROPOSED SANITARY SANITARY SEWER SEWER 13-165D D TO TO EX EX. 13-165 13-165 PROFILE HORIZ. SCALE = 1" = HORIZ. SCALE: 1"=1' 10' VERT.SCALE: VERT. SCALE 1"=0' 1" = 5' PHONE 434-977-0205 CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA 22902 PHYSICAL 999 SECOND ST. SE. DESCRIPTION DATE NO. PROPOSED GAS LINE PROFILE DESCRIPTION PROPOSED PROPOSEDSTORM SEWER STORM 3 TO EX PROFILE HORIZ. SCALE: 1"=20' HORIZ. HORIZ.SCALE SCALE=1"=1' 1" = 10' VERT. SCALE: 1"=5' VERT.SCALE: VERT. SCALE1"=0' 1" = 5' DATE NO. DESIGNED BY: LO, DG UNDERGROUND UTILITY PROFILE DRAWN BY: LO (ELECTRIC AND COMMUNICATIONS) UNDERGROUND UTILITY PROFILE CHECKED BY: JT HORIZ. (ELECTRIC SCALE AND = 1" = 10' COMMUNICATIONS) HORIZ. SCALE: 1"=10' VERT. SCALE: VERT. SCALE 1"1"=5' = 5' DATE: 02-20-2020 JOB: 8555 CONTOUR INTERVAL: 2 FT SHEET: 7 OF 20 Attachment B 435 MERCHANT WALK SQ., SUITE 300-159 CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA 22902 MAILING A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION WWW.ROUDABUSH.COM SERVING VIRGINIA SINCE 1956 PHONE 434-977-0205 CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA 22902 PHYSICAL 999 SECOND ST. SE. DESCRIPTION DATE NO. DESCRIPTION 2- Story On Crawl 2- Story DATE FFE=380.3 On Crawl 2- Story FFE=380.3 Basement NO. FFE=382 DESIGNED BY: LO, DG DRAWN BY: LO CHECKED BY: JT GROVE STREET One Way 3- Story On Crawl FFE=376.1 KING STREET 3- Story 3- Story 3- Story Brick Front On Crawl On Crawl On Crawl FFE=376.1 FFE=378.0 FFE=376.2 10TH STREET SW DATE: 02-20-2020 JOB: 8555 CONTOUR INTERVAL: 2 FT SHEET: 8 OF 20 Attachment B 435 MERCHANT WALK SQ., SUITE 300-159 CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA 22902 MAILING A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION WWW.ROUDABUSH.COM SERVING VIRGINIA SINCE 1956 PHONE 434-977-0205 CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA 22902 PHYSICAL 999 SECOND ST. SE. DESCRIPTION DATE NO. DESCRIPTION DATE NO. DESIGNED BY: LO, DG DRAWN BY: LO CHECKED BY: JT DATE: 02-20-2020 JOB: 8555 CONTOUR INTERVAL: 2 FT SHEET: 9 OF 20 \\RGA2019\Data\RGA\TMPROJ\8555-Grove Street\NEW SITE PLAN - 20191104\DWG\SITE PLAN\FOURTH SUBMITTAL\GROVE STREET PUD-FSP_VSMP-REVISION4_CITY_COMMENTS-W-3 [PU UPDATE].dwg, 9/29/2021 1:20:24 PM, AutoCAD PDF (General Documentation).pc3 Attachment B 435 MERCHANT WALK SQ., SUITE 300-159 CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA 22902 MAILING A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION WWW.ROUDABUSH.COM SERVING VIRGINIA SINCE 1956 PHONE 434-977-0205 CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA 22902 PHYSICAL 999 SECOND ST. SE. DESCRIPTION DATE NO. DESCRIPTION DATE NO. DESIGNED BY: LO, DG DRAWN BY: LO CHECKED BY: JT DATE: 02-20-2020 JOB: 8555 CONTOUR INTERVAL: 2 FT SHEET: 10 OF 20 \\RGA2019\Data\RGA\TMPROJ\8555-Grove Street\NEW SITE PLAN - 20191104\DWG\SITE PLAN\FOURTH SUBMITTAL\GROVE STREET PUD-FSP_VSMP-REVISION4_CITY_COMMENTS-W-3 [PU UPDATE].dwg, 9/29/2021 1:20:52 PM, AutoCAD PDF (General Documentation).pc3 Attachment B 435 MERCHANT WALK SQ., SUITE 300-159 CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA 22902 MAILING A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION WWW.ROUDABUSH.COM SERVING VIRGINIA SINCE 1956 PHONE 434-977-0205 CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA 22902 PHYSICAL 999 SECOND ST. SE. DESCRIPTION DATE NO. DESCRIPTION DATE NO. DESIGNED BY: LO, DG DRAWN BY: LO CHECKED BY: JT “ ” DATE: 02-20-2020 JOB: 8555 CONTOUR INTERVAL: 2 FT SHEET: 11 OF 20 \\RGA2019\Data\RGA\TMPROJ\8555-Grove Street\NEW SITE PLAN - 20191104\DWG\SITE PLAN\FOURTH SUBMITTAL\GROVE STREET PUD-FSP_VSMP-REVISION4_CITY_COMMENTS-W-3 [PU UPDATE].dwg, 9/29/2021 1:24:27 PM, AutoCAD PDF (General Documentation).pc3 Attachment B 435 MERCHANT WALK SQ., SUITE 300-159 CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA 22902 MAILING A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION WWW.ROUDABUSH.COM SERVING VIRGINIA SINCE 1956 10TH STREET SW PHONE 434-977-0205 CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA 22902 PHYSICAL 999 SECOND ST. SE. GROVE STREET One Way DESCRIPTION KING STREET DATE One Way NO. DESCRIPTION DATE NO. DESIGNED BY: LO, DG DRAWN BY: LO CHECKED BY: JT 10TH STREET SW DATE: 02-20-2020 JOB: 8555 CONTOUR INTERVAL: 2 FT SHEET: 12 OF 20 \\RGA2019\Data\RGA\TMPROJ\8555-Grove Street\NEW SITE PLAN - 20191104\DWG\SITE PLAN\FOURTH SUBMITTAL\GROVE STREET PUD-FSP_VSMP-REVISION4_CITY_COMMENTS-W-3 [PU UPDATE].dwg, 9/29/2021 2:01:19 PM, AutoCAD PDF (General Documentation).pc3 Attachment B 435 MERCHANT WALK SQ., SUITE 300-159 CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA 22902 MAILING A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION WWW.ROUDABUSH.COM SERVING VIRGINIA SINCE 1956 10TH STREET SW PHONE 434-977-0205 CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA 22902 PHYSICAL 999 SECOND ST. SE. GROVE STREET One Way DESCRIPTION KING STREET DATE One Way NO. DESCRIPTION DATE NO. DESIGNED BY: LO, DG DRAWN BY: LO CHECKED BY: JT 10TH STREET SW DATE: 02-20-2020 JOB: 8555 CONTOUR INTERVAL: 2 FT SHEET: 13 OF 20 \\RGA2019\Data\RGA\TMPROJ\8555-Grove Street\NEW SITE PLAN - 20191104\DWG\SITE PLAN\FOURTH SUBMITTAL\GROVE STREET PUD-FSP_VSMP-REVISION4_CITY_COMMENTS-W-3 [PU UPDATE].dwg, 9/29/2021 2:04:55 PM, AutoCAD PDF (General Documentation).pc3 Attachment B 435 MERCHANT WALK SQ., SUITE 300-159 CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA 22902 MAILING A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION WWW.ROUDABUSH.COM SERVING VIRGINIA SINCE 1956 10TH STREET SW PHONE 434-977-0205 CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA 22902 PHYSICAL 999 SECOND ST. SE. GROVE STREET One Way DESCRIPTION KING STREET DATE One Way NO. DESCRIPTION DATE NO. DESIGNED BY: LO, DG DRAWN BY: LO CHECKED BY: JT 10TH STREET SW DATE: 02-20-2020 JOB: 8555 CONTOUR INTERVAL: 2 FT SHEET: 14 OF 20 \\RGA2019\Data\RGA\TMPROJ\8555-Grove Street\NEW SITE PLAN - 20191104\DWG\SITE PLAN\FOURTH SUBMITTAL\GROVE STREET PUD-FSP_VSMP-REVISION4_CITY_COMMENTS-W-3 [PU UPDATE].dwg, 9/29/2021 2:06:01 PM, AutoCAD PDF (General Documentation).pc3 Attachment B 435 MERCHANT WALK SQ., SUITE 300-159 CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA 22902 MAILING A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION WWW.ROUDABUSH.COM SERVING VIRGINIA SINCE 1956 PHONE 434-977-0205 CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA 22902 PHYSICAL 999 SECOND ST. SE. “ ” “ ” “ ” DESCRIPTION · · · · · · DATE · · NO. · · · DESCRIPTION · PS · TABLE 25 TOTAL LBS. PER ACRE · · MINIMUM CARE LAWN - COMMERCIAL OR RESIDENTIAL 175-200 LBS. - KENTUCKY 31 OR TURF-TYPE TALL FESCUE 95-100% - IMPROVED PERENNIAL RYE GRASS 0-5% - KENTUCKY BLUEGRASS 0-5% HIGH MAINTENANCE LAWN 200-250 LBS. - KENTUCKY 31 OR TURF-TYPE TALL FESCUE 100% DATE GENERAL SLOPE (3:1 OR LESS) - KENTUCKY 31 FESCUE 128 LBS. - RED TOP GRASS 2 LBS. - SEASONAL NURSE CROP* 20 LBS. NO. LOW-MAINTENANCE SLOPE (STEEPER THAN 3:1) - KENTUCKY 31 FESCUE 108 LBS. - RED TOP GRASS 2 LBS. - SEASONAL NURSE CROP* 20 LBS. DESIGNED BY: LO, DG - CROWN VETCH** 20 LBS. TOTAL 150 LBS. DRAWN BY: LO CHECKED BY: JT *USE SEASONAL NURSE CROP IN ACCORDANCE WITH SEEDING DATES AS STATED BELOW: FEBRUARY 16TH THROUGH APRIL 30TH. . . . . . . . . . . . ANNUAL RYE MAY 1ST THROUGH AUGUST 15TH . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . FOXTAIL MILLET AUGUST 16TH THROUGH OCTOBER 31ST. . . . . . . . . . .ANNUAL RYE NOVEMBER 1ST THROUGH FEBRUARY 15TH . . . . . . . .ANNUAL RYE *** SUBSTITUTE SERICEA LESPEDEZA FOR CROWNVETCH EAST OF FARMVILLE, VA (MAY THROUGH SEPTEMBER USE HULLED SERICEA, ALL OTHER PERIODS, USE UNHULLED SERICEA.) IF FLATPEA IS USED IN LIEU OF CROWNVETCH, INCREASE RATE TO 30 LBS./ACRE. ALL LEGUME SEED MUST BE PROPERLY INNOCULATED. WEEPING LOVEGRASS MAY BE ADDED TO ANY SLOPE OR LOW MAINTENANCE MIX DURING WARMER SEEDING PERIODS; ADD 10- 20 LBS./ACRE IN MIXES. PS TABLE 24 Maintenance Fertilization for Permanent Seedings Use Soil Test Recommendation or Rates Shown Below Seeding Mixture Formulation Lbs. per Lbs. per Time Mowing Acre 1000 sf Tall fescue 10-10-10 500 11.5 Yearly, or as *Not closer than 3" if makes up 70% or needed fall occasional mowing is 400 9.2 or more of 30-10-10 desired. cover. Spring the year Do not mow crownvetch Crownvetch following Service 0-20-0 400 9.2 establishment lespedeza and every 4-5 Birdsfoot trefoil years thereafter. Fairly uniform Fall the year Not required. not stand of Tall following closer than 4" if Tescue & 5-10-10 500 11.5 establish- ment occasional mowing is Service and every 4-5 desired, and then in lespedeza, or years fall after seed has Birdsfoot thereafter. matured. Trefoil. Weeping Spring the year Not required. not Lovegrass & following closer than 4" if Service 5-10-10 500 11.5 establishment occasional mowing is lespedeza fairly and every 3-4 desired, and fall after uniform plant years thereafter. sericea has matured. distribution September, 30 Mow no closer than 2" Red & chewings 20-10-10 250 5.8 for red fescue and Ky days later fescue, bluegrass; and closer December, May Kentucky than 3" for fescue. 100 2.3 20-June-30, if bluegrass, hard needed. fescue mixture: TABLE 26 TEMPORARY SEEDINGS BY RATES, DEPTHS, AND DATES Planting Seeding zones (2) and Seeding Date (3) depth (1) 7a and 7b 6b 6a and 5b (Inches) 2/1- 5/1- 8/15- 3/1- 5/1- 8/15- 3/15- 6/1- 8/1- 4/30 8/14 11/30 4/30 8/14 11/15 5/31 7/31 10/31 BY BY BY X - 10/15 X - 10/15 X - 10/1 X - - X - - X - - X - X X - X X - X X X 10/15 X X 10/15 X X 10/1 X X X X X X X X X 1/4-1/2 - X - - X - - X - 1/4-1/2 X - 11/1 X - 11/1 X - 8/15 DATE: 02-20-2020 - X - - X - - X - (1) (2) Applicable on slopes of 3:1 or flatter Refer to figure A - Adopted from USDA, ARS Miscellaneous Publication #1475, January 1990 JOB: 8555 (3) (4) Between fall and spring seeding dates, use mulch only if ground is frozen and reseed when thawed May be used as a nurse crop for late fall/early winter permanent seedings, add 56 lbs/ac. to the CONTOUR INTERVAL: 2 FT permanent seeding mixture (4) Maryland State Highway Administration Temporary Seed Mix (5) May be used as a nurse crop for mid-summer permanent seedings. Add 2 lbs/ac to permanent seed 15 OF 20 mix. (6) May be used as a nurse crop for mid-summer permanent seedings. Add 10 lbs/ac. to the permanent seeding mix. SHEET: Attachment B 435 MERCHANT WALK SQ., SUITE 300-159 CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA 22902 MAILING A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION WWW.ROUDABUSH.COM SERVING VIRGINIA SINCE 1956 PHONE 434-977-0205 CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA 22902 PHYSICAL 999 SECOND ST. SE. DESCRIPTION DATE NO. DESCRIPTION GROVE STREET One Way DATE NO. DESIGNED BY: LO, DG DRAWN BY: LO CHECKED BY: JT KING STREET One Way 10TH STREET SW DATE: 02-20-2020 JOB: 8555 CONTOUR INTERVAL: 2 FT SHEET: 16 OF 20 \\RGA2019\Data\RGA\TMPROJ\8555-Grove Street\NEW SITE PLAN - 20191104\DWG\SITE PLAN\FOURTH SUBMITTAL\GROVE STREET PUD-FSP_VSMP-REVISION4_CITY_COMMENTS-W-3 [PU UPDATE].dwg, 9/29/2021 2:08:51 PM, AutoCAD PDF (General Documentation).pc3 Attachment B 435 MERCHANT WALK SQ., SUITE 300-159 CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA 22902 MAILING A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION WWW.ROUDABUSH.COM SERVING VIRGINIA SINCE 1956 PHONE 434-977-0205 CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA 22902 PHYSICAL 999 SECOND ST. SE. POST-DEVELOPED DRAINAGE AREA MAP DESCRIPTION DATE NO. DESCRIPTION GROVE STREET One Way DATE NO. DESIGNED BY: LO, DG DRAWN BY: LO CHECKED BY: JT KING STREET One Way 10TH STREET SW DATE: 02-20-2020 JOB: 8555 CONTOUR INTERVAL: 2 FT SHEET: 17 OF 20 \\RGA2019\Data\RGA\TMPROJ\8555-Grove Street\NEW SITE PLAN - 20191104\DWG\SITE PLAN\FOURTH SUBMITTAL\GROVE STREET PUD-FSP_VSMP-REVISION4_CITY_COMMENTS-W-3 [PU UPDATE].dwg, 9/29/2021 2:09:29 PM, AutoCAD PDF (General Documentation).pc3 Attachment B NO. DATE DESCRIPTION NO. DATE DESCRIPTION SHEET: A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION SERVING VIRGINIA SINCE 1956 JOB: 8555 DRAWN BY: LO PHYSICAL MAILING CHECKED BY: JT 18 OF 20 999 SECOND ST. SE. 435 MERCHANT WALK SQ., SUITE 300-159 CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA 22902 CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA 22902 DATE: 02-20-2020 DESIGNED BY: LO, DG PHONE 434-977-0205 WWW.ROUDABUSH.COM 2 FT CONTOUR INTERVAL: Attachment B 435 MERCHANT WALK SQ., SUITE 300-159 CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA 22902 MAILING A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION WWW.ROUDABUSH.COM SERVING VIRGINIA SINCE 1956 PHONE 434-977-0205 CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA 22902 PHYSICAL 999 SECOND ST. SE. DESCRIPTION DATE NO. DESCRIPTION S EE D I N G PERMANENT 7-IV DATE 3-CO NO. DESIGNED BY: LO, DG DRAWN BY: LO CHECKED BY: JT 2-UA 5-CO 5-IV 84-MIX W / S E E D I N G 3-AG DATE: 02-20-2020 JOB: 8555 CONTOUR INTERVAL: 2 FT SHEET: 19 OF 20 \\RGA2019\Data\RGA\TMPROJ\8555-Grove Street\NEW SITE PLAN - 20191104\DWG\SITE PLAN\FOURTH SUBMITTAL\GROVE STREET PUD-FSP_VSMP-REVISION4_CITY_COMMENTS-W-3 [PU UPDATE].dwg, 9/29/2021 1:14:14 PM, AutoCAD PDF (General Documentation).pc3 Attachment B 435 MERCHANT WALK SQ., SUITE 300-159 CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA 22902 MAILING A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION WWW.ROUDABUSH.COM SERVING VIRGINIA SINCE 1956 PHONE 434-977-0205 CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA 22902 PHYSICAL 999 SECOND ST. SE. DESCRIPTION DATE NO. DESCRIPTION DATE NO. DESIGNED BY: LO, DG DRAWN BY: LO CHECKED BY: JT DATE: 02-20-2020 JOB: 8555 CONTOUR INTERVAL: 2 FT SHEET: 20 OF 20 \\RGA2019\Data\RGA\TMPROJ\8555-Grove Street\NEW SITE PLAN - 20191104\DWG\SITE PLAN\FOURTH SUBMITTAL\GROVE STREET PUD-FSP_VSMP-REVISION4_CITY_COMMENTS-W-3 [PU UPDATE].dwg, 9/29/2021 1:27:33 PM, AutoCAD PDF (General Documentation).pc3 Attachment C Fifeville Heights Condominiums A PUD Application regarding the property at 1000 & 1002 Grove Street & 10'11 St. SW. Respectfully submitted by: V. G. Sullivan and Mark H. Saunders on behalf of London Calling, LLC June 27, 2006 Narrative Statement Background London Calling, LLC was fotmed in the summer of2005 by three pminers, including two Charlottesville city residents, to pursue development oppmiunitics that balance the following objectives: • Responding to the city's Planned Unit Development initiative, create a small­ scale, in-fill development model that improves the urban fabric of Charlottesville city neighborhoods and decreases sprawl by L:pgrading or replacing existing housing stock while delivering a reasonable return to investors; • Build architecturally distinctive, high-quality middle-income houses; e Offer units priced in an under-represented range of the Charlottesville real estate market (roughly $200,000 - $350,000) ® Use environmentally sensitive building technologies wherever pos2ible, not just as marketing but to lessen environmental impact, including increased storm-water retention and energy efficiency; • Achieve maximum efficiency in building systems for environmental sustainability and long-term affordability; • Allow artisan quality construction by acting as General Contractor; • Preserve viable historic structures and urban forest wherever possible; • Provide all of the above while acting as responsible community members, not outside "developers" insensitive to the needs of the community We purchased the two parcels at 1000 and 1002 Grove Street in fall 2005. The parcels attracted us as a possible PUD because of their proximity to U.Va., pmiicularly the hospital complex, and growing retail development along the West Main Street corridor and existing shopping along Cherry A venue. The houses on the site had been neglected and i!l-used and were no longer economically viable due to a variety of issues. The site also seemed ideal for increased density because of its situation at the edge of a residential neighborhood, across the street from a large parking lot and one block from a Piedmont Housing Alliance (PHA) site slated for mixed-use development. We felt that the site, if sensitively developed, could offer a transition between the parking lot and its future use, the 9th_l01h connector, and the older neighborhood behind it. We also approached the owner of I 000 King Street. While he supported our development plans, he did not want to join our project. Attachment C Designers In the same month, we approached the Charlottesville Community Design Center with our objective to create a small community on the sites. The CCDC referred us to Christopher Genter and Susanne Schindler of Genter-Schindler/Utile Architects, the winners of the Urban Habitats design competition. The architects embraced the idea of creating a PUD that planners and developers could point to as a successful model from a variety of perspectives. As experts in in-fill development, contextual design, and green building technology, the architects bring strong credentials to the project. Process With the first design in hand-a 7-unit site plan with 3 detached and 4 attached units clustered around a common garden-we came before the planning commission on April 11, 2006. The reaction to the proposal seemed to us largely positive, with more than one commissioner commending the care represented in the preparation of the design. We carried away the following generally constructive feedback: • There was no consensus regarding detached versus attached houses, with some commissioners advocating single-family detached while others advocated row houses; • Provide at least one affordable unit: the definition of"affordable" was debated (anywhere between $120,000 - $292,000 per unit) but a sales price figure pegged to "80% of gross median income" was reported as a standard measure adopted by the city; o Maintain and enhance the environmental features represented in the design, including replacing areas of turf that could be compacted with rain gardens or other plantings; e Provide a more pleasant elevation on the King Street side for existing homeowners; o Provide greater visual access to the common space so that the development does not appear to exclude the neighborhood. After receiving this feedback, we approached the Fifeville Neighborhood Association with the plan. At a meeting on May 11, 2006, the Fifeville neighbors expressed great concern about what has happened to their neighborhood in the last 5 years-the 9111 -10111 connector, Walker Square apartments/condominiums, the threat of new development at the corner of Cherry Avenue and Ridge Street-and there were some neighbors who wanted no new development at all. Responding to the 7-unit site plan, which we passed out at the meeting and made available to the association's e-mail list, some of the neighbors echoed the planning commission's positive reaction to the quality of the design but we perceived the following specific negative reactions: o The scale of the single attached 4-unit building was too large, creating a "wall" between the development and the existing neighbors • Preserve as many existing trees as possible, especially a large American holly and a green ash, the largest tree on the site Attachment C • The neighbors were not interested in "affordability" as a token gesture in service of greater density • The design provoked security concerns, including a perceived cut-through along a proposed walkway on the western boundary and easy access to the common area • The design "turned its back on Grove," not providing a pleasing streetscape or enough "eyes on the street" to provide security • King Street house design "clashed" with the cottage on the King-10 111 St. corner • The level of density would create a "wedge" leading to fmiher density in the neighborhood With these reactions from planners and neighbors in hand, including minutes from a follow-up meeting with neighbors on May 20, 2006, the architects revised the plan in an attempt to balance their client's objectives with the other parties' concerns. The first revised plan incorporated the following: • Decrease the density from 7 units to 6 detached units; • Preserve all the important existing trees, including the holly and the ash; • Add windows to the Grove Street elevations for more "eyes on the street;" • Break up the walkway perceived as a security issue; e Move two parking spaces to limit direct access to the common area-perceived as a security issue-while providing greater visual access to provide a visual respite for passing neighbors; • Improve King Street elevation, including gabled roof to match neighboring houses We also met with Peter Loach and Mark Watson of the PHA to learn more about and discuss their initiatives with regard to providing an "affordable unit." We provided the revised 6-unit plan to the neighborhood association by email, and presented it to the planning commission on June 13, 2006. We did not receive any substantive reaction to the revised plan from the neighbors, although we understand that there is still opposition. From the planners, we received the following constructive feedback: • Increase the variety of housing types, with one commissioner pushing larger homes up to 2000+ square feet • Do more with the design of the middle unit E 0 Push the environmental features o Include an affordable unit At this point, we asked the architects to balance as much as possible the sometimes conflicting reactions/requirements of the three primary interested parties: London Calling; the planning commission; and the Fifeville neighbors. The resulting 6-unit plan reflects what we believe to have been a positive process conducted in good faith by all parties: Attachment C • Provides a variety of housing types and sizes, including a 1057-square foot two­ bedroom cottage at unit E and two large (1658- and 1721-square foot) three­ bedroom homes with space for a family; • Modulates units D, E, F with green-roofed one-storey extensions punctuating two- and three-story sections to mitigate the scale of the development • Adds accessible green roofs to all one-story sections • Preserves important trees • Improves King and Grove Street elevations, from aesthetic and security perspectives • Allows visual but not physical access to common garden In sum, we believe that the proposed plan reflects our respect for the neighborhood and the goals of the planning commission, and will enhance the City in the long run. Response to Specific Requirements In response to the PUD "Objectives" as enumerated in Sec. 34-490, our plan meets the specific requirements as follows: 1) To encourage developments of equal or higher quality than otherwise required by the strict application of zoning district regulations that would otherwise govern: The two structures currently on the site have been neglected to the point that they are derelict, not economically viable for renovation by an investor or a homeowner. Replacing the existing structures with two similar structures would likewise create homes far outside the size, scale, and price range of the surrounding neighborhood. (2) To encourage innovative arrangements of buildings and open spaces to provide efficient, attractive, flexible and environmentally sensitive design. The architects have created an attractive, ingenious arrangement of buildings with green roves and permeable parking spaces clustered around a central community space that provides fmther storm water retention. (3) To promote a variety of housing types, or, within a development containing only a single housing type, to promote the inclusion of houses of various sizes; The design offers four different housing sizes and floor plans to accommodate different lifesty!es and income levels. (4) To encourage the clustering of single-.family dwellings for more efficient use of land and preservation of open space; Attachment C The design mixes single-family detached houses with a row of"attached cottages" linked by single-story extensions with green roofs to increase living space while minimizing the visual impact of the building's scale. (5) To provide for developments designed to function as cohesive, unified projects; Because London Calling has applied the same design values to the entire project, it will function as a community from an aesthetic, environmental, and livability perspective. (6) To ensure that a development will be harmonious with the existing uses and character of adjacent property, and/or consistent with patterns of development noted with respect to such adjacent property; As noted above, the development was designed as a transition between the more densely developed areas to the north and east, and the small-lot, residential character of the neighborhood to the south and west. (7) To ensure preservation of cultural features, scenic assets and natural features such as trees, streams and topography; The site plan incorporates the existing topography, using it as an asset to improve home design, views from upper-storey decks, and storm water management, and explicitly preserves at least five large existing trees and adds additional native species to the site (8) To provide for coordination of architectural styles internally within the development as well as in relation to adjacent properties along the perimeter of the development; and The design presents a cohesive, attractive, updated interpretation of the architectural styles-ranging from cottage to federal to Victorian, claddcd mainly with stucco or lap siding-represented in the surrounding neighborhood. The buildings will be sided in I-lardiplank or similar material with a variety of rooflines, including gabled, flat, and shed. (9) To provide for coordinated linkages among internal buildings and uses, and external connections, at a scale appropriate to the development and adjacent neighborhoods; The design takes advantage of the topography to keep the scale of the development similar to the adjacent prope1iies, while allowing for ample open space and parking. The height of the buildings on Grove and King are equal to the existing structures and lower than the majority of neighboring structures, and the proposed building footprint is only 477 square feet (13%) greater than the existing footprint. Attachment C (! 0) To facilitate access to the development by public transit services or other single vehicle-alternative services, including, without limitation, public pedestrian systems. I 000-1002 Grove Street is ideally situated to facilitate access to public transit systems, bike lanes on the 9' 11 -10' 11 street connector and West Main Street, and safe sidewalks that lead to the University, the Corner district, West Main Street, and the Downtown Mall. The site plan calls for a sidewalk wrapping the corner of IO"' and Grove Streets, thus adding a section where none exists on I 0'11 • Sec. 34-493. Required open space. The site plan provides for 16% shared open space as defined in the relevant article, designated as a "common garden" that due to its size will primarily provide a visual and aesthetic amenity to the residents and neighbors of the development, and an opportunity to install environmental features that increase storm-water retention on the site, including rain gardens and native plant species. The common area will allow for quiet activities such as reading, picnicking, etc. While not included in the shared "open space" as strictly defined, the site plan also provides private yards, decks, and porches opening onto the shared space and the smrnunding streets, as well as accessible (one-storey) green roofs to improve the community and private lives of the residents and the surrounding neighborhood. Proffers: London Calling LLC, as pati of the site plan, proffers the following: I) To offer, through a PHA or similar program, one or more of the six units represented in the site plan to a buyer whose family gross income represents 80% or less of the gross median income in the city of Charlottesville for the most recent calendar year for which the figure is available; 2) To install environmental features shown on the site plan designed to retain as much storm water as possible, including but not limited to rain gardens, rain barrels, and green roofs on the one-storey sections of the buildings; 3) To achieve Energy Star or higher efficiency ratings for all units including insulation, appliances, hot water heaters, and HVAC systems; 4) To make every possible effort to save existing trees shown on the site plan, and replace any significant trees lost with native species such as white ash, Appalachian serviceberry, American dogwood, or similar. Attachment C Prepared and submitted on behalf of London Calling LLC by V. G. Sullivan Mark H. Saunders ',"--1 Attachment C I " ' , ------------------~------------------------~------------------------------- \'-- I J 1 .' 11 "'-___./ - - - '-----"' '-.__,/ '-..__,,/ '-..__,,/ "-._,/ GROVE ST Tpa;c;I .--- ... ----------­ partel ' Parcels 2 ,~ i 230051000 23do52000H ,, Units ~1:~r=:i:,::=1\~;;+:i;t,M ' \ 6 ' ' I "­ ' Site Area 12,778 SF 029 ACRE ' I .. - .. 1 Density 20 UNITS I I I Existing Building Footprint 3,614 SF Proposed Building Footprint 4,091 SF Increase 477 SF lfi "Iif~i;~~i,ftciJ~ : ~~~':non Proposed Area FAR 8,954 . 0.70 SF 1­ U) 'I,- ­ '' ;::: Parking Area 2,336 SF 'I ;2 Total Open Space* 6,351 SF 1 I• 50 % ' I _/I I' I' I•'I Shared Open Space 2,010 SF If-!~=---"-""---'---------- • ' ' , ' 1 . 1 I (Common Garden) 16 % ) ! ! i ... i ' I I , ) I ~ ~- ~ I I ' I ) I \ 1' I I ' ' I ' I ~- r'l·~ ~ ___________ i i _,,.1._ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ -'---- _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ! _L _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ' 11 *open space calculations includes ground floor porches but does not include upper floor decks. KING ST 'I G I" - ------- - - ',~ - - -"----'.------- ~""- ..I\ ----------------~--) .\ '~ --- ( Attachment C ' 1J _________________________________ _ .1. /·. • "----/. '----.-/ "...____/ '(___,/ ~- ..._____,.. Parcels 2 ~ ·' I ' ) Units 6 I ~ ) Site Area 12,778 SF 0.29 ACRE Density 20 UNIT~ Existing Building Footprint 3,614 SF Proposed Building Footprint 4,091 SF Increase 477 SF Proposed Area 8,954 SF FAR 0.70 Parking Area 2,336 SF Total Open Space* 6,351 SF 50 % i 'I 11 ~\(S&L~-~--- __ ,.._,_ :-~:::::c::;:-·-.-.:::._l_!I~ I 1:::.Iffr::1____ ,,,,, ' :---'_ ;;::::,:<·-_:-_.;..-:._<·:'_·.:-- ___ : Shared Open Space 2,010 SF / 11 (Common Garden) 16 % --'----) ~­ ) ~ ~ - ~ ;ii\...~. ~ ,.__../ j - ­ <)i - - - - I ___j__ ­ - ­ -~I - - -'--- - - ---- *open space calculations includes ground floor porches but does not include upper floor decks. -\l I ' I ' 'I G r• Attachment C [j · ±:D - I Grove Street King Street ,, l'il i± ·~·'. Grove 10th and King Street :i.}i. Charlottesvme, VA .;; 10 th Street prepared for London Calling, LLC by 111111 01 5 I 10 1:. ut i I e 31 May 2006 Attachment C Gl ~ (J) CJ) .... ..., (J) .... (J) D ) (";"_' Attachment C '''-''-'' Unit 1 2 3 Total Parking Deck A 591 528 387 1,506 2 69 sf porch, 140 sf deck 8 591 528 387 1,506 2 69 sf porch, 140 sf d eek c 591 528 387 1,506 2 69 sf porch, 140 sf deck D 791 528 402 1,721 2 28 sf porch, 125 sf deck E 573 484 ... 1,057 2 55 sf porch ·.· .Q54 794;t . l,658··· .2 f15sfp'Qrcli .. 6. 4,091 8,954 12 bedroom or studio 4 6 *d:~ ,. ~ '~'"~ :~I I b,,,,,. I""""\ IL----~ bedroom living dining section A r '­ r Attachment C living I dining . m~tflt I kitchen private yard 1-­ (/) ~ () a:: (CJ private private pdvate ~tchen yard yard yard [,. I i,.!';_:k-~f~; i(l_j~I: [.,___j I dining living I dining living I dining '1.bJ I' 1·· ! , j' ' !;-·---, It---',: llr"I r c: ',....,....,, Unit 1 2 3 Total Parking Deck Attachment C A 591 528 387 1,506 2 69 sf porch, 140 sf deck B 591 528 387 1,506 2 69 sf porch, 140 sf deck c 591 528 387 1,506 2 69 sf porch, 140 sf deck D 791 528 402 1,721 2 28 sf porch, 125 sf deck E 573 484' 1,057 2> 55 sf porch 954 1,658 2 J15 sfporct{' 6. 4,091 8,954 12 --,\ 32·-o" 22·-o" I 22·-o" 22·-o" 24'-C _,:..-· ;;~.l~ra·~.~.;~;J:&;;c; . • -·. ~: ' : ! 1· '~,1.i ' 'I: i: · I :.. ·. ,i 1 ' I ' '1 ' ' I :!' . • ·1 I,:''· '1 i 'I ' I ' -- ' ~----. ' . . . .. I II II IIll me7JW 11 1 if 7: i r~1~1Ht1H~~~-~JHH~-r--1, 1 I 1 ', II >I we -~-~-.:-~: .2.•. : i. .' ! i ' ' ! !' ~' i i~i 1, i I II ; it ' I t' ' ': J' ' I ;:=:;=========+===~ "" '9 I I . \711 Fir [I;!: I~ i:fa~~):;~;- - ' 0 9 :1•11 ,:, 1 ri ,11 ' I' 1 I ' 1 - l:\~S'ZJ.:• ~ II I I I , \, I \,// './ ' j I -­ / .;,;c<···-·'•" ;~L__J__/~ -~~(;{t;!<'- \ . _,· .L ! ' ~fi~~~:i _~- 1 G I IVVI Attachment C Unit 1 2 3 Total Parking Deck 591 528 387 1,506 2 69 sf porch, 140 sf deck 591 528 387 1,506 2 69 sf porch, 140 sf deck 591 528 387 1,506 2 69 sf porch, 140 sf deck 791 528 402 1,721 2 28 sf porch, 125 sf deck 573 484 1,057 2 55 sfporc[i'. · .954 ·70.4<'· <: :··, 1,658 ,;;: 2: 1)5 sfpo/¢f1f.'' 6 4,091 8,954 12 32·-o" 22·-o" 22·-o.. 22·-o.. I 24'-0 r;::==;:;::;:;::;:;::i==='!;'=;=E=i=:;i ~· -· -- - I "" bath' :,q" 9: """ <( bedroom bedroom bedroom '\ bedroom 2 c r Attachment C I IVVI Unit 1 2 3 Total Parking Deck 591 528 387 1,506 2 69 sf porch, 140 sf deck 591 528 387 1,506 2 69 sf porch, 140 sf deck 591 528 387 1,506 2 69 sf porch, 140 sf deck 791 528 402 1,721 2 28 sf porch, 125 sf deck 57.3 4,8fL 1,057. 2 55 sfporch ..954 704 i!358 ;_ ·.· .2 ·ci15 sfpoich' 6. 4,091 8,954 12 _ __ __ 32·-o" 22'-o" 22·-o" 22·-o" I 24'-0 -----·---­ '· 5' N <( N bedroom or studio --·· l~-iTl!_·: id~dk' !! i:, 3 r ' ', ~ - ! ·, : :i !! i G Attachment C 3 Storey House Floor GROV£ST Unit 1 2 3 Total Parking Deck bedroom ,'\ or studio [1-q . c_, I A 591 528 387 t.506 1,506 2 69 sf porch. 140 sf deck i 8 591 528 337 2 69 sf porch, 140 sf deck I 113 0 - :_c c rut3 9 • 591 528 387 1,506 2 69 sf porch, 140 sf deck D 625 529 387 1,540 2 69 sf porch, 140 sf deck "' E 711 711 1.422 2 60 sf porch boo•o:m " A ~ F 711 711 1.422 2 100 sf porch rn ~~'F"""l ' 6 3,820 8,902 12 I K11.:GS'i living and dining © Al- I section 8 "'~~-" I . _j .... rttfr. -~ - --- itche -- I ,, bedroom or studio 'I! [1 '1 " bedroom or studio bedroom bedroom Lcc 11~ ~ ·, :~,_....._, •••~ dining ~ cc 8 32 (' ~, i ;.\:,; I 2.!'-Q" f2I .!1 ~ :, I~' bath 3 batt(' r @!) 2 J~-·I w----,··' WO· 1 1 kitchen living and din­ grasscrete or ether t;; "' pi=rmeeble suriace ~ § pavmg ~I~tchen private r{ i .-t '""" ·;ard , , ""' khc.~Jr I :·,, f ~-1 1'icg I dicicg II I :i k· '.< -;i. ·Ii ·"- -------­ ")\!;~'" ' ~o•) • . J '---_- J'.;'~d -_-~_,~-,,,_ __ .. _.._..·---'·.·- .,. ;>- ~""""" .. J__-f.J-.'_"t-r-·---~"n;;;.,:;- ;._t ~- ]Ji ..' ,-,.-J· --. ;.- ---71-,--::~) ll_'--._!i.!ti_- . . . .,:_f ,I . .• ' ! i Grove 10th and King Street Charlottesville, VA prepared for London Calling, LLC by --~~ 111;11 () 1 5 10 I 15 @ 70TH ST ut i I e 31May2006 Attachment D Front Elevation - Facing King Street Rear Elevation DATE BY DESCRIPTION NO. Charlottesville Viginia THE GROVE Development : 1005A and 1005B King Street Building 1 & 6 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: , A. Joseph Homes LLC DRAWINGS PROVIDED BY: Charlottesville, VA 22902 401 E. Market St ES27 ajosephhomes.com Exterior Color Scheme: DATE: 11/19/2020 Lap Siding - James Hardie Cedarmill Cobble Stone SCALE: Trim - James Hardie Artic White Porch Ceiling to be Stained Beadboard SHEET: Exposed Deck Joists to be Covered with White PVC Trim- Paint Arctic White Foundation - Poured Concrete with Brick Stamping or Parged - Painted to Match Exterior A-1 Attachment D Right Elevation - Unit 1 Facing Open Space DATE BY DESCRIPTION NO. Charlottesville Viginia THE GROVE Development : 1005A and 1005B King Street Building 1 & 6 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: , A. Joseph Homes LLC DRAWINGS PROVIDED BY: Charlottesville, VA 22902 401 E. Market St ES27 ajosephhomes.com Exterior Color Scheme: DATE: 11/19/2020 Lap Siding - James Hardie Cedarmill Cobble Stone SCALE: Trim - James Hardie Artic White Porch Ceiling to be Stained Beadboard SHEET: Exposed Deck Joists to be Covered with White PVC Trim- Paint Arctic White Foundation - Poured Concrete with Brick Stamping or Parged - Painted to Match Exterior A-2 Attachment D Left Elevation DATE BY DESCRIPTION NO. Charlottesville Viginia THE GROVE Development : 1005A and 1005B King Street Building 1 & 6 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: , A. Joseph Homes LLC DRAWINGS PROVIDED BY: Charlottesville, VA 22902 401 E. Market St ES27 ajosephhomes.com Exterior Color Scheme: DATE: Lap Siding - James Hardie Cedarmill Cobble Stone 11/19/2020 Trim - James Hardie Artic White SCALE: Porch Ceiling to be Stained Beadboard Exposed Deck Joists to be Covered with White PVC Trim- Paint Arctic White SHEET: Foundation - Poured Concrete with Brick Stamping or Parged - Painted to Match Exterior A-3 23'-0" 5'-0" 18'-0" 26'-0" 57'-0" 57'-0" 12'-3" Attachment D 3'-7" 31'-0" Foundation Plan 13'10" 8" Walls Footings: 23'-0" 12" Wall Between Units 2' 0" Wide x 1' 0" Deep Poured Concrete Walls: DRAWINGS PROVIDED BY: PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Development NO. DESCRIPTION BY DATE : A. Joseph Homes LLC 1005A and 1005B King Street DATE: SCALE: THE GROVE SHEET: 401 E. Market St ES27 Building 1 & 6 Charlottesville, VA 22902 Charlottesville Viginia A-4 11/19/2020 ajosephhomes.com , Attachment D DATE Window Schedule BY Mark Size Description Count Notes DESCRIPTION 1 5'-0" X 5'-6" Double - Double Hung Window 2 Header Height 7' 9" 2 5'-0" X 5'-6" Double - Double Hung Window 1 Header Height 7' 9" 3 7'-6" X 5'-0" Triple - Double Hung Window 1 Header Height 7' 9" 4 3'-0" X 4'-0" Single - Double Hung Window - Tempered 1 Header Height 7' 9" 5 2'-6" X 4'-6" Single - Double Hung Window - Tempered 1 Header Height 7' 9" NO. 6 2'-6" X 4'-0" Single - Double Hung Window 1 Header Height 7' 9" 7 2'-6" X 4'-0" Single - Double Hung Window 1 Header Height 7' 9" 8 5'-0" X 4'-0" Double - Double Hung Window - Tempered 1 Header Height 7' 9" Charlottesville Viginia 9 2'-0" X 4'-0" Single - Double Hung Window - Tempered 1 Header Height 7' 9" 10 4'-0" X 1'-0" Single - Fixed Window - Tempered 1 Header Height 7' 9" THE GROVE 57'-0" 1'-6" 2'-6" 7'-6" 2'-6" 5'-11" 3'-0" 9'-7 1/2" 4'-0" 3'-1 1/2" 2'-0" 5'-5" 5'-0" 4'-11" 7 6 4 10 9 8 Development : 4'-0" 4'-0" PWDR 5'-0" 5'-10 1/2" 15'-0" 5'-5 1/8" 5'-6 1/2" 1005A and 1005B King Street 2668 KITCHEN 9'-3 1/2" 9'-3 1/2" 9'-0" x 14' 0" FAMILY ROOM W.I.C. 5'-1 1/2" 10' 10" x 13' 8" 14' 9" x 13' 8" 2'-9 1/4" 2868 9' 0" x 5' 2" KITCHEN 3 13'-11" 13'-11" 7'-0" 7'-6" 2840 Building 1 & 6 18'-0" 2868 2868 4'-8 3/4" 14'-3 7/8" 5'-0" 23'-0" 23'-0" Deck Stairs to Grade 2668 2'-11 3/4" FAMILY ROOM 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: 2640 5068 2668 12'-11" x 14' 0" PWDR 5'-0" BEDROOM #1 2'-9 1/4" 13'-2 1/2" 13'-2 1/2" 2868 3'-7" 5'-7 3/8" 6'-8 9/16" 12'-11" x 12' 1" 5 9" 3046 12'-4 3/8" 18'-5/8" Floor Outlet 5'-6" 2868 5'-0" , 1 1 3068 A. Joseph Homes LLC FRONT STOOP CENTER ON 25'-0" CENTERED ON HOME 3' DEEP 4' WIDE DOOR 5'-0" FRONT STOOP / PORCH 20'-7" 2'-6" 2'-11" 5'-6" 5'-0" 3'-5" 3'-2" 3'-5" 5'-0" 5'-6" 25' WIDE 5' DEEP 26'-0" 31'-0" CENTER ON DOOR DRAWINGS PROVIDED BY: Charlottesville, VA 22902 401 E. Market St ES27 57'-0" ajosephhomes.com Party Wall to be Constructed from Foundation to Roof Between Units Fire Rated Roof Sheathing within 4' of Party Wall Wall Between Units - Fire Protection Wall extends past Party Wall NO VENTS - 1 HR Interior - 1HR Exterior DATE: 11/19/2020 1st Floor Plan SCALE: SHEET: A-5 Attachment D DATE Window Schedule BY Mark Size Description Count Notes DESCRIPTION 1 2'-6" X 2'-6" Single - Double Hung Window 2 Header Height 7' 3" 2 2'-0" X 4'-0" Single - Double Hung Window - Tempered 2 Header Height 7' 3" 3 2'-0" X 2'-0" Single Fixed Window 2 Header Height 7' 3" 4 5'-0" X 5'-0" Double - Double Hung Window 1 Header Height 7' 3" 5 2'-6" X 5'-0" Single - Double Hung Window (1 Lower Sash Temp) 3 Header Height 7' 3" NO. 6 2'-6" X 5'-0" Single - Double Hung Window 4 Header Height 7' 3" 7 2'-0" X 3'-6" Single - Double Hung Window - Tempered 1 Header Height 7' 3" 8 2'-0" X 3'-6" Single - Double Hung Window - Tempered 1 Header Height 7' 3" Charlottesville Viginia 9 2'-6" X 2'-6" Single Fixed Window 3 Header Height 7' 3" 10 2'-0" X 3'-6" Single - Double Hung Window - Tempered 1 Header Height 7' 3" THE GROVE 57'-0" 1'-9" 2'-0" 3'-7" 2'-0" 9'-2 1/2" 5'-0" 6'-7 1/2" 2'-0" 3'-1 1/2" 2'-6" 1'-8" 2'-6" 1'-8" 2'-6" 5'-2 1/2" 2'-0" 3'-8" 3 3 4 7 9 9 9 8 Development : 2'-6" 10'-7 1/16" 6'-8 1/2" 15'-6" LAUNDRY 2868 5 5'-7 1/2" 5'-7 1/2" 5'-3/16" 5'-4" x 1005A and 1005B King Street 2'-6" 6'-5" BEDROOM #2 2668 8'-2 1/2" BEDROOM #1 10'-2" x 11'-7" 8'-6" 10'-3" x 11' 6" 8'-2 1/2" 11'-10 1/2" 11'-9 1/2" 2868 2868 2668 Open 2668 6'-8 1/2" 2'-9" W.I.C. Shelf 3'-5" x 3'-8" 5 (5) Building 1 & 6 6'-5" 11'-11 3/8" 1 4'-3 1/8" 1'-4 3/4" 3'-11 3/4" 2'-1 1/2" 18'-0" 2'-6" 2668 2'-6" 3'-2" 2668 2668 5'-9 1/2" BOOKSHELVES 5'-3/16" 23'-0" 23'-0" 2'-9" 2668 2668 2668 3068 CLST. CLST. 5'-3 9/16" 5'-3 9/16" 2'-2 1/2" 8'-3/8" 2868 5 2'-2" 6'-0" CLST. 16'-10 1/2" PROJECT DESCRIPTION: CLST. 2'-6" 6'-6" 5'-8 1/2" 9'-1 7/16" BEDROOM #2 7'-9" x BEDROOM #3 12'-9" x 10' 8" 16'-7" x 10' 7" 3'-5 1/2" 13'-2 1/2" 3'-9 3/8" 2'-11" 2'-6" 2 2 1 2'-6" 5'-7 1/2" 5'-0" 2668 , 3'-0" 10'-11 5/8" 8'-6 1/2" 10'-10 7/8" 6 6 10 6 6 A. Joseph Homes LLC 13'-2" 2'-0" 3'-7" 2'-0" 5'-3" 2'-0" 2'-6" 3'-0" 2'-6" 4'-6" 2'-0" 4'-6" 2'-6" 3'-0" 2'-6" 2'-0" 26'-0" 31'-0" DRAWINGS PROVIDED BY: Charlottesville, VA 22902 401 E. Market St ES27 57'-0" ajosephhomes.com Party Wall to be Constructed from Foundation to Roof Between Units Fire Rated Roof Sheathing within 4' of Party Wall Wall Between Units - Fire Protection Wall extends past Party Wall NO VENTS - 1 HR Interior - 1HR Exterior DATE: 11/19/2020 2nd Floor Plan SCALE: SHEET: A-6 Attachment D First Floor - 9' Second Floor - 9' DATE Overall Height - Not to Exceed 35' Refer to City Guidlines and Site Plan for BY 'Height' Definition DESCRIPTION Building Height From (FFE) First Floor Elevation to Middle of Main Gable - Approximately 26' 3" NO. Roof System Charlottesville Viginia Main House - 10/12 Front Porch - 10/12 THE GROVE Right Side Green Porch - 3/12Min - 5/12Max Wall Between Units - See Floorplan Pages For Building Notes Development : Overhangs Front and Right of Unit 1 - 1' 1005A and 1005B King Street Rear of Unit 1 - 6" Left of Unit 1 (Between Units) - 0" Front of Unit 6 - 1' Building 1 & 6 Left and Right of Unit 6 - 6" Add 5" for Gutters Add 1" for Fascia Board PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Home Details Front Unit (#6): 2 Bedrooms 2 1/2 Baths 890* Finished Square Ft. , 12* Sq. Ft. Front Stoop A. Joseph Homes LLC Home Details Rear Unit (#1): 3 Bedrooms DRAWINGS PROVIDED BY: 3 1/2 Baths Charlottesville, VA 22902 401 E. Market St ES27 1372* Finished Square Ft. ajosephhomes.com 125* Sq. Ft. Porch 35* Side Deck Square Ft. * Square Ft. Numbers are Approximate DATE: 11/19/2020 SCALE: SHEET: A-7 Attachment D Front Elevation Left Elevation DATE BY DESCRIPTION NO. Charlottesville Viginia THE GROVE Development : 1002 Grove Street Building 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: , A. Joseph Homes LLC DRAWINGS PROVIDED BY: Charlottesville, VA 22902 401 E. Market St ES27 ajosephhomes.com Exterior Color Scheme: Lap Siding - James Hardie Cedarmill Gray Slate (1st Choice) DATE: Lap Siding - James Hardie Cedarmill Night Gray (2nd Choice) 8/31/2020 Straight Hardie Shake To Match Lap Siding Color Above Break SCALE: Trim - James Hardie Arctic White Porch Ceiling to be Stained Beadboard SHEET: Exposed Deck Joists to be Covered with White PVC Trim- Paint Arctic White Foundation - Poured Concrete with Brick Stamping or Parged - Painted to Match Exterior A-1 Attachment D Rear Elevation Right Elevation DATE BY DESCRIPTION NO. Charlottesville Viginia THE GROVE Development : 1002 Grove Street Building 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: , A. Joseph Homes LLC DRAWINGS PROVIDED BY: Charlottesville, VA 22902 401 E. Market St ES27 ajosephhomes.com Exterior Color Scheme: Lap Siding - James Hardie Cedarmill Gray Slate (1st Choice) DATE: Lap Siding - James Hardie Cedarmill Night Gray (2nd Choice) 8/31/2020 Straight Hardie Shake To Match Lap Siding Color Above Break SCALE: Trim - James Hardie Arctic White Porch Ceiling to be Stained Beadboard SHEET: Exposed Deck Joists to be Covered with White PVC Trim- Paint Arctic White Foundation - Poured Concrete with Brick Stamping or Parged - Painted to Match Exterior A-2 Attachment D Window Schedule DATE Mark Size Description Count Notes Window Schedule BY 1 9'-0" X 6'-6" Triple - Double Hung Window 1 Header Height 8' 0" 2 5'-0" X 6'-6" Double - Double Hung Window 1 Header Height 8' 0" 3 5'-0" X 6'-6" Double - Double Hung Window 1 Header Height 8' 0" DESCRIPTION Mark Size Description Count Notes 4 5 4'-0" X 3'-6" 7'-6" X 3'-6" Double - Double Hung Window Triple - Double Hung Window - Tempered 1 1 Header Height 8' 0" Header Height 8' 0" 1 3'-0" X 1'-6" 3'-0" X 1'-6" Casement Window 5 6 2'-0" X 3'-6" Single - Double Hung Window - Tempered 1 Header Height 8' 0" 30'-0" NO. 30'-0" Charlottesville Viginia 2'-6" 3'-0" 3'-0" THE GROVE 6 5'-5 1/2" PWDR 2'-0" 5'7" 1 6'-1" KITCHEN 3'-0" 5'7" 11'-7" x 23' 0" 5 2'-6" 11'-10 1/2" 12'-2 1/2" 2680 7'-6" 1'-6" Butlers Pantry Home Mgmt / 1 4 4'-0" 3'-0" Development 9'-0" 11'-9 3/16" 20'-0" 20'-0" 20'-0" 23'-3" 2'-9 3/4" 15' 5" : 3'-3 1/2" 2868 2680 2680 4'3" Bench / Cubbies 6'-1" MUD 1 2 ROOM 9'-0" 7'-5 1/2" 32'-0" 32'-0" CONCRETE 32'-0" 32'-0" 7'-2" x 5'-0" 3'-0" FLOOR 5' 10" ABOVE 1002 Grove Street 19'-8 13/16" Dog 2'-7 1/2" Door 0" 2680 Building 2 GREAT ROOM 1 19'-2" x 19' 5" 19'-5 1/2" 6'-2 1/2" 3'-0" Floor Outlet 8'-0" 2'-7 1/2" PROJECT DESCRIPTION: 12'-0" 12'-0" 1 3 5'-0" 3'-0" Coats 3'-0" 2'-0" 1 3080 , Footings: 3'-9" 16' 5' 7' A. Joseph Homes LLC 2' 0" Wide x 1' 0" Deep 8'-0" Front Columns Footings: 2' 6" x 2' 6" x 1' 6" Deep Front Step Footings 2'6" x 6'0" x 1'6" Deep DRAWINGS PROVIDED BY: Charlottesville, VA 22902 1'-0" 17'-0" 5'-0" 1'-0" 4'-10" 9'-0" 4'-7" 3'-2" 2'-5" 3 3/4" 2'-9 1/4" 2'-11" Poured Concrete Walls: 8" 401 E. Market St ES27 24'-0" 6'-0" ajosephhomes.com 24'-0" 6'-0" 30'-0" 30'-0" DATE: Foundation Plan 1st Floor Plan 8/31/2020 SCALE: SHEET: A-3 Attachment D Window Schedule Mark Size Description Count Notes Window Schedule DATE 1 3'-0" X 1'-0" Single - Fixed Window 1 Header Height 7' 6" 2 2'-6" X 2'-6" Single - Fixed Window 2 Header Height 7' 6" Mark Size Description Count Notes BY 3 2'-6" X 5'-0" Single - Double Hung Window 2 Header Height 7' 6" 1 4'-0" X 1'-0" Single - Fixed Window - Tempered 1 Header Height 7'3" 4 4'-0" X 5'-0" Double - Double Hung Windows Tempered 1 Header Height 7' 6" 2 5'-0" X 4'-6" Double - Double Hung Window 1 Header Height 7'3" 5 6'-0" X 5'-0" Double - Double Hung Window 1 Header Height 7' 6" 3 4'-0" X 1'-0" Single - Fixed Window - Tempered 1 Header Height 7'3" DESCRIPTION 1 7 2'-6" X 5'-0" Single - Double Hung Window 1 Header Height 7' 6" 24'-0" 8 2'-6" X 5'-0" Single - Double Hung Window 1 Header Height 7' 6" 9 2'-0" X 5'-0" Single - Double Hung Window - Tempered 1 Header Height 7' 6" 30'-0" NO. 6'-6" 4'-0" 3'-0" 4'-0" 6'-6" 3'-9" 2'-0" 11'-10 1/2" 2'-6" 5'-4 1/2" 2'-6" 2'-0" 9 3 1 Charlottesville Viginia 2 2 3 1'-6" CLST. 3'-6 5/16" THE GROVE 4'-4 1/2" 2668 4'-1" x 2868 4'-9" 2'-6" 4'-8 1/2" 3'-9" 4'-11/16" 6'-10" Laundry UNFINISHED 7'-9" BEDROOM #2 9'-10 5/16" 7'-6" 10'-7 1/2" SHOWER 10'-4" x 13'-7" 3'-2" 4 HOUSE 11'-11 1/2" x 6'-8" 2868 Full Bath 5'-10 1/2" MAINT. 4050 4'-0" 4'-11/16" 9'-7" 3 STORAGE 16'-1 5/16" x 6'-7" 2868 2'-6" 4'-8 1/2" Development 13'-10 1/2" 6'-10 5/16" 11'-8 13/16" 20'-0" 2868 5'-1 11/16" 2868 : 2878 2868 W.I.C. BOOKS 3'-9 1/2" DRYING 2868 AREA 11'-5" x 9'-4 1/2" 3'-7 1/2" 4'-6" HALL W.I.C. 7'-3 3/16" 4'-10 1/2" 9'-8" 6'-0" 7'-0" x 4'-10" 5068 2'-6 3/16" 8'-9 3/16" 2868 10'-4" LIN 2'-11" 2068 8'-10 1/2" 6'-11" 32'-0" 32'-0" 32'-0" 32'-0" 5'-1 7/16" 4'-1/8" 2868 2868 Stairwell 2868 1002 Grove Street 2878 7 UNFINISHED 14'-10 7/8" 2'-6" 1 3046 Building 2 HOUSE 20'-10 1/2" MAINT. STORAGE BEDROOM #1 BEDROOM #3 15'-4 11/16" 4'-10 1/2" 15'-1" x 15' 4" 6'-4" 14'-1 x 13'-6 14'-4 1/2" PROJECT DESCRIPTION: 12'-0" 4'-10 5/16" 8 7'-10 1/2" STORAGE 2'-6" DESK CLOSET 4'-7 5/8" 2868 2868 15'-7 1/2" 4'-3" x 4'-7" 2'-3" 13'-9 3/16" 5 2 2878 , A. Joseph Homes LLC 9'-6" 5'-0" 9'-6" DRAWINGS PROVIDED BY: 24'-0" Charlottesville, VA 22902 6'-6" 6'-0" 6'-1 3/8" 2'-9 1/4" 2'-7 3/8" 1'-4" 3'-0" 1'-8" 401 E. Market St ES27 ajosephhomes.com 24'-0" 6'-0" 30'-0" DATE: 2nd Floor Plan 3rd Floor Plan 8/31/2020 SCALE: SHEET: A-4 Attachment D First Floor - 10' Second Floor - 9' DATE Third Floor (Interior Walls) - 9' Third Floor (Exterior Non-Gable) - 5'6" BY DESCRIPTION Overall Height - Not to Exceed 35' Refer to City Guidlines and Site Plan for NO. 'Height' Definition Charlottesville Viginia Building Height From (FFE) First Floor THE GROVE Elevation to Middle of Main Gable - Approximately 31' 0" Development : Roof System Main House - 8/12 Front Porch - 4/12 1002 Grove Street Side Roof - 8/12 Building 2 Overhangs PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Front and Rear - 1' Left and Right - 1' Add 5" for Gutters , Add 1" for Fascia Board A. Joseph Homes LLC Home Details: DRAWINGS PROVIDED BY: Charlottesville, VA 22902 3 Bedrooms 401 E. Market St ES27 ajosephhomes.com 3 1/2 Baths 2090* Finished Square Ft. 331* Front Double Porch Square Ft. DATE: 48* Side Deck Square Ft. 8/31/2020 * Square Ft. Numbers are Approximate SCALE: SHEET: A-5 Attachment D Front Elevation Left Elevation DATE BY DESCRIPTION NO. Charlottesville Viginia THE GROVE Development : 209 10th Street SW Building 3 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: , A. Joseph Homes LLC DRAWINGS PROVIDED BY: Charlottesville, VA 22902 401 E. Market St ES27 ajosephhomes.com Exterior Color Scheme: Lap Siding - James Hardie Cedarmill Arctic White (1st Choice) DATE: Lap Siding - James Hardie Cedarmill Light Mist (2nd Choice) 8/31/2020 Trim - James Hardie Artic White SCALE: Porch Ceiling to be Stained Beadboard Exposed Deck Joists to be Covered with White PVC Trim- Paint Arctic White SHEET: Foundation - Poured Concrete with Brick Stamping or Parged - Painted to Match Exterior A-1 Attachment D Rear Elevation Right Elevation DATE BY DESCRIPTION NO. Charlottesville Viginia THE GROVE Development : 209 10th Street SW Building 3 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: , A. Joseph Homes LLC DRAWINGS PROVIDED BY: Charlottesville, VA 22902 401 E. Market St ES27 ajosephhomes.com Exterior Color Scheme: DATE: Lap Siding - James Hardie Cedarmill Arctic White (1st Choice) 8/31/2020 Lap Siding - James Hardie Cedarmill Light Mist (2nd Choice) SCALE: Trim - James Hardie Artic White Porch Ceiling to be Stained Beadboard SHEET: Exposed Deck Joists to be Covered with White PVC Trim- Paint Arctic White Foundation - Poured Concrete with Brick Stamping or Parged - Painted to Match Exterior A-2 Attachment D DATE Window Schedule BY DESCRIPTION Mark Size Description Count Notes 1 6'-0" X 5'-0" Triple - Double Hung Window 1 Header Height 7' 9" 10'3" 10'3" 2 6'-0" X 3'-0" Triple - Double Hung Window 1 Header Height 7' 9" 3 1'-6" X 3'-0" Single - Double Hung Window 1 Header Height 7' 9" 4 1'-6" X 3'-0" Single - Double Hung Window 1 Header Height 7' 9" NO. 23'-0" 5 7'-6" X 5'-6" Triple - Double Hung Window 1 Header Height 7' 9" Center Footer On Exterior Footings: 23'-0" 2' 0" Wide x 1' 0" Deep Charlottesville Viginia Rear Columns Footings: 2' 6" x 2' 6" x 1' 6" Deep THE GROVE 3'-3" 2'-10" 7'-8" 6'-0" 3'-3" 4'-8" 5'-0" Poured Concrete Walls: 8" 2878 22030 SEAT & CUBBIES 3'-3" MUD 3 ROOM 6'-6 1/4" 1'-6" KITCHEN 2030 Development 6'-3" x 10'-8 3/4" 6' 0" 10'-1" x 15' 9" 2668 10'-4 3/4" 7' 5" : 3'-9" 2668 6'-3 1/4" 4 3'-10 1/2" 2' PANTRY 1'-6" 6'-0" 2030 16'-3/4" 3'-6" 209 10th Street SW 27'-0" 27'-0" 27'-0" 27'-0" 7' 5" 2668 PWDR Building 3 1 16'-3/4" 2' 10" 6'-0" 2030 FAMILY ROOM 15'-8" x 15' 9" 15'-11 1/4" PROJECT DESCRIPTION: 7'-6" 2'-11 1/2" COAT 3'-4 1/2" 2668 5 3078 , 4' - 0" A. Joseph Homes LLC 4'-3" 3'-2" 2'-10" 7'-6" 5'-3" Note: 6" Walls First Floor Exterior ONLY EXTERIOR - Staggered Exterior 17' - 0" Centered on House Sheathing Between Floors 23'-0" 23'-0" DRAWINGS PROVIDED BY: Charlottesville, VA 22902 401 E. Market St ES27 ajosephhomes.com DATE: Foundation Plan 1st Floor Plan 8/31/2020 SCALE: SHEET: A-3 Attachment D DATE Window Schedule Window Schedule BY Mark Size Description Count Notes 1 2'-6" X 2'-6" Single - Fixed Window 1 Header Height 7' 6" DESCRIPTION 2 2'-6" X 2'-6" Single - Fixed Window 1 Header Height 7' 6" Mark Size Description Count Notes 3 2'-6" X 2'-6" Single - Fixed Window 2 Header Height 7' 6" 1 5'-0" X 4'-6" Double - Double Hung Window 1 Header Height 7' 6" 4 2'-6" X 5'-0" Single - Double Hung Window 1 Header Height 7' 6" 2 4'-0" X 1'-0" Single - Fixed Window Tempered 1 Header Height 6' 8" 5 2'-6" X 5'-0" Single - Double Hung Window 1 Header Height 7' 6" 3 4'-0" X 1'-0" Single - Fixed Window Tempered 1 Header Height 6' 8" 6 6'-0" X 4'-0" Double - Double Hung Window 1 Header Height 7' 6" NO. 7 2'-0" X 3'-0" Single - Double Hung Window - Tempered 1 Header Height 7' 6" 23'-0" 8 2'-6" X 2'-6" Single - Fixed Window - Tempered 1 Header Height 7' 6" 23'-0" Charlottesville Viginia 3'-9" 2'-0" 8'-0" 6'-0" 3'-3" 6'-3" 4'-0" 2'-6" 4'-0" 6'-3" THE GROVE 7 6 2 3 2'-6" 1'-6" 13'-1 1/2" 6'-5 7/16" W.H. & 3 3'-4 1/2" UNFINISHED ELEC PANEL 5'-4 1/2" 6'-2 5/16" 4'-9 5/8" 2668 12'-2" 2668 Development HVAC x 4'-10" 9'-4 1/2" BEDROOM #2 10'-5 3/4" Full Bath 3'-0" ROOM 2668 10'-2" x 12'-10" : ONLY 5'-4" x 12'-4" 12'-5 3/8" 5'-7 1/2" 6'-4 1/4" 12'-7 11/16" 3 CLST. 2668 2668 UNFINISHED 5'-1 1/4" 2'-6" 4'-10" x 6'-1" 2668 6'-9 5/16" HOUSE 16'-1 3/4" MAINT. 2'-9" 2878 STORAGE 2668 5'-4 1/2" 3'-11 1/2" 209 10th Street SW 21068 8 W.I.C. W.I.C. 27'-0" 27'-0" 27'-0" 27'-0" 5'-4 1/2" 5'-4 1/2" 2'-6" 5'-1" x 4'-3 3/4" 5'-1" x 6'-6" 3'-8" 8'-3 5/16" Building 3 11'-1" 2668 2668 2'-9" Stairwell 2 STORAGE 2'-6" CLOSET BEDROOM #3 2878 14'-5/8" 13'-9" PROJECT DESCRIPTION: 11'-1o" x 10'-10" 12'-1 1/2" BEDROOM #1 x 4'-10" 10'-7 3/4" 3'-0" 10'-4" x 14' 7" 6'-4 1/4" 5'-11/16" 3'-10 3/4" 1 1'-6" 2'-6" 3'-6 13/16" 2668 2668 2868 14'-10 1/2" 4 5 1 2678 , 4' - 0" A. Joseph Homes LLC Note: 4" Walls Third Floor 9'-0" 5'-0" 9'-0" EXTERIOR - Staggered Exterior Note: 4" Walls Second Floor Sheathing Between Floors EXTERIOR - Staggered Exterior 4'-7 1/2" 2'-7" 2'-8 1/2" 2'-6" 3'-6" 2'-6" 4'-7" Sheathing Between Floors 23'-0" 23'-0" DRAWINGS PROVIDED BY: Charlottesville, VA 22902 401 E. Market St ES27 ajosephhomes.com DATE: 2nd Floor Plan 3rd Floor Plan 8/31/2020 SCALE: SHEET: A-4 Attachment D First Floor - 9' Second Floor - 8' Third Floor (Interior Walls) - 9' DATE Third Floor (Exterior Non-Gable) - 5'6" BY DESCRIPTION Overall Height - Not to Exceed 35' Refer to City Guidlines and Site Plan for NO. 'Height' Definition Charlottesville Viginia Building Height From (FFE) First Floor THE GROVE Elevation to Middle of Main Gable - Approximately 29' 6" Development Roof System : Main House - 9/12 Front Porch - 6/12 209 10th Street SW Rear Porch - 5/12 Building 3 Overhangs PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Front and Rear - 1' Left and Right - 6" Add 5" for Gutters , Add 1" for Fascia Board A. Joseph Homes LLC DRAWINGS PROVIDED BY: Home Details: Charlottesville, VA 22902 401 E. Market St ES27 ajosephhomes.com 3 Bedrooms 3 1/2 Baths 1665* Finished Square Ft. DATE: 135* Front Porch Square Ft. 8/31/2020 115* Covered Patio Square Ft. SCALE: * Square Ft. Numbers are Approximate SHEET: A-5 Attachment D Front Elevation Left Elevation DATE BY DESCRIPTION NO. Charlottesville Viginia THE GROVE Development : 207 10TH ST SW Building 4 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: , A. Joseph Homes LLC DRAWINGS PROVIDED BY: Charlottesville, VA 22902 401 E. Market St ES27 ajosephhomes.com Exterior Color Scheme: Painted Brick Front - To Match Siding DATE: 8/31/2020 Lap Siding - James Hardie Cedarmill Pearl Gray (1st Choice) SCALE: Lap Siding - James Hardie Cedarmill Aged Pewter (2nd Choice) Trim - James Hardie Artic White SHEET: Foundation - Poured Concrete with Brick Stamping or Parged - Painted to Match Exterior A-1 Attachment D Rear Elevation Right Elevation DATE BY DESCRIPTION NO. Charlottesville Viginia THE GROVE Development : 207 10TH ST SW Building 4 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: , A. Joseph Homes LLC DRAWINGS PROVIDED BY: Charlottesville, VA 22902 401 E. Market St ES27 ajosephhomes.com Exterior Color Scheme: Painted Brick Front - To Match Siding DATE: Lap Siding - James Hardie Cedarmill Pearl Gray (1st Choice) 8/31/2020 Lap Siding - James Hardie Cedarmill Aged Pewter (2nd Choice) SCALE: Trim - James Hardie Artic White Foundation - Poured Concrete with Brick Stamping or Parged - Painted to Match Exterior SHEET: A-2 Attachment D DATE Window Schedule BY Mark Size Description Count Notes DESCRIPTION 1 3'-0" X 5'-6" Single - Double Hung Window 1 7' 9" Header Height 2 3'-0" X 5'-6" Single - Double Hung Window 1 7' 9" Header Height 3 6'-0" X 3'-6" Triple - Double Hung Window 1 7' 9" Header Height 4 3'-0" X 3'-6" Single - Double Hung Window 1 7' 9" Header Height 5 2'-0" X 3'-0" Single - Double Hung Window 1 7' 9" Header Height NO. 6 2'-0" X 3'-0" Single - Double Hung Window 1 7' 9" Header Height 9'-3" 9'-3" Charlottesville Viginia 9'-3" 9'-3" THE GROVE Center Footer On Exterior 21'-0" Footings: 2' 0" Wide x 1' 0" Deep Rear Columns Footings: 8" 2' 6" x 2' 6" x 1' 6" Deep 4'-8" 21'-0" 3'-9" 6'-0" 2'-5" 2'-10" 1'-6" 3'-0" 1'-6" 4'-4" Poured Concrete Walls: 8" 3 4 Development 0" : 2878 10'-8 3/4" KITCHEN DINING 13' x 10'-3" 6'-10" x 10'-3" 10'-1 3/4" 10'-1 3/4" 14'-0" 207 10TH ST SW 2'-6 1/2" 4'-9" Building 4 13'-2 1/2" 4'-5" 1'-6 1/4" 2868 27'-0" 27'-0" 4'-6 3/4" 27'-0" 27'-0" 2'-6" 6 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: 4'-11 1/4" 2'-0" 2'-0" FAMILY ROOM 7'-0" 4'-7 1/2" 15' 6" x 15'-9" 11'-1 1/2" , 5 A. Joseph Homes LLC 2'-0" 2'-0" 4'-7 3/8" 2 1 3078 3' -9" Center Stoop on Front Door Adjust Stairs to Grade DRAWINGS PROVIDED BY: Charlottesville, VA 22902 401 E. Market St ES27 Note: 6" Walls First Floor ONLY 4'-0" EXTERIOR - Staggered Exterior ajosephhomes.com Sheathing Between Floors BRICK FRONT NOT INCLUDED 8'-1" 3'-0" 3'-0" 3'-0" 2'-10" 3'-2" 1'-1" 21'-0" IN EXTERIOR DIMENSIONS 21'-0" DATE: Foundation Plan 1st Floor Plan 8/31/2020 SCALE: SHEET: A-3 Attachment D Window Schedule DATE Window Schedule BY Mark Size Description Count Notes Mark Size Description Count Notes 1 2'-6" X 5'-0" Single - Double Hung Window 1 DESCRIPTION 2 2'-6" X 5'-0" Single - Double Hung Window 1 7' 6" Header Height 1 5'-0" X 5'-0" Double - Double Hung Window 1 7' 6" Header Height 3 2'-0" X 3'-0" Single - Double Hung Window - Tempered 1 7' 6" Header Height 2 2'-0" X 3'-0" Single - Double Hung Window - Tempered 1 7' 6" Header Height 4 5'-0" X 2'-0" Single Fixed Window 1 7' 6" Header Height 3 2'-0" X 3'-0" Single - Double Hung Window - Tempered 1 7' 6" Header Height 5 5'-0" X 2'-0" Single Fixed Window 1 7' 6" Header Height 4 3'-0" X 1'-0" Single Fixed Window 1 7' 6" Header Height 6 6'-0" X 4'-0" Double - Double Hung Window 1 7' 6" Header Height NO. 7 2'-6" X 5'-0" Single - Double Hung Window - Tempered Lower Sash 1 7' 6" Header Height 21'-0" Charlottesville Viginia 21'-0" 3'-9" 6'-0" 5'-9" 2'-0" 3'-6" 5'-8" 2'-0" 1'-4" 3'-0" 1'-4" 2'-0" 5'-8" THE GROVE 5 3 2 4 3 W.H. & 3'-0" ELEC PANEL 5'-5 1/2" 10'-1" 5'-5 1/2" 4'-1 7/16" 3'-7" 12'-3 1/2" 8'-2 1/2" x 4'-2" Development 8'-3" 4 2668 10'-5 3/4" 10'-5 3/4" 2868 5'-0" BEDROOM #2 : 2868 10'-3" x 11'-10" 4'-7 1/2" 3'-6 5/8" 7'-8 7/16" UNFINISHED CLST. SHELVES 5'-1/4" 5'-1/4" 4'-7" x 4068 2868 HOUSE 3'-11" MAINT. W.I.C. STORAGE 2878 5'-8" x 7'-0" 6'-1 3/8" W.I.C. STAIRS 2668 21068 207 10TH ST SW 27'-0" 27'-0" 27'-0" 11'-0" 27'-0" 5'-5 1/2" 5'-1" x 3'-11 1/4" 7'-4 1/2" 3'-7" 3'-10 1/2" 4'-7 1/2" 8'-3 5/16" 4'-3/16" 8'-2 1/2" Building 4 UNFINISHED 2868 2668 12'-5 5/8" 12'-6 3/8" HVAC ROOM 2878 ONLY 13'-3 1/2" 7'-2 1/2" PROJECT DESCRIPTION: 26'-2" 12'-1 5/8" BEDROOM #3 7 BEDROOM #1 x 4'-2" 10'-6 3/4" 5'-0" 11'-9" x 10'-11" 10'-3" x 13'" 11'-3" STORAGE 3'-6 5/8" 3'-5 7/8" 21068 2668 2668 3'-3" 3'-0" x 4'-2" 1 , 1 2 6 A. Joseph Homes LLC Note: 4" Walls Second Floor 4'-3" 2'-6" 2'-6" 2'-6" 2'-6" 2'-6" 4'-3" Note: 4" Walls Third Floor 8'-0" 5'-0" 8'-0" EXTERIOR - Staggered Exterior EXTERIOR - Staggered Exterior Sheathing Between Floors Sheathing Between Floors 21'-0" 21'-0" DRAWINGS PROVIDED BY: Charlottesville, VA 22902 401 E. Market St ES27 ajosephhomes.com DATE: 2nd Floor Plan 3rd Floor Plan 8/31/2020 SCALE: SHEET: A-4 Attachment D First Floor - 9' Second Floor - 8' Third Floor (Interior Walls) - 9' Third Floor (Exterior Non-Gable) - 5'6" DATE BY Wall Restrictions (FIRE) - DESCRIPTION Right Side - NO VENTS Right Side - 1 HR Fire Interior and Exterior NO. Overall Height - Not to Exceed 35' Charlottesville Viginia Refer to City Guidlines and Site Plan for THE GROVE 'Height' Definition Building Height From (FFE) First Floor Development Elevation to Middle of Main Gable - : Approximately 28' 6" Roof System 207 10TH ST SW Main House - 9/12 Building 4 Front Porch - 12/12 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Rear Porch - 5/12 Framed Overhangs - Front and Rear - 1' , A. Joseph Homes LLC Left and Right - 6" Add 5" for Gutters Add 1" for Fascia Board DRAWINGS PROVIDED BY: Charlottesville, VA 22902 401 E. Market St ES27 ajosephhomes.com Home Details: 3 Bedrooms 3 1/2 Baths DATE: 1525* Finished Square Ft. 8/31/2020 100* Covered Patio Square Ft. SCALE: * Square Ft. Numbers are Approximate SHEET: A-5 Attachment D Front Elevation Left Elevation DATE BY DESCRIPTION NO. Charlottesville Viginia THE GROVE Development : 205 10TH ST SW Building 5 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: , A. Joseph Homes LLC DRAWINGS PROVIDED BY: Charlottesville, VA 22902 401 E. Market St ES27 ajosephhomes.com Exterior Color Scheme: DATE: Lap Siding - James Hardie Cedarmill Monterey Taupe (1st Choice) 8/31/2020 Lap Siding - James Hardie Cedarmill Timber Bark (2nd Choice) SCALE: Trim - James Hardie Artic White Foundation - Poured Concrete with Brick Stamping or Parged - Painted to Match Exterior SHEET: A-1 Attachment D Rear Elevation Right Elevation DATE BY DESCRIPTION NO. Charlottesville Viginia THE GROVE Development : 205 10TH ST SW Building 5 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: , A. Joseph Homes LLC DRAWINGS PROVIDED BY: Charlottesville, VA 22902 401 E. Market St ES27 ajosephhomes.com Exterior Color Scheme: DATE: Lap Siding - James Hardie Cedarmill Monterey Taupe (1st Choice) 8/31/2020 Lap Siding - James Hardie Cedarmill Timber Bark (2nd Choice) SCALE: Trim - James Hardie Artic White Foundation - Poured Concrete with Brick Stamping or Parged - Painted to Match Exterior SHEET: A-2 Attachment D Window Schedule Mark Size Description Count Notes 1 3'-0" X 5'-6" Single - Double Hung Window 1 7' 9" Header Height DATE 2 3'-0" X 5'-6" Single - Double Hung Window 1 7' 9" Header Height 3 6'-0" X 3'-6" Triple - Double Hung Window - Tempered 1 7' 9" Header Height 4 3'-0" X 3'-6" Single - Double Hung Window 1 7' 9" Header Height BY 5 2'-0" X 3'-0" Single - Double Hung Window 1 7' 9" Header Height 6 2'-0" X 3'-0" Single - Double Hung Window 1 7' 9" Header Height 9'-3" 9'-3" 9'-3" 9'-3" DESCRIPTION Center Footer On Exterior 21'-0" Footings: 2' 0" Wide x 1' 0" Deep NO. Rear Columns Footings: 8" 2' 6" x 2' 6" x 1' 6" Deep Charlottesville Viginia 4'-8" 21'-0" 3'-9" 6'-0" 2'-5" 2'-10" 1'-6" 3'-0" 1'-6" 4'-4" Poured Concrete Walls: 8" 0" 3 4 THE GROVE 2878 10'-8 3/4" KITCHEN DINING 13' x 10'-3" 6'-10" x 10'-3" 10'-1 3/4" 10'-1 3/4" 14'-0" Development 2'-6 1/2" 4'-9" : 13'-2 1/2" 4'-5" 1'-6 1/4" 2868 27'-0" 27'-0" 4'-6 3/4" 27'-0" 27'-0" 2'-6" 6 4'-11 1/4" 2'-0" 205 10TH ST SW 2'-0" Building 5 7'-0" 4'-7 1/2" 11'-1 1/2" FAMILY ROOM 15' 6" x 15'-9" PROJECT DESCRIPTION: 5 2'-0" 2'-0" 4'-7 3/8" 2 1 3078 3' -9" Center Stoop on Front Door Adjust Stairs to Grade , Note: 6" Walls First Floor ONLY 4'-0" EXTERIOR - Staggered Exterior Sheathing Between Floors A. Joseph Homes LLC 8'-1" 3'-0" 3'-0" 3'-0" 2'-10" 3'-2" 1'-1" 21'-0" 21'-0" DRAWINGS PROVIDED BY: Charlottesville, VA 22902 401 E. Market St ES27 ajosephhomes.com DATE: Foundation Plan 1st Floor Plan 8/31/2020 SCALE: SHEET: A-3 Attachment D Window Schedule DATE Window Schedule BY Mark Size Description Count Notes Mark Size Description Count Notes 1 2'-6" X 5'-0" Single - Double Hung Window 1 DESCRIPTION 2 2'-6" X 5'-0" Single - Double Hung Window 1 7' 6" Header Height 1 5'-0" X 5'-0" Double - Double Hung Window 1 7' 6" Header Height 3 2'-0" X 3'-0" Single - Double Hung Window - Tempered 1 7' 6" Header Height 2 2'-0" X 3'-0" Single - Double Hung Window - Tempered 1 7' 6" Header Height 4 5'-0" X 2'-0" Single Fixed Window 1 7' 6" Header Height 3 2'-0" X 3'-0" Single - Double Hung Window - Tempered 1 7' 6" Header Height 5 5'-0" X 2'-0" Single Fixed Window 1 7' 6" Header Height 4 3'-0" X 1'-0" Single Fixed Window 1 7' 6" Header Height 6 6'-0" X 4'-0" Double - Double Hung Window 1 7' 6" Header Height NO. 7 2'-6" X 5'-0" Single - Double Hung Window - Tempered Lower Sash 1 7' 6" Header Height 21'-0" Charlottesville Viginia 21'-0" 3'-9" 6'-0" 5'-9" 2'-0" 3'-6" 5'-8" 2'-0" 1'-4" 3'-0" 1'-4" 2'-0" 5'-8" THE GROVE 5 3 2 4 3 W.H. & 3'-0" ELEC PANEL 5'-5 1/2" 10'-1" 5'-5 1/2" 4'-1 7/16" 3'-7" 12'-3 1/2" 8'-2 1/2" x 4'-2" Development 8'-3" 4 2668 10'-5 3/4" 10'-5 3/4" 2868 5'-0" BEDROOM #2 : 2868 10'-3" x 11'-10" 4'-7 1/2" 3'-6 5/8" 7'-8 7/16" UNFINISHED CLST. SHELVES 5'-1/4" 5'-1/4" 4'-7" x 4068 2868 HOUSE 3'-11" MAINT. W.I.C. STORAGE 2878 5'-8" x 7'-0" 6'-1 3/8" W.I.C. STAIRS 2668 21068 205 10TH ST SW 27'-0" 27'-0" 27'-0" 11'-0" 27'-0" 5'-5 1/2" 5'-1" x 3'-11 1/4" 7'-4 1/2" 3'-7" 3'-10 1/2" 4'-7 1/2" 8'-3 5/16" 4'-3/16" 8'-2 1/2" Building 5 UNFINISHED 2868 2668 12'-5 5/8" 12'-6 3/8" HVAC ROOM 2878 ONLY 13'-3 1/2" 7'-2 1/2" PROJECT DESCRIPTION: 26'-2" 12'-1 5/8" BEDROOM #3 7 BEDROOM #1 x 4'-2" 10'-6 3/4" 5'-0" 11'-9" x 10'-11" 10'-3" x 13'" 11'-3" STORAGE 3'-6 5/8" 3'-5 7/8" 21068 2668 2668 3'-3" 3'-0" x 4'-2" 1 , 1 2 6 A. Joseph Homes LLC Note: 4" Walls Second Floor 4'-3" 2'-6" 2'-6" 2'-6" 2'-6" 2'-6" 4'-3" Note: 4" Walls Third Floor 8'-0" 5'-0" 8'-0" EXTERIOR - Staggered Exterior EXTERIOR - Staggered Exterior Sheathing Between Floors Sheathing Between Floors 21'-0" 21'-0" DRAWINGS PROVIDED BY: Charlottesville, VA 22902 401 E. Market St ES27 ajosephhomes.com DATE: 2nd Floor Plan 3rd Floor Plan 8/31/2020 SCALE: SHEET: A-4 Attachment D First Floor - 9' Second Floor - 8' Third Floor (Interior Walls) - 9' Third Floor (Exterior Non-Gable) - 5'6" DATE BY Wall Restrictions (FIRE) - DESCRIPTION Right Side - NO VENTS Right Side - 1 HR Fire Interior and Exterior NO. Overall Height - Not to Exceed 35' Charlottesville Viginia Refer to City Guidlines and Site Plan for THE GROVE 'Height' Definition Building Height From (FFE) First Floor Development Elevation to Middle of Main Gable - : Approximately 28' 6" Roof System 205 10TH ST SW Main House - 9/12 Building 5 Front Porch - 12/12 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Rear Porch - 5/12 Framed Overhangs - Front and Rear - 1' , A. Joseph Homes LLC Left and Right - 6" Add 5" for Gutters Add 1" for Fascia Board DRAWINGS PROVIDED BY: Charlottesville, VA 22902 401 E. Market St ES27 ajosephhomes.com Home Details: 3 Bedrooms 3 1/2 Baths DATE: 1525* Finished Square Ft. 8/31/2020 100* Covered Patio Square Ft. SCALE: * Square Ft. Numbers are Approximate SHEET: A-5 CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE DEPARTMENT OF NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT SERVICES STAFF MEMO JOINT CITY COUNCIL AND PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC HEARING UPDATE MEMO ON REZONING APPLICATION ZM20-00003 AND SPECIAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION SP21-00002 DATE OF HEARING: October 21, 2021 Project Planner: Matt Alfele, AICP Date of Staff Memo: October 8, 2021 Applicant: Lorven Investments LLC Applicant’s Representative(s): Justin Shimp, Shimp Engineering, P.C. Current Property Owner: Lorven Investments LLC Application Information Property Street Address: 1613 Grove St. Ext., 1611 Grove St. Ext, and 0 Grove St. Tax Map & Parcel: 230133000, 230134000, and 230135000 Total Square Footage/ Acreage Site: 0.652acres (28,401square feet) Comprehensive Plan (General Land Use Plan): Low Density Residential Current Zoning Classification: R-2 (applicant is pursuing a rezoning to R-3 under application ZM20-00003, a SUP under application SP21-00002 and a Critical Slope Waiver under application P21-0023) Overlay District: None Applicant’s Request and update Summary On May 11, 2021 Planning Commission held a Public Hearing for the requested rezoning and SUP applications. The application was seeking to rezone the Subject Properties from R- 2 (Residential Two-family) to R-3 (Residential Multifamily) and increase the density to forty-three (43) DUA (Dwelling Units per Acre). The applicant was also seeking a recommendation on a Critical Slope Waiver at that meeting. All three applications were needed for the proposed development. That development included four (4) apartment buildings with seven (7) two (2) bedroom units per building for a total number of residential units of twenty-eight (28). During the Public Hearing the Planning Commission heard from five (5) members of the public. Two (2) members of the public voiced support for the proposed development and three (3) voiced opposition. The public in favor of the development stated the City needed Page 1 of 11 ZM20-00003, SP16-000001, P21-0023 1613 Grove Street Update Memo more housing and affordable units. Members of the public opposed to the development believe parking will be an issue and Valley Road Extended cannot handle more traffic. They also stated the development would not fit the characteristics of the surrounding single and two-family homes. During Planning Commission’s discussion traffic, density, stream restoration and impacts to the surrounding neighborhood were discussed. Planning Commission did not know if this location (at the end of a dead-end street) was the best location for twenty-eight (28) units. Some commissioners would like to see more than the by-right, but less than the twenty-eight (28). Traffic was a big concern as Valley Road Extended is a narrow road and would be hard to improve due to Rock Creek bordering one side. The Commission also stated they would like to see more affordable units within the development. This proposal only requires one (1) affordable unit per Sec. 34-12. At the end of the discussion the applicant requested, and was granted, a deferral to address these concerns. Notwithstanding the changes noted below, the applications before you tonight are the same as what was presented to Planning Commission on May 11, 2021. Critical Slope Waiver Application P21-0023 No Changes Rezoning Application ZM20-00003 Additional Proffer (Affordable Housing) (Attachment E) The applicant updated their proffer statement to add an affordable housing requirement. The applicant is proposing that eight (8) of the twenty-eight (28) units will be Affordable Units (AUs). Of the eight (8) AUs, four (4) will be for-rent affordable where the monthly cost of rent, including any tenant paid utilities, does not exceed 125% of the Fair Market Rent by unit bedrooms for the Charlottesville MSA; and four (4) units will be for-rent units where the monthly cost of rent, including any tenant paid utilities, does not exceed the Fair Market Rent by unit bedrooms for the Charlottesville MSA. The AUs shall be reserved as such throughout a period of a least ten (10) years from the date on which the unit received a certificate of occupancy. The AU obligations set forth in the proffer statement shall be set forth within one or more written declarations of covenants recorded within the land records of the Charlottesville Circuit Court in a form approved by the Office of the City Attorney. Summary of Proffers: The proffered development conditions regarding affordable housing include: Page 2 of 11 ZM20-00003, SP16-000001, P21-0023 1613 Grove Street Update Memo …In furtherance of the Project, the Owner hereby proffers for City Council’s consideration voluntary development conditions, which the Owner agrees are reasonable. The Owner agrees that, if the Property is rezoned as requested, the use and development of the Property will be subject to and in accordance with the following conditions:… …2. Affordable Housing: The Owner shall provide affordable housing within the Property, as follows: a. For the purposes of this Proffer, the term “For-Rent Workforce Affordable Dwelling Unit” means a dwelling unit where the monthly cost of rent, including any tenant paid utilities, does not exceed 125% of the Fair Market Rent by unit bedrooms for the Charlottesville MSA, the aforementioned Fair Market Rent is established annually by the federal Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). b. For the purposes of this Proffer, the term “For-Rent Affordable Dwelling Unit” means a dwelling unit where the monthly cost of rent, including any tenant paid utilities, does not exceed the Fair Market Rent by unit bedrooms for the Charlottesville MSA, the aforementioned Fair Market Rent is established annually by the federal Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). c. Fourteen percent (14%) of all dwelling units constructed within the area of the Property shall be For-Rent Workforce Affordable Dwelling Units and an additional fourteen percent (14%) of all dwelling units constructed within the area of the Property shall be For-Rent Affordable Dwelling Units (collectively, the “Required Affordable Dwelling Units”) for a total of 28% of dwelling units constructed within the area of the Property provided as Required Affordable Dwelling Units. The Required Affordable Dwelling Units shall be identified on a layout plan, by unit, prior to the issuance of any certificate of occupancy for a residential unit within the Property (“Initial Designation”). The Owner reserves the right, from time to time after the Initial Designation, and subject to approval by the City, to change the unit(s) reserved as Workforce-Affordable Dwelling Units and Affordable Dwelling Units, and the City’s approval shall not unreasonably be withheld so long as a proposed change does not reduce the number of Required Affordable Dwelling Units and does not result in an Affordability Period shorter than required by these proffers with respect to any of the Required Affordable Dwelling Units. i. The Required Affordable Dwelling Units shall be reserved as such throughout a period of at least ten (10) years from the date on which the unit receives a certificate of occupancy from the City’s building official (“Rental Affordability Period”). All Rental Affordable Dwelling Units shall be administered in accordance with one or more written declarations of Page 3 of 11 ZM20-00003, SP16-000001, P21-0023 1613 Grove Street Update Memo covenants within the land records of the Charlottesville Circuit Court, in a form approved by the Office of the City Attorney. ii. On or before July 1 of each calendar year the then current owner of each Required Affordable Dwelling Unit shall submit an Annual Report to the City, identifying each Required Affordable Dwelling Unit by address and location, and verifying the Household Income of the occupant of each Required Affordable Dwelling Unit. d. The land use obligations referenced in 2.c.i and 2.c.ii shall be set forth within one or more written declarations of covenants recorded within the land records of the Charlottesville Circuit Court, in a form approved by the Office of the City Attorney, so that the Owner’s successors in right, title and interest to the Property shall have notice of and be bound by the obligations. In the event of re- sale of any of the required Affordable dwelling Units that reduces the number of required Affordable Dwelling Units below the thresholds set forth in this proffer, the declaration of covenants shall provide a mechanism to ensure that an equivalent Affordable Dwelling Unit is created within the City of Charlottesville, either on or off of the Subject Project, that satisfies the requirements contained herein for the remainder of the Affordability Period. Staff Analysis: In this particular application, the proposed development does not exceed 1.0 floor-area ratio (FAR), therefore the applicant is not required to provide on-site affordable dwelling units as part of the project (pursuant to City code Section 34-12). However, the applicant is proffering:  Fourteen percent (14%) of all dwelling units constructed within the area of the Property shall be For-Rent Workforce Affordable Dwelling Units  and an additional fourteen percent (14%) of all dwelling units constructed within the area of the Property shall be For-Rent Affordable Dwelling Units The applicant has defined the above as: For-Rent Workforce Affordable Dwelling Unit means a dwelling unit where the monthly cost of rent, including any tenant paid utilities, does not exceed 125% of the Fair Market Rent by unit bedrooms For-Rent Affordable Dwelling Unit means a dwelling unit where the monthly cost of rent, including any tenant paid utilities, does not exceed the Fair Market Rent by unit bedrooms At this time, the applicant is proposing to develop a total of 28 dwelling units, of which eight (8) of those will be committed affordable units. Information has not been provided as to the proposed bedroom size or square footage of the affordable units. Page 4 of 11 ZM20-00003, SP16-000001, P21-0023 1613 Grove Street Update Memo The table below shows the 2021 HUD guidelines for Fair Market Rent. We have included information in this table based on the applicant’s proffer. However, if this application is approved, the FMR will be based on the HUD guidelines for that year that the Certificate of Occupancy for the unit is issued. Eff 1 BR 2 BR 3 BR 4 BR 5 BR 2021 HUD FMR 949 1077 1266 1575 1965 2260 Proffer: 4 units @ FMR 949 1077 1266 1575 1965 2260 4 units @ 125% FMR 1186 1346 1583 1969 2456 2925 Monthly cost includes tenant- paid utilities Staff offers the following comments as to this application and the proffered development conditions related to providing affordable dwelling units:  Under 2(b), staff is concerned that not enough detail is provided describing the process in the event the Owner changes the unit(s) reserved as Workforce Affordable Dwelling Units and Affordable Dwelling Units. This proffer does not specify the size of the units (square footage) and/or number of bedrooms. Further, it does not state that the size (square footage or number of bedrooms) will not be reduced/changed, should this section of the proffer be enacted.  Under 2(d), staff is concerned that not enough detail is provided describing the process in the event of re-sale of any of the required Affordable dwelling Units that reduces the number of required Affordable Dwelling Units below the thresholds set forth in this proffer. How can the City be assured that an equivalent Affordable Dwelling Unit is created within the City in a timely manner and/or that the Owner/applicant will come out of compliance with the proffer conditions at any time for an unspecified timeframe, should this section of the proffer be enacted?  Under 2(d), not enough detail is provided describing the process of how the monitoring and enforcement of the yearly reporting will continue in the event of re- sale of any of the committed affordable dwelling units. This section is not clear if any of the proposed rental affordable dwelling units will be re-sold as privately owned (homeownership) units.  The proffer does not state that the units must not be segregated.  The proffer does not state that on-site amenities will be available for use by the occupants of the affordable and workforce units. Page 5 of 11 ZM20-00003, SP16-000001, P21-0023 1613 Grove Street Update Memo Special Use Permit SP21-00002 Updated Preliminary Site Plan (Attachment A) Building Height: The original building height was a maximum allowable of forty-five (45) feet and a proposed height of forty (40) feet. The updated plan calls for a maximum allowable of forty-five (45) feet and a proposed height of thirty-five (35) feet. The applicant is proposing to lower the rear buildings so each unit has one (1) unit below grade. Bedrooms: The original development called for twenty-eight (28) two (2) bedroom units. The updated plan calls for eight (8) one (1) bedroom units and twenty (20) two (2) bedroom units. Parking: The original development called for on street parking on Valley Road Extended. The updated plan removes the on street parking. Section 34-12 (Affordable Dwelling Units): The original development required one (1) affordable unit per Section 34-12. The updated plan has been reconfigure so that it now falls below the one (1) floor-area ratio (FAR) and no longer requires an affordable unit. The applicant is now proffering eight (8) affordable units (see the rezoning section above). Vicinity Map Page 6 of 11 ZM20-00003, SP16-000001, P21-0023 1613 Grove Street Update Memo Context Map 1 Context Map 2- Zoning Classification KEY - Orange: R-2 Page 7 of 11 ZM20-00003, SP16-000001, P21-0023 1613 Grove Street Update Memo Context Map 3- General Land Use Plan, 2013 Comprehensive Plan KEY: Yellow: Low Density Residential, Blue: Public or Semi-Public, & Orange: High Density Residential Staff Recommendation Staff Recommendation for ZM20-00003 Staff finds the proposed zoning change could contribute to some goals of the City’s Comprehensive Plan such as increasing the City housing stock, restoring a portion of Rock Creek, and adding an affordable dwelling unit. But staff also finds that the proposed rezoning would not be consistent with the City future Land Use Map or the surrounding fabric of the neighborhood. Staff recommends denial of the rezoning request. Staff Recommendation for SP16-000001 Staff recommends denial of the Special Use Permit as the increased density at this location would not be in line with the City Future Land Use Map and could have an adverse impact on the surrounding low density neighborhood and infrastructure. Recommended Conditions Should the Special Use permit be approved, Staff recommends the following conditions: 1. Up to 43 dwelling units per acre (DUA) are permitted on the Subject Properties with a maximum of two bedrooms per unit. 2. The restoration of Rock Creek as presented in the applicant’s narrative dated July 14, 2020 and revised September 29, 2021. 3. Modifications of yard requirements to: a. Front yard: Twenty-five (25) feet. b. North Side yard: Five (5) feet. Page 8 of 11 ZM20-00003, SP16-000001, P21-0023 1613 Grove Street Update Memo c. South Side yard: Fourteen (14) feet. d. Rear yard: Twenty-five (25) feet. Staff Recommendation for P21-0023 If a recommendation for approval is provided, the following conditions should be considered: 1) Site Plans (VESCP Plans) should include, at a minimum, 4 stages/phases of ESC controls. The first phase shall include “Initial/Preliminary Controls” and also include special consideration and provisions for how the ‘creek’/’channel’ will be crossed throughout the project and how concentrated flows will outfall to the channel/culvert. Ideally outfall and site access (culvert work/tie in) would be established with rigorous independent ESC controls prior to the establishment of a sediment trap and associated conveyances. Any channels/diversions that convey ‘clear’ water to the channel shall be stabilized with sod on the ‘clear water’ side immediately after installation. The sequence shall dictate that no ‘benching’, or any disturbance of the slopes can occur until after the establishment of the trap and conveyances (Stage/Phase III). 2) “Super Silt Fence” (chain linked backing) shall be installed where perimeter silt fence is specified. 3) Any disturbance occurring outside of conveyances to the trap, in either sequence or space, planned or unforeseen, shall be immediately stabilized with sod (for pervious areas, utilities should have other “same day stabilization”). Suggested Motions Rezoning 1. I move to recommend approval of this application to rezone the Subject Property from R-2, to R-3, on the basis that the proposal would service the interests of the general public and good zoning practice. OR, 2. I move to recommend denial of this application to rezone the Subject Property from R-2 to R-3, on the basis that the proposal would not service the interests of the general public and good zoning practice. Special Use Permit 1. I move to recommend approval of this application for a Special Use Permit for Tax Map & Parcels 230133000, 230134000, and 230135000 (1613 Grove Street Extended) to permit residential density up to forty-three (43) DUA and adjusted yard requirements as depicted on the site plan dated September 29, 2021 with the following listed conditions. a. Conditions recommended by staff b. [alternative conditions, or additional condition(s)….list here] OR, Page 9 of 11 ZM20-00003, SP16-000001, P21-0023 1613 Grove Street Update Memo 2. I move to recommend denial of this application for a Special Use Permit for Tax Map & Parcels 230133000, 230134000, and 230135000 (1613 Grove Street Extended) Critical Slope 1. I move to recommend approval of the critical slope waiver for Tax Map and Parcel 230135000, 230134000, and 230133000 as requested, with no reservations or conditions, based on a finding that [reference at least one]:  The public benefits of allowing the disturbance outweigh the benefits afforded by the existing undisturbed critical slope, per Section 34-1120(b)(6)(d)(i)  Due to unusual physical conditions, or the existing development of the property, compliance with the City’s critical slopes regulations would prohibit or unreasonably restrict the use or development of the property, per Section 34-1120(b)(6)(d)(ii) 2. I move to recommend approval of the critical slope waiver for Tax Map and Parcel 230135000, 230134000, and 230133000 as requested, with the conditions outlined in the staff report, based on a finding that [reference at least one]:  The public benefits of allowing the disturbance outweigh the benefits afforded by the existing undisturbed critical slope, per Section 34-1120(b)(6)(d)(i)  Due to unusual physical conditions, or the existing development of the property, compliance with the City’s critical slopes regulations would prohibit or unreasonably restrict the use or development of the property, per Section 34-1120(b)(6)(d)(ii) 3. I move to recommend denial of the critical slope waiver for Tax Map and Parcel 230135000, 230134000, and 230133000 Attachments A. Updated Preliminary Site Plan B. Updated Exhibit C. Updated Narrative D. Updated ADU Worksheet E. Updated Preliminary Proffer Statement Link to the staff reports and attachments from the May 11, 2021 Public Hearing. Reports start on page 4. https://charlottesvilleva.civicclerk.com/Web/Player.aspx?id=1099&key=-1&mod=- 1&mk=-1&nov=0 Or, https://civicclerk.blob.core.windows.net/stream/CHARLOTTESVILLEVA/7d5d2871-ff48- 4b5e-b988-efefd68930e5.pdf?sv=2015-12- 11&sr=b&sig=eGMe3%2F%2BklOcQeV3OaxApywoUK34OjN4eGqFYBX7N%2Bmo%3D&st Page 10 of 11 ZM20-00003, SP16-000001, P21-0023 1613 Grove Street Update Memo =2021-10-11T14%3A48%3A13Z&se=2022-10-11T14%3A53%3A13Z&sp=r&rscc=no- cache&rsct=application%2Fpdf Page 11 of 11 Attachment A (10/21/21) PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN 1613 GROVE STREET TAX MAP 23, PARCEL 133, 134, 135 CHARLOTTESVILLE, VIRGINIA LEGEND OWNER/DEVELOPER BUILDING HEIGHTS VICINITY MAP SCALE : 1"=1000' Lorven Investments, LLC Maximum allowable: 45', proposed heights at less than 35' 4776 Walbern Court EXISTING NEW DESCRIPTION Chantilly, VA 20151 EXISTING USE BOUNDARIES ZONING Vacant BENCHMARK Existing: R-2 Residential SITE PROPERTY LINE Proposed: R-3 Residential with Special Use Permit (SUP) for residential density up to 43 DUA PROPOSED USE 4 apartment buildings - total 28 units ADJACENT PROPERTY LINE SETBACKS Residential density - 43 DUA SITE BUILDING SETBACK Per R-3 setback regulations: PARKING SETBACK FRONT MINIMUM: 25' LAND USE SCHEDULE SIDE MINIMUM: 14'* REAR MINIMUM: 25' EXISTING Area % SITE TEXT *Northern side setback to be reduced to 5', setback modification request submitted concurrently with SUP Building 0 SF 00.0% PARKING COUNT Pavement 0 SF 00.0% Sidewalk 0 SF 0.0% TOPOGRAPHY SOURCE OF TITLE Open space 28,401.12 SF 100.0% INDEX CONTOUR DB 2020 PG 578 Total= 28,401.12 SF (0.652 ac.) INTERVAL CONTOUR SPOT ELEVATION SOURCE OF BOUNDARY AND TOPOGRAPHY PROPOSED Area % Building 8,881.6 SF 31.3% Boundary information obtained from plat of record TOP OF CURB ELEVATION Pavement 6,103.8 SF 21.5% Topographic information obtained from City of Charlottesville GIS information Sidewalk 2,583.3 SF 9.1% TOP OF WALL ELEVATION Open space 10,832.4 SF 38.1% BOTTOM OF WALL ELEVATION FLOODZONE Total= 28,401.12 SF (0.652 ac.) According to the FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Map, effective February 4, 2005 Map provided by Google.com STREAM (Community Panel 51003C0269D), this property does not lie in a floodplain. PARKING SCHEDULE STREAM BUFFER Multifamily dwellings: 1 bedroom & 2 bedroom units, 1 space per unit 100 YEAR FLOODPLAIN WATER & SANITARY SERVICES (8) 1 bedroom units + (20) 2 bedroom units, 28 spaces required BUILDING Site is served by City of Charlottesville public water and sewer. 28 spaces required, 29 spaces provided BUILDING All waterline shutdowns must be coordinated with and performed by the City, and the developer must hand out notices to RETAINING WALL affected customers at least 48 hours in advance. ITE Trip Generation STAIRS CITY PERMITS AM PM Daily EDGE OF PAVEMENT Use ITE Code IV 1. The contractor shall be responsible for obtaining a street cut permit from the City. In Out Total In Out Total Total ROAD CENTERLINE 2. A Temporary Street Closure Permit is required for closure of sidewalks, parking spaces, and roadways; and is Multifamily Housing 220 28 Dwelling Units 3 11 14 12 7 19 171 subject to approval by the City Traffic Engineer. The contractor contact information will be provided with the final plans. FRONT OF CURB (Low-Rise) 3. The contractor shall provide adequate pedestrian barriers and circulation during construction. BACK OF CURB ITE Trip Generation, 10th Generation Edition reflects AM and PM peak hour traffic. CG-12 TRUNCATED DOME FIRE MARSHAL'S NOTES SIGNS SIDEWALK SITE PLAN: All signs and pavement shall conform with the latest edition of the MUTCD Guidelines. BIKE PARKING 1. VSFPC 505.1-The building street number to be plainly visible from the street for emergency responders. A sign permit must be issued in accordance with the City of Charlottesville Sign Regulations prior to placement of any signs 2. VSFPC 506.1 - An approved key box shall be mounted to the side of the front or main entrance. on-site. HANDICAP ACCESSIBLE AISLE 3. VSFPC 506.1.2 - An elevator key box will be required if the building has an elevator. HANDICAP PARKING 4. VSFPC 507.5.4 - Fire hydrants, fire pump test header, fire department connections or fire suppression system control valves shall remain clear and unobstructed by landscaping, parking or other objects. GENERAL NOTES MATERIAL 2. VSFPC 503.2.1 - Overhead wiring or other obstructions shall be higher than 13 feet 6 inches. 1. All excavation for underground pipe installation must comply with OSHA Standards for the Construction SHEET INDEX 912 E. HIGH ST. 434.227.5140 CONCRETE 3. VSFPC 3312.1 - An approved water supply for fire protection shall be made available as soon as combustible material arrives Industry (29 CFR Part 1926). C1 COVER CHARLOTTESVILLE VA, 22902 JUSTIN@SHIMP-ENGINEERING.COM on the site. Fire hydrants shall be installed and useable prior to the start of any building construction. 2. The location of existing utilities across or along the line of the proposed work are not necessarily shown RIPRAP 4. All pavement shall be capable of supporting fire apparatus weighing 85,000 lbs. on the plans and where shown based on "MISS UTILITY" markings and are only approximately correct. C2 EXISTING CONDITIONS ASPHALT 5. Required vehicle access for fire fighting shall be provided to all construction or demolition sites. Vehicle access shall be The contractor shall locate all underground lines and structures as necessary. provided to within 100 feet of temporary pr permanent fire department connections. Vehicle access shall be provided by 3. The contractor shall verify the locations of all boundaries, buildings, existing elevations, vegetation and EC-2 MATTING either temporary or permanent roads, capable of supporting vehicle loading under all weather conditions. Vehicle access other pertinent site elements. Contractor shall immediately report any discrepancies to the engineer of C3 PRELIMINARY PLAT EC-3 MATTING shall be maintained until permanent fire apparatus access roads are available. record. T WETLAND 6. Buildings four or more stories in height shall be provided with not less than one standpipe for use during construction. Such 4. The contractor shall be responsible for notifying "MISS UTILITY" - 1-800-552-7001. C4 SITE PLAN standpipes shall be installed when the progress of construction is not more than 40 feet in height above the lowest level of EW 5. Any damage to existing utilities caused by the contractor or its subcontractors shall be the contractor's TREELINE fire department access. Such standpipe shall be provided with fire department hose connections at accessible locations C5 LANDSCAPE PLAN adjacent to usable stairs. Such standpipes shall be extended as construction progresses to within one floor of the highest sole responsibility to repair. This expense is the contractor's responsibility. 6. All paving, drainage related materials and construction methods shall conform to current specifications V I FENCE UTILITY point of construction having secured decking or flooring. 7. VSFPC 912.2.1 the fire department connection shall be located on the street side of the structure unless otherwise approved and standards of the City of Charlottesville unless otherwise noted. ESHIMP JUSTIN M. R Lic. No. 45183 7. An erosion and sediment control plan is required with this site plan. by the fire code official. 8. All slopes and disturbed areas are to be fertilized, seeded and mulched. The maximum allowable slope R FO UTILITY POLE 8. SFPC 507.5.1.1-Hydrant for standpipe system- Buildings equipped with a standpipe system installed in accordance with is 2:1. Where it is reasonably obtainable, lesser slopes of 3:1 or better are to be achieved. GUY WIRE Section 905 shall have a fire hydrant within 100 feet of fire department connections. The distance shall be permitted to 9. Paved, rip-rap or stabilization mat lined ditch may be required when in the opinion of the Engineer it is exceed 100 feet where approved by the fire code official. deemed necessary in order to stabilize a drainage channel. OVERHEAD UTILITY 9. VSFPC 503.2.1 Overhead wiring or other obstructions shall be higher than 13 feet 6 inches. 10. All traffic control signs shall conform to the 2011 Virginia Supplement to the 2009 Manual on Uniform UNDERGROUND UTILITY 10. VSFPC 3312.1 An approved water supply for fire protection shall be made available as soon as combustible material Control Devices.. arrives on site. 11. Unless otherwise noted all concrete pipe shall be reinforced concrete pipe - Class III. STORM 11. VSFPC 905.3.1 If the floor level of the highest story is more than 30 feet above the lowest level of fire department vehicle 12. All material inside concrete forms shall be clean and free of all rocks and other loose debris. Sub-base STORM MANHOLE access, then a Class I standpipe mu7st be installed in addition to the sprinkler system. material shall be compacted by mechanical means. Remove all standing water from area inside forms. PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN 12. VSFPC 3311.1 Where a building has been constructed to a height greater than 50 feet or four (4) stories, at least one 13. Concrete and asphalt shall not be placed unless the air temperature is at least 40 degrees in the shade DROP INLET temporary lighted stairway shall be provided unless one or more of the permanent stairways are erected as the construction and rising. Material shall not be placed on frozen subgrade. CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA STORM SEWER progresses. 14. All existing curbs, curb and gutters and sidewalks to be removed shall be taken out to the nearest joint. ROOF DRAIN 13. VSFPC 503.3 Marking Fire Lanes, The location and method of marking fire lanes shall be clearly indicated on the submitted plan. Fire lanes shall be a minimum of 20 feet in width. Signs and markings to delineate fire lanes as designated by the fire 15. Existing asphalt pavement shall be saw cut and removed as per VDOT Road and Bridge Specifications 1613 GROVE SANITARY official shall be provided and installed by the owner or his/her agent of the property involved. Fire apparatus roads 20 to 26 feet in width shall be posted or marked on both sides "No Parking--Fire Lane. 2016. Removal shall be done in such a manner as to not tear, bulge or displace adjacent pavement. Edges shall be clean and vertical. All cuts shall be parallel or perpendicular to the direction of traffic. STREET 16. The contractor shall exercise care to provide positive drainage to the storm inlets or other acceptable SANITARY MANHOLE 14. VSFPC 3313.1 Where required-Buildings four or more stories in height shall be provided with not less than one standpipe drainage paths in all locations. SANITARY SEWER MAIN for use during construction. Such standpipes shall be installed when the progress of construction is not more than 40 feet in 17. Contact information for any necessary inspections with City: height above the lowest level of fire department access. Such standpipe shall be provided with fire department hose E&S inspector, NDS- 970-3182 (for the E&S inspections) SANITARY SEWER LATERAL connections at accessible locations adjacent to useable stairs. Such standpipes shall be extended as construction Project Inspectors, NDS-970-3182 (for other construction items like sidewalk, pavement patches, road, progresses to within one floor of the highest point of construction having secured decking or flooring. storm sewer etc) SUBMISSION: WATER WATER LINE 15. VSFPC 507.5.1.1 Hydrant for standpipe system-Buildings equipped with a standpipe system installed in accordance with Section 905 shall have a fire hydrant within 100 feet of the fire department connections. The distance shall be permitted to Water and Sanitary Sewer-Public Works 970-3800 Street cut, Public Works 970-3800 2020.07.14 WATER METER exceed 100 feet where approved by the fire code official. Other public ROW issues-City Engineer 970-3182. REVISION: CONSTRUCTION & DEMOLITION: 18. Any sidewalk and/or curb damage identified in the site vicinity due to project construction activities as 2021.01.29 WATER METER VAULT 1. VSFPC 310.3: 310.5 - Smoking to be allowed in only designated spaces with proper receptacles. determined by City inspector shall be repaired at the contractor's expense. 2021.04.15 FIRE HYDRANT 2. VSFPC 3304.2 - Waste disposal of combustible debris shall be removed from the building at the end of each workday. 19. A temporary street closure permit is required for closure of sidewalks, parking spaces and roadways 2021.06.22 3. IFC 1410.1-Access to the building during demolition and construction shall be maintained. and is subject to approval by the City Traffic Engineer. FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION 4. VSFPC 3304.6 - Operations involving the use of cutting and welding shall be done in accordance with Chapter 35, of the 20. Per the Virginia Department of Health Waterworks Regulation (Part II, Article 3, Section 12 VAC 5-590 2021.09.29 GAS Virginia Statewide Fire Prevention Code, addressing welding and hotwork operations. through 630), all buildings that have the possibility of contaminating the potable water distribution 5. VSFPC 3315.1 -Fire extinguishers shall be provided with not less than one approved portable fire extinguisher at each system (hospitals, industrial sites, breweries, etc) shall have a backflow prevention device installed GAS LINE stairway on all floor levels where combustible materials have accumulated. within the facility. This device shall meet specifications of the Virginia uniform Statewide Building Code, EASEMENTS 6. VSFPC 3310.1 - Required vehicle access for fire fighting shall be provided to all construction or demolition sites. Vehicle shall be tested in regular intervals as required, and test results shall be submitted to the Regulatory access shall be provided to within 100 feet of temporary or permanent fire department connections, if any. Vehicle access Compliance Administrator in the Department of Utilities. CONSTRUCTION shall be provided by either temporary or permanent roads, capable of supporting vehicle loading under all weather 21. All buildings that may produce wastes containing more than one hundred (100) perts per million of fats, GRADING conditions. Vehicle access shall be maintained until permanent fire apparatus access roads are available. or grease shall install a grease trap. The grease trap shall meet specifications of the Virginia Uniform Statewide Building Code, maintain records of cleaming and maintenance, and be inspected on regular FILE NO. ACCESS RECREATIONAL AREA intervals by the Regulatory Compliance Administrator in the Department of Utilities. 20.010 SIGHT DISTANCE (8) 1-bedroom units + (20) 2-bedroom units proposed 22. Please contact the Regulatory Compliance Administrator at 970-3032 with any questions regarding the grease trap or backflow prevention devices. APPROVALS UTILITY STORMWATER FACILITY MAINTENANCE Required Recreational Facilities: 5,600 sq. ft. of adult and 400 sq. ft. of child recreational space; 25% or 1,500 sq. ft. AFFORDABLE HOUSING COVER of indoor or weather-protected facilities are required STORMWATER ACCESS (8) 1-bedroom units proposed as affordable in accordance with proffered conditions. Proposed Recreational Facilities: 4,565 sq. ft. of adult recreational area provided on-site; 4,460 sq. ft. of natural Director of Neighborhood Development Services Date DRAINAGE amenity area provided with restoration of Rock Creek; 440 sq. ft. of child recreational area provided; SANITARY 1,570 sq. ft. of covered recreational area provided SHEET C1 OF 5 WATERLINE GASLINE C1 Attachment A (10/21/21) 912 E. HIGH ST. 434.227.5140 CHARLOTTESVILLE VA, 22902 JUSTIN@SHIMP-ENGINEERING.COM T E W V I ESHIMP JUSTIN M. R Lic. No. 45183 R FO PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA 1613 GROVE STREET SUBMISSION: 2020.07.14 REVISION: 2021.01.29 2021.04.15 2021.06.22 2021.09.29 FILE NO. 20.010 EXISTING CONDITIONS SHEET C2 OF 5 C2 Attachment A (10/21/21) 912 E. HIGH ST. 434.227.5140 CHARLOTTESVILLE VA, 22902 JUSTIN@SHIMP-ENGINEERING.COM T E W V I ESHIMP JUSTIN M. R Lic. No. 45183 R FO PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA 1613 GROVE STREET SUBMISSION: 2020.07.14 REVISION: 2021.01.29 2021.04.15 2021.06.22 2021.09.29 FILE NO. 20.010 PRELIMINARY PLAT SHEET C3 OF 5 C3 Attachment A (10/21/21) 912 E. HIGH ST. 434.227.5140 CHARLOTTESVILLE VA, 22902 JUSTIN@SHIMP-ENGINEERING.COM T E W V I ESHIMP JUSTIN M. R Lic. No. 45183 R FO PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA 1613 GROVE STREET SUBMISSION: 2020.07.14 REVISION: 2021.01.29 2021.04.15 2021.06.22 2021.09.29 FILE NO. 20.010 SITE PLAN SHEET C4 OF 5 C4 Attachment A (10/21/21) QB UA QA QB QA CB QA 912 E. HIGH ST. 434.227.5140 SN CHARLOTTESVILLE VA, 22902 JUSTIN@SHIMP-ENGINEERING.COM CB CB TD T SN QA E W V I AG ESHIMP JUSTIN M. R Lic. No. 45183 BN R FO PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA AG 1613 GROVE SN QA STREET UA SUBMISSION: BN 2020.07.14 REVISION: 2021.01.29 TD 2021.04.15 2021.06.22 2021.09.29 FILE NO. 20.010 LANDSCAPE PLAN SHEET C5 OF 5 C5 Attachment B (10/21/21) REZONING + SPECIAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION EXHIBIT 1613 GROVE STREET SITE CONTEXT Sheet 1 of 7 University of Virginia Health System Complex MO ROAD NR OE University of Virginia Y L VALLE Brandon Avenue AN E EET ROV E STR G Y M I LWA AY RA W CSX OO D LA NE ET PATO N G STRE KI SION N ST N ET EXTE RE E ST REET OV GR HAN EET Y STR VA N BA OVER N UNLE LL EY KER STRE RO AD STRE ET EXT ET EN DA SIO E VID NU N E AV TER R IVE RY SD RA A ER M HO CE CH T TMP(s) 23-133, 23-134, 23-135 REVISED 29 SEPTEMBER 2021 Revised 22 June 2021 Submitted 14 July 2020 100 0 100 200 300 project: 20.010 SHIMP ENGINEERING, P.C. 7/2/2020 Attachment B (10/21/21) REZONING + SPECIAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION EXHIBIT 1613 GROVE STREET SITE & REZONING INFO Sheet 2 of 7 OWNER/DEVELOPER USE Lorven Investments, LLC EXISTING: Vacant 4776 Walbern Ct PROPOSED: Multifamily Chantilly, VA 20151 ZONING TMP(s) EXISTING: R2 23-133, 23-134, 23-135 PROPOSED: R3, with concurrent special use permit submitted for increased density (21 DUA to 22-43 DUA) ACREAGE 0.652 DENSITY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Low density NEIGHBORHOOD residential (<15 DUA) Fifeville PROPOSED: 28 units proposed; 43 DUA FLOODZONE BUILDING HEIGHT According to the FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Map, effective Per Section 34-353 of the Charlottesville Zoning Ordinance, date February 4, 2005 (Community Panel 51003C0269D), a maximum building height of 45’ shall be permitted. this property does not lie within a Zone X 100-year Proposed building heights are less than 35’. floodplain. SETBACKS Per Section 34-353 of the Charlottesville Zoning Ordinance, setbacks shall be permitted as follows: FRONT MINIMUM: 25’ SIDE MINIMUM: 14’* REAR MINIMUM: 25’ *For 22-43 DUA, side setbacks shall be 1 foot/3 feet in building height, 10’ minimum. Maximum allowable building height is 45’. Proposed building heights are less than 35’. Side setback to be reduced to 5’ from the northern boundary (adjacent to the railroad ROW) with SUP exception TMP(s) 23-133, 23-134, 23-135 REVISED 20 SEPTEMBER 2021 Revised 22 June 2021 Submitted 14 July 2020 project: 20.010 SHIMP ENGINEERING, P.C. Attachment B (10/21/21) REZONING + SPECIAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION EXHIBIT 1613 GROVE STREET ZONING MAP Sheet 3 of 7 R-3 R-2 R-1 R-3 R-2 PUD TMP(s) 23-133, 23-134, 23-135 REVISED 29 SEPTEMBER 2021 Revised 22 June 2021 7/13/2020 Submitted 14 July 2020 400 0 400 800 1200 DISCLAIMER:The City makes no warranties, expressed or implied, concerning the accuracy, completeness or suitability of this data, and it should not be construed or used as a legal description. The information displayed is a compilation of information obtained from various sources, and the City is not responsible for it's accuracy or how current it may be. Every reasonable effort is made to ensure the accuracy and completeness of the data. Pursuant to Section 54.1-402 of the Code of Virginia, any determination of topography or contours, or any depiction of physical improvements, property lines or boundaries is for general information only and shall not be used for the design, modification or construction of improvements to real property or for flood plain determination. project: 20.010 Graphic Scale: 1”=400’ SHIMP ENGINEERING, P.C. Attachment B (10/21/21) REZONING + SPECIAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION EXHIBIT 1613 GROVE STREET LAND COVERAGE Sheet 4 of 7 Per Sec. 34-353 of the Charlottesville Zoning Ordinance, land coverage in R-3 zoning districts shall not exceed 80% of the total site for 22-87 DUA. Total site area is 0.652 AC or 28,401.12 sq. ft. Required open space is 20% of total site area, or 0.1304 AC or 5,680.224 sq. ft. Total proposed open space is 0.248 AC or 10,806 sq. ft. 10,806 sq. ft. 0.248 acres TMP(s) 23-133, 23-134, 23-135 REVISED 29 SEPTEMBER 2021 Revised 22 June 2021 Submitted 14 July 2020 20 0 20 40 60 project: 20.010 Graphic Scale: 1”=20’ SHIMP ENGINEERING, P.C. Attachment B (10/21/21) REZONING + SPECIAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION EXHIBIT 1613 GROVE STREET SITE SECTIONS A A’ Sheet 5 of 7 A’ A SITE ELEVATION ‘A - A’ SITE ELEVATION ‘A - A’ PROPOSED GRADE 442 441 440 439 438 PROPOSED GRADE 437 PROPOSED GRADE 436 435 434 433 432 431 430 PARKING UNDER BUILDING 20 FT WIDE TRAVELWAY 442 441 20 FT WIDE TRAVELWAY 440 439 PROPOSED GRADE & PARKING AREA 438 437 BASEMENT UNIT 436 435 ENTRANCE TMP(s) 23-133, 23-134, 23-135 434 433 432 431 REVISED 29 SEPTEMBER 2021 430 Revised 22 June 2021 PARKING UNDER BUILDING 20 FT WIDE TRAVELWAY Submitted 14 July 2020 10 0 10 20 30 20 FT WIDE TRAVELWAY & PARKING AREA project: 20.010 BASEMENT UNIT Graphic Scale: 1”=10’ SHIMP ENGINEERING, P.C. ENTRANCE Attachment B (10/21/21) REZONING + SPECIAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION EXHIBIT 1613 GROVE STREET SITE SECTIONS Sheet 6 of 7 B B’ SITE ELEVATION ‘B - B’ 443 442 441 440 439 438 PROPOSED GRADE 437 436 435 434 433 432 431 430 TMP(s) 23-133, 23-134, 23-135 PARKING UNDER BUILDING 20 FT WIDE TRAVELWAY PARKING UNDER BUILDING BASEMENT UNIT BASEMENT UNIT REVISED 29 SEPTEMBER 2021 Revised 22 June 2021 Submitted 14 July 2020 10 0 10 20 30 project: 20.010 Graphic Scale: 1”=10’ SHIMP ENGINEERING, P.C. Attachment B (10/21/21) REZONING + SPECIAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION EXHIBIT UNIT 1 FRONT & SIDE ELEVATIONS 1613 GROVE STREET ELEVATIONS Sheet 7 of 7 UNIT 2 FRONT & SIDE ELEVATIONS TMP(s) 23-133, 23-134, 23-135 REVISED 29 SEPTEMBER 2021 Revised 22 June 2021 Submitted 14 July 2020 project: 20.010 SHIMP ENGINEERING, P.C. Attachment C (10/21/21) Project Narrative For: ZMA and SUP 1613 Grove St Ext Parcel Description: Tax Map 23, Parcels 133, 134, 135 Initial Submittal: July 14, 2020 Revision 1: January 29, 2021 Revision 2: April 15, 2021 Revision 3: June 22, 2021 Revision 4: September 29, 2021 Pre-App Meeting Date: March 12, 2020 TAX MAP ACREAGE EXISTING PROPOSED COMP PLAN PARCEL NO. ZONING ZONING DESIGNATION TMP 23-133 0.147 R-2 R-3 Low-Density Residential TMP 23-134 0.239 R-2 R-3 Low-Density Residential TMP 23-135 0.266 R-2 R-3 Low-Density Residential Total: 0.652 Location: The parcels front an unimproved portion of Grove Street Extended with parcel 23-135 abutting Valley Road Extended. The properties are located within the Fifeville Neighborhood and are located along the edge of the land use map of the Cherry Avenue Small Area Plan Draft. The CSX railroad runs parallel to the properties’ north boundaries. Surrounding Uses: The new parcel will have frontage on Valley Road Extended. The property is bordered by two family residential structures to the east and south and by an unimproved section of Grove St. Ext and CSX railroad right of way to the north. Directly north of the CSX ROW is property owned by the University of Virginia that is subject to the Brandon Avenue Master Plan. Project Proposal: Lorven Investments, LLC is the owner (the “owner”) of tax map parcels 23-133, 23-134 and 23-135 in the City of Charlottesville (collectively, the “property”). On behalf of the owner, we request a rezoning and special use permit to allow for a cluster of neighborhood scale multi-family buildings with a total of 28 residential units on the property. To realize this housing opportunity, we request to rezone the property from Two-family Residential (R-2) to Multi-family Residential (R-3). Concurrent with the rezoning request, we request a special use permit for additional residential density of up to 43 dwelling units per acre. To accommodate a multi-family development on the property, the existing interior boundary lines will be vacated to create one .652 acre parcel (the “new parcel”). In conjunction with the special use Attachment C (10/21/21) permit request, and in accordance with modifications allowed by Sec. 34-162, we request a reduction of the northern side setback (adjacent to the unimproved portion of Grove St. Ext) of the new parcel to 5’ and for an exception from Sec.34-353(B)(4) which requires the distance between the façade of a multifamily dwelling having between 22-43 DUA and the boundary of any low density residential district to be 50 feet. We propose a cluster of four (4) neighborhood-scale multi-family buildings that in total will house 28 residential units. The buildings will be organized on the property in a skewed quadrant and will be constructed on the site to create different areas for outdoor leisure and recreation space between and around the buildings. Each building is proposed to have (7) units and of the total 28 units, eight (8) of the units are proposed as one bedroom units and twenty (20) of the units are proposed as two bedroom units. Parking is provided on site, in accordance with City parking requirements, to serve the parking needs of future residents. The buildings are designed to relegate the parking from Valley Road Extended and most of the parking spaces are accommodated underneath the overhang of the buildings, limiting the amount of impervious surface on-site required to accommodate both the residential units and the required parking areas. The site, including the banks of Rock Creek, is currently overtaken with Kudzu, an invasive species, and the preliminary site plan included with this special use permit request demonstrates a native replanting design along the banks that will contribute to a robust canopy and green screen along Valley Road Extended. The buildings are proposed at heights of less than 35’, as shown in the elevations included with this submission package, these proposed building heights are less than the 45’ maximum by-right allowance for the R-3 Residential Zoning District. The property is bordered by R-2 zoned properties which are subject to a maximum height of 35’. Just across the railroad right-of-way, just north of the property, there are B-1 and UHD zoned properties which have a maximum height of 45’ and 50’ respectively. The buildings are designed to be 10’ floor-to-floor at three stories above grade, with the easternmost buildings having basement apartments. The two easternmost buildings will be constructed into the hillside with a height of approximately 28’ above grade. The buildings adjacent to Valley Street Extended do not have basement apartments, resulting in a height of approximately 33’ above grade. The property sits at a lower elevation than most of its surrounding context; the variation in grade between this site and its surroundings contributes to minimizing the scale and mass of the buildings. The proposed finish floor elevation of the buildings is between 436’ and 443’(with the easternmost buildings having a BFE of 433’). The finished floor elevation of the structure to the east is approximately 462’, the finished floor elevation of the structure to the south is approximately 442’, the approximate floor elevations of the properties opposite Valley St. are 440’, and the ridge of the adjacent railroad right-of-way is 479’. The project design will establish: 1) A neighborhood-scale multi-family housing development with off-street parking in close proximity to major regional employers 2) Greenspace and green screens, providing open space for future residents that is inviting and supports the enhancement of Rock Creek, and 3) Intentional recreational areas for residents that encourage outdoor leisure and play Public Need or Benefit The Comprehensive Regional Housing Study and Needs Analysis completed by Partners for Economic Solutions in 2019 states in the executive summary that, “over the past two decades, Grove St. Ext Narrative 2 Attachment C (10/21/21) housing prices in Planning District 10 have increased rapidly as new construction failed to keep pace with the increase in demand at all but the highest rent and price levels.” 1 This proposed project will contribute to the “missing middle” housing stock and help to meet demand for housing in Charlottesville City limits. R-3 Justification The proposed development is consistent with the intent of the R-3 zoning district which states, “The purpose of the multifamily residential zoning district is to provide areas for medium- to high-density residential development” and that R-3 consists, “of medium-density residential areas in which medium- density residential developments, including multifamily uses, are encouraged.” This project proposes a medium density multi-family development, consistent with the intent of the R-3 district. Development of the property aligns with the goals and opportunities of the Fifeville Neighborhood as outlined in the Cherry Avenue Small Area Plan Draft. The SWOT analysis compiled by the neighborhood revealed that residents feel there is a lack of affordability in the neighborhood, pricing out long-term community members. While there is fear that development will change the neighborhood, community members still felt there is a strong opportunity to improve housing options within Fifeville. With new development, “additional housing may help residents remain in the community, even if they move to a new home within the neighborhood” (43). The multifamily development on Grove Street Extended could be an opportunity to address the challenge of meeting housing demand in the largely single-family zoning district in the Fifeville neighborhood. 1613 Grove Street is ideal for vacant lot development with effective density. The property is located at the end of Valley Road Extended’s block of duplexes and two-family dwelling units. A medium-density multifamily development would not be out of character in this portion of the neighborhood and will be designed in a manner to complement, not overshadow, the existing neighborhood context. The structures would not be visible from main thoroughfares of the Fifeville neighborhood, minimizing overall impact to the small-town feel that community members seek to preserve, while demonstrating a different level of density that neighbors could experience. Allowing for this type of development where impact is minimal would help the community better understand the built condition of the desired density, affordability, and housing types they envision, without compromising the character of the neighborhood nor displacing any current residents. Generous green screens will be planted at the edges of the property which will contribute to a robust landscape program on the site, adding to the tree canopy in the neighborhood while providing sufficient privacy for future residents. This will ensure that the tree and green space character of the neighborhood local streets will not only be preserved but enhanced. Consistency with the Comprehensive Plan: The property is located within the Western portion of the Fifeville Neighborhood and is located on the Western-most edge of the Cherry Avenue Small Area Plan Draft. The property fronts an unimproved portion of Grove Street Extended and extends along Valley Road Extended. Rock Creek is located on the western edge of tax map parcel 23-135, parallel to Valley Road Extended. 1 “Comprehensive Regional Housing Study and Needs Analysis.” Partners for Economic Solutions. March 22, 2019 Grove St. Ext Narrative 3 Attachment C (10/21/21) Although this area is designated as Low-Density Residential on the future land use map, the Cherry Avenue Small Area Plan Draft encourages re-examination of allowable uses in the zoning code and exploration of methods to increase the number of affordable housing options in low-density portions of the neighborhood. A zoning map amendment for this property will contribute to the enhancement of housing options in the neighborhood and this proposed design contributes to protecting the character of the area. This rezoning will achieve the intent of several of the City’s housing goals including: creating quality housing opportunities for all and growing the City’s housing stock for residents of all income levels. The development is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan in the following ways: Chapter 4 Environment • Goal 2: Promote practices throughout the City that contribute to a robust urban forest. The preliminary site plan included with this rezoning request shows a landscape plan that would add a variety of native trees and plants to the site along the banks of Rock Creek, along the borders of the property, and internally in parking and recreational areas. • Goal 4: Improve public and private stormwater infrastructure while protecting and restoring stream ecosystems. The proposed development will adhere to all local and state stormwater regulations. A native planting stream buffer is proposed along the banks of Rock Creek which will help to contribute to the restoration of the stream ecosystem. At present, the banks of the stream are unprotected from stormwater runoff and are overtaken by invasive plant species. Chapter 5 Housing • Goal 3: Grow the City’s housing stock for residents of all income levels. A medium-density multi-family development on this property is an opportunity to incorporate more housing options throughout the City and help the City attain its goal of achieving a mixture of incomes and uses in as many areas of the City as possible. The owner is committed to providing affordable housing within this development, and of the 28 units, eight (8) one bedroom units are proposed as affordable. A proffer statement has been submitted in conjunction with this rezoning request, committing to eight (8) affordable units if the property is rezoned to R-3. The City is also actively working through an update to the Comprehensive Plan and the future land use map with the hopes of adopting an updated plan in late 2021. The property is designated as “general residential” on the most recent future land use map draft (dated August 2021) and the project proposal is consistent with various goals of the draft plan, such as: Housing • Goal 2: Diverse Housing Throughout the City: Support a wide range of rental and homeownership housing choices that are integrated and balanced across the city, and that meet multiple City goals including community sustainability, walkability, bikeability, ADA accessibility, public transit use, increased support for families with children and low-income households, access to food, access to local jobs, thriving local businesses, and decreased vehicle use. Environment, Climate, and Food Equity Grove St. Ext Narrative 4 Attachment C (10/21/21) • Goal 1: Climate Change, Emissions, and Energy: Reduce community greenhouse gas (CHG) emissions and the city’s overall carbon footprint to meet goals established for 2030 (45% reduction in greenhouse gas emissions from 2011 levels) and 2050 (carbon neutrality). By creating more housing in close proximity to schools, parks, and places of employment the need to utilize a car for every trip out of the house is reduced. 28 units in this location would put more residents within a half mile walk of an elementary school, a .8 mile walk or bike to an elementary school, and a one mile walk/bike/transit ride to a major employment center at the UVA health system. Land Use, Urban Form, and Historic and Cultural Preservation: • Goal 2: Balance Conservation and Preservation with Change: Protect and enhance the existing distinct identities of the city’s neighborhoods and places while promoting and prioritizing infill development, housing options, a mix of uses, and sustainable reuse in our community. This infill development promotes effective density within structures that are designed within a mass and form that resembles a large single family home or two family structure. The structures are sighted to be set down on the site, working with the grade, to minimize the appearance of the structures from the surrounding properties. As a vacant site, this property can accommodate this infill development without compromising existing structures. Impacts on Public Facilities & Public Infrastructure: American Community Survey (ACS) 5 year estimates indicate the average household size in Charlottesville is 2.38 people 2.Using the ACS average, a multi-family development with a maximum of 28 proposed units could potentially yield 67 new residents within Police District 7 and Ridge Street Station Fire District. It should be noted this household size is for all unit sizes and is not limited to one or two-bedroom households. Despite the additional density, vehicular trips generated by the development are expected to be minimal, and thus will not greatly impact congestion on Cherry Avenue, which is a concern expressed in the Cherry Avenue Small Area Plan. A CAT bus stop is located a short distance from the property at the intersections of Cherry Avenue and Valley Road Extended and the development intends to provide bike lockers for residents. It is expected that these two alternative transportation methods will lower the already low trip estimate. The Charlottesville Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan has other pedestrian-friendly infrastructure proposed (the aforementioned greenway tunnel and multi-use pathway) that will connect Fifeville and the immediate property to Charlottesville, encouraging even more pedestrian trips in the future. Impacts on Schools: This property lies within the Johnson Elementary School district. After attending neighborhood elementary schools, all Charlottesville students attend Walker Upper Elementary School, Buford Middle School, and Charlottesville High School. 2 ACS 2013-2017 5 YR Estimates Table B25010 “Average Household Size of Occupied Housing Units by Tenure” Grove St. Ext Narrative 5 Attachment C (10/21/21) ACS 2018 5 year estimates show that there are an estimated 4,800 residents between the ages of 5-17 within City limits. 3 By dividing this estimate by the number of occupied housing units in the city, 18,613, it can be approximated that there are approximately .26 children per housing unit in Charlottesville. 4 Since 28 units are proposed on the site, it is estimated there may be an additional seven school-aged children within the development. Impacts on Environmental Features: All design and engineering for improving the property will comply with applicable City and State regulations for erosion and sediment control and stormwater management. Rock Creek (located at the western portion of tax map parcel 23-135) will be protected during and after construction. Stream restoration along Rock Creek near the property frontage is proposed as a component of this application. Currently, the banks of Rock Creek are overrun with Kudzu and don’t have stabilization measures in place to ensure the integrity of the bank over the long term. The restoration plan included with this application proposes the installation of stabilization stones and native trees and grasses that was informed by the Virginia Department of Conservation 5, which provides guidelines for native species adjacent to streams, creating stream flow and erosion control, nutrient filtration, and wildlife habitats. Compliance with USBC Regulations: The proposed project will comply with all applicable USBC regulations. Proffers to Address Impacts: As a condition of rezoning approval, the owner will provide a cash contribution for improvements to pedestrian infrastructure within the Fifeville Neighborhood to improve pedestrian connectivity and safety along that street. The owner proposes to proffer a total of $48,000 prior to issuance of certificate of occupancy of the seventh dwelling unit on the property. The $48,000 contribution is consistent with providing just over 700 linear feet of sidewalk per the City’s 2019 sidewalk fund calculator which priced each linear foot of sidewalk at $67.75. Additionally, the owner has committed to providing eight (8) 1 bedroom affordable housing units on the property. 3 ACS 2018 5 YR Estimates Table DP05 “ACS Demographic and Housing Estimates” 4 ACS 2018 5 YR Estimates Table DP04 “Selected Housing Characteristics” 5 Virginia Department of Conservation, “Virginia Riparian Buffer Zones: Native Plants for Conservation, Recreation & Landscaping.” Grove St. Ext Narrative 6 Attachment D (10/21/21) Affordable Dwelling Unit Ordinance Worksheet-1613 Grove St. Step 1: Total Floor Area Ratio (FAR) of Site A. Total size of development site: 0.65 acres B. Total square footage of site: 0.65 x 43,560.00 = 28,401.12 square feet (sf) (# of acres) C. 1.0 Floor Area Ratio (FAR): 28,401.12 (total sf of site) D. Gross Floor Area (GFA) of ALL buildings/uses: 25,598.00 sf E. Total site FAR: 25,598.00 ÷ 28,401.12 = 0.90 (total GFA of site) (1.0 FAR) F. Is E greater than or equal to 1.0 FAR? NO: Your proposed development does not trigger the ADU ordinance. YES: Proceed to Step 2 or Step 3. Step 2: Number of ADUs Required G. GFA in excess of 1.0 FAR: - = 0.00 (D: total site GFA) (B: total SF of site) H. Total GFA of ADUs required: 0.00 x 0.05 = 0.00 (G: GFA in excess of 1.0 FAR) I. Equivalent density based on Units Per Acre: i. Dwelling Units per Acre (DUA) approved by SUP: 43.00 ii. SF needed for ADUs: 0.00 ÷ 43,560.00 = 0.0000000 acres (H: Total GFA of ADUs) iii. Total number of ADUs required: 0.0000000 x 43.00 = 0.00 (ii: ADU acreage) (i: DUA approved) Step 3: Cash-in-Lieu Payment Attachment D (10/21/21) J. Cash-in-Lieu Amount Residential: x $2.370 = $0.00 K. Cash-in-Lieu Amount Mixed-Use: Total GFA of development site: GFA Occupied Commercial Space: GFA Occupied Residential Space: Total GFA Occupied Space: 0.00 % Residential: #DIV/0! Propotionate amount of non- occupied space GFA for residential GFA Non-Occupied Space*: 0.00 use: #DIV/0! Amount of Payment: #DIV/0! x $2.370 = #DIV/0! *GFA of non-occupied space shall include: (i) basements, elevator shafts and stairwells at each story, (ii) spaces used or occupied for mechanical equipment and having a structural head room of six (6) feet six (6) inches or more, (iii) penthouses, (iv) attic space, whether or not a floor has been laid, having a structural head room of six (6) feet six (6) inches or more, (v) interior balconies, and (vi) mezzanines. GFA shall not include outside balconies that do not exceed a projection of six (6) feet beyond the exterior walls of the building; parking structures below or above grade; or and roof top mechanical structures. Step 4: Minimum Term of Affordability L. Residential Project i. Households earning up to 80% AMI: Unit Type Eff. 1BR 2BR 3BR 4BR 5BR 6BR Number of Units Market Rent HUD Fair Market Rents $752.00 $1,027.00 $1,179.00 $1,478.00 $1,772.00 $2,037.00 $2,303.00 HUD Utility Allowance Difference per Month $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Annual Cost of ADU $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Total Annual Cost of ADUs: 0.00 (Sum of Annual Cost of ADU) Minimum Term of Affordability*: #DIV/0! (Cash-in-lieu payment / Total annual cost of ADUs) *If answer is less than 5, then minimum term of affordability will be 5 years. Attachment D (10/21/21) M. Mixed-Use Project i. Households earning up to 80% AMI: Unit Type Eff. 1BR 2BR 3BR 4BR 5BR 6BR Number of Units Market Rent HUD Fair Market Rents $752.00 $1,027.00 $1,179.00 $1,478.00 $1,772.00 $2,037.00 $2,303.00 HUD Utility Allowance Difference per Month $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Annual Cost of ADU $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Total Annual Cost of ADUs: 0.00 (Sum of Annual Cost of ADU) Minimum Term of Affordability: #DIV/0! (Cash-in-lieu payment / Total annual cost of ADUs) *If answer is less than 5, then minimum term of affordability will be 5 years. Attachment E (10/21/21) BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE, VIRGINIA IN RE: PETITION FOR REZONING (City Application No. ZM20-00003) STATEMENT OF PRELIMINARY PROFFER CONDITIONS For 1613 Grove Street Ext. City of Charlottesville Tax Map 23 Parcels 133, 134, 135 TO THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE Lorven Investments, LLC is the owner (the “Owner”) of Tax Parcels 230133000, 230134000, 230135000 (collectively, the “Property”) which is the subject of rezoning application ZM20- 00003, a project known as “1613 Grove Street Ext.” (the “Project”). The Owner seeks to amend the current zoning of the Property subject to certain voluntary conditions set forth below. Each signatory below signing on behalf of the Owner covenants and warrants that it is an authorized signatory of the Owner for this Proffer Statement. In furtherance of the Project, the Owner hereby proffers for City Council’s consideration voluntary development conditions, which the Owner agrees are reasonable. The Owner agrees that, if the Property is rezoned as requested, the use and development of the Property will be subject to and in accordance with the following conditions: 1. Valley Road Extended Sidewalk Improvements: a. Prior to the issuance of certificate of occupancy from the City’s building official for the seventh (7th) dwelling unit on the Property, the Owner shall contribute Forty-Eight Thousand Dollars ($48,000.00) to the City of Charlottesville’s Capital Improvement Program (CIP) as a cash contribution for construction of pedestrian improvements within the Fifeville Neighborhood. 2. Affordable Housing: The Owner shall provide affordable housing within the Property, as follows: a. For the purposes of this Proffer, the term “For-Rent Workforce Affordable Dwelling Unit” means a dwelling unit where the monthly cost of rent, including any tenant paid utilities, does not exceed 125% of the Fair Market Rent by unit bedrooms for the Charlottesville MSA, the aforementioned Fair Market Rent is established annually by the federal Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). b. For the purposes of this Proffer, the term “For-Rent Affordable Dwelling Unit” means a dwelling unit where the monthly cost of rent, including any tenant paid utilities, does not exceed the Fair Market Rent by unit bedrooms for the Charlottesville MSA, the aforementioned Fair Market Rent is established annually by the federal Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). Attachment E (10/21/21) c. Fourteen percent (14%) of all dwelling units constructed within the area of the Property shall be For-Rent Workforce Affordable Dwelling Units and an additional fourteen percent (14%) of all dwelling units constructed within the area of the Property shall be For-Rent Affordable Dwelling Units (collectively, the “Required Affordable Dwelling Units”) for a total of 28% of dwelling units constructed within the area of the Property provided as Required Affordable Dwelling Units. The Required Affordable Dwelling Units shall be identified on a layout plan, by unit, prior to the issuance of any certificate of occupancy for a residential unit within the Property (“Initial Designation”). The Owner reserves the right, from time to time after the Initial Designation, and subject to approval by the City, to change the unit(s) reserved as Workforce-Affordable Dwelling Units and Affordable Dwelling Units, and the City’s approval shall not unreasonably be withheld so long as a proposed change does not reduce the number of Required Affordable Dwelling Units and does not result in an Affordability Period shorter than required by these proffers with respect to any of the Required Affordable Dwelling Units. i. The Required Affordable Dwelling Units shall be reserved as such throughout a period of at least ten (10) years from the date on which the unit receives a certificate of occupancy from the City’s building official (“Rental Affordability Period”). All Rental Affordable Dwelling Units shall be administered in accordance with one or more written declarations of covenants within the land records of the Charlottesville Circuit Court, in a form approved by the Office of the City Attorney. ii. On or before July 1 of each calendar year the then current owner of each Required Affordable Dwelling Unit shall submit an Annual Report to the City, identifying each Required Affordable Dwelling Unit by address and location, and verifying the Household Income of the occupant of each Required Affordable Dwelling Unit. d. The land use obligations referenced in 2.c.i and 2.c.ii shall be set forth within one or more written declarations of covenants recorded within the land records of the Charlottesville Circuit Court, in a form approved by the Office of the City Attorney, so that the Owner’s successors in right, title and interest to the Property shall have notice of and be bound by the obligations. In the event of re-sale of any of the required Affordable dwelling Units that reduces the number of required Affordable Dwelling Units below the thresholds set forth in this proffer, the declaration of covenants shall provide a mechanism to ensure that an equivalent Affordable Dwelling Unit is created within the City of Charlottesville, either on or off of the Subject Project, that satisfies the requirements contained herein for the remainder of the Affordability Period. Attachment E (10/21/21) WHEREFORE, the undersigned Owner stipulates and agrees that the use and development of the Property shall be in conformity with the conditions hereinabove stated, and request that the Property be rezoned as requested, in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Charlottesville. By: ________________________________________ Lorven Investments, LLC Manager/Member Print Name: _________________________________ Owner’s Address: _____________________________ CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE DEPARTMENT OF NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT SERVICES STAFF REPORT PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING APPLICATION FOR A CRITICAL SLOPE WAIVER APPLICATION NUMBER: P20-00008 DATE OF MEETING: October 21, 2021 Project Planner: Brian Haluska, AICP Date of Staff Report: October 4, 2021 Applicant: BKKW, LLC Applicant’s Representative(s): Kurt Keesecker Current Property Owner: BKKW, LLC Application Information Property Street Address: Lyman Street Tax Map & Parcel/Tax Status: 590289200 and 590358E00 (real estate taxes paid current – Sec. 34-12) Total Project Area (Limits of Disturbance): 8,613 square feet Total Area of Critical Slopes on Parcels: 2,415 square feet | 28% Area of Proposed Critical Slope Disturbance: 2,415 square feet | 100% of total critical slopes area on parcel | 5.4% of total critical slopes area Comprehensive Plan (General Land Use Plan): Low Density Residential Current Zoning Classification: R-2 with an Infill Special Use Permit Overlay District: None Applicant’s Request (Summary) BKKW, LLC is requesting a waiver from Section 34-1120(b) of the City Code (Critical Slope Ordinance) to allow for construction of a development that would include up to three residential units. Improvements specific to areas where critical slopes would be impacted should the waiver be approved are shown on the Critical Slope Exhibit (Attachment B) and include portions of all proposed lots in the development Existing critical slopes areas located on this Property include 2,415 square feet or 28 percent of the site. The applicable definition of “critical slope” is as follows: Page 1 of 6 P21-0008 Lyman Street Residences Critical Slope Any slope whose grade is 25% or greater, and (a) a portion of the slope has a horizontal run of greater than 20 feet, and its total area is 6,000 SF or greater, and (b) a portion of the slope is within 200 feet of a waterway. See City Code Sec. 34-1120(b)(2). Based on the information presented within the application materials, Staff verifies that the area for which this waiver is sought meets all of the above-referenced components of the definition of “critical slope”. Vicinity Map Page 2 of 6 P21-0008 Lyman Street Residences Critical Slope Critical Slopes per the Zoning Ordinance Standard of Review Per Sec. 34-1120(6)(d): The planning commission shall make a recommendation to city council in accordance with the criteria set forth in this section, and city council may thereafter grant a modification or waiver upon making a finding that: (i)The public benefits of allowing disturbance of a critical slope outweigh the public benefits of the undisturbed slope (public benefits include, but are not limited to, stormwater and erosion control that maintains the stability of the property and/or the quality of adjacent or environmentally sensitive areas; groundwater recharge; reduced stormwater velocity; minimization of impervious surfaces; and stabilization of otherwise unstable slopes); or (ii)Due to unusual size, topography, shape, location, or other unusual physical conditions, or existing development of a property, one (1) or more of these critical slopes provisions would effectively prohibit or unreasonably restrict the use, reuse or redevelopment of such property or would result in significant degradation of the site or adjacent properties. If the recommendation is for City Council to grant the requested waiver, the Planning Commission may also make recommendations as to the following: In granting a modification or waiver, city council may allow the disturbance of a portion of the slope, but may determine that there are some features or areas that cannot be disturbed. These include, but are not limited to: (i)Large stands of trees; Page 3 of 6 P21-0008 Lyman Street Residences Critical Slope (ii)Rock outcroppings; (iii)Slopes greater than 60%. City council shall consider the potential negative impacts of the disturbance and regrading of critical slopes, and of resulting new slopes and/or retaining walls. City council may impose conditions as it deems necessary to protect the public health, safety or welfare and to insure that development will be consistent with the purpose and intent of these critical slopes provisions. Conditions shall clearly specify the negative impacts that they will mitigate. Conditions may include, but are not limited to: (i)Compliance with the "Low Impact Development Standards" found in the City Standards and Design Manual. (ii)A limitation on retaining wall height, length, or use; (iii)Replacement of trees removed at up to three-to-one ratio; (iv)Habitat redevelopment; (v)An increase in storm water detention of up to 10% greater than that required by city development standards; (vi)Detailed site engineering plans to achieve increased slope stability, ground water recharge, and/or decrease in stormwater surface flow velocity; (vii)Limitation of the period of construction disturbance to a specific number of consecutive days; (viii)Requirement that reseeding occur in less days than otherwise required by City Code. Project Review and Analysis Each applicant for a critical slopes waiver is required to articulate a justification for the waiver, and to address how the land disturbance, as proposed, will satisfy the purpose and intent of the Critical Slopes Regulations, as found within City Code Sec. 34-1120(b)(1). The applicant has provided information in the attached critical slopes waiver narrative (Attachment A) for Application Finding #1 and #2. Staff Analysis 34-1120(b)(d)(i) Application Finding #1: Staff does not recommend a waiver on the basis of Finding 1 for this application. Staff Analysis 34-1120(b)(d)(ii) Application Finding #2 : Engineering Department: “Due to unusual size, topography, shape, location, or other unusual physical conditions, or existing development of a property, one (1) or more of these critical slopes provisions would Page 4 of 6 P21-0008 Lyman Street Residences Critical Slope effectively prohibit or unreasonably restrict the use, reuse or redevelopment of such property or would result in significant degradation of the site or adjacent properties.” However, since the original submittal did not included sequences of construction, or clear narrative specifying how the slopes/downstream waters will be protected during construction, and in accordance with the following City Code section: “No modification or waiver granted shall be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, detrimental to the orderly development of the area or adjacent properties, or contrary to sound engineering practices.” City Engineering recommends the following conditions: 1) Site Plans (VESCP Plan component) should include, at a minimum, 4 stages/phases of ESC controls, the first shall be “Initial/Preliminary Controls” and outfall construction, the second (if required) shall include the establishment of a sediment trap and associated conveyances. 2) “Super Silt Fence” (chain linked backing) shall be installed where perimeter silt fence is specified. Planning Department: The specific physical characteristics of the site meet the standards required in Finding #2. The front parcel of the development is constrained by an underground utility easement, requiring that the units shown in the applicants’ rezoning and SUP application be built on the back parcel, where the critical slopes are located. The site layout of the currently proposed development is consistent with the materials presented by the applicant when the parcels were rezoned and granted an infill SUP by City Council. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends the Planning Commission recommend to City Council to grant the critical slope waiver on the basis that “due to unusual physical conditions, one (1) or more of these critical slopes provisions would effectively prohibit or unreasonably restrict the use of such property.” Recommended Conditions 1) Site Plans (VESCP Plan component) should include, at a minimum, 4 stages/phases of ESC controls, the first shall be “Initial/Preliminary Controls” and outfall construction, the second (if required) shall include the establishment of a sediment trap and associated conveyances. 2) “Super Silt Fence” (chain linked backing) shall be installed where perimeter silt fence is specified. Page 5 of 6 P21-0008 Lyman Street Residences Critical Slope Suggested Motions 1. “I move to recommend approval of the critical slope waiver for Tax Map and Parcel 590289200 and 590358E00, as requested, with the conditions listed in the staff report, based on a finding that [reference at least one]: • The public benefits of allowing the disturbance outweigh the benefits afforded by the existing undisturbed critical slope, per Section 34-1120(b)(6)(d)(i) [Not Recommended] • Due to unusual physical conditions, or the existing development of the property, compliance with the City’s critical slopes regulations would prohibit or unreasonably restrict the use or development of the property, per Section 34- 1120(b)(6)(d)(ii) [Recommended] 2. “I move to recommend denial of the steep slope waiver for Tax Map and Parcel 590289200 and 590358E00. Attachments A. Application and Narrative B. Critical Slope Exhibit Page 6 of 6 CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE DEPARTMENT OF NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT SERVICES STAFF REPORT PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING APPLICATION FOR APPROVAL OF A PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN APPLICATION NUMBER: P21-0008 DATE OF MEETING: October 21, 2021 Project Planner: Brian Haluska Date of Staff Report: October 8, 2021 Applicant: BKKW, LLC Applicant’s Representative(s): Kurt Keesecker Current Property Owner: BKKW, LLC Property Street Address: 0 Lyman Street Tax Map & Parcel: 580289200 and 580358E00 Current Zoning Classification: R-2 Residential Overlay District: None Reason for Planning Commission Review: Preliminary site plan reflects the proposed development of a property that is the subject of an approved special permit per Sections 34- 820(d) Vicinity Map Page 1 of 4 P21-0008 Lyman Street Preliminary Site Plan Standard of Review Site plan approval is a ministerial function of Planning Commission in which no discretion is involved. If this preliminary site plan contains all required information, then it must be granted approval. If Planning Commission disapproves this plan, it shall set forth in writing the specific reasons therefor. As per Section 34-823(c), the reasons for disapproval shall identify deficiencies in this plan which cause the disapproval, by reference to specific ordinances, laws, or regulations. If this plan is disapproved, Planning Commission must also generally identify modifications or corrections that will permit approval of this plan. Applicant’s Request (Summary) Mr. Kurt Keesecker of BKKW, LLC is seeking Planning Commission approval for the Lyman Street Preliminary Site Plan. This preliminary site plan proposes three (3) residential units fronting on Lyman Street. On April 1, 2019, City Council approved Special Use Permit SP18-00011 authorizing an infill special use permit at this location. As per the City’s Zoning Ordinance, Planning Commission shall review this preliminary site plan because it reflects the proposed development of property that is subject to a Special Use Permit. Site Plan Requirements A. Compliance with the City’s Erosion and Sediment Control ordinance (Chapter 10) Staff has determined that this preliminary site plan complies with the City’s Erosion and Sediment Control ordinance. Erosion and Sediment Control plans are included as site plan Sheets C2.0 through C2.4, and Stormwater Management Plans are included as site plan Sheets C6.0 and C6.1. B. Compliance with applicable R-2 Commercial District zoning regulations (Sections 34- 350 - 34-420) The property is zoned R-2 Residential District. The project complies with all requirements of the R-2 Residential District and the approved infill special use permit previously approved by City Council.. C. Compliance with general standards for site plans (Section 34-827) Staff has determined that this site plan contains the following information as required: 1. General site plan information, including but not limited to project, property, zoning, site, and traffic information: Found on Sheet C0.0. 2. Existing condition and adjacent property information: Found on Sheet C1.0. 3. Phasing plan: The project will be constructed in one phase. Page 2 of 4 P21-0008 Lyman Street Preliminary Site Plan 4. Topography and grading: Found on Sheet C4.0. 5. Existing landscape and trees: Found on Sheet C1.0. 6. The name and location of all water features: N/A. 7. One hundred-year flood plain limits: N/A. 8. Existing and proposed streets and associated traffic information: Found on Sheet C1.0. No new roads are proposed. 9. Location and size of existing water and sewer infrastructure: Found on Sheets C1.0. 10. Proposed layout for water and sanitary sewer facilities and storm drain facilities: Found of Sheet C5.0. 11. Location of other existing and proposed utilities and utility easements: Found on Sheet C5.0. 12. Location of existing and proposed ingress to and egress from the property, showing the distance to the centerline of the nearest existing street intersection: Found on Sheet C3.0. 13. Location and dimensions of all existing and proposed improvements: Found on Sheets C3.0 and C3.1. 14. All areas intended to be dedicated or reserved for public use: N/A. 15. Landscape plan: Found on Sheet C7.0. 16. Where deemed appropriate by the director due to intensity of development: a. Estimated traffic generation figures for the site based upon current ITE rates: Found on Sheet C0.2. b. Estimated vehicles per day: Found on Sheet C0.2. D. Additional information to be shown on the site plan as deemed necessary by the director or Commission in order to provide sufficient information for the director or Commission to adequately review the site plan. The Special Use Permit granted by City Council on April 1, 2019 includes the following conditions, which are provided on Sheet C0.2 of the preliminary site plan. 1. Three (3) buildings, to be constructed as single-family dwellings (the “SFDS”), each on its own separate lot and with each building fronting on Lyman Street. Found on Sheet C3.0 2. Each lot containing a single-family dwelling shall have an area no less than 2500 square feet (SF) and no more than 3500 SF; each such lots shall have frontage on Lyman Street of no less than 34 feet and no more than 65 feet; and each such lot shall have side yards of at least 2 feet, but no required front or rear yard areas. Found on Sheet C3.0 Page 3 of 4 P21-0008 Lyman Street Preliminary Site Plan 3. Each single-family lot, and the land on which it is constructed, may be used and occupied in any manner authorized within §34-420 of the R-2 zoning district regulations, including, without limitation, internal accessory apartments. Found on Sheet C0.0. 4. The land area currently identified as Tax Pacel 358E will not contain any buildings or structures (other than the SFDS) and will be used predominantly for access and parking for the SFDS described above and as landscaped open space with plantings, and for any additional driveway or parking as may be necessary to serve internal accessory apartments established within the SFDS. Found on Sheet C3.0 5. The general design and height of all buildings, the layout of the entire development shall be in all material aspects the same as depicted within the site plan dated December 21, 2018, revised February 28, 2019, and the narrative materials accompanying application No. SP19-00011. Found on Sheet C3.0 E. Compliance with Additional Standards for Specific Uses (Sections 34-930 - 34-938) No improvements regulated by these sections are proposed. Public Comments Received Site Plan Conference Required by Z.O. Sec. 34-821 The city held a site plan conference on March 17th, 2021 beginning at 10:00 on a virtual platform. Property owners within 500 feet, and the Belmont-Carlton Neighborhood Association were notified of the meeting per requirements in Section 34-41(c)(2). Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the preliminary site plan. Attachments 1. Preliminary Site Plan dated August 6, 2021 2. Special Use Permit Resolution dated April 15, 2019 3. Conceptual Site Plan Associated with SUP dated December 21, 2018 Page 4 of 4 © 2018 - LINE+GRADE, LLC LYMAN STREET RESIDENCES PRELIMINARY CHARLOTTESVILLE, VIRGINIA SITE PLAN DESIGN INFORMATION: UTILITY OWNERS: DESIGN MANUALS REFERENCED: COMM.: COMCAST, TING, VERIZON CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE SADM 2016 VDOT ROAD AND BRIDGE STANDARDS GAS: CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE TMP 58-289.2 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: WATER: CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE DISTURBANCE AREA: 0.22 AC (9,678 SF) PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS AREA: 3,943 SF STORM SEWER: PRIVATE MISS UTILITY TICKET NO.: A131801842-00A B110600703-00B SANITARY SEWER: CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE PROP. PROPERTY LINE EX. PROPERTY LINE PROP. PROPERTY LINE (04/16/21) TO BE ABANDONED 12 DIGIT HUC CODE: 020802040401 TMP 58-358E LYMAN STREET RESIDENCES Sheet List Table LYMAN STREET SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE PSP FSP PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN CHARLOTTESVILLE, VIRGINIA C0.0 Title Sheet DOUGLA C0.1 General Notes TITLE SHEET C0.2 Site Calculations S AVENU C1.0 Existing Conditions and Demolition C2.0 Erosion and Sediment Control Narrative E C2.1 Erosion and Sediment Control Plan Ph 1 C2.2 Erosion and Sediment Control Plan Ph 2 C2.3 Erosion and Sediment Control Plan Ph 3 C2.4 Erosion and Sediment Control Plan Details SITE MAP N C3.0 Site Plan SCALE: 1" = 20' C3.1 Site Plan Details C4.0 Grading Plan C5.0 Utility Plan C5.1 Utility Details and Profiles C6.0 Stormwater Management Plan E ST N C6.1 Stormwater Management Details 8TH C7.0 Landscape Plan X1.0 Survey TOTAL SHEETS 13 E JE EM FFE RSO NS SUBMITTAL LOG ARK T ET SUBMISSION DESCRIPTION RECIPIENT SUBMITTAL DATE EW ST ATE 1 PRELIMINARY NDS 12/23/2020 RS T 2 PRELIMINARY NDS 5/11/2021 3 PRELIMINARY NDS 08/06/2021 SITE MAP LOCATION MAP 08/06/2021 DANIEL C. HYER Lic. No. 45596 E W AT ER ST ST N MA APPROVED DCH NDS DIRECTOR SIGNATURE DATE OD SUBMISSION NO. 3 GO ST E AV ON PROJECT 2011001 AS AV GL T H E W O R K O F U DO L I N E + G R A D E VICINITY MAP N LOCATION MAP N CITY ENGINEER SIGNATURE DATE SCALE: 1" = 4000' SCALE: 1" = 500' C0.0 © 2018 - LINE+GRADE, LLC GENERAL CONSTRUCTION NOTES: UTILITIES: CONCRETE AND ASPHALT: 1. ALL CONSTRUCTION METHODS AND MATERIALS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CURRENT VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ROAD AND 1. PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION OR EXCAVATION, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ASSUME RESPONSIBILITY OF LOCATING ANY AND ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES 1. ALL CONCRETE AND ASPHALT SHALL CONFORM TO CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE STANDARDS AND DESIGN MANUAL AND VDOT ROAD AND BRIDGE (PUBLIC OR PRIVATE) THAT MAY EXIST WITHIN OR CROSS THROUGH THE AREA OF CONSTRUCTION WHETHER OR NOT THEY ARE SHOWN ON THE PLANS. SPECIFICATIONS: SECTION 217 FOR CONCRETE AND SECTION 315 FOR ASPHALT. BRIDGE STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS (VDOT RBS&S), VIRGINIA EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL HANDBOOK, THE RULES AND REGULATIONS WATER AND SANITARY SEWER CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATIONS AND STANDARDS FOR THE PLAN APPROVING AUTHORITY AND ANY OTHER APPLICABLE PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CALL 'MISS UTILITY OF VIRGINIA' AT 1-800-552-7001. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE 2. ALL PROPOSED MIX DESIGNS FOR CONCRETE AND ASPHALT SHALL SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE CITY ENGINEER PRIOR TO PLACEMENT. RESPONSIBLE FOR REPAIRING, AT HIS SOLE EXPENSE, ANY EXISTING UTILITY DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION. FEDERAL, STATE, OR LOCAL ORDINANCES, CODES, AND LAWS. 3. A VDOT CERTIFIED CONCRETE FIELD TECHNICIAN SHALL BE PROCURED BY THE CONTRACTOR AND BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PERFORMING AND 2. THE PLAN DOES NOT GUARANTEE THE EXISTENCE, NONEXISTENCE, SIZE, TYPE, LOCATION, ALIGNMENT, OR DEPTH OF ANY OR ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES DOCUMENTING ALL CONCRETE TESTING AND INSPECTIONS PER CH. 4 OF THE VDOT MANUAL OF INSTRUCTION FOR THE MATERIALS DIVISION. STRENGTH 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFYING ALL CONDITIONS, MATERIALS, DIMENSIONS LOCATIONS AND EXISTING ELEMENTS TO REMAIN IN OR OTHER FACILITIES. WHERE SURFACE FEATURES (MANHOLES, CATCH BASINS, VALVES, ETC.) ARE UNAVAILABLE OR INCONCLUSIVE. INFORMATION SHOWN TESTS SHALL BE PERFORMED AT 7 AND 28 DAYS OF CURING. THE FIELD BEFORE PROCEEDINGS WITH ANY WORK. IF CONDITIONS VARY FROM WHAT IS REPRESENTED IN THE DRAWINGS, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAY BE FROM UTILITY OWNER'S RECORDS AND/OR ELECTRONIC LINE TRACING, THE RELIABILITY OF WHICH IS UNCERTAIN. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE ENGINEER. PERFORM TEST EXCAVATIONS OR OTHER INVESTIGATION AS NECESSARY TO VERIFY LOCATION AND CLEARANCES. 3. A VDOT CERTIFIED LEVEL II ASPHALT FIELD TECHNICIAN SHALL BE PROCURED BY THE CONTRACTOR AND BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PERFORMING AND DOCUMENTING ALL ASPHALT TESTING AND INSPECTIONS PER CH. 5 OF THE VDOT MANUAL OF INSTRUCTION FOR THE MATERIALS DIVISION. 3. EXISTING CONSTRUCTION SHOWN IN THESE DRAWINGS SHALL BE USED AS RELATIVE REFERENCES AND ARE TO BE VERIFIED IN THE FIELD BY THE 3. WHEN THE WORK CROSSES EXISTING UTILITIES, THE EXISTING UTILITIES SHALL BE ADEQUATELY SUPPORTED AND PROTECTED FROM THE DAMAGE DUE TO CONTRACTOR IF DEEMED CRITICAL FOR PROPER EXECUTION OF THE WORK. THE WORK. ALL METHODS FOR SUPPORTING AND MAINTAINING THE EXISTING UTILITIES SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE RESPECTIVE UTILITY COMPANY 4. CONCRETE INSPECTIONS ARE REQUIRED DURING SUBGRADE PREPARATION, STONE BASE PLACEMENT, CONCRETE FORM SETUP, REINFORCING STEEL AND/OR THE ENGINEER. CONTRACTOR SHALL EXERCISE CARE TO INSURE THAT THE GRADE AND ALIGNMENT OF EXISTING UTILITIES ARE MAINTAINED AND PLACEMENT, AND PRIOR TO POURING. THE CITY INSPECTOR SHALL BE PRESENT FOR ALL THIRD PARTY TESTS. 4. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL DUST CONTROL MEASURES. THAT NO JOINTS OR CONNECTIONS ARE DISPLACED. BACKFILL SHALL BE CAREFULLY PLACED AND COMPACTED TO PREVENT FUTURE DAMAGE OR 5. ASPHALT INSPECTIONS ARE REQUIRED DURING SUBGRADE PREPARATION AND PRIOR TO STONE BASE PLACEMENT, BASE COURSE, AND EACH SETTLEMENT TO EXISTING UTILITIES. ANY UTILITIES REMOVED AS PART OF THE WORK, AND NOT INDICATED TO BE REMOVED OR ABANDONED, SHALL BE SUBSEQUENT LIFT OF ASPHALT. THE CITY INSPECTOR SHALL BE PRESENT FOR ALL THIRD PARTY TESTS. 5. PROVIDE ADEQUATE PROTECTION FOR THE EXISTING BUILDINGS, BUILDING OCCUPANTS, VEHICLES AND PEDESTRIANS AT ALL TIMES IN ACCORDANCE RESTORED USING MATERIALS AND INSTALLATION EQUAL TO THE UTILITY'S STANDARDS. WITH OSHA AND ALL APPLICABLE STATE AND LOCAL CODES. 6. ALL CONCRETE AND ASPHALT DELIVERY TICKETS SHALL BE CHECKED BY THE CITY INSPECTOR. 4. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY LANDOWNERS, TENANTS AND THE ENGINEER A MINIMUM OF 72 HOURS PRIOR TO THE INTERRUPTION OF ANY SERVICES. 6. MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT SHALL BE STORED IN APPROVED AREAS TO PREVENT IMPACTS ON VEHICLES AND PEDESTRIANS. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE SERVICE INTERRUPTIONS SHALL BE KEPT TO A MINIMUM. 7. CONCRETE FINISHES WITHIN ROADWAY SHALL CONFORM TO VDOT R&B SPECS. INCIDENTAL CONCRETE (STAIRS, SIDEWALKS, CURBS, RAMPS, ETC) FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR MEASURES TAKEN TO ENSURE VEHICULAR AND PEDESTRIAN SAFETY THROUGH THE ENTIRE DURATION OF THE WORK. SAFETY 1 SHALL BE BROOM FINISHED RESULTING IN A CONSISTENT SURFACE ACCEPTABLE TO THE CITY ENGINEER. BROOM GROOVES SHALL BE BETWEEN 16 " AND 5. CONTRACTOR TO MAKE ANY NECESSARY ADJUSTMENTS TO ALL UTILITY JUNCTION BOXES, VALVE BOXES, MANHOLES, CLEAN-OUTS, AND OTHER GRADE IS PARAMOUNT. 1 RELATED ITEMS IN SIDEWALK, ROADWAY, AND/OR ADJACENT AREAS TO MATCH FINISHED GRADE. COSTS ARE TO BE INCLUDED UNDER THE VARIOUS UNIT 8" DEEP. 7. EQUIPMENT AND MATERIALS SHALL BE STORED IN DESIGNATED AREAS AND SHALL NOT ENCUMBER THE OWNER'S OPERATIONS, SURROUNDING RIGHT BID ITEMS. NO SEPARATE PAYMENT WILL BE MADE. 8. CONCRETE AND ASPHALT WITHIN RIGHT-OF-WAY SHALL OR PUBLICLY MAINTAINED FACILITIES SHALL MEET SPECIFICATIONS IN TABLE 12-4 AND 12-5 OF WAY, OR ADJOINING GROUNDS. 6. PER THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH WATERWORKS REGULATIONS (PART II, ARTICLE 3, SECTION 12 VAC 5-590 THROUGH 630), ALL BUILDINGS THAT BELOW. 8. ALL WORK AREAS SHALL BE CLEANED DAILY. HAVE THE POSSIBILITY OF CONTAMINATING THE POTABLE WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM (HOSPITALS, INDUSTRIAL SITES, BREWERIES, ETC.) SHALL HAVE A BACKFLOW PREVENTION DEVICE INSTALLED WITHIN THE FACILITY. THIS DEVICE SHALL MEET SPECIFICATIONS OF THE VIRGINIA UNIFORM STATEWIDE 9. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROTECTION OF BUILDINGS ADJACENT TO WORK AREAS. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL BUILDING CODE, SHALL BE TESTED IN REGULAR INTERVALS AS REQUIRED, AND TEST RESULTS SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE REGULATORY COMPLIANCE COSTS OF DAMAGES RESULTING FROM CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. ADMINISTRATOR IN THE DEPARTMENT OF UTILITIES. TABLE 12-4: ALLOWABLE CONCRETE MIXES 10. SECTION CUTS AND DETAIL CALLOUTS INDICATED IN THE DRAWINGS ARE TYPICAL FOR THE PROJECT. THEY ARE TO BE CONSIDERED TYPICAL FOR SIMILAR 7. ALL BUILDINGS THAT MAY PRODUCE WASTES CONTAINING MORE THAN ONE HUNDRED (100) PARTS PER MILLION OF FATS, OIL, OR GREASE SHALL INSTALL MIN. 28-DAY MIX DESIGNATION ALLOWABLE USES NOTES CONDITIONS AND HAVE NOT BEEN SHOWN EVERYWHERE THEY APPLY. A GREASE TRAP. THE GREASE TRAP SHALL MEET SPECIFICATIONS OF THE VIRGINIA UNIFORM STATEWIDE BUILDING CODE, MAINTAIN RECORDS OF CLEANING COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH AND MAINTENANCE, AND BE INSPECTED ON REGULAR INTERVALS BY THE REGULATORY COMPLIANCE ADMINISTRATOR IN THE DEPARTMENT OF UTILITIES. 3,000 PSI UTILITY THRUST BLOCKING, 11. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR JOB SITE SAFETY. VDOT CLASS A3 BURIED APPLICATIONS ONLY 8. CONTACT THE REGULATORY COMPLIANCE ADMINISTRATOR AT 970-3032 WITH ANY QUESTIONS REGARDING THE GREASE TRAP OR BACKFLOW PREVENTION ENCASEMENT 12. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATION OF ALL CONSTRUCTION. DEVICES. ELEMENTS IN ROW (CURB & GUTTER, SIDEWALK, 1. USE ROCKWOOD PIGMENTS/DAVIS COLORS #5084, 13. SYMBOLS IN THE DRAWINGS ARE NOT TO SCALE. OMAHA TAN. INTEGRALLY COLORED CONCRETE. 14. ALL WORK SHALL BE LAID-OUT PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF NEW WORK BASED ON MEASUREMENT OF EXISTING CONSTRUCTION AND EXISTING EARTH WORK AND SITE CONDITIONS: VDOT CLASS A4, INTEGRALLY COLORED 4,000 PSI DRIVEWAYS, TRANSIT STOP SLABS, ETC) AND INCIDENTAL 2. USE OF FLY ASH IN THIS MIX IS NOT ALLOWED. 3. ALL AGGREGATES USED ON A PROJECT MUST BE FROM A CONSTRUCTION DESIGNATED TO REMAIN AS PART OF THE PROJECT. DO NOT START INSTALLATION OF WORK UNTIL LAY-OUT IS COMPLETE AND POTENTIAL AND STRUCTURAL CONCRETE 1. EXCEPT AS OTHERWISE SHOWN ON THE PLANS, ALL CUTS AND FILLS SHALL BE NO GREATER THAN 3:1. SINGLE SOURCE AND SHALL BE CONSISTENT IN COLOR. CONFLICTS HAVE BEEN IDENTIFIED AND ADDRESSED. OTHER THAN ROW ELEMENTS 2. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON THE PLANS OR IN THE SPECIFICATIONS, ALL FILL MATERIALS SHALL BE COMPACTED TO 95% OF THEORETICAL MAXIMUM CURBS AND SIDEWALKS 15. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE HELD RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL DAMAGE TO THE EXISTING BUILDINGS AND ADJACENT GROUNDS AND PROPERTY CAUSE BY DENSITY AS DETERMINED BY AASHTO T-99 METHOD A, WITHIN PLUS OR MINUS 2% OF OPTIMUM MOISTURE, FOR THE FULL WIDTH AND THE DEPTH OF THE VDOT CLASS A5, 5,000 PSI SUBJECTED TO FREQUENT SEE NOTES FOR A4 CONCRETE ABOVE THE CARELESSNESS OR NEGLECT OF HIS WORKMEN. DAMAGE TO PORTIONS OF THE PROPERTY NOT SUBJECT TO WORK UNDER THE CONTRACT SHALL BE FILL. INTEGRALLY COLORED VEHICULAR IMPACTS REPAIRED TO THE FULL SATISFACTION OF THE OWNER AND ENGINEER, AT THE CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE. 3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ADD, CHANGE, OR RELOCATE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROLS AT THE DIRECTION OF THE CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE E&S FILL MATERIAL FOR 1. USE AS DIRECTED BY CITY ENGINEER. 16. PROTECTION OF THE WORK: PROTECT EFFECTIVELY ALL MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT DURING THE ENTIRE PERIOD OF CONSTRUCTION. REPLACE INSPECTOR TO THEIR SATISFACTION AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE OWNER. VDOT FLOWABLE FILL 30 PSI ABANDONED PIPES, BACKFILL 2. COORDINATE WITH CITY ENGINEER TO DETERMINE MATERIAL. WHETHER A DIFFERENT COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH IS NEEDED. MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT DAMAGED, LOST OR STOLEN WITHOUT ADDITIONAL COST TO THE OWNER. 4. ALL GRADING AND IMPROVEMENTS TO BE CONFINED TO THE PROJECT AREA UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED. 17. PROTECT EXISTING MATERIALS DURING INSTALLATION OF TEMPORARY PROTECTION AND CONSTRUCTION. DO NOT DEFACE OR REMOVE EXISTING MATERIALS IF INTENDED TO STAY. ATTACHMENTS OF TEMPORARY PROTECTION TO EXISTING CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER 5. PROPOSED GRADES SHALL BE FIELD ADJUSTED TO CONFORM TO THE INTENT OF THE TYPICAL SECTIONS. A SMOOTH GRADE SHALL BE MAINTAINED FROM THE BASELINE TO THE PROPOSED EDGE OF PAVEMENT OR FACE OF CURB TO PRECLUDE THE FORMING OF FALSE GUTTERS AND/OR PONDING OF WATER ON TABLE 12-5: ALLOWABLE ASPHALT MIXES PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. ALL PAVED SURFACES. MIX DESIGNATION ALLOWABLE USES NOTES 18. OBTAIN ENGINEER REVIEW AND WRITTEN APPROVAL IN THE FORM OF A CONSTRUCTION CHANGE DIRECTIVE OR SUPPLEMENTAL INSTRUCTION BEFORE 6. CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN A SMOOTH GRADE TO THE PROPOSED EDGE OF PAVEMENT OR FACE OF CURB TO PROVIDE POSITIVE DRAINGE ON ALL PAVED ROADWAY AND COMMERCIAL DRIVEWAY SURFACE/WEARING VDOT SM-9.5A MAKING CHANGES OR ADDITIONS TO CONSTRUCTION OR REMOVING MATERIALS THAT WERE INTENDED TO REMAIN. SURFACES. ANY AREAS WHERE WATER IS IMPOUNDED SHALL BE CORRECTED BY CONTRACTOR AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. POSITIVE DRAINAGE OF ALL COURSE, WEDGE AND LEVELING COURSE, RESIDENTIAL SURFACE MIX ROADWAY AREAS TO THE STORM DRAIN INLETS OR OTHER ACCEPTABLE DRAINAGE CHANNELS AS NOTED ON THE PLANS IS REQUIRED. DRIVEWAYS, ASPHALT SIDEWALKS, AND SHARED USE PATHS. RECLAIMED ASPHALT PAVEMENT AND RECLAIMED ASPHALT 19. NOTIFY ENGINEER OF VISIBLE CHANGES IN THE INTEGRITY OF MATERIALS OR COMPONENTS WHETHER DUE TO ENVIRONMENTAL CAUSES INCLUDING 7. CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN EXISTING STREAMS, DITCHES, DRAINAGE STRUCTURES, CULVERT AND FLOWS AT ALL TIMES DURING THE WORK. VDOT IM-19.0 SHINGLE MATERIALS ARE ALLOWED IN CONFORMANCE WITH BIOLOGICAL ATTACK, UV DEGRADATION, FREEZING OR THAWING OR DUE TO STRUCTURAL DEFECTS INCLUDING CRACKS, MOVEMENT OR DISTORTION. DO LOW SPEED ROADS, LONG-TERM TEMPORARY REPAIRS VDOT SPECIFICATIONS. CONTRACTOR SHALL PAY FOR ALL PERSONAL INJURY AND PROPERTY DAMAGE WHICH MAY OCCUR AS A RESULT OF FAILING TO MAINTAIN ADEQUATE INTERMEDIATE MIX NOT PROCEED WITH WORK IN QUESTION UNTIL DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER. DRAINAGE. VDOT BM-25.0 BASE LYMAN STREET RESIDENCES ROADWAY AND COMMERCIAL DRIVEWAY BASE COURSE 20. WHERE MISSING FEATURES ARE INDICATED TO BE REPAIRED OR REPLACED, PROVIDE FEATURES WHOSE DESIGNS ARE BASED ON ACCURATE 8. ALL PIPES, DI'S AND OTHER STRUCTURES SHALL BE INSPECTED BY THE ENGINEER BEFORE BEING BACKFILLED OR BURIED. THE ENGINEER MAY REQUIRE MIX DUPLICATIONS RATHER THAN ON CONJECTURAL DESIGNS, SUBJECT TO APPROVAL OF THE ENGINEER. CONTRACTOR, AT NO ADDITIONAL COST, TO UNCOVER AND RE-COVER SUCH STRUCTURES IF THE HAVE BEEN BACKFILLED OR BURIED WITHOUT SUCH INSPECTION. 21. WHERE WORK REQUIRES EXISTING FEATURES TO BE REMOVED, CLEANED AND REUSED, PERFORM THESE OPERATIONS WITHOUT DAMAGE TO THE PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN MATERIALS THEMSELVES, TO ADJACENT MATERIALS, OR TO THE SUBSTRATE. WHEN CLEANING, MATCH SAMPLES OF EXISTING MATERIALS THAT HAVE 9. ALL STORM CHANNELS, DRAINS, AND SEWER SYSTEMS SHALL BE CLEANED UPON COMPLETION OF THE PROPOSED WORK. SEDIMENT, CHEMICALS, AND/OR CHARLOTTESVILLE, VIRGINIA GENERAL NOTES DEBRIS REMOVED FROM THESE SYSTEMS SHALL BE REMOVED AND DISPOSED OF PROPERLY. BEEN CLEANED AND IDENTIFIED FOR ACCEPTABLE CLEANING LEVELS. AVOID OVER CLEANING TO PREVENT DAMAGE TO EXISTING MATERIALS DURING CLEANING. 22. TEMPORARY MATERIALS MAY BE NEW OR USED, BUT MUST BE ADEQUATE IN FOR REQUIRED USAGE, MUST NOT CREATE UNSAFE CONDITIONS AND MUST MAINTENANCE OF TRAFFIC: NOT VIOLATE REQUIREMENTS OF APPLICABLE CODES AND STANDARDS. 1. TEMPORARY STREET CLOSURE PERMIT REQUIRED FOR CLOSURE OF SIDEWALKS, PARKING SPACES AND ROADWAYS AND IS SUBJECT TO APPROVAL BY THE 23. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE AND MAINTAIN ADEQUATE FIRE PROTECTION IN THE FORM OF FIRE EXTINGUISHER OR OTHER EFFECTIVE MEANS OF CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE TRAFFIC ENGINEER. EXTINGUISHING FIRE, READY FOR INSTANT USE, DISTRIBUTED AROUND THE PROJECT AND IN AND ABOUT TEMPORARY, INFLAMMABLE STRUCTURES 2. THE VIRGINIA WORK AREA PROTECTION MANUAL AND THE MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES (MUTCD) SHALL GOVERN ALL TEMPORARY DURING CONSTRUCTION OF WORK. EXISTING FIRE HOSE CONNECTIONS SHALL BE ACCESSIBLE AT ALL TIMES BY FIRE DEPARTMENT PERSONNEL. TRAFFIC CONTROL OPERATIONS THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT. ADHERENCE TO APPLICABLE PROVISIONS OF THE MANUAL IS REQUIRED MATERIAL SAND DEBRIS SHALL NOT BE STORED IN FRONT OF THE CONNECTION, THUS PREVENTING ACCESS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE OF THE CONTRACTOR EVEN THOUGH DETAILED REFERENCE TO ALL SUCH PROVISIONS MAY NOT BE CONTAINED IN THE PLANS. ACCESS PROCEDURES WITH THE FIRE MARSHALL. GENERAL NOTES 3. ALL EXISTING RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL ENTRANCES SHALL BE MAINTAINED AT ALL TIMES, UNLESS OTHERWISE DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER. N2 72 24. GASOLINE AND OTHER FLAMMABLE LIQUIDS SHALL BE STORED AND DISPENSED FROM UL LISTED SAFETY CONTAINERS IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE 6° .0 NATIONAL BOARD OF FIRE UNDERWRITERS' RECOMMENDATIONS. 4. NO TEMPORARY PAVEMENT MARKING SHALL BE ALLOWED ON THE FINAL ASPHALT SURFACE COURSE. 06 05 '1 0.4 5. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN ALL LANES OF TRAVEL OPEN FROM 6:30 AM TO 9:00 AM AND 3:00 PM TO 5:00 PM UNLESS DEEMED UNNECESSARY BY 4"W 25. SUBMITTALS ARE NOT REQUIRED IF CONTRACTOR ELECTS TO USE THE PROPRIETARY PRODUCTS LISTED. SUBMITTALS WILL BE REQUIRED IF CONTRACTOR THE ENGINEER. SHORT PERIODS OF ONE WAY FLAGGING OPERATIONS MAY BE CONDUCTED OUTSIDE THE HOURS MENTIONED ABOVE. WISHES TO USE ALTERNATE PRODUCTS. ALL ALTERNATE PRODUCTS ARE SUBJECT TO REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE ENGINEER AND OWNER. T-11318000 6. ALL TRAFFIC SIGNALS SHALL BE ADJUSTED AS DEEMED NECESSARY BY THE ENGINEER PRIOR TO ANY TRAFFIC CHANGES. N: 3897667.465 26. CONTRACTOR SHALL CALL MISS UTILITY AT 1-800-552-7001 BEFORE CONSTRUCTION COMMENCES. 7. WHEN WORK IN THE EXCAVATION AREA IS DISCONTINUED FOR A SHORT PERIOD OF TIME, AS AT NIGHT, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BACKFILL THE CUT AREAS E: 11490510.541 ADJACENT TO THE BUSTING PAVEMENT WITH A 'FILLET OF MATERIAL'. THE FILLET SHALL BE COMPOSED OF THE SAME MATERIAL (EXCAVATION, BORROW, ELEV: 447.36 27. TREE AND PLANT ROOTS OR BRANCHES THAT MAY INTERFERE WITH THE WORK SHALL BE TRIMMED OR CUT ONLY WITH THE APPROVAL OF THE OWNER BASE COURSE, ETC.) ALL COSTS FOR PLACING AND REMOVING THIS FILLET OF MATERIAL SHALL BE INCLUDED IN THE PRICE BID FOR OTHER BID ITEMS OF T-11315001 AND ENGINEER. ANY TREES OR PLANTS WHICH ARE SHOWN TO REMAIN THAT DO NOT INTERFERE WITH THE WORK, BUT ARE DAMAGED BY CONTRACTOR N: 3897593.593 WORK ON THIS PROJECT, AND NO ADDITIONAL CHARGE WILL BE ALLOWED. OR HIS SUB-CONTRACTORS, SHALL BE REPLACED BY CONTRACTOR AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. E: 11490583.003 8. EXISTING SURFACE, AGGREGATE BASE AND SUBBASE MATERIAL WHICH WILL BE DEMOLISHED OR OBLITERATED DURING CONSTRUCTION AND WHICH IS ELEV: 446.45 SUITABLE FOR MAINTENANCE OF TRAFFIC AS DETERMINED BY THE ENGINEER, SHALL BE SALVAGED AND UTILIZED FOR MAINTENANCE OF TRAFFIC PRIOR TO WORK AREA PROTECTION AND MAINTENANCE: THE USE OF COMMERCIAL MATERIAL. WHEN NOT SPECIFIED AS A SEPARATE PAY ITEM, THE REMOVAL AND SALVAGING OF EXISTING SURFACES AND AGGREGATE BASE AND SUBBASE MATERIAL WILL BE MEASURED AND PAID FOR AS REGULAR EXCAVATION IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 303 OF THE VDOT 1. CLEARING AND GRUBBING SHALL BE CONFINED TO THOSE AREAS NEEDED FOR CONSTRUCTION, AND AS SHOWN IN THE DRAWINGS. ROAD AND BRIDGE SPECIFICATIONS. N BENCHMARK TIE-DOWN 2. DISTURBED AREAS BEYOND THE ROADWAY CURB AND WHERE INDICATED ON THE PLANS SHALL RECEIVE TOPSOIL AS NECESSARY AND AS DIRECTED. 9. CONSTRUCT ALL INTERSECTIONS AND DRIVEWAYS UNDER TRAFFIC. 1 1" = 20': 0 20 40 SEEDING MIXTURE SHALL BE DETERMINED BY THE VIRGINIA EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL HANDBOOK SECTION 3.32 10. IF USED, TEMPORARY TRAFFIC BARRIER SERVICE SHALL BE INSTALLED AND REMOVED SO AS NOT TO PRESENT ANY BLUNT END OR HAZARD TO THE 3. CONTRACTOR IS PERMITTED TO WORK IN THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY AND ANY TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT EASEMENT SHOWN ON THE PLANS. MOTORING PUBLIC. HOWEVER, CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY PROPERTY OWNER(S) FORTY-EIGHT (48) HOURS PRIOR TO WORKING ON ANY PRIVATE PROPERTY TO COORDINATE ACCESS AND TO DETERMINE A STORAGE AREA FOR MATERIALS IF NEEDED. COORDINATION OF ACCESS TO PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY AND STORAGE OF 11. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY TRANSIT PROVIDERS A MINIMUM OF TWO WEEKS PRIOR TO ANY IMPACT OR DISRUPTION TO REGULAR SERVICE OR STOPS. GENERAL SURVEY NOTES: MATERIALS THEREON SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH THE ENGINEER. CONTRACTOR'S FAILURE TO NOTIFY AND COORDINATE WITH PROPERTY OWNERS 12. ALL EXISTING PAVEMENT MARKINGS CONFLICTING WITH PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION PAVEMENT MARKINGS (IF USED) SHALL BE ERADICATED. AND/OR THE ENGINEER MAY RESULT IN DELAYS. NO ADDITIONAL COMPENSATION OR TIME FOR PERFORMANCE WILL BE GIVEN FOR ANY SUCH DELAYS. 13. INSTALLATION AND REMOVAL OF TEMPORARY TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SECTION 6G.25 OF THE WORK AREA TOPOGRAPHY SOURCE: ACTUAL GROUND SURVEY (SEE ATTACHED SURVEY) 4. CONTRACTOR SHALL, AT HIS EXPENSE, MAINTAIN THE WORK SITE IN A CLEAN AND ORDERLY APPEARANCE AT ALL TIMES. ALL DEBRIS AND SURPLUS PROTECTION MANUAL. BASIS OF DATUM: HORIZONTAL: NAD-83 VIRGINIA SOUTH ZONE (GPS DERIVED) MATERIAL COLLECTED SHALL BE DISPOSED OF OFF THE WORK SITE BY CONTRACTOR, AT HIS EXPENSE. VERTICAL: NAVD-88 (GPS DERIVED) 14. USE APPROPRIATE SIGNS TO SHIFT PEDESTRIAN TRAFFIC AS NEEDED. 5. EXISTING LAWNS, TREES, SHRUBS, FENCES, UTILITIES, CULVERTS, WALLS, WALKS, DRIVEWAYS, POLES, SIGNS, RIGHT-OF-WAY MONUMENTS, MAILBOXES BENCHMARKS: (SEE IMAGES ABOVE) 15. CONTRACTOR SHALL ASSURE ENDS OF TEMPORARY CONCRETE BARRIER (IF USED) DO NOT OBSTRUCT INTERSECTION SIGHT LINES. AND THE LIKE SHALL BE PROTECTED FROM DAMAGE DURING THE WORK. ANY DAMAGE CAUSED TO SUCH ITEMS SHALL BE REPAIRED OR REPLACED BY CONTRACTOR AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. PROPERTY PINS DISTURBED BY CONTRACTOR THAT ARE NOT SHOWN ON THE PLANS TO BE DISTURBED SHALL BE 08/06/2021 6. RESTORED BY LICENSED SURVEYOR AT THE CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE. MEASURES TO CONTROL EROSION AND SEDIMENT SHALL BE PROVIDED PURSUANT TO AND IN COMPLIANCE WITH CURRENT FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL FIRE PREVENTION: DANIEL C. HYER Lic. No. 45596 REGULATIONS. THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THE CONSTRUCTION PLANS AND/OR APPROVAL OF THE PLANS SHALL IN NO WAY RELIEVE THE 1. SMOKING SHALL ONLY BE ALLOWED IN DESIGNATED SPACES WITH PROPER RECEPTACLES. "NO SMOKING" SIGNS SHALL BE POSTED AT EACH BUILDING SITE CONTRACTOR OR HIS AGENT OF ANY LEGAL RESPONSIBILITY WHICH MAY BE REQUIRED BY THE CODE OF VIRGINIA OR ANY ORDINANCE ENACTED BY THE AND WITHIN EACH BUILDING DURING CONSTRUCTION PER VIRGINIA STATEWIDE FIRE PREVENTION CODE. CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE THE NECESSARY DIVERSION DITCHES, DIKES, OR TEMPORARY CULVERTS REQUIRED TO 2. OVERHEAD WIRING OR OTHER OVERHEAD OBSTRUCTIONS SHALL NOT BE LOWER THAN 13 FEET 6 INCHES OVER A PUBLIC STREET PER THE VIRGINIA PREVENT MUD AND DEBRIS FROM BEING WASHED ONTO THE STREETS OR ADJACENT PROPERTY. CONTRACTOR'S VEHICLES SHALL BE KEPT CLEAN TO STATEWIDE FIRE PREVENTION CODE. PREVENT MUD OR DUST FROM BEING DEPOSITED ON STREETS. NO AREA SHALL BE LEFT DENUDED FOR MORE THAN SEVEN (7) CALENDAR DAYS. 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL ENSURE THAT BUILDING STREET NUMBERS ARE PLAINLY VISIBLE FROM THE FRONTAGE STREET AT ALL TIMES DURING CONSTRUCTION 7. CONTRACTOR SHALL CLEAN UP, RESTORE, SEED AND MAINTAIN ALL DISTURBED AREAS IMMEDIATELY UPON COMPLETION OF WORK. TOPSOIL SEED, FOR EMERGENCY RESPONDERS, PER VIRGINIA STATEWIDE FIRE PREVENTION CODE. APPROVED DCH FERTILIZER AND MULCH SHALL BE PLACED IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE STANDARDS ON ALL DISTURBED AREAS. A PERMANENT STAND OF GRASS ADEQUATE TO PREVENT EROSION SHALL BE ESTABLISHED PRIOR TO FINAL ACCEPTANCE. ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROLS 4. AN APPROVED WATER SUPPLY FOR FIRE PROTECTION SHALL BE MADE AVAILABLE AS SOON AS COMBUSTIBLE MATERIALS ARRIVE ON SITE. WASTE AND COMBUSTIBLE DEBRIS SHALL BE REMOVED FROM THE BUILDING AT THE END OF EACH DAY AND DISPOSED OF IN ACCORDANCE WITH VIRGINIA STATEWIDE SUBMISSION NO. 3 SHALL BE REMOVED WITHIN 30 DAYS AFTER THE PROJECT IS STABILIZED. (MS-18) FIRE PREVENTION CODE. PROJECT 2011001 8. FOR FURTHER REQUIREMENTS AND DETAILS OF TREE PRESERVATION, PLANTING, EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL, REFER TO THE VIRGINIA EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL HANDBOOK. 5. OPERATIONS INVOLVING THE USE OF CUTTING AND WELDING SHALL BE DONE IN ACCORDANCE WITH CHAPTER 35 OF THE VIRGINIA STATEWIDE FIRE PREVENTION CODE. T H E W O R K O F 9. AN EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL CERTIFIED RESPONSIBLE LAND DISTURBER (CRLD) IS REQUIRED FOR ALL LAND DISTURBANCE ACTIVITIES. 6. FIRE EXTINGUISHERS SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH NOT LESS THAN ONE APPROVED PORTABLE FIRE EXTINGUISHER AT EACH STAIRWAY ON ALL FLOOR LEVELS L I N E + G R A D E 10. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROPERLY INSTALL AND MAINTAIN EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROLS FOR THE LIFE OF THE PROJECT; AND ROUTINELY CHECK WHERE COMBUSTIBLE MATERIALS HAVE ACCUMULATED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE VIRGINIA STATEWIDE FIRE PREVENTION CODE. CONTROL DEVICES BEFORE, DURING AND AFTER STORM EVENTS. 7. VEHICULAR ACCESS FOR FIRE FIGHTING SHALL BE PROVIDED AT ALL CONSTRUCTION AND DEMOLITION SITES AND TO WITHIN 100 FEET OF TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTIONS. VEHICULAR ACCESS SHALL BE CAPABLE OF SUPPORTING FIRE APPARATUS AND VEHICLE LOADING UNDER ALL WEATHER CONDITIONS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE VIRGINIA STATEWIDE FIRE PREVENTION CODE. C0.1 © 2018 - LINE+GRADE, LLC PROPOSED LEGEND EXISTING SANITARY CENTERLINE WATER CENTERLINE STORM SEWER GAS LINE UNDERGROUND POWER UNDERGROUND COMMUNICATIONS OVERHEAD UTILITY 382 CONTOUR LINE 382 CURB/CURB AND GUTTER SPILL CURB WITH TRANSITION AREA PAVEMENT MARKING LINE BUILDING LINE BUILDING OVERHEAD/PROJECTION WALL TREELINE PROPERTY LINE EASEMENT LINE BUILDING SETBACK LINE ROAD CENTERLINE CHANNEL CENTERLINE ZONING NOTES: SITE IS SUBJECT TO SPECIAL USE PERMIT SP19-00011 ALLOWING A COMMON BERM CENTERLINE PLAN OF DEVELOPMENT INCLUDING: 1. THREE (3) BUILDINGS, TO BE CONSTRUCTED AS SINGLE-FAMILY DWELLINGS (THE "SDFS"), EACH ON ITS OWN SEPARATE LOT AND WITH LOD LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE EACH BUILDING FRONTING ON LYMAN STREET; LYMAN STREET RESIDENCES 2. EACH LOT CONTAINING A SINGLE-FAMILY DWELLING SHALL HAVE AN DRAINAGE DIVIDE AREA NO LESS THAN 2500 SQUARE FEET (SF) AND NO MORE THAN 3500 SF; EACH SUCH LOT SHALL HAVE FRONTAGE ON LYMAN STREET OF NO LESS THAN 34 FEET AND NO MORE THAN 65 FEET; AND EACH SUCH LOT UTILITY POLE SITE CALCULATIONS SHALL HAVE SIDE YARDS OF AT LEAST 2 FEET, BUT NO REQUIRED FRONT PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN OR REAR YARD AREAS; CHARLOTTESVILLE, VIRGINIA ADA ACCESS PATH AND LANDING 3. EACH SINGLE-FAMILY LOT, AND THE LAND ON WHICH IT IS CONSTRUCTED, MAY BE USED AND OCCUPIED IN ANY MANNER AUTHORIZED WITHIN §34-420 OF THE R-2 ZONING DISTRICT DETECTABLE WARNING STRIP REGULATIONS, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, INTERNAL ACCESSORY APARTMENTS; 4. THE LAND AREA CURRENTLY IDENTIFIED AS TAX PARCEL 358E WILL NOT SIGN CONTAIN ANY BUILDINGS OR STRUCTURES (OTHER THAN THE SFDS), AND WILL BE USED PREDOMINANTLY FOR ACCESS AND PARKING FOR 12 4 PARKING/HANDICAP PARKING COUNTER 26 3 THE SFDS DESCRIBED ABOVE AND AS LANDSCAPED OPEN SPACE WITH PLANTINGS, AND FOR ANY ADDITIONAL DRIVEWAY OR PARKING AS MAY BE NECESSARY TO SERVE INTERNAL ACCESSORY APARTMENTS ENTRYWAY/INGRESS/EGRESS SYMBOL ESTABLISHED WITHIN THE SFDS; AND 5. THE GENERAL DESIGN AND HEIGHT OF ALL BUILDINGS, THE LAYOUT OF TREE THE ENTIRE DEVELOPMENT AREA, AND THE CHARACTERISTICS OF THE DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE IN ALL MATERIAL ASPECTS THE SAME AS DEPICTED WITHIN THE SITE PLAN DATED DECEMBER 21, 2018, REVISED SHRUB FEBRUARY 28, 2019, AND THE NARRATIVE MATERIALS ACCOMPANYING APPLICATION NO. SP19-00011 CONCRETE BMP RIPRAP ABBREVIATIONS AC ACRES LP LOW POINT ADJ ADJUST LVC LENGTH OF VERTICAL CURVE APPROX APPROXIMATE MAX MAXIMUM BC BACK OF CURB MIN MINIMUM BLDG BUILDING ME MATCH EXISTING BM BENCHMARK NIC NOT IN CONTRACT BVCS BEGIN VERTICAL CURVE STATION N.T.S. NOT TO SCALE BVCE BEGIN VERTICAL CURVE ELEVATION OC ON CENTER BW BOTTOM OF WALL OD OUTSIDE DIAMETER CL CENTERLINE O/S OFFSET CF CUBIC FEET PC POINT OF CURVATURE PCC POINT OF COMPOUND CURVATURE 08/06/2021 CG CURB AND GUTTER CONC CONCRETE PI POINT OF INTERSECTION DANIEL C. HYER Lic. No. 45596 D OR Δ DELTA ANGLE PRC POINT OF REVERSE CURVATURE DIA DIAMETER PROP PROPOSED EC EDGE OF CONCRETE PT POINT OF TANGENCY EG EXISTING GRADE PVC POINT OF VERTICAL CURVATURE EL/ELEV ELEVATION PVI POINT OF VERTICAL INTERSECTION EP EDGE OF PAVEMENT PVT POINT OF VERTICAL TANGENCY APPROVED DCH EVCS END VERTICAL CURVE STATION R RADIUS EVCE END VERTICAL CURVE ELEVATION ROW RIGHT-OF-WAY SUBMISSION NO. 3 EX EXISTING SAN SANITARY SEWER FG FINISHED GRADE SD STORM DRAIN PROJECT 2011001 FND FOUNDATION SF SQUARE FEET SMH SANITARY MANHOLE T H E W O R K O F GRVL GRAVEL STA STATION L I N E + G R A D E HC HANDICAP HP HIGH POINT SW SIDEWALK ID INSIDE DIAMETER TC TOP OF CURB C0.2 INV INVERT TEMP TEMPORARY LAT LATERAL THT THROAT LF LINEAR FEET TW TOP OF WALL LOD LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE TYP TYPICAL WSEL WATER SURFACE ELEVATION © 2018 - LINE+GRADE, LLC 438.94 CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC. 437.49 436.94 436.50 438.54 EX. MANMADE DRAINAGE SWALE 437.59 438.17 435.26 434.78 S69°09'12"E 435.38 436.84 436.48 436.05 435.59 0.99' LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE COINCIDES WITH PROPERTY LINE CRITICAL SLOPES WITHIN LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE = 2,415 SF 439.32 441.91 439.40 IF IF S55°48'53"E IF S55°46'05"E IF VEPCO UP 437.83 145.72' 437.83 40.39' S27°06'29"W G0025 LOD 9598 SF 437.67 PE26 43LOCUST 7.64 TREE GUY 4.67' EXISTING 8" LOCUST TREE 437.86 EXISTING 18" 437.61 437.57 TO BE REMOVED TO BE REMOVED VEPCO UP IF 437.78 G0025 OHE UTILITY TRENCH IN CITY RIGHT OF PE27 N26°47'0 TMP 58-289.2 PARCEL "X" 15' WATERLINE ESMT WAY FOR SANITARY BORING 440.69 S25°59'05"W D.B. 876 P. 618 PLAT 30.10' bkkw, llc EXISTING OVERHEAD UTILITY LINES TO BE RELOCATED 447.53 5,620.39 S.F. 4-18LOC40 442.72 10.42' db 2012 pg 1696 8LOC30 441.66 IF 4MAP20 2"E 448.42 T-11318014 zone: r2 N: 3897742.573 EXISTING 17" ASH TREE use: vacant E: 11490446.028 443.46 O ODS TO BE REMOVED BOXW 443.75 ELEV: 447.80 EXISTING 4" MAPLE TREE WGR GRAVEL LO ET 444.74 TO BE REMOVED GUY M AN STRE LY CLOSED) EXISTING PROPERTY LINE TO BE ABANDONED EXISTING TREELINE TO BE DEMOLISHED 4MAP20 S26°21'10"W ( 448.03 15.13' 146.90' IF 40.42' MNS IF N55°7650'49"W 444.20 N55°50'49"W T 443.58 447.61 NEW TOTAL: 8,612.76 S.F. T-11318000 N26°763 2-17ASH38 S26°13'3 TMP 58-358E N: 3897667.465 LOD 9598 SF PARCEL B5 E: 11490510.541 445.42 20.27' 446.51 20.83' 447.72 BKKW LLC ELEV: 447.36 446.55 PORTION OF DISTURBANCE 448.40 2,992.37 S.F. 3'54"E 9 ON CITY PROPERTY 447.35 db 1072 pg 878 DRAINAGE EASEMENT 445.84 "W EXISTING PAVEMENT AND 8" CI GATE CONCRETE APRON TO BE REMOVED zone: r2 EXISTING CURB TO BE DEMOLISHED D.B. 971 P. 294, 296 PLAT 444.78 TMP 58 89 use: vacant TO BE ABDANDONED EP DAB INV-2 .1 FOR PROPOSED ENTRANCES E 8" CI EX. SIGN WV EX. SIGN D.B. 64 ST M ENTS, INC. 146.94' WV 444.34 D.B. 6192 PP.. 162 448.83 EP N56°04'11"W 8" CI 447.06 PORTION OF DISTURBANCE INST. 20080 616-619 PLAT 449.26 448.33 447.70 IS ON CITY PROPERTY 02952 CFL MNS 449.39 CONC APRON 6" CI WV 445.78 24' ACCESS ESMT D.B. 876 P. 618 PLAT 448.35 WV EXISTING CG-2 TO REMAIN 6" CI SAWCUT EXISTING PAVEMENT T-11315000 448.62 6" CI N: 3897714.197 CONTRACTOR TO POTHOLE EX. LYMAN STREET TMP 58-358 21.5' 22.79' E: 11490424.783 UTILITIES PRIOR TO BORING 23.8' 30' row 446.40 the belmont loft company, llc PE EXISTING CONDITIONS AND DEMOLITION ELEV: 448.80 446.66 DB 2019 PG 3035 WV 447.62 2" ZONE: PUD T-11315001 USE: RESIDENTIAL D 446.77 T RESERVSET. N: 3897593.593 N N VEPCO UP E: 11490583.003 ASEMTEING LYMA 30' EE G0025 ELEV: 446.45 I S LYMAN STREET RESIDENCES X FOR ATION CE86 RD 449.25 LOC OE86 449.63 DOUGLAS AVEN GUY EX. SIGN GUY 449.68 CSW 448.60 TITLE REFERENCES FOR TMP 58-289.2 FH CSW 449.25 CSW 40' R/W 449.81 448.43 (PARCEL "X"): PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN 448.67 BRUCE R. WARDELL, ARCHITECT, P.C. GUY WM 112 4TH ST. NE CHARLOTTESVILLE, VIRGINIA 448.51 CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA 22902 450.58 GUY INST. NO. 2010000710 D.B. 515 P. 680, 681 PLAT 6" 450.58 10' ALLE D.B. 5 P. 371 UE CI D.B. 5 P. 204 448.06 D.B. 5 P. 17 S.C.B. 2 P. 14 Y 6" BORING FOR FORCEMAIN 449.13 449.03 TITLE REFERENCES FOR TMP 58-358E CONNECTION (PARCEL B5): BKKW, LLC 112 4TH ST. NE CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA 22902 TMP 58-358A TMP 58-358B TMP 58-358C D.B. 1072 P. 878 JOHN STEPHEN HUFF JOHN STEPHEN HUFF LOUISE MARIA VAN RIEL D.B. 971 P. 294, 296 PLAT D.B. 515 P. 668 DB 2009 PG 3012 DB 2018 PG 558 DB 2016 PG 4250 D.B. 16 P. 342 ZONE: PUD ZONE: PUD ZONE: PUD VEPCO UP D.B. 5 P. 371 G0025 D.B. 5 P. 204 USE: RESIDENTIAL USE: RESIDENTIAL USE: RESIDENTIAL PE15 D.B. 5 P. 17 N EXISTING CONDITIONS AND DEMOLITION PLAN 1 1" = 10': 0 10 20 LEGEND LOD LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE DEMOLISH CONCRETE SAWCUT REMOVE TREE UTILITY TRENCH SANITARY BORING LOCATION 08/06/2021 CRITICAL SLOPES DANIEL C. HYER Lic. No. 45596 SOILS 91 - URBAN LAND, HSG D LOD 80 SF CONTRACTOR TO POTHOLE EX. UTILITY PRIOR TO BORING APPROVED DCH SUBMISSION NO. 3 UTILITY TRENCH IN CITY RIGHT OF WAY PROJECT 2011001 6" P T H E W O R K O F VC L I N E + G R A D E SMH AA RIM = 459.28 6" PVC INV IN = 453.28 8" PVC INV IN = 455.28 8" PVC INV OUT = 452.3 8" PVC 8 C1.0 8" PVC © 2018 - LINE+GRADE, LLC CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC. DOWNSPOUT SPLASHBLOCK CIP RETAINING WALL OR RIVER ROCK 2 FT SIDE BUILDING SETBACK URBAN CIP RETAINING WALL URBAN URBAN PER SP19-00011 BIORETENTION CELL BIORETENTION CELL BIORETENTION CELL (92 SF) (92 SF) (92 SF) IF IF IF IF RIP-RAP RIP-RAP 437.67 IF 15' WATERLINE ESMT D.B. 876 P. 618 PLAT ES-1 3' UNIT C UNIT A UNIT B A 915 SF 4MAP20 PROP. LOT AREA IF 915 SF CURB 8" HT. 915 SF 36" NYLOPLAST OUTLET BOLLARDS 3,122 SF PROP. LOT AREA PROP. LOT AREA CONTROL STRUCTURE BOLLARD ODS BOXWO 2,764 SF CURB 8" HT. CAR PARK 2,727 SF CAR PARK CAR PARK 16' 16' WGR GRAVEL LO 24" NYLOPLAST INLET STREET M AN LY CLOSED) ( 10' 3' 3' 10' 6' 10' 3' IF MNS IF N 34°03'34" E 50.50' 444.20 T N 33°55'45" E 50.30' PROPOSED PROPERTY BOUNDARY PROPOSED PROPERTY NEW GUY WIRE PERMEABLE DRIVEWAY BOUNDARY PAVERS (TYP.) NEW UTILITY POLE LOCATION GATE 1.5' TMP 58 89 3' 3.5' DAB INV-2 .1 EX. SIGN WV EX. SIGN D.B. 642ESPTMENTS, INC. WV D.B. 619 P.. 162 INST. 20080 616-619 PLAT IS 02952 CFL 10' 10' 6' 10' WV 24' ACCESS ESMT D.B. 876 P. 618 PLAT RE-2 PROPOSED VARIABLE WIDTH EX. NO PARKING SIGN TO WV REMAIN PERMEABLE EX STOP SIGN, NO PARKING SIGN, AND NEW CG-2 PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT PAVERS (TYP.) STREET NAME SIGNS TO REMAIN LYMAN STREET TMP 58-358 30' row RELOCATED OVERHEAD the belmont loft company, llc WV UTILITY LINE DB 2019 PG 3035 ZONE: PUD D USE: RESIDENTIAL T R ESERVSET. N N VEPCO UP ASEMTEING LYMA 30' EE G0025 I S LYMAN STREET RESIDENCES X FOR ATION CE86 RD LOC OE86 DOUGLAS AVEN CSW EX. SIGN FH CSW CSW 40' R/W PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN WM CHARLOTTESVILLE, VIRGINIA 10' ALLEY UE SITE PLAN PROPOSED 10 FT PRIVATE SANITARY EASEMENT COINCIDING WITH ALLEY WIDTH TMP 58-358A TMP 58-358B TMP 58-358C JOHN STEPHEN HUFF JOHN STEPHEN HUFF LOUISE MARIA VAN RIEL DB 2009 PG 3012 DB 2018 PG 558 DB 2016 PG 4250 ZONE: PUD ZONE: PUD ZONE: PUD VEPCO UP USE: RESIDENTIAL USE: RESIDENTIAL USE: RESIDENTIAL G0025 PE15 N SITE PLAN 1 1" = 10': 0 10 20 LEGEND EX. CONCRETE PROP. CONCRETE PERMEABLE WALKWAY PERMEABLE DRIVEWAY PAVERS URBAN BIORETENTION SURFACE 08/06/2021 DANIEL C. HYER Lic. No. 45596 APPROVED DCH SUBMISSION NO. 3 PROJECT 2011001 T H E W O R K O F L I N E + G R A D E C3.0 © 2018 - LINE+GRADE, LLC LYMAN STREET RESIDENCES CG-2 PP-1 PAVEMENT PATCH CG-12B 1 2 3 PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN SITE PLAN DETAILS CHARLOTTESVILLE, VIRGINIA CIP RETAINING WALL 1" ROUNDING OF CONCRETE DOWNSPOUT RESIDENTIAL MONOLITHIC 8" CURB PROPERTY BEYOND 6" x 7'-6" LONG SCHEDULE 80 STEEL PIPE FILLED WITH CONCRETE. HOT DIPPED GALVANIZED AND PAINTED BLACK. PROVIDE POSTS AS INDICATED ON PLAN. BOLLARD URBAN 4'-6" BIORETENTION CELL POURED CONCRETE SLOPE TO (3,500 P.S.I.) DRAIN EXPANSION 08/06/2021 JOINT (TYP) DANIEL C. HYER Lic. No. 45596 3'-0" APPROVED DCH #5 BAR, 12" LONG SUBMISSION NO. 3 THROUGH PIPE PROJECT 2011001 6" T H E W O R K O F 1.5' DIA. L I N E + G R A D E RE-2 ENTRANCE ACROSS CURB AND GUTTER (2 OF 2) TYPE I BOLLARD SITE SECTION A 4 5 6 1" = 2': 0 2 4 C3.1 © 2018 - LINE+GRADE, LLC CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC. 436 437 438 CIP RETAINING WALL TW = 448.1 436 438 BW = 438 437 440 URBAN CIP RETAINING WALL URBAN URBAN BIORETENTION CELL TW = 449.1 BIORETENTION CELL BIORETENTION CELL TW 441.16 BW = 439 IF IF IF IF TW 442.50 439 RIP-RAP 437.67 441.75 440.75 440.75 439.00 IF 442 445 439 15' WATERLINE ESMT 440 D.B. 876 P. 618 PLAT 441 448.68 442 447.18 446.99 IF 4MAP20 TC 449.65 TC 448.67 447.11 443 UNIT A UNIT B UNIT C 444 444.20 BFE 440 BFE 439 BFE 438 ODS FFE 449 CAR PARK FFE 448 CAR PARK CAR PARK FFE 447 443.00 BOXWO WGR GRAVEL LO 44 STREET 444.50 7 M AN LY CLOSED) 445 ( 448.63 448.26 447.60 447.17 446.91 446.44 IF MNS IF 448 444.20 T 449.00 448.00 447.00 446 2 FT WIDE BERM ELEV. 444.50' 447 448 447.70 446.90 446.63 GATE 44 5 TMP 58 89 DAB INV-2 .1 EX. SIGN WV 447 EX. SIGN D.B. 642ESPTMENTS, INC. 448.24 448.14 447.59 WV 447.20 D.B. 619 P.. 162 INST. 20080 616-619 PLAT 448.50 448.60 448.35 448.22 447.59 447.32 IS 02952 CFL 447.55 447.40 447.31 WV 24' ACCESS ESMT 448.20 448.10 447.17 D.B. 876 P. 618 PLAT WV 44 7 LYMAN STREET TMP 58-358 30' row 448 the belmont loft company, llc WV DB 2019 PG 3035 449 ZONE: PUD D USE: RESIDENTIAL T R ESERVSET. N N VEPCO UP ASEMTEING LYMA 30' EE G0025 I S LYMAN STREET RESIDENCES X FOR ATION CE86 RD LOC OE86 DOUGLAS AVEN CSW EX. SIGN FH CSW CSW 40' R/W PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN WM CHARLOTTESVILLE, VIRGINIA GRADING PLAN 10' ALLEY UE TMP 58-358A TMP 58-358B TMP 58-358C JOHN STEPHEN HUFF JOHN STEPHEN HUFF LOUISE MARIA VAN RIEL DB 2009 PG 3012 DB 2018 PG 558 DB 2016 PG 4250 ZONE: PUD ZONE: PUD ZONE: PUD VEPCO UP USE: RESIDENTIAL USE: RESIDENTIAL USE: RESIDENTIAL G0025 PE15 N GRADING PLAN 1 1" = 10': 0 10 20 LEGEND 382 EX. CONTOUR 382 PROP. CONTOUR CHANNEL CENTERLINE CRITICAL SLOPES 08/06/2021 DANIEL C. HYER Lic. No. 45596 APPROVED DCH SUBMISSION NO. 3 PROJECT 2011001 T H E W O R K O F L I N E + G R A D E C4.0 © 2018 - LINE+GRADE, LLC CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC. 436 437 438 DOWNSPOUT TO SPLASHBLOCK 436 438 DOWNSPOUT TO SPLASHBLOCK OR RIVER ROCK OR RIVER ROCK 437 440 1.5" DR 11 IPS HDPE FORCE 6" PERFORATED PVC 1.5" DR 11 IPS HDPE FORCE SEWER 6" PERFORATED PVC 1.5" DR 11 IPS HDPE FORCE SEWER LATERAL FOR UNIT A LATERAL FOR UNIT B SEWER LATERAL FOR UNIT C APS MODEL APC CLUSTER END IF IF SEAL OR SIMILAR IF 15" HDPE VEPCO UP IF RIP-RAP G0025 437.67 RIP-RAP PE26 GUY VEPCO UP IF G0025 OHE 445 PE27 15' WATERLINE ESMT D.B. 876 P. 618 PLAT ES-1 UNIT C 45° HORZ BEND UNIT A UNIT B BFE 438 4MAP20 FFE 447 IF NYLOPLAST 36" OUTLET BFE 440 BFE 439 FFE 449 FFE 448 CONTROL STRUCTURE ODS CAR PARK CAR PARK CAR PARK BOXWO WGR GRAVEL LO 44 24" NYLOPLAST INLET STREET GUY 7 M AN LY CLOSED) 15" HDPE ( IF 6" PERFORATED PVC IF MNS NEW44 4.2WIRE T FORCED LATERALS CONNECT TO CITY GUY 0 SEWER MAIN WITHIN 6" HDPE CONDUIT DIRECTIONAL BORE TO EX. MANHOLE STORMTANK M20 (3) NEW UNDERGROUND NEW UTILITY POLE 7' ELECTRIC GATE 8" CI 44 5 TMP 58 89 DAB INV-2 .1 8" CI EX. SIGN WV EX. SIGN D.B. 642ESPTMENTS, INC. WV D.B. 619 P.. 162 8" CI INST. 20080 616-619 PLAT IS 02952 CFL RELOCATED OVERHEAD WV UTILITY LINE 24' ACCESS ESMT PROPOSED VARIABLE WIDTH CORPORATION STOP CORPORATION STOP 6" CI CORPORATION STOP D.B. 876 P. 618 PLAT C I WV WITH 5/8" WM 6" PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT WITH 5/8" WM WITH 5/8" WM 44 7 6" CI CONTRACTOR TO POTHOLE EX. UTILITIES PRIOR TO BORING LYMAN STREET TMP 58-358 30' row 448 the belmont loft company, llc PE WV DB 2019 PG 3035 2" 6" SCH 8 449 ZONE: PUD D USE: RESIDENTIAL T R ESERVSET. N N VEPCO UP ASEMTEING LYMA 30' EE 0 HDPE I S G0025 LYMAN STREET RESIDENCES X FOR ATION CE86 RD LOC OE86 DOUGLAS AVEN GUY CSW EX. SIGN GUY CSW FH CSW 40' R/W PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN GUY WM CHARLOTTESVILLE, VIRGINIA GUY UTILITY PLAN 6" 10' ALLEY UE CI PROPOSED 10 FT PRIVATE SANITARY EASEMENT COINCIDING WITH ALLEY WIDTH TMP 58-358A TMP 58-358B TMP 58-358C JOHN STEPHEN HUFF JOHN STEPHEN HUFF LOUISE MARIA VAN RIEL DB 2009 PG 3012 DB 2018 PG 558 DB 2016 PG 4250 ZONE: PUD ZONE: PUD ZONE: PUD VEPCO UP USE: RESIDENTIAL USE: RESIDENTIAL USE: RESIDENTIAL G0025 PE15 N UTILITY PLAN 1 1" = 10': 0 10 20 LEGEND PROP. 6" DIP SANITARY CASING PROP. FORCED SANITARY LATERAL PROP. STORM SEWER PROP. OVERHEAD ELECTRIC LINE PROP. UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC LINE PROP. WATER SERVICE LINE AND METER 6" SCH 8 08/06/2021 DANIEL C. HYER 0 Lic. No. 45596 HDPE CONTRACTOR TO POTHOLE EX. UTILITY PRIOR TO BORING APPROVED DCH SUBMISSION NO. 3 PROJECT 2011001 6" P T H E W O R K O F VC L I N E + G R A D E SMH AA RIM = 459.28 6" PVC INV IN = 453.28 8" PVC INV IN = 455.28 8" PVC INV OUT = 452.3 8" PVC APS MODEL APC CLUSTER END SEAL OR SIMILAR 8 C5.0 8" PVC (3) DR 11 IPS HDPE LATERALS INV IN 452.72' © 2018 - LINE+GRADE, LLC 465 465 PROP (3) 4" PVC IN 452.72' EX 8" PVC OUT 452.38' EX. 8" CI WATER MAIN EX 6" PVC IN 453.28' EX 8" PVC IN 455.28' EX 6" CI WATER MAIN PROP. 45° HORZ BEND EX SAN MH AA EX 6" PVC SAN. RIM 459.28' STA 0+27.54 STA 1+43.72 STA 1+34.56 STA 1+74.48 STA 0+00 LATERAL 460 460 UTILITY DETAILS AND PROFILES LYMAN STREET RESIDENCES 455 455 PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN 4" SCHEDULE 40 PVC CHARLOTTESVILLE, VIRGINIA MIN 2% SLOPE 4"X1.5" REDUCER AND 11.25° VERT BEND SEE DETAIL 2 / C5.1 EX. GRADE STA=0+05.34 EL=452.96 16 450 8. 450 9 9 INV. IN 452.72 LF (MATCH CROWNS 6" S CH TO EX. 8" PVC OUT) 80 HD P E CA SI N G W ITH (3 )1 .5 "D R 11 IP S HD 445 PE 445 F OR CE M AIN LA TER ALS EN CL OS ED EXISTING MANHOLE 11.25° VERT. BEND (SEE PLAN FOR HORZ. BENDS) 7" 4"X1.5" REDUCER 6" APS MODEL APC CLUSTER END SEAL OR 440 440 SIMILAR 2" (3) ACTIVE LATERALS 08/06/2021 6" SCH 80 HDPE DANIEL C. HYER (3) 1.5" DR 11 IPS HDPE PLASTIC CASING SPACER Lic. No. 45596 LATERALS, SEE SECTION A WESTATLANTIC TECH CORP WA-NM-M-CASING SPACER WITH ROLLER WHEELS OR SIMILAR. CASING SPACERS 8' NOTES: 16.11 LF 6" SCH 80 HDPE CASING WITH (3) 1.5" DR 11 O.C. ALONG HDPE JOINT. 1. EXISTING WATER LINES ASSUMED AT 3 FT IPS HDPE FORCE MAIN LATERALS ENCLOSED DEPTH. A (3) 1.5" HDPE FORCE LATERALS APPROVED DCH 2. CONTRACTOR TO FIELD VERIFY ELEVATIONS WITHIN 6" HDPE. SUBMISSION NO. 3 OF ALL EXISTING UTILITY CROSSINGS PRIOR STA=1+90.87 (3) 4" SCHEDULE 40 PVC LINES TO GRAVITY OUTSIDE DIAMETERS SHOWN TO TO BORING FOR SANITARY CONNECTION. EL=438.08 FLOW INTO MANHOLE (MIN 2% SLOPE) SCALE . PROJECT 2011001 3. MAINTAIN MINIMUM 1 FT VERTICAL DISTANCE BETWEEN UTILITIES. T H E W O R K O F 0+00 0+50 1+00 1+50 2+00 2+10 L I N E + G R A D E PROPOSED SANITARY PROFILE CONNECTION DETAIL SECTION A 1 2 3 H: 1" = 20': 0 V: 1" = 2': 0 20 2 40 4 C5.1 © 2018 - LINE+GRADE, LLC CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC. POINT OF ANALYSIS 1 436 437 EXISTING MANMADE DRAINAGE SWALE CHANNEL 436 438 STORMWATER NARRATIVE: 437 438 THE LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE ARE USED AS DRAINAGE AREAS FOR THE ANALYSIS OF THIS 438 SITE, SINCE THERE IS NO UPSTREAM DRAINAGE AREA THAT WILL BE AFFECTED BY 439 CHANGES IN DRAINAGE PATTERNS. THE TIME OF CONCENTRATION REMAINS SIX (6) IF IF IF MINUTES FROM PRE TO POST DEVELOPMENT. EXISTING SOILS ARE HSG D, AND THERE IS A IF 46% INCREASE IN IMPERVIOUS AREA FROM PRE TO POST DEVELOPMENT. THE POINT OF ANALYSIS 1 IS ALSO THE LIMITS OF ANALYSIS, AS ENERGY BALANCE IS SATISFIED AND THE 10 YR PEAK FLOW RATE IS REDUCED FROM PRE TO POST IF 439 DEVELOPMENT. 440 IN PRE-DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS, THE SITE IS ANALYZED AS ONE DRAINAGE AREA, SINCE IT ALL FLOWS TO THE MANMADE DRAINAGE SWALE JUST OFFSITE. THE POINT OF ANALYSIS 442 44 1 IS LOCATED OFFSITE, AS THIS IS PRACTICALLY WHERE ALL ONSITE WATER DRAINS TO. 3 IF 4MAP20 HOWEVER; OFFSITE AREAS ARE NOT INCLUDED IN THIS ANALYSIS AS THEIR DRAINAGE PATTERNS ARE NOT AFFECTED BY CHANGES TO THE SUBJECT SITE. IN POST-DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS, THE SITE IS BROKEN INTO FIVE (5) DRAINAGE AREAS. WGR ONE DRAINAGE AREA FOR EACH UNIT'S ROOF WHICH OUTLETS INTO SEPARATE URBAN BIORETENTION FILTERS, ONE FOR THE FRONT OF THE SITE WHICH IS CAPTURED IN AN 444 UNDERGROUND DETENTION FACILITY, AND ONE FOR THE SMALL AREA IN THE BACK OF THE SITE THAT IS NOT CAPTURED IN ANY STORMWATER SYSTEM. IF MNS IF 444.20 SHEET CHANNEL AND FLOOD PROTECTION ARE ADDRESSED IN CONFORMANCE WITH PRE-DEVELOPMENT DRAINAGE AREA 9VAC25-870-66(B)(1)(b)[ENERGY BALANCE] AND 9VAC25-870-66-(C)(2)(b). 0.218 AC NUTRIENT CREDITS TO BE PURCHASED TO SATISFY REMAINDER OF NUTRIENT LOAD OFFSET CN = 79 REQUIRED BY 9VAC25-870-63. SEE VRRM SPREADSHEET C6.1. 447 GATE 44 5 IS CFL 44 6 448 447 LYMAN STREET 30' row 449 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN RD DOUGLAS AVEN LYMAN STREET RESIDENCES 40' R/W N PRE DEVELOPMENT SWM MAP 1 PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN 1" = 10': 0 10 20 CHARLOTTESVILLE, VIRGINIA POINT OF UE CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC. ANALYSIS 1 EXISTING MANMADE DRAINAGE SWALE 436 437 439 438 IF IF IF IF DRAINAGE AREA NOT CAPTURED 443 439 BMP A BMP B BMP C IF DRAINAGE AREA NOT CAPTURED 446 0.033 AC CN4= 81 41 442 UNIT A DRAINAGE UNIT B DRAINAGE UNIT C DRAINAGE IF 4MAP20 443 44 AREA TO BMP A AREA TO BMP B AREA TO BMP C 5 0.024 AC 0.024 AC 0.024 AC CN = 96 CN = 96 CN = 96 WGR IF MNS IF 444.20 446 44 DRAINAGE AREA DRAINAGE AREA 4 TO STORMTANK TO STORMTANK 0.114 AC 0.114 AC CN = 84 CN = 84 GATE 448 LEGEND 447 TIME OF CONCENTRATION 08/06/2021 DANIEL C. HYER IS Lic. No. 45596 CFL DRAINAGE AREA 44 6 IMPERVIOUS AREA 44 FOREST/OPEN SPACE 448 7 LYMAN STREET APPROVED DCH 30' row OVERLAND FLOW DIRECTION SUBMISSION NO. 3 PROJECT 2011001 VEPCO UP NOTES: T H E W O R K O F G0025 1. LAND WITHIN DRAINAGE AREA THAT IS NOT HATCHED IS MANAGED TURF CE86 RD 2. POST DEVELOPMENT TIME OF CONCENTRATION NOT SHOWN - 6 MINUTES ASSUMED L I N E + G R A D E OE86 DOUGLAS AVEN 3. SOIL DIVIDE NOT SHOWN AS ALL SOILS ARE 91 - URBAN LAND, HSG D 40' R/W N 2 POST DEVELOPMENT SWM MAP 1" = 10': 0 10 20 C6.0 UE © 2018 - LINE+GRADE, LLC STORMWATER MANAGEMENT DETAILS LYMAN STREET RESIDENCES PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN CHARLOTTESVILLE, VIRGINIA 08/06/2021 DANIEL C. HYER Lic. No. 45596 APPROVED DCH SUBMISSION NO. 3 PROJECT 2011001 T H E W O R K O F L I N E + G R A D E C6.1 © 2018 - LINE+GRADE, LLC CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC. BIORETENTION FILTER SHENANDOAH BIORETENTION FILTER SHENANDOAH BIORETENTION FILTER PLANTING SEED MIX SWITCH GRASS PLANTING SEED MIX SWITCH GRASS PLANTING SEED MIX IF IF IF IF 437.67 IF 15' WATERLINE ESMT D.B. 876 P. 618 PLAT UNIT A UNIT B UNIT C IF 4MAP20 (5) BLUE ARROW (8) BLUE ARROW JUNIPERS JUNIPERS ODS (4) LITTLE (5) LITTLE BOXWO HENRY ITEAS HENRY ITEAS WGR GRAVEL LO STREET M AN LY CLOSED) ( IF MNS IF 444.20 T LITTLE BLUESTEM LITTLE BLUESTEM LITTLE BLUESTEM GATE TMP 58 89 DAB INV-2 .1 EX. SIGN EX. SIGN D.B. 642ESPTMENTS, INC. D.B. 619 P.. 162 INST. 20080 616-619 PLAT IS 02952 CFL 24' ACCESS ESMT D.B. 876 P. 618 PLAT HACKBERRY (2) BLUE MIST SHRUBS JAPANESE MAPLE TULIP POPLAR (2) BLUE MIST SHRUBS HACKBERRY TULIP POPLAR (2) BLUE MIST SHRUBS LYMAN STREET TMP 58-358 30' row the belmont loft company, llc PE DB 2019 PG 3035 2" ZONE: PUD D USE: RESIDENTIAL T R ESERVSET. N N VEPCO UP ASEMTEING LYMA 30' EE G0025 I S LYMAN STREET RESIDENCES X FOR ATION CE86 RD LOC OE86 DOUGLAS AVEN CSW EX. SIGN CSW CSW 40' R/W PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN LANDSCAPE PLAN CHARLOTTESVILLE, VIRGINIA 10' ALLEY UE PROPOSED 10 FT PRIVATE SANITARY EASEMENT COINCIDING WITH ALLEY WIDTH TMP 58-358A TMP 58-358B TMP 58-358C JOHN STEPHEN HUFF JOHN STEPHEN HUFF LOUISE MARIA VAN RIEL DB 2009 PG 3012 DB 2018 PG 558 DB 2016 PG 4250 ZONE: PUD ZONE: PUD ZONE: PUD VEPCO UP USE: RESIDENTIAL USE: RESIDENTIAL USE: RESIDENTIAL G0025 PE15 N LANDSCAPE PLAN 1 1" = 10': 0 10 20 LEGEND ORNAMENTAL GRASS BIORETENTION SEEDING PROP. TREE PROP. SHRUB 08/06/2021 DANIEL C. HYER Lic. No. 45596 APPROVED DCH SUBMISSION NO. 3 PROJECT 2011001 T H E W O R K O F L I N E + G R A D E C7.0 FOR VISUAL REFERENCE ONLY - NOT TO SCALE SP19-00011 RESOLUTION GRANTING A SPECIAL USE PERMIT FOR I N F I L L D E V E L O P M E N T O N T W O P A R C E L S FRONTING ON LYMAN STREET WHEREAS, BKKW, LLC is the owner (“Landowner”) of certain property fronting on Lyman Street, designated on 2018 City Tax Map 58 as Parcels 289.2 and 358E (“Subject Property”), and pursuant to City Code §34-165, the Landowner requests a special use permit to authorize an infill development project, as more particularly described within the application materials submitted by the Landowner in connection with City Application No. SP19-00011; and WHEREAS, the zoning classification of the Subject Property is R-2 (Two Family Residential); and WHEREAS, the purpose of the application is to allow construction of a specific infill development project within the Subject Property, consisting of the following: A common plan of development for the land area within Parcels 289.2 and 358E, including: (i) three (3) buildings, to be constructed as single-family dwellings (the “SFDs”), each on its own separate lot and with each building fronting on Lyman Street; (ii) each lot containing a single-family dwelling shall have an area no less than 2500 square feet (SF) and no more than 3500 SF; each such lot shall have frontage on Lyman street of no less than 34 feet and no more than 65 feet; and each such lot shall have side yards of at least 2 feet, but no required front or rear yard areas; (iii) each single-family lot, and the land on which it is constructed, may be used and occupied in any manner authorized within §34-420 of the R-2 zoning district regulations, including, without limitation, internal accessory apartments; (iv) the land area currently identified as tax Parcel 358E will not contain any buildings or structures (other than the SFDs), and will be used predominantly for access and parking for the SFDs described above and as landscaped open space with plantings, and for any additional driveway or parking as may be necessary to serve internal accessory apartments established within the SFDs; and (v) the general design and height of all buildings, the layout of the entire development area, and the characteristics of the development shall be in all material aspects the same as depicted within the site plan dated December 21, 2018, revised February 28, 2019, and the narrative materials accompanying Application No. SP19-00011 (hereinafter, the “Infill Project”); and WHEREAS, a public hearing on the proposed Infill Project was conducted jointly by the Planning Commission and City Council on March 12, 2019, following notice to the public and to adjacent property owners as required by Virginia Code §15.2-2204 and City Code §34-44; and WHEREAS, based on the representations, information, and materials included within the application materials submitted by the Landowner in connection with SP19-00011, and upon consideration of: information and analysis set forth within the Staff Report; factors set forth in City Code §34-157, §34-165, and §34-166; the recommendation of the Planning Commission; and comments received at the joint public hearing, this Council finds that the Infill Project is appropriate in the location requested and may be approved subject to suitable regulations and safeguards; SP19-00011 N O W , T H E R E F O R E , BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Charlottesville, THAT a Special Use Permit is hereby granted to authorize the Infill Project defined above within this Resolution to be constructed on the Subject Property, including, without limitation, approval of modified yard regulations, density standards, and parking standards otherwise applicable within the R-2 zoning district. Minor adjustments of the dimensional regulations set forth above, within the definition of this “Infill Project” shall be permitted when necessary for compliance with engineering, stormwater, utility or other legal requirements, any such adjustments not to exceed five percent (5%) of the dimensions included within the definition of “Infill Project”. Nothing set forth within this Resolution shall be construed as limiting or requiring any particular architectural details or features, including, without limitation: exterior finishes or construction materials, window or door locations, etc. Approved by Council $SULO, 201 ,ZOB5IPNBT Clerk of Council CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE DEPARTMENT OF NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT SERVICES STAFF REPORT PLANNING COMMISSION PRELIMINARY DISCUSSION APPLICATION FOR A SPECIAL USE PERMIT DATE OF THE MEETING: October 21, 2021 Project Planner: Matt Alfele Date of Staff Report: October 6, 2021 Applicant: Aspen Heights Partners Applicant’s Representative(s): Mitchell Matthews Architects Current Property Owner: Lamson, Norman, TR Gadient JPS LD TR and H & F, LLC Application Information Property Street Address: 2005 & 2007 Jefferson Park Avenue and 104 Observatory Avenue Tax Map & Parcel: 170103000, 170103100, and 170104000 Total Square Footage/ Acreage Site: Approx. 1.711 acres (74,531 square feet) Comprehensive Plan (General Land Use Plan): High Density Residential Current Zoning Classification: R-3 Residential Overlay District: Entrance Corridor Purpose of Meeting and Applicant’s Request (Summary) John Matthews, (Mitchell Mathews Architects) representing the applicant, is proposing to develop the 1.7 acres of land located at 2005/2007 JPA and 104 Observatory Ave for residential use outside the current by-right density designation. The Comprehensive Land Use Map for this area calls for High Density Residential. Prior to submitting an application to the City for a Special Use Application and Entrance Corridor approval, Mr. Matthews and his team are looking for feedback from the Planning Commission on the proposed project. Page 1 of 4 2005 JPA SUP Preliminary Discussion Vicinity Map Context Map 1 Page 2 of 4 2005 JPA SUP Preliminary Discussion Context Map 2- Zoning Classifications KEY - Orange: R-2U, Red: R-3, Purple: Neighborhood Commercial Context Map 3- General Land Use Plan, 2013 Comprehensive Plan KEY: Yellow: Low Density Residential, Red: Neighborhood Commercial, & Orange: High Density Residential Page 3 of 4 2005 JPA SUP Preliminary Discussion Proposed Discussion points for the Planning Commission: 1. Is a DUA of 70 at this location appropriate? 2. Is a height of 75’ appropriate for this location? 3. Is the rear setback appropriate to protect the existing R-2U district? Attachments A. Applicant Materials Page 4 of 4 Attachment A 2005 JEFFERSON PARK AVENUE C H A R L O T T E S V I L L E , V A SPECIAL USE PERMIT & ENTRANCE CORRIDOR INFORMAL REVIEW M I T C H E L L M AT T H E W S A R C H I T E C T S SEPTEMBER 23, 2021 Attachment A REQUEST FOR INFORMAL REVIEW OF SPECIAL USE PERMIT REQUESTS (LISTED BELOW) AND ENTRANCE CORRIDOR CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS INTRODUCTION: 2005 JPA is a proposed multi-family residential development on Jefferson Park Avenue. The project consists of residential units over parking and is situated in close proximity (walking distance) to the University of Virginia’s central grounds. The project is within an entrance corridor. LOCATION: 2005, 2007 Jefferson Park Avenue and 104 Observatory Avenue, an assemblage of 3 lots, with frontage on Jefferson Park Avenue between Observatory Avenue and Washington Avenue. ZONING: The property is currently zoned R-3 in the City of Charlottesville. PROPOSED USE: Multi-Family Residential SPECIAL USE PERMIT REQUEST: A Special Use Permit (SUP) is being requested for: 1) Additional Density: Allowable by right: Up to 21 DUA Allowable by SUP: Up to 87 DUA. PROPOSED: 70 DUA 2) Additional Height: Allowable by right: 45’ max Allowable by SUP: Up to 101’ (44-87 DUA) PROPOSED: 75’, from average grade plane 3) Rear yard setback reduction: Required: 75’ (for 44-87 DUA), with a 25’ S-3 buffer PROPOSED: 36’, with a 25’ S-3 buffer JUSTIFICATION FOR THE SPECIAL USE PERMIT FOLLOWS. REFER TO SECTION 1 (page 6) FOR INFORMATION ON THE SURROUNDING CONTEXT. REFER TO SECTION 2 (page 14) FOR ANALYSIS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN VISION FOR THIS AREA THROUGH THE LAST FEW DECADES. REFER TO SECTION 3 (page 24) FOR ILLUSTRATIVE INFORMATION EXPLAINING THE PROPOSED PROJECT. 2005 JPA M I T C H E L L / M AT T H E W S Charlott es v ille VA EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Architects & Planners 2 09.23.2021 All grades, counts and quantities are approximate and will change as design proceeds. 434.979.7550 © 2021 Attachment A 1. Whether the proposed use or development will be harmonious with Goal #2: Mixed Use. The project allows for an amenity space at Chapter 6: Transportation: existing patterns of use and development within the neighborhood: street level for potential conversion to future commercial use – while The proposal will allow students to live in easy walking distance to The proposed multi-family residential project is harmonious with the still fitting the definition of an ancillary consumer service business, both UVA and nearby commercial areas (the Corner and Fontaine)— existing patterns of use in this neighborhood – residential, predominately allowable within R-3 zoning. This will create a compatible condition as well as in close proximity to a bus stop - helping to minimize the student rentals. The neighborhood is coincident with Census Tract 6.0, that both meets current zoning, the 2013 comprehensive plan’s use of private automobile transportation. which is characterized by 93% of the current dwellings being renter- goal of a mix of uses within walking distance of residential that occupied and 79% being non-family household types. The proposed encourages small businesses, and the future vision outlined in the Goal #1: Complete Streets Observatory Avenue and Washington project is also consistent with the goals of the current zoning ordinance, ongoing comprehensive plan work. Ave will both benefit from increased pedestrian infrastructure as a and recently approved projects on Jefferson Park Avenue. This project result of this project. Jefferson Park Avenue is already a multi-modal promotes a sustainable community – making efficient use of the land and Chapter 5: Housing: through corridor with sufficient pedestrian, bicycle, and vehicular placing carefully designed student housing in close proximity to UVA. We The proposed redevelopment of 2005 JPA will increase the infrastructure to accommodate this project. anticipate that the scale, material choices and detailing of this proposed neighborhood’s housing stock in a location that can both support residential building will strengthen the character of Jefferson Park Avenue increased density and that has been earmarked by the City for Goal #2: Land Use & Community Design The proposed and the whole JPA neighborhood. increased residential use. Specifically, it will increase purpose-built development will increase pedestrian safety on all three adjacent student housing, which will decrease the pressure on single-family streets by minimizing vehicular access points – an improvement 2. Whether the proposed use or development and associated public residential neighborhoods that are increasingly being populated by over current conditions. All parking will be on site and hidden from facilities will substantially conform to the city’s comprehensive student rentals, such as the adjacent Fry’s Spring Neighborhood, view below grade, lessoning the existing pressure for on street plan: The redevelopment of 2005 JPA conforms to both the current and or the growth and expansion experienced on other sides of parking and assisting in the creation of a more pedestrian friendly proposed comprehensive plans in the following areas: the University, into the Lewis Mountain and the 10th and Page environment. Ample on-site bicycle storage facilities will be provided. neighborhoods. Displacement within established neighborhoods Chapter 1: Land Use: and affordability issues across the city are directly related to the Chapter 7: Historic Preservation and Urban Design: Goal #1: Sense of Place. This stretch of Jefferson Park Avenue historical lack of student housing supply. Goal #8: Entrance Corridors This proposed project will be a quality is commonly considered a student housing corridor between UVA development along one of the city’s most frequented entrance / UVA Hospital and the Fry’s Spring / Fontaine Ave Neighborhood Goal #1: Housing’s Impact on City Goals & Vision Of utmost corridors. Street trees and other landscape elements will enhance Commercial area. It is predominately vehicular oriented and importance is an increase in city housing stock alongside the the streetscape and contribute to the urban design. classified in the Streets that Work typology as Mixed Use B, the equitable impact of such development. Placing increased height equivalent of West Main Street, Millmont Street, Cherry Avenue, and and reasonable residential density in a predominately student rental 3. Whether proposed use or development of any buildings or structures University Avenue. It is a multi-modal street that supports higher neighborhood, along a transit oriented corridor, supports the city’s will comply with all applicable building code regulations: The density development projects. The vitality of the street comes from goals and vision. structures and site will be designed to comply with all applicable building its intensity of use for transportation – thus its designation as an code regulations. Entrance Corridor. A wide range of residential densities and diverse Goal #3: Grow the City’s Housing Stock Not only will this architectural styles currently defines its character. JPA embodies residential project add to the city’s existing housing stock, it will the evolution of off-campus student housing around the University also trigger the affordable housing ordinance, supporting affordable of Virginia. It is currently a corridor that is evolving, as expected. housing throughout the city. The ongoing comprehensive plan re-write currently envisions it as an urban mixed-use corridor, defined as higher-intensity mixed-use Goal #8: Sustainability Principles This residential building development linking employment, commercial and civic hubs. This expands the diversity of housing choices in this area of the city, project bridges between the current ordinance and the future vision thereby balancing offerings with other areas such as along the West of the corridor, by contributing to the establishment of a vibrant, Main Street corridor, or Millmont Street. Increased density in close engaged sense of place that can be replicated along Jefferson Park proximity to UVA, where increased density is desirable, promotes a Avenue - one of a walkable, people-focused, urban project that aids more sustainable city. the city in its supply of housing stock. 2005 JPA M I T C H E L L / M AT T H E W S Charlott es v ille VA SUP REVIEW CRITERIA: SECTION 34-157 Architects & Planners 3 09.23.2021 All grades, counts and quantities are approximate and will change as design proceeds. 434.979.7550 © 2021 Attachment A 4. Whether the proposed use or development will have any potentially e. Undue density of population or intensity of use in relation to the creates two narrow residential wings projecting towards the street, adverse impacts on the surrounding neighborhood, or the community community facilities existing or available; The proposed population one extending farther than the other – reducing the massing and in general; and if so, whether there are any reasonable conditions of and intensity of use are consistent with those anticipated under scale of the project along the JPA streetscape. At the more prominent approval that would satisfactorily mitigate such impacts. Potential the current zoning designation and under all previous, current and corner of the site, at Washington Avenue, the base and upper levels adverse impacts to be considered include, but are not necessarily proposed versions of the Comprehensive Plan. No adverse effects merge into a vertical expression denoting both the primary, street- limited to, the following: to the existing or available community facilities are expected. The level pedestrian entrance, as well as the primary amenity spaces project will likely have a positive effect of restoring detached single- within. This vertical massing is carved away at the top floor to create a. Traffic or parking congestion; The project is located near the family housing units within nearby neighborhoods like Fry’s Spring, to an outdoor terrace. A series of terraces and stairways mediate the University of Virginia’s central grounds; given this proximity, it is their intended occupancy as single-family households. The request of rising grade along JPA. anticipated that residents would not commute daily by car, but would 70 DUA is below the maximum available (87 DUA) under an SUP for predominately walk. The project’s parking enters from Washington this zoning district. The scale of the project is comparable to other projects along Jefferson Avenue, which is a through street between JPA and Stadium Road, Park Avenue, albeit with a more engaging streetscape and a more as opposed to Observatory Avenue, which is a dead end. Similarly, f. Reduction in the availability of affordable housing in the urban or contemporary form and aesthetic. The scale of the project the project is near the commercial area at the intersection of JPA neighborhood; The proposed development will comply with the changes relative to the elevation change across the site. The scale Extended, Fontaine Ave, and Maury Ave, providing convenient walk- affordable housing ordinance through one of the three mechanisms is consistent with the proposed Urban Mixed Use Corridor zoning able services and dining options nearby. The site is also located along available – to be determined at a later date. The site does not currently description – calling for 5 stories up to 8 along key neighborhood the free trolley line, with an existing stop approximately a block away. accommodate affordable housing – all units are market rate; therefore corridors designated in the Streets that Work plan (such as JPA). At JPA has significant bike infrastructure in place and the project will no committed affordable housing units will be lost. the western façade, adjacent to R-2U zoning, the proposed project provide ample on-site bicycle storage facilities. The project is taking is 5 stories in height – consistent with the ongoing comprehensive advantage of a portion of available parking reductions to balance g. Impact on school population and facilities; While the units are plan height designation for the proposed adjacent zoning designation market demand with actual spaces provided. All of these conditions planned to be market rate rental units and available to the general – Higher-Intensity Residential. will limit the potential traffic and parking congestion. public, given its proximity to UVA, it is anticipated that students, possibly young professionals and/or employees at the medical school Overall, the proposed massing and scale of the proposed project is b. Noise, lights, dust, odor, fumes, vibration, and other factors, and hospital will primarily occupy the units. It is expected that the consistent with the current ordinance and the ongoing comprehensive which adversely affect the natural environment; No activities project will have minimal to no impact on the school population and planning work. are anticipated that will adversely affect the natural environment. All facilities. exterior lighting will comply with the city’s dark sky ordinance. The 5. Whether the proposed use or development will be in harmony with same functions currently on site will continue on site. h. Destruction of or encroachment upon conservation or historic the purposes of the specific zoning district in which it will be placed: districts; The proposed project is not within a conservation or historic The proposed use will not change from its current use. The development c. Displacement of existing residents or businesses; This project district. No individually protected properties exist on this site. The is in harmony with the purposes of the zoning district, which calls for replaces 17 current residential units with 119 units – creating an project is within an entrance corridor overlay district and ERB review medium-density residential, including multi-family. overall gain of 102 units. Construction will not begin until all leases will be required. and occupancies for current tenants have terminated. 6. Whether the proposed use or development will meet applicable i. Conformity with federal, state and local laws, as demonstrated general and specific standards set forth within the zoning ordinance, d. Discouragement of economic development activities that may and certified by the applicant; The proposed project will conform to subdivision regulations, or other city ordinances or regulations; The provide desirable employment or enlarge the tax base; 2005 JPA all applicable federal, state, and local laws. proposed use is identical to the current use. This development is within the will not discourage economic development, but rather will contribute city’s allowable uses, density (with SUP), and height (with SUP) provided to the vibrancy of a mixed use area along JPA, providing patrons to j. Massing and scale of project. From the street, the building massing for in this zoning district. The property is located within an entrance nearby commercial establishments. It will help spur the development originates with a two-story base along Jefferson Park Avenue, which corridor overlay district and is subject to review by the Entrance Corridor and investment in this area by providing a residential population base disappears into grade along the two side streets due to the substantial Review Board. An application will be submitted to the ERB for concurrent in need of additional goods and services. (30’) elevation drop across the site. Above this, the massing of the review with the SUP application. building is a U-shape – with the open end facing JPA. This arrangement 2005 JPA M I T C H E L L / M AT T H E W S Charlott es v ille VA SUP REVIEW CRITERIA, CONTINUED Architects & Planners 4 09.23.2021 All grades, counts and quantities are approximate and will change as design proceeds. 434.979.7550 © 2021 Attachment A (1)   A site plan when required by section 34-802 of the City Code; To be submitted with application at a later date. (2)   A written disclosure of the information required by section 34-8 of the City Code and, if the applicant is not the owner of the property, written evidence of his status as (i) the authorized agent of the property owner, or (ii) a contract purchaser of the property whose application is with the permission of the property owner; To be provided in the application at a later date. (3)   For developments including any non-residential uses, and developments proposing the construction of three (3) or more single- or two-family dwellings, the applicant shall provide a completed low- impact development (“LID”) methods worksheet; To be provided in the application at a later date. (4)   For applications proposing the alteration of the footprint or height of an existing building, or the construction of one (1) or more new buildings: (i) a building massing diagram and (ii) elevations; See accompanying graphic materials. (5)   Information and data identifying how many, if any, existing dwelling units on the development site meet the city’s definition of an “affordable dwelling unit” and whether any such existing units, or equivalent affordable units, will remain following the development; Existing units on site do not meet the city’s definition of “affordable dwelling units”. Existing units will be replaced for a net gain of 102 units. (6) Other supporting data sufficient to demonstrate compliance with the purposes and standards of this Zoning Ordinance, including, without limitation, graphic materials that illustrate the context of the project as well as information and data addressing the factors set forth within section 34-157 above. See accompanying graphic materials. 2005 JPA M I T C H E L L / M AT T H E W S Charlott es v ille VA SUP APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS: SECTION 34-158 Architects & Planners 5 09.23.2021 All grades, counts and quantities are approximate and will change as design proceeds. 434.979.7550 © 2021 Attachment A EXISTING CONDITIONS SECTION 1 The project site is located on the southeastern side of the City, within blocks of the University’s Central Grounds. It is situated in the middle of the JPA neighborhood, which is predominately renter occupied according to both recent census data and GIS records. The site is one block away from a commercial node, at the intersection of Maury Avenue and Jefferson Park Avenue. The project spans between two sides streets, Observatory Avenue - a dead end, and Washington Avenue, a through street between JPA and Stadium Road. The site has only one continguous parcel or neighbor to the rear, which is renter occupied. All parcels across the bordering streets - JPA, Observatory Ave and Washington Ave, are renter occupied, less one - which sits diagonally to the rear corner of the site along Observatory Avenue. The existing zoning of R-3, approved in 2009, stretches the length of JPA, on the northwest side, while University High Density was designated for the opposite side of the street and R-2U stretches behind to Stadium Road. Existing conditions along JPA are varied. Newer projects range in scale from SECTION 1: five to nine stories facing JPA. These projects have limited engagement with the street, presumably due to topographic challenges. Similarly, the 2005 JPA TABLE OF CONTENTS & SYNOPSIS site drops 37’ across the site. VICINITY MAP NEIGHBORHOOD MAP LOCATION MAP RENTER OCCUPIED MAP ZONING SUMMARY CONTEXT PHOTOS SURVEY 2005 JPA M I T C H E L L / M AT T H E W S Charlott es v ille VA SYNOPSIS OF EXISTING CONDITIONS Architects & Planners 6 09.23.2021 All grades, counts and quantities are approximate and will change as design proceeds. 434.979.7550 © 2021 Attachment A UN IVE RS ITY AV E UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA WES TM AIN ST CITY LIMITS RA ILR OA D UE EN AV OAD RK LR RAI PA SO N E R EFF J 2005 JEFFERSON PARK AVENUE 2005 JPA M I T C H E L L / M AT T H E W S Charlott es v ille VA VICINITY MAP Architects & Planners 7 09.23.2021 All grades, counts and quantities are approximate and will change as design proceeds. 434.979.7550 © 2021 Attachment A D. T. YR ET S GB EM M RU THE CORNER 8 MIN. WALK THE ROTUNDA UVA SOURCE: https://censusreporter.org/profiles/14000US51540000600- SCOTT STADIUM CITY LIMITS census-tract-6-charlottesville-va/ 5 MIN. WALK UE EN AV RK PA N SO ER F F LR OAD JE RAI JPA NEIGHBORHOOD & CENSUS TRACT 6.0 2005 JEFFERSON PARK AVENUE FRY’S SPRING NEIGHBORHOOD 2005 JPA M I T C H E L L / M AT T H E W S Charlott es v ille VA NEIGHBORHOOD MAP Architects & Planners 8 09.23.2021 All grades, counts and quantities are approximate and will change as design proceeds. 434.979.7550 © 2021 Attachment A AD STADIUM RO W AS HI NG TO N AV EN UE OB UE SE E N RV M 2005 JPA AV AT AU RK O RY PA RY ON AV S ER AV E FF NU E E NU J E E OAD ILR RA FONTAINE AVENUE 2005 JPA M I T C H E L L / M AT T H E W S Charlott es v ille VA LOCATION MAP Architects & Planners 9 09.23.2021 All grades, counts and quantities are approximate and will change as design proceeds. 434.979.7550 © 2021 Attachment A OAD STADIUM R W AS HI NG N TO AV E N OB U E N SE U E E AV RV RK AT M A SITE P O AU ON RY RY S ER AV A FF E E NU J VE NU E E OAD ILR RA FONTAINE AVENUE RENTER OCCUPIED COMMERCIAL INSTITUTIONAL UNIVERSITY 2005 JPA M I T C H E L L / M AT T H E W S Charlott es v ille VA RENTER OCCUPIED AND OTHER USES Architects & Planners 10 09.23.2021 All grades, counts and quantities are approximate and will change as design proceeds. 434.979.7550 © 2021 Attachment A Location 2005 Jefferson Park Ave. Area 1.711 acres (74, 531.16 SF) Zone R-3 UNIVERSITY OF Residential Units up to 21 DUA (by right) VIRGINIA 22 - 87 DUA (by SUP) Parking Two bedroom apt. or smaller: 1 space Three or Four bedroom apt.: 2 spaces Height 45’ (max) (by right) 80’ (22-43 DUA, by SUP) E 101’ (44-87 DUA, by SUP) U EN AV R K Setbacks PA 26.35’ (average of neighbor- (front) ing properties) N O E RS Setbacks F A D 20’ (corner, both sides) J EF IL RO (side) RA Setbacks 25’ min. (rear) 50’ (22-43 DUA, adjacent to low density residential) 75’ (44-87 DUA, adjacent to low density residential) (25’ Type S-3 buffer, above 21 DUA) 2005 JEFFERSON PARK AVENUE Overlays Entrance Corridor 2005 JPA M I T C H E L L / M AT T H E W S Charlott es v ille VA ZONING SUMMARY Architects & Planners 11 09.23.2021 All grades, counts and quantities are approximate and will change as design proceeds. 434.979.7550 © 2021 Attachment A 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 5 2 6 7 8 SITE 3 10 9 4 1 8 9 10 2005 JPA M I T C H E L L / M AT T H E W S Charlott es v ille VA NEIGHBORHOOD CONTEXT PHOTOS - JPA CORRIDOR Architects & Planners 12 09.23.2021 All grades, counts and quantities are approximate and will change as design proceeds. 434.979.7550 © 2021 Attachment A ADE GR P IN RO ’D 37 Y:\904\48530-Aspen Heights\DWG\48530-V-XPSURV_ALTA.dwg | Plotted on 8/13/2021 1:02 PM | by Joe Medley 'ALTA / NSPS LAND TITLE SURVEY' OF THREE PARCELS OF LAND COMPRISING 1.711 ACRES FRONTING JEFFERSON PARK AVENUE, 37’ DROP IN GRADE ACROSS SITE WASHINGTON AVENUE, ( > 3 STORIES) & OBSERVATORY AVENUE 37' v1 BEING TAX MAP PARCELS 17-103, 17-103.1, & 17-104 IN THE CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE, VIRGINIA 2005 JPA M I T C H E L L / CITY M AT T H E W S VA SURVEY EXISTING CONDITIONS 13 OF CHARLOTTESVILLE, Charlott es v ille VA A r cJuly Date: h 28, i t e2021 ct s Scale: & P lASa SHOWN nners Sheet 2 of 2 J.N.: 48530 09.23.2021 All grades, counts and quantities are approximate and will change as design proceeds. 434.979.7550 Drawn by: DWJ © 2021 Checked by: JCM LAST REVISED: Aug. 13, 2021 Attachment A SECTION 2 C O M P. P L A N T R E N D S Additional justification for height and density (SUP REQUEST): Comprehensive Plan Trends 2001 - PRESENT along West Main Street, no significant, new, purpose- built student housing has been created in close proximity The comprehensive plans of the past 20 years show to Central Grounds, even as expectations for it to occur the community’s expectation for increased density along the JPA corridor have grown. and height along the JPA corridor, specifically serving the residential needs of UVA students, as The 2013 Comprehensive Plan modified the zoning in demonstrated by the exhibits in this section. the JPA neighborhood to increase its density. Rather than UHD, R-3 and R-2U spanning east to west Two decades ago, in the 2001 Comprehensive Plan, between the railroad and Stadium Road, the entire area neighborhoods identified the conversion of single-family was designated as High-Density residential. This vision owner occupied residential homes to rental units to eliminated the different designation between the 2005 accommodate the increasing demand for student rentals JPA site and the adjacent parcel to the rear. as problematic. The Neighborhoods also identified locations closest to UVA as preferable by students. The The 2018 draft land use maps continued this trend, planning commission identified higher density along treating the entire cross section of the neighborhood transit corridors as preferable. as the same residential density - east to west, north to south, less the commercial area at the intersection of The 2003 Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map shows Maury and JPA and extending west along Fontaine. SECTION 2: the same conditions as the present zoning. The ongoing comprehensive plan work returns to a TABLE OF CONTENTS & SYNOPSIS The 2011 Housing Survey shows a density of housing vision of a higher density or intensity corridor - albeit 2001 COMP PLAN CONCERNS units congregated 1) in the Venable neighborhood - both with the same designation on either side of JPA and with 2003 COMP PLAN LUM behind the Corner and along Madison Avenue, 2) along the addition of a mixed-use condition rather than solely 2011 HOUSING SURVEY MAP JPA, and 3) at public housing sites. Additions to this map residential. The adjacent parcel to the rear, is proposed 2013 COMP PLAN LUM have been made based on incomplete data of known as a different designation (higher-intensity residential), 2018 COMP PLAN FLUM (DRAFT) 2021 COMP PLAN FLUM (DRAFT) built or under construction projects, showing the last with a suggested height of 5 stories. The 2005 JPA 2021 COMP PLAN INFO (DRAFT) decades’ progress of additional housing units. While site is designated as Urban Mixed-use Corridor and 2016 STREETS THAT WORK projects along West Main Street have garnered lots of suggests height may range from 5 to 8 stories. Upon 2021 COMP PLAN INFO (DRAFT) attention locally, multi-family residential projects have implementation of these anticipated changes, the generally been dispersed across the city’s medium to heights and densities of the two designations become high intensity zoning districts. Other than the projects more similar. 2005 JPA M I T C H E L L / M AT T H E W S Charlott es v ille VA SYNOPSIS OF COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TRENDS Architects & Planners 14 09.23.2021 All grades, counts and quantities are approximate and will change as design proceeds. 434.979.7550 © 2021 Attachment A 2005 JPA M I T C H E L L / M AT T H E W S Charlott es v ille VA NEIGHBORHOOD CONCERNS FROM 2001 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Architects & Planners 15 09.23.2021 All grades, counts and quantities are approximate and will change as design proceeds. 434.979.7550 © 2021 Attachment A 2005 JEFFERSON PARK AVENUE 2005 JPA M I T C H E L L / M AT T H E W S Charlott es v ille VA 2003 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN LAND USE MAP Architects & Planners 16 09.23.2021 All grades, counts and quantities are approximate and will change as design proceeds. 434.979.7550 © 2021 Attachment A Housing Units Number of Units on Parcel £ No Units 29 KNOWN ADDITIONAL £ US PROJECTS SINCE 2011 1 Unit 2 Units 3 - 10 Units £ Route 250 £ 11 - 50 Units 51 - 240 Units £ St et m Em Rd Rio 2005 JEFFERSON PARK AVENUE Pr e sto nA 2011 Land Use and Housing Survey and the 2010 US Census ve The housing unit count from the survey and the same count from the Decennial census were within 0.66% of each other, despite the very different methodolo- West M ain S gies used. The 2011 survey counted 19,062 units and the 2010 Census counted t Dow ntow High St nM 19,189 units. Most of the variation is accounted for in neighborhoods around the all University of Virginia. ve e ry A k Av Cher ar Ma nP rke rso Number of Units per Block Je ffe tS t 0 - 10 Units Av 11 - 30 Units St on 5th t S M 31 - 60 Units o ntic ello Av 4 61 - 100 Units e 100 - 220 Units 221 - 447 Units 64 6 64 2005 JPA M I T C H E L L / M AT T H E W S Charlott es v ille VA HOUSING UNITS, SOURCE: 2011 HOUSING SURVEY, WITH UPDATES Architects & Planners 17 09.23.2021 All grades, counts and quantities are approximate and will change as design proceeds. 434.979.7550 © 2021 Attachment A GREENFI BR PA EN RK RD EA BROO TW W ND COURT MYER ST OO LA OO BR E DS NO DR S DR D OO PL D OR FIEL KD STM TT ELDS GL OW RTH KMER OD R WE NO £ ¤ £ ¤ IN 85 BE RO RD 1 H WO COUR LA GH 63 A RT RW 4 D MO KE ROSLYN E ¤ £ A IDLE A DR 743 HE IC M NT FO BIX AD T LE RO KC ROSLYN NG AR ER 63 £ HA ¤ RE ON RO AD IA A D M T RO TR M GT 1 EY ST RK BS GE CT LN FOREST LN TIN RID AD DR N M BE D SP HU RIDGE DR IVY RO LA R RIN REDING G LA TON CO KE ST UR LANE T TE FORE RO BR RA NN DR BIN COU IG IS M RO DR BL HT BRIER HIL RT E A F OOD CT D E LA IE W NC L M PL LAMBS ROAD O LD IDE KE R K WOODLAKE WILLIA O OV A D FA OO GREEN D DR VE PR BR GENERAL LAND USE PLAN RO PL IVE W TOWNW RO PL RAIN MSBU DR TREE DR £ HE ¤ CO SLY WIL ROAD IG N 43 SNOWD LS HT DM 7 MM SR EN DR DOMINION W ER DR HIL DRIVE RG D E BL PL E ON WEALTH RIO FO BIR AN AC RIO CO NA D E HO UR LIB GL M P LN KIN O DR CT E CT RO OA RT A SE L S D DE TT AS KS Y R CT ON SP AD N PU CT LN TO S RIN RIN CT K S OW D G TT DR TIN KR PL TE DR HE G PU IV OA HAD RD N E TIN RO OO RD IT HU HIL BL WES S LLIN BR RD RD LIC LS JPA WYNRIDGE DR DELLWO EA D TFIE CO RD £ G WESTF ¤ 65 RD OL E ST AU ER WYNRIDGE LN UR 7 W ED LD S AK DR LD T PL LV EF RID OR OD RD IELD IE FIE BE HY M CO GE LD MIN T E OL D MALL DR H H UR CH ROAD LT RT MINOR NS SA CIR EA BROOK NO ALBERT EE L QU W DR RIDGE CTOR CT N UR N WHITEWO KNIGH O CO TO OD RD CT DS T CT T M ROAD X M IER EY EXETER SA CO FORE DR EM BR ASHL SU CT ST TH PR AN M LE DR CH TE CIR WEAL CIR C HILL SDA CT WALDEN CT W ON BL R CT K VD HLA ATHA COMM CT ES OA EE ND SUMERSET TF TO OAK CT GE W N NE S TR CORRIDOR A LN M CT IE OR PINE MANCHESTER CT LA GE GREEN LD K PE GR OA YT CRITT E EN ARBOR ON DR BR RD FREE NDS RD CREST DR IE R LD STATE RD DR IE EF CHLA BOWLES LN RD 29 W ES AK E E W L TF R IV TE RT D £ ¤ IE DR 743 BRAN RD LD RR H TU ON LT EL RD RD NO N EA RD £ N ¤ EE GD L RT W K W GREE GAZE L RO R RD EE TE HIL N H NBRIE LN BO G TIN TO O 65 W R E LN AD R CR CT L FOUNTA M E CT IDG PE R 4 IN M DR ST N GE ROSE EL E E A NN CO DR CT HU CT L CH WAY D A ARBO L E RTR RT E OLI OR R GL IR IV R L WE O TU CT E EL ST DR INGB PIN AD ST PA GN GE WAKE RR GA E PL R BA DR W UE TE FIELD EN IV CO HU ME MA MILL PARK TE RR AP HAV I DR MOCK LIS PS U V E TS CT CT LT AC RT HO NT BIL SA CH AV DR MILLST PE US VERM PL A CO KS TM PL ONE RIVER SE MO T IRA PL R AIL ST TON IC LN ED RO O CT KERRY E LN TR REYNARD RE LN RIV MA DENIC TR DR AD E ER IN PEBBLE CREEK CT DIS OLD FOR D RIE AS GE R YW GE RD OA CH RID DR EXT E BR PL K RD S OL EN RA D DA MICH OD PL ER BL CA LINE AN HILLWO G S N AEL RIV LO CT LN A K GASO MIN U UR NN RD BR FF MON IDGE RD BR O PL N KB SOLO O DU ER SE Y SE WILSON O ALLE N HO DR MIN AC ING RIV CT OK PL BO URN LE OL BLACKB BL 2005 JEFFERSON WO ND E RD Y LN OD WAY STURBR OLD SALEM ST DR DR CT E ST DR WOOD IV ER APARTMENTS DR KERR TR G INGLE RD EE REE EA NBRI TER RD OP ST PK N HILL T N AY RD DR ES DR ZA LO R L OOD N COURT GREE RC W N RD M HUNTWOOD LN TO BA R N LE W CO IO BE SA RA DR LE INGLEW TO Y DR YO KIN SH RIE R L LO KE DRIVE DR ROA TAR LINE RK KS FA EL DR MO GE ES N TOWN G IV E RY H BY DU CO SE E IR IN NB CHAR N NT OR DR U SO E X WILLIAM CT L W D URT NB ER US RD HIL FO INDIA RD WENDOV EE AN £ KIN ¤ 6 DY ROAD GE DA DR DR G T RD BA 65 PEND AN UR TER RD SW G LANE LIN LETO AN RD GR R M CO MEAD PARK N JAME TN COUR FO DA COUR BR T OA RD UIL N PARK AVENUE AN CE G DE KS DR STOW OW WEST BUNK ST GU KE CK AD L T LM DR ER TON DR NW O O EA S BROO E HILL ST R T HY AD D DA L O DR ME O N DR D BENNING LN RO RD S D LN DR O L DR LN CHARLOTTE ST O KY HIL R EM E W K RD HIE TE AU CIR HW AD RIC RT IN MIC O LD LIC G IN NO EE ER E S R KIN MID AV GE WA TM RD IE HT HO G IST N HF OR YN AD ES RO SM VIC T GE L Y EA ER L IT ID DL JOH T ER O K DR AL LE R W RD SM AY IT UR VE DR ST R R AD C H FR PA L WO ES DR CO LE AU D FIE VA ED OO K HOLLY N EX DRIVE EN LE OD RIC DRIVE LE N H EY E AR OO KENW £ LD CIR FD W ¤ H AY C PA G HU K CT E HIG CLI EEN C IT R INE LE RID T AV K CIR TO R W S R CIR LLY W. DYW HURS KE 631 R T CT ST LE RD GR BR HO RD SU NE ES H E GE N CT EN BRAN CT CO ER EA ST RK RD DO DR N W T RH K ER OW RID UR T WA DR A W DR BL BA A CA AS YO N ST WOOD RT Y AR RT RU KE IM R NC S AD CROSSING R ER HAM RN T W AY RA T DR EN LN AT LA SC CH ER W ME C KENW VIC EN LN RD ER MO LO CT GRE N RIV Y KS VALLITH OOD TO EY R RT AL CO IO GB RD DA DR ON CO RIA PEN PARK MER LN G KE PETERSON BY-PASS N RD PK UR RD N CE X N CO RU FOXB FO TO ROOK T Y DAIR WY ¤ £ ¤ EX LANE BELFIELD LOOP £ GR PL 250 29 M OV TOWNE WILLO PIN EA ET DO E LN WDALE RD O W RD LANE P BR EY SP E OO CT CT GEL IV GROVER O K NASH DR DR TT O A RID RD R D CT CIR CT SW D R IRY PET R O LE BLUE NER DA VE O RD ON UM D CO CT PE CR BY-PASS HIT AR RD ON FAULCO NN ST RD RD W TT DR T HE PA DS RY LN C £ ¤ SU GE GENT R EAF E E S KL HIR OAKL NG SIA AN DR T RID 250 N AR RD ON STONE HE BU ES Y LANE DR SEYMOUR RD N UR DR RIDG D CH CK D DM LIN T ID EL LISB P SQ IE ON BRUC VEGA LE R TO RD G G M OO SS ER E AV PRESCELLY PL G S SA RE AR R CT E UE E L D LM TO W BR BY HIL W Y MA IS EN BL ME RU STON E ROSE HILL N IL CA OO G LE DR G ST RU M RO LBO M BY AF £ LN ¤ KW DRIVE DR BR W A D LILI LN LN CIR ES OO D AY IDG 601 CIR UR W DR TV BL AL FIE ST E PEYT IE VD NE LD RK E W OL ON HO OX RV PL DR OOD D RD FORD HARROW RD PA RD DR FARM RD AG LM IV AM RD HA CO IVE Y RD GH AD RD CIR P RD NE NES RO ES IVY W ELE E IN RO WA E PLYMO R CK FO ST IV AD OX R Y UTH ST MASON AV WIL RT BU TE IV UR DR HO DR ES CO LN E PL RD O DR E CR DW LB U T W EL WELLFORD PARKER STONE IN BUS L OXFORD E IZ O ST AL HERNDON R AB SHERWOOD RD FIELD RD M LN OD R SE OLD FE ON RUTLED ET RD PL IVY W RIE £ FRANKLIN RM D ¤ ND GE AVE H ST N N MA RD R S RD OL RD AV DO FE RO SS AL DR E 250 IE LA E CT PRESTON G NE RUGBY RO R RD BEEC TA VE Y LOCUST AN YD RUGBY LN CT LA AD IV FA RD NE AVE HW G T R AVE LN ME KENSINGTON CO OO N E AVE ELE RIED LN LA T R DR O D RR ED SS LO LN RD LE ST EMME G TE O IN T P CU DR EW R ST LN W ROBINSON E CU CO W FERN AV LOCU AY O WESTWOO ST WOODS RD OD O RU D RD S DER CT S D DE ME STILLF D ID G S ST DR L AN WO LL LN LE RR BY CK E UN PL VE LN HO AR BL CIR EW CIR WIL Y PL GREENWAY LO HARDWOO TE N ROSSER E IV E AIR HB RD ON AMHERST HEM PARK ST CH WOOD ER AV CABELL AVE D RA AL ER AUGUSTA AVE CL AR E W NS AS ST COMMON UTH AN PL ND TT SIT AVE AD D NO CT ST BARB T T M PE OO PL RTH EX BU VE ROSE HILL DR N Y ST EM ID CO E DR SO LO AVE ER AR GL W BLV ER WEST CIR E A DW ED RN O NLA E GE SH AV TR E O C TU AV AMHER D RIV AV C H LE SM BIR £ ILL EE UR CT ¤ BYPASS LL ST LN S E CIR BE RD ST ST MEADOW N S X IT Y TO PL AV RD ALL LAM CA BIR LE CT RD 250 H RE TR CT RD TRIPPER BETH ES MADISON KELSEY IS DW AR AC ST RR PR LC AVE AVE SH TW KS CM CT OOD ST H WAY AVE O NS HIL C U IV ON DA £ YM M MAR ¤ AL ST ST AN ST C Y GR VIS ELL ST DIS LIE Y LO AN WOOD RO M T AD MA LN D AV TIN LE EX 20 SIT R Y AL E CA B ROAD AD LIE AR CO G D WA CA D L ER RIV PA HO IN M NW LA LN TS NE RD ES ST RK LL AV HE ON UN M IV AN H T N E BE LA BO Y NR ILL AV ELK UN RD P ER ST ST AN IF AN NA YA DR TH E SA TH RD ROSSER CY AV CO SW LN GO ST C VE DR H NW RO RD ST NT E LN EY 16TH RM E R ET DO HA LE IV TH E ST H IA KENT CR MIN AVE E MIDM N CO ST BR 10 RLT C T MA ST OR N DE ON NC AV NA LY GE 13TH LEWIS ST ON N L RD AV ON OR CU SPRI AV OR E E W 17TH E ER AL AV SA AV CARR GG G L ONT KL 12TH N D ST E E EA MT CIR LN VE HIL BE CAM ST IR AC VE ST LOUDON LL RD A ST EV R VIRG RD TIN CL LEWIS 15TH UIRE RIV ST KE TH IEW ) S LN MTN INIA (unopen NEL LN 1/2 E ST AR SE O S RV T ST 14 AVE IL ROAD AVE BO RO D S LN RD Y ISTA M G LATR BERT ST RE RO ST FAUQ 10 SO ST GB AR R UNIV HIL OBE SO OT AV OR LYO ON FO DA NO E LE ST N AN DR CT C RD TE N CT L ER LN ST AV THOM WE NS T RT PR LE R R RU AR DIS CELL N M SON ST CT ST ST E D HW LA O RD LN LE ST T M RIV BYPASS D EM ES ND ST AV CIR O LO A PE JO MA BE NORTHW CO EMME O UN RO IS HN ST E D NG O G AN OOD EVER CIR NIA CHAN TO AL 13TH RR IVE ST RR ED D SADL DE H GREE MO E WOO 9T 11TH R RD £ ¤ RS SO N N DR £ ER WINE AR Y NW E ¤ WB T AV HA N AVE N CK E ITY DR IN ST TIR CELL RA 20 GTO PO DRIV YCASTL 29 PAO ST Y ELLIE OL E PARK JA ST PA O MB E IN PL M ES AV LI LN E MINOAVE D GE CIR Mc AV NC ST AV H ST ST RE MO XIN ST CO 8T WINE RIV CIR R IR HA Y RTO ST E HA SE LE ON N CU A N PA Z ER W EAST AV E Mc LE ST MALCOL EL CL RV LN ST AR BONN 1ST R RD LAW NE CO DA ST ST KW M ES VI EW EY O WAL ST LO ST E M N £ IR AY ¤ RM CRESCE LE NE H DR KE E CT BE ST LL RL WERTL PAG GR NT RD R NT AV ICK W 10T AND ST E ST VA A AL FARIS 1421 PARK RU DR DR IL A CE E ALTA ST ST MO CIR N ST H ST LO A CH AV NW E MO S ST PL AZ PO RE £ HA T ¤ RD NT W 13 ST AV TA DR 2ND K RD PLA LLY CIR DR Y ST HE E P O RIC ST IC 12 ST Y AL 12 1/2 RS NEW DG 250 LL RM DR AV AV D S MO ST E SY T HO H R Mc CO KE CA HM 10 1/2 ST HO ST E 7T TA MO WA HIG TIRE YLO DR RE E HS 'S H O AV AVE W M MAP R ORE IG ND IE T HO ST PRESTON ST ST E BROW MO EH AIN LE USE SP ST VE NG WHITEH RD S ST ST N ST ST ST CIN JEFF 4TH AVE T BEND DUKE RO LE EAD O T ST A H ELSO ER EVEL PARK DR JEFFERSON 8T MA GR OR SO OLD AP ST AD GIL LE EAM M ST BLVD N ST ST ST E RK E M 5TH TN E ST ET 11TH OAKHURST ST 7TH CIR AV OE LN CR O 8 TH ST OS STEW DR ST D LA E HIGH SP 6TH CIR NE AVE COMMER JEFF SO £ OA R TE N ¤ ST RO M DR ST CE ERSO CT AN UT ST AY R ER RIDG RD BROW ET T ST W S TE ESTE ST IW MONR PS ST N ST H 250 2S WAL AN ART NE ST ETH NR ST O H S ST PA GILDERSLEEVE E ST UG KE O A SNL LITT ST MAI NT IVER JE ELL ER N NC R SQ 2ND PLZ AV 9 1/ LI N ST VA TO 6TH VA DR LE PA DON ST 7TH R LA 1ST WOOD PELL RO HIG P IN MA ST LL TIB ST MAL H NA 2ND DELE S LK T CRIS HS 9TH ST ST LLE 9T L EY CA VAN SO 3RD T WA RO ON ST ST ST BRAN C E 7TH ST ER ADCT NOVA DO UT TER E AV DR 4TH M H 13TH LN E ST AD RO H ST ALD 5TH KING ST GROV T M 10T RD AR SO RM 12TH ST HS AY ST CHE ST ME KING BO 10TH T JONE W UT N SEA CIR R HS RRY FA VA 4T HIC O SPRI SO HA CHEL ST LA O WATE H AVE GA U BL F F CIR DIC LL STADIUM NE D ST RR KM EA DR R 11T E FA RM 13TH ETT ST EY ST W VE ST S ST ST KE IRW RIVER OB GL ST MAURY ES AN NG RD AS /2 PANT ST ST ST ON MIMOSA T N ELM AY KING OA OU MA 61 H 2ND A S CA ER T ST ST HIN PATO APPLETREE PIEDMONT AVE N ST K 6T 4TH TH ST ER CT RK TH ST CL TE RR R E ST ST N BA ST H ST ET GT AVE OPS ER AVON CH VA T PL OLM A GROV 12 BINGL M 5T R OL RD ON DR R S E PRICE RK EXT ST ON N R EY PIN GRAVES ST SA TO KE TE ON LTON NUNL MIMOSA ST PE VER KER E ST KM ST PA VA ST ISH D AK RY AVE AR CT TIC AV T E OA ST LE LL SH HANO NS ES TERR AV VY CH SH HIN E EV E DAVID FIF E OR EY LITTL ON ST DRIV GRAV AM TO EL E RD AV T1 DR UL CIS MA E ST ST FRAN NA RS ROCK WAY E 8T RD S AV OA GE Y ST ST BO LO VE H FE TON K HILL ST WA DR OD FONTAINE AVE AS 16TH AV JEF BE E OM RID /2 ST LM LA TH ST ST GO PIEDMONT AVE D NT 71 IR E ST M MONPELIER OR R FOREST HILLS AVE ON ST R LEWIS R RD CH AL ST FA UG PLATEAU KE CARL FA TF T D HU ST LLY RA STC EXT BA UR SUMM ES T ITY ST TODD AVE VE D EN DO RS ST NU RD ST HE E CENTER CT A 1ST BROA YC IVE AT C N CH HO AV LN S AVE UN RR WILLIS E ¤ £ CE 18TH EL ST UR BA RD O E RD E 782 AV AVE R RK YS RA AV W G NO ROBERTSON AVE ER LIO EL W O E SD F RU WESTERLY MA T GA IT ST RID BO PA RRIS RD ES LIF DR ST ALE AK MY NT IDE IE SS UR ST NUT LA LL RT ST HIGHLAND SP FA TT OL IN R CE LE AV ERV IV CIR IN RC LE AVE YE LN LA E G RS ST AL BE ST TTE E AVE E AV MO RG ST C L RR DR FOREST IA AV R U ST AV AVE ET E RIV RO E E T ST ING BL EXT MA TU AVE DA RAYMOND E BR RY BU RIV E C E EN IDGE RK CH TRAILRIDGE D NG RN NA K LA AV HE BR ET ER 2N HIL EP CR BAIN RD IBLI N ST JEFFERSON NK ST RD IM ST BU YO E B EE RY E AVE STR FO AV UL LIN ET AV ST L K ST MO E SH DE RA ST RD ST M RD CA ER H N CT NT RE RE G ST RD E AM H RL 6T N RR RO AV ST LIN CH AV AR PE WA S TO RO KS RD LEONARD ER AV ST EA RAND RIB ST EL AC E TM RO LE UTH 1ST OS X TR D ST CR E MARCHANT VE TU NA N CK ST LIO BR ST SO B E AN C S DA ST IN FT OAD RD ST VE TO PR SO PL TT ON AN AV MON S MID O WAY SUNSET N E BA OLPH MORG MON M N OR H ST GE AV AV LT E NG T ILE LA RL ALT S ST E IL RA E ND PA UNR 5T DR ITH KH TE ST E RIA ST YR L AV RID AV IAN U RA A RD IS EL ET IN R ID MA CT RK CA ST D ST IS E HAM OR SM D AV IE IN ON TA NO IN VIL E LOOP RID ST TO AV HA R CLE EH ST DR RL SO LA LN IER G AN CT E ST EN ICK VELA U M EY RO E GE RD BIN N ST ME CA GE PIR NO ID IA PT G RO VIN MASON ND L AV L HUNTL C E RID BRUNSW C EU O B TA AVE E RD E KLA E K DANBURY WATERBURY AV N AV ST GREENWICH IL G RO E S RD ND RD S HILL RA LA ST RO CR AVE WO PA MONTICELL AD CA E BL IN T VIL AV ST LO CT W AV ETT SA WIL E RK R BAYLOR E ST N OD EK RD ST DARIE K RR HIG LN RO ON PA DR EL IC DR DU IN LA E T HLA RD U HARTFORD LA RLY CIRRK N SE LIN TE ID LYNN ER ST DR ND WOODFOLK TO IC PL RD BA PA RSO RD AV AV ON K ND UN AVE PL YLO RO E FL AN MILFORD ROAD AN EA EH NT RO CT S U O FR TER AC R GE EN FE R AVE DR C O RAYMOND MO E ROYS PL MO KL GE EN DR BR MO F SELE NT PA AN AV JE OO DA R CE DR Y CLEV KW AV L AT E D LN K VE ST K DE ELAN E IN CREE PAR IV DR OO E RD DR ES E D AV CLY N EN D MOOR ST W MANILA E RIO LN E E ST ALL RIVES K ON OR MA CT DR CO R ST N ST EE ST TE O CIR ST LN NAYL ET AD OW O CR IN R U ST DR AVE LT E EN PO G LL O BL SA AV RIA YE ST R SLATE E UR IS PL AV E IEW ST DG S CS HARR TH E GR PL IAN NA ES X K HB FIF LO CH OL D AVE WEL ID IM PL Y D RD HART RO LINDEN RO RIST GR R VISTA OL NC ROAD MILL MANS U QUARRY RD ME CT GE KEYS CIR IS LE BELLEV EL RR PL DR TROOST E RD MO A § KNOLL LID IG ¦ ¨ HA DR DR N LY CHANDLERS MC H PL NT TO EAS CT PL ST LLIA DR AV D TONE LEY ALE 64 HIL TOWLER ST MONTE OO E T VIE COURT SE SH PL D MO BR MTN FL W OL OO EA DR V IN K IE LN A NG W ST ST W PL M T CAME MID PE LO LO NE DLE DR PP ET TO SHAS AZAL ER E N TA CT FIELDING CT KE RE LN LN PL DRIVE £ ¤ E ST § BIL RD ¦ ¨ GARDEN 780 NE CE O ER M BE HARRIS 64 DR NT LA IN CAMELLIA Y E RO CREEK RO QU IV H A 5T D DR GLEN XT AVE E DR ST SC ON £ ¤ AR 781 BO § ¦ ¨ AV UG MIC H 64 TA HIE VE R DO RN WY DR EGE D N LN AVE EXT CA COLL PK RT MANSFIELD ST RD £ ¤ 1 LN ER HA PL 63 OOD CT ON INW MOUNTA LOCKSLEY RS RO FE AD COUNTRY TERR SUNSET GREEN APTS J EF AS £ ¤ 780 OM £ ¤ CO LD TH £ ¤ U NTR 631 FIE CIR STREET EXT µ RD Y IN 20 GR 5TH W PIN E EN LE EH CT RD UR VIL 53 BROOK AD Land Use S T RG RO TS OA U STAGECOACH HB OT K C ESIDE HIL N SOUTH W LAK HILL AVE LY SC OO DRIVE L D Low Density Residential Park or Preserved Open Space DR D OL CT High Density Residential Public or Semi-Public Neighborhood Commercial ** Denotes property not subject to the City of Charlottesville's municipal authority Mixed Use Business and Technology Miles 0 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 Map adopted as part of the 2013 Comprehensive Plan by Charlottesville City Council on August 19, 2013. 2005 JPA M I T C H E L L / M AT T H E W S Charlott es v ille VA 2013 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN LAND USE MAP Architects & Planners 18 09.23.2021 All grades, counts and quantities are approximate and will change as design proceeds. 434.979.7550 © 2021 Attachment A D R A F T Stonefield FEB. 2018 Meadow Creek Valley Greenbrier NOV. 2018 Greenbrier Park ek R iv re C an ow na d ea Ri M ve r Meadowcreek Gardens & Disc Golf Walker Charlottesville High School Pen Park Greenleaf YMCA Park M McIntire ea Barracks Road ow d Shopping Center Park C re ek Northeast Park Washington Park Jackson P. Murray Burley Schenk's Greenway Venable The Rotunda and Lawn Burnley- Downtown Moran Mall Maplewood UVA Hospital Pantops Cemetery Ri va n Jefferson n School aR ive Meade r Park Buford Tonsler Oakwood Park Cemetery Forest Hills Park Riverview Downtown Belmont Park Clark Johnson Belmont Park Fry's Springs Jordan Rives Park Park Quarry Park eek sCr ore Jackson-Via Mo k 2005 JEFFERSON ee Azalea Park Mo or es C r 5th St. Station PARK AVENUE City of Charlottesville Land Use ² Comprehensive Plan 2018 2005 JEFFERSON Park and Preserved Open Space General Land Use Plan School Cemetery PARKLAND AVENUE 0 0.5 1 1 inch = 1,000 feet STW Typology 1:12,000 on 24"x36" Map By: NDS, City of Charlottesville 12/06/2017 Mile This product is for general information only and shall not be used Downtown Industrial Mixed Use B Neighborhood A NOVEMBER USE PLAN PLANNING COMMISSION PROPOSED Data Source: City of Charlottesville Planning Commission and for design, modification, or construction. City of Charlottesville SDE 12/06/2017 There is no guarantee of completeness or accuracy. Projection Information: Lambert Conformal Conic, NAD83, Virginia State Plane South The City assumes no liability arising from use of this product. Mixed Use A Neighborhood B 2005 JPA M I T C H E L L / M AT T H E W S Charlott es v ille VA 2018 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FUTURE LAND USE MAP DRAFTS Architects & Planners 19 09.23.2021 All grades, counts and quantities are approximate and will change as design proceeds. 434.979.7550 © 2021 Attachment A Draft Future Land Use Map Ri 8/31/21 o Rd . Dr. r rie nb . Dr ee Gr s. ht ig He ko ro 250 b ow ad Me Kenwo o d Ln. Grove Rd. Ln. Ba Gentry .N Mel rra St . ck et Rd bou m sR by Em ug d. rne R Rd. Rugby Ave. d. yR gb Ru Iv y Rd . ve . A . Rd t us an r. c Lo Gra D rm dy ll de Hi Av e. W Al e s . Ro t. N e. Rd . St Av Pr is r hS es ve rr n t. to ee . Ha U Ri 14t W Rd Park S n ni gr Av t. N ire ve er e. nt rsi Ev cI hS ty M Av 2005 JEFFERSON 10t e, Wes E. H . tM ain S igh t. St. High St. PARK AVENUE . ve eA ad A Ch JP Me er ry Av e. E. Mo Ma nt rke . ice tS ve llo t. d. gA Av nR n bli e. St. i Ca Str rlt o JPA on on rlt Av Av Ca . e. Sensitive Community Areas St Ell iot h 5t Av e. Monticello Rd For more information about the land use categories and the . is Rd Sensitive Community Areas, please see the 8/31/2021 Planning Harr Commission Work Session Presentation, available at the QR code . or tinyurl.com/Cville0831. 2005 JPA M I T C H E L L / M AT T H E W S Charlott es v ille VA CURRENT 2021 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FUTURE LAND USE MAP DRAFT Architects & Planners 20 09.23.2021 All grades, counts and quantities are approximate and will change as design proceeds. 434.979.7550 © 2021 Attachment A 8/24/2021 42 Mixed Use Corridors NEIGHBORHOOD MIXED USE CORRIDOR Neighborhood mixed use areas arranged along corridors that support existing residential districts. Mixed Use Corridors Mixed/ Business Use Corridors & Tech / URBAN MIXED USE CORRIDOR Higher intensity mixed use development arranged along corridors that link the employment, commercial, and civic hubs of the city. Business & Technology BUSINESS AND TECHNOLOGY MIXED USE Neighborhood Urban Neighborhood Mixed Use Corridor Mixed Mixed Use Use Corridor Corridor Light industrial and production uses as well as Commercial, employment, residential Commercial, Commercial,employment, employment,residential residential. Active Commercia Ligh (including small multi-unit and live-work unit (including small multi-unit and live-work unit USES USES additional commercial and residential uses (where ground floor uses groundbus floo buildings). Active ground floor uses. buildings). Active ground floor uses. Act appropriate). Neighborhood character. Respond to existing Neighborhood character. Respond to existing Respondenvironmental residential, to existing RespondRec to FORM FORM residential, environmental and historic residential, environmental and historic hum 2005 JEFFERSON and historic context and historic context context PARK AVENUE Up to 5 stories, general average of 3 stories. Up5to 5 stories, stories, general up to average 8 at key of 3 stories. intersections (such Upup 5 stories, HEIGHT HEIGHT Highest buildings at intersections or at sites Highest buildings at as intersections ofintersections or at sites Downtown, Industrial, as intersect with larger land areas with larger Mixed land Use, or areas Neighborhood corridors in the Mixed Use, Streets That Work plan) Streets Tha 2005 JPA M I T C H E L L / M AT T H E W S Charlott es v ille VA CURRENT 2021 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATIONS Architects & Planners 21 09.23.2021 All grades, counts and quantities are approximate and will change as design proceeds. 434.979.7550 © 2021 Attachment A JEFFERSON PARK AVENUE IS IDENTIFIED AS A MIXED USE B STREET 2005 JPA M I T C H E L L / M AT T H E W S Charlott es v ille VA 2016 STREETS THAT WORK PLAN Architects & Planners 22 09.23.2021 All grades, counts and quantities are approximate and will change as design proceeds. 434.979.7550 © 2021 Attachment A 8/24/2021 39 Residential HIGHER-INTENSITY RESIDENTIAL Neighborhoods and sites for multi-unit housing. Incentivize affordability and increased intensity to meet Affordable Housing Plan goals. Multi-unit housing (13+). May include large USES and/or smaller-scaled buildings. Limited ground floor commercial uses encouraged. All residential categories: compatible with existing residential and historic neighborhood context. Highest FORM building heights according to context. Zoning tools will define building form and neighborhood compatibility criteria for development (e.g., lot coverage, topography, parking, etc.) HEIGHT Up to 5 stories. 2005 JEFFERSON PARK AVENUE ADJACENT DESIGNATION 2005 JPA M I T C H E L L / M AT T H E W S Charlott es v ille VA CURRENT 2021 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATIONS Architects & Planners 23 09.23.2021 All grades, counts and quantities are approximate and will change as design proceeds. 434.979.7550 © 2021 Attachment A UNITS 119 units SECTION 3 DESIGN SITE AREA 1.711 Acres DUA 70 DUA (SUP REQUEST) STORIES 7 stories at JPA, 5 stories adjacent to R-2U zoning BUILDING HEIGHT 75’, from average grade plane (SUP REQUEST) PARKING 175 spaces provided Justification for rear yard setback reduction (SUP REQUEST): PROPOSED We are seeking a reduction in the rear yard setback As suggested by planning staff, the project investigated from 75 feet to 36 feet. This request is based on the the application of the West Main East zoning regulations following argument that contends a setback of 75’ on the proposed building site with regard to the rear yard is grossly excessive, disproportionate, and obsolete setback adjacent to a low-density residential district. under today’s view of (and vision for) this evolving The WME regulations require a 20’ minimum rear yard neighborhood. Strict adherence to the Ordinance in setback along with a bulk plane requirement and a 10’ this instance seems contrary to the intent originally Type S-1 buffer. Height is limited to 52’. In comparison, envisioned - to protect single-family homes, and is in the proposed design would have a 36’ setback, and be conflict with the long-held belief by City planners and approximately 56’ tall adjacent to the R-2U zoning. The others that reasonable increased density adjacent to project would be under this hypothetical bulk plane – the University is preferable and beneficial. The intent utilizing the WME zoning requirements of a 20’ setback, of the Ordinance was to separate single-family, owner- and using the adjacent R-2U height of 35’. Refer to the occupied homes from multi-family residential buildings. conceptual section provided in this section. This is no longer the case in this neighborhood where only the smallest vestiges of single-family, owner- Finally, if the city’s comprehensive plan work continues SECTION 2: occupied residences remain. This is overwhelmingly a to follow its current path, and the zoning re-write TABLE OF CONTENTS, PROJECT neighborhood of student rentals that continues its slow implements the same, the adjacent zoning district will DATA & JUSTIFICATION OF REAR transition to increased density, more pedestrians, and no longer be low-density. The adjacency created will YARD SETBACK REDUCTION more efficient land use where a 75-foot setback is not be 5 stories maximum on the adjacent site to 5-8 stories SITE PLAN necessary. on this site – with both anticipating higher-intensity MASSING DIAGRAM (PERSPECTIVE) residential. MASSING DIAGRAM (SECTION) For this project, the zoning ordinance requires a rear STREETSCAPE PLAN yard setback of 75’ due to the property’s adjacency to In conclusion, the 75-foot setback requirement is an STREETSCAPE PERSPECTIVE a low-density residential district and based upon the anachronism no longer appropriate for this evolving STREETSCAPE PERSPECTIVE project’s proposed density (Sec. 34-353 (b)(4)). The neighborhood. STREETSCAPE PERSPECTIVE adjacent property has been a student rental for decades. Given, the compatible uses, we propose height as the governing metric of the setback requirement. 2005 JPA M I T C H E L L / M AT T H E W S Charlott es v ille VA PROJECT DATA & JUSTIFICATION OF REAR YARD SETBACK REDUCTION Architects & Planners 24 09.23.2021 All grades, counts and quantities are approximate and will change as design proceeds. 434.979.7550 © 2021 Attachment A WASHINGTON AVENUE PROPERTY LINE JEFFERSON PARK AVENUE 20’ setback 36’ PROPOSED setback PROPERTY LINE 26.35’ setback PROPERTY LINE 75’ setback 25’ buffer 20’ setback PROPERTY LINE OBSERVATORY AVENUE 2005 JPA M I T C H E L L / M AT T H E W S Charlott es v ille VA SITE PLAN Architects & Planners 25 09.23.2021 All grades, counts and quantities are approximate and will change as design proceeds. 434.979.7550 © 2021 Attachment A 2005 JPA M I T C H E L L / M AT T H E W S Charlott es v ille VA PERSPECTIVE JPA & OBSERVATORY AVENUE CORNER Architects & Planners 26 09.23.2021 All grades, counts and quantities are approximate and will change as design proceeds. 434.979.7550 © 2021 Attachment A ALLOWABLE BUILDING HEIGHT (35’) & PROPOSED COMP PLAN HEIGHT UNDER EXISTING R-2U ZONING PROPERTY PROPERTY OF 5 STORIES OR 55’ +/- LINE LINE M E AL C ZO R PLANTI PE LK THE E SETBACK BU P O NINGW Y H 75' REQUIRED REAR SETBACK MAXIMUM BUILDING ENVELOPE UNDER SUP 26' 36' PROPOSED SETBACK REQUESTED BUILDING ENVELOPE WITH SUP MAX. HEIGHT JEFFERSON PARK AVENUE 20' 101' REQUESTED 55' HEIGHT 75' 35' 35' ∆ GRADE 25' TYPE S-3 AVG. GRADE 37' BUFFER PLANE 2005 JPA M I T C H E L L / M AT T H E W S Charlott es v ille VA COMPARISON TO BUILDABLE ENVELOPE UNDER A SPECIAL USE PERMIT Architects & Planners 27 09.23.2021 All grades, counts and quantities are approximate and will change as design proceeds. 434.979.7550 © 2021 Attachment A S CHANGE IN FLOOR PLAN LEVEL DENOTES FLOOR PLAN BREAK MAIL 510 M 509.5 510 20’ setback 20’ setback 2ND LEVEL 1ST LEVEL 509.66 523 509.85 510 507.66 OBSERVATORY AVENUE WASHINGTON AVENUE AMENITY AMENITY LOBBY (POTENTIAL FOR FUTURE COMMERCIAL) 505 26.35’ setback 510 509.66 513 510 PROPERTY LINE 503 JEFFERSON PARK AVENUE 2005 JPA M I T C H E L L / M AT T H E W S ENLARGED STREETSCAPE PLAN R2 / P2 A-r PARTIAL c h i t e c t s &PLAN - rSTREET Charlott es v ille VA Planne s 28 09.23.2021 2005 JEFFERSON PARK AVENUE All grades, counts and quantities are approximate and will change as design proceeds. 434.979.7550 © 2021 MITCHELL / MATTHEWS © 2021 ASPEN HEIGHT S PARTNERS ARCHITECTS & PLA NNERS SK-131-2 Attachment A 2005 JPA M I T C H E L L / M AT T H E W S Charlott es v ille VA PERSPECTIVE JPA & WASHINGTON AVENUE CORNER Architects & Planners 29 09.23.2021 All grades, counts and quantities are approximate and will change as design proceeds. 434.979.7550 © 2021 Attachment A 2005 JPA M I T C H E L L / M AT T H E W S Charlott es v ille VA PERSPECTIVE JPA STREETSCAPE Architects & Planners 30 09.23.2021 All grades, counts and quantities are approximate and will change as design proceeds. 434.979.7550 © 2021 Attachment A 2005 JPA M I T C H E L L / M AT T H E W S Charlott es v ille VA PERSPECTIVE JPA STREETSCAPE Architects & Planners 31 09.23.2021 All grades, counts and quantities are approximate and will change as design proceeds. 434.979.7550 © 2021